1 Environ Resource Econ (2007) 38:1 11 DOI /s ORIGINAL PAPER The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy Frank Convery Æ Simon McDonnell Æ Susana Ferreira Received: 2 May 2006 / Accepted: 20 October 2006 / Published online: 13 January 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V Abstract There have been occasional ad hoc efforts to influence consumer behaviour by the imposition of product taxes that reflect external costs imposed by such products that are not initially included in their price. In the spirit of this idea, in 2002 Ireland introduced a 15 Euro cent tax on plastic shopping bags, previously provided free of charge to customers at points of sale. The effect of the tax on the use of plastic bags in retail outlets has been dramatic a reduction in use in the order of 90%, and an associated gain in the form of reduced littering and negative landscape effects. Costs of administration have been very low, amounting to about 3% of revenues, because it was possible to integrate reporting and collection into existing Value Added Tax reporting systems. Response from the main stakeholders: the public and the retail industry, has been overwhelmingly positive. Central to this acceptance has been a policy of extensive consultation with these stakeholders. The fact that a product tax can influence consumer behaviour significantly will be of interest to many policymakers in this area. This paper analyses the plastic bag levy success story and provides insights and general guidelines for other jurisdictions planning similar proposals. Keywords Environmental taxes Æ Product taxes Æ Plastic bag tax Æ Litter Æ Ireland 1 Introduction Edmund Burke observed that To tax and to please, no more than to love and be wise, is not given to men. But there are exceptions, and exceptions are usually F. Convery Æ S. McDonnell (&) Æ S. Ferreira School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Richview, Clonskeagh, Dublin 14, Ireland
2 2 Frank Convery et al. interesting; the Irish plastic bags 1 levy has proved so popular with the Irish public that it would be politically damaging to remove it. In this paper we tell this unusual story how it came about, its design and performance characteristics as regards environmental effectiveness and economic efficiency, and the lessons yielded for others considering introducing environmental taxes. This levy is a relatively new addition to the ever-changing mural that is European environmental taxation. In a hierarchy of analytical attention, the literature has focused on environmental taxes in air/energy; water and waste respectively (see for example OECD 2001; Stavins 2001; or Sterner 2003). Product taxes per se are not a priority. This paper is a small contribution to correcting for this asymmetry in analytical focus, by showing that product taxes, in addition to influencing consumer behaviour, can also provide efficiency and environmental payoffs, and do so at negligible cost. Pigou (1960) made the now familiar case for environmental taxation. External costs of pollution could be internalised by imposing a tax on the pollutant at the level which reduces emissions to the point where the marginal benefits of internalisation equal the marginal costs of abatement. There is now a very broad literature on the advantages of market-based instruments (such as environmental charges or tradable permits) over command and control approaches in terms of static and dynamic efficiency, see for example Baumol and Oates (1988) or Sterner (2003). Compared to other instruments, taxation may offer advantages on equity and competitiveness grounds (Barker and Kohler 1998; Ekins and Speck 1999; Jaffe et al. 1995), and may bring about a double dividend as revenues are recycled to reduce other distorting taxes, e.g. on labour, see Goulder (1995), Goulder et al. (1997) and Bovenbergh and Van der Ploeg (1998). In the waste area, the literature on applications of environmental taxation has focused primarily on producer-generated pollution. Typical policies aimed at consumers attempt to reduce the volume of materials in the waste stream through deposit refund systems, or user charges for waste collection (see e.g. Bohm 1981; Fullerton and Kinnaman 1996; Callan and Thomas 1999; or Choe and Fraser 2001). In this paper we focus on an alternative instrument, more similar to that of Pearce and Turner (1992) 2, a product tax, of 0.15 per plastic bag, which has been applied in Ireland since March This tax was designed to change consumers behaviour to reduce the presence of plastic bags in the rural landscape, and to increase public awareness of littering. Ireland is not the first or the only country in taking action to discourage the use of plastic bags other countries such as Bangladesh or Rwanda have banned shopping plastic bags, and Denmark applies a tax on producers and retailers but it is perceived as one of the most successful, both in terms of public acceptance and stakeholder buy in. It is not surprising, then, that jurisdictions planning similar proposals (California, the UK, China, and Kenya among others) look upon the Irish PlasTax as a key referent. Prior to this study, these perceptions of success were largely untested from an academic point of view. One of the aims of this paper is to fill this gap. 1 The term plastic bag used in this paper is the same as defined in the Irish Waste Management (Amendment) Act 2001, Section 9. This Act describes a plastic bag as a bag which is inter alia: (a) made wholly or in part of plastic, and (b) which is suitable for use by a customer at the point of sale in a supermarket, service station or other sales outlet. For more see: ZZA36Y2001S9.html. 2 Pearce and Turner (1992) assess a tax on packaging waste.
3 Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy 3 Table 1 Maximum willingness to pay for a plastic bag Amount % Willing to pay Nothing would not pay pennies ( ) pennies ( ) 25 6 pennies + ( ) 8 Source: Drury (2000, p. 17). The survey was commissioned by the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government as part of a series of surveys to learn people attitudes on the environment. This survey was carried out between the 26th November and 8th December 1999 with a sample of 1,003 Irish adults aged 18 or over. See Drury (2000) for more details The next two sections of the paper provide details on the nature and implementation of the Irish plastic bag levy. Section 4 evaluates the performance of the tax in terms of social acceptance and achievement of its environmental objectives. Section 5 provides policy implications and conclusions. 2 The nature of the plastic bag levy In March 2002, the Irish government introduced a levy of 0.15 per plastic bag provided to shoppers at point of sale in retail outlets 3 While prior to the introduction of the levy plastic bags were not the most prevalent litter items (constituting some 5% of the national litter composition (Litter Monitoring Body 2003)), the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government stated that that plastic bag litter was a visible and persistent component of litter pollution, throughout the countryside and along the coastline 4 Two characteristics of Ireland are germane in this respect. Firstly, Ireland is a country of frequent high winds, and bags released in the open may travel long distances. Secondly, Ireland is a country of hedgerows, with relatively small fields enclosed by shrubs, hedges, clumps of trees and ditches found along every roadside, in which discarded plastic bags are trapped and accumulate. This accumulation becomes particularly evident in winter, when the masking effect of deciduous vegetation is absent. The tax implemented in March 2002 is not Pigouvian; there was no attempt to identify the marginal external costs and determine the optimum level of tax. However, it was explicitly aimed at changing consumer s behaviour, and fixed at an amount sufficiently high to give most consumers pause for thought, and stimulate them to avoid paying by bringing their own permanent reusable shopping bags with them. 5 Estimates of consumer s maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for a plastic bag in Table 1, show that the tax, set at 0.15, is more than six times higher than the 3 Levy is the official term used in the Waste Management (Amendment) Act (2001). In this paper, we use the words tax and levy interchangeably. 4 Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government Press release 20/12/2001: 5 Customers can purchase permanent bags at the point of sale in most retail outlets. The potential substitution from plastic to paper bags instead of permanent bags was not a concern when the tax was introduced since it was not in the interest of the retailers to provide this option; many retailers in the retail survey made the observation that the storage costs of paper bags are substantially higher than those of plastic bags.
4 4 Frank Convery et al. average maximum WTP, around 0.024, and that only 8% of the consumers surveyed felt it was worth paying for a plastic bag when its price exceeded half of the approved tax or An imposition of a ban on littering is a more direct approach to reducing littering in general, and the number of plastic bags released into the environment in particular. With such a policy only litterers are targeted. 6 The Litter Pollution Act of 1997, as amended by the Waste Management (Amendment) Act 2001 and the Protection of the Environment Act 2003, introduced strong penalties to help combat litter pollution in Ireland more effectively. 7 In recent years, Local Authorities have also introduced more litter wardens to police the act. By implementing, in addition to the existing littering ban, a plastic bag levy to target the consumption of plastic bags, the regulator aimed at (i) addressing the differential impact (in terms of durability and visibility) of plastic bags on rural landscape when compared with other forms of littering, and (ii) send a strong signal to consumers in order to change behaviour towards more sustainable modes of consumption. Some critics of the tax noted that a large portion of plastic bags were reused by homeowners to contain their domestic rubbish from where they would end up in landfill. In this inert form, critics point out; plastic bags are little threat to the environment. However, in a number of surveys, plastic bags were seen as one of the most visible components of litter, suggesting that even if a large portion of plastic bags were being used for domestic disposal reuse there was scope to influencing consumer behaviour through the use of a tax. Another relevant characteristic of the levy is its design without consideration of double-dividend effects. Revenues are not explicitly recycled to reduce other taxes in the economy; they are ring fenced into an environment fund operated by the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, to be used for defraying the costs of administration of the levy and the support and promotion of a variety of environmental programs. It is, however, possible that, through the use of these funds, an implicit form of revenue recycling occurs through an avoidance in tax increases required to implement the environmental projects supported by this environment fund. 8 Finally, as the tax is imposed at the retail level on Irish shoppers, it does not introduce competitiveness concerns. The Republic of Ireland shares a land border with Northern Ireland, where there is no levy, but the costs on the consumers are such a minor proportion of the total shopping bill, and the levy has proved in any event to be so popular with the public, that there is highly unlikely to be any leakage of shoppers across the border caused by the levy. 9 Authors such as S. McDonnell (unpublished thesis), Nolan-ITU (2002) and, more recently, UNEP (2005) have all investigated responses by policymakers 6 It could be argued that people whose behaviour was modified by the levy were not littering in the first place! 7 In the act, there is provision for an on the spot fine of 125 or a fine not exceeding 3,000 if convicted in court ( 8 In personal communication with the DOELG (December 2002), officials indicated that the projects undertaken using these funds to finance inter alia recycling facilities and infrastructure as well as educational programmes were above and beyond the pre-existing level or the levels in the absence of such a fund. The extent of this is, however, unclear. 9 There is, however, a large disparity in petrol and diesel prices between the two jurisdictions, because of much higher excise duties applied in the UK, and this does result in considerable leakage of consumption from Northern Ireland to the Republic of Ireland.
5 Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy 5 internationally. The latter report has recommended seven policy responses for reducing plastic bag consumption in the context of Kenyan waste management policies. These policies include a ban on plastic bags that are less than 30 microns in thickness (as has happened in South Africa), voluntary schemes (such as in Australia), and promotion of environmentally friendly or recyclable alternative bags. In addition, producer and weight-based taxes are identified (in Italy and Denmark, respectively). The authors note that the Danish weight-based tax is better applied when the policy aim is to reduce the amount of plastic used in the manufacture of bags and that a levy based on the Irish system is ideal if the main policy aim is to reduce visual litter. 10 The authors also note that a consumer-based levy yields bigger reductions in plastic bag consumption but at the expense of a larger administrative burden. 3 Implementation of the levy The possibility of an Irish plastic bag levy was discussed initially in 1994, but it was not until 1999 that Mr. Noel Dempsey the then Minister for Environment and Local Government, commissioned a report to explore the different options. After looking at levies on domestic production and importation, and on point of sale, the report recommended the imposition of an upstream levy (on producers and importers) of approximately per bag, similar to a tax on carrier bags in Denmark. The Danish example did, however, consist of a differentiated weight-based rate for paper and plastic. The reason given for rejecting the downstream point-of-sale levy was that it could be administratively complex. But Mr. Dempsey wanted a strong signal to be given directly to consumers, including having the choice of paying the levy and getting a bag. In March 2000, Mr. Dempsey s proposal of a downstream 0.15 tax per bag was agreed by the Irish Government. Since the provisions of the Waste Management Act (1996) were not strong enough to support such a levy, an amendment to that Act was duly provided in the Waste Management (Amendment) Act, (2004). 3.1 Involvement of the main stakeholders Securing support from the different stakeholders affected by the imposition of the levy (i.e. the retail industry, Ministry of finance, the local authorities, the revenue commissioners and, crucially, consumers), was seen as a key requirement for its successful implementation. The retail industry initially proposed a voluntary take back scheme, but once it was clear that the government was determined to proceed, the lobbying focus turned to implementation. In the design and implementation of the scheme, there was extensive consultation with the main industry representative body and the leading retailers. 10 UNEP (2005) recommends a seven-pronged approach that includes a levy on suppliers rather than on consumers. The rationale is that in Kenya, being a developing economy, the administrative burden is far less for the former policy than for the latter and there also exists a considerable casual market in which it would be difficult to monitor and collect revenues from a consumer-based levy. This is not such an important consideration in developed countries.
6 6 Frank Convery et al. The main concern of the retailers was that they would be blamed for profiteering. The solution was a strong publicity campaign by the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, conveying the reasons for the introduction of the levy. Another concern was that the introduction of the levy would encourage shoplifting as a result of shoppers not having standard bags. Butchers were strongly opposed to a levy that would apply to all plastic bags, on the basis that various purchases, e.g. meat, would need to be wrapped separately for hygiene reasons. Their case was accepted, and exemption was given to plastic bags below a certain size when used for blocking (separating food stuffs and other products for hygiene and food safety purposes). Support from the Minister for Finance, the Revenue Commissioners and the Local Authorities was necessary for the collection, administration and enforcement of the levy. The Minister s personal commitment seems to have been the strongest factor in getting the principle of a plastic bag levy introduced in practice. The acceptance by the Revenue Commissioners of a hypothecated fund was also central to increasing consumer acceptance of the levy (advertising and information campaigns explicitly stated that all revenues would be used for explicitly environmental purposes). Drury (2000) notes a double standard among Irish consumers in the area of litter. While consumers have consistently been in favour of improved environmental protection in the abstract they have shown an unwillingness to take responsibility when it comes to their own actions. One of the stated aims of the Government was to make a link between price and good environmental behaviour in the public mind, and a strong publicity campaign was aimed at reducing the public resistance. 3.2 Operation and enforcement The costs of implementation have been modest. One-off set up costs were 1.2 million (devoted to the purchase of new computer systems and additional resources needed to administer the levy). Annual administering costs were in the order of 350, Advertising costs arising from the publicity campaign to launch the levy amounted to 358, The revenues from the programme are ring fenced in an Environment Fund, controlled by the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, to be used for defraying the costs of administration and the support and promotion of a variety of environmental programs. Revenues from the programme are over 30 times the costs of collection; in the first year (March 2002 to February 2003) they amounted to 12 million; in the next year, there was a small increase, to million. 13 While this could be evidence of slippage in the behaviour of consumers (as revenues are generated when consumers buy plastic bags), it most likely reflects delays in the implementation of the scheme by some stores Interdepartmental agreement between the Department of Environment and Local Government and the Revenue Commissioners. 12 Personal communication with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and the Revenue Commissioners (December 2002). 13 Personal Communication, Revenue Commissioners, Ireland (December 2004). 14 The major UK department stores were initially reluctant to implement, because their centrally controlled and defined accounting systems needed to be adapted. However, after some delay, they are now fully compliant.
7 Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy 7 For most retail firms, the revenue collection and reporting is readily and easily integrated with their Value Added Tax (VAT) collection systems, so net additional costs are modest, and more than counterbalanced by cost savings in terms of plastic bag purchase foregone and additional sales of bin liners. Enforcement is a responsibility of the Local Authorities, who make sure that the levy is charged to the end customer, and the Revenue Commissioners. This has proved to be relatively easy, as the public have bought in to the scheme, and report delinquent retail outlets. 4 Evaluation of the performance of the levy Since the introduction of the levy, the number of bags entering the consumption stream has been reduced by approximately 94% according to S. McDonnell (unpublished thesis). Pre-levy consumption was calculated at roughly 1.2 billion bags per annum Fehily et al. (1999). Post-levy consumption can be easily computed from the payments of the retailers to the Revenue Commissioners. Measuring the presence of plastic bags in the landscape is a more difficult task. A combined project by Irish Business Against Litter and An Taisce (National Trust of Ireland) produced a number of litter surveys. 15 These have found that between January 2002 and April 2003 the number of clear areas (i.e. areas in which there is no evidence of plastic bag litter) has increased by 21%, while the number of areas without traces 16 has increased by 56%. These numbers are remarkably high given the long lasting nature of plastic bags in the environment. A different source, the National Litter Pollution Monitoring System notes that plastic bag litter accounted for 5% of national litter composition before the introduction of the levy. In 2002, this number fell to 0.32%, in 2003 to 0.25% and to 0.22% in 2004 (Litter Monitoring Body 2004, 2005). In order to evaluate the impact of the levy on the main stakeholders, we conducted interviews with households and leaders in the retail sector. We did face-toface interviews with seven leaders in the retail sector, following their completion of detailed questionnaires. The cumulative market share of those retailers interviewed accounts for approximately 50% of Irish retail sales, and represent a cross section of outlets as regards nature and scale. Table 2 summarizes the key findings. The heading of the table indicates the retail type. Rows 1 3 contain indicators of the retailer size, such as the number of outlets they operate and the annual sales turnover. The next four rows show that the costs saved in purchase and storage of plastic bags more than offset the additional administrative and shoplifting costs. For example, Retailer A experienced savings in the region of 1.93 million in the first year of operation (bag expenditure on plastic bags forgone minus the implementation and administration costs). The numbers in row 8, calculated by S. McDonnell (unpublished thesis), estimates the reduction in plastic bag consumption at around 94%. Row 9 shows that retailers find the effects of the tax on their well-being neutral or positive, closely related to the fact that the additional costs of implementation, were generally less than the savings resulting from not having to purchase plastic bags Traces are defined as up to five items over a linear distance of 1 m.
8 8 Frank Convery et al. Table 2 Survey of retailers. Key findings (E) Indept (F) Dept/Clothes (G) Dept/Clothes (D) Symbol group (C) Symbol group (B) Supermkt multiple Category (A) Supermkt multiple No. of outlets 80 < Market share (%) n/a n/a n/a 1, Sales turnover (2002, million ) Bag expenditure before levy (million ) Plastic bag storage costs (rent, etc) ( ) 0 100,000 a 15,000 start up 2,000 per quarter Annual implementation costs attributable to levy ( ) 65,000 Rose initially then fell b then fell Rose initially Shoplifting and trolley theft annual increase attributable to levy ( ) Bag use reduction post levy (%) Overall impact c (+2, +3) 1 ( 1, 0) 75 Small Very large 400 Demand increase for permanent bags (%) Notes: Key results from face to face interviews with seven leaders in the retail sector, following their completion of detailed questionnaires. Survey conducted in January March Heading indicates the retail type: (i) Supermarket Multiple: large supermarket chains focusing on groceries and associated food stuffs. Some of these chains also have associated clothes departments. (ii) Symbol Group Grocers: convenience store type franchises operated under the name of the symbol group, typically located in urban and suburban areas and catering to more passing trade. (iii) Petrol Station Forecourts: convenience stores located in many petrol stations. (iv) Independent Stores: stand alone or small chain stores independent from the main symbol and supermarket multiples chains. (v) Other store types: large department and clothes stores. The former are typically large city centre-based organisations focusing on clothes, homewares and associated goods Only minor adjustments to already operating VAT system a 10,000 per quarter for shoplifting and 15,000 per quarter initially b Retailers were asked to rate the overall impact of the plastic bag levy on their operations on a scale of 3 to +3. The former figure represented a very negative impact and the latter figure represents a very positive impact, zero indicates a neutral impact c
9 Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy 9 Table 3 Survey of householders. Key findings Impact at checkout Convenience Expense Environmental Impact Positive Neutral Negative Notes: Key results from a telephone survey of 100 randomly selected householders in the Dublin 01 phone area. Survey was conducted in March 2003 Implementation costs were low because book-keeping was integrated with VAT returns. 17 In order to evaluate the impacts on consumers, we took a randomly selected sample of householders, and conducted a telephone survey. One hundred interviews were completed corresponding to a 42.74% response rate. Due to time and financial constraints a larger survey was not possible, but some assessment of consumer sentiment was deemed valuable. There are a number of limitations to this survey which should be highlighted. Firstly, the survey size results in a margin of error of ±9.8% for respondent answers. In addition, the fact that the survey was restricted to the 01 Dublin landline telephone area excludes individuals that do not own a landline or are not resident within the greater Dublin area. Reported results should be read in this context. Overall, the respondents were very much in favour of the levy. Table 3 shows that the majority felt that the impact of the levy in terms of convenience at checkouts and generally was enhanced, but that the levy has added to their expense. This latter finding is an inevitable product of the fact that householders either have to pay the levy or buy long-life bags. Virtually all respondents indicated that the impact on the environment was positive, producing a noticeable reduction in plastic bags in the environment. There was no discernible variation in these responses related to socio-economic status or degree of environmental awareness. 18 Finally, Fehily et al. (1999) analysed the impact of the tax on the plastic bag industry. They estimated that in 1999, 79% of the plastic bags consumed were imported. The remaining 11% was produced by four plastic manufacturing firms operating in the Republic. Since then, one has gone out of business causing the loss of 26 jobs, but it is uncertain whether this would have happened even in the absence of the levy. 5 Conclusions and lessons In March 2002, the Irish government introduced a levy of 0.15 per plastic bag. The effects of the tax on the use of plastic bags in retail outlets and in the landscape have been dramatic, with usage falling by more than 90%. Annual revenues are in the order of million. The collection and associated administration costs are about 3% of revenues. The primary lessons from this paper are two fold: firstly, the 17 Retailer B was so pleased with the take up of its long life bags (that reduced its costs of providing plastic bags) that it advertised in its stores it was absorbing the 1% VAT increase which was introduced in 2002 because of its significant savings on plastic bags. 18 The questionnaires of the surveys are available from the authors upon request.
10 10 Frank Convery et al. introduction of a price signal through the use of a product tax can influence consumer behaviour significantly; secondly, ensuring stakeholder and consumer acceptance of the tax is central to the successful implementation of such a tax. Informational campaigns highlighting the environmental impacts and hypothecation of revenues into an environment fund are central in ensuring such acceptance. In the case of this tax, high-level support from both the supporting minister and the treasury was also required. In addition, evidence from other jurisdictions indicates that, where policymakers are trying to reduce plastic bag consumption considerably and there is a welldeveloped and defined retail market (and that has been consulted widely), a consumer-based downstream levy is the appropriate policy measure. In regard to the latter point, the response from the main stakeholders: the public and the retail industry, has been very positive in terms of implementation and acceptance. There is a strong perception amongst all householders surveyed that the effect on the environment has been positive. Many report feeling guilty when they forget to bring their own long life bag and have to pay the levy! We are not aware of another tax that induces such an enthusiasm and affection from those who are liable to pay it. Retailers find the effects on their well-being neutral or positive, with the additional costs of implementation, book-keeping integrated with VAT returns, being modest, and generally lower than the savings resulting from not having to purchase bags. Extensive consultation with stakeholders to identify key constraints (e.g. the use of smaller bags to separate fresh food for hygiene purposes) was critical for its wide acceptance. The commitment of a Minister at Cabinet level was crucial in ensuring that the various arms of government collaborated, so that the proposal went from concept to successful execution. Without Mr. Dempsey s enthusiastic and effective support, it would not have happened, and it is likely that the voluntary scheme initially preferred by industry would have been selected. In addition, a robust legislative and regulatory base that involved amending the Waste Management Act was necessary. References Barker T, Köhler J (1998) Equity and Ecotax reform in the EU: achieving a 10% reduction in CO 2 emissions using excise duties. Environmental fiscal reform. Working Paper No. 10. University of Cambridge, Cambridge Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press Bohm P (1981) Deposit refund systems: theory and applications to environmental, conservation, and consumer policy. Resources for the future, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Bovenbergh AL, Van der Ploeg F (1998) Consequences of environmental tax reform for involuntary unemployment and welfare. Environ Resour Econ 12(2): Callan SJ, Thomas JM (1999) Adopting a unit pricing system for municipal solid waste: policy and socio-economic determinants. Environ Resour Econ 14(4): Choe C, Fraser I (2001) On the flexibility of optimal policies for green design. Environ Resour Econ 18(4): Drury Research on Behalf of the Department of the Environment and Local Government (2000) Attitudes and actions a national survey on the environment. Drury, Dublin Ekins P, Speck S (1999) Competitiveness and exemptions from environmental taxes in Europe. Environ Resour Econ 13:
11 Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy 11 Fehily, Timoney & Company (1999) Consultancy study on plastic bags. Report prepared for the Department of Environment and Local Government, Dublin Fullerton D, Kinnaman TC (1996) Household responses to pricing garbage by the bag. Am Econ Rev 86: Goulder LH (1995) Environmental taxation and the double dividend : a reader s guide. Int Tax Public Finance 2(2): Goulder L, Parry I, Burtraw D (1997) Revenue-raising vs. other approaches to environmental protection: the critical significance of pre-existing tax distortions. RAND J Econ 28(4): Jaffe A, Peterson P, Portney P, Stavins R (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us? J Econ Liter 33: OECD (2001) Environmentally related taxes in OECD countries: issues and Strategies. OECD, Paris Pearce DW, Turner RK (1992) Packaging waste and the polluter pays principle: a taxation solution. J Environ Manage Plan 35(1):5 15 Pigou AC (1960) The economics of welfare, 4th edn. MacMillan, London Stavins R (2001) Experience with market based environmental policy instruments. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper Accessed January 12th 2006 Sterner T (2003) Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Resources for the future, Washington DC The Litter Monitoring Body (2003) The National Litter Pollution Monitoring System system result. TES Consulting Engineers, Dublin. Available online at EHLG%20System%27s%20Results%20Report%20Final% pdf The Litter Monitoring Body (2004) The National Litter Pollution Monitoring System system result. TES Consulting Engineers, Dublin. Available online at 20Final.pdf. Accessed January 12th, 2006 The Litter Monitoring Body (2005) The National Litter Pollution Monitoring System system result. TES Consulting Engineers, Dublin. Available online at Pol.nsf/0/b25ca5135fc9b0e780256f0f003bc819/$FILE/Annual%20Report%20Final%20August % pdf The Waste Management (Amendment) Act (2004) Irish Statute Book Database Government of Ireland. Available at: UNEP (2005) Selection, design and implementation of economic instruments in the Kenyan solid waste management sector. United Nation Environment Programme, Geneva, Switzerland
The Irish Plastic Bag Levy A Review of its Performance 5 years on. It was sad to see the empty bag Blown about like a dirty rag A Summer Morning Walk By Patrick Kavanagh (1904-1967) Introduction: In March
Plastic Bags The Irish Experience Berlin Workshop 24 February 2014 Jean Clarke Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government Background to plastic bag initiative Plastic bag levy introduced
Plastic Bags The Irish Experience Brussels Workshop 17 February 2015 Jean Clarke Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government New Amendment The key provisions are as follows:- the adoption
JUNE 2003 Submission to Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Committee Inquiry into Plastic Bag Tax (Assessment and Collection) Bill 2002 and Plastic Bag (Minimisation
Proposal to reduce the consumption of Plastic Bags This would amend Directive 94/62/EC on Packaging and Packaging Waste Yvette Smith Rossignaud Unit D - Waste, Air, Radiation & Noise Unit AIM and OBJECTIVE:
Report on the Sustainability Committee s Inquiry into Petition P-03-63 : Banning Plastic Bags November 2008 Report on the Sustainability Committee s inquiry into Petition P-03-63 Banning Plastic Bags Introduction
European policy approaches to waste management and infrastructure A5.0 Overview Appendix 5 Of greatest interest in terms of understanding the policies best suited for Irish waste management, infrastructure
NATIONAL ECONOMIC DIALOGUE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND EQUITY IN TAX POLICY 16-17 JULY 2015 Economic Growth and Equity in Tax Policy This paper has been prepared as a contribution to the discussion in the breakout
The impact on the UK economy of a reduction in fuel duty Report for Fair Fuel UK March 2012 Centre for Economics and Business Research Ltd. Unit 1, 4 Bath Street, London EC1V 9DX t: 020 7324 2850 f: 020
The Elasticity of Taxable Income: A Non-Technical Summary John Creedy The University of Melbourne Abstract This paper provides a non-technical summary of the concept of the elasticity of taxable income,
Levy on plastic bags in Ireland 1. Summary Country/Geographical Area Ireland Level implementation Scale Waste fraction / Specific Waste Type Target Audience Objective Initiator/coordinator Other key actors
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly as a section 76 Bill; Bill published in Government Gazette No. 2289 of 1 August 2003) (The English
Alternatives to Traditional Regulation Building capacity for RIA in South Africa Presentation to Officials 27 May 2009 Michael Goldblatt Director Palmer Development Group Session 6. Regulatory Alternatives
Review of Section 481 Film Relief Department of Finance Consultation Paper May 2012 Tax Policy Unit Department of Finance Government Buildings, Upper Merrion Street, Dublin 2 Ireland Tel: +353 1 6767571
Lightweight plastic carrier bags POSITION PAPER ON EP AMENDMENTS TO DIRECTIVE 94/62/EC Date: March 2014 Contact: Mohamed Temsamani, +32 2 737 05 83, email@example.com Carrier bags play an important
54 Interpretation (Part 3) This section contains definitions of the legal citations used in Part 3. This is a conventional provision in Finance Acts. It allows abbreviated terms to be used in reference
The Impact of Bill 18-150 on the Economy of Washington, D.C. THE BEACON HILL INSTITUTE AT SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY 8 Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Tel: 617-573-8750, Fax: 617-994-4279 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org,
Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2141595/ The Future of Fee Based Banking Income Description: This report examines the market for fee-based retail banking products
Cheat Sheet Reducing Waste and Managing the Problem Definition: Waste can be defined simply as the unwanted materials that we throw away as they are worthless, useless or in excess of. Farms, factories
EUROPEAN COMPARISON OF ECONOMIC INCENTIVES IN OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH Elsler, D. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, E 48009 Bilbao E-mail: email@example.com Economic incentives aim
A Consumer Council Briefing for Northern Ireland MPs and MLAs March 2013 The Office of Fair Trading report on the UK Petrol and Diesel Sector: Issues for Northern Ireland and Future Actions This briefing
A super waste of money Redesigning super tax concessions April 2015 ISSN 1836-9014 Matt Grudnoff Policy Brief About TAI The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra.
Open Banking Building a transparent banking system Housing Open Banking : Building a transparent banking system Labour s With Britain back in recession thanks to the Government s failed economic policies
Integrated Skills in English ISE II Reading & Writing exam Sample paper 1 Your full name: (BLOCK CAPITALS) Candidate number: Centre: Time allowed: 2 hours Instructions to candidates 1. Write your name,
Case study for the OECD Working Party on Resource Productivity and Waste: The Australian National Television and Computer Recycling Scheme Contents Executive Summary... 3 Background... 4 The Australian
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview of solid waste management in developing countries Solid waste management is becoming a major public health and environmental concern in urban areas of many developing
Danish Experiences with Green Tax Reforms and Lessons Learned DIS US students Søren Dyck-Madsen The Danish Ecological Council DIS US students 7.11.20912 Why Green the Tax System Tax the Bad s not the Good
International Tax Services EYEcon October 2002 International trends in dividend taxation Implications for Australian Companies and Tax Policy Report prepared for the ASX Table of Contents Overview...ii
Taxation and social security system reform John Freebairn University of Melbourne CEDA Council on Economic Policy (CCEP) Sydney, 18 March, 2013 A. General observations The case for reform of the taxation
National Energy Action s Northern Ireland response to CFD Implementation in NI Strategic issues Discussion Paper May 2015 National Energy Action Northern Ireland (NEA NI), the leading national fuel poverty
Negative Externalities AS Economics Presentation 2005 Key Issues The meaning of externalities Examples of negative externalities Differences between private and social costs Externalities as a cause of
Economic Analysis of Proposed Betting Tax Regimes Anthony Foley Dublin City University Business School February 2012 Commissioned by the Irish Bookmakers Association 1 Executive Summary The approach to
Position of Detailhandel Nederland on consultation of European Commission on reduction of plastic carrier bags Detailhandel Nederland, further referred to as the Dutch Retail Association, represents the
Quarterly Economic Commentary David Duffy Kieran McQuinn Ciara Morley Daniel Foley Winter 2015 The forecasts in this Commentary are based on data available by 11 December 2015. Draft completed 11 December
Put Rubbish Away for Good! Lesson aims Students will become rubbish detectives and investigate areas of unsightly rubbish in their school or community. Students will need to take photographs or draw the
Overview - State Tax Review Discussion Paper FEBRUARY 2015 WWW.YOURSAY.SA.GOV.AU Why Are We Reviewing Our State Tax System? South Australia is already a great place to live and we value that as a community.
CHEMIST WAREHOUSE SUBMISSION TO THE COMPETITION POLICY REVIEW MAY 2014 Table of contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Outlet location decision-making... 3 3. Discounting... 4 4. The true cost of regulation...
TAXATION OF PRIVATE LANDLORDS The Tax Position of the Small Private Landlord The private rented sector is possibly the only sector of the economy where the tax and regulatory systems work to prevent the
Plastic & Glass Packaging Recycling Business Targets 2016-2020 IA No: Lead department or agency: Defra Other departments or agencies: Scottish Government, Welsh Assembly Government, Dept of the Environment
SPEECH BY MINISTER OF FINANCE MR NHLANHLA NENE South Africa s tax system and the tax reform agenda for 2015 and beyond BER Conference VENUE: Balalaika Hotel, Sandton DATE: 12 June 2015 Good morning and
Reducing plastic bag waste in major cities of Cambodia Presented by: Fabio Moni Project Manager, Fondazione ACRA-CCS Reducing plastic bag waste in major cities of Cambodia Plastic bags, a Cambodian perspective
Workshop on Best Practices in Policies and Measures, 11 13 April 2000, Copenhagen THE UK CLIMATE CHANGE PROGRAMME AND EXAMPLES OF BEST PRACTICE Gabrielle Edwards United Kingdom Abstract: The UK published
Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia and the Pacific CASE STUDY Addressing Competitiveness in introducing ETR United Kingdom s climate change levy Key point The UK Government introduced an energy tax
OECD Economic Studies No. 29, 1997/II INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF PART-TIME WORK Georges Lemaitre, Pascal Marianna and Alois van Bastelaer TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 140 International definitions
2016 Budget predictions Tax revenues estimates 2015/16 tax revenues In the 2015 Medium Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS), estimates for 2015/16 tax revenues were revised downwards by R7.6 billion to
Policy and Regulations Faridabad (2009) Policy and Regulations Faridabad (India) 1.1 Policies No specific regulations have been framed for addressing the management of plastic waste, and it is thus governed
Western Australian Waste Authority BUSINESS PLAN 2015 16 1 ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN The Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Act 2007 (WARR Act) is the key piece of legislation dealing with the management
Economic impacts of expanding the National Insurance Contributions holiday scheme Federation of Small Businesses policy paper Overview This research paper sets out estimates for the economic and employment
POSITION PAPER Plastic Bags February 2010 IN BRIEF Plastic bags are often dominating environmental headlines. In recent years, a number of political initiatives (national and local) have been taken, involving
Transfer Pricing Country Profile (to be posted on the OECD Internet site www.oecd.org/ctp/tp/countryprofiles) Name of Country: POLAND / Date of profile: January 2012 1. Reference to the Arm s Length Principle
What can business expect if Britain remains? 1. Issues impacting all businesses Trade prospects with, and market access to: European Union member states, non-eu member states with existing EU trade agreements,
Guide to Electricity price formation in Ireland and Northern Ireland The numbers The average household consumes 4,300 kwh 1 of electricity per annum in Ireland and 4,100 in Northern Ireland. At an average
and Science Energy White Paper at a glance WWW. i Energy White Paper at a glance The Australian Government made an election commitment to deliver an Energy White Paper to give industry and consumers certainty
FISCAL INCENTIVES AND RETIREMENT SAVINGS Project Outline 2014-2015 The OECD argues in favour of complementary private pension savings to boost overall saving for retirement. Financial incentives may be
OECD PROJECT ON FINANCIAL INCENTIVES AND RETIREMENT SAVINGS Project Outline 2014-2016 The OECD argues in favour of complementary private pension savings to boost overall saving for retirement. Financial
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF CORPORATE TAX RATE REDUCTIONS Leadership makes the difference January 211 The Economic Impact of Corporate Tax Rate Reductions January 211 Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters Author:
A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANISMS OF COMPETITION IN THE GAMBLING MARKET RORY MCSTAY Senior Freshman In this essay, Rory McStay describes the the effects of information asymmetries in the gambling
Ireland and the EU 1973-2003 Economic and Social Change Table 1 Population, 1971-2002 viii Table 2 Population of the provinces ix Table 3 Births, deaths and life expectancy ix Table 4 Numbers in education
Page 1 Fantasy Budget Competition Due date: 4 th November 2013 Dean Bracken Sean Feely Conor Lunney David McNamara Page 2 Introduction The budget for 2014 announced on the 15 th of October 2013 promotes
HANDOUTS Property Taxation Review Committee Legislative Services Agency September 1, 2004 Criteria For Good Proposals for Property Tax Reform Dr. Thomas Pogue, University of Iowa DISCLAIMER The Iowa General
The Irish Plastic Bag Levy : A mechanism to reduce marine litter? Thomas K. Doyle 1 & Anne Marie O Hagan 2 1 Coastal & Marine Research Centre, UCC 2 Hydraulics and Maritime Research Centre, UCC MARLISCO
OECD GLOBAL FORUM ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: EMISSIONS TRADING CONCERTED ACTION ON TRADEABLE EMISSIONS PERMITS COUNTRY FORUM OECD Headquarters, Paris 17-18 March, 2003 Proposal of Upstream Emissions Trading
CGT main residence exemption Why removing the tax concession for homes over $2 million is good for the budget, the economy and fairness Policy Brief Matt Grudnoff January 2016 i ABOUT THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND WASTE PREVENTION Simon Drury, WRAP Welcome and introduction This presentation Resource Management, Why? Using the Waste Hierarchy Waste mapping Opportunities for action. WRAP WRAP
An Evaluation of the Possible Macroeconomic Impact of the Income Tax Reduction in Malta Article published in the Quarterly Review 2015:2, pp. 41-47 BOX 4: AN EVALUATION OF THE POSSIBLE MACROECONOMIC IMPACT
Mobile Phone Industry Recycling Program Presented by Glenn Brown The Australian Telecommunications Association AMTA is the peak national body representing the mobile telecommunications industry in Australia.
The Waste Levy pros and cons from a business perspective John Pask Business NZ About Business NZ 76,000 MEMBERS Affiliated Industry Groups (67) www.businessnz.org.nz Proposed waste levy Is it necessary?
UHI Explained Frequently asked questions on the proposed new model of Universal Health Insurance Overview of Universal Health Insurance What kind of health system does Ireland currently have? At the moment
SEPTEMBER 2015 v2 A STUDY OF TAX-FREE SAVINGS ACCOUNT TAKEUP IN SOUTH AFRICA A project by Analysts: Stuart Theobald, CFA Colin Anthony Phibion Makuwerere, CFA www.intellidex.co.za www.savetaxfree.co.za
An Phríomh-Oifig Staidrimh Central Statistics Office Household Finance and Consumption Survey 2013 Published by the Stationery Office, Dublin, Ireland. Available from: Central Statistics Office, Information
Employee Handbook of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland RCPI Policy Group on Alcohol 2014 Pre Budget Submission September 2013 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Recommendations... 5 3. Effect of
Payments Package: Questions and Answers Date: November 2013 Contact: Ruth Milligan, T: +32 2 737 05 95, firstname.lastname@example.org A. Introduction The Commission published its Payments Package on 24 July
Mobile Marketing An Inside View from Marketing Managers A Report by ZinMobi ZinMobi Participants Content 1. Executive Summary 2. The Size of the Mobile Revolution 3. Detailed Results 4. Recommendations
THE PETROL TAX DEBATE Zoë Smith THE INSTITUTE FOR FISCAL STUDIES Briefing Note No. 8 Published by The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street London WC1E 7AE Tel 2 7291 48 Fax 2 7323 478 email@example.com
Taxation The combination of Malta s tax system and its extensive double tax treaty network (over 50) means that, with proper planning and structuring, investors can achieve considerable fiscal efficiency
Climate Change and Waste The Missing Link December 2010 Written by Jacob Gregory Strategies being used to mitigate climate change in Canada are largely focused on curtailing emissions from energy production:
Tax Guide 2014/15 South Africa Individuals and Trusts Tax Rates 1 March 2014 to 28 February 2015 Individual Taxpayers and Special Trusts Taxable Income R0 174 550 Rate of Tax 18% of taxable income R174
SEPTEMBER 2015 A STUDY OF TAX-FREE SAVINGS ACCOUNT TAKEUP IN SOUTH AFRICA A project by Analysts: Stuart Theobald, CFA Colin Anthony Phibion Makuwerere, CFA www.intellidex.co.za www.savetaxfree.co.za KEY
Guide to Transparency in Public Finances Looking Beyond the Core Budget 2. Tax Expenditures www.openbudgetindex.org Introduction For more than a decade, civil society organizations around the world, as
ESRI Research Note The Irish Electricity Market: New Regulation to Preserve Competition Valeria di Cosmo and Muireann Á. Lynch Research Notes are short papers on focused research issues. They are subject
Project LINK Meeting New York, - October 1 Country Report: Australia Prepared by Peter Brain: National Institute of Economic and Industry Research, and Duncan Ironmonger: Department of Economics, University
BUDGET 2015 RETAIL FUNDAMENTAL TO RECOVERY 1 REI BUDGET 2015 SUBMISSION In order to sustain our recovery, grow the economy and support employment in the Irish retail industry, we call for the following
Fundamental principles of ecological taxation Federica Pitrone, Maastricht University 18th Ius Commune Conference, Maastricht, 28 November 2013 Department 1 Outline 1. Preliminary comments: the greening
Diageo reports strong sales momentum 29 June 2006 Diageo plc Diageo will announce preliminary results for the year ending 30 June 2006 on 31 August 2006 and has today issued the following statement. Summary
SMALL FIRMS ASSOCIATION SMALL FIRMS ASSOCIATION SUBMISSION ON INTERCHANGE FEES FOR CARD-BASED PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS Presented to: Department of Finance June 2015 BACKGROUND The Small Firms Association is
Personal current accounts in the UK An OFT market study Executive summary July 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background The personal current account (PCA) is a cornerstone of Britain s retail financial system.
Discussion Paper Series May 2010 EfD DP 10-13 Behavioral Response to Plastic Bag Legislation in Botswana Johane Dikgang and Martine Visser The Environment for Development (EfD) initiative is an environmental