MEDIATING THE MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE
|
|
- Brett Carpenter
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MEDIATING THE MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE Presented by: John Simpson, Lubbock SPLAWN AND SIMPSON This Paper is Dedicated to DAVID R. COBB State Bar of Texas 10TH ANNUAL ADVANCED MEDICAL MALPRACTICE COURSE March 13-14, 2003 Santa Fe CHAPTER 16
2
3 John Simpson, III Born: Tifton, Georgia February 9, 1949 Married: Carolyn Byrd Simpson Children: Corey Byrd Simpson Mary Kendall Simpson Education: Texas Tech University School of Law, JD, 1974 Texas Tech University, BBA, 1971 Bellaire High School, Houston, Texas, 1967 Professional: Admitted to Practice, State Bar of Texas, 1974; United States District Court for the Northern and Western Districts of Texas; United States Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit; United States Court of Claims, District of Columbia Board of Legal Specialization, State Bar of Texas Board Certified, Civil Trial Law, 1981 Board Certified, Personal Injury Trial Law, 1981 Texas Bar Foundation, Life Fellow Litigation Section Council, State Bar of Texas (Chair ) American Board of Trial Advocates (Panhandle/South Plains Chapter President, 1995) Texas Trial Lawyers Association Lubbock County Bar Association, President Lubbock County Young Lawyers Association, President, Community Service: Marian Moss Enterprises, Board of Directors , President 1996 First United Methodist Church, Lubbock, Chairman, Administrative Board Citizens Juvenile Advisory Committee, Board of Directors, Chairman ; 1996 The Lubbock Club, Board of Directors Rotary Cerebral Palsy Center, TTUHSC, Chairman, Advisory Council 1994 Rotary Club of Lubbock, Board of Directors , President South Plains Children's Shelter, Board of Directors Hillcrest Country Club, Board of Directors, President Honors and Awards: Omicron Delta Kappa, Texas Tech University Who's Who in American Colleges and Universities, 1970 Outstanding Young Lawyer, Lubbock County Bar Association, 1980 Kappa Alpha Order, Texas Tech University Kappa Alpha Order Educational Foundation, Board of Trustees Phi Alpha Delta, Texas Tech University School of Law
4 Publications: Discovery Update Litigation Update Institute, State Bar of Texas, San Antonio (2002) Automobile Litigation Update 17 th Annual Litigation Update Institute, State Bar of Texas, San Antonio (2001) It s the Year 2000 and Mediation is Here to Stay, 19 The Advocate, No. 1, p.3 (Spring 2000) Automobile Litigation Update 15 th Annual Litigation Update Institute, State Bar of Texas, San Antonio (1999) Automobile Litigation Update 14 th Annual Litigation Update Institute, State Bar of Texas, Austin (1998) Automobile Litigation 13 th Annual Litigation Update Institute, State Bar of Texas, Austin (1997) Automobile Litigation Update " 12th Annual Litigation Update Institute, State Bar of Texas, Austin (1996) Negotiation: Timing and Tactics Preparing, Trying, and Settling Auto Collision Cases Institute, State Bar of Texas, Dallas and Houston (1996) "Automobile Litigation Update " 11th Annual Litigation Update Institute, State Bar of Texas, San Antonio (1995) "Personal Injury - Supreme Court Review ," 1994 Spring Seminar for Legal Assistants, West Texas Association of Legal Assistants (1994) "Extra-Contractual Claims/Bad Faith," South Plains Claims Association (1993) "Common Litigation Pitfalls, The Plaintiff's Perspective," Texas Association of Defense Counsel (1993) "Professionalism In Personal Injury Practice," All In a Day's Work - IV Seminar, Lubbock County Bar Association (1993) Jury Selection, Plaintiff Perspective, All You Wanted to Know Seminar, Lubbock County Bar Association (1992) "So Your Client Wants to Settle," All In a Day's Work - II Seminar, Lubbock County Bar Association (1991) "Impairment Income Benefits," State Bar of Texas (1991) "Impairment Income Benefits Under the New Workers' Compensation Act," 23 Trial Lawyers Forum, No. 4, p. 27 (1990) "Pattern Jury Charges, Volume 2," State Bar of Texas (1989) "Multiple Specific Injury Recovery," 7 Texas Personal Injury Law Reporter, No. 1, p. 1 (1989) "Trial De Novo," 22 Trial Lawyers Forum, No. 2, p. 39, (1988) "The Lump Sum Rule," 22 Trial Lawyers Forum, No. 3, p. 27 (1988) "Proof of Compensable Injuries," 22 Trial Lawyers Forum, No. 4, p. 49 (1988) "Specific Injuries Revisited," 22 Trial Lawyers Forum, No. 1, p. 27 (1987) "Mary Carter and Other Tools of Settlement," State Bar of Texas, Evaluating and Settling Insurance Claims Institute (1987)
5 TABLE OF CONTENTS I....1 II...1 III....2 IV....2 V...3 Keys to a Successful Mediation...4 Keys to a Lousy Mediation...5 Mediation Survey...6 i
6
7 MEDIATING THE MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE Any practitioner who ever anticipates having to handle any type of litigated matter must become familiar with the rules and principles of mediation if he or she is to effectively represent his client in the year 2003 and beyond. Because of the remarkable success that the court system has had with mediation, arbitration and alternative dispute resolution programs, mediation has become and will continue to be an integral part of the civil justice system in this country. I. The authority for referral of cases to alternative dispute resolution and/or mediation is found in the TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE at section , et seq. It is the policy of our court system to encourage the peaceable resolution of disputes and the early settlement of pending litigation. Many jurisdictions have local rules which require that all cases be submitted to ADR or mediation prior to certification as ready for trial. Today we see many more court-ordered mediations than three years ago. Generally speaking, courts of competent jurisdiction have the authority by local rule to refer all cases to alternative dispute resolution or mediation. Section , TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE, authorizes an objection which can be filed by any party within ten days of the referral. Such objection needs to be brought to the attention of the court for appropriate hearing if necessary and any litigant seriously wishing to avoid the mediation process should secure such a hearing and get a ruling on the objection to mediation. There is authority for the proposition that parties who do not submit to alternative dispute resolution when ordered to do so, may face sanctions pursuant to Rule 215, TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. All matters revolving around the mediation process including, but not limited to the mediation conference and the negotiations therein, are subject to strict rules of confidentiality. TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE section The parties to a civil suit can be compelled to participate in alternative dispute resolution despite their objections. Decker, et ux vs. Lindsay, 824 S.W.2d 247 (Tex. App. Houston (1 st District) 1992); Hur vs. City of Mesquite, 893 S.W. 2d 227 (Tex. App.-Am. 1995, writ denied). Although parties can be compelled to attend a mediation conference, they cannot be forced to make demands or offers or to settle the case. Decker, et ux vs. Lindsay, supra. A court ordering parties to mediation can set a reasonable fee for the services of an impartial third-party mediator and can tax such fee as cost of court in the suit. TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE section (a) and (b). The courts hold that mediation may be beneficial even if the parties believe it will not resolve the lawsuit. A court 1 cannot force the litigants in a disputed matter to settle their case, but the court can compel them to sit down and talk with each other. The court can empower the mediator with certain authority over the parties but a mediator is not authorized to impose his or her judgment on any of the issues that are in dispute between the parties. TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE section (b). Many mediations end in a settlement and the settlement agreement is reduced to writing. The agreement is usually referred to as a mediation agreement. A court cannot act on a mediation agreement without an appropriate pleading or motion to do so. Martin vs. Black, 909 S.W.2d 192 (Tex. App. Houston (14 th District) 1995, writ filed); Stevens vs. Snyder, 874 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. App. Dallas 1994, writ denied). Matters and material discussed or revealed in a mediation is confidential and not subject to disclosure. TCPRC The section does not use the word privileged. See In Re Learjet Inc. 59 S.W. 3d 842 (Tex. App.-TX org. proceeding). In order for a mediation agreement to be enforceable, it must be in writing as authorized by TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, Rule 11. A party has a right to revoke consent to a settlement agreement where the settlement agreement has not been signed or filed as part of the record. Rizk vs. Millard, 810 S.W.2d 318 (Tex. Civ. App. (Houston 14 th District) 1991). The obvious conclusion is that for a mediated settlement agreement to be enforceable as a contract, it must be in writing as authorized by TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, Rule 11, and TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE section (a). Hardman vs. Dault, 199 WL (Tex. App. San Antonio 1999); Padilla vs. LaFrance, 907 S.W. 2d 454 (Tex. 1995); In Re Arms, 860 S.W. 2d 590 (Tex. App.-Am. 1993, no writ). II. Just as there are many cases which are very compatible with the mediation process, there are many cases which simply are not compatible with alternative dispute resolution principles and attempts to mediate such cases end up being futile and leaving the parties more frustrated that they were before the mediation process was scheduled. Generally speaking, cases involving claimed damages which are or can be liquidated are more susceptible to the mediation process than those cases which involve claims of vague, intangible, unliquidated damages. In other words, automobile collision cases are more susceptible and compatible with the mediation process than cases involving the partition of a large tract of undeveloped real estate with producing minerals. Case preparation and development must be complete to the point that the lawyers for each side understand the law and the facts of the case before any thoughts of mediation are reasonably entertained.
8 Mediations involving cases which have little or no case development in terms of discovery or investigation are generally not compatible with the mediation process, especially where claims for large damages are sought by the plaintiff and liability is not clearly established. III. Pre-suit or early-suit medical negligence mediations can be successful but the criteria for such success is very specific and limited. Only those cases where liability is certain and the plaintiff s damages are clearly defined are practical for an early-mediation. In any case, where the plaintiff s claims of damage are hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars, the mediation is usually an exercise in futility because rarely will a defendant mediate such a case as opposed to simply contacting plaintiff s counsel directly to discuss settlement. The medical cases that do settle at mediation are cases that are well developed and fully discovered according to the Discovery Rules in the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE or the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. In most important cases, it is critical that all expert witnesses concerning liability and/or damages be disclosed prior to the mediation and that reasonable efforts be made to reduce their testimony or their opinions to discoverable form. Most successful mediations occur in instances where a firm trial setting is pending or there is a realistic expectation of a trial setting. IV. Preparation. It is critical that any attorney who plans to conduct a meaningful mediation know the law of his case and/or the facts of his case. Those advocates who succeed in mediation are always well prepared on the issues of fact and the issues of law so that they can discuss with the mediator and the other party in detail on all disputed issues. It is also important that the client generally understand the law and the facts of their case. If the client does not have an appreciation for the fact background or case fact development or for the law of the case, then that client s expectations with regard to the mediation will be unrealistic and this will lead to great frustration for the client. It is critically important in the preparation stage of the mediation that each lawyer have a clear understanding of his or her authority with regard to negotiations. Realistic goals concerning settlement should be formed and agreed upon well in advance of the mediation between the client and counsel. Exchange of Documents. Documentary evidence is the key to success in the courtroom in any civil suit. It is vitally important that all important documents be exchanged between the parties prior to the mediation conference. It is not a good idea to hold back an important piece of evidence in the form of documentation regarding liability or damages. The 2 revelation of such information in a medical negligence causes insecurity on the part of the other party, creates a lack of confidence in their own lawyer, and causes the opposing party to adopt a very defensive position which probably dooms any prospects of reasonable negotiations. It is absolutely critical that any and all expert reports be exchanged in advance of the mediation conference. This is especially true in medical negligence litigation or where the plaintiff s claims involve very, very significant damage claims. Review Prior Settlement Discussions. Many times the parties discuss settlement prior to the convening of a formal mediation conference. It is important that confusion be avoided with regard to a party s settlement position in the case and therefore great pains should be used to review the litigator s file to determine if in fact any settlement demands and/or settlement offers have been exchanged. Define Expectations. Assuming that the litigator is completely familiar with the law of his case and/or the facts of the case, it is important for the litigator to openly discuss with the client or carrier, the client s expectations about the case prior to the mediation conference. The expectations of the client and of the lawyer and carrier should be based upon a firm foundation that is reasonable under the facts of a given case and the law of the case. The Defined Expectation Rule is important in court-ordered mediations because the parties have some belief that the mediation process will be unsuccessful under any circumstances and is doomed from beginning. Although the court cannot force parties to settle their case, the court can compel parties to attend the mediation and it is important that all aspects of the case be discussed with the client prior to the mediation and that there be no confusion between the litigator and the client with regard to the client s expectations. Negotiations. The litigator and his client must be aware of all important issues of fact and law. The litigator must have a complete understanding of the factual and legal basis for the claims of damages and/or defenses against damages. If there are subrogation issues in a given case, these subrogation issues need to be clearly defined as between the litigator, his client and the owner of the subrogation interest. In order to be effective at a mediation, a litigator must be able to articulate his belief in the full value of his or her case. He or she must be able to articulate a reasonable expectation with regard to a jury verdict and integrate such an expectation with the facts of the case and the law of the case. All parties must take a realistic approach in assessing liability. Making such an assessment, the litigator for either side must be alert to all available causes of action, all available defenses, all pending pleas at bar and the practical effect of any prior rulings with regard to procedure and discovery in the case. Because of the large body of law that has developed by
9 way of ART. 4590i, correct assessment of liability, defensive issues and the admissibility of expert testimony is critical to success or failure at trial or mediation. No experienced litigator in Texas can or should ignore the venue of the case. In order to effectively negotiate a case on behalf of a client, a lawyer must be familiar with a verdict history in the venue in question. Since probable results vary greatly from county to county, it is critical that the practitioners know and understand all of the venue issues in a given case. There are as many different negotiating styles and theories as there are lawyers, judges, mediators, claims representatives and clients. Those who are successful in negotiations share one common characteristic and that is that they negotiate with confidence. Confidence comes from the proposition that they know that their case is fully developed, they understand all the issues in their case, and they have a good feeling about how a jury will view their case and their evidence. Unreasonably high demands and unreasonably low offers always indicate that a party is negotiating without much confidence in the above factors and such lack of confidence is generally a very high hurdle to over-come and resolve a case through settlement. The Mediation Impasse. Impasses in negotiations obviously can occur early or late in mediation conference and sometimes impasses develop at the mid-point. Most early mediation impasses result because one party or the other refuses to accept the proposition that they will not prevail completely at the time of trial. Without such a realization, that party perceives no advantage to resolving the case through settlement and is prepared to spend his or her time and money litigating the case because he or she has no fear that the case will end up in a negative verdict. Mediation impasses that arise in the middle of the conference or at the last hour usually involve issues primarily of economics. By mediating for several hours, the parties have already conceded to the proposition that they may not prevail at the time of trial and are willing to compromise with regard to their demands and/or defenses. In such cases, when the parties become restricted in their ideas about the case, it is important and critical that the litigator look to the leadership of the mediator to move the settlement process forward. Parties in medical negligence cases should insist on a mediator with experience in legal medicine and the trial of medical cases if they want to have a chance to resolve the case at mediation. Statistically we know that many, many cases that are not resolved at mediation ultimately do settle. Often times after the adjournment of a mediation and a report to the court that the mediation was unsuccessful, further discovery and/or reflection on all of the issues causes one party or the other to rethink their position and create a desire re-engage for the purposes of discussing settlement. Ideas concerning reconvening are often 3 viewed by a party as dealing from a position of weakness and therefore are reluctant to contact the other side even though they have a legitimate interest in settling the case. This is the perfect opportunity for the parties to use the mediator in a secondary fashion. Most mediators are quite receptive to the idea of being approached by one party or the other concerning settlement of a case even though a previous settlement conference or mediation conference was unsuccessful. Experienced litigators who are genuinely interested in representing the best interest of their client have no hesitation whatsoever in contacting the mediator in a case to call on the mediator s skills and experience to re-engage the parties for serious settlement discussions. V. It is critical that any settlement agreement reached by the parties be reduced to writing. This written agreement should be drafted in terms of a Rule 11 Agreement pursuant to the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE and a Rule 13 Agreement or Pleading pursuant to the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. There should be no contingencies in any mediation agreement. Settlement agreements or mediation agreements that contain the words subject to are probably subject to serious challenge if a suit is brought or a pleading is brought to enforce such an agreement. Written mediation agreements also tend to protect the interest of the lawyers and the integrity of the process. Many times clients on both sides of the docket want to retract their consent to settle a given case after 2 or 3 days of reflection. With proper mediation conference preparation and a realistic discussion about client expectations in advance of the settlement conference, such a decision to change one s mind is rare. But nevertheless the written mediation agreement will allow the parties and the court to be secure in the fact that the litigation is finally concluded saving the parties and the court further expense and delay. Subrogation has become a major issue of late. Medical liens, whether perfected or not, must be addressed in the mediation agreement. Plaintiff s counsel and his staff must make identification of liens a top priority in preparation for the mediation. The best policy is to know the exact amount of the lien, any offsets or discounts available, applicability of attorneys fees under the Common Fund Doctrine and the name and address of the person with authority to negotiate the lien.
10 1. Dedicate adequate time to prepare 2. Know the facts of the case Know the law of the case 3. Know the medicine of the case Know the science of the case 4. Prepare your client (and/or carrier) Facts of case Law of case Medicine of case Science of case Your experts Your opponent s experts 5. Insurance issues Coverage; covered claims Permission to settle clauses Endorsement No Expectations of client or carrier Plaintiffs Defendants Carriers Discuss details and figures KEYS TO A SUCCESSFUL MEDIATION 7. Demands and Offers Stowers Doctrine Ethics opinion SBOT No. 179 (1958) Coverage limits 8. Subrogation 9. Negotiations prior to mediation loose lips sink ships 10. Offer your client a chance to say something at the joint session if it is positive. 4
11 KEYS TO A LOUSY MEDIATION 1. Fail to know your client s first name. 2. Quickly advise all parties in the joint session that you are a great trial lawyer and pass out your firm brochure which chronicles your last ten successful cases (none of which were in the subject venue). 3. Articulate to your opponent that he does not understand the facts or the law of the case so as to inspire lots of confidence in your opponent s client. 4. A. (Plfs.) Be sure to remind everybody, including the claims representative, that your Stower s Demand expires at 4:30 p.m. today! B. (Defs.) Announce to the Plaintiffs that their demand is outrageous and that until they make a reasonable demand, there will be no offers. 5. Be sure to say it s only money or it s always about the money in the opening session. 6. Bring a structured settlement person to the opening session and let them pass out a few cards for promotional purposes. 7. Bring your client and his new spouse to a mediation in a wrongful death case also attended by the parents of your client s deceased spouse whose care is the subject of the case. 8. Advise your opponent and the mediator that your client is very nervous, does not want to go to court and really wants to get this over. 9. Advise your opponent and the mediator that your doctor client is non compos mentis and will not be able to testify at trial. 10. Announce to the group in the joint session that there are only two people in the room that know what the case is worth (you and the mediator) and that your opponent is not one of them. 5
12 CONFIDENTIAL MEDIATION SURVEY Mediation date attorney client Court: Federal State Arbitration Suit not filed Mediation is: Court Ordered Not Court Ordered The defendant(s) insurance limits have been disclosed: Yes No The defendant(s) insurance limits are believed to be: The documented special damages are: Past medical Future medical Other Past earnings Future earnings Experts: Plaintiff disclosed deposed Defendant disclosed deposed Assessment of basic liability (10 = strongest): Assessment of causation (10 = strongest): Realistic, provable damages: less than $50K $500K to $1M $50K to $250K $1M to $2.5M $250K to $500K More than $2.5M My view of full value of this case is: less than $50K $500K to $1M $50K to $250K $1M to $2.5M $250K to $500K More than $2.5M If written permission for settlement is required of your client, do you have permission? My client has realistic expectations about the mediation: Yes No My representative(s) have realistic expectations about the mediation: Yes No My expectations for success at the mediation are: (10 = strongest): Plaintiff s last demand is $ ; withdrawn Yes No Defendant s last offer is $ ; withdrawn Yes No Attorney for Date: You are not required to respond to any or all of the above. Any response you do make will be regarded as highly confidential and will be viewed by the mediator only. 6
MEDIATION RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ISSUES IN CONSTRUCTION CASES by Benton T. Wheatley
MEDIATION RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ISSUES IN CONSTRUCTION CASES by Benton T. Wheatley State Bar of Texas Construction Law Newsletter, Summer 2001, p. 6. Introduction: Many lawyers have been in
More informationThe Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas
The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas NIGHTMARE ON MEDIATION STREET You mediate a case where the Plaintiff is suing
More informationA Mediation Primer for the Plaintiff s Attorney
By: Bruce Brusavich A Mediation Primer for the Plaintiff s Attorney Making your case stand out to the other side, and what to do when they ask you to dance. Make the Defense Ask to Mediate Obtaining a
More informationWhat to Expect In Your Lawsuit
What to Expect In Your Lawsuit A lawsuit is a marathon not a sprint. Stewart R. Albertson. There is a saying that the wheels of justice move slowly. That is as true today as when it was initially stated.
More informationTHE IMPACT OF HIPAA ON PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE
THE IMPACT OF HIPAA ON PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE JEFFREY B. McCLURE Andrews & Kurth L.L.P. Copyright 2003 by Jeffrey B. McClure; Andrews & Kurth State Bar of Texas 19 TH ANNUAL ADVANCED PERSONAL INJURY
More informationImpediments to Settlement
Impediments to Settlement W. Bruce Barrickman, Esq. 5775 Glenridge Drive Suite E100 Atlanta, GA 30328 678-222-0248 www.bayadr.com IMPEDIMENTS TO SETTLEMENT W. Bruce Barrickman, Esq. Mediation is a great
More informationCase4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
More information13-22840-rdd Doc 402 Filed 10/25/13 Entered 10/25/13 16:17:31 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. (Jointly Administered)
Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------x In re: SOUND SHORE MEDICAL CENTER OF WESTCHESTER, et al., 1 Debtors.
More informationSTANDARDS FOR CERTIFICATION OF LAWYERS SPECIALIZING IN PERSONAL INJURY & WRONGFUL DEATH Revised January 1, 2013
STANDARDS FOR CERTIFICATION OF LAWYERS SPECIALIZING IN PERSONAL INJURY & WRONGFUL DEATH Revised January 1, 2013 Pursuant to the authority vested in the Arizona Board of Legal Specialization ( BLS ) by
More informationETHICS IN JUVENILE CASES THE DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE
ETHICS IN JUVENILE CASES THE DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE 19 th ANNUAL JUVENILE LAW CONFERENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT O. DAWSON JUVENILE LAW INSTITUTE February 22 24, 2006 Westin Park Central Hotel Dallas, Texas BRIAN
More informationA Practical Guide to. Hiring a LAWYER
A Practical Guide to Hiring a LAWYER A PRACTIAL GUIDE TO HIRING A LAWYER I. Introduction 3 II. When do you Need a Lawyer? 3 III. How to Find a Lawyer 4 A. Referrals 4 B. Lawyer Referral Service 5 C. Unauthorized
More informationVIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES RULE 1. MEDIATION IN MALPRACTICE CASES In order to alleviate the burden to the parties
More informationWASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL LIABILITY & PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSOR STEVEN M. PAVSNER SYLLABUS
I. Synopsis WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL LIABILITY & PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSOR STEVEN M. PAVSNER SYLLABUS The objective of the seminar, Medical Liability and Public Health, is to
More informationIf you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading.
If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading. Court procedures can be complex. This brochure was developed to help Ohioans who are considering representing themselves in court. It
More informationHow To Prove Guilt In A Court Case In Texas
CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT VS. LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Comes Now, Charles Durham,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16- DIVISION: CV- vs. Plaintiff, Defendant. ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING
More informationTable of Contents. 1. What should I do when the other driver s insurance company contacts me?... 1
Table of Contents 1. What should I do when the other driver s insurance company contacts me?... 1 2. Who should be paying my medical bills from a car accident injury?... 2 3. What should I do after the
More informationWHAT HAPPENS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE
WHAT HAPPENS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE From Negotiating With Insurance Companies To Trial By Michael A. Schafer, Attorney at Law 440 South Seventh Street, Ste. 200 Louisville, Kentucky 40203 (502) 584-9511
More informationWrit of Mandamus is Conditionally Granted; Opinion Filed December 3, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Writ of Mandamus is Conditionally Granted; Opinion Filed December 3, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01457-CV IN RE SOUTHPAK CONTAINER CORPORATION AND CLEVELAND
More informationAmy S. Harris Shareholder
Shareholder Amy Harris joined Macdonald Devin in 1989 and represents clients in state and federal trial and appellate courts, primarily in insurance defense litigation and insurance coverage. She has served
More informationthe court determines at a non-jury hearing that the award is not in the best interest of the child. The burden of proof at a hearing under this
MEDIATION Texas Family Code 6.602. MEDIATION PROCEDURES. (a) On the written agreement of the parties or on the court's own motion, the court may refer a suit for dissolution of a marriage to mediation.
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More information: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In re: ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES GOVERNING : MEDIATION OF MATTERS AND THE
More informationCompulsory Arbitration
Local Rule 1301 Scope. Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. (1) The following civil actions shall first be submitted to and heard by a Board of Arbitrators: (a) (b) (c) (d) Civil actions, proceedings
More informationRULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES
RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES (a) Illegal, Prohibited, or Clearly Excessive Fees and Costs. [no change] (b) Factors to Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Fees and Costs. [no change]
More informationWhat Is Small Claims Court? What Types Of Cases Can Be Filed In Small Claims Court? Should I Sue? Do I Have the Defendant s Address?
SMALL CLAIMS COURT What Is Small Claims Court? Nebraska law requires that every county court in the state have a division known as Small Claims Court (Nebraska Revised Statute 25-2801). Small Claims Court
More informationPRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM. RE: Sample Bankruptcy Motions and Orders for Personal Injury Practitioners and Trustees
PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Attorneys Practicing Before Me And Other Interested Persons C. Timothy Corcoran, III United States Bankruptcy Judge DATE: January 3, 2000 1 RE: Sample Bankruptcy
More informationJEFF JURY ATTORNEY MEDIATOR ARBITRATOR DISTINGUISHED MEDIATOR TEXAS MEDIATOR CREDENTIALING ASSOCIATION
JEFF JURY DISTINGUISHED MEDIATOR TEXAS MEDIATOR CREDENTIALING ASSOCIATION DISTINGUISHED FELLOW INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDIATORS BURNS ANDERSON JURY & BRENNER, L.L.P. P.O. BOX 26300 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78755-6300
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD DUTTON, : : Consolidated Under Plaintiff, : MDL DOCKET NO. 875 : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. : 09-62916 TODD SHIPYARDS CORP.,
More informationGADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES 1. Description. The Superior Court of California, County of Orange (Court), offers a voluntary civil mediation program for
More informationEDUCATION St. Mary's University School of Law, San Antonio, Texas J.D. with distinction 1983 Member of the John M. Harlan Society
PHYUSJ. SPEEDLIN MEDIATOR - ARBITRATOR - PRIVATE JUDGE Plunkett & Gibson, Inc. 70 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 1100 San Antonio, TX 78216 Phone(210) 734-7092 speedlinp@plunkett-gibson.com OVERVIEW Phylis J. Speedlin
More informationAn Oral Deposition. Texas Litigation
An Oral Deposition in Texas Litigation Prepared by: Jim L. García Attorney at Law Cersonsky, Rosen & García, P.C. 1770 St. James Place, Suite 150 Houston, Texas 77056 Telephone: (713) 600-8500/Fax: (713)
More informationCase 06-03280 Document 35 Filed in TXSB on 11/27/06 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 06-03280 Document 35 Filed in TXSB on 11/27/06 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE DAVID WIMBERLY, CASE NO. 05-81669-G3-13 Debtor,
More informationALEXANDRA WILSON ALBRIGHT Senior Lecturer
ALEXANDRA WILSON ALBRIGHT Senior Lecturer University of Texas School of Law 727 East Dean Keeton Street Austin, Texas 78705 512-232-1316 Fax: 512-471-6988 Email: aalbright@law.utexas.edu EDUCATION B.A.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 14-11987 Non-Argument Calendar. Docket No. 1:13-cv-02128-WSD.
Case: 14-11987 Date Filed: 10/21/2014 Page: 1 of 11 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-11987 Non-Argument Calendar Docket No. 1:13-cv-02128-WSD PIEDMONT OFFICE
More informationNOVEMBER 12, 2014 FINAL AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS AND OTHER MATTERS
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION NJ TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, INC. NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. NJ TRANSIT MERCER, INC. NJ TRANSIT MORRIS, INC. REGULARLY SCHEDULED BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER
More informationEMPLOYEES GUIDE TO APPEALING A WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM DENIAL
EMPLOYEES GUIDE TO APPEALING A WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM DENIAL Appeals of workers compensation claim denials are handled by the Labor Commission s Adjudication Division. If you disagree with the claim
More informationCURRICULUM VITAE ROBERT J. NAPLETON
CURRICULUM VITAE ROBERT J. NAPLETON Firm: MOTHERWAY & NAPLETON, LLP 140 South Dearborn Street Suite 1500 60603 (312) 726-2699 Fax: (312) 726-6851 E-Mail: bnapleton@mnlawoffice.com Firm Website: www.mnlawoffice.com
More informationCALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656
CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any
More informationBENJAMIN L. HALL, III THE HALL LAW FIRM 530 Lovett Blvd. Houston, Texas 77006
BENJAMIN L. HALL, III THE HALL LAW FIRM 530 Lovett Blvd. Houston, Texas 77006 EDUCATION J.D. Ph.D. M.Div. B.A. HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, Cambridge, MA June 1986, Merrill Griswold Scholar DUKE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE
More informationATTORNEY S FEES IN ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITIES: Strategies to Reduce or Defeat Plaintiffs Fee Claims
ATTORNEY S FEES IN ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITIES: Strategies to Reduce or Defeat Plaintiffs Fee Claims and Potentially Recover Your Own Fees PUBLIC AGENCY RISK MANAGERS ASSOCIATION February 2016 Daniel
More informationAny civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.
CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply
More informationPHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN Dykema Cox Smith 112 East Pecan, Suite 1800 San Antonio, TX 78205 Phone (210) 554-5594 pspeedlin@dykema.com
PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN Dykema Cox Smith 112 East Pecan, Suite 1800 San Antonio, TX 78205 Phone (210) 554-5594 pspeedlin@dykema.com OVERVIEW Phylis J. Speedlin counsels clients in two primary areas: alternative
More informationSettlement. conference; Tips for Judges
Settlement Conference Tips for Judges (with a Form and a List of Things Lawyers Should NOT Do) Hon. Morton Denlow Most cases eventually settle. The guidance offered by the judge at the settlement conference
More informationAddressing Abusive Lawyer Conduct in Relation to Litigation Proceedings
Author: Attorney Dan A. Riegleman N63 W23965 Main Street Sussex, Wisconsin 53089 Prepared: 06/01/10 WHITE PAPER: DR2504 Addressing Abusive Lawyer Conduct in Relation to Litigation Proceedings There are
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT
Filed 10/11/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT ED AGUILAR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B238853 (Los Angeles County
More informationHow To Settle A Car Accident In The Uk
PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE This booklet has been produced by D.J. Synnott Solicitors to give our clients an understanding of the personal injury compensation
More informationAdvice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.
More informationSTANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS
Notice: This Agreement is not valid unless signed and accepted by an officer of The Feldman Law Firm, P.C., who will make the sole decision whether to accept your case. This Agreement may be digitally
More informationHONORABLE JOSEPH P. SPINOLA New York
HONORABLE JOSEPH P. SPINOLA New York Joseph P. Spinola is a former Justice of the New York State Supreme Court, Nassau County. He gained a reputation as an eminently qualified and even-handed jurist, who
More informationWhat to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration
What to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration Russell R. Yurk Jennings, Haug & Cunningham, L.L.P. 2800 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1800 Phoenix, AZ 85004-1049 (602) 234-7819
More informationMary H. Spillane Member. Mary H. Spillane
Mary H. Spillane Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98101 Office: (206) 628-6656 Fax: (206) 628-6611 Email: mspillane@williamskastner.com Mary Spillane, a member in the Seattle
More informationKenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax
Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Experience Kenneth B. Walton is a Founding Partner of the Boston-based
More informationKenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax
Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Experience Kenneth B. Walton is a Founding Partner
More informationBRIAN F. SPECTOR, LLC
Brian F. Spector BRIAN F. SPECTOR, LLC Post Office Box 566206 Miami, Florida 33256-6206 Tel 305.666.1664 Cell 305.613.5200 Fax 305.661.8481 brian@bspector.com www.bspector.com EXPERIENCE BRIAN F. SPECTOR,
More informationF First Judicial District of Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Trial Division Civil CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
F First Judicial District of Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Trial Division Civil CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ADVICE TO COUNSEL 1. Be sure to fully complete the Case Management
More informationFARAH & FARAH RULES OF LAW
RULES OF LAW Injury Case Roadmap: The Legal Process for Personal Injury Cases BY EDDIE E. FARAH & CHARLIE E. FARAH, ATTORNEYS AT LAW ...insurance companies more and more are being run by bean counters,...
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00815-CV IN THE ESTATE OF Alvilda Mae AGUILAR From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2802 Honorable
More informationTHE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education
9 THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education Third Party Litigation Funding: Pros, Cons, and How It Works November 1, 2012 Telephone Seminar/Audio Webcast Alternative Litigation Funding Conference
More informationCONTINGENT FEE CONTRACT
CONTINGENT FEE CONTRACT STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR General Terms & Nature of Case THIS IS AN AGREEMENT between THE GORDON LAW FIRM, P. C., (hereinafter referred to as "the Firm"), whose principal office
More informationIMPROVING SETTLEMENT SAVVY. Kathy Perkins Kathy Perkins LLC, Workplace Law & Mediation www.kathy-perkins.com
IMPROVING SETTLEMENT SAVVY Kathy Perkins Kathy Perkins LLC, Workplace Law & Mediation www.kathy-perkins.com In these difficult economic times, parties may be looking to reduce litigation costs and risk
More informationJUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Division A. Opinion by JUDGE NIETO. Casebolt and Dailey, JJ., concur
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS February 15, 2001 Court of Appeals No. 98CA1099 El Paso County District Court No. 96CV2233 Honorable Theresa M. Cisneros, Judge Carol Koscove, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Bolte,
More informationHOW JURIES CALCULATE MISSOURI PERSONAL INJURY AWARDS
HOW JURIES CALCULATE MISSOURI PERSONAL INJURY AWARDS Leaving the final decision on compensation in the hands of a jury is always a risk, one that most both parties in a personal injury case often prefer
More informationYou ve Been Sued, Now What? A Roadmap Through An Employment Lawsuit
You ve Been Sued, Now What? A Roadmap Through An Employment Lawsuit California employers facing their first employment lawsuit can be in for a rude awakening. Such lawsuits are a harsh introduction to
More informationTHE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White
THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 13-1006 IN RE ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, RELATOR ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PER CURIAM Rafael Zuniga sued San Diego Tortilla (SDT) for personal injuries and then added
More informationTable of Contents. Selected Iowa Wrongful Death Laws and Rules
Table of Contents 1. What is a wrongful death claim?... 2 2. Who may recover compensation for a wrongful death?... 3 3. How is a wrongful death claim commenced?... 4 4. What types of losses are compensated
More informationCase 5:09-cv-00910-FB Document 35 Filed 10/20/10 Page 1 of 5
Case :09-cv-00910-FB Document Filed 10/0/10 Page 1 of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION CARL DWIGHT DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-09-CA-910-FB
More informationRule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. 1. Application of rule. (a) This rule applies to: (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state; (2) All actions or proceedings
More informationRecent Developments Regarding Attorney s Fees PHILIP DURST DEATS DURST & OWEN, P.L.L.C. 1204 SAN ANTONIO, SUITE 203 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701
Recent Developments Regarding Attorney s Fees 1 PHILIP DURST DEATS DURST & OWEN, P.L.L.C. 1204 SAN ANTONIO, SUITE 203 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Recent Developments Regarding Attorney s Fees 2 PHILIP DURST DEATS
More informationMedical Malpractice Litigation. What to Expect as a Defendant
Medical Malpractice Litigation What to Expect as a Defendant Being named as a defendant in a malpractice suit may be your first exposure to civil litigation. You will probably wish it would just go away.
More informationUTAH. Past medical expenses may be recovered. Plaintiffs must show that they have been injured and,
UTAH Rick L. Rose Kristine M. Larsen RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER P.C. 36 South State Street, Suite 1400 P.O. Box 43585 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 532-1500 Facsimile: (801) 532-7543 rrose@rqn.com
More informationCOST AND FEE ALLOCATION IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
International Academy of Comparative Law 18th World Congress Washington D.C. July 21-31, 2010 Topic II.C.1 COST AND FEE ALLOCATION IN CIVIL PROCEDURE National Reporter - Slovenia: Nina Betetto Supreme
More informationCURRICULUM VITAE JOHN M. ALTON
CURRICULUM VITAE JOHN M. ALTON Experience: John M. Alton Co., L.P.A. 88 West Main Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Owner:March 1, 1998 present Ray & Alton LLP Principal: March 1, 1994 February 28, 1998 Lane,
More informationCRIMINAL DEFENSE AGREEMENTS
5/6/13 CRIMINAL DEFENSE & CIVIL LITIGATION AGREEMENTS LLOYD M. CUETO LAW OFFICE OF LLOYD M. CUETO P.C. 7110 WEST MAIN STREET BELLEVILLE, ILLINOIS 62223 (618) 277-1554 CRIMINAL DEFENSE AGREEMENTS HOW TO
More informationInformation for Worker s Compensation Clients
Information for Worker s Compensation Clients Overview of the Worker s Compensation Act Indiana Worker s Compensation cases are governed by a State law known as the Worker s Compensation Act. The legislature
More informationIn recent years, energy industry users have increasingly voiced the complaint
Controlling Costs in Domestic Energy Arbitrations by The Hon. Mark Whittington 1, JAMS In recent years, energy industry users have increasingly voiced the complaint that arbitration has become much like
More informationThe What to Expect Series FINRA s Dispute Resolution Process 1
FINRA s Dispute Resolution Process 1 What to Expect: FINRA s Dispute Resolution Process It is rare for most firms to find themselves in a dispute with a customer, an employee, or another firm that escalates
More informationLowcountry Injury Law
Lowcountry Injury Law 1917 Lovejoy Street Post Office Drawer 850 Beaufort, South Carolina 29901 Personal Injury Phone (843) 524-9445 Auto Accidents Fax (843) 532-9254 Workers Comp DanDenton@Lawyer.com
More informationManaging Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective. Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III
Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective by Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III Presented to the Offshore Marine Services Association / Loyola College of Law Industry Seminar
More informationJUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM
JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM A delinquency petition is a court document alleging that a juvenile, between ages 10-16, has violated a law which would be a criminal offense if committed by an adult. Disposition
More informationIf we cannot reach a favorable settlement, my colleagues and I are ready, willing and able to go to trial.
Robert A. Chapman Phone (312) 606 8752 E mail rchapman@chapmanspingola.com "For more than 10 years, Swift Engineering has turned to Bob Chapman to handle our litigation and advise us when disputes come
More informationJoseph P. McMonigle, Partner. Summary of Qualifications
465 California Street, Fifth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Main: (415) 397-2222 Direct: (415) 438-4534 jmcmonigle@longlevit.com Summary of Qualifications Joe McMonigle is honored by membership in the four
More informationSTRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS
STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS NORTH CAROLINA TRIAL JUDGES BENCH BOOK, SUPERIOR COURT, VOL. 2 (Civil), Structured Settlements, at pp. 4-7 (3d ed.) (Institute of Government 1999) A. THE APPROVAL HEARING 1. Plaintiff
More informationRULE 63 DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW
RULE 63 DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW Definitions (1) In this rule, Application claim for relief includes a child support order, a spousal support order, a custody order, a property order, and corollary relief
More informationAN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act.
3721L.01I AN ACT To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2010 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2010 Session STEPHANIE JONES and HOWARD JONES v. RENGA I. VASU, M.D., THE NEUROLOGY CLINIC, and METHODIST LEBONHEUR HOSPITAL Appeal from the
More information2013 IL App (1st) 120898-U. No. 1-12-0898
2013 IL App (1st) 120898-U FOURTH DIVISION March 28, 2013 No. 1-12-0898 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationSETTLEMENT STRATEGIES IN COMPLEX MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES
SETTLEMENT STRATEGIES IN COMPLEX MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES Michael Sawicki Brown & Sawicki, L.L.P. 2626 Cole Avenue, Suite 850 Dallas, Texas 75204 (214) 468-8844 (Phone) (888) 468-8844 (Toll Free) (214)
More informationAdrian G. Driscoll's Representative Experience
Adrian G. Driscoll's Representative Experience Practice Area: Construction, Coverage, Insurance Services, Lawyers, Professional Liability Key Issues: Attorney Malpractice; Attorney's Fees and Costs; Construction
More informationPARRY G. CAMERON, Senior Attorney
Phone: 310.557.2009 Fax: 310.551.0283 Email: pcameron@tocounsel.com Parry Cameron has over twenty-three years experience in commercial and business litigation at both the trial and appellate levels. He
More informationMilwaukee Bar Association Fee Arbitration
Milwaukee Bar Association Fee Arbitration Attached are the Rules for the arbitration of fee disputes on behalf of the Milwaukee Bar Association. In consideration of the arbitration services to be rendered,
More informationMULTIPLE REPRESENTATION AND DRAFTING CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENTS
MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION AND DRAFTING CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENTS ADVANCED PERSONAL INJURY LAW COURSE CLE TEXAS STATE BAR 2013 S AM J OHNSON S COTT, DOUGLASS & MC C ONNICO, L.L.P. A TTORNEYS A T L AW WWW.
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
More informationBylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association Enacted November 18, 2015 Preamble and Purpose 1.) Background. Under Rule V, Section 5 of the
More informationHP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
More informationAmerican Board of Professional Liability Attorneys *ABA Accredited Organization
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY Applicant s Firm _ Street_ City _ State _ Zip _ Business Phone _ Fax E-Mail Address _ State of Principle Practice _ Other states where you practice _ Attorney Registration
More informationMEDIATION: THE BASICS 1
MEDIATION: THE BASICS 1 WHAT IS MEDIATION AND WHY IS IT USED Mediation, in lay terms, is an effort to resolve a disputed matter, or disputed issues, outside of the judicial or litigation setting. Almost,
More information