1 Motives for Enrolling in Online Leadership Courses: Insights for Superintendents as Employers and as Financiers Theodore J. Kowalski, Professor & Kuntz Endowed Chair, University of Dayton David Dolph, Chair, Department of Educational Leadership, University of Dayton I. Phillip Young, Chair, Department of Educational Leadership, University of South Carolina Robert Mengerink, Superintendent, Cuyahoga County (OH) Educational Service Center Paper presented at the National Conference on Education American Association of School Administrators Nashville, Tennessee, February 15, 2014 For further information: Professor T. J. Kowalski
2 Increasingly, superintendents and principals are asking questions about the quality and effectiveness of distance learning and about the motives of those who take graduate courses in this format. Their inquisitiveness is driven by a responsibility to evaluate post-baccalaureate education completed by current and prospective employees. In some districts, this duty extends to recommending tuition reimbursement for teachers, administrators, and other professional employees. Apprehensions about online courses are not unusual. Across all types of organizations, many employers have expressed negative dispositions toward and distrust of online courses and degrees (Carnevale, 2007; Columbaro & Monaghan, 2009). Although the effectiveness of online and in-class courses has been examined for more than 2 decades, much of this research was conducted outside the education profession and educational administration specifically. Commonly, the studies focused on student satisfaction or comparisons of cognitive outcomes as measured by posttests and grades. As a result, relatively little is known about motives that influence educator decisions to take online graduate courses in school administration. In light of this fact, this study had three primary purposes. 1. To determine the extent to which students enrolled in or planned to enroll in online courses 2. To identify the importance of common motives for enrolling in online courses 3. To examine levels of association between the levels of importance placed on motives and each of two demographic variables (teaching experience and teaching assignment). The research was conducted with students enrolled in a master s degree program in educational administration at a private research university. Findings indicated (a) variations in enrollment choices, variations in the importance placed on four motives, and a statistically significant association between teaching experience and two of the motives. Theoretical Framework The National Center for Education Statistics (The Condition of Education, 2011) reported the number of students enrolled in at least one distance education course increased from 1.1 million in 2002 to 12.2 million in This number is forecasted to exceed 20 million by Consequently, distance learning is expected to account for an even higher percentage of higher
3 education courses in the future. The study of distance education is complicated by several factors including provider differences, especially in mission (not-for-profit versus for-profit universities), program scope (e.g., faculty, degrees), and accreditation. As an example, employers are most likely to have a negative view of online courses and degrees from unaccredited, for-profit institutions (Carnevale, 2007). Understandably, the rapid increase of distance learning has raised questions about the comparability of traditional and online instruction, both in terms of instructional quality and learning outcomes. According to Baker (2003), instructional differences have generally related to three factors: instructor-student interaction (e.g., the extent to which learning is observed or measured in real time), learner interaction (e.g., the extent to which ideas and information are exchanged between and among students), and attendance (e.g., the extent to which students are motivated and accept responsibility for learning). Although differences have been identified in each of these areas, findings do not establish that one instructional format is de facto superior, either in terms of instructional quality or learning outcomes. Nevertheless, two concerns about online courses for school administrators persist. First, instructional quality studies almost always have been based on student perceptions of institutional variables (e.g., Maquire, 2005) and student variables (e.g., Yang & Cornelious, 2005). Yang and Darrington (2010) reported that the most important factors affecting student ratings of instructional quality were peer interactions, instructor feedback, and course structure. Second, the use of distance education to prepare practitioners in an applied science continues to be criticized because learning experiences occur in relative isolation (Beam, 2010). Noting that the development of district and school administrators is fundamentally and irrevocably an interpersonal, relation process, Fusarelli (2004) argued that pre-service and continuing education should not take place via a disembodied and depersonalized delivery system. With respect to student learning outcomes, comparative research literature, including metaanalyses (e.g., Dell, Low & Wilker, 2010; Shachar & Neumann, 2003), also have been unconvincing even though findings have usually been based on valid metrics, such as comparisons of student test scores. Shachar (2008) contends inconclusiveness is largely attributable to differences in treatments, settings, measurement instruments, and research methods. Thus, some scholars continue to question whether the two formats are actually comparable with respect to knowledge acquisition.
4 More recently, researchers have focused more directly on motives for encouraging, approving, and engaging in distance learning. Generally, this line of research has had three foci: social-political, institutional, and student. From a social-political standpoint, the growth of online courses is attributable to externally set agendas, such as state legislation providing approval and incentives for the expansion of this process (Calvert, 2005). Institutionally, many universities decided to offer online degrees and courses because of increased competition for students and dwindling organizational resources (Margolis, 2000; Navarro, 2000). Basically, experiences in educational administration have been the same; that is, both efficiency and market competition have influenced institutional decisions to offer online courses (Kowalski, 2006). Research on student motives for engaging in distance learning has been conducted in several academic disciplines, but most notably in business administration. Scholars examining this issue (e.g., Braun, 2008; Klesius, Homan, & Thompson, 1997) have found convenience, flexibility, and cost savings to be the most common reasons why student have enrolled in online courses. A review of research conducted by Thomerson and Smith (1996) found among many students convenience even trumped satisfaction; that is, students continued to enroll in online courses even when they were dissatisfied with previous experiences. Extant literature also posits that student learning style affects student choices and learning outcomes. Although the concept of learning style is somewhat vague, Grasha (1996) simply describes it as an individual's preferred way of learning. For example, an introverted person may prefer to learn in isolation. Even though a nexus between student learning style and learning outcomes has been reported in several studies (e.g., Aragon, Johnson & Shaik, 2002; Boyd, 2004; Meyer, 2003), the extent to which individual preference for an instructional mode influences enrollment decisions and learning outcomes is largely unknown (Battalio, 2009). Despite agreement that learning preferences are relevant, the extent of their effect on selecting and successfully completing online classes is unanswered (Santo, 2006). Methods and Findings The defined population in this study consisted of 202 full-time and part-time students enrolled in a master s degree program in educational administration at a private research university. The 30-semester hour program consisted of 9 required, 3-semester hour courses and an internship. The institution was selected because students had the option of completing each
5 course in a traditional or online format, the tuition for both instructional modes was the same, and the percentage of online courses had been increasing steadily for the past 5 years. Data were collected via electronic survey and analyzed by the authors during the fall semester, Respondents were assured of confidentiality. The study was guided by three questions: 1. To what extent did the students take or plan to take online courses? 2. What level of importance did students ascribe to four possible motives for selecting online courses (convenience, cost savings, flexibility, and instructional preference)? 3. To what extent was perceived importance of each of the four motives associated with each of two demographic variables: level of teaching experience and level of assignment (elementary or secondary)? The first two research questions were answered by calculating descriptive statistics. The third research question was answered by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients (r). Surveys were completed and returned by 91 students, a return rate of 45%. Since the students were at various stages of the master s degree program, they were asked to indicate how many courses they either had completed or planned to complete via distance learning. The results are shown in Table 1. As these data reveal, the percentage of students who took or planned to take at least half of the required courses online was only 26.6%. Based on a review of extant literature, four possible motives for taking online courses were identified and listed in the survey. Respondents were asked to designate the importance of each motive in relation to online course selection. The outcomes are contained in Table 2.
6 Table 1 Number of Online Courses Number of Online Courses (either completed or to be completed) Frequency Percentage or or or or Total 90* *One student did not answer the question. Table 2 Importance of Possible Motives Motive Level of importance in relation to online course selection Major Moderate Minor None Convenience 59% 14% 11% 16% Flexibility 46% 22% 14% 18% Cost savings 13% 11% 23% 53% Instructional preference 5% 18% 14% 63% Cost savings in this study were related primarily to mileage, parking, and meals because the university had the same tuition for in-class and on-line courses. Based on a combination of the major and moderate response categories, convenience and flexibility clearly were identified as being highly important whereas cost savings and instructional preference were far less important. Data analyses, disaggregated by the percentage of responses, veal that two of the possible four motives for taking online classes were much more important. Combining the major
7 and moderate response categories, the ranking of importance among the possible motives is as follows: Convenience, 73% Flexibility, 68% Cost savings, 24% Instructional preference, 23% Data also were collected for two demographic variables: level of respondent teaching experience (in years) and level of assignment (not employed in education, assigned to an elementary school, assigned to a secondary school, or an assignment spanning both elementary and secondary schools). The average (mean) level of teaching experience was 5.47 years and the standard deviation was With respect to level of assignment, 18.4% were not currently employed in education; 30.3% were employed in elementary schools; 44.7% were employed in secondary schools; 6.6% were employed in positions spanning both elementary and secondary schools. Pearson correlations were calculated to determine levels of association between each motive and each of the two demographic variables. The coefficients are contained in Table 3. Table 3 Associations between Motive Importance and Demographic Variables Importance of motive Respondent Demographic Characteristics Teaching experience Level of assignment Cost savings Convenience.19*.11 Flexibility.29*.04 Instructional preference Note: * = p.05 Only two of the eight correlation coefficients were statistically significant even though the levels of association were not especially high. Students with higher levels of teaching experience (i.e., more than 5 years) indicated that convenience and flexibility were more important than did other respondents.
8 Discussion Findings in this study reveal that most students opted to complete less than half of their required courses via distance learning. This outcome was unexpected since the percentage of online courses in the master s degree had steadily increased over the past 5 years. This finding should be considered in light of two possibilities: a high percentage of the non-responders were students who opted to take most or all of their courses online; students may change their position on taking online classes as they progress through the program. Thus, responders who were in the early stages of the program may actually take more online courses than they anticipate. Findings regarding convenience, flexibility, and cost savings as enrollment motives are generally congruent with a number of earlier studies based on different samples and contexts, such as those conducted by Braun (2008), Klesius, Homan, & Thompson (1997), and Thomerson & Smith (1996). Although some authors have reported a notable association between learning styles and learning outcomes in online courses (e.g., Aragon, Johnson & Shaik, 2002; Boyd, 2004; Meyer, 2003), there is little empirical evidence supporting the contention that instructional preferences influence enrollment decisions (Battalio, 2009). Clearly then, the motives of the educators comprising the defined population in this study were basically consistent with the motives of graduate students in other disciplines. For reasons explained earlier, superintendents and principals are understandably concerned about the quality and effectiveness of online courses. To date, meta-analyses of distance learning research reveals that in-class and online courses are comparable in terms of student learning. Yet, astute administrators recognize that effective continuing education extends beyond the cognitive domain. As superintendents and principals evaluate continuing education, they should be guided by the following realities. There are vast differences among and even within institutions offering online and inclass courses. These differences include institutional motives, instructional rigor, and resources. Thus, investments in continuing education need to be judged independently. Given the nature of school administration, the psychomotor (skills), affective (dispositions), and social (interactive) learning domains are critical. Having students learn in relative isolation raises critical questions that remain unanswered.
9 As demonstrated in this study, student motives for enrolling in online courses differ quantitatively and qualitatively. In many states, principals are now required to facilitate the development of individualized staff development programs for teachers. In this vein, determining teacher motives becomes a logical step to ensuring that the content and instructional approach in graduate courses address real teacher needs. Additional research on selecting online courses in educational administration can and should be conducted within states, university programs, and school districts. Such studies should also examine instructional rigor and learning outcomes not only in the cognitive domain, but also in the psychomotor, affective, and social domains. In the context of individualized continuing education, greater attention to how employees learn is unavoidable. References Aragon, S. R., Johnson, S. D., & Shaik, N. (2002). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), Baker, R. K. (2003). A framework for design and evaluation of internet-based distance learning courses phase one-framework justification, design and evaluation. Online Journal of Distance Learning, 6(2). Battalio, J. (2009). Success in distance education: Do learning styles and multiple formats matter? American Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), Beam, K. (2010). On-line doctorates for administrators. School Administrator, 67(8), Boyd, D. (2004). The characteristics of successful online students. New Horizons in Adult Education, 18(2), Braun, T. (2008). Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), Calvert, J. (2005). Distance education at the crossroads. Distance Education, 26(2), Carnevale, D. (2007, January 5). Employers often distrust online degrees. Chronicle of Higher Education, A27-A28. Columbaro, N. & Monaghan, C. H. (2009). A land mine for distance education: Employers' views of online degrees. Distance Education Report, 13(15), 1-7.
10 Condition of Education (2011). Distance education in higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Dell, C.A., Low, C. & Wilker, J. F. (2010). Comparing student achievement in online and faceto-face class formats. The Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 6(1), Fusarelli, L. (2004, January 14). The new consumerism in educational leadership. Education Week, 23(18), 9. Grasha, A. F, (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Pittsburgh: Alliance Publishers. Klesius, J., Homan, S., & Thompson, T. (1997). Distance education compared to traditional instruction: The students' view. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24(3), Kowalski, T. J. (2006). Part-time faculty and distance education: Quandaries in educational administration s swamp. In F. Dembowski (Ed.), Unbridled spirit: Best practices in educational administration: The 2006 yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (pp ). Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications. Maguire, L. L. (2005). Faculty participation in online distance education: Barriers and motivators. Online Journal of DE Administration, 8(1). Retrieved from Margolis, M. (2000). Using the Internet for teaching and research: A political evaluation. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Issues in Web-based pedagogy: A critical primer (pp. 9-22). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Meyer, K. (2003). The Web s impact on student learning. T.H.E. Journal, 30(5), Navarro, P. (2000). The promise and potential pitfalls of cyberlearning. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Issues in Web-based pedagogy: A critical primer (pp ). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Santo, S. A. (2006). Relationships between learning styles and online learning: Myth or reality? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(3), Shachar, M. (2008). Meta-analysis: The preferred method of choice for the assessment of distance learning quality. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 9(3), 1-15.
11 Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), Thomerson, D., & Smith, C. (1996). Student perceptions of affective experiences encountered in distance learning courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), Yang, Y., & Cornelious, L. F. (2005). Preparing instructors for quality online instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). Retrieved from Yang, Y., & Durrington, V. (2010). Investigation of students perceptions of online course quality. International Journal of ELearning, 6(3),
University of Dayton ecommons Educational Leadership Faculty Publications Department of Educational Leadership 9-2014 Student Motives for Taking Online Courses in Educational Administration Theodore J.
MSU Departmental Assessment Plan 2009 2010 Department: Education Department Head: Dr. Joanne Erickson Assessment Coordinator: Bill Freese 214 Reid Hall 994 3072 Degrees/Majors/Options Offered by Department
Where has the Time Gone? Faculty Activities and Time Commitments in the Online Classroom B. Jean Mandernach, Swinton Hudson, & Shanna Wise, Grand Canyon University USA Abstract While research has examined
Transcript w/ References Recorded 1/28/13 In 2012, a research study has been proposed by Kelly and Redman (2012) of the University of San Diego regarding the perception and acceptance of online education.
Bozkurt Identifying Stakeholder Needs 1 Identifying Stakeholder Needs within Online Education Dr. Ipek Bozkurt Assistant Professor Engineering Management Programs School of Science and Computer Engineering
For more resources click here -> Building Online Learning Communities: Factors Supporting Collaborative Knowledge-Building Joe Wheaton, Associate Professor David Stein, Associate Professor Jennifer Calvin,
Documenting Quality of Online Programs in Teacher Preparation Christopher Locklear, Ed.D, Lead Coordinator, Wachovia Partnership East, East Carolina University Mary Lynne Davis, Ph.D., Assessment Coordinator,
Paper presented at the Adult Higher Education Alliance Conference The Future of Adult Higher Education: Principles, Contexts and Practices The Two Worlds of Adult MBA Education: Online v. Traditional Courses
EFL LEARNERS PERCEPTIONS OF USING LMS Assist. Prof. Napaporn Srichanyachon Language Institute, Bangkok University email@example.com ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to present the views, attitudes,
GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE COURSES OFFERED FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOL PERSONNEL Rationale: Professional development takes many forms, including such activities as workshops, courses, conferences,
EXPECTED ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ONLINE LEARNING: PERCEPTIONS FROM COLLEGE STUDENTS WHO HAVE NOT TAKEN ONLINE COURSES Melody W. Alexander, Ball State University, firstname.lastname@example.org Allen D. Truell,
Effectiveness of Online Instruction Delar K. Singh, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Education Eastern Connecticut State University Willimantic, CT 06226 E-mail: email@example.com Paper presented
BEST COLLEGES 2015 ONLINE LEARNING SURVEY: ONLINE STUDENT NEEDS, PREFERENCES AND EXPECTATIONS EMAIL US: firstname.lastname@example.org Online Student Needs, Preferences and Expectations Online learning is still
GRADUATE FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING Sharon Santilli and Vesna Beck Nova Southeastern University The participants for this study were 47 doctoral faculty from Nova Southeastern University Fischler
CAP - Page 1 Model for Good Practice in Accelerated Programs in Higher Education Council for Accelerated Programs In this day of multiple delivery methods, the use of time alone to document achievement
Aberasturi, S., & Kongrith, K. (2006). Students attitudes about online master s degree programs versus traditional programs. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 50-57. Students
GRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM COLLEGE OF EDUCATION & HUMAN SERVICES Dr. Hank Weddington, Dean Dr. Kim Matthews, Chair SCHOOL OF EDUCATION MASTER OF ARTS IN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ADMINISTRATION OFFERED IN ASHEVILLE
The Role of Community in Online Learning Success William A. Sadera Towson University Towson, MD 21252 USA email@example.com James Robertson University of Maryland University College Adelphia, MD USA Liyan
Factors Influencing Students Success in an Online Statistics Course at College-level R. Indika P. Wickramasinghe, PhD., Abstract Studies about students performance in a class are very important to an instructor,
Gatekeeper Perceptions of Interpersonal Skills Learned in Postsecondary Online Degree Programs: Recommendations for Teaching Interpersonal Skills Online Dr. Vesta R. Whisler Cassie L. Jacobs Jillian M.
Instructor and Learner Discourse in MBA and MA Online Programs: Whom Posts more Frequently? Peter Kiriakidis Founder and CEO 1387909 ONTARIO INC Ontario, Canada firstname.lastname@example.org Introduction Abstract: This
An exploratory study of student motivations for taking online courses and learning outcomes ABSTRACT Sarath A. Nonis Arkansas State University Grant H. Fenner Arkansas State University An investigation
USING THE ETS MAJOR FIELD TEST IN BUSINESS TO COMPARE ONLINE AND CLASSROOM STUDENT LEARNING Andrew Tiger, Southeastern Oklahoma State University, email@example.com Jimmy Speers, Southeastern Oklahoma State
GRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM COLLEGE OF EDUCATION & HUMAN SERVICES Dr. Hank Weddington, Dean Dr. Kim Matthews, Chair SCHOOL OF EDUCATION CERTIFICATE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ADMINISTRATION OFFERED IN ASHEVILLE
The Effect of Software Facilitated Communication on Student Outcomes in Online Classes Stuart S. Gold, DeVry University Online Abstract This research project examined the question of the relationship between
Wilkes University s Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) in Educational Leadership with a concentration in Leadership Studies is a 60-credit post-master s program comprised of coursework in curriculum and instruction,
Doctoral Students: Online, On Time, and On to Graduation Abstract Increased numbers of students are enrolling in online doctoral programs. Although students enroll for a variety of reasons, many do not
Requirements for the Master s Degree in Curriculum and Instruction The requirements for the Master s Degree in Curriculum and Instruction are twofold: 1) Thirty-six credits of graduate coursework as described
Learning Outcomes Associated with Group Assignments Carol Schmer Clinical Instructor firstname.lastname@example.org Peggy Ward-Smith Associate Professor email@example.com Jane Peterson Assistant Professor firstname.lastname@example.org
1 Appendix D: Summary of studies on online lab courses 1) Sloan Consortium Class Differences: Online Education in the United States (2011) Searched for lab, laboratory, science found no significant hits
A COMPARISON OF COLLEGE AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN AN ONLINE IT FOUNDATIONS COURSE Amy B. Woszczynski Kennesaw State University email@example.com Debra Bass Geist Kennesaw State University firstname.lastname@example.org
International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Volume 8 Number 1 Article 5 January 2014 Graduate Student Perceptions of the Use of Online Course Tools to Support Engagement Stephanie
FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDE OF IRAQI STUDENTS ABOUT DISTANCE LEARNING EDUCATION Kamaran Y. Mohamadamin, Hawler Medical University, Iraq Co-Author: Nazar P. Shabila, Hawler Medical
The Journal of Interactive Online Learning Volume 2, Number 3, Winter 2004 www.ncolr.org ISSN: 1541-4914 Examining Students Performance and Attitudes Towards the Use of Information Technology in a Virtual
MERCY COLLEGE SCHOOL BUILDING LEADERSHIP PROGRAM 2014 2016 (AUSTRIA) Schedule and Program: The program includes 2 fall semesters, 2 spring semesters, and 1 summer, depending upon students educational background
Internet and Higher Education 8 (2005) 167 174 The relationship between problems with technology and graduate students evaluations of online teaching Mary K. Tallent-RunnelsT, William Y. Lan, Wesley Fryer,
Nursing Plugged In: Evaluating a Web-based Graduate Nursing Program to Inform Web-based Instructional Programs in Ohio and Across the United States Final Report submitted to the Research Center for Educational
Volume 20, Number 4 - September 2004 through December 2004 Quality Measurement and Good Practices in Web-Based Distance Learning: A Case Study of the Industrial Management Program at Central Missouri State
GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT Dean M.J. Feuer Senior Associate Dean C.A. Kochhar-Bryant Associate Dean for Research and External Relations M.B. Freund Administrative Dean and Chief
The Acceptability of Online University Degrees in the Arab Academia Dr. Gamal M. M. Mustafa Associate Professor of Foundations of Education Al-Azhar Univ. Egypt & Imam Mohd Inibn Saud Islamic Univ. KSA.
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 448 722 IR 020 485 AUTHOR Johnson, Scott D.; Aragon, Steven R.; Shaik, Najmuddin; Palma-Rivas, Nilda TITLE Comparative Analysis of Online vs. Face-to-Face Instruction. PUB DATE 1999-10-00
International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. No. ; March 0 Health Care Management Student Perceptions of Online Courses Compared to Traditional Classroom Courses Ronald M. Fuqua* Deborah Gritzmacher
Factors Influencing a Learner s Decision to Drop-Out or Persist in Higher Education Distance Learning Hannah Street Mississippi State University email@example.com Abstract Previous studies conducted
Outcomes of Preservice Teacher s Technology Use William F. Morrison, Assistant Professor, Bowling Green State University Tara L. Jeffs, Assistant Professor, East Carolina University Abstract: At a time
STUDENT PERCEPTIONS AND PREFERENCES FOR TERTIARY ONLINE COURSES: DOES PRIOR HIGH SCHOOL DISTANCE LEARNING MAKE A DIFFERENCE? Dale Kirby, Dennis B. Sharpe, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada, Michael
Council for Standards in Human Service Education National Standards MASTER S DEGREE IN HUMAN SERVICES http://www.cshse.org 2013 (2010, 2009) I. GENERALPROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS A. Institutional Requirements
Evaluation in Online STEM Courses Lawrence O. Flowers, PhD Assistant Professor of Microbiology James E. Raynor, Jr., PhD Associate Professor of Cellular and Molecular Biology Erin N. White, PhD Assistant
1 of 8 Getting an Edge in Online Education: Developing an Online Learning Web Portal Beate P. Winterstein Educational Research Methodology Department, School of Education PO Box 21670, Curry 210 University
Paper ID #7674 Student Engagement Strategies in One Online Engineering and Technology Course Dr. Julie M Little-Wiles, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI Dr. Julie Little-Wiles is a Visiting
Redesigning a Master s for Teachers Program Cathy Stockton Louisiana Tech University Abstract This paper describes the process that one college of education used to redesign the master s for teachers program.
STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF INSTRUCTOR INTERACTION IN THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT Michelle Kilburn, Ed.D. Southeast Missouri State University Assistant Professor, Criminal Justice & Sociology firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract
Effective Online Instructional Competencies as Perceived by Online University Faculty and Students: A Sequel Study Jeffrey L. Bailie Professor School of Graduate Education Kaplan University email@example.com
Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education (2006) 14(3), 531-541 The Impact of Online Teaching on Faculty Load: Computing the Ideal Class Size for Online Courses LAWRENCE A. TOMEI Robert Morris University
Preface The Nurses and Midwives Act (Chapter 209) [May 2000] empowers Singapore Nursing Board (SNB) to make regulations for matters relating to the accreditation of educational programmes in nursing and
The Effect of Electronic Writing Tools on Business Writing Proficiency Lisa Walters and Susan McNamara Lisa M. Walters is Visiting Assistant Professor of Business Administration and Susan McNamara is Assistant
A USABILITY STUDY OF INTERACTIVE WEB-BASED MODULES Tulay Girard Penn State Altoona, United States firstname.lastname@example.org Musa Pinar Valparaiso University, United States email@example.com ABSTRACT This research
ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING October 16, 2002 TO: FROM: Illinois State Board of Education Robert E. Schiller, Superintendent Christopher Koch, Director Agenda Topic: Materials: Staff Contact(s):
International Jl. on E-Learning (2008) 7(3), 523-532 Pedagogical Characteristics of Online and Face-to-Face Classes KARL L. WUENSCH, SHAHNAZ AZIZ, EROL OZAN, MASAO KISHORE, AND M. H. N. TABRIZI East Carolina
Comparing AACSB Faculty and Student Online Learning Experiences: Changes between 2000 and 2006 Melody W. Alexander, Ball State University Heidi Perreault, Missouri State University Jensen J. Zhao, Ball
Adjunct Faculty Members Perceptions of Online Education Compared to Traditional Education DIANE HAMILTON, Ph.D. 1 1 Ashford University, 8620 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, CA 92123 Corresponding author:
Comparison of and Perceptions of Best Practices in Online Technology s David Batts Assistant Professor East Carolina University Greenville, NC USA firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract This study investigated the perception
Understanding the Accounting Faculty Shortage: THE FUTURE ROLE OF THE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANT About IMA IMA, the association of accountants and fi nancial professionals in business, is one of the largest
Department of Management and Human Resources PhD Program The primary goal of the PhD program is to develop top-class researchers in the field of management, with specializations in the areas of entrepreneurship,
Model for E-Learning in Higher Education of Agricultural Extension and Education in Iran Jafar Yaghoubi 1 and Iraj Malekmohammadi 2 1. Assistant Professor, Zanjan University, Iran, Jafar230@yahoo.com 2.
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE Educational Leadership Doctor of Philosophy Degree Major Course Requirements EDU710 (3.0 credit hours) Ethical and Legal Issues in Education/Leadership This course is an intensive
Abstract Title: Identifying and measuring factors related to student learning: the promise and pitfalls of teacher instructional logs MSP Project Name: Assessing Teacher Learning About Science Teaching
K12 ONLINE LEARNING: THE NATIONAL LANDSCAPE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR WASHINGTON Sue Collins November 9, 2011 Agenda National Landscape / Trends National Standards Policy Barriers and Recommendations Blended
A Systems Engineering Framework for Online Course Design and Delivery Ipek Bozkurt, Ph.D. Assistant Professor University of Houston Clear Lake School of Science and Computer Engineering Engineering Management
VIEWS OF STUDENTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND SPORT MANAGEMENT ON DISTANCE EDUCATION Asst.Prof.Dr.Gülten Hergüner Sakarya University Physical Education and Sports Teaching Department email@example.com
International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 2, No. 6, 2013, pp. 61-66 MANAGEMENT JOURNALS managementjournals.org Student Quality Perceptions and Preferences for MBA Delivery Formats:
Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, Vol. 20, No. 2, Fall/Winter 2002 COMPARISON OF INTERNET AND TRADITIONAL CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION IN A CONSUMER ECONOMICS COURSE Debbie Johnson Southeastern
Running Head: COHORTS, LEARNING STYLES, ONLINE COURSES Cohorts, Learning Styles, Online Courses: Are they important when designing Leadership Programs? Diana Garland, Associate Director Academic Outreach
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Ph.D. in counseling is intended to prepare individuals for employment as counselor educators in colleges and universities and as leaders in clinical mental health counseling, college
Howard University Clinical Psychology PhD Program Frequently Asked Questions SUMMARY OF FAQs I. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY PHD PROGRAM FAQs 1. Is the program APA Accredited? 2. Who is the Director of Clinical
Program Identity: The EdD in Educational Leadership advances critical inquiry for deliberate intentions. The EdD in Educational Leadership is a scholar-practitioner degree designed to provide leaders throughout
Quality Indicators for Online Programs at Community Colleges Leo Hirner Director Distance Education Services Metropolitan Community College Kansas City Introduction The phenomenal growth in online education
Department: Psychology MSU Departmental Assessment Plan 2007-2009 Department Head: Richard A. Block Assessment Coordinator: Richard A. Block Degrees/Majors/Options Offered by Department B.S. in Psychology
Comparing the Distance Learning-Related Course Development Approach and Faculty Support and Rewards Structure at AACSB Accredited Institutions between 2001 and 2006 Heidi Perreault, Missouri State University
1750 H Street NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006 P 202.756.2971 F 866.808.6585 www.hanoverresearch.com HIGHER EDUCATION PRACTICE RESEARCH ABSTRACTS January 2012 The following abstracts describe a sampling
The Balanced Scorecard Beyond Reports and Rankings More commonly used in the commercial sector, this approach to strategic assessment can be adapted to higher education. by Alice C. Stewart and Julie Carpenter-Hubin
The Qualitative Report Volume 15 Number 4 July 2010 956-965 http://www.nova.edu/ssss/qr/qr15-4/eller.pdf An Evaluation of a Development Program for New Principals John F. Eller Virginia Polytechnic Institute