CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION"

Transcription

1 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi ) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/A/2015/ Adjunct Order to decision dated: Ravinder Kumar v. Tihar Jail, New Delhi Parties Present: 1. The appellant not present on scheduled day, 30 th Dec He is brought to commission on after getting permission from Visiting Judge Ms. Nivedita Anil Sharma. FACTS: 2. Appellant sought copies of his medical records. PIO on replied that records were searched but not found. First appellate authority on directed the PIO CJ 2 to provide information within 10 days. Claiming non compliance he approached Commission. PROCEEDINGS: 3. The appellant is a life convict in a dowry death case since He believes that he has some visual difficulty at the time of entry into the jail, this was mentioned in his admission health card, which would help him to prove his innocence in court. He wanted copies of his medical records dated including OPD orders and attested papers from the date of his admission into the jail till The appellant submitted that he could not be present on as custodial parole was denied. He alleged denial was only because he filed RTI requests with the jail. The CIC/SA/A/2015/ Page 1

2 appellant complained to the Commission that because of this attitude many other prisoners are not in a position to file or defend their RTI cases. 5. On 30 th Dec 2015 the Commission could hear only the jail authorities and passed order on , directing them to comply with orders of First Appellate Authority dated to give information within ten days. 6. The appellant contended: He along with his parents and brothers were jailed for dowry death. His wife was killed in a dacoity but his family was implicated by in laws. Since all his family members are lodged in jail, there is none to help him for information, hence he had to approach under RTI Act. As the information sought was related to life and liberty, it should have been given within 48 hours. In fact, he got all medial documents in 2010 under RTI but those papers were neither attested nor certified. He again applied on for certified copies. 7. Appellant has presented to the Commission a copy of the letter issued by the office of PIO/DCP, North District, Civil Lines on , showing that the record for the period under reference has been destroyed vide order No /Acctt/North District dated He has also enclosed the order pointing out that it was given to him 14 days after the receipt of RTI application. The PIO admitted that RTI dated was received. 8. The DCP/First Appellate Authority stated in his order that the record was destroyed and there was no ground to admit the appeal. The appellant filed another RTI to PIO, Central Jail, Tihar, who responded to the appellant saying that his RTI application was transferred to PIO, Central Jail Hospital. The latter had stated that the medical record sought by the appellant could not be found as there was no medical record department and Medical Records Assistant/Technician in the jail hospital. Against this, the appellant filed an appeal before the FAA/DIG(Prisons) on The FAA held on that the reply of the PIO, Central Jail 3 was not appropriate and he was directed to supply the information to the appellant within 10 days. CIC/SA/A/2015/ Page 2

3 DECISION: 6. The Commission finds that there is a significant public interest behind the RTI application as accused should be allowed every opportunity to prove his innocence as per the cardinal principles of criminal justice. He believes that the medical records would help him to prove that with visual deficiency he could not have killed his wife as alleged, but that opportunity was denied by not certifying the medial records at first instance, destroying the records at second instance and finally denying him permission to attend the second appeal. 7. The appellant could show that because of denial by Superintendent, Central Jail 2 he could not attend second appeal on The PIO/Tihar Jail did not inform the Commission about the refusal of permission, which amounts to suppression of information. The Commission holds that it is the duty of public authority to permit the inmates of jail to defend second appeal, or make alternative arrangements like video conferencing. They should explain the Commission the reasons for such denial. If not, it will be violation of appellant s right to information attracting penalty under Section 20 of RTI Act. 8. Because of the reasons explained above the Commission considers the Supdt, Central Jail 2 as deemed PIO and direct him to show cause why penalty should not be imposed upon him for obstructing the appellant from securing his Right to information by denying permission to attend second appeal before CIC, within 21 days from the date of receipt of this order. 8. Another issue brought before the Commission was destruction of record after RTI application was filed. Appellant presented documents which showed that the DCP, North District, Civil Lines has destroyed medical record of the appellant vide order dated , 14 days after the receipt of the RTI application on Destruction of records during pendency of RTI application would attract penalty under Section 20. Hon ble Delhi High Court in Union Of India Vs. Vishwas Bhamburkar [2013(297)ELT500(Del.)] observed: CIC/SA/A/2015/ Page 3

4 6. This can hardly be disputed that if certain information is available with a public authority, that information must necessarily be shared with the applicant under the Act unless such information is exempted from disclosure under one or more provisions of the Act. It is not uncommon in the government departments to evade disclosure of the information taking the standard plea that the information sought by the applicant is not available. Ordinarily, the information which at some point of time or the other was available in the records of the government, should continue to be available with the concerned department unless it has been destroyed in accordance with the rules framed by that department for destruction of old record. Therefore, whenever an information is sought and it is not readily available, a thorough attempt needs to be made to search and locate the information wherever it may be available. It is only in a case where despite a thorough search and inquiry made by the responsible officer, it is concluded that the information sought by the applicant cannot be traced or was never available with the government or has been destroyed in accordance with the rules of the concerned department that the CPIO/PIO would be justified in expressing his inability to provide the desired information. Even in the case where it is found that the desired information though available in the record of the government at some point of time, cannot be traced despite best efforts made in this regard, the department concerned must necessarily fix the responsibility for the loss of the record and take appropriate departmental action against the officers/officials responsible for loss of the record. Unless such a course of action is adopted, it would be possible for any department/office, to deny the information which otherwise is not exempted from disclosure, wherever the said department/office finds it inconvenient to bring such information into public domain, and that in turn, would necessarily defeat the very objective behind enactment of the Right to Information Act. 7. Since the Commission has the power to direct disclosure of information provided, it is not exempted from such disclosure, it would also have the jurisdiction to direct an inquiry into the matter wherever it is claimed by the PIO/CPIO that the information sought by the applicant is not traceable/readily traceable/currently traceable. Even in a case where the PIO/CPIO takes a plea that the information sought by the applicant was never available with the government but, the Commission on the basis of the material available to it forms a prima facie opinion that the said information was in fact available with the government, it would be justified in directing an inquiry by a responsible officer of the department/office concerned, to again look into the matter rather deeply and verify whether such an information was actually available in the records of the government at some point of time or not. After all, it is quite possible that the required information may be located if a thorough search is made in which event, it could be possible to supply it to the applicant. Fear of disciplinary action, against the person responsible for loss of the information, will also work as a deterrence against the willful suppression of the information, by vested interests. It would also be open to the Commission, to make an inquiry itself instead of directing an inquiry by the department/office concerned. Whether in a particular case, an inquiry ought to be made by the Commission or by the officer of the department/office concerned is a matter to be decided by the Commission in the facts and circumstances of each such case. 9. This Commission held in Shri Ashok Kr. Dixit vs. Delhi Technology University, GNCTD, Delhi [CIC/SA/C/2013/000013]: 5. Record cannot be destroyed after RTI application is filed, even if it outlived the time prescribed under weeding out policy, and if destroyed like that, it would invite the penalty under section 20 of RTI Act. CIC/SA/A/2015/ Page 4

5 10. Appellant could show that Mr Vijender Kumar Yadav, IPS, Addl. DCP I, North District, who is also the PIO, who stated to have received RTI application Dt addressed to him, (which was received in his office on ), is the same officer, who in his capacity as Addl.DCP has issued an order for the destruction of medical record of the appellant, which proves he deliberately obstructed information. The Commission directs Mr. Vijender Kumar Yadav to show cause why maximum penalty should not be imposed upon him for destruction of medical records of the appellant when the RTI request is pending with them, within 21 days from the date of receipt of this order. 11. The Commission directs the Superintendent, Central Jail 2 to initiate the efforts to find the medical records of the appellant if at all left out of the destruction process in the medical record room. In the alternative, the Commission requires the DCP/Civil Lines to search for any parallel entries of medical records or the bills for medical reimbursement or vouchers for payment made to the appellant or any other related document pertaining to medical history of the appellant, within 21 days from the date of receipt of this order. 12. The Commission directs the DGP (Prisons) to show cause why suitable compensation should not be awarded to the appellant for delaying, denying and destroying the medical records by the Public Authority. Sd/ Authenticated true copy (M. Sridhar Acharyulu) Information Commissioner (U. C. Joshi) Deputy Secretary Addresses of the parties: 1. The PIO under RTI, Govt of Delhi O/o Resident Medical Officer, GNCTD, Central Jail Tihar, CIC/SA/A/2015/ Page 5

6 New Delhi Shri Ravinder Kumar, S/o Sh. Babu Lal, Ward No. 01, Central Jail No. 2, Tihar, New Delhi. 3. The PIO under the RTI Act, Govt. of Delhi Central Jail No.2, Tihar Jail New Delhi The PIO/FAA under the RTI Act, Govt of Delhi Additional DCP (Mr. Vijender Kumar Yadav, IPS) Delhi Police, North District, Civil Lines, DELHI. 5. The DIG (Prisons) C/o Director General of Prisons Central Jail Tihar, New Delhi CIC/SA/A/2015/ Page 6

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/C/2015/000015

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/A/2015/001951

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000444 Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. Directorate of Health Services.

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000669 Appellant : Sh. Anil Sood Respondent : Sub Divisional Magistrate

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/A/2014/000004

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SS/A/2013/002209 SA Appellant : Mr. Subhash Chand Agrawal Respondent : Department

More information

Shri D. Sethi, GM, Ms. M. Kuttykrishnan, Asstt. Legal Adviser & Ms. Divya Sood Daur, General Manager at CIC. ADJUNCT ORDER

Shri D. Sethi, GM, Ms. M. Kuttykrishnan, Asstt. Legal Adviser & Ms. Divya Sood Daur, General Manager at CIC. ADJUNCT ORDER Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi110066 websitecic. gov.in Appeal: No. CIC/VS/A/2013/002002/MP Appellant : Public Authority

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION. Complainant : Shri R.K. Jain, 1512 B, Bhishm Pitamah Marg, Wazir Nagar, New Delhi 110 003.

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION. Complainant : Shri R.K. Jain, 1512 B, Bhishm Pitamah Marg, Wazir Nagar, New Delhi 110 003. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Decision No. CIC/DS/C/2013/000559/SB Dated 07.04.2016 Complainant : Shri R.K. Jain, 1512 B, Bhishm

More information

Appellant - Mohd. Yusuf Abbasee Respondent - Government of NCT of Delhi

Appellant - Mohd. Yusuf Abbasee Respondent - Government of NCT of Delhi CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2006/00699 & 700 dated 21.9.2006 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant - Mohd. Yusuf Abbasee Respondent - Government of NCT of Delhi Facts:

More information

On behalf of the Respondents, the following were present in person:

On behalf of the Respondents, the following were present in person: Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002332 File No. CIC/SH/C/2015/000462 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (18)/ (19) Date of hearing : 28th March 2016 Date

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000494 Appellant : Dr.Dheeraj Kapoor Respondent : Directorate of

More information

Central Information Commission. Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066. Website: www.cic.gov.in. : Heavy Water Plant, Kota ORDER

Central Information Commission. Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066. Website: www.cic.gov.in. : Heavy Water Plant, Kota ORDER Central Information Commission Room No.306, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066 Website: www.cic.gov.in CIC/SM/A/2013/000855/SS Dated: 14.2.2014 Appellant : Gaurav Garg,

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110067 Tel : +91-11-26717355

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110067 Tel : +91-11-26717355 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110067 Tel : +91-11-26717355 Appeal No.CIC/VS/A/2014/001672 Appellant: Subhash Sharma R/o Khera

More information

Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/002663. Appellant /Complainant : Shri B.B. Das Adhikary, Bhubaneswar

Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/002663. Appellant /Complainant : Shri B.B. Das Adhikary, Bhubaneswar Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Telefax:011 26180532 & 011 26107254 website cic.gov.in Appellant /Complainant :

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Complaint No.CIC/WB/C/2009/ dated Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Complaint No.CIC/WB/C/2009/ dated Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Complaint No.CIC/WB/C/2009/000006 dated 3.2.2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18 Complainant - Ms Sudha Gupta Respondent - Dy. Commissioner of Police (DCP) New Delhi

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal Nos. CIC/WB/A/2008/01019 & 1020 dated 3-6-2008 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal Nos. CIC/WB/A/2008/01019 & 1020 dated 3-6-2008 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal Nos. CIC/WB/A/2008/01019 & 1020 dated 3-6-2008 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant: Respondent: Shri Sudhir Chopra Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110066 PARTIES TO THE CASE: Appeal No.CIC/SS/A/2011/001364 Appellant : Ms. Iqbal Kaur (represented

More information

BAIL AND REMAND. Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article

BAIL AND REMAND. Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article 1 BAIL AND REMAND Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Since we are governed by the rule of law, freedom of every individual within the

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 20.01.2016 20.01.2016. Bokaro. Kolkata

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 20.01.2016 20.01.2016. Bokaro. Kolkata CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 F.No.CIC/YA/A/2015/001700 Date of Hearing Date of Decision : : 20.01.2016 20.01.2016 Complainant/Appellant : Ms.

More information

present at the NIC Studio, Ahmedabad and Ms. Charuta Joshi, Manager (Legal) was

present at the NIC Studio, Ahmedabad and Ms. Charuta Joshi, Manager (Legal) was Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002051 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) Date of hearing : 7 th July 2015 Date of decision : 7 th July 2015 Name

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682. File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682. File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682 File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM Appellant: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, New Delhi Public

More information

The Criminal Procedure Rules Part 17 as in force on 2 February 2015 PART 17 EXTRADITION

The Criminal Procedure Rules Part 17 as in force on 2 February 2015 PART 17 EXTRADITION Contents of this Part PART 17 EXTRADITION Section 1: general rules When this Part applies rule 17.1 Meaning of court, presenting officer and defendant rule 17.2 Section 2: extradition proceedings in a

More information

Respondents : Shipping Corporation of India Limited ORDER. This appeal earlier came up for hearing on 05.06.2013 when the Commission

Respondents : Shipping Corporation of India Limited ORDER. This appeal earlier came up for hearing on 05.06.2013 when the Commission Central Information Commission Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931 Case No. November 12, 2013 Appellant : Shri

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant: Respondent: Shri Suraj Prakash, United India Insurance Co. Decision Announced

More information

OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION ) S 136 of 1994 COMMISSIONER (QLD) ) (Decision No ) JOHN C BENNETT Applicant - and - DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION

OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION ) S 136 of 1994 COMMISSIONER (QLD) ) (Decision No ) JOHN C BENNETT Applicant - and - DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION ) S 136 of 1994 COMMISSIONER (QLD) ) (Decision No. 95029) Participants: JOHN C BENNETT Applicant - and - QUEENSLAND CORRECTIVE SERVICES COMMISSION Respondent DECISION AND REASONS

More information

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY President Judge General Court Regulation No. 2005-05 In Re: Amendment, Adoption and Rescission of Philadelphia

More information

On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Sanjay Agarwal, CPIO was present at the NIC

On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Sanjay Agarwal, CPIO was present at the NIC Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) Date of hearing : 29th June 2016 Date of decision : 29th June 2016 Name of the Appellant : Shri Ramchandra

More information

Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website-cic.gov.

Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website-cic.gov. Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 website-cic.gov.in Appeal No. CIC/MP/A/2014/002115 CIC/MP/A/2014/002153 Appellant

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/RM/A/2014/001293

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26101592

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26101592 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26101592 File No. CIC/BS/A/2014/002043+002045+002046+002047+002048+002073+002116+002143+ 002434+002438+002451+002559+002636+000727+000863+000947+001004+

More information

BY SUMEET VERMA ADVOCATE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & DELHI HIGH COURT

BY SUMEET VERMA ADVOCATE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & DELHI HIGH COURT BY SUMEET VERMA ADVOCATE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & DELHI HIGH COURT POSSIBILITY OF REHABILITATION AS A LEGAL ARGUMENT TO CONVINCE JUDGES NOT TO IMPOSE DEATH SENTENCE The Constitution bench of the hon ble

More information

Appellant /Complainant : Sh. Madan Mohan Tiwari, New Delhi

Appellant /Complainant : Sh. Madan Mohan Tiwari, New Delhi 1 Central Information Commission Room No.296, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Telefax:011 26180532 & 011 26107254 website cic.gov.in Appellant /Complainant

More information

CIC/VS/A/2013/001063/SH

CIC/VS/A/2013/001063/SH Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/VS/C/2013/000347/SH File No. CIC/VS/C/2013/000349/SH File No. CIC/VS/C/2013/000350/SH File No. CIC/VS/C/2013/000352/SH File No. CIC/VS/C/2013/000353/SH

More information

CHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985

CHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985 CHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985 Subchapter 6.000 General Provisions Rule 6.001 Scope; Applicability of Civil Rules; Superseded Rules and Statutes (A) Felony Cases. The rules

More information

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003 1. Kasturi Lal Khurana, son of Ram Lal, Date of institution : 11.3.2003 Date

More information

General District Courts

General District Courts General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance

More information

THE PUNJAB SALES TAX ON SERVICES ACT 2012

THE PUNJAB SALES TAX ON SERVICES ACT 2012 THE PUNJAB SALES TAX ON SERVICES ACT 2012 CHAPTER VIII OFFENCES AND PENALTIES 48. Offences and penalties. (1) If a person commits any offence described in column 2 of the Table below shall, in addition

More information

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND PART I. (A) No attorney will be assigned to defend any indigent person in a criminal case unless his or her name appears on one of the approved trial counsel lists

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August KrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi Appellant : Shri Madhusudhan Mukherjee

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August KrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi Appellant : Shri Madhusudhan Mukherjee CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August KrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 02.07.2015 F.No.CIC/YA/A/2014/002131 F.No.CIC/YA/A/2014/002237 F.No.CIC/KY/C/2014/000329-YA F.No.CIC/YA/A/2014/003284

More information

A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process

A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney General s Office A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney

More information

Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses

Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses Office of the Attorney General Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses MARCH 2009 LAWRENCE WASDEN Attorney General Criminal Law Division Special Prosecutions Unit Telephone: (208) 332-3096 Fax: (208)

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS WITH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS WITH 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD....APPELLANT VERSUS HILLI MULTIPURPOSE COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD...RESPONDENT

More information

Casino, Liquor and Gaming Control Authority Act 2007 No 91

Casino, Liquor and Gaming Control Authority Act 2007 No 91 New South Wales Casino, Liquor and Gaming Control Authority Act 2007 No 91 Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Definitions 2 4 Meaning of gaming and liquor legislation

More information

IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE RON WILLIAMS AND

IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE RON WILLIAMS AND SAINT LUCIA IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SLUHCV 2012/0123 BETWEEN RON WILLIAMS AND THE DIRECTOR OF BORDELAIS PRISON The ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SAINT LUCIA.. 2013: October

More information

As used in this chapter, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following

As used in this chapter, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following Page 1 Massachusetts General Laws Annotated Currentness Part IV. Crimes, Punishments and Proceedings in Criminal Cases (Ch. 263-280) Title II. Proceedings in Criminal Cases (Ch. 275-280) Chapter 278A.

More information

INFORMATION / FACT SHEET CRIME TO TRIAL PROCESS CRIMINAL COURT HEARINGS EXPLAINED

INFORMATION / FACT SHEET CRIME TO TRIAL PROCESS CRIMINAL COURT HEARINGS EXPLAINED INFORMATION / FACT SHEET CRIME TO TRIAL PROCESS CRIMINAL COURT HEARINGS EXPLAINED *(Please be advised that this is a general guide only and is by no means an exhaustive summary of all criminal court hearings.

More information

Filing Fee $117.00. Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record

Filing Fee $117.00. Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record Filing Fee $117.00 Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record Effective 1-1-2015 This packet is to be used to assist you in filing an application to seal your criminal record. * * * * * * * * * * * * *

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DEFAMATION Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006 NEMICHAND JAIN ALIAS CHANDRA SWAMI... Petitioner Through Mr. K.K. Sud, Sr.

More information

Cooperation with the International Criminal Court Act (2002:329)

Cooperation with the International Criminal Court Act (2002:329) Cooperation with the International Criminal Court Act (2002:329) Issued: 8 May 2002 Entered into force: 1 July 2002 General provisions Section 1 If the Court established under the Rome Statute of the International

More information

Glossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench

Glossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench Glossary of Terms The Glossary of Terms defines some of the most common legal terms in easy-tounderstand language. Terms are listed in alphabetical order. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W

More information

Mutual Legal Assistance (International)

Mutual Legal Assistance (International) Mutual Legal Assistance (International) 2005-32 MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE (INTERNATIONAL) ACT 2005 Principal Act Act. No. 2005-32 Commencement 23.5.2005 Assent 23.5.2005 Amending enactments Relevant current

More information

On behalf of the Respondents, the following were present:

On behalf of the Respondents, the following were present: Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/001245 File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002761 File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002763 File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002760 File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/001797

More information

OFFICE ORDER. Registration, Abatement or Return of Appeal/Complaint. To streamline, the work relating to Appeal and Complaint cases, it is ordered

OFFICE ORDER. Registration, Abatement or Return of Appeal/Complaint. To streamline, the work relating to Appeal and Complaint cases, it is ordered OFFICE ORDER Registration, Abatement or Return of Appeal/Complaint. To streamline, the work relating to Appeal and Complaint cases, it is ordered that:- 1. Every Appeal, Complaint, application, statement,

More information

A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal

A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal Presented by the Office of the Richmond County District Attorney Acting District Attorney Daniel L. Master, Jr. 130 Stuyvesant

More information

SENATE... No. 2299. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. In the Year Two Thousand Fourteen

SENATE... No. 2299. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. In the Year Two Thousand Fourteen SENATE.............. No. 2299 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts In the Year Two Thousand Fourteen SENATE, Wednesday, July 23, 2014 The committee on Ways and Means, to whom was referred the Senate Bill

More information

Copyright @ Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh.

Copyright @ Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh. 360 (2) Every order made by a Competent Court under this Act shall be subject to appeal in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, applicable to appeals. Appointment of Provincial

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2006/00807 & 923 dated 17.8.2006 & 4.12.2006 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant - Shri Naved Yar Khan Respondent - Govt. of N.C.T. Delhi

More information

VICTIM COMPENSATION SCHEME

VICTIM COMPENSATION SCHEME VICTIM COMPENSATION SCHEME GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFIRS AND JUSTICE (HOME-IV BRANCH) NOTIFICATION The 8 December, 2011 No.5/154/2008-3H4/3597-In exercise of th powers conferred by section

More information

Colorado Revised Statutes 2013 TITLE 21

Colorado Revised Statutes 2013 TITLE 21 Colorado Revised Statutes 2013 TITLE 21 STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER ARTICLE 1 State Public Defender 21-1-101. Public defender - policy - commission. (1) The office of state public defender is hereby created

More information

Part B PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS NOTICE

Part B PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS NOTICE Part B PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS NOTICE New York State Education Department PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS NOTICE Rights for Parents of Children with Disabilities, Ages 3-21 As a parent, you are a vital member of the

More information

104, Silverton Town, 1 st Floor, Golf Course Extension Road, Sec 50, Gurgaon 122001. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002741

104, Silverton Town, 1 st Floor, Golf Course Extension Road, Sec 50, Gurgaon 122001. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002741 Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002740 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) Date of first hearing 5th January 2016 Date of first order 5th January

More information

CHAPTER VIII ACTION AGAINST TEMPORARY GOVERNMENT SERVANTS. 1. Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965

CHAPTER VIII ACTION AGAINST TEMPORARY GOVERNMENT SERVANTS. 1. Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 CHAPTER VIII ACTION AGAINST TEMPORARY GOVERNMENT SERVANTS 1. Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 The conditions of service of temporary Government servants, are, in A(6) certain matters,

More information

FEDERAL VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS 1

FEDERAL VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS 1 FEDERAL VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS 1 CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT (CVRA): 18 U.S.C. 3771 (a) Rights of Crime Victims. A crime victim has the following rights: (1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.

More information

The Court of Protection Rules 2007

The Court of Protection Rules 2007 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No. 1744 (L. 12) MENTAL CAPACITY, ENGLAND AND WALES The Court of Protection Rules 2007 Made - - - - - 25th June 2007 Laid before Parliament 4th July 2007 Coming into force -

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Special Leave Petition (Civil) No of 2012 CC 14781/2012)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Special Leave Petition (Civil) No of 2012 CC 14781/2012) 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 27734 of 2012 (@ CC 14781/2012) Girish Ramchandra Deshpande.. Petitioner Versus Cen. Information

More information

The Credit Reporting Act

The Credit Reporting Act 1 CREDIT REPORTING c. C-43.2 The Credit Reporting Act being Chapter C-43.2 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2004 (effective March 1, 2005). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been

More information

Settlement Commission

Settlement Commission Document No. 1.0.7.14-SC For departmental use only Detailed Study Report on Settlement Commission Prepared by Shri Harshal V Mete Shri Mukesh Kumar Shri Navneet Kaushal IRS (C&CE) Probationers 65th batch

More information

REVISED RULES OF COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES SUPREME COURT RULE 102 HABEAS CORPUS

REVISED RULES OF COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES SUPREME COURT RULE 102 HABEAS CORPUS REVISED RULES OF COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES SUPREME COURT RULE 102 HABEAS CORPUS Sec. 1. To what habeas corpus extends. - Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, the writ of habeas corpus shall extend

More information

Chapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition)

Chapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition) Chapter 813 2013 EDITION Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants GENERAL PROVISIONS 813.010 Driving under the influence of intoxicants; penalty 813.011 Felony driving under the influence of intoxicants;

More information

Morgan County Prosecuting Attorney Debra MH McLaughlin

Morgan County Prosecuting Attorney Debra MH McLaughlin Morgan County Prosecuting Attorney Debra MH McLaughlin Directions: From Fairfax Street Entrance, Enter Main Door, turn Right through door, up the narrow staircase. Office is at top of steps. (Old Circuit

More information

HEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING

HEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING HEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING 19-301. License required; exceptions; practice without license (a) In general. -- Except as otherwise provided in this title, an individual

More information

The Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction

The Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction The Circuit Court The circuit court is the trial court of general jurisdiction in Virginia, and the court has authority to try a full range of both civil and criminal cases. Civil cases involve disputes

More information

Title 34-A: CORRECTIONS

Title 34-A: CORRECTIONS Title 34-A: CORRECTIONS Chapter 5: PROBATION AND PAROLE Table of Contents Subchapter 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 3 Section 5001. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 5002. PARDONS BY THE GOVERNOR... 4 Section 5003. PROHIBITED

More information

THE EXTRADITION ACT, 1974. An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the extradition of fugitive offenders. CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY

THE EXTRADITION ACT, 1974. An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the extradition of fugitive offenders. CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY THE EXTRADITION ACT, 1974 (ACT No. LVIII of 1974) An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the extradition of fugitive offenders. WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating

More information

INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT NOTICE OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS

INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT NOTICE OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT NOTICE OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS Tennessee Department of Education Division of Special Education Department of Education February 11, 2008; Publication Authorization

More information

CHAPTER 234 HOUSE BILL 2131 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 12-348, 41-1007 AND 42-2064, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; RELATING TO TAX ADJUDICATIONS.

CHAPTER 234 HOUSE BILL 2131 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 12-348, 41-1007 AND 42-2064, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; RELATING TO TAX ADJUDICATIONS. Senate Engrossed House Bill State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-second Legislature First Regular Session 0 CHAPTER HOUSE BILL AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS -, -00 AND -0, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;

More information

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2012 WI 123 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thomas E. Bielinski, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Thomas

More information

Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002481 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) 18th January 2016

Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002481 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) 18th January 2016 Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) Date of first hearing : 18th January 2016 Date of first order : 18th January 2016 Date of second hearing

More information

N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act

N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act 1 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BARPETA. N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act Present : Md. Abdul Hakim, M.A.,LL.B., Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barpeta. Narayan Nath --- Complainant

More information

Part B PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS NOTICE

Part B PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS NOTICE Part B PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS NOTICE New York State Education Department PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS NOTICE Rights for Parents of Children with Disabilities, Ages 3-21 As a parent, you are a vital member of the

More information

DECISIONS. Communication No. 393/1990. Date of communication : 16 March 1990 (initial submission)

DECISIONS. Communication No. 393/1990. Date of communication : 16 March 1990 (initial submission) Distr. RESTRICTED */ ENGLISH/FRENCH CCPR/C/45/D/393/1990 27 July 1992 ENGLISH Original: HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Forty-fifth session DECISIONS Communication No. 393/1990 Submitted by : A.C. Alleged victim

More information

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE Date: 5 May 2015 Approved: 3 June 2015 Review date: 22 April 2018 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. NOTES OF GUIDANCE Counselling General Principles Investigation Minor Matters

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2007/01219 dated Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2007/01219 dated Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2007/01219 dated 8.12.2007 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant - Shri Ajit Kar Respondent - Delhi Police Facts: By an application of 27.2.2007

More information

14th January 2016. 14th January 2016

14th January 2016. 14th January 2016 Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000773 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000838 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000841 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000843 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/001111

More information

STATE OF CONNECTICUT REGULATION of the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION (NAME OF AGENCY)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT REGULATION of the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION (NAME OF AGENCY) STATE OF CONNECTICUT REGULATION of the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION (NAME OF AGENCY) Concerning APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANIES (SUBJECT MATTER OF REGULATION) (NEW) Section 1. The Regulations of Connecticut

More information

Part 700 Tribal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (TOSHA)

Part 700 Tribal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (TOSHA) Part 700 Tribal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (TOSHA) Section 701 Purpose and Definitions. (a) The purpose of Chapter 7 is to assure as far as possible safe and healthful working conditions

More information

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Dated 17 th July, Petition No. 273 of Reliance Telecom Ltd.

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Dated 17 th July, Petition No. 273 of Reliance Telecom Ltd. TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Dated 17 th July, 2014 Petition No. 273 of 2012 Reliance Telecom Ltd. Petitioner Vs. Union of India Respondent Petition No. 274 of 2012 Reliance

More information

Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court

Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court Rule 6.610 Criminal Procedure Generally (A) Precedence. Criminal cases have precedence over civil actions. (B) Pretrial. The court, on its own initiative

More information

The Hr. School Edu. Act, 1995 (HARYANA ACT NO. 12 OF 1999)

The Hr. School Edu. Act, 1995 (HARYANA ACT NO. 12 OF 1999) The Hr. School Edu. Act, 1995 (HARYANA ACT NO. 12 OF 1999) (Copy of Hr. Noti. No. Leg 14/99 dt. 4.6.99-Hr. Act No. 12 of 1999 as notified in Haryana Govt. Gazette dt. 4.6.1999) Chapter-I PRELIMINARY 1.

More information

2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013

2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013 2 nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No. 54 of 2013 Date of institution: 17.1.2013 Date of Decision: 20.1.2015 National

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. - versus AND. - versus. MR KAMLESH JAIN & OTHERS...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. - versus AND. - versus. MR KAMLESH JAIN & OTHERS... IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment delivered on: 06.03.2009 IA 1941/2006 in CS(OS) 328/2006 M/S KOXAN INDIA Plaintiff - versus RAMESH MARDIA & OTHERS... Defendants

More information

THE TAMIL NADU VICTIM COMPENSATION SCHEME, 2013 LAWYER STATUTES

THE TAMIL NADU VICTIM COMPENSATION SCHEME, 2013 LAWYER STATUTES THE TAMIL NADU VICTIM COMPENSATION SCHEME, 2013 LAWYER STATUTES P. VAIRAVA SUNDARAM - ADVOCATE 31st December 2013 Contents 1. Short title.-... 2 2. Definitions.-... 2 3. Victim Compensation Fund.-... 3

More information

Legislative Brief The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, 2006

Legislative Brief The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, 2006 Legislative Brief The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, 2006 The Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on August 23, 2006. The Bill has been referred to the Parliamentary Standing Committee

More information

HIGH COURTS AND SUBORDINATE COURTS

HIGH COURTS AND SUBORDINATE COURTS MODULE - 3 Political Science 15 HIGH COURTS AND SUBORDINATE COURTS Y ou have already read about the role of India s highest Court called the Supreme Court. Just below the Supreme Court, there are High

More information

CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE STANDARDS

CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE STANDARDS V I C T I M S E R V I C E S D I V I S I O N Texas Department of Criminal Justice Victim Services Division CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE STANDARDS Developed and distributed by the The Texas Crime Victim Clearinghouse

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Central Information Commissioner CIC/SA/A/2014/001212,

More information

Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED]

Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED] Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED] CONTENTS Section PART 1 ARREST AND CUSTODY CHAPTER 1 ARREST BY POLICE 1 Power of a constable 2 Exercise of the power Arrest without warrant Procedure following

More information

2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law:

2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law: 2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: 2011AP778-D In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant,

More information

Crimes (Computer Hacking)

Crimes (Computer Hacking) 2009-44 CRIMES (COMPUTER HACKING) ACT 2009 by Act 2011-23 as from 23.11.2012 Principal Act Act. No. 2009-44 Commencement except ss. 15-24 14.1.2010 (LN. 2010/003) Assent 3.12.2009 Amending enactments Relevant

More information

IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1. CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7]

IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1. CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7] IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1 CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7] 205 11.1(906) Voluntary termination of parole. Any voluntary termination of parole should

More information