EPEAT Program Guidelines
|
|
- June Skinner
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EPEAT Program Guidelines Published 8 January 2015 By The Green Electronics Council EPEAT Program Guidelines 1
2 Context This EPEAT Program Guidelines document is part of a set of documents that describe the EPEAT green electronics product registration system or scheme. It is the most general document of the set. For more detail please refer to the appropriate document. EPEAT Program Guidelines EPEAT Standards Development EPEAT Product Registration System EPEAT Promotion and Messaging EPEAT Requirements of Manufacturers EPEAT Requirements of PREs ISO EPEAT Program Guidelines 2
3 Contents Context Introduction Changes from previous version General Program Information Program Overview Authority and Governance Roles and Functions Product Environmental Performance Standards in EPEAT Required and Optional Criteria Product Ratings: EPEAT Bronze, Silver and Gold Product Criteria and Corporate Criteria Geographic Applicability of EPEAT Product Registration and the EPEAT Registry The EPEAT Product Registration System Selection and Oversight of PREs Desk Review Verification Use of EPEAT Name and Marks The EPEAT Name and Marks Monitoring and Enforcement of Proper Use of Marks Appropriate Messaging Related to EPEAT and Green Electronics Measuring Program Effectiveness EPEAT Environmental Benefits Calculator Sales Reporting and Annual Environmental Benefits Report For More Information EPEAT Program Guidelines 3
4 1 Introduction EPEAT is a comprehensive environmental rating system that helps purchasers identify greener electronic equipment. These EPEAT Program Guidelines provide guidance and general information about EPEAT and are intended to be a roadmap for navigating various aspects of EPEAT. These EPEAT Program Guidelines are also one of the controlling documents for EPEAT, along with the following: EPEAT Product Registration System EPEAT Requirements of PREs EPEAT Requirements of Manufacturers (coming soon) 1.1 Changes from previous version This is an update to the original document dated November 19, The updates were intended to apply more consistent formatting and wording to the set of documents and are not intended to be substantive changes. 2 General Program Information 2.1 Program Overview Electronic products are responsible for many significant advances to our quality of life in the last hundred years. Yet, the environmental and public health impacts of electronic products are significant and span the entire product life-cycle from extraction of resources, through manufacturing, use, and end-of-life. Though these global impacts are substantial there are few ways to differentiate products on their environmental attributes at their time of purchase. EPEAT is a comprehensive registration program that helps purchasers identify electronic products that have superior environmental performance and helps manufacturers gain market recognition for reducing the environmental and public health impacts of their products. 2.2 Authority and Governance EPEAT was developed by a broad group of diverse stakeholders representing product manufacturers, component suppliers, environmental advocacy organizations, government representatives, large purchasers of electronics, retailers, electronics recyclers, academic researchers and others. The development and start-up of EPEAT were supported by cooperative agreements from the US EPA. In 2005 the Green Electronics Council was selected in a competitive bid process to manage EPEAT. EPEAT is now managed by, and operates under the authority of, the Green Electronics Council (GEC), an independent not-for-profit corporation based in Portland, Oregon, USA. GEC serves the public interest by making the EPEAT program and its other programs and activities available to the global public without charge. GEC is overseen by a fiduciary board of directors. EPEAT is a program of GEC, and EPEAT staff are employees of GEC. EPEAT Program Guidelines 4
5 Because the activities of EPEAT impact the interests of many stakeholders, EPEAT maintains an Advisory Council that is comprised of a balanced representation of different stakeholder perspectives, to provide advice to the GEC board and management regarding the EPEAT program. Reference EPEAT Advisory Council Governance Policy 2.3 Roles and Functions In order to achieve its mission GEC supports the following key operational roles related to EPEAT which are discussed in more detail below: Setting the standards that define environmental performance leadership criteria for different types of electronic products. Certifying products to the standards, thus creating the EPEAT registry of greener electronics. GEC also supports the following supporting roles related to EPEAT: Promoting the use of EPEAT as a sound way to identify greener electronics. Researching the environmental impacts of electronics, and ways to reduce them. Educating stakeholders and the public on the environmental impact of electronics and what they can do to help reduce it. Evaluating the effectiveness of EPEAT in achieving its mission. To fulfill these roles and functions, GEC establishes partnerships with interested stakeholders, including product manufacturers, retailers, large purchasers of electronics, technical certification bodies, standards development organizations (SDOs), and other organizations. The nature of these partnerships and the roles these partners play are described below. 3 Product Environmental Performance Standards in EPEAT In order for EPEAT registration to apply to a type of product, the standard that establishes the environmental performance leadership criteria for that type of product must be accepted by EPEAT and implemented in the system. GEC may evaluate and use existing standards and, in cases where no suitable standard exists, GEC may support the development of a new standard. Reference Policy on Qualification of Standards for EPEAT Standards that are implemented in EPEAT are developed in formal voluntary consensus processes. All standards implemented in EPEAT to date have been developed within Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) that are accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). This assures that the standards achieve EPEAT s policy requirements of balanced and open participation and that no party, including GEC, dominates the process. The standards implemented in EPEAT must be leadership standards which only products with the highest environmental performance on the market can meet at the time of publication of the standards, and they must address the environmental impacts from the full life-cycle of the product, from extraction EPEAT Program Guidelines 5
6 of resources through manufacturing, use, and end-of-life. The standards are intended to be comprehensive and must address impacts in at least the following categories of environmental performance: reduction or elimination of environmentally sensitive materials, selection of environmentally preferable materials, design for end of life, life cycle extension, energy conservation, end-of-life management, corporate performance and product packaging. To date the following standards have been implemented in EPEAT, providing for registration of the identified types of products: The IEEE Standard for the Environmental Assessment of Personal Computer Products The IEEE Standard for the Environmental Assessment of Imaging Equipment The IEEE Standard for the Environmental Assessment of Televisions 3.1 Required and Optional Criteria Each criterion of standards implemented in EPEAT is identified as being either Required (or Prerequisite) or Optional. Required criteria must be met in order for a product to be EPEAT registered. Optional criteria represent higher levels of environmental leadership and may be met in order to achieve a higher rating. 3.2 Product Ratings: EPEAT Bronze, Silver and Gold The EPEAT system was developed to recognize three levels of environmental performance: EPEAT Bronze, Silver and Gold. This multi-tier rating recognizes the leading products and also provides manufacturers with increased recognition and incentive for achieving higher levels of performance. The product rating (B/S/G) is determined as follows: EPEAT Bronze rated products meet all the Required criteria EPEAT Silver rated products meet all the Required criteria and 50% of the Optional criteria EPEAT Gold rated products meet all the Required criteria plus 75% of the Optional criteria Thus, manufacturers may choose different criteria to focus on in order to achieve higher ratings, and different products with the same rating (i.e. EPEAT Gold) may meet different optional criteria. 3.3 Product Criteria and Corporate Criteria Specific criteria of standards implemented in EPEAT may relate either to the individual product, or may relate to the manufacturer. This distinction is identified in the criteria. Product criteria apply to the specific product, and corporate criteria apply to all products registered by the manufacturer. 3.4 Geographic Applicability of EPEAT The standards implemented in EPEAT contain criteria related to the product itself and to services that the manufacturer may provide that affect the environmental performance of the product, such as recycling services. Most of the requirements of standards implemented in EPEAT must be met equally in all countries (i.e. most criteria that relate to product content), but some criteria may be met in some EPEAT Program Guidelines 6
7 countries and not others. For example, a manufacturer may offer packaging take-back services in some countries and not others. The geographic applicability of each criterion is identified in the criterion. In order to maintain accurate communication to purchasers and the public, EPEAT maintains different product registries for different countries. Each country registry contains only products that are sold in that country, and reflects the environmental characteristics of the products sold there. Because some criteria might be met only in some countries, the product ratings (Gold/Silver/Bronze) may differ slightly by country. In order to maintain accurate communications to purchasers in each country, EPEAT s requirements for use of the EPEAT name and marks requires that manufacturers make statements that are correct and appropriate in the country in which they are made. 4 Product Registration and the EPEAT Registry EPEAT s primary purpose is to make available the EPEAT registry of environmentally preferred electronics at The registry is the list of products that are registered in the EPEAT system to standards that are implemented in the system. The EPEAT registry is populated by manufacturers voluntarily registering their products. Manufacturers formally participate in EPEAT by signing a License and Subscriber Agreement and paying the appropriate fee, and by contracting with one or more EPEAT approved Product Registration Entities (PREs). EPEAT maintains a list of approved PREs and their contact information on the EPEAT website. Once contracted, a PRE will make available to the manufacturer a secure portal to the EPEAT product registry database. The manufacturer then uses the portal to declare to the PRE the product s conformance to each criterion of the applicable product standard. A manufacturer s initial declarations are reviewed by the PRE, and on their approval are included in the public registry. Those detailed declarations to each criterion are available to the public in the database. The EPEAT Bronze, Silver and Gold ratings are calculated by the database software based on the criteria that the manufacturer claims for that product. 4.1 The EPEAT Product Registration System EPEAT operates a Conformity Assurance (CA) Program to ensure the on-going accuracy of the declarations in the registry and thereby maintain the credibility of EPEAT as a resource for purchasers. Reference The EPEAT Product Registration System The CA Program has three primary processes to ensure the accuracy of declarations in the database Selection and Oversight of PREs, Desk Review, and Verification Selection and Oversight of PREs The first major process for ensuring the accuracy of the registry is EPEAT s selection and oversight of the PREs that must be hired by each participating manufacturer. PREs are responsible for recruiting manufacturers and supporting them to make accurate declarations. PREs are competitive in the market. i.e. EPEAT does not control the pricing of PRE services and participating manufacturers are free to choose their PRE. EPEAT Program Guidelines 7
8 In order to ensure a consistent, credible, and rigorous conformity assurance program, EPEAT has established formal eligibility requirements that must be met for organizations to be approved as PREs, on-going requirements that must be met continuously, an audit process to assure that the requirements are met, processes for PREs to correct identified discrepancies, and processes for EPEAT to terminate PREs that fail to meet requirements. Reference EPEAT Requirements of PREs In order to maintain consistency of declarations in the registry, EPEAT maintains processes to provide guidance to all participating manufacturers, PREs, and other interested parties when questions arise about the details of conformance to standards implemented in EPEAT. Each PRE signs a contract with EPEAT that commits the PRE to follow the guidance and EPEAT Requirements of PREs. Contracts with all PREs are the same Desk Review A manufacturer s initial declarations do not appear in the public registry until they are reviewed and approved by the PRE to whom they were declared, consistent with the procedures of the EPEAT Product Registration System. This initial Desk Review of declarations ensures that the manufacturer understands the requirements of the standard, is making accurate declarations, and is prepared to demonstrate conformance when needed. When the PRE is confident that the initial declarations are accurate they will approve those declarations to appear on the public registry at which point the product is EPEAT registered. After the PRE has reviewed sufficient initial declarations of a manufacturer and is confident that the manufacturer is competent at making accurate declarations they may allow the manufacturer s declarations to appear in the public registry without review (referred to as off Desk Review ). After a manufacturer is off Desk Review they are in direct control of their product listings in the registry. They may add products, change their declarations, and remove products without review. The manufacturer s agreements with EPEAT and with their PRE obligate them to maintain accurate declarations at all times. The manufacturer is not required to notify EPEAT or their PRE when their products or processes change, but they are obligated to maintain accurate declarations. Thus, the public EPEAT registry is a dynamic and constantly changing database that accurately reflects the environmental characteristics of the products in it at all times. There is no periodic update process. The database defines the current state of product registration in real time Verification The third major process to ensure the accuracy of the registry is a rigorous surveillance program called verification. Verification tests the accuracy of specific declarations in the database on an on-going audit basis. All criteria of all products declared in all countries through all PREs are subject to verification at any time. Verification investigations are conducted without prior notice to the manufacturers, and they test the accuracy of declarations in the registry as they existed at the time the investigation began. A manufacturer may change their declarations at any time, but verification confirms that the declaration was accurate, even if it has since been changed. EPEAT Program Guidelines 8
9 Verification investigations are conducted in batches called verification rounds. Verification activities are covered by manufacturer s fees paid to EPEAT and to their PRE(s). There are no additional fees at the time of verification. EPEAT produces an annual budget and plan for verification that specifies a target number of investigations to be conducted each year, the planned number of rounds, and planned methods of investigation. The annual plans are publicly available and are posted here. EPEAT targets verification investigations, determining which criteria of which products will be investigated, and the method of investigation for each round. Investigations are targeted both randomly and for cause. In order to use Verification resources efficiently, most rounds are targeted at declarations that are at greater risk of being inaccurate. This is determined by the manufacturer s past performance, input from external parties, outlier declarations, etc. The investigations are conducted by auditors called Qualified Verifiers or QVs, working for the manufacturer s chosen PRE. At EPEAT s direction, QVs may use different methods to determine conformity. Sometimes the investigation is conducted by the QV buying a product on the open market and inspecting or testing it. More often the accuracy of the declaration is verified by the manufacturer providing evidence to the QV to demonstrate its accuracy. When the investigation is of this type the manufacturer has 30 days to provide the required evidence to prove conformance. When the investigation is complete the QV produces an Investigation Report describing the evidence collected and recommending Conformance or Nonconformance. The reports are reviewed for completeness by the PRE and forwarded to EPEAT. The Investigation Report is evaluated, and conformity is determined, by an independent Product Verification Committee, or PVC, maintained by EPEAT. The members of the PVC are contractors to EPEAT and are paid independent of their decisions. They are experts on various aspects of environmental performance of electronics and are free of conflicts of interest. Members of the PVC are identified here. The Investigation Reports do not identify the product or manufacturer being investigated to enable the PVC to determine conformity based only on the evidence collected and evaluated by the QV, blind to the specific manufacturer and product being investigated. Reference Policy on the Product Verification Committee If a manufacturer is found to have made an inaccurate declaration they are required to promptly correct the situation. They may do this by changing the declaration in the registry, by promptly correcting the underlying process or problem, or by removing the product from the registry. If they do not promptly take one of these actions EPEAT will remove the product from the registry. Thus, at the end of each round of verification all nonconformances have been resolved and the registry contains no known accuracies. In order to maintain public confidence in EPEAT, verification processes and results are transparent. The plan for each round of verification is published (after the state of the registry has been recorded), and the results of each round are published in a Verification Outcomes Report that identifies the manufacturers and products that received nonconformances and what action was taken to restore the accuracy of the registry. The Verification Round Plans and Verification Outcomes Reports are posted EPEAT Program Guidelines 9
10 here. This public disclosure of the results is a major incentive for the participating manufacturers to maintain accurate declarations. 5 Use of EPEAT Name and Marks 5.1 The EPEAT Name and Marks Manufacturers that participate in EPEAT have a license to use the EPEAT name and marks to promote the environmental preferability of their products. Reference EPEAT License and Subscriber Agreement Manufacturers are not required to use the name and marks on products or packaging. A product s status in the registry defines a manufacturer s ability to provide EPEAT registered products in real time. By searching the registry, purchasers and the public can ascertain a product s registration status at any time. The EPEAT certification marks are shown below: 5.2 Monitoring and Enforcement of Proper Use of Marks The EPEAT name and marks are registered in the US by the Green Electronics Council and are being secured in a growing number of countries worldwide. EPEAT licenses the use of the EPEAT name and marks only through formal license agreements. EPEAT is responsible for monitoring appropriate use of the EPEAT name and marks globally and for prosecuting offenders. EPEAT s agreement with PREs requires the PRE to report to EPEAT any observed inappropriate use. Reference Proper use of the EPEAT name and Marks 5.3 Appropriate Messaging Related to EPEAT and Green Electronics Many countries around the world have requirements for how manufacturers and others may communicate the environmental characteristics of their products. EPEAT recommends that manufacturers and others consult legal counsel as they promote their products to ensure compliance with local laws and regulations. EPEAT Program Guidelines 10
11 EPEAT also offers guidance on how to describe EPEAT and the greenness of EPEAT registered products. Reference EPEAT Messaging Guidelines 6 Measuring Program Effectiveness 6.1 EPEAT Environmental Benefits Calculator The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed a computer tool to evaluate the benefits that accrue as a result of the purchase of EPEAT registered products. The tool is available to the global public at no cost. Reference EPEAT Environmental Benefits Calculator The tool compares the purchase of a user specified number of EPEAT registered products to the same number of a conventional product, and applies a life-cycle approach to estimate the benefits to the environment that accrue from that purchase decision. This tool can also be used by manufacturers, retailers or resellers to gauge the impact of selling EPEAT registered products. 6.2 Sales Reporting and Annual Environmental Benefits Report EPEAT requires that participating manufacturers report their annual sales of EPEAT registered products in each country covered in EPEAT. By combining these global sales figures EPEAT is able to obtain the global annual sales of EPEAT registered products. By entering this sales data into the EPEAT Environmental Benefits Calculator EPEAT can estimate the environmental benefits of the sale or purchase of EPEAT registered products. EPEAT reports this data publicly by country and globally each year. Past reports can be found here. 7 For More Information Contact the Green Electronics Council at: Green Electronics Council 227 SW Pine St., Suite 300 Portland, OR USA Main phone: (503) EPEAT Program Guidelines 11
Standard Monitoring Procedures
Standard Monitoring Procedures GEO Certified Club and Course Management Golf Environment Organization 2 Quality Street North Berwick Scotland EH39 4HW T: +44 (0) 1620 895100 W: golfenvironment.org Reference:
More informationEnvironmental Certification Services: Certification Manual for Green Squared SM Tile and Installation Material Sustainability
SCS Green Squared SM Certification Manual 2011. Scientific Certification Systems Environmental Certification Services: Certification Manual for Green Squared SM Tile and Installation Material Sustainability
More informationGreening the Lifecycle of Office Equipment: The State Electronics Challenge Get Awarded for Your Success!
Greening the Lifecycle of Office Equipment: The State Electronics Challenge Get Awarded for Your Success! November 17, 2015 State Electronics Challenge Voluntary & free program targeted to municipal, regional,
More informationChain of Custody Standard
Responsible Supply of Fishmeal and Fish Oil Chain of Custody Standard A Tool for Voluntary Use in Markets for Products of Fishmeal and Fish oil Contents Page A Foreword... 3 B Principles of the Process.
More informationPrivate Certification to Inform Regulatory Risk-Based Oversight: Discussion Document
Private Certification to Inform Regulatory Risk-Based Oversight: Discussion Document 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 BACKGROUND... 3 PRIVATE CERTIFICATION SCHEMES VS. REGULATORY STANDARDS... 3 PRIVATE
More informationSCS FSC Chain-of-Custody Guidance for Certification of Multiple Sites
2000 Powell Street, Ste. 600 Emeryville, CA 94608 USA +1.510.452.8000 main +1.510.452.8001 fax www.scsglobalservices.com SCS FSC Chain-of-Custody Guidance for Certification of Multiple Sites Table of Contents
More informationForeword... 11 Introduction - The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI)... 11 Scope... 12 Section Overview... 12 Normative References...
Version 6.3 Overview Contents Foreword... 11 Introduction - The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI)... 11 Scope... 12 Section Overview... 12 Normative References... 13 9 Foreword Global Food Safety Initiative
More informationSafe Quality Food Food Safety Certification
Safe Quality Food Food Safety Certification John F. Schulz Director of Business Operations SQF Institute The Value of Third Party Accredited Auditing Understanding SQF 2000 in the Packaging Industry February
More informationCertification Manual. Fair Trade USA V2.0 English Version. SCS Global Services Manual
SCS Global Services Manual Certification Manual Fair Trade USA V2.0 English Version 2000 Powell Street, Ste. 600, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA +1.510.452.8000 main +1.510.452.8001 fax www.scsglobalservices.com
More informationKEY - Ethical Certifications and Memberships
KEY - Ethical Certifications and Memberships Australian BMP Cotton The Australian BMP Cotton trademark is the consumer s guarantee that the branded textile product they are buying is made of Australian
More informationCopyright, Language, and Version Notice The official language of this [Certification Protocol] is English. The current version of the [Certification
Copyright, Language, and Version Notice The official language of this [Certification Protocol] is English. The current version of the [Certification Protocol] is maintained on the Bonsucro website: www.bonsucro.com.
More informationCHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems
Date(s) of Evaluation: CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems Assessor(s) & Observer(s): Organization: Area/Field
More informationTOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT II QUALITY AUDIT
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT II Chapter 13: QUALITY AUDIT Dr. Shyamal Gomes Introduction: The term audit was defined in the 16th Century as the official examination of the accounts with verification by reference
More informationREQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATIONS TO THE MAGEN TZEDEK SERVICE MARK STANDARD
REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATIONS TO THE MAGEN TZEDEK SERVICE MARK STANDARD Foreword The Magen Tzedek Commission has established a standards and certification
More informationEPEAT CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROTOCOLS 4.4 Product longevity/life cycle extension
EPEAT CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROTOCOLS 4.4.1 Manufacturer warranty/service agreement 4.4.1.1 Required Availability of additional three year warranty or service agreement Verification Guidance This criterion
More informationIntroduction to Social Compliance & Its Business Benefits
Proposal for Conducting Seminar on Introduction to Social Compliance & Its Business Benefits Submitted to: Environment Agency, Abu Dhabi Table of Contents Summary..02 Seminar Objectives 02 Content Outline..02
More informationISO 50001 Energy Management System
ISO 50001 Energy Management System DETAILED GUIDE ISO 50001 Background It has been estimated that the ISO 50001 Energy Management Standard could have a positive impact on some 60% of the world s energy
More informationCertification Process Requirements
SAAS Certification Process Requirements SAAS Procedure 200 and ISO/IEC 17021 Social Accountability Accreditation Services, June 2010 Accreditation Process and Policies SAAS Normative Requirements SAAS
More informationPublicizing your ISO 9001 : 2008 or ISO 14 001: 2004 certification
ISO 9001 : 2008 or ISO 14 001: 2004 certification ISO ISO (International Organization for Standardization) is the source of the ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 families of quality and environmental management standards
More informationMOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE. LITS Computer Replacement and Support Strategy for Faculty and Staff Computers
MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE Revised 3/27/12 LITS Computer Replacement and Support Strategy for Faculty and Staff Computers This document outlines the Computer Replacement and Support Strategy for faculty and
More informationContact address: Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation c/o The Consumer Goods Forum 22/24 rue du Gouverneur Général Eboué 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux
Version 6.3 Contact address: Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation c/o The Consumer Goods Forum 22/24 rue du Gouverneur Général Eboué 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux France Secretariat email: gfsinfo@theconsumergoodsforum.com
More informationGreen Product Management
Green Product Management Wistron is not only a professional product design, manufacturing and aftersales service company, but also a provider of technical services. Equally our product development system
More informationInternational Organization for Standardization
International Organization for Standardization ISO 9001 What does it mean in the supply chain? Introduction As someone who is involved in the selection of suppliers and, possibly, responsible for purchasing
More information2015 CANADIAN ELECTRICAL CODE UPDATE TRAINING PROVIDER PROGRAM Guidelines
2015 CANADIAN ELECTRICAL CODE UPDATE TRAINING PROVIDER PROGRAM Guidelines Under this program, CSA Group has developed a training program that provides detailed instruction on all major aspects of the CE
More informationGreen-e Climate Stakeholder Process Voluntary GHG Project Certification Programs
VOLUNTARY GHG PROJECT CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS This document provides information to stakeholders about the Gold Standard, a voluntary GHG project certification program. This document is distributed to stakeholders
More informationFSC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
Forest Stewardship Council FSC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD Forest management evaluations ACCREDITATION Title: Document reference code: Scope: Forest management evaluations International Approval date: 31 August
More informationCanine Website System (CWS System) DHS/TSA/PIA-036 January 13, 2012
for the (CWS System) DHS/TSA/PIA-036 January 13, 2012 Contact Point Carolyn Y. Dorgham Program Manager, National Explosives Detection Canine Team Program Carolyn.Dorgham@dhs.gov Reviewing Official Mary
More informationWorld Tourism Organization RECOMMENDATIONS TO GOVERNMENTS FOR SUPPORTING AND/OR ESTABLISHING NATIONAL CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM
World Tourism Organization RECOMMENDATIONS TO GOVERNMENTS FOR SUPPORTING AND/OR ESTABLISHING NATIONAL CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM Introduction Certification systems for sustainable tourism
More informationPrinciples to be observed by Pre-LOUs that wish to integrate into the Interim Global Legal Entity Identifier System (GLEIS)
Principles to be observed by Pre-LOUs that wish to integrate into the Interim Global Legal Entity Identifier System (GLEIS) Executive Summary This note establishes the principles that should be observed
More informationQuality Management System Manual ISO9001:2008
Quality Management System Manual ISO9001:2008 Controlled Copy Rev. 3 Page 1 of 21 7/1/13 Table of Contents Company Profile...5 Past...5 Present...5 Mission...5 Vision...5 Locations...6 1 Scope...6 1.1
More informationChain of Custody of Forest Based Products - Requirements
PEFC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD Requirements for PEFC scheme users PEFC ST 2002:2013 2012-12-04 Enquiry Draft Chain of Custody of Forest Based Products - Requirements PEFC Council World Trade Center 1, 10
More informationThe criteria and guidelines Best Belgian Sustainability Report 2013 - Edition 2014
The criteria and guidelines Best Belgian Sustainability Report 2013 - Edition 2014 In order to progressively move to G4 guidelines as adopted in May 2013 by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and to
More informationDiscretionary Funding Policies and Procedures
0 Discretionary Funding Policies and Procedures New York City Council May 2014 1 City Council Discretionary Funding POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Preface Each year, Members of the Council allocate discretionary
More informationAn Alternative Method for Maintaining ISO 9001/2/3 Certification / Registration
International Accreditation Forum, Inc. An Alternative Method for Maintaining ISO 9001/2/3 Certification / Registration A Discussion Paper The International Accreditation Forum, Inc. (IAF) operates a program
More informationCasino Gaming Regulation
Chapter 4 Section 4.01 Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Casino Gaming Regulation Follow-up to VFM Section 3.01, 2010 Annual Report Background Casino gaming in Ontario is primarily overseen by two
More informationImplementing ISO 9001
If you are faced with implementing ISO 9001, or anticipate it may soon become a requirement for your organization, keep reading. This article identifies reasons to implement the standard, summarizes its
More information[SUBMITTED BY EMAIL TO: secretary@dps.ny.gov] May 12, 2016
[SUBMITTED BY EMAIL TO: secretary@dps.ny.gov] May 12, 2016 Hon. Kathleen H. Burgess Secretary to the Commission New York State Public Service Commission Three Empire Plaza Albany, New York 12223-1350 RE:
More informationGENERAL OPERATIONS MANUAL FOR ASTM PRODUCT CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
GENERAL OPERATIONS MANUAL FOR ASTM PRODUCT CERTIFICATION PROGRAM INTERNATIONAL Standards Worldwide Issued September 25, 2012 Version 5.0 BY AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL ASTM
More informationCertification Fee Structure for Green-e Climate and Green-e Energy
Certification Fee Structure for Green-e Climate and Green-e Energy Formerly Appendix C: Green-e Energy Certification Fee Schedule and Appendix C: Green-e Climate Certification Fee Schedule Each entity
More informationCERTIFICATION OF SEAFARER RECRUITMENT AND PLACEMENT SERVICE PROVIDERS
Guide for Certification of Seafarer Recruitment and Placement Service Providers GUIDE FOR CERTIFICATION OF SEAFARER RECRUITMENT AND PLACEMENT SERVICE PROVIDERS AUGUST 2011 American Bureau of Shipping Incorporated
More informationDOCUMENT CS/1: SCHEME DESCRIPTION AND BENEFITS
WELDING FABRICATOR CERTIFICATION SCHEME DOCUMENT CS/1: SCHEME DESCRIPTION AND BENEFITS 6 th Edition July 2012 Issued under the authority of the Governing Board for Certification All correspondence should
More information15 Guiding Principles
Health, Safety, Environment and Corporate Social Responsibility 15 Guiding Principles 2013 Message from President and CEO 0 New Gold has a complementary portfolio of assets in different countries and cultures
More informationMQA EDUCATION AND TRAINING QUALITY ASSURANCE
EDUCATION AND TRAINING QUALITY ASSURANCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING QUALITY ASSURANCE 1. Functions The proviso for the accreditation of Education and Training Quality Assurance (ETQA) bodies was promulgated
More informationOverview of GFSI and Accredited Certification
Overview of GFSI and Accredited Certification Overview of GFSI and Accredited Certification Introduction Global food trade is expanding and providing consumers with access to a wider variety of foods all
More informationFor the Design, Installation, Commissioning & Maintenance of Fixed Gaseous Fire Suppression Systems
BAFE Scheme: SP203-3 Version 1: July 2008 Amendment No: 1 Fire Protection Industry Scheme, Reference SP203 Part 3 For the Design, Installation, Commissioning & Maintenance of Fixed Gaseous Fire Suppression
More informationAUDIT PROTOCOL FOR THE VICTORIAN WATER QUALITY MONITORING NETWORK
AUDIT PROTOCOL FOR THE VICTORIAN WATER QUALITY MONITORING NETWORK ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY June 1999 AUDIT PROTOCOL FOR THE VICTORIAN WATER QUALITY MONITORING NETWORK, June 1999 David Robinson
More informationUsing Quality Assurance Standards. Don t assume quality, ensure quality
Using Quality Assurance Standards Don t assume quality, ensure quality Learning Objectives At the end of this module, you will be able to: Identify the difference between Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality
More informationCamber Quality Assurance (QA) Approach
Camber Quality Assurance (QA) Approach Camber s QA approach brings a tested, systematic methodology, ensuring that our customers receive the highest quality products and services, delivered via efficient
More informationSpillemyndigheden s Certification Programme Change Management Programme
SCP.06.00.EN.1.0 Table of contents Table of contents... 2 1 Objectives of the change management programme... 3 1.1 Scope of this document... 3 1.2 Version... 3 2 Certification... 4 2.1 Certification frequency...
More informationTo join Achilles UVDB, visit www.achilles.com/uvdb, call +44 (0)1235 861118 or email enquiries@achilles.com
UVDB Achilles UVDB FAQ s About Achilles UVDB What is the Achilles UVDB Supplier Information Management Service? Achilles UVDB is the community for the UK utilities industry. It enables the utilities sector
More informationAdditional Chain of Custody requirements
CERTIFIED SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD Marine Stewardship Council Additional Chain of Custody requirements -- Normative (version 1.4) Date of release: 31 January 2014 This document is an extract from Annex BD of
More informationEnvironmentally and socially responsible uranium mining CleanUranium: Executive Summary 07/25/2015
Environmentally and socially responsible uranium mining CleanUranium: Executive Summary 07/25/2015 Background and objectives One of the factors on the environmental impact of nuclear energy is the way
More informationFSSC 22000-Q. Certification module for food quality in compliance with ISO 9001:2008. Quality module REQUIREMENTS
FSSC 22000-Q Certification module for food quality in compliance with ISO 9001:2008 Quality module REQUIREMENTS Foundation for Food Safety Certification Gorinchem, The Netherlands: 2015 Version Control
More informationUK Aerospace Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Auditor Authentication Scheme
How to apply for and maintain UK Aerospace Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Auditor Authentication Scheme Contents 1. General information 2 2. IRCA Aerospace auditor authentication grades 3 3. Criteria
More informationGreen IT 2012: Sustainable Electronics 2012 DOE Information Management Conference
Green IT 2012: Sustainable Electronics 2012 DOE Information Management Conference Edwin Luevanos Office of Corporate IT Project Management (IM-40) Jeff Eagan Office of Sustainability Support (HS-21) 1
More informationAmerican National Standards. value of the ANS designation
American National Standards value of the ANS designation accreditation and approval The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) coordinates, facilitates, and promotes the development of voluntary
More informationwww.greenglobe.com Green Globe Certification Policy V1.6
www.greenglobe.com Green Globe Certification Policy V1.6 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 GREEN GLOBE CERTIFICATION... 1 INDUSTRY SECTORS... 1 GREEN GLOBE CERTIFICATION POLICY V1.6... 2 1. STRUCTURE
More informationQUALITY MANAGEMENT IN VTS
CHAPTER 18: QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN VTS Background At its twenty-fourth session, the IMO Assembly adopted resolution A.973(24) on the Code for the Implementation of Mandatory IMO Instruments and resolution
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU)
L 122/22 Official Journal of the European Union 11.5.2011 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 445/2011 of 10 May 2011 on a system of certification of entities in charge of maintenance for freight wagons and
More informationCertification Process Requirements
SAAS Certification Process Requirements SAAS Procedure 200 Social Accountability Accreditation Services, June 2010 Accreditation Process and Policies SAAS Normative Requirements SAAS maintains a set of
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES. (Adopted as of June 2, 2014)
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (Adopted as of June 2, 2014) The following corporate governance guidelines have been approved and adopted by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Arista Networks, Inc.
More informationCompliance Management Systems
Certification Scheme Y03 Compliance Management Systems ISO 19600 ONR 192050 Issue V2.1:2015-01-08 Austrian Standards plus GmbH Dr. Peter Jonas Heinestraße 38 A-1020 Vienna, Austria E-Mail: p.jonas@austrian-standards.at
More informationPrivacy Policy. February, 2015 Page: 1
February, 2015 Page: 1 Revision History Revision # Date Author Sections Altered Approval/Date Rev 1.0 02/15/15 Ben Price New Document Rev 1.1 07/24/15 Ben Price Verify Privacy Grid Requirements are met
More informationConstruction Management Standards of Practice
Construction Management Standards of Practice 2010 Edition Advancing Professional Construction/ Program Management Worldwide. 7926 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 800 McLean, VA 22102-3303 USA 703.356.2622 703.356.6388
More informationProject Risk Management: Independent Software QA Ensures Success
Project Risk Management: Independent Software QA Ensures Success Introduction We hear the stories time after time: A group of talented, hard-working, motivated software engineers has once again produced
More informationq-1'08 date ofpublication in the Federal Register]. www.regulations.gov.
- - p p p p p DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Display Date q-1'08 Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA-2008-N-01831 Third-Party Certification Programs for Foods and Feeds; Request for Comments
More informationAPX VCS Registry Operating Procedures. September 2012
APX VCS Registry Operating Procedures September 2012 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 ABOUT THE APX VCS REGISTRY... 1 1.2 GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE... 1 2 ACCOUNTS AND USER REGISTRATION... 2 2.1 PARTICIPATION
More informationBriefing Note on the ICGLR Regional Certification Mechanism
Briefing Note on the ICGLR Regional Certification Mechanism 1. The ICGLR s commitment to addressing the illegal exploitation of natural resources in the Great Lakes Region The International Conference
More informationJune 2008 Report No. 08-038. An Audit Report on The Department of Information Resources and the Consolidation of the State s Data Centers
John Keel, CPA State Auditor An Audit Report on The Department of Information Resources and the Consolidation of the State s Data Centers Report No. 08-038 An Audit Report on The Department of Information
More informationCriminal Justice Offender Tracking System Certification Program Requirements
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Criminal Justice Offender Tracking System Certification Program Requirements NIJ CR-1004.00.00 June 2012 NCJ xxxxxx National
More informationRule R8-65. REPORT BY PERSONS CONSTRUCTING ELECTRIC GENERATING FACILITIES
Rule R8-65. REPORT BY PERSONS CONSTRUCTING ELECTRIC GENERATING FACILITIES EXEMPT FROM CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. (a) All persons exempt from certification under G.S. 62-110.1(g) shall file with the Commission
More informationINTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE OF INTERNAL AUDITING (STANDARDS)
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE OF INTERNAL AUDITING (STANDARDS) Revised: October 2012 i Table of contents Attribute Standards... 3 1000 Purpose, Authority, and Responsibility...
More informationYour Software Quality is Our Business. INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION (IV&V) WHITE PAPER Prepared by Adnet, Inc.
INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION (IV&V) WHITE PAPER Prepared by Adnet, Inc. February 2013 1 Executive Summary Adnet is pleased to provide this white paper, describing our approach to performing
More informationQUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS General Requirements. Documentation Requirements. General. Quality Manual. Control of Documents
Chapter j 38 Self Assessment 729 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS General Requirements 1. Establishing and implementing a documented quality management system 2. Implementing a documented quality
More informationCONSULTATION DELIVERING LIFETIME ASSURED BEEF
CONSULTATION DELIVERING LIFETIME ASSURED BEEF January 2015 (Responses by Friday 27 th March 2015) 1 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cattle are currently considered assured under the Red Tractor scheme
More informationI S O I E C 2 7 0 0 2 2 0 1 3 I N F O R M A T I O N S E C U R I T Y A U D I T T O O L
15.1 ESTABLISH SECURITY AGREEMENTS WITH SUPPLIERS 15.1.1 EXPECT SUPPLIERS TO COMPLY WITH RISK MITIGATION AGREEMENTS Do you clarify the information security risks that exist whenever your suppliers have
More informationCICS Quick Guide to ISO 50001, the New Energy Management System Standard
CICS Quick Guide to ISO 50001, the New Energy Management System Standard Author: Ann-Marie Currey Energy is high up on everyone s agenda at the moment; from governments worldwide who are keen to support
More informationDepartment of Homeland Security Web Portals
for the Department of Homeland Security Web Portals June 15, 2009 Contact Point Mary Ellen Callahan Chief Privacy Officer Department of Homeland Security (703) 235-0780 Page 2 Abstract Many Department
More informationLEAF Marque certification of. LEAF Producer Groups. Quality Management system requirements 2009
LEAF Marque certification of LEAF Producer Groups Quality Management system requirements 2009 Valid from 1 st January 2009 The LEAF Marque scheme aims to give consumers confidence in the care farmers take
More informationPartner: Address: Tel. No.: Contact: Contact Title: Contact s email: Effective Date: Partner s Web Site(s):
Partner: Address: Tel. No.: Contact: Contact Title: Contact s email: Effective Date: Partner s Web Site(s): This Partner Program Agreement (the "Partner Agreement") is made and entered into between Register.com.
More informationOLB certification process for Forestry Companies GP01
OLB certification process for Forestry Companies GP01 Reference: GP01 OLB FC 1.2 version, 22/03/2013 Bureau Veritas Certification France 60 Général de Gaulle Avenue - 92046 Paris - La Défense Cedex - France
More informationTranslation Service Provider according to ISO 17100
www.lics-certification.org Certification Scheme S06 Translation Service Provider according to ISO 17100 Date of issue: V2.0, 2015-11-15 Austrian Standards plus GmbH Dr. Peter Jonas Heinestraße 38 1020
More informationIAF Mandatory Document
IAF MD15:2014. IAF Mandatory Document IAF MANDATORY DOCUMENT FOR THE COLLECTION OF DATA TO PROVIDE INDICATORS OF MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CERTIFICATION BODIES PERFORMANCE (IAF MD15:2014) Issued: 14 July 2014
More informationPaul Scheihing, U.S. Department of Energy Joe Almaguer, Dow Chemical Company Pamela de los Reyes and Tracy Fisher, Energetics Incorporated
Superior Energy Performance cm : A Roadmap for Continual Improvement in Energy Efficiency Paul Scheihing, U.S. Department of Energy Joe Almaguer, Dow Chemical Company Pamela de los Reyes and Tracy Fisher,
More informationBaseline requirements Version 1.0 Errata
Baseline requirements Version 1.0 Errata 1. Auditor Qualification Requirements Effective 1 Jan 2013 A. In Section 3 (References), add: ETSI Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Trust Service
More informationQUALITY ASSURANCE GUIDE FOR GREEN BUILDING RATING TOOLS
World Green Building Council Rating Tools Task Group: QUALITY ASSURANCE GUIDE FOR GREEN BUILDING RATING TOOLS Version 1.0 _ 2013 /(DRAFT_01 /Sept_13) INTRODUCTION This guide has been developed as a part
More informationDRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: July 2015
Third-Party Auditor/Certification Body Accreditation for Food Safety Audits: Model Accreditation Standards Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance
More informationEnhancing Food Safety Through Third Party Certification
Enhancing Food Safety Through Third Party Certification GLOBAL FOOD SAFETY INITIATIVE Enhancing Food Safety Through Third Party Certification Table of Contents An Overview of GFSI and Accredited Certification
More informationR000. Revision Summary Revision Number Date Description of Revisions R000 Feb. 18, 2011 Initial issue of the document.
2 of 34 Revision Summary Revision Number Date Description of Revisions Initial issue of the document. Table of Contents Item Description Page 1. Introduction and Purpose... 5 2. Project Management Approach...
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES (CBs)
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES (CBs) AUGUST 2014 1. Introduction National Information Technology Authority (NITA-U) was established by the Act of Parliament (National Information Technology
More informationRSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems. For accreditation and certification bodies
RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems For accreditation and certification bodies Adopted by the RSPO Board of Governors on 21 November 2014 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Definitions... 5 3. Certification
More informationENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PLANNING GUIDANCE UNDER THE TOXICS USE REDUCTION ACT (TURA)
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PLANNING GUIDANCE UNDER THE TOXICS USE REDUCTION ACT (TURA) Published in accordance with MGL c. 21I and 310 CMR 50.00 Developed in collaboration with: Toxics Use Reduction
More information2013 Communication on Progress
2013 Communication on Progress Participant The Coca-Cola Company Published 2014/01/02 Time period January 2012 November 2013 Files 2012-2013-gri-report_Coca-Cola.pdf (English) Links http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainability
More informationMSC Group Chain of Custody (CoC) Guidance for Non-Reduced Risk Groups
MSC Group Chain of Custody (CoC) Guidance for Non-Reduced Risk Groups 1. About this document This document is a non-normative guidance document intended to help companies understand CoC requirements. The
More informationQuality Management Plan
Quality Management Plan 6666 West Quincy Avenue Denver, Colorado 80235-3098 Telephone (303) 347-6100 September 1, 2011 CONTENTS Page APPROVALS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ii vi 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 FOUNDATION
More informationTo develop, enhance and effectively regulate the accounting profession in Lesotho through:
Vision To be a world class regulatory and professional accountancy body in Lesotho, that is an organization of choice to best serve the interests of its local and international stakeholders, and which
More informationSafetyMAP Initial Level User Guide
SafetyMAP Initial Level User Guide Initial Level User Guide 4th Edition Introduction This User Guide has been produced to support SafetyMAP: Auditing Health and Safety Management Systems, 4 th Edition
More informationForest Stewardship Council
PROPOSAL: Development of a new Normative Document Name of normative document: FSC Procedure for Demonstrating the Impact of Forest Stewardship on Ecosystem Services (hereafter, The ES Procedure ) Type
More informationSQF Program Vocabulary
SQF Program Vocabulary 2nd Edition AMENDED JUNE 2009 Safe Quality Food Institute 2345 Crystal Drive, Suite 800 Arlington, VA 22202 USA 202-220-0635 www.sqfi.com SQF Institute is a division of the Food
More informationObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation
Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation International Organization of Securities Commissions June 2010 CONTENTS Page Foreword and Executive Summary 3 A Principles Relating to the Regulator 4
More information