1 Digital Government Strategy Governance Structure Approach Documentation Department of the Treasury Submitted pursuant to Milestone 4.2 of the Office of Management and Budget s Digital Government Strategy for the 21 st Century November 23, 2012 (Submitted) December 3, 2012 (Revision) Version 1.0
2 ii» Digital Government Strategy Governance Structure Approach Revision History Version Number Edits by Revision Date 0.1 Redacted 11/01/2012 Baseline Draft 0.2 Redacted 11/02/2012 Baseline Draft update Redacted /14/2012 Reason Structural, content, and revisions to incorporate details from the IT Roadmap and Open Government Plans 0.35 Redacted 11/15/2012 Incorporated TTIRB diagram Redacted /19/2012 Editorial and grammatical changes Redacted /19/2012 Redacted /19/2012 Treasury CIO and Deputy CIO Feedback incorporated, which included structural and content updates Formatting and content updates for clarity, parallelism, and rhetoric based on feedback from Treasury CIO Redacted /20/2012 Additional editorial and structural updates 0.85 Redacted 11/21/2012 Approved Document within OCIO purview 0.9 Redacted 11/29/2012 Small editorial change 1.0 Redacted 12/3/2012 Approved Document
3 U. S. Department of the Treasury» iii Letter of Transmittal and Approval This document is the Department of the Treasury s ( Treasury, Department ) Digital Government Strategy Governance Document ( Governance Document, Document ) pursuant to Milestone 4.2 of the Digital Government Strategy for the 21 st Century ( Digital Strategy, DGS ). The Document describes the approach to providing governance for DGS and is an addendum to Treasury s Enterprise Information Technology (IT) Roadmap. The IT Roadmap describes the FY plans for continuing to improve the effectiveness and efficiency with which the Treasury enterprise leverages IT to fulfill mission objectives. The DGS document is subject to change as the IT Roadmap is updated in the future. The governance approach will continue to be coordinated with Treasury s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Management, the Treasury CIO Council (includes the Bureau CIOs), and the Treasury Technology Investment Review Board (TTIRB). Redacted Robyn East Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information Systems and Chief Information Officer
4 iv» Digital Government Strategy Governance Structure Approach [This page was intentionally left blank.]
5 U. S. Department of the Treasury» v Contents Revision History... ii Letter of Transmittal and Approval... iii Contents... v 1 Project Description Overview Background Impact and Benefits Compliance References Strategic Framework Core Values Strategic Practices Governance Structure Results Oriented Governance Treasury Technology Investment Review Board (TTIRB) Digital Government Governance and Open Government Consolidation Treasury Technology Investment Review Board (TTIRB) Diagram TTIRB Summary TTIRB Members Informational and Proposed Structure DGS Governance - Next Steps Established Governance Bodies and Mechanisms Measuring and Managing IT Investment Performance Current Strategic Use in Data Opening up Data Assets Customer Engagement Understanding Customer Utilization Strategic Action Plan for Data Quality and Transparency in Tandem with Open Government, Current State Data Quality Conclusion...10
6 vi» Digital Government Strategy Governance Structure Approach [This page was intentionally left blank.]
7 U. S. Department of the Treasury» 1 1 Project Description 1.1 Overview This document outlines the governance structure under which Treasury will implement Digital Government Strategy (DGS). The governance structure will enable the Department to monitor the effectiveness and efficiency of implementation of the Digital Government Strategy. 1.2 Background The DGS was announced by the Federal Chief Information Officer Steven Van Roekel on May 23, The Digital Strategy requires each federal agency to embrace the opportunity to innovate more with less and enable entrepreneurs to better leverage government data to improve the quality of services to the American people. Through the understanding of the agency s information architecture, shared platforms, customer engagements, and security and privacy protocols 1, the Digital Strategy plans to: Enable the American people and an increasingly mobile workforce to access high-quality digital government information and services anywhere, anytime, on any device; 2 Ensure that as the government adjusts to this new digital world, we seize the opportunity to procure and manage devices, applications, and data in smart, secure and affordable ways; 3 and Unlock the power of government data to spur innovation across our Nation and improve the quality of services for the American people. 4 As a visionary strategy, the DGS will transform and enhance government services through mobile neutral platforms and secure, ubiquitous information access. 1.3 Impact and Benefits DGS is an opportunity for Treasury to leverage the organizational enhancements created under M A Treasury Technology Investment Review Board (TTIRB) sub-committee will be convened. The Sub-Committee will provide oversight for three initiatives: Open Government 6, Smart Disclosure, and DGS. This will leverage the TTIRB governance structure and facilitate a cohesive approach to implementing these initiatives under one supportive hierarchy. 1.4 Compliance References This document complies with the following policies and guidance documents: 1 See Digital Government: Building a 21st Century Platform to Better Serve the American People, pg Excerpt from Digital Government: Building a 21st Century Platform to Better Serve the American People, p. 2, May 23, Id. 4 Id. 5 See M-11-29, Chief Information Officer Authorities. 6 See The President s Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government.
8 2» Digital Government Strategy Governance Structure Approach M-10-06, Open Government Directive M-11-29, Chief Information Officer Authorities M-12-10, Implementing PortfolioStat The President s Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government Informing Consumers through Smart Disclosure, September 8, 2011 Digital Government: Building a 21st Century Platform to Better Serve the American People, May 2012 Executive Order 13571, Streamlining Service Delivery and Improving Customer Service Executive Order 13576, Delivering an Efficient, Effective, and Accountable Government Digital Services Governance Recommendations, August 23, Strategic Framework It is the mission of Treasury IT to: foster the prudent use of IT resources to operate the U.S. Department of the Treasury efficiently and effectively; meet priorities set by Treasury, Bureau, and government-wide management; help ensure Treasury s IT capabilities remain in alignment with, and relevant to, the markets it serves. To achieve this mission, Treasury IT has established a strategic framework within which our core organizational values combine with our strategic practices to deliver capability to the markets we serve. This framework is particularly relevant because it depicts not only Treasury IT s commitment to its constituency but also the importance of our organizational values as the foundation of everything we do. Figure 1. The Six Domains of Treasury s Strategic Practices for FY FY 2016
9 U. S. Department of the Treasury» Core Values Through all Treasury IT activity, management and staff will exhibit the values described below in the performance of their duties. Specifically: Service: Work for the benefit of our customers and the American people Integrity: Adhere to the highest ethical standards of honesty, trustworthiness, accountability, and dependability Transparency: Promote openness, information-sharing, and collaboration Innovation: Recognize that Treasury must renew IT to meet evolving demands for cost effective solutions People: Recruit, advance, and retain skilled IT people to work at all levels of the organization Respect: Value the dignity, talent, and diverse perspectives of employees, customers, and partners These values are the foundation upon which we deliver solutions and capability to our constituency. 2.2 Strategic Practices Our strategic practices describe the key capability areas essential to ensuring the continued delivery of effective, efficient, and timely functionality to our customers and partners. These practice areas are particularly relevant in today s time of austere budgets as they serve as the strategic context within which all development work is assessed. These practice areas specifically include the following six domains with two practices (shaded portions) specifically applicable to the Digital Strategy: Practices Scalable/Innovative Enterprise Infrastructure Expanded Shared Service Offerings Desired Impact on People, Processes, and Technology A reliable foundation for IT across Treasury Secure interoperable networks Common methods for identity and access management Facilities and equipment readily available and accessible for use Architecture and processes prepared for new technologies (ex: wireless communications, ubiquitous use of mobile devices, expansion of public, private, and hybrid clouds, virtualization, social networks) and a technology-savvy customer community More efficient and effective IT platforms Common suite of solutions available for addressing commodity IT requirements Business solutions developed with greater agility Shared applications and business solutions leveraged across federal, financial, and workforce communities Simplified adoption of next generation service offerings through use of common standards and mechanisms for service integration
10 4» Digital Government Strategy Governance Structure Approach Collaborative, Adaptive Culture Proactive Cybersecurity Strategic Use of Data Results-oriented Governance Improved mission efficiency Culture of continuous improvement in the way we recruit, train, evaluate and reward employees of all tenures and positions IT staff responsive to customer needs as demonstrated by the timely delivery of technology solutions that improve business outcomes Commitment to best practices in our IT processes to ensure stability and availability of our services through use of methodologies such as the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) and the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) IT staff with the means to dynamically adapt to new technologies Protection of information, services and assets Effective continuous monitoring and comprehensive situational awareness Increasingly cost effective Cybersecurity investments Thoughtful and effective approach to risk management Treasury environment equipped for continuously evolving threats Data-centric infrastructure that supports policy analysis and decision making Processes, operations, and customer service continuously improved through data-driven technology Improved data integrity through use of common data standards and definitions across Treasury Transparency into information used to support policy decisions Improved management effectiveness IT investment/cost-benefit decisions based on robust project and operational metrics Improved purchasing power and alignment of IT resources through consolidation of duplicative investments Advocacy of Treasury best practices through Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and government-wide working groups Mechanisms available for coordinating decision-making on policy improvements and the management of key interdependencies 3 Governance Structure 3.1 Results Oriented Governance Treasury is actively putting governance structures in place to enable a more open, dynamic and business-oriented dialog on Treasury s key business priorities and the enabling technologies they require. In addition to looking at how we measure and monitor the performance of our IT investments, an effective IT governance structure requires the ability to discover and act on opportunities whether they be specific to a bureau or office, or across the overall enterprise. An effective governance process should serve as a conduit for communicating Treasury s priorities and objectives to the appropriate constituency.
11 U. S. Department of the Treasury» Treasury Technology Investment Review Board (TTIRB) Treasury is currently completing the implementation of the Treasury Technology Investment Review Board (TTIRB). This body will provide a forum for decision making on enterprise-wide IT platforms and help with surfacing to the Shared Services Council opportunities to increase enterprise-wide efficiency and effectiveness through shared solutions. 3.3 Digital Government Governance and Open Government Consolidation As referenced in the TTIRB diagram, Figure 2, an early activity of the TTIRB will be formation of a DGS Sub-Committee. The TTIRB will collaborate with/make recommendations to Shared Services Council as necessary for new or significantly changing investments. With the DGS and parts of non- Privacy, Transparency, and Records (PTR) related activities in Open Government (e.g., Information Collection Reporting, Paper Reduction Act, etc.) consolidated under the TTIRB, performance measurement processes can be enhanced through a more consistent framework along with better communications among bureaus and between bureaus and the Department. Furthermore, there will be motivation towards strategic collaboration to reduce duplicative IT portfolio efforts. This multidimensional governance framework can eliminate one-time trade-off decisions and ensure balanced decision making according to the priorities of the Department. DGS, Smart Disclosure, and Open Government initiatives have many overlaps that can be consolidated in order to produce consistent APIs 7, mobile content, and datasets for Data.gov through better information, funding and resource commitments. 7 APIs, also known as application programming interfaces, permit a secure system of machine-to-machine interaction over a network, which will require a scalable infrastructure (from security to monitoring to disaster recovery to the physical hardware) to be in place for good performance. Web APIs involve the transfer of data, but not a user interface.
12 6» Digital Government Strategy Governance Report 3.4 Treasury Technology Investment Review Board (TTIRB) Diagram Key Objectives/ Outcomes DO s IT investments aligned with key business priorities Greater business ownership of investments in shared technology platforms (i.e., SharePoint) IT investment decisions based on robust project and operational metrics More transparent cost allocation for shared platforms and infrastructure Sub-Councils Treasury CIO Council Requirements for Shared Technologies/ Platforms Digital Government Strategy Sub- Committee Reporting Sub-Committee Treasury Technology IRB Treasury Shared Services Council CFO Council Treasury Quad- Council Informs/ Advices/ Solicits Guidance Investment Priorities Enterprise Governance Bodies Funding Sources IT Governance Framework Core Components Configuration Management & Quality Control Working Group DO IT Investment Review Board (including Enterprise Apps) Technical Advisory Working Group Communicates through Change Management & Communications Working Group Customers Offices Bureaus Federal Entities Policy/ Oversight OMB Audit/IG Cyber Enterprise Business Solutions Infra. & Ops. Cyber Security IT Strat EA CTO Budget Working Group Capital Planning & Investment Control Working Group Informs/ Advices Performance Management Working Group Selects, Controls & Evaluates Investment pipeline New Investments Business case/ ROI Mission alignment Success metrics Budget/ Costs (300A) Work plan (300B) Key: Indicates new entities, flows, or processes Existing Investments Updated budget (300A) Updated work plan (300B) Variances to plan Figure 2. Treasury Technology Investment Review Board and the potential Digital Government Strategy Sub-Committee.
13 U. S. Department of the Treasury» TTIRB Summary The scope of the TTIRB spans Treasury s operational, business, and IT units. Under the oversight of the TTIRB, the DGS, Open Government, Smart Disclosure governance structures will be consolidated into one group, known as the DGS Sub-Committee (DGS SC). The TTIRB will perform the governance of the DGS until the DGS subcommittee s structure is completely defined with a scope, list of members, and responsibilities. During the transition period, the TTIRB will build the framework for the DGS Sub-Committee based on the recommendations provided by OMB on Digital Services Governance and also perform all necessary responsibilities for the Digital Strategy TTIRB Members Informational and Proposed Structure The main TTIRB body will consist of the following groups and voting members: TTIRB Voting Members o Assistant Secretary for Management (ASM) Chair o Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information Systems/Chief Information Officer (DASIS/CIO) Vice Chair (also the designated Department lead for DGS) o Deputy CIO (alternate) o Bureau CIO (Treasury CIO Council Representative) o Treasury Budget Officer o Bureau Chief Financial Officer o Treasury Procurement Executive o Bureau Procurement Representative o Treasury Chief Human Capital Officer (CHCO) o Bureau Human Capital Officer o Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy, Transparency, and Records (DAS PTR) TTIRB Non-Voting Members o Associate CIO for Enterprise Business Solutions (ACIO EBS) o Associate CIO for IT Strategy and Technology Management/Chief Technology Officer (ACIO ITSTM/CTO) o Associate CIO for Infrastructure Operations (ACIO IO) o Associate CIO for Cybersecurity/Chief Information Security Officer (ACIO Cyber/CISO) o Chief Enterprise Architect o Director of IT Capital Planning Other TTIRB participants may include bureau representatives of their respective divisions and/or branches as needed. 3.6 DGS Governance - Next Steps The Department and OCIO are finalizing the membership of the TTIRB and will hold the first meeting in January The DGS Sub-Committee will be stood-up by the end of the second quarter of FY2013. In the interim, the TTIRB will act and perform the governance of the implementation of
14 8» Digital Government Strategy Governance Structure Approach DGS. Treasury will have a more definitive governance structure once the DGS Sub-Committee is established. 3.7 Established Governance Bodies and Mechanisms To help improve organizational visibility into, and business ownership of, Treasury s IT investment decision making, several governance bodies have been established. These include the following: The Office of the CIO, in conjunction with the Treasury s Management and Budget Office, has recently initiated a Departmental Offices IT Investment Review Board (DO IT IRB). Comprised of senior business and technology leaders within DO, this Board has representation from IRS Procurement, IT, Finance, Budget, and the department-wide Treasury CIO Council. This Board has met regularly since its first meeting on February 29, 2012 and has oversight responsibility for DO s IT investment portfolio. Since DO operates a number of Treasury-wide shared services (i.e., HR Connect, Treasury.gov, ECM and others), the DO IT IRB currently has oversight responsibility for these investments funded through Treasury s Working Capital Fund (WCF). Chaired by the Assistant Secretary for Management (ASM), and comprised of the deputy commissioners from each of Treasury s Bureaus, a Shared Services Council was established to create an executive level forum for decision making around the development and utilization of shared services across Treasury. The Treasury Acquisition Council (TAC) provides a forum for senior leaders to work together to create a world class acquisition system (people, process, organization, and technology) across the Department of the Treasury. The TAC develops and implements strategies and initiatives to continuously improve acquisition performance. The TAC provides a forum for the Bureau Chief Procurement Officers and other interested stakeholders to coordinate cross-cutting policy and management issues, develop and implement innovative acquisition approaches, share best practices and lessons learned, oversee and track progress against improvement goals, and make other decisions on issues that have a potential for Treasury-wide impact on acquisition and financial management programs. The CIO, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Chief Human Capital Officer (CHCO) are ex officio members of the TAC. The Treasury Quad Council is a leadership group chaired by the ASM and comprised of membership from representative Treasury Bureaus Chief Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer, Chief Procurement Officer, and Chief Human Capital Officer Communities. The Quad Council makes recommendations to the ASM and CFO on matters requiring strong interdisciplinary and inter-bureau cooperation and coordination, including strategic sourcing. 3.8 Measuring and Managing IT Investment Performance In FY 2012, Treasury s Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC) community worked to establish cost, schedule and operational metrics by which Treasury s major and minor initiatives are currently measured. Reporting is provided monthly to bureau executive management and is the basis by which the Chief Information Officer (CIO) determines the health of all IT investments (as reported on the IT Dashboard). Furthermore, it is the degree of variance in these metrics that determines whether a TechStat is required on any particular investment.
15 U. S. Department of the Treasury» 9 4 Current Strategic Use in Data 4.1 Opening up Data Assets Data is the lifeblood of the financial services community and the federal government is an owner of many key datasets. Whether it is information related to construction, trade, Gross Domestic Product, housing, employment, income, expenditures or any other macro/ micro- economic related information, the U.S. Federal government plays an essential role in that data ecosystem. Treasury plays a particularly valuable role as the steward of important economic and financial data that is in turn consumed by both private and public sector entities. Fostering greater consumption and leverage of the nation s financial and economic data is important to the ongoing evolution and maturation of the financial marketplace Customer Engagement As the Federal Reserve System regularly consumes Treasury data, Treasury has identified it as a key customer for engagement with DGS and other application building opportunities. As a method of outreach, Treasury will review data collection from our partners, data munging 8 by data users, and data metrics on the Federal Reserve Economic Database (FRED) as provided by Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRSTL) Understanding Customer Utilization As a method of outreach, Treasury will evaluate GSA/OMB-provided website performance metrics to support the scope of Treasury.gov, IRS.gov and other bureau-specific sites. Specific areas of interest for Treasury can include tracking content usage, mobile usage of the website, and other social analytics. Analytics reporting will be incorporated into TTIRB meetings on a monthly basis to ensure compliance with all existing rules, policies, and guidance, which includes civil liberties/privacy and cybersecurity. Further, Treasury is actively working on projects to facilitate the consumption of Treasury data via mobile platforms, which includes IRS2Go, m.irs.gov (mobile version of IRS.gov), Auction Results Table, and Debt to the Penny and Who Holds It. 4.2 Strategic Action Plan for Data Quality and Transparency in Tandem with Open Government, Current State Among the many initiatives to promote transparency, participation, and collaboration, the Open Government Directive 9 requires agencies to address the quality of federal spending information. Treasury s plan will address the quality of both financial and non-financial data made available to the public. 8 Data munging describes the overall process of manipulating unstructured and/or messy data into a structured or clean form. The word has snuck its way into the jargon of many modern day data hackers. Munge rhymes with lunge. (As defined by Wes McKinney in Python for Data Analysis [O Reilly Media, 2013]) 9 See 6.
16 10» Digital Government Strategy Governance Structure Approach Data Quality Treasury submitted its first Open Government and Data Quality Plans to OMB in May The second update to the Open Government Plan was made in August 2012, with a focus on internal information sharing and process improvements. The Data Quality Plan describes the current processes used within Treasury to ensure the quality of the data posted online, with an emphasis on the contracts and grants data on USASpending.gov. The Data Quality Plan also lays out the additional actions Treasury is taking to improve the quality of Treasury data released to the public. 5 Conclusion Treasury s DGS Governance structure will support Part B of Milestone 4.2 goals to deliver better services at lower costs in the following areas: Content lifecycle management; Adoption of third-party online tools; Mobile application delivery; Sharing of infrastructure and digital information; and Data management and inventory.
U.S. Department of Education Office of the Chief Information Officer Investment Review Board (IRB) CHARTER January 23, 2013 I. ESTABLISHMENT The Investment Review Board (IRB) is the highest level IT investment
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Information Technology Infrastructure Services Governance Board Digital Government Strategy Senior Advisory Council Charter Version: 1.1 Date: November 29, 2012 Digital
State of Minnesota IT Governance Framework June 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Introduction... 4 IT Governance Overview... 4 Process for Developing the New Framework... 4 Management of the
TESTIMONY OF Richard A. Spires Chief Information Officer U.S. Department of Homeland Security Before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform February 27, 2013 Chairman Issa, Ranking Member
Department of Homeland SecUl ity Management Directives System MD Number: 0005 Issue Date: 10/28/2004 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LINE OF BUSINESS INTEGRATION AND MANAGEMENT I. Purpose This Management Directive
TESTIMONY OF STEVE COOPER DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEES ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM
Goal 5: Create a 21st century approach to government by improving efficiency, effectiveness, and customer interaction STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 5.3: Promote efficient use of resources through shared services,
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 December 16, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS FROM: SUBJECT: Linda M. Combs, Controller Update on the
STATEMENT OF CHARLES EDWARDS DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Office of the Auditor General AUDIT OF IT GOVERNANCE Tabled at Audit Committee March 12, 2015 This page has intentionally been left blank Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 1 Background...
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION Special Attention of: Transmittal for Handbook No: 3260.1 Issued: September 6, 2002 1. This Transmits: HUD Handbook 3260.1, Enterprise Data
Office of the Chief Information Officer Business Plan: 2012 2015 Department / Ministère: Executive Council Date: November 15, 2012 1 P a g e This Page Left Intentionally Blank 2 P a g e Contents The Business
Information Technology Strategic Plan IT Strategic Plan Benefits Establishes strategic IT goals, assures corporate alignment Benefits of executive/it engagement in plan development Sets an agreed vision
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2011 Data Center Consolidation Plan and Progress Report Version 2.0 September 30, 2011 Enclosure Contents 1 Introduction... 2 2 Agency Goals for Data Center Consolidation...
Appendix L Project Management and Information Technology Processes FinCEN is an agency whose mission is dependent on the effective collection, dissemination, and meaningful analysis of large quantities
IT Governance Overview Contents Executive Summary... 3 What is IT Governance?... 4 Strategic Vision and IT Guiding Principles... 4 Campus-Wide IT Strategic Vision... 4 IT Guiding Principles... 4 The Scope
Value to the Mission FEA Practice Guidance Federal Enterprise Program Management Office, OMB November 2007 FEA Practice Guidance Table of Contents Section 1: Overview...1-1 About the FEA Practice Guidance...
United States Department of State Bureau of Information Resource Management (IRM) Open Data Plan November 12, 2013 Table of Contents Background... 1 Requirements... 1 Enterprise Data Inventory... 1 Public
Section 4 MANAGEMENT CONTROLS AND PROCESSES Section 4 MANAGEMENT CONTROLS AND PROCESSES MANAGEMENT CONTROLS AND PROCESSES FEATURED IN THIS SECTION 4.1 Information Management Framework... 1 4.2 Strategic
Finance Division Strategic Plan 2014-2019 Introduction Finance Division The Finance Division of Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) provides financial management, enterprise planning and stewardship in support
Department of the Interior Open Data FY14 Plan November 30, 2013 Contents Overview Introduction DOI Open Data Objectives Transparency Governance and Culture Change Open Data Plan FY14 Quarterly Schedule
Statement of Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation Before THE UNITED STATES SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE (SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT)
5 FAM 670 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT (CT:IM-92; 08-01-2007) (Office of Origin: IRM/BPC/PRG) 5 FAM 671 WHAT ARE IT PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND WHY ARE THEY REQUIRED?
STATEMENT OF Dr. David McClure Associate Administrator Office of Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies General Services Administration BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE
U.S. Department of the Treasury Treasury IT Performance Measures Guide Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) Enterprise Architecture Program June 2007 Revision History June 13, 2007 (Version 1.1)
Statement of Dr. Simon Szykman, Chief Information Officer U.S. Department of Commerce Before the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the United States Senate on Reducing Duplication
The Future of Census Bureau Operations Version 1.0 April 25, 2013 The Future of Census Bureau Operations Page ii [This page intentionally left blank] The Future of Census Bureau Operations Page iii Document
Business Plan for the Geospatial Platform September 20, 2012 REDACTED The Geospatial Platform Federal Geographic Data Committee Geospatial Platform Business Plan, September 20, 2012 REDACTED 1 The Federal
Departmental Offices Working Capital Fund FY 2013 President s Budget Submission Table of Contents SECTION 1 PURPOSE... 2 Introduction... 3 Program Summary by Bureau Type... 3 SECTION 2 PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
Department of the Interior Report on the Implementation of the E-Government Act Fiscal Year 2013 A. Enhanced Delivery of Information and Services to the Public - Sec. 101, 3602 Activity #1. Cloud Services:
Accountability Report 2014 2015 Department of Internal Services Table of Contents Accountability Statement... 3 Message from the Minister and Deputy Minister... 4 Financial Results... 5 Measuring Our Performance...
Rice University Task Force on Information Technology Report on IT Principles, Governance & Organization April 22, 2014 1 IT Principles, Governance, Organization Information technology, across all missions
National Geospatial Data Asset Management Plan Portfolio Management Implementation Plan for the OMB Circular A 16 Supplemental Guidance as it relates to OMB Circular A 16, Coordination of Geographic Information
GOVERNMENT USE OF MOBILE TECHNOLOGY Barriers, Opportunities, and Gap Analysis DECEMBER 2012 Product of the Digital Services Advisory Group and Federal Chief Information Officers Council Contents Introduction...
Information Resources Management Strategic Plan U.S. Department of the TREASURY Fiscal Year 2013 2016 Version: 1.1 Date: February 28 th, 2014 This document is the Department of the Treasury s Information
THE STATUS OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT IN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Audit Division Audit Report
Federal Enterprise Architecture Using EA to Design Future-Ready Agencies and Implement Shared Services Scott A. Bernard, Ph.D. Scott_Bernard@omb.eop.gov Federal Chief Enterprise Architect Executive Office
U.S. Department of Labor Digital Government Strategy (DGS) Milestone #6.3 Improving Digital Services Introduction Last Updated: May 22, 2013 This document summarizes the U.S. Department of Labor s (DOL)
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROCUREMENT POLICY December 4, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF ACQUISITION OFFICERS SENIOR PROCUREMENT
Written Testimony of Mark Kneidinger Director, Federal Network Resilience Office of Cybersecurity and Communications U.S. Department of Homeland Security Before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee
2013-2016 Strategic Plan Office for Information Technology Message from the Chief Information Officer Shortly after Governor Corbett took office in 2011, the Office of Administration/Office for Information
U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Aid Lifecycle Management Methodology Stage Gate Review Process Description Version 1.3 06/30/2015 Final DOCUMENT NUMBER: FSA_TOQA_PROC_STGRW.NA_001 Lifecycle
SECTION 200 OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK Table of Contents 200.1 To which agencies does A 11 Part 6 apply? 200.2 What other laws or policies are relevant to Part 6 of OMB Circular A 11?
FY 2016 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN NSF s FY 2016 Performance Plan reflects NSF s priorities as identified through its planning and budget process. The table below provides a summary of NSF s performance goals
Small Business Administration Information Technology Strategic Plan ( ITSP) 2012-2016 Leveraging SBA IT resources to support America s small businesses Message from the Chief Information Officer The Small
CITY OF HOUSTON Executive Order E.O. No: 1-44 Effective Date: December 20, 2012 1. AUTHORITY 1.1 Article VI, Section 7a, of the City Charter of the City of Houston. 2. PURPOSE 2.1 The City of Houston seeks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 June 2, 2016 M-16-12 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES FROM: Anne E. Rung United States Chief
Cybersecurity in the States 2012: Priorities, Issues and Trends Commission on Maryland Cyber Security and Innovation June 8, 2012 Pam Walker, Director of Government Affairs National Association of State
Department of Homeland Security Capital Planning and Investment Control Guide Version 4.0 May 2007 Prepared by the Office of the Chief Information Officer Document Version History Document Version Version
Information Technology Strategic Plan 2014-2017 Leveraging information technology to create a competitive advantage for UW-Green Bay Approved December 2013 (Effective January 2014 December 2017) Contents
GEOSPATIAL LINE OF BUSINESS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS March 2007 Adjudicated Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 VALUE PROPOSITION 3 3 ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK 3 31 PMO Organizational
DoD CIO s 10-Point Plan for IT Modernization Ms. Teri Takai DoD CIO Executive Summary Proactive Partnerships for IT Modernization IT Modernization Strategy Consolidate Infrastructure Streamline Processes
Department of Homeland Security Management Directives System MD Number: 0007.1 Issue Date: 03/15/2007 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND MANAGEMENT I. Purpose A. This Management Directive (MD) establishes
Office of the Chief Information Officer Office of the Assistant Secretary for Resources and Technology Department of Health and Human Services HHS OCIO Policy for Information Technology (IT) Enterprise
Form 1221-2 (June 1969) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Release: 1-1718 Date: MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET Subject 1265 Information Technology Investment Management (ITIM)
Department of Homeland Security DHS Information Technology Management Has Improved, But Challenges Remain OIG-12-82 May 2012 Office of Inspector General U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington,
Division of Information Technology Strategic Plan 2012 THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 1 FROM THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER FROM THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER Dear Colleagues, The George Washington University
Eastern Illinois University information technology services strategic plan January, 2014 Introduction With the selection of emerging technologies as one of the six themes of the university s recent strategic
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8000.01 March 17, 2016 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Management of the Department of Defense Information Enterprise (DoD IE) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This directive:
DATE REVISION xxxbyxxx IT Modernization: EA Information Management DATE: September 2003 AUTHOR: Enterprise Architecture Team 1.0 Introduction It is the policy of the United States Government that executive
2015 Strategic Business Plan Franklin County Data Center Ishreth Sameem, CIO Mission The Franklin County Data Center partners with County agencies to deliver cost efficient business solutions and provide
The University of Alabama at Birmingham Information Technology Strategic Plan 2011 2013 Table of Contents Message from the Vice President... 3 About UAB... 4 About UAB Information Technology Meeting needs
STATEMENT OF Dr. David McClure Associate Administrator Office of Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies General Services Administration BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM
Department of the Interior IRM Strategic Plan February 28, 2014 Blank Page U.S. Department of the Interior ii IRM Strategic Plan Roadmap Department of the Interior IRM Strategic Plan Approval Name: Bernard
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Information Resources Management (IRM) Strategic Plan Office of the Chief Information Officer March 2014 www.nasa.gov NASA IRM Strategic Plan CIO s Introductory
Oswego State Draft Information Technology Strategic Plan November 17, 2015 Fall 2014 January February March April May Strategic Planning Steering Committee formed Events & Meetings planned Strategic Planning
DOJ INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN 2014 2016 United States Department of Justice Published Date: April 2014 This page has been intentionally left blank April 2014 Page 2 of 50 Table of
Kent State University s Cloud Strategy Table of Contents Item Page 1. From the CIO 3 2. Strategic Direction for Cloud Computing at Kent State 4 3. Cloud Computing at Kent State University 5 4. Methodology
State of Minnesota Enterprise Security Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2009 2013 Jointly Prepared By: Office of Enterprise Technology - Enterprise Security Office Members of the Information Security Council
Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative Data Center Consolidation Plan for the U.S. Small Business Administration Maintained by: The Office of the Chief Information Officer Paul Christy, CIO Revised:
Strategic Plan Network Optimization & Transport Services 2013-2018 Office of the Chief Information Officer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration United States Department of Commerce Version 2.0
U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. ORDER DOE O 200.1A Approved: SUBJECT: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 1. OBJECTIVES. The Department of Energy s (DOE) overarching mission, to advance the national,
United States Department of Health & Human Services Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office HHS Enterprise Architecture Governance Plan Version 3.0 February 2007 Approvals The Health and Human
Federal Cloud Computing Initiative Overview Program Status To support the Federal Cloud Computing Direction and Deployment Approach, the ITI Line of Business PMO has been refocused as the Cloud Computing
USGS Digital Strategy Update on USGS Activities related to the Digital Strategy U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Executive Summary Background: On May 23, 2012 the Administration published
Cybersecurity Briefing November 18, 2015 Agenda Cybersecurity FITARA Implementation Accomplishments BIA and BIE services and performance Priorities Next steps 2 Background on the OPM/DOI incident DOI has
Information Technology Manag gement Framework Roles and Respo onsibilities Version 1.2 Novemb ber 20122 ITM Roles and Version History Version ed By Revision Date Approved By Approval Date Description of
IRM FY2014 2018 Information Resources Management Strategic Plan DOE IRM Mission Advance the Department s mission through policy, standards, and services, which meet mission requirements, balance risk and
M ANAGEMENT I NTEGRATION G OAL Achieve organizational and management excellence 71 MANAGEMENT INTEGRATION STRATEGIC GOAL Management Integration Goal Achieve organizational and management excellence The
North Carolina Procurement Transformation Governance Model March 11, 2011 Executive Summary Design Approach Process Governance Model Overview Recommended Governance Structure Recommended Governance Processes
WHITE PAPER: STRATEGIC IMPACT PILLARS FOR EFFICIENT MIGRATION TO CLOUD COMPUTING IN GOVERNMENT IntelliDyne, LLC MARCH 2012 STRATEGIC IMPACT PILLARS FOR EFFICIENT MIGRATION TO CLOUD COMPUTING IN GOVERNMENT
Aligning with the future T h e IT Strat e g i c P l a n INFORMATION RESOURCES Academic Technologies 2005 2010 Introduction We have witnessed a tremendous growth in the use of information technology across
White Paper Case Study: How Collaboration Platforms Support the ITIL Best Practices Standard Abstract: This white paper outlines the ITIL industry best practices methodology and discusses the methods in
Department-wide Systems and Capital Investment Program Mission Statement The Department-wide Systems and Capital Investments Program (DSCIP) is authorized to be used by or on behalf of the Treasury Department