1 MORE THAN A RAMBLE: A LAW STUDENT S REVIEW OF HUGH G. E. MACMAHON S PROGRESS, STABILITY, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR EQUALITY: A RAMBLE THROUGH THE EARLY YEARS OF MAINE LAW, (PORTLAND, ME.: DRUMMOND WOODSUM & MACMAHON 2009, PP. 376, $28.00) Christopher Harmon I. MORE THAN A RAMBLE II. BRINGING LAW TO LIFE III. A FAIR CRITIQUE IV. CONCLUSION
2 224 MAINE LAW REVIEW [Vol. 66:1 MORE THAN A RAMBLE: A LAW STUDENT S REVIEW OF HUGH G. E. MACMAHON S PROGRESS, STABILITY, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR EQUALITY: A RAMBLE THROUGH THE EARLY YEARS OF MAINE LAW, (PORTLAND, ME.: DRUMMOND WOODSUM & MACMAHON 2009, PP. 376, $28.00) Christopher Harmon * Hugh MacMahon s work, Progress, Stability, and the Struggle for Equality: A Ramble Through the Early Years of Maine Law, , 1 is a thoroughly researched, well-written narrative that provides readers with a glimpse into Maine s past while making them contemplate legal problems that will persist far into the future. MacMahon maintains a careful balance in his writing, ensuring it is not too dulled down for legal professionals, but not too complex with superfluous legalese for laymen. He does a wonderful job introducing legal concepts and demonstrating how those principles were first introduced into the Pine Tree State. Through the use of legal history, the author illustrates a seemingly simpler time, in which past Maine industries, like ice harvesting and logging, flourished; demonstrates how rapidly society was changing with the Industrial Revolution, the Civil War, and the Women s Rights Movement; and discusses how the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court conservative in its nature had to delicately balance these complicated and competing interests while preserving the integrity of the judicial system. I. MORE THAN A RAMBLE In his introduction, MacMahon explains his work is a ramble through the early years of Maine law and is nothing more than a brief, and sometimes opinionated, discussion of selected topics of Maine law during the first hundred years of Maine s statehood. 2 However, as early as his work begins, it is evident that MacMahon has undervalued the thoroughness of his research and his attention to detail. As impressive as it is that the author sat and read the reporters of the Law Court from 1820 to 1920, 3 it is misleading to suggest that his research ended there. In every chapter, he introduces a legal concept, discusses the relevant early Maine case law on the issue, and follows the discussion with how the Law Court, the * J.D. Candidate, 2014, University of Maine School of Law. The Author would like to thank Scott Sawyer for inspiring him to practice law. Uncle Scott, August 13, 1957 March 19, 2012, will always stand as a symbol for what it means to practice law with the highest character and ethics. He is, and always will be, greatly loved and missed. 1. HUGH G. E. MACMAHON, PROGRESS, STABILITY, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR EQUALITY: A RAMBLE THROUGH THE EARLY YEARS OF MAINE LAW, (2009). 2. Id. at xiii. 3. It should be noted that MacMahon actually carried his research into 1921 because he thought that a sufficient legal history of the first hundred years of Maine would be incomplete without the 1921 blasphemy case of State v. Mockus, 120 Me. 84, 113 A. 39 (1921). MACMAHON, supra note 1, at 228.
3 2013] BOOK REVIEW 225 Maine legislature, or the United States Supreme Court eventually provided a remedy or altered that aspect of the law, changing it into the law as we know it today. For example, in a chapter on employee injuries, MacMahon discusses the various burdens plaintiffs had to overcome such as contributory negligence and the fellow servant rule 4 when nearly fatal workplace hazards were open to observation. 5 However, he expands his research beyond the Law Court s decision to provide his readers with a full understanding of the law s development. He first discusses the Maine Legislature s response in 1915, with its first iteration of the Workers Compensation Act, which eliminated the common law defenses of contributory negligence, the fellow servant rule, and assumption of the risk. 6 In doing so, MacMahon even digs into the legislative history to quote then-senate President, and later Governor, Carl E. Miliken, in his remarks supporting the legislation. 7 Furthermore, the author carries his research into the late twentieth century, discussing a 1987 case that describes the importance of the 1915 statute. 8 The author not only researched how Maine addressed or remedied the issue at hand, but he also took the time to see how the United States Supreme Court and other states handled the same topic. For example, in discussing a Maine case regarding the reading of the bible in public schools, Donahue v. Richards, 9 MacMahon summarizes the Law Court s ruling approving the expulsion of fifteenyear-old Bridget Donahue for refusing to read the King James version of the bible. 10 He also discusses how other courts around the same time period dealt with the issue. 11 He explains that, in contrast to Maine, the supreme courts of Wisconsin and Illinois both held that any reading of the bible amounted to sectarian instruction and was forbidden in public schools. 12 Lastly, he artfully ends the discussion with the United States Supreme Court s decision in Schempp, 13 which ultimately prohibited public schools from having students read biblical passages. By explaining how Maine, two states, and the Supreme Court of the United States have all dealt with the same legal problem, MacMahon provides a comprehensive survey of American law as it developed. Moreover, MacMahon does not end his research there. At several points throughout his work he delves into the background of the players involved in the case to provide both legal and non-legal readers a complete understanding and background. For example, in discussing Maine s blasphemy case, State v. Mockus, 14 MacMahon actually researched the blasphemer s prior illicit history 4. Id. at Id. at 142 (quoting Podvin v. Pepperell Mfg. Co., 104 Me. 561, 564, 72 A. 618, 619 (1908)). This legal principle is assumption of the risk. Id. 6. Id. at & n Id. at Id. at 158 (discussing Westman s Case, 118 Me. 133, 106 A. 532 (1987)) Me. 379 (1854). 10. MACMAHON, supra note 1, at See id. at See id. (discussing State ex rel. Weiss v. Dist. Bd. of Sch. Dist. 8 of Edgerton, 44 N.W. 967 (Wis. 1890), and People ex rel. Ring v. Bd. of Educ. of Dist. 24, 92 N.E. 251 (Ill. 1910)). 13. Sch. Dist. of Abington Twp. v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963) Me. 84, 113 A. 39 (1912).
4 226 MAINE LAW REVIEW [Vol. 66:1 before he committed the same offense in Maine. 15 Lastly, when reading the section on Maine s morality laws, it is clear that the author did more than ramble through Maine s legal history in finding the dissenting opinion in Lewis v. Littlefield. 16 MacMahon uses this case to discuss the Law Court s treatment of illegal wagers. 17 In the case, two runners made a bet over who could run fifteen miles faster and each runner gave his money to Littlefield, who was a minor. 18 Lewis lost the race and Littlefield and gave the winnings to the winner, as all parties had originally agreed. 19 Lewis demanded Littlefield return his money and sued to recover it. 20 The trial court agreed with Lewis and the Law Court affirmed, ruling that all bets were unlawful, and that Littlefield was guilty of conversion. 21 Upon reading this opinion, MacMahon, who was troubled by what he thought was an unjust ruling, was puzzled by the notable absence of a dissenting opinion. 22 However, he scrolled through the reporters until he found a dissenting opinion that had been issued a full year after the majority had issued their decision. 23 The author was relieved that there was a dissent and that Justice Emery criticized the Court for failing to take the defendant s minor status into consideration in its ruling. 24 The author argued that dissents are important because a court s work product may well fall short unless the views of every member are taken into account. 25 Likewise, MacMahon s audience should be grateful for his thoroughness, as legal analysis is not complete unless the author does his diligence in completing the research. II. BRINGING LAW TO LIFE When lawyers and law students use cases for research, they generally search for a certain principle or ruling and often lose sight of the fact that cases involve real people. MacMahon s work does an excellent job of humanizing the cases by bringing the parties, lawyers, and judges to life. For example, MacMahon provides a thorough background of all involved in the case of Allen v. McKean [sic], 26 a case involving the First Circuit abrogating the Maine Legislature s attempt to remove the president of Bowdoin College, William Allen. 27 Acknowledging that the players in the case were a most interesting group, MacMahon explains that the defendant McKeen, the treasurer of Bowdoin, 15. MACMAHON, supra note 1, at Me. 233 (1839). 17. MACMAHON, supra note 1, at Lewis, 15 Me. at Id. 20. Id. 21. Id. at MACMAHON, supra note 1, at Id. 24. Id. at Id. at F. Cas. 489 (C. C.D. Me. 1833) (No. 229); see also MACMAHON, supra note 1, at 44 (explaining that the official report of the case contained a misspelling of the defendant s name, which should have read McKeen ). 27. MACMAHON, supra note 1, at 42.
5 2013] BOOK REVIEW 227 was represented by Stephen Longfellow, father of the poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. 28 MacMahon also explains that Associate Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story presided over the case in his capacity as Circuit Justice for the First Circuit. 29 Additionally, the author notes that Allen, the Bowdoin President and plaintiff in the matter, dealt with the same issue when he was the President at Dartmouth University. 30 These facts serve as a pleasant reminder to the reader that it is people who are at the heart of every legal issue. However, MacMahon truly brings this point to light in his vivid descriptions of plaintiffs in employment injury cases, where he describes the painful realities of mill work in the early years of the State. 31 Similarly, MacMahon does a brilliant job humanizing the victim, Dr. Pickard, in State v. Me. Cent. R.R. Co., 32 a case the author uses to demonstrate the Law Court s somewhat draconian contributory negligence rulings. 33 In describing the case, the author ingeniously begins with the fact that Dr. Pickard died the day after Christmas in With the early establishment of this fact, the reader becomes instantly emotionally invested in the victim and is all the more upset at learning that the State, prosecuting for the benefit of [Dr. Pickard s] widow and children, 35 lost the case because they were unable to overcome a prima facie assumption that, where Dr. Pickard had crossed the train tracks willingly, he was guilty of negligence. 36 Perhaps the Law Court was not entirely sympathetic to the plaintiff, but thanks to MacMahon, Dr. Pickard and his family will have the sympathy of generations of students, practitioners, and observers of the law. III. A FAIR CRITIQUE From a modern perspective, the Maine Law Court s decisions from 1820 to 1920 which included ruling that women could not be judges, 37 and that deceased plaintiffs had a double burden in personal injury cases to prove that a defendant s negligence caused their injuries without any fault of the injured s own 38 may seem perplexing, if not incomprehensible. However, MacMahon is mindful that the Court was in a different era, and he is careful not to be overly critical of the rulings. 28. Id. at Id. at Id. at For instance, in the case of Podvin v. Pepperll Mfg. Co., 104 Me. 561, 72 A. 618 (1908), MacMahon reveals how the fifty-nine-year-old Podvin was working in a Biddeford cotton mill when her hair became entangled in a sowing machine and her scalp [was] torn from her head. MACMAHON, supra note 1, at 141 (quoting Podvin, 104 Me. 561, 71 A. 618, 619 (1908)). Similarly, in Cote v. Jay Mfg. Co., 115 Me. 300, 98 A. 817 (1916), the author describes how the fourteen-year-old plaintiff s hand was severed at the wrist by the cutting blades of a planer used for manufacturing wooden skewer sticks. MACMAHON, supra note 1, at Me. 357 (1884). 33. See generally MACMAHON, supra note 1, Id. at Me. Cent. R.R. Co., 76 Me. at Id. at ; see also MACMAHON, supra note 1, at Id. at 121 (discussing Opinion of the Justices, 62 Me. 596 (1874)). 38. Id. at 81.
6 228 MAINE LAW REVIEW [Vol. 66:1 For example, the author acknowledges that during the Industrial Revolution the Court considered economic progress so important that... it sometimes allowed its support for commercial and industrial interests to almost entirely override legitimate interests of other parties, most notably, employees who suffered injury or death in the workplace, victims of railroad crossings accidents, and widows and children in wrongful death cases. 39 Although dismayed by some of the Court s rulings, MacMahon at least provides deference to the Court as protective of commerce and industry in a pivotal period in Maine s economic history; he acknowledges the difficulties the Court had in keeping pace with the changing social and economic culture while still staying faithful to stare decisis. Furthermore, when MacMahon does question the early Court s rulings, he is careful to critique the Court s logic, rather than its endorsement of societal norms. For example, in his discussion of Donahue v. Richards, MacMahon looks beyond the fact that our contemporary society would not allow public schools to require bible reading; instead, he focuses on the Court s legal analysis. 40 In the opinion, Justice Appleton narrowly interprets the religious freedom clause in the Maine Constitution and rules that it prevents the legislature from establishing a religious preference, however, does not prevent a school committee from doing so. 41 MacMahon, in his criticism, astutely argues that the Maine constitutional provision has a triple emphasis on ensuring there is no religious preference in government, regardless of level. 42 He goes on to explain that, in essence, if Appleton s ruling were followed, the legislature would be unlawfully delegating authority to the school committee that it does not have itself. 43 The author s ability to objectively critique the Law Court for its analysis demonstrates his careful, unprejudiced examination of the true legal issue in question, which makes for a more fulfilling read. IV. CONCLUSION MacMahon s work on early Maine legal history is an enjoyable read for those who have little legal experience as well as those seasoned in the trade. He walks through a variety of legal concepts from separation of powers and judicial review, to nuisances and takings. His work is a must-read for the legal practitioner in Maine; it is a wonderful survey illustrating how the Law Court first dealt with a range of interesting legal issues. MacMahon s knack for storytelling humanizes the characters in cases that are nearly two centuries old, and his thorough research brings the reader up to speed on the current status of the legal principles discussed. His enthusiasm emanates from the page and helps bring Maine s hidden legal history to life in a way few before him have been able to do. 39. Id. at Id. at Id. at 216 (discussing Donahue v. Richards, 38 Me. 376 (1854)). 42. Id. at Id. at 220.
Injured on the Job Your Rights under FELA Quick Facts: What To Do If Injured 1. Consult your own doctor for treatment. Give your doctor a complete history of how your injury happened. Make sure that the
CHAPTER 30: EMPLOYEE INJURIES INTRODUCTION TO JOB SAFETY Our legal system has developed three ways of handling employee injuries: A. NEGLIGENCE SUITS Was developed under common-law where the injured employee
Reed Armstrong Quarterly January 2009 http://www.reedarmstrong.com/default.asp Contributors: William B. Starnes II Tori L. Cox IN THIS ISSUE: Joint and Several Liability The Fault of Settled Tortfeasors
HOW MUCH MONEY IS MY SLIP AND FALL CASE WORTH? Knowledge of the Value of Your Claim Can Help You to Determine If a Settlement Offer Is Reasonable and Appropriate Given the Circumstances of the Fall and
Trying Damages in the Wrongful Death Case of an Adult Child By Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan When a young worker, who is married, with three children and who is earning $100,000 per year, dies after falling
CO-EMPLOYEE LIABILITY 2013 DEVELOPMENTS Established in 1945, Evans & Dixon, L.L.C. is one of the most experienced and respected insurance defense firms in the Midwest. Steeped in tradition and committed
Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice Terms Statutes of Limitations Minnesota Medical Malpractice Laws Medical malpractice includes many forms of liability producing conduct
LOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS The Concept of Negligence If you have been injured, only an experienced Louisiana personal injury accident attorney can evaluate the unique facts and circumstances
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
Chapter One: Our Laws Lessons: 1-1 Our Laws & Legal System 1-2 Types of Laws Lesson 1-2 Goals Explain how constitutional, statutory, case and administrative laws are created Explain how to resolve conflicts
Does Texas Need a Workers Compensation System? Bill Peacock Texas Public Policy Foundation Beginnings of Workers Compensation Liability and Litigation in the 19 th Century The problem of industrial accidents
the compensation myth The Compensation Myth It is common to hear stories of the Compensation Culture or claims that Britain is becoming Risk Averse as a result of people claiming compensation. The truth
TEXAS AUTO ACCIDENTS Auto accidents can cause thousands or even millions of dollars in losses due to medical expenditures, an inability to work, a reduction in future earnings, or the untimely death of
Common Myths About Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Cases 1 By B. Keith Williams There are several myths about accident cases and the attorneys that handle them. It is important to keep these myths in
Things You Should Know About Your Child s Personal Injury Case Virginia law treats often children differently than it treats adults for many reasons. Children are not considered mature enough to understand
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 0 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 17th day of October, 200, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2005-C -249 CHARLES ALBERT AND
Medical Malpractice VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS INTRODUCTION: Tell the jurors that this is a very big and a very important case. Do a SHORT summary of the case and the damages we are seeking. This summary should
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20519 ASBESTOS COMPENSATION ACT OF 2000 Henry Cohen, American Law Division Updated April 13, 2000 Abstract. This report
Key Concept 9: Understand the differences between compensatory and punitive damages 1 A. Torts 1. Compensatory and Punitive Damages Tort law involves civil liability between private parties. A plaintiff
Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers 2014 Granby Street, Suite 200 Norfolk, VA, 23517 (757) 455-0077 (866) 455-6657 (Toll Free) YOUR RIGHTS WHEN YOU ARE INJURED ON THE RAILROAD Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers 2014
The Fifth Circuit Attempts to Clarify the Interplay Between OCSLA and Maritime Law; Declines to Create a Zone of Danger Cause of Action Under General Maritime Law In Francis Barker v. Hercules Offshore,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NOT PRECEDENTIAL No. 08-1412 In re: GEORGE W. COLE, Debtor CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, Appellant v. ROBERT P. SHEILS, Jr., Trustee On Appeal from the United
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JAMES D. FOWLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 08-cv-2785 ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Judge Robert M. Dow,
Introduction What is Personal Injury? Personal injury is any injury that occurs to your person. Most personal injuries are a result of an accident, although some can result from malicious, deliberate intent.
Motor Vehicle Accident Claims: What are your rights? If you or a loved one has been seriously injured in a motor vehicle accident, there are a number of critical decisions that must be made. Who will care
Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1954-1955 Term February 1956 Constitutional Law - Judicial Review - Legalized Gambling - Louisiana State Racing Commission
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 HOWARD A. SCOTT, EXECUTOR OF IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ESTATE OF ALBERT L. SCOTT, PENNSYLVANIA DECEASED AND LAVERNE SCOTT, IN HER OWN RIGHT,
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus This syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. Chief
For Publication IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS FLORILYN TRIA JONES and JOHN C. JONES, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 0-0D 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 FELIPE FLORES REYES and
Chapter 4 Crimes (Review) On a separate sheet of paper, write down the answer to the following Q s; if you do not know the answer, write down the Q. 1. What is a crime? 2. There are elements of a crime.
Filed 9/19/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE LAS VEGAS LAND AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
If you have questions or would like further information regarding Physician and Hospital Liens, please contact: Larry S. Kowalczyk 312-540-7616 email@example.com Result Oriented. Success Driven. www.querrey.com
Appendix I: Select Legislative Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative is and Mesothelioma Benefits Act H.R. 6906, 93rd 1973). With respect to claims for benefits filed before December 31, 1974, would authorize
The Law and You 65 YOUR RIGHTS AT WORK CAN I JOIN A UNION? Yes. The Constitution protects your rights to join a trade union of your choice. If any one tries to stop you exercising this right you can take
Common Law: Trespass, Nuisance and Negligence Fact Sheet 02 Updated December 2010 An Introduction to Common Law: Trespass, Nuisance and Negligence Mostly, the environmental law that we rely on to protect
PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS IN NEVADA MEDICAL MALPRACTICE REFORM Carl Tobias* In late July 2002, a special session of the Nevada Legislature passed medical malpractice reform legislation. 1 The expressly-stated
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. JOHN MACARTNEY, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS,
MONTANA SELF INSURERS ASSOCIATION Executive Director Bob Worthington Board of Directors Rick Clark Plum Creek Timber Co Tim Fitzpatrick MT Schools Group Donna Haeder NorthWestern Corp Marv Jordan MT Contractors
Friday, August 29, 2008 TRIAL ADVOCACY The Art of Jury Selection: Working With Challenges Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan It has been said that the purpose of jury selection is to select a 'fair and impartial'
The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio State Law Journal (Moritz College of Law) Ohio State Law Journal: Volume 22, Issue 3 (1961) 1961 Automobile Liability Policy Held to Cover Stolen
But For Causation in Defective Drug and Toxic Exposure Cases: California s Form Jury Instruction CACI 430 By Matt Powers and Charles Lifland Since the California Supreme Court s 1991 decision in Mitchell
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 97-C-0188 MELVIN GRAHAM versus WILLIS-KNIGHTON MEDICAL CENTER ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL CALOGERO, Chief Justice, dissenting. In my view,
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
Table of Contents 1. What should I do when the other driver s insurance company contacts me?... 1 2. Who should be paying my medical bills from a car accident injury?... 2 3. What should I do after the
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 15 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 25th day of February, 2003, are as follows: BY KIMBALL, J.: 2002-C - 1634 RONALD J.
What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins Introduction More and more lawsuits are filed in Florida alleging that the trustee of a trust
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ESTATE OF TIMOTHY HUGHES, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED January 23, 2007 v No. 259987 Oakland Circuit Court CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 2000-024949-CZ and Defendant/Cross-Defendant-
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. 12-408 JAMES K. MEADOR V. APPELLANT T O T A L C O M P L I A N C E CONSULTANTS, INC., AND BILL MEDLEY APPELLEES Opinion Delivered January 31, 2013 APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NO. 10-4345 DOROTHY AVICOLLI, Appellant v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, a/k/a GEICO; ANGELO CARTER; CHARLES CARTER On Appeal
================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus This syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. Chief
Chapter IV FACULTY LIABILITY I. Overview INTRODUCTION Faculty members are agents of their employers the college or university. In that capacity, the college is liable or responsible for their acts that
The Foundation of Juvenile Practice Part 1: You are Adversary Counsel, NOT a GAL! Private Bar Certification Forensic Exercise November 19, 2014 Role of Juvenile Defense Counsel: Forensic Exercise: Question
Table of Contents Court Ordered Life Insurance 3 Child Support Life Insurance 5 Divorce and Life Insurance 7 Your Rights and Entitlements 9 Important Issues 11 Page 2 Court Ordered Life Insurance Court
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC02-2659 CYNTHIA CLEFF NORMAN, Petitioner, vs. TERRI LAMARRIA FARROW, Respondent. [June 24, 2004] WELLS, J. We have for review Norman v. Farrow, 832 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA
Case 2:09-cv-00532-JPH Document 23 Filed 02/02/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL WALKER : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : NO. 09-532 BIG BURGER RESTAURANTS,
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Safe Auto Insurance Company, : Appellant : : v. : No. 2247 C.D. 2004 : Argued: February 28, 2005 School District of Philadelphia, : Pride Coleman and Helena Coleman
FEATURE ARTICLE Nursing Home Care Act Cases Abate at Death By: Edward M. Wagner Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, Urbana A Statutory Cause of Action Attempted for a Violation of the Illinois Nursing Home
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Jay Ebersole, Administrator of the : Estate of Stephanie Jo Ebersole, : Deceased : : v. : No. 1732 C.D. 2014 : Argued: February 9, 2015 Southeastern Pennsylvania
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE DAVID FITZPATRICK, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF RYAN R. FITZPATRICK, Plaintiff, v. Docket No. 2:10-CV-54-GZS KENNETH P. COHEN, Defendant. ORDER
McCulloch v. Maryland 1819 Appellant: James William McCulloch Appellee: State of Maryland Appellant s Claim: That a Maryland state tax imposed on the Bank of the United States was unconstitutional interference
Going to Court as a Witness - July 2010 Going to Court as a Witness 1 Introduction Going to court can be stressful for many victims and witnesses. If you need to give evidence in a criminal trial, we hope
The Family Medical Leave Act Overview By Tracy A. Cinocca A general rule in many states is that an employment contract is terminable-at-will, which means that either the employer or the employee has the
LC Paper No. CB(2)517/05-06(01) SUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG 1. This is a submission of the Recovery
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-1110 Faron L. Clark, Respondent, vs. Sheri Connor, et al., Defendants, Vydell Jones, Appellant. Filed January 21, 2014 Affirmed Hooten, Judge Cass County District
Illinois Fund Doctrine Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel By: Michael Todd Scott State Farm Insurance Company, Bloomington The Illinois Fund Doctrine, Can It Be Avoided? I. Introduction Since
ACTIVITY 3 A patient is admitted into an NHS trust hospital for surgery to repair a hernia. Unfortunately, by mistake, a swab is left inside the patient who has to return to theatre for a second operation.
CAN FAMILY MEMBERS SUE IN AN AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT CASE IN FLORIDA? When you are involved in an automobile accident, you suffer physical, emotional and financial damages 1 When you are involved in an automobile
QUESTION NO. 3 Amendment to Titles 1 and 3 of the Nevada Revised Statutes CONDENSATION (ballot question) Shall Title 1 of the Nevada Revised Statutes governing attorneys, and Title 3 of the Nevada Revised
STUC Response to the Scottish Government s Making Justice Work - Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill May 2013 Introduction The STUC is Scotland s trade union centre. Its purpose is to co-ordinate, develop and
A GUIDE TO INDIANA WORKER S COMPENSATION 2004 EDITION MACEY SWANSON AND ALLMAN 445 North Pennsylvania Street Suite 401 Indianapolis, IN 46204-1800 Phone: (317) 637-2345 Fax: (317) 637-2369 A GUIDE TO INDIANA
No. 89-261 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1990 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, -vs- Plaintiff and Respondent, THE ESTATE OF GARY NELSON BRAUN, Deceased, and CHESTER V. BRAUN,
WHEN A CHILD MAY HAVE A TORT CLAIM: WHAT S THE CHILD S COURT- APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO DO? The Oregon Child Advocacy Project Professor Leslie J. Harris and Child Advocacy Fellows Colin Love-Geiger and Alyssa
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 15, 2000 Cornelia G. Clark Acting Clerk, Court of Appeals of Wisconsin NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Division One STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent, vs. No. SD31758 JOHN S. BYERS, Filed October 16, 2012 Defendant-Appellant. AFFIRMED APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20507 Commissioner Constance S. Barker Jeremy Nathan, Complainant, v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, Department of Justice (Federal