1 Secret Court Docket Practice Exposed by David M. Reutter and Paul Wright Prison Legal News, December 2003 One of the founding principles of the United States judiciary system is the right of access by the public and press. In their infinite wisdom, the authors of the Bill of Rights placed that principle within the First Amendment. That principle, however, has become yet another casualty in the war on crime and terror. Aside from the Miami Business Daily, who first broke this story, the corporate and legal media have largely ignored the use of secret court dockets by the judiciary. Most alarmingly, these secret court dockets are being used to hide civil rights lawsuits, criminal drug cases, and even divorce proceedings by wealthy litigants. Hiding a Counter-Insurgency Scandal Attorneys representing Colombian drug kingpin Fabio Ochoa, 46, a former member of the Medellin drug cartel, have asked the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to cease the practice of maintaining dual secret dockets in the Southern District of Florida. Ochoa, represented by Miami attorneys Roy Black and G. Richard Strafer, argues in his brief to the 11th Circuit that Ochoa has been victimized by an improper collaboration between prosecutors and the judiciary, which cut him off from information he needed to defend himself at his criminal drug trial. Black is best known as the high powered attorney who represented William Kennedy Smith on rape charges, leading to an acquittal, and who also secured acquittals for accused drug traffickers Salvador Magluta and Willie Falcon. Black and Strafer argue the government is trying to hide scandalous evidence of a federal government program that extorted cash from drug dealers to bankroll Colombian right-wing paramilitary death squads in the 1990 s in order to combat leftist guerrillas in that country. The fight against leftist guerrillas has been the centerpiece of American foreign policy in Central and South America for the past 30 years. It has relied extensively on mass murder and torture by both the armies and police forces of the region s government s as well as government backed death squads. The scheme allegedly extorted millions from South American drug traffickers in exchange for sentence reductions prior to surrendering themselves to American authorities. The attorneys want information from the secret docket case of Nicholas Bergonzoli. In October 1995, Bergonzoli was indicted by a Connecticut federal grand jury for conspiracy to import cocaine. The case was transferred to the federal district court in Miami, and assigned case number 99cr196. Once in Miami, the case disappeared from public view, as a search of the court s PACER electronic docket system yields a reply of no matches found. On January 29, 2002, Bergonzoli was sentenced and is now serving a secret sentence of 39 months in a Miami federal prison. Ochoa s attorneys are interested in Bergonzoli because he has been identified in court papers as an intermediary that peddled the government s reduced sentences program to witnesses expected to testify at Ochoa s trial. Ochoa refused to pay a $30 million bribe to Bergonzoli s contact, government informant Baruch Vega of Miami Beach. Federal Magistrate William Turnoff rejected a motion to dismiss because Ochoa has not offered one iota of evidence in support of his claims that federal agents and prosecutors knew about the sentence-reduction sales scheme.
2 Another intermediary in the governments sentence-reduction sales program, Julio Correa, had his case entirely disappear from the Southern District of Florida s court dockets. In March 1995, Correa was indicted for cocaine conspiracy. What happened in his case from that time until he disappeared in Columbia, and was presumably murdered, is unknown. What is known, however, is that from the time of his surrender to the FBI in 1997 until his disappearance in August, 2001, Correa never spent a day in prison. Ochoa will have no such luck. He was convicted by a jury on drug conspiracy charges on May 29, 2003, and in August was sentenced to 30 years in prison. Yet another case hidden from public view is that of Algerian Mohammad Kamal Bellahouel, who entered the U.S. on a student visa in He came to the attention of authorities after an employee of Regal Cinemas in Delray Beach, Florida, said she recalled seeing Bellahouel enter the theater to watch a movie with a suspect in the 9/11 hijackings. Based on this unsubstantiated revelation and the fact Bellahouel worked as a waiter and likely served several of the 9/11 hijackers at the restaurant he worked at, a material witness warrant was issued and Bellahouel was taken into custody. Anyone held under such a warrant is entitled to a court-appointed lawyer. Once in custody, federal officials began a game of legal hardball. They issued the warrant, then decided they didn t want him to get representation, so they no longer held him as a material witness, said private lawyer David A. Silk, who is handling Bellahouel s immigration case. But they held him anyway. The long and short of it is they quashed the warrant to keep him from being represented when the FBI went to talk to him. For a few days, Bellahouel was held at the Federal Correctional Institution in Miami. He was not criminally charged and is now out on bond awaiting the outcome of immigration proceedings. Attorney Black said several other criminal cases are being kept off the Southern District s docket: United States v. Ramon, docket No. 99CR711; United States v. Prado, No. 99CR27; United States v. Escaf, No. 99CR433. Black believes information from these cases could help Ochoa s defense, yet they remain sealed to the public and Ochoa s defense team. Black said evidence of dual docketing comes from Ochoa s case itself. For example, docket entry no is listed between docket numbers 222 and 223. All were filed in mid-june However, sealed document number 1166 did not go public until February 25, Then there is docket number 1213, which is an order unsealing grand jury proceedings involving many of Ochoa s co-defendants. That order appeared on the public docket on March 28, The problem is, according to the docket, Judge K. Michael Moore signed that order three years earlier on February 15, Disappearances on All Levels The Southern District of Florida is not the only keeper of secret-dual dockets. Contrary to its own opinion in United States v. Valenti, the 11th Circuit has jumped into the fray. The fact that Bellahouel was held in a Miami federal prison only came to light after a deputy appellate clerk mishandled the appeal of Bellahouel s habeas case and allowed his name to become public. In the Southern District, there exists absolutely no public record of this case. However, the appellate clerk s mistake temporarily revealed the appeal of Bellahouel v. Wetzel, Case No
3 Monica Wetzel was the warden of the federal prison in Miami at the time of Bellahouel s detention. Of Bellahouel s case, appellate court clerk Robert Phelps said, We made a mistake. It shouldn t have been put out in the first place. All references to Bellahouel s case have since disappeared from public view in the 11th Circuit. It also appears that Bellahouel and his lawyers are under a gag order. I cannot talk about it. I am not allowed said Bellahouel. The identity of Bellahouel s lawyers was only revealed March 5, 2003 after Federal Public Defender Kathleen Williams was blocked from entering a meeting of a threejudge panel from the 11th circuit sitting in Miami, which was closed to the public and media. Williams was only admitted after explaining she was an attorney in the case. Williams and her appeals chief Paul Rashkind refuse to comment on the case or even acknowledge they represent Bellahouel. None of the federal circuit court judges hearing the case would respond to questions or otherwise acknowledge the case exists. Until March 5, Bellahouel s involvement in the 9/11 case was a secret. His situation is similar to the 1,200 Arab men rounded up by the U.S. Justice Department in the 9/11 aftermath. Even less is known about these round up in the FBI investigation Code named PENTTBOM, which resulted in the secret detention of material witnesses. There has been no disclosure of their names, numbers, or nationalities; not even their lawyers identities have been revealed. Assuming they have lawyers. Since 9/11, more than 750 people have been detained on immigration violations. In June 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court put on hold New Jersey U.S. District Judge John Bissell s order that found it unconstitutional to impose a blanket policy closing all detention or deportation hearings to the public and media that the government calls special interest cases. More people will be tried in secret, and that s unfortunate, said Lee Gelerant, an American civil Liberties Union attorney specializing in immigrant rights. They re appearing all by themselves in front of a judge, facing a trained INS prosecutor in secret. There s no public scrutiny of the process, he said. Of the 750 detainees, 611 have had secret hearings so far. They have been disappeared just as American advisers instructed their allies and flunkies of the 1970 s and 1980 s of assorted military dictatorships in South and Central America to do. No public record or acknowledgment exists that these people have been taken into government custody much less any word on their treatment or conditions of confinement in custody. The secret docket practice has become so commonplace, that when Ochoa s lawyers filed a motion to intervene in Bellahouel s case before the 11th Circuit, it was filed under seal at the request of a deputy appellate clerk. Without acknowledging Bellahouel s case exists or an opinion has been rendered, the 11th Circuit instructed Ochoa s lawyers to raise the issue in their brief before the court in Ochoa s interlocutory appeal of his criminal drug case.
4 The trend of secret court dockets and proceedings has began to creep into state judiciary systems. In Connecticut, courts can make cases into a level 1 invisible or level 2 names-only case. When The Connecticut Law Review disclosed in March 2003 that it had learned of the existence of level 1 cases that lack party names and docket numbers to keep their very existence hidden from the public, another newspaper brought suit under 1983 and 1985 in federal court. The suit styled The Hartford Courant Co. v. Pelligrino seeks basic docket information about the 104 level 1 stealth cases. In recent years, the perk of level 1 has been held out to a millionaire CEO, state lawmaker, judge, and famous lawyer. Recently, University of Connecticut President Phillip G. Austin and his wife had their divorce shrouded in the ultra-secret mode, with top level court approval. Rather than invoking national security or crime fighting rationales, this is a case of using the public courts in total secrecy to shroud the legal travails of the wealthy and politically connected. The ever expanding introduction of secrecy into the criminal justice system is an alarming trend that is contrary to the most basic principles of a democratic government, said Federal Public Defender Kathleen Williams. It is also infecting the civil justice system when it suits the convenience of the wealthy and well connected or, as in Bellahouel s civil rights cases, may shroud human rights violations by government officials. Connecticut supreme court chief justice William Sullivan has called for a change in Connecticut state court rules to eliminate secret dockets in that state s court system. At the federal level, the silence is deafening, with no government official or judge even acknowledging the practice exists, much less that it should be stopped. The Disappearing Act Attorney Black discovered evidence of secret dockets and the human dynamics behind the practice when the once-sealed transcript of a November 2, 1999, bond hearing for one of Ochoa s many drug co-defendants, Orlando Sanchez- Cristancho, was unsealed. Sanchez-Cristancho was under indictment, but he was trying to finalize a deal to cooperate with the government, which the federal prosecutor was trying to keep secret. The prosecutor, Theresa M.B. Van Vliet, asked Chief Magistrate Ann Vitunac to seal the proceedings and any evidence the bond hearing ever happened. Van Vliet told the judge that 11 days earlier Magistrate Lurana Snow had granted Sanchez-Cristancho a no cash bond, released him to the custody of the Drug Enforcement Administration, and then sealed everything so it would not be obvious in the record itself. The problem, according to Van Vliet, is that apparently when it gets filed, even if it is under seal, the court s computer, the WinDoc system, indicates sealed document. Judge Vitunac then ruled, We will hold these tapes [of the proceedings], not docket this proceeding, and my order at this moment is oral and to be put in writing at a later date. Seven months passed before that proceeding was placed on the public docket. In Connecticut, clerks are instructed to go to great lengths to hide secret docket cases. It is suggested that a photocopy of the original Daybook Page be made and the docket number and name of the case be redacted. In the redacted space, add level 1 file, the clerk s manual instructs. The public gets the photocopy while the original is maintained in a secure location such as the safe.
5 The Law A decision by the 11th Circuit, United States v. Valenti, 987 F.2d 708 (11th Cir. 1993), prohibits the use of dual dockets that keep matters from the public. In 1993, the 11th Circuit held that one public and one secret docket in a corruption case in Florida s Middle District violated the First Amendment. The Middle District s maintenance of a public and a sealed docket is inconsistent with affording the various interests of the public and the press meaningful access to criminal proceedings, the opinion says. The Southern District of Florida s Local Rule 5.4 says, unless otherwise provided by law, court rule or court order, proceedings in the U.S. District Court are public and court filings are matters of public record. A form is provided to close filings from public view, Order Re: Sealed Filing. There are no provisions of law or rule enacted before or after 9/11 that justifies or allows the sealing of an entire docket of a case or individual entries themselves in any type of litigation. Keeping a minimal public record of sealed matters allows defendants, the public, or the news media to mount a legal challenge to a prosecutor s motion to seal or a court s sealing order when they know that a sealing has occurred or is being sought. Normally, non-public developments in a case are reflected by a sealed docket entry. No one in South Florida is talking about the secret-dual dockets. Chief Judge William J. Zloch declined to comment on the practice. The court clerk, Clarence Maddox, said his office does not employ a dual docketing system, we use a single docketing system the integrated case management system for all our docketing work. While refusing to comment on the irregularities outlined in this article, Maddox said the court in its discretion is the authority for what is sealed and thus available to the public. This is an established and longstanding practice. Also refusing to comment on the dual-secret dockets was the United States Attorney in Miami, Marcos Jimenez. Eroding Public Trust Attorneys contacted by the Miami Daily Business Review, who are all past presidents of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, expressed shock and anger. I find it offensive, said Miami s Albert Krieger. While it s possible to conceive of a situation sealing a docket might be required, I m at a loss to see it at the moment. I ve never seen this before, said Fort Lauderdale s Bruce Lyons. Although on the 50th Anniversary of the House Un-American Activities Committee there s nothing that surprises me. Miami lawyer Neil Sonnett, termed the Bergonzoli case an extraordinary circumstance and called the sealing of dockets inexcusable if used to hide relevant matters for the defense of clients from lawyers. Ochoa s lawyers, however, argue a greater harm. While asking the 11th Circuit to put the issue of United States v. Valenti to rest forever, they argue the public credibility is threatened by what has happened in Ochoa s case and several criminal cases associated with it. It would be both ironic and tragic if the court were to issue an opinion in this case defining the scope of a criminal defendant s First Amendment right to access the court s through procedures that themselves denied that
6 defendant the same access afforded his opponent in the litigation, says Ochoa s brief. Black and Strafe argue that if government officials want to use informants whose identities they want to remain secret, they should not pursue criminal cases against them, which requires the court to provide the public information. Once Executive Branch officials take the step of filing a case, thereby invoking the role of the judiciary, they must either live with the consequences of that choice or dismiss the case, the brief says. When two branches collaborate to perpetuate an undercover operation that is not subject to public scrutiny, the public and the citizens accused will inevitably lose confidence in the independence of the judiciary. The foundation of the Republic will not crack if the federal government fails to put Fabio Ochoa in federal prison, the brief concludes. It will shatter, however, if the American people come to believe that their judicial system cannot be trusted. In late October, 2003, Bellahouel s secret case made it to the U.S. Supreme Court. No appellate court or district court ruling or docket information exists and the 27 page petition for certiorari filed in the supreme court by Kathleen Williams has been partially censored. Bellahouel s identity is also secret, concealed behind his initials. The certiorari petition notes: The entire dockets for this case and appeal, every entry on them, are maintained privately, under seal, unavailable to the public. As we go to press the Supreme Court has asked the solicitor general s office to respond to the brief. In the court of appeals, not just the filed documents and docket sheet are sealed from public view, but also hidden is the essential fact that a legal proceeding exists. The cert petition s existence indicates that the Eleventh Circuit, in a secret ruling, must have upheld the use of secret dockets and ruled against Bellahouel on the merits, presumably reversing its ruling in Valenti. Panel rulings can only be reversed by the circuit court sitting en banc. With a secret ruling, no one knows if that happened. The case is docketed in the Supreme Court as MKB v. Warden, Supreme Court Case No The Supreme Court has previously held that public and media access to judicial proceedings are an integral part of a functioning democracy. In Press Enterprise Co.v. Superior Court, 104 S.Ct 819 (1984), the court held The value of openness lies in the fact that people not actually attending trials can have confidence that standards of fairness are being observed. The sure knowledge that anyone is free to attend gives assurance that established procedures are being followed and that deviations will become known. It remains to be seen what the supreme court will do when those principles conflict with government expediency. Only after Bellahouel s case was docketed in the Supreme Court did the mainstream media take notice of this issue. However, Ochoa s case, with it s pervasive and proven pattern of hidden dockets, secret deals and sentenced prisoners who never actually go to prison, has languished in obscurity. Arguably, government agents extorting millions from drug lords to bankroll right wing death squads in a counterinsurgency war against leftist rebels, and then covering it up, would be a newsworthy issue. Apparently not. But, the last time it happened, known as the Iran-Contra scandal, the media didn t exactly jump on the story then either. Paul Wright, Editor Prison Legal News 972 Putney Rd. PMB 251 Brattleboro, VT 05301
Stages in a Capital Case from http://deathpenaltyinfo.msu.edu/ Note that not every case goes through all of the steps outlined here. Some states have different procedures. I. Pre-Trial Crimes that would
The Legal System in the United States At the conclusion of this chapter, students will be able to: 1. Understand how the legal system works; 2. Explain why laws are necessary; 3. Discuss how cases proceed
DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS This pamphlet has been provided to help you better understand the federal
Some Things You Should Know An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System Office of the Federal Public Defender Southern District of West Virginia 300 Virginia Street
Supreme Court of Georgia. ROLLINS v. STATE ROLLINS v. The STATE. No. S03A1419. -- January 12, 2004 Abbi T. Guest, Decatur, for appellant.daniel J. Porter, Dist. Atty., David B. Fife, Asst. Dist. Atty.,
Federal Public Defender W.D. Michigan The Federal Criminal Process INTRODUCTION The following summary of the federal criminal process is intended to provide you with a general overview of how your case
UNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson What is the Criminal Justice System? The criminal justice system is the system we have in the United States for addressing situations where it is believed
BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 08-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS 11 Austin Office COMMISSION FOR LAWYER * DISCIPLINE, * Petitioner * * 201400539 v. * * CHARLES J. SEBESTA, JR., * Respondent
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 07-29-P-S ) HALVOR CARL, ) ) Defendant ) RECOMMENDED DECISION ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS Halvor Carl, charged with
Case 1:14-cr-20052-JEM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/14 16:27:13 Page 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. ROGER BERGMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION
A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal Presented by the Office of the Richmond County District Attorney Acting District Attorney Daniel L. Master, Jr. 130 Stuyvesant
Section 15-23-60 Definitions. As used in this article, the following words shall have the following meanings: (1) ACCUSED. A person who has been arrested for committing a criminal offense and who is held
DOLCEFINO CONSULTING The Harris County District Attorney s Office is committed to provide or arrange for services to meet the material, emotional, and information needs experienced by victims and witnesses,
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 8. ALIENS AND NATIONALITY CHAPTER 12. IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY IMMIGRATION ADMISSION QUALIFICATIONS FOR ALIENS; TRAVEL CONTROL
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-4684 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, versus Plaintiff - Appellee, BERNARD JERIDORE, a/k/a Benny B, a/k/a Bernie, Defendant - Appellant.
Case 2:03-cr-00122-JES Document 60 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 7 PageID 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION FRANCIS MACKEY DAVISON, III, Petitioner, vs. Case No.
A Federal Criminal Case Timeline The following timeline is a very broad overview of the progress of a federal felony case. Many variables can change the speed or course of the case, including settlement
Facts for Federal Criminal Defendants FACTS FOR FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS I. INTRODUCTION The following is a short summary of what will happen to you if you are charged in a federal criminal case. This
General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this handbook is to provide answers to some very basic questions that inmates or inmates families might have regarding the processes of the criminal justice system. In no way
PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE PAYMENT OF CRIMINAL LEGAL AID FEES Courts Policy Division Department of Justice and Equality March 2015 Note: This document does not purport to provide legal advice or to provide
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN I. AUTHORITY Under the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, as amended, (CJA), 18 U.S.C. 3006A and the Guidelines for Administering
TAIWAN Edgar Y. CHEN Tsar & Tsai Law Firm G 8 th Fl., 245 DunHua S. Rd., Sec. 1. Taipei 106 TAIWAN Phone: G 88-2-27814111 or 66386999 Fax : G 886-2-27213834 or 27315581 Email: G firstname.lastname@example.org 1 1
BASIC CRIMINAL LAW Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Joe Bodiford Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer www.floridacriminaldefense.com www.blawgger.com THE FLORIDA CRIMINAL PROCESS Source: http://www.fsu.edu/~crimdo/cj-flowchart.html
THE US LEGAL SYSTEM: A Short Description Federal Judicial Center Background The United States Constitution establishes a federal system of government. The Constitution gives specific powers to the federal
SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Court Record Access Policy The Supreme Court of British Columbia 800 Smithe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2E1 www.courts.gov.bc.ca Page 1 of 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: GENERAL
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael H. TARKOFF, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-13223. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Feb. 20, 2001. Appeal from the United States District
Information For Defendants About Getting A Court-Appointed Attorney If you are charged with a criminal offense and cannot afford to hire an attorney, you are entitled to a court-appointed attorney. May
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW TO FIND AND WORK WITH A LAWYER LEGAL DISCLAIMER: FAMM cannot provide legal advice, representation, referrals, research, or guidance to those who need legal help. Nothing
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Filed *** 01/26/2015 8:00 AM THE HON. CRANE MCCLENNEN STATE OF ARIZONA CLERK OF THE COURT J. Eaton Deputy GARY L SHUPE v. MONICA RENEE JONES (001) JEAN JACQUES CABOU
107 THE DECISIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CASES AGAINST CROATIA REGARDING THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO A LAWYER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS Lovorka Kušan * INTRODUCTION By 27 November 2016 Croatia
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00020-CR EX PARTE DIMAS ROJAS MARTINEZ ---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ----------
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-4037 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. REGGIE ANDRE BECKTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States
A JAILHOUSE LAWYER S MANUAL Chapter 4: How to Find a Lawyer Columbia Human Rights Law Review Ninth Edition 2011 LEGAL DISCLAIMER A Jailhouse Lawyer s Manual is written and updated by members of the Columbia
Personal Injury Wrongful Death Slip & Fall Automobile Accidents Trucking Accidents Motorcycle Accidents Medical Malpractice Criminal Defense You re Under ARREST! What Happens Now? Do NOT Speak to Police
Crystal L. Cox Attorney Pro Se UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON Portland Division OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC and KEVIN D. PADRICK, Plaintiffs, V. CRYSTAL COX, Pro Se Defendant Objection
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 06a0010n.06 Filed: January 5, 2006 No. 04-5667 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SURESH KUMAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES
LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY By Peter L. Ostermiller Occasionally, a defendant, while incarcerated and apparently having nothing better to do, will file a Motion under RCr. 11.42,
Alabama bail laws 1. Applicable Statutes A. CODE OF ALABAMA TITLE 15. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. CHAPTER 13. BAIL. ARTICLES 1-6. 2. Licensing Requirements for Agents A. The Code of Alabama, Alabama Rules of Criminal
Case 1:03-cr-00422-LEK Document 24 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PATRICK GILBERT, Petitioner, -against- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1:05-CV-0325 (LEK)
ADVOCATES AND SOLICITORS EXAMINATIONS COMMON EXAMINATIONS Civil Procedure and Criminal Procedure April 2004 IMPORTANT NOTES 1. Please write legibly unreadable papers may result in lost marks. 2. Your written
Using Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics John Scalia, Jr. Statistician Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Federal criminal case processing
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Peter Tom, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Eugene Nardelli Luis A. Gonzalez Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Justices. ---------------------------------------x
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-2057 David Johnson, petitioner, Appellant, vs.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit Nos. 94-30407 94-30386 (Summary Calendar) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JULIO RIEPELE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEROME GAMBINO, versus Consolidated
Office of the Attorney General Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses MARCH 2009 LAWRENCE WASDEN Attorney General Criminal Law Division Special Prosecutions Unit Telephone: (208) 332-3096 Fax: (208)
Your Criminal Justice System Helpful Information for the Victims and Witnesses of Crime Provided by Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt Victims Services Division 120 SW 10th Ave, 2nd Floor Topeka, KS
A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney General s Office Bill Lockyer, Attorney General A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims
2:13-cv-12939-PJD-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 07/06/13 Pg 1 of 11 Pg ID 1 DETROIT FREE PRESS, a Michigan corporation, STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFMICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, v. Case No. Hon.
Understanding the Civil Involuntary Commitment Process About the Author By D. Renée Hildebrant http://www.okbar.org/obj/articles_05/021205.htm Oklahoma Bar Journal D. Renée Hildebrant is the trial court
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION BRIAN Z. FRANCE, v. MEGAN P. FRANCE, Plaintiff, Defendant. Case No. 3:11-CV-00186 PLAINTIFF S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM: Addressing Deficiencies in Idaho s Public Defense System By delegating to each county the responsibility to provide counsel at the trial level without any state funding or oversight,
Case 3:07-cv-00952-L Document 26 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 6 PageID 979 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RAFFAELE M. PANDOZY, Ph.D., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 14-3137 United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Lacresia Joy White lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant Appeal
Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court Rule 6.610 Criminal Procedure Generally (A) Precedence. Criminal cases have precedence over civil actions. (B) Pretrial. The court, on its own initiative
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT
[Cite as State v. Mobarak, 2015-Ohio-3007.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 14AP-517 (C.P.C. No. 12CR-5582) v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Soleiman
PAST CRIME, CRIME FRAUD, FUTURE CRIME: WHERE ARE WE? By Abraham A. Dash and Franklin A. Dash Mr. Abraham Dash is a Professor Emeritus at the University of Maryland School of Law and Mr. Franklin Dash is
Case 1:05-cr-10037-GAO Document 459 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL NO. 05-10037-GAO-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GRANT BOYD, Defendant. O TOOLE,
. ' IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE 201B FEB -9 kt4 11: 29 IN RE: GAILE OWENS I NO. 85-01174 1 Shelby County TENNESSEE ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS' AMICUS STATEMENT IN SUPPORT
A. Under GRPC 1.6, a lawyer MUST disclose information, even if gained in the professional relationship with a client and even if no law requires the lawyer to do so, if necessary to prevent: 1. Death 2.
No person... shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. Amendment V. Defendant may not be compelled
GROSS, C.J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2010 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellant, v. D.B.D., the father, Appellee. No. 4D09-4862 [August 25, 2010]
NOTICE The text of this opinion can be corrected before the opinion is published in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are encouraged to bring typographical or other formal errors to the attention of the Clerk
Going to Court as a Witness - July 2010 Going to Court as a Witness 1 Introduction Going to court can be stressful for many victims and witnesses. If you need to give evidence in a criminal trial, we hope
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EDWIN SCARBOROUGH, Defendant Below- Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below- Appellee. No. 38, 2014 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware,
Course Court Systems and Practices Unit I Criminal Justice System Essential Question What are the history, structure, and function of the state and federal courts and criminal procedure? TEKS 130.296(c)
Guide to Municipal Court What Types of Cases Are Heard in Municipal Court? Cases heard in municipal court are divided into four general categories: Violations of motor vehicle and traffic laws Violations
INFORMATION FOR FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................ 1 SILENCE...................................................................................
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEVIN D. TALLEY, Defendant-Below No. 172, 2003 Appellant, v. Cr. ID No. 0108005719 STATE OF DELAWARE, Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware,
Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings and Your Child A Guide for Parents and Guardians NOTICE TO READER This brochure provides basic information about family court procedures relating to juvenile delinquency
Chapter 3 Justice Process at the County Level Brooks County Courthouse Chapter Three: Judice Process at the County Level Developmental Assets: Life Skills: TEKS: Objectives: 10. Safety 30. Responsibility
Jury Trials Greenville Municipal Court s Vision To promote accuracy and efficiency in our information for the benefit of our external and internal partners. Mission To provide the effective administration
Cite as: 557 U. S. (2009) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES IN RE TROY ANTHONY DAVIS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS No. 08 1443. Decided August 17, 2009 JUSTICE SCALIA, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, 1 (' r,f~_ilejj,,.). J/.:; r1c 1 cnufjr -. -, ; I. II. l015 JAN 8 /\ 8: Ob AMENDED CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN January 2015.. UIS7RICT or UTAH AUTHORITY.
Texas Appeals Court Finds Mental Health Judge Failed to Follow Basic Principle of Legal Procedure By Craig A. Conway, J.D., LL.M. (Health Law) email@example.com A Texas appeals court ruled last month