value of her medical treatment and that she had rebutted the presumption under Deck v. Teasley.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "value of her medical treatment and that she had rebutted the presumption under 490.715. Deck v. Teasley."

Transcription

1 The Flag In Personal Injury Action, Evidence May Be Presented on the Value of Medical Treatment Received to Rebut Presumption That Medical Expenses Are Limited to the Amount Actually Paid by w. dudley mccarter Delmar Teasley drove his vehicle into the back of a line of vehicles stopped at a traffic signal, causing the vehicle behind Edith Deck to collide with her vehicle. Ms. Deck sustained injuries in the collision and underwent surgery, physical therapy and other medical care. 1 Ms. Deck was billed $27, for her treatment. The amount actually paid for her treatment, after adjustments, was $9, Payments were made by Medicare, supplemental insurance and Ms. Deck. 2 Before the trial on her suit against Teasley, Teasley filed a motion to determine the value of [her] medical treatment pursuant to section At the hearing on Teasley s motion, Ms. Deck presented testimony from three individuals who previously or currently worked in healthcare positions involving the W. DUDLEY MCCARTER Behr, McCarter & Potter St. Louis cost of providing medical services. Each testified that the amount billed to Ms. Deck for her medical treatment was customary, fair and reasonable. They also testified that the face value of the bills was the value of the medical services provided, not the amount reimbursed by Medicare. [T]he trial court found that the presumption in section was not rebutted and determined that the value of [Deck s] medical treatment was limited to the amount actually paid for it, together with any amount she still was obligated to pay. 4 During trial, Ms. Deck made an offer of proof regarding the value of her medical expenses, again attempting to rebut the presumption of value under section [T]he trial court again ruled that Ms. Deck could not present evidence to the jury of her medical bills that had not been paid by her or on her behalf. 6 [T]he jury rendered a verdict in favor of Ms. Deck and assessed her damages in the amount of $42, On appeal, the Supreme Court remanded the case for a new trial on the issue of damages only, finding that Ms. Deck had presented substantial evidence that her total medical bills represented the value of her medical treatment and that she had rebutted the presumption under Deck v. Teasley. Section , subsection 5, newly enacted in 2005, governs the admissibility of evidence regarding a specific type of damages, the value of medical treatment rendered to a party. It provides that evidence of the dollar amount necessary to satisfy the financial obligation to health care providers is admissible at trial and creates the rebuttable presumption that such amount represents the value of the medical treatment rendered. On the motion of any party, the court may determine whether other evidence of value is admissible at trial and delineates that the other evidence may include, but is not limited to: the medical bills incurred; the amount actually paid for the medical treatments; or the amount or estimate of the amount not paid that such party is obligated to pay in the event of a recovery / Journal of the Missouri Bar

2 The rebuttable presumption created by section is that the dollar amount paid to satisfy the financial obligation to the healthcare providers is the value of the medical treatment rendered. 9 The rebuttable presumption in section requires the trial court to determine if the party seeking to rebut the presumption has presented substantial evidence that the value of medical treatment rendered is an amount different from the dollar amount necessary to satisfy the financial obligations to health care providers. If such substantial evidence is proffered, the statutory presumption is rebutted. When the presumption is rebutted, the party s other evidence of value, as well as the amount necessary to satisfy the financial obligations is admitted at trial as if no presumption exists. If the presumption is not rebutted, then the only evidence of the value of medical treatment rendered is the dollar amount necessary to satisfy the financial obligation of the health care providers. 10 Here, Ms. Deck presented substantial, evidence at the pre-trial hearing and the offer of proof that the amount she was billed is the value of the medical treatment rendered to her. 11 In light of such substantial evidence, the trial court misapplied the law in ruling that the statutory presumption in section was not rebutted. 12 Ms. Deck proffered evidence that the value of the medical treatment rendered to her was $27, However, due to the trial court s exclusion of that evidence, the jury only was permitted to hear evidence that the value of her medical treatment was $9,904.28, the amount that [she], Medicaid and supplemental insurance actually paid for her treatment after adjustments. The exclusion of evidence of the additional $18, in potential damages the jury should have been allowed to consider, materially affected the merits of the action. See Accomac Realty Co. v. City of St. Louis, 152 S.W.2d 100, 103 (Mo. 1941). Accordingly, the trial court s exclusion of Ms. Deck s evidence of the value of medical treatment was prejudicial and she is entitled to a new trial on the issue of damages. Judgment of Foreign State is Presumed Valid; Burden is on Defendant to Prove Lack of Personal Jurisdiction by Foreign State People s Bank obtained a judgment in an Oklahoma court against Missouri resident H. L. Frazee. People s Bank proceeded to enforce the judgment in the circuit court of Wright County, Missouri. The circuit court found that the Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction over Frazee and quashed the registration of the foreign judgment. The judgment was entered in Oklahoma on a guarantee signed by Frazee for a loan to his son and his son s wife. People s Bank had prepared the guarantee and mailed it to Frazee in Missouri. Frazee signed the guarantee and mailed it back to People s Bank. In the suit People s Bank filed to enforce the guarantee, a summons was mailed to Frazee by certified mail, but he refused service. The Oklahoma court entered a default judgment against him. The circuit court found that the Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction over Frazee, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in People s Bank v. Frazee. 13 Generally, when personal jurisdiction is contested by the filing of a motion to dismiss a Missouri action, the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing that the defendant s contacts with the forum state were sufficient. State ex rel. Ranni Assocs., Inc. v. Hartenbach, 742 S.W.2d 134, 137 (Mo. banc 1987). When the challenge to personal jurisdiction arises in the context of a motion to register a foreign judgment, however, the strong presumption of the validity of a foreign judgment that is regular on its face makes the general rule inapplicable. 14 Frazee defaulted in the Oklahoma action [and he] contested the Oklahoma district court s personal jurisdiction over him for the first time in the Missouri circuit court. Because the issue was not litigated in the foreign state, Mr. Frazee had the right to attack the judgment for lack of personal jurisdiction in the Missouri circuit court. Miller v. Dean, 289 S.W.3d 620, 624 (Mo. App. 2009). The Oklahoma judgment Mr. Frazee was contesting is regular on its face, so the judgment was subject to the strong presumption that the Oklahoma court had jurisdiction. As the party asserting invalidity of the foreign judgment, Mr. Frazee bore the burden of establishing that the Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction. 15 Because this jurisdictional challenge arises in the context of a motion to register a foreign judgment, this Court must look to the rendering state s law that is, Oklahoma substantive law November-December 2010 / 313

3 to determine whether the Oklahoma court had personal jurisdiction over Mr. Frazee. See Phillips [ v. Fallen], 6 S.W.3d at 868 [(Mo. banc 1999)]. 16 [T]he inquiry is whether the Oklahoma court s exercise of personal jurisdiction over Mr. Frazee comports with federal due process. See Gilbert v. SEC. Fin. Corp. of Okla., Inc., 152 P.3d 165, 173 (Okla. 2006). 17 In some cases, single or isolated acts by a defendant in a state, because of their nature and quality and the circumstances of their commission, provided sufficient minimum contacts to support jurisdiction for liability arising from those acts. Bryant [v. Smith Interior Design Group, Inc.], 310 S.W.3d at 233 [(Mo. banc 2010)]. 18 Here, Frazee knew he was dealing with an Oklahoma bank when he signed the guarantee. He also knew that People s Bank would not have provided a loan to Frazee s son and daughter-inlaw without Frazee s guarantee. Frazee engaged in telephone conversations with People s Bank and mailed the guarantee back to Oklahoma after he signed it. Contrary to Frazee s assertion that a non-resident guarantor must reap a pecuniary gain, other courts have found that a personal financial benefit or pecuniary gain by the guarantor is unnecessary to exercise personal jurisdiction over the non-resident guarantor. E. G. Mellon Bank[, (East) PSFS, Nat l Ass n. v. Farino], 960 F.2d at 1225 n. 4 [(3rd Cir. 1992)]. 19 There are also sound policy reasons for exercising jurisdiction over non-resident guarantors. "[T]he Due Process Clause may not readily be wielded as a territorial shield to avoid interstate obligations that have been voluntarily assumed." Mellon Bank, 960 F.2d at In this case, Frazee voluntarily assumed the obligation of guaranteeing [the] note. [He] purposely directed activity into the forum 314 / Journal of the Missouri Bar and purposely availed himself to the protections of Oklahoma [and] should not be able to avoid his interstate obligation by asserting lack of personal jurisdiction. 20 Because of the strong presumption of validity of foreign state judgments, Mr. Frazee had the burden to establish that the judgment was irregular or that Oklahoma lacked personal jurisdiction over him. Every personal jurisdiction case involves a fact-specific inquiry; it does not lend itself to categorical determinations. [Mellon Bank, 960 F.2d at 1225]. Under the facts and circumstances surrounding Mr. Frazee s execution of the guarantee, [he] had the required minimum contacts with Oklahoma. Therefore, the Oklahoma court's exercise of personal jurisdiction over Mr. Frazee comports with Oklahoma s long-arm statute and due process. 21 Defective Construction Claim Barred By Ten-Year Statute of Repose In 1987, Mr. Dell Foods hired Dennis Watson Construction as general contractor for the construction of an addition to [Mr. Dell s] production facility. The proposed addition included an insulated room to be used as a large walk-in freezer. Watson retained Williams-Carver to plan and construct a refrigeration system for the freezer room. 22 In 2001, a fire was intentionally set by a Mr. Dell employee in a room adjacent to the freezer. A concrete block wall separated the room from the freezer, but there was a gap of between 16 to 24 inches above the concrete wall. The fire spread from the adjacent room to the freezer by going over the top of the concrete wall. As the insurer for Mr. Dell, Travelers paid in excess of $5,000,000 for the [fire damage] and received an assignment of Mr. Dell s rights. 23 In 2005, Travelers filed suit against Williams-Carver for negligent installation of the freezer, alleging that Williams-Carver concealed the defective gap at the top of the wall of the freezer. The trial court granted summary judgment to Williams-Carver, finding that Travelers claims were filed beyond the 10-year statute of repose, RSMo. and further finding that the concealment exception of the statute did not apply. The Court of Appeals affirmed in Travelers Indemnity Co. v. The Williams-Carver Co. 24 The Missouri Supreme Court has defined the phrase sole connection with the improvement in Section as a connection to a defective or unsafe condition of an improvement or real estate giving rise to liability. Magee v. Blue Ridge Prof l Bldg. Co., 821 S.W.2d 839, 843 (Mo. banc 1991). 25 [I]f a defendant has any connection that gives rise to liability with respect to an improvement other than by design, planning or construction, Section is not available as an affirmative defense. Lay v. P & G Healthcare, Inc., 37 S.W.3d 310, 321 (Mo. App. 2000). The defendant's sole connection to the defective or unsafe improvement to real property must be as an architect, engineer or builder Id. 26 Here, the sole connection of Williams- Carver with the improvement was as the builder of the refrigeration system. Traveler s lawsuit against Williams-Carver was filed more than ten years after the improvements to Mr. Dell s production facility were completed in Williams- Carver properly invoked the affirmative defense of the ten-year statute of repose in Section by presenting uncontroverted evidence that

4 its sole connection with the improvements was to perform or furnish construction services. 27 The concealment exception in does not apply. As used in the statute, the term conceals means an affirmative act, something actually done directly intended to prevent discovery or to thwart investigation. Magee, 821 S.W.2d at [D] eposition testimony established that the gap between the top of the concrete wall and the roof was open and obvious. 29 To rebut the evidence of openness, Travelers alleges the defective nature of the gap was latent and, therefore, its significance should have been disclosed by Williams-Carver. However, latent defects are not the same as concealed defects. Fueston v. Burns & McDonnell Eng g Co., 877 S.W.2d 631, 638 (Mo. App. 1994). Conceals means more than a failure to reveal information allegedly known. Butler [v. Mitchell- Hugeback, Inc.], 895 S.W.2d at [(Mo. banc 1995)]. Rather, it carries the implication of intentional conduct designed to prevent discovery. Id. at There is no evidence that Williams- Carver acted affirmatively to prevent the discovery of the gap in the wall. Given the open and obvious nature of the alleged defective condition, there is no factual dispute as to whether the concealment exception in Section (2) could be applied. 31 Official Immunity is Available to Publicly- Employed Emergency Responders Only in a True Emergency Situation Anthony Thomas called complaining of chest pains and difficulty breathing. 32 Within a short time, an ambulance unit from the Community Fire Protection District arrived at his home. The unit was manned by Michael Brandt, a licensed emergency medical technician, and James Loehrer, a licensed paramedic. 33 Upon arrival, Brant and Loehrer examined Thomas and collected his vital signs. They diagnosed his problem as acid reflux and recommended over-the-counter medication. Believing he was in no immediate medical danger, they left his home 15 minutes after arriving. The next morning, Thomas again called 9-1-1, still complaining of chest pains and difficulty breathing. An ambulance unit from Community Fire Protection District, manned by a different two-person team, arrived at his home. That team began administering emergency medical care and transported him to DePaul Health Center, where he died later that day from cardiac arrest. The spouse and son of Thomas filed a wrongful death suit against Community Fire Protection District, Brandt and Loehrer. The trial court granted summary judgment to Grant and Loehrer, finding that they were entitled to official immunity. The Court of Appeals reversed, however, in Thomas v. Brant. Official immunity is a judicially-created doctrine designed to protect public employees from liability for allegedly negligent acts committed during their performance of official duties. [Southers v. City of Farmington, 263 S.W.3d 603, 610 (Mo. banc 2008).] Generally, whether public employees are protected turns on the type of act involved; the court must determine whether the challenged act was discretionary or ministerial. Davis v. Lambert- St. Louis Intern. Airport, 193 S.W.3d 760, 763 (Mo. banc 2006). Acts which are discretionary are protected, while acts which are ministerial are not. Id. A discretionary act is one that requires the exercise of reason in the adaptation of means to an end and discretion in determining how or whether an act should be done or course pursued. Id. A ministerial act is a clerical duty performed pursuant to a mandate with no exercise of judgment involved. State ex rel. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Gaertner, 619 S.W.2d 761, 765 (Mo. App. E.D. 1981). The doctrine is intended to encourage a vigorous and effective government where public officials can make decisions free of fear of personal liability. Southers, 263 S.W.3d at 611; Eli Lilly, 619 S.W.2d at 763. When the issue of official immunity involves a publiclyemployed medical professional, there is a second step to the analysis. 34 In Richardson [v. City of St. Louis, 293 S.W.3d 133 (Mo. App. E.D. 2009)], this Court held that whether the actions of emergency medical responders are protected turns on the circumstances of the situation. When emergency responders are acting in a rapidly-evolving emergency situation with limited information, they are protected by official immunity. Id. 35 Without commenting on the vitality of Eli Lilly, [this court] reaffirms the approach advanced in Richardson. When publicly-employed emergency medical personnel are treating patients, their negligent acts are protected by official immunity only if they are acting in a true emergency situation. This true emergency situation is a strict requirement. A true emergency is one November-December 2010 / 315

5 involving rapidly-evolving circumstances where the medical personnel have limited information. The court should determine whether the situation involved a true emergency on a case-by-case basis by evaluating the totality of the circumstances. 36 Here, the two-person team that responded to the first call was not acting in a true emergency situation. The time and information available to [them] was more like that of a doctor treating a patient in a hospital than that of an emergency responder arriving to find a patient in critical condition. 37 Responders acting in non-emergency situations will be held to the same standard of care as their privately-employed counterparts. 38 Official immunity is available to publicly-employed emergency responders only if they are acting in a true emergency situation. In this case, [the first two responders] were not acting in a true emergency situation. 39 Contractor May Recover Attorney s Fees Under Private Prompt Payment Act Lucas Stucco & EIFS Design, LLC (Contractor) and Loren Landau (Owner) entered into a contract for the installation of a stucco finish on Owner s building. 40 After the project was completed, Owner still owed Contractor a balance of $4,900. Contractor filed suit for breach of contract, action on account, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment. In the prayer to each count of Contractor s petition, Contractor requested an award of attorney s fees. After a bench trial, the trial court awarded Contractor $4,900, plus attorney s fees of $10,567. The Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed in Lucas Stucco & EIFS Design, LLC v. Landau. The general rule in Missouri is that attorney s fees are not awarded to every successful litigant. Harris v. 316 / Journal of the Missouri Bar Union Elec. Co., 766 S.W.2d 80, 89 (Mo. banc 1989). Attorney fees are recoverable in two situations: when a statute specifically authorizes recovery and when the contract provides for attorney fees. Essex Contracting, Inc. v. Jefferson County, 277 S.W.3d 647, 657 (Mo. banc 2009). 41 The Missouri Private Prompt Payment Act, Section , provides that [a]ll persons who enter into a contract for private design or construction work shall make all scheduled payments pursuant to the terms of the contract. Section Any person who fails to make such payments may be subject to an action under the statute. Section In resolving the action, [t]he court may[,] in addition to any other award of damages, [award] reasonable attorney fees [ ] to the prevailing party. Id. Although the issue in this case is one of first impression, Vance Brothers, Inc. v. Obermiller Construction Services, Inc., 181 S.W.3d 562 (Mo. banc 2006), discussed the pleading requirements of the act. Vance concluded that there are two requirements for pleading a violation of the act: (1) the parties entered into a private construction contract; and (2) one or more payments were not made pursuant to the contract. Id. at Here, Contractor pleaded these two act requirements. 43 Contractor requested reasonable attorney fees in the prayer. The act does not require specific reference to the statute in the petition as a requirement to seek the relief it affords. Instead, a court may award any relief a statute provides, including attorney fees, as long as the party has pleaded the necessary elements of the act and has requested that relief in the prayer. By alleging in the petition all of the elements necessary to bring a claim under the act, Contractor met the pleading requirements of the statute, such that a specific request for reasonable attorney fees in the prayer may be granted. 44 A Municipality or Other Public Corporation May Bring a Declaratory Judgment Action to Determine a Boundary Dispute The City of Lake St. Louis filed a declaratory judgment action against the City of O Fallon, seeking to invalidate O Fallon s annexation of certain disputed property. The suit alleged that Lake St. Louis had a legally protectable interest in enforcing its ordinances, collecting and administering taxes, and protecting the rights of the city and its residents in the disputed area, and asked the trial court to enter judgment declaring that O Fallon had not legally annexed the property that Lake St. Louis claimed to be within its boundaries. 45 O Fallon filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that Lake St. Louis was not entitled to bring a declaratory judgment action to determine its boundaries. 46 The trial court granted O Fallon s motion, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in City of Lake St. Louis v. City of O Fallon. [W]hile O Fallon is correct that individuals are not permitted to bring declaratory judgment actions seeking to determine boundaries or to oust a municipal or other public corporation from disputed territory, municipalities, school districts and other public corporations are permitted to bring

6 such actions. 47 A declaratory judgment provides guidance to the parties, declaring their rights and obligations and otherwise governing their relationship. Shipley v. Cates, 200 S.W.3d 529, 534 (Mo. banc 2006). 48 While the attorney general and prosecutor may bring a suit in quo warranto [when two governmental entities assert claims over a disputed area], whether they choose to do so is within those officials discretion. The governmental entity, therefore, as the party directly affected, should have the right instead to bring a declaratory judgment action in its own name to vindicate its directly affected interest in the territory. To require a directly affected municipality or other similar public corporation to rely on a third party the attorney general or a county prosecutor to bring suit over its very boundaries would risk leaving it without a remedy if the attorney general and prosecutor exercise their discretion not to act. While this is appropriate where an individual litigant is involved, to avoid the multiplicity of suits that otherwise would ensue and to ensure that spurious claims are not asserted in an effort to adversely affect the public body, such reasoning does not apply to the municipality or other public corporation itself, as it has a direct and vital interest in determining its own boundaries. 49 While a quo warranto action may be brought by the attorney general or prosecuting or circuit attorney at the relation of the public corporation to determine a boundary dispute, a declaratory judgment action may also be brought directly by the municipality or other public corporation itself. Endnotes 1 Deck v. Teasley, SC90628 (Mo. banc, Oct. 26, 2010). 2 Id. 3 Id. 4 Id. 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 Id. 8 Id. 9 Id. 10 Id. 11 Id. 12 Id. 13 No. SC (Mo. banc 2010). 14 Id. 15 Id. 16 Id. 17 Id. 18 Id. 19 Id. 20 Id. 21 Id. 22 Travelers Indemnity Co. v. The Williams- Carver Co., No. WD (Mo. App. W.D. 2010). 23 Id. 24 Id. 25 Id. 26 Id. 27 Id. 28 Id. 29 Id. 30 Id. 31 Id. 32 Thomas v. Brandt, No. ED (Mo. App. E.D. 2010). 33 Id. 34 Id. 35 Id. 36 Id. 37 Id. 38 Id. 39 Id. 40 Lucas Stucco & EIFS Design, LLC v. Landau, No. SC90771 (Mo. banc 2010). 41 Id. 42 Id. 43 Id. 44 Id. 45 City of Lake St. Louis v. City of O Fallon, No. SC (Mo. banc 2010). 46 Id. 47 Id. 48 Id. 49 Id. November-December 2010 / 317

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a

More information

Oklahoma Supreme Court Declares Oklahoma s Lawsuit Reform Act of 2009 Unconstitutional

Oklahoma Supreme Court Declares Oklahoma s Lawsuit Reform Act of 2009 Unconstitutional Oklahoma Supreme Court Declares Oklahoma s Lawsuit Reform Act of 2009 Unconstitutional On June 4, 2013, the Oklahoma Supreme Court issued two opinions invalidating as unconstitutional numerous Oklahoma

More information

2015 IL App (3d) 130003-U. Order filed February 5, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015

2015 IL App (3d) 130003-U. Order filed February 5, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (3d 130003-U Order filed

More information

2:08-cv-12533-DPH-PJK Doc # 67 Filed 03/26/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 2147 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

2:08-cv-12533-DPH-PJK Doc # 67 Filed 03/26/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 2147 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:08-cv-12533-DPH-PJK Doc # 67 Filed 03/26/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 2147 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, MICHIGAN CATASTROPHIC

More information

Small Claims: The Process in Detail

Small Claims: The Process in Detail What is a small claims division? Every justice court in Arizona has a small claims division to provide an inexpensive and speedy method for resolving most civil disputes that do not exceed $2,500. All

More information

FLOYD-TUNNELL V. SHELTER MUT. INS. CO.: WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS AND UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE

FLOYD-TUNNELL V. SHELTER MUT. INS. CO.: WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS AND UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE FLOYD-TUNNELL V. SHELTER MUT. INS. CO.: WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS AND UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE INTRODUCTION Rebecca Floyd-Tunnell and Doris Floyd ( Appellants ) filed suit against Shelter Mutual Insurance

More information

CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825

CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825 CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825 Filed 13 September 9 P4:46 Gary Fitzsimmons District Clerk Dallas District CADE MANNETTI, v. Plaintiff, VISIONARY RESTAURANTS LLC, VISIONARY STAFFING LLC, WILLIAM McCROREY, AND THOMAS

More information

Civil Suits: The Process

Civil Suits: The Process Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized

More information

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 26, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-07-00390-CV LEO BORRELL, Appellant V. VITAL WEIGHT CONTROL, INC., D/B/A NEWEIGH, Appellee On Appeal from

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STEVE AUSTIN, Appellant, v. JOHN SCHIRO, M.D., Respondent. WD78085 OPINION FILED: May 26, 2015 Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clinton County, Missouri

More information

No. 1-10-0602 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

No. 1-10-0602 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT SECOND DIVISION May 31, 2011 No. 1-10-0602 Notice: This order was filed under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under

More information

Part 6 Adjudication of Parentage

Part 6 Adjudication of Parentage Part 6 Adjudication of Parentage 78B-15-601 Proceeding authorized -- Definition. (1) An adjudicative proceeding may be maintained to determine the parentage of a child. A judicial proceeding is governed

More information

ARBITRATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT FALL 2009 CONFERENCE

ARBITRATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT FALL 2009 CONFERENCE ARBITRATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT FALL 2009 CONFERENCE Informative Website. I have found to be an extremely informative website the University of Missouri s School of Law web communication which can be accessed

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Thompson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company et al Doc. 1 1 1 WO William U. Thompson, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Plaintiff, Property & Casualty Insurance

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division IN RE: WILLIAM G. DADE ) Case No. 00-32487 ANN E. DADE ) Chapter 7 Debtors. ) ) ) DEBORAH R. JOHNSON ) Adversary

More information

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Case: 4:12-cv-02030-DDN Doc. #: 42 Filed: 06/19/13 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MARY HAYDEN, ) individually and as plaintiff

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE DAYSTAR INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, MARICOPA COUNTY TREASURER; ADAM SANDOVAL and OFILIA SANDOVAL;

More information

13 LC 37 1568ER. Senate Bill 202 By: Senators Unterman of the 45th, Mullis of the 53rd and Chance of the 16th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

13 LC 37 1568ER. Senate Bill 202 By: Senators Unterman of the 45th, Mullis of the 53rd and Chance of the 16th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT Senate Bill 202 By: Senators Unterman of the 45th, Mullis of the 53rd and Chance of the 16th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 1 2 3 4 To amend Article 5 of Chapter 8 of Title 31 of the Official Code of Georgia

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO FRANCIS GRAHAM, ) No. ED97421 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs. ) ) Honorable Steven H. Goldman STATE

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO KEVIN COOPER, ) ) No. ED96549 Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court v. ) of St. Louis County ) CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC, ) Honorable

More information

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc Robert E. Fast, M.D., et al., Appellants, vs. No. SC89734 F. James Marston, M.D., Respondent. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BUCHANAN COUNTY Honorable Weldon C. Judah,

More information

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order

More information

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act.

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act. 3721L.01I AN ACT To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION Case: 1:14-cv-00034-SNLJ Doc. #: 93 Filed: 07/01/14 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION DEPOSITORS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff,

More information

What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute. By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins. Introduction

What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute. By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins. Introduction What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins Introduction More and more lawsuits are filed in Florida alleging that the trustee of a trust

More information

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations. RESULTS Appellate Court upholds decision that malpractice action barred September 2, 2015 The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently upheld a summary judgment obtained by David Overstreet and Mike McCall

More information

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Scope. 2. Applicability. 3. Pleadings. 3.1. Commencement of action. 4. Compulsory counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party

More information

Oklahoma Medicaid False Claims Act. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Oklahoma Medicaid False Claims Act".

Oklahoma Medicaid False Claims Act. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Oklahoma Medicaid False Claims Act. Oklahoma Medicaid False Claims Act 5053. Short title This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Oklahoma Medicaid False Claims Act". 5053.1. Definitions--Civil penalty for false or fraudulent claims

More information

General District Courts

General District Courts General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL No. ED96759 INSURANCE CO., Respondent, Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County v. PAMELA C. COKE Honorable

More information

Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge:

Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge: Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1362 James Joyce, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Armstrong Teasdale,

More information

History: Add. 1971, Act 19, Imd. Eff. May 5, 1971; Am. 1976, Act 89, Imd. Eff. Apr. 17, 1976.

History: Add. 1971, Act 19, Imd. Eff. May 5, 1971; Am. 1976, Act 89, Imd. Eff. Apr. 17, 1976. MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Act 198 of 1965 AN ACT providing for the establishment, maintenance and administration of a motor vehicle accident claims fund for the payment of damages for injury to

More information

How to Litigate a Writ of Mandate Case

How to Litigate a Writ of Mandate Case How to Litigate a Writ of Mandate Case Manuela Albuquerque, Esq. Thomas B. Brown, Esq. Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP League of California Cities City Attorneys Conference May 4-7, 2011 Yosemite Introduction

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA PLAINTIFF S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA PLAINTIFF S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION MICHAEL GLENN WHITE, et. al. Plaintiffs v. VIRGINIA BOARD OF EDUCATION; et. al., Defendants. Case No. 3:00CV386

More information

2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U No. 1-14-1985 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).

More information

Personal Injury Litigation

Personal Injury Litigation Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction

More information

2005-C -2496 CHARLES ALBERT AND DENISE ALBERT v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. (Parish of Lafayette)

2005-C -2496 CHARLES ALBERT AND DENISE ALBERT v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. (Parish of Lafayette) FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 0 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 17th day of October, 200, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2005-C -249 CHARLES ALBERT AND

More information

2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT NOTICE Decision filed 10/15/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227

More information

RECOGNIZING BAD FAITH CASES

RECOGNIZING BAD FAITH CASES RECOGNIZING BAD FAITH CASES Michael J. Mohlman Smith Coonrod Mohlman, LLC 7001 W. 79th Street Overland Park, KS 66204 Telephone: (913) 495-9965; Facsimile: (913) 894-1686 mike@smithcoonrod.com www.smithcoonrod.com

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session FARMERS MUTUAL OF TENNESSEE v. ATHENS INSURANCE AGENCY, CHARLES W. SPURLING and wife, CAROLYN SPURLING Direct Appeal from the

More information

Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax

Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Experience Kenneth B. Walton is a Founding Partner

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-148 (HL) ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-148 (HL) ORDER Case 7:12-cv-00148-HL Document 43 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 11 CHRISTY LYNN WATFORD, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

More information

Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax

Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Experience Kenneth B. Walton is a Founding Partner of the Boston-based

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 10-3272. In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor. ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 10-3272. In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor. ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 10-3272 In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor NOT PRECEDENTIAL ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. On Appeal from the United States District

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 99,491. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 99,491. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 99,491 KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, v. JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under the Kansas Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement

More information

Indemnity Agreements & California s Crawford Decision: Its Implications and Strategies for Defense

Indemnity Agreements & California s Crawford Decision: Its Implications and Strategies for Defense Indemnity Agreements & California s Crawford Decision: Its Implications and Strategies for Defense Prepared for the Construction Law Section Meeting at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Federation of Defense

More information

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL D. GUOLEE, Judge. Affirmed.

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL D. GUOLEE, Judge. Affirmed. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED November 19, 1996 A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS.

More information

VII. JUDGMENT RULE 54. JUDGMENTS; COSTS

VII. JUDGMENT RULE 54. JUDGMENTS; COSTS VII. JUDGMENT RULE 54. JUDGMENTS; COSTS (a) Definition; Form. Judgment as used in these rules includes a decree and any order from which an appeal lies. A judgment shall not contain a recital of pleadings

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District SOUTHERN DIVISION BIRI M. BLEVINS, JOHN T. BUSEY, No. ED99852 AND CHARLES W. JONES, Appellants, Appeal from the Circuit Court vs. of Cape Girardeau County

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Bartle, C.J. December 14, 2006

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Bartle, C.J. December 14, 2006 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA REBECCA S. ZEIGENFUSE : CIVIL ACTION on behalf of herself and all : others similarly situated : : v. : : APEX ASSET MANAGEMENT,

More information

Case: 2:07-cv-00039-JCH Doc. #: 20 Filed: 10/03/07 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #:

Case: 2:07-cv-00039-JCH Doc. #: 20 Filed: 10/03/07 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: <pageid> Case: 2:07-cv-00039-JCH Doc. #: 20 Filed: 10/03/07 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION MARY DOWELL, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 2:07-CV-39

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Physical Therapy Institute, Inc., : Petitioner : : v. : No. 71 C.D. 2014 : Submitted: October 10, 2014 Bureau of Workers Compensation : Fee Review Hearing Office

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and

More information

Case: 1:10-cv-00363-WHB Doc #: 31 Filed: 09/02/10 1 of 14. PageID #: 172

Case: 1:10-cv-00363-WHB Doc #: 31 Filed: 09/02/10 1 of 14. PageID #: 172 Case: 1:10-cv-00363-WHB Doc #: 31 Filed: 09/02/10 1 of 14. PageID #: 172 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JAMES MEYER, v. Plaintiff, DEBT RECOVERY SOLUTIONS

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CAMDEN COUNTY. Honorable Aaron G. Koeppen, Associate Circuit Judge

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CAMDEN COUNTY. Honorable Aaron G. Koeppen, Associate Circuit Judge TRAVELERS COMMERCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, F/K/A TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. No. SD32166 KAGAN CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C., Filed: August 13, 2013 A LIMITED LIABILITY

More information

No. 05-11-00700-CV IN THE FOR THE RAY ROBINSON,

No. 05-11-00700-CV IN THE FOR THE RAY ROBINSON, No. 05-11-00700-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016616444 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 November 30 P8:40 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS WELLS FARGO BANK,

More information

TAX RETURNS AND LOSS OF EARNINGS JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ. LAWATYOURFINGERTIPS

TAX RETURNS AND LOSS OF EARNINGS JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ. LAWATYOURFINGERTIPS TAX RETURNS AND LOSS OF EARNINGS CLAIMS JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ. LAWATYOURFINGERTIPS DISCOVERY OF TAX RETURNS -- LOSS OF EARNINGS CLAIMS A PLAINTIFF MAY NOT ASSERT A PRIVILEGE TO TX RETURNS AND THUS

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION C.W. WOODS CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) CASE NO. ) CV 13-891 CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, a ) municipal corporation, ) Defendant.

More information

906 Olive Street, Suite 420 St. Louis, MO 63101 314.241.2481 www.askarcher.com 1

906 Olive Street, Suite 420 St. Louis, MO 63101 314.241.2481 www.askarcher.com 1 A Word on MO Comp Subrogation First the Statute: By: Christopher T Archer, 2012 287.150. Subrogation 1. Where a third person is liable to the employee or to the dependents, for the injury or death, the

More information

Construction Defect Action Reform Act

Construction Defect Action Reform Act COLORADO REVISED STATUTES Title 13. Courts and Court Procedure Damages Regulation of Actions and Proceedings Article 20. Actions Part 8. Construction Defect Actions for Property Loss and Damage Construction

More information

2015 IL App (2d) 150184-U No. 2-15-0184 Order filed November 4, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT

2015 IL App (2d) 150184-U No. 2-15-0184 Order filed November 4, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT No. 2-15-0184 Order filed November 4, 2015 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule

More information

Offering Defense Witnesses to New York Grand Juries. Your client has just been held for the action of the Grand Jury. Although you

Offering Defense Witnesses to New York Grand Juries. Your client has just been held for the action of the Grand Jury. Although you Offering Defense Witnesses to New York Grand Juries By: Mark M. Baker 1 Your client has just been held for the action of the Grand Jury. Although you have a valid defense, you do not want your client to

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc SHELBY E. WATSON, Appellant, v. No. SC93769 WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC., ET AL., Respondents. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS The Honorable

More information

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion)

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) SIMMONS V. PRECAST HAULERS NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT

More information

v. Record No. 061373 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY June 8, 2007 CARLA VON NEUMANN-LILLIE

v. Record No. 061373 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY June 8, 2007 CARLA VON NEUMANN-LILLIE Present: All the Justices SETTLEMENT FUNDING, LLC v. Record No. 061373 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY June 8, 2007 CARLA VON NEUMANN-LILLIE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY M. Langhorne Keith,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 13-1006 IN RE ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, RELATOR ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PER CURIAM Rafael Zuniga sued San Diego Tortilla (SDT) for personal injuries and then added

More information

2013 CO 12 No. 11SC494, Northstar v. DLR Group, Inc. C.A.R. 10(b) Designation of Appellate Record

2013 CO 12 No. 11SC494, Northstar v. DLR Group, Inc. C.A.R. 10(b) Designation of Appellate Record Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association

More information

RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES

RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES (a) Illegal, Prohibited, or Clearly Excessive Fees and Costs. [no change] (b) Factors to Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Fees and Costs. [no change]

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 17 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 17 1 SUBCHAPTER III. CRIMINAL PROCESS. Article 17. Criminal Process. 15A-301. Criminal process generally. (a) Formal Requirements. (1) A record of each criminal process issued in the trial division of the General

More information

Case 1:07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB ERNA GANSER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc STATE OF MISSOURI ex rel. NEAL W. HOLZUM, M.D., Case No. SC91434 Relator, vs. THE HONORABLE NANCY L. SCHNEIDER, Respondent. Consolidated with STATE OF MISSOURI ex rel.

More information

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405. CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply

More information

1999, the decree ordered Molly to pay, as a part of the division of the marital estate, the $14,477

1999, the decree ordered Molly to pay, as a part of the division of the marital estate, the $14,477 Reverse and Remand; Opinion Filed May 4, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01422-CV TEXANS CREDIT UNION, Appellant V. RICHARD C. BRIZENDINE, Appellee On Appeal

More information

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS Page: 1 Job Path: @psc3912/cville_data2/stcodes/wy/rls-supp/qj46679.22 Date: 02/26/16 Time: 10:29:29 WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Scope. 2. Applicability.

More information

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830 Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. State of Arkansas 90th General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830 By: Senator D. Sanders

More information

Appeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays

Appeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays Appeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays Appellate Lawyers Association April 22, 2009 Brad Elward Peoria Office The Effect of a Judgment A judgment is immediately subject to enforcement and collection. Illinois

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION : : : : : : : O R D E R

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION : : : : : : : O R D E R IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION JOHN I. GORDON, ESQUIRE v. MICHAEL O. PANSINI, ESQUIRE, et al. JUNE TERM, 2011 NO. 02241

More information

MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT

MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT DOROTHEA LEBLANC, Appellant, v. RESEARCH BELTON HOSPITAL, Respondent. WD69248 OPINION FILED: December 9, 2008 Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. 12-408

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. 12-408 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. 12-408 JAMES K. MEADOR V. APPELLANT T O T A L C O M P L I A N C E CONSULTANTS, INC., AND BILL MEDLEY APPELLEES Opinion Delivered January 31, 2013 APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY

More information

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-12-00623-CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-12-00623-CV AFFIRM; Opinion Filed March 13, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00623-CV KEANE LANDSCAPING, INC., KEVIN KEANE, AND AMY KEANE, Appellants V. THE DIVINE GROUP,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE B254585

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE B254585 Filed 2/26/15 Vega v. Goradia CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified

More information

PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE

PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE A Stock Insurance Company, herein called the Company PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE Various provisions in this policy restrict coverage. Please read the

More information

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. DISTRICT COURT SIXTH DIVISION THOMAS A. PALANGIO D/B/A : CONSUMER AUTO SALES : : v. : A.A. No. 11-093 : DAVID M. SULLIVAN, TAX : ADMINISTRATOR

More information

SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE

SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE INDEX WHO CAN BE SUED IN SMALL CLAIMS Pg. 1 RESTRICTIONS ON CLAIM AMOUNTS Pg. 1 FILING FEES Pg. 1 OTHER LEGAL OPTIONS Pg. 1 HOW DO I FILE A CLAIM Pg. 2 WHERE SHOULD I FILE A SMALL CLAIM Pg. 2 WHAT HAPPENS

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals RENDERED: DECEMBER 7, 2012; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED ORDERED PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 8, 2013; 10:00 A.M. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2011-CA-000990-MR RANDY PEZZAROSSI APPELLANT APPEAL

More information

CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING

CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING CLIENT INFORMATION: GUIDELINES ON ADMINISTRATION & BILLING As updated from time-to-time for billing rates and responsible attorney and, following actual notice to the client. This agreement forms the basis

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA J&K BODY SHOP, INC., ET AL., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) NO. CIV-11-0077-HE ) ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO., ) ET AL., ) ) Defendants.

More information

MALPRACTICE OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS INTRODUCTION

MALPRACTICE OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS INTRODUCTION MALPRACTICE OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Presented by: Michael G. Berry Berry Wilson, LLC 200 East High Street, Suite 300 P.O. Box 1606 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Phone: 573-638-7272 michaelberry@berrywilsonlaw.com

More information

Case 2:10-cv-02263-JAR Document 98 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:10-cv-02263-JAR Document 98 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:10-cv-02263-JAR Document 98 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SANDRA H. DEYA and EDWIN DEYA, individually and as next friends and natural

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District CHRISTOPHER SPIELVOGEL, ET AL., Appellants, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI Respondent. WD70548 OPINION FILED: October 27, 2009 Appeal from the Circuit

More information

[J-119-2012] [MO: Saylor, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : : DISSENTING OPINION

[J-119-2012] [MO: Saylor, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : : DISSENTING OPINION [J-119-2012] [MO Saylor, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT HERD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, P.C., v. Appellee STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant No. 35 MAP 2012 Appeal

More information

2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U. No. 1-13-3918 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT

2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U. No. 1-13-3918 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT 2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U No. 1-13-3918 SIXTH DIVISION May 6, 2016 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

INFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT

INFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT PINAL COUNTY Apache Junction Justice Court Eloy Justice Court Superior/Kearny Justice Court Maricopa/Stanfield Justice Court JUSTICE COURTS Casa Grande Justice Court Florence/Coolidge Justice Court Mammoth/San

More information

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. No. 98-C-3193 TOUFIC NASSIF. SUNRISE HOMES, INC., COAST QUALITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and SHIRLEY NASSIF

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. No. 98-C-3193 TOUFIC NASSIF. SUNRISE HOMES, INC., COAST QUALITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and SHIRLEY NASSIF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 98-C-3193 TOUFIC NASSIF SUNRISE HOMES, INC., COAST QUALITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and SHIRLEY NASSIF ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF

More information

2013 IL App (1st) 120898-U. No. 1-12-0898

2013 IL App (1st) 120898-U. No. 1-12-0898 2013 IL App (1st) 120898-U FOURTH DIVISION March 28, 2013 No. 1-12-0898 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO PETER R. GRAY, JR et al., Plaintiffs, v. BEVERAGES & MORE, INC. DBA BEVMO, Defendant. Civ. No. CGC-09-493678 NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information