1 Closer Look at ACOs A series of briefs designed to help advocates nderstand the basics of Accontable Care Organizations (ACOs) and their potential for improving patient care. From Families USA Updated Febrary 2012 Making the Most of Accontable Care Organizations (ACOs): What Advocates Need to Know What s an ACO? Since the Affordable Care Act was signed into law, there has been a lot of bzz abot Accontable Care Organizations (ACOs). Spporters of ACOs see them as a way to reshape the way health care is delivered. They hope that ACOs will improve health care qality and redce health care costs by getting providers to work together and focs on the qality of care, not the qantity. The broad concept of an ACO is not complicated. An ACO is an entity that is made p of health care providers across the continm of care (inclding acte care, longterm care, and behavioral and mental health care) that agrees to be held accontable for improving the health of its patients. If patients health care costs end p being less than wold otherwise be expected while health care qality is maintained or improved, the providers get to keep a share of that savings. Providers, therefore, have a financial incentive to work together to improve the health of their patients. A sccessfl ACO shold pt the patient at the center of all its activities and ensre coordination of care. An ACO is not an insrance plan. Rather, the ACO model provides for a new way to pay health care providers: Providers that are part of the ACO will contine to be paid by a third party payer, sch as Medicare, Medicaid, or a private insrance plan. While the concept may be straightforward, actally designing an ACO that will benefit health care consmers is difficlt. There is no one-size-fits-all model for an ACO, and there are a great many nanswered qestions abot how they shold operate. If they are implemented poorly, ACOs cold simply end p limiting access to care, rather than improving qality.
2 2 Making the Most of Accontable Care Organizations This brief examines some of the key qestions facing advocates and policy makers as ACOs take shape, and we sggest how consmer advocates can get involved in answering these qestions in a way that benefits patients. Sbseqent briefs have examined some of the complexities of ACOs in more detail. These pieces are available on or website at The Promise of ACOs Althogh ACOs are not the silver bllet that will fix all the problems within or health care system, they are potentially a powerfl tool that cold improve the qality of care and change the way providers are paid so that they are encoraged to deliver high-qality, low-cost care. ACOs aim to fix the fragmentation in or health care system by addressing simltaneosly both the way care is delivered (delivery system reform) and the way that it is paid for (payment reform). One of the goals of ACOs is to move the health care system away from a fee-for-service system, in which providers are paid for each service a patient receives, to one focsed on delivering the best care at the best price. This is often described as high-vale care. In a fee-for-service system, the more services providers give, the more money they are paid. This creates a powerfl incentive to provide more and more services, regardless of whether the services are improving the patient s health. In a vale-driven system, providers will be paid based on the qality and cost of the care they provide. Changing the financial incentives that often drive the way providers deliver health care shold help ensre that patients receive the right care at the right time in the right setting. The most important of an ACO s many fnctions is to bring health care providers and commnitybased services together to work in a way that meets all the needs of its patient poplation. The ACO shold help bridge the gap in commnication that has often existed between providers (for example, between primary care providers and specialists), along the continm of care (for example, between acte care and long-term care), and between health care providers and commnity-based services (for example, between doctors and Meals on Wheels programs). The ACO will also be responsible for helping providers change the way they deliver care. ACOs shold develop gidelines for their providers that establish how care shold be delivered. ACOs may also give providers health information technology (HIT) that incldes electronic health records and decision-spport tools that will help providers and patients work together to explore different treatment options to determine which is best for the patient. An ACO will also serve important administrative fnctions, sch as negotiating contracts with insrers, both private insrers and pblic programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
3 What Advocates Need to Know 3 To deliver on the promise of lower costs throgh improved patient health, ACOs will have to develop trly patient-centered care. The Institte of Medicine has defined patientcentered care as providing care that is respectfl of and responsive to individal patient preferences, needs, and vales and ensring that patient vales gide all clinical decisions. 1 Part of providing patient-centered care means ensring that patients have access to care when they need it. This means something as practical as being able to see health care providers the same day or on the weekend, rather than having to wait for an appointment and having a condition worsen. It also means providing the spport that patients need, sch as helping them transition between health care settings (for example, leaving a hospital for home or an assisted living facility). It shold inclde coordination among all the patient s health care providers and among care settings, particlarly dring transitions between settings. Care coordination shold also inclde coordination among payers, inclding Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare, and other forms of coverage, as well as coordination of health and social services, sch as transportation and ntrition. The Emerging ACO Landscape The idea of creating an integrated health care entity is not new. Large health care systems like the Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania or the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota have provided integrated care across the health care continm for decades, often to wide acclaim. What is relatively new is the idea of sing payment reform to make a grop of providers accontable for the qality of care they provide. Several demonstrations and experiments have tried this model in recent years. Medicare began a demonstration in 2005, 2 and the Dartmoth Institte and the Brookings Instittion are testing ACO models with five different provider grops and private insrance companies in different parts of the contry. 3 As part of its efforts to promote better qality care and lower costs, the Affordable Care Act gave the development of ACOs a significant boost. The new law created several kinds of ACOs, inclding the Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO. This is a new type of payment within Medicare that providers can choose to participate in. Under this model, if the ACO lowers Medicare expenditres from year to year and meets qality measrements, the ACO will share in a percentage of the savings. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issed final reglations for the Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO in October The program will begin in The Affordable Care Act also athorizes Medicare to test other types of ACO models. For example, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation is testing 32 Pioneer ACOs in 18 states. 5 On the Medicaid side, the new law athorizes a limited Medicaid ACO demonstration. The demonstration allows states to test Medicaid Pediatric ACOs over a five-year period. States are also prsing Medicaid ACOs throgh other means, inclding state plan amendments and waivers. Colorado, for example, began enrolling beneficiaries in its Medicaid ACO model in
4 4 Making the Most of Accontable Care Organizations In terms of private insrance, the Affordable Care Act does not explicitly promote the growth of ACOs that serve patients with this type of insrance. However, private insrers have historically adopted many of the payment reforms that have been pioneered by Medicare. If Medicare ACOs are sccessfl, private insrers are likely to follow sit and develop ways to pay ACOs. This is why the development of Medicare ACOs is so important. In addition, private insrers are showing significant interest in encoraging the development of ACOs or of entities that in some ways resemble ACOs. This interest is nderstandable, as ACOs have the potential to redce costs for all payers, inclding private insrers. However, in some cases, insrers may seek to blr the lines between a provider-based ACO and an insrance company. This concern highlights the need for advocates to psh for vigilant patient protections as ACOs develop. The Role for Advocates As providers reorganize themselves into ACOs, advocates have an important role to play to make sre that patients interests and needs are met. This is tre for ACOs that are established nder Medicare s rles, as well as for those that emerge throgh Medicaid and the private sector. Advocates shold monitor the development of Medicare ACOs for several reasons. First, and most obviosly, these ACOs will serve Medicare beneficiaries, who need access to high-qality care. Secondly, these ACOs will almost certainly inclde major health care instittions in some areas (large hospital systems, for example). This means that they will serve patients who are not in Medicare bt who also need high-qality care. Finally, ACOs that are developed nder Medicare rles will likely serve as models for ACOs that are developed to work with other payers, sch as private insrers. In addition, an increasing nmber of state Medicaid programs and large provider grops and instittions like hospitals are considering establishing new integrated entities. Some of these proposals are actally tre ACOs, in which grops of providers across the care spectrm are held accontable by Medicaid or private insrers for qality and get to share in any savings. Other proposals may se the term ACO bt are not trly ACOs. Some are forms of primary care case management, in which primary care doctors are given incentives to coordinate care. Others may be closer to new models for health insrance, in which a private insrer takes on a larger role in coordinating care. In still other cases, providers may be consolidating (for example, hospitals prchase physician grops) allegedly to create an ACO, bt the necessary accontability mechanisms are yet to be established. Becase ACOs are at sch an early stage of development, the most important role advocates can play in the process is to become involved in setting p the rles and in establishing the new entities. This can mean many things. For example:
5 What Advocates Need to Know 5 If a Medicaid program proposes an ACO, advocates shold participate in the planning process to make sre beneficiaries needs are met. If a large hospital system is acqiring a set of other providers and annonces it will form an ACO, advocates shold demand a voice in establishing consmer protections and rles for accontability. When federal and state reglations and policies are proposed in Medicare and Medicaid, advocates shold consider sbmitting comments. Advocates shold develop relationships with health care administrators, medical societies, insrance commissioners, and health departments, among others, to stay informed abot changes to their local health care delivery system. What follows is a list of key challenges that may be encontered in the ACO development process and how advocates might sggest these challenges be addressed. Challenges Facing ACOs Challenge 1: Developing an ACO that Meets a Commnity s Needs What a particlar ACO will look like will depend largely on the health care delivery system in that area. ACOs cold be any of the following: flly integrated health delivery systems, large mltispecialty grop practices that own or have strong affiliations with hospitals, physician-hospital organizations, physician-only organizations, or some combination of these. For rral areas, becase the providers may be spread over a large geographic area, a rral ACO is more likely to be virtal, while an rban one may be located in a physical location. In addition, different tools may need to be sed to help rral providers with care coordination, sch as telemedicine, which may not be a common tool that is sed by rban ACOs. Whatever form it takes, an ACO mst be bilt on a fondation of primary care. Primary care providers are sally the ideal providers to coordinate patient care. Beyond this, an ACO shold organize itself based on the needs of its patient poplation. For example, if the patient poplation is older, the ACO shold inclde providers of long-term services and spports and commnity-based services sch as Meals on Wheels. If the ACO treats a largely low-income poplation, the ACO will need to inclde safety net providers, sch as federally qalified health centers (FQHCs), as well as transportation service providers.
6 6 Making the Most of Accontable Care Organizations In addition to a strong primary care fondation, ACOs shold inclde a wide range of health care providers and commnity-based resorces (beyond hospitals and doctors) throgh formal or informal relationships. ACOs mst inclde an adeqate and appropriate mix of health care providers and commnity-based services in order to manage patient care along the fll care continm. Governance of ACOs is another concern. In most cases, an ACO will have some kind of governing body, sch as a board of directors. The governing body shold inclde patients and commnitybased service providers, as well as participating health care providers. The governing body shold allow all ACO participants and the commnity to take part in the decision-making of the ACO, which will help ensre local accontability. Isses for Advocates Does the ACO have an adeqate and appropriate range of providers and services, inclding a large primary care capacity? Can the ACO meet the commnity s health care needs, inclding cltral and lingistic concerns? Does the governance strctre allow adeqate participation by commnity members who are not health care providers? Challenge 2: Figring Ot Which Patients Are in the ACO For the ACO model to work, there mst be some way for the payer and the ACO to know which patients they are responsible for. Under most models, inclding the Medicare shared savings program model, beneficiaries will be atomatically assigned to an ACO based on which doctors and providers they see. They will not have to enroll affirmatively in an ACO like they have to enroll in a health insrance plan. Rather, if Ms. Smith sees Dr. Jones for most of her care, and Dr. Jones is part of the ACO, then Ms. Smith is considered to be assigned to Dr. Jones s ACO for payment prposes. However, there are other ways for beneficiaries to become part of an ACO. Some ACOs and payers may allow beneficiaries to explicitly enroll in an ACO. This cold either be an active, volntary choice by the beneficiary, or it cold be some kind of atomatic process made by the insrer. In some models, the payer cold reqire the beneficiary to select an ACO, similar to selecting a primary care provider within a network. This last option, which is not part of any crrent Medicare proposal, wold have the effect of limiting patients access to providers and shold be explored very careflly, and it shold be implemented only after the adeqacy of the ACO has been established.
7 What Advocates Need to Know 7 Under any approach, two concerns are paramont: 1) Patients mst know that they have been assigned to an ACO, and 2) patients need to know what their rights are regarding leaving the ACO. In most cases, providing patients with a way to opt ot of the ACO is a good idea. Isses for Advocates How will patients know they are part of an ACO? The more direct and personalized the notification is, the better. Are there any limitations on access to providers? If so, what are they, and how can they be overcome? How can a patient leave the ACO? Challenge 3: Allowing Patients Freedom of Choice of Providers Under the Medicare Shared Savings Program, patients will be able to see both ACO providers and non-aco providers. The ACOs will not be like managed care insrance plans where patients can see only providers within their plan s network. However, the ACO will still be held financially accontable for all the care the patient poplation receives, both from ACO providers and from non-aco providers. For patients, this freedom of choice of provider is particlarly important if a patient is ndergoing a corse of treatment with a particlar provider. For providers, it shold encorage health care providers both inside and otside the ACO to commnicate and coordinate care, regardless of whether they share the same financial incentives, becase it is in the best interest of the patient. Some providers have voiced concerns that they shold not be accontable for care that patients receive from providers otside the ACO. As a reslt, some ACO models (those paid by Medicaid and private insrers) may reqire patients to see providers only within the ACO. In these cases, consmer protections sch as reqiring adeqate networks, ensring continity of care, and institting an easy appeals process to obtain care otside the ACO are essential. Isses for Advocates Will patients have freedom of choice of provider? Will ACO providers be able to commnicate adeqately with non-aco providers? If freedom of choice of provider is limited, ensring an adeqate range of providers within the ACO is even more vital. Advocates need also to bild in consmer protections, inclding protections for ensring continity of care and an appeals process.
8 8 Making the Most of Accontable Care Organizations Challenge 4: Holding ACOs Accontable for Qality An ACO mst be held accontable for the performance qality of its member providers. Withot sch measrement, beneficiaries, payers, and the pblic cannot be sre of the qality of care that beneficiaries receive and determine whether that care improves over time. Qality measrement also serves as a check on the temptation to prodce short-term savings by limiting care, rather than by improving qality. Under the Medicare shared savings program reglations, the qality of care that is delivered is linked to the amont of the incentive payment that an ACO can receive. This makes the ACO accontable for the care that its providers deliver. If the ACO providers lower costs and meet minimm qality reqirements, the ACO receives an incentive payment. The higher the qality scores, the larger the incentive payment. On the other hand, if the ACO s health care providers do not meet the qality reqirements, then the ACO will not receive any incentive payment. Other ACO models may se different measres of accontability and different formlas for incentive payments. Advocates shold make sre that whatever measres and formlas are sed, they are rigoros enogh to drive qality improvements. Whenever possible, the qality measrements shold be standardized across different payers, both to limit the brden on health care providers and to help improve the qality measrement process. Isses for Advocates Is there rigoros qality measrement in place that evolves over time to ensre that qality is always improving? Is the qality measrement appropriate for the commnity and for the patients who will be served? For example, consider whether a measrement is sitable for a pediatric verss a geriatric practice; what the appropriate langage and cltral standards shold be; as well as whether there are particlar conditions, like diabetes, that are especially prevalent. Will the formla for incentive payments ensre participation of an adeqate range of providers? Challenge 5: Getting Providers and Patients to Work Better Together To be sccessfl, ACOs will need to drive a change in the cltre both of health care providers and patients. Historically, doctors have not practiced in teams and have not commnicated well across the care continm. At the same time, many patients believe more care is better and the newest technology or medication is always the best, when in fact sometimes less intensive treatment can be more effective. ACOs aim to shift this cltre to one where the emphasis is on care coordination and not simply doing more and more of the latest and costliest procedres.
9 What Advocates Need to Know 9 To start the care coordination process, ACOs shold explain to patients (throgh notices and other means) that the provider is part of an ACO and what that means for the patient. Providers shold also inclde patients in the process of developing health care plans that reflect patient preferences and vales. ACOs shold also develop protocols to se shared decision making that explains the benefits and conseqences of each treatment to patients (or their caregivers). Isses for Advocates As ACOs take shape, look for evidence (throgh srveys and other means) that providers are working in teams and commnicating better with patients and among themselves. Use positions on governing boards to monitor patient involvement in treatment, sch as the se of shared decision making. Challenge 6: Avoiding the Mistakes of Managed Care Althogh they are not a form of health insrance, ACOs have some sperficial similarities to health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and other managed care. When first conceived, managed care was intended to prodce savings becase insrers wold benefit from redced health care costs if their members health was improved throgh initiatives like case management and better preventive benefits. In some cases, this worked. In many instances, however, insrers fond it easier to redce costs simply by closing provider networks, which limited patients freedom of choice of provider, and by denying coverage of services. Little attention was paid to improving qality and paying for high-vale care. As a reslt, in the 1990s, there was a significant backlash against managed care from both patients and providers. Unlike managed care, ACOs are designed to be provider-based. They shold se care coordination and qality measrement to improve health care qality and drive down health care costs. The focs shold be on providing high-qality care, not limiting access to care. Taking the responsibility of improving qality while lowering costs ot of the hands of a third party, often a large company that has no ties to the commnity and that is not directly involved with providing health care, and ptting it into the hands of a local organization that is made p of the providers who directly provide care to patients is among the most important differences between a managed care plan and an ACO. Nevertheless, there is a risk that poorly designed ACOs cold prse short-term savings by limiting access to care. That is why robst accontability measres are essential. It is also why payers (insrers) need to be kept separate from ACOs. Isses for Advocates Ensre patients and providers, not insrers, have athority over health care decisions.
10 10 Making the Most of Accontable Care Organizations Conclsion The development of ACOs is an important opportnity for health care advocates to participate in the reshaping of or health care system. If done well, ACOs hold the promise of redcing health care costs while improving qality for patients. Bt they will scceed only if the needs and concerns of patients are continally broght forward as these new entities develop. As ACOs emerge at the state and local level, advocates shold inject themselves into the planning processes and ensre that consmers interests are protected. Resorces ACO Learning Network, available online at Medicare Shared Savings Program Final Rle, availalble online at /pdf/ pdf. Medicare Shared Savings Program Proposed Rle, available online at pkg/fr /pdf/ pdf. National Committee for Qality Assrance (NCQA), available online at tabid/1312/defalt.aspx. National Qality Form, available online at National Qality Measres Clearinghose, available online at abot/index.aspx. 1 Institte of Medicine, Crossing the Qality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Centry (Washington: National Academy Press, 2001). 2 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare Physician Grop Practice Demonstration (Washington: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, December 2001), available online at 3 More information abot the Brookings-Dartmoth ACO model is available on the The Dartmoth Institte for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Center for Poplation Health, Accontable Care Organizations web page, online at at centers/poplation-health/policy-core/accontable-care-organizations/. 4 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accontable Care Organizations, 76 FR 67802, available online at https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/11/02/ /medicare-programmedicare-shared-savings-program-accontable-care-organizations. 5 Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, Pioneer ACO Model, available online at pioneer/, accessed on Febrary 10, Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, Accontable Care Collaborative (Denver: Colorado Department of Health Care Policy, 2011), available online at
11 What Advocates Need to Know 11 This brief was written by: Michealle Gady Health Policy Analyst and Marc Steinberg Depty Director, Health Policy The following Families USA staff contribted to the preparation of this report: Kathleen Stoll, Depty Exective Director, Director of Health Policy Kim Bailey, Research Director Christine Sebastian, Health Policy Analyst Peggy Denker, Director of Pblications Ingrid VanTinen, Depty Director of Pblications Nancy Magill, Senior Graphic Designer
12 Making the Most of Accontable Care Organizations (ACOs): What Advocates Need to Know Febrary 2012 by Families USA A complete list of Families USA pblications is available online at New York Avene NW, Site 1100 n Washington, DC Phone: n
The Good Governance Standard for Pblic Services The Independent Commission on Good Governance in Pblic Services Good Governance Standard for Pblic Services OPM and CIPFA, 2004 OPM (Office for Pblic Management
Adopted Fall 2005 The Stats of Nrsing Edcation in the California Commnity Colleges T h e A c a d e m i c S e n a t e f o r C a l i f o r n i a C o m m n i t y C o l l e g e s Nrsing Task Force 2004-2005
Rasterized 300 dpi Linking Data across Agencies: States That Are Making It Work Updated March 2010 By: Rebecca Carson and Elizabeth Laird, Data Qality Campaign; Elizabeth Gaines and Thaddes Ferber, The
Self-Compliance Tool for Part 7 of ERISA: Health Care-Related Provisions INTRODUCTION This self-compliance tool is intended to help grop health plans, plan sponsors, plan administrators, health insrance
www.pwc.com Corporate performance: What do investors want to know? Innovate yor way to clearer financial reporting October 2014 PwC I Innovate yor way to clearer financial reporting t 1 Contents Introdction
Evalation and Program Planning 25 2002) 183±190 www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan A taxonomy of knowledge management software tools: origins and applications Peter Tyndale* Kingston University Bsiness
A Consumer Guide to Understanding Health Plan Networks Table of Contents steps you can take to understand your health plan s provider network pg 4 What a provider network is pg 8 Many people are now shopping
7 Help Desk Tools Or Age of Anxiety is, in great part, the reslt of trying to do today s jobs with yesterday s tools. Marshall McLhan Key Findings Help desk atomation featres are common and are sally part
The essential guide to health care quality 1 NCQA Table of Contents INTRODUCTION A Letter from Margaret E. O Kane....................................... 4 CHAPTER 1 What Is Health Care Quality?.......................................
Summary of Responses to an Industry RFI Regarding a Role for CMS with Personal Health Records Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 1. INTRODUCTON... 7 2. CMS ROLE WITH PHRs... 9 What PHR functionalities
A Provincial Framework for End-of-Life Care Ministry of Health May 2006 Letter from the Minister British Columbia continues to develop a health care system that encourages choice and dignity, along with
Quality. Independence. Impact. BENDING THE CURVE Person-Centered Health Care Reform: A Framework for Improving Care and Slowing Health Care Cost Growth This project was supported by Bending the Curve Authors
Introdction to HBase Schema Design Amandeep Khrana Amandeep Khrana is a Soltions Architect at Clodera and works on bilding soltions sing the Hadoop stack. He is also a co-athor of HBase in Action. Prior
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................2 PART I: UNDERSTANDING MANAGED CARE TERMINOLOGY.....................2 Description of Managed Care.............................................2
Purchasing Managed Care Services for Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment: Essential Elements and Policy Issues Technical Assistance Publication Series Financing Subseries, Volume III Jeffrey N. Kushner Development
A Tale of Two Systems: A look at state efforts to Integrate Primary Care and behavioral Health in Safety Net Settings By Mary Takach Kitty Purington Elizabeth Osius MAY 2010 ii A Tale Of Two Systems: A
Behavioral Health / Primary Care Integration and the Person-Centered Healthcare Home APRIL 2009 INTEGRATION AND THE HEALTHCARE HOME Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 4 Section 1: The Patient-Centered
best practices A Public/Private Partnership with the New York State Unified Court System Drug Treatment, Managed Care and the Courts From Conflict to Collaboration Written by Robert V. Wolf 2004 This publication
Getting to There from Here: Evolving to ACOs Through Clinical Integration Programs Including the Advocate Health Care Example as Presented by Lee B. Sacks, M.D. James J. Pizzo and Mark E. Grube Kaufman,
A fresh start for the regulation and inspection of adult social care Working together to change how we inspect and regulate adult social care services The Care Quality Commission is the independent regulator
Managing Physical Rehabilitation in a Managed Care Environment Peter R. Kovacek, MSA, PT Kathleen A. Jakubiak Kovacek, PT KovacekManagementServices, Inc Harper Woods, Michigan KovacekManagementServices,
Physician Payment: Current System and Opportunities for Reform Lynn Nonnemaker Sarah Thomas AARP Public Policy Institute Joyce Dubow AARP Policy and Strategy Physician Payment: Current System and Opportunities