# LIGHT SUBGRAPHS IN PLANAR GRAPHS OF MINIMUM DEGREE 4 AND EDGE-DEGREE 9

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "LIGHT SUBGRAPHS IN PLANAR GRAPHS OF MINIMUM DEGREE 4 AND EDGE-DEGREE 9"

## Transcription

1 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS IN PLANAR GRAPHS OF MINIMUM DEGREE 4 AND EDGE-DEGREE 9 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS Abstract. Let G be the class of simple planar graphs of minimum degree 4 in which no two vertices of degree 4 are adjacent. A graph H is light in G if there is a constant w such that every graph in G which has a subgraph isomorphic to H also has a subgraph isomorphic to H whose sum of degrees in G is w. Thenwealso write w(h) w. It is proved that the cycle C s is light if and only if 3 s 6, where w(c 3 ) = 1 and w(c 4 ) 35. The 4-cycle with one diagonal is not light in G, but it is light in the subclass of all triangulations. The star K 1,s is light if and only if s 4. In particular, w(k 1,3 ) = 3. The paths P s (s 1) are light, and w(p 3 ) = 17 and w(p 4 ) = Introduction The weight of a subgraph H of a graph G is the sum of the valences (in G) of its vertices. Let G be a class of graphs and let H be a connected graph such that infinitely many members of G contain a subgraph isomorphic to H. Then we define w(h, G) to be the smallest integer w such that each graph G G which contains a subgraph isomorphic to H has a subgraph isomorphic to H of weight at most w. If w(h, G) existsthenh is called light in G, otherwiseh is heavy in G. For brevity, we write w(h) ifg is known from the context. Fabrici and Jendrol [6] showed that all paths are light in the class of all 3-connected planar graphs. They further showed that no other connected graphs are light in the class of all 3-connected planar graphs. Fabrici, Hexel, Jendrol and Walther [7] proved that the situation remains unchanged if the minimum degree is raised to four, i.e. in this class of graphs only the paths are light. Mohar [15] showed that the same is true for 4-connected planar graphs. Borodin [3] proved that the 3-cycle C 3 is light in the class of plane triangulations without vertices of degree 4. Moreover, C 3 is light in the class of all plane triangulations containing no path of k degree 4 Date: April 19, 001. Supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Slovenia, Research Project J

2 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS vertices. But for arbitrary 3-connected plane graphs without vertices of degree 4, the triangle is not light. This is shown by the pyramids. So, we shall suppress vertices of degree 3 and consider the class of (simple) planar graphs of minimum degree 4 in which no two vertices of degree 4 are adjacent. More generally, the latter condition can be relaxed by requiring that there are no k-paths (k 1) consisting of degree-4 vertices. One of our side remarks is that 3-connectivity is not needed at all. Lebesgue [1] showed that every 3-connected plane graph of minimum degree at least four contains a 3-face with one of the following valency triples: 4, 4,j, j [4, + ); 4, 5,j, j [5, 19]; 4, 6,j, j [6, 11]; 4, 7,j, j [7, 9]; 5, 5,j, j [5, 9]; and 5, 6,j, j [6, 7]. This implies that C 3 is light with w(c 3 ) 8 if there are no adjacent 4-vertices. We show, in particular, that w(c 3 ) = Let us consider plane graphs of minimum degree 5. In this class w(c 3 ) = 17 by Borodin []. More is known for triangulations: C 4 and C 5 are light by Jendrol and Madaras [10] and w(c 4 ) = 5 and w(c 5 ) = 30 by Borodin and Woodall [4]; C 6,...,C 10 are light by Jendrol et al. [11] and Madaras and Soták [14]. The cycles C s (s 11), are not light [11]. By our results, the cycles C 4, C 5, C 6 are also light for arbitrary plane graphs of minimum degree 5. For the cycle lengths 7,...,10 the problem remains to be open.. In our paper we mainly consider plane graphs of minimum degree 4 which contain no adjacent 4-vertices. It is shown that the cycles C s (3 s 6) are light, and for the 3-cycle the precise weight is w(c 3 )= 1. The cycles C s, s 7, are not light (not even in triangulations). This is shown by the graph obtained from K,n by replacing each face of K,n by the graph shown in Fig. 1(a) such that the top and the bottom vertex are identified with vertices of degree n in K,n. (a) (b) (c) Figure 1. Long cycles are not light

3 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS 3 3. Consider plane graphs of minimum degree 4 that contain no path with k degree-4 vertices (k 3 is fixed). For triangulations, the lightness of C 3 was proved by Borodin [3] with w(c 3 ) max(9, 5k+8). For arbitrary graphs in this class, C 3 is also light. One can prove that there is always a 3-cycle with maximum vertex degree 1k. The cycle C 4 is light for k {3, 4}; thereisalwaysac 4 with maximum degree 48. For k 3, the 4-cycle is not light. This is shown by the graph obtained from the K,n by inserting the line graph of the dodecahedron into each 4-face F and adding some new edges as shown in Fig. 1(b). This graph does not contain a path with 3 degree-4 vertices. For 5 k, the lightness of C 4 is an open problem. The cycle C s is not light for any s 5andk 3. This is shown by the graph obtained from K,n by inserting two adjacent 4-vertices into each face as shown in Fig. 1(c). 4. As mentioned above, the only light subgraphs in the class of all 4-connected plane graphs are the paths [15]. Hence, we consider again the plane graphs of minimum degree 4 containing no path with k degree-4 vertices. If k = 1 the graphs have minimum degree 5. In this class the star K 1,s is light if and only if s 4 by Jendrol and Madaras [10] (they also require 3-connectivity of graphs). Moreover, w(k 1,3 ) = 3 by [10] and w(k 1,4 ) = 30 by Borodin and Woodall [4]. For k = we shall prove that w(k 1,3 ) = 3 and that K 1,4 is light. The star K 1,3 is light for any k 3; we prove that there is always a K 1,3 with maximum degree 1k. F or s 4thestarK 1,s is not light: Consider the graph obtained from K,n by replacing every second face by the graph shown in Fig. 1(c) and by adding a diagonal into each other face of K,n. 5. As mentioned above, the s-path P s is light in the class of all 3- connected planar graphs. Little is known about the precise weight of P s. Only for small values of s the exact weight of P s has been determined: w(p 1 )=5,w(P ) = 13 by Kotzig [13], and w(p 3 )=1 by Ando, Iwasaki, and Kaneko [1]. proved w(p 1 )=5,w(P )= 11, and w(p 3 ) = 19, respectively. For triangulations, w(p 4 )=3by Jendrol and Madaras [10]. In the class of all 3-connected plane graphs of minimum degree 5 Wernicke [16] and Franklin [8] proved that w(p ) = 11 and w(p 3 ) = 17, respectively. Here we investigate the class of all plane graphs of minimum degree 4 containing no two adjacent 4-vertices. For P 3, the weight is w(p 3 ) = 17; and again w(p 1 )=5, and w(p ) = 11. Our results are summarized in the following theorem. Observe that we do not require 3-connectivity of graphs (while for nonlightness we may require 3-connectivity).

4 4 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS Theorem 1.1. Let G be the class of simple planar graphs of minimum degree 4 having no adjacent 4-vertices. (i) The cycle C s is light if and only if 3 s 6, wherew(c 3 )=1, and w(c 4 ) 35. (ii) The graph K4 (K 4 minus an edge) is not light in the whole class; but it is light in the subclass of all triangulations. (iii) The star K 1,s is light if and only if s 4. Inparticular,w(K 1,3 )= 3. (iv) The paths P s (s 1) are light, and w(p 3 )=17and w(p 4 )=3. For each of the graphs H whose lightness is proved in Theorem 1.1 (i.e., C 3,C 4,C 5,C 6,K 1,3,K 1,4,P 3,andP 4 ), except for the long paths, we actually prove that every G Gcontains a subgraph isomorphic to H. In the proof of Theorem 1.1, we will use the discharging method which works as follows. Let G be a plane graph. Denote by F (G) the set of faces of G. Letd(v) denote the degree of the vertex v V (G), and let r(f) denote the size of the face f F (G). Now, assign the charge c : V (G) F (G) R to the vertices and faces of G as follows. For v V (G), let c(v) =d(v) 6andforf F (G), let c(f) =r(f) 6. We can rewrite the Euler formula in the following form: (d(v) 6) + ( r(f) 6) = 1. (1) v V (G) f F (G) This shows that the total charge of vertices and faces of G is negative. Next, we redistribute the charge of vertices and faces by applying some rules so that the total charge remains the same. The charge of x V (G) F (G) after applying the rules, will be denoted by c (x). It will also be called the final charge of x. In each claim, after applying the rules, we will prove that each face and vertex of G has non-negative final charge if G does not have a light copy of the considered subgraph. This will contradict (1) and complete the proof. In order to make proofs easier, we shall allow multiple edges and loops (where each loop counts in the degree of its endvertex). However, some restrictions will be imposed. Let α and β be fixed integers (depending on the considered case). The class denoted by G(α, β) consists of all plane (multi)graphs satisfying the following conditions: (i) There are no faces of size. (ii) No multiple edge is incident with a vertex of degree 4, and if it is incident with a vertex of degree 5, then the other endvertex has degree α. (iii) The endvertices of loops are of degree β.

5 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS 5 Considering the class G(α, β) enables us to prove, in each specific case, that vertices of large degree (usually α 1) in extreme counterexamples are incident only with triangular faces. Roughly speaking, these conditions enable us to dismiss the 3-connectivity assumption used in some related works (e.g., [1, 3, 6, 7]). We will prove in the sequel that w(c 3 ) 1, w(k 1,3 ) 3, w(p 3 ) 17, and w(p 4 ) 1. Equalities in all these cases are shown by the following examples. It is well known that there exists a 5-connected triangulation G d of the plane which contains precisely 1 vertices of degree 5, all other vertices are of degree 6, and any two vertices of degree 5 are at distance at least d (cf., e.g., [9, 5]). These examples show that w(p s ) 6s 1(s 1) and w(k 1,3 ) 3. By taking the barycentric subdivision of G d and removing all edges joining vertices of degree 5 in G d with the vertices corresponding to their incident faces, we get an example which shows that w(c 3 ) 1. In what follows, we will use the following definitions. A vertex of degree k is said to be a k-vertex and a face of size k is a k-face. Denote by m k (v) thenumberofk-vertices adjacent to the vertex v, andlet r k (f) bethenumberofk-vertices incident with the face f. (In these definitions, multiple adjacency is considered.) Let u, w be consecutive neighbors of the vertex v in the clockwise orientation around v. Then we say that u is a predecessor of w and w is a successor of u with respect to v. We say that two vertices v and u incident with a face f are f-adjacent, if it is not possible to add an edge uv in f without obtaining a face of size. Theorem.1. w(p 3 ) 17.. The lightness of P 3 Proof. In this proof, we work with the class G(9, 8). Suppose that the claim is false and G G(9, 8) is a counterexample on V (G) vertices with E(G) as large as possible. Suppose that f = x 1 x k x 1 (k 4) is a face of G of size at least 4. Without loss of generality we may assume that d(x 1 ) 5. We claim that d(x 1 )+d(x 3 ) 11. Otherwise, let G be the graph obtained from G by adding the edge x 1 x 3 in f. It is easy to see that G G(9, 8). If P is a 3-path in G of weight at most 17, then it must contain the new edge. But the sum of degrees of x 1 and x 3 in G is at least 14, so P does not exist. Therefore, G contradicts the maximality of E(G). Similarly, d(x )+d(x 4 ) 11, etc. This implies that d(x i ) 7fori =1,...,k.Consequently,x i x i+1.also, x x 4. (Otherwise we would have multiple edges joining x and x 3.

6 6 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS Moreover, d(x ) 5andd(x 3 ) 7 which contradicts property (ii) of G(9, 8).) Thus, P = x x 3 x 4 is a path with w(p ) = 17, a contradiction. This proves that G is a triangulation. Discharging Rule R. Suppose that v is a vertex with d(v) 7and that u is a 4- or 5-vertex adjacent to v. Ifd(v) =7thenv sends 1 to u. Ifd(v) > 7, then v sends (if d(u) = 4) or (if d(u) =5)tou. 3 5 We claim that after applying Rule R, c (x) 0 for every x V (G) F (G). This is clear for x F (G). Suppose now that v is a vertex of G. Letd = d(v). We consider the following cases. d = 4: Vertex v has at least three neighbors of degree 7. Thus, c (v) +3 =0. 3 d = 5: Obviously, v has at least 4 neighbors of degree 7. From these neighbors, v receives at least 8. So, it has positive final charge. 5 d = 6: Inthiscase,v neither sends nor receives any charge. So, c (v) =c(v) =0. d = 7: At most one neighbor of v is of degree 5. Hence, c (v) 1 1=0. d =8: Ifv is incident with a 4-vertex, then it is not incident with a 5-vertex. In this case, c (v) > 0. If v is not incident 3 with a 4-vertex, then it is incident with at most five 5-vertices. Then c (v) 5 =0. 5 d =9: Notethatv has at most one neighbor of degree 4, at most six neighbors of degree 5, and at least three neighbors of degree 6. Hence, c (v) 3 5 > d 10: Observe that v has at most d 3 neighbors of degree 5. So, c (v) d 6 d 0. This completes the proof. 3 3 Theorem 3.1. w(p 4 ) The lightness of P 4 Proof. We shall prove the theorem for the class G(9, 9). Suppose that the claim is false and G is a counterexample on V (G) vertices with E(G) maximum. (1) Let f be a face with r(f) 4 and let x and y be vertices on f, which are not f-adjacent. Then d(x) +d(y) 13. Moreover, if d(x) =4or d(y) =4,thend(x)+d(y) 1. In particular, every vertex v with d(v) 9 is incident only with 3-faces. Suppose that (1) is false. Then we can add the edge xy in f. Denote by G the resulting graph. Observe that G G(9, 9) and that every

7 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS 7 4-path in G which contains the new edge xy has weight at least 4. Thus, G contradicts the maximality of E(G). Thisproves(1). () No face of size 5 is incident with a 4-vertex. Suppose that () is false and let f = x 1 x x k x 1 be a face such that x 3 is a 4-vertex and k 5. Then, x x 4, x 1 x 3,andx 3 x 5. By (1), d(x )+d(x 4 ) 13 and d(x i ) 8 for every i {1,...,k}. Because of planarity, either x 1 x 4 or x x 5. We may assume that x 1 x 4. Since d(x 1 ) 8andG G(9, 9), x 1 x. Hence, P = x 1 x x 3 x 4 is a 4-path. By (1), d(x 1 )+d(x 4 ) 13. Since P is not light, d(x ) 7. Consequently, x x 5 (otherwise, we could add the loop joining x and x 5 in f, contradicting maximality of E(G) ). Therefore, we may apply the same arguments to the path x 5 x 4 x 3 x to conclude that d(x 4 ) 7. Then d(x )+d(x 4 ) 14, a contradiction. (3) Let f be a 4-face incident with a 4-vertex x. Then, every vertex of f distinct from x is of degree 6. For, suppose that (3) is false. Let f = x 1 x x 3 x 4 x 1,wherex = x 1. Since G G(9, 9) and since d(x )+d(x 4 ) 13 by (1), it is easy to see that all vertices on f are distinct. If d(x 3 )=4or5,thenx and x 4 contradict (1) (or the path P = x 1 x x 3 x 4 is light). So, we may assume that d(x ) = 5. Since P is not light, it follows by (1) that the degrees of x 3 and x 4 are 7 or 8 but not both equal to 7. Let G = G + x x 4.It is easy to see that if G has a light P 4,thenG also has a light P 4.This contradicts the maximality of G. (4) Let v be a 7- or8-vertex. Then m 4 (v)+m 5 (v) d(v). Suppose that (4) is false. Let x 1,x,...,x d(v) be the neighbors of v in the clockwise order around v. We may assume that d(x 1 ) 5and d(x ) 5. Vertices x 1 and x are not adjacent. (Otherwise we would obtain a light P 4 in G.) Denote by f the face incident with the walk x 1 vx.thus,r(f) 4. Let x be a neighbor of x 1 on f different from v. (We can always choose x. Otherwise, x 1 is a 4- or 5-vertex which has two common edges with the 7- or 8-vertex v, a contradiction.) Since x 1 is not adjacent to x, x x. Since the path xx 1 vx is not light, d(v)+d(x) 14, a contradiction to (1). Let us now introduce the discharging rules. Rule R1. If f is a face with r(f) 5andu is a 5-vertex incident with f, thenf sends 1 to u. Rule R. Suppose that f is a 4-face and u is a 4- or 5-vertex incident with f. (a) If d(u) =5,thenf sends /r 5 (f) tou.

8 8 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS (b) If d(u) =4,thenf sends to u. Rule R3. Suppose that v is a 7- or 8-vertex. Then v sends 1 to every 3 adjacent 5-vertex. The remaining charge is then equally redistributed between the adjacent 4-vertices. Rule R4. Suppose that v is a vertex with d(v) 9 and suppose that u is a 4- or 5-vertex adjacent to v. Let α = c(v)/d(v). Let u and u + be the predecessor and the successor of u with respect to v. Also, let u be the predecessor of u and u ++ be the successor of u + with respect to v. (a) Suppose that d(u) = 4. Vertex v sends 1 to u if one of the following conditions is satisfied: (1) u,u +,u ++ are of degree 6; () u,u,u + are of degree 6; (3) u + is a 5-vertex and u,u,u ++ are of degree 6; (4) u is a 5-vertex and u,u +,u ++ are of degree 6. Otherwise v sends α to u. (b) Suppose that d(u) =5andu, u + are not both 4-vertices. If u,u +,u ++ are of degree 6oru,u,u + are of degree 6 then v sends α to u. Otherwisev sends α to u. Rule R5. Suppose that u is 5-vertex adjacent to a 4-vertex v. Suppose also that other three neighbors of v are of degree at least 11. Then, v sends 1 to u. 11 Rule R6. Suppose that v is a 5-vertex adjacent to a 4-vertex u and m 4 (v) = 1. Suppose that v has at most one neighbor x distinct from u which has degree 8, and if x exists, then u and x are adjacent and d(x) =6. Thenv sends 1 to u. Otherwise, if v has at most two 3 neighbors of degree 9, then it sends 1 to u. 5 We claim that after applying Rules R1 R6, c (x) 0 for every x V (G) F (G). Suppose first that f is a face of G. If r(f) =3 then it neither receives nor sends any charge. So, c (f) =c(f) =0. If r(f) = 4 then by Rule R and (3), c (f) = 0 or. Finally, assume that r(f) 5. By (), no 4-vertex is incident with f. Observe also that there are no four consecutive 5-vertices v 1 v v 3 v 4 on the boundary of f. If not, v 1 v v 3 v 4 would be a light path or we would have v 1 = v 4.Inthe latter case, let w be a vertex on f adjacent to v 1 and different from v and v 3. Note that d(w) 9(otherwisewv 1 v v 3 is a light path). But then w contradicts (1). Hence, c (f) r(f) 6 3r(f) 4 > 0.

9 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS 9 Suppose now that v is a vertex of G with c (v) < 0. Let d = d(v). Enumerate the neighbors of v by x 1,x,...,x d in the clockwise order around v. Consider the following cases. d = 4: Suppose first that v is incident with a face f of size at least 4. By (), r(f) = 4. Observe that Rule R5 does not apply to v. (Otherwise, v has three neighbors of degree 11, which implies that all faces incident with v are triangles.) By Rule R, f sends to v, so c (v) 0. Now, we may assume that all faces incident with v are triangles. Consider the following subcases. m 7 (v) : Let x i and x j be distinct neighbors of v of degree 7. Then v is the only neighbor of x i of degree 5. Otherwise, G contains a light P 4. Similarly for x j. By R3, each of x i and x j sends 1 to v. Thusc (v) 0. m 7 (v) =1: Let x 1 be a 7-vertex. Suppose that one of x,x 3,x 4 is of degree 6. Then, the other two are of degree 7. If d(x )=5 then v and x are the only neighbors of x 1 of degree 5. Hence x 1 sends to v. If d(x 3 3) 9thenv receives at least from x 3 3. Suppose now that d(x 3 )=8. Ifx 3 has a neighbor of degree 5 distinct from v and x,thenwehavealightp 4. Hence, x 3 sends 5 to v by R3. Same arguments apply at x 3 4,andsoc (v) 0. Similar arguments work if d(x 3 )=5ord(x 4 )=5. Hencewemay assume that the neighbor of v of degree 6 has degree equal to 6. By (4) and Rules R3 and R4, each of the two neighbors of v of degree 8 sends at least 1 to v. Notethatv is the only neighbor of x 1 of degree 5 (otherwise we obtain a light P 4 ). So, x 1 sends 1tov by R3. Thus, c (v) = 0, a contradiction. Suppose now that x, x 3, x 4 are all of degree 8. If some of these three vertices is an 8-vertex, then it has no neighbor of degree 4 different from v (otherwise, G has a light P 4 ). So, by Rule R3 (and (4)), each neighbor of v of degree 8 sends at least 1 to v. And, if some of x, x 3, x 4 is of degree 9, then it sends at least to v. 3 Thus,c (v) > 0, a contradiction. 3 3 m 7 (v) =0: We may assume that at least one of x 1,x,x 3,x 4 is of degree 6. Otherwise, each of them sends at least 1/ tov and hence c (v) 0. If three neighbors of v have degree 6, the there is a light P 4. Suppose now that precisely one of them, say x 1,has degree 6. If x i (i ) is of degree 8, then only v and possibly x 1 are its neighbors of degree 5. Hence x i sends to v at least 4 3 by Rule R3. If d(x i ) 9, then x i sends to v. If Rule R5 is 3 applied at v, thend(x i ) 11 (i ) and hence x i sends 10 to 11 v by R4. This implies that c (v) 0. Therefore, v has precisely

10 10 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS two neighbors of degree 6. Say x i and x j are vertices of degree 8andx k and x l are of degree 6. If at least one of x k,x l is of degree 5 and one of x i,x j is of degree 8, then we have a light P 4.Ifx k,x l are 6-vertices and x i is an 8-vertex, then v is the only neighbor of x i of degree 5. By Rule R3, x i sends to v, so c (v) 0. Therefore, we may assume that x i,x j both have degree 9. By (1), all faces containing x i and x j are of size 3. Now we consider several possibilities. If d(x k )=d(x l ) = 6, then each of x i and x j sends 1 to v by Rule R4(a) (otherwise, we obtain a light path which contains x k, v, x l,andaneighborofx i or x j of degree 5.) Suppose that d(x k )=5andd(x l )=6. Ifx k and x l are not consecutive neighbors of v, theneachofx i and x j sends 1 to v by Rule R4(a). So, we may assume that k =1,l =,i =3, and j = 4. Then, by R4(a) and R6, x i sends 1 to v, x j sends 3 and x k sends 1 3 to v. Suppose now that d(x k)=d(x l )=5. Then d(x i ) 10 and d(x j ) 10. By Rules R4 and R6, it follows that each of x k and x l sends 1 5 and each of x i and x j sends 4 5 to v. So,c (v) 0. d =5: Ifv sends a charge to some 4-vertex by Rule R6, then each neighbor of v of degree 9 sends 1 to v and each neighbor of degree 3 10 sends to v by Rule R4. If v sends 1 by Rule R6, then 5 5 c (v) Suppose now that v sends 1 by Rule R6. If the vertex x of R6 does not exist, then c (v) So, 3 3 x exists. Let x be the neighbor of v which is the successor of x. Since there is not light P 4 in G, x sends to v by R4(b). Consequently, 3 c (v) 0. So, assume that Rule R6 does not apply to v. Suppose first that v is incident with a face f of size at least 4. Because of Rule R1 we may assume that f is of size 4. Let vx 1 wx be the boundary of f. By (3), f is not incident with a 4-vertex. If f is incident with no more than two 5-vertices, then v receives at least 1 from f by R. Note that r 5 (f) 4. So, we may assume that r 5 (f) =3. Hence, f sends to v. This implies that the other faces incident with 3 v are triangles. Note that x 3 and x 5 are of degree 9(otherwise,we obtain a light P 4 in G). Each of these vertices sends at least 1 to v, by 3 Rule R4. Thus, the final charge of v is positive, a contradiction. Now, we may assume that all faces incident with v are triangles. Note that v has at least three neighbors of degree at least 7 (else there would be a light P 4 ). With one exception, each of these neighbors sends at least 1 to v, 3 soc (v) 0. The exceptional case is when v is adjacent to two 4-vertices, say x 1 and x 3,andd(x ) 9. In this case, x sends no charge to v. Since there is no light P 4 in G, x, x 4,andx 5 are all

11 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS 11 of degree at least 11. By R4, each of x 4 and x 5 sends 5 to v. The 11 fourth neighbor of x 1 is of degree 11 (otherwise, we obtain a light P 4 ). Hence, by R5, v also receives 1 from x Similarly, v receives 1 11 from x 3.Thus,c (v) > d 8: If d =6thenv neither sends nor receives any charge, i.e. c (v) =c(v) = 0. By (3) and R3 it follows that for d =7and8,v has nonnegative final charge. d 9: Let α = d 6. We are interested in the minimal possible d value of c (v). Observe that if there are four consecutive neighbors x i,x i 1,x i,x i+1 of v whose degrees are 6, 6, 4, 6, then we may reset d(x i 1 ) = 5. After this resetting the value of c (v) is unchanged or decreased. We argue similarly, if the degrees of x i,x i 1,x i,x i+1 are 6, 4, 6, 6, respectively. If there are five consecutive vertices x i,x i 1,x i,x i+1,x i+ whose degrees are 6, 5, 4, 6, 6, then we may reset d(x i ) = 5. After this the value of v (v) do not increase. We argue similarly, if the degrees of x i,x i 1,x i,x i+1,x i+ are 6, 6, 4, 5, 6. Similarly, if x i,x i 1,x i,x i+1 are of degrees 6, 6, 5, 6or 6, 5, 6, 6, then set d(x i 1 )=5ord(x i ) = 5, respectively. If there are four consecutive neighbors of v which all have degree 5, then the first and the fourth are 5-vertices which coincide. Observe also that there are no five consecutive neighbors of v all of degree 5. (Otherwise, in both cases, we obtain a light P 4.) Above observations imply the following. Denote by k i (1 i 4) the number of maximal subwalks with i 1 edges of the walk x 1 x x d x 1 after deleting the vertices of degree 6. Denote by k the total number of such maximal subwalks. (Since G may have parallel edges, it is possible that two different maximal subwalks have a common vertex.) Then, k = k 1 + k + k 3 + k 4 and k 1 +k +3k 3 +4k 4 + k d. Finally, after applying Rule R4, c (v) d 6 αk 1 3αk 4αk 3 5αk 4 d 6 αd =0. Theorem 4.1. w(c 3 ) The lightness of C 3 Proof. We shall prove the theorem for the class G(1, 13). Suppose that the claim is false and G is a counterexample on V (G) vertices with E(G) as large as possible. We claim that every vertex v V (G) withd(v) 11 is incident only with 3-faces. Suppose not. Then there exists a face f of size 4which is incident with v. Letw be a vertex on f which is not f-adjacent with

12 1 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS v. It is easy to see that the graph G = G + vw belongs to G(1, 13) and that every 3-cycle in G has weight. Thus, G contradicts the maximality of E(G). We have five discharging rules. Rule R1. From each r-face f (r 4) send 3 to each incident 4-vertex. 4 After that, send the remaining charge equally distributed to all incident vertices of degree 5. There is one exception to this rule. For further reference it is described as Rule R1 below. v' f ' v 3 v 4 f f '' v'' v v 1 Figure. TheRuleR1 Rule R1. Suppose that f = v 1 v v 3 v 4 is a 4-face where d(v 1 )=d(v 3 )= 4, and d(v ) = 5. Suppose also that the other faces containing v are of size 3. Let f and f be the faces distinct from f containing the edges v 3 v 4 and v 1 v 4, respectively. Let v v 3 and v v 1 be the neighbors of v 4 incident to f and f, respectively. (See Figure.) If f is a 4-face and d(v ) = 4, then we say that the pair (f,f )isadmissible. Similarly, (f,f ) is admissible if f is a 4-face and d(v ) = 4. Now, send charge 3/4 toeachofv 1 and v 3. If both pairs (f,f )and(f,f ) are admissible, send 1/40 to v and 8/40 to v 4. If only one of (f,f )and(f,f )is admissible, send 11/40 to v and 9/40 to v 4. Otherwise, apply R1 to f, i.e., send 10/40 to each of v and v 4. It is easy to see that each 5-vertex incident with a 4-face f receives at least 5 from f except when f is a 4-face incident with two 1 vertices of degree 4. In that case, each 5-vertex on f receives at least 1 from f. Iff is not a 4-face exceptional in Rule R1 (so that R1 does 5 not apply), then each 5-vertex on f receives at least 1 from f. 4 In Rule R below we use the following function φ : Z R. We let φ(d) =0ifd 6ord 1, and we put φ(7) = 1, φ(8) = φ(9) = 1, 4 φ(10) = 3, φ(11) = 4. Then we have for any d d 11:

13 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS 13 (O1) φ(d 1 )+φ(d ) 1, if d 1 + d 18. (O) φ(d 1 )+φ(d ) 4, 5 if d 1 + d 17. (O3) φ(d 1 )+φ(d ) 1, if d 1 + d 17 and (d 1,d ) (6, 11). Rule R. If v is a vertex with d(v) 11, then v sends charge φ(d(v)) to each 4- or 5-vertex u adjacent to v such that the edge uv is contained in at least one 3-face. Rule R3. If v is a d-vertex with d 1, then v sends charge determined below to each neighbor u of degree 4. (a) If u is incident with precisely two 3-faces, then v sends 1/ tou. (b) If u is incident with precisely three 3-faces uvu 1, uvu,anduu u 3, and d(u ) 11, then v sends 1/4 tou. (c) If u is incident with precisely three 3-faces uvu 1, uvu,anduu u 3, and d(u ) 1, then v sends 5/8 tou. (d) If u is incident with four 3-faces, then v sends 1 to u. Rule R4. If v is a d-vertex with d 1, then v sends charge determined below to each neighbor u of degree 5. (a) Suppose that u is incident with precisely two 3-faces, uvu 1 and uvu. If all neighbors of u distinct from v are of degree 4, send 7/0 from v to u. If all neighbors of u except v and one of u 1,u are of degree 4, send 6/0. Otherwise, send 1/4 fromv to u. (b) Suppose that u is incident with precisely three 3-faces uvu 1, uvu, and uu u 3,andd(u ) 1. If all neighbors of u except v and u are of degree 4 and if the other two faces incident with u are 4-faces, then v sends 11/40 to u; otherwise, v sends 1/4tou. (c) Suppose that u is incident with precisely four 3-faces uvu 1, uvu, uu u 3, and either uu 1 u 4 or uu 3 u 4. Suppose also that d(u ) 1, and d(u 1 ) 1 (if uu 1 u 4 is a face), d(u 3 ) 1 (if uu 3 u 4 is a face). Then v sends 1/4 tou. (d) Suppose that u is incident with precisely four 3-faces uvu 1, uvu, uu u 3, and uu 3 u 4, where d(u ) 11. Let f be the 4-face containing u. If d(u 1 )=d(u 4 ) = 4 and Rule R1 applies in f where u corresponds to the vertex v in R1 and u 1 corresponds to v 3 (if (f,f ) is admissible) or to v 1 (if (f,f ) is admissible), then send 7/0 from v to u. If d(u 1 )=d(u 4 )=4,f is a 4-face and R1 does not apply in f as stated above, then send 3/8 from v to u. Ifd(u 1 ) 4ord(u 4 ) 4,orf is not a 4-face, send 7/4 from v to u. (e) If u is incident with five 3-faces and at least one of the two vertices sharing a 3-face with the edge uv has degree 11, then v sends 1/ tou.

14 14 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS After applying rules R1 and R1, all faces have charge 0 and this charge remains unchanged by other discharging rules. Rule R sends nonzero charge only from vertices of degrees 7,...,11 to vertices of degree 4 or 5. Rules R3 R4 send charge from 1-vertices to 4- and 5-vertices, respectively. Along any edge, nonzero charge is sent by at most one of the rules (or their subcases). Let v V (G) andd = d(v). Let d denote the number of 3-faces containing v. Let v 1,...,v d be the neighbors of v enumerated in the clockwise order around v, andletd i = d(v i ), i =1,...,d. We claim that c (v) 0, and this is proved depending on the value of d. d =4: Ifc (v) < 0, then d because of Rules R1 and R1. We distinguish the following four cases: (a) d =andvv 1 v and vv v 3 are 3-faces. (b) d =andvv 1 v and vv 3 v 4 are 3-faces. (c) d =3andvv 1 v, vv v 3,andvv 3 v 4 are 3-faces. (d) d =4. Thechargeatv after applying R1 and R1 is equal to 1, 1, 5, 4 and, respectively. Suppose that v i v i+1 (1 i 3) is an edge of G. Since vv i v i+1 is not light, d i + d i If d i 11 and d i+1 11, then (O1) implies that v i and v i+1 together send charge 1tov. (In such a case we say that (O1) applies.) Since the vertices on faces of size 4 all have degree 10, case (b) is settled. Similarly in case (a) if d 11. If d 1, then R3(a) applies. Similarly in case (c): either (O1) applies twice, (O1) once and R3(b) once, or R3(c) twice. Finally, in case (d), R3(d) or (O1) are applied at least twice. In each case we get nonnegative final charge at v. d =5: Ifc (v) < 0, then d 1 by the remark after Rule R1. If d = 1, then (O) applies (in addition to the charge received from four faces), so c (v) > 0. We are left with the following six cases: (a) d =andvv 5 v 1 and vv 1 v are 3-faces. If d 1 11, then (O) applies to v 1 v and this easily implies that c (v) 0. Otherwise, d 1 1 and the rule R4(a) is used on the edge v 1 v. Let f 1,f,f 3 be the 4-faces incident with v (in this clockwise order). If Rule R1 is notusedinanyofthem,thenv receives charge 1/4 fromeachof them and receives 1/4 by R4(a) from v 1. So, c (v) 0. If Rule R1 was applied at v, thenv played the role of v 4 in R1, and faces f 1,f,f 3 have played the role(s) of f,f,f. In particular, d 3 = d 4 =4andat least one of d,d 5 is also equal to 4. If d 4ord 5 4,thenatmost two ordered pairs (f i,f j ) were admissible in applications of R1, and the total charge received at v from f 1,f,f 3 is 3 = 7. In this case, the remaining 3 come from v 10 1 by R4(a). If d = d 5 =4,then there were at most four admissible ordered pairs (f i,f j ), and the total

15 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS 15 charge received at v from f 1,f,f 3 is 3 4 = 13. In this case, the remaining 7 come from v 0 1 by R4(a), again. (b) d =andvv v 3 and vv 4 v 5 are 3-faces. In this case all neighbors of v have degree 10 and (O) applies twice. (c) d =3andvv v 3, vv 3 v 4,andvv 4 v 5 are3-faces. Wearedoneif (O) applies at least once. Otherwise, d(v 3 ) 1 and d(v 4 ) 1. Now, R4(b) applies at v 3 and at v 4.Denotebyf and f the two faces of size 4 incident with v. If v receives 1 from each of f and f, 4 then c (v) 0. Otherwise, R1 has been used in f and f, sending 9 40 to v. Inthatcase,d 1 = d = d 5 =4andf,f are 4-faces. By R4(b), v receives from v 40 3 and v 4 and 18 from f and f,soc (v) =0. 40 (d) d =3andvv 5 v 1, vv 1 v,andvv 3 v 4 are 3-faces. Similarly as in case (b), (O) applies to v 3 v 4. (e) d =4andvv 4 v 5, vv 5 v 1, vv 1 v,andvv v 3 are 3-faces. Denote by f the 4-face incident with v. For each of the 3-faces vv i v i+1,we have d i + d i+1 17 (indices modulo 5). By (O) we may assume that either d i 1 or d i+1 1 in such a case. Since v 3 and v 4 are of degree 10, we have d 1 and d 5 1. If d 1 1, then v receives charge 1/4 fromeachofv 1,v,v 5 by R4(c), and receives 1/4 fromf by R1 or R1. If d 1 11, then R4(d) was used at v and v 5. If v receives at least 5/1 from f, then we are done. Otherwise, by the remark after Rule R1, d 3 = d 4 =4andf is a 4-face. If R1 applies in f by sending 1 11 (respectively )tov, thenv receives from v and v 5 total charge = 8 (respectively = 9), by R4(d), so c (v) 0. Similarly, if R1 does not apply in f, thenv and v 5 each send 3 to v 8 by R4(d), so c (v) =0. (f) d = 5. If two consecutive neighbors of v have degree 1, then R4(e) applies twice, and we are done. Otherwise, we may assume that d 1 d 11. By observation (O3), we may assume that d 1 =6and d = 11. Now, v sends 4/5 tov by R. If R applies at some other vertex of degree between 7 and 11 then, clearly, c (v) 0. Otherwise, since vv 5 v 1 is not light, d 5 1. Consequently, d 4 11 (and hence d 4 6), and so d 3 1. Therefore, Rule 4(e) applies at v 3 as well. d = 6 : Vertices of degree 6 retain their original charge 0. 7 d 11 : These vertices may lose charge only by R. If vv i v i+1 is a 3-face, then one of v i,v i+1 has degree > 5, so R applies at most once. Otherwise, R may apply at v i and v i+1, but v receives 1 from 5 the face containing these vertices. We may assume that each edge vv i is contained in at least one 3-face. Using these facts, it is easy to see that the charge at v remains nonnegative. (The worst case for d 8 is when R is used on vv i and vv i+ and the faces containing v i 1 vv i

16 16 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS and v i+ vv i+3 (indices modulo d) areofsize 4.) In the extreme case for d = 10, one also has to observe that charge 1/4 issentfromthe two faces of size 4. The details are left to the reader. d = 1 : By the claim at the beginning of the proof, v is incident with 3-faces only. Therefore, d i +d i+1 10 for i =1,...,1 (all indices modulo 1). In particular, if d i =4,thend i+1 6. If d i =5,thenv sends 1/ tov i. Since v sends charge only to vertices of degrees 4 or 5, this implies that v sends at most 1/ on average, and hence its charge does not become negative. d 13 : Denote by φ i the charge sent from v to v i, i =1,...,d.We claim that, for each i, there exists an integer t, 1 t d, such that { t + t 6 t + t, if d =13 φ i + φ i φ i+t 1, if d>13 () 14 where indices are taken modulo d. In fact, we shall need a strengthening of () when d = 13. We shall prove that one can get t 6and φ i + φ i φ i+t 1 t + t 0.6 (3) 6 unless d i = d i+ = d i+4 =4,d i+1 = d i+3 =5,andφ i = φ i+4 =1, φ i+ = 1, φ i+1 + φ i The claim is trivial if d i 4 (take t = 1). So we may assume that i =1andd 1 = 4. The claim is also obvious if R3(a) or R3(b) is used for φ 1 (t =1)orifd 6(t = ). Hence we may assume that d =5.If d 3 6, then t = 3 will do. So, d 3 {4, 5}. In particular, R4(b), R4(c), R4(e) were not used for φ. Hence φ 3, so we may also assume that 8 R3(d) was used for φ 1 (otherwise t = would do). In particular, v 1 is contained in four 3-faces. This implies that R4(d) was used for φ.in particular, the edge v v 3 is contained in an r-face f, wherer 4, so neither R3(d) nor R4(e) was used for φ 3. Suppose now that d 3 =5. Thenφ =7/4. If R4(a) was used for φ 3,thenφ 3 6 since d 0 =5. Thenφ 1 +φ +φ < yields (3). Same holds if φ Hence, we may assume that R4(d) 40 was used for φ 3.Sinced 4,φ 3 =7/4. So, φ 1 +φ +φ 3 =3/+1/1, and t = 3 will do. It remains to consider the case when d 3 = 4. If R3(c) is used for φ 3, then d 4 1. Hence, φ 4 =0,andφ 1 +φ +φ 3 +φ 4 1+3/8+5/8=, so t = 4 will do. If R3(b) is used for φ 3,thenφ 1 +φ +φ 3 +φ 4 1+3/8+ 1/4+1/ =+1/8, so t = 4 proves (3). Otherwise, R3(a) is used for φ 3. Then R4(e) is not used for φ 4.Ifφ 4 1/4, then t =4verifies(3). If R4(b) is used for φ 4,thend 5 1, so φ 5 =0andt = 5 works. Hence, we may assume that d 4 =5,φ 4 > 1, and that R4(d) or R4(a) is used 4

17 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS 17 for φ 4.Thenwehaveφ 1 +φ +φ 3 +φ 4 1+3/8+1/+3/8=+4/16, and we are done if d 14. From now on we may w.l.o.g. assume that d = 13. Suppose first that R4(a) is used for φ 4 > 1.Ifφ 4 4 = 6,thend Ifφ 5 = 1 (Rule R4(e)), then d 6 11, so φ 6 =0andφ 1 + +φ 6 1+3/8+1/+6/0+ 1/ which yields (3). If φ 5 3,thent = 5 will do. The remaining case 8 is when φ 4 = 7. Then d 0 5 = 4. If R3(c) is used for φ 5,thend 6 1, so t = 6 gives (3). If R3(b) is used, then t = 5 works. Finally, having R3(a) for φ 5 implies that φ 6 3. Hence φ φ 6 3+ proves 0 (3). From now on we may assume that R4(d) is used for φ 4. If φ,φ 4 { 3, 7 }, then Rule R1 has been used in f and in the 4-face f containing v 3 v 4. Therefore φ = φ 4 = 7.Otherwise,φ 0 +φ < In any case, φ 1 + φ + φ 3 + φ 4 1+1/+7/10 = + 1/5. If φ 5 3, 8 we take t = 5. If R4(e) is used for φ 5,thenφ 5 = 1 and φ 6 =0,sot =6 works. Similarly if R3(c) is used for φ 5. Since R3(a) cannot be used for φ 5, the only remaining possibility is that d 5 =4andφ 5 =1. This completes the proof of (3) and characterizes the only exception. Now we continue with the proof of (). We apply (3) to i =5. Let t 1 be the corresponding value of t. (If the exception to (3) occurs, we take t 1 = 4 and say that t 1 is exceptional.) Next, we repeat the same with i =5+t 1. Let t be the corresponding value of t. If neither of t 1,t is exceptional, then we let t =4+t 1 + t and (3) implies φ φ t t 1 + t + t 1 + t 1. 6 t + t 6. Let us observe that any of the cases satisfying (3) uses R3(d) only at its first edge. Therefore t 13. We may assume henceforth that t 1 or t is exceptional. Suppose first that t 1 is exceptional. Then φ 1 + +φ and φ 9 = 1. It suffices to prove (by taking t = 13) that φ 10 + φ 11 + φ 1 + φ (4) We shall make use of the following claims: (1.1) If d i 5, d i+3 5, d i+1 5, and d i+ 5, then φ i+1 + φ i This is clear if d i+1 11 or d i+ 11. Otherwise, neither R4(e) nor R4(d) with 3 or 7 is used for φ 8 0 i+1,φ i+. This implies (1.1). The next claim is also obvious by inspection. (1.) If d i 5, d i+ 5, d i+1 5, and all four faces containing the edges v i v i+1 and v i+1 v i+ are 3-faces, then φ i+1 =0.

18 18 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS Returning to the proof of (4), assume first that d 11 =4. Ifφ 11 =1, then φ 10 =0by(1.)andφ 1 + φ 13 7 by (1.1). This implies (4). 1 Otherwise, φ 11 5 and φ Hence (4) follows in the same way as 8 before. Similar estimates prove (4) if d 1 =4. We assume henceforth that d i 5fori =10, 11, 1, 13. If φ i =0for some i, thenφ 10 + φ 11 + φ 1 + φ , so (4) follows. Otherwise, φ i 7 for i =10, 11, 1, 13. This implies (4) as well. 4 It remains to consider the case when t is exceptional. Then t =4 and t 1 5. If t 1 = 5, then the above proof of (4) shows that t =13 works for (). Next, t 1 4 since that would imply that d 13 =4(which is not possible since d 1 =4andv 1 and v 13 are adjacent). Since d 9 =4, we have t 1. If t 1 =,thenφ 6 =0by(1.)andt =6works. So, t 1 =3. Thenφ 13 = 0 by (1.), and φ 6 + φ 7 7 by (1.1). Hence 1 φ φ 13 (+ 1 ) < 7, 5 1 so t = 13 gives (). This completes the proof of (). The following averaging argument using () shows that c (v) 0. For i =1,...,d,lett i be the integer t in (). Let n 1 =1andn j+1 = n j + t nj, j =1,,... Let r be an integer, and let q = n r 1and s = q/d. Itfollowsby()that q φ i q + q α i=1 where α =6ifd = 13, and α =14ifd 14. Let ϕ = d i=1 φ i.then q i=1 φ i sϕ, so s q/(s +1) q/(s +1) ϕ + s +1 d α + d α d + d 1 = c(v). Since r and hence s may be arbitrarily large, this shows that ϕ c(v) and, consequently, c (v) 0. Theorem 5.1. w(k 1,3 ) The lightness of K 1,3 Proof. This proof is given for the class G(11, 13). Suppose that the claim is false and G is a counterexample on V (G) vertices with E(G) as large as possible. We claim that every vertex v V (G) withd(v) 11 is incident only with 3-faces. Suppose not. Then there exists a face f of size 4which is incident with v. Let w be a vertex on f which is not f-adjacent with v. In the graph G = G + vw, every subgraph H = K 1,3 which

19 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS 19 contains the edge vw has weight w(h) = 5. Thus, G contradicts the maximality of E(G). Rule R1. Suppose that f is a face with r(f) 4andu is a 4- or 5-vertex incident with f. Thenf sends 1 to u. Rule R. Suppose that u is a 4-vertex adjacent to a vertex v with d(v) 7. (a) If d(v) =7andm 4 (v) =1,thenv sends to u. 3 (b) If d(v) =7andm 4 (v) =,thenv sends 1 to u. (c) In all other cases, v sends 1 to u. Rule R3. Suppose that u is a 5-vertex adjacent to a vertex v with 7 d(v) 10. (a) If d(v) =7andm 4 (v) =1,thenv sends 1 to u. 3 (b) In all other cases, v sends c(v) m 4(v) m 5 to u. (v) Rule R4. Suppose that u is a 5-vertex adjacent to an 11-vertex v. Let u and u + be the predecessor and successor of u with respect to v. (a) If d(u ) 5andd(u + ) 6 or vice-versa, then v sends 1 to u. (b) In all other cases, v sends 1 to u. 3 Rule R5. Suppose that u is a 5-vertex adjacent to a vertex v with d(v) 1. Let u and u + be the predecessor and successor of u with respect to v. (a) If d(u )=4andd(u + ) = 5 or vice-versa, then v sends 1 to u. 4 (b) If d(u )=d(u + )=4,thenv sends no charge to u. (c) In all other cases, v sends 1 to u. In Rules R4 and R5, multiple adjacency is allowed. In other words, a 5-vertex receives a charge as many times as it is adjacent to a vertex of degree 11. Since G has no light K 1,3, the following holds for any vertex v of G: (a) If d(v) 11 then m 4 (v). (b) If d(v) 10 and m 4 (v) =,thenm 5 (v) =0. (c) If d(v) 9andm 4 (v) =1,thenm 5 (v) 1. (d) If d(v) 8thenm 4 (v)+m 5 (v). Using (a) (d) and Rule R3, we can calculate c, the minimal possible charge which a 5-vertex receives from a neighbor v with 7 d(v) 10. The values of c depending on d(v) andm 4 (v) are given in Table 1. Next, we claim that after applying Rules R1 R5, c (x) 0 for every x V (G) F (G). Suppose first that f F (G). If r(f) =3thenit neither receives nor sends any charge. So, c (f) =c(f) = 0. And, if

20 0 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS d(v) m 4 (v) c 1/ 1/ /3 /5 1/3 Table 1. The minimal charge c r(f) 4, then c (f) r(f) 6 r(f) 0 (by R1). This proves the claim. Suppose now that v is a vertex of G with c (v) < 0. Under this assumption, we will obtain a contradiction. Let d = d(v) andlet x 1,x,...,x d be the neighbors of v in the clockwise order around v. Consider the following cases. d = 4: By Rule R, v has at most one neighbor of degree 8 and at most three neighbors of degree 7. Otherwise, its final charge is nonnegative. If m 7 (v) 1thenG has a light K 1,3 whose central vertex is v. If m 7 (v) =,thenv has exactly one neighbor of degree 8. Otherwise, v is a central vertex of a light K 1,3. Now, by Rule R, c (v) = 0. Finally, if m 7(v) = 3 then the fourth neighbor of v, sayx 4, has degree 6. We may assume that v is incident only with 3-faces. Otherwise, by Rule R1, c (v) 0. By Rule R, at least one of x 1,x,x 3 sends 1 to v (otherwise, c (v) = +3 3 =0). Denote one such vertex by x. By Rule R(b), x is a 7-vertex and it has another neighbor of degree 4. Hence, we obtain that G has a light K 1,3 whose central vertex is x, a contradiction. d = 5: Note that v has at least three neighbors of degree 7 (multiplicity is considered) and at most two neighbors of degree 4. We may assume that v is incident only with 3-faces. Otherwise, v receives 1 from some face and it receives from adjacent vertices totally 1 by Rules R3 R5. If m 4 (v) =0theneachneighborofv of degree at least 7 sends at least 1 to v. 3 Thus,c (v) If m 4 (v) = 1 then we may assume that d(x 1 )=4. Itiseasyto see that v receives 1 or 1 from each neighbor of degree 7. So, 4 3 assume that some neighbor sends 1 to v. By R5, let this neighbor be 4 x. Hence, d(x ) 1 and d(x 3 )=5. Now,weseethatd(x 4 ) 10 and d(x 5 ) 10. By Rules R3 R5, each of x 4 and x 5 sends at least 3 8 to v. So,c (v) = 0. (The minimum 3 of charge, which x sends to v, is obtained by R3(b) when d(x 5 ) = 10, m 4 (x 5 )=1. Note that in this case m 5 (x 5 ) 8sincex 4 is a neighbor of x 5 of degree > 5. Similar conclusion holds for x 4.)

21 LIGHT SUBGRAPHS 1 Finally, if m 4 (v) = then we may assume that x 1 and x 3 are 4- vetices and x,x 4,x 5 are vertices of degree at least 11. Now, by Rules R4 and R5, each of x 4 and x 5 sends 1 to v. Thisimpliesthatc (v) 0. 6 d 10: If d = 6 then it neither sends nor receives charge. So, c (v) =c(v) =0. Ifd =7thenm 4 (v)+m 5 (v). It is easy to verify that c (v) 0. Suppose now that 8 d 10. If m 5 (v) =0then m 4 (v) and hence c (v) =d 6 m 4 (v) 0. And, if m 5 (v) > 0, then using Rule R3(b) it is easy to show that c (v) =0. d = 11: We are looking for the minimum possible value of c (v). Denote by m 5 the number of vertices which receive 1 from v and denote by m + 5 the number of vertices which receive 1 from v (multiplicity is 3 considered). Then, c (v) =5 m 4 (v) 1 m m+ 5. We may assume that m 5 = 0 by the following observation. Suppose that x i receives 1 from v. Then, we may assume that d(x i+1) 6, d(x i ) = 5, and d(x i 1 ) 5. Reset d(x i+1 ) = 5. It is easy to verify using Rule R4 that after this resetting c (v) cannot increase. Finally, m 4 (v) implies that c (v) =5 m 4 (v) m+ 5 (v) 3 5 m 4 (v) 11 m 4(v) 3 0. d 1: We are interested in the minimum possible value of c (v). Denote by m 5 the number of vertices which receive 1 from v and denote by m + 5 the number of vertices which receive 1 from v (multiplicity is 4 considered). Then, c (v) =d 6 m 4 (v) 1 m m+ 5. We may assume that for each x i, d(x i ) 5. Otherwise, we can reset d(x i )=5. By Rule R5, it is not hard to check that after this resetting, c (v) remains unchanged or decreases. We may also assume that there are no three consecutive neighbors x i 1,x i,x i+1 of v all of degree 5. Otherwise, we can reset d(x i ) = 4. Observe that after this c (v) never increases. Finally, we may assume that v has two consecutive neighbors both of degree 5, say x 1 and x d. Otherwise, every second neighbor of v is a 4-vertex and by Rules R and R5(b), c (v) =d 6 d 0. A (5, 4)-chain is a walk y 1,y,...,y k+1 whose vertices have degrees 5, 4, 5, 4,...,5, respectively. The possibility that some vertex can have multiple appearance in a (5, 4)-chain is not excluded. By the above assumptions, we can split x 1 x x d into k different (5, 4)-chains P 1,...,P k. Suppose that the length of P i is l i +1, i =1,...,k.Then c (v) =d 6 k ( l i + 1 ) = d 6 d 0. i=1

22 B. MOHAR,R.ŠKREKOVSKI, AND H.-J. VOSS Theorem 6.1. w(c 4 ) The lightness of C 4 Proof. This proof is given for the class G(, 3). Suppose that the claim is false and G is a counterexample on V (G) vertices with E(G) as large as possible. First, we claim that every vertex v V (G) with d(v) 1 is incident only with 3-faces. Suppose not. Then there exists afacef of size 4 which is incident with v. Let w be a vertex on f which is not f-adjacent with v. In the graph G = G + vw every 4-cycle which contains the edge vw has weight = 36. Since G G(, 3), this implies that G is also a counterexample, a contradiction to the maximality of E(G). The discharging rules are as follows. Rule R1. Suppose that f is a face and u is a vertex incident with f. (a) If d(u) =4andr(f) 4, then f sends 1 to u. (b) If d(u) =5andr(f) 6, then f sends 1 to u. (c) If d(u) =5and4 r(f) 5, then f sends 1 to u. Rule R. Suppose that u is a 5-vertex adjacent to a vertex v of degree 10. Then v sends 4 to u. 10 Rule R3. Suppose that u is a 4- or 5-vertex adjacent to a vertex v of degree 11. (a) If d(u) =4anduv is in two 3-faces, then v sends 10 to u. 11 (b) If d(u) =4anduv is in precisely one 3-face, then v sends 5 to u. 11 (c) If d(u) =5anduv is in two 3-faces, then v sends 5 to u. 11 Rule R4. Suppose that u is a 4- or 5-vertex adjacent to a vertex v of degree 1. (a) If d(u) =4anduv is in two 3-faces, then v sends 1 to u. (b) If d(u) =4anduv is in precisely one 3-face, then v sends 1 to u. (c) If d(u) =5anduv is in two 3-faces, then f sends 1 to u. Now, we shall prove that after applying R1 R4, c (x) 0 for every x V (G) F (G). Let f be a face of G. If f is a 3-face, then c (f) =c(f) =0. If r(f) 6, then f has charge (r(f) 3) r(f). By Rule R1 the face f sends to each incident vertex a charge 1, hence c (f) 0. If r(f) =5,thenc(f) = 4. The face f has at most two 4-vertices. So, two of its vertices receive 1 and three receive 1. Hence, c (f) 0. Finally, suppose that r(f) = 4. Then, f has charge. All vertices on f have degree 1. Therefore, no edge on f is a loop, and if v is a 5-vertex on f, its two neighbors on f are distinct vertices of G. In

### M-Degrees of Quadrangle-Free Planar Graphs

M-Degrees of Quadrangle-Free Planar Graphs Oleg V. Borodin, 1 Alexandr V. Kostochka, 1,2 Naeem N. Sheikh, 2 and Gexin Yu 3 1 SOBOLEV INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS NOVOSIBIRSK 630090, RUSSIA E-mail: brdnoleg@math.nsc.ru

### Labeling outerplanar graphs with maximum degree three

Labeling outerplanar graphs with maximum degree three Xiangwen Li 1 and Sanming Zhou 2 1 Department of Mathematics Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics

### Total colorings of planar graphs with small maximum degree

Total colorings of planar graphs with small maximum degree Bing Wang 1,, Jian-Liang Wu, Si-Feng Tian 1 Department of Mathematics, Zaozhuang University, Shandong, 77160, China School of Mathematics, Shandong

### Coloring Eulerian triangulations of the projective plane

Coloring Eulerian triangulations of the projective plane Bojan Mohar 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Ljubljana, 1111 Ljubljana, Slovenia bojan.mohar@uni-lj.si Abstract A simple characterization

### The 4-Choosability of Plane Graphs without 4-Cycles*

Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 76, 117126 (1999) Article ID jctb.1998.1893, available online at http:www.idealibrary.com on The 4-Choosability of Plane Graphs without 4-Cycles* Peter Che Bor

### ON THE WEIGHT OF MINOR FACES IN TRIANGLE-FREE 3-POLYTOPES

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 6 (206) 60 69 doi:0.75/dmgt.877 ON THE WEIGHT OF MINOR FACES IN TRIANGLE-FREE -POLYTOPES Oleg V. Borodin Institute of Mathematics Siberian Branch Russian Academy

### When is a graph planar?

When is a graph planar? Theorem(Euler, 1758) If a plane multigraph G with k components has n vertices, e edges, and f faces, then n e + f = 1 + k. Corollary If G is a simple, planar graph with n(g) 3,

### Homework MA 725 Spring, 2012 C. Huneke SELECTED ANSWERS

Homework MA 725 Spring, 2012 C. Huneke SELECTED ANSWERS 1.1.25 Prove that the Petersen graph has no cycle of length 7. Solution: There are 10 vertices in the Petersen graph G. Assume there is a cycle C

### 3. Eulerian and Hamiltonian Graphs

3. Eulerian and Hamiltonian Graphs There are many games and puzzles which can be analysed by graph theoretic concepts. In fact, the two early discoveries which led to the existence of graphs arose from

### 8. Matchings and Factors

8. Matchings and Factors Consider the formation of an executive council by the parliament committee. Each committee needs to designate one of its members as an official representative to sit on the council,

### DO NOT RE-DISTRIBUTE THIS SOLUTION FILE

Professor Kindred Math 04 Graph Theory Homework 7 Solutions April 3, 03 Introduction to Graph Theory, West Section 5. 0, variation of 5, 39 Section 5. 9 Section 5.3 3, 8, 3 Section 7. Problems you should

### On Integer Additive Set-Indexers of Graphs

On Integer Additive Set-Indexers of Graphs arxiv:1312.7672v4 [math.co] 2 Mar 2014 N K Sudev and K A Germina Abstract A set-indexer of a graph G is an injective set-valued function f : V (G) 2 X such that

### SHORT CYCLE COVERS OF GRAPHS WITH MINIMUM DEGREE THREE

SHOT YLE OVES OF PHS WITH MINIMUM DEEE THEE TOMÁŠ KISE, DNIEL KÁL, END LIDIKÝ, PVEL NEJEDLÝ OET ŠÁML, ND bstract. The Shortest ycle over onjecture of lon and Tarsi asserts that the edges of every bridgeless

### Basic Notions on Graphs. Planar Graphs and Vertex Colourings. Joe Ryan. Presented by

Basic Notions on Graphs Planar Graphs and Vertex Colourings Presented by Joe Ryan School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Newcastle, Australia Planar graphs Graphs may be drawn

### Extremal Wiener Index of Trees with All Degrees Odd

MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 70 (2013) 287-292 ISSN 0340-6253 Extremal Wiener Index of Trees with All Degrees Odd Hong Lin School of

### Every tree contains a large induced subgraph with all degrees odd

Every tree contains a large induced subgraph with all degrees odd A.J. Radcliffe Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA A.D. Scott Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics University

### 10. Graph Matrices Incidence Matrix

10 Graph Matrices Since a graph is completely determined by specifying either its adjacency structure or its incidence structure, these specifications provide far more efficient ways of representing a

### Zachary Monaco Georgia College Olympic Coloring: Go For The Gold

Zachary Monaco Georgia College Olympic Coloring: Go For The Gold Coloring the vertices or edges of a graph leads to a variety of interesting applications in graph theory These applications include various

### SHARP BOUNDS FOR THE SUM OF THE SQUARES OF THE DEGREES OF A GRAPH

31 Kragujevac J. Math. 25 (2003) 31 49. SHARP BOUNDS FOR THE SUM OF THE SQUARES OF THE DEGREES OF A GRAPH Kinkar Ch. Das Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, W.B.,

### Planarity Planarity

Planarity 8.1 71 Planarity Up until now, graphs have been completely abstract. In Topological Graph Theory, it matters how the graphs are drawn. Do the edges cross? Are there knots in the graph structure?

### Planar Tree Transformation: Results and Counterexample

Planar Tree Transformation: Results and Counterexample Selim G Akl, Kamrul Islam, and Henk Meijer School of Computing, Queen s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 Abstract We consider the problem

### 2.3 Scheduling jobs on identical parallel machines

2.3 Scheduling jobs on identical parallel machines There are jobs to be processed, and there are identical machines (running in parallel) to which each job may be assigned Each job = 1,,, must be processed

### Handout #Ch7 San Skulrattanakulchai Gustavus Adolphus College Dec 6, 2010. Chapter 7: Digraphs

MCS-236: Graph Theory Handout #Ch7 San Skulrattanakulchai Gustavus Adolphus College Dec 6, 2010 Chapter 7: Digraphs Strong Digraphs Definitions. A digraph is an ordered pair (V, E), where V is the set

### Computer Science Department. Technion - IIT, Haifa, Israel. Itai and Rodeh [IR] have proved that for any 2-connected graph G and any vertex s G there

- 1 - THREE TREE-PATHS Avram Zehavi Alon Itai Computer Science Department Technion - IIT, Haifa, Israel Abstract Itai and Rodeh [IR] have proved that for any 2-connected graph G and any vertex s G there

### Finding and counting given length cycles

Finding and counting given length cycles Noga Alon Raphael Yuster Uri Zwick Abstract We present an assortment of methods for finding and counting simple cycles of a given length in directed and undirected

### Chapter 6 Planarity. Section 6.1 Euler s Formula

Chapter 6 Planarity Section 6.1 Euler s Formula In Chapter 1 we introduced the puzzle of the three houses and the three utilities. The problem was to determine if we could connect each of the three utilities

### Graphs without proper subgraphs of minimum degree 3 and short cycles

Graphs without proper subgraphs of minimum degree 3 and short cycles Lothar Narins, Alexey Pokrovskiy, Tibor Szabó Department of Mathematics, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany. August 22, 2014 Abstract

### 1. Relevant standard graph theory

Color identical pairs in 4-chromatic graphs Asbjørn Brændeland I argue that, given a 4-chromatic graph G and a pair of vertices {u, v} in G, if the color of u equals the color of v in every 4-coloring

### 1 Plane and Planar Graphs. Definition 1 A graph G(V,E) is called plane if

Plane and Planar Graphs Definition A graph G(V,E) is called plane if V is a set of points in the plane; E is a set of curves in the plane such that. every curve contains at most two vertices and these

### Cycles in a Graph Whose Lengths Differ by One or Two

Cycles in a Graph Whose Lengths Differ by One or Two J. A. Bondy 1 and A. Vince 2 1 LABORATOIRE DE MATHÉMATIQUES DISCRÉTES UNIVERSITÉ CLAUDE-BERNARD LYON 1 69622 VILLEURBANNE, FRANCE 2 DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS

### Homework Exam 1, Geometric Algorithms, 2016

Homework Exam 1, Geometric Algorithms, 2016 1. (3 points) Let P be a convex polyhedron in 3-dimensional space. The boundary of P is represented as a DCEL, storing the incidence relationships between the

### On end degrees and infinite cycles in locally finite graphs

On end degrees and infinite cycles in locally finite graphs Henning Bruhn Maya Stein Abstract We introduce a natural extension of the vertex degree to ends. For the cycle space C(G) as proposed by Diestel

### k, then n = p2α 1 1 pα k

Powers of Integers An integer n is a perfect square if n = m for some integer m. Taking into account the prime factorization, if m = p α 1 1 pα k k, then n = pα 1 1 p α k k. That is, n is a perfect square

### Sum of Degrees of Vertices Theorem

Sum of Degrees of Vertices Theorem Theorem (Sum of Degrees of Vertices Theorem) Suppose a graph has n vertices with degrees d 1, d 2, d 3,...,d n. Add together all degrees to get a new number d 1 + d 2

### Solutions to Exercises 8

Discrete Mathematics Lent 2009 MA210 Solutions to Exercises 8 (1) Suppose that G is a graph in which every vertex has degree at least k, where k 1, and in which every cycle contains at least 4 vertices.

### Class One: Degree Sequences

Class One: Degree Sequences For our purposes a graph is a just a bunch of points, called vertices, together with lines or curves, called edges, joining certain pairs of vertices. Three small examples of

### Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are

### UPPER BOUNDS ON THE L(2, 1)-LABELING NUMBER OF GRAPHS WITH MAXIMUM DEGREE

UPPER BOUNDS ON THE L(2, 1)-LABELING NUMBER OF GRAPHS WITH MAXIMUM DEGREE ANDREW LUM ADVISOR: DAVID GUICHARD ABSTRACT. L(2,1)-labeling was first defined by Jerrold Griggs [Gr, 1992] as a way to use graphs

### Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes

Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes Peter J. Olver 5. Inner Products and Norms The norm of a vector is a measure of its size. Besides the familiar Euclidean norm based on the dot product, there are a number

### Characterizations of Arboricity of Graphs

Characterizations of Arboricity of Graphs Ruth Haas Smith College Northampton, MA USA Abstract The aim of this paper is to give several characterizations for the following two classes of graphs: (i) graphs

### A simple existence criterion for normal spanning trees in infinite graphs

1 A simple existence criterion for normal spanning trees in infinite graphs Reinhard Diestel Halin proved in 1978 that there exists a normal spanning tree in every connected graph G that satisfies the

### Divisor graphs have arbitrary order and size

Divisor graphs have arbitrary order and size arxiv:math/0606483v1 [math.co] 20 Jun 2006 Le Anh Vinh School of Mathematics University of New South Wales Sydney 2052 Australia Abstract A divisor graph G

### 136 CHAPTER 4. INDUCTION, GRAPHS AND TREES

136 TER 4. INDUCTION, GRHS ND TREES 4.3 Graphs In this chapter we introduce a fundamental structural idea of discrete mathematics, that of a graph. Many situations in the applications of discrete mathematics

### 2 S.JENDROl' AND H.-J. VOSS 4. Light subgraphs of order three Subgraphs with restricted degrees of their vertices Light subgraphs - maximu

LIGHT SUBGRAPHS OF GRAPHS EMBEDDED IN THE PLANE AND IN THE PROJECTIVE PLANE { A SURVEY { S. JENDROL' 1) and H.-J. VOSS 2)y 1) Institute of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, P.J.Safarik University, Jesenna

### The Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem

The Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem COS 528 class notes October 18, 2006 Scribe: Dávid Papp Main idea: use of the blocking flow paradigm to achieve essentially O(min{m 2/3, n 1/2 }

### FALSE ALARMS IN FAULT-TOLERANT DOMINATING SETS IN GRAPHS. Mateusz Nikodem

Opuscula Mathematica Vol. 32 No. 4 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/opmath.2012.32.4.751 FALSE ALARMS IN FAULT-TOLERANT DOMINATING SETS IN GRAPHS Mateusz Nikodem Abstract. We develop the problem of fault-tolerant

### LINEAR ALGEBRA W W L CHEN

LINEAR ALGEBRA W W L CHEN c W W L Chen, 1982, 2008. This chapter originates from material used by author at Imperial College, University of London, between 1981 and 1990. It is available free to all individuals,

### Computational Geometry

Motivation 1 Motivation Polygons and visibility Visibility in polygons Triangulation Proof of the Art gallery theorem Two points in a simple polygon can see each other if their connecting line segment

### CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY

January 10, 2010 CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY The set of polynomials over a field F is a ring, whose structure shares with the ring of integers many characteristics.

### The positive minimum degree game on sparse graphs

The positive minimum degree game on sparse graphs József Balogh Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Illinois, USA jobal@math.uiuc.edu András Pluhár Department of Computer Science University

### SUBGROUPS OF CYCLIC GROUPS. 1. Introduction In a group G, we denote the (cyclic) group of powers of some g G by

SUBGROUPS OF CYCLIC GROUPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction In a group G, we denote the (cyclic) group of powers of some g G by g = {g k : k Z}. If G = g, then G itself is cyclic, with g as a generator. Examples

### Chapter 2. Basic Terminology and Preliminaries

Chapter 2 Basic Terminology and Preliminaries 6 Chapter 2. Basic Terminology and Preliminaries 7 2.1 Introduction This chapter is intended to provide all the fundamental terminology and notations which

### arxiv:1409.4299v1 [cs.cg] 15 Sep 2014

Planar Embeddings with Small and Uniform Faces Giordano Da Lozzo, Vít Jelínek, Jan Kratochvíl 3, and Ignaz Rutter 3,4 arxiv:409.499v [cs.cg] 5 Sep 04 Department of Engineering, Roma Tre University, Italy

### A 2-factor in which each cycle has long length in claw-free graphs

A -factor in which each cycle has long length in claw-free graphs Roman Čada Shuya Chiba Kiyoshi Yoshimoto 3 Department of Mathematics University of West Bohemia and Institute of Theoretical Computer Science

### Partitioning edge-coloured complete graphs into monochromatic cycles and paths

arxiv:1205.5492v1 [math.co] 24 May 2012 Partitioning edge-coloured complete graphs into monochromatic cycles and paths Alexey Pokrovskiy Departement of Mathematics, London School of Economics and Political

### A simple criterion on degree sequences of graphs

Discrete Applied Mathematics 156 (2008) 3513 3517 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Discrete Applied Mathematics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dam Note A simple criterion on degree

### On the maximum average degree and the incidence chromatic number of a graph

Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science DMTCS ol. 7, 2005, 203 216 On the maximum aerage degree and the incidence chromatic number of a graph Mohammad Hosseini Dolama 1 and Eric Sopena 2

### ! Solve problem to optimality. ! Solve problem in poly-time. ! Solve arbitrary instances of the problem. #-approximation algorithm.

Approximation Algorithms 11 Approximation Algorithms Q Suppose I need to solve an NP-hard problem What should I do? A Theory says you're unlikely to find a poly-time algorithm Must sacrifice one of three

### Local periods and binary partial words: An algorithm

Local periods and binary partial words: An algorithm F. Blanchet-Sadri and Ajay Chriscoe Department of Mathematical Sciences University of North Carolina P.O. Box 26170 Greensboro, NC 27402 6170, USA E-mail:

### On planar regular graphs degree three without Hamiltonian cycles 1

On planar regular graphs degree three without Hamiltonian cycles 1 E. Grinbergs Computing Centre of Latvian State University Abstract. Necessary condition to have Hamiltonian cycle in planar graph is given.

### Non-Separable Detachments of Graphs

Egerváry Research Group on Combinatorial Optimization Technical reports TR-2001-12. Published by the Egrerváry Research Group, Pázmány P. sétány 1/C, H 1117, Budapest, Hungary. Web site: www.cs.elte.hu/egres.

### Triangle deletion. Ernie Croot. February 3, 2010

Triangle deletion Ernie Croot February 3, 2010 1 Introduction The purpose of this note is to give an intuitive outline of the triangle deletion theorem of Ruzsa and Szemerédi, which says that if G = (V,

### Combinatorics: The Fine Art of Counting

Combinatorics: The Fine Art of Counting Week 9 Lecture Notes Graph Theory For completeness I have included the definitions from last week s lecture which we will be using in today s lecture along with

### Chapter 4. Trees. 4.1 Basics

Chapter 4 Trees 4.1 Basics A tree is a connected graph with no cycles. A forest is a collection of trees. A vertex of degree one, particularly in a tree, is called a leaf. Trees arise in a variety of applications.

### Large induced subgraphs with all degrees odd

Large induced subgraphs with all degrees odd A.D. Scott Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambridge, England Abstract: We prove that every connected graph of order

### Chapter 11. 11.1 Load Balancing. Approximation Algorithms. Load Balancing. Load Balancing on 2 Machines. Load Balancing: Greedy Scheduling

Approximation Algorithms Chapter Approximation Algorithms Q. Suppose I need to solve an NP-hard problem. What should I do? A. Theory says you're unlikely to find a poly-time algorithm. Must sacrifice one

### COLORED GRAPHS AND THEIR PROPERTIES

COLORED GRAPHS AND THEIR PROPERTIES BEN STEVENS 1. Introduction This paper is concerned with the upper bound on the chromatic number for graphs of maximum vertex degree under three different sets of coloring

### A characterization of trace zero symmetric nonnegative 5x5 matrices

A characterization of trace zero symmetric nonnegative 5x5 matrices Oren Spector June 1, 009 Abstract The problem of determining necessary and sufficient conditions for a set of real numbers to be the

### Graph Theory Lecture 3: Sum of Degrees Formulas, Planar Graphs, and Euler s Theorem Spring 2014 Morgan Schreffler Office: POT 902

Graph Theory Lecture 3: Sum of Degrees Formulas, Planar Graphs, and Euler s Theorem Spring 2014 Morgan Schreffler Office: POT 902 http://www.ms.uky.edu/~mschreffler Different Graphs, Similar Properties

### 1 Digraphs. Definition 1

1 Digraphs Definition 1 Adigraphordirected graphgisatriplecomprisedofavertex set V(G), edge set E(G), and a function assigning each edge an ordered pair of vertices (tail, head); these vertices together

### Chapter 6: Colouring Graphs

17 Coloring Vertices Chapter 6: Colouring Graphs 1. Sections 17-19: Qualitative (Can we color a graph with given colors?) Section 20: Quantitative (How many ways can the coloring be done?) 2. Definitions:

### On the independence number of graphs with maximum degree 3

On the independence number of graphs with maximum degree 3 Iyad A. Kanj Fenghui Zhang Abstract Let G be an undirected graph with maximum degree at most 3 such that G does not contain any of the three graphs

### HOLES 5.1. INTRODUCTION

HOLES 5.1. INTRODUCTION One of the major open problems in the field of art gallery theorems is to establish a theorem for polygons with holes. A polygon with holes is a polygon P enclosing several other

### PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include 2 + 5.

PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS (Last updated: November 17, 2015) Remark. This is a list of exercises on polynomials. Miguel A. Lerma Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include

### Applied Algorithm Design Lecture 5

Applied Algorithm Design Lecture 5 Pietro Michiardi Eurecom Pietro Michiardi (Eurecom) Applied Algorithm Design Lecture 5 1 / 86 Approximation Algorithms Pietro Michiardi (Eurecom) Applied Algorithm Design

### An inequality for the group chromatic number of a graph

An inequality for the group chromatic number of a graph Hong-Jian Lai 1, Xiangwen Li 2 and Gexin Yu 3 1 Department of Mathematics, West Virginia University Morgantown, WV 26505 USA 2 Department of Mathematics

### 1. Determine all real numbers a, b, c, d that satisfy the following system of equations.

altic Way 1999 Reykjavík, November 6, 1999 Problems 1. etermine all real numbers a, b, c, d that satisfy the following system of equations. abc + ab + bc + ca + a + b + c = 1 bcd + bc + cd + db + b + c

### 9.1. Vertex colouring. 9. Graph colouring. Vertex colouring.

Vertex colouring. 9. Graph colouring k-vertex-critical graphs Approximation algorithms Upper bounds for the vertex chromatic number Brooks Theorem and Hajós Conjecture Chromatic Polynomials Colouring of

### Cacti with minimum, second-minimum, and third-minimum Kirchhoff indices

MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATIONS 47 Math. Commun., Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 47-58 (2010) Cacti with minimum, second-minimum, and third-minimum Kirchhoff indices Hongzhuan Wang 1, Hongbo Hua 1, and Dongdong Wang

### Degree Hypergroupoids Associated with Hypergraphs

Filomat 8:1 (014), 119 19 DOI 10.98/FIL1401119F Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Degree Hypergroupoids Associated

### 7. Colourings. 7.1 Vertex colouring

7. Colourings Colouring is one of the important branches of graph theory and has attracted the attention of almost all graph theorists, mainly because of the four colour theorem, the details of which can

### Tools for parsimonious edge-colouring of graphs with maximum degree three. J.L. Fouquet and J.M. Vanherpe. Rapport n o RR-2010-10

Tools for parsimonious edge-colouring of graphs with maximum degree three J.L. Fouquet and J.M. Vanherpe LIFO, Université d Orléans Rapport n o RR-2010-10 Tools for parsimonious edge-colouring of graphs

### Computational Geometry

Motivation Motivation Polygons and visibility Visibility in polygons Triangulation Proof of the Art gallery theorem Two points in a simple polygon can see each other if their connecting line segment is

### VERTICES OF GIVEN DEGREE IN SERIES-PARALLEL GRAPHS

VERTICES OF GIVEN DEGREE IN SERIES-PARALLEL GRAPHS MICHAEL DRMOTA, OMER GIMENEZ, AND MARC NOY Abstract. We show that the number of vertices of a given degree k in several kinds of series-parallel labelled

### SEQUENCES OF MAXIMAL DEGREE VERTICES IN GRAPHS. Nickolay Khadzhiivanov, Nedyalko Nenov

Serdica Math. J. 30 (2004), 95 102 SEQUENCES OF MAXIMAL DEGREE VERTICES IN GRAPHS Nickolay Khadzhiivanov, Nedyalko Nenov Communicated by V. Drensky Abstract. Let Γ(M) where M V (G) be the set of all vertices

### 1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques

4CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL: SETS, FUNCTIONS AND MATHEMATICAL INDU 1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques The purpose of this section is to study the proof technique known as mathematical induction.

### Asymptotically Faster Algorithms for the Parameterized face cover Problem

Asymptotically Faster Algorithms for the Parameterized face cover Problem Faisal N. Abu-Khzam 1, Henning Fernau 2 and Michael A. Langston 3 1 Division of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American

### A counterexample to a result on the tree graph of a graph

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS Volume 63(3) (2015), Pages 368 373 A counterexample to a result on the tree graph of a graph Ana Paulina Figueroa Departamento de Matemáticas Instituto Tecnológico

### (a) (b) (c) Figure 1 : Graphs, multigraphs and digraphs. If the vertices of the leftmost figure are labelled {1, 2, 3, 4} in clockwise order from

4 Graph Theory Throughout these notes, a graph G is a pair (V, E) where V is a set and E is a set of unordered pairs of elements of V. The elements of V are called vertices and the elements of E are called

### ! Solve problem to optimality. ! Solve problem in poly-time. ! Solve arbitrary instances of the problem. !-approximation algorithm.

Approximation Algorithms Chapter Approximation Algorithms Q Suppose I need to solve an NP-hard problem What should I do? A Theory says you're unlikely to find a poly-time algorithm Must sacrifice one of

### Stationary random graphs on Z with prescribed iid degrees and finite mean connections

Stationary random graphs on Z with prescribed iid degrees and finite mean connections Maria Deijfen Johan Jonasson February 2006 Abstract Let F be a probability distribution with support on the non-negative

### Theorem A graph T is a tree if, and only if, every two distinct vertices of T are joined by a unique path.

Chapter 3 Trees Section 3. Fundamental Properties of Trees Suppose your city is planning to construct a rapid rail system. They want to construct the most economical system possible that will meet the

### AN ALGORITHM FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A GIVEN BINARY MATROID IS GRAPHIC

AN ALGORITHM FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A GIVEN BINARY MATROID IS GRAPHIC W. T. TUTTE. Introduction. In a recent series of papers [l-4] on graphs and matroids I used definitions equivalent to the following.

### All trees contain a large induced subgraph having all degrees 1 (mod k)

All trees contain a large induced subgraph having all degrees 1 (mod k) David M. Berman, A.J. Radcliffe, A.D. Scott, Hong Wang, and Larry Wargo *Department of Mathematics University of New Orleans New

### α = u v. In other words, Orthogonal Projection

Orthogonal Projection Given any nonzero vector v, it is possible to decompose an arbitrary vector u into a component that points in the direction of v and one that points in a direction orthogonal to v

### Odd induced subgraphs in graphs of maximum degree three

Odd induced subgraphs in graphs of maximum degree three David M. Berman, Hong Wang, and Larry Wargo Department of Mathematics University of New Orleans New Orleans, Louisiana, USA 70148 Abstract A long-standing

### Graph definition Degree, in, out degree, oriented graph. Complete, regular, bipartite graph. Graph representation, connectivity, adjacency.

Mária Markošová Graph definition Degree, in, out degree, oriented graph. Complete, regular, bipartite graph. Graph representation, connectivity, adjacency. Isomorphism of graphs. Paths, cycles, trials.

### Generalized Induced Factor Problems

Egerváry Research Group on Combinatorial Optimization Technical reports TR-2002-07. Published by the Egrerváry Research Group, Pázmány P. sétány 1/C, H 1117, Budapest, Hungary. Web site: www.cs.elte.hu/egres.