1 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS FLORIDA STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES 1981 Edition THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES International Standard Book Number Library of Congress Catalog Card No The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida , 1982, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1989, 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000 by The Florida Bar. All rights reserved Published in Reprinted and repaginated August 1997 with all supplements including July, 1997 Supp. Printed in the United States of America SUMMARY OF CONTENTS The first page of each part of this book bears a summary of the contents of that part. A detailed subject index to all the instructions is at the rear of the book. Page PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS... 1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS... 7 MISCELLANEOUS INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS ON SUBSTANTIVE CRIMES RYCE ACT PROCEEDINGS Comment [COMMENT1]: 3/89 page nos. changed from schedule thru subj. index
2 BACK TO SUMMARY OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS Page 1.01 PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS CLOSING ARGUMENT... 6 PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS 1.01 PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS Opening Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: You have been selected and sworn as the jury to try the case of State of Florida v. (defendant). This is a criminal case. (Defendant) is charged with (crime charged). The definition of the elements of (crime charged) will be explained to you later. It is your solemn responsibility to determine if the State has proved its accusation beyond a reasonable doubt against (defendant). Your verdict must be based solely on the evidence, or lack of evidence, and the law. The [information] [indictment] is not evidence and is not to be considered by you as any proof of guilt. It is the judge's responsibility to decide which laws apply to this case and to explain those laws to you. It is your responsibility to decide what the facts of this case may be, and to apply the law to those facts. Thus, the province of the jury and the province of the court are well defined, and they do not overlap. This is one of the fundamental principles of our system of justice. Before proceeding further, it will be helpful if you
3 understand how a trial is conducted. At the beginning of the trial the attorneys will have an opportunity, if they wish, to make an opening statement. The opening statement gives the attorneys a chance to tell you what evidence they believe will be presented during the trial. What the lawyers say is not evidence, and you are not to consider it as such. Following the opening statements, witnesses will be called to testify under oath. They will be examined and cross-examined by the attorneys. Documents and other exhibits also may be produced as evidence. After the evidence has been presented, the attorneys will have the opportunity to make their final argument. Following the arguments by the attorneys, the court will instruct you on the law applicable to the case. After the instructions are given [the alternate juror will be released and] you will then retire to consider your verdict. Admonition You should not form any definite or fixed opinion on the merits of the case until you have heard all the evidence, the argument of the lawyers and the instructions on the law by the judge. Until that time you should not discuss the case among yourselves. During the course of the trial the court may take recesses, during which you will be permitted to separate and go about your personal affairs. During these recesses you will not discuss the case with anyone nor permit anyone to say anything to you or in your presence about the case. If anyone attempts to say anything to you or in your presence about this case, tell [him] [her] that you are on the jury trying the case and ask [him] [her] to stop. If he persists, leave [him] [her] at once and immediately report the matter to the bailiff, who will advise me. The case must be tried by you only on the evidence presented during the trial in your presence and in the presence of the defendant, the attorneys and the judge. Jurors must not Comment [COMMENT2]: 3/89 corrected the spelling of bailiff in paragraph that begins During the course of the trial... iii
4 conduct any investigation of their own. Accordingly, you must not visit any of the places described in the evidence, and you must not read nor listen to any reports about the case. Further, you must not discuss this case with any person and you must not speak with the attorneys, the witnesses or the defendant about any subject until your deliberations are finished. Give if defendant requests In every criminal proceeding a defendant has the absolute right to remain silent. At no time is it the duty of a defendant to prove [his] [her] innocence. From the exercise of a defendant's right to remain silent, a jury is not permitted to draw any inference of guilt, and the fact that a defendant did not take the witness stand must not influence your verdict in any manner whatsoever. The attorneys are trained in the rules of evidence and trial procedure, and it is their duty to make all objections they feel are proper. When an objection is made you should not speculate on the reason why it is made; likewise, when an objection is sustained, or upheld, by me, you must not speculate on what might have occurred had the objection not been sustained, nor what a witness might have said had [he] [she] been permitted to answer. iv
5 1.02 CLOSING ARGUMENT case. Both the State and the defendant have now rested their The attorneys now will present their final arguments. Please remember that what the attorneys say is not evidence. However, do listen closely to their arguments. They are intended to aid you in understanding the case. Each side will have equal time, but [the State] [the defendant] is entitled to divide this time between an opening argument and a rebuttal argument after the opponent has spoken. v
6 BACK TO SUMMARY OF CONTENTS GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS Page 2.01 INTRODUCTION TO FINAL INSTRUCTIONS STATEMENT OF CHARGE (a) WHEN THERE ARE LESSER INCLUDED CRIMES OR ATTEMPTS PLEA OF NOT GUILTY; REASONABLE DOUBT; AND BURDEN OF PROOF WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE (a) EXPERT WITNESSES (b) ACCOMPLICE (c) DEFENDANT TESTIFYING (d) DEFENDANT NOT TESTIFYING (e) DEFENDANT'S STATEMENTS [CONFESSIONS] RULES FOR DELIBERATION MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PENALTIES (Deleted) CAUTIONARY INSTRUCTION VERDICT (a) SINGLE DEFENDANT, MULTIPLE COUNTS OR INFORMATIONS (b) SINGLE COUNT, MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS (c) MULTIPLE COUNTS OR INFORMATIONS, MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS Comment [COMMENT3]: 12/95 page nos. changed from 2.08 to end 2.09 SUBMITTING CASE TO JURY December 1995
7 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 2.01 INTRODUCTION TO FINAL INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, I thank you for your attention during this trial. Please pay attention to the instructions I am about to give you.
8 Notes to Judge: 2.02 STATEMENT OF CHARGE (Defendant), the defendant in this case, has been accused of the crime of (crime charged). 1. Read charges about the specific crimes, found on pages 71 to If there are multiple counts, the court should explain each count, and the lesser included crimes related to it. Comment [COMMENT4]: 3/89 cross ref to page nos. were changed in note 1
9 2.02(a) WHEN THERE ARE LESSER INCLUDED CRIMES OR ATTEMPTS Note to Judge: Give before reading charges on lesser included crimes or attempts. In considering the evidence, you should consider the possibility that although the evidence may not convince you that the defendant committed the main crime[s] of which [he] [she] is accused, there may be evidence that [he] [she] committed other acts that would constitute a lesser included crime. Therefore, if you decide that the main accusation has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you will next need to decide if the defendant is guilty of any lesser included crime. The lesser crimes indicated in the definition of (crime charged) are: (list C see chart on page?) Comment [COMMENT5]: 3/89 cross ref to page no. changed 3/89
10 2.03 PLEA OF NOT GUILTY; REASONABLE DOUBT; AND BURDEN OF PROOF Comment [COMMENT6]: 7/97 changes made to every paragraph on this page except the Whenever paragraph The defendant has entered a plea of not guilty. This means you must presume or believe the defendant is innocent. The presumption stays with the defendant as to each material allegation in the [information] [indictment] through each stage of the trial unless it has been overcome by the evidence to the exclusion of and beyond a reasonable doubt. To overcome the defendant's presumption of innocence the State has the burden of proving the crime with which the defendant is charged was committed and the defendant is the person who committed the crime. The defendant is not required to present evidence or prove anything. Whenever the words reasonable doubt are used you must consider the following: Note to Judge: It is recommended that you use this instruction to define reasonable doubt during voir dire. State v. Wilson, 686 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1996). A reasonable doubt is not a mere possible doubt, a speculative, imaginary or forced doubt. Such a doubt must not influence you to return a verdict of not guilty if you have an abiding conviction of guilt. On the other hand, if, after carefully considering, comparing and weighing all the evidence, there is not an abiding conviction of guilt, or, if, having a conviction, it is one which is not stable but one which wavers and vacillates, then the charge is not proved beyond every reasonable doubt and you must find the defendant not guilty because the doubt is reasonable. July 1997
11 It is to the evidence introduced in this trial, and to it alone, that you are to look for that proof. A reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant may arise from the evidence, conflict in the evidence or the lack of evidence. If you have a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty. If you have no reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
12 2.04 WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE It is up to you to decide what evidence is reliable. You should use your common sense in deciding which is the best evidence, and which evidence should not be relied upon in considering your verdict. You may find some of the evidence not reliable, or less reliable than other evidence. You should consider how the witnesses acted, as well as what they said. Some things you should consider are: 1. Did the witness seem to have an opportunity to see and know the things about which the witness testified? 2. Did the witness seem to have an accurate memory? 3. Was the witness honest and straightforward in answering the attorneys' questions? 4. Did the witness have some interest in how the case should be decided? 5. Does the witness' testimony agree with the other testimony and other evidence in the case? Note to Judge: The instructions covered under paragraphs numbered six through ten, inclusive, are not common to all cases. These numbered paragraphs should be included only as required by the evidence. 6. Has the witness been offered or received any money, preferred treatment or other benefit in order to get the witness to testify? 7. Had any pressure or threat been used against the witness that affected the truth of the witness' testimony?
13 8. Did the witness at some other time make a statement that is inconsistent with the testimony [he] [she] gave in court? Note to Judge: The court also may wish to give as part of this instruction the instructions covered under 2.04(a) and (b), concerning expert witnesses and accomplices. If so, the Committee recommends that they be given as additional numbered paragraphs, which would precede the last two unnumbered paragraphs of this instruction. 9. Was it proved that the witness had been convicted of a crime? 10. Was it proved that the general reputation of the witness for telling the truth and being honest was bad? You may rely upon your own conclusion about the witness. A juror may believe or disbelieve all or any part of the evidence or the testimony of any witness.
14 2.04(a) EXPERT WITNESSES Expert witnesses are like other witnesses, with one exception C the law permits an expert witness to give [his] [her] opinion. However, an expert's opinion is only reliable when given on a subject about which you believe [him] [her] to be an expert. Like other witnesses, you may believe or disbelieve all or any part of an expert's testimony.
15 2.04(b) ACCOMPLICE You should use great caution in relying on the testimony of a witness who claims to have helped the defendant commit a crime. This is particularly true when there is no other evidence tending to agree with what the witness says about the defendant. However, if the testimony of such a witness convinces you beyond a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt, or the other evidence in the case does so, then you should find the defendant guilty.
16 2.04(c) DEFENDANT TESTIFYING Comment [COMMENT7]: 7/92 [his] [her] added and deleted Give if defendant requests The defendant in this case has become a witness. You should apply the same rules to consideration of [his] [her] testimony that you apply to the testimony of the other witnesses. July 1992
17 2.04(d) DEFENDANT NOT TESTIFYING Give either paragraph or both if defendant requests The constitution requires the State to prove its accusations against the defendant. It is not necessary for the defendant to disprove anything. Nor is the defendant required to prove [his] [her] innocence. It is up to the State to prove the defendant's guilt by evidence. The defendant exercised a fundamental right by choosing not to be a witness in this case. You must not view this as an admission of guilt or be influenced in any way by [his] [her] decision. No juror should ever be concerned that the defendant did or did not take the witness stand to give testimony in the case.
18 2.04(e) DEFENDANT'S STATEMENTS A statement claimed to have been made by the defendant outside of court has been placed before you. Such a statement should always be considered with caution and be weighed with great care to make certain it was freely and voluntarily made. Therefore, you must determine from the evidence that the defendant's alleged statement was knowingly, voluntarily and freely made. In making this determination, you should consider the total circumstances, including but not limited to: 1. Whether, when the defendant made the statement, [he] [she] had been threatened in order to get [him] [her] to make it, and 2. Whether anyone had promised [him] [her] anything in order to get [him] [her] to make it. If you conclude the defendant's out of court statement was not freely and voluntarily made, you should disregard it.
19 2.05 RULES FOR DELIBERATION These are some general rules that apply to your discussion. You must follow these rules in order to return a lawful verdict: Comment [COMMENT8]: 12/95 changes were made to paragraphs numbered 2, 5, and 8 1. You must follow the law as it is set out in these instructions. If you fail to follow the law, your verdict will be a miscarriage of justice. There is no reason for failing to follow the law in this case. All of us are depending upon you to make a wise and legal decision in this matter. 2. This case must be decided only upon the evidence that you have heard from the testimony of the witnesses [and have seen in the form of the exhibits in evidence] and these instructions. 3. This case must not be decided for or against anyone because you feel sorry for anyone, or are angry at anyone. 4. Remember, the lawyers are not on trial. Your feelings about them should not influence your decision in this case. 5. Your duty is to determine if the defendant has been proven guilty or not, in accord with the law. It is the judge's job to determine a proper sentence if the defendant is found guilty. 6. Whatever verdict you render must be unanimous, that is, each juror must agree to the same verdict. Give 7 if applicable 7. It is entirely proper for a lawyer to talk to a witness about what testimony the witness would give if called to the courtroom. The witness should not be discredited by talking to a lawyer about [his] [her] testimony. 8. Your verdict should not be influenced by feelings of prejudice, bias or sympathy. Your verdict must be based on the evidence, and on the law contained in December 1995
20 these instructions MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PENALTIES [Deleted see 2.05 item 5.] Comment [COMMENT9]: 10/ was deleted and reworded in 2.05 item 5 October 1985
21 2.07 CAUTIONARY INSTRUCTION Deciding a verdict is exclusively your job. I cannot participate in that decision in any way. Please disregard anything I may have said or done that made you think I preferred one verdict over another.
22 2.08 VERDICT Note to Judge: The giving of an instruction as to the verdict can be avoided by the use of a self-executing verdict form. The judge can read the verdict form to the jury, explaining it as [he] [she] goes. A sample of possible verdict forms for typical variables in combinations of defendants and charges follows: 1. Verdict form for single count, single defendant. We, the jury, find as follows, as to the defendant in this case: (check only one) a. The defendant is guilty of (crime charged). b. The defendant is guilty of (a lesser included offense). c. The defendant is not guilty. 2. Verdict form for multiple counts, single defendant. We, the jury, find as follows, as to Count I of the charge: (check only one as to this count) a. The defendant is guilty of (crime charged). b. The defendant is guilty of (a lesser included offense). c. The defendant is not guilty. We, the jury, find as follows, as to Count II of the charge: (check only one as to this count) a. The defendant is guilty of (crime charged). b. The defendant is guilty of (a lesser included offense). c. The defendant is not guilty. Use separate verdict for each defendant 3. Verdict form for multiple counts, multiple defendants. We, the jury, find as to the defendant, (name of defendant), as follows: As to Count I: (check only one as to this count) a. The defendant is guilty of (crime charged). b. The defendant is guilty of (a lesser included
23 offense). c. The defendant is not guilty As to Count II: (check only one as to this count) a. The defendant is guilty of (crime charged). b. The defendant is guilty of (a lesser included offense). c. The defendant is not guilty. 4. Verdict form in capital cases, second proceeding. a. We recommend the defendant be sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of parole for 25 years. b. We recommend, by a vote of..., that the defendant be sentenced to death. 5. Verdict form when insanity is a defense. a. The defendant is guilty of (crime charged). b. The defendant is guilty of (a lesser included offense). c. The defendant is not guilty. d. The defendant is not guilty because legally insane. You may find the defendant guilty as charged in the [information] [indictment] or guilty of such lesser included crime as the evidence may justify or not guilty. Comment [COMMENT10]: Next two paragraphs added 12/95 If you return a verdict of guilty, it should be for the highest offense which has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If you find that no offense has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then, of course, your verdict must be not guilty. Only one verdict may be returned as to [the crime] [each crime] charged. This verdict must be unanimous, that is, all of you must agree to the same verdict. The verdict must be in writing and for your convenience the necessary forms of verdict have been prepared for you. They are as follows (read verdict forms):
24 Note to Judge: In cases of multiple defendants or multiple charges, give (a), (b) or (c) as applicable. 2.08(a) SINGLE DEFENDANT, MULTIPLE COUNTS OR INFORMATIONS A separate crime is charged in each [count of the information] [indictment] [information] and while they have been tried together each crime and the evidence applicable to it must be considered separately and a separate verdict returned as to each. A finding of guilty or not guilty as to one crime must not affect your verdict as to the other crime(s) charged.
25 2.08(b) SINGLE COUNT, MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS The defendants have been tried together; however, you must consider each defendant and the evidence applicable to [him] [her] separately. You may find [one] [any] [or] [both] guilty or not guilty. However, your verdict as to one defendant must not affect your verdict as to the other(s).
26 2.08(c) MULTIPLE COUNTS OR INFORMATIONS, MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS A separate crime is charged against each defendant in each [count of the information] [information] [indictment]. The defendants have been tried together; however, the charges against each defendant and the evidence applicable to [him] [her] must be considered separately. A finding of guilty or not guilty as to [one] [both] [or] [some] of the defendants must not affect your verdict as to any other defendant(s) or other crimes charged.
27 2.09 SUBMITTING CASE TO JURY In just a few moments you will be taken to the jury room by the bailiff. The first thing you should do is elect a foreman. The foreman presides over your deliberations, like a chairman of a meeting. It is the foreman's job to sign and date the verdict form when all of you have agreed on a verdict in this case. The foreman will bring the verdict back to the courtroom when you return. Either a man or a woman may be foreman of a jury. Your verdict finding the defendant either guilty or not guilty must be unanimous. The verdict must be the verdict of each juror, as well as of the jury as a whole. In closing, let me remind you that it is important that you follow the law spelled out in these instructions in deciding your verdict. There are no other laws that apply to this case. Even if you do not like the laws that must be applied, you must use them. For two centuries we have lived by the constitution and the law. No juror has the right to violate rules we all share.
28 BACK TO SUMMARY OF CONTENTS MISCELLANEOUS INSTRUCTIONS Page 3.01 PRINCIPALS (a) PRINCIPALS C WHEN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT HIRED BY DEFENDANT DATE OF CRIME VENUE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (a) ALIBI (b) INSANITY (1) INSANITY (2) INSANITY C HALLUCINATIONS Comment [COMMENT11]: (b)(1) was (b) before (June 1994). Renumbered to add (2) (new) July 1997 (c) ENTRAPMENT (d) JUSTIFIABLE USE OF DEADLY FORCE (e) (f) JUSTIFIABLE USE OF NONDEADLY FORCE... 51a JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER (g) VOLUNTARY INTOXICATION (h) INDEPENDENT ACT Comment [COMMENT12]: new charge (h) added 7/97 July 1997
29 (i) DURESS OR NECESSITY (a) AGGRAVATION OF A FELONY BY CARRYING A FIREARM F.S (1)... 58c 3.05(b) AGGRAVATION OF A FELONY BY CARRYING A WEAPON OTHER THAN A FIREARM F.S (1) (c) AGGRAVATION OF A FELONY BY COMMITTING AN AGGRAVATED BATTERY F.S (1) (d) AGGRAVATION OF A FELONY BY POSSESSION OF A FIREARM OR DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE F.S (2) (e) AGGRAVATION OF A FELONY BY WEARING A HOOD, MASK OR OTHER DEVICE TO CONCEAL IDENTITY (f) AGGRAVATION OF A FELONY BY EVIDENCING PREJUDICE F.S JURY DEADLOCK INSTRUCTION UPON DISCHARGE OF JURY SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE "WILLIAMS RULE" F.S INSANITY C PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION Comment [COMMENT13]: Williams ' Rule numbered and 3.10 (new) added July 1997 Revised March 30, CONVICTION OF CERTAIN CRIMES AS IMPEACHMENT F.S , (1) March 2000
30 MISCELLANEOUS INSTRUCTIONS Comment [COMMENT14]: the whole charge was reworded December PRINCIPALS F.S If the defendant helped another person or persons [commit] [attempt to commit] a crime, the defendant is a principal and must be treated as if [he] [she] had done all the things the other person or persons did if 1. the defendant had a conscious intent that the criminal act be done and 2. the defendant did some act or said some word which was intended to and which did incite, cause, encourage, assist or advise the other person or persons to actually [commit] [attempt to commit] the crime. See State v. Dene, 533 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1988) To be a principal, the defendant does not have to be present when the crime is [committed] [or] [attempted]. December 1995
31 F.S See State v. Dene, 533 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1988) 3.01(a) PRINCIPALS C WHEN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT HIRED BY DEFENDANT If the defendant paid or promised to pay another person or persons to [commit] [attempt to commit] a crime, the defendant is a principal and must be treated as if [he] [she] had done all of the things the person who was promised or received the money did if: 1. the defendant had a conscious intent that the criminal act be done and 2. [he] [she] made or promised the payment in exchange for the commission or promise to commit the crime or to help commit the crime and 3. the [crime] [attempt] was committed by (the other person). To be a principal, the defendant does not have to be present when the crime is [committed] [or] [attempted]. Comment [COMMENT15]: was promised added to last sentence of first paragraph 7/97 Comment [COMMENT16]: changes made to para. nos. 1 and 3 July 1997 July 1997
32 3.02 DATE OF CRIME Give if statement of particulars filed Note to Judge: The State must prove that the crime was committed [(date)] [(time)] [(place)]. When applicable, instruct on statute of limitations or on fact that crime need not be committed on date stated in charge.
33 3.03 VENUE It must be proved, only to a reasonable certainty, that the alleged crime was committed [in this county] [within the areas of the counties named in the charge]. Note to Judge: This charge should be given only when the defendant requests and there is an issue of fact in the evidence for the jury to resolve.
34 3.04 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 3.04(a) ALIBI An issue in this case is whether defendant was present when the crime allegedly was committed. Note to Judge: When the defendant is charged only as a principal not present at the commission of the crime, the following instruction may not be applicable. If you have a reasonable doubt that the defendant was present at the scene of the alleged crime, it is your duty to find the defendant not guilty. Comment [COMMENT17]: 7/97 added (1) to title
35 3.04(b)(1) INSANITY Comment [COMMENT18]: 7/97 added (1) to title An issue in this case is whether (defendant) was insane when the crime allegedly was committed. A person is considered to be insane when: 1. [He] [She] had a mental infirmity, disease or defect. 2. Because of this condition a. [he] [she] did not know what [he] [she] was doing or its consequences or b. although [he] [she] knew what [he] [she] was doing and its consequences, [he] [she] did not know it was wrong. All persons are presumed to be sane. However, if the evidence causes you to have a reasonable doubt concerning the defendant's sanity, then the presumption of sanity vanishes and the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was sane. In determining the issue of insanity, you may consider the testimony of expert and nonexpert witnesses. The question you must answer is not whether the defendant is insane today, or has ever been insane, but simply if the defendant was insane at the time the crime was allegedly committed. Give if applicable Unrestrained passion or ungovernable temper is not insanity, even though the normal judgment of the person be overcome by passion or temper. Give if applicable If the evidence establishes that the defendant had been adjudged insane by a court, and has not been judicially restored to legal sanity, then you should assume the defendant was insane at the time of commission of the alleged crime, unless the evidence convinces you otherwise. July 1997
36 If you find that (defendant) committed the crime but have a reasonable doubt that [he] [she] was sane at that time, then you should find [him] [her] not guilty by reason of insanity. If your verdict is that the defendant is not guilty because insane, that does not necessarily mean [he] [she] will be released from custody. I must conduct further proceedings to determine if the defendant should be committed to a mental hospital, or given other outpatient treatment or released. Comment [COMMENT19]: 6/94 last sentence of charge was changed Note to Judge: If drugs or alcohol are involved, see Cirack v. State, 201 So.2d 706 (Fla. 1967). June 1994
37 3.04(b)(2) INSANITY C HALLUCINATIONS Comment [COMMENT20]: 7/97 new charge An issue in this case is whether (defendant) was insane when the crime allegedly was committed. A person is considered to be insane when: 1. The person had a mental infirmity, disease, or defect. 2. Because of this condition, the person had hallucinations or delusions which caused the person to honestly believe to be facts things which are not true or real. The guilt or innocence of a person suffering from such hallucinations or delusions is to be determined just as though the hallucinations or delusions were actual facts. If the act of the person would have been lawful had the hallucinations or delusions been the actual facts, the person is not guilty of the crime. Note to Judge: If voluntary intoxication is raised by the defense, see 3.04(g). All persons are presumed to be sane. However, if the evidence causes you to have a reasonable doubt concerning the defendant's sanity, then the presumption of sanity vanishes and the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was sane. In determining the issue of insanity, you may consider the testimony of expert and nonexpert witnesses. The question you must answer is not whether the defendant is insane today, or has ever been insane, but simply if the defendant was insane at the time the crime allegedly was committed. Unrestrained passion or ungovernable temper is not June 1994
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL ACTION H-00-0000 DEFENDANT(S) JURY INSTRUCTIONS I. General A. Introduction Members of the Jury:
Federal Public Defender W.D. Michigan The Federal Criminal Process INTRODUCTION The following summary of the federal criminal process is intended to provide you with a general overview of how your case
Attachment No. 2 Proposed Plain Language Revisions to Colorado Criminal Jury Instruction Chapter 1:04 and Chapter 3 The work of the Plain Language Subcommittee is set forth below. For comparison, the redrafted
1 THE COURT: You have been selected and sworn to determine the facts and render a verdict in the case of the Commonwealth / 1 of Pennsylvania versus Robert Greene, who is charged with one count of robbery,
From Classroom to Courtroom JUDGE INSTRUCTIONS The Trial 1. After the bailiff has called the court to order, judge enters courtroom and sits at bench. The judge tells everyone, but the jury, to be seated.
Understanding the criminal justice process Introduction Missouri law establishes certain guarantees to crime victims, including participation in the criminal justice system. Victims can empower themselves
JUROR S MANUAL (Prepared by the State Bar of Michigan) Your Role as a Juror You ve heard the term jury of one s peers. In our country the job of determining the facts and reaching a just decision rests,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA KEYBOARD()DIVISION KEYBOARD(), Plaintiff, v. KEYBOARD(), Defendants. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] CV Members of the Jury: COURT S INSTRUCTIONS
Stages in a Capital Case from http://deathpenaltyinfo.msu.edu/ Note that not every case goes through all of the steps outlined here. Some states have different procedures. I. Pre-Trial Crimes that would
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA JENNIFER WINDISCH, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO: 2007-CA-1174-K JOHN SUNDIN, M.D., RHODA SMITH, M.D., LAURRAURI
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS and INITIAL VOIR DIRE (CRIMINAL) (JUDGE O. H. EATON, JR. ) Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the criminal division of the Circuit Court. The Circuit Court considers criminal
MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE CRIMINAL VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS ASKED BY THE COURT THE MN SUPREME COURT TASK FORCE ON JURY SELECTION HAS RECOMMENDED THAT JUDGES BE MORE PROACTIVE IN ASKING INITIAL QUESTIONS
DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS This pamphlet has been provided to help you better understand the federal
Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court Rule 6.610 Criminal Procedure Generally (A) Precedence. Criminal cases have precedence over civil actions. (B) Pretrial. The court, on its own initiative
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 09-00296-03-CR-W-FJG ) ROBERT E. STEWART, ) ) Defendant.
Boulder County Bar Association Bar Media Manual The following are excerpts from the Boulder County Bar Association s Bar Media Manual. A full copy of the manual is available at http://www.boulderbar.org/bar_media/index.html.
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PALAU HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS I. Purpose of This Handbook The purpose of this handbook is to acquaint trial jurors with the general nature and importance of their
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 2: CRIMINAL LIABILITY; ELEMENTS OF CRIMES Table of Contents Part 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES... Section 31. VOLUNTARY CONDUCT (REPEALED)... 3 Section 32. ELEMENTS OF CRIMES
JURY INSTRUCTIONS PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS 1. ANTITRUST CLAIMS 2. Elements of Monopoly Claim 2.1 Definition of Monopoly Power 2.2 Relevant Market 2.3 Existence of Monopoly Power 2.4 Willful Maintenance
State of Arizona House of Representatives Forty-third Legislature Second Regular Session REFERENCE TITLE: psychiatric security review board Introduced by Representative Gardner AN ACT Amending sections
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY THE STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff, vs. Defendant. CRIMINAL NO. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense) COMES NOW the above-named Defendant
SETTLEGOODE v. PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al CV-00-313-ST JURY INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOWING CLOSE OF EVIDENCE These instructions will be in three parts: first, general rules that define and control your duties
Community Legal Information Association of Prince Edward Island, Inc. Going to Court: Criminal Trial Procedure If you've been charged with a crime and your case has not been diverted from the courts system,
CHAPTER SIX: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE By Gino L. DiVito, Retired Justice, Illinois Appellate Court, Partner, Quinlan & Crisham, Ltd.; Chicago Commencement of Prosecution In Illinois, the prosecution of a criminal
Jurors are randomly selected by the county computer system from a source which combines current Medina County voter registration list and residents of the county that hold a valid Texas drivers license
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this handbook is to provide answers to some very basic questions that inmates or inmates families might have regarding the processes of the criminal justice system. In no way
TOP TEN TIPS FOR WINNING YOUR CASE IN JURY SELECTION PRESENTED BY JEFF KEARNEY KEARNEY & WESTFALL 2501 PARKVIEW STREET, SUITE 300 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 336-5600 LUBBOCK CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Mock Trial Script The Case of a Stolen Car This mock trial is appropriate for middle and high school students. The script includes a role for a narrator,
Chapter 15 Criminal Law and Procedures Chapter Outline 1. Introduction 2. What Is a Crime? 3. Elements of Criminal Liability 4. Types of Crimes 5. Cyber Crime 6. Constitutional Safeguards 7. Criminal Procedures
Criminal Law Glossary Arrest Charge Convicted Court Crime/Offence Crown Attorney or Prosecutor Criminal Custody Guilty Illegal Innocent Lawyer To seize a person under authority of the law. Police officers
THE CRIMINAL EQUATION: actus reus + mens rea = CRIME Proof of Offences A person charged with a criminal offence is presumed innocent until that person pleads guilty or is proven guilty in court. The Crown
A Federal Criminal Case Timeline The following timeline is a very broad overview of the progress of a federal felony case. Many variables can change the speed or course of the case, including settlement
T E X A S Y O U N G L A W Y E R S A S S O C I A T I O N A N D S T A T E B A R O F T E X A S C RIMINAL LAW 1 0 1 : O V E RVIEW OF T H E T E XAS C RIMINAL J USTICE P ROCESS A C RIMINAL LAW 1 0 1 Prepared
ARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES (a) Mission: The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce
HOW A TYPICAL CRIMINAL CASE IS PROSECUTED IN ALASKA The Office of Victims Rights receives many inquiries from victims about how a criminal case in Alaska is investigated by police and then prosecuted by
Courtroom Terminology A Accused: formally charged but not yet tried for committing a crime; the person who has been charged may also be called the defendant. Acquittal: a judgment of court, based on the
Boulder Municipal Court Boulder County Justice Center P.O. Box 8015 1777 6 th Street Boulder, CO 80306-8015 www.bouldercolorado.gov/court JURY READINESS CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS You have set your case for
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME: : PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM
M Crim JI 7.15 Use of Deadly Force in Self-Defense (1) The defendant claims that [he / she] acted in lawful self-defense. A person has the right to use force or even take a life to defend [himself / herself]
Law & The Courts Resource Guide - what to do in case of an auto accident - your rights in traffic court - your rights if arrested table of contents What To Do In Case Of An Auto Accident...1 Your Rights
KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES I. MISSION The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce the
The Legal System in the United States At the conclusion of this chapter, students will be able to: 1. Understand how the legal system works; 2. Explain why laws are necessary; 3. Discuss how cases proceed
A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal Presented by the Office of the Richmond County District Attorney Acting District Attorney Daniel L. Master, Jr. 130 Stuyvesant
USE OF FORCE Attorney General's Use of Force Policy Issued April 1985 Revised June 2000 Preface The provisions of this revised policy are a product of the collective efforts and judgment of the New Jersey
HB 5143/PA 309, sponsored by Rep. Rick Jones, creates the Self Defense Act and specifies that it is not a crime to use force or deadly force to defend oneself if that person is not breaking any laws when
The Witness and the Justice System in Alberta Introduction This booklet provides basic information about appearing as a witness in the courts of Alberta. It is designed to explain your role as a witness,
General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance
Your Voice in Criminal Court a guide to court orientation for adult witnesses INFORMATION + RESOURCES FOR VICTIM SERVICE WORKERS introduction Victim Service Workers have an important role to play in the
CAUSE NO. STATE S EXHIBIT #1 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 49th DISTRICT COURT VS. OF ZAPATA COUNTY, TEXAS PLEA OF GUILTY, ADMONISHMENTS, VOLUNTARY STATEMENTS, WAIVERS, STIPULATION & JUDICIAL CONFESSION (Defendant
TAKING YOUR OMAHA DUI CASE TO JURY TRIAL If a Dismissal of Your Omaha DUI Charges Is Not Forthcoming You May Decide to Take Your Case in Front of a Jury in the Hope of Being Exonerated Thomas M. Petersen
11.00. ASSAULT, BATTERY, AND RELATED CRIMES 11.01 Definition Of Assault A person commits the offense of assault when he [ (knowingly) (intentionally) ] [without lawful authority] engages in conduct which
Facts for Federal Criminal Defendants FACTS FOR FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS I. INTRODUCTION The following is a short summary of what will happen to you if you are charged in a federal criminal case. This
STATE OF TEXAS VS JANE DOE VOIR DIRE 1. CONVERSATION - ONLY TIME YOU CAN ASK THE LAWYERS QUESTIONS 2. NO RIGHT OR WRONG ANSWER 3. DESELECTION (TO MAKE THE JURY = SIT THERE & BE QUIET) 4. SOME QUESTIONS
Part I: General Information How was I chosen for jury service? THE ANSWER BOOK FOR JURY SERVICE Potential jurors are selected randomly by the jury commissioners using lists designated by the courts, such
Jury Duty Information HANDBOOK FOR JURORS IN CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CASES IN THE 29 th Judicial Court For the Parish of St. Charles Courthouse Hahnville, Louisiana JUDGES EMILE R. ST.PIERRE Division C M. LAUREN
GLOSSARY OF TERMS - CRIMINAL Acquittal: A finding that the defendant is not guilty of the charges brought by the government. This finding may be reached by the trial judge in a case tried before a judge
Office of the Attorney General Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses MARCH 2009 LAWRENCE WASDEN Attorney General Criminal Law Division Special Prosecutions Unit Telephone: (208) 332-3096 Fax: (208)
Chapter Five CRIMINAL LAW AND VICTIMS RIGHTS In a criminal case, a prosecuting attorney (working for the city, state, or federal government) decides if charges should be brought against the perpetrator.
Opening Statements Handout 1 Once the jury has been chosen, the attorneys for both sides deliver an opening statement about the case to the jury. Opening statements outline the facts that the attorneys
YOU VE been CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU NEED to KNOW Visit the Alberta Justice website at: www.justice.alberta.ca This booklet is intended to provide general information only. If you require specific
Personal Injury Wrongful Death Slip & Fall Automobile Accidents Trucking Accidents Motorcycle Accidents Medical Malpractice Criminal Defense You re Under ARREST! What Happens Now? Do NOT Speak to Police
Page 1 Instruction 6.275 Issued March 2015 G.L. c. 265, 13M I. INTENTIONAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY The defendant is charged with having committed an assault and battery on a family or household member, namely
CHAPTER 100 PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS SYNOPSIS 101 Duty of Jurors Admonishment 103 Personal Knowledge of a Juror 105 Law to the Court, Facts to the Jury 107 Instructions Considered as a Whole 109 Issues
YOU VE been CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU NEED to KNOW Justice 1 This booklet is intended to provide general information only. If you require specific legal advice, please consult the appropriate legislation
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
Morgan County Prosecuting Attorney Debra MH McLaughlin Directions: From Fairfax Street Entrance, Enter Main Door, turn Right through door, up the narrow staircase. Office is at top of steps. (Old Circuit
JOSEPH M. BURTON (SB No. 0) STEPHEN H. SUTRO (SB No. ) GREGORY G. ISKANDER (SB No. 0) DUANE MORRIS LLP One Market Plaza, Spear Tower Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Telephone: () 1-0 Facsimile: ()1- Attorneys
Going to Court: A Roadmap for People Representing Themselves in Criminal Court This roadmap to criminal law is divided into four different sections. The Basics explains what criminal law is and how criminal
Case 1:11-cr-00326-SCJ-JFK Document 119-1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 16 GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
Franklin County State's Attorney Victim Services FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What type of services and information can I get through Victim Services Program? A Victim Advocate will be assigned to assist
RYAN PACYGA CRIMINAL DEFENSE 333 South 7 th Street, Suite 2850 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-339-5844 www.arrestedmn.com More information on the YouTube channel Ryan Pacyga CRIMINAL COURT IN MINNESOTA: Understanding
Restoration of Civil Rights Helping People regain their Civil Liberties Consequences of a Felony Food Stamps and social security benefits: People convicted of a felony for possession or sell of controlled
Chapter 3 Justice Process at the County Level Brooks County Courthouse Chapter Three: Judice Process at the County Level Developmental Assets: Life Skills: TEKS: Objectives: 10. Safety 30. Responsibility
Mandatory Arrest Checklist: Sec. 968.075, Wis. Stats. The following document was prepared in 1989, by the Appleton Police Department, and updated by the Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence, in
Lesson Overview Overview: This lesson will teach students how the legal system works and how a case progresses through the state courts. Objectives: Students will be able to Define key terms related to
CHALLENGING CRIMINAL HISTORY CALCULATIONS I. Challenging Predicates for Career Offender! The Basic Rule for Career Offender 4B1.1 A defendant is a career offender if: 1. The defendant is at least 18 years
Some Things You Should Know An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System Office of the Federal Public Defender Southern District of West Virginia 300 Virginia Street
t A Guide to Minnesota Criminal Procedures What's the difference between felonies, gross misdemeanors, misdemeanors and petty misdemeanors? Under Minnesota law, felonies are crimes punishable by more than
Revised 9/8/08 assault. Count AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT - PHYSICAL FORCE OR COERCION WITH SEVERE PERSONAL INJURY of the indictment charges the defendant with aggravated sexual [READ COUNT OF INDICTMENT]