The European Network on Statistics for Digitisation, Digital Preservation and. co-funded by ICT-PSP

Transcription

1 The European Network on The Statistics European for Network Digitisation, Statistics for Digitisation, Digital Preservation and Digital Preservation and Online Access to Cultural to Cultural Heritage Heritage co-funded by ICT-PSP

2 ENUMERATE Europeana Vlaanderen 24/01/2013 algemeen core survey / thematic survey(s) data platform (demo)

3 ENUMERATE general ENUMERATE is the European Thematic Network on Statistics for Digitisation, Digital Preservation and Online Access to Digital Cultural Heritage. ENUMERATE is the successor to the NUMERIC project (May 2007 May 2009) which sought to investigate evidence of the progress of Digitisation of Europe s Cultural Heritage. ENUMERATE builds on the evidence and methodological framework established by NUMERIC, and will draw on the recommendations to ensure continuity and enhancement of the data it generated.

4 ENUMERATE Aims 1. The development of a vibrant and sustainable European community of practice, connecting practitioners in statistical analysis and digital content creation and preservation and supporting the sharing of knowledge and best practices. 2. The creation, promotion and development of a statistically valid open methodology for surveying the digitization, use, preservation and associated costs of cultural heritage materials in Member States. 3. The implementation of a multi-annual programme of coordinated surveys based on this methodology, including wide-scale harmonized statistical data-gathering and more in-depth and analytical surveying of digitization activities by European cultural heritage institutions. 4. The creation and maintenance of an open, sustainable data platform to collate, analyse and promote the use of the normalized data and intelligence arising from these surveys.

5 ENUMERATE Consortium Collections Trust, UK; Digitaal Erfgoed Nederland (DEN), Netherlands; Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Germany; Digibis, Spain; FARO Vlaams Steunpunt voor Cultureel Erfgoed, Belgium; Ministère de Culture et de la Communication, France; Oesterreichische Nationalbibliothek, Austria; Naradna in Univerzitetna Knjiznica (National and University Library), Slovenia; Orszagos Széchényi Konytvar (National Széchényi Library), Hungary; The European Library (hosted by the Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Netherlands).

6 ENUMERATE Surveys Year 1: CORE SURVEY A high-level survey aimed at establishing a baseline of statistical information about Digitisation, Digital Preservation, Digitisation Costs and Online Access to Digital Cultural Heritage. Year 2: THEMATIC SURVEY A detailed and in-depth survey aimed both at enhancing the quantitative data and supporting it with qualitative information. Year 3: CORE SURVEY A reiteration of the initial survey, aimed at improving the quality of the data and providing trend information and analysis to inform policy development.

7 Core survey (2012) - Rapport : - geeft globale resultaten voor Europa - geen rapport per land voorzien - wel dataplatform met deelresultaten / land (demo) - respons België (42) voldoende, maar laag in vgl. met NUMERIC ( ) - respons Vlaanderen te laag voor representatieve analyse (ca. 20) (NUMERIC: 72)

8 2. Response to the survey Total usable responses: 1951 from 29 countries (of these 300 were not completed completely, but enough to be included in the results) From 1951: 1623 digitised / digitisation activities (83%), 328 none (17%) Highest response in Spain (255), problematic respons in Bulgaria (0) and France (1). Non EU countries ( Other ) are Liechtenstein and Switzerland Number of responding institutions is large enough to calculate reliable data on the level of institution type

9 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Austria Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switserland United Kingdom Target Realisation Figure 1: Response per country compared with target

10 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Special or other type of library Archives/records office Other type of museum Museum of archaeology, history Museum of art Higher education library Museum of science, technology Museum of anthropology and ethnology Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute Institution for Monument Care National library Figure 2: Response by institution type (n=1951)

11 3. Results: Digitisation activity

12 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Museum of art 42% 52% Museum of archaeology, history 28% 58% Institution for Monument Care Museum of anthropology and ethnology Other type of museum Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute Museum of science, technology 26% 26% 24% 22% 22% 64% 62% 61% 65% 63% Higher education library Archives/records office Special or other type of library National library 14% 12% 12% 4% 52% 55% 54% 62% Total 20% 57% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Have digitized Intend to digitize Figure 5: Estimated percentage of heritage collection already digitally reproduced and percentage still to be digitally reproduced (n=1626) - comparison Numeric

13 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Archival records Rare books Other books Newspapers Serials Manuscripts Sheet music Microforms/Microfilms Maps Photographs Engravings/Prints Drawings Posters Postcards Paintings 2D objects 3D works of art 3D man-made objects Other 3D objects (incl. natural science specimens) Monuments and sites Film Video recordings Audio (music & other recorded sound) 46% 29% 39% 22% 25% 24% 30% 20% 23% 28% 36% 9% 13% 12% 13% 28% 37% 30% 32% 35% 36% 24% 32% 31% 31% 29% 27% 11% 11% 22% 21% 21% 22% 8% 10% 7% 7% 19% 21% 21% 27% 21% 24% 56% 66% 64% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Have digitized Intend to digitize Figure 6: Object types most freq. digitised & intended to be digitised (n=1626)

14 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Archival records (meters) Rare books (volumes) Other books (volumes) Newspapers (titles) Serials (volumes) Manuscripts (number) Sheet music (number) Microforms/Microfilms (number) Maps (number) Photographs (number) Engravings/prints (number) Drawings (number) Posters (number) Postcards (number) Paintings (number) 2 dimensional objects (number) 3 dimensional art objects (objects) Other 3 dimensional man-made objects (objects) Other 3 dimensional non-man-made (objects) Monuments and sites (number) Film (hours) Video recordings (hours) Audio (hours) 7% 8% 8% 17% 11% 14% 13% 14% 18% 32% 33% 34% 53% 58% 54% 65% 45% 33% 39% 42% 37% 47% 46% 48% 32% 40% 40% 38% 43% 52% 29% 33% 23% 32% 45% 43% 10% 27% 26% 33% 29% 37% 38% 39% 37% 45% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% catalogued in digital metadata digitally reproduced Figure 7: Part of the collection catalogued in digital metadata and percentage of the collection currently digitized (n=200)

15 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Archival records (meters) Rare books (volumes) Other books (volumes) Newspapers (titles) Serials (volumes) Manuscripts (number) Sheet music (number) Microforms/Microfilms (number) Maps (number) Photographs (number) Engravings/prints (number) Drawings (number) Posters (number) Postcards (number) Paintings (number) 2 dimensional objects (number) 3 dimensional art objects (objects) Other 3 dimensional man-made objects (objects) Other 3 dimensional non-man-made (objects) Monuments and sites (number) Film (hours) Video recordings (hours) Audio (hours) 40% 36% 7% 8% 52% 56% 58% 8% 34% 37% 17% 46% 52% 11% 37% 29% 14% 58% 53% 13% 34% 31% 14% 55% 6% 18% 76% 1% 32% 67% 11% 4% 8% 13% 4% 26% 16% 19% 33% 46% 32% 40% 43% 29% 33% 23% 38% 10% 34% 26% 18% 29% 6% 38% 7% 37% 56% 50% 61% 47% 53% 45% 51% 59% 52% 40% 53% 56% 56% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% no intent to digitize digitally reproduced still to digitize Figure 8: Part of the collection currently digitized, intended to digitize and with no intention to digitize (n=200)

16 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) National library Museum of art Museum of anthropology and ethnology Museum of archaeology, history Institution for Monument Care Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute Museum of science, technology Special or other type of library Other type of museum Archives/records office Higher education library 52% 47% 44% 37% 37% 35% 34% 31% 31% 30% 25% Total 34% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Figure 10: Does your organisation have a written digitisation strategy? (n=1557) comparison Numeric

17 4. Results: Digital access

18 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Institution for Monument Care 0% 20% 100% Archives/records office Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute Museum of art Museum of archaeology, history Museum of science, technology Museum of anthropology and ethnology Other type of museum Special or other type of library National library Higher education library 6% 6% 19% 23% 27% 18% 25% 24% 22% 22% 13% 20% 11% 34% 35% 35% 37% 39% 47% 51% 84% 70% 77% 87% 94% 94% 82% 86% 80% 89% Total 16% 36% 85% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Web statistics Database statistics User studies Figure 14: How is the use of the digital collection measured? (n=628)

19 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Offline 49% 61% Institutional website 31% 47% National aggregator 22% 37% Thematic aggregator 14% 24% Europeana 15% 31% Memory of the World Wikipedia 2% 4% 3% 7% Institutional API 12% 23% 3rd party API 6% 13% Other 16% 28% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% currently 2 years from now Figure 15: Which percentage of the digital collections is accessible through which options? (n=774)

20 6. Results: Digital expenditure

21 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Archives/records office Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute Special or other type of library Other type of museum Museum of anthropology and ethnology Museum of art Museum of archaeology, history Higher education library National library Museum of science, technology Institution for Monument Care 1,5% 1,2% 1,4% 1,3% 1,1% 1,0% 0,9% 0,9% 0,9% 0,9% 0,8% 0,9% 0,6% 0,7% 0,6% 0,6% 0,2% 0,5% 2,5% 2,7% 2,8% 3,8% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4% 4% 5% budget2011 budget2012 Figure 20: Annual budget for digitisation activities in % of total institutional budget (n=703)

22 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Institution for Monument Care 5,2 1 Archives/records office 3,4 4 Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute 8,0 0 Museum of art 3,1 1 Museum of archaeology, history 2,0 2 Museum of science, technology 3,2 1 Museum of anthropology and ethnology 3,8 1 Other type of museum 2,1 1 Special or other type of library 3,7 1 National library 13,6 1 Higher education library 4,8 1 Total 3, Paid staff Volunteers Figure 22: Staff involved in digitisation activities, in FTE (n=1584)

23 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Total paid staff in FTE Digitisation paid staff in FTE In % Museum of anthropology and ethnology 46,7 3,9 8,3% Other type of museum 30,3 2,3 7,6% Archives/records office 48,3 3,6 7,4% National library 190,2 14,0 7,4% Special or other type of library 66,8 4,0 6,0% Museum of archaeology, history 44,2 2,2 5,0% Museum of art 75,3 3,2 4,3% Museum of science, technology 88,4 3,6 4,1% Institution for Monument Care 145,6 5,2 3,6% AV, broadcasting or film institute 610,1 8,1 1,3% Higher education library 513,9 5,0 1,0% Total 112,4 3,8 3,3% Table 4: Digitisation paid staff compared to total paid staff (N answered both questions = 948) - comparison Numeric

24 ENUMERATE Core Survey (2012) Institution for Monument Care Archives/records office Audio-visual, broadcasting or film institute Museum of art Museum of archaeology, history Museum of science, technology Museum of anthropology and ethnology Other type of museum Special or other type of library National library Higher education library 0% 0% 5% 3% 7% 10% 14% 3% 7% 3% 5% 4% 3% 4% 5% 7% 9% 9% 0% 9% 4% 4% 2% 5% 2% 4% 5% 8% 12% 8% 9% 9% 13% 20% 31% 34% 41% 45% 50% 42% 44% 41% 48% 49% 90% 91% 79% 88% 81% 82% 80% 90% 85% 92% 91% Total 4% 40% 5% 7% 87% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Internal budgets Commercial trading Public grant or subsidy Private investment Public-private partnership Figure 23: From what sources are the digitisation activities funded? (n=1584)

25 Results Digital Expenditure Digitisation costs have several components: in 70% of the cases the costs cover paid staff. In about 50% equipment en conversion costs are included. Right clearance costs are only included by 8% of the institutions. On average the digitisation team is limited to on average about 5.5 FTE (3.5 FTE paid staff; 2 FTE volunteers). Remarkable is the relative high number of volunteer FTE at archives and records offices (4 FTE; 3.4 paid staff). In national libraries on average 15 FTE are involved in the digitisation process. On average the budget per FTE engaged in digitisation activities is euro in 2011 and euro in 2012 On average digitisation activities are funded most often by internal budgets, followed by public grant or subsidy. Not mentioned very much are commercial trading (4%), private investment (5%) and public-private partnership (7%).

26 Cijferboek cultureel erfgoed Relatie ENUMERATE met cijferboek: -Beperkt set overgenomen in cijferboek Verdere integratie na afloop ENUMERATE kan overwogen worden (apart onderdeel digitalisering op basis core survey), mits voldoende geconsolideerde methode (en respons). - Afhankelijk toekomstig verloop (vervolgproject ENUMERATE plus?)

27 Thematic Surveys The Thematic Survey is looking at four themes: - Identification of Growth of Digital Collections (supply); - Costs of Digital Collections (economics); -> België - Usage of Digital Collections (demand); - Digital Preservation Practices (sustainability).

28 België: thematic Survey costs of digital collections Belgische instellingen nodig (5-7 VL) die effectief digitale collecties beheren. - Taal: Engels - Periode: februari-april KANDIDATEN? Please participate in the surveys and and follow the link below to register to participate: of via jeroen.walterus@faronet.be

29 Meer info Website Registreer je voor de newsletter: Volg ENUMERATE op linked in: Volg ENUMERATE op Twitter: Delicious:

30 Demo data platform

31 Contact FARO. Vlaams steunpunt voor cultureel erfgoed