MITIGATION STRATEGY OVERVIEW
|
|
- Marybeth Long
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ALL-HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN MITIGATION STRATEGY Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(3)(i): The mitigation strategy shall include a description of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards. OVERVIEW This section of the Plan provides the blueprint for USC to follow in becoming less vulnerable to its identified hazards. It is based on general consensus of the USC Planning Team and the findings and conclusions of the Risk Assessment (Section 5: Hazard Identification and Analysis and Section 6: Vulnerability Assessment). It consists of the following four subsections: Introduction Mitigation Goals Identification of Mitigation Techniques Selection of Mitigation Techniques for USC DRU INTRODUCTION RVIEW The intent of the Mitigation Strategy is to provide USC with the goals that will serve as guiding principles for future mitigation policy and project administration, along with an analysis of mitigation techniques deemed available to meet those goals and reduce the impact of identified hazards. It is designed to be comprehensive, strategic and functional in nature: In being comprehensive, the development of the strategy includes a thorough review of all hazards and identifies extensive mitigation measures intended to not only reduce the future impacts of high risk hazards, but also to assist the University achieve compatible economic, environmental and social goals. In being strategic, the development of the strategy ensures that all policies and projects to be proposed for implementation under the USC are consistent with pre-identified, long-term planning goals. In being functional, each proposed mitigation action is linked to established priorities and assigned to specific departments or individuals responsible for their implementation with target completion deadlines. When necessary, funding sources are identified that can be used to assist in project implementation. The first step in designing the Mitigation Strategy includes the identification of USC s system-wide mitigation goals. Mitigation goals represent broad statements that are achieved through the implementation of more specific, action-oriented objectives. These actions include both soft hazard mitigation policies (such as the enhancement of building standards for new USC facilities),
2 7:2 and hard structural mitigation projects that seek to address specifically targeted hazard risks (such as the retrofitting or hardening of an existing USC facility). The second step involves the identification, consideration and analysis of available mitigation measures to help USC achieve the identified mitigation goals. This is a long-term, continuous process sustained through the development and maintenance of this DRU All-Hazards Mitigation Plan. Alternative mitigation measures will continue to be considered as future mitigation opportunities become identified, as data and technology improve, as mitigation funding becomes available, and as the DRU All-Hazards Mitigation Plan is maintained by USC over time. The third and last step in designing the Mitigation Strategy is the selection and prioritization of specific mitigation actions for USC (provided separately in Section 8: Mitigation Action Plan). The Mitigation Action Plan, or MAP, represents an unambiguous and functional plan for action and is considered to be the most essential outcome of the mitigation planning process. The MAP includes a prioritized listing of proposed hazard mitigation actions (policies and projects) for USC to carry out with accompanying information such as those departments or lead individuals assigned responsibility for their implementation, potential funding sources and an estimated target date for completion. The MAP provides those departments or individuals responsible for implementing mitigation actions with a clear roadmap that also serves as an important tool for monitoring success or progress over time. The cohesive collection of actions listed in the MAP can also serve as an easily understood menu of mitigation policies and projects for those University decision makers who want to quickly review the recommendations and proposed actions of the USC Disaster Resistant University Plan. Each senior and regional campus had a planning team that worked to assist in the mitigation strategy. This allowed each campus to consider their current emergency plans and campus assessments to align directly with the mitigation action plan proposed for their campus. The four year campuses, USC Aiken and USC Upstate both already had comprehensive plans in place and were able to use the Mitigation Action Plan to enhance their efforts. In preparing the Mitigation Action Plan, the DRU Planning Team considered USC s overall hazard risk and capability to mitigate the effects of hazards as recorded in Section 4: Hazard Identification and Analysis and Section 5: Vulnerability Assessment, in addition to meeting the adopted mitigation goals and unique needs of the university. To assist in this process, USC applied the FEMA-recommended evaluation criteria to each proposed mitigation action. MITIGATION ACTION PRIORITIZATION For the USC, the Planning Team was tasked with establishing a priority for each action. Prioritization of the proposed mitigation actions was based on the following six (6) factors: Effect on overall risk to life and University property Ease of implementation Campus and community support A general economic cost/benefit review [1] [1] Only a general economic cost/benefit review was considered by the Planning Team through the process of selecting and prioritizing mitigation actions. Mitigation actions with high priority were determined to be the most cost effective and most compatible with the participating jurisdictions unique needs. A more detailed cost/benefit analysis will be applied to particular projects prior to the application for or obligation of funding, as appropriate.
3 7:3 Funding availability Continued compliance with the NFIP (if applicable) Using these criteria, actions were classified as high, moderate, or low priority by the all of the MITIGATION GOALS campuses. ITIGATION GOAMITIGATION GOAL The goals of USC s were crafted early in the planning process and continuously refined through facilitated discussions and brainstorming sessions with the Planning Team (further discussed in Section 2: Planning Process). Each of the following goal statements represent a broad target for USC to achieve through the implementation of its Disaster Resistant University Plan. GOAL 1 Protect the life, safety and security of the campus community by creating a safe and secure environment that is disaster resilient allowing the University to fulfill its mission. GOAL 2 Ensure that the university s mission of teaching, research, creative activity, and service is maintained in the event of a natural or human-caused disaster. GOAL 3 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(3)(i): The mitigation strategy shall include a description of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards. Increase the protection of existing facilities and infrastructure from hazard threats through retrofit projects by focusing on protecting university assets and critical infrastructure including utilities infrastructure, communication systems, information technology systems and research facilities utilizing funding mechanisms that are available. GOAL 4 Prioritize mitigation strategies to reduce potential losses and identified hazard vulnerabilities and pursue funding sources to establish alternatives for emergency funding. GOAL 5 Enhance campus education programs to raise awareness of hazards, and educate and train the campus community members regarding steps to take to protect themselves and techniques to minimize vulnerability to those hazards. GOAL 6 To share knowledge gained from this project with other state or regional colleges and universities.
4 7:4 IDENTIFICATION OF MITIGATION TECHNIQUES In formulating USC s Mitigation Strategy, a wide range of activities were considered in order to help achieve the established mitigation goals in addition to addressing any specific and targeted hazard concerns. These activities were discussed at length during Planning Team meetings as well as through site visits conducted by the Atkins project team. In general, all activities considered by the Planning Team can be classified under one of the following six (6) broad categories of mitigation techniques. 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(3)(ii): The mitigation strategy shall include a section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effect of each hazard, with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure. 1. Prevention Preventative activities are intended to keep hazards from getting worse, and are typically administered through regulatory programs or enforcement actions that influence the way land is developed, buildings are constructed or how people respond. They are particularly effective in reducing future vulnerability, especially in areas where development has not yet occurred or capital improvements have not been substantial. Examples of preventative activities include: Planning and design Facilities construction Open space preservation Law enforcement (crime deterrence) Floodplain / stormwater management Capital improvements programming 2. Property Protection Property protection measures involve the modification of existing buildings and structures to help them better withstand the forces of a hazard, or removal of the structures from hazardous locations. Examples include: Acquisition and /or relocation Building elevation Retrofitting (e.g., windproofing, floodproofing, security enhancements, etc.) Critical facilities protection Safe rooms, shutters, impact-resistant glass Insurance 3. Natural Resource Protection Natural resource protection activities reduce the impact of natural hazards by preserving or restoring natural areas and their protective functions. Such areas include floodplains, wetlands, coastal areas, etc. Parks, recreation or conservation agencies and organizations often assist with the implementation of these protective measures. Examples include: Floodplain protection Watershed management
5 7:5 Riparian buffers Forest and vegetation management (e.g., fire resistant landscaping, fuel breaks, etc.) Erosion and sediment control Wetland preservation and restoration Habitat preservation 4. Structural Projects Structural mitigation projects are intended to lessen the impact of a hazard through construction or structural hardening. They are usually designed by engineers and managed or maintained by public works departments at local, state and federal agency levels. Examples include: Reservoirs Dams / levees / dikes / floodwalls Diversions / detention / retention Channel modification Storm sewers 5. Emergency Services Although not typically considered a mitigation technique, emergency service measures do minimize the impact of a hazard event on people and property. These commonly are actions taken immediately prior to, during, or in response to a hazard event. Examples include: Warning and communication systems Emergency power generation Evacuation planning and management Emergency response training and exercises Sandbagging for flood protection Installing temporary shutters for wind protection 6. Public Education and Awareness Public education and awareness activities are used to advise people (faculty, students, parents, visitors, etc.) about hazards, hazardous areas, and mitigation techniques they can use to protect themselves and their property in the event of a hazard. Examples of measures to educate and inform the public include: Outreach projects Speaker series / demonstration events Hazard map information Library materials
Develop hazard mitigation policies and programs designed to reduce the impact of natural and human-caused hazards on people and property.
6.0 Mitigation Strategy Introduction A mitigation strategy provides participating counties and municipalities in the H-GAC planning area with the basis for action. Based on the findings of the Risk Assessment
More informationSection 6: Mitigation Strategy
Section 6: Mitigation Strategy The Mitigation Strategy section provides the blueprint for the participating jurisdictions in the Unifour Region to follow to become less vulnerable to the negative effects
More informationSection 6: Mitigation Strategy
Section 6: Mitigation Strategy The Mitigation Strategy section provides the blueprint for the participating jurisdictions in the Eno- Haw Region to follow to become less vulnerable to the negative effects
More informationChapter 6: Mitigation Strategies
Chapter 6: Mitigation Strategies This section of the Plan describes the most challenging part of any such planning effort the development of a Mitigation Strategy. It is a process of: 1. Setting mitigation
More informationAssociation of State Flood Managers Annual Conference Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Association of State Flood Managers Annual Conference Wednesday, June 4, 2014 Hillsborough County, In the Trenches Local Mitigation Eugene Henry, CFM, AICP Hazard Mitigation Manager Floodplain Administrator
More informationWhy should communities invest in resiliency? What are the steps communities can take to become more resilient?
Community Preparedness for Flood Resiliency Nina Peek, AICP New York Planning Federation Board of Directors Senior Technical Director AKRF, Inc. Focus of Today s Presentation Why should communities invest
More informationFlood Risk Management
Flood Risk Management Value of Flood Risk Management Every year floods sweep through communities across the United States taking lives, destroying property, shutting down businesses, harming the environment
More informationFlood Risk Management
Flood Risk Management Value of Flood Risk Management Value to Individuals and Communities Every year floods sweep through communities across the United States taking lives, destroying property, shutting
More informationGoal 1 To protect the public health, safety and property from the harmful effects of natural disasters.
Plan Framework for Coastal Management The purpose of this element is to provide for the protection of residents and property in within the coastal area of the host community, and to limit expenditures,
More informationBarre City City-wide Policy and Program Options
Barre City (VERI Land Use Regulations Update policies allowing fill in flood hazard areas. RPC, DEC River Management, VLCT, Allowing landowners to elevate buildings using fill may help protect an individual
More informationFloodplain Management - What You Need to Know
The National Program and the Community Rating System Shannon Hulst, Wetlands Watch March 26, 2014 What We are Doing with the CRS Partnership with VIMS & VCPC (W&M Law School) VCPC working with DCR to ensure
More informationLower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1
Strategy Name: Reduce Existing Potential for Flood Damages LRSW-S3C1. Develop and implement a program to: Minimize flood damages through the use of structural measures. Minimize flood damages through the
More informationCOMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS
National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 4 hours for annual recertification, per response. The burden
More informationPLANNING FOR POST-DISASTER RECOVERY BRIEFING PAPERS FLOOD INSURANCE AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
06 PLANNING FOR POST-DISASTER RECOVERY BRIEFING PAPERS FLOOD INSURANCE AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Flood losses are increasing nationwide. A community may take more than a decade to fully recover from a flood,
More informationFederal Emergency Management Agency, DHS 206.431. SOURCE: 55 FR 35537, Aug. 30, 1990, unless otherwise noted.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS 206.431 (d) A State may appeal a determination by the Regional Administrator on any action related to Federal assistance for fire suppression. Appeal procedures
More informationAppendix J Online Questionnaire
Appendix J Online Questionnaire In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, this questionnaire was approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The OMB control number and expiration date
More informationLocal hazard mitigation plans Disaster recovery plans Flood preparedness activities/public education Mitigation projects (construction) Post-disaster
Local hazard mitigation plans Disaster recovery plans Flood preparedness activities/public education Mitigation projects (construction) Post-disaster recovery and mitigation efforts Others? We have a significant
More informationPolicy Clarifications on the Eligibility of Water and Wastewater Utility Projects for FEMA s Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants
Policy Clarifications on the Eligibility of Water and Wastewater Utility Projects for FEMA s Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants I. Introduction and Purpose This document provides
More informationSection 8 Mitigation Strategy
Section 8 Mitigation Strategy Disaster-Resistant University Hazard Mitigation Plan The Interim Final Rule (IFR) published in the February 26, 2002 Federal Register requires mitigation strategies as part
More information6.01 FEMA. 6.02 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
CHAPTER 6 FEMA AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT 6.01 FEMA The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is an agency of the United States Department of Homeland Security. FEMA is tasked with responding to, planning
More informationA. Flood Management in Nevada
Nevada Division of Water Planning A. Flood Management in Nevada Introduction Flooding has been a concern for Nevada communities since the first settlers moved to the territory in the mid-1800 s. Fourteen
More informationPost-Flood Assessment
Page 1 of 7 Post-Flood Assessment CHAPTER 4 AGENCY COORDINATION Agency coordination is an essential element for the operation of the flood management systems in the Central Valley. Due to the nature of
More informationUnited States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works Fiscal Year 2013 Federal Program Inventory May 2013 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Program Inventory... 3 1. Navigation... 3 2. Flood Risk Management...
More informationProtecting Floodplain. While Reducing Flood Losses
Protecting Floodplain Natural and Beneficial i Functions While Reducing Flood Losses Jon Kusler Association of State Wetland Managers 518 872 1804; jon.kusler@aswm.org Report available at: http://aswm.org/pdf_lib/nbf.pdf
More informationFederal Triangle Stormwater Working Group Federal Triangle Floodproofing Seminar BUILDING STRONG SM
Federal Triangle Stormwater Working Group Federal Triangle Floodproofing Seminar Initial Risk Flood Risk = Probability of Flooding x Consequences Zoning Building Codes Outreach Evacuation Planning Risk
More informationInfrastructure Flood Protection Guidance and Best Practices
The standards and best practices contained in this document are required elements for new projects seeking State funding under the New Jersey Environmental Infrastructure Finance Program (NJEIFP). Further
More informationSOME COMMON QUESTIONS ABOUT FLOODPROOFING
SOME COMMON QUESTIONS ABOUT FLOODPROOFING WHEN DOES FLOODING OCCUR? Although flooding can occur at any time of the year, the risks of high floods are greatest in the spring and summer. Spring floods are
More informationFlooding Fast Facts. flooding), seismic events (tsunami) or large landslides (sometime also called tsunami).
Flooding Fast Facts What is a flood? Flooding is the unusual presence of water on land to a depth which affects normal activities. Flooding can arise from: Overflowing rivers (river flooding), Heavy rainfall
More informationAnchorage All-Hazard Mitigation Plan October 2004
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) is vulnerable to a wide range of natural, technological, and human/societal hazards including earthquakes, avalanches, and hazardous material accidents.
More informationCLINTON COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1-4 1.0 INTRODUCTION.. 5-11 1.1 Hazard Mitigation Planning and the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 5-6 1.2 Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Adoption 7 1.3 Multi-Jurisdictional Planning Participation..
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. Hazard Mitigation Plan. Chapter 5 Mitigation Strategy
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Hazard Mitigation Plan Chapter 5 Mitigation Strategy Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 201.4(c )(ii): The State mitigation strategy shall include a] description of State goals to
More informationRE: Docket # COE 2010 0035; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via email to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov.
April 18, 2011 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Attn: CECW CO R 441 G Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20314 1000 RE: Docket # COE 2010 0035; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via email to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking
More informationTable of Contents ESF-3-1 034-00-13
Table of Contents Primary Coordinating Agency... 2 Local Supporting Agencies... 2 State, Regional, and Federal Agencies and Organizations... 3 Purpose... 3 Situations and Assumptions... 4 Direction and
More information5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES
5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES Flood damage reduction consists of two basic techniques structural and non-structural. Structural methods modify the flood and take the flood away from people
More informationThe answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:
Following the recent flooding events for Front Range communities in Colorado, property owners, communities, and the National Flood Insurance Program are being presented with some new challenges in the
More informationSaving Constituents Money on Flood Insurance Under FEMA s Community Rating System (CRS)
Saving Constituents Money on Flood Insurance Under FEMA s Community Rating System (CRS) Today s Discussion 1. FEMA s Flood Insurance Program: A Brief Overview 2. Flood Insurance Rates: Are they rising?
More informationMICHIGAN S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
MICHIGAN S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS protecting the health, safety, and welfare of our citizens site design land use planning master planning streetscape design brownfield redevelopment guidelines and regulations
More informationAssiniboine River and Lake Manitoba Basins Flood Mitigation Study: Providing Greater Protection For Manitobans From Flood Risks
Assiniboine River and Lake Manitoba Basins Flood Mitigation Study: Providing Greater Protection For Manitobans From Flood Risks Welcome! Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation is studying flooding
More informationIntegrating Hazard Mitigation Into Local Planning
Integrating Hazard Mitigation Into Local Planning Case Studies and Tools for Community Officials March 1, 2013 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 1-1 Defining Integration... 1-1 Planning for Resilience...
More informationFlood Protection Tips
Flood Protection Tips Information About Floodplains and Flood Prevention What is a floodplain? Floodplains serve many useful purposes, and those that are preserved in their natural or nearly natural state
More informationVermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town
Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town MEETING NOTES April 16, 2015 6:00 8:00 PM VERI Project Overview With funding from the US Economic Development Administration
More informationOregon Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program Plan Update Training Manual
FEMA Oregon Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program Plan Update Training Manual Prepared by: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience OPDR FEMA OPDR FEMA OPDR 2010, University of Oregon s Community Service Center
More information- POLICY - Disaster Recovery Assistance Program
August 29, 2013 - POLICY - Disaster Recovery Assistance Program Overview Disasters and emergency legislative funding occur frequently and usually unpredictably. These characteristics require a standard
More informationFlood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey
Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program Christopher C. Obropta, Ph.D., P.E. Email: obropta@envsci.rutgers.edu
More informationText Box 1 Important Actions, Questions and Constraints to Consider on Standards and Vulnerability
259 Text Box 1 Important Actions, Questions and Constraints to Consider on Standards and Vulnerability Actions Reach agreement on standards through public review and consensus Balance objectives for standards
More informationImplementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for Disaster Response, Recovery, and Mitigation Projects
Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for Disaster Response, Recovery, and Mitigation Projects Linda Luther Analyst in Environmental Policy February 3, 2010 Congressional Research Service
More informationNAFSMA Position on Floodplain Management Issues
National Association of Flood & Stormwater Management Agencies PO Box 56764, Washington, DC 20040 202-289-8625 www.nafsma.org I. Introduction NAFSMA Position on Floodplain Management Issues (Approved on
More informationHow To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance
Regulatory Alternatives to Address Stormwater Management and Flooding in the Marlboro Street Study Area Alternative 1: Amend Existing Local Regulations This proposed alternative provides an incremental
More informationFlood Protection & control works
Flood Protection & control works Whakamarumaru i ngā waipuke Environment Canterbury is the joint lead agency with territorial authorities for flood risk reduction. Under changes to the Local Government
More informationNational Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System
National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System A Strategic Plan for the Community Rating System Fiscal Years 2008 2013 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Although the Community Rating System (CRS) has been
More information2015 -- H 6042 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
LC00 01 -- H 0 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO TOWNS AND CITIES -- RHODE ISLAND COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND USE ACT Introduced
More informationCOASTAL APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR SITING PERMIT
Frank M. Rabauliman Administrator Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Bureau of Environmental and Coastal Quality Division of Coastal Resources Management Gualo Rai Center
More informationUSA - EVOLUTION OF POLICY ON FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CASE #86
USA - EVOLUTION OF POLICY ON FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CASE #86 This case describes integrated floodplain strategies in the US, involving the participation of three levels of government and the private sector.
More informationFLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May 2010. Prepared by. for the. 2010 by Earth Economics
FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN May 2010 Prepared by for the Execubve Summary The Chehalis Basin experienced catastrophic flooding in 2007 and 2009. In response, the
More informationOWNERS NAME PHONE OWNERS ADDRESS APPLICANTS NAME PHONE APPLICANTS ADDRESS
TOWN OF SWANSBORO 502 Church Street, Swansboro, NC 28584 FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT OWNERS NAME PHONE OWNERS ADDRESS APPLICANTS NAME PHONE APPLICANTS ADDRESS Per Article 21, Section 21-7. Establishment
More information(Adopted July 26, 2005 Resolution No. 05-24) Prepared by: Kevin Marstall, PE, Senior Civil Engineer, CRS Coordinator
On The Floodplain Management Components Of The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Including The Annex to the Plan as the City s Local Hazard Mitigation
More informationOsceola County Hazard Mitigation Plan. Part 3 - Mitigation Strategy
Osceola County Hazard Mitigation Plan Part 3 - Mitigation Strategy Osceola County Hazard Mitigation Plan - Part 3 Mitigation Strategy 3-1 Contents Overview... 3 Strategy... 3 Goals... 3 Types of Mitigation
More informationChehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction 2013-2015 Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013
Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction 2013-2015 Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013 1. Design alternatives for large capital flood projects (basinlevel water retention and Interstate
More informationWATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING DESIGN LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY AND RIVER RESTORATION. www.sindlar.eu
Geomorphological processes of watercourse development, system of typology and application of the results in practice Part 01 Analysis of geomorphological processes in watercourses Part 02 Applications
More informationKing County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction
King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction Introduction Eminent domain refers to the power possessed by the state over all property within the
More informationAppendix D: Federal Agencies Hazard Mitigation Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities
Appendix D: Federal Agencies Hazard Mitigation Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities Federal Agency and Web Address Hazard Mitigation Roles and Responsibilities Natural Hazards Mitigation Legal Authority
More informationFloodplain Development Land Use Review
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 490 333 Broadalbin Street SW Albany, OR 97321 Phone 541-917-7550 Fax 541-791-0150 www.cityofalbany.net Floodplain Development Land Use Review
More informationGeorgia Coastal Stormwater Supplement April 2009
9.0 Local Post-Construction Stormwater Management Programs 9.1 Overview Prior to the 1980s, stormwater management was synonymous with flood control. Postconstruction stormwater management systems consisted
More informationNYSDEC Optional Additional Language Model Local Law for Flood Damage Prevention Optional Additional Language
NYSDEC General Comments. The contains language that complies with the floodplain management requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) contained in federal regulations 44 CFR 60.3 through
More informationMANAGING FLOODPLAINS CRS AND THE NFIP
MANAGING FLOODPLAINS CRS AND THE NFIP Landon K. Smith, CBO, CFM BUILDING OFFICIAL / FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR CITY OF ORANGE BEACH, ALABAMA www.aafmfloods.org AAFM Users Group
More informationOregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework
Oregon Climate Change Adaptation Framework Oregon Environmental Quality Commission Climate Change Adaptation Framework Presentation at a glance: Purposes of the framework Participating agencies Climate
More informationLesson 5. After a Disaster: Recovery and Hazard Mitigation Programs. Disaster Assistance
Introduction The previous four lessons focused on pre-disaster mitigation: developing a program, and writing and implementing a hazard mitigation plan. The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) encourages
More informationMiami-Dade County Roadmap for Adapting to Coastal Risk
Miami-Dade County Roadmap for Adapting to Coastal Risk Vulnerability Assessment & Planning Workshop Results & Recommendations Roadmap for Adapting to Coastal Risk Page 1 Introduction GreenPrint is Miami-Dade
More informationCRS State Profile: New Mexico
CRS State Profile: New Mexico This is a profile for communities in your state that are participating in the Community Rating System (CRS). This profile is intended to provide information to the State NFIP
More informationResources FEMA CURRICULUM. FEMA Mitigation Curriculum MITIGATION TRAINING. Resident Courses
MITIGATION TRAINING is provided mainly through the courses and programs of the Emergency Management Institute (EMI) located in Emmitsburg, Maryland. The EMI serves as the focal point for the development
More informationFEMA s Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) Fiscal Year 2011 Report to Congress March 15, 2011. Federal Emergency Management Agency
FEMA s Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) Fiscal Year 2011 Report to Congress March 15, 2011 Federal Emergency Management Agency Message from the Administrator March 15, 2011 I am pleased
More informationState Mitigation Plan Review Guide. Released March 2015 Effective March 2016 FP 302-094-2
State Mitigation Plan Review Guide Released March 2015 Effective March 2016 FP 302-094-2 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations... iii SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION...
More informationPresentation Program Outline
Presentation Program Outline IRWM Program Background San Diego IRWM Planning 2013 IRWM Update Integrated Flood Management Flood Management Planning Study IRWM Program Background What is IRWM? Collaborative
More informationRevising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan
Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan Throughout the Plan 1. There is a fundamental need for the revised plan to address how
More information1. GENERAL ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (ABFE) QUESTIONS
INTRODUCTION As communities begin to recover from the devastating effects of Hurricane Sandy, it is important to recognize lessons learned and to employ mitigation actions that ensure structures are rebuilt
More informationCounty Watersheds. Total Project Cost - $11.1 M. Project Description. Funding Sources. Project Milestones. Service Impact
County Watersheds Total Project Cost - $11.1 M Project Description These funds are for watershed capital projects throughout the County. Projects can include stream restoration, best management practices
More informationProgram Details Notes Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA)
Federal Emergency Agency Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Provides funding to implement measures to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk of flood damage http://www.fema.gov/government/grant/fma/index.shtm
More informationAN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE
L OW E R C A R M E L R I V E R A N D L AG O O N F L O O D P L A I N R E S TO R AT I O N A N D E N H A N C E M E N T P R O J E C T AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE FLOOD PROTECTION RESTORE AND PROTECT RIPARIAN
More informationDisaster Preparedness and Safety Element
Disaster Preparedness and Safety Element Element Objectives The policies and actions of the Disaster Preparation and Safety Element are intended to achieve the following six objectives: 1. Establish and
More informationFINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD-00002 FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012
FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD-00002 FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... 1 Executive Summary... 2 1 Objective... 4 2 Study Approach...
More informationDivision of Water Frequently asked floodplain questions
Division of Water Frequently asked floodplain questions Q: Where can I find copies of the floodplain mapping? A: Local floodplain administrators will have copies of the FEMA mapping. (Generally the local
More informationWhat We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed
What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed presented by Ceil Strauss, State Floodplain Manager DNR Ecological & Water Resources 1 EWR Roles In Floodplains Regulatory:
More informationPost-Sandy Municipal Needs Assessment for Long-Term Recovery and Resiliency Planning EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Post-Sandy Municipal Needs Assessment for Long-Term Recovery and Resiliency Planning EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared by Nathaly Agosto Filión, Resiliency Manager for the New Jersey Resiliency Network, a program
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release January 30, 2015 EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - -
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release January 30, 2015 EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - - ESTABLISHING A FEDERAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD AND A PROCESS FOR FURTHER SOLICITING
More informationChapter 4 Natural Hazards and Emergency Management
Chapter 4 Natural Hazards and Emergency Management Chapter 4 Natural Hazards and Emergency Management 1.0 NATURAL HAZARDS Littleton has a relatively low risk from natural hazards. The most likely natural
More informationA Self Assessment to Address Climate Change Readiness in Your Community Midwest Region
A Self Assessment to Address Climate Change Readiness in Your Community Midwest Region 0 Climate Change Readiness Index A Self Assessment to Address Climate Change Readiness in Your Community Communities
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project I. Description of the Project and its Relationship to Other Projects in the Proposal The Lower
More informationNOAA COASTAL SERVICES CENTER Strategic Plan: 2010 to 2015
NOAA COASTAL SERVICES CENTER Strategic Plan: 2010 to 2015 N a t i o n a l O c e a n i c a n d A t m o s p h e r i c A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( N O A A ) C o a s t a l S e r v i c e s C e n t e r March
More informationAPPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SURVEY RESULTS
APPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SURVEY RESULTS APPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SURVEY RESULTS This section of the Plan includes a general summary of the results and findings of the Public Participation
More informationFlood Emergency Response Planning: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster RIC005
Flood Emergency Response Planning: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster RIC005 Speakers: Tom Chan, CEO, Global Risk Miyamoto Greg Bates, Principal, Global Risk Consultants Learning Objectives
More informationCarlton Fields Memorandum
Carlton Fields Memorandum TO: FROM: RE: DAN WEEDE FRED RUSHING RIPARIAN BUFFER DATE: JULY 26, 2013 BACKGROUND Both the state of Georgia and the city of Atlanta 1 have certain guidelines that must be followed
More information1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria
1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria 1.7.1 Introduction These guidelines set out standards for evaluating and processing proposed modifications of the 100- year floodplain with the following objectives:
More informationUSDA Forest Service Proposed Soil and Water Restoration Categorical Exclusions Frequently Asked Questions 2013-09-05 Table of Contents
USDA Forest Service Proposed Soil and Water Restoration Categorical Exclusions Frequently Asked Questions 2013-09-05 Table of Contents What is the Final Rule implemented by the Forest Service?... 2 Why
More informationCommon Challenges with CDBG-Disaster Recovery Programs Guidance for Navigating the Recovery Terrain
Common Challenges with CDBG-Disaster Recovery Programs Guidance for Navigating the Recovery Terrain 1 What are the Common Challenges? 2 Common Challenges Unique challenges arise in the administration of
More information2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results
SURVEY BACKGROUND The 2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey was distributed in September in an effort to obtain feedback about the level of support for various priorities identified in the draft Comprehensive
More information7.1 VOLUNTARY PARTICIPATION 7.2 REGIONAL COORDINATION 7.3 IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY
7.0 ERP IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK Implementation of the Pleasant Grove/Curry Creek ERP will be a longterm process and will require extensive collaboration among watershed stakeholders. It is anticipated
More informationFlood Insurance Repetitive Loss Property
Flood Insurance Repetitive Loss Property When our system of canals, ditches and culverts was built over 20 years ago, it could handle all but the largest tropical storms and hurricanes; since then, urban
More informationWhy should policymakers care about restoring
Restoring and Protecting Floodplains State Policy Options National Conference of State Legislatures By Larry Morandi August 2012 Why should policymakers care about restoring and protecting floodplains?
More informationThe Basics of Indian Rocks Beach and Flood Hazard Information
Helpful Flood Hazard Information Are you doing all you can to protect your property from flood damage? You have received this letter because your property is in an area that is subject to flooding. The
More informationFlood Insurance Changes Come to Virginia Wetlands Watch, October 2013
Flood Insurance Changes Come to Virginia Wetlands Watch, October 2013 Major changes to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), including rate increases that will affect many Middle Peninsula residents,
More information