WITHDRAWAL OF LIFE SUPPORT BACKGROUND
|
|
- Nathan Cook
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 WITHDRAWAL OF LIFE SUPPORT BACKGROUND The complainant s wife was admitted to a public hospital for an operation to secure access for peritoneal renal dialysis. At the time of the patient s admission she was 30 years of age. She subsequently developed peritonitis and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The patient remained critically ill for some time after being admitted to ICU and then her condition began to improve. During this critical period discussions were held between the patient s treating physicians and the complainant s family concerning the patient s likelihood of survival. THE COMPLAINT The Commission received a joint complaint from the family members stating that the information and diagnosis given to both of them following the patient s admission to ICU was grossly inaccurate and dangerous to her survival and that the complainants were pressured to allow the turning off of the patient s life support on grounds which were medically unfounded and unsupported. The Commission, after completing preliminary inquiries into the complaint, determined that it would undertake a formal investigation into whether or not the complainants were pressured and the advice given to them was accurate. As is required by Part 8 of the Health and Community Services Complaints Act, the Medical Board were notified of the complaint as a number of registered medical practitioners were named. Collectively throughout this case summary these practitioners are referred to as the Medical Team. THE INVESTIGATION In carrying out the investigation, the Commission: Provided a copy of the complaint to the public hospital and sought a response. Obtained a copy of the patient s medical records from the public hospital and an interstate hospital. Commissioned an expert opinion from a Staff Specialist in Intensive Care and Area Director of Intensive Care at an interstate hospital. Arranged a meeting between the complainants and the expert in Darwin. Obtained copies of: o Good Medical Practice Guidelines issued by the Medical Board of the Northern Territory; o ANCI National Competency Standards for the Registered Nurse; o Policies and Procedures Regarding Withholding & Withdrawing of Life Support from Royal North Shore Hospital; o Interim Guidelines on Dying with Dignity from NSW Health; o Guidelines for Decision Making at the End of Life from NSW Health; and o Registrar Protocols for Withholding and Withdrawing of Life Support from public hospital the subject of the complaint.
2 The draft Investigation Report was forwarded to the Department of Health and Community Services (DHCS), the Medical Board of the NT and the complainants for comment prior to finalising the investigation. OTHER ISSUES During the course of the investigation a number of other significant issues were raised and addressed. These were: Documentation During the course of the investigation it became apparent that the clinical notes were silent on many of the issues raised in the complaint and were therefore of little or no assistance to the Commission in reaching its conclusions. Failure to Provide Accurate Information, Failure to Read Medical Notes and Respect and Dignity Protocols The complainants believed there was a failure by the treating physicians to provide accurate information, to read the medical notes and to observe respect and dignity protocols during the critical period of the complainant s medical condition. All of this ultimately led to them losing confidence in the advice provided by the medical team. Practices and Procedures in End of Life Decision Making During the course of the investigation it became apparent that the public hospital had not followed the practices and procedures as recommended in End of Life Decision Making as followed in other Intensive Care Units. The hospital s failure to follow these practices and procedures is of substantial importance. Had the public hospital followed the recommended practices and procedures the trauma and distress caused to the complainants may well have been avoided. ISSUE 1: THE COMPLAINANTS WERE PRESSURED TO ALLOW THE TURNING OFF OF THE PATIENTS LIFE SUPPORT ON GROUNDS WHICH WERE MEDICALLY UNFOUNDED, UNPROVEN AND UNSUPPORTED BY HER MEDICAL RECORDS Issue 1A Advice that access for dialysis was no longer available Based on the medical records and information before the Commission, the response from the public hospital, the expert opinion and responses to the draft Investigation Report, the Commission concluded that: The medical records showed that a provisional diagnosis of vascular stenosis was made by the Renal Specialist when the patient was admitted. The patient s past medical records and her past Renal Specialist from interstate had not been consulted prior to or after her admission. The Renal Specialist, after undertaking a Medline search, identified a possible procedure which might offer access for dialysis. The Renal Specialist handed over ward service to another Specialist.
3 The procedure the Renal Specialist identified as a result of his Medline search had not been discussed with the medical team or carried out prior to when the complainants had their meeting with the medical team to discuss the appropriateness of continued treatment. The public hospital acknowledged that discussions centred on the patient s current critical illness with a history of extremely difficult intravenous access for long-term dialysis and an outcome associated with poor quality of life and shortterm survival. There was no evidence to indicate that the medical team, at the meeting, gave any indication to the complainants that there was a possible procedure that could be carried out on the patient that might offer her access for dialysis. There were no facts which would allow the Commission to conclude that stenosis was used by the hospital representatives at the meeting to pressure the complainants to permit cessation of life support. At the meeting the medical team considered that: o intravenous access for long term dialysis, which was life sustaining for the patient, was extremely poor; o the patient would not survive beyond two weeks with the access currently being used for dialysis; o in these circumstances the patient s life support could be withdrawn; and o the possible procedure identified by the Renal Specialist was not mentioned. Issue 1B The advice that brain death had occurred Based on medical records and information before me, the response from the public hospital, the expert opinion and the further response from DHCS to the draft Investigation Report the Commission concluded that: Brain death was not considered or discussed with the complainants. Neurological deficit and not brain death was discussed. EEGs and a CT scan were not performed to detect whether there was a loss of neurological function. The medical team were of the opinion that the patient had reduced neurological function based on the following information: o she had a critical illness, particularly ongoing sepsis, and very low blood pressure requiring inotropic support at the time; and o a torch had been shone in her eyes and there had been no pupil reaction in one eye and only a little in the other. The advice given to the complainants of the hopelessness of the patient s situation was appropriate at the time based on the available medical evidence. At the time of discussions by the medical team with the complainants they had concluded that the patient had no chance of survival and her life support could therefore be withdrawn. There was a communication failure on behalf of the medical team.
4 If the complainants had not opposed and resisted as strongly as they did, the life support for the patient would most likely have been withdrawn. The Commission understood that the complainants would have seen the meeting as adversarial they felt pressured, they did not agree with the hopelessness of the patient s medical condition, they believed that other tests should have been undertaken and they did not believe life support should be withdrawn. The Commission also noted that one member of the medical team stated that the meeting did not go well and clearly the family were very upset and stressed by it. On the other hand the medical team had, on the basis of the patient s medical condition, concluded that her situation was hopeless and that life support should be withdrawn. On examining all this information the Commission remained of the view that under these circumstances had not the complainants strongly resisted the views of the medical team, the life support for the patient would most likely have been withdrawn. In the end however the differing views were expressed and the correct outcome was achieved, that is, the life support for the patient was not withdrawn. ISSUE 2: FAILURE TO PROVIDE ACCURATE INFORMATION One of the major concerns expressed by the complainants was that they lost confidence in the patient s medical team because of the inaccurate information provided to them by some of the treating physicians and their obfuscation and lack of respect. There were a number of examples sighted by the complainants to demonstrate why they had lost confidence and the Commission on examining these concluded that as an adequate explanation had not been provided to the complainants it was reasonable for them to conclude that they were not being provided with accurate information. The Commission accepted however that under the circumstances (saving the patient s life) it was reasonable for the medical team to give these incidents a low priority. This failure to openly and honestly discuss what was happening and why with the complainants was another example of poor communication by the medical team. ISSUE 3: FAILURE TO READ MEDICAL NOTES The complainants identified three specific instances where, in their opinion, medical staff failed to read medical records and that because of this they were not provided with accurate, honest and open information so that they might be in a position to understand what was happening and therefore make informed decisions regarding the patients care, particularly in relation to withdrawing life support. Based on the medical records and information before the Commission, the response from the public hospital, the expert opinion and the response by DHCS to the draft Investigation Report, the Commission accepted the expert s view that information is transmitted from the intensive care team to other specialists involved verbally and has all the attendant benefits he identified, that is, it is safer, more effective and associated with the important benefit of the possibility of questions and answers and collective wisdom. The Commission was mindful however that this view was predicated on good communication between treating doctors such as occurs on ward rounds, ward discussions and hand-over rounds, and that such discussions should at the very least be summarised and documented.
5 The Commission still remained of the view that not only good communication, but the taking of accurate and adequate notes and the reading of clinical notes, were all vital to good patient outcomes, particularly where a number of specialists were involved. In a situation where the patient is in intensive care and there are a number of physicians treating the patient, it is essential, in the Commission s opinion, that medical records are constantly updated and accurate and that they are read by those treating the patient. Overall, the three incidents referred to above did not support a view that the medical team failed to read the patient s medical records or that such a failure had the potential to lead to an adverse event. The Commission was satisfied that there were procedures and practices in place to ensure that the patient was at all times provided with appropriate treatment and care. ISSUE 4: RESPECT AND DIGNITY PROTOCOLS The complainants did not consider they were treated with dignity or respect and cited three specific examples to demonstrate this. The Commission understood how the complainants, based on the experiences exampled above, would conclude that they were not treated with respect and dignity. However, after receiving the further comments from DHCS and reviewing all the information, the Commission concluded that apart from one incident where the complainants were not treated appropriately in all other circumstances the complainants were treated with a reasonable amount of respect and dignity. In addition, as already stated, while the Commission remained of the view that it was reasonable for the complainants to conclude that they were not provided with accurate information, it accepted that under the circumstances (saving the patient s life) it was reasonable for the medical team to give the particular incidents a low priority. ISSUE 5: DOCUMENTATION Throughout the report received from the expert, he noted the absence of medical documentation. The Commission also made a number of references throughout the report to there not being adequate documentation. There are a number of standards that are applicable to appropriate record keeping, namely: Good Medical Practice Guidelines ANCI National Competency Standards for the Registered Nurse After considering the comments of the expert, the medical records, the standards that are applicable to both the medical and nursing profession in the NT and the responses to the draft Investigation Report, the Commission was of the opinion that Health Professionals have a legal and ethical obligation to maintain accurate and adequate records to ensure good patient care. The Commission concluded that the standard of record keeping in relation to the care and treatment provided to the patient was not of a reasonable standard. PRACTICES AND PROTOCOLS IN END OF LIFE DECISION MAKING
6 The Commission sought comment from the expert on whether the hospital had any up-to-date policies/practices/protocol in place relating to End of Life Decision Making. The expert stated that he did not know but hoped the answer was yes. The expert also provided the Commission with copies of policies and guidelines from other interstate hospitals. The DHCS provided the Commission with a copy of their End of Life Decision Making practices/procedures/protocols followed by the Hospital which consisted of a one page document entitled Withholding and Withdrawal of Life Support which in the opinion of the Commission substantially dealt with medical issues and was not a document addressing procedures and protocols for End of Life Decision Making as provided for in other hospitals in other states. The Commission concluded that the pressure the complainants were subjected to could have been avoided, or considerably reduced, if DHCS had in place, and followed, practices and procedures similar to those developed by interstate hospitals. After considering the literature and the recommended practices and protocols in End of Life Decision Making made available by the expert, the Commission concluded that DHCS should immediately follow proper procedures and protocols in End of Life Decision Making and, to do so, adopt the recommended guidelines practiced by the Royal North Shore Hospital or something similar. OVERALL STANDARD OF MEDICAL CARE AND TREATMENT Overall the Commission concluded that the medical care and treatment provided to the patient was of a reasonable standard. However there were specific aspects of her care that the Commission had concerns with, namely: Inadequate documentation of medical records Inadequate consultation of past medical records and Renal Specialist Life support for the complainant would most likely have been withdrawn if not for the opposition and resistance to such an approach by the complainants Poor communication by the medical team with the complainants. Communication between the medical team and the complainants was not to a reasonable standard. The Commission s concern in this case was that the medical team were not proactive in obtaining information from, or discussing life support withdrawal with, the complainants. THE CODE The Commission concluded that the following principles of the Code had been breached: Principle 2.1 (b) and (c) (Providers have a responsibility to provide accurate and up to date information responsive to the user s needs and concerns, which promotes health and well-being; and answer questions honestly and openly) in that the complainants (on behalf of patient) were not provided with accurate and up to date information at all times and neither were all their questions answered honestly and openly. Principle 6.2 (a) (Providers have a responsibility to respect the role family members, friends, carers and advocates may have in the user s care and treatment.) in that the roles of complainants were not respected.
7 RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations made by the Commission focused on improving the systemic issues identified as a result of undertaking this investigation. They were: 1. DHCS obtain literature from relevant professional organisations and involve all medical and nursing staff in up-skilling their practices in maintaining accurate and adequate clinical notes to ensure good patient care. Specifically it recommended: Education about documentation; Auditing of documentation; and Action to be taken on audit results. 2. DHCS immediately develop and implement proper procedures and protocols for End of Life Decision Making, adopting as guidelines the documents provided by the Royal North Shore Hospital and NSW Health or developing something similar. 3. DHCS ensure a social worker is available to families with patients in ICU in order to meet the needs of the family in situations such as that experienced by the complainants. 4. In view of the concerns raised by the Medical Board in their correspondence to the Commission, the report be forwarded to the Medical Board for them to take action as they consider appropriate. In response to this recommendation, the Medical Board advised that they had determined to take no further action in relation to the individual named medical practitioners. Importantly DHCS are undertaking a major project to review policies and procedures associated with end of life decision making by patients, families and significant others.
Statutory duty of candour with criminal sanctions Briefing paper on existing accountability mechanisms
Statutory duty of candour with criminal sanctions Briefing paper on existing accountability mechanisms Background In calling for the culture of the NHS to become more open and honest, Robert Francis QC,
More informationProcedure for the. Verification of Death by a Registered Nurse
Procedure for the Verification of Death by a Registered Nurse Version 1 Implementation date 1 st October 2009 Review date 1 st October 2011 Introduction This procedure has been developed to respond to
More informationHow to complain about a doctor
How to complain about a doctor England This booklet is for patients in England. Our procedures are the same throughout the UK, but healthcare and support organisations do vary. We have therefore also produced
More informationMental Health Act 2009
Version: 29.3.2015 South Australia Mental Health Act 2009 An Act to make provision for the treatment, care and rehabilitation of persons with serious mental illness with the goal of bringing about their
More informationPolicies and Procedures. Policy on the Handling of Complaints
RMP. South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust Policies and Procedures Policy on the Handling of Complaints Approved by Trust Board December 2006 (revised version approved by RMEC May 2010) Policy Type Policy
More informationAustralian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care
Activities for MANAGERS Australian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care Putting the Framework into action: Getting started Contents Principle: Consumer centred Area for action: 1.1 Develop methods
More information20. Can the head of a household give consent for information exchange for all residents in the house (especially if they are over 18)?
About this guide This document has been developed as part of the Housing and Human Services Accord, which is focused on government and non-government agencies working together to ensure clients who need
More informationSUMMARY PAPER A COMPARISON OF PATIENT CHARTERS IN AUSTRALIA
SUMMARY PAPER A COMPARISON OF PATIENT CHARTERS IN AUSTRALIA This Summary Paper has been prepared by the Commission office. The range of patient rights and responsibilities that it contains were sourced
More informationhttp://www.gmc-uk.org/concerns/making_a_complaint/who_to_complain_to_en.asp
Who to complain to information for patients in England http://www.gmc-uk.org/concerns/making_a_complaint/who_to_complain_to_en.asp The process of making a complaint will be easier and less stressful if
More informationNursing Agencies. Minimum Standards
Nursing Agencies Minimum Standards 1 Contents Page Introduction 3 Values underpinning the standards 6 SECTION 1 - MINIMUM STANDARDS Management of the nursing agency 1. Management and control of operations
More informationThe Higher Education Authority Review of the processes employed by the University of Limerick to inquire into allegations made by Persons A, B and C
The Higher Education Authority Review of the processes employed by the University of Limerick to inquire into allegations made by Persons A, B and C 29 January 2016 Report version: Final Contents 1. EXECUTIVE
More informationAustralian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care
Activities for HEALTH SERVICE EXECUTIVES and BOARDS Australian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care Putting the Framework into action: Getting started Contents Principle: Consumer centred Area
More informationCHARTER OF PATIENT RIGHTS
CHARTER OF PATIENT RIGHTS Welcome to QUEENSLAND COUNTRY DENTAL Queensland Country Dental will always endeavour to advise patients about their rights and the way our practice operates. Part of the process
More information'Swampy Territory' The role of the palliative care social worker in safeguarding children of adults who are receiving specialist palliative care
'Swampy Territory' The role of the palliative care social worker in safeguarding children of adults who are receiving specialist palliative care This qualitative study explores the role of the palliative
More informationFamily Centred Care: Involving Families in Child Health Care. Service Improvement Unit The Children s Hospital at Westmead
Family Centred Care: Involving Families in Child Health Care Service Improvement Unit The Children s Hospital at Westmead Overview Philosophy of Family Centred Care A Parents Perspective Current initiatives
More informationA review into the quality of NHS complaints investigations where serious or avoidable harm has been alleged
A review into the quality of NHS complaints investigations where serious or avoidable harm has been alleged EMBARGOED COPY Not to be published in any form EMBARGOED COPY Not to be published in any form
More informationHow to complain about a doctor. England
How to complain about a doctor England This booklet is for patients in England. Our procedures are the same throughout the UK, but healthcare and support organisations do vary. We have therefore also produced
More informationPolicy & Procedure Manual Administration - Role and Expectations of the Most Responsible Physician (MRP)
The Scarborough Hospital Policy & Procedure Manual Administration - Role and Expectations of the Most Responsible Purpose To clarify and standardize the role of the Most Responsible at The Scarborough
More informationLoss of. focus. Report from our investigation into the care and treatment of Ms Z
A Loss of focus Report from our investigation into the care and treatment of Ms Z Contents Who we are 1 What we do 1 Introduction 1 How we conducted the investigation 3 Summary of Ms Z s Circumstances
More informationTimeline on administering and withholding/withdrawing treatment from severely brain injured patients:
Timeline on administering and withholding/withdrawing treatment from severely brain injured patients: The law and professional guidance Chronic Disorders of Consciousness York-Cardiff research centre V1
More informationNHS Constitution. Access to health services:
NHS Constitution Patients and the public your rights and NHS pledges to you Everyone who uses the NHS should understand what legal rights they have. For this reason, important legal rights are summarised
More informationLearning when things go wrong. Marg Way Director, Clinical Governance Alfred Health, Melbourne
Learning when things go wrong Marg Way Director, Clinical Governance Alfred Health, Melbourne Safety and Quality Management in hospitals Things have changed a lot over the last 10 years.. HOSPITAL catastrophes
More informationStandard 5. Patient Identification and Procedure Matching. Safety and Quality Improvement Guide
Standard 5 Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Safety and Quality Improvement Guide 5 5 5October 5 2012 ISBN: Print: 978-1-921983-35-1 Electronic: 978-1-921983-36-8 Suggested citation: Australian
More informationMLC Personal Protection Portfolio MLC Life Cover Super
MLC Personal Protection Portfolio MLC Life Cover Super Product disclosure statement This Product Disclosure Statement was prepared by: MLC Limited ABN 90 000 000 402 AFSL 230694 Issuer of MLC Personal
More informationNHS Complaints Advocacy
NHS Complaints Advocacy Raising Concerns or Complaints About the NHS Advocacy in Surrey is provided by Surrey Disabled People s Partnership (SDPP) In partnership with SDPP is a registered Charity: 1156963
More informationHow to Complete This Power of Attorney for Healthcare
How to Complete This Power of Attorney for Healthcare Overview The attached Power of Attorney for Healthcare form is a legal document, developed to meet the legal requirements of Wisconsin. This document
More informationEthics and Patient Rights (EPR)
Ethics and Patient Rights (EPR) Standard EPR.1 [Verification of credentials of professional staff] The organization has an effective process for gathering, verifying, and evaluating the credentials (e.g.
More informationThe Living Will: What Do I Need to Know?
What is a Living Will? The Living Will: What Do I Need to Know? Simply put, a Living Will is a legal document that tells the doctor that you don t want to be put on a life-support machine when it won t
More informationThe National Health Service. Constitution. A draft for consultation, July 2008
The National Health Service Constitution A draft for consultation, July 2008 NHS Constitution The NHS belongs to the people. It is there to improve our health, supporting us to keep mentally and physically
More informationStroke Telemedicine Services: A Guide to the Commissioning and Provision
Stroke Telemedicine Services: A Guide to the Commissioning and Provision Author: Professor Tony Rudd, National Clinical Director for Stroke Date: December 2014 First produced in August 2010 by Dr Damian
More informationImproving Services for Patients with Learning Difficulties. Jennifer Robinson, Lead Nurse Older People and Vulnerable adults
ENC 5 Meeting Trust Board Date 18 th December 2014 Title of Paper Lead Director Author Improving Services for Patients with Learning Difficulties Kathryn Halford, Director of Nursing Jennifer Robinson,
More informationInterim report on NHS and Adult Social Care Complaints Procedures in Manchester
Interim report on NHS and Adult Social Care Complaints Procedures in Manchester Introduction The Health & Wellbeing Overview & Scrutiny Committee of Manchester City Council asked the LINk to look at complaints
More informationHow to complain about a doctor
How to complain about a doctor Scotland This booklet is for patients in Scotland. Our procedures are the same throughout the UK, but healthcare and support organisations do vary. We have therefore also
More informationThe Role of The Consultant, The Doctor and The Nurse. Mr Gary Kitching Consultant in Emergency Medicine Foundation Training Programme Director
The Role of The Consultant, The Doctor and The Nurse. Mr Gary Kitching Consultant in Emergency Medicine Foundation Training Programme Director Objective To provide an overview of your role as a junior
More informationWitness Protection Act 1995 No 87
New South Wales Witness Protection Act 1995 No 87 Status information Currency of version Current version for 5 October 2012 to date (generated 10 October 2012 at 19:15). Legislation on the NSW legislation
More informationContents. Section/Paragraph Description Page Number
- NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICA CLINICAL NON CLINICAL - CLINICAL CLINICAL Complaints Policy Incorporating Compliments, Comments,
More informationHow To Manage A Hospital Emergency
ENHANCED SERVICE SPECIFICATION RISK PROFILING AND CARE MANAGEMENT SCHEME Introduction 1. This enhanced service has been designed by the NHS Commissioning Board (NHS CB) to reward GP practices 1 for the
More informationRaising and escalating concerns. Guidance for nurses and midwives
Raising and escalating concerns Guidance for nurses and midwives We are the nursing and midwifery regulator for England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Islands. We exist to safeguard the health
More informationDate: Meeting: Trust Board Public Meeting. 29 October 2014. Title of Paper: Francis 2 Summary Update Report
Meeting: Trust Board Public Meeting Date: 29 October 2014 Title of Paper: Francis 2 Summary Update Report Key Issues: (Actions, Timescales, Costs etc.) The second Francis report (Francis 2), published
More informationWhen should this tool be used?
Protecting adults at risk: The London Multi-agency policy and procedures to safeguard adults from abuse. Practice Guidance: Safeguarding Adults Risk Assessment & Risk Rating Tool Why do we need this tool?
More informationPlain Language. Guide
Plain Language Guide Mental Health Act 2009 Disclaimer The information contained in this publication is intended to assist in the interpretation of the Mental Health Act 2009 and is not a substitute for
More informationProfessional Standards Authority and Human Tissue Authority
Professional Standards Authority and Human Tissue Authority Notes of joint seminar on consent, 11 December 2012 The notes below summarise the case study discussions only. Case study 1 Qualifying Relationships
More informationGUIDELINES ISSUED UNDER PART 5A OF THE EDUCATION ACT 1990 FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS POSED TO SCHOOLS BY A STUDENT S VIOLENT
GUIDELINES ISSUED UNDER PART 5A OF THE EDUCATION ACT 1990 FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS POSED TO SCHOOLS BY A STUDENT S VIOLENT BEHAVIOUR CONTENTS PAGE PART A INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT
More informationData Protection Policy
Internal Ref: NELC 16.60 Review date December 2016 Version No. V04 Data Protection Policy 1 Data Protection Statement Data Protection Policy 1.1 North East Lincolnshire Council recognises that in order
More informationPsychologist s records: Management, ownership and access. APS Professional Practice
Psychologist s records: Management, ownership and access APS Professional Practice October 2012 Copyright 2012 Psychologist s records: Management, ownership and access Table of Contents Executive summary...
More informationQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS HEALTHCARE IDENTIFIERS BILL 2010
About Healthcare Identifiers QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS HEALTHCARE IDENTIFIERS BILL 2010 Q1. What is the Healthcare Identifiers Service? The Healthcare Identifiers (HI) Service will implement and maintain a
More informationAustralian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care
Activities for the HEALTHCARE TEAM Australian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care Putting the Framework into action: Getting started Contents Principle: Consumer centred Areas for action: 1.2
More informationSurvey of Nurses. End of life care
Survey of Nurses 28 End of life care HELPING THE NATION SPEND WISELY The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending on behalf of Parliament. The Comptroller and Auditor General, Tim Burr, is an
More informationSample Language for Interim and Supportive Measures to Protect Students Following an Allegation of Sexual Misconduct
Sample Language for Interim and Supportive Measures to Protect Students Following an Allegation of Sexual Misconduct I. Introduction The Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault is committed
More informationRURAL VMO/HMO CONTRACT OF LIABILITY COVERAGE (INCLUDING PRIVATE INPATIENT INDEMNITY COVER)
RURAL VMO/HMO CONTRACT OF LIABILITY COVERAGE (INCLUDING PRIVATE INPATIENT INDEMNITY COVER) THIS CONTRACT is made on the day of 2006, BETWEEN (insert the name of public health organisation) ("the PHO")
More informationADVANCE HEALTH DIRECTIVE
Form 4 Queensland Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (Section 44(2)) ADVANCE HEALTH DIRECTIVE This form deals with your future health care. The time may come when you cannot speak for yourself. By completing
More informationSCDHSC0233 Develop effective relationships with individuals
Overview This standard identifies the requirements when you develop effective relationships with individuals. This includes identifying individuals' preferences and needs regarding your relationship with
More informationUnited Response. Overall rating for this service Good. Inspection report. Ratings. Overall summary. Is the service safe? Good
United Response Kumba Imani Millenium Centre Inspection report 4 Princes Road Toxteth Liverpool L8 1TH Tel: 0151 203 1125 Website: www.unitedresponse.org.uk Date of inspection visit: 6 and 29 August and
More informationVMO/HMO CONTRACT OF LIABILITY COVERAGE PUBLIC PATIENTS & PRIVATE PAEDIATRIC IN PATIENTS
VMO/HMO CONTRACT OF LIABILITY COVERAGE PUBLIC PATIENTS & PRIVATE PAEDIATRIC IN PATIENTS THIS CONTRACT is made on the day of 2005, BETWEEN (insert the name of public health organisation) ("the PHO") AND
More informationPolicy and Procedure for Claims Management
Policy and Procedure for Claims Management RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR: COMMUNICATIONS, PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND HUMAN RESOURCES EFFECTIVE FROM: 08/07/10 REVIEW DATE: 01/04/11 To be read in conjunction with: Complaints
More informationMEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM
MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM IMPORTANT INFORMATION Please read the following information before completing this proposal A. Your Duty of Disclosure Before you enter
More informationMastering Adverse Outcomes
Mastering Adverse Outcomes Part of the Cognitive Institute Risk Management Series To define adverse outcomes and explore current healthcare professionals attitudes To appreciate patient motivations to
More informationGuidance Notes for Applicants of the Certificate for Clinical Trial on Medical Device
Guidance Notes for Applicants of the Certificate for Clinical Trial on Medical Device List of Contents Page 1. Introduction 1.1 The Medical Device Administrative Control System and the 3 proposed legislation
More informationKnow your rights and responsibilities as a private patient in hospital. Private Patients Hospital Charter
Know your rights and responsibilities as a private patient in hospital Private Patients Hospital Charter Commonwealth of Australia 2004 ISBN 0 642 82235 2 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as
More informationNational Early Warning Score. National Clinical Guideline No. 1
National Early Warning Score National Clinical Guideline No. 1 February 2013 The National Early Warning Score and COMPASS Education programme project is a work stream of the National Acute Medicine Programme,
More informationStress Management Policy
Level 3 - H&S Policy Structure Stress Management Policy BACKGROUND The Health & Safety Executive (HSE) define stress as the adverse reaction people have to excessive pressures or other types of demand
More informationGuide to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards for health service organisation boards
Guide to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards for health service organisation boards April 2015 ISBN Print: 978-1-925224-10-8 Electronic: 978-1-925224-11-5 Suggested citation: Australian
More informationAmbitions for Palliative and End of Life Care:
Ambitions for Palliative and End of Life Care: A national framework for local action 2015-2020 National Palliative and End of Life Care Partnership Association for Palliative Medicine; Association of Ambulance
More informationThe State Hospital s Board for Scotland
The State Hospital s Board for Scotland PATIENT & CARER FEEDBACK Procedure for Feedback; Comments, Concerns, Compliments and Complaints (Incorporating the NHS Can I Help you Guidance) Policy Reference
More informationGeneral Guidance on the National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare
General Guidance on the National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare September 2012 About the Health Information and Quality Authority The (HIQA) is the independent Authority established to drive continuous
More informationPriorities of Care for the Dying Person Duties and Responsibilities of Health and Care Staff with prompts for practice
Priorities of Care for the Dying Person Duties and Responsibilities of Health and Care Staff with prompts for practice Published June 2014 by the Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People 1 About
More information431 SUPPORT INDIVIDUALS WHERE ABUSE HAS BEEN DISCLOSED
Unit overview Elements of competence 431a 431b Support individuals who disclose abuse Support individuals who have been abused About this unit For this unit you will need to support individuals who have
More informationLexcel England and Wales v6 Standard for in-house legal departments Excellence in legal practice management and client care
www.lawsociety.org.uk/lexcel Lexcel England and Wales v6 Standard for in-house legal departments Excellence in legal practice management and client care Lexcel England and Wales v6 Contents About Lexcel...
More informationA guide for employers and registrants. Managing fitness to practise
A guide for employers and registrants Managing fitness to practise Contents Introduction 1 About us (the HPC) 1 Who do we regulate? 1 Protected titles 2 Fitness to practise 2 This document 3 Managing fitness
More informationProfessional Behaviour and Ethical Conduct. Code of Practice relating to:
Code of Practice relating to: Professional Behaviour and Ethical Conduct Promoting transparency and enhancing public confidence in the dental profession February 2012 Code of Practice relating to: Professional
More informationOUTLINE Supportive care management of the advanced CKD patient
RENAL SUPPORTIVE CARE. NURSING EXPERIENCE AND PERSPECTIVES Renal Supportive Care Symposium 2013 Elizabeth Josland CNC OUTLINE Supportive care management of the advanced CKD patient Recognise patients who
More informationMEDICAL MALPRACTICE LIABILITY INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LIABILITY INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM IMPORTANT FACTS RELATING TO THIS PROPOSAL FORM The Purpose of this Proposal Form is to set out all relevant information for your adviser to submit
More informationConsultation Paper: Standards for Effectively Managing Mental Health Complaints
What is the purpose of this paper? The purpose of this paper is to encourage discussion and feedback from people who access, or work in, Western Australia s mental health sector. The paper proposes a draft
More informationCOMPLAINTS PROCEDURE
COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE AUGUST 2004 Revised July 1996 Revised March 1997 Revised November 1997 Revised May 1998 Revised November 1998 Revised July 1999 Revised May 2002 Revised March 2004 Revised June 2004
More informationTRIM: 93267. National Consensus Statement: Essential Elements for Safe and High-Quality End-of-Life Care in Acute Hospitals
TRIM: 93267 National Consensus Statement: Essential Elements for Safe and High-Quality End-of-Life Care in Acute Hospitals Consultation draft January 2014 Commonwealth of Australia 2014 This work is copyright.
More informationASTH416 Develop practices which promote choice, well-being and protection of all individuals
Develop practices which promote choice, well-being and protection of Overview For this unit you will need to develop, maintain and evaluate systems, and support others to promote the rights, responsibilities,
More informationHow to complain about a doctor
How to complain about a doctor Wales This booklet is for patients in Wales. Our procedures are the same throughout the UK, but healthcare and support organisations do vary. We have therefore also produced
More informationMEDICAL STAFF RULES & REGULATIONS
MEDICAL STAFF RULES & REGULATIONS PURPOSE: Rules and Regulations shall set standards of practice that are to be required of each individual exercising clinical privileges in the hospital, and shall act
More informationYour rights if you have been injured as a result of treatment
Your rights if you have been injured as a result of treatment If you have had medical treatment which went wrong or caused you injury, you are entitled to full explanations and you may be able to get compensation
More informationGUIDELINES FOR INTRAPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION
GUIDELINES FOR INTRAPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION Guidelines for Intraprofessional Collaboration: Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical Nurses Working Together October 2015 (1/19) Nurses Association of
More informationImproving the Performance of Doctors. Complaints Investigations and Remediation
Improving the Performance of Doctors Complaints Investigations and Remediation SHARING INFORMATION WITH PATIENTS AND CARERS HAPIA GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE 2014 HEALTHWATCH AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ASSOCIATION
More informationISSUE DATE: AUGUST 2010 GOOD OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL PRACTICE
ISSUE DATE: AUGUST 2010 GOOD OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL PRACTICE Charitable Objects and Mission Statement Charitable Objects of the Faculty of Occupational Medicine The charitable objects of the Faculty are
More informationNationwide providers of specialist care and rehabilitation
Valuing People VP Community Care Nationwide providers of specialist care and rehabilitation 9 YEARS OF SPECIALIST CARE VP Community Care An introduction to what we do Registered with the CQC, we support
More informationSPECIALIST ADVOCACY SERVICES IN NORFOLK
SPECIALIST ADVOCACY SERVICES IN NORFOLK Independent Mental Health Advocacy Independent Mental Capacity Advocacy Relevant Persons Paid Representative Service Annual Report 2014-2015 Introduction This annual
More informationexcellence in care Authorised Adult Palliative Care Plan Respecting patient wishes General Practitioner Information Kit
excellence in care Authorised Adult Palliative Care Plan Respecting patient wishes General Practitioner Information Kit Authorised Adult Palliative Care General Practitioners (GPs) involved in palliative
More informationInterviewable: Yes No Resident Room: Initial Admission Date: Care Area(s): Use
Facility Name: Facility ID: Date: Surveyor Name: Resident Name: Resident ID: Initial Admission Date: Care Area(s): Interviewable: Yes No Resident Room: Use Use this protocol for a sampled resident receiving
More informationCHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES
CHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES Application and interpretation of this Chapter 43.1.-(1) Subject to paragraph (4) and rule 43.1A (actions based on clinical negligence).
More informationNational Standards for Safer Better Healthcare
National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare June 2012 About the Health Information and Quality Authority The (HIQA) is the independent Authority established to drive continuous improvement in Ireland
More informationGetting it Right: Lessons from the Ombudsman Service
Getting it Right: Lessons from the Ombudsman Service Craig Turton, Interim Senior Health Policy Manager Complaints handling, investigating, resolving and learning conference 1 st October 2013 The Parliamentary
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
Facility Name: Facility ID: Date: Surveyor Name: Resident Name: Resident ID: Initial Admission Date: Interviewable: Yes No Resident Room: Care Area(s): Use Use this protocol for a sampled resident receiving
More informationResponding to Complaints in Your Practice
Responding to Complaints in Your Practice Contents Frontline and formal complaints 3 Why do patients complain? 3 How doctors respond to complaints 4 Your responsibilities 4 Avoiding complaints 5 Avoiding
More informationMedicines reconciliation on admission and discharge from hospital policy April 2013. WHSCT medicines reconciliation policy 1
Medicines reconciliation on admission and discharge from hospital policy April 2013 WHSCT medicines reconciliation policy 1 Policy Title Policy Reference Number Medicines reconciliation on admission and
More informationMEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM
MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM IMPORTANT INFORMATION: PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION BEFORE COMPLETING THIS PROPOSAL A. Your Duty of Disclosure Before you enter
More informationExplanatory Memorandum to the National Health Service (Concerns, Complaints and Redress Arrangements) (Wales) Regulations 2011
Explanatory Memorandum to the National Health Service (Concerns, Complaints and Redress Arrangements) (Wales) Regulations 2011 This Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared by the Health and Social Services
More informationLearning Disabilities Nursing: Field Specific Competencies
Learning Disabilities Nursing: Field Specific Competencies Page 7 Learning Disabilities Nursing: Field Specific Competencies Competency (Learning disabilities) and application Domain and ESC Suitable items
More informationNHS Constitution The NHS belongs to the people. This Constitution principles values rights pledges responsibilities
for England 21 January 2009 2 NHS Constitution The NHS belongs to the people. It is there to improve our health and well-being, supporting us to keep mentally and physically well, to get better when we
More informationchild protection child protection child
child protection child protection child protection child protection child protection child protection child Chapter 4 protection child protection child CONTENTS Current Law and Practice 120 Introduction
More informationAdvanced Nurse Practitioner Adult Specialist Palliative Care
JOB DESCRIPTION ellenor Advanced Nurse Practitioner Adult Specialist Palliative Care Responsible to Accountable to: Head of Adult Community Services Director of Patient Care General ellenor is a specialist
More informationWill the pre-existing ailment waiting period affect you? information for consumers
Will the pre-existing ailment waiting period affect you? information for consumers Commonwealth of Australia 2001 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no
More informationCouncil Meeting, 26/27 March 2014
Council Meeting, 26/27 March 2014 HCPC response to the Final Report of A Review of the NHS Hospitals Complaint System Putting Patients Back in the Picture by Right Honourable Ann Clwyd MP and Professor
More information