Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 15

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 15"

Transcription

1 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 15 Beth E. Terrell, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Michael D. Daudt, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Jennifer Rust Murray, OSB # Mary B. Reiten TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC 936 North 34th Street, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington Telephone: (206) Facsimile: (206) [Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] Attorneys for Plaintiffs KELLY OTT, and BENJAMIN GESLER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, NANCY LUEBBEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION NO. 3:14-cv ST v. Plaintiffs, FOURTH AMENDED CLASS ACTION ALLEGATION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES MORTGAGE INVESTORS CORPORATION OF OHIO, INC., an Ohio corporation, also doing business as MORTGAGE INVESTORS CORPORATION, AMERIGROUP MORTGAGE CORPORATION, VETERANS INFORMATION DEPARTMENT and VETERANS HOME LOANS, CLASS ACTION DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart Defendant.

2 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 2 of 15 Plaintiffs Kelly Ott, Nancy Luebben, and Benjamin Gesler (hereinafter referred to as Plaintiffs ), by their undersigned counsel, for this class action complaint against Defendant Mortgage Investors Corporation of Ohio, Inc. doing business as Mortgage Investors Corporation, Amerigroup Mortgage Corporation, Veterans Information Department, and Veterans Home Loans ( MIC ) allege as follows: I. INTRODUCTION 1. Nature of Action. Plaintiffs Kelly Ott and Benjamin Gesler individually and as class representatives for all others similarly situated, and Plaintiff Nancy Luebben individually bring this action against MIC for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227 et seq. ( TCPA ). II. PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Kelly Ott. Plaintiff Kelly Ott ( Plaintiff Ott ) is a citizen of Oregon, residing in Multnomah County, Oregon. 3. Plaintiff Nancy Luebben. Plaintiff Nancy Luebben ( Plaintiff Luebben ) is a citizen of Oregon, residing in Linn County, Oregon. 4. Plaintiff Benjamin Gesler. Plaintiff Benjamin Gesler ( Plaintiff Gesler ) is a citizen of Oregon, residing in Multnomah County, Oregon. 5. Defendant MIC. Defendant MIC is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in St. Petersburg, Florida, and conducts business throughout the United States, including in Multnomah County, Oregon. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Defendant MIC transacted business under the names AmeriGroup Mortgage Corporation, Veterans Information Department, Mortgage Investors Corporation, and Veteran Home Loans. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. Subject Matter Jurisdiction. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs TCPA claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C because Plaintiffs TCPA claims arise under the laws of the United States, specifically 47 U.S.C DAMAGES - 1

3 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 3 of Personal Jurisdiction. This Court has personal jurisdiction over MIC because it has submitted to Oregon jurisdiction by registering with the Secretary of State to do business in the State of Oregon, and the wrongful acts alleged in this Complaint were committed in Oregon. 8. Venue. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2) in that a substantial part of the events or omissions given rise to Plaintiffs claims occurred in this District. IV. THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 1991, 47 U.S.C In 1991, Congress enacted the TCPA in response to a growing number of consumer complaints regarding certain telemarketing practices. 10. The TCPA makes it unlawful to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice to any telephone number assigned to a cellular telephone service. See 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). The TCPA provides a private cause of action to persons who receive calls in violation of 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A). See 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(3). 11. The TCPA also makes it unlawful for any entity to make more than one call in a 12-month period to any number that is registered with the National Do-Not-Call Registry or that entity s company specific do-not-call list. See 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5); 47 C.F.R (c)(2) & (d). The TCPA provides a private cause of action to persons receiving calls in violation of 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5). V. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS A. Factual Allegations Regarding Defendant MIC 12. MIC advertises itself on its webpage, as specialists in our industry, ranking MIC among the nation s leading VA lenders. DAMAGES - 2

4 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 4 of Part of MIC s strategy for increasing the volume of its customers involved the use of an automatic telephone dialing system ( ATDS ), also known as a predictive dialer. 14. In a Complaint for Permanent Injunction, Civil Penalties, and Other Relief filed by the United States of America, No. 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, it was alleged that MIC claims to be the nation s largest U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs home loan refinancer and provides home loan refinancing in 42 states. MIC also claims to have served more than 300,000 veterans and to have refinanced more than $30 billion in VA homes loans during the past 15 years. 15. Said Complaint further alleged that, from its offices in St. Petersburg and Tampa, Florida, MIC promotes VA home loan refinancing services to current and former U.S. military service members throughout the United States, and it promotes its VA home loan refinancing through unsolicited outbound telephone calls to consumers. 16. MIC employed hundreds of telemarketers who cold-called consumers and, using written scripts, encouraged consumers to schedule in-home sales appointments with companyaffiliated loan officers. 17. Consumers reported that they receive dozens of unwanted calls from MIC and that the company repeatedly failed to remove consumer s telephone numbers from its call list upon demand. 18. According to company training materials, MIC s telemarketers were not authorized to remove consumers telephone numbers from company call lists. Furthermore, MIC transferred irate customers, who had demanded that the company stop calling them, to a manager who would then try to convince the consumer to schedule an appointment. MIC s telemarketers were trained to attempt to turn around consumers who had requested that the company stop calling, and MIC reprimanded telemarketers who failed to attempt to turn around such calls. DAMAGES - 3

5 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 5 of MIC placed more than 5.4 million calls to numbers listed on the National Do- Not-Call Registry between February 2, 2009 and July 30, Thousands of consumers have filed complaints with the Federal Trade Commission and other agencies regarding the unwanted and harassing telemarketing calls by MIC. 21. MIC also made calls using an ATDS to cellular telephones whose owners did not provide express prior consent to receive such calls, including Plaintiff Gesler. 22. Consumers continued to receive calls despite requesting that MIC stop calling, until MIC ceased telemarketing operations in October Many of the recipients of these calls did not consent to receive such telephone calls. B. Factual Allegations Regarding Plaintiff Ott 24. Plaintiff Ott is a veteran of the United States military. 25. Plaintiff Ott registered his residential telephone number on the National Do-Not- Call Registry on October 7, MIC initiated calls to Plaintiff Ott after he had registered his residential telephone number on the National Do-Not-Call Registry. 27. Plaintiff Ott also directly requested that MIC stop calling on several occasions, including on January 1, Plaintiff Ott also received telemarketing calls from MIC after his requests that MIC stop calling. 29. Plaintiff Ott was not interested in applying for a new home loan or refinancing his existing home loan during Plaintiff Ott is unaware of how MIC may have obtained his contact information. 31. Plaintiff Ott did not contact MIC or provide his contact information to MIC. DAMAGES - 4

6 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 6 of 15 C. Factual Allegations Regarding Plaintiff Luebben 32. Plaintiff Luebben is a veteran of the United States military. 33. Plaintiff Luebben received many telephone solicitation calls from MIC during Plaintiff Luebben directly requested that MIC stop calling on several occasions, including on or around February 22, 2010 and April 30, Nonetheless, MIC continued to initiate calls for telemarketing purposes to Plaintiff Luebben. 36. Plaintiff Luebben was not interested in applying for a new home loan or refinancing her existing home loan during Plaintiff Luebben is unaware of how MIC may have obtained her contact information. 38. Plaintiff Luebben did not contact MIC or provide her contact information to MIC. D. Factual Allegations Regarding Plaintiff Gesler 39. Plaintiff Gesler is not a veteran of the United States military. 40. Plaintiff Gesler received many telephone solicitation calls from MIC during on his cellular telephone. 41. Plaintiff Gesler directly requested that MIC stop calling on several occasions, including on or around March 4, Nonetheless, MIC continued to initiate calls for telemarketing purposes to Plaintiff Gesler. 43. Plaintiff Gesler was not interested in applying for a new home loan or refinancing an existing home loan during Plaintiff Gesler is unaware of how MIC may have obtained his contact information. 45. Plaintiff Gesler did not contact MIC or provide his contact information to MIC. DAMAGES - 5

7 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 7 of On information and belief, MIC initiated calls to Plaintiff Gesler using ATDS equipment and software that had the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers to be called and which included auto-dialers and predictive dialers. VI. CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS 47. Class Definition. Pursuant to CR 23(b)(2) and (b)(3), Plaintiffs bring this case as a class action on behalf of National Classes as defined as follows: Cell Phone Class: All persons in the United States to whom: (a) Defendant made one or more non-emergency telephone calls; (b) to their cellular telephone number; (c) through the use of an automatic telephone dialing system; and (d) at any time in the period that begins four years before the date of filing this Complaint to trial. National Do-Not-Call Class: All persons in the United States who: (a) received more than one telephone solicitation call, initiated by Defendant; (b) in a 12-month period; (c) on their cellular telephone line or residential telephone line; (d) whose cellular or residential telephone line number(s) appeared on the National Do-Not-Call registry more than thirty days before the calls; (e) with whom Defendant did not have an established business relationship; and (f) at any time in the period that begins four years before the date of filing this Complaint to trial. Excluded from the Classes are MIC, any entity in which MIC has a controlling interest or that has a controlling interest in MIC, and MIC s legal representatives, assignees, and successors. Also excluded are the judge to whom this case is assigned and any member of the judge s immediate family. 48. Numerosity. The Classes are each so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. On information and belief, the Classes each have more than 1,000 members. Moreover, the disposition of the claims of the Classes in a single action will provide substantial benefits to all parties and the Court. 49. Commonality. There are numerous questions of law and fact common to Plaintiffs and members of the Classes. These common questions of law and fact include, but are not limited to, the following: DAMAGES - 6

8 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 8 of 15 a. As to Plaintiff Gesler and the Cell Phone Class, whether MIC violated 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A) by making any call, except for emergency purposes, to a cellular telephone number using an ATDS; b. As to Plaintiff Gesler and the Cell Phone Class, whether MIC knowingly and/or willfully violated 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A) by making any call, except for emergency purposes, to a cellular telephone number using an ATDS, thus entitling Plaintiff Gesler and the Cell Phone Class to treble damages; c. As to Plaintiff Ott and the National Do-Not-Call Class, whether MIC violated 47 C.F.R (c) by initiating more than one telephone solicitation within a 12- month period to Plaintiff Ott and members of the National Do-Not-Call Class who have registered their telephone numbers with the National Do-Not-Call Registry; d. As to Plaintiff Ott and the National Do-Not-Call Class, whether MIC knowingly and/or willfully violated 47 C.F.R (c) by initiating more than one telephone solicitation within a 12-month period to Plaintiff Ott and members of the National Do-Not-Call Class who have registered their telephone numbers with the National Do-Not-Call Registry, thus entitling Plaintiff Ott and the National Do-Not-Call Class to treble damages; e. Whether MIC is liable for ATDS-generated calls to cellular numbers. 50. Typicality. Plaintiffs claims are typical of the claims of the Classes. Plaintiffs claims, like the claims of Classes arise out of the same common course of conduct by MIC and are based on the same legal and remedial theories. 51. Adequacy. Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Classes. Plaintiffs have retained competent and capable attorneys with significant experience in complex and class action litigation, including consumer class actions and TCPA class actions. Plaintiffs and their counsel are committed to prosecuting this action vigorously on behalf of the Classes and have the financial resources to do so. Neither Plaintiffs nor their counsel have interests that are contrary to or that conflict with those of the proposed Classes. DAMAGES - 7

9 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 9 of Predominance. MIC has engaged in a common course of conduct toward Plaintiffs and members of the Classes. The common issues arising from this conduct that affect Plaintiffs and members of the Classes predominate over any individual issues. Adjudication of these common issues in a single action has important and desirable advantages of judicial economy. 53. Superiority. A class action is the superior method for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy. Classwide relief is essential to compel MIC to comply with the TCPA. The interest of individual members of the Classes in individually controlling the prosecution of separate claims against MIC is small because the damages in an individual action for violation of the TCPA are small. Class treatment is superior to multiple individual suits or piecemeal litigation because it conserves judicial resources, promotes consistency and efficiency of adjudication, provides a forum for small claimants, and deters illegal activities. There will be no significant difficulty in the management of this case as a class action. VII. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A) Cellular Telephone Calls Cell Phone Class) 54. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth in the preceding paragraphs. 55. The foregoing acts and omissions of MIC constitute numerous and multiple violations of the TCPA, 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A), by making calls, except for emergency purposes, to the cellular telephone numbers of Plaintiff Gesler and members of the Cell Phone Class using an ATDS. 56. As a result of MIC s violations of the TCPA, 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A), Plaintiff Gesler and members of the Cell Phone Class presumptively are entitled to an award of $500 in damages for each and every call to their cellular telephone numbers using an ATDS, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(3)(B). DAMAGES - 8

10 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 10 of 15 VIII. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Knowing and/or Willful Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A) Cellular Telephone Calls Cell Phone Class) 57. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth in the preceding paragraphs. 58. The foregoing acts and omissions of MIC constitute numerous and multiple knowing and/or willful violations of the TCPA, 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A), by making calls, except for emergency purposes, to the cellular telephone numbers of Plaintiff Gesler and members of the Cell Phone Class using an ATDS. 59. As a result of MIC s knowing and/or willful violations of the TCPA, 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A), Plaintiff Gesler and members of the Cell Phone Class are entitled to treble damages of up to $1,500 for each and every call to their cellular telephone numbers using an ATDS, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(3). IX. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Violations of 47 C.F.R (d) & 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5) Internal Do-Not-Call List) 60. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth in the preceding paragraphs. 61. The foregoing acts and omissions of constitute numerous and multiple violations of 47 C.F.R (d), by initiating any call for telemarketing purposes to Plaintiffs Luebben and Gesler without following procedures for maintaining a list of persons who request not to receive telemarketing calls ( internal do-not-call list ). This includes MIC s failure to properly record do-not-call requests, failure to maintain a record of do-not-call requests, and failure to honor do-not-call requests. 62. As a result of violations of 47 C.F.R (d), Plaintiffs Luebben and Gesler are entitled to an award of $500 in statutory damages for each and every call in violation of the internal do-not-call list regulation, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5)(B). DAMAGES - 9

11 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 11 of 15 X. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Knowing and/or Willful Violations of 47 C.F.R (d) & 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5) Internal Do-Not-Call List) 63. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth in the preceding paragraphs. 64. The foregoing acts and omissions of MIC constitute numerous and multiple knowing and/or willful violations of 47 C.F.R (d), by initiating any call for telemarketing purposes to Plaintiffs Luebben and Gesler without following procedures for maintaining a list of persons who request not to receive telemarketing calls. This includes MIC s failure to properly record do-not-call requests, failure to maintain a record of do-not-call requests, and failure to honor do-not-call requests. 65. As a result of MIC s knowing and/or willful violations of 47 C.F.R (d), Plaintiffs Luebben and Gesler are entitled to an award of treble damages of up to $1,500 for each and every call in violation of the internal do-not-call list regulation, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5)(B). XI. XI. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Violations of 47 C.F.R (c) & 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5) National Do-Not-Call Registry National Do-Not-Call Class) 66. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth in the preceding paragraphs. 67. The foregoing acts and omissions of MIC constitute numerous and multiple violations of 47 C.F.R (c), by initiating more than one telephone solicitation within a 12-month period to Plaintiff Ott and members of the National Do-Not-Call Class who have registered their telephone numbers with the National Do-Not-Call Registry. 68. As a result of MIC s violations of 47 C.F.R (c), Plaintiff Ott and members of the National Do-Not-Call Class are entitled to an award of $500 in statutory damages for each and every call initiated to them, after registering their telephone numbers with the National Do-Not-Call Registry, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5)(B). DAMAGES - 10

12 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 12 of 15 XII. SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Knowing and/or Willful Violations of 47 C.F.R (c) & 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5) National Do-Not-Call Registry National Do-Not-Call Class) 69. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference each and every allegation set forth in the preceding paragraphs. 70. The foregoing acts and omissions of MIC constitute numerous and multiple knowing and/or willful violations of 47 C.F.R (c), by initiating more than one telephone solicitation within a 12-month period to Plaintiff Ott and members of the National Do-Not-Call Class who have registered their telephone numbers with the National Do-Not-Call Registry. 71. As a result of MIC s knowing and/or willful violations of 47 C.F.R (c), Plaintiff Ott and members of the National Do-Not-Call Class are entitled to an award of treble damages of up to $1,500 for each and every call made to them, after registering their telephone numbers with the National Do-Not-Call Registry, in violation of 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5)(B). XIII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, on their own behalf and on behalf of the members of the Classes, pray for judgment against MIC as follows: A. Certification of the proposed Classes; B. Appointment of Plaintiff Ott as representative of the National Do-Not-Call Class; C. Appointment of Plaintiff Gesler as representative of the Cell Phone Class; D. Appointment of the undersigned counsel as counsel for the Classes; E. A declaration that MIC and/or its affiliates, agents, and/or other related entities actions complained of herein violate the TCPA; F. An award to Plaintiffs and the Classes of damages, as allowed by law; DAMAGES - 11

13 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 13 of 15 G. An award to Plaintiffs and the Classes of attorneys fees and costs, as allowed by law and/or equity; and and proper. H. Leave to amend this Complaint to conform to the evidence presented at trial; I. Orders granting such other and further relief as the Court deems necessary, just, I. XIV. DEMAND FOR JURY Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury for all issues so triable. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED AND DATED this 4th day of June, TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC By: /s/ Jennifer Rust Murray, OSB # Beth E. Terrell, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Michael D. Daudt, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Jennifer Rust Murray, OSB # Mary B. Reiten Blythe H. Chandler, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Samuel J. Strauss, Admitted Pro Hac Vice North 34th Street, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington Telephone: (206) Facsimile: (206) Rob Williamson, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Kim Williams WILLIAMSON & WILLIAMS 2239 West Viewmont Way West. Seattle, Washington Telephone: (206) DAMAGES - 12

14 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 14 of 15 Michael J. Estok, OSB # LINDSAY HART, LLP 1300 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Portland, Oregon Telephone: (503) Facsimile: (503) Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAMAGES - 13

15 Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 15 of 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jennifer Rust Murray, hereby certify that on June 4, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: Stellman Keehnel, OSB No Nicole M. Tadano, Admitted Pro Hac Vice DLA PIPER LLP (US) 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000 Seattle, Washington Telephone: (206) Facsimile: (206) Lesli Esposito, Admitted Pro Hac Vice John Huh, Admitted Pro Hac Vice DLA PIPER US LLP (PA) One Liberty Place, Suite Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Telephone: (215) Facsimile: (215) Attorneys for Defendant DATED this 4th day of June, TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC By: /s/ Jennifer Rust Murray, OSB # Jennifer Rust Murray, OSB # North 34th Street, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington Telephone: (206) Facsimile: (206) Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAMAGES - 14

Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 136 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 136 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 5 Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 136 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 5 Michael J. Estok, OSB #090748 Email: mestok@lindsayhart.com 1300 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Portland, Oregon 97201-5640 Phone: 503-226-7677

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) ron@consumersadvocates.com ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) alexis@consumersadvocates.com KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) kas@consumersadvocates.com

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 140-1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 140-1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 140-1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 Beth E. Terrell, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Email: bterrell@terrellmarshall.com Jennifer Rust Murray, OSB #100389 Email: jmurray@terrellmarshall.com

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 135 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 135 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 7 Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 135 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 7 Beth E. Terrell, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com Michael D. Daudt, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Email: mdaudt@tmdwlaw.com Jennifer

More information

Case: 1:13-cv-04046 Document #: 56 Filed: 06/10/14 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:242

Case: 1:13-cv-04046 Document #: 56 Filed: 06/10/14 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:242 Case: 1:13-cv-04046 Document #: 56 Filed: 06/10/14 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:242 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION EDUARDO TOMEO; JOSEPH MORDEN; PAMELA

More information

Case 1:13-cv-11944 Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:13-cv-11944 Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 : : : : : : : : : : : Case 113-cv-11944 Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Robert Pegg, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Collecto,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 Daniel G. Shay, CA Bar #0 danielshay@tcpafdcpa.com LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL G. SHAY 0 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 1B San Diego, California 0 Tel:.. Fax:.1. Benjamin H. Richman* brichman@edelson.com J.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. (SBN: ) josh@westcoastlitigation.com Robert L. Hyde, Esq. (SBN: ) bob@westcoastlitigation.com Hyde & Swigart Camino Del Rio South,

More information

Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 19 Filed: 02/28/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:193 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 19 Filed: 02/28/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:193 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 19 Filed: 02/28/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:193 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER LITIGATION ACT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. : UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION PAUL BARRETT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Case No. : CLASS ACTION

More information

Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8

Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8 Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 9:13-cv-80670-KAM AJA DE LOS SANTOS, an individual, on

More information

Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GARY HANLEY on behalf of himself and

More information

Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9

Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9 Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:13-cv-61747-RSR KURT S. SOTO, an individual, on behalf

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. KIM WALLANT and LOUIS BOREK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, FREEDOM

More information

Case3:11-cv-00043-RS Document34 Filed07/28/11 Page1 of 8

Case3:11-cv-00043-RS Document34 Filed07/28/11 Page1 of 8 Case:-cv-000-RS Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 Sean Reis (SBN 00 sreis@edelson.com EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP 00 Tomas Street, Suite 00 Rancho Santa Margarita, California Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( - Michael

More information

2:15-cv-00201-DCN Date Filed 01/15/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22

2:15-cv-00201-DCN Date Filed 01/15/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22 2:15-cv-00201-DCN Date Filed 01/15/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION LINDA KENZIK, individually and on behalf of others

More information

Case: 1:13-cv-08310 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case: 1:13-cv-08310 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 Case: 1:13-cv-08310 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL GRANT, individually and on

More information

Case3:13-cv-02858-JST Document27 Filed11/27/13 Page1 of 14

Case3:13-cv-02858-JST Document27 Filed11/27/13 Page1 of 14 Case:-cv-0-JST Document Filed// Page of 0 Clayeo C. Arnold, California SBN 00 carnold@justiceyou.com Christine M. Doyle, California SBN 0 cdoyle@justiceyou.com CLAYEO C. ARNOLD, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

More information

Case 4:14-cv-00248-A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv-00248-A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION Case 414-cv-00248-A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION Katrina Hilliard, v. Plaintiff, GTC Auto Sales, Inc. d/b/a

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION KELLY OTT and BENJAMIN GESLER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and NANCY LUEBBEN, individually, No.

More information

Case 0:14-cv-61899-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/19/2014 Page 1 of 10

Case 0:14-cv-61899-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/19/2014 Page 1 of 10 Case 0:14-cv-61899-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/19/2014 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IRESTORE REPAIR AND ) WIRELESS, LLC, on behalf

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA H.L. WATKINS AND COMPANY, INC., ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. ) ) 06-CV8980-3 THE HOT LEAD COMPANY, LLC, ) ROBERT MICHAEL HORNE, )

More information

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAROL PARKER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PARADE ENTERPRISES, LLC, No. 3:14-CV-08084-MAS-DEA AMENDED COMPLAINT

More information

Case 1:15-cv-13004-GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv-13004-GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:15-cv-13004-GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KEITH MATHEWS On behalf of himself and Others similarly situated Plaintiff, Case

More information

Case: 1:16-cv-02787 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/03/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv-02787 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/03/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-02787 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/03/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CARY WOLOVICK, individually and on behalf

More information

Case 1:14-cv-10006-WGY Document 1 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 6 : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:14-cv-10006-WGY Document 1 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 6 : : : : : : : : : : : Case 114-cv-10006-WGY Document 1 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Anthony Clark, v. Plaintiff, Living Scriptures, Inc.; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, Court File No. 12-cv-01236-RHK-JSM INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, Court File No. 12-cv-01236-RHK-JSM INTRODUCTION CASE 0:12-cv-01236-RHK-JSM Document 50 Filed 04/01/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, ACTION COMPLAINT v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

More information

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KELVIN BLEDSOE, Plaintiff, v. SAAQIN, INC., No. COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff Kelvin

More information

FILED 2012 Dec-05 PM 04:01 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA

FILED 2012 Dec-05 PM 04:01 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA Case 2:12-cv-04033-JEO Document 1 Filed 12/05/12 Page 1 of 11 FILED 2012 Dec-05 PM 04:01 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Plaintiff 2:14-cv-2081-RMG. Case No. vs. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Plaintiff 2:14-cv-2081-RMG. Case No. vs. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 2:14-cv-02081-RMG Date Filed 05/29/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARK FITZHENRY, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons

More information

Case4:15-cv-04219-DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case4:15-cv-04219-DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11 Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (bhughes@cooley.com)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT CORY GROSHEK, and all others, similarly situated, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 TIME WARNER CABLE INC. Defendant. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff,

More information

Case 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT Document 23 Filed 02/18/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT Document 23 Filed 02/18/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT Document 23 Filed 02/18/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT KATHY WORNICKI,

More information

Case 3:13-cv-01686-JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:13-cv-01686-JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10 Case 313-cv-01686-JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Renee Wheeler, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs,

More information

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND District Court, Denver County, Colorado 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 GUILLERMO ARTEAGA-GOMEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED: January 22, 2015 6:02

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Case: 4:15-cv-01593 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 10/19/15 Page: 1 of 22 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION STATE OF MISSOURI ex rel. ) Attorney General CHRIS KOSTER,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER Case 1:14-cv-05919-JEI-KMW Document 19 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 84 Frank L. Corrado, Esquire Attorney ID No. 022221983 BARRY, CORRADO & GRASSI, PC 2700 Pacific Avenue Wildwood, NJ 08260 (609)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO.: 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO.: 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW ORDER Case 8:13-cv-01647-SDM-TGW Document 10 Filed 07/17/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID 61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW

More information

Case: 1:13-cv-07149 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/04/13 Page 1 of 25 PageID #:1

Case: 1:13-cv-07149 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/04/13 Page 1 of 25 PageID #:1 Case: 1:13-cv-07149 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/04/13 Page 1 of 25 PageID #:1 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Jonathan D. Selbin (pro hac vice to be filed) Email: jselbin@lchb.com Douglas I. Cuthbertson

More information

9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA INTRODUCTION

9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA INTRODUCTION 9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON xxxxxxxxxxxdivision BEAUFORT ) Jonathon Rowles, individually

More information

Case 2:14-cv-00244 Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv-00244 Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE DR. A. CEMAL EKIN, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 3:15-cv-00012-CAR Document 9 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv-00012-CAR Document 9 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION Case 3:15-cv-00012-CAR Document 9 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION MELISSA BROWN and BEN JENKINS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs.

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43 Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43 Calvin L. Keith, OSB No. 814368 CKeith@perkinscoie.com Sarah J. Crooks, OSB No. 971512 SCrooks@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION RPOST HOLDINGS, INC., RPOST COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, and RMAIL LIMITED, CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiffs, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS

More information

[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case :0-cv-00-LRS Document - Filed // 0 Toby J. Marshall, WSBA # Erika L. Nusser, WSBA #0 Attorneys for the Plaintiffs Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () 0- Email: tmarshall@tmdwlaw.com Email: enusser@tmdwlaw.com

More information

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in Weld County, Colorado, District Court, 901 9 th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970.351.7300 Plaintiff: vs. Defendants: JENNIFER BELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRADLEY PETROLEUM,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION NANCY PRITCHARD, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION; KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, as PLAN ADMINISTRATOR;

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney GARY PLESSMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Fraud Section California State Bar No. 1 Room 1, Federal Building 00 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles,

More information

Case 3:15-cv-01953-MO Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:15-cv-01953-MO Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 8 Case 3:15-cv-01953-MO Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 8 Brenna K. Legaard, OSB #001658 Email: blegaard@schwabe.com SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT, P.C. 1211 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97204

More information

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION Case Number XXX A.C.G., J.G.M., on behalf of themselves and ) all others similarly situated, ) Plaintiffs )

More information

Case 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 DAVID BALDWIN, v. Plaintiff, ANTHONY FOXX, in his official capacity as Secretary of The United States Department of Transportation,

More information

Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21 Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATES

More information

2:14-cv-03690-DCN Date Filed 09/18/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

2:14-cv-03690-DCN Date Filed 09/18/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA 2:14-cv-03690-DCN Date Filed 09/18/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARK FITZHENRY, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons

More information

Case 3:08-cv-00920-JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:08-cv-00920-JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 3:08-cv-00920-JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 236 Tillou Road South Orange, NJ 07079 Telephone: (973 313-1887 Fax: (973 833-0399 lrosen@rosenlegal.com

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA PHILIP M. BALLIF Nevada Bar # 2650 DURHAM, JONES & PINEGAR. P.C. 10785 W. Twain Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone: (702 870-6060 Facsimile: (702 870-6090 Email: pballif@djplaw.com JOHN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION WAYNE WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PROTECT SECURITY, LLC. Defendant.

More information

Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365

Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER

More information

Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BEST LITTLE PROMOHOUSE IN TEXAS LLC, Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION DE ANGELO BENTLEY, ) MARQUES ROBERTSON, ) IKEYMA MCKENTRY, ) individually,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION ZIPIT WIRELESS INC., Plaintiff, v. BLACKBERRY LIMITED F/K/A RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and BLACKBERRY CORPORATION f/k/a

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TAMARA SLIPCHENKO, on behalf ) of herself and all other persons similarly ) situated, ) ) Case No.: Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COMPLAINT

More information

If automated telephone calls were directed to your cell phone, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

If automated telephone calls were directed to your cell phone, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON If automated telephone calls were directed to your cell phone, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. A federal court

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MOBILE TRANSFORMATION LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) Civil Action No. Ex rel. ) ) FILED IN CAMERA AND Plaintiff, ) UNDER SEAL ) vs. ) FALSE CLAIMS ACT ) MEDICAID FRAUD, ), and ) JURY

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH LAURIE PAUL, individually and on behalf of all other similarly-situated individuals, Plaintiff, vs. PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEMS-

More information

FfLED Superior Court Of California, Ii/21/20H

FfLED Superior Court Of California, Ii/21/20H r 1 1 1 C. Brooks Cutter, SBN 0 William A. Kershaw SBN 0 John R. Parker, Jr., SBN 1 KERSHAW, CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP 01 Watt Avenue Sacramento, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Robert A. Buccola, SBN

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiff, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated

Attorneys for Plaintiff, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated Case 3:14-cv-01316-H-JLB Document 13 Filed 08/12/14 Page 1 of 20 MATTHEW RIGHETTI, ESQ. {121012} 1 matt@righettilaw.com 2 JOHN GLUGOSKI, ESQ. {191551) jglugoski@righettilaw.com 3 MICHAEL RIGHETTI, ESQ.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 Sterling A. Brennan (CA State Bar No. 01) E-Mail: sbrennan@mabr.com Tyson K. Hottinger (CA State Bar No. 1) E-Mail: thottinger@mabr.com MASCHOFF BRENNAN LAYCOCK GILMORE ISRAELSEN & WRIGHT, PLLC

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 OSB#013943 sean.riddell@live.com Attorney At Law 4411 NE Tillamook St Portland, OR 97140 971-219-8453 Attorney for Plaintiff IN

More information

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 1 2 1 1 1 1 COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL, P.L.L.C. STEVEN J~ TO L (Pro ac Vac-e-) DANIEL S. SOMMERS (Pro Hac Vice) ANDREW N. FRIEDMAN (Pro Hac Vice) JASON M. LEVITON (Pro Hac Vice) Lead Counsel for

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS If you are a current or former installation technician of Cable Communications, Inc. and worked in Oregon, please read this Notice carefully.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation v. Plaintiff, SALESFORCE.COM, INC., a Delaware Corporation Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Luke L. Dauchot (SBN Nimalka R. Wickramasekera (SBN Benjamin A. Herbert (SBN South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 001 Telephone: (1 0-00 Facsimile: (1 0-00 Attorneys for Plaintiff, v.

More information

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION TO THE HONORABLE

More information

Case 1:13-cv-10524 Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cv-10524 Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:13-cv-10524 Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Patricia Boudreau, Alex Gray, ) And Bobby Negron ) On Behalf of Themselves and All

More information

Case 0:09-cv-60796-CMA Document 141 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2010 Page 1 of 18

Case 0:09-cv-60796-CMA Document 141 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2010 Page 1 of 18 Case 0:09-cv-60796-CMA Document 141 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2010 Page 1 of 18 RICHMOND MANOR APTS., INC., THE GURKIN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INTRACOASTAL TERRACE CONDOMINIUM ASSN, INC., and SERENA

More information

Case 8:12-cv-02184-JST-MLG Document 5 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:41

Case 8:12-cv-02184-JST-MLG Document 5 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:41 Case :-cv-0-jst-mlg Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MARK F. SULLIVAN, State Bar No. GEORGE P. GALBRAITH-ALBUTT, State Bar No. 00 SULLIVAN TAKETA LLP Townsgate Road Suite 0 Westlake Village, California

More information

NO. ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE. COME NOW, THE STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through Attorney General GREG

NO. ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE. COME NOW, THE STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through Attorney General GREG NO. IN THE MATTER OF: STATE OF TEXAS AND MORTGAGE INVESTORS CORPORATION d/b/a AMERIGROUP MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Respondent IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. INFANT SWIMMING RESEARCH, INC., v. Plaintiff, FAEGRE & BENSON, LLP, MARK FISCHER, JUDY HEUMANN, NORMAN HEUMANN, BOULDER

More information

CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA

CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA LESTER ANSARDI, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED SUIT NO. PLAINTIFF VERSUS UNITED STATES MARITIME SERVICES, INC., UNITED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. ( Plaintiff or Endeavor ), by and through its

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. ( Plaintiff or Endeavor ), by and through its UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ENDEAVOR MESHTECH, INC., Plaintiff, v. ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Civil Action No. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

More information

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8 Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# laborlawyer@pacbell.net THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : Case 111-cv-06207 Document # 1 Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION FUTUREVISION.COM, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., TIME WARNER CABLE, LLC, CEQUEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC DBA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON BROADBAND GRAPHICS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON BROADBAND GRAPHICS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, 0 Devon Zastrow Newman (State Bar # ) Johnathan E. Mansfield (State Bar # ) SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT SW TH Avenue, Suite 00 Phone: (0) - Fax: (0) -00 Email: dnewman@schwabe.com Email: jmansfield@schwabe.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-000-tor Document Filed 0/0/ 0 John T. John, WSBA # Daniel J. Oates, WSBA # 0 Alaskan Way, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington Telephone: ( -00 Email: jjohn@grahamdunn.com doates@grahamdunn.com Attorney

More information

Case: 1:13-cv-00903-SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31

Case: 1:13-cv-00903-SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31 Case: 1:13-cv-00903-SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION Peter E. Heuser, OSB # 811281 Email pheuser@schwabe.com Devon Zastrow Newman, OSB #014627 Email dnewman@schwabe.com Telephone: 503.222.9981 Facsimile: 503.796.2900 Sean G. Gallagher, pro hac vice pending

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, ENTREPRENEURIAL STRATEGIES, LTD.; and Civil No. 2:06-CV-15 (WCO) DALE ALLISON,

More information

Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/23/2013 Page 1 of 11

Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/23/2013 Page 1 of 11 Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/23/2013 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 9:13-cv-80670-KAM AJA DE LOS SANTOS, an individual,

More information

Case 2:14-cv-00445-CW-BCW Document 62 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:14-cv-00445-CW-BCW Document 62 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6 Case 2:14-cv-00445-CW-BCW Document 62 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6 Karra J. Porter, 5223 Karra.Porter@chrisjen.com David C. Richards, 6023 David.Richards@chrisjen.com CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN, P.C. 15 West South

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., v. Plaintiffs, HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Plaintiff, v. GENWORTH MORTGAGE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. / COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION Case: 1:10-cv-03314 Document #: 17 Filed: 09/30/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:63 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION JAMES ROWE, ) individually and on

More information

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

United States District Court for the Northern District of California United States District Court for the Northern District of California IF YOU RECEIVED A NON-EMERGENCY MORTGAGE OR CREDIT CARD DEFAULT SERVICING CALL OR TEXT ON YOUR CELLULAR TELEPHONE FROM BANK OF AMERICA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division JONATHAN F. OLIN Deputy Assistant Attorney General MICHAEL S. BLUME Director,

More information

Case 1:14-cv-10612-PBS Document 1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No.

Case 1:14-cv-10612-PBS Document 1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No. Case 1:14-cv-10612-PBS Document 1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VERSATILE MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts

More information

Case 1:15-cv-01037-RP Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv-01037-RP Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Case 1:15-cv-01037-RP Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Nina Louden and Johanna Condley, on behalf of themselves and all other

More information

4:14-cv-02261-PMD Date Filed 06/10/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

4:14-cv-02261-PMD Date Filed 06/10/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 4:14-cv-02261-PMD Date Filed 06/10/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION RICHARD REYNOLDS, SHARON LINICK, LINDA NEELY,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Case No.

More information