Performance Evaluation Process Frequently Asked Questions
|
|
- John Lane
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Performance Evaluation Process Frequently Asked Questions Q1. Are employees required to receive a performance evaluation? A1. Yes. It is important to track and document the performance of employees throughout the employment relationship. Those employees who perform well benefit because you have a record on which to base merit increases and promotional opportunities. For those employees who perform poorly, you have the critical documentation necessary for disciplinary action(s). Q2. Do all performance competencies count the same? How will my rating be calculated? A2. No, all competency factors do not have the same weight. A total of 12 performance competencies are assigned to each non-management position (non evaluators). Evaluators are assigned one additional factors. The total weights for performance competencies must equal 100. Each competency has been assigned a weight between 7 to 9 points to make the total score equal 100. The evaluation system will automatically calculate the average score based upon assigned weights. This average will yield the overall or final performance competency rating. For example, non-management employees are assessed on twelve (12) performance competencies. Each competency will receive an evaluation rating. All individual ratings will then be averaged to calculate an overall competency rating (numerical value). Management employees are assessed thirteen (13) performance competencies. Each competency will receive an evaluation rating. All individual ratings will then be averaged to calculate an overall competency rating (numerical value). Q3. Are all evaluators assigned a flexible factor? A3. Yes. The flexible factor is required for employees with responsibilities for the management/supervision of regular college staff, not including temporary staff and work-study students. ASO evaluators are assigned management effectiveness with PSSO evaluators being assigned employee management. Q4. Are comments required for each competency and goal on the performance evaluation? A4. Yes, comments are required for all competencies and goals. Balanced comments are strongly encouraged. This assists employees in better understanding where achievements or shortfalls exist, regardless of rating. These comments also form the basis for the professional development plan. Q5. How is the Professional Development Plan taken into account? A5. The Professional Development Plan is not included in any calculations and is no longer a part of the performance evaluation document. The primary purpose of the plan is to identify specific skills or training needs. This provides each employee an opportunity to enhance their performance in the areas where shortfalls may exist or seek career growth. Professional development plans may be submitted at the time during the performance evaluation cycle or by August 1 st of the new fiscal year. Page 1 FAQ Rev. 01/09
2 Q6. How is professional development planning handled for new employees, hired after December 31 st, who do not participate in the annual performance evaluation process? A6. New hires may participate in professional development as deemed appropriate by their managers. The specifics of what they take can be jointly determined. Generally, after the 3-month evaluation would be an appropriate timeframe, because it allows the manager to have more familiarity with the employee, how they are fulfilling their new role and what type development opportunities would be complementary. It is possible however, that some skill related development is needed within the first three months to assist employees in fulfilling the requirements of the new position. A new employee may also become aware of a professional development opportunity that they are interested in. They should approach their manager for review/approval, regardless of the length of their tenure with the college. The best form to formalize this is the Professional Growth and Development Plan, available on the Intranet site or the Human Resources office. Q7. What happens if my professional development plan changes? A7. Changes to your professional development plan may occur if your goals and objectives change. Revised professional development plans can be submitted to Human Resources using the Professional Growth and Development Plan form. These forms are available on the Human Resources Intranet site or the Human Resources office. Q8. What signatures are required on the performance evaluation document prior to employee review and discussion? A8. A minimum of two levels of management review and next level management approval is required prior to the evaluation conference with the employee. If requested by the employee, the evaluator may allow a preliminary performance evaluation review/discussion prior to securing the 2 nd level manager s signature, if it does not compromise any requirements previously communicated by management. The employee should receive and sign their performance evaluation only after two management levels or management review and approval has been obtained. Q9. What are the score ranges for each overall rating? A9. Overall ratings will be determined using the following ranges: = Consistently exceeds job requirements = Frequently exceeds job requirements = Meets job requirements = Needs significant improvement in 1 or more areas = Does not meet job requirements Q10. What is being done to ensure objectivity? A10. At a minimum, all performance evaluations will be reviewed by a senior manager (dean, assistant dean, unit, or department head), who is one level below the vice president, prior to being discussed with the employee. The senior managers are responsible for consistency and fairness across their unit/departments. All performance evaluations with an overall rating of 1 or 5 will be reviewed/approved by the respective vice president, prior to being discussed with the employee. The vice presidents are responsible for consistency and fairness across their areas. Page 2 FAQ Rev. 01/09
3 Q11. Can employees submit a self-evaluation? A11. Although the college does not have a formal self-evaluation process, employees can choose to provide evaluators with a summary of their accomplishments for consideration when completing their assessments. The Employee Input for Evaluating Performance form may be used. Q12. Is a list or narrative of accomplishments required? A12. No. This is not a college-wide requirement. Based on management discretion, a requirement to provide a list or narrative of accomplishments may be established for a particular department/unit/division of the college. Your manager can confirm whether or not it is a requirement for you. An employee may complete the Employee Input for Evaluating Performance form for this purpose. Q13. If provided, will the list or narrative of accomplishments be added to my performance evaluation document when submitted to Human Resources? A13. No. The list or narrative of accomplishments is not a formal part of the performance evaluation document. If provided, accomplishments will be maintained by the evaluator in their supervisory file, along with other performance related documents such as letters of compliment or complaint. This input allows employees to share what they feel are major assignments or tasks accomplished throughout the performance cycle. These will generally be taken from your goals and objectives, whether formal or informal or from specific, measurable duties from your job description. The accomplishments also assist managers in recalling accomplishments that may have occurred earlier in the performance cycle. Accomplishments will generally include outcomes/outputs that link to special tasks or projects. Q14. What if an employee disagrees with their evaluation? A14. Our current process for employee disagreements remains the same for performance evaluations. The employee s signature only acknowledges receipt and discussion of the document, not necessarily agreement with all of content. Employees have the right to comment on the content of their performance review and have their comments included in their file with the evaluation. These comments can include areas of disagreement or positive comments as well. Employees also have the option of indicating on the type of follow-up requested on the Employee Comment Form for Performance Evaluation if they elect to write comments. Q15. If there is a change to an employee s rating as a result of informal or formal reconsideration, should additional comments be made on the evaluation form? A15. Not necessarily, with a rating change the comments should be changed only if warranted to support the new rating. The revised evaluation should be re-routed to the next level manager for approval prior to marking the evaluation complete. Q16. What if an employee believes that the areas of disagreement are different enough to result in a change to their final score range? A16. These employees should promptly forward their supporting documentation, initially to Human Resources along with the Employee Comment Form for Performance Evaluation. The Comment Form should indicate Management Follow-up Requested which may include all levels up to the vice president, if needed. The revised evaluation should be re-routed to the next level manager for approval prior to marking the evaluation complete. Human Resources will make any adjustments to the salary letter are warranted. Human Resource assistance is available to employees and evaluators throughout this process. Page 3 FAQ Rev. 01/09
4 Q17. Will employees be notified if their performance evaluation is not submitted on time? A17. No. Human Resources will notify the respective vice president of all delinquent performance evaluations. The vice presidents will ensure that all evaluations are submitted in time for Human Resources to complete their annual process. Q18. Will employees receiving an overall rating of 1 be automatically dismissed from the college? A18. No. Employees receiving an overall rating of 1 will not receive a salary increase. These employees will receive a performance improvement plan, developed jointly between their manager and Human Resources, by the end of June. This plan will include all actions necessary to bring their performance up to the expected level and a timeframe in which the actions must be achieved. Dismissal is an option if the employee does not achieve the expected level within the designated timeframe. Q19. Are evaluations required for contract or temporary staff? A19. No. It is acceptable to provide periodic feedback to all employees. This will not generally occur in written form. Performance feedback for contract and temporary staff can be documented; however the regular college evaluation tool for regular employees should not be used for this purpose. Human Resources has developed a standard Contractual Employee Performance Review document for management use. Q20. Are grant funded employees participating in the performance management program? A20. Yes. Evaluations are completed and any salary increases effective based upon the terms and conditions of the grant. Q21. How should I handle performance evaluations for employees who are due for a three or six month assessment? A21. All employees hired prior to January 1 should be evaluated using the annual performance evaluation form. Three and six-month assessments should be completed on the form currently used for that purpose using the following schedule as a guideline: Hire Date 3 month assessment due 6 month assessment due January April August performance evaluation process February May August performance evaluation process March 1 June August performance evaluation process Employees hired after March 1 receive an annual performance evaluation at the conclusion of the following fiscal year. They will receive their 3 & 6 month evaluations (in the appropriate timeframe) using the standard forms for that purpose. Q22. What happens if an employee changes evaluators during the cycle? A22. Generally, the current evaluator will solicit written performance documentation from the prior evaluator. If an employee worked the majority of the performance cycle under one evaluator, this person Page 4 FAQ Rev. 01/09
5 should be the one to complete the evaluation. If the evaluation represents combined input, it is appropriate for both evaluators to sign the document. Q23. How can a manager evaluate an employee whose work they do not observe on a regular basis? A23. An employee s performance evaluation should be completed by or include input from an evaluator who has direct knowledge of the expectations of the position and how the employee has performed relative to those expectations. This is generally the immediate manager of the position. Being located with the employee is not required for a manager to render a fair and accurate assessment. If the immediate manager does not have sufficient information to assess an employee s performance, they should seek input from someone who does. The manager must be able to clarify how the assessment was determined during the evaluation discussion with the employee. This applies throughout the performance cycle, not just during the annual review process. Performance feedback is an on-going management responsibility. Q24. How often should feedback be provided to employees? A24. Managers/Supervisors should be providing periodic feedback regarding employee performance throughout the year. Employees should solicit feedback from their manager/supervisor if it is not being provided on a regular basis. As a guide, feedback should be provided on a monthly or bi-monthly basis at a minimum. Q25. How will my goals be rated? A25. Goals will be rated on a numerical system of = Exceeded 4 = Complete 3 = Progress 2 = Incomplete 1 = Not Addressed All aspects of the goal have been achieved. Performance exceeded expectations. All major aspects of the goal have been achieved. Performance met expectations. Significant progress has been made in completing major aspects of the goal. Marginal progress has been made, but major aspects of the goal are incomplete. Little or no progress has been made toward completion of this goal. Q26. What happens if I do not meet a goal through no fault of my own? A26. If a goal could not be met, the evaluator must determine if barriers beyond the employee s control were a factor. If beyond the employee s control, it should not be included in the performance evaluation. Please reference Guidelines for Rating Goals for further details to assist you in making this determination. Q27. What happens if my goals change throughout the year or after they have been submitted to Human Resources on August 1 st? A27. Only goals that are being reviewed should be included in the performance evaluation. If a goal was changed or deleted throughout the year, updates should be made in the performance evaluation system. Changes after the original submission should also be forwarded to Human Resources. This includes additions or deletions. Simply print and submit a new form and provide a copy to the employee for their file. Page 5 FAQ Rev. 01/09
6 In cases where goals were renegotiated during the evaluation cycle, only the revised goals should be listed and evaluated. Q28. When are goals due for new employees and those hired after January 1 st? A28. Goals for new hires should be completed during the first 30 days of employment. It is essential that all new employees be made aware of what they are expected to accomplish and what will be included in their upcoming evaluations. All goals and objectives should be documented and referenced during individual employee meetings with their managers/evaluators. Changes throughout the evaluation cycle should also be documented. Q29. How are increases handled for employees with start dates between January and March? A29. Employees hired in the January through March timeframe will participate in the August performance evaluation process. Based on their overall rating, they may be eligible for a salary increase effective 9/1 based upon the designated salary adjustment pool. Q30. How is the overall rating determined? A30. The overall rating of an employee s performance evaluation will be determined as follows: Performance Goals (20%) + Performance Competency Rating (80%) = Overall Performance Rating Example: Average Performance Goal Rating = Average Competency Rating = Overall Performance Rating = 3.75 x.20 = x.8 = = 3.41 (Meets Job Requirements) Page 6 FAQ Rev. 01/09
Performance Management
Performance Management PURPOSE... 1 POLICY STATEMENT... 2 WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY... 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 REGULATIONS... 3 1.0 TIMING AND FREQUENCY OF APPRAISALS... 3 2.0 PERFORMANCE PLANNING... 3 2.1
More informationSupervisor s Guide to Performance Management: Performance Evaluation 1
Updated: March 2014 Supervisor s Guide to Performance Management: Performance Evaluation What is Performance Management? Performance management focuses on the supervisor s basic responsibility of encouraging
More informationJOB AIDS AND RESOURCES FAQs Performance Evaluation System
General PES Questions What is PES? PES stands for Performance Evaluation System. It is the tool used to plan and measure employee performance on an annual basis. The Performance Evaluation System, or PES,
More informationThis policy provides establishes procedures for evaluating employees performance and communicating performance expectations.
Revision Date: First Version Page: 1 of 10 I. SCOPE This policy applies to all salaried operational employees of the College of William and Mary, including the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (hereafter
More informationBoston University. 2015 Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt
Boston University 2015 Performance Evaluation Program Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt (excludes staff covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements and Certain Contracts) October 2015 TABLE
More informationEFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2010 Page 1 of 12
1093.0 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 1093.0.1 Authorization: Act 688 of 2009 amends Arkansas Code Annotated 21-5-1101 to provide a performance-based merit increase pay system based on employee performance evaluation.
More informationProgram Statement DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Number: 3210.2B Date: February 3, 2011 Supersedes: 3210.1A (5/30/01) Evaluations
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Program Statement OPI: HRM Number: 3210.2B Date: February 3, 2011 Supersedes: 3210.1A (5/30/01) Subject: Performance Evaluations 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. To
More informationB. Probationary Evaluations
A.R. Number: 5.7 Effective Date: 2/1/2007 Page: 1 of 9 I. PURPOSE A. This policy outlines the Employee Performance Evaluation System (EPES) and the process to be followed for evaluating City of Richmond
More informationF. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM GENERAL POLICY It is the policy of Scott County to regularly evaluate the work performance of its employees and provide them with relevant feedback to enable
More informationADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES
ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES The Performance Appraisal Process at Madison College is designed to accomplish the following objectives: Encourage meaningful communication between the employee
More informationPerformance Management System
Section 10, Page 1 Contents: Policy Policy Definitions The Process of Managing Performance Addressing Poor Performance Supporting Employee Development Transitions Access and Use of Performance Information
More informationPerformance Appraisal Handbook
Working Smarter for America The Department of the Interior s Performance Appraisal Handbook A Guide for Managers/Supervisors and Employees Office of the Secretary Office of Human Resources 10/4/04 #370DM430HB-1
More informationON CAMPUS STUDENT EMPLOYMENT: GUIDELINES
ON CAMPUS STUDENT EMPLOYMENT: GUIDELINES I. PURPOSE The Oregon Tech Student Employment Service was established to provide employment opportunities to Oregon Tech students so that they may earn a portion
More informationSurvey on the Future of Government Service Executive Summary July 16, 2015
Survey on the Future of Government Service Executive Summary July 16, 2015 The Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions at Vanderbilt University, in cooperation with Princeton University and the
More informationDepartment of History Policy 1.1. Faculty Evaluation. Evaluation Procedures
Approved: 2/23/099 Department of History Policy 1.1 Faculty Evaluation Evaluation Procedures 1. The Department of History will evaluate all tenured and non-tenure faculty by March 1 of each academic year
More informationResearch Associate, Senior Research Associate and Research Scientist Policy and Procedures
Research Associate, Senior Research Associate and Research Scientist Policy and Procedures School of Medicine Case Western Reserve University Eligibility 1. Research Associate (RA) and Senior Research
More informationPART I D.C. PERSONNEL REGULATIONS CHAPTER 14 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTENTS
CHAPTER 14 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 14-I-i Section PART I D.C. PERSONNEL REGULATIONS CHAPTER 14 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTENTS Page 1400 APPLICABILITY...... 1 1401 EXCLUSIONS... 1 1402 PURPOSE... 2 1403
More informationREVENUE BUREAU ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PURPOSE & PROCESS SUBJECT TO LMC REVIEW AND REVISION IN SEPTEMBER 2009 INTRODUCTION
REVENUE BUREAU ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PURPOSE & PROCESS SUBJECT TO LMC REVIEW AND REVISION IN SEPTEMBER 2009 INTRODUCTION The annual Performance Evaluation (PE) is a communication tool designed
More informationPerformance Management Program An Employee Communication Presentation
Performance Management Program An Employee Communication Presentation Introduction Merit Pay and Performance Evaluation Overview Administrative and administrative support employees are eligible to participate
More informationThe Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009
The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009 Background This document provides details of the Department of Regulatory Agencies Performance
More informationPERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EMPLOYEE GUIDE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EMPLOYEE GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...3 THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM...4 Performance Factors...4 Performance Levels...4 Performance Appraisal Rating...5 Appraiser s Overview
More informationOklahoma State University Policy and Procedures
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures ANNUAL FACULTY APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 2-0112 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 POLICY 1.01 A review of faculty activities and accomplishments for
More informationPERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS INDEX CODE: 707 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07-06-15 Contents: I. Policy II. Objectives of Performance Evaluation III. Elements of the System IV. Responsibilities V. Frequency & Types VI. Utilization
More informationStaff Wage and Salary Guidelines
Staff Wage and Salary Guidelines Preface These procedures apply to staff employed by the University of Southern California. In the event of a discrepancy between these procedures and guidelines and a collective
More informationAPPENDIX TOWN OF MONTAGUE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM GUIDELINES
Performance Appraisal Review APPENDIX TOWN OF MONTAGUE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM GUIDELINES I. INTRODUCTION A. WHAT IS PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL? Performance appraisal is a process of assessing a person
More informationPERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
HOSPITAL NAME INSTITUTIONAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE (IPP) Department: Manual: Section: TITLE/DESCRIPTION POLICY NUMBER PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVE DATE REVIEW DUE REPLACES NUMBER NO. OF PAGES APPROVED
More informationARKANSAS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND. Policy Type Subject of Policy Policy No. Administrative Personnel Performance Evaluation System 1013
PURPOSE: Pursuant to Act 449 of 2007, the Arkansas School for the Blind (ASB) adopts a Merit Pay Increase System for performance evaluation standards. The Personnel Performance Evaluation System (PPES)
More informationeperformance Frequently Asked Questions for Managers
eperformance Frequently Asked Questions for Managers Topics Covered Question(s) General Questions......1-17 Differentiating Performance at FAS.......18-28 Linking Pay to Performance at FAS 29-32 Additional
More informationDealing with customer complaints and compliments procedure
Dealing with customer complaints and compliments procedure Classification: Policy Name: First Issued / Approved: 05/08/08 Last Reviewed: Management Policies & Procedures Dealing with customer complaints
More informationThe University of Texas at Brownsville Staff Performance Review FY 2014
The University of Texas at Brownsville Staff Performance Review FY 2014 Purpose of Staff Performance Reviews This training is designed to discuss the Performance Review process for Fiscal Year 2014. Performance
More informationCOLORADO DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TRANSPORTATION JANUARY 2016
STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN JANUARY 2016 Approved by Department of Personnel and Administration
More informationPerformance Evaluation System
Performance Evaluation System Table of Contents SECTION 1 Overview Chapter 10 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 PES Timeframes PES Roles Evaluating Supervisor Responsibilities 2nd Level Evaluator Responsibilities Appointing
More informationHUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:
HUMAN RESOURCES Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10 Policy Statement 3: Performance Management Performance Management Program 1. Purpose To establish a Policy for implementing and managing
More informationC. HIRING PROCESS FOR FACULTY AND ACADEMIC PROFESSIONALS
C. HIRING PROCESS FOR FACULTY AND ACADEMIC PROFESSIONALS This document details the process for hiring faculty and academic professionals. Under the process, deans have the discretion to delegate approval
More informationYale University Performance Management Guide
Yale University Performance Management Guide Table of Contents Section Page Philosophy and Intent 3 FOCUS Annual Performance Management Cycle 4 Expectations 5 Starting With the End in Mind 5 Important
More informationPERFORMANCE APPRAISAL APPRAISER S GUIDE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL APPRAISER S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...3 THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM...4 Performance Factors...4 Performance Levels... 5 Performance Appraisal Rating...6 Appraiser
More informationPerformance Appraisal Handbook (370 DM 430)
U.S. Department of the Interior Performance Appraisal Handbook (370 DM 430) A Guide for Managers/Supervisors and Employees Performance Appraisal Handbook Table of Contents Timeline for the Performance
More informationPERFORMANCE REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDE Administrative Staff & Managers and Technicians & Academic Counsellors
PERFORMANCE REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDE Administrative Staff & Managers and Technicians & Academic Counsellors A. Purpose and Outcomes B. Frequency and Timing C. Process: 1. Setting Performance Objectives
More informationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Mission Statement: There is hereby established a University at Pueblo, to be known as Colorado State University Pueblo, which shall be
More informationDelaware County Human Resources Department Performance Review System Supervisor Guide
Supervisors, Managers and Directors, Thank you for reviewing the. This guide is an important source of information regarding the administration of the Performance Review System. The proper application
More informationDivision of Human Resources Staff Performance Management Procedure
Performance standards and expectations, based on an up-to-date position description, should be clearly communicated to employees at the time of appointment to their position and as they change thereafter.
More informationSECTION IX. 9.01 Purpose
SECTION IX EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 9.01 Purpose The Employee Performance Appraisal System provides to employees, descriptions and evaluations of work expectations. The current system is an enhancement
More informationStaffing and Classification Procedures
Staffing and Classification Procedures Preface These procedures apply to staff employed by the University of Southern California. In the event of a discrepancy between procedures, guidelines and a collective
More information3300 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 3301 PROBATIONARY SYSTEM. A. Policy
3300 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 3301 PROBATIONARY SYSTEM A. Policy The probationary system ensures that newly hired or promoted employees are aware of the expectations of their supervisors and are apprised
More informationColorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan
Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan Approved by Department of Personnel and Administration on October 2014 I. INTRODUCTION COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
More informationEMC CORPORATION. Corporate Governance Guidelines
EMC CORPORATION Corporate Governance Guidelines The following Corporate Governance Guidelines (the Guidelines ) have been adopted by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of EMC Corporation (the Company
More informationAmherst College Office of Human Resources PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS GUIDE
Amherst College Office of Human Resources PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS GUIDE March 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................................... 3 Preparing for the Performance
More informationDepartment of Nursing. Criteria for Nursing Faculty Promotion
Department of Nursing Criteria for Nursing Faculty Promotion The promotion of a faculty member is determined by merit. Teaching, creative scholarship and professional qualifications, and professional service
More informationAcademic Council Policies and Procedures
Academic Council Policies and Procedures Academic Council Policy and Procedures: Version 14 April 22 th 2014 1 Table of Contents Academic Council Policies Appointment, Promotion & Tenure Policies Faculty
More informationSalary Document. College of Applied Sciences and Technology Ball State University 2015-2016. Approved by CAST Salary Committee: 4-15-15
Salary Document College of Applied Sciences and Technology Ball State University 2015-2016 Approved by CAST Salary Committee: 4-15-15 I. Statement of Purpose SALARY DOCUMENT COLLEGE OF APPLIED SCIENCES
More informationNORTH STAR CHARTER SCHOOL
Employment Application Certified Teacher North Star Charter School is committed to providing equal employment opportunities for all candidates without regard to race, creed, color, national origin, sex,
More informationCombined Bachelor s/master s Degree Program Sponsored by the Graduate School and the Honors Program
Combined Bachelor s/master s Degree Program Sponsored by the Graduate School and the Honors Program The Honors Program provides students with the opportunity to plan a curriculum leading to both the Bachelor's
More informationCorporate Governance Guidelines. Kenon Holdings Ltd. Adopted as of September 17, 2014
Corporate Governance Guidelines of Kenon Holdings Ltd. Adopted as of September 17, 2014 Corporate Governance Guidelines of Kenon Holdings Ltd. The following Corporate Governance Guidelines have been adopted
More informationPROCEDURES FOR ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND POST-TENURE REVIEW
PROCEDURES FOR ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND POST-TENURE REVIEW Date: December 1997 Revision December 1998 Revision March 2000 Revision November 2001 Revision April 2003 Revision June 2003 Revision April
More informationJames Madison University Salary Administration Plan
James Madison University Salary Administration Plan Date of Current Revision: September 2014 Click the link below to be taken to a specific section. Overview Pay Practices Pay Practice Chart Reassignment
More informationDENTON COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION CHAPTER III EMPLOYMENT. P a g e 10 32
DENTON COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION CHAPTER III EMPLOYMENT P a g e 10 32 EMPLOYMENT PROCEDURES. 3.1 The Denton County Sheriff s hiring process is centralized and managed by the Denton
More informationAMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES (as amended and restated as of February 23, 2015)
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES (as amended and restated as of February 23, 2015) 1) Director Qualifications A significant majority of the Board of Directors shall consist of independent,
More informationFinancial Aid Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy for Graduate Students Effective 2015 2016
To remain eligible for federal, state and institutional financial aid, students must be meeting the standards for academic performance and progress as defined by NJIT s Satisfactory Academic Progress (hereinafter
More information3 FAM 2820 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE AND PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES
3 FAM 2820 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE AND PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES 3 FAM 2821 GENERAL 3 FAM 2821.1 Authorities (Office of Origin: HR/CSHRM) The authorities cited for this subchapter
More informationPerformance Management Toolkit. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare. Office of Children, Youth and Families
Performance Management Toolkit Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Office of Children, Youth and Families June 2012 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS TOOLKIT The toolkit includes the following resources: Management
More informationChapter 8: Performance Appraisal. Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives:
Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal Section 8-1: General Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives: Provides a basis for the determination of the level of performance, to involve the employee
More informationNMSU Online Staff Evaluation User Guide for https://evaluation.nmsu.edu/
NMSU Online Staff Evaluation User Guide for https://evaluation.nmsu.edu/ This user guide provides instructions for using the Exempt Staff and Nonexempt Staff Evaluation Web Application, from now on also
More informationDOUMA CONSULTING SERVICES APPLICATION FORM SHARED SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION
Page 1 of 6 DOUMA CONSULTING SERVICES APPLICATION FORM SHARED SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION WEST SIOUX COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT & AKRON WESTFIELD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT A. PERSONAL INFORMATION (please
More informationPROCEDURES FOR ACADEMIC FACULTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL STAFF SALARIES
PROCEDURES FOR ACADEMIC FACULTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL STAFF SALARIES Revised and Adopted by the Provost Executive Vice President and the Vice President for University Operations Effective: April
More informationADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM No. 92 Rev. 1. SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Evaluation System
ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM No. 92 Rev. 1 SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Evaluation System I. BACKGROUND Article 39 of the General Standards, entitled "Work Performance Evaluation," states: Staff
More informationMEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Performance Management and Appraisal Program (PMAP)
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Performance Management and Appraisal Program (PMAP) Section 1.0 The Agency retains the right to determine how much of its budget will be allocated for performance awards. Should
More informationChapter 6. Performance Management Program
Chapter 6 Performance Management Program This publication supersedes MSNG-HRR, Chapter 6, dated 1 October 2011. Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction 6-1. Purpose 6-2. Explanation of Terms 6-3. Responsibilities
More informationAlexander County Performance Evaluation Policy
Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy Adopted: April 2, 2002 Revised August 4, 2003 I. INTRODUCTION The County of Alexander has recognized the relationship of position classification, job performance,
More informationThis policy applies to all City employees, except temporary seasonal and temporary oncall
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL I. PURPOSE To provide a process by which the job performance of each employee is periodically and regularly appraised for purposes of development, merit bonus review and
More informationStudent Appeals. Policies and Procedures
S3 Policies and Procedures Student Appeals Originator: Dean of Student Services Approver: Senior Academic Committee Effective: November 27, 2015 Replaces: June 20, 2014 1. Preamble Red River College will
More informationEmployee Performance Management System (EPMS) - FAQs
GENERAL Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) - FAQs Q. Who is covered under the University s EPMS Policy HR 1.36? A. HR 1.36 describes the policy and procedures for the job performance evaluation
More informationMasters Program in Political Science:
Masters Program in Political Science: Frequently Asked Questions Division of Political Science Mark O. Hatfield School of Government www.pdx.edu/hatfieldschool/political- science (Updated, September 2011)
More informationCITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013 Name: Position: Anniversary Date in Position: Department: Supervisor: Appraisal Period: from to PURPOSE Communication about performance between
More informationFrequently Asked Recruiting Questions & Answers
Frequently Asked Recruiting Questions & Answers Applying For a Job How do I know what positions are open at Glenmede? Visit the Careers page of www.glenmede.com for a listing of the employment opportunities
More informationCorporate Governance Guidelines. Apartment Investment and Management Company. Adopted as of March 8, 2004 (last updated July 2010)
Corporate Governance Guidelines of Apartment Investment and Management Company Adopted as of March 8, 2004 (last updated July 2010) Corporate Governance Guidelines of Apartment Investment and Management
More informationUCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
UCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Evaluation Period:* to Evaluation Meeting Date: SECTION 1 Employee: Job Title: Employee ID: Department: Immediate Supervisor/Administrator: Title: TYPE OF
More informationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM Updated March 2015 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM The Mission of Extension is: to provide information
More informationb. Advancement: A promotion to the next higher level of qualification. Minimum Pay Plan for Utilities Operator Minimum Pay Grade
PHYSICAL PLANT OPERATING POLICY AND PROCEDURE : Personnel Qualification System DATE: August 23, 2013 PURPOSE The purpose of this Physical Plant Operating Policy and Procedure (PP/OP) is to set forth procedures
More informationPerformance Management Development System (PMDS) for all Staff at NUI Galway
Performance Management Development System (PMDS) for all Staff at NUI Galway PMDS.doc 1 1. Introduction The Performance and Development Review System (PMDS) for NUI Galway has its foundation in Sustaining
More informationUniversity of the Arts London. Complaints Procedures. Introduction
University of the Arts London Complaints Procedures Introduction 1. The University has clear procedures for dealing with student complaints which form part of its quality assurance system and reflect current
More informationSTATUS OF EMPLOYMENT:
EVALUATING AND RECOMMENDING PERSONNEL FOR CONTINUED EMPLOYMENT The continuing appraisal of College District employees is an essential component for improving employee performance and services to students.
More informationFY16 Minimum Pay Plan for Utilities Operator Minimum Starting Pay. Pay Title
OPERATIONS DIVISION : Personnel Qualification System DATE: September 10, 2015 PURPOSE The purpose of this Operations Division Standard Operating Procedure (OD/SOP) is to set forth procedures for administration
More informationFinancial Aid Office. Federal Work-Study Employment Guide. Student Employee
Financial Aid Office Federal Work-Study Employment Guide Student Employee Last Updated 02/2012 Welcome to the Federal Work-Study Program at Virginia Western Community College. Student employees play a
More informationPerformance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors. For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff
Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff Department of Human Resources May 2013 Introduction Performance management
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF ARTS
THE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF ARTS PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND REVIEW SUPPORT STAFF The University and the Faculty of Arts recognize the important and indispensable contributions made by support staff.
More informationSection 4 Rehabilitation Benefits
Section 4 Rehabilitation Benefits Under the Minnesota workers compensation law, vocational rehabilitation services can be provided to employees and surviving spouses. The intent of rehabilitation is set
More informationCORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING Request for Proposals Community Service Grants Business Process Analysis
CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING Request for Proposals Community Service Grants Business Process Analysis Deadline for response: May 8, 2013 5 p.m. EST RFP AT A GLANCE The Corporation for Public Broadcasting
More informationCivil Service Performance Management System
Civil Service Performance Management System A handbook for Supervisors on how to conduct performance planning, mid-term progress review and annual appraisal meetings. Table of Contents 1 Abbreviations...
More informationFINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION Revised May 2012
FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION Revised May 2012 I. OBJECTIVES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Read and become familiar with the Constitution and Bylaws. Maintain and monitor the financial accounts of the ARMA Houston Chapter,
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Name Social Security No. Agency Department Position Classification Date Assigned to Current Position Performance Review From To PLANNING STAGE
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PAYROLL & INSURANCE SERVICES THROUGH A TEMPORARY STAFFING AGENCY ISSUED MAY 10, 2013 Proposal must be received no later than 3:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) Tuesday, May
More informationgraduate academic policies and procedures
graduate academic policies and procedures These pages contain information on policies, procedures, and regulations that are specific to graduate study at Columbia College Chicago. Students should check
More informationTITLE: Employee Performance Evaluations
Courage Responsibility Ethics Dedication - CREDibly serving the public safety of New Mexico ISSUE DATE: 11/08/85 REVIEW/REVISED: 02/23/15 EFFECTIVE DATE: 11/22/85 CD-032100 TITLE: Employee Performance
More informationREGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO VENDOR / CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR SERVICES & CONSTRUCTION
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO VENDOR / CONTRACTOR EVALUATION FOR SERVICES & CONSTRUCTION ALL FIELDS ARE MANDATORY Contractor Name: Contract Title and Number: Purchase Order Number: Contract Term:
More informationOceaneering International, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines
Oceaneering International, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines 1. Director Qualifications The Company s Bylaws provide that the Board of Directors (the Board ) will not be less than three nor more than
More informationPh.D. Program Handbook
Ph.D. Program Handbook School of International Service American University Academic Year 2014-15 Edition Updated August 1, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction... iv Courses & Requirements... 2 Core Courses...
More informationI. Bylaws 2. II. Mission and Organization of the Department of Psychology 3. III. Administrative Structure of the Department of Psychology 5
BYLAWS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO Approved by the Department Faculty on May 16, 2008 Approved by the Dean of the College of Liberal Arts on March
More informationCIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION. Experienced Attorney & Attorney Manager Hiring Policy
CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION Experienced Attorney & Attorney Manager Hiring Policy The following process is used to for recruiting and hiring for career experienced attorneys and attorney manager positions 1
More informationINFORMATION FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS IN BIOCHEMISTRY. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Utah State University, Logan, Utah
Biochemistry Graduate Program Approved July 2014 INFORMATION FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS IN BIOCHEMISTRY Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Utah State University, Logan, Utah The Department of Chemistry
More informationThe information contained in this guideline is the processes typically recommended by Human Resource Services (HRS).
The information contained in this guideline is the processes typically recommended by Human Resource Services (HRS). Neither these guidelines nor any University policies, procedures, or practices shall
More information