Introduction 3. Scope of the Consultation 3. Background 3. Proposals for the Teachers Pension Scheme from April 2013 to March
|
|
- Madison Hunt
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Consultation on proposed increases in contributions for members of the Teachers Pension Scheme (TPS) in ; and the removal of provisions governing scheme valuations and cap and share arrangements Government response January 2013
2 Contents Introduction 3 Scope of the Consultation 3 Background 3 Proposals for the Teachers Pension Scheme from April 2013 to March Main findings from the consultation 8 Summary responses to the six questions 9 Question 1: Do the proposed tiered contributions meet the objectives set out by the Government in the Spending Review? 9 Question 2: Are there any consequences of the proposed contribution tiers that you consider have not been addressed? 10 Question 3: Do you consider that there are equality issues that will result in any individual groups being disproportionately affected by the proposed contribution tiering? If so, what do you consider to be the disproportionate effect? 12 Question 4: The proposed tiering structure above proposes moving from seven tiers to eight, to accommodate the additional tier at 40,000-45,000. From an administration perspective, do you anticipate issues in implementing the revised tiering structures by April 2013? 14 Question 5: Do you think that the proposed change to dealing with retrospective pay awards and mid-month changes is necessary? If not, what alternative would you propose? 15 Question 6: Are the proposed amendments to the Teachers Pensions Regulations 2010 appropriate? 16 Summary of conclusions and next steps 17 2
3 Introduction 1. In July 2011 the Department consulted on proposals to increase contribution rates for members of the Teachers Pension Scheme (TPS). Following the consideration of responses to that consultation, tiered contributions were introduced into the TPS from April This consultation set out the Government s proposals for further increases to teacher contributions from April This consultation also set out the Government s proposals to remove the current provisions in the TPS regulations covering scheme valuations (also known as actuarial review) and cap and share arrangements. These provisions are no longer necessary, as the Government is implementing a reformed TPS from 2015, which will include new arrangements for conducting valuations. Scope of the Consultation 3. The purpose of the consultation was to seek views and evidence on: whether the proposed contribution increases meet the principles set out by the Government; the administrative implications of the proposed changes; and, whether the proposed regulation changes to remove provisions on scheme valuations and cap and share are appropriate. To assist with this, the Department set out specific questions on which it welcomed responses, although consultees were invited to respond on any aspect of the proposals. 4. The responses reported in this document relate to the consultation on the contribution increases in only; and the Government s proposals to remove the current provisions in the TPS regulations covering scheme valuations and cap and share arrangements. 5. The Government remains committed to securing the full savings announced in the Spending Review 2010 and further proposals will be brought forward for , and beyond, following further discussions between the Government and the public service unions and employers. Background 6. Providing good quality pensions is becoming more challenging given increasing life expectancy. That is why the Government set up the Independent Public Service Pensions Commission (IPSPC) chaired by Lord Hutton to make recommendations on how such pensions can be made sustainable and affordable, whilst remaining fair to the workforce and the tax payer. 7. The IPSPC, as part of its review, produced an interim report considered the case for delivering savings on public service pensions within the spending review period 3
4 - consistent with the Government s commitment to protect those on low incomes - to contribute towards the reduction of the structural deficit. In his interim report of 7 October 2010, Lord Hutton recommended that increased longevity and the imbalance between employer and employee contributions are strong reasons to make short-term changes to pension contributions pending a more fundamental redesign of the schemes. 8. The Terms of Reference, Interim Report (dated Oct 2010) and the Final Report (dated March 2011) can be found at 9. The Government announced in the 2010 Spending Review that it accepted the findings of the interim IPSPC Report on public service pensions and that it would therefore seek progressive changes to the level of employee contributions. The total overall savings are 2.8 billion per annum across the public service pension schemes by These savings are to be introduced incrementally over three years starting in April 2012, on a 40%: 80%: 100% basis. 10. In a statement in July 2011, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury reiterated the Government s intention to protect low earners and set out the Government s proposal that: anyone earning less than 15,000 per year Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) will see no increase; those earning between 15,000 and 21,000 per year FTE will see a gross increase of no more than 1.5 percentage points by (this amounts to a 0.6 percentage point increase in on a pro-rata basis); and no individual will see a gross increase of more than 6 percentage points by (this amounts to a 2.4 percentage point cap in on a prorata basis). Proposals for the Teachers Pension Scheme from April 2013 to March 2014 Contribution Increases in Following implementation of tiered contributions in April 2012, the Department has been monitoring opt-out rates amongst teachers. To date there has been no discernable increase in opt-out rates, from which the Department has concluded that the tiering structure is achieving the Government s aims. 12. The Department s starting point for the contribution increases was to rollforward the current structure to deliver the next 40% of the savings. However, following discussion with stakeholders, the Department considered whether changes to the current structure are necessary to provide further protection to 4
5 some groups. In particular, the Department considered representations that greater protection should be provided to the lower paid and that the tier from 40k- 75k was too wide (meaning that some classroom teachers were facing the same increase as some head teachers). 13. The proposed contribution rates for , on which the Department consulted, are as follows: Pensionable annual earnings in relevant year ( ) Contribution Rate in Increase (against ) Lower Upper Tier % Tier % Below 14, % 0.0% 15,000 25, % 0.0% 26,000 31, % 0.6% 32,000 39, % 1.2% 40,000 44, % 1.2% 45,000 74, % 2.1% 75,000 99, % 2.2% 100, , % 2.4% 14. This proposal rolls forward the existing tiering structure and distribution approach for those earning up to 40k, with the exception that tier 2 has been capped at 7% to ensure those earning up to 26k will see no further increase beyond the 0.6% applied in April This provides greater protection for 90.6k (13.9%) of the workforce (in tier 2). The proposal introduces a new tier of 40-45k, which moves 14.4% of the workforce from tier 6 to tier 5 and provides greater protection for 94.5k (14.4%) more members. This is intended to address concerns that the previous tier 6 was too broad and also an anomaly created by tax relief, which meant that teachers in the 40-45k income bracket faced a greater impact on their take home pay than those on 45-55k. The new tier means that those who earn more will face the larger reduction in take-home pay. However, providing the above protection requires an increase of 0.5 percentage points for those earning 45-75k in order to deliver the savings foregone by introducing the new tier. 15. The proposed tiers are designed to be consistent with the Government s principles of protecting the low paid; progressive; and minimises the risk of opt-outs. TPS members are employed in a range of different settings. However, the majority are employed in maintained schools, where pay is set in accordance with the School Teachers Pay and Conditions Document. The proposed tiers are therefore intended to reflect the different pay scales typically in use in maintained schools as a proxy for all TPS members, regardless of where they are employed. 5
6 Mid-month Salary Changes and Retrospective Pay Awards 16. During last year s consultation the Department set out two options for employers to determine which salary rate should be used to allocate the contributions tier that should be applied to each individual teacher. They were: Option 1 - determine each member s contribution tier at the beginning of the year, and apply that to all subsequent months; and Option 2 - set the tier each month based on the salary within that month (on a pro-rata basis). 17. Following the consultation the Department implemented option 2. However, since implementation, a number of employers raised concerns about the administrative burden caused by calculating the contributions to be deducted following the application of retrospective pay awards. The Department therefore proposed an amendment to the current arrangements such that in the event of a retrospective pay award, the employer would determine the new contribution rate based on the new FTE salary, and that would be applied to all member s salary paid in that month (including arrears). FTE is defined as total pay in the month, excluding back pay, multiplied by 12 (on a pro-rata basis). Removal of legislative provisions governing actuarial review and cap and share arrangements 18. The Regulations which govern the TPS currently include provisions for contribution rates to be determined, following an actuarial review of the scheme, and cap and share arrangements whereby the split of contributions between members and employers would be determined. The actuarial review of the TPS, along with similar reviews of other public service pension schemes, was put on hold whilst the Government considered the implications of the change to the discount rate, announced by the Chancellor in Budget 2011, which is used to calculate the contribution rate and the implications of pension reforms to public service schemes. 19. The Government has now announced that it will be proceeding with the implementation of reformed public service schemes by April The reformed schemes will include new arrangements for managing future cost pressures, including an employer cost cap. The Public Service Pensions Bill, which is currently passing through Parliament will provide for these new arrangements. 20. In light of the new arrangements for setting contribution rates, which will come into effect in 2015, there is now no need to carry out the currently suspended TPS actuarial review or the cap and share processes. The Government considers that the money and resource, which would be used in conducting such processes, is better served focusing on the actuarial valuation which will be needed in order to 6
7 set up the new TPS. After all, the true costs of the Scheme going forward can only be determined in the full light of the reforms being introduced. 21. Although the currently suspended actuarial review will not be completed, there will still be visibility and financial control, as costs which would have been shown in the suspended actuarial valuations will still show up in the actuarial valuation, which will be carried out for the new scheme. There will also still be annual valuations of the TPS for accounting purposes, using the same data, although these valuations are not used for setting contribution rates. 7
8 Main findings from the consultation 22. This report summarises the findings that have resulted from the public consultation on the proposed employee contribution increase to the TPS in financial year ; and proposals to remove the current provisions in the TPS regulations covering scheme valuations and cap and share arrangements. 23. The Department received a total of 41 responses to the six questions. The respondents fell into the following categories: Other 8 School 8 TPS Member 8 Local Authority 6 Higher Education 3 Employer 3 Union 3 Further Education 2 Total Those that fell under the other category include individuals, payroll administrators, finance managers, pension specialists, and directors of corporate services. 25. A summary of the main issues raised is provided below: The Department has failed to provide sufficient justification to demonstrate an increase in employee contributions; The proposals will have a disproportionate impact on members by reference to their protected characteristics; Contribution rates based on full-time equivalent (FTE) salary will have a disproportionate impact on the predominantly female and part-time members; The increase in employee contributions will deter teachers from seeking promotion for senior leadership positions; The proposed increase in employee contributions plus the employer contribution (currently at 14.1%) could buy greater benefits elsewhere; The proposals will increase opt-out rates, particularly for those new to the profession; Greater protection should be provided for those earning up to 45k; The proposals do not take account of increased salaries in London; and Early confirmation of the proposed changes is required in order to avoid any implementation issues. 8
9 Summary of responses to the six questions Question 1: Do the proposed tiered contributions meet the objectives set out by the Government in the Spending Review? Summary of responses 26. There were 25 responses to this question. 27. A third of respondents including unions agreed that the proposed tiered contributions meet the objectives set out by the Government in the Spending Review, but expressed concerns that it had been met at a cost to TPS membership. 28. Respondents who disagreed thought that the increase in contributions was unnecessary, as the, TPS was an in profit viable scheme and any increases in contributions were designed to reduce the Government deficit. Respondents also raised concerns that without a valuation of the scheme, the Department failed to provide sufficient justification to demonstrate that an increase in employee contribution rates is required in order to improve the balance between employee contributions and the taxpayer, leading to a potential increase in opt-outs. 29. The majority of respondents said they were unsure if the proposals met the objectives set out in the spending review, but made no further comment. Conclusion 30. The consultation document made clear that the scope of the consultation was to seek views and evidence on the way in which contribution increases might be implemented, rather than the Government s decision to increase contributions, which was taken in response to Lord Hutton s interim report. 31. In light of the new arrangements for setting contribution rates, which come into effect in 2015, there is no need to carry out the currently suspended TPS actuarial review or the cap and share processes. The Government considers that the money and resources used for conducting such processes is better served focusing on the actuarial valuation which will be needed in order to set up the new TPS, as the true costs of the scheme can only be determined once the reforms have been introduced. 32. Some consultees argued that the increase in contributions may increase opt-out rates. The Department is committed to minimising the risk of members opting out of the TPS. The proposals for are are designed to provide a significant degree of protection to those on lower salaries and are in the early stages of their career and will therefore see the smallest increase in their contribution rates.the conclusion from the responses received, that are relevant to the specific 9
10 questions, is that the Department s proposals do meet the objectives set out by the Government in the Spending Review. Question 2: Are there any consequences of the proposed contribution tiers that you consider have not been addressed? Summary of responses 33. There were 32 responses to this question. 34. Over half of the respondents who replied to this question suggested that there were a number of consequences that had not been addressed. Four main issues were raised in response to this question. These, along with the DfE response, is provided below: Issue Changes in contribution rates will increase opt-out rates, particularly for those new to the profession. DfE Position The Department is committed to minimising the risk of members opting out of the TPS. The contribution tiers are designed to ensure that those in the early stages of their career have the smallest increase in contribution rates. To date, monthly opt-out analysis in 2012 shows there has been no discernible increase in optout levels. Between January 12 to November 12, there have been a total of 3,539 elections to opt out, this is a reduction of 422 (10.7%) compared with the same time in In line with the Government s commitment to support the lowest paid and reduce opt out rates, the proposals for provide even greater protection for these groups who will pay the smallest increase (if any). By opting out of the TPS, members would also lose the contribution the employer makes to their pension (currently 14.1%), funded by taxpayers, this remains a very generous contribution to teachers pensions. A comprehensive communications strategy is being implemented to ensure that all members, and employers, are clear on all of the benefits that the scheme provides. This will ensure that 10
11 employees make fully informed decisions about participation in the scheme, with the aim of mitigating against the risk of significant increases in opt-out rates. Contribution increases will deter teachers from seeking promotion for senior leadership positions. The tiers have been designed to minimise the impact of the changes in contribution rates and we do not consider that this will act as a barrier to career progression or recruitment. For example, a classroom teacher earning approximately 28,000 would contribute 7.9% of their salary (resulting in additional contributions of 340 in ). If they were promoted to Deputy Head teacher earning approximately 38,000 they would contribute 8.8% (resulting in additional contribution of 730 in ). The increase in salary is significantly higher than the additional contributions that they would be required to make. Greater protection should be provided for those earning up to 45k The contribution increases tiers do not take account of increased salaries in London. Providing this level of protection in addition to the increased protection being proposed is not affordable. Consequently, this level of protection will require members in the upper tiers to pay significantly more. The contribution tiers have been based on the pay structure for the majority of teachers in maintained schools. This means that teachers in London whose salaries are higher may have a slightly higher contribution rate than teachers located outside of the capital. However, provided the member remains in London their pension benefits will be calculated based on a higher salary. Conclusion 35. A number of issues were raised and these have been considered in light of the principles behind the proposed contribution tiers. The Department s proposals were designed to mitigate against the risks identified above, nevertheless the position will be carefully monitored and any lessons learned will inform the proposals for the tiering structure and distributional approach for and beyond. 11
12 Question 3: Do you consider that there are equality issues that will result in any individual groups being disproportionately affected by the proposed contribution tiering? If so, what do you consider to be the disproportionate effect? Summary of responses 36. There were 26 responses to this question. 37. Those respondents who said there would be no equality issues stated that the proposals would not impact on any groups and that the equality assessment for last year s exercise had been completed satisfactorily so they did not want to raise any further equality issues. 38. The majority of respondents who replied suggested there would be equality issues, resulting in individual groups being affected by the proposals. There were four main areas where comments were provided. These, along with the DfE response, is provided below: Issue Contribution increases will have a disproportionate impact on the younger, lower paid, disabled, teachers from black and minority ethnic (BME) groups, and part-time teachers, who are more likely to be female. Older teachers and the highest paid are also likely to be disproportionately adversely affected DfE Position An equality analysis has been undertaken in accordance with the public sector equality duty to have due regard to the potential equality issues arising as a result of the proposals. The equality analysis indicates that there is no disproportionate impact on members by reference to their protected characteristics. The proposals for provide even greater protection for the lowest paid, part time members who are disproportionately female and newly qualified teachers. Disabled and minority ethnic groups feature more heavily in lower paid teaching roles and therefore also benefit from the increased protection. Tiered contribution rates based on fulltime equivalent (FTE) salary will have a disproportionate impact on part-time members who are predominantly This issue has been considered carefully as part of our equality analysis. The approach to use FTE is consistent with the 12
13 female. principle that pension benefits are calculated on FTE salaries and therefore contributions tiers should also be calculated on a FTE basis. In addition, FTE salaries are used in both the Local Government Scheme and the NHS scheme, which have had tiered contributions for some time. Members on lower pay scales are offered the most protection from contribution increases as increases are tiered. So in designing how increases are to operate this does offer mitigation against some of the impact of contribution increases. The contribution increases tiers do not take account of increased salaries in London. The proposals will unfairly impact on teachers in senior posts because they are being asked to pay more but don t get higher benefits in return. The DfE position is shown in response to Question 2. The contribution rates are reasonable and proportionate, consistent with the Government s objective to ensure the increase is progressive and protects the lower paid. More senior teachers will be advantaged from the way that significant salary progression is more beneficial in a final salary scheme. Conclusion 39. The Department has completed an equality analysis in accordance with the public sector equality duty placed on the department to have due regard to the potential equality issues arising as a result of the proposals, which included careful consideration of the feedback from the consultation exercise. 40. The Department s analysis indicates that there is no disproportionate impact on members by reference to their protected characteristics. The Department therefore concludes that the proposals represent a reasonable and proportionate means of achieving the Government s objectives. 13
14 Question 4: The proposed tiering structure above proposes moving from seven tiers to eight, to accommodate the additional tier at 40,000-45,000. From an administration perspective, do you anticipate issues in implementing the revised tiering structures by April 2013? Summary of responses 41. There were 33 responses to this question. 42. More than half of the respondents said the proposals to move from a seven tier structure to an eight tier structure would potentially create administration burdens for their organisations. The majority of respondents said potential issues would only arise from late notification of the proposed changes. 43. Other respondents (including unions and employer representatives) said the changes in were administered satisfactorily and did not anticipate any administrative issues implementing the proposals for Lessons learnt from last year were that the changes were announced too late. For successful implementation by April 13, early confirmation of the proposed changes, as well as comprehensive guidance needs to be issued in a timely manner, in order for software providers and employers to build and test the new tiers into their payroll system and communicate the changes to members. Conclusion 45. The potential administrative impact has been considered carefully as part of the policy decision-making process. The Department recognises that this could be administratively more complex for some employers depending on the payroll systems they use. With that in mind, we have aimed to finalise the proposed tiering structure as soon as possible in order to ensure that employers have adequate time to make any necessary changes to their payroll systems and communicate the changes to employees in advance of implementation in April In addition, nearly all employers will have experience in dealing with the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS), which has employed a system of tiered contributions for some time. The recently agreed reformed LGPS will have 9 tiers so there is no obvious reason why employers will be able to administer that system and not a system with 8 tiers. The Department therefore concludes that the proposed eight tier structure is appropriate. 14
15 47. It is clear that comprehensive guidance must be provided to ensure that employers are able to implement these proposals effectively. High quality information must also be provided to ensure that members are kept fully informed. Question 5: Do you think that the proposed change to dealing with retrospective pay awards and mid-month changes is necessary? If not, what alternative would you propose? Summary of responses 48. There were 29 responses to this question. 49. Respondents, including unions and employer representatives, agreed that provided scheme members are in no way disadvantaged, the proposed change to dealing with retrospective pay awards and mid-month changes are necessary as it will simplify the current process and will save a significant amount of administrative time. 50. Those respondents that thought the proposals for dealing with retrospective pay awards and mid-month changes were unnecessary, felt they did not think retrospective deductions should be made and teacher tiers should be fixed for the year. Some respondents expressed concern that the amount of work involved outweighed the small amount that may be collected. 51. Of the respondents that were unsure about the proposals, several commented that they could not think of another fairer approach. Conclusion 52. The majority view in response last s consultation exercise was that contribution tiers are set based on a member s monthly pay. The proposed change to dealing with retrospective pay awards and mid-month changes was in response to a number of employer concerns about the administrative burden caused by calculating the contributions to be deducted following the application of retrospective pay awards. 53. No evidence was presented that the proposals will have an adverse impact on members. The Department therefore concludes that the proposed change to dealing with retrospective pay awards and mid-month represents a fairer approach. 15
16 Question 6: Are the proposed amendments to the Teachers Pensions Regulations 2010 appropriate? Summary of responses 54. There were 26 responses to this question. 55. The majority of respondents, including unions and employers, disagreed that the proposed amendments to the Teachers Pensions Regulations 2010 were appropriate. Many felt that until the Government carried out a valuation of the scheme that demonstrated the need to increase member contributions, the proposals are unjustified. 56. Those who agreed with the proposals thought they were reasonable and appropriate given the decision to move ahead without carrying out a valuation. 57. There was also a suggestion that with the increase in employee contributions plus the employer contribution currently at 14.1% could buy greater benefits elsewhere, far in excess of anything offered by the TPS. Conclusion 58. The scope of the consultation was on the way in which contribution increases might be implemented, as opposed to Government s decision to increase contributions, which was taken in response to Lord Hutton s interim report. 59. As previously stated, in light of the new arrangements for setting contribution rates, which will come into effect in 2015, there is no need to carry out the currently suspended actuarial review or the cap and share processes. The Government considers that the money and resource used to conduct such processes is better served focusing on the actuarial valuation which will be needed in order to set up the new TPS. After all, the true costs of the scheme going forward can only be determined in the full light of the reforms being introduced. 60. The TPS compares very favourably to private sector pension schemes. The TPS is a defined benefit scheme, which means teachers receive a guaranteed amount in retirement. In the private sector defined benefit schemes are typically in decline; most people in the private sector are in pension schemes where they will receive an uncertain amount based on the value of an investment fund or cash pot. Members would also lose the contribution the employer makes to their pension (currently 14.1%). The Department therefore concludes that the proposals are appropriate. 16
17 Summary of conclusions and next steps 61. The majority of responses, including those from unions, employers and members provided opposition to the policy of increasing pension contributions and the proposed amendments to the TPS regulations. 62. However, from the responses received, and the reduction in opt-outs compared to the previous year, the Department has concluded that the proposals represent a reasonable and proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Where concerns have been raised, the Department has provided responses. On the basis of the various arguments put forward, officials believe the Department s proposals represent the maximum degree of protection it is reasonable to provide to lower paid teachers, when balanced against the consequential impact for the highest paid. 63. The Department will continue to monitor the position when considering the proposals for the tiering structure and distributional approach for and beyond. 64. A comprehensive communications strategy is being implemented to ensure that all members, and employers, are clear on the benefits that the scheme provides. This will ensure that employees make fully informed decisions about participation in the scheme, with the aim of mitigating against the risk of significant increases in optout rates. 65. Appropriate amendments will be made to the Teachers Pensions Regulations 2010 to give the proposed changes legal effect on 1 April
18 Crown copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit or Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: This document is available online at: 18
This document describes proposals for the LGPS in England and Wales and does not override any existing legislation. LGPS 2014
LGPS 2014 EMPLOYER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS THE BACKGROUND TO LGPS 2014 Why is another new scheme being introduced? The Coalition government came to power with a clear agenda to change public sector
More informationElectricity Market Reform:
Electricity Market Reform: Consultation on Low Carbon Contracts Company s and Electricity Settlements Company s operational costs 2015/16 Government Response January 2015 Crown copyright 2015 URN 15D/001
More informationConsultation on potential early repayment mechanisms for student loans
HIGHER EDUCATION Consultation on potential early repayment mechanisms for student loans JUNE 2011 Contents Student finance reforms...3 Why we are consulting on early repayment mechanisms...3 The existing
More informationLGPS 2014 - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
LGPS 2014 - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS THE BACKGROUND TO LGPS 2014 Why is another new scheme being introduced? The Coalition government came to power with a clear agenda to change public sector pensions,
More informationFirefighter fitness standards and assessment
Firefighter fitness standards and assessment Consultation response December 2014 Department for Communities and Local Government Crown copyright, 2014 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with
More informationIMPLEMENTING THE RESTRICTION OF PENSIONS TAX RELIEF: NAPF SUBMISSION TO THE HMT/HMRC CONSULTATION
IMPLEMENTING THE RESTRICTION OF PENSIONS TAX RELIEF: NAPF SUBMISSION TO THE HMT/HMRC CONSULTATION Executive Summary The NAPF welcomes the Coalition Government s decision to adopt a tax regime based principally
More informationBasis for setting the discount rate for calculating cash equivalent transfer values payable by public service pension schemes
Basis for setting the discount rate for calculating cash equivalent transfer values payable by public service pension schemes updated guidance issued by HM Treasury March 2011 Official versions of this
More informationConsultation Document. Retained Firefighters pension settlement: A consultation to provide access to a modified pension scheme in Wales
Number: WG19518 Welsh Government Consultation Document Retained Firefighters pension settlement: A consultation to provide access to a modified pension scheme in Wales Date of issue: 23 August 2013 Action
More informationStudent accommodation and affordable housing contributions
Section 106 Planning obligations speeding up negotiations Student accommodation and affordable housing contributions Government Response to consultation March 2015 Department for Communities and Local
More informationUPPINGHAM TOWN COUNCIL PENSION LIABILITIES
UPPINGHAM TOWN COUNCIL PENSION LIABILITIES The Finance and General Purposes Committee has been asked to look into two aspects of pension provision which will need to be decided upon and implemented in
More informationThis document has been archived. DfE Capital Funding
DfE Capital Funding Technical note for universal infant free school meals (financial year 2014 to 2015) and basic need (financial years 2014 to 2017) December 2013 Contents Introduction 3 Universal infant
More informationIntegrating the operation of income tax and National Insurance contributions. A call for evidence
Integrating the operation of income tax and National Insurance contributions A call for evidence July 2011 Integrating the operation of income tax and National Insurance contributions A call for evidence
More informationTax exemption for employer expenditure on healthrelated. summary of responses
Tax exemption for employer expenditure on healthrelated interventions: summary of responses December 2013 Tax exemption for employer expenditure on health-related interventions: summary of responses December
More informationOxford University Student Union. Consultation on Support for Postgraduate Study
Oxford University Student Union response to the Consultation on Support for Postgraduate Study OUSU is the representative body for the University of Oxford s 22,000 diverse students, existing to represent,
More informationPAY POLICY STATEMENT 2015/16
PAY POLICY STATEMENT 2015/16 This Pay Policy Statement is produced in accordance with Chapter 8 of the Localism Act 2011. It was approved by Luton Borough Council ( the Council ) at a meeting of the Full
More informationHow To Make A Pension Scheme More Affordable For Police
By e mail only Pensions Consultation 2015 Pensions and Savings Team HM Treasury 1 Horse Guards Road London SW1A 2HQ 25 th September 2015 Dear Sir/Madam, STRENGTHENING THE INCENTIVE TO SAVE: A CONSULTATION
More informationFreedom and choice in pensions: government response to the consultation
Freedom and choice in pensions: government response to the consultation Cm 8901 July 2014 Freedom and choice in pensions: government response to the consultation Presented to Parliament by the Chancellor
More informationBasis for setting the discount rate for calculating cash equivalent transfer values payable by public service pension schemes
Basis for setting the discount rate for calculating cash equivalent transfer values payable by public service pension schemes guidance issued by HM Treasury October 2011 Basis for setting the discount
More informationA guide to the local government finance settlement in England
A guide to the local government finance settlement in England December 2013 Department for Communities and Local Government Crown copyright, 2013 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the
More informationConsultation Proposals for implementation of the reformed Teachers Pension Scheme in 2015
Consultation Proposals for implementation of the reformed Teachers Pension Scheme in 2015 Contents Page Introduction 2 Background and Context 3 Areas not covered by the consultation which will be part
More informationNational funding formula: equality analysis
National funding formula: equality analysis March 2016 Contents The public sector equality duty 3 What we are proposing in this consultation package 4 Consideration of the protected characteristics identified
More informationA Guide to the Local Government Pension Scheme for Employees in England and Wales. Hampshire Pension Fund
A Guide to the Local Government Pension Scheme for Employees in England and Wales Hampshire Pension Fund Employees in England and Wales April 2014 Index 1. About this Booklet 2. About the Local Government
More informationRegulators Code July 2013
July 2013 Foreword In the Autumn Statement 2012 Government announced that it would introduce a package of measures to improve the way regulation is delivered at the frontline such as the Focus on Enforcement
More informationSTATES OF JERSEY PENSION INCREASE DEBT: OPTIONS FOR EARLY REPAYMENT STATES GREFFE
STATES OF JERSEY PENSION INCREASE DEBT: OPTIONS FOR EARLY REPAYMENT Presented to the States on 18th June 2013 by the Minister for Treasury and Resources STATES GREFFE 2013 Price code: B R.63 2 REPORT Background
More informationBasic Guide to Retirement Income Options
Basic Guide to Retirement Income Options Can I afford to retire? Which retirement income solution is best for me? Should I take all my tax-free cash entitlement? Will my family benefit from my pension
More informationAdvice on trade union facility time. For school leaders, governing bodies, employers and employees in schools
Advice on trade union facility time For school leaders, governing bodies, employers and employees in schools January 2014 Contents About this departmental advice 3 Expiry or review date 3 Who is this advice
More informationHow To Get A New Nhs Pension Scheme
NHS pension scheme changes: rules and benefits comparison The new arrangements for NHS pensions mean that from 1 April 2008 there will be two schemes: The current updated. This will continue to be a final
More informationTUPE: Frequently Asked Questions For Schools becoming an Academy
TUPE: Frequently Asked Questions For Schools becoming an Academy 1. PURPOSE This document is for Governors, Head Teachers and staff of schools who have received the Academy Order from the Department for
More informationISA qualifying investments: consultation on including shares traded on small and medium-sized enterprise equity markets
ISA qualifying investments: consultation on including shares traded on small and medium-sized enterprise equity markets March 2013 ISA qualifying investments: consultation on including shares traded on
More informationFinancial planning guide For teachers who are approaching retirement
Financial planning guide For teachers who are approaching retirement Financial planning guide 1 2 Contents Think ahead 4 When did you join? 5 Different rules, at different times 6 What kind of member are
More informationTax-Free Childcare: consultation on childcare account provision
Tax-Free Childcare: consultation on childcare account provision May 2014 Tax-Free Childcare: consultation on childcare account provision May 2014 Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (excluding
More informationBelow normal pension age on exit one month s pay for each year of service up to 21 months.
Civil Service Compensation Scheme Q&A December 2010 The new Civil Service Compensation Scheme (CSCS) which takes effect on 22 December 2010 sets out the level of compensation that Departments can pay their
More informationREDUNDANCY PROCEDURE 1 POLICY STATEMENT & SCOPE
REDUNDANCY PROCEDURE 1 POLICY STATEMENT & SCOPE 1.1 Recognising that its employees are its most important resource, The College is committed to maintaining security of employment for all its employees.
More informationInformation for high earners in USS
Note: The government intends to repeal and replace the taxation changes which will affect high earners from April 2011 however the detail of replacement provisions has not been finalised. The consultation
More informationAmending the childcare disqualification arrangements in schools and non-domestic registered settings. Government consultation
Amending the childcare disqualification arrangements in schools and non-domestic registered settings Government consultation Launch date 6 May 2016 Respond by 1 July 2016 Contents Introduction 3 Who this
More informationLaunch date 28 April 2014 Respond by 18 July 2014 Ref: Department for Education. Teachers Pension Scheme (TPS) Further regulations to complete reform
Launch date 28 April 2014 Respond by 18 July 2014 Ref: Department for Education Teachers Pension Scheme (TPS) Further regulations to complete reform Teachers Pension Scheme (TPS) Further regulations to
More informationAgencies Pensions Update Keeping Employers Updated on Scheme Developments
Agencies Pensions Update Keeping Employers Updated on Scheme Developments - March 2012 Issue Highlights: Contact Us New LGPS Update Technical Update Data Matching and FRS 17 Shared services People Focus
More informationUHI Explained. Frequently asked questions on the proposed new model of Universal Health Insurance
UHI Explained Frequently asked questions on the proposed new model of Universal Health Insurance Overview of Universal Health Insurance What kind of health system does Ireland currently have? At the moment
More informationPension schemes Pension schemes under the new employer duties
Workplace pensions reform detailed guidance Pension schemes Pension schemes under the new employer duties 4 April 2013 v4.1 1 Employer duties and defining the workforce An introduction to the new employer
More informationQuestions and Answers (Q&A) 1 3 rd December 2015 Tax harmonisation and retirement reforms
Questions and Answers (Q&A) 1 3 rd December 2015 Tax harmonisation and retirement reforms 1. What are the changes that will come into effect on 1 March 2016? The Taxation Laws Amendment Act, 2013 will
More informationDepartment of Education - Performance Management and Capabilities in the UK
Department for Education EQUALITY ANALYSIS Title Teacher Performance Description of the policy The aim of this policy change is to help schools in England to raise the standard of teaching through tackling
More informationProtecting and promoting patients interests licensing providers of NHS services
Protecting and promoting patients interests licensing providers of NHS services Your response to the consultation You may re-use the text of this document (not including logos) free of charge in any format
More informationLimits to tax relief and tax-free benefits
TAX LIMITS FINAL SALARY AND CAREER REVALUED BENEFITS SECTIONS Limits to tax relief and tax-free benefits Introduction Pension benefits earned by individuals in the UK, which qualify to receive tax relief,
More informationAnnex B: Payment and Expenses for Governors
A REVIEW OF FURTHER EDUCATION AND SIXTH FORM COLLEGE GOVERNANCE Annex B: Payment and Expenses for Governors JULY 2013 Annex B: Payment and Expenses for Governors Introduction 1. This document has been
More informationFair and transparent pricing for NHS services
Fair and transparent pricing for NHS services A consultation on proposals for objecting to proposed pricing methodology 2 Fair and transparent pricing for NHS services A consultation on proposals for objecting
More informationIntroduction...4 How to contact West Yorkshire Pension Fund...4
1 The Index Page Introduction...4 How to contact West Yorkshire Pension Fund...4 The Choice Your Pensions Choice... 5 State Second Pension Scheme (S2P)... 5 Personal Pension Plans and Stakeholder Pension
More informationNew High Earner Tax in the UK Applies to US Pension Plan Contributions and Accruals
MEMORANDUM TO CLIENTS May 13, 2010 RE: New High Earner Tax in the UK Applies to US Pension Plan Contributions and Accruals For a number of years, the UK has had a relatively generous annual contribution
More informationRestriction of pensions tax relief: a discussion document on the alternative approach
Restriction of pensions tax relief: a discussion document on the alternative approach July 2010 Restriction of pensions tax relief: a discussion document on the alternative approach July 2010 Official
More informationSupporting the employeeownership
Supporting the employeeownership sector July 2013 Supporting the employeeownership sector July 2013 Crown copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format
More informationNext steps to zero carbon homes
Next steps to zero carbon homes Small sites exemption November 2014 Department for Communities and Local Government Crown copyright, 2014 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown.
More informationMandatory Gender Pay Gap Reporting
Mandatory Gender Pay Gap Reporting Government Consultation on Draft Regulations Issue date: 12 February 2016 Respond by: 11 March 2016 Contents About this Consultation 3 Ministerial Foreword 5 Introduction
More informationWhen will the Fund become cash flow negative?
LONDON BOROUGH OF BARKING AND DAGENHAM PENSION FUND 001 When will the Fund become cash flow negative? Addressee This paper is addressed to the Officers and Elected Members of London Borough of Barking
More informationNHS Pension Scheme retirement flexibilities
NHS Pension Scheme retirement flexibilities Part 1: Factsheets A factsheet on the mutual basis of the NHS Pension Scheme This factsheet provides background information on the mutual basis of the NHS Pension
More informationIPPR speech Pension reform in the public services
IPPR speech Pension reform in the public services 23 June 2011 Good morning everybody. Can I start by thanking the IPPR for giving me this opportunity to say a few words about pension reform in the public
More informationCompany s revised approach to early retirement your questions answered
Xerox Final Salary Pension Scheme Company s revised approach to early retirement your questions answered Employed members of the Xerox Final Salary Pension Scheme were sent a letter by the Company in February
More informationPay Policy Statement 2015-16. 1 st February 2015.
Pay Policy Statement 2015-16 1 st February 2015. 1 CONTENTS: 1. Background 2. Purpose and Scope: 3. Organisational context 4. Determination of pay and terms and conditions 5. Relationship between highest
More informationPart-time working and Teachers Pension Scheme
Part-time working and Teachers Pension Scheme I have worked for a number of years part-time, am I in Teachers Pension Scheme (TPS)? If you are working on a fractional (part-time) contract or as an hourly
More informationThe Education Services Grant. Statement of final arrangements for 2015 to 2016
The Education Services Grant Statement of final arrangements for 2015 to 2016 July 2014 Contents Introduction 3 Chapter 1 Education Services Grant funding for 2015-16 6 Our rationale 6 Retained duties
More informationHow To Respond To The Share Buy Backs And Share Buybacks Consultation
Our Ref JMG/RWC Darren Walcott Business Environment Directorate Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 1 Victoria Street London SW1H 0ET 15 November 2012 National Office Grant Thornton UK LLP Grant
More informationFIXED-TERM AND TEMPORARY CONTRACTS
FIXED-TERM AND TEMPORARY CONTRACTS This document sets out some basic information for NUT members about fixedterm and temporary contracts, including about their conditions of service and employment rights
More informationWiltshire Council Human Resources Pay Policy Statement
Wiltshire Council Human Resources Pay Policy Statement This policy can be made available in other languages and formats such as large print and audio on request. What is it? The pay policy statement sets
More informationConsultation on freezing the student loan repayment threshold JULY 2015
Consultation on freezing the student loan repayment threshold JULY 2015 Contents Introduction... 3 1. Why consider freezing the repayment threshold?... 3 2. How to respond... 8 3. Confidentiality and data
More informationRelaxation of planning rules for change of use from commercial to residential
Relaxation of planning rules for change of use from commercial to residential Summary of consultation responses and the Government s response to the consultation Relaxation of planning rules for change
More informationQuick House Sales. Market Study Annexe B: Business good practice. August 2013 OFT1499B
Quick House Sales Market Study Annexe B: Business good practice August 2013 OFT1499B Crown copyright 2013 You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under
More information21 August 2015 ACSA CONTACTS
ACSA response to Exposure Draft Legislation Tax and Superannuation Laws Amendment (2015 Measures No. #) Bill 2015: Limiting fringe benefit tax concessions on salary packaged entertainment benefits 21 August
More informationReplacing LACSEG with the Education Services Grant
Replacing LACSEG with the Education Services Grant Government response to the consultation on funding Academies and local authorities for the functions that devolve to Academies 1 Introduction 1. The school
More informationA Short Guide to NHS Foundation Trusts
A Short Guide to NHS Foundation Trusts 1 A new type of NHS hospital NHS Foundation Trusts Ten Key Points 1.1 NHS Foundation Trusts are at the cutting edge of the Government s commitment to devolution and
More informationThe Draft Child Support (Collection and Enforcement) (Amendments) Regulations 2012
The Draft Child Support (Collection and Enforcement) (Amendments) Regulations 2012 now The Draft Child Support (Meaning of Child and New Calculation Rules) (Consequential and Miscellaneous Amendment) Regulations
More informationStatistical First Release
Statistical First Release Special Educational Needs in England: January 2014 Reference SFR 26/2014 Date 4 September 2014 Coverage England Theme Children, Education and Skills Issued by Department for Education,
More informationNational Scholarship Fund for teachers special educational needs and disabilities
National Scholarship Fund for teachers special educational needs and disabilities Round 4 - handbook Page 1 of 15 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. THE FOURTH ROUND Error! Bookmark not defined. 3. ELIGIBILITY
More informationResponse (Revised) To the Ministry of Labour s consultation paper on Mandatory Retirement. Donna Marie Kennedy President
Response (Revised) To the Ministry of Labour s consultation paper on Mandatory Retirement Donna Marie Kennedy President Greg Pollock General Secretary September 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................1
More informationLondon Borough of Lewisham Pay Policy Statement 2015/16
London Borough of Lewisham Pay Policy Statement 2015/16 1. Introduction The Council seeks to be a fair and good employer of choice and in doing so deliver effective services in the borough. It seeks to
More informationCreating a Secondary Annuity Market: a response by the National Association of Pension Funds
Creating a Secondary Annuity Market: a response by the National Association of Pension Funds June 2015 www.napf.co.uk Creating a secondary annuity market: a response by the NAPF Contents Executive Summary
More informationSTATES OF JERSEY. DRAFT BUDGET STATEMENT 2015 (P.129/2014): AMENDMENT (P.129/2014 Amd.) COMMENTS
STATES OF JERSEY DRAFT BUDGET STATEMENT 2015 (P.129/2014): AMENDMENT (P.129/2014 Amd.) COMMENTS Presented to the States on 16th September 2014 by the Minister for Treasury and Resources STATES GREFFE 2014
More informationPlanning application process improvements
Planning application process improvements Government response to consultation January 2015 Department for Communities and Local Government Crown copyright, 2015 Copyright in the typographical arrangement
More informationAdditional Annual Leave (Salary Sacrifice) Scheme 2014 / 15
Additional Annual Leave (Salary Sacrifice) Scheme 2014 / 15 Page 1 of 16 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction & Purpose 3 2 Scope 3 3 Definitions 3 4 Responsibilities 3 5 Flowchart 4 6 Details of scheme
More informationWithdrawing relief for interest on loans to purchase life annuities
Withdrawing relief for interest on loans to purchase life annuities Summary of Responses 10 December 2013 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Responses 4 3 Next steps 6 Annex A List of stakeholders consulted 7
More informationFrequently asked questions about Student Finance from September 2012
Frequently asked questions about Student Finance from September 2012 Who is this document for? Unless otherwise specified, details of the student finance package described in this document relate only
More informationLGPC Bulletin 73 August 2010
Local Government Pensions Committee Secretary, Terry Edwards LGPC Bulletin 73 August 2010 This month s Bulletin contains a number of general items of information. Please contact Dave Friend with any comments
More informationPolice Negotiating Board Staff Side submission to the HMT/HMRC Discussion Document on the Restriction of Pensions Tax Relief
Police Negotiating Board Staff Side submission to the HMT/HMRC Discussion Document on the Restriction of Pensions Tax Relief 1. Introduction 1.1 This response is on behalf of the Staff Side of the Police
More informationTax Controls and your LGPS Benefits
Tax Controls and your LGPS Benefits In this leaflet we look at the HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) rules that govern pension savings. Where pension terms are used, they appear in bold italic type. These
More informationEducational Psychology Workforce Survey 2013
Educational Psychology Workforce Survey 2013 Research report April 2014 Yen Truong and Hilary Ellam Contents List of figures 4 List of tables 4 1 Summary 5 Workforce demographics 5 Recruitment 5 Commissioning
More informationYour Pension TEACHERS PENSION SCHEME. General Guide Contributions and Benefits GUIDE 1
Your Pension TEACHERS PENSION SCHEME General Guide Contributions and Benefits GUIDE 1 Your Scheme The Teachers Pension Scheme (TPS) is a defined benefits final salary scheme, which provides a guaranteed
More informationSection 106 Planning Obligations speeding up negotiations
Section 106 Planning Obligations speeding up negotiations Student accommodation and affordable housing contributions Consultation February 2015 Department for Communities and Local Government Crown copyright,
More informationEPN 322 Annex A. Increased employee pension contributions
Increased employee pension s From 1 April 2012 most members of classic, premium and nuvos sections of the Civil Service pension arrangements will pay extra s towards their pensions. The information that
More information1 PURPOSE AND SUMMARY 1.1 This report seeks approval to consult on the draft 2015/16 2019/20 Revenue Financial Plan.
ITEM NO. 11(a) 2015/1 201/20 REVENUE FINANCIAL PLAN Report by the Chief Financial Officer SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL 18 December 2014 1 PURPOSE AND SUMMARY 1.1 This report seeks approval to consult on the
More informationBriefing Paper: Local Government Pensions in a Cost Share Group Company
Briefing Paper: Local Government Pensions in a Cost Share Group Company Introduction This briefing paper outlines how Wessex Education Shared Services (WESS) identified and overcame a number of challenges
More informationLimits to tax relief and tax-free benefits
TAX LIMITS FINAL SALARY AND CAREER REVALUED BENEFITS SECTIONS Limits to tax relief and tax-free benefits Introduction Pension benefits earned by individuals in the UK which qualify to receive tax relief
More informationRedundancy, Redeployment and Reallocation of Duties Code of Practice for Support Staff
Redundancy, Redeployment and Reallocation of Duties Code of Practice for Support Staff This Code of Practice has been agreed with UNISON. 1. Definition of Terms Reallocation of Duties According to Terms
More informationA brief guide to The Local Government Pension Scheme. Employees in England and Wales April 2011
A brief guide to The Local Government Pension Scheme Employees in England and Wales April 2011 Highlights of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) The LGPS gives you: Secure benefits the scheme provides
More informationLimits to tax relief and tax-free benefits
TAX LIMITS FINAL SALARY AND CAREER REVALUED BENEFITS SECTIONS Limits to tax relief and tax-free benefits Introduction Pension benefits accrued by individuals in the UK which qualify to receive tax relief
More informationDerbyshire Constabulary REORGANISATION, REDUNDANCY AND REDEPLOYMENT POLICY POLICY REFERENCE 05/001. This policy is suitable for Public Disclosure
Derbyshire Constabulary REORGANISATION, REDUNDANCY AND REDEPLOYMENT POLICY POLICY REFERENCE 05/001 This policy is suitable for Public Disclosure Owner of Doc: Head of Department, Human Resources Date Approved:
More informationKenny Dick, Head of Finance and Corporate Governance. To present draft budget proposals for 2014/15 to the Board for approval.
2014-15 Draft Budget Report to: Board Date: 28 March 2014 Report by: Report No. Kenny Dick, Head of Finance and Corporate Governance Agenda Item: 9 PURPOSE OF REPORT To present draft budget proposals for
More informationBritish Steel Pension Scheme: Public Consultation Response from the Pension Protection Fund
British Steel Pension Scheme: Public Consultation Response from the Pension Protection Fund Summary The PPF recognises the Government s commitment to securing a sustainable future for the UK steel industry
More informationRother District Council Agenda Item: 6.1
Rother District Council Agenda Item: 6.1 Report to - Overview and Scrutiny Committee Date - 19 October 2015 Report of the - Executive Director of Resources Subject - Council Tax Reduction Scheme 2016-2017
More informationPAY POLICY STATEMENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2015/2016
PAY POLICY STATEMENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2015/2016 Statement of Pay Policy for the year 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 1. Introduction Sections 38 43 of the Localism Act 2011 require the Authority to
More informationA super waste of money
A super waste of money Redesigning super tax concessions April 2015 ISSN 1836-9014 Matt Grudnoff Policy Brief About TAI The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra.
More informationKEY GUIDE. Pensions and tax planning for high earners
KEY GUIDE Pensions and tax planning for high earners The rising tax burden on income If you find more and more of your income is taxed at over the basic rate, you are not alone. The point at which you
More informationPurchase of notional service for superannuation purposes Revision of Scheme
Circular 0125/2006 To: Institutes of Technology, Vocational Education Committees Purchase of notional service for superannuation purposes Revision of Scheme 1. Introduction. 1.1 Following discussions with
More informationThe Police Pension Scheme 2015. Members Guide
The Police Pension Scheme 2015 Members Guide 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 6 2. The Police Pension Scheme 2015 at a glance... 8 2.1 Key features... 8 2.2 Pension benefits for members... 8 2.3 Benefits
More information