qomo > W \V-Uft W C \k*v\ BCMi7tffAX fiy ^ &* Deputy Moses Soto Facsimile: (312) \J" FILED Superior Court of California

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "qomo > W \V-Uft W C \k*v\ BCMi7tffAX fiy ^ &* Deputy Moses Soto Facsimile: (312)346-5562 \J" FILED Superior Court of California"

Transcription

1 qomo > THOMAS V. GIRARDI, State Bar No GRAHAM B. LIPPSMITH, State Bar No. 84 frardrf KEESE Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 9001 Telephone: (3)9-01 Facsimile; (3) WILLIAM T. GIBBS, Illinois Bar No CORBOY & DEMETRIO 33 North Dearborn St., Suite 00 Chicago, Illinois Telephone: (312) <->> Facsimile: (312) \J" Attorneys for PLAINTIFF MANUEL NORIEGA v. FILED Superior Court of California County oflos Angeles JUL 1 Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk fiy ^ &* Deputy Moses Soto W W \V-Uft W C \k*v\ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Plaintiff, ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, Inc., a corporation, d/b/a ACTIVISION and TREYARCH, a corporation, Defendants. CASE NO.: BCMitffAX FOR DAMAGES FOR: 1) Violation ofcalifornia Civil Code 3344and Common Law Right of Publicity 2) Unjust Enrichment 3) Unfair Business Practices in Violation of California Business and Professions Code 10 ' -) -Fs. o o o o S? *> - w to C" Z X O <" CD ^ TO.. 33 rn o m 3> C,Tr 3 3 2s 2J rn X» -i - -it <«f". O O <W -./ ri '-" ---. x ~ * * CI o cn f ^ CO» CO o o CO O *» a- J> ~i o m X> TO r-i in ci --j *. Sf ft *» u c< q p ifn S1 e o o o o 3 o

2 1 2 On information and belief, Plaintiff Manuel Noriega ("Plaintiff) alleges as follows: 3 L NATURE OF THE ACTION Defendants, ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, Inc., a corporation, d/b/a ACTIVISION and TREYARCH, a corporation ("Defendants"), engaged in the blatant misuse, unlawful exploitation, and misappropriation of Plaintiffs image and likeness for economic gain in the video game they produced and distributed. 2. Defendants designed, created, advertised and sold the popular video game CALL OF DUTY: BLACK OPS II ("Black Ops II"). 3. In an effort to increase the popularity and revenue generated by BLACK OPS II, Defendants used, without authorization or consent, the image and likeness of Plaintiff in BLACK OPS II. 4. Defendants' use ofplaintiffs image and likeness caused damage to Plaintiff. Plaintiff was portrayed as an antagonist and portrayed as the culprit of numerous fictional heinous crimes, creating the false impression that Defendants are authorized to use Plaintiffs image and likeness. This caused Defendants to receive profits they would not have otherwise received.. Plaintiff is portrayed in BLACK OPS II as a kidnapper, murderer and enemy of the state. An objective of one portion ofblack OPS II is solely to capture Plaintiff. 6. Defendants' video game, BLACK OPS II, features several non-fiction characters, including Plaintiff, for one purpose: to heighten realism in its video game, BLACK OPS II. This translates directly into heightened sales for Defendants.. Defendants deliberately and systematically misappropriated Plaintiffs

3 ?g likeness to increase revenues and royalties, at the expense of Plaintiffand without the consent ofplaintiff. II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This Court has personal jurisdiction over each and every one of the Defendants. Venue in this Court is proper because Defendants reside and/or carry on business here, and the wrongful acts of Defendants originated here. III. THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff is an individual residing in Gamboa, Panama. 2. Defendant ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, d/b/a ACTIVISION is, and at all times mentioned herein, was a corporation existing under the laws ofcalifornia. ACTIVISION is incorporated in Delaware, however maintains its headquarters and principle place of business in Santa Monica, California. 3. Defendant TREYARCH is, and at all times mentioned herein, was a corporation organized and existing under the taws ofcalifornia. 4. Defendants are a multi-billion dollar interactive entertainment software company (ACTIVISION) and its subsidiary (TREYARCH) that produce the Call of Duty video game franchise, which includes the Black Ops series.. Defendant ACTIVISION describes itself as "a leading worldwide developer, publisher and distributor of interactive entertainment and leisure products." Its revenues support this claim. In 12, ACTIVISION reported in its Annual 10-K Report to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission a consolidated net revenue of $4.9 billion for 12 and a consolidated net income of $1.1 billion. ACTIVISION'S principle place of business is California, but it sells its games directly to consumers throughout the country 3

4 through its website and indirectly through major retailers in all fifty states and around the world. IV. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 3344 AND COMMON LAW RIGHT OF PUBLICITY 1. Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference each and every allegation contained in each paragraph above. 2. At all relevant times, Plaintiff had the sole and exclusive right of publicity with regard to the use of his name arid likeness as displayed and portrayed in BLACK OPS II and all corresponding advertisingmaterials disseminated by Defendants. 3. Defendants used the name, image, and likeness of Plaintiff in the video game BLACK OPS II without Plaintiffs or his representatives' permission, consent or authorization. 4. Plaintiffwas readily identifiable in the video game, insofar as one who views the photograph with a naked eye can reasonably determine that the person depicted in the photograph is the same person who is complaining of its unauthorized use.. Plaintiff is identified by name on numerous occasions throughout BLACK OPS II. 6. Defendants' unauthorized and unlawful use of Plaintiffs name and likeness was willful, intentional, and knowing and was done for the direct purpose of profiting offof and gaining a commercial benefit through the popularity and sales of BLACK OPS II.. The acts alleged above constitute a violation ofcalifornia Civil Code 3344 and Plaintiffs common law right ofpublicity.

5 8. As a direct and proximate resultof Defendants' unauthorized and unlawful use of Plaintiffs name and likeness, Plaintiff suffered harm, including but not limited to iv damage to his reputation and denial ofthe benefit ofthe rights ofpublicity which belong to him. 9. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to compensation for the willful, intentional, unauthorized, and unlawful use ofhis name and likeness, in an amount to be proven attrial. 10. Defendants' conduct was malicious, fraudulent, oppressive and intended to injure Plaintiff. Consequently. Plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages. V. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION UNJUST ENRICHMENT 1. Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference each and every allegation contained in each paragraph above. 2. At all relevant times, Plaintiff had the sole and exclusive right ofpublicity with regard to the use of his image and likeness as displayed and portrayed in BLACK OPS II and all corresponding advertising materials disseminated by Defendants. 3. Defendants appropriated the image and likeness of Plaintiffin BLACK OPS II and all corresponding advertising materials disseminated by Defendants without proper permission orauthorization. Defendants also intentionally interfered with Plaintiffs right to publicity by misappropriating his image and likeness in BLACK OPS II. 4. Defendants' unauthorized and unlawful use ofplaintiffs image and likeness was intentional, willful, knowing and done for the purpose ofobtaining profit and for the purpose of denying Plaintiff of his rightful share of any profit to be made from the commercial use of his image and likeness.

6 . As a result ofdefendants' unauthorized and unlawful use ofplaintiff's image and likeness, Defendants have been unjustly enriched in an amount to be proven attrial. 6. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to compensation for the unauthorized and unlawful use of his image and likeness, in an amount to be proven at trial. VI. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE Plaintiff incorporates herein bythis reference each and every allegation contained in each paragraph above. 2. Defendants have deceived and confused the public into believing that Plaintiffauthorized, approves, and endorses the use ofits name and likeness in BLACK OPS II. 3. Defendants' acts, alleged above, constitute unfair competition in that they reflect untair, deceptive, untrue, and misleading business acts within the meaning of Business and Professions Code As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' conduct, Defendants have unfairly and wrongfully obtained and must disgorge profits belonging to Plaintiffin an amount which shall be proved at trial. VII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF U] follows: WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as 1. For an injunction ofthe following conduct: Defendants' use of Plaintiffs' image and likeness without Plaintiffs consent at any time in the future

7 1 2. For restitution in the amount ofthe benefit to Defendants; 2 3. For general damages sustained by Plaintiff; 3 4. For special damages sustained by Plaintiff; 4. For lost profits sustained by Plaintiff; 6. For Defendants' profits; 6. For an accounting; 8. For punitive damages; 8 9. For Plaintiffs costs; For prejudgment interest; and 10. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 12 VIII. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 13 Plaintiff hereby demands a jury trial for all issues in this lawsuit. 1 Dated: July 1, GIRARDI KEESE 1 ^SBAHAM B. LIPPSMITH Attorneys for Plaintiff I. p

8 ATTORNEYOR PARTY WITHOUTATTORNEY (Warns, Slate Barnumber,end address): "Graham B. LippSmith (SBN 84} Girarcii I Keese Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 9001 telephone no.: FAXNO.: attorney for (Namey. Plaintiff Manuel Noriega SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OFLOS Angeles STREET AOORESS: 1 N. Hill St. mailing address: 1 N. Hill Street cityandtip code: Los Angeles branch name: Stanlev Mosk Courthouse CASE NAME: Noriega v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation 1 x 1Unlimited 1 ilimited Counter ) Joinder (Amount (Amount Filed with first appearance by defendant demanded demanded is exceeds $,000) $,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) FOR COURT USE ONLY Superior Court of California County oflos Angeles JUL 1 CM-010 Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk fly ^ ^kfo Deputy Moses Soto CASE NUMBER: JUDGE: OEPT: 14 BY FAX Items 1-6 below must be completed (see instructionson page 2). 1 Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case: Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation cz Auto () Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules ) r Uninsured motorist (46) CZ Rule 3.40 collections (09) I Antitrust/Trade regulation (03) Other PI/PO/WD(Personal Injury/Property n Other collections (09) I Construction defect (10) Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort n Insurance coverage () I Masstort (40) [ IAsbestos (04) L_ Other contract (3) I Securities litigation () I IProduct liability () Real Property I J Environmental/Toxic tort (30) f ]Medical malpractice (4) I IEminentdomain/Inverse i I Insurancecoverage claimsarisingfrom the [ OtherPI/PO/WD () condemnation () above listed provisionally complex case Non-PHPO/WD (Other) Tort Wrongful eviction (33) types (41) I Business tort/unfair business practice (0) I IOther real property () Enforcement of Judgment I Civil rights (08) Unlawful Detainer I Enforcement ofjudgment () Defamation (13) I ICommercial (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint! J Fraud () Residential (32) RICO () [! Intellectual property () I IDrugs (38) Other complaint (not specified above) (42) 1 JProfessional negligence () Judicial Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition I x IOther non-pi/pd/wd tort (3) IAsset forfeiture (0) II Partnership and corporate governance () Employment [ _J Petition re: arbitration award() I Other petition (not specified above) (43) [ ]] Wrongful termination (36) [ IWrit of mandate (02) l jother employment (1) [ IOther judicial review (39) This case ZH is l~x"l is not complex under rule ofthecalifornia Rules ofcourt. If thecase is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional judicial management: a. ' j ' I Large numberof separately represented parties d. ZD Large number ofwitnesses b. Extensive motion practice raisingdifficult or novel issues that will be time-consuming to resolve e. I I Coordination with related actions pending inone ormore courts in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court C.l :c. I I Substantialamount of documentary evidence f. I I Substantialpostjudgment judicial supervision 3."-"Remedies sought (check all that apply): a. (~x~l monetary b. x ] nonmonetary; declaratory orinjunctive relief c. ~~x~l punitive 4%-Number of causes of action (specify): three (3) -"'This case I is LxJ is not a class action suit. 6i/lf there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM^01.) Date: July 1, Graham B. LippSmith (SBN 84) f! (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) -, NOTICE "Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed rounder the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and InstitutionsCode). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.0.) Failure to file may result r< insanctions. -'''File thiscover sheet in addition to any cover sheet requiredby local court rule. If this case is complex under rule et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on alt other parties to the action or proceeding. Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.40 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only. Page1of 2 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council d California CM-OIOIRev. July 1, 0] CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET, oal Cal. Rules ofcourt, rules , 3.40; Solucions- Cal. Standards of JgdidaJ Adminislrason, std $* Plus

9 instructions on how to complete thf cnvfr ^hfft ~,.,-.v statistics about the types and numbesofwses? vi f <?? co"ta,ned on P39* 1- s information will be used to compile one box for the casetvoo that betzlclizflt?, t? ' C?ple(e "ems!^ ^h 6on th«^et In item 1, you must check To assist you In comptellmthe she*l.z ft " 3CS'Qn' Check,he box that best indicates lhe Primarv caus«of action, check tl» rnoro t^tn^t^^j^zz**bf! neral and amore specific ^<*««*** *»" L sheet«^«^xi^^f2^i?fit^ r?9 Undtr e3ch eme'l«* in i,em 1are»*»** **»' A«"«its counsel, or both toicj^t^io^^'usk^st"""*8*"""^ "^' ^ which property services or monav walviz1 1 *!, GXC'US'Ve f mtefesl and 8ito^ey's fees, arising from a transaction In alsnt. damage i<2)' ^'< ^mz^% TheS^ T" t***1' recovery.of <*** d0es not personal inc,uda property, an ac,lon or «**"*<he () a%reiud9men. fo,towi"9- writ <1>tort of tfrne-for-servfce requirewnttandr^nll*, co,,ectj0ns «* on,his f means that it will be exempt from the general L sepirtc!>mpr ex0itapsss'^lt^ T* ^ Paf1'eS miist 3fS US9 She C'V* Csse O^ S»*st *> designate whether ihe thesl ts?d tal? Z^^Z ^ is comptex COun,efdesi9nal:0ft,hat,he <*** mav f"e *no. and complex, Sew m,3lef or. if the than plaintiff *«has time made of ils no to designation, appearance adesignation ajoinder in that.he Auto Tort Auto ()~Porsonal Injury/Properly Damage/Wrorxjlul Daalh Uninsured MotOfl6. (48)(ifthe case Involves an uninsured motorist cfafm subjectto arbitration, check this item InsteadofAuto) OtherPt/PD/WD (Personal Injury/ Property Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort Asbestos (04) AsbestosProperty Damage Asbestos Personal Injury/. Wrongful Death Product Liability (not asbestos or toxlc/envlronmenta!) () Medical Malpractice (4) Medical Malpracllcs- Physfclans &Surgeons Other Professional Health Care Malpractice OtherPWPD/WD () Premises Uab)6ly (e.g., slip and feb) Intertkmsl BodJy InjuryyPDAM) (o.q^ aasault, vandalism) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Negligent InWcdon of Emotional Distress OihafPVPD/vM) Non-PlrPDWD(Other) Tort Bustnes* Tort/Unfair Business Practice <0) OS RJ^>le(0.g:, dlscrtmlnabon. felso arrest) (not ch>8,;":) harassment) (OS) Defairtatlon(e.g., stancer. Bbel) I (13) Fraud () '" Intei/ectual Property() k-.;. Professional NegBgenoa () Legal Mefp/acUco yi OtherProfessionalMalpractlca (notmedical orlegal) '" * C«harNorvPI/PDArVDTort(3) Employment is V*on8fulTeirn(n8tJor.(36) (T\ OtherEmptoyment () - I.. «4rOIOJR.», July I. 0) CASE TYPES AND EXAMPLES Contract Breach o( Contract/Warranty (06) Oieach ol ftenlal/lease Cortrad (notunlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) Cont/actArVerranty Breacrv-Seller Plalnl/lf (not fraud ornegligence) NegKoent Breach of Contract/ Warranty Other Breach of CortractAfVafranty Collections (e.g.. money owed, open book accounts) (08) CoBecUonCase-Seller Plaintiff OtherPromissory Note/Collections Case Insurance Coverage (notprovisionally complex}(t8) Aufo Subrogation OtherCoverage Other Contract(3) Com/actual Fraud OtherContract Dispute Real Property Emtnent Domain/Inverse Condemnation () VvronaM Eviction f») Other Real Property (e.g., quiet title) () Writ ofpossession ofreal Properly Mortgage Foreclosure Quiet Title OtherRealProperly (not eminent domain, lendhrd/lemnt, or foreclosure) Unlawful Detainer Commercial (31) Resldenllal (32) Drue* (38) {tithe caseinvolves Illegal drvgs, cftec*thisitem; otherwise, mpoit as CommanMorReskloatfah Judicial Review Asset Forfeiture (0) Petition Re: Arbitration Award (it) WritofMandate (02) Wm-TAdmWslratfve Mandamus WHI-Mandaoiu* on LimitedCourt Case Matter Writ-Other UmftedCourt Case Review Other Judicial RevtewDS) Review of Health Officer Order Noticeol Appeal-Labor Commissioner Appeab CIVILCASE COVER SHEET ProvisionallyComplexCivil Litigation (Cat. Rules of Court Rulos ) Antitrust/Trade Regulation (03) Construction Delect(10) ClaimsInvolving Mass Tort (40) Securilles Litigation () Bivtronmentel/ToxIcTort (30) Insurance Coverage Claims (arising from provisionallycomplex case type 8sted*bovo) (41) Enforcement of Judgment Enforcement ofjudgment () Abstract of Judgment (Out of County) ConfessionofJudgment (nondomaslkmlauons) SisterStateJudgment AdministrativeAgency Award (not unpaidtaxes) PetSBorVCerllScatlon of Entry of Judgment on Unpaid Taxes Other Enforcement ofjudgment Case Miscellaneous CtvU Complaint RICO (2?) Other Complefnl (notspecified above) (42) Declaratory ReSef Only Injunctive ReliefOnly(nonharassment) Mechanics Lien OtherCommercial Complaint Case(non-tortAxtn-comphx) Other ChrO Complaint fcofrtotvnorhcoinpfox) Miscellaneous CtvU Petition Partnership and Corporate Governance () Other Petition(notspecified above) (43) CMI Harassment Workplace Violence Ekter/Dependent Adult Abuse Election Contest Petition fornamechangs Petition for Relief From tale Claim OiharCMPetWon P»8»*<XJ

10

11

12

13

PI/PD - Complaint SAMPLE. Use the samples to help you complete the packet of blank forms.

PI/PD - Complaint SAMPLE. Use the samples to help you complete the packet of blank forms. PI/PD - Complaint SAMPLE Use the samples to help you complete the packet of blank forms. ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): YOUR NAME YOUR STREET ADDRESS YOUR CITY,

More information

(Name of Court) Plaintiff Case #:

(Name of Court) Plaintiff Case #: FORM 1.997. CIVIL COVER SHEET The civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law. This form

More information

CL-0891-0912. Form 1.997 Civil Cover Sheet

CL-0891-0912. Form 1.997 Civil Cover Sheet Form 1.997 Civil Cover Sheet The civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace r supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law. This form shall

More information

PINAL COUNTY INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS

PINAL COUNTY INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS Revised 07.27.15 BLANK CIVIL PACKET INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS Provided as a Public Service by Amanda Stanford Clerk of the Superior Court Name of Person Filing: Street Address: City, State, Zip Code: Telephone

More information

Fla. R. Civ. P.1.997 Civil Cover Sheet

Fla. R. Civ. P.1.997 Civil Cover Sheet Fla. R. Civ. P.1.997 Civil Cover Sheet This civil cover sheet and the infonnation contained in it do not replace or supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law. This

More information

CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA QUALITY BICYCLE PRODUCTS, INC. v. Plaintiff, BIKEBARON, LLC SINCLAIR IMPORTS, LLC and

More information

File & Serve Xpress San Francisco Superior Court Welcome Kit

File & Serve Xpress San Francisco Superior Court Welcome Kit File & Serve Xpress San Francisco Superior Court Welcome Kit CLIENT SUPPORT: 888.529.7587 SALES: 888.247.2051 We are pleased to announce the San Francisco Superior Court is expanding electronic filing

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 100 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JPM NETWORKS, LLC, ) d/b/a KWIKBOOST ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 3:14-cv-1507 JCM FIRST VENTURE, LLC )

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Seung Yang [SBN 249857] 1 Kane Moon [SBN 249834] 2 MOON & YANG, APC 3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1820 3 Los Angeles, California 90010 Telephone: (213 232-31 ~ r. L/B 4 E-mail: seung.vang@moonyanglaw.com

More information

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I.

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I. CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE

More information

1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER]

More information

California efiling Configuration Standards. Version 1.0

California efiling Configuration Standards. Version 1.0 California efiling Configuration Standards Version 1.0 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose: The purpose of this document is to outline a proposed standardized efiling code-set for the state of California. 1.1 VERSIONS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 2:11-cv-00225-KDE-SS Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) MARIO CACHO and ANTONIO OCAMPO, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. v. ) ) SHERIFF

More information

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL

More information

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION Case Number XXX A.C.G., J.G.M., on behalf of themselves and ) all others similarly situated, ) Plaintiffs )

More information

Case3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0-JCS Document Filed0/0/ Page of KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP Karl S. Kronenberger (Bar No. ) Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Bar No. ) Ansel J. Halliburton (Bar No. 0) 0 Post Street, Suite 0 San Francisco,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. (SBN: ) josh@westcoastlitigation.com Robert L. Hyde, Esq. (SBN: ) bob@westcoastlitigation.com Hyde & Swigart Camino Del Rio South,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 WILLIAM E. KOVACIC General Counsel KATHERINE ROMANO SCHNACK THERESE L. TULLY Federal Trade Commission East Monroe Street, Suite Chicago, Illinois 00 (1 0- [Ph.] (1 0-00 [Fax] FAYE CHEN

More information

California Points and Authorities

California Points and Authorities California Points and Authorities Publisher: Matthew Bender Elite Products Table of Contents Volume 1 Chapter 1 Writing Legal Memoranda and Briefs Chapter 10 Abatement And Survival of Actions Chapter 11

More information

Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BEST LITTLE PROMOHOUSE IN TEXAS LLC, Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION NANCY PRITCHARD, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION; KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, as PLAN ADMINISTRATOR;

More information

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in Weld County, Colorado, District Court, 901 9 th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970.351.7300 Plaintiff: vs. Defendants: JENNIFER BELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRADLEY PETROLEUM,

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00039-MMD-VPC Document 12-1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1

Case 3:14-cv-00039-MMD-VPC Document 12-1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1 Case :-cv-000-mmd-vpc Document - Filed 0// Page of EXHIBIT EXHIBIT Case :-cv-000-mmd-vpc Document - Filed 0// Page of JOHN OHLSON, ESQ. NV Bar No. Hill Street, Suite 0 Reno, Nevada 0 Telephone: () -00

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY THE HONORABLE CAROL MURPHY 1 1 1 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY TARVA LEE, ) ) No: --00- Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF ) CONTRACT, BAD FAITH, FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8 Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# laborlawyer@pacbell.net THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#

More information

PARRY G. CAMERON, Senior Attorney

PARRY G. CAMERON, Senior Attorney Phone: 310.557.2009 Fax: 310.551.0283 Email: pcameron@tocounsel.com Parry Cameron has over twenty-three years experience in commercial and business litigation at both the trial and appellate levels. He

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) LAW FIRM OF KAISER, DEBIASO. ANDREW AND SWINDELLS SUMfTOMO TOWER NINTH FLOOR 444 WEST OCEAN BOULEVARD LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802-4516 (310) 590-8471 ERIC C. DEMLER

More information

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS In re: MICHELE GRAHAM, Case No.: 02-43262 (Chapter 7 Debtor. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Adversary Proceeding

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION JAMES C. STURDEVANT (SBN 94551 JESPER I. RASMUSSEN (SBN 121001 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 475 Sansome Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415 477-2410

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you were injured or provided treatment for an injury and filed a claim under your Allstate Med Pay coverage, and were compensated in an amount

More information

Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12 ORIGH~~AL

Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12 ORIGH~~AL Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12 ORIGH~~AL EXECSUMMITS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILEDINCLERK'Sorn NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA u.s.o.c. -A~nCE

More information

3 JON M. ICHINAGA Supervising Deputy Attorney General '4 MAURICE R. JOURDANE

3 JON M. ICHINAGA Supervising Deputy Attorney General '4 MAURICE R. JOURDANE 1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General ofthe State of California 2 MARK J. BRECKLER Senior Assistant Attorney General 3 JON M. ICHINAGA Supervising Deputy Attorney General '4 MAURICE R. JOURDANE DeputyAttorney

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION ELECTRONICALLY FILED 5/18/2012 2:30 PM CV-2012-901583.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA ANNE-MARIE ADAMS, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION ZACHARY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation v. Plaintiff, SALESFORCE.COM, INC., a Delaware Corporation Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Case 2:06-cv-15766-JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15

Case 2:06-cv-15766-JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15 Case 2:06-cv-15766-JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MAZZONI

More information

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Case No.: v. Plaintiff, BASS PRELITIGATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) ron@consumersadvocates.com ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) alexis@consumersadvocates.com KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) kas@consumersadvocates.com

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Paul L. Hoffman, CSB #1 Michael D. Seplow, CSB # 0 K. Arianne Jordan, CSB # 1 SCHONBRUN DeSIMONE SEPLOW HARRIS & HOFFMAN LLP Ocean Front Walk Venice, California 01 Telephone: ( -01 Fax: ( -00 Gloria Allred,

More information

Case4:15-cv-04219-DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case4:15-cv-04219-DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11 Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (bhughes@cooley.com)

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA David W. Lincicum (California Bar No. 223566) Burke W. Kappler (D.C. Bar No. 471936) Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Stop NJ-8122 Washington, D.C. 20580 dlincicum@ftc.gov bkappler@ftc.gov

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Robert S. Green (SBN ) James Robert Noblin (SBN ) GREEN & NOBLIN, P.C. -and- Telephone: Email: William B. Federman FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD Telephone: Email:

More information

Adrian G. Driscoll's Representative Experience

Adrian G. Driscoll's Representative Experience Adrian G. Driscoll's Representative Experience Practice Area: Construction, Coverage, Insurance Services, Lawyers, Professional Liability Key Issues: Attorney Malpractice; Attorney's Fees and Costs; Construction

More information

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If You Bought Mario Badescu Healing Cream or Control Cream At Any Time Since February 15, 2009 You Could Get One or Two $45 Certificates

More information

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-00-loa Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Bradley Jardis, vs. Keith M. Knowlton, L.L.C. SBN 0 S. Rural Road, Suite 0, PMB# Tempe, Arizona -00 (0 -; FAX (0 - Keith M. Knowlton - SBN 0 Attorney for Plaintiff

More information

Checks written out to cash being negotiated by the elder s caregiver. Checks signed by the senior but filled out by someone else

Checks written out to cash being negotiated by the elder s caregiver. Checks signed by the senior but filled out by someone else Elder Financial Abuse Litigation Guide California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform Inappropriate banking activity, such as unusually large withdrawals or withdrawals from automated banking machines when

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 JAMES W. JOHNSTON ATTORNEY AT LAW 00 S. Flower Street, Suite 10 Los Angeles, California 001 State Bar No. (1) 1- Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEAN KUMANCHIK, vs. Plaintiff, Case No.: UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD d/b/a UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, a Florida

More information

Complaint as permitted by Case Management Order # 4 and Implementing Order PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Complaint as permitted by Case Management Order # 4 and Implementing Order PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE [INSERT NAME], Plaintiff(s) vs. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, d/b/a STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS, JILL DOE MANUFACTURERS (1-10), JACK DOE WHOLESALERS (1-10), JAKE DOE SELLERS (1-10),

More information

-------------------------------)

-------------------------------) Case 1:11-cv-11538 Document 1 Filed 09/01/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. JOHN ALEXANDER GRANT, BENJAMIN LEE GRANT

More information

Trademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES

Trademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES Trademark Infringement Complaint [Name/Address] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ALPHA, INC., a Washington corporation, v. Plaintiff, MR, DELTA

More information

Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Defendants.

Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Defendants. Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN FATWALLET, INC., a Delaware corporation, v. ANDREW CHIU, an individual, and

More information

Case: 1:13-cv-02099 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/19/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

Case: 1:13-cv-02099 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/19/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1 Case: 1:13-cv-02099 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/19/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SHAWN and ANNE MICHELE JAMROS, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 ALAN HIMMELFARB - SBN 00 KAMBEREDELSON, LLP Leonis Boulevard Vernon, California 00 Telephone: ( - ahimmelfarb@kamberedelson.com JAY EDELSON MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER KAMBEREDELSON, LLC

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION FUTUREVISION.COM, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., TIME WARNER CABLE, LLC, CEQUEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC DBA

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants.

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants. BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California HERSCHEL T. ELKINS Senior Assistant Attorney General ALBERT NORMAN SHELDEN Supervising Deputy Attorney General HOWARD WAYNE (State Bar No. ) Deputy

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION WAYNE WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PROTECT SECURITY, LLC. Defendant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Case 6:10-cv-00557 Document 1 Filed 10/21/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION TRANSDATA, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 6:10-cv-557

More information

Plaintiffs Steve Yourke and Kristin Richards ( Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves and

Plaintiffs Steve Yourke and Kristin Richards ( Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves and 1 1 Plaintiffs Steve Yourke and Kristin Richards ( Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated United States residents, allege the following: INTRODUCTION 1. This is a civil action

More information

Case3:11-cv-00043-RS Document34 Filed07/28/11 Page1 of 8

Case3:11-cv-00043-RS Document34 Filed07/28/11 Page1 of 8 Case:-cv-000-RS Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 Sean Reis (SBN 00 sreis@edelson.com EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP 00 Tomas Street, Suite 00 Rancho Santa Margarita, California Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( - Michael

More information

CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA File No. Julius Chad Zimmerman, Plaintiff, v. Dave Bellows, in his individual and official

More information

Case 2:15-cv-03432-DDP-AGR Document 1 Filed 05/07/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:15-cv-03432-DDP-AGR Document 1 Filed 05/07/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ddp-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Matthew T. Walsh, Esq. (Bar No. ) CARROLL, McNULTY & KULL LLC 00 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 00 Chicago, Illinois 00 Telephone: () 00-000 Facsimile:

More information

CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825

CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825 CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825 Filed 13 September 9 P4:46 Gary Fitzsimmons District Clerk Dallas District CADE MANNETTI, v. Plaintiff, VISIONARY RESTAURANTS LLC, VISIONARY STAFFING LLC, WILLIAM McCROREY, AND THOMAS

More information

Case 2:14-cv-00244 Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv-00244 Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE DR. A. CEMAL EKIN, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, v. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case :0-cv-0-VRW Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of FRITZ CLAPP (Cal. Bar No. ) Attorney at Law 0 Foothill Boulevard Oakland, California 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-mail: Attorney

More information

The following is an excerpt from the 2012 Manual on Town Government. LIABILITY

The following is an excerpt from the 2012 Manual on Town Government. LIABILITY Minnesota Association of Townships Document Number: RM1000 Information Library Revised: January 2012 The following is an excerpt from the 2012 Manual on Town Government. LIABILITY Any discussion of a town

More information

- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,

- '. --, ,-~ ')  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission, - "'. --, -.:li ') " :::; ),-~ --' DA VlD SHONKA Acting General Counsel 2 BARBARA Y.K. CHUN, Cal. BarNo. 0 3 JOHN D. JACOBS, Cal. Bar No. 1344 Federal Trade Commission 4 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 00 Los Angeles,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT j~~e~_1atten, CLERK FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 6(flY Deputy Clerk ATLANTA DIVISION.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT j~~e~_1atten, CLERK FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 6(flY Deputy Clerk ATLANTA DIVISION. FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE U.SD.C M1l'lta JUN 022011 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT j~~e~_1atten, CLERK FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 6(flY Deputy Clerk ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

More information

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Pencils of Promise, Inc. ( PoP, we, us or our ) shares your concern about the protection of your personal information online. This Privacy Policy and Terms of Use ( Policy

More information

-1- SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

-1- SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF GEORGIA. NOW COMES the named plaintiff, for himse_if and all

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF GEORGIA. NOW COMES the named plaintiff, for himse_if and all ! IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF GEORGIA L. WAYNE GRIFFIN, and all other persons similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs AMERICAN DEFENDER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant CIVIL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 Daniel G. Shay, CA Bar #0 danielshay@tcpafdcpa.com LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL G. SHAY 0 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 1B San Diego, California 0 Tel:.. Fax:.1. Benjamin H. Richman* brichman@edelson.com J.

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. KIM WALLANT and LOUIS BOREK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, FREEDOM

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case 2:06-cv-00132-KJD-LRL Document 1 Filed 02/03/2006 Page 1 of 10 Louis V. Traeger California State Bar No. 38714 ltraeger@cftc.gov William P. Janulis IL ARDC No. 1326449 Rosemary Hollinger IL ARDC No.

More information

Case4:13-cv-05715-DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

Case4:13-cv-05715-DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5 Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed// Page of WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 0 (CA) MARCIA L. MITCHELL, SBN (WA) DERA A. SMITH, SBN (CA) U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Phillip Burton Federal Building 0

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA County of Sacramento 720 9 th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 874-5522 Website www.saccourt.ca.gov

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA County of Sacramento 720 9 th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 874-5522 Website www.saccourt.ca.gov SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA County of Sacramento 720 9 th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 874-5522 Website www.saccourt.ca.gov Program Information and Materials The attached materials describe the Program

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney GARY PLESSMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Fraud Section California State Bar No. 1 Room 1, Federal Building 00 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles,

More information

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff VS. LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendant.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendant. > 0 0.. 0 C LU.. CC 0 U t 0 1 1 1 1 1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California FRANCEST.GRUNDER Senior Assistant Attorney General KATHRIN SEARS Supervising Deputy Attorney General BENJAMIN G.

More information

PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS TO UNDERSTAND PROCEDURES IN THE PERSONAL INJURY (PI) COURTS, PLEASE CAREFULLY REVIEW THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT S (LASC

More information

Case 3:15-cv-05082-JRC Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:15-cv-05082-JRC Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 10 Case :-cv-00-jrc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 TEFERI BIKILA, an individual, v. Plaintiff, VIBRAM USA INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

More information

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KELVIN BLEDSOE, Plaintiff, v. SAAQIN, INC., No. COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff Kelvin

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA H.L. WATKINS AND COMPANY, INC., ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. ) ) 06-CV8980-3 THE HOT LEAD COMPANY, LLC, ) ROBERT MICHAEL HORNE, )

More information

Case: 1:16-cv-04705 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/27/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv-04705 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/27/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-04705 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/27/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STACY PINCUS, individually and on behalf

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION. In Re: Bankruptcy No. 09-26549. (Chapter 11) Filed Electronically

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION. In Re: Bankruptcy No. 09-26549. (Chapter 11) Filed Electronically Document Page 1 of 16 Steven C. Tycksen, #3300 Chad Shattuck, #9345 TYCKSEN & SHATTUCK, L.C. 12401 South 450 East, Unit E1 Draper, Utah 84020 Telephone: 801-748-4081 Facsimile: 801-748-4087 steve@tyshlaw.com

More information

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel ANN I. JONES RAYMOND E. McKOWN Federal Trade Commission 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite Los Angeles, California 00 ( -00 JOHN ANDREW SINGER Federal Trade Commission

More information

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLAINTIFF MCAFEE, INC. S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLAINTIFF MCAFEE, INC. S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION McAFEE, INC. v. Plaintiff, WILMER, CUTLER, PICKERING, HALE AND DORR, L.L.P JURY REQUESTED No. 4:08-cv-160 MHS-DDB Defendant.

More information

Case 3:13-cv-00077-ST Document 1 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv-00077-ST Document 1 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION Case 3:13-cv-00077-ST Document 1 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 Trial Attorney for Plaintiff Eric Olsen, Oregon Bar No. 783261 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 9415

More information

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a "Business Case Division" (hereinafter referred to as the "Division").

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a Business Case Division (hereinafter referred to as the Division). SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA Atlanta October 11, 2012 The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed: It is ordered that Paragraph 5 of Atlanta Judicial Circuit Rule

More information

PARTICIPANT APPLICATION & RELEASE. * For verification purposes only pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2256 et seq.

PARTICIPANT APPLICATION & RELEASE. * For verification purposes only pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2256 et seq. PARTICIPANT APPLICATION & RELEASE * For verification purposes only pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2256 et seq. Have you ever been through a major hardship/tragedy? (hurricane, tornado, fire, earthquake, major

More information

Insurers Not Obligated to Defend in ZIP Code Coverage Suits

Insurers Not Obligated to Defend in ZIP Code Coverage Suits Insurers Not Obligated to Defend in ZIP Code Coverage Suits By Bryana Blessinger Hill & Lamb LLP Portland, Oregon Insurers are increasingly faced with privacy and data-breach related claims. One of the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MOBILE TRANSFORMATION LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff

More information

Case 1:15-cv-05107 Document 1 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:15-cv-05107 Document 1 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 Case 1:15-cv-05107 Document 1 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------x PEGGY CABRERA,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. ) JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, ) Attorney General, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. ACCESS RESOURCE SERVICES, )

More information

misleading labeling and marketing of merchandise it sells at its company-owned Levi s Outlet stores

misleading labeling and marketing of merchandise it sells at its company-owned Levi s Outlet stores 1 misleading labeling and marketing of merchandise it sells at its company-owned Levi s Outlet stores ( Levi s Outlet ).. During the Class Period (defined below), Levi s misrepresented the existence, nature

More information

Case 4:09-cv-00502-RCC Document 1 Filed 09/04/09 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 4:09-cv-00502-RCC Document 1 Filed 09/04/09 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Case :0-cv-000-RCC Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of DAVID MONROE QUANTZ, P.L.C. E. Camp Lowell Dr. Tucson, Arizona ( -00 David Monroe Quantz State Bar No: 000 david@quantzlawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff

More information

Dt 1 2 7007 B C 5 8 2 2 4 3 URT

Dt 1 2 7007 B C 5 8 2 2 4 3 URT 1 2 3 4 5 Felicia A. Mobley (SBN 189892) MOBLEY LAW OFFICES 352 North Robertson Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90048, Cris assigned 0) (310) 652-4155 Jed Attorney for Plaintiff Carol rader LOS Dt 1 2 7007 JOHypiCeRKE,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of Michael Millen Attorney at Law (#) Calle Marguerita Ste. 0 Telephone: Fax: (0) -0 mikemillen@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information