MOZGÓKÉPKULTÚRA ÉS MÉDIAISMERET ANGOL NYELVEN

Transcription

1 Mozgóképkultúra és médiaismeret angol nyelven középszint gyakorlati vizsga Javítási-értékelési útmutató 1211 ÉRETTSÉGI VIZSGA MOZGÓKÉPKULTÚRA ÉS MÉDIAISMERET ANGOL NYELVEN KÖZÉPSZINTŰ GYAKORLATI ÉRETTSÉGI VIZSGA JAVÍTÁSI-ÉRTÉKELÉSI ÚTMUTATÓ NEMZETI ERŐFORRÁS MINISZTÉRIUM

2 EXAMINATION ON THE CULTURE OF THE MOVING IMAGE AND MEDIA EDUCATION PROJECT ANSWER KEY A/1. MAKING A FILM EXTRACT Make a fictional film extract 3 5 minutes long without any dialogue or narrator voice (or any other explanatory text or insert). Construct a specific scene (or series of scenes) in which each of the basic emotions, i.e. joy, sorrow, anger, surprise, fear and disgust, can be clearly recognised. Attach to your work the textual script of the scene, character descriptions and introductions, and the process account (length specified in the exam requirements). In the process account, explain the solution to the task, present the type, genre or character of film that the scene would be part of, describe the problems that occurred during filming and provide a self-evaluation of the completed material. EVALUATION: POINTS AND MATERIAL TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION Concept design; preparation for realisation; organisation of work (The process account is the primary source for evaluation.) REQUIREMENTS AND POINTS AWARDED DEDUCTION OF POINTS AND MOST COMMON MISTAKES When evaluating, if the length specified in the exam requirements has not been observed, deduct points from the total project score according to the following: - deduct 3 points if extract is seconds shorter than specified minimum - deduct 4 points if extract is seconds shorter than specified minimum TOTAL gyakorlati vizsga /

3 - deduct if extract is seconds longer than specified maximum - deduct 3 points if extract is seconds longer than specified maximum - deduct 4 points if extract is seconds longer than specified maximum - deduct 5 points if extract is seconds longer than specified maximum Award 0 points if extract is shorter than 90 seconds or longer than 7.5 minutes. Award 0 points if any voice or insert is used, i.e. describing or pronouncing basic emotions with words, that is prohibited in the exam requirements. In the process account, in the case of a narrative film extract, does Candidate recognise, and explain correctly and in sufficient detail the narrative specifications of the scene (e.g. interpretation of dramaturgical arch of the extract; revealing the causality in the extract; clarifying the function of extract in the Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation. maximum 10 points gyakorlati vizsga /

4 complete story)? In the process account, in the case of a non-narrative extract, does Candidate recognise, and explain correctly and in sufficient detail the dramaturgical arch of the extract; has Candidate elaborated on its structure of logic, motifs and the constructing of each shot on the other? In the extract, does Candidate recognise, and explain correctly and in sufficient detail in the process account the role-play and behaviour signs (particularly the most emphatically used body language to express emotions; appearance and complementary metacommunicative signs e.g. face painting/make up, clothing/costume; complementary props and attributes), their construction on each other and relationship when illustrating, visualising basic emotions? Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation. Deduct 3 points for the complete lack thereof. In the extract, has Candidate understood and explained in sufficient depth that the prohibition of verbal signs in the exam requirements intensifies the gyakorlati vizsga /

5 previously mentioned layers of roleplay signs and their relationship with other formal language signs (scenery, plot or dramaturgical structure, montage, noise and/or music)? 3 points In the process account, does Candidate recognise and explain correctly the indications of montage(s) in the extract (e.g. techniques of linear montage that aid continuity of time and space and causality; clarity of multiple storylines; relationship and meaningful effects of montages constructed by associative and expressive series or motive series)? Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation, or complete lack thereof. In the process account, does Candidate recognise and explain correctly the techniques for organising scenery and directing in the shots of the scene (e.g. choice of shot size, camera angle and perspective; reasons for compositions and camera movements; use of lighting and colour; use of sets and props; reasons for using noise sound effects and/or music)? Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation or complete lack thereof. gyakorlati vizsga /

6 The quality of the documentation of the work and the standard of (self)-reflection regarding the created material. (The process account and its appendices are the primary source of evaluation.) Does Candidate recognise and explain correctly the genre/stylistic characteristics and film genre of the planned story/sequence and the shot extract? 1 point How detailed and elaborated are the documents and scripts attached to the process account, and do they correspond with the formal requirements (outline of complete plot; storyboard / textual script / technical script of the extract; draft(s) of mise en scene; editing plan)? In the process account, does Candidate present the preparation of the filming (planning and interpretation of theme, choice of location, casting, etc.) and the process of realisation (particularly the alternative options that present themselves during filming and the primary motivations supporting the various alternatives)? In the process account, does Candidate detail and appropriately justify the most important Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation, or complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 point for partial incompleteness or superficiality of attached compulsory and optional documents. Deduct for substantial incompleteness or superficiality of documents. Deduct 1 point if there are such documents but the choice of authorial motivations for alternative solutions is not completely clear or the reasoning is superficial. Deduct for the complete lack of such documents. Deduct 1 point if there is description of differences but without reasoning or interpreted insufficiently, or for maximum 6 points gyakorlati vizsga /

7 The technical and aesthetic quality, creativity and personality of the project. (Primary source of evaluation is the created material, but the comments in the process account regarding the given aspect may also be taken into consideration.) differences between the planned and the completed versions? 1 point Does the process account contain self-evaluating comments and summation of the completed material? 1 point At the available technical level, how would you evaluate the standard of the formal devices in the filmed scene: clarity and consistency of plot development / use of motifs and role-play; logical connections between editing and montages, consistency and smoothness (e.g. techniques of linear montage that aid space-time continuity and causality; clarity of multiple storylines; relationship and meaningful effects of montages constructed by associative and expressive series or motive series); precise and consistent camera-work and accuracy, consistency of spatial and optical settings (coherence and functionality); other directing elements (e.g. scenery, props, lighting, used/usable sound effects). 4 points the complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 point for substantial incompleteness and/or superficiality of documents referring to this aspect, or complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 or for editing/joining inaccuracies or plot development and role-play techniques that interfere with comprehension (depending on frequency and severity of interference). Deduct 1 or for shot size and spatial/optical setting which interfere with comprehension, or for their illogical use (depending on frequency and severity of interference). Deduct 1 point for confusing use of other directing devices listed or for leaving them without explanation. (Unless the process account presents an acceptable reason for and explanation of the various techniques. ) maximum 6 points gyakorlati vizsga /

8 (Maximum 4 points can be deducted.) Has Candidate used any unique, creative techniques to express changes in emotions, their sequence or their relation to each other in the scene? Deduct 1 or if creative or cohesion techniques have been used but have not been mentioned, justified or explained (depending on severity). Has Candidate made an effort to create a palpably individual tone and form which is consciously and consistently employed throughout the scene? Formal quality of presentation How would you evaluate the general appearance of the project (how enjoyable is the recording and its presentation at the available technical level; clarity of process account, etc.)? 1 point Does Candidate comply with length requirements? (Maximum can be deducted.) Deduct 1 point if presentation seriously interferes with comprehension and plot development. Deduct 1 or if specified length of process account has been greatly exceeded, or any incompleteness renders comprehension difficult (depending on severity). maximum 3 points gyakorlati vizsga /

9 A/2. MAKING A PHOTO ANIMATION Make a film between 60 and 90 seconds in length exclusively out of a serious of photos, in which the main character is a snail, or other slow, cumbersome, defenceless character, which is crossing a busy public place (for example, an underpass or shopping centre). Finish the plot with a punch line. Enclose a process account (length specified in the exam requirements) to your work, in which you present your basic concept, explain the created material, describe the problems that occurred during work and provide a self-evaluation of the completed work. EVALUATION: POINTS AND MATERIAL TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION Design of concept; preparation of realisation; organisation of work (The process account is the primary source of evaluation.) REQUIREMENTS AND POINTS AWARDED DEDUCTION OF POINTS AND MOST COMMON MISTAKES Deduct if work is 5 15 seconds shorter than the specified minimum. Deduct 4 points if work is seconds shorter than the specified minimum. TOTAL POINTS Deduct 1 point if work is 5 15 seconds longer than the specified maximum. Deduct 3 points if work is seconds longer than the specified maximum. Deduct 5 points if work is seconds longer than the specified maximum. Award 0 points if project is shorter gyakorlati vizsga /

10 than 30 seconds or longer than 135 seconds. Deduct 4 points from total score of project with photos of drawings if phase drawings are also included in the appendix of process account. Deduct 3 points from total if unexpected, surprise ending is missing, or if Candidate left it without recognition or explanation. In the created photo animation, does Candidate recognise and explain correctly and in sufficient detail the close relationships concerning choice of location and choice of characters (e.g. motivation for crossing and showing reason; potential genre and stylistic difficulties due to specific nature of location; presentation of main character s defencelessness)? In the process account, does Candidate recognise, and explain correctly and in sufficient detail the most important narrative specifications of the photo Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation of major narrative specifications. maximum 10 points gyakorlati vizsga /

11 animation created (e.g. recognition of structural units of narration; presenting connections concerning motivations of characters and story; specifying relationships between dramaturgical arch of story and units of photos), and role in the story of the unexpected/surprise ending? 3 points In the process account, does Candidate recognise and explain correctly and in sufficient detail the role-play signs of characters in the photo series (e.g. metacommunication and other related signs; appearance, clothing; typical props/attributes), or in the case of object animation also including using animals as characters in certain phases the expressive structure and logic of major motive in the story and spatial situation? 1 point Deduct for substantially description and interpretation of major narrative specifications. Deduct 1 point for incomplete or missing explanation of unexpected/surprise ending to the story. Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation of aspect. gyakorlati vizsga /

12 The quality of the documentation of the work and the standard of (self)-reflection regarding the created material. (The process account and its appendices are the primary source of evaluation.) In the process account, does Candidate recognise and explain correctly the montage indications in the created photo animation (e.g. constructing consistency from phase photos and visual indications of time and space connections; indications of possible multiple storylines and/or expressive techniques)? In the process account, does Candidate recognise and explain correctly the techniques for organising scenery and directing in the created photo animation (e.g. choice of shot size, camera angle and perspective and their functional use; function of compositions; function of possible photo technical devices and effects; function of light and colour; reasons for using certain places, props and scenery)? How elaborate and appropriate for clear presentation of the concept are the optionally attached (not specifically required in the task requirements) documents (e.g. synopsys of plot scetch, storyboard, plan of location, Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 point for partly superficial, inappropriate attached documents, appendix, or if they are not attached, that of included in in the work account. Deduct 1 point if concrete information concerning the concept maximum 6 points gyakorlati vizsga /

13 The technical and aesthetic quality, creativity and personality of the project. (Primary source of evaluation is the created material, but the comments in the process account regarding the given aspect may also be taken into consideration.) photos of location and/or plan of filming, script) - and in the case of lack of such attachements their presentation in the work account. In the process account, does Candidate present the preparation of the photo animation (choice of location, casting, interpretation of story and characters, planning, etc.) and the realisation process (taking photos and postprocessing)? In the process account, does Candidate detail and adequately justify the most important differences between the planned and completed versions? 1 point Does the process account contain self-evaluating comments and summation of the completed material? 1 point At the available technical level, how would you evaluate the standard of the formal devices in the created photo animation: clarity and consistency of plot development and role-play / animation; logical connections is missing or seriously intervenes comprehension in the attached appendix or if they are not attached in the work account. Deduct 1 point if there are such documents but authorial motivations emerging in the process are not completely clear or the reasoning is superficial. Deduct for the complete lack of such documents. Deduct 1 point if there is a description of differences but without reasoning or interpreted insufficiently, or for the complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 point for substantial incompleteness and/or superficiality of documents referring to this aspect, or complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 or for editing/joining inaccuracies or plot development and role-play techniques that interfere with comprehension (depending on frequency and severity of interference). maximum 6 points gyakorlati vizsga /

14 between montage(s) (e.g. presence of signs that aid space-time orientation, connections between movements, possible associative and expressive techniques); precise and consistent camerawork and accuracy, consistency of spatial and optical settings (coherence and functionality); functional use of other directing elements (e.g. location and scenery, clothing/costume and props, lighting and colour). 4 points Deduct 1 or for shot size and spatial/optical setting which interfere with comprehension, or for their illogical use (depending on frequency and severity of interference). Deduct 1 point for illogical use of other directing devices listed or for leaving them without explanation. (Unless the process account presents an acceptable reason for and explanation of the various techniques.) (Maximum 4 points can be deducted.) Has Candidate used any independent creative techniques to express the motivation of the main character, its defencelessness (difficulties due to relationship between main character and location or genre/stylistic character of story), or the punch line ending the story? Formal quality of presentation How would you evaluate the general appearance of the project Deduct 1 or if creative techniques or techniques providing cohesive form have been used but have not been mentioned, justified or explained (depending on severity). (Maximum can be deducted.) Deduct 1 point if presentation seriously interferes with maximum 3 points gyakorlati vizsga /

15 (how enjoyable are the photos and their presentation at the available technical level; clarity of process account, etc.)? 1 point Does Candidate comply with the length requirements? comprehension and plot development. Deduct 1 or if specified length of process account has been greatly exceeded, or any incompleteness renders comprehension difficult (depending on severity). gyakorlati vizsga /

16 A/3. MAKING A RADIO PROGRAMME EXTRACT Last August the Government changed family allowance into education support, making it possible to freeze the benefit if students were absent from more than 50 lessons without permission. In the 2010/2011 school year, there was a decrease in truancy due to the introduction of the regulation. This is the first time that attention has been paid to truancy and its consequences. (Ministry of National Resources, Social, Family and Youth Affairs Committee, 31 August 2011) Make a radio programme extract of between 6 and 8 minutes in length, in which at least 4 speakers who are affected express their opinions and experience regarding the topic (e.g. a teacher, a local government employee, a parent, a student). Attach a process account (length specified in the exam requirements) to your work, in which you present your basic concept for the programme extract, the target group of the programme, the points of view when choosing people to interview, the problems that occurred during work, and a self-evaluation of the completed material. EVALUATION: POINTS AND MATERIAL TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION Concept design; preparation of realisation; organisation of work (The process account is the primary source of evaluation.) REQUIREMENTS AND POINTS AWARDED DEDUCTION OF POINTS AND MOST COMMON MISTAKES When evaluating, if the length specified in the exam requirements has not been observed, deduct points from the total project score according to the following: - deduct 3 points if extract is seconds shorter than specified minimum - deduct 4 points if extract is seconds shorter than specified minimum - deduct 5 points if extract is seconds shorter than specified minimum TOTAL POINTS gyakorlati vizsga /

17 - deduct if extract is seconds longer than specified maximum - deduct 3 points if extract is seconds longer than specified maximum - deduct 4 points if extract is seconds longer than specified maximum Deduct 6 points if extract is more than 2 minutes shorter than the specified minimum but not shorter than 3 minutes, or more than 2 minutes longer than the specified maximum but not longer than 12 minutes. Award 0 points if extract is shorter than 3 minutes or longer than 12 minutes. Deduct points from the total project score according to the following. If the material created only includes - 3 interviews related to the topic, deduct 3 points - 2 interviews related to the topic, deduct 5 points gyakorlati vizsga /

18 If the material created includes fewer than two relevant speakers or there are speakers not relevant to the topic, award the project 0 points. Does Candidate recognise and explain in sufficient complexity the topic indicated in the exam requirements (an operational problem with multiple factors appearing within the framework of a social-community establishment system, which is particularly suitable for representing different interests and values)? Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. maximum 10 points Does Candidate clarify in sufficient depth the basic aspects of the topic (e.g. types of absence and the most frequent causes, the most important legal requirements and school rules regarding recording and dealing with absenteeism, those involved and their relationship with the processed phenomenon, and the basic effects of the governmental measures indicated in the exam requirements), and does Candidate justify the reason for the choice of these aspects? gyakorlati vizsga /

19 Does Candidate recognise, present and explain in sufficient depth in the process account the media representation of the various revealed interests and values, their emphases, proportion and relation to the topic (e.g. autonomy and hierarchy of institutional organisation; effect of governmental plans on responsible use of social benefits and on shaping family norms; generation gaps; judging law abiding and rule breaking behaviour)? Does Candidate clarify and justify in sufficient detail in the process account the character of the medium and the aim and function of the material created (e.g. case study, thematic cluster of interviews or infotainment-like magazine programme)? Does Candidate analyse which target audience is expected by the chosen processing method? Does Candidate explain in sufficient depth in the process account how the features of the chosen processing method, radio genre (e.g. thematic cluster of interviews, short edited studio debate, interview with spots and expert/reporter comment) affect the Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 point for partially incomplete and superficial description and interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially incomplete and superficial gyakorlati vizsga /

20 presentation of interests, values and roles regarding the topic (e.g. how typical are the presented law abiding, law breaking and controller patterns of behaviour)? description and interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. Does Candidate present how all this affects, or might affect, community/social constructs? Does Candidate recognise and explain in sufficient details in the process account how the position of information mediator (reporter, moderator/presenter) in the chosen processing method affects the representation of emerging viewpoints (e.g. compulsory objectivity, neutrality, effort to be varied)? Deduct 1 point for partially description and interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially description and interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. The quality of the documentation of the work and the standard of (self)- reflection concerning the created material. (The process account and its appendices are the primary source of Does Candidate recognise the responsibility of the information mediator s position in validating and protecting speakers personal rights (e.g. protection of personal data, right to remain anonymous/unidentifiable)? How elaborate and appropriate for clear presentation of the concept are the optionally attached (not specifically required in the task requirements) documents (e.g. list of questions, script Deduct 1 point for partly superficial, inappropriate attached documents, appendix, or if they are not attached, that of included in in the work account and if concrete maximum 6 points gyakorlati vizsga /

21 evaluation.) of reporter, list of script, script) - and in the case of lack of such attachements their presentation in the work account? 1 point Does Candidate present in the process account the process of preparation (planning and collecting of sources, choice of speakers and locations, making pre-interviews, organising and preparing recording)? information concerning the concept is missing or seriously intervenes comprehension in the attached appendix or if they are not attached in the work account. Deduct 1 point for incomplete and/or superficial interpretation of preparatory section (primarily justification of choice of interviewee, presenting preparation for interview). Deduct for complete lack of description of preparatory section. Does Candidate explain in the process account the editing process for recording(s) and material? Does Candidate justify the differences between planned and recorded material and edited version (with particular attention to speakers appearance and change in the role of the reporter)? Does the process account contain any self-evaluating remarks (either positive or negative) concerning the relationship between completed material and plans, experiences during Deduct 1 point for superficial presentation of recording and editing section or the complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 point for describing differences between planned and completed material but leaving it without justification, its incomplete interpretation or the complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 point if such textual parts are present but the structure of reasoning is not organised sufficiently or logically, or for the complete lack thereof. gyakorlati vizsga /

22 working process and solution of problems occurring during work? 1 point The technical and aesthetic quality, creativity and personality of the project. (Primary source of evaluation is the created material, but the comments in the process account regarding the given aspect may also be taken into consideration.) Are interviewees and reporter s/ mediator s/presenter s comments and questions purposeful and suitable to the topic especially the perceptible expression of different opinions and viewpoints? Does Candidate justify in the process account the relationship between the comments and questions in the edited version and in the exam requirements? Deduct 1 or for questioning completely or primarily without function (questions that are not or not clearly related to the topic, or not revealing) (depending on severity). Deduct 1 point if Candidate does not justify the relation of comments, questions and the task. (Maximum can be deducted.) maximum 6 points Is the created sound material sufficiently informative (does it relate who the interviewees are, how they are related to the topic, where the reports were made, etc.)? 1 point Deduct 1 point for absence of listed basic information. In the editing (within the confines of the chosen radio genre, type of programme), is there a perceptible effort to have a logical, dramaturgical construct and structure especially the parallel or contrasting display of different points of view or opinions? Deduct 1 or for inconsistent or clumsy editing (e.g. reporter s or interviewee s long, redundant comment, absence or serious inconsistency of purposeful, inspiring editing based on the available material (depending on gyakorlati vizsga /

23 Does Candidate justify and explain in the process account the ideas concerning editing, and difficulties concerning their fulfilment. Does the interview use any ideas suitable for the chosen medium that can be regarded as original or unique (e.g. background noises, sound effects that create atmosphere and expressively characterise situations, sound bites or quotations, or any perceptible editing ideas)? 1 point The formal quality of the presentation How would you evaluate the general appearance of the project (how enjoyable are the recordings and the presentation of the recordings at the available technical level, and according to the functions required in the process account; the clarity and logicality of the process account, etc.)? 1 point Does Candidate comply with the length requirements of the process account? severity). Deduct 1 point for absence of justification or explanation of logic and editing difficulties. (Maximum can be deducted.) Deduct 1 point for presence of solution but absence of justification and interpretation. Deduct 1 point for presentation that seriously interferes with comprehension of the report (e.g. bad quality sound that cannot be enjoyed, disturbing sound effects, clumsy editing) and for clumsy structure of process account. Deduct 1 or for significant divergence from the length specified for process account or any incompleteness of process account that renders understanding maximum 3 points gyakorlati vizsga /

24 very difficult (depending on severity). gyakorlati vizsga /

25 B/1. EXPERIMENTAL DOCUMENTARY FILM (ANALYTICAL ESSAY) Write an analytical essay (length specified in the task requirements), in which you explain why the film by Ferenc Grunwalsky entitled Motherhood (Anyaság) might be regarded as an experimental documentary film. In your essay, use István Zsugán s writing From film technique experiments to new types of narrative Conversation with Gábor Bódy during the filming of Nárcisz and Psziché to explain the concept of experimental film. EVALUATION: POINTS AND MATERIAL TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION Quality of subject interpretation, authenticity of background sources used in the essay REQUIREMENTS AND POINTS AWARDED Does Candidate establish and consistently use the concept of experimental film on the basis of the film seen and the material read? DEDUCTION OF POINTS AND MOST COMMON MISTAKES Award 0 points if Candidate does not support essay with independent observations but provides only a general guide; i.e. essay does not demonstrate appropriate level of comprehension. Deduct 1 point for substantially interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. TOTAL POINTS maximum 10 points Has Candidate established movements and methods of film experiments (e.g. destruction, examination of limits, exploring and reconstructing possibilities of usual film communication, narration, meaning creation, use of gyakorlati vizsga /

26 form, themes)? 1 point Does Candidate emphasise at least three of Gábor Bódy s aspects whose examination is also a valid aspect when revealing the use of form and meaning creation in the film Motherhood (e.g. interpreting communication, film communication, meaning creation, use of form, structure of film, narration)? 3 points Deduct 1 or for substantially interpretation of aspect (depending on severity). Deduct 3 points for substantially interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. Has Candidate demonstrated and explained in sufficient depth the film s use of documentary film techniques (revealing social problems by demonstrating characters standard of living, introducing direct impression of surroundings)? Has Candidate demonstrated and explained in sufficient depth the devices the film uses to deconstruct documentary film devices, how it extends the usual limits of devices (e.g. examining multiple layers of meaning, series Deduct 1 point for partially interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. Deduct 1 3 points for incomplete and/or superficial interpretation of aspect (depending on severity). Deduct 4 points for substantially interpretation of aspect, or the gyakorlati vizsga /

27 of montage, series of characters faces, meaning creation and through this the expression of incidental nature of human relations; parallel images of a child, and a mother almost the age of a child, through this the demonstration of elemental, left alone existence of a child; destructing the genre rules of an interview: enduring techniques of examining communication; minimalising dialogues; series and change in the girl s face; endured, long observation of communication, looking for reactions; minimalising story)? 4 points complete lack thereof. Clear text arrangement (logical structure) and argument technique, stylistic quality Are the various interpretation directions and key argument points clear and well organised; is the logical development of the text continuous? Deduct 1 point if descriptive and analysing paragraphing is confused or difficult to follow. Deduct 1 point if organisation fails to connect the various parts of the text. maximum 6 points gyakorlati vizsga /

28 How logical is the connection between the material used and the related explanation, analyses and arguments (how acceptable and valid is the argument)? Is the style of text coherent and easy to read? Is the language used of the required scientific and technical level? Deduct 1 point for incomplete and/or superficial arguments (conclusions drawn from incomplete premises, or incorrect conclusions drawn from correct premises). Deduct for mainly or completely incorrect arguments and/or factual mistakes. Deduct 1 point for stylistic devices that interfere with comprehension, and/or incorrect use of technical expressions and language. Deduct for mainly or completely inaccurate stylistic devices (general use of style different from scientific requirements of essay writing style). The inclusion and quality of individual observations and arguments How individual is the reading comprehension technique of the essay? How creative, resourceful and complete is the approach to and demonstration of the various theoretical issues and the clarification of the relationships between them; organisation and composition of the entire material? Deduct 1 or for lack of independence of reading comprehension and argument techniques (depending on severity). Award points for logical, rhetorical and organising ideas, use of italics and other devices showing connections (use of paragraphs, numbering, italics, graphic emphasis) that help the exploration of the topic and logical, maximum 6 points gyakorlati vizsga /

29 clear organisation. Deduct 1 point for the absence of organising ideas, devices of emphasis and connection, or the incoherent use thereof. Does the essay contain any independent points of view or reflections? Deduct for the complete or partial absence of text organisation. Deduct 1 point for incomplete presence and/or incoherent explanation of reflective-critical or evaluating remarks, or self-reflective observations that consciously express the relation to the topic, or the complete absence of this reflection.. Deduct for the complete absence of such textual parts. Quality of presentation Does Candidate comply with the length requirements? Is the essay easy to follow? Are the various parts of the essay separated? 1 point Deduct 1 or if Candidate does not comply with the length requirements (depending on how much longer or shorter). Deduct 1 point for disorganised, unclear formal appearance. maximum 3 points (Note: non-compliance with length requirements can result in the deduction of even if Candidate meets the other formal quality requirements. If essay does not comply gyakorlati vizsga /

30 Does Candidate mark the quotations? Does essay contain appendices and bibliography that were necessary for the descriptiveanalysing part and for the research, if necessary, to write the essay? 1 point Deduct 1 point for repeated misuse or complete disregard of requirements concerning quotations, appendices and bibliography. with length requirements and there are other formal problems with the presentation resulting in the deduction of points, the maximum number of points that can be deducted is 3.) gyakorlati vizsga /

31 B/2. SPACE AS VISUAL CONSTRUCTION IN CONCENTRATION CAMP FILMS (ANALYTICAL ESSAY) Make a comparative analysis (length specified in the task requirement), in which you compare the depiction of concentration camps in the following concentration camp films in terms of defining space as scenery and presenting constructed and natural environment to express death camps. Base your essay on Mihail Romm s film Everyday Fascism and at least 2 films from the following: Lajos Koltai s Fateless (Sorstalanság), Roberto Benigni s Life is Beautiful, Stefan Ruzowitzky s The Counterfeiters (Pénzhamisítók). In your analysis, choose a scene from each film that is especially important regarding the given aspect, and build your comparison primarily on a thorough examination of these scenes. EVALUATION: POINTS AND MATERIAL TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION Quality of explanation of the problem and authenticity of background material used during the writing of the essay REQUIREMENTS AND POINTS AWARDED DEDUCTION OF POINTS AND MOST COMMON MISTAKES Award 0 points if Candidate does not support essay with independent observations but provides only a general guide; i.e. essay does not demonstrate appropriate level of comprehension. TOTAL POINTS Deduct 10 points if Candidate refers to only 1 film. Deduct 5 points if Candidate refers to only 2 films. Deduct points even if Candidate refers to a film but the selected scene and the explanation are not connected to the topic at all. gyakorlati vizsga /

32 In the analysis based on the selected scene does Candidate demonstrate in sufficient depth how the images of the concentration camp and documentary recordings of the era and of afterwards suit the montage system and process of reasoning in the film essay Everyday Fascism? (e.g. the images of the concentration camp are documents, symbols of concepts like destruction, barbarity and inhumanity; in the reasoning of the film the images of the concentration camp by the continuous picture-connections and/or by the text of narration create a counterpoint, expressing the two extremes of the concept of the human: the horror of destruction and its unavoidable nature and the phenomenon of destroyers indifference that psychologically cannot be come to terms with, defencelessness, victimisation and demonic behaviour.) Deduct 1 or for partially interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. maximum 10 points Does Candidate connect the three works of art selected? Deduct 1 point for incomplete and/or superficial interpretation of aspect. gyakorlati vizsga /

33 Does Candidate point out the differences and/or parallels between the Romm film and the selected fiction films in their interpretation of the concentration camp concept? (e.g. the situation of the viewer: in the case of Everyday Fascism the viewer is in the role of interpreter, the shock of the vision is dissolved by the ironic twists and turns in the interpretation of Nazism; in the case of fictional films the viewer is put in the space and time of the story, empathises; and/or critical/analyser approach; the image of the concentration camp is a construct in all films, which is subordinated to the construct of the film it becomes the tool of reasoning, or story development, or dramaturgy.) 1 point When analysing the fictional films, does Candidate explain that the image of the concentration camp also establishes a system of relationships and is also explained through the system of relationships (e.g. deportation, the concentration camp destroying the Deduct 1 point for partially interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. gyakorlati vizsga /

34 relationships of the character, relationship between guards and deported, deported and deported)? Does Candidate explain the connection between the image of the concentration camp and the construction of relations (e.g. the image of the concentration camp is about different strategies or just the opposite, the complete destruction of life strategies, or the dilemma of this question)? Does Candidate explain in sufficient detail the formal devices and techniques for constructing sense of space, in addition to their connections in fiction films (e.g. decoration, space organising montage, camera movement, use of point of view and light and/or stylised techniques, film quotes and/or expressing characters observations and perceptions)? 5 points Deduct 1 4 points for interpretation of aspect (depending on severity). Deduct 5 points for substantially interpretation or the complete lack thereof. gyakorlati vizsga /

35 The clear arrangement of text (logical structure) and argument technique, stylistic quality. Are the various interpretation directions and key argument points clear and well organised; is the logical development of the text clear? How logical are the explanation, analyses and arguments (how valid and authentic is the argument) used in connection with the applied facts? Is the style of the text coherent and easy to read? Is the language used at the required scientific and technical level? Deduct 1 point if descriptive/analysing paragraphing is confused and difficult to follow. Deduct 1 point if organisation fails to connect the various parts of the text. Deduct 1 point for incomplete and/or superficial reasoning (conclusions drawn from incomplete premises or incorrect conclusions drawn from correct premises). Deduct for mainly or completely incorrect argument or factual mistakes. Deduct 1 point for the use of stylistic devices, technical expressions and language that interfere with comprehension. Deduct for mainly or completely inaccurate, unreasonable stylistic devices (frequent use of style different from the general requirements of essay writing). maximum 6 points The inclusion and quality of individual observations and arguments. How independent is the reading comprehension technique of the essay? Deduct 1 or for lack of independence of reading comprehension and arguing techniques (depending on severity). maximum 6 points gyakorlati vizsga /

36 How creative, resourceful and complete is the approach to and exploration of various theoretical issues and the clarification of the relationships between them; organisation and composition of the entire material? Award points for logical, rhetorical and organising ideas, use of italics and other devices showing connections (use of paragraphs, numbering, italics, graphic emphasis) that help the exploration of the topic and logical, clear organisation. Deduct 1 point for the absence of organising ideas, devices of emphasis and connection or the incoherent use. Does the essay contain any independent points of views or reflections? Deduct for the complete or substantial absence of text organisation. Deduct 1 point for incomplete presence and/or incoherent explanation of reflective-critical or evaluating remarks, self-reflective observations that intently express the relation to the issue discussed. Quality of presentation Does Candidate comply with the length requirements? Deduct for complete absence of such textual parts. Deduct 1 or if Candidate does not comply with the length requirements (depending on how much longer or shorter). Is the essay easy to follow? Deduct 1 point for disorganised, unclear formal appearance. Maximum points: 3 (Note: non-compliance with length requirements can result in the deduction of 2 points even if gyakorlati vizsga /

37 Are the various parts of the essay separated? 1 point Does Candidate mark the quotations? Does essay contain appendices and bibliography that were necessary for the descriptiveanalysing part and for the research, if necessary, to write the essay? 1 point Deduct 1 point for repeated misuse or complete disregard of requirements concerning quotations, appendices and bibliography. Candidate meets the other formal quality requirements. If essay does not comply with length requirements and there are other formal problems with the presentation resulting in the deduction of points, the maximum number of points that can be deducted is 3.) gyakorlati vizsga /

38 B/3. WEB 2.0 AND DIRECT COMMUNICATION (ANALYTICAL ESSAY) Write an analytical essay based on at least four justified aspects (length specified in the task requirement) on how the latest (usually referred to as web 2.0) forms of communication (chat, forums and comments, blogs, torrent sites, social media, mobile communication forms using net connections, etc.) bring back some basic, defining characteristics of traditional, direct human communication. In your essay show the similarities, parallels and major differences between the characteristics of direct human communication and those of web 2.0 communication. In your analysis use between 5 and 10 examples, cases or stories of your own or which come from your surroundings. When documenting and analysing, respect the most important rules concerning personal rights and the protection of personality. EVALUATION: POINTS AND MATERIAL TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION REQUIREMENTS AND POINTS AWARDED DEDUCTION OF POINTS AND MOST COMMON MISTAKES TOTAL POINTS Quality of explanation of the problem and authenticity of background material used during the writing of the essay. Award 0 points if Candidate does not support essay with independent observations but provides only a general guide; i.e. essay does not demonstrate appropriate level of comprehension. Deduct 10 points if Candidate does not use his/her own examples or does not interpret them. Deduct points if Candidate uses fewer than 5 examples: - deduct 3 points if only 3 or 4 examples are used or explained; gyakorlati vizsga /

39 - deduct 5 points if only 1 or 2 examples are used or explained. Does Candidate use the concept, phenomenon and aspects of direct and indirect communication with confidence? Does Candidate make it clear in the justification that the systems analysed are indirect communication systems? Deduct 1 point for partially interpretation of aspect. Deduct for substantially interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. maximum 10 points Does Candidate explain in sufficient depth the techniques of indirect communication systems and nets, the opportunities and genres concealed in the technical system, which model direct communication (e.g. continuous role swap between transmitter and receiver; continuous, fast feedback; multimedia nature, i.e. more senses, connecting more codes, as if more stimuli were reaching us than in direct communication)? Deduct 1 or for partially interpretation of aspect (depending on severity). Deduct 3 points for substantially interpretation of aspect, or the complete lack thereof. Does Candidate explain the situation and required aspects of direct communication and gyakorlati vizsga /

40 everyday conversation, and the phenomenon of countering direct communication when analysing our current communication habits? 3 points Has Candidate documented his/her experiences and stories appropriately? Deduct 1 point for partially interpretation of aspect. Are Candidate s examples easy to follow, does their documentation help comprehension? How exemplary, varied and multifaceted are the documented examples? Deduct for substantially interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. Has Candidate followed the rules of data handling? In the documented examples, does Candidate show the dual nature of communicative situations, i.e. the joint effect of directness and technical indirectness, and/or does Candidate point out that web 2.0 forms of communication increase and generate media consumption? 3 points Deduct 1 or for partially interpretation of aspect (depending on severity). Deduct 3 points for substantially interpretation of aspect or the complete lack thereof. gyakorlati vizsga /

41 The clear arrangement of text (logical structure) and argument technique, stylistic quality. Are the various interpretation directions and key argument points clear and well organised; is the logical development of the text continuous? Deduct 1 point if descriptive/analysing paragraphing is confused or difficult to follow. Deduct 1 point if organisation fails to connect the various parts of the text. maximum 6 points How logical are the interpretation, analysis and arguments (how valid and authentic is the argument) relating to the facts used? Deduct 1 point for incomplete and/or superficial reasoning (conclusions drawn from incomplete premises or incorrect conclusions drawn from correct premises). Deduct for mainly or completely incorrect argument or factual mistakes. The presence and quality of individual observations and arguments. Is the style of the text coherent and easy to read? Is the language used at the required scientific and technical level? How independent is the reading comprehension technique of the essay? Deduct 1 point for the use of stylistic devices, technical expressions and language that interfere with comprehension. Deduct for mainly or completely inaccurate, unreasonable stylistic devices (frequent use of style different from the general requirements of essay writing). Deduct 1 or for lack of independence of reading comprehension and arguing techniques (depending on severity). maximum 6 points gyakorlati vizsga /