1 MARYLAND Voluntary Market PURE PREMIUMS and RATING VALUES PROPOSED EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 2003
2 The enclosed materials are copyrighted materials of the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. ("NCCI") The use of these materials may be governed by a separate contractual agreement between NCCI and its licensees such as an affiliation agreement between you and NCCI. Unless permitted by NCCI, you may not copy, create derivative works, (by way of example, create or supplement your own works, databases, software, publications, manuals, or other materials) display, perform, or use the materials, in whole or in part, in any media. Such actions taken by you, or by your direction, may be in violation of federal copyright and other commercial laws. NCCI does not permit or acquiesce such use of its materials. In the event such use is contemplated or desired, please contact NCCI's Legal Department for permission.
3 Maryland TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND AND FILING PROCEDURE 1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE IN LOSS COSTS 2 KEY COMPONENT EXPERIENCE, TREND AND BENEFITS 3 EXPERIENCE 3 TREND 4 BENEFITS 11 CONCLUSION 12 EXHIBITS 13 HISTORICAL LOSS COST CHANGES 13 RECENT KEY LEGISLATION 14 MARYLAND WRITTEN PREMIUM 16 MARYLAND LARGEST WORKERS COMP WRITERS 17 PROPOSED LOSS COSTS AND RATING VALUES NCCI KEY CONTACTS APPENDIX NCCI AFFILIATES
4 Maryland BACKGROUND AND FILING PROCEDURE The workers compensation benefit system in Maryland is designed to cover medical costs associated with workplace injuries, as well as provide wage replacement (indemnity) benefits to injured workers for lost work time. The National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. (NCCI) collects an extensive amount of information regarding the workers compensation system in Maryland, and submits proposed advisory prospective loss costs for review and approval by the Maryland Commissioner of Insurance. These advisory prospective loss costs are intended to cover the indemnity and medical benefits provided under the system. They do not, however, contemplate any other costs associated with providing workers compensation insurance (such as commissions, taxes, etc.), or the expenses associated with providing these benefits (loss adjustment expenses). Each insurance company offering workers compensation insurance in Maryland must file a loss cost multiplier to be applied to the approved advisory prospective loss costs in order to compute the final workers compensation rates that they intend to charge. This multiplier is intended to cover the other costs associated with providing workers compensation insurance that are not already part of the advisory prospective loss costs. Alternatively, insurance companies may opt to not adopt these loss costs and make an independent filing instead. In this filing, NCCI is proposing that the Commissioner of Insurance approves a 4.7% decrease in the current loss costs (which went into effect on January 1, 2003), and that the new loss costs take effect on November 1, This document will explain why this decrease is necessary. NCCI separately determines loss costs for each workers compensation classification. In this filing, the actual change from the current loss cost is different depending on the classification. In fact, the loss costs for some classifications would increase if this filing is approved. Employers unable to secure coverage in the voluntary market can apply for such coverage from the Injured Workers Insurance Fund in Maryland. 1
5 Maryland SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE IN LOSS COSTS Key Components Percentage Change Experience, Trend and Benefits -9.4% Impact of Attorney fee Change +3.1% Impact of Harris vs. Board of Educ.of Howard County +2.0% Overall Change Requested -4.7% A brief discussion of each of these key components follows this page. The change in loss costs varies depending on the classification. Each classification belongs to one of five industry groups. The average change proposed for each of these five groups is displayed below, as well as the largest increase and largest decrease possible for a classification in each of those groups. OVERALL CHANGE -4.7% MANUFACTURING -10.3% Maximum Increase +15% Maximum Decrease -35% CONTRACTING -0.5% Maximum Increase +25% Maximum Decrease -25% OFFICE & CLERICAL -6.7% Maximum Increase +18% Maximum Decrease -32% MISCELLANEOUS -6.2% Maximum Increase +19% Maximum Decrease -31% GOODS & SERVICES -5.3% Maximum Increase +20% Maximum Decrease -30% 2
6 Maryland KEY COMPONENT EXPERIENCE, TREND AND BENEFITS This key component has three main parts. EXPERIENCE NCCI reviewed the emerging experience of Maryland workers compensation policies in recent years. The primary focus of our review was on premiums and losses from Policy Years 2000 and 2001, evaluated as of December 31, A policy year captures the premiums and losses from the block of policies that have effective dates during a given year. Policy Year 2001 is the most recently available policy year, since the last policy had an effective date of December 31, 2001 and did not expire until December 31, The use of the two most recently available policy years is consistent with the filings made in the past several years by NCCI in Maryland. Calendar-Accident Year 2002 experience was also examined for the purposes of this filing. A calendar-accident year captures the premiums earned during a given year, together with the losses associated with workplace accidents taking place during the same year. This information is useful in analyzing whether the pattern observed in recent years can be expected to continue in the same direction into future time periods. It should be noted that NCCI adjusts the historical policy and calendar-accident year experience to reflect both loss cost changes approved and statutory benefit changes implemented since that time period. The specific loss experience used by NCCI in this filing is paid which is benefit amounts already paid by insurers on reported claims. The use of paid loss experience is also consistent with NCCI s filings in the past several years in Maryland. From these losses, NCCI has computed loss development factors. They are needed since there is substantial lag between the time a claim is reported and the time the claim is finally settled. The factors are based on how pattern of loss payments changed over time for claims from older years. In the 11/01/2003 filing, NCCI relied on the average change in paid estimates over the last three years from the first report to the nineteenth report. The loss development factor from 19th report to ultimate, herein called the tail factor, has been selected based on five years average excluding high and low. 3
7 Maryland TREND As noted above, the filing relies primarily on the experience from Policy Years 2000 and However, the proposed loss costs are intended for use with policies with effective dates starting on November 1, Therefore, it is necessary to use trend factors that forecast how much the future Maryland workers compensation experience will differ from the past. These trend factors measure anticipated changes in the amount of indemnity and medical benefits as compared to anticipated changes in the amount of workers wages. For example, if benefit costs are expected to grow faster than wages, then a trend factor greater than zero should be applied. Conversely, if wages are expected to grow faster than benefit costs, then a trend factor less than zero is indicated. The chart below shows the history of indemnity loss ratios for the past 19 years. An indemnity loss ratio represents the proportion of premium dollars that are necessary to cover indemnity benefits (the figures in the chart reflect premiums at today s loss costs and losses at today s statutory benefit levels). Maryland Indemnity Loss Ratio History Indemnity Loss Ratio Year Policy Year Maryland s indemnity loss ratio continued to decline in policy year
8 Maryland Underlying these loss ratios are the number of workplace injuries (claim frequency) and the average cost of each of these injuries. The chart below summarizes the recent history of lost-time claims (i.e., those claims where a worker missed work time due to a workplace injury) in Maryland. Maryland Frequency 45.0 Frequency per Million of On-Leveled Premium Year Policy Year Maryland claim frequency continued to decline in policy year
9 Maryland For these workplace injuries, the average indemnity cost over time can be tracked by observing the following chart. Maryland Indemnity Cost Per Case 17,000 16,500 Average Cost Per Case 16,000 15,500 15,000 14,500 14,000 13,500 13,000 12,500 12, Year Policy Year Indemnity average cost per case experienced a modest increase in policy year 2001, its fifth consecutive year of increase. 6
10 Maryland After removing the impact of the growth in workers wages that occurred over this time period, the average indemnity cost per case in excess of wage growth is shown in the following chart. Maryland Indemnity Cost Per Case 18,000 Average Cost Per Case 17,500 17,000 16,500 16,000 15,500 15, Year Policy Year After 3 consecutive years of increases, Maryland s indemnity average cost per case (in excess of wage growth) showed a decline in the latest policy year. However, early indications from accident year 2002 show an average indemnity cost per case that is comparable to the policy year 2000 level. In last year s Maryland filing, NCCI proposed an indemnity trend factor of -1% per year. Based on our analysis this year, we are proposing an indemnity trend factor of 1% per year. This means that indemnity benefits are expected to increase at a slower pace than workers wages. 7
11 Maryland On the medical side of benefits, the chart below shows the history of medical loss ratios for the past 19 years. Maryland Medical Loss Ratio History Medical Loss Ratio Year Policy Year The modest decrease in the Maryland medical loss ratio in policy year 2001 was the third consecutive decrease after relatively stable loss ratios from 1994 through
12 Maryland As with indemnity, underlying these loss ratios are the number of workplace injuries (claim frequency) and the average cost of each of these injuries. The frequency chart discussed earlier is also a primary driver of medical costs. For these workplace injuries, the average medical cost over time is tracked in the following chart. Maryland Medical Cost Per Case Average Cost Per Case 13,500 13,000 12,500 12,000 11,500 11,000 10,500 10,000 9,500 9,000 8,500 8,000 7,500 7, Year Policy Year. Maryland s medical cost per case continued to increase in policy year
13 Maryland After removing the impact of the growth in workers wages that occurred over this time period, the average medical cost per case in excess of wage growth is shown in the following chart: Maryland Medical Cost Per Case 13,500 13,000 Average Cost Per Case 12,500 12,000 11,500 11,000 10,500 10,000 9,500 9, Year Policy Year Maryland s medical average cost per case in excess of wage growth has risen steadily since 1994 and experienced a particularly large increase in the latest policy period. In last year s Maryland filing, NCCI proposed a medical trend factor of 1.5% per year. Based on our analysis this year, we are again proposing a medical trend factor of 1.5% per year. This means that medical benefits are expected to increase at a slightly faster pace than workers wages. 10
14 Maryland BENEFITS Workers injured in Maryland receive wage replacement (indemnity) benefits at a rate of [2/3] of their pre-injury weekly wage. These benefits are subject to a weekly minimum and maximum. Each January, the minimum and maximum weekly benefits are updated based on the most recent average weekly wage in Maryland. Since losses from Policy Years 2000 and 2001 reflect the indemnity benefits being paid at that time, it is necessary for NCCI to reflect what the level of these benefits will be starting January 1, Updating the proposed voluntary loss costs to reflect the impact of minimum and maximum benefit increases on January 1, 2004 results in a 1.8% increase for indemnity losses. Since indemnity claims comprise 57.2% of all losses, the overall impact is 1.0%. A similar adjustment for medical costs needed to be made as a result of an increase in the hospital fee schedule implemented by the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission. The hospital fee schedule was increased by an average of 5.1% effective July 1, The total impact on medical costs is estimated at 1.9%. Since medical claims comprise 42.8% of all losses, the estimated overall impact is 0.8%. Another adjustment was needed as a result of revisions to the attorney fee schedule in Maryland by the Workers Compensation Commission. Various changes and amendments to the attorney fee schedule became effective from February to April of The method used to determine certain fees and maximums varies by injury. The most significant dollar change was to fees for permanent partial (PP) and permanent total (PT) disability. The maximum fee allowed increased from $7,500 to 20 times the state average weekly wage (SAWW). Fees for most of the other indemnity injury types (except for TT and TP) and legal procedures (except for settlement agreements) also increased by almost 100%. We estimate that the cost impact on the total workers compensation system is an increase of +3.1%. Due to a recent decision by Maryland s highest court, yet another adjustment was required. On June 6, 2003, Maryland s Court of Appeals, the state s highest court, issued a decision in Harris v. Board of Education of Howard County that changed the compensability rules under the workers compensation act. The court overruled a judicially created doctrine permitting denial of benefits for injuries that do not result from unusual activity on the part of the claimant. The court held that the unusual activity requirement is a distinct minority view in the nation and contravenes the liberal purposes of the Workers Compensation Act. We estimate an overall increase in workers compensation system costs in Maryland of 2% as a result of this decision. 11
15 Maryland CONCLUSION This filing document provides a high-level perspective on why Maryland loss costs need to decrease 4.7%. This decrease is due, in large part, to a continued decline in frequency of claims; however, medical costs continue to increase and there are early signs that indemnity costs will no longer continue in their favorable downward direction. These observations are consistent with what is being observed in the latest national data. In many states, efforts have been made to erode legislative reform, increase benefits, and weaken the exclusive remedy provision in workers compensation. Some reports also indicate that the savings from reform, managed care, and safety awareness may have begun to run dry. Therefore, continued diligence is needed by Maryland workers compensation stakeholders to ensure that the system remains strong and competitive. Following are various exhibits containing other Maryland workers compensation information that may be of interest, as well as the proposed loss costs and rating values by classification. 12
16 Maryland EXHIBIT I Maryland Historical Loss Cost Changes 9.0% 7.0% 7.6% 5.0% Change in Loss Cost 3.0% 1.0% -1.0% -3.0% -5.0% -3.4% 1.3% 1.6% -7.0% -9.0% -11.0% -9.8% -13.0% -15.0% -12.8% 01/01/ /01/ /01/ /01/ /01/ /01/ /01/ /01/2003 Effective Date No Loss Cost filings were made by NCCI for 1/1/97 and 1/1/99. 01/01/2002 increase of 1.3% was from law only filing. After several years of filing loss cost decreases, NCCI filed increases in loss costs in 2001, 2002 (law Only) and
17 Maryland EXHIBIT II RECENT KEY LEGISLATION AFFECTING WORKERS COMPENSATION 2003 Key Legislation Effective Date Bill Number Description Impact H.B. 690 Specifies a new benefit formula and cap for wholly dependent surviving spouses who become partially self-supporting after the death of a covered minimal employee. Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission approved increase to hospital inpatient n/a services of 5.33% +0.8% approved increase to hospital outpatient services of 4.33% n/a Harris v. Board of Education of Howard County - decision by state s highest court changed the compensability rules under the workers compensation act. The court overruled a judicially +2.0% created doctrine permitting denial of benefits for injuries that do not result from unusual activity on the part of the claimant. Maryland Workers Compensation Commission revised the attorney fee schedule in Maryland. Various changes and amendments to the attorney fee schedule became effective from February to n/a April of The method used to determine certain +3.1% fees and maximums varies by injury. The most significant dollar change was to fees for permanent partial (PP) and permanent total (PT) disability. 14
18 Maryland 2002 Key Legislation Effective Date Bill Number Description Impact S.B. 371 Establishes risk based capital requirements for the Injured Workers Insurance Fund. None S.B. 522 Repeals sunset date of provision specifying various aspects of the workers compensation system that None may be established through collective bargaining S.B. 772 Amends the formula for calculating the tax against each insurer for the maintenance of the Workers Compensation Commission. Establishes a workers compensation fund in the state treasury and creates None an advisory committee on the Commissioner s budget Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission increase in hospital fee schedule by an average of +0.6% 3.2% H.B. 491 Creates presumption that a sole proprietor is not a covered employee if the sole proprietor provides a certain notice to the principal contractor. None H.B H.B Increases the maximum limit of specified death benefits payable to partly dependent survivors from $45,000 to $60,000; Modifies the calculation of the weekly death benefits payable to partly dependent survivors. Maryland Workers Compensation Commission may not modify an award unless the modification is applied for within 5 years after the latter of: date of accident, date of disablement or last compensation payment. None None 15
19 Maryland EXHIBIT III Maryland Written Premium Written Premium ($ millions) Calendar Year Maryland s Calendar Year written premium increased significantly in
20 Maryland EXHIBIT IV Maryland Largest Workers Compensation Writers CY % 8.0% 7.6% 6.6% Market Share 6.0% 4.0% 5.0% 4.9% 4.5% 2.0% 0.0% Hartford Liberty Zurich Erie AIG Company The five largest private insurance companies providing workers compensation insurance in Maryland in 2002 are shown in this chart. 17
21 PURE PREMIUMS - NOT RATES Pure premiums exclude all expense provisions. MARYLAND Exhibit V Effective November 1, 2003 Page S1 CLASS LOSS D EX-MED CLASS LOSS D EX-MED CLASS LOSS D EX-MED CODE COST ELR RATIO RATIO CODE COST ELR RATIO RATIO CODE COST ELR RATIO RATIO D D D D X N P P P P * * E E X E D D D E E D D * Refer to the Footnotes Page for additional information on this class code.
22 PURE PREMIUMS - NOT RATES Pure premiums exclude all expense provisions. MARYLAND Exhibit V Effective November 1, 2003 Page S2 CLASS LOSS D EX-MED CLASS LOSS D EX-MED CLASS LOSS D EX-MED CODE COST ELR RATIO RATIO CODE COST ELR RATIO RATIO CODE COST ELR RATIO RATIO 3175D X E X N X X X X * Refer to the Footnotes Page for additional information on this class code.
23 PURE PREMIUMS - NOT RATES Pure premiums exclude all expense provisions. MARYLAND Exhibit V Effective November 1, 2003 Page S3 CLASS LOSS D EX-MED CLASS LOSS D EX-MED CLASS LOSS D EX-MED CODE COST ELR RATIO RATIO CODE COST ELR RATIO RATIO CODE COST ELR RATIO RATIO N N F F F F M M M M D M M M M M M M M F F F F M M M F X X DX D X D M M M N M* M* M* F F F N * Refer to the Footnotes Page for additional information on this class code.
How Does the Workers' Compensation System in Florida Compare to Other States? Report Number 2002-117 November 2001 Prepared for The Florida Senate Prepared by Committee on Banking and Insurance Summary...
Medical Malpractice Report Insurers with 5% Market Share Provided by the West Virginia Offices of the Insurance Commissioner November 2011 1 Introduction The West Virginia Offices of the Insurance Commissioner
Medical Malpractice Report Insurers with 5% Market Share November 2012 1 2 Introduction The West Virginia Offices of the Insurance Commissioner has prepared this report on Medical Professional Liability
Medical Malpractice Report Insurers with 5% or more of the Medical Malpractice market share in West Virginia Provided by the West Virginia Offices of the Insurance Commissioner: November 2014 Introduction
American Agricultural Insurance Company REINSURANCE BASICS A I CA REINSURANCE BASICS A I CA American Agricultural Insurance Company Suite 300W 1501 E Woodfield Rd Schaumburg, IL 60173 Suite 580 One Easton
The Effect of Repealing the Florida Motor Vehicle No-fault Law Report Number 2008-102 October 2007 Prepared for The Florida Senate Prepared by Committee on Banking and Insurance Table of Contents Introduction...3
Idaho State Advisory Forum 2014 December 4, 2014 Mike_Taylor@ncci.com 503-892-1858 Sean_Cooper@ncci.com 561-893-3072 Copyright 2014 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Taxation of Insurance Companies Prepared by Ron Shanovich Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main, Suite 301 Madison, WI 53703 Taxation of Insurance Companies Introduction This paper provides
Employers Guide to Workers Compensation Insurance in Washington State Review your insurance coverage and reporting requirements. Take steps to prevent injuries and control costs. The information in this
Medical Malpractice Insurance in 2002: Crisis or Opportunity For New Jersey Policymakers? Background Information for... THE NEW JERSEY HEALTH POLICY FORUM Tuesday, October 1, 2002 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM Thomas
Review of Florida s Health Insurance Laws Relating to Rates and Access to Coverage Report Number 2000-04 August 1999 Prepared for The Florida Senate by Committee on Banking and Insurance Summary... separate
Your Guide to Automobile Insurance For Michigan Consumers Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) Toll-Free Consumer Assistance Line 877-999-6442 www.michigan.gov/difs Table of Contents Page
HEALTHSOUTH CORP FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 02/20/14 for the Period Ending 12/31/13 Address 3660 GRANDVIEW PARKWAY SUITE 200 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35243 Telephone 205-967-7116 CIK 0000785161 Symbol HLS SIC
Article 36. North Carolina Rate Bureau. 58-36-1. North Carolina Rate Bureau created. There is hereby created a Bureau to be known as the "North Carolina Rate Bureau," with the following objects and functions:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Model Regulation Service 4 th Quarter 2014 HEALTH INSURANCE RESERVES MODEL REGULATION Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Appendix A. Appendix B. Appendix
Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services 2014 Report on the Oregon Workers Compensation System Workers Compensation Twelfth Edition January 2015 2014 Report on the Oregon Workers Compensation
Texans for Lawsuit Reform Texas Workplace Injury Compensation Analysis, Options, Impact Stradian, January 2009 Rev. 1.0 The Texans for Lawsuit Reform Foundation is a nonprofit research organization that
KENTUCKY Guidebook to Workers Compensation Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Workers Claims 657 Chamberlin Avenue Frankfort, KY 40601 http://www.labor.ky.gov/workersclaims Commissioner Dwight T. Lovan
2012 Medical Malpractice Annual Report Closed from Jan. 1, 2008 through Dec. 31, 2011 August 2012 Rates and Forms Division Lisa Smego, CPCU, ARM, AIAF, ARC, AIE, Data Reporting Manager Eric Slavich, ACAS,
ANALYSIS OF THE NEW JERSEY BUDGET DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 PREPARED BY OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES NEW JERSEY LEGISLATURE MAY 2004 NEW JERSEY STATE LEGISLATURE SENATE
S&P Healthcare Claims Indices: Checking the Pulse of the Healthcare Market Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. S&P Healthcare Claims Indices 3. Index History and Analysis 4. Potential Uses for the Indices
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRY DIVISION OF INSURANCE 2013 NEVADA INSURANCE MARKET REPORT Scott J. Kipper, Commissioner State of Nevada Department of Business and Industry Division of
Florida Office of Insurance Regulation 2011 Annual Report October 1, 2011 Medical Malpractice Financial Information Closed Claim Database and Rate Filings -- INDEX Executive Summary 3 Purpose and Scope
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requesters June 2003 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE Multiple Factors Have Contributed to Increased Premium Rates a GAO-03-702 June 2003
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE Unemployment Insurance Background Unemployment insurance was initiated on a national basis in the United States as Title III and Title IX of the Social Security Act of 1935. It is