1 Section X Table of Contents 1. Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with juvenile justice case processing Using a non-adversarial approach, prosecution and defense counsel, and others promote public safety while protecting the rights of participants Juvenile drug courts emphasize early identification and placement of eligible participants Juvenile drug courts provide access to a continuum of alcohol, drug, and other related treatment and rehabilitation services Abstinence is monitored by frequent alcohol and other drug testing A coordinated strategy governs responses from the juvenile drug court to each participant s performance and progress Ongoing judicial interaction with each juvenile drug court participant is essential Monitoring and evaluation measure the achievement of program goals and gauge effectiveness Continuing interdisciplinary education promotes effective juvenile drug court planning, implementation, and operations Forging partnerships among juvenile drug courts, public agencies, and community-based organizations generates local support and enhances juvenile drug court program effectiveness....72
2 60 Section X Preface As most juvenile justice practitioners know all too well, the populations and caseloads of juvenile court dockets have changed dramatically over the past decade. The nature of both the delinquent acts and dependency matters being handled has become more complex and includes escalating degrees of substance abuse. Practitioners in the juvenile justice system recognize that the situations bringing many juveniles under the court's jurisdiction are frequently linked with substance abuse and complicated often multigenerational, family, and personal problems. These associated problems must be addressed if the pattern of youth crime and family dysfunction is to be reversed. Many justice system practitioners also recognize that, insofar as substance abuse problems are an issue, the juvenile and criminal dockets are increasingly handling the same types of situations and often the same litigants. The juvenile court has traditionally been considered an institution specifically established to address the juvenile's needs holistically. However, many juvenile court practitioners have found the traditional approach to be ineffective when applied to the problems of substance-abusing juvenile offenders. During the past several years, a number of jurisdictions have looked to the Drug Court Model to determine how juvenile courts might incorporate a therapeutic approach to deal with the increasing population of substance-abusing juveniles more effectively. Development of juvenile drug courts can be a complex task. Juvenile drug courts require the involvement of many agencies and community representatives. For example, most programs characterize the extent of drug use among the participating juveniles as increasingly more severe. Most programs also report the age at first use among participants to be between 10 and 14 years of age, although earlier use is being detected. During 1995 and 1996, when juvenile drug courts first began, participants reported alcohol and marijuana as their primary drugs of choice. However, more recently there appears to be increasing use of other substances, particularly methamphetamine, crack/cocaine, heroin, toxic inhalants, and prescription drugs. Purpose These standards are recommended to provide a general framework of common principles, policies, and practices for juvenile and family drug courts in Georgia. They present a single orientation from which the judicial branch, including judges and all court personnel, can work with prosecutors, the defense bar, corrections officials, local government, law enforcement, department of social services, and public and private treatment providers to address problems of substance abuse which pervade the court system's criminal and abuse and neglect caseload. The steps are stated broadly in order to leave room for each juvenile and family drug court to meet local needs. This structure of standards and practices will: Minimize duplication of efforts and ensure greater coordination among all court supervised juvenile drug court programs throughout Georgia Maximize coordination and sharing of scarce treatment resources Strengthen efforts to obtain federal funding Facilitate development of coordinated long-range plans for financing drug treatment court operations. 1 1 Background information obtained from a report prepared by the Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project at the American University, Washington, D.C.
3 61 1. Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with juvenile justice case processing. 1.1 Pursuant to O.C.G.A , each juvenile drug court shall establish a planning group to create a work plan for the court. The work plan shall address the operational, coordination, resource, information management, and evaluation needs of the juvenile drug court and shall include all policies and practices related to implementing the standards set forth in this document. 1.2 The juvenile drug court team should include, at a minimum, the following representatives: judge, public defender, prosecutor, program coordinator, law enforcement or probation, and treatment provider/substance abuse professional. 1.3 The juvenile drug court team shall collaboratively develop, review, and agree upon all aspects of drug court operations (mission, goals, eligibility criteria, operating procedures, performance measures, orientation, drug testing, and program structure guidelines) prior to commencement of program operations. 1.4 This plan is executed in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between all team members and updated annually as necessary. 1.5 Each of these elements shall be compiled in writing in the form of a Policies and Procedures Manual which is reviewed and updated as necessary no less than every two years. 1.6 The goals of juvenile drug court programs in Georgia shall include compliance with local program requirements, participation in treatment, employment, educational achievement, restitution to the victim or to the community, and declining incidence of alcohol land/or other drug use, with eventual long term recovery. 1.7 All members of the juvenile drug court team are expected to attend and participate in a minimum of two formal staffings per month. 1.8 Members of the juvenile drug court team should attend drug court sessions. 1.9 Standardized evidence-based treatments, as recommended in the Juvenile Drug Court Treatment Standards (Section X), shall be adopted by the juvenile drug court to ensure quality and effectiveness of services and to guide practice Juvenile drug courts should provide for a continuum of services through a partnership with a primary treatment provider to deliver treatment, coordinate other ancillary services, and make referrals as necessary The juvenile drug court shall maintain ongoing communication with the treatment provider. The treatment provider should regularly and systematically provide the court with written reports on participant progress; a reporting schedule shall be agreed upon by the drug court team and put in writing as part of the court s operating procedures. Reports should be provided on a weekly basis and within 24 hours as significant events occur. Significant events include but are not limited to the following: death; unexplained absence of a participant from a residence or treatment program; incidents of drug/alcohol use; physical, sexual, or verbal abuse of a participant by staff or other clients; staff negligence; fire, theft, destruction or other loss of property; complaints from a participant or his/her family; requests for information from the press, attorneys, or government officials outside of those connected to the court; and participant behavior requiring attention of staff not usually involved in his/her care.
4 Participants should have contact with case management personnel (juvenile drug court staff or treatment representative) at least once per week during the first twelve months of treatment to review status of treatment and progress. Additionally, a juvenile drug court should consider including a school liaison on the team to provide information, help youth enroll in school or alternative programs, help youth take proficiency exams if applicable, and help youth set goals to increase engagement in school or graduate.
5 63 2. Using a non-adversarial approach, the judge, prosecution, defense counsel, and others promote public safety while protecting the rights of participants. 2.1 Prosecution and defense counsel shall both be members of the juvenile drug court team and shall participate in the design, implementation, and enforcement of the program s screening, eligibility, and case-processing policies and procedures. 2.2 The prosecutor and defense counsel shall work to create a sense of stability, cooperation, and collaboration in pursuit of the program s goals. 2.3 The prosecution or other designated team member shall review cases and determine whether a juvenile is eligible for the drug court program; file all required legal documents; participate in and enforce a consistent and formal system of sanctions in response to positive drug tests and other participant noncompliance; agree that a positive drug test or open court admission of drug use will not result in the filing of additional drug charges based on that admission; and make decisions regarding the participant s continued enrollment in the program based on progress and response to treatment rather than on legal aspects of the case, with the exception of additional criminal behavior. 2.4 The defense counsel shall review the arrest warrant, affidavits, charging document, and other relevant information, and review all program documents (i.e., waivers, written agreements); advise the juvenile as to the nature and purpose of the juvenile drug court, the rules governing participation, the merits of the program, the consequences of failing to abide by the rules, and how participation or nonparticipation will affect his/her interests; provide a list of and explain all of the rights that the juvenile will temporarily or permanently relinquish; advise the participants on alternative options, including all legal and treatment alternatives outside of the drug court program; discuss with the juvenile the long-term benefits of sobriety; explain that the prosecution has agreed that admission to drug use in open court will not lead to additional charges, and therefore encourage truthfulness with the judge and treatment staff; and inform the participant that they will be expected to take an active role in court sessions, including speaking directly to the judge as opposed to doing so through an attorney. 2.5 Pursuant to O.C.G.A , juvenile drug courts may accept offenders with non-drug charges. 2.6 For any participant whose charges include a property crime, the court must comply with the requirements and provisions set forth in the Crime Victims Bill of Rights (O.C.G.A , et seq.). 2.7 All participants shall receive a participant handbook upon accepting the terms of participation and entering the program. Receipt of handbook shall be acknowledged through a signed form, developed by the Judicial Council Accountability Court Committee, with an executed copy placed in the court file maintained locally. 2.8 Each juvenile drug court shall develop and use a form, or adopt the model created by the Judicial Council Accountability Court Committee, to document that each participant has received counsel from an attorney prior to admittance to a drug court, including the receipt of the local participant agreement with an executed copy placed in the official court file maintained locally. 2.9 Some juvenile drug courts may be involuntary in that the juvenile and his family are ordered to be part of the program. If the juvenile drug court is involuntary, there should not be any coerced participation in a juvenile drug court, such as giving eligible offenders the choice between an onerous disposition and participation in the program The decision to participate in a juvenile drug court shall not be influenced by offering a dispositional alternative more grueling or demanding to eligible offenders than that which is offered in cases where drug court participation is not an option.
6 The judge, on the record, must apprise a participant of all due process rights, rights being waived, any process for reasserting those rights, and program expectations Terminations from juvenile drug court require notice, a hearing, and a fair procedure. Not covered by this requirement is when a participant self-terminates, and this situation does not require any type of pre-termination hearing The consequences of termination from a juvenile drug court should be comparable to those sustained in other similar cases before the presiding judge. The sentence shall be reasonable and not excessively punitive solely based on termination from juvenile drug court Termination hearings conducted for juvenile drug court participants shall include all due process rights afforded to any offender serving a probated sentence.
7 65 3. Juvenile drug courts emphasize early identification and placement of eligible participants. 3.1 Participant eligibility requirements/criteria (verified through legal and clinical screening) shall be developed and agreed upon by all members of the juvenile drug court team and included in writing as part of the program s policies and procedures. 3.2 Juvenile drug courts may admit eligible participants pre-plea, post-plea, or operate under a hybrid model. 3.3 Screening for program eligibility shall include the review of legal requirements and clinical appropriateness, including the administration of a risk and needs assessment. 3.4 Risk assessment factors that are crucial in determining a participant s suitability for the juvenile drug court, such as family and community ties, mental health status, employment status, educational level, and prior criminal history, are weighed by the juvenile drug court team on a case-bycase basis. 3.5 Members of the juvenile drug court team and other designated court or criminal justice officials shall screen cases for eligibility and identify potential juvenile drug court participants. 3.6 Participants being considered for a juvenile drug court shall be promptly advised about the program, including the requirements, scope, and potential benefits and effects on their case. 3.7 Participants should begin treatment as soon as possible; preferably, no more than 30 days should pass between a participant being determined eligible for the program and commencement of treatment services. 3.8 Assessment for substance abuse and other treatment shall be conducted by appropriately trained and qualified professional staff using standardized assessment tools. 3.9 Juvenile drug courts shall maintain an appropriate caseload based on their capacity to effectively serve all participants according to these standards No potential participant shall be excluded solely on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, creed, age, national origin, ancestry, pregnancy, marital or parental status, sexual orientation, or disability Each participant and the participant s parent or guardian shall consult with a defense attorney and review all juvenile drug court requests.
8 66 4. Juvenile drug courts provide access to a continuum of alcohol, drug, and other related treatment and rehabilitation services. 4.1 Juvenile drug court programs should last a minimum of 12 months and should not exceed 24 months; a minimum of 18 months is considered best practice. Exceptions to the 24-month maximum may be made based on participant progress and/or additional violations following a 24-month evaluation and assessment, to be followed up every four months thereafter and not to exceed a total program length of 36 months. A formal report of each assessment following 24 months shall be added to a participant s file to justify extension of the program. 4.2 Juvenile drug court programs should be structured into a series of phases. The final phase may be categorized as aftercare/continuing care. 4.3 Juvenile drug court programs shall offer a comprehensive range of core alcohol and drug treatment services. These services include: (1) Group counseling (2) Individual counseling (3) Drug testing. 4.4 Juvenile drug court programs should ideally offer: (1) Family counseling (2) Gender specific counseling (3) Educational counseling and assistance (4) Domestic violence counseling (5) Mental health screening (6) Assessment and counseling for co-occurring mental health issues (7) Risk and needs assessment (e.g. LSI-R, etc.) (8) CBT curricula geared towards Relapse Prevention and Criminal Thinking (evidencebased practices). 4.5 Ancillary services are available to meet the needs of participants. These services may include but are not limited to: (1) Employment counseling and assistance (2) Educational component (3) Medical and dental care referrals and assistance (4) Transportation (5) Housing needs (6) Mentoring (7) Alumni groups. 4.6 Case management plans shall be individualized for each participant based on the results of the initial assessment; ongoing assessment shall be provided according to a program schedule and treatment plans may be modified or adjusted based on results. 4.7 A review process or set of quality controls shall be in place to ensure accountability of the treatment provider.
9 67 5. Abstinence is monitored by frequent alcohol and other drug testing. 5.1 Participants shall be administered a drug test a minimum of twice per week during the first two phases of the program; a standardized system of drug testing shall continue through the entirety of the program. 5.2 Drug testing shall be administered to each participant on a random selection basis. 5.3 All juvenile drug courts shall utilize urinalysis as the primary method of drug testing; a variety of alternative methods may be used to supplement urinalysis, including breath, hair, and saliva testing and electronic monitoring. 5.4 All drug testing shall be directly observed by an authorized, same sex member of the drug court team, a licensed/certified medical professional, or other approved official of the same sex. 5.5 Results of all drug tests should be available to the court and action should be taken as soon as possible, ideally within 48 hours of receiving the results. 5.6 In the event a single urine sample tests positive for more than one prohibited substance, the results shall be considered as a single positive drug screen. 5.7 A minimum of 90 days negative drug testing shall be required prior to a participant being deemed eligible for graduation from the program. 5.8 Each juvenile drug court shall establish a method for participants to dispute the results of positive drug screens through either gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, liquid chromatographymass spectrometry, or some other equivalent protocol. 5.9 Creatinine violations and scheduled drug screens missed without a valid excuse, as determined by the presiding judge, may be considered as a positive drug screen.
10 68 6. A coordinated strategy governs responses from the juvenile drug court to each participant s performance and progress. 6.1 A juvenile drug court shall have a formal system of sanctions and rewards, including a system for reporting noncompliance, established in writing and included in the court s policies and procedures. 6.2 The formal system of sanctions and rewards shall be organized on a gradually escalating scale and applied in a consistent and appropriate manner to match a participant s level of compliance. 6.3 Juvenile drug courts should implement a system for a minimum level of field supervision for each participant based on their respective level of risk. Field supervision may include unannounced visits to home or school and curfew checks. The level of field supervision may be adjusted throughout the program based on participant progress and any reassessment process. 6.4 Regular and frequent communication between all members of the juvenile drug court team shall provide for immediate and swift responses to all incidents of noncompliance, including positive drug tests. 6.5 Responses to compliance and noncompliance (including criteria for expulsion) are explained orally and provided in writing to juvenile drug treatment court participants during their orientation. Periodic reminders are given throughout the treatment process. 6.6 There shall be no indefinite time periods for sanctions, including those sanctions involving incarceration or detention. Incarceration or detention should only be considered as the last option in the most serious cases of noncompliance. 6.7 Participants shall be subject to progressive positive drug screen sanctions prior to being considered for termination, unless there are other acts of noncompliance affecting this decision.
11 69 7. Ongoing judicial interaction with each juvenile drug court participant is essential. 7.1 A single juvenile court judge or associate juvenile court judge must preside over an individual juvenile drug court program and should be committed to serving in this role long-term. 7.2 The judge shall attend and participate in all pre-court staffings. 7.3 A regular schedule of status hearings shall be used to monitor participant progress. 7.4 There shall be a minimum of two status hearings per month in the first phase of juvenile drug court programs and, dependent on participant needs, this minimum schedule may continue through additional phases. 7.5 Frequency of status hearings may vary based on participant needs and benefits, as well as judicial resources. Status hearings should be held no less than once per month during the last phase of the program. 7.6 Status review shall be conducted with each participant on an individual basis; to optimize program effectiveness, group reviews should be avoided unless necessary based on an emergency. 7.7 The judge, to the extent possible, should strive to spend an average of three minutes or greater with each participant during status review.
12 70 8. Monitoring and evaluation measure the achievement of program goals and gauge effectiveness. 8.1 The goals of the juvenile drug court program are described concretely and in measurable terms. Minimum goals are: (1) Reducing drug addiction and drug dependency (2) Reducing crime (3) Reducing recidivism (4) Reducing drug-related court workloads (5) Increasing personal, familial, and societal accountability among participants (6) Promoting effective planning and use of resources among the criminal justice and social services systems and community agencies (7) Encouraging education by reducing truancy, reducing dropout rates, and increasing the number of juveniles receiving diplomas, GEDs, and completing vocational programs. 8.2 Participant progress, success, and satisfaction should be monitored on a regular basis (including at program entry and graduation) through the use of surveys. 8.3 Participant data should be monitored and analyzed on a regular basis (as set forth in a formal schedule) to determine the effectiveness of the program. 8.4 A process and outcomes evaluation should be conducted by an independent evaluator within three years of implementation of a juvenile drug court program and in regular intervals as necessary, appropriate, and/or feasible for the program thereafter. 8.5 Feedback from participant surveys, review of participant data, and findings from evaluations should be used to make any necessary modifications to program operations, procedures, and practices. 8.6 Data needed for program monitoring and management are easily obtainable and are maintained in useful formats for regular review by program management. 8.7 Juvenile drug courts should use the preferred case management program, or compatible equivalent, as designated by the Judicial Council Accountability Court Committee, in the interest of the formal and systematic collection of program performance data. 8.8 Juvenile drug courts shall collect, at a minimum, a mandatory set of performance measures determined by the Judicial Council Accountability Court Committee which shall be provided in a timely requisite format to the Administrative Office of the Courts as required by the Judicial Council Accountability Court Committee, including a comprehensive end-of-year report. The minimum performance measures to be collected shall include: recidivism (re-arrests and reconvictions), number of moderate and high risk participants, drug testing results, drug testing failures, number of days of continuous sobriety, units of service (number of court sessions, number of days participant receives inpatient treatment), employment, successful participant completion of the program (graduations), and unsuccessful participant completion of the program (terminations, voluntary withdrawal, death/other).
13 71 9. Continuing interdisciplinary education promotes effective juvenile drug court planning, implementation, and operations. 9.1 Juvenile drug court programs shall have a formal policy on staff training requirements and continuing education. 9.2 All members of a juvenile drug court team shall receive training through the National Drug Court Institute if offered for juvenile drug courts and funding is available. 9.3 Completion of the National Drug Court Planning Initiative, if offered for juvenile drug courts, shall be required prior to implementation in order to attain certification. 9.4 Existing programs should participate in Juvenile Drug Court Operational Tune-Up, as needed. 9.5 Court teams, to the extent possible, should attend comprehensive training on an annual basis, as provided by the Judicial Council Accountability Court Committee, the National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP), and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ). Comprehensive training may also include a technical assistance component (facilitated site-visits, implementation and educational goal development for program enhancement, and strategic planning meetings). 9.6 Juvenile drug court judges and staff should participate in ongoing continuing education as available through professional organizations (ICJE, NADCP, GCCA, etc.). 9.7 New team members shall attend formal orientation and training administered by the Judicial Council Accountability Court Committee or the National Association of Drug Court Professionals(NADCP). If possible, a codified transition policy should be in place for new team members. 9.8 Juvenile drug court staff should participate in ongoing cultural competency training on an annual basis.
14 Forging partnerships among juvenile drug courts, public agencies, and community-based organizations generates local support and enhances drug court program effectiveness Pursuant to O.C.G.A , each juvenile drug court shall establish a planning group to create a work plan for the court. The work plan shall address the operational, coordination, resource, information management, and evaluation needs of the court and shall include all policies and practices related to implementing the standards set forth in this document A local steering committee consisting of representatives from the court, community organizations, law enforcement, treatment providers, health providers, social service agencies, and the faith community should meet at a minimum three times per year to provide policy guidance, fundraising assistance, and feedback to the drug court program Juvenile drug courts should consider forming an independent 501(c)3 organization for fundraising and administration of the steering committee Juvenile drug courts should actively engage in forming partnerships and building relationships between the court and various community partners. This may be achieved through facilitation of forums, informational sessions, public outreach, and other ways of marketing. It is recommended that the team meet every six months to do community mapping to help forge partnerships in the community.
Section I Table of Contents 1. Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing....3 2. Using a non-adversarial approach, prosecution and defense counsel
Section V Table of Contents 1. DUI/Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing....31 2. Using a non-adversarial approach, prosecution and defense
JUVENILE DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA Adopted December 15, 2005 (REVISED 10/07) PREFACE * As most juvenile justice practitioners know only too well, the populations and caseloads
DUI DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA ADOPTED October 2006 (REVISED) PREFACE During the past fifteen years, a quiet revolution has occurred within the criminal justice system. The
As required by O.C.G.A. 15-1-16, to receive state appropriated funds adult mental health courts must be certified by the Judicial Council of Georgia (Council). The certification process is part of an effort
ATLANTIC JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DRUG COURT History The Atlantic Judicial Circuit began exploring the possibility of a Drug Court in 2008 under the leadership of Superior Court Judge D. Jay Stewart. A planning
Specialty Courts 101 Developed by: National Drug Court Institute (NDCI) Presented by: Carolyn Hardin, Senior Director NDCI, March1, 2011 The following presentation may not be copied in whole or in part
Pierce County Drug Court Established September 2004 Policies and Procedures Updated September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Drug Court Team II. Mission Statement III. The Drug Court Model IV. Target Population
Montgomery County VETERANS TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM Montgomery County VETERANS TREATMENT COURT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Montgomery County Veterans Treatment Court is to assist Veterans and their
SPECIAL OPTIONS SERVICES PROGRAM UNITED STATES PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK February 4, 2013 1 I. Introduction The Special Options Services (SOS) Program was established in the
Drug Court Handbook Mission Statement Drug Courts in the 7th Judicial District will strive to reduce recidivism of alcohol & drug offenders in the criminal justice system and provide community protection
VETERANS TREATMENT COURTS Jay E. Town Prosecutor, State of Alabama AWP, Board of Directors BRIEF HISTORY OF VTCs Began in Buffalo, New York in 2008 Drug Court Model Judge Robert Russell Multiple Awards
Utah Juvenile Drug Court Certification Checklist May, 2014 Draft Standards followed by an R are required features of a drug court, and adherence to these standards is required for certification. Standards
Juvenile and Family Drug Courts: An Overview Prepared by the Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project The Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse
ENROLLED Regular Session, 1997 HOUSE BILL NO. 2412 BY REPRESENTATIVE JACK SMITH AN ACT To enact Chapter 33 of Title 13 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 13:5301 through 5304,
KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES I. MISSION The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce the
ARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES (a) Mission: The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce
The FUNDAMENTALS Of DRUG TREATMENT COURT Hon. Patrick C. Bowler, Ret. Drug Treatment Courts A New Way Partner with Treatment Transform Roles Non-adversarial/Team Shared Goal of Recovery Communication Immediate
9-23-1. Short title This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Alyce Griffin Clarke Drug Court Act. HISTORY: SOURCES: Laws, 2003, ch. 515, 1, eff from and after July 1, 2003. 9-23-3. Legislative
Program Handbook Cabell County Drug Court SCA Treatment Court Form 200 SR DCT Page 1 of 9 What is Drug Court? West Virginia s Cabell County Drug Court is a collaborative effort of legal, mental health,
THE NORFOLK COUNTY VETERANS TREATMENT COURT INFORMATION PACKET BRIEF INTRODUCTION Thank you for your interest in the Norfolk County Veterans Treatment Court. This packet of information is intended to provide
Mercyhurst College Civic Institute ERIE COUNTY TREATMENT COURT YEAR 1: Mental Health Court Status Report April 2003 Published by: Mercyhurst Civic Institute Emily Reitenbach Art Amann TABLE OF CONTENTS
Northeast Wisconsin Veteran s Treatment Court Participant Handbook The 8 th Judicial District is comprised of: Brown, Door, Kewaunee, Marinette, Oconto, Outagamie and Waupaca Counties. Established 2011
VETERANS TREATMENT COURTS BEST PRACTICE ELEMENTS SUBJECT: States can facilitate the development of Veterans Treatment Courts, or VTCs, through legislation that supplements existing drug and mental health
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 4.16 CRIMINAL ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS PROGRAM In order to provide for successful completion of community supervision and reduce victimization
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS GUIDELINE FOR FEDERAL PROSECUTORS November 8, 2012 DRUG TREATMENT COURTS Purpose  The purpose of this guideline is to advise federal Crown counsel of the
SHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency. STATE OF OKLAHOMA 2nd Session of the 45th Legislature (1996) SENATE BILL NO. 1153 By: Hobson AS INTRODUCED
MISSISSIPPI DRUG COURT RULES As Promulgated By The State Drug Court Advisory Committee MISSISSIPPI DRUG COURT RULES As promulgated by the STATE DRUG COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Distributed by the Administrative
Fina~~26/ll Denver Sobriety Court Program Memorandum of Agreement Introduction The Denver Sobriety Court (Sobriety Court) was established in 2010 through efforts of the Crime Prevention and Control Commission
CORE COMPETENCIES GUIDE VETERANS TREATMENT COURT PLANNING INITIATIVE TRAININGS VETERANS TREATMENT COURT JUDGE CORE COMPETENCIES (The following tasks are intended to be illustrative and not all inclusive)
1 COLORADO PROBLEM SOLVING COURTS BEST PRACTICES MANUAL Table of Contents 1. Colorado Problem Solving Courts Principles and Guidelines 2 a. Section 1: Adult Drug or Treatment Courts i. Introduction ii.
Appendix B1 County Drug Court Profiles: King County Drug Court Program Profile 40 KING COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT PROGRAM PROFILE June 2000 BACKGROUND The King County Drug Court program, the oldest in the
STATE OF NEW YORK : : ALLEGANY COUNTY DRUG COUNTY OF ALLEGANY : : TREATMENT COURT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK against CONTRACT JOHN DOE., Defendant. I, JOHN DOE, agree to enter the Allegany County
Appendix I Thurston County Criminal Justice Treatment Account Plan 2014-2016 Thurston County Criminal Justice Treatment Account Plan 2014-2016 This plan has been prepared in response to Behavioral Health
CORRECTIONS (730 ILCS 166/) Drug Court Treatment Act. (730 ILCS 166/1) Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Drug Court Treatment Act. (730 ILCS 166/5) Sec. 5. Purposes. The General Assembly
CITY OF ST. LOUIS JUVENILE DRUG COURT PARTICIPANT'S HANDBOOK MISSION STATEMENT CITY OF ST. LOUIS JUVENILE DRUG COURT To provide an environment for court-supervised juveniles to become clean and sober and
THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND Adult Drug Court Participant Handbook MY DRUG COURT INFORMATION My Case Manager s Name is: My Case Manager s Phone Number is: My Case Manager s Email address
1 DEVELOPING AND REVISING THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts Key Component #10 2 The development and maintenance of ongoing commitments, communication, coordination, and
DUI Court is a Problem Solving Court or commonly referred to as a drug court. A "drug court," as defined by the National Association of Drug Court Professionals, is "a special court given the responsibility
BUTLER COUNTY CDAT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK (COURT-DIRECTED ADDICTION TREATMENT) COURT OF COMMON PLEAS KEITH M. SPAETH, JUDGE 315 High Street Hamilton, OH 45011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome and Introduction..
THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT ADULT DRUG COURT PROGRAMS POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL Table of Contents I. Mission Statement 2 II. The Ten Key Components 3 III. Benefits and Services Offered 7 IV. Drug
St. Croix County Drug Court Program Participant Handbook Updated: May 2014 To The St. Croix County Drug Court Program. This Handbook is designed to answer your questions and provide overall information
May 21, 2015 Jay E. Town AMERICA S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Program Description & Functionality... 3 II. Ten Pillars & Goals of the Program... 5 III. Team Roles... 7 IV. Program Structure...
Plattsburgh City Court DRUG COURT HANDBOOK Hon. Penelope D. Clute Drug Court Judge Welcome to Plattsburgh City Court Drug Court This Handbook is designed to: Drug Court Eligibility and Exclusionary Criteria
Colorado Drug Courts A plan for statewide implementation - Prepared in response to Joint Budget Committee request for information Prepared by: Division of Planning and Analysis Colorado State Court Administrator
DRUG COURT DEFERRED JUDGMENT INFORMATION SHEET If you have been charged with a crime involving possession of a controlled substance and/or possession of drug paraphernalia, you may be eligible to participate
SEBASTIAN COUNTY DRUG COURT Client Handbook Page 1 Revised 6-26-2013 INTRODUCTION TO DRUG COURT You have been arrested for a felony crime and have been identified as a person who may have a drug problem.
CONSENT - ADULT I have read the Drug Court Agreement. I have reviewed the terms of the agreement with my attorney. I agree to abide by the terms of the agreement. I am aware that under the Drug Court Agreement,
Juvenile Drug Treatment Court Programs Office of Problem- Solving Courts Maryland s Guidelines for Planning and Implementing Juvenile Drug Treatment Court Programs MARYLAND S GUIDELINES FOR PLANNING AND
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief David L. Perry 830 West Jefferson Street 850-644-1234 VICTIMS' RIGHTS BROCHURE YOUR RIGHTS AS A VICTIM OR WITNESS: ------- We realize that for many persons,
ST. LOUIS VETERANS TREATMENT COURT POLICY MANUAL FINAL COPY FOR COURT EN BANC CONSIDERATION EFFECTIVE 1/1/2015 St. Louis Veterans Treatment Court State of Missouri, 22 nd Judicial Circuit 1114 Market Street,
SOBRIETY PROGRAM GUIDELINES Office of Attorney General 2013 Contents I. GENERAL PROVISIONS...3 A. Policy Statement...3 B. Definitions....4 C. Testing Site...6 D. 24/7 Sobriety Testing as a Condition of
Milwaukee County Drug Treatment Court Participant Handbook Property of: If found please return to Justice 2000, Inc.: 821. W. State St. Rm. 417 Milwaukee, WI 53233 (414) 278-2140 _ This Handbook was created
22 ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT DRUG COURT Information to Potential Participant The Drug Court Program is a privilege you may exercise only once. To take part in this program, you must do the following: Complete
POTTER, RANDALL AND ARMSTRONG COUNTIES DRUG COURT: A VIABLE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCE HON. JOHN B. BOARD Judge, 181 st District Court State Bar of Texas SEX, DRUGS & SURVEILLANCE January 10-11, 2013
1 Denver County Sobriety Court Handbook Denver County Sobriety Court Handbook Mission: Sobriety Court provides an efficient, judicially supervised, accountable, and systemic process to address addiction,
M ANHATTAN MISDEMEANOR T REATMENT C O U R T Index Welcome to MMTC 3 What is MMTC? 4 What s in it for me? 5 MMTC Rules 6-8 MMTC Phase Description and 9-15 Sanction Scheme Graduation 16 MMTC Expectations
Certified Criminal Justice Professional (CCJP) Appendix B Appendix B Certified Criminal Justice Professional (CCJP) Performance Domains and Job Tasks Domain I: Dynamics of Addiction and Criminal Behavior
Checklist for Juvenile Justice Agency Leaders and Managers THE FOLLOWING CHECKLIST will help your agency conduct a detailed assessment of how current policy and practice align with what research has shown
PARTICIPANT CONTRACT, DEKALB COUNTY DRUG/DUI COURT: C.L.E.A.N. PROGRAM (CHOOSING LIFE AND ENDING ABUSE NOW) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DEKALB COUNTY, ILLINOIS PARTICIPANT CONTRACT
Mental Health Court 101 2007 Georgia Drug & DUI Court Conference Peachtree City, GA Honorable Kathlene Gosselin, Hall County Superior Court & H.E.L.P. Program Team While the number of patients in psychiatric
LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT Administered by the Lancaster County Department of Community Corrections Judicial Oversight by the Lancaster County District Court www.lancaster.ne.gov keyword: drug court
01 NCAC 17.0701 PURPOSE NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE ONE - ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 17 - COUNCIL ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN SECTION.0700 - ABUSER TREATMENT PROGRAMS The purpose of the rules in this
Office of State Attorney Michael J. Satz VICTIM RIGHTS BROCHURE YOUR RIGHTS AS A VICTIM OR WITNESS: CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS The stages of the criminal justice system are as follows: We realize that for
Stearns County, MN Repeat Felony Domestic Violence Court Planning and Implementation Best Practice Guide How can a community come together to change its response to domestic violence crimes? Can a court
NORTHERN HILLS ADULT DRUG COURT TREATMENT PROGRAM BASIC UNDERSTANDING, WAIVERS AND AGREEMENTS Defendant's Name: Address: Date of Birth: / / Phone Number(s): In Case of Emergency, Contact: Address: Telephone
PARTICIPANT CONTRACT, DEKALB COUNTY DRUG/DUI COURT: C.L.E.A.N. PROGRAM (CHOOSING LIFE AND ENDING ABUSE NOW) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DEKALB COUNTY, ILLINOIS PARTICIPANT CONTRACT
The National Drug Court Survey Lead Research Center Faye Taxman, Doug Young, Anne Rhodes, Matthew Perdoni, Stephen Belenko, Matthew Hiller Collaborating Research Centers National Institute on Drug Abuse
What Have We Learned from the Multisite Adult Drug Court Evaluation? Implications for Practice and Policy The Multisite Adult Drug Court Evaluation By Shelli B. Rossman, M.A., and Janine M. Zweig, Ph.D.
State Attorney s s Office Diversion Programs Presented by: Jay Plotkin Chief Assistant State Attorney The Purpose of Diversion The Office of the State Attorney maintains several diversionary programs designed
OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA PRE-TRIAL DIVERSION REVISED: JUNE 2009 Approved by State Attorney June 4, 2009 In the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Pre-Trial Diversion (PTD) is
1 GUIDE TO THE DUI INTEGRATED TREATMENT COURT FOR LAWYERS (DITC) The DITC is a wonderful, voluntary program designed to assist multiple DUI/DWAI offenders to complete probation successfully in order to
Felony Participant ONTATS Staten Island Treatment ourt 67 Targee Street Staten Island, New York 10304 718.273.1696 718.390.5180 TAS (Treatment Alternatives to Street rime) 387 Van Duzer Street Staten Island,
DUI Court Program Participants Handbook Revised June 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Program Description... 1 DUI Court Supervision... 3 DUI Court Program Rules... 4 Program Fees... 7 Treatment Procedures...
House Proposal of Amendment S. 292 An act relating to term probation, the right to bail, medical care of inmates, and a reduction in the number of nonviolent prisoners, probationers, and detainees. The
GEORGIA DRUG COURT STANDARDS Preface Purpose The Standard or Key Components were produced by a diverse group of drug court practitioners and other experts from across the country, brought together by the
Adult Drug Treatment Court Programs Office of Problem- Solving Courts Maryland s Guidelines for Planning and Implementing Adult Drug Treatment Court Programs MARYLAND S GUIDELINES FOR PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING
Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings and Your Child A Guide for Parents and Guardians NOTICE TO READER This brochure provides basic information about family court procedures relating to juvenile delinquency