KD In the Community...

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "KD In the Community..."

Transcription

1 Minority Mentoring Picnic THe KDQuarterly KD In the Community... winter 2012 The attorneys of Kubicki Draper are dedicated to serving their communities throughout the year. They often volunteer their time with local organizations, and the offices also come together as a unit to give back to their communities. Participants in the Walk for PKD EDITOR Bretton Albrecht IN THIS ISSUE 2 Summary Judgements Are Back in Slip and Fall Cases 3 Spotlight on Charles Watkins 4 Purchase-Money Security Interests 5 Education: Seminars & Speaking Engagements 6-7 Cases/ Appellate Results 8 KD Announcements New Additions Jorge Santeiro, Jr. and Karina Perez of the Tampa office participated in the Great American Teach-In. This event, held throughout the Tampa Bay area, is designed to teach local students about the benefits of education and career planning. Jorge Santeiro, Jr., spoke to middle school students at Tampa Charter School about the Bill of Rights, the practice of law, and the importance of education. Karina Perez spoke to high school students at Plant City High School about planning for college, choosing a career, and practicing law. Harold Saul of the Tampa office, along with family, friends and other KD attorneys and staff participated in the Walk for PKD for the fourth consecutive year. The team was captained by Harold Saul and was named Ivan s Investors for a PKD Cure in honor of Harold s father. The Team raised over $21,000 and was the top team for the Tampa Walk. Mentoring Tent hosted by KD Kendra Therrell of the Fort Myers/Naples office helped coordinate the annual Trunk or Treat event at Cape Coral First United Methodist Church. This free community outreach provides a safe Halloween alternative for families and children. Trick-or-treating, free food, games and bounce houses were provided. The event involved coordinating more than 120 volunteers and vendors, and had more than 3,000 attendees from the community. Charles Watkins, Nicole Ellis, Radia Turay and Becky Brock of the Miami office recently took an active role in guiding and mentoring several law school students at the Annual Minority Mentoring Picnic hosted at Amelia Earhart Park in the Miami area. Once again, Kubicki Draper contributed to the event as a sponsor and hosted a mentoring tent. Kubicki Draper is honored to have participated in this worthy effort to give back to our community and to help the next generation of attorneys find their footing, sure and safe, upon the rock of service.

2 Based on a recent decision from the Third District Court of Appeals in Delgado v. Laundromax, Inc., 65 So.3d 1087 (3 DCA 2011), Summary Judgments are once again obtainable in slip and fall actions pending in the courts of Florida. As many adjusters are probably aware, Summary Judgment Motions were frequently filed in slip and fall cases in Florida prior to Indeed, many courts were inclined to grant Summary Judgment Motions in slip and fall cases when the evidence showed that the condition was not created by the premises owner and where the plaintiff failed to offer evidence regarding how long the condition was present before the accident (ie, lack of notice). [See Winn Dixie v. Marcotte, 553 So.2d 213 (5 DCA 1989); and Hamideh v. K-Mart, 648 So.2d 824 (3 DCA 1995)] On the other hand, where a savvy plaintiff s attorney submitted evidence that the slip and fall condition had footprints, wheel marks, or other evidence of age, then the liability issue regarding the premises owner s notice of the condition presented a jury question and Summary Judgments were denied. [See Woods v. Winn-Dixie, 621 So.2d 710 (3 DCA 1993); and Washington v. Pic-N-Pay Supermarket, 453 So.2d 508 (4 DCA 1984)] In short, victory or defeat in a slip and fall lawsuit was largely dependent on the facts and evidence surrounding the accident and the respective legal skills of the lawyers representing the parties. For reasons that are not entirely clear, the Florida Supreme Court decided to overturn the apple cart in the controversial 2001 case Owens v. Publix, 802 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2001). In Owens v. Publix, the plaintiff slipped and fell on the proverbial banana peel. Although there were some conflicts in the evidence regarding the age of the banana peel, the trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of Publix which found that there was not sufficient evidence on the notice issue to hold the supermarket liable.the directed verdict was later affirmed by the Fifth District Court of Appeals. Rather than simply reversing the directed verdict and sending the notice issue back to the jury, the Florida Supreme Court decided to create a brand new legal standard against premise liability owners who are sued in slip and fall actions. In doing so, the Florida Supreme Court held that the existence of a transient condition on the defendant s premises created a rebuttable presumption against the defendant that the premises were not maintained with reasonable care. This ruling had the effect of shifting the burden of proof on the primary liability issue to the defendant instead of the plaintiff, who historically had this burden of proof. Further, in Owens v. Publix the Florida Supreme Court created an additional basis for liability against premises owners under the mode of operation theory. Under the mode of operation theory, the defendant s actual or constructive notice of a transient condition was no longer relevant if the plaintiff could prove that the defendant s mode of operation at the business was such that slip and fall conditions would be created on a regular basis. This mode of operation theory created a separate basis for negligence against the premises owner. SUMMARY JUDGMENTS ARE BACK IN SLIP AND FALL CASES! By Gregory J. Prusak 2 In response to the legal and financial burdens that the Owens v. Publix decision placed on businesses throughout Florida, the legislature enacted F.S in F.S restored the balance in the universe and placed the burden of proof in slip and fall actions back on the plaintiff. However, the statute stated that actual or constructive notice of the transitory foreign object or substance is not a required element of proof to this claim...but may be offered by any party together with all of the evidence. F.S did not contain any language regarding Summary Judgments, nor any provisions which created an absolute defense for a business or premise owner sued for a slip and fall accident. Accordingly, the Plaintiff s Bar has argued for years that Summary Judgments are no longer obtainable in slip and fall actions and that issues regarding the actual or constructive notice of a business owner are in all cases matters for the jury to determine. It should be noted that the FL legislature passed a new slip and fall statute on July 1, 2010, known as F.S The provisions of F.S were more favorable to business owners and again placed the burden of proving slip and fall liability on the plaintiff. While F.S does not mention the mode of operation theory, section 1(b) allows the judge or jury to factor in whether the condition occurred with regularity and was therefore foreseeable. With this history in mind, the Third District Court of Appeals heard argument in Delgado v. Laundromax on June 15, In Delgado v. Laundromax, the facts showed that the plaintiff slipped and fell on a clear liquid (water) after taking a few steps onto the premises of the laundromat. The accident occurred in 2003, accordingly the defendant argued that the 2002 version of the statute (ie, F.S ) was applicable. During discovery, the plaintiff admitted that she had no evidence that the clear liquid (water) substance was caused by the actions of the Defendant, that she did not know where the water came from, or how long the water was on the floor. Most importantly, with respect to the notice issue, the plaintiff admitted that she did not know of any person at Laundromax who was aware of the existence of the condition prior to her fall. Based on the foregoing record, the Defendant, Laundromax filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. In response, the plaintiff argued that liability issues under F.S invariably give rise to jury questions on the issue of whether the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the transient condition prior to the accident. The trial judge rejected these arguments by plaintiff s counsel and granted a Summary Judgment in favor of Laundromax. In doing so, the trial court held that the plaintiff failed to provide any actual or constructive evidence that the defendant knew or should have known about the condition prior to the fall. In affirming the SummaryJudgment, the Third DCA cited Broz v. Winn-Dixie, 546 So.2d 83 (3 DCA 1989) and noted that the mere presence of water on the floor is not enough to establish constructive notice. continued at bottom of next page

3 I N T H E S P O T L I G H T : For Charles Watkins, a shareholder in the Miami office, the most rewarding aspect of being a civil defense attorney is achieving justice for his clients. He explains that many do not appreciate how life-altering it is for people to be sued and forced to undergo the resulting litigation process. One of his treasured mementos is a note from a client, expressing her appreciation for the defense verdict Mr. Watkins obtained in a case where the client was sued for extravagant damages following a minor auto accident. Mr. Watkins enjoys trying cases to verdict and has done so over 70 times. One of the highlights of his career is obtaining a complete defense jury verdict for his client in an auto accident case where the plaintiffs were seriously injured and the jury awarded damages against the other (non-client) defendants totaling over $20 million. Originally from Jamaica, Mr. Watkins comes from a family of lawyers. His father was a jurist and during his lifelong practice, one of the foremost experts in constitutional law in the Caribbean. He also has a daughter, brother, nephew, and cousin who are lawyers, with another nephew in law school. After his family moved to Florida, Mr. Watkins earned his Bachelor s degree from Barry University and his Masters in International Business from Florida International University. Following his graduation, he worked as an adjuster for a major insurance company, where he was quickly promoted to claims manager. Mr. Watkins earned his Juris Doctorate from the University of Miami, completing the four-year program in just three years. Charles Watkins Mr. Watkins is passionate about defending the rights of his clients, putting a stop to overreaching plaintiffs, and bringing out the truth. Upon being admitted to The Florida Bar, Mr. Watkins joined Kubicki Draper. He speaks with appreciation about how Dan Draper (one of the firm s founding shareholders) in particular took an active role in mentoring him and set an example for training excellent lawyers. Mr. Watkins, who has now been with the firm for almost twenty years, took that example to heart and actively mentors young lawyers and law students, both at Kubicki Draper and in the community. Most recently, he helped direct and organize the firm s participation in a Minority Mentoring Picnic for law school students in the Miami area. Mr. Watkins service and involvement in the community and legal profession is far too extensive to detail here. The highlights include his mentoring involvement, founding the MGC Scholarship Fund to help qualified students, and his past service as a guardian ad litem defending the rights of children. In addition to these and other community and legal organizations, he is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA). He is also a member of the Council on Litigation Management (CLM), which promotes the highest standards in claims and litigation management in Insurance, Corporate Industry and among Defense Counsel. As one of the CLM s National Diversity Chairs, Mr. Watkins helped plan and is one of the moderators at the prestigious 2011 Diversity Forum in New York City. When asked about his greatest achievements, Mr. Watkins responds that he credits his success in life and lawyering to his faith and his family. Mr. Watkins and his wife Audrey have been married for over thirty years and have two grown children who are also successful with their education and careers. He says he is very blessed to have achieved so much, both personally and professionally. In a further attempt to defeat the Motion for Summary Judgment, the plaintiff argued on appeal that there was a jury question under F.S regarding whether or not Laundromax had a negligent mode of operation with respect to the manner in which the defendant maintained the premises. However, the Third DCA held that the plaintiff offered no evidence of a negligent mode of operation despite the fact that the suit had been in litigation since The Third DCA likewise noted that the plaintiff testified in discovery that the laundromat was always clean and orderly on her prior visits to the defendant s premises. Accordingly, the Delgado v. Laundromax decision establishes that Summary Judgments are proper in slip and fall actions even though the legislature has enacted two different statutes on this premises liability issue (ie, F.S replaced by F.S ). in order to prevail by Summary Judgment, the premises owner must prove (1) that it did not create the transient condition; and (2) that there was no actual or constructive notice regarding the age of the transient 3 condition prior to the accident. In addition, depending on the nature of the defendant s business, the plaintiff may need to prove that the subject condition occurs frequently and is thus foreseeable under the defendant s mode of operation to avoid Summary Judgment. Please note that there is considerable debate in the legal community regarding whether the new slip and fall statute, FS is to be applied retroactively or in a prospective manner after its effective date of July 1, Many trial courts are applying the statute in a retroactive manner upon timely motions by defense counsel. However, in Kelso v. Big Lots, 2010 WL (M.D. Fla. 2010), the Middle District ruled that FS is substantive in nature and should not be applied retroactively. That being said, it's still a good strategy to try and persuade the trial court to apply the statute retroactively. Indeed. FS does not contain any provisions on the "mode of operation" theory. Therefore, an argument can be made to the court that the doctrine is no longer applicable in slip and fall actions.

4 Purchase-Money Security Interests By Frank Delia The focus of this article is a particular type of security interest, known as a Purchase-Money Security Interest or PMSI, which arises when a buyer borrows money to make a purchase and immediately gives the lender a security interest in the item purchased with the borrowed funds. The holder of a PMSI will generally have priority over another creditor who has a security interest in the same item. When the issue of lien priorities arises, the person who understands the requirements for a PMSI will be equipped to argue either that the PMSI is valid or invalid, depending on whether the person seeks to enforce the PMSI or seeks to challenge its priority. I have litigated this issue from both sides of the fight. What I want to impart in this article is that, although most believe a PMSI is an air-tight lien with absolute priority, it actually is not. In determining whether a PMSI is valid or has priority, the saying is true that The Devil is In the Details. The key provision in Florida is section , Florida Statutes, which is entitled Priority of purchase-money security interests, and which provides in relevant part: Except as otherwise provided in subsection (7), a perfected purchase-money security interest in goods other than inventory or livestock has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same goods, and, except as otherwise provided in s , a perfected security interest in its identifiable proceeds also has priority, if the purchase-money security interest is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the collateral or within 20 days thereafter (1), Fla. Stat. A PMSI in inventory can also be created subject to certain requirements, such as giving written notice to current lien-holders. See (2), Fla. Stat. A PMSI may also apply when a bank or other lender gives value to enable the debtor to acquire rights in or the use of the collateral if the value is in fact used. See (7), Fla. Stat. That type of loan is often referred to as an enabling loan. Under section , four things must generally be done to properly form a PMSI in goods or inventory. First, a security agreement must be executed between the seller and buyer. Here, it is very important that the agreement relate only to the goods that will be transferred to the customer in the future. Second, the PMSI must be perfected by filling with the appropriate agency in the state where the customer is legally organized (UCC-1 Financing Statement). Third, the PMSI must be perfected prior to the customer receiving the goods (seller must file the Financing Statement before the goods are delivered). Fourth, the PMSI creditor must generally give written notice to a holder of a conflicting security interest if the holder of that conflicting security interest has filed a financing statement after giving a prior loan. The notice must inform the holder of the security interest that it intends to attach a PMSI and must list what is covered by item or type. A lender looking to acquire a PMSI should follow the above four guidelines and also consult the full statute for further guidance. A lender seeking to oppose a PMSI claim can use the above guide to find weakness in the claim. It is important to keep in mind that the person or party seeking to establish the existence and priority of a PMSI will bear the burden of proof. In most of the cases that I have litigated where I have had to oppose a PMSI claim, I have been able to find a defect or an objectionable issue. Commonly, the lenders claiming a PMSI are unable to meet their burden of showing they have a valid PMSI. I cannot overemphasize the number of defects I have found in PMSI cases. Lenders seeking to perfect a PMSI would be wise to issue the funds directly to the seller of the collateral or to issue a check naming the seller and the debtor as joint payees. Remember, by the time the issue of who has a superior lien interest arises, typically several years have gone by and small things like bills and invoices may get lost. Needless to say, it is often difficult for the lender to get copies of these documents from a debtor who defaults. Thus, a party seeking to challenge a PMSI claim should usually file an immediate objection and demand proof of the PMSI, as the PMSI claimant will often have a difficult time tracing the loan to a particular set of goods. On the other hand, a party seeking to enforce a PMSI should make sure to document and preserve a record showing that the requirements for a PMSI were followed. We look forward to seeing you at our fifth annual Claims Management Conference. visit our website for more information kubickidraper.com 4

5 EDUCATION KD SEMINARS & SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS Kubicki Draper is committed to our clients and the legal community. The firm draws upon the collective talents of over 80 attorneys throughout Florida to present continuing education seminars to our clients and to participate in industry-related events throughout the country. Michael Clarke of the Tampa office co-authored the Florida Case Law Update for publication in the Spring issue of the Trial Advocate Quarterly. Mr. Clarke also appeared as a featured speaker at the Florida Defense Lawyers Association s 2011 Annual Meeting to present on this topic. Angela Flowers of the Ocala office participated in a Mock Oral Argument presentation on September 12, 2011 at the Annual Education Program of the Florida Conference of District Court of Appeal Judges. Both Florida District Court of Appeal judges and Supreme Court of Florida Justices were in attendance. Angela served as Chief Judge in the program titled Turning the Tables on Oral Argument: From the Bench to the Podium. Judge Altenbernd of the Second DCA, Judge Griffin of the Fifth DCA, and Judge Suarez of the Third DCA played the roles of the attorneys. Michael Carney of the Ft. Lauderdale office presented at the FCCI Annual Claims Conference in Sarasota on Ethics. Michael Walsh of the Ft. Lauderdale office and Joe Carey of the Orlando office presented a seminar to North American Risk regarding Medical Coding. Michael Balducci of the West Palm Beach Office, Chad Hess of the Tallahassee Office, and Ken Oliver of the Ft. Myers Office presented a seminar at Geico in Lakeland on topics including evaluating DUI and potential punitive damages claims; identifying and handling collateral source setoffs; and recognizing and resolving various medical, medicare, and hospital liens. Jorge Santeiro of the Tampa office, Greg Prusak of the Orlando office and Ken Oliver of the Ft. Myers office presented a variety of topics to claims professionals from Gallagher Bassett. Liens, Early Case Resolutions, Proposals for Settlement and Premises Liability Issues Involving Hotels and Resorts were some of the topics covered. Brad McCormick of the Miami office and Melonie Bueno of the West Palm Beach office in conjunction with FRS Team presented on Fabrics Restoration and Top Ten Bad Faith Pitfalls to Avoid in Florida to a variety of carriers including CJW & Associates, Custard and Federated Mutual. Michael Carney and Michael Walsh of the Ft. Lauderdale office and Betty Marion of the Ocala office and visited North American Risk to present on Fraud/Counter Claims. Greg Prusak of the Orlando office, Brad McCormick of the Miami office and Michael Carney of the Ft. Lauderdale office, spoke at Discover Re regarding the Top Ten Bad Faith Pitfalls to Avoid in Florida. Michael Carney of the Ft. Lauderdale office, Brad McCormick of the Miami office, and Michael Clarke of the Tampa office presented a seminar on Ethics, Proposals for Settlement, and recent developments in PIP law to Assurance America Insurance Company. Michael Walsh of the Ft. Lauderdale office and Michael Clarke of the Tampa office presented a seminar on medical coding analysis in support of PIP defense to Mercury Insurance Company. Brad McCormick of the Miami office and Betsy Gallagher of the Tampa office presented a CEU program to The Hartford on the Production of Documents from an Insurer: When to Fight and When to Surrender. Laurie Adams and Melonie Bueno of the West Palm Beach office, presented a CLE seminar on First Party Claims Handling. The topics included demands, civil remedies, global mediations, hospital liens, removal to federal court, discovery and fees in a first party action, and prevailing party costs. Jorge Santeiro, Jr. and Bryan Krasinski of the Tampa office presented on Percutaneous Discectomies and Letters of Protection to the West Coast Claims Association. We welcome the opportunity to host a complimentary continuing education seminar at your office or participate as a speaker at your event. For more information, please contact Aileen Diaz , 5

6 r e c e n t r e s u l t s TRIALS Laurie Adams and Melonie Bueno of the West Palm Beach office obtained a favorable trial result in a wrongful death claim which arose from the death of a 16-year-old girl in an auto accident. The plaintiff parents, through their high profile law firm, sought $10,000, in damages for the wrongful death of their daughter while she was being driven in a motor vehicle by the parents' employee. The client was the defendant driver, who admitted liability for the accident and the death, and was alleged to have been driving recklessly, showboating, running stop signs, and speeding with multiple minors in the vehicle. The accident caused the deaths of three people including the plaintiff, and the client driver received a thirtythree year jail sentence for manslaughter as a result. Ms. Adams and Ms. Bueno focused their defense on reducing the damages, and also argued that biomechanical expert testimony showed the decedent's failure to wear a seatbelt significantly contributed to her death. At the close of an emotional two-week trial, the jury placed 20% liability on the decedent for failure to wear her seatbelt, and returned a verdict of $3,000, in damages, far less than plaintiffs sought from the jury. Carey N. Bos of the Orlando office obtained a complete defense verdict after a three and a half day trial in an auto accident case. It took the jury just over an hour to reach its decision. The collision occurred when Plaintiff, who was driving a tractor-trailer, made a quick left turn in front of Defendant, a taxicab driver who had the right-of-way. At trial, Plaintiff claimed that he did not see the taxicab before the accident and that the Defendant was the one who was speeding and driving carelessly. However, Mr. Bos was able to get Plaintiff s accident reconstruction expert to admit on cross-examination that Plaintiff should have seen Defendant, who he claimed was 3.2 seconds away from Plaintiff, before impact, even assuming Defendant was traveling at 65 mph as Plaintiff asserted (although Defendant testified he was not traveling that fast). Mr. Bos was able to get Plaintiff s accident reconstructionist to further admit that Plaintiff should not have made the left turn in front of Defendant, no matter what speed Defendant was going. Thus, Mr. Bos successfully presented the defenses of lack of liability and lack of causation of damages. This was a huge victory, as Plaintiff had demanded $400,000 at mediation and was asking the jury for a total of $140,000 in economic damages, PLUS an unspecified amount for pain and suffering and other non-economic damages. Stuart Poage and Fraz Ahmed of the Tallahassee office recently concluded a five day federal jury trial involving a U/M claim against their client insurer. They previously tried the same claim about one year ago and obtained a complete defense verdict. Although liability for causing the accident was admitted, there was substantial dispute regarding the causation of damages and the alleged aggravation of Plaintiff s prior and preexisting injuries and conditions. At the second trial, Mr. Poage and Mr. Ahmed were again able to attack the testimony of Plaintiff's physicians, and they were also able to mount a heavy attack on Plaintiff's credibility. For example, Plaintiff had attended the first two days of trial using a cane, and both he and his wife testified he needed it. However, the defense presented surveillance conducted of Plaintiff the first two nights of trial, which caught him out on the town without the cane the entire time. Despite this impeachment evidence, Plaintiff's attorney asked the jury for $900,000.00, claiming a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition. However, after only 55 minutes of deliberation, the 12-person jury came back with another complete defense verdict. 6 Greg Prusak of the Orlando office recently obtained a defense verdict in favor of the insurer in an uninsured motorist suit. The plaintiff was a 46-year-old man who claimed that he was entitled to resident relative status and corresponding U/M benefits under an automobile insurance policy issued to his older sister. The plaintiff claimed that he had moved in with his sister following his release from prison, and that he intended to live in her home permanently at the time of the motor vehicle accident giving rise to this case, in which plaintiff had suffered a fractured hip that required surgery. Plaintiff claimed medical bills in excess of $60,000.00, and had a potential wage loss claim of around $20, Mr. Prusak defended on the basis that plaintiff was not entitled to coverage as a resident relative, as the evidence showed he had moved out of his sister s home prior to the accident. In an unusual twist, plaintiff s sister eventually even admitted her brother was not living with her at the time of the accident. At the close of trial, Mr. Prusak persuaded the Court to follow prior case law holding that a person claiming resident relative status must prove he intended to reside in the dwelling of the insured family member on a permanent basis at the time of the accident for which benefits are sought. Thereafter, the jury awarded a defense verdict in favor of the insurer after just 30 minutes of deliberation, finding that the plaintiff was not a resident relative under the policy. In obtaining the defense verdict, Mr. Prusak obtained considerable legal and technical support from Attorney Angela Flowers of Kubicki Draper s Appellate Division. MOTIONS Laurie Adams and Melonie Bueno of the West Palm Beach office successfully dismissed a bad faith claim in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. After underlying counsel received a verdict in excess of $350, on a $50, uninsured motorist policy, Ms. Adams and Ms. Bueno argued that abatement was not an acceptable remedy because accrual of the claim could not occur until the damages were fixed, and abatement creates unacceptable discovery risks in an unaccrued claim. The Court agreed and dismissed plaintiff's claim for bad faith. Peter Baumberger of the Miami office prevailed on a motion to dismiss a statutory warranty count against a general contractor in a multimillion dollar construction defect case. The basis of the ruling was that, in view of the allegations in the complaint, the defects manifested or occurred after the three year statutory warranty period had expired. The opposition argued that this issue should be addressed via a motion for summary judgment following completion of discovery, but Mr. Baumberger was able to persuade the court that dismissal was appropriate in view of the allegations contained within the operative complaint. He was also able to persuade the Court that the dismissal should be with prejudice. Laurie Adams and Melonie Bueno of the West Palm Beach office successfully struck plaintiffs' proposal for settlement and plaintiffs' total claims for attorney s fees in the amount of $400, Subsequent to the wrongful death trial of a 16-year-old girl that involved aggravated liability and an emotionally charged two-week trial, Ms. Adams and Ms. Bueno successfully argued that the proposal for settlement was invalid, as it contained six different ambiguities and required judicial interpretation. The court agreed, striking the proposal for settlement, and plaintiff recovered no attorney s fees.

7 r e c e n t r e s u l t s Brian Chojnowski of the Tallahassee office obtained a favorable result in a non-binding arbitration in a construction defect case. Plaintiff alleged the asphalt at a condominium project was defectively installed, claimed our client was solely responsible for the alleged workmanship issues, and was seeking nearly $500,000 in damages. The arbitrator reduced that figure by 45% for the amount of useful life Plaintiff had already received from the asphalt, assigned our client only 5% liability, while apportioning 10% to the Plaintiff and the remaining 85% among the Developer, General Contractors, and Architects. Thus, the total amount awarded against our client was only $13, Although the arbitrator s award was not binding, it convinced Plaintiff to settle for $75,000, far less than originally sought. Michael Clarke of the Tampa office recently defeated a claim for attorney s fees based upon a Proposal for Settlement (PFS) served in an attempt to circumvent the holding of State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Palma, 629 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 1993), and claim fees for fees in Trudell v. The Travelers Home and Marine Ins. Co., Case No.: 2009-CC (Fla. 10th Jud. Cir. Cty. Ct. October 14, 2011). Specifically, after obtaining a fee judgment in excess of the amount demanded within a PFS on fees alone, the plaintiff then sought additional attorney s fees for all time spent in pursuit of establishing the reasonable amount of fees within the judgment. The trial court determined that such a claim for fees for fees was invalid as the pursuit of fees under the above facts are not part of a civil action under , Florida Statutes. Sharon Degnan and Josh Polsky, both of the Fort Lauderdale office, obtained a judgment of no coverage in favor of their insurance company client on the eve of trial. The underlying personal injury claim, wherein the plaintiff was seeking damages in excess of $750,000.00, arose out of a one-car motor vehicle accident on I-75 that occurred while the insured s mother was driving the insured vehicle, when the right rear axle broke off, causing the vehicle to overturn at a high rate of speed. The plaintiff sustained substantial injuries, including a broken neck and back, which resulted in an emergency surgery to fuse her cervical spine. The Insurer intervened in the underlying personal injury litigation and sought a declaratory judgment that coverage for the mother s claim was excluded under an insured person exclusion in the policy, which precluded coverage for bodily injury damages to "any insured," which included the mother s damages so long as she was driving the insured vehicle as a permissive user. After initially denying the Insurer s summary judgment motion, the court reconsidered its ruling on the eve the trial and, after nearly two years of litigation, entered a judgment in favor of the Insurer based upon counsel s argument that the policy exclusion was applicable and the trigger theory asserted by plaintiff carried an inherent flaw which would ultimately lead to a favorable coverage determination in favor of the Insurer. Karina Perez of the Tampa office obtained a Summary Judgment in a slip and fall case. Ms. Perez represented a contractor hired to install high speed internet lines and junction boxes in a large condominium complex in Sarasota. The Plaintiff stepped on one of the junction boxes, which allegedly gave way. She suffered a fracture to her right heel as well as vertebral fractures to L1 and L2 and was in a wheelchair for two months. When she was finally out of her wheelchair, undergoing physical therapy and getting around on crutches, her right foot gave way while negotiating a set of stairs, causing her to fall once again and this time fracturing her left tibia. Ms. Perez moved for summary judgment, arguing that the defendant owed no legal duty to Plaintiff and that Plaintiff s case was based on an impermissible stacking of inferences, as there was no evidence of negligent installation of the box in the first place. Despite the Motion being opposed by both the Plaintiff and a Co-Defendant, Ms. Perez prevailed in obtaining a summary judgment. APPELLATE Caryn L. Bellus of the Miami office prevailed on appeal in American Safety Casualty Insurance Co. v. Mijares Holding Co., LLC, 36 Fla. L. Weekly D2212 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). In the underlying action, Plaintiff Mijares Holding had sued American Safety and a co-defendant insurer in a multi-count complaint. After the trial court entered an order denying a motion to dismiss as to our client, American Safety, Ms. Bellus appealed to the Third District Court of Appeal, where she successfully argued that the trial court s order must be reversed and the cause dismissed as to American Safety for improper venue, as the subject insurance policies contained mandatory and enforceable forum selection clauses, which provided that the Superior Court of Cobb County, Georgia shall have jurisdiction over the parties rights and obligations under the policies. The Third District Court of Appeal agreed that the forum selection clauses were valid and enforceable, and it therefore reversed with directions to dismiss American Safety from the action because the clauses expressly provided that jurisdiction and venue could only be had in Georgia. Ms. Bellus also successfully opposed Appellee s motion for rehearing. In denying rehearing, the Third District issued a new opinion that was even more detailed and favorable, see American Safety Casualty Insurance Co. v. Mijares Holding Co., LLC, 3D , --- So. 3d --- (Fla. 3d DCA Dec. 28, 2011). Michael Clarke of the Tampa office obtained a summary judgment, followed by affirmance on appeal, in Niesen v. City of Clearwater, et. al., Case No.: (11th Cir. May 17, 2011), before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Mr. Clarke successfully argued that the estate s claims, arising from the alleged use of excessive force by police officers in beating an individual to death in 1977, were barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiff attempted to avoid application of the defense by arguing that the defendants conspired to conceal the use of force and cover up the beating only later to have a participant admit that the official reports of the incident had been falsified in an ongoing conspiracy. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals found that the plaintiff had sufficient information to proceed in the cause of action prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. Michael Clarke of the Tampa office obtained a decision and opinion in Florida Emergency Physicians (a/a/o Greg Herman) v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., Case No.: AP, (Fla. 18th Jud. Cir. Ct. August 11, 2011), affirming the lower court action in setting aside a voluntary dismissal served by plaintiff and directing that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant. Interestingly, this was the second appeal in the action and the plaintiff s voluntary dismissal of the case occurred on original remand in an attempt to avoid the appellate mandate directing further proceedings which would result in a defense judgment. The defendant is currently seeking the award of its attorney s fees. 7

8 Announcements Laurie Adams of the West Palm Beach office has been selected Top Lawyer for the 2012 Edition of the South Florida Legal Guide. She has also been named Florida Legal Elite and received the 2011 South Florida Women Extraordinaire award for top women business leaders in South Florida. Caryn Bellus has been selected Top Lawyer for the 2012 Edition of the South Florida Legal Guide. Michael J. Carney of the Ft. Lauderdale office, for the 4th year in a row, was selected Top Lawyer in the 2012 South Florida Legal Guide. Angela Flowers participated in a Mock Oral Argument presentation at the Annual Education Program of the Florida Conference of District Court of Appeal Judges. Both Florida District Court of Appeal judges and Supreme Court of Florida Justices were in attendance. Ms. Flowers served as Chief Judge in the program titled Turning the Tables on Oral Argument: From the Bench to the Podium. Judge Altenbernd of the Second DCA, Judge Griffin of the Fifth DCA, and Judge Suarez of the Third DCA played the roles of the attorneys. Betsy Gallagher of the Tampa office was recognized in Florida Trend Magazine as Legal Elite for 2011 in the area of Appellate Practice. She was also recognized as one of Tampa s Best Lawyers 2012 in the area of appellate practice which was distributed with The Tampa Tribune and Wall Street Journal. Jennifer LeVine of the West Palm Beach office was selected to participate in the Anti-Defamation League s Glass Leadership Institute (GLI). The program is intended to introduce leaders to the important work of the Anti-Defamation League, which is one of the nation's premier civil rights and human relations agencies. Through a year-long series of lectures, GLI participants will gain the knowledge and skills to effectively defend democratic ideals, combat all forms of hatred, and protect civil rights for all as they serve as leaders in the organization and in the community. Congratulations to Rebecca Cooperman Kay of the Miami office and Jessica Lanifero of the Jacksonville office who recently welcomed baby boys into the world and to Chelsea Winicki of the Jacksonville office who had a baby girl. New Additions to the Firm: We are pleased to announce the addition of a new Shareholder. Richard B. Collins joins us in Tallahassee and will focus on handling complex litigation and drug and pharmacy litigation matters with a focus on medical devices, medical malpractice, products liability and professional ethics and discipline law. Brad McCormick Sharon Christy Rosemarie Silva Aileen Diaz C O N T A C T I N F O R M A T I O N New Assignments Firm Administrator Seminars/Continuing Education Credits Statewide Coverage in Florida from 11 Offices MIAMI key west FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH NAPLES/FORT MYERS TAMPA OCALA ORLANDO JACKSONVILLE TALLAHASSEE PENSACOLA 8

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ALFREDO MEJIA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-2248 ) CITIZENS

More information

https://advance.lexis.com/pages/contentviewprintablepage.aspx

https://advance.lexis.com/pages/contentviewprintablepage.aspx Page 1 of 5 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24928 Manfredi v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24928 (Copy citation) United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit December 17, 2013,

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC02-2659 CYNTHIA CLEFF NORMAN, Petitioner, vs. TERRI LAMARRIA FARROW, Respondent. [June 24, 2004] WELLS, J. We have for review Norman v. Farrow, 832 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA

More information

With regard to the coverage issue 1 : With regard to the stacking issue 2 :

With regard to the coverage issue 1 : With regard to the stacking issue 2 : 37 Fla. L. Weekly D1140c Insurance -- Uninsured motorist -- Coverage -- Stacking -- Action against UM insurer by insured policyholder who was injured in single-car accident while riding as passenger in

More information

PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A.

PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A. PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A. 201 EAST PINE STREET 15 TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 4940 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32802-4940 TELEPHONE (407) 839-0120 TELECOPIER (407) 841-9726 ORLANDO@RISSMAN.COM

More information

Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax

Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Experience Kenneth B. Walton is a Founding Partner of the Boston-based

More information

Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax

Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee kwalton@donovanhatem.com 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Experience Kenneth B. Walton is a Founding Partner

More information

Michael C. Clarke and Betsy E. Gallagher of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Michael C. Clarke and Betsy E. Gallagher of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SARITHA REDDY PADURU and RAVI ANUGU, Appellants/Cross- Appellees, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TRIAL DIVISION CIVIL SECTION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TRIAL DIVISION CIVIL SECTION IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TRIAL DIVISION CIVIL SECTION LOUISE FOSTER Administrator of the : AUGUST TERM 2010 Estate of GEORGE FOSTER : and BARBARA DILL : vs.

More information

CASE NO. 1D09-0765. Rhonda B. Boggess of Taylor, Day, Currie, Boyd & Johnson, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D09-0765. Rhonda B. Boggess of Taylor, Day, Currie, Boyd & Johnson, Jacksonville, for Appellant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ATHENA F. GRAINGER, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF SAMUEL GUS FELOS, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2007

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2007 Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2007 Opinion filed October 3, 2007. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D06-2476 Lower Tribunal No. 01-3314

More information

Personal Injury Litigation

Personal Injury Litigation Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-15213 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-00238-GRJ.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-15213 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-00238-GRJ. Case: 13-15213 Date Filed: 06/17/2014 Page: 1 of 10 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-15213 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-00238-GRJ

More information

Amy S. Harris Shareholder

Amy S. Harris Shareholder Shareholder Amy Harris joined Macdonald Devin in 1989 and represents clients in state and federal trial and appellate courts, primarily in insurance defense litigation and insurance coverage. She has served

More information

What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute. By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins. Introduction

What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute. By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins. Introduction What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins Introduction More and more lawsuits are filed in Florida alleging that the trustee of a trust

More information

Case 3:07-cv-01180-TEM Document 56 Filed 04/27/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:07-cv-01180-TEM Document 56 Filed 04/27/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION Case 3:07-cv-01180-TEM Document 56 Filed 04/27/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION JAMES E. TOMLINSON and DARLENE TOMLINSON, his wife, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Paul S. Bryan, Judge. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF

More information

Reed Armstrong Quarterly

Reed Armstrong Quarterly Reed Armstrong Quarterly January 2009 http://www.reedarmstrong.com/default.asp Contributors: William B. Starnes II Tori L. Cox IN THIS ISSUE: Joint and Several Liability The Fault of Settled Tortfeasors

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 14-10913 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cv-01066-MSS-TBM.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 14-10913 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cv-01066-MSS-TBM. Case: 14-10913 Date Filed: 12/15/2014 Page: 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-10913 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cv-01066-MSS-TBM GEICO GENERAL

More information

Case 1:09-cv-00554-JAW Document 165 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 2495 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 1:09-cv-00554-JAW Document 165 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 2495 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE Case 1:09-cv-00554-JAW Document 165 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 2495 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MICHAEL HINTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:09-cv-00554-JAW ) OUTBOARD MARINE

More information

Commonly Used Terms in Auto Accident Cases

Commonly Used Terms in Auto Accident Cases Commonly Used Terms in Auto Accident Cases 117 South Willow Avenue Tampa, Florida 33606 Toll Free: 877-444-2929 Phone: 813-223-2929 Fax: 813-251-6853 Definitions are specific as to Florida Law. Other state

More information

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D14-279

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D14-279 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JESSE SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D14-279

More information

[July 16, 19871 REVISED OPINION. We have for review two cases of the district courts of

[July 16, 19871 REVISED OPINION. We have for review two cases of the district courts of FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMPENSATION FUND, Petitioner, VS. GEORGE BOUCHOC, et a1., Respondents. No. 69,230 WINTER HAVEN HOSPITAL, INC., Petitioner, VS. No. 69,493 FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMPENSATION FUND, Respondent.

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE GERALD J. BAMBERGER, et al., ) No. ED92319 ) Appellants, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court vs. ) of St. Louis County ) 08SL-CC01435 CHARLES

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000079-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-SC-002127-O Appellant, v.

More information

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations. RESULTS Appellate Court upholds decision that malpractice action barred September 2, 2015 The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently upheld a summary judgment obtained by David Overstreet and Mike McCall

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000005-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-SC-012076-O v. EMERGENCY

More information

Insurance Bad Faith. Statutory Bad-Faith Claims Following An Appraisal Award In Florida MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT

Insurance Bad Faith. Statutory Bad-Faith Claims Following An Appraisal Award In Florida MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Insurance Bad Faith Statutory Bad-Faith Claims Following An Appraisal Award In Florida by David H. Shaw, II, Esq. Butler Pappas Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP Tampa, Florida A commentary

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 02, 2014 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 02, 2014 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 02, 2014 Session CONNIE REDMOND v. WALMART STORES, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 13C3247 Joseph P. Binkley,

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division IN RE: WILLIAM G. DADE ) Case No. 00-32487 ANN E. DADE ) Chapter 7 Debtors. ) ) ) DEBORAH R. JOHNSON ) Adversary

More information

Cohen. Battisti LEGAL ASSIGNMENT OF INSURANCE BENEFITS Attorneys at Law INSIDER SECRETS: ! 2%34/2!4)/.

Cohen. Battisti LEGAL ASSIGNMENT OF INSURANCE BENEFITS Attorneys at Law INSIDER SECRETS: ! 2%34/2!4)/. Cohen INSIDER SECRETS: Battisti LEGAL Attorneys at Law ASSIGNMENT OF INSURANCE W R O N G F U L D E AT H BENEFITS! 2%34/2!4)/. 1211 ORANGE AVENUE, SUITE 200 WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789 #/-0!.9 3 '5)$% 4

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Docket No. 107472. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. KEY CARTAGE, INC., et al. Appellees. Opinion filed October 29, 2009. JUSTICE BURKE delivered

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-348 ************

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-348 ************ STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-348 LESTER BLACKMAN, ET AL. VERSUS BROOKSHIRE GROCERY COMPANY ************ APPEAL FROM THE CITY COURT OF ALEXANDRIA, PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 103,325,

More information

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 03-CV-1445. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (CA-3748-02)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 03-CV-1445. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (CA-3748-02) Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections

More information

SPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT

SPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY SPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Special Civil A Guide to the Court page 1 Special Civil is a court of limited jurisdiction

More information

CASE NO. 1D12-2739. John W. Wesley of Wesley, McGrail & Wesley, Ft. Walton Beach, for Appellants.

CASE NO. 1D12-2739. John W. Wesley of Wesley, McGrail & Wesley, Ft. Walton Beach, for Appellants. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JARVIS A. HOLMES and MARSHA HOLMES, v. Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF

More information

THIELEN, FOLEY & MIRDO, LLC

THIELEN, FOLEY & MIRDO, LLC TFM Est. 1998 THIELEN, FOLEY & MIRDO, LLC Attorneys at Law, Bloomington, Illinois The Firm Thielen, Foley & Mirdo, LLC is a law firm dedicated to providing skilled and cost-effective legal representation,

More information

PARRY G. CAMERON, Senior Attorney

PARRY G. CAMERON, Senior Attorney Phone: 310.557.2009 Fax: 310.551.0283 Email: pcameron@tocounsel.com Parry Cameron has over twenty-three years experience in commercial and business litigation at both the trial and appellate levels. He

More information

FOR USE IN THE MARION COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS COURTS

FOR USE IN THE MARION COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS COURTS LITIGANTS MANUAL FOR USE IN THE MARION COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS COURTS The Indiana General Assembly created the Marion County Small Claims Courts and provided that litigants may try their cases in such courts

More information

CASE LAW SUMMARY 2011. Automobile Liability. Vargas v. Enterprise Leasing Company, 60 So. 3d 1037 (Fla. 2011)

CASE LAW SUMMARY 2011. Automobile Liability. Vargas v. Enterprise Leasing Company, 60 So. 3d 1037 (Fla. 2011) Leased Vehicles/Rental Car Vehicles CASE LAW SUMMARY 2011 Automobile Liability Vargas v. Enterprise Leasing Company, 60 So. 3d 1037 (Fla. 2011) The Supreme Court determined that the Graves Amendment did

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW. LEGAL METHOD-CIVIL PROCEDURE (3 Hours) Day Division Wednesday, December 18, 1991

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW. LEGAL METHOD-CIVIL PROCEDURE (3 Hours) Day Division Wednesday, December 18, 1991 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW LEGAL METHOD-CIVIL PROCEDURE (3 Hours) Day Division Wednesday, December 18, 1991 Professor Condlin - Section B 9:10 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. No. Signature: Printed Name: INSTRUCTIONS:

More information

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266 CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266 COUNTY AND COURT: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 18TH JUDICIAL

More information

KUBICKI DRAPER. Kubicki Draper. congratulates its lawyers selected for inclusion

KUBICKI DRAPER. Kubicki Draper. congratulates its lawyers selected for inclusion THe KDQuarterly fall 2011 *Peter Baumberger L A W O F F I C E S KUBICKI DRAPER Professional Association Founded 1963 Daniel Draper, Jr. Caryn Bellus Kubicki Draper congratulates its lawyers selected for

More information

What Is Small Claims Court? What Types Of Cases Can Be Filed In Small Claims Court? Should I Sue? Do I Have the Defendant s Address?

What Is Small Claims Court? What Types Of Cases Can Be Filed In Small Claims Court? Should I Sue? Do I Have the Defendant s Address? SMALL CLAIMS COURT What Is Small Claims Court? Nebraska law requires that every county court in the state have a division known as Small Claims Court (Nebraska Revised Statute 25-2801). Small Claims Court

More information

PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A.

PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A. PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A. 201 EAST PINE STREET 15 TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 4940 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32802-4940 TELEPHONE (407) 839-0120 TELECOPIER (407) 841-9726 ORLANDO@RISSMAN.COM

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA MEDICAL THERAPIES, LLC, f/k/a MEDICAL THERAPIES, INC., d/b/a ORLANDO PAIN CLINIC, as assignee of SONJA M. RICKS, CASE

More information

... IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO: 66,025 BRUCE WAXMAN, Petitioner, JOSEPH TILLMAN, et a1., Respondents.

... IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO: 66,025 BRUCE WAXMAN, Petitioner, JOSEPH TILLMAN, et a1., Respondents. ... IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO: 66,025 BRUCE WAXMAN, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH TILLMAN, et a1., Respondents. BRIEF OF CROSS-PETITIONER TILLMAN ON JURISDICTION KOCHA & HOUSTON,

More information

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

Construction Defect Coverage Recap For 1st Quarter

Construction Defect Coverage Recap For 1st Quarter Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Construction Defect Coverage Recap For 1st Quarter

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2010

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2010 GROSS, C.J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2010 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellant, v. D.B.D., the father, Appellee. No. 4D09-4862 [August 25, 2010]

More information

Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective. Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III

Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective. Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective by Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III Presented to the Offshore Marine Services Association / Loyola College of Law Industry Seminar

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: DAVID L. TAYLOR THOMAS R. HALEY III Jennings Taylor Wheeler & Haley P.C. Carmel, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: DOUGLAS D. SMALL Foley & Small South Bend, Indiana

More information

4/28/2011. Personal Auto and Past Court Rulings: Florida. Florida Bad Faith Case Law

4/28/2011. Personal Auto and Past Court Rulings: Florida. Florida Bad Faith Case Law Personal Auto and Past Court Rulings: Florida Florida Bad Faith Case Law Todd Parnell 2 A number of seminal cases on FL Bad Faith that have shaped the issues insurer s must contend with today 4 primary

More information

What to expect when you are injured in a New York accident!

What to expect when you are injured in a New York accident! What to expect when you are injured in a New York accident! An ebook by Stuart DiMartini 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 dimartinilaw.com 2012 Law Offices of Stuart DiMartini P a g e

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT Filed 10/11/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT ED AGUILAR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B238853 (Los Angeles County

More information

Illinois Supreme Court Requires Plaintiff to Apportion Settlements Among Successive Tortfeasors

Illinois Supreme Court Requires Plaintiff to Apportion Settlements Among Successive Tortfeasors Illinois Supreme Court Requires Plaintiff to Apportion Settlements Among Successive Tortfeasors By: Joseph B. Carini III & Catherine H. Reiter Cole, Grasso, Fencl & Skinner, Ltd. Illinois Courts have long

More information

Fridman v. Safeco Insurance Co., 41 Fla. Law Weekly S62 (Fla. February 25, 2016):

Fridman v. Safeco Insurance Co., 41 Fla. Law Weekly S62 (Fla. February 25, 2016): Clark Fountain welcomes referrals of personal injury, products liability, medical malpractice and other cases that require extensive time and resources. We handle cases throughout the state and across

More information

RESUME OF MATTHEW R. DANAHY. St. Edmund Hall, Oxford University, Oxford, England 1985 Accredited Program in Law Sponsored by Florida State University

RESUME OF MATTHEW R. DANAHY. St. Edmund Hall, Oxford University, Oxford, England 1985 Accredited Program in Law Sponsored by Florida State University MATTHEW R. DANAHY * 901 WEST SWANN AVENUE KIMBERLY M. MURRAY DAVID C. MURRAY TAMPA, FLORIDA 33606 KIMBERLY E. LOW MICHAEL A. GIASI TELEPHONE (813) 258-3600 OF COUNSEL: * BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER

More information

/ s D. WW TE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. MARGARITA J. PALMA,

/ s D. WW TE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. MARGARITA J. PALMA, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA / s D. WW TE STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, vs. Petitioner CASE NO. 78,766 MARGARITA J. PALMA, Respondent PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION J CHARLES W. MUSGROVE,

More information

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266 CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL 32315-3730 (904) 224-6649/(800) 446-2998 * FAX (850) 222-6266 COUNTY AND COURT: Pasco County Florida NAME OF CASE:

More information

Impediments to Settlement

Impediments to Settlement Impediments to Settlement W. Bruce Barrickman, Esq. 5775 Glenridge Drive Suite E100 Atlanta, GA 30328 678-222-0248 www.bayadr.com IMPEDIMENTS TO SETTLEMENT W. Bruce Barrickman, Esq. Mediation is a great

More information

RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES

RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES (a) Illegal, Prohibited, or Clearly Excessive Fees and Costs. [no change] (b) Factors to Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Fees and Costs. [no change]

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY ELIZABETH RASKAUSKAS ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) C.A. No. CPU6-09-000991 GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, PROGRESSIVE ) DIRECT

More information

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NUMBER 73,50 Plaintiff, Petitioner, PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Respondent. I.. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DECISION OF THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF

More information

CASE NO. 1D15-1966. The instant appeal originated with a medical malpractice complaint filed by

CASE NO. 1D15-1966. The instant appeal originated with a medical malpractice complaint filed by IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JAN COLVIN AND WADE COLVIN, v. Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE

More information

ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE

ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE No. 79,712 ANNA RUE CAMP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. [February 4, 19931 McDONALD, J. In Camp v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.,

More information

RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF JAMES H. WHITE, JR. STAATS, WHITE & CLARKE. Florida Bar No.: 309303. 229 McKenzie Avenue. Panama City, Florida 32401

RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF JAMES H. WHITE, JR. STAATS, WHITE & CLARKE. Florida Bar No.: 309303. 229 McKenzie Avenue. Panama City, Florida 32401 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA FILED THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, vs. Petitioners, CASE NO.: 85,337 BRETT ALLAN WARREN, Personal DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL Representative

More information

CIVIL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS. The Plaintiff, JENNIFER WINDISCH, by and through undersigned counsel, and

CIVIL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS. The Plaintiff, JENNIFER WINDISCH, by and through undersigned counsel, and IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA JENNIFER WINDISCH, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO: 2007-CA-1174-K JOHN SUNDIN, M.D., RHODA SMITH, M.D., LAURRAURI

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT Filed 2/11/15 Estate of Thomson CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified

More information

Library of Georgia Personal Injury Law Forms with CD-ROM (Print and Online)

Library of Georgia Personal Injury Law Forms with CD-ROM (Print and Online) Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2126932/ Library of Georgia Personal Injury Law Forms with CD-ROM (Print and Online) Description: As much as victims need advocates,

More information

Case 1:13-cv-00796-RPM Document 23 Filed 02/18/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9

Case 1:13-cv-00796-RPM Document 23 Filed 02/18/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 Case 1:13-cv-00796-RPM Document 23 Filed 02/18/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 Civil Action No. 13-cv-00796-RPM MICHAEL DAY KEENEY, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 12, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D12-2622 Lower Tribunal No. 11-10021 Fernando Montes

More information

In the Indiana Supreme Court

In the Indiana Supreme Court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Robert S. O Dell Carmel, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE W. F. Conour Jeffrey A. Hammond Timothy F. Devereux Indianapolis, Indiana In the Indiana Supreme Court No. 29S02-0908-CV-378

More information

FILED December 15, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL

FILED December 15, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL NOTICE This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (4th 150225-U NO. 4-15-0225

More information

Recent Case Update. Insurance Stacking UIM Westra v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 13 AP 48, June 18, 2013)

Recent Case Update. Insurance Stacking UIM Westra v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 13 AP 48, June 18, 2013) Recent Case Update VOL. XXII, NO. 2 Summer 2013 Insurance Summary Judgment Stacking UIM Saladin v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 12 AP 1649, June 4, 2013) On August 26, 2010,

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 14-1414 ALLEN L. FEINGOLD; PHILLIP GODDARD STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 14-1414 ALLEN L. FEINGOLD; PHILLIP GODDARD STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-1414 ALLEN L. FEINGOLD; PHILLIP GODDARD v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Phillip Goddard, Appellant On Appeal from the District

More information

2015 IL App (2d) 141168-U No. 2-14-1168 Order filed October 15, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT

2015 IL App (2d) 141168-U No. 2-14-1168 Order filed October 15, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT No. 2-14-1168 Order filed October 15, 2015 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule

More information

2013 IL App (1st) 120546-U. No. 1-12-0546 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2013 IL App (1st) 120546-U. No. 1-12-0546 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2013 IL App (1st) 120546-U Third Division March 13, 2013 No. 1-12-0546 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT NOTICE Decision filed 10/15/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227

More information

Legal, Practical, and Ethical Considerations of Medical Malpractice Settlements

Legal, Practical, and Ethical Considerations of Medical Malpractice Settlements becker poliakoff bp@becker-poliakoff.com Legal, Practical, and Ethical Considerations of Medical Malpractice Settlements The Florida Bar Journal, January, 2009 Volume 83, No. 1 Reprinted with Permission

More information

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2010 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2010 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2010 Session STEPHANIE JONES and HOWARD JONES v. RENGA I. VASU, M.D., THE NEUROLOGY CLINIC, and METHODIST LEBONHEUR HOSPITAL Appeal from the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 12-12181. D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cv-01103-GAP-GJK. versus

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 12-12181. D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cv-01103-GAP-GJK. versus Case: 12-12181 Date Filed: 08/06/2013 Page: 1 of 11 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-12181 D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cv-01103-GAP-GJK STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY

More information

Case 1:10-cv-02583-CCB Document 28 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 1:10-cv-02583-CCB Document 28 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Case 1:10-cv-02583-CCB Document 28 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CRYSTAL WILLIAMS * * v. * Case No. CCB-10-2583 * TRAVCO INSURANCE CO. * ******

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: KIRK A. HORN Mandel Pollack & Horn, P.C. Carmel, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: ROBERT S. O DELL O Dell & Associates, P.C. Carmel, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION 2002 WI App 237 Case No.: 02-0261 Complete Title of Case: KENNETH A. FOLKMAN, SR., DEBRA J. FOLKMAN AND KENNETH A. FOLKMAN, JR., Petition for Review filed.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: MICHAEL J. ADLER Adler Law LLC Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: LEE F. BAKER ABBEY JEZIORSKI State Farm Litigation Counsel Indianapolis, Indiana IN

More information

CASE NO. 1D09-1707. James F. McKenzie of McKenzie & Hall, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D09-1707. James F. McKenzie of McKenzie & Hall, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellees. FLORIDA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF

More information

No. 1-11-1354 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

No. 1-11-1354 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2012 IL App (1st 1111354-U SIXTH DIVISION April 20, 2012 No. 1-11-1354 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT 2016 IL App (1st) 150810-U Nos. 1-15-0810, 1-15-0942 cons. Fourth Division June 30, 2016 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in

More information

This is the appeal of an Amended Final Judgment Awarding Costs and Attorney's

This is the appeal of an Amended Final Judgment Awarding Costs and Attorney's IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE APPELLATE DIVISION INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: 00-14 L.T. CASE NO.: 97-769-CC

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 10, 2010 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 10, 2010 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 10, 2010 Session MELINDA LONG, as Administrator of the Estate of Opal Hughes, v. HILLCREST HEALTHCARE - WEST, et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court

More information

EMERGING ISSUES IN LEGAL MALPRACTICE DEFENSE

EMERGING ISSUES IN LEGAL MALPRACTICE DEFENSE FDCC Winter Meeting Hyatt Grand Champions Resort Indian Wells, California February 26 March 5, 2011 EMERGING ISSUES IN LEGAL MALPRACTICE DEFENSE Presented by Professional Liability Section Richards H.

More information

2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U No. 1-14-1985 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).

More information

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. Miami - West Palm Beach - Tampa - Key West - Ft. Lauderdale West - Naples Jacksonville Orlando - Pensacola - Bonita Springs - Fort Lauderdale East Medical Malpractice Legal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT

More information

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a

More information

The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance

The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance PRODUCT LIABILITY Product Liability Litigation The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance By Kenneth Ross Product liability litigation and product safety regulatory activities in the U.S. and elsewhere

More information