Use Gartner's Pace Layers Model to Better Manage Your Financial Management Application Portfolio
|
|
- Nathan Campbell
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Research Publication Date: 24 June 2011 ID Number: G Use Gartner's Pace Layers Model to Better Manage Your Financial Management Application Portfolio Nigel Rayner, John E. Van Decker To develop a pace layered application strategy, start by deconstructing your portfolio into individual applications and identifying the specific business processes each application supports. The characteristics of the applications and processes will determine where they belong within the three areas of the pace layer model: systems of record, systems of differentiation or systems of innovation (see "How to Get Started With a Pace Layered Application Strategy"). Use this approach to create a financial management (FM) application strategy that prioritizes initiatives, guides investments and accommodates the flexibility required of dynamic markets. Key Findings Applications are classified as systems of differentiation or systems of innovation based on the business activities they enable or support. The terms "differentiation" and "innovation" refer to the business process, not the software. Many applications will move among layers as their associated processes and business requirements change. Connective tissue and systems of record form the foundation of FM, while enabling new applications that support the competitive differentiation and innovation to be integrated into that foundation. The systems of record for FM are most likely to be an integrated suite of core financial applications (general ledger [GL], accounts payable [AP], accounts receivable [AR] and fixed assets [FA]). This will provide an auditable, robust repository for financial transaction data. Corporate performance management (CPM) applications offer opportunities for innovation and differentiation, regardless of organization size and industry. Recommendations Use pace layering to help define your FM application strategy. Recognize that application needs change over time and that applications can move among pace layers based on those needs. The level of granularity also can change over time Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. This publication may not be reproduced or distributed in any form without Gartner's prior written permission. The information contained in this publication has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in such information. This publication consists of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Although Gartner research may include a discussion of related legal issues, Gartner does not provide legal advice or services and its research should not be construed or used as such. Gartner is a public company, and its shareholders may include firms and funds that have financial interests in entities covered in Gartner research. Gartner's Board of Directors may include senior managers of these firms or funds. Gartner research is produced independently by its research organization without input or influence from these firms, funds or their managers. For further information on the independence and integrity of Gartner research, see "Guiding Principles on Independence and Objectivity" on its website,
2 Ensure that you have a strong foundation for systems of record in place. You should be comfortable to leave these applications in place for at least 10 years to support current and projected business activities. Use systems of differentiation to create competitive advantage in terms of finance process efficiency and effectiveness. Use systems of innovation to support strategic finance processes that will enable and support business transformation. Make sure to take into account connective tissue issues such as master data management (MDM) and process integration when making sourcing decisions between integrated and specialist solutions. Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 2 of 18
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Analysis... 4 Introduction: The Scope of FM Applications... 4 What Is Pace Layering?... 4 What Is Connective Tissue?... 5 EIM and Analytics... 5 Business Process Management... 6 Application Architecture and Process Integration... 6 FM Applications... 7 Classifying FM Applications to the Right Pace Layer... 8 Questions to Identify of Systems of Innovation... 8 Questions to Identify Systems of Differentiation... 8 Questions to Identify Systems of Record... 8 Applying Pace Layering to FM Applications... 9 Midsize, Product-Centric Company With a B2B Focus... 9 Midsize Service-Centric Company Large Multinational With Single-Instance ERP and Shared Services Recommendations for FM Pace Layers Guidance for Systems of Record Guidance for Systems of Differentiation Guidance for Systems of Innovation Applications Frequently Migrate Among Layers New Applications Should Be Classified at Point of Conception Conclusion LIST OF TABLES Table 1. FM Apps by Segment... 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Figure 1. Application Pace Layers... 5 Figure 2. FM Pace Layers for a Hypothetical Midsize B2B Product-centric Company, Figure 3. FM Pace Layers for a Hypothetical Midsize B2B Product-Centric Company, Figure 4. FM Pace Layers for a Hypothetical Midsize Service-Centric Firm Figure 5. Hypothetical Large Multinational Company Example, Figure 6. Hypothetical Large Multinational Company Example, Figure 7. Recommendations for Layers: FM Apps Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 3 of 18
4 ANALYSIS Introduction: The Scope of FM Applications FM applications have evolved over the last 30 years from relatively basic core financial ledgers to a diverse and complex portfolio of applications that helps automate and optimize a wide range of finance processes. Finance organizations are now faced with managing an application portfolio that extends beyond the core financial ledgers into areas like treasury management, financial governance and CPM. At the same time, the depth of functionality in core financial applications has evolved significantly to address different industry and geographic needs. Finance and IT organizations are thus faced with a challenging task to identify the right mix of applications and vendors to meet their business requirements. Gartner advises the use of pace layering to manage the FM applications portfolio effectively. What Is Pace Layering? We describe pace layering for applications in detail in "How to Get Started with a Pace Layered Application Strategy." The notion of pace layers comes from the realm of buildings and architecture. The idea was to design buildings that would adapt and be useful for different purposes over a long span of time (hundreds of years) without major disruption. For business applications, pace laying means creating an application strategy that can adapt and be useful for changing business needs over time. Traditionally, most companies have had one strategy for selecting, deploying and managing applications. While they may have had methodologies for classifying applications by value or technological viability, they did not typically recognize that applications are inherently different based on how the organization uses them. Gartner has defined three application categories or "layers" to distinguish these application types: Systems of Record Applications that make up an organization's systems of record typically support administrative and transaction processing activities, such as finance, HR, asset management, core banking or procurement. Systems of Differentiation Applications that support processes unique to the organization or its industry. Systems of Innovation Applications built to support new, innovative business activities and are constructed quickly to enable enterprises to take advantage of these new ideas and opportunities. By using the pace layer model, organizations can develop more appropriate strategies for each one (see Figure 1). Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 4 of 18
5 Figure 1. Figure 1. Application Pace Layers Source: Gartner (June 2011) These layers correspond to the nature of the processes that are supported and the rate of change required of the application. The same application may be classified differently in one company than another based on how it is used and the organization's business model. Applications may move from one layer to another as they mature, or as a business process evolves from experimental to well-established to industry-standard. What Is Connective Tissue? Connective tissue is another name for technology that allows applications in different pace layers and within layers to work together as a whole, much the way integration applications allow applications from different vendors to work together (see "Connecting Technology for a Pace- Layered Application Strategy"). There is a wide diversity of connective tissue strategies deployed in FM applications, and connective tissue is important for allowing internal enterprise applications to work together, as well as to facilitate external collaboration. EIM and Analytics MDM is an important aspect of connective tissue. Some FM applications include MDM-like capabilities. For example, financial consolidation applications can map different GL structures into a consistent consolidated view. However, where it is likely that applications from multiple vendors will be used, a more robust approach will be needed to manage specific master data, including suppliers, customers, cost centers, etc. In addition, analytical master data (for example, the aggregation hierarchies used in financial reporting) will be an important part of the connective tissue for FM apps, so it is important to establish an MDM strategy that encompasses both operational and analytical use cases. Many FM applications include their own embedded analytics, and in some cases may require the deployment of an application data mart and/or data warehouse (for example, SAP NetWeaver BW). In addition, packaged analytic applications will be deployed as part of the overall portfolio, and these will have their own data repositories. It is vital to implement a strategy that ensures data consistency and quality across these applications, and across the pace layers. This goes beyond master data, as it should include definitions of shared business data (such as key performance indicators [KPIs] or key financial and management reporting entities). Some FM applications have ETL-like tools to import, extract and transfer data, and these should be assessed for their suitability as part of an information management strategy, compared with ETL capabilities. These tools should not be managed by the finance team at a departmental level. Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 5 of 18
6 Business Process Management Business process models are embedded in FM systems of record, and any evaluation should include an assessment of these "best practice" models against business requirements. Process variation in FM systems of record should be discouraged. However, in systems of differentiation and innovation, process agility may be key to achieving business value, so any assessment of these applications should include the way in which the process model can be adapted by users. The majority of FM applications now includes some form of business process orchestration and workflow management capability, and in some areas, such as AP invoice automation, the flexibility of the workflow and business process model is the primary value proposition of the application. Evaluations of FM applications for systems of differentiation and innovation should include an assessment of the composition technology provided as part of the application and how easy it is for users to manage and maintain the business process model. We anticipate that the majority of business processes in FM applications will be orchestrated by process management and composition technologies inherent in the applications. However, in some areas, it may be necessary to use third-party business process management suite or composition technologies, so any FM application should be assessed for its fit with any organizational technology standards (for example, if Microsoft SharePoint is used to create mashups across organizations, whether the application can deliver content through SharePoint). Application Architecture and Process Integration A major issue for FM applications is integrating the applications among and within the pace layers. One of the arguments for using suite-based solutions is that they provide the necessary integration, especially when it comes to maintaining the consistency of financial data. This is of significant value in FM applications, where auditability of financial record-keeping is a fundamental principle of a well-managed finance operation. These integrated applications maintain both process and data integrity. This is why we would expect to see a preponderance of suites for FM systems of record, and our advice reflects this. All FM applications have various interface and integration capabilities, ranging from batch interface routines through to rule-based interface modules. Consequently, evaluations of FM applications should include an assessment of their native interface and integration capabilities, and how well these fit into an organization's overall application architecture standards. Increasingly, we are seeing adoption of less-proprietary, service-oriented approaches to integration, perhaps using some form of enterprise service bus. This allows third-party middleware to be used to orchestrate processes among applications, so it may be possible to leverage middleware tools already used in your organization to provide some connective tissue. Alternatively, some application vendors provide this type of technology as a way of linking different products in their portfolios (and also linking them with third-party products). Evaluations of FM applications should include an assessment of how easily they will work with third-party middleware, and if vendors provide their own middleware capabilities. Some FM applications will require external integration; for example, supplier e-invoicing and AP invoice automation will require links to suppliers. This could be as simple as providing a portal to allow suppliers to enter invoices and retrieve information directly about their invoices and payments. This may be appropriate for smaller suppliers, but supplier networks are more useful for suppliers with which a significant volume of business is conducted. These networks provide integration services to link suppliers directly with an organization's internal FM applications. EDI is still commonly used in some industries, and often for external integration with the very largest suppliers. There will also be requirements for bank/cash management systems to link directly with banks or third-party communication platforms like SWIFTNet. Collection and deduction Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 6 of 18
7 management systems will need to link to third-party credit management services and should also provide "self-eservice" capabilities to allow customers to access account and invoice information. Consequently, expect to deploy multiple connective tissue strategies in connecting with partners, because the requirements for connectivity will vary across the portfolio (see "Taxonomy, Definitions and the Vendor Landscape for Application Integration Solutions, 2011"). FM Applications FM applications manage finance processes. These applications are the primary responsibility of the CFO and the office of finance, although some, such as CPM suites, have wider applicability across the organization. The main application segments include: Core financial applications Core financial applications are part of the ERP market, and include the applications that provide visibility into an enterprise's financial position through automation and process support for any activity that has a financial impact. These include the core functional areas of GL, AR, FA and project accounting (PA). These applications also provide financial reporting data as needed by local and international regulations. CPM suites CPM includes the processes used to manage corporate performance, such as strategy formulation and budgeting, planning and forecasting (BP&F), as well as the methodologies that support these processes, including the balanced scorecard, or value-based management, and the metrics used to measure performance against strategic and operational performance goals. CPM also comprises a series of analytic applications, such as BP&F, financial-consolidation and financial-reporting solutions, that provides the functionality to support these processes, methodologies and metrics, targeted at the CFO, the finance team, senior executives and corporate-level decision makers. Financial governance applications These are focused on improving financial processes and controls, particularly in the final stages before disclosure. The main components of financial governance are close management and disclosure management, although financial governance suites are emerging to provide a more comprehensive solution to the needs of the finance function. Financial value chain (FVC) applications The FVC is the flow of cash from company to company, and three types of technology support it: supplier-facing applications, customer-facing applications and internal cash management. Although some functionality in this area is provided by core financial applications, many specialist solutions provide additional functionality in areas such as AP invoice automation, collection management and corporate treasury. Table 1 shows a listing of applications used in this research by application segment. Table 1. FM Apps by Segment FM Application Segment Core Financial Applications CPM Suites Financial Governance Applications Application GL, AP, FA, AR, PA and billing Strategy management, profitability modeling and optimization, forecasting, budgeting and planning, financial consolidation, financial and management reporting, XBRL-based management reporting Close management, disclosure management Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 7 of 18
8 FM Application Segment FVC Applications Source: Gartner (June 2011) Application Supplier e-invoicing, AP invoice automation, travel and expense management (expense reimbursement, travel booking), collection and deduction management, treasury management (bank and cash management, in-house banking, risk management, debt and investment management) Classifying FM Applications to the Right Pace Layer Classifying FM applications to the proper pace layer is a matter of characterizing solutions in terms of the way they add value to a particular organization. Specific FM solutions are not always tied to a particular layer, because variations in size, location, industry and strategy impact the effects of the solution on a given organization. Generally speaking, systems of record are used for core processes that change infrequently, systems of differentiation support processes that drive competitive advantage via unique capabilities, and systems of innovation enable new ideas, unique processes and emerging strategies. There are a few simple questions to ask to help decision makers and IT determine where to slot the applications within the pace layers. Below, we list questions to consider for each pace layer. If you answer yes to most of the questions for one of the layers, then the application falls into that layer. Questions to Identify of Systems of Innovation Are the capabilities able to support business transformation and business model innovation? Is the functionality innovative and only deployed by a small number of organizations? Are small, boutique specialty vendors just as credible as larger vendors for this functionality? Questions to Identify Systems of Differentiation Do the capabilities allow the organization to differentiate its processes, providing a competitive advantage for the company? Are most solutions highly configurable with some minor customization? Are most technology providers delivering best-of-breed solutions that can work with any core financial applications? Questions to Identify Systems of Record Are the capabilities essential to core finance processes within the organization, but do not provide a competitive differentiation? Is the functionality commoditized so that most solutions provide very similar functionality? Are most solutions able to be implemented almost completely out of the box, with little customization or configuration, leveraging best-practice templates? Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 8 of 18
9 Is this functionality usually delivered as part of a suite? Applying Pace Layering to FM Applications To understand how to apply pace layering, it is useful to look at examples that illustrate different ways in which applications would be categorized. Midsize, Product-Centric Company With a B2B Focus In this first example organization, most FM applications are systems of record, because there is little the company can do to differentiate itself through its finance processes. Instead, it needs a stable core of FM applications that supports its business operations in a cost-effective manner. The FM applications for this organization might look like Figure 2. Figure 2. FM Pace Layers for a Hypothetical Midsize B2B Product-centric Company, 2011 Source: Gartner (June 2011) However, there are some areas where FM applications can support differentiation. Certain customer- and supplier-facing applications allow users to build differentiating relationships, compared with their peers. Collection and deduction management systems allow better targeting and management of customer debt, while AP invoice automation and supplier e-invoicing can better manage supplier payment processing and build a stronger, more collaborative relationship with suppliers. One area that offers opportunities for differentiation and innovation is CPM. Organizations can use budgeting and planning applications to differentiate the speed with which they can react to new business opportunities, compared with the competition. Similarly, they can use financial and management reporting applications to differentiate the way they report to shareholders and investors. Some CPM applications are systems of innovation if they are deployed in the right way: strategy management, profitability modeling and optimization, and Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 9 of 18
10 forecasting applications all provide capabilities that allow organizations to identify what drives their business performance, and to create and manage strategic innovation in business strategy. Forecasting applications play a key role in supporting innovative business practices like Pattern- Based Strategy. Looking forward five years, there are some potential changes in the way the application portfolio would be categorized. AP invoice automation will be more widely deployed to become "commodity" functionality that will form part of the AP element in systems of record. Similarly, supplier e-invoicing will increase its penetration to become a standard, nondifferentiating way of doing business, even among midsize companies. Strategy management, profitability modeling and optimization, and forecasting will remain systems of innovation, because this is an area where there is significant innovation in the applications as more vendors deliver predictive analytic capabilities coupled with in-memory technology to support complex and dynamic scenario modeling and simulation. Figure 3 shows FM pace layers for a hypothetical midsize B2B product-centric company five years down the road. Figure 3. FM Pace Layers for a Hypothetical Midsize B2B Product-Centric Company, 2016 Source: Gartner (June 2011) Midsize Service-Centric Company Our next example is for a midsize, service-centric organization that is primarily focused on delivering B2B consulting services (through billable consultants). For this company, CPM applications are classified in the same way as the midsize product-centric company, but there is a different focus for systems of differentiation. Here, the project and billable hours focus mean that travel and expense management becomes a system of differentiation organizations that can Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 10 of 18
11 get their people to project locations more efficiently and effectively can differentiate themselves against competitors and to potential employees. PA and billing systems also offer opportunities to differentiate how projects are costed and charged to clients. Collection and deduction management applications can be deployed to support differentiation in the way the company manages its clients. Travel and expense management is also an area of differentiation, because firms that can manage travel effectively when dealing with a highly mobile billable resource base can differentiate themselves to clients and employees. Figure 4 shows FM pace layers for a hypothetical midsize service-centric firm today. Figure 4. FM Pace Layers for a Hypothetical Midsize Service-Centric Firm Source: Gartner (June 2011) We don't see the classification of pace layers changing over the next five years for this type of company. As described, the three systems of innovation in Figure 4 will still offer opportunities for innovation, while developments in travel and expense management will offer continued opportunities for differentiation. We anticipate that vendors will offer more functionality specifically for more effective, resource-based budgeting and planning, while the functionality around project billing and collection management will also still remain a key differentiator. Large Multinational With Single-Instance ERP and Shared Services Our example in Figure 5 shows what the pace layers might look like for a large, multi-billion-dollar multinational that has implemented a single-instance administrative ERP system and is implementing finance shared services. Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 11 of 18
12 Figure 5. Hypothetical Large Multinational Company Example, 2011 Source: Gartner (June 2011) The pace layers for this organization show more opportunities for differentiation and innovation, because of the scale of investment in the single-instance administrative ERP system and shared services. CPM applications are classified in the same way (reinforcing the message that aspects of CPM support differentiation and innovation regardless of company size or industry). However, applications supporting financial governance (close management and disclosure management) become differentiating. This is because large organizations can differentiate themselves to investors and shareholders based on the speed and quality of their external financial reporting. Similarly, some areas of treasury management (in-house banking and risk management) can be differentiating for large companies, while debt and investment management can support innovative ways of generating corporate financing. To support differentiation and innovation, these applications require a degree of sophistication among treasury users that will not be found in smaller companies. Supplier e-invoicing becomes a system of innovation for large companies. In a midsize organization, these support differentiation through greater efficiencies of AP processes, but larger organizations can leverage some of the new collaborative capabilities enabled by this technology (such as dynamic discounting) to create new collaborative ways of working with suppliers that can yield significant economic benefits. We have also identified extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL)-based internal management reporting as a system of innovation. XBRL-based Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 12 of 18
13 external reporting is part of disclosure management, which in itself is not innovative. However, Gartner advocates the use of XBRL for internal management reporting because this can provide real-time visibility into management information across the enterprise. Using XBRL technology in this way would be innovative because it leverages a new technology, and few, if any, companies are using XBRL in this way. Organizations that adopted this would be able to respond more rapidly to changing business conditions and new business opportunities. Figure 6 shows a sample large multinational in Figure 6. Hypothetical Large Multinational Company Example, 2016 Source: Gartner (June 2011) This figure shows how the classification into pace layers may change over the next five years. As with the midsize product organization, AP invoice automation will become part of AP, while supplier e-invoicing will be widely adopted and thus commoditized. Although in the short term there are opportunities for innovation, we expect large organizations to adopt supplier e-invoicing rapidly over the next five years, so it will become hard even to differentiate among peers with this technology. Travel and expense management will be split across the layers, because expense reimbursement will become a commodity functionality; however, for large organizations with a significant number of employees that travel on company business, travel booking will remain a system of differentiation. Financial governance applications will become more widely adopted, making it harder to create differentiation through more-effective reporting and disclosure, while inhouse banking will become a standard treasury functionality for most large organizations. XBRL- Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 13 of 18
14 based management reporting will be deployed by leading companies, making it a system of differentiation, rather than innovation. Recommendations for FM Pace Layers Create a pace layered application landscape for FM applications. Differentiate among: Systems of record for core finance processes that change infrequently: The greatest benefits from these systems come when they are implemented using out-of-the-box functionality to drive greater efficiencies from transaction processing. These systems should provide a stable core for recording and managing all financial activity of the organization for at least 10 years. So they must allow for any anticipated growth in scale. Systems of differentiation for processes that drive competitive advantage: These applications may be part of a suite, but can equally be best-of-breed applications. These will be implemented to accommodate finance processes required to differentiate the organization's business activities, so they are less likely to use best practice process templates. Instead, users will configure the applications so that the finance processes can support differentiating business processes (for example, using AP invoice automation systems to create stronger relationships with key suppliers). Systems of innovation to support business transformation: These systems will either support innovative new technologies to deliver new capabilities (such as in-memory technologies) or deliver strategic value from the finance function. For example, profitability modeling and optimization applications enable executives to understand what drives profitability, and to create new strategies that can transform corporate performance. Develop an approach for each layer (see below). Finally, establish standards for connective tissue across the layers. Guidance for Systems of Record Systems of record for finance will typically be an integrated suite of financial applications. Best-of-breed subledgers should only be deployed if there is a strong business case for them being classed as systems of differentiation. Ensure that the existing systems are adequate to support your current and anticipated business operations for at least 10 years. If they are not, identify what you need to do to stabilize them (which could include an upgrade or implementation of alternative applications). You should anticipate potential regulatory changes in this planning, as generally only the most current application versions will support major regulatory changes. Review your vendor's road map to identify whether major upgrades or new versions are planned in the next 10 years that will impact your current release level. If so, assess their impact, and plan accordingly. Define a clear strategy for your finance systems of record, and make sure this is documented and agreed on by the management team. This should be used to avoid periodic soul searching about whether the current finance systems of record should be changed based on new technology trends or competitor marketing. Only review this strategy if there is a significant, unanticipated change in business conditions or the scope of the organization's business activities. Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 14 of 18
15 Business processes managed by systems of record will typically be standardized as much as possible across the organization, and should be supported by best-practice templates in the applications. The pace of change of business processes in systems of record should be slow, thus allowing long-term investments in applications. If business processes need to be dynamic to support the business strategy, these are most likely systems of differentiation or innovation. Define how these systems will interact with other systems of record, especially where they may form part of a wider ERP strategy (see "ERP Strategy: Why You Need One, and Key Considerations for Defining One"). Guidance for Systems of Differentiation Evaluate best-of-breed solutions against offerings from your core financial application suite vendor. Although the suite vendor offerings may offer integration benefits, choose the solutions that offer the best support for differentiated business processes. Do not be swayed by promises of integration benefits. Re-evaluate solutions in this layer every two to three years, and monitor your suite vendor's solutions. These often lag behind best-of-breed vendors, but catch up over time, or best-of-breed vendors may be acquired by suite vendors. Consider leveraging software-as-a-service (SaaS) or cloud-based delivery as a way of augmenting your systems of record (which, in most cases for FM applications, are onpremises applications). Guidance for Systems of Innovation Evaluate specialist and niche vendors equally with larger, more established vendors. Don't be swayed by vendor viability in this area; instead, work with the vendor that has the most innovative solutions, as this will drive maximum benefits. Although some applications are genuinely new and innovative (such as XBRL-enabled management reporting), most applications in this area have not been widely deployed, even though the technology may have existed for many years. For example, profitability modeling and optimization applications have not been widely deployed and usually in a tactical manner, and the more advanced optimization modeling tools have very limited penetration in the FM applications portfolio. You may need to source skills externally to help get the maximum benefit from systems of innovation, because most finance users will be unaware of the potential of these applications (as they are unlikely to have experienced them). Your vendor evaluation should include their skills capability (or that of their partners) to support a visionary implementation of their applications that will truly drive greater innovation. Figure 7 shows the recommendations for layers for FM applications. Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 15 of 18
16 Figure 7. Recommendations for Layers: FM Apps Source: Gartner (June 2011) Applications Frequently Migrate Among Layers One of the important concepts in the pace layered model is that applications are likely to move among layers. Applications frequently move "downward" through the layers, often as the functionality becomes more widely deployed and commoditized. For example, budgeting and planning functionality in CPM applications is shown as systems of differentiation in our examples because they are not widely deployed, so organizations that implement them effectively can create differentiation over their competitors. However, as more organizations deploy these applications and system integrators develop a range of best-practice deployment templates, they will become systems of record. There will be less need (and opportunity) for configuration and flexibility. Most systems of innovation will become systems of differentiation as they are more widely adopted. However, in some cases, applications that start out as systems of record may need to become systems of differentiation. For example, a manufacturing company that changes its business strategy to focus more on delivering advisory and design services to other manufacturers might find that its project costing applications become systems of differentiation, rather than systems of record. The examples above show that the migration of applications varies by company size and industry. For example, the large multinational organization has a more complex portfolio of FM applications, compared with midsize organizations. Application managers and IT strategists need to ensure that they have the right approach to connective tissue to support their application portfolio. For example, a more dynamic application portfolio will more likely require a standardsbased approach to connective tissue that does not rely too heavily on a specific application Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 16 of 18
17 vendor technology, whereas less-dynamic portfolios could make more use of integration technologies from application vendors. New Applications Should Be Classified at Point of Conception The pace layer model is not only valuable for improving the management of applications, but also can guide decisions about new applications. When the business or IT identifies the need for a new business application, either one should be able to assign it to a layer based on assumptions about its strategic focus, rate of change and process characteristics. This will determine what governance model should apply to decisions about ownership, funding, architectural standards, etc. If the determination is that this is a system of innovation, then there should be a process that ensures the elapsed time from concept to delivery is as short as possible. By contrast, a proposal for a new system of record should be subjected to intense scrutiny to determine if the process and the application satisfy a tough set of criteria around long-term value, technical stability and ROI. A pace layered strategy, and the associated governance models, should be biased to control IT spending and begin to shift the available resources from systems of record to systems of differentiation and systems of innovation. Conclusion Our hope is that clients will use the pace layer model to move beyond the tired old debates about packaged applications versus custom-developed applications, or suites versus best-of-breed applications. We believe that the right application strategy for most organizations is a hybrid model that can accommodate integrated suites, departmental point solutions and ad hoc custom applications, with a mix of on-premises and cloud deployment. The range of business requirements and the pace of technological change simply make this a necessity. Many businesses actually have this mix, but they don't have a strategy, governance model and architectural environment that embrace and support it. This research is part of a set of related research pieces. See "What Can Gartner's Pace Layered Application Strategy Do for an Enterprise's Business?" for an overview. Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 17 of 18
18 REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS Corporate Headquarters 56 Top Gallant Road Stamford, CT U.S.A European Headquarters Tamesis The Glanty Egham Surrey, TW20 9AW UNITED KINGDOM Asia/Pacific Headquarters Gartner Australasia Pty. Ltd. Level 9, 141 Walker Street North Sydney New South Wales 2060 AUSTRALIA Japan Headquarters Gartner Japan Ltd. Aobadai Hills, 6F 7-7, Aobadai, 4-chome Meguro-ku, Tokyo JAPAN Latin America Headquarters Gartner do Brazil Av. das Nações Unidas, andar World Trade Center São Paulo SP BRAZIL Publication Date: 24 June 2011/ID Number: G Page 18 of 18
2009 FEI Technology Study: CPM and BI Pose Challenges and Opportunities
Research Publication Date: 23 July 2009 ID Number: G00168896 2009 FEI Technology Study: CPM and BI Pose Challenges and Opportunities John E. Van Decker Many organizations recognize that existing financial
More information2010 FEI Technology Study: CPM and BI Show Improvement From 2009
Research Publication Date: 22 March 2010 ID Number: G00175233 2010 FEI Technology Study: CPM and BI Show Improvement From 2009 John E. Van Decker Many organizations recognize that current financial management
More information2010 Gartner FEI Technology Study: Planned Shared Services and Outsourcing to Increase
Research Publication Date: 20 April 2010 ID Number: G00176029 2010 Gartner FEI Technology Study: Planned Shared Services and Outsourcing to Increase John E. Van Decker, Cathy Tornbohm This Gartner Financial
More informationIT asset management (ITAM) will proliferate in midsize and large companies.
Research Publication Date: 2 October 2008 ID Number: G00161024 Trends on Better IT Asset Management Peter Wesche New exiting trends will lead to a higher adoption of asset management methodologies. Tighter
More informationResearch. Key Issues for Software as a Service, 2009
Research Publication Date: 6 February 2009 ID Number: G00164873 Key Issues for Software as a Service, 2009 Robert P. Desisto, Ben Pring As organizations' capital budgets dry up, clients evaluating SaaS
More informationDeliver Process-Driven Business Intelligence With a Balanced BI Platform
Research Publication Date: 12 April 2006 ID Number: G00139377 Deliver Process-Driven Business Intelligence With a Balanced BI Platform Kurt Schlegel To enable process-driven business intelligence, IT organizations
More information2009 Gartner FEI Technology Study: XBRL in the U.S. Enterprise
Research Publication Date: 23 July 2009 ID Number: G00169733 2009 Gartner FEI Technology Study: XBRL in the U.S. Enterprise John E. Van Decker Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) will be a requirement
More informationOvercoming the Gap Between Business Intelligence and Decision Support
Research Publication Date: 9 April 2009 ID Number: G00165169 Overcoming the Gap Between Business Intelligence and Decision Support Rita L. Sallam, Kurt Schlegel Although the promise of better decision
More informationThe Five Competencies of MRM 'Re-' Defined
Research Publication Date: 14 March 2008 ID Number: G00155835 The Five Competencies of MRM 'Re-' Defined Kimberly Collins This research details the five key competencies of marketing resource management
More informationERP, SCM and CRM: Suites Define the Packaged Application Market
Research Publication Date: 25 July 2008 ID Number: G00158827 ERP, SCM and CRM: Suites Define the Packaged Application Market Yvonne Genovese, Jeff Woods, James Holincheck, Nigel Rayner, Michael Maoz Users
More informationThe Value of Integrating Configuration Management Databases With Enterprise Architecture Tools
Research Publication Date: 13 January 2011 ID Number: G00210132 The Value of Integrating Configuration Management Databases With Enterprise Architecture Tools Ronni J. Colville, Patricia Adams As configuration
More informationKey Issues for Business Intelligence and Performance Management Initiatives, 2008
Research Publication Date: 14 March 2008 ID Number: G00156014 Key Issues for Business Intelligence and Performance Management Initiatives, 2008 Kurt Schlegel The Business Intelligence and Performance Management
More informationBusiness Intelligence Focus Shifts From Tactical to Strategic
Research Publication Date: 22 May 2006 ID Number: G00139352 Business Intelligence Focus Shifts From Tactical to Strategic Betsy Burton, Lee Geishecker, Kurt Schlegel, Bill Hostmann, Tom Austin, Gareth
More informationThe Lack of a CRM Strategy Will Hinder Health Insurer Growth
Industry Research Publication Date: 15 October 2008 ID Number: G00162107 The Lack of a CRM Strategy Will Hinder Health Insurer Growth Joanne Galimi The Gartner 2008 healthcare payer application survey
More informationQ&A: The Many Aspects of Private Cloud Computing
Research Publication Date: 22 October 2009 ID Number: G00171807 Q&A: The Many Aspects of Private Cloud Computing Thomas J. Bittman Cloud computing is at the Peak of Inflated Expectations on the Gartner
More informationXBRL Will Enhance Corporate Disclosure and Corporate Performance Management
Research Publication Date: 23 April 2008 ID Number: G00156910 XBRL Will Enhance Corporate Disclosure and Corporate Performance Management Nigel Rayner, Neil Chandler Extensible Business Reporting Language
More informationIntegrated Marketing Management Aligns Executional, Operational and Analytical Processes in a Closed-Loop Process
Research Publication Date: 26 October 2010 ID Number: G00207031 Integrated Marketing Management Aligns Executional, Operational and Analytical Processes in a Closed-Loop Process Kimberly Collins This research
More informationData in the Cloud: The Changing Nature of Managing Data Delivery
Research Publication Date: 1 March 2011 ID Number: G00210129 Data in the Cloud: The Changing Nature of Managing Data Delivery Eric Thoo Extendible data integration strategies and capabilities will play
More informationQ&A: The Impact of XBRL on Corporate Performance Management
Research Publication Date: 27 May 2008 ID Number: G00158184 Q&A: The Impact of XBRL on Corporate Performance Management Nigel Rayner Extensible Business Reporting Language is an XML-based standard that
More informationVendor Focus for IBM Global Services: Consulting Services for Cloud Computing
Research Publication Date: 22 February 2010 ID Number: G00174046 Vendor Focus for IBM Global Services: Consulting Services for Cloud Computing Susan Tan Amid the hype and buzz of cloud computing are very
More informationThe Current State of Agile Method Adoption
Research Publication Date: 12 December 2008 ID Number: G00163591 The Current State of Agile Method Adoption David Norton As the pace of agile adoption increases, development organizations must understand
More informationKey Issues for Identity and Access Management, 2008
Research Publication Date: 7 April 2008 ID Number: G00157012 for Identity and Access Management, 2008 Ant Allan, Earl Perkins, Perry Carpenter, Ray Wagner Gartner identity and access management research
More informationClients That Don't Segment Their Network Infrastructure Will Have Higher Costs and Increased Vendor Lock-in
Research Publication Date: 15 March 2011 ID Number: G00210952 Clients That Don't Segment Their Network Infrastructure Will Have Higher Costs and Increased Vendor Lock-in Tim Zimmerman Enterprises must
More informationKnowledge Management and Enterprise Information Management Are Both Disciplines for Exploiting Information Assets
Research Publication Date: 31 July 2009 ID Number: G00169664 Knowledge Management and Enterprise Information Management Are Both Disciplines for Exploiting Information Assets Regina Casonato This research
More informationKey Issues for Data Management and Integration, 2006
Research Publication Date: 30 March 2006 ID Number: G00138812 Key Issues for Data Management and Integration, 2006 Ted Friedman The effective management and leverage of data represent the greatest opportunity
More informationHow Eneco's Enterprisewide BI and Performance Management Initiative Delivered Significant Business Benefits
Research Publication Date: 13 June 2008 ID Number: G00158605 How Eneco's Enterprisewide BI and Performance Management Initiative Delivered Significant Business Benefits Nigel Rayner Eneco was faced with
More informationPrivate Cloud Computing: An Essential Overview
Research Publication Date: 23 November 2010 ID Number: G00209000 Private Cloud Computing: An Essential Overview Thomas J. Bittman Private cloud computing requires strong leadership and a strategic plan
More informationBest Practices for Confirming Software Inventories in Software Asset Management
Research Publication Date: 24 August 2009 ID Number: G00167067 Best Practices for Confirming Software Inventories in Software Asset Management Peter Wesche, Jane B. Disbrow This research discusses the
More informationHow To Create A Cloud Computing System
G00230221 Five Cloud Computing Trends That Will Affect Your Cloud Strategy Through 2015 Published: 10 February 2012 Analyst(s): David W. Cearley, David Mitchell Smith In this Impact Assessment, we focus
More informationAgenda for Supply Chain Strategy and Enablers, 2012
G00230659 Agenda for Supply Chain Strategy and Enablers, 2012 Published: 23 February 2012 Analyst(s): Michael Dominy, Dana Stiffler When supply chain executives establish the right strategies and enabling
More informationQ&A: How Can ERP Recurring Costs Be Contained?
Research Publication Date: 18 December 2008 ID Number: G00163030 Q&A: How Can ERP Recurring Costs Be Contained? Peter Wesche Driven by increased pressure for cost containment, attendees at the 2008 Financial
More informationManaging IT Risks During Cost-Cutting Periods
Research Publication Date: 22 October 2008 ID Number: G00162359 Managing IT Risks During Cost-Cutting Periods Mark Nicolett, Paul E. Proctor, French Caldwell To provide visibility into increased risks
More informationThe Four New Ps of Marketing That CMOs and CIOs Should Consider
G00227185 The Four New Ps of Marketing That CMOs and CIOs Should Consider Published: 18 May 2012 Analyst(s): Kimberly Collins Four new Ps of marketing align people and processes across the marketing ecosystem,
More informationThe Seven Building Blocks of MDM: A Framework for Success
Research Publication Date: 11 October 2007 ID Number: G00151496 The Seven Building Blocks of MDM: A Framework for Success John Radcliffe Gartner's Seven Building Blocks of Master Data Management (MDM)
More informationIron Mountain's acquisition of Mimosa Systems addresses concerns from prospective customers who had questions about Mimosa's long-term viability.
Research Publication Date: 22 March 2010 ID Number: G00175194 Iron Mountain Acquires Mimosa Systems Sheila Childs, Kenneth Chin, Adam W. Couture Iron Mountain offers a portfolio of solutions for cloud-based
More informationResearch. Mastering Master Data Management
Research Publication Date: 25 January 2006 ID Number: G00136958 Mastering Master Data Management Andrew White, David Newman, Debra Logan, John Radcliffe Despite vendor claims, master data management has
More informationHow BPM Can Enhance the Eight Building Blocks of CRM
Research Publication Date: 6 April 2007 ID Number: G00146588 How BPM Can Enhance the Eight Building Blocks of CRM Marc Kerremans, Jim Davies Business process management (BPM) should complement an organization's
More informationRoundup of Business Intelligence and Information Management Research, 1Q08
Gartner for IT Leaders Publication Date: 2 May 2008 ID Number: G00157226 Roundup of Business Intelligence and Information Management Research, 1Q08 Bill Hostmann This document provides a roundup of our
More informationEmbrace Virtual Assistants as Part of a Holistic Web Customer Service Strategy
Research Publication Date: 19 August 2010 ID Number: G00205618 Embrace Virtual Assistants as Part of a Holistic Web Customer Service Strategy Johan Jacobs Customers are insisting on multiple methods to
More informationEmerging PC Life Cycle Configuration Management Vendors
Research Publication Date: 20 January 2011 ID Number: G00209766 Emerging PC Life Cycle Configuration Management Vendors Terrence Cosgrove Although the PC configuration life cycle management (PCCLM) market
More informationBEA Customers Should Seek Contractual Protections Before Acquisition by Oracle
Research Publication Date: 15 February 2008 ID Number: G00155026 BEA Customers Should Seek Contractual Protections Before Acquisition by Oracle Peter Wesche, Jane B. Disbrow Oracle has announced an agreement
More informationBackup and Disaster Recovery Modernization Is No Longer a Luxury, but a Business Necessity
Research Publication Date: 11 August 2011 ID Number: G00215300 Backup and Disaster Recovery Modernization Is No Longer a Luxury, but a Business Necessity John P Morency, Donna Scott, Dave Russell For the
More informationCloud E-Mail Decision-Making Criteria for Educational Organizations
Research Publication Date: 10 June 2011 ID Number: G00213675 Cloud E-Mail Decision-Making Criteria for Educational Organizations Matthew W. Cain Educational organizations sometimes struggle to choose between
More informationReal-Time Decisions Need Corporate Performance Management
Research Publication Date: 26 April 2004 ID Number: COM-22-3674 Real-Time Decisions Need Corporate Performance Management Frank Buytendijk, Brian Wood, Mark Raskino The real-time enterprise model depends
More informationQ&A: Seven Questions Every Business Intelligence Leader Must Answer
Research Publication Date: 9 April 2008 ID Number: G00156821 Q&A: Seven Questions Every Business Intelligence Leader Must Answer Kurt Schlegel, Bill Hostmann Every business intelligence leader must answer
More informationThe Next Generation of Functionality for Marketing Resource Management
G00212759 The Next Generation of Functionality for Marketing Resource Management Published: 11 May 2011 Analyst(s): Kimberly Collins This research defines the next generation of marketing resource management
More informationIT Architecture Is Not Enterprise Architecture
Research Publication Date: 17 November 2010 ID Number: G00206910 IT Architecture Is Not Enterprise Architecture Bruce Robertson Many enterprise architecture (EA) teams and their stakeholders still use
More informationGartner's Business Intelligence and Performance Management Framework
Research Publication Date: 9 October 2006 ID Number: G00142827 Gartner's Business Intelligence and Performance Management Framework Bill Hostmann, Nigel Rayner, Ted Friedman The use of business intelligence
More informationWhen to Use Custom, Proprietary, Open-Source or Community Source Software in the Cloud
Industry Research Publication Date: 3 May 2010 ID Number: G00175030 When to Use Custom, Proprietary, Open-Source or Community Source Software in the Cloud Massimiliano Claps, Andrea Di Maio Cloud computing
More informationGartner Defines Enterprise Information Architecture
Research Publication Date: 20 February 2008 ID Number: G00154071 Gartner Defines Enterprise Information Architecture David Newman, Nicholas Gall, Anne Lapkin As organizations look for new ways to exploit
More informationCase Study: Mohawk Fine Papers Uses a CSB to Ease Adoption of Cloud Computing
Research Publication Date: 19 July 2011 ID Number: G00214537 Case Study: Mohawk Fine Papers Uses a CSB to Ease Adoption of Cloud Computing Benoit J. Lheureux Paper manufacturer Mohawk Fine Papers needed
More informationFor cloud services to deliver their promised value, they must be underpinned by effective and efficient processes.
Research Publication Date: 15 October 2010 ID Number: G00208009 ITIL 'in the Cloud' George Spafford, Ed Holub The cloud-computing delivery model is generating a lot of interest from organizations wishing
More informationGovernance Is an Essential Building Block for Enterprise Information Management
Research Publication Date: 18 May 2006 ID Number: G00139707 Governance Is an Essential Building Block for Enterprise Information Management David Newman, Debra Logan Organizations are seeking new ways
More informationMicrosoft and Google Jostle Over Cloud-Based E-Mail and Collaboration
Research Publication Date: 24 March 2008 ID Number: G00156216 Microsoft and Google Jostle Over Cloud-Based E-Mail and Collaboration Tom Austin Both Google and Microsoft come up short in terms of delivering
More informationCase Study: Lexmark Uses MDM to Turn Information Into a Business Asset
G00217757 Case Study: Lexmark Uses MDM to Turn Information Into a Business Asset Published: 22 December 2011 Analyst(s): Bill O'Kane Lexmark International undertook a master data management (MDM) program
More informationThe What, Why and When of Cloud Computing
Research Publication Date: 4 June 2009 ID Number: G00168582 The What, Why and When of Cloud Computing David Mitchell Smith, Daryl C. Plummer, David W. Cearley Cloud computing continues to gain visibility.
More informationEnterprise Asset Management Migration Requires Detailed Planning
Research Publication Date: 2 September 2005 ID Number: G00130205 Enterprise Asset Management Migration Requires Detailed Planning Kristian Steenstrup Neglecting to address key areas when migrating to packaged
More informationThe Hype Around an Integrated Talent Management Suite Outpaces Customer Adoption
Research Publication Date: 3 February 2009 ID Number: G00164356 The Hype Around an Integrated Talent Management Suite Outpaces Customer Adoption James Holincheck Gartner surveyed 123 customer references
More informationSingapore Empowers Land Transport Planners With Data Warehouse
G00219502 Singapore Empowers Land Transport Planners With Data Warehouse Published: 18 October 2011 Analyst(s): Eric Thoo The Land Transport Authority (LTA) of Singapore wanted to improve planning and
More informationRecognize the Importance of Digital Marketing
Recognize the Importance of Digital Marketing Laura McLellan, Lead Author Laura McLellan, Laura McLellan serves CMOs and other marketing executives, sharing how digital strategies are being integrated
More informationDiscovering the Value of Unified Communications
Research Publication Date: 12 February 2007 ID Number: G00144673 Discovering the Value of Unified Communications Bern Elliot, Steve Cramoysan Unified communications represent a broad range of new solutions
More informationToolkit: Reduce Dependence on Desk-Side Support Technicians
Gartner for IT Leaders Publication Date: 23 April 2007 ID Number: G00147075 Toolkit: Reduce Dependence on Desk-Side Support Technicians David M. Coyle, Terrence Cosgrove The IT service desk and PC life
More informationTransactional HR self-service applications typically get implemented first because they typically automate manual, error-prone processes.
Research Publication Date: 28 August 2008 ID Number: G00159897 HR Self-Service Applications Defined James Holincheck In this research, we discuss the different types of HR self-service and strategies for
More informationSurvey Analysis: Adoption of Cloud ERP, 2013 Through 2023
G00261104 Survey Analysis: Adoption of Cloud ERP, 2013 Through 2023 Published: 24 January 2014 Analyst(s): Nigel Rayner This Gartner Research Circle survey conducted in September 2013 shows that some organizations
More informationCost Optimization: Three Steps to Saving Money on Maintenance and Support for Network Security Products
Research Publication Date: 10 December 2008 ID Number: G00163195 Cost Optimization: Three Steps to Saving Money on Maintenance and Support for Network Security Products Lawrence Orans, Greg Young Most
More informationCase Study for Supply Chain Leaders: Dell's Transformative Journey Through Supply Chain Segmentation
Research Publication Date: 12 November 2010 ID Number: G00208603 Case Study for Supply Chain Leaders: Dell's Transformative Journey Through Supply Chain Segmentation Matthew Davis Faced with ever-changing
More informationCase Study: A K-12 Portal Project at the Miami-Dade County Public Schools
Industry Research Publication Date: 31 December 2007 ID Number: G00154138 Case Study: A K-12 Portal Project at the Miami-Dade County Public Schools Bill Rust The Miami-Dade County Public Schools a school
More informationBusiness Intelligence Platform Usage and Quality Dynamics, 2008
Research Publication Date: 2 July 2008 ID Number: G00159043 Business Intelligence Platform Usage and Quality Dynamics, 2008 James Richardson This report gives results from a survey of attendees at Gartner's
More informationInvest in an analysis of current metrics and those missing, and develop a plan for continuous management and improvement.
Research Publication Date: 29 April 2008 ID Number: G00154802 Key Metrics for IT Service and Support David M. Coyle, Kris Brittain To evaluate IT service and support performance, senior management must
More informationResearch Agenda and Key Issues for Converged Infrastructure, 2006
Research Publication Date: 20 July 2006 ID Number: G00141507 Research Agenda and Key Issues for Converged Infrastructure, 2006 Sylvain Fabre Gartner's research will cover fixed-mobile convergence, the
More informationThe IT Service Desk Market Is Ready for SaaS
Research Publication Date: 17 April 2009 ID Number: G00166526 The IT Service Desk Market Is Ready for SaaS David M. Coyle The IT service desk market is well-positioned to use the software-as-a-service
More informationCase Study: New South Wales State Department of Education Adopts Gmail for 1.2 Million Students
Industry Research Publication Date: 26 January 2010 ID Number: G00172722 Case Study: New South Wales State Department of Education Adopts Gmail for 1.2 Million Students Steve Bittinger Australia's New
More informationEvaluating Microsoft, Oracle and SAP CRM Application Strategy
Research Publication Date: 8 October 2009 ID Number: G00170698 Evaluating Microsoft, Oracle and SAP CRM Application Strategy Michael Maoz, Kimberly Collins, Robert P. Desisto The quality of the customer
More informationTactical Guideline: Minimizing Risk in E-Mail Hosting Relationships
Research Publication Date: 26 February 2008 ID Number: G00154838 Tactical Guideline: Minimizing Risk in E-Mail Hosting Relationships Matthew W. Cain This report discusses the often hidden risks in moving
More informationResponsible Vulnerability Disclosure: Guidance for Researchers, Vendors and End Users
Research Publication Date: 17 October 2006 ID Number: G00144061 Responsible Vulnerability Disclosure: Guidance for Researchers, Vendors and End Users Amrit T. Williams, John Pescatore, Paul E. Proctor
More informationAn outline of the five critical components of a CRM vision and how they contribute to an enterprise's CRM success
Research Publication Date: 1 March 2007 ID Number: G00146362 How to Create a Powerful CRM Vision Gene Alvarez This research provides: Guidance on how to develop a CRM vision An outline of the five critical
More informationThe EA process and an ITG process should be closely linked, and both efforts should leverage the work and results of the other.
Research Publication Date: 4 April 2008 ID Number: G00155260 Integrate EA and IT Governance s Betsy Burton, R. Scott Bittler, Cassio Dreyfuss In many organizations, we find that IT governance (ITG) initiatives
More informationIT Operational Considerations for Cloud Computing
Research Publication Date: 13 June 2008 ID Number: G00157184 IT Operational Considerations for Cloud Computing Donna Scott Cloud computing market offerings increase the options available to source IT services.
More informationSalesforce.com's Chatter: Facebook-Like Feel for CRM Applications
Research Publication Date: 24 February 2011 ID Number: G00210748 Salesforce.com's Chatter: Facebook-Like Feel for CRM Applications Robert P. Desisto, Michael Maoz Salesforce.com attempts to use principles
More informationIn the North American E-Signature Market, SaaS Offerings Are Increasingly in Demand
Research Publication Date: 18 August 2011 ID Number: G00215378 In the North American E-Signature Market, SaaS Offerings Are Increasingly in Demand Gregg Kreizman Enterprises are becoming increasing comfortable
More informationGartner's View on 'Bring Your Own' in Client Computing
G00217298 Gartner's View on 'Bring Your Own' in Client Computing Published: 20 October 2011 Analyst(s): Leif-Olof Wallin Here, we bring together recently published research covering the hot topic of supporting
More informationUnderstanding Vulnerability Management Life Cycle Functions
Research Publication Date: 24 January 2011 ID Number: G00210104 Understanding Vulnerability Management Life Cycle Functions Mark Nicolett We provide guidance on the elements of an effective vulnerability
More informationApplying Pace Layering to ERP Strategy
Applying Pace Layering to ERP Strategy Published: 27 January 2012 ID:G00227719 Analyst(s): Nigel Rayner VIEW SUMMARY Most organizations struggle to implement an effective ERP strategy. Gartner's Pace-Layered
More informationCase Study: The State of Ohio Delivers Business Intelligence With a 'Think Global, Act Local' Organizational Model
Research Publication Date: 28 January 2011 ID Number: G00209076 Case Study: The State of Ohio Delivers Business Intelligence With a 'Think Global, Act Local' Organizational Model Kurt Schlegel This case
More informationDocument the IT Service Portfolio Before Creating the IT Service Catalog
Research Publication Date: 8 January 2009 ID Number: G00163200 Document the IT Service Portfolio Before Creating the IT Service Catalog Debra Curtis, Kris Brittain IT service portfolios and IT service
More informationCloud IaaS: Service-Level Agreements
G00210096 Cloud IaaS: Service-Level Agreements Published: 7 March 2011 Analyst(s): Lydia Leong Cloud infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) providers typically offer SLAs that cover the various elements of
More informationModify Your Storage Backup Plan to Improve Data Management and Reduce Cost
G00238815 Modify Your Storage Backup Plan to Improve Data Management and Reduce Cost Published: 4 October 2012 Analyst(s): Dave Russell IT leaders and storage managers must rethink their backup procedures
More informationData Center Consolidation Projects: Benefits and Pitfalls
Research Publication Date: 2 May 2011 ID Number: G00212148 Data Center Consolidation Projects: Benefits and Pitfalls David J. Cappuccio This research outlines the primary success factors in consolidation
More informationGovernment 2.0 is both citizen-driven and employee-centric, and is both transformational and evolutionary.
Industry Research Publication Date: 11 November 2009 ID Number: G00172423 Government 2.0: Gartner Definition Andrea Di Maio Given the increasing confusion and hype surrounding Government 2.0, it is important
More informationMake the maturity model part of the effort to educate senior management, so they understand the phases of the EIM journey.
Research Publication Date: 5 December 2008 ID Number: G00160425 Gartner Introduces the EIM Maturity Model David Newman, Debra Logan Organizations cannot implement enterprise information management (EIM)
More informationUse These Guidelines for Making Better CRM Consulting Provider Selections
Research Publication Date: 7 July 2006 ID Number: G00141062 Use These Guidelines for Making Better CRM Consulting Provider Selections Matthew Goldman, Ed Thompson, Lorrie Scardino Gartner sees many inconsistencies
More informationAdditional Tools for a World-Class ERP Infrastructure
G00219770 Additional Tools for a World-Class ERP Infrastructure Published: 28 October 2011 Analyst(s): Pat Phelan, Derek Prior This research provides a guide to the infrastructure elements that are needed
More informationOrganizations Must Employ Effective Data Security Strategies
Research Publication Date: 30 August 2005 ID Number: G00123639 Organizations Must Employ Effective Data Security Strategies Rich Mogull Organizations can best protect data through a hierarchical data security
More informationThe Six Triggers for Using Data Center Infrastructure Management Tools
G00230904 The Six Triggers for Using Data Center Infrastructure Management Tools Published: 29 February 2012 Analyst(s): Rakesh Kumar This research outlines the six main triggers for users to start using
More informationMicrosoft's Cloud Vision Reaches for the Stars but Is Grounded in Reality
Research Publication Date: 4 November 2008 ID Number: G00162793 Microsoft's Cloud Vision Reaches for the Stars but Is Grounded in Reality David Mitchell Smith, Neil MacDonald At Professional Developers
More informationEnergy savings from well-managed data centers can reduce operating expenses by as much as 20%.
Research Publication Date: 29 March 2010 ID Number: G00174769 DCIM: Going Beyond IT David J. Cappuccio Infrastructure and operations (I&O) leaders must now go beyond performance management of IT equipment
More informationContainers and Modules: Is This the Future of the Data Center?
Research Publication Date: 8 April 2011 ID Number: G00211139 Containers and Modules: Is This the Future of the Data Center? David J. Cappuccio Modular and container-based data centers have emerged as yet
More informationConsider Identity and Access Management as a Process, Not a Technology
Research Publication Date: 2 September 2005 ID Number: G00129998 Consider and Management as a Process, Not a Technology Earl L. Perkins, Ant Allan This Research Note complements earlier Gartner research
More informationRepurposing Old PCs as Thin Clients as a Way to Save Money
Research Publication Date: 30 March 2009 ID Number: G00166341 Repurposing Old PCs as Thin Clients as a Way to Save Money Mark A. Margevicius, Stephen Kleynhans Tough economic times are forcing customers
More informationOrganizations Should Implement Web Application Security Scanning
Research Publication Date: 21 September 2005 ID Number: G00130869 Organizations Should Implement Web Application Security Scanning Amrit T. Williams, Neil MacDonald Web applications are prone to vulnerabilities
More information