A new type of contingent capital with jump risk


 Sarah Johnson
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 A new type of contingent capital with jump risk Abstract We eamine a new type of contingent capital, called contingent convertible security (CCS), when asset value follows a jumpdiffusion process. The merit of CCS is that it can dynamically adjust capital structure almost without incurring adjustment costs. We obtain closedform epressions of the equilibrium prices of all corporate securities. Compared with standard capital structures, CCS can lead to as much as a 9.5 percent increase in the issuing firm s value but the number declines to 5.7 percent if CCB is issued instead of CCS. The larger the investment risk, the more pronounced the advantage of CCS over SB and CCB. In our model, CCS does not suffer the debt overhang problem and shareholders have no riskshifting incentive to increase the diffusive volatility of asset value, although they benefit from a higher jump risk. Keywords: contingent capital, debt overhang, risktaking incentive, jump risk JEL: G13, G32 1. Introduction It is wellknown that a firm generally issues both equity and debt, instead of all equity. This is because there are two market imperfections: a ta deduction on interest epense and bankruptcy costs. A firm may have a strict Preprint submitted to World Finance Conference Buenos Aires. December 15, 2014
2 but limited incentive to issue debt and the optimal capital structure must be based on the tradeoff between the values of ta shields and of bankruptcy costs. However, if the firm is too important to fail, we must give much more weight to bankruptcy costs. In particular, after the global financial crisis of 2007/2009, the new global bank regulatory standard, Basel III, introduces stricter capital requirements for banks in order to reduce default risk to an acceptable level. Naturally, ecessive debt financing is prohibited and so the benefits of ta shields are decreased. To increase ta shields while keeping default risk in a low level, a proposal that has recently received much attention is to issue contingent convertible bond (CCB, henceforth). CCB, also known as contingent capital, is a bond that can automatically convert into equity if the issuer s financial health deteriorates to a prespecified threshold or trigger. The first CCB was issued by Lloyds Banking Group in November 2009, which launched its $13.7 bn issue of Enhanced Capital Notes. Net in line was Rabobank making its first entry in the market for contingent debt with a 1.25 bn issue early The Tier2 capital instrument with writedown features is actually a new type of contingent capital. In China, for the first time, Tianjin Binhai rural commercial bank issued RMB 1.5 bn yuan of the writedown contingent capital in July After that, ICBC (Hong Kong) raised $0.5 bn in October 2013 and PingAn bank raised RMB 9 bn yuan in March 2014 in this way. By April 2014, more than 20 banks in China announced their capitalraising plans, including the issue of more than RMB 420 bn yuan of the writedown contingent capital. Contingent capital has several appealing properties. For eample, it in 2
3 creases a bank s capital when a bank is weak, which is precisely when it is hardest for the distressed bank to issue new equity. An inherent problem within banking finance is the risk of panic: when a bank needs to convert hybrid debt into equity, it sends a clear signal to investors that the bank is in trouble. These investors are then tempted to withdraw their investments, making the initial problem much worse. Contingent capital is emerging as the most concrete new idea for solving these inherent problems. On the design of contingent capital, a crucial issue is how to determine the conversion threshold for the activation of contingent capital, which is considered by many papers in the literature. For eample, specific definitions for triggering events are put forward in a consultative document issued by Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2010). McDonald (2013) evaluates a form of contingent capital for financial institutions that converts from debt into equity if two conditions are met: the firm s stock price is at or below a trigger value and the value of a financial institution inde is also at or below a trigger value. Sundaresan and Wang (2014) consider the design of contingent capital with a stock price trigger for mandatory conversion and the problem on multiple or no equilibrium is discussed. Glasserman and Nouri (2012) analyze the case of contingent capital with a capitalratio trigger and partial and ongoing conversion. The capital ratio is based on accounting or book values to approimate the regulatory ratios that determine capital requirements for banks. Himmelberg et al. (2014) consider the soft trigger case in which the conversion does not necessarily occur at the first instant when the trigger is breached. Instead, the conversion event happens randomly in a probability. For further conversion mechanism discussions, please 3
4 refer to Metzeler and Reeser (2011), Barucci and Del (2012), Hilscher and Raviv (2014), among others. However, all the papers in the literature assume that once contingent capital or CCB converts into equity, it keeps the form of equity all the time until the firm goes bankrupt and in particular, it will never convert back into debt. We think that this assumption is worth being improved. Intuitively, if such form of contingent capital can be converted repeatedly between debt and equity, the firm must get much more ta shields while default risk does not increase. Motivated by this observation, we rela the assumption and develop a new type of contingent capital, called contingent convertible security (CCS, henceforth). CCS is like CCB but differently it can be repeatedly and automatically converted between debt and equity depending on two specified values of a financial situation inde, say the level of the cash flow generated by the issuing firm or the corresponding unlevered firm s value. It is well known in corporate finance that optimal capital structure depends on the firm s financial conditions, say the cash flow level generated by the firm or the unlevered firm s value, i.e. asset value. Generally speaking, the better the financial conditions, the higher the leverage in capital structure should be. On account of that the financial conditions usually change randomly all the time and more often than not, the optimal capital structure just established will become obsolete quickly. To keep capital structure optimal, we are able to do nothing but update the capital structure dynamically. For eample, if a firm gets into (grows out of) trouble, the firm should retire (issue) debt to dynamically adjust the firm s leverage. Unfortunately, such update usually incurs considerable adjustment costs, see Fischer et al. (1989) 4
5 and Titman and Tsyplakov (2007) among others. In sharp contrast, if a firm includes CCS into its capital structure, to some etent, such adjustment is automatically realized and roughly incurs no etra costs. It is true that a revolving line of credit would do so also without incurring etra costs. However, if the firm is an small and mediumsized enterprise (SME), let alone a bank, the adjustment by a revolving line of credit is generally unfeasible, see e.g. Yang and Zhang (2013). In addition, as reported by Leland (1994), in the absence of transactions costs, restructuring by continuous readjustments of debt coupon would seem to be desirable to maimize total firm value as cash flow changes. However, shareholders and debtholders are reluctant to readjust the debt coupon by debt repurchase (issuance). For eample, the increasing of the current debt capacity by selling a small amount of additional debt will be blocked by debtholders, because this market operation will increase the risk of original bond holders, and do harm to their benefits. However, if issuing CCS, we have no such concerns since the adjustment is determined in advance in the agreement, which precludes the conflict of different stakeholders. CCS is similar to the preferred stock (preferred shares) with noncumulative dividends in addition to CCB. Preferred shares sit between debt and common equity in the capital structure, and noncumulative dividends can be suspended if the cash flow of the issuing firm is insufficient. Like CCS, nonpayment of preferred dividends does not trigger default and consequently under the rules of Bank for International Settlements, a noncumulative preferred stock is included in Tier 1 capital. Just as the preferred stock, CCS is senior (i.e. higher ranking) to common stock, but subordinate to bonds in 5
6 terms of claim (or rights to their share of the assets of the firm). Even if CCS converts into equity, it is still different from common stock since like preferred stock, we assume that CCS carries no voting rights no matter whether it has converted into equity or not. For eample, in our model, the default timing and the technology choice of a firm are completely decided by the holders of common stock. However, there is a fundamental difference between CCS and preferred stock (including that with noncumulative dividends): CCS payments are tadeductible whereas preferred dividends are not. Because of this distinction, the preferred stock is unable to adjust capital structure while CCS can do so automatically to some degree and in contrast to preferred stock, CCS is able to increase the value of ta shields while keeping bankruptcy risk unchanged. Banks are generally the issuers of CCSs/CCBs, which, however, could be issued by any firms. For eample, Song and Yang (2013) discuss how CCB as a debt financing instrument might affect the timing and pricing of the option to invest, agency cost of debt and optimal capital structure and find that CCB has a new merit: There is an optimal fraction of equity allocated to CCB holders upon conversion, such that the agency cost reaches the minimum value zero. In fact, our conclusions in this paper are applicable to any firm, no mater whether it is a bank or not, and even no matter whether it is a small or a large firm. In particular, CCSs are suitable for SMEs to solve the financing problems they face, which are becoming increasingly serious all over the world. An SME usually has to default just because it cannot afford to pay coupons, even though the value of equity of the SME is very valuable. If an SME is a listed company, default can be avoided by dilution of equity in 6
7 common way but many SMEs are not listed. More often than not, they have to default too earlier incurring a net substantial social cost while thanks to CCSs, such default would be effectively avoided. In fact, a new contingent capital with our CCS feature was already issued by the Spanish bank BBVA in May 2013, through the introduction of coupons that are allowed to be deferred. A coupon deferral had already been accepted as a common feature in corporate or financial hybrids, but has been now found its way to contingent capital as well. The investor in a BBVA contingent convertible can see an upcoming coupon payment cancelled at the sole discretion of this bank or its regulator. The full anatomy of this bond has been given in Corcuera et al. (2014). 1 CCS is first developed by Yang and Zhao (2014), which assume the cash flow of a firm follows a geometric Brownian motion. By contrast, we directly model the value of an unlevered firm, which is assumed to follow a jumpdiffusion process. This assumption leads to a more complicated and realistic model. Incorporating jumps into the dynamics of a firm s value is important for three reasons. First it can solve the predictability problem of the conversion and default event, since it creates nonzero credit spreads for short maturities, as argued by Pelger (2012). Second, it can discuss the impact of market jump risk on the evaluation of contingent capital. Third, a limitation of many 1 Corcuera et al. (2014) introduce Coupon Cancellable CCBs, a new type of CCB where coupons can be cancelled during the lifetime of the note. They provide closedform pricing formulas for their CCBs and show that deathspiral effect is reduced. By contrast, our CCS will not generate deathspiral effect at all since CCS takes a fi amount of the issuer s shares when it converts into equity, as discussed by Pelger (2012). 7
8 structural models is that they do not incorporate asymmetric information between shareholders and creditors. This is partly mitigated by the inclusion of jumps in a firm s value, which could effectively reflect a sudden release of information, as pointed out by Duffie and Lando (2001). The goal of this paper is to develop CCS, investigate the incentives it creates for shareholders when the value of the issuing firm follows the double eponential jump diffusion process. We develop a structural model of the type introduced by Leland (1994), and etended by Kou (2002) and Chen and Kou (2009) to include jumps. We derive closedform epressions of the equilibrium prices of all corporate securities and the optimal capital structure when the cash flow of a firm or asset value is modeled as a jumpdiffusion process, namely a Kou process. We analyze the incentives created by CCS and investigate how CCS affects debt overhang, asset substitution and the sensitivity of shareholders to various types of risk. We show that while CCS decreases default risk like CCB, it also significantly increase the value of the issuing firm by dynamically adjusting capital structure without incurring etra adjustment costs. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 sets up the model and corporate securities are defined. Section 3 discusses the equilibrium pricing of all corporate securities and all the security prices are eplicitly derived. Section 4 provides numerical simulations and comparative statics. Section 5 concludes. Some proofs and epressions are shown in Appendices. 8
9 2. The model In this section, we develop a structural model of CCS. In general, it is assumed in the literature that the cash flow or value of an unlevered firm follows a pure diffusion process. However, it might be unrealistic for many firms since the cash flow or asset value would sometimes undergo a sudden decline or sudden increase. Hence, following Leland (1994), Pelger (2012) and Pennacchi et al. (2014), we model firm s value directly but we assume the unlevered firm s value (i.e. asset value) follows a jumpdiffusion process. We assume that asset value is affected by infrequent jumps due to the arrival of important events that have more than a marginal effect on the value of the unlevered firm. According to Merton (1976), jumps are described by a Poisson counting process. The dynamics of asset value is described as the resultant of two components: the continuous part which is a reflection of new information which has a marginal impact on the firm and the jump part which is a reflection of important new information that has an instantaneous, big impact on the firm. Following Merton (1976), we assume the latter type of information is firmspecific, i.e. its impact is restricted to the firm and so, the jump component of asset value represents idiosyncratic risk. Accordingly, the jump component is uncorrelated with the market portfolio. The arrival time and size J of the jump are independent. Specifically, the probability that the jump arrives during time interval t ( t 0) is λ t, where λ is arrival intensity or jump intensity that describes the epected number of jumps per year. If the ith jump arrives at time t with size J i, the value A of the unlevered firm will change from A t to A t+ = J i A t in the net instant t+, where J i > 0 is realization of a random variable J at the ith 9
10 jump. Variable J i, i = 1, 2,, is independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.). In addition, all investors have standard liquid financial opportunities which involve a riskfree asset with interest rate r > 0 and a risky asset (the market portfolio). Formally, we assume directly that under the riskneutral measure Q, 2 the risky asset price M and the firm s value A are governed by the following stochastic differential equations: dm t /M t = rdt + σ m dz 1 t, da t A t M 0 given, = (µ λk)dt + σ(ρdz 1 t + 1 ρ 2 dz 2 t ) + d ( Nt i=1 J i ), A 0 given, for any t [0, ), where N is a standard Poisson process with jump intensity λ, k is the epected percentage change if a jump occurs, i.e. k = E Q (J 1), σ m and σ are the strictly positive volatility rates, and Z (Z 1, Z 2 ) is a 2dimensional standard Brownian motion on a complete probability space (Ω, F, Q). The parameter ρ in (1) represents the correlation coefficient between the firm s value and the risky asset, while ρσ is the systematic volatility of the firm s value. Naturally, we assume ρ < 1. The parameter µ in (1) is the riskadjusted epected growth rate, i.e. µ = µ A ρση, where µ A is the epected growth rate under the physical probability measure and η is the market Sharpe ratio. We denote by F {F t (1) : t 0} the Qaugmentation of the filtration 2 According to a standard pricing method, we get the equilibrium stochastic discount factor, which determines the measure Q. 10
11 σ(z s ; 0 s t) generated by process Z. The filtration F describes the information available to investors. Clearly, according to the dynamic asset pricing theory, (1) means that the cash flow, denoted by δ t, at any time t 0 generated by the firm is (r µ)a t. I.e. we have the relation, δ t = (r µ)a t for all t 0. Naturally, we assume µ < r, which is well known. We take it that the firm has chosen a capital structure including a straight bond (SB, henceforth), CCS and equity. SB is consol type, meaning that it requires continuous coupon payment at the constant rate of b per unit of time (year), until default. CCS is a hybrid security, which takes the form of either debt or equity and can interconvert repeatedly between them, as long as the firm remains solvent. If CCS takes the form of debt (debt security), it requires continuous coupon payment at the constant rate of c per unit of time. If CCS takes the form of equity (equity security), its holder receives a fraction β, called ownership stake, of the residual cash flow in the form of dividends at the rate β[δ t (1 θ)b] at time t, where 0 < θ < 1 is a constant ta rate. In order to implement easily, we should prevent CCS from converting too frequently and hence we select two different conversion thresholds of the interconversion: One is the conversion threshold, denoted by A E, which once asset value hits from above, CCS automatically converts from a debt security into an equity security; The other is the conversion threshold, denoted by A D, which once asset value hits from below, CCS automatically converts from an equity security to a debt security. On account of that the time is homogenous in our model, we specify the 11
12 default threshold, denoted by, which is independent of time. I.e., once asset value is less than, the firm goes bankrupt. The default threshold can be eogenously given or endogenously determined. Naturally, we have < A E < A D, i.e. the default threshold should be less than the two conversion thresholds of CCS. At default, asset value is assigned to the SB holder but a fraction, denoted by α, of the value will lost due to bankruptcy costs, where 0 α 1 is constant and called bankruptcy loss rate in the literature. Remark 1. One may worry about that asset value is unsuitable to determine a trigger since it is unobservable. However, Pelger (2012) has shown that the unobservability of asset value process can be circumvented by using credit spreads or the CDS risk premium. Credit spreads have the same advantages as stock prices as they constantly adjust to new information in contrast to accounting triggers. They are a sufficient statistic for asset value process. Thus, defining the conversion event in terms of credit spreads is equivalent to using asset value process. The same holds for CDS risk premiums. After a transformation, our CCS can be therefore applied in practice with a trigger event based on observable market prices, see Metzeler and Reeser (2011), Koziol and Lochen (2012), Chen et al. (2013), and Pennacchi et al. (2014). 3. Pricing corporate securities including CCS with jump risk 3.1. Preliminaries It is well known that the unique solution of the second equation in (1) is given by A t = A 0 ep(x t ) 12
13 where X t = µt + σ(ρzt 1 + N t 1 ρ 2 Zt 2 ) + ln J i i=1 and µ = µ 1 2 σ2 λk. The process X is a Lévy process, i.e., a process with stationary and independent increments. The Laplace eponent of X is the function G( ) such that E Q [ep(ξx t )] = ep (G(ξ)t) for an any time t with E Q [ep(ξx t )] <. According to Cont and Tankov (2003), we have G(ξ) = 1 2 σ2 ξ 2 + µξ + λk. (2) In particular, we now consider the double eponential jumpdiffusion model, developed by Kou (2002). To simplify the formula and model jump sizes, we introduce the variables Y i ln J i, i = 1, 2,. Clearly, these variables are i.i.d. and valued in R. Following Kou (2002), we assume the jump size Y i has an asymmetric double eponential distribution with density f(y) = f + (y) + f (y), where f + (y) = pη 1 e η 1y 1 [y 0] and f (y) = (1 p)η 2 e η 2y 1 [y<0] for η 1, η 2 > 0 and 0 p 1, represent the probability densities of upward and downward jumps respectively. Therefore, we obtain E Q [e ξy i ] = e ξy f(y)dy = pη 1 η 1 ξ + (1 p)η 2 η 2 +ξ <, ξ ( η 2, η 1 );, ξ / ( η 2, η 1 ). 13
14 Especially, if η 1 > 1, then E Q [e Y i ] < and E Q [e Y i ] = pη 1 η (1 p)η 2 η Thus, from (2), for ξ ( η 2, η 1 ) the Laplace eponent function is given by G(ξ) = 1 ( 2 σ2 ξ 2 pη1 + µξ + λ η 1 ξ + (1 p)η ) 2 1. η 2 + ξ According to Kou and Wang (2003), the equation G(ξ) = r has four roots denoted by β 1, β 2, β 3 and β 4, which satisfy 0 < β 1 < η 1 < β 2 < and 0 < β 3 < η 2 < β 4 <. These parameters are important in the pricing of corporate securities as shown in the following tet Equilibrium pricing theory with jump We first develop an equilibrium pricing theory under the jumpdiffusion model to derive the main conclusions of this section. Suppose that an asset is a derivative product underlying the value of the unlevered firm, which generates the cash flow ζ t = f(a t ), t [0, ). We denote its equilibrium price by V f (), where represents the current level of the value of the unlevered firm. From Ito s formula, the function V f ( ) satisfies the following relationship: (µ λk)v f ()+ 1 2 σ2 2 V f ()+f()+λe Q [V f (e Y i ) V f ()] rv f () = 0. 14
15 In particular, if the cash flow is a linear function of the value of the unlevered firm up to a stopping time, i.e. ζ t = f(a t ) = aa t + K, t [0, τ D ), where the stopping time τ D inf{t 0 : A t / D} represents the first departure of A from a given domain D and at the stopping time τ D, the holder of the asset gets nothing but a lumpsum dividend or the value of the remaining cash flow, which is a given function, denoted by g( ), of the value of the unlevered firm, then thanks to Ito s formula, for D, the value function V ( ) of the specified asset must satisfy (µ λk)v ()+ 1 2 σ2 2 V ()+a+k+λe Q [V (e Y i ) V ()] rv () = 0 (3) with the following condition V () = g(), / D. (4) Motivated by a result in Yang and Zhao (2014) and applying the guessandverify method, we derive that the general solution of (3) is given by V () = A 1 β 1 + A 2 β 2 + A 3 β 3 + A 4 β 4 + a r µ + K, D, (5) r where A 1, A 2, A 3 and A 4 are constants to be determined from boundary condition (4). Remark 2. The pricing formula (5) we derive here is powerful to obtain the eplicit prices of the corporate securities including CCS under the jumpdiffusion model, as shown in the following tet. 15
16 3.3. The pricing of corporate securities As pointed out before, we denote by A D (A E ) the conversion threshold of CCS from equity (debt) into debt (equity) and denote the bankruptcy threshold by. The pricing of SB. According to (3) and (4), we obtain that if the firm is solvent, i.e. (, ), the value V B () of SB must satisfy (µ λk)v B () σ2 2 V B () + b + λe Q [V B (e Y i )] (λ + r)v B () = 0 (6) with the condition V B () = (1 α), and the condition V B () = b/r,, since default will never happen if the value of the unlevered firm approaches infinity. Thanks to (5) with these conditions, we easily get the following eplicit value of SB: V B () = C B 1 ( ) β3 + C B 2 ( ) β4 + b r, (, ), (7) where and C1 B = (1 α) (β 3 η 2 )(1 + β 4 ) (β 3 β 4 )(1 + η 2 ) β 4(β 3 η 2 ) b η 2 (β 3 β 4 ) r C2 B = (1 α) (η 2 β 4 )(1 + β 3 ) (β 3 β 4 )(1 + η 2 ) β 3(η 2 β 4 ) b η 2 (β 3 β 4 ) r. The proof is presented in Appendi A. The pricing of CCS. We first derive the price V CD ( ) of CCS when it is a debt security. Utilizing (3) and (4), we derive that for (A E, ), the value 16
17 V CD () satisfies (µ λk)v CD +λ 0 ln A E () σ2 2 V CD () + c + λ ln AE ln V CE (e y )f (y)dy V CD (e y )f (y)dy + λ 0 V CD (e y )f + (y)dy (λ + r)v CD () = 0 (8) with the conditions: V CD () = c/r if ; V CD () = V CE () if (, A E ]; V CD () = 0 if. According to (5), the solution is given by ( ) β3 ( ) β4 V CD () = C 1 + C 2 + c A E A E r, (A E, ), (9) where the constants C 1 and C 2 are to be determined later. presented in Appendi B. The proof is Now, we turn to the price V CE ( ) of CCS when it is an equity security. In the same way, the price V CE ( ) of CCS is a solution to the following equation: (µ λk)v CE +λ 0 ln () σ2 2 V CE () + β[(r µ) (1 θ)b] V CE (e y )f (y)dy + λ ln AD 0 V CE (e y )f + (y)dy +λ ln A D V CD (e y )f + (y)dy (λ + r)v CE () = 0, < < A D, (10) with the conditions: V CE () = V CD () if A D ; V CD () = 0 if. Thanks to (5), after a careful computation, we obtain that for (, A D ), 17
18 V CE () ( ) β1 ( = C 3 A D + C4 ) β2 ( A D + C5 ) β3 + C6 ( ) β4 ( + β (1 θ) b r), (11) where the constants C 3, C 4, C 5, C 6 together with C 1, C 2 in (9) constitute a column vector (C 1, C 2, C 3, C 4, C 5, C 6 ), which is the solution of the system of linear equations: ΓX = Φ, where Γ A β 3 DE β 3 +η A β4 DE 1 1 β 4 +η 1 β 1 η 1 β 2 η 1 A β 1 DB β 1 +η 2 A β3 DB β 3 +η 1 A β4 DB β 4 +η 1 A β2 DB 1 1 β 2 +η 2 β 3 η 2 β 4 η 2 A β 3 DE A β 4 DE 1 1 A β 3 DB A β 4 DE 0 0 A β 1 DB A β 2 DB η 2 β 3 1 η 2 β 4 A β1 DE β 1 +η 2 A β2 DE β 2 +η 2 A β3 EB η 2 β 3 A β4 EB η 2 β A β 1 DE A β 2 DE A β 3 EB A β 4 EB Φ βa D 1 η 1 β(1 θ)b+c rη 1 β( 1+η 2 + b(1 θ) rη 2 ) βa D + β(1 θ)b+c r β( b(1 θ) r ) βa E 1+η 2 + β(1 θ)b+c rη 2 βa E + β(1 θ)b+c r,, (12) and A DE A D /A E, A DB A D / and A EB A E /. The proof is also presented in Appendi B. The pricing of equity. Motivated by the derivation of the price of CCS, we fist consider the price V ED ( ) of equity when CCS is a debt security. We get 18
19 that V ED ( ) satisfies (µ λk)v ED () σ2 2 V ED () + (r µ) (1 θ)(b + c) +λ ln A E ln V EE (e y )f (y)dy + λ 0 ln A E V ED (e y )f (y)dy +λ 0 V ED (e y )f + (y)dy (λ + r)v ED () = 0, > A E with the conditions: V ED () = (1 θ)(b+c) r if ; V ED () = V EE () r if (, A E ]; V ED () = 0 if. Thanks to (5), after some more tedious algebra, we get the solution as follows: ( ) β3 ( ) β4 V ED () = C 7 + C 8 + A E A E where the constants C 7 and C 8 are determined later. (1 θ)(b + c), (A E, ), r (13) Net, we discuss the price V EE ( ) of equity when CCS is an equity security. In the same way, the price function V EE ( ) must satisfy (µ λk)v EE +λ 0 ln () σ2 2 V EE () + (1 β)((r µ) (1 θ)b) V EE (e y )f (y)dy + λ ln AD 0 V EE (e y )f + (y)dy +λ ln A D V ED (e y )f + (y)dy (λ + r)v EE () = 0, < < A D, with the conditions: V EE () = V ED () if A D ; V EE () = 0 if. According to the general solution (5) with the above conditions, in the same way, we obtain an eplicit price of equity when CCS is an equity security 19
20 as follows: V EE () = ( ) β1 ( ) β2 ( ) β3 ( ) β4 ( ) C 9 A D + C10 A D + C11 + C12 + (1 β) (1 θ)b r where (, A D ) and constants C 9, C 10, C 11, C 12 with C 7, C 8 in (13) constitute a column vector (C 7, C 8, C 9, C 10, C 11, C 12 ), which is the solution of the system of linear equations: ΓX = Ψ, where Γ is given by (12) and Ψ βa D 1 η 1 + (1 θ)(bβ+c) rη 1 (1 β)( 1+η 2 + (1 θ)b rη 2 ) βa D (1 θ)(βb+c) r (1 β)( (1 θ)b r ) βa E 1+η 2 (1 θ) βb+c rη 2 βa E (1 θ) βb+c r. Remark 3. All the results are eplicit even under the complicated jumpdiffusion case. The eplicit results are valuable to make a strict and general analysis. In addition, if we let the parameter λ 0, it is not difficult to recover the main results derived by Yang and Zhao (2014) The optimal capital structure To determine capital structure, we must first specify each issued corporate security. For eample, with regard to CCS, we assume its ownership stake β, its conversion barrier pair (A E, A D ) and bankruptcy barrier are given in advance. After that, the capital structure is determined by the coupon rate pair (b, c) and the optimal capital structure is given by the SB coupon rate b 20
21 and CCS coupon rate c, which solve the following firm s value maimisation problem: sup { V B () + V CD () + V ED () }, (14) (b,c) A where A represents the set of all admissible coupon rate pairs, and naturally we have A = [0, ) [0, ). Based on the previous eplicit prices of the SB, CCS and equity, the optimal capital structure can be derived by solving a nonlinear programming problem. It leads to a system of equations with two variables, of which the solution is tedious to write. Hence, we omit the details and directly provide numerical simulations in the net section. 4. Numerical simulations and comparative statics In this section, we conduct numerical simulations and derive comparative statics. By numerical computation, we make clear how much a firm s value is increased due to CCS. We eamine whether CCS will aggravate inefficiencies from asset substitution and debt overhang. We also discuss the relationship between investment risk and optimal capital structure if CCS is issued. For simplification but without loss of the effectiveness of our analysis, following Koziol and Lochen (2012), we assume the two conversion thresholds of CCS are given by A E = φ 1 (b + c)/(r µ), A D = φ 2 (b + c)/(r µ), (15) for some 0 < φ 1 < φ 2. In particular, parameter φ 1 allows us to easily adjust the regulatory standard. Clearly, the bigger the parameter φ 1, the stricter 21
Contingent Convertible Debt and Capital Structure Decisions
Contingent Convertible Debt and Capital Structure Decisions Boris Albul, Dwight Jaffee, Alexei Tchistyi CCBs are gaining attention from both, regulators and market participants Contingent Convertible Bond
More informationDISCUSSION OF OPTIMAL DEBT SERVICE: STRAIGHT
Gunther Friedl * DISCUSSION OF OPTIMAL DEBT SERVICE: STRAIGHT VS. CONVERTIBLE DEBT 1 MOTIVATION AND OBJECTIVE OF THE PAPER Corporate bond default plays a significant role in today s business environment.
More informationLECTURE 10.1 Default risk in Merton s model
LECTURE 10.1 Default risk in Merton s model Adriana Breccia March 12, 2012 1 1 MERTON S MODEL 1.1 Introduction Credit risk is the risk of suffering a financial loss due to the decline in the creditworthiness
More informationChapter 7: Capital Structure: An Overview of the Financing Decision
Chapter 7: Capital Structure: An Overview of the Financing Decision 1. Income bonds are similar to preferred stock in several ways. Payment of interest on income bonds depends on the availability of sufficient
More informationShould Life Insurers buy CoCo Bonds?  Regulatory Effects Implied by the Solvency II Standards
Should Life Insurers buy CoCo Bonds?  Regulatory Effects Implied by the Solvency II Standards Helmut Gründl, Tobias Niedrig International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR) and Center of Excellence
More informationArticle from: Risk Management. June 2009 Issue 16
Article from: Risk Management June 2009 Issue 16 CHAIRSPERSON S Risk quantification CORNER Structural Credit Risk Modeling: Merton and Beyond By Yu Wang The past two years have seen global financial markets
More informationUse the table for the questions 18 and 19 below.
Use the table for the questions 18 and 19 below. The following table summarizes prices of various defaultfree zerocoupon bonds (expressed as a percentage of face value): Maturity (years) 1 3 4 5 Price
More informationAsymmetry and the Cost of Capital
Asymmetry and the Cost of Capital Javier García Sánchez, IAE Business School Lorenzo Preve, IAE Business School Virginia Sarria Allende, IAE Business School Abstract The expected cost of capital is a crucial
More information2.5 Debt negotiation models and optimal capital structure
2.5 Debt negotiation models and optimal capital structure The optionbased approach gives the prices of equity and bonds in a given capital structure. Instead of the static choice of capital structure,
More informationChapter 7. . 1. component of the convertible can be estimated as 1100796.15 = 303.85.
Chapter 7 71 Income bonds do share some characteristics with preferred stock. The primary difference is that interest paid on income bonds is tax deductible while preferred dividends are not. Income bondholders
More informationTPPE17 Corporate Finance 1(5) SOLUTIONS REEXAMS 2014 II + III
TPPE17 Corporate Finance 1(5) SOLUTIONS REEXAMS 2014 II III Instructions 1. Only one problem should be treated on each sheet of paper and only one side of the sheet should be used. 2. The solutions folder
More informationHow credit analysts view and use the financial statements
How credit analysts view and use the financial statements Introduction Traditionally it is viewed that equity investment is high risk and bond investment low risk. Bondholders look at companies for creditworthiness,
More informationPart 9. The Basics of Corporate Finance
Part 9. The Basics of Corporate Finance The essence of business is to raise money from investors to fund projects that will return more money to the investors. To do this, there are three financial questions
More informationExpected default frequency
KM Model Expected default frequency Expected default frequency (EDF) is a forwardlooking measure of actual probability of default. EDF is firm specific. KM model is based on the structural approach to
More informationSubordinated Debt and the Quality of Market Discipline in Banking by Mark Levonian Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Subordinated Debt and the Quality of Market Discipline in Banking by Mark Levonian Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Comments by Gerald A. Hanweck Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Visiting Scholar,
More informationBeyond preferred stock valuation of complex equity and hybrid instruments
Beyond preferred stock valuation of complex equity and hybrid instruments ASA Advanced Business Valuation Conference October 2015 Amanda A. Miller, Ph.D. 4 June 2015 Amanda A. Miller, Ph.D. (amanda.miller@ey.com)
More informationCHAPTER 20. Hybrid Financing: Preferred Stock, Warrants, and Convertibles
CHAPTER 20 Hybrid Financing: Preferred Stock, Warrants, and Convertibles 1 Topics in Chapter Types of hybrid securities Preferred stock Warrants Convertibles Features and risk Cost of capital to issuers
More informationFinance 2 for IBA (30J201) F. Feriozzi Resit exam June 18 th, 2012. Part One: MultipleChoice Questions (45 points)
Finance 2 for IBA (30J201) F. Feriozzi Resit exam June 18 th, 2012 Part One: MultipleChoice Questions (45 points) Question 1 Assume that capital markets are perfect. Which of the following statements
More informationFinance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Market MicroStructure: Notes on the Kyle Model
Finance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Market MicroStructure: Notes on the Kyle Model These notes consider the singleperiod model in Kyle (1985) Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading, Econometrica 15,
More informationCoCo Bonds and their extension risk
Aarhus University CoCo Bonds and their extension risk Jan De Spiegeleer (Jabre Capital Partners KU Leuven) Wim Schoutens (KU Leuven) 1 Aarhus University Extension Risk Aarhus Quant Factory January 2014
More informationCapital Structure. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Capital Structure Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Debt and Equity There are two main types of financing: debt and equity. Consider a twoperiod world with dates 0 and 1. At
More informationContingent Capital in the new regulatory regime Challenge or Opportunity?
Contingent Capital in the new regulatory regime Challenge or Opportunity? David Mathers, Chief Financial Officer London, October 5th, 2011 Cautionary statement Cautionary statement regarding forwardlooking
More informationWhy Invest in Preferred Shares? James I. Hymas, President Hymas Investment Management Inc. jihymas@himivest.com (416) 6044204
Why Invest in Preferred Shares? James I. Hymas, President Hymas Investment Management Inc. jihymas@himivest.com (416) 6044204 The question of asset class is an important one to all investors. The basic
More informationDesign of Con+ngent Capital with Stock Price Trigger for Conversion
Design of Con+ngent Capital with Price Trigger for Conversion Suresh Sundaresan Columbia University Zhenyu Wang Federal Reserve Bank of New York The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors
More informationHigh Yield Bonds A Primer
High Yield Bonds A Primer With our extensive history in the Canadian credit market dating back to the Income Trust period, our portfolio managers believe that there is considerable merit in including select
More informationDUKE UNIVERSITY Fuqua School of Business. FINANCE 351  CORPORATE FINANCE Problem Set #7 Prof. Simon Gervais Fall 2011 Term 2.
DUKE UNIVERSITY Fuqua School of Business FINANCE 351  CORPORATE FINANCE Problem Set #7 Prof. Simon Gervais Fall 2011 Term 2 Questions 1. Suppose the corporate tax rate is 40%, and investors pay a tax
More informationt = 1 2 3 1. Calculate the implied interest rates and graph the term structure of interest rates. t = 1 2 3 X t = 100 100 100 t = 1 2 3
MØA 155 PROBLEM SET: Summarizing Exercise 1. Present Value [3] You are given the following prices P t today for receiving risk free payments t periods from now. t = 1 2 3 P t = 0.95 0.9 0.85 1. Calculate
More informationWhat is the (Real Option) Value of a College Degree?
What is the (Real Option) Value of a College Degree? JEFFREY R. STOKES 313 Curris Business Building Department of Finance College of Business Administration University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA
More informationA Piece of the Pie: Alternative Approaches to Allocating Value
A Piece of the Pie: Alternative Approaches to Allocating Value Cory Thompson, CFA, CIRA cthompson@srr.com Ryan Gandre, CFA rgandre@srr.com Introduction Enterprise value ( EV ) represents the sum of debt
More informationCost of Capital, Valuation and Strategic Financial Decision Making
Cost of Capital, Valuation and Strategic Financial Decision Making By Dr. Valerio Poti,  Examiner in Professional 2 Stage Strategic Corporate Finance The financial crisis that hit financial markets in
More informationChapter 1 The Scope of Corporate Finance
Chapter 1 The Scope of Corporate Finance MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. One of the tasks for financial managers when identifying projects that increase firm value is to identify those projects where a. marginal benefits
More informationA guide to investing in hybrid securities
A guide to investing in hybrid securities Before you make an investment decision, it is important to review your financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, time horizon, diversification
More informationAssessing Credit Risk for a Ghanaian Bank Using the Black Scholes Model
Assessing Credit Risk for a Ghanaian Bank Using the Black Scholes Model VK Dedu 1, FT Oduro 2 1,2 Department of Mathematics, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. Abstract
More informationStocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing
Stocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing Ralf Korn 1 and L. C. G. Rogers 2 Abstract In the BlackScholes model, any dividends on stocks are paid continuously, but in reality dividends
More informationIntroduction. What is AIF Securitisation? Analysts. Press. www.scoperatings.com
October, 2014 Securitisation of Alternative Investment Funds s www.scoperatings.com Introduction Alternative Investment Fund ("AIF") 1 managers are looking to respond to investors search for yield in a
More informationThe Equity Premium in India
The Equity Premium in India Rajnish Mehra University of California, Santa Barbara and National Bureau of Economic Research January 06 Prepared for the Oxford Companion to Economics in India edited by Kaushik
More informationEvaluation on Hybrid Capital of Life Insurance Companies
06D417 September 1, 2006 Evaluation on Hybrid Capital of Life Insurance Companies Japan Credit Rating Agency (JCR) has summarized below the basic perspectives and standards for the evaluation of hybrid
More information'Contingent Convertibles' The World of CoCos
February 2014 'Contingent Convertibles' The World of CoCos Jan De Spiegeleer & Wim Schoutens February 2014 Reacfin's 10th anniversary event Outline 2 Introduction (Wim) n Contingent Capital Quantitative
More informationLife Cycle Asset Allocation A Suitable Approach for Defined Contribution Pension Plans
Life Cycle Asset Allocation A Suitable Approach for Defined Contribution Pension Plans Challenges for defined contribution plans While Eastern Europe is a prominent example of the importance of defined
More informationThe BlackScholes Formula
FIN40008 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008 The BlackScholes Formula These notes examine the BlackScholes formula for European options. The BlackScholes formula are complex as they are based on the
More informationMULTIPLE DEFAULTS AND MERTON'S MODEL L. CATHCART, L. ELJAHEL
ISSN 17446783 MULTIPLE DEFAULTS AND MERTON'S MODEL L. CATHCART, L. ELJAHEL Tanaka Business School Discussion Papers: TBS/DP04/12 London: Tanaka Business School, 2004 Multiple Defaults and Merton s Model
More informationBUS303. Study guide 2. Chapter 14
BUS303 Study guide 2 Chapter 14 1. An efficient capital market is one in which: A. all securities that investors want are offered. B. all transactions are closed within 2 days. C. current prices reflect
More informationFIN 423/523 Recapitalizations
FIN 423/523 Recapitalizations DebtforEquity Swaps EquityforDebt Swaps Calls of Convertible Securities to Force Conversion optimal conversion policy Asymmetric Information What Is a Recapitalization
More informationBlack Scholes Merton Approach To Modelling Financial Derivatives Prices Tomas Sinkariovas 0802869. Words: 3441
Black Scholes Merton Approach To Modelling Financial Derivatives Prices Tomas Sinkariovas 0802869 Words: 3441 1 1. Introduction In this paper I present Black, Scholes (1973) and Merton (1973) (BSM) general
More informationTHE FINANCING DECISIONS BY FIRMS: IMPACT OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE CHOICE ON VALUE
IX. THE FINANCING DECISIONS BY FIRMS: IMPACT OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE CHOICE ON VALUE The capital structure of a firm is defined to be the menu of the firm's liabilities (i.e, the "righthand side" of the
More informationCost of Capital and Project Valuation
Cost of Capital and Project Valuation 1 Background Firm organization There are four types: sole proprietorships partnerships limited liability companies corporations Each organizational form has different
More informationFINANCIAL ECONOMICS OPTION PRICING
OPTION PRICING Options are contingency contracts that specify payoffs if stock prices reach specified levels. A call option is the right to buy a stock at a specified price, X, called the strike price.
More informationGeneral Forex Glossary
General Forex Glossary A ADR American Depository Receipt Arbitrage The simultaneous buying and selling of a security at two different prices in two different markets, with the aim of creating profits without
More informationBlackScholesMerton approach merits and shortcomings
BlackScholesMerton approach merits and shortcomings Emilia Matei 1005056 EC372 Term Paper. Topic 3 1. Introduction The BlackScholes and Merton method of modelling derivatives prices was first introduced
More informationCharacteristics of Convertible Bonds. Equity + Bond
Characteristics of Convertible Bonds Equity + Bond Convertible bonds Combination of bonds and equities bond plus a call option on stock * bondholder has the right to convert the bond into common shares
More informationExtending Factor Models of Equity Risk to Credit Risk and Default Correlation. Dan dibartolomeo Northfield Information Services September 2010
Extending Factor Models of Equity Risk to Credit Risk and Default Correlation Dan dibartolomeo Northfield Information Services September 2010 Goals for this Presentation Illustrate how equity factor risk
More informationIntroduction to Options. Derivatives
Introduction to Options Econ 422: Investment, Capital & Finance University of Washington Summer 2010 August 18, 2010 Derivatives A derivative is a security whose payoff or value depends on (is derived
More informationC(t) (1 + y) 4. t=1. For the 4 year bond considered above, assume that the price today is 900$. The yield to maturity will then be the y that solves
Economics 7344, Spring 2013 Bent E. Sørensen INTEREST RATE THEORY We will cover fixed income securities. The major categories of longterm fixed income securities are federal government bonds, corporate
More informationFundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F9
Answers Fundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F9 Financial Management June 2008 Answers 1 (a) Calculation of weighted average cost of capital (WACC) Cost of equity Cost of equity using capital asset
More informationCopyright 2009 Pearson Education Canada
d) If Dorval calls in the outstanding bonds, a bondholder who currently owns bonds with $100,000 of face value will have to sell them back to the firm at face value. The bonds would be more valuable than
More informationSource of Finance and their Relative Costs F. COST OF CAPITAL
F. COST OF CAPITAL 1. Source of Finance and their Relative Costs 2. Estimating the Cost of Equity 3. Estimating the Cost of Debt and Other Capital Instruments 4. Estimating the Overall Cost of Capital
More informationWhat Do ShortTerm Liquidity Ratios Measure? What Is Working Capital? How Is the Current Ratio Calculated? How Is the Quick Ratio Calculated?
What Do ShortTerm Liquidity Ratios Measure? What Is Working Capital? HOCK international  2004 1 HOCK international  2004 2 How Is the Current Ratio Calculated? How Is the Quick Ratio Calculated? HOCK
More informationProf Kevin Davis Melbourne Centre for Financial Studies. Current Issues in Bank Capital Planning. Session 4.4
Enhancing Risk Management and Governance in the Region s Banking System to Implement Basel II and to Meet Contemporary Risks and Challenges Arising from the Global Banking System Training Program ~ 8 12
More informationMaster of Mathematical Finance: Course Descriptions
Master of Mathematical Finance: Course Descriptions CS 522 Data Mining Computer Science This course provides continued exploration of data mining algorithms. More sophisticated algorithms such as support
More informationThe Effects of Contingent Convertible (CoCo) Bonds on Insurers Capital Requirements under Solvency II
The Effects of Contingent Convertible (CoCo) Bonds on Insurers Capital Requirements under Solvency II Abstract The Liikanen Group proposes contingent convertible (CoCo) bonds as a potential mechanism to
More informationModelling and Pricing Hybrid bonds
1 Credit Research Modelling and Pricing Hybrid bonds Julien TURC Head of Quantitative Research, Société Générale CIB Overview 2 Common features of hybrid securities Pricing hybrid bonds The multiple method
More informationWACC and a Generalized Tax Code
WACC and a Generalized Tax Code Sven Husmann, Lutz Kruschwitz and Andreas Löffler version from 10/06/2001 ISSN 0949 9962 Abstract We extend the WACC approach to a tax system having a firm income tax and
More informationSwaps: Debtequity swap
Swaps: Debtequity swap INTRODUCTION Debtequity (respectively equitydebt) swap allows a company, government, or municipality to swap debt for equity (respectively equity for debt). Debt and equity are
More informationBank stability and market discipline: The effect of contingent capital on risk taking and default probability
Bank stability and market discipline: The effect of contingent capital on risk taking and default probability Jens Hilscher, Brandeis International Business School Alon Raviv, Brandeis International Business
More informationOptimal proportional reinsurance and dividend payout for insurance companies with switching reserves
Optimal proportional reinsurance and dividend payout for insurance companies with switching reserves Abstract: This paper presents a model for an insurance company that controls its risk and dividend
More informationHolding the middle ground with convertible securities
January 2015» White paper Holding the middle ground with convertible securities Eric N. Harthun, CFA Portfolio Manager Robert L. Salvin Portfolio Manager Key takeaways Convertible securities are an oftenoverlooked
More informationFundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F9
Answers Fundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F9 Financial Management December 2008 Answers 1 (a) Rights issue price = 2 5 x 0 8 = $2 00 per share Theoretical ex rights price = ((2 50 x 4) + (1 x 2 00)/5=$2
More informationChapter 11. Stocks and Bonds. How does this distribution work? An example. What form do the distributions to common shareholders take?
Chapter 11. Stocks and Bonds Chapter Objectives To identify basic shareholder rights and the means by which corporations make distributions to shareholders To recognize the investment opportunities in
More informationI. Emerging markets will not be initially subject to TLAC Liability structure: Business structure:
Dear FSB, This is Bank of China Luxembourg Branch. Thank you for your attention for our reply regarding TLAC just released a version for comments from your side. From the contents, TLAC (Total Loss Absorbency
More informationRisk Warning Notice. Introduction
First Equity Limited Salisbury House London Wall London EC2M 5QQ Tel 020 7374 2212 Fax 020 7374 2336 www.firstequity.ltd.uk Risk Warning Notice Introduction You should not invest in any investment product
More informationChapter 11 Options. Main Issues. Introduction to Options. Use of Options. Properties of Option Prices. Valuation Models of Options.
Chapter 11 Options Road Map Part A Introduction to finance. Part B Valuation of assets, given discount rates. Part C Determination of riskadjusted discount rate. Part D Introduction to derivatives. Forwards
More informationThe Empire Life Insurance Company
The Empire Life Insurance Company Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements For the six months ended June 30, 2015 Unaudited Issue Date: August 7, 2015 DRAFT NOTICE OF NO AUDITOR REVIEW OF CONDENSED
More informationNet revenue 785 25 1,721 05 5,038 54 3,340 65 Tax payable (235 58) (516 32) (1,511 56) (1,002 20)
Answers Fundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F9 Financial Management December 2013 Answers 1 (a) Calculating the net present value of the investment project using a nominal terms approach requires the
More informationThe cost of capital. A reading prepared by Pamela Peterson Drake. 1. Introduction
The cost of capital A reading prepared by Pamela Peterson Drake O U T L I N E 1. Introduction... 1 2. Determining the proportions of each source of capital that will be raised... 3 3. Estimating the marginal
More informationCallable Bonds  Structure
1.1 Callable bonds A callable bond is a fixed rate bond where the issuer has the right but not the obligation to repay the face value of the security at a preagreed value prior to the final original maturity
More informationReview of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology
Review of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology March 24, 2005 1 Introduction The purchase of an options contract gives the buyer the right to buy call options contract or sell put options contract some
More informationSchonbucher Chapter 9: Firm Value and Share PricedBased Models Updated 07302007
Schonbucher Chapter 9: Firm alue and Share PricedBased Models Updated 07302007 (References sited are listed in the book s bibliography, except Miller 1988) For Intensity and spreadbased models of default
More informationModelling and Pricing Contingent Convertibles
Modelling and Pricing Contingent Convertibles Per Alvemar and Philip Ericson June 8, 2012 Graduate School Master of Science in Finance Master Degree project 2012 Supervisor: Alexander Herbertsson Acknowledgements
More informationFNCE 301, Financial Management H Guy Williams, 2006
REVIEW We ve used the DCF method to find present value. We also know shortcut methods to solve these problems such as perpetuity present value = C/r. These tools allow us to value any cash flow including
More informationRating Methodology for Domestic Life Insurance Companies
Rating Methodology for Domestic Life Insurance Companies Introduction ICRA Lanka s Claim Paying Ability Ratings (CPRs) are opinions on the ability of life insurance companies to pay claims and policyholder
More informationCost of Capital and Corporate Refinancing Strategy: Optimization of Costs and Risks *
Cost of Capital and Corporate Refinancing Strategy: Optimization of Costs and Risks * Garritt Conover Abstract This paper investigates the effects of a firm s refinancing policies on its cost of capital.
More informationCapital Constraints, Lending over the Cycle and the Precautionary Motive: A Quantitative Exploration (Working Paper)
Capital Constraints, Lending over the Cycle and the Precautionary Motive: A Quantitative Exploration (Working Paper) Angus Armstrong and Monique Ebell National Institute of Economic and Social Research
More informationThe economics of sovereign debt restructuring: Swaps and buybacks
The economics of sovereign debt restructuring: Swaps and buybacks Eduardo FernandezArias Fernando Broner Main ideas The objective of these notes is to present a number of issues related to sovereign debt
More informationCredit Analysis 101
Credit Analysis 101 102 Liquidity and Working Capital Basics Liquidity  Ability to convert assets into cash or to obtain cash to meet shortterm obligations. Shortterm  Conventionally viewed as a
More informationOption pricing. Vinod Kothari
Option pricing Vinod Kothari Notation we use this Chapter will be as follows: S o : Price of the share at time 0 S T : Price of the share at time T T : time to maturity of the option r : risk free rate
More informationCHAPTER 16. Financial Distress, Managerial Incentives, and Information. Chapter Synopsis
CHAPTER 16 Financial Distress, Managerial Incentives, and Information Chapter Synopsis In the previous two chapters it was shown that, in an otherwise perfect capital market in which firms pay taxes, the
More informationInd AS 32 and Ind AS 109  Financial Instruments Classification, recognition and measurement. June 2015
Ind AS 32 and Ind AS 109  Financial Instruments Classification, recognition and measurement June 2015 Contents Executive summary Standards dealing with financial instruments under Ind AS Financial instruments
More information1. What is a recapitalization? Why is this considered a pure capital structure change?
CHAPTER 12 CONCEPT REVIEW QUESTIONS 1. What is a recapitalization? Why is this considered a pure capital structure change? Recapitalization is an alteration of a company s capital structure to change the
More informationCopyright 2009 Pearson Education Canada
The consequence of failing to adjust the discount rate for the risk implicit in projects is that the firm will accept highrisk projects, which usually have higher IRR due to their highrisk nature, and
More information4: SINGLEPERIOD MARKET MODELS
4: SINGLEPERIOD MARKET MODELS Ben Goldys and Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Semester 2, 2015 B. Goldys and M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 4: SinglePeriod Market
More informationBond valuation. Present value of a bond = present value of interest payments + present value of maturity value
Bond valuation A reading prepared by Pamela Peterson Drake O U T L I N E 1. Valuation of longterm debt securities 2. Issues 3. Summary 1. Valuation of longterm debt securities Debt securities are obligations
More informationCorporate Income Taxation
Corporate Income Taxation We have stressed that tax incidence must be traced to people, since corporations cannot bear the burden of a tax. Why then tax corporations at all? There are several possible
More informationSaving and Investing. Being an educated investor will help enable you to become financially sound. Chapters 30 and 31
Saving and Investing Being an educated investor will help enable you to become financially sound Chapters 30 and 31 Essential Questions How do you know when to save and when to invest? What are some reasons
More informationMichael C S Wong 2014 2
Michael C S Wong 2014 Michael C S Wong 2014 2 Analyzing corporate credit risk: The myths in China Dr. Michael C S Wong Associate Professor, College of Business, City University of Hong Kong Chairman, CTRisks
More informationBoris Albul Shankar Narayanan Margarita Tsoutsoura Carles Vergara
Credit Default Swaps: Pricing and Finding the Sensitivity (of the Deviation of Theoretical Price from the Market Price) with Respect to Different Factors Boris Albul Shankar Narayanan Margarita Tsoutsoura
More information11 November 2014 EBA/CP/2014/39. Consultation Paper. Draft Guidelines on the rate of conversion of debt to equity in bailin
11 November 2014 EBA/CP/2014/39 Consultation Paper Draft Guidelines on the rate of conversion of debt to equity in bailin 1 Contents 1. Responding to this Consultation 3 2. Executive Summary 4 3. Background
More informationThe Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates. An Impossible Bond Pricing Model. 780 w Interest Rate Models
780 w Interest Rate Models The Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates Before discussing how a bond marketmaker would deltahedge, we first need to specify how bonds behave. Suppose we try to model a zerocoupon
More informationGAMMA.0279 THETA 8.9173 VEGA 9.9144 RHO 3.5985
14 Option Sensitivities and Option Hedging Answers to Questions and Problems 1. Consider Call A, with: X $70; r 0.06; T t 90 days; 0.4; and S $60. Compute the price, DELTA, GAMMA, THETA, VEGA, and RHO
More informationTutorial: Structural Models of the Firm
Tutorial: Structural Models of the Firm Peter Ritchken Case Western Reserve University February 16, 2015 Peter Ritchken, Case Western Reserve University Tutorial: Structural Models of the Firm 1/61 Tutorial:
More informationFUNDING INVESTMENTS FINANCE 238/738, Spring 2008, Prof. Musto Class 6 Introduction to Corporate Bonds
FUNDING INVESTMENTS FINANCE 238/738, Spring 2008, Prof. Musto Class 6 Introduction to Corporate Bonds Today: I. Equity is a call on firm value II. Senior Debt III. Junior Debt IV. Convertible Debt V. Variance
More information