Understanding the Legal Issues Surrounding Same-Sex Marriage
|
|
- Ezra Gregory
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 I N S I D E T H E M I N D S Understanding the Legal Issues Surrounding Same-Sex Marriage Leading Lawyers on Adapting to Recent Supreme Court Decisions Impacting Family Law
2 2013 Thomson Reuters/Aspatore All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Act, without prior written permission of the publisher. This book is printed on acid free paper. Material in this book is for educational purposes only. This book is sold with the understanding that neither any of the authors nor the publisher is engaged in rendering legal, accounting, investment, or any other professional service. Neither the publisher nor the authors assume any liability for any errors or omissions or for how this book or its contents are used or interpreted or for any consequences resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this book. For legal advice or any other, please consult your personal lawyer or the appropriate professional. The views expressed by the individuals in this book (or the individuals on the cover) do not necessarily reflect the views shared by the companies they are employed by (or the companies mentioned in this book). The employment status and affiliations of authors with the companies referenced are subject to change. For customer service inquiries, please West.customer.service@thomson.com. If you are interested in purchasing the book this chapter was originally included in, please visit
3 The Evolution of Law Surrounding Same-Sex Marriage in the United States Jennifer Lazor Partner Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP
4 By Jennifer Lazor Introduction This chapter will focus on the evolution of law addressing same-sex marriage with particular emphasis on the recent Supreme Court decisions. The chapter further underscores developing areas of law related to samesex relationships. State vs. Federal Law In appropriate proximity to the July 4 th holiday, the debate around same-sex marriage unfolded in the storied context of state sovereignty versus the reach of the federal government into the private lives of its citizens. This typically American tug-of-war has been the backstory for many of our nation s foundational legal debates including slavery, abortion, and now, same-sex marriage. More specifically, on June 26, 2013, two Supreme Court decisions offered, if not an all-encompassing resolution of the same-sex marriage issue in the United States, a very clear indicator of what is to come. Those decisions are: U.S. v. Windsor 1 and Hollingsworth v. Perry. 2 An overview of the relevant law leading up to those decisions illustrates the interplay between federal and state governments over the issue of same-sex marriage. The autonomy of individual states to regulate marriage and domestic relations occurring within their borders was unchallenged even by our founding fathers in adopting the Constitution. 3 Over the years, this autonomy has been tempered with the need to protect the constitutional rights of citizens, such as with interracial marriage in Loving v. Virginia. 4 In 1996, Congress enacted the since-controverted Defense of Marriage Act 1 U.S. V. Windsor, 133 S. Ct (2013) (involving a same-sex marriage recognized in New York but not by the IRS for purposes of an estate tax exemption). 2 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 130 S. Ct. 705 (2013) (involving a constitutional challenge to California s Proposition 8 legislation, which banned same-sex marriage in that state). 3 Haddock v. Haddock, 201 U.S. 562, 575 (1906) (noting that the Constitution delegated no authority to the Government of the United States on the subject of marriage and divorce. ); see also In re Burrus, 136 U.S. 586, (1890) ( The whole subject of domestic relations of husband and wife, parent and child, belongs to the law of the States and not the laws of the United States. ) Both of these precedents were cited in the majority opinion to U.S. v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967).
5 The Evolution of Law Surrounding Same-Sex Marriage in the United States (DOMA). 5 In relevant part, DOMA essentially does two things. In Section 2 it recognizes the individual rights of the states to regulate same-sex marriages (it does so by asserting essentially that no state shall be forced to recognize such a marriage). In Section 3, DOMA declares that for purposes of federal legislation a marriage shall be defined exclusively as a legal union between one man and one woman. Accordingly, the scenario that began to emerge as certain states accepted same-sex marriage was one where the same-sex marriage was recognized for state law purposes but not federal. This was the issue central to U.S. v. Windsor, wherein the IRS s refusal to apply a federal inheritance tax exemption to a same-sex spouse in a marriage recognized by the state of New York resulted in a $363,053 tax liability for the surviving spouse. U.S. v. Windsor Prior to the recent Supreme Court decisions, twelve states and Washington, DC recognized same-sex marriages. Those twelve states are: Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, Washington, Maine, Maryland, Delaware, Minnesota, Rhode Island, and New York. Although afforded the same rights as opposite-sex married couples for state purposes, parties to a same-sex marriage were not treated as married under federal law. As emphasized at several junctures within the majority opinion of US v. Windsor, this exclusion had far-reaching impact into over 1,000 areas of federal law. It meant that same-sex couples were treated differently than married heterosexuals in areas of the law, including but not limited to: tax, trusts and estates, immigration law, employee benefits, social security benefits including Medicare and Medicaid allocations, property law, and even federally funded education loans and grants. It bears mention as well that at present, six states recognize some form of domestic partnership and/or civil union status for same-sex couples: Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Nevada, and Oregon. 6 In these states, domestic partnerships and civil unions generally are marriage-like statuses conveyed to same-sex couples. Typically, participating states 5 28 U.S.C. 1738c (West). 6 National Congress of State Legislatures, Defining Marriage: Defense of Marriage Acts and Same-Sex Marriage Laws (Jun. 26, 2013); human-services/same-sex-marriage-overview.aspx.
6 By Jennifer Lazor convey with this status certain or all of the same rights afforded to married couples (short of actually permitting marriage) as permitted within the state. However, the recognition extended to parties of a civil union or domestic partnership for purposes of state law did not (and does not today) carry over into federal law. As a practical matter, for the family law practitioners, this dichotomous treatment of same-sex couples for state versus federal purposes presents a thorny divide. Agreements and orders obtained on behalf of clients on the state level may have completely different and even unintended ramifications on the federal level. In addition, if a same-sex couple relocated to a different state that did not recognize same-sex marriage, domestic partnerships or civil unions, still another set of ramifications could await the couple. Given these variables, the practice of family law involving same-sex couples becomes a multi-disciplinary exercise (with the attendant financial toll of multifaceted legal representation). It is against this backdrop that the Windsor and Hollingsworth decisions came down. In U.S. v. Windsor, the Supreme Court found that application of DOMA to preclude the inheritance tax exemption was unconstitutional. In fact, the high court invalidated DOMA as for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity. 7 However, the issue that the Court did not address was whether states could still ban marriage based on a same-sex relationship. In other words, even after U.S. v. Windsor, there remains the issue of whether it is constitutional for a state to enact law that prevents people of the same sex from being married. Accordingly, we appear to have now entered a phase in the evolution of law addressing same-sex marriage where residents of Washington, DC, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, Washington, Maine, Maryland, Delaware, Minnesota, Rhode Island, and New York (and now, as discussed below, California), who have entered into same-sex marriage, are afforded equal recognition as married under both state and federal law. However, what about the same-sex couples in the remaining states where same-sex marriage is not permitted under the law of that state? 7 See, supra n. 1.
7 The Evolution of Law Surrounding Same-Sex Marriage in the United States Hollingsworth v. Perry The ability of states to continue to exclude same-sex marriages was the subject of Hollingsworth v. Perry, which addressed constitutional challenges to California s Proposition 8, a law that excluded same-sex marriages. However, due to the facts and circumstances of the Hollingsworth matter, the ultimate constitutionality of a state law barring same-sex marriages was not decided. In barest terms the facts are as follows: The California State Supreme Court had determined Proposition 8 to be unconstitutional and the California legislature opted not to challenge that determination. The petitioner in the US Supreme Court case was the contingent of individuals who supported Proposition 8 and were the legislation s initial proponents. The Supreme Court determined that they did not have standing to challenge the California Supreme Court s and legislature s positions regarding the invalidation of Proposition 8. Accordingly, to date there is no restriction on the authority of individual states to enact or maintain laws that preclude same-sex marriages. Therefore, residents of the other states where same-sex marriages are not recognized still linger in the same statebut-not-federally-recognized status addressed above. Thus the charge of family law practitioners and other advocates is to ensure that their clients receive proper advice on the ramifications of their agreements and court orders, not only from a state perspective, but also from the often disparate perspective of federal law. It is foreseeable too that over the upcoming years, state and federal courts will continue to entertain lawsuits challenging the ultimate constitutionality of state prohibitions on same-sex marriages. Strategies for Successfully Representing Same-Sex Couples Assuming that right of same-sex couples to be deemed married throughout every state and by extension of the Windsor decision, federally, then the focus becomes: What does that marriage look like? It flows logically in many respects that upon marriage the identity of the couple evolves to include identification as a more extensive family, inclusive of children. For biological reasons alone, the issue of bringing children into a same-sex marriage is not the generally straightforward rite of passage enjoyed by heterosexual couples. As a result of these circumstances, there may be an increasing reliance on surrogacy and artificial insemination for same-sex couples to have children.
8 By Jennifer Lazor There are two types of surrogate relationships. In the traditional sense, surrogacy involves the fertilization of a female surrogate s own egg through artificial insemination using the sperm of a male donor. Accordingly, the surrogate bears a biological relationship to the child, as does the donor. The other type of surrogacy is gestational. There, a fertilized ovum is implanted into a carrier. The ovum is not that of the carrier so that the carrier has no biological relationship to the child. Gestational carriers, therefore, are actually a subset of surrogates. Although individuals may debate the appropriateness of these alternative methods of reproduction, such methods do appear to be on the rise. One study cites to 260 surrogate births in the United States in 2006, compared to an estimated 1,000 in Some sources dismiss that rate of increase as conservative because it does not include all clinics, private surrogacy agreements made outside of an agency/clinic, or couples who do not provide their own egg, such as with gay male couples. 9 The challenge to family law practitioners in handling matters involving same-sex couples availing themselves to alternative means of reproduction is evident in the varying scenarios presented in such arrangements: Does the state even recognize the surrogacy relationship and resulting contract as legal? There is no uniformity on this issue among the states. For example, New Jersey permits surrogacy contracts but limits the compensation permitted to surrogates essentially to direct reimbursement of pregnancy and legal expenses. Furthermore, in New Jersey although surrogacy contracts are permitted within this context, New Jersey courts have not required strict performance of the contracts when a contest arises. This was most evident in the so-called Baby M case where a surrogate was given certain visitation rights to the child born of the surrogacy relationship. 10 Other states do not even permit surrogacy contracts whereas still other states not only recognize such contracts but also permit compensation to the surrogate above reimbursement costs. 8 Lorraine Ali & Raina Kelly, The Curious Lives of Surrogates, NEWSWEEK, Apr. 7, 2008, at Id. 10 Matter of Baby M, 537 A.2d (1988).
9 The Evolution of Law Surrounding Same-Sex Marriage in the United States Is there going to be a biological relationship between one of the members of the couple to the child, whether as the surrogate or sperm donor? If so, what are the custodial rights to the child of the member of the couple without a biological relationship to the child? This question can (and should) be asked from perspectives that assume the couple remains intact and assume the relationship does not endure. Is it necessary for the couple to adopt a child born of alternative reproduction methods even if there is a biological relationship on the part of one member? If so, does the state in which the couple resides permit same-sex couples to adopt? Different states treat these issues differently. Moreover, these questions are really just threshold inquiries into deeper areas of investigation. Perhaps the next frontier beyond forming a same-sex marriage will be striving toward nationwide uniformity in establishing the manner in which same-sex couples will build a family. Conclusion Perhaps the best advice for lawyers in dealing with these complicated issues is simply to pay attention to the world around you and ask for help when you need it. In such an ever-changing arena, representing same-sex couples entails a dedication to keeping abreast of new developments in the law. Also, given the tax, estate, and other legal implications these couples face due to the continuing lack of parity between state and federal law, there has to be communication between attorneys in different areas of the law to ensure the client is well protected. Key Takeaways Stay updated on all developments in the issue of states and the federal government recognizing or not recognizing same-sex marriages. After the decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry, the constitutionality of state law barring same-sex marriages has not been overturned. At this point, there is no restriction on the authority of individual states to enact or maintain laws that
10 By Jennifer Lazor preclude same-sex marriages. This puts same-sex marriages in uncertain legal territory, and increases the responsibility of family law practitioners to make sure their clients are educated and advised on the ramifications of their agreements and court orders. They cannot concentrate on just the state perspective, but also the conflicting and disparate federal perspective. Beware of the federal implications to same-sex couples in areas including: tax, trusts and estates, immigration law, employee benefits, social security benefits including Medicare and Medicaid allocations, property law, and even federally funded education loans and grants. In states that do not recognize same-sex marriages there may be inconsistencies on how your client will be treated within the state and federally. Also, given the newness of the recent Supreme Court decisions, the task of affording uniformity to federal laws for samesex couples even within states that recognize same-sex marriage is still a work-in-progress. Therefore, attorneys must employ diligence in ensuring their client receives the protection of the law to which the client is now entitled. Prepare your clients considering surrogacy to face the possible challenges and scenarios. Establish threshold information such as: Is the surrogacy relationship and contract legal in your state? Will a biological relationship exist between one of the parents and the child, either as surrogate or sperm donor? What custodial rights does the parent without a biological relationship have to the child? What difficulties need to be prepared for if the couple separates? Will adoption be necessary even if one parent has a biological relationship to the child born of surrogacy? Does your state permit same-sex couples to adopt? Pay attention to developments in this practice area and do not be afraid to ask for help. Remember that issues relating to same-sex couples are constantly changing and it is incumbent on lawyers in this area to stay educated and aware of the latest cases and decisions. Keep communication with other lawyers in this area a top priority.
11 The Evolution of Law Surrounding Same-Sex Marriage in the United States Jennifer Lazor is a partner in Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP s Family Law Group. Prior to joining the firm, she clerked for the Honorable Edward J. Ryan, Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Middlesex County. Following her clerkship, Ms. Lazor has devoted her practice exclusively to family law, including extensive experience in divorce/dissolution matters; family law appeals; custody and parenting time disputes; domestic violence matters; marital, premarital, separation, and cohabitation agreements; and other family law-related matters. Ms. Lazor is certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a matrimonial law attorney, and is a qualified family law mediator pursuant to R. 1:40. She has been a member of the New Jersey Supreme Court Family Practice Committee since 2009, and she serves that committee further as co-chair of the Non-Dissolution/Domestic Violence Subcommittee. Ms. Lazor also serves as a member of the New Jersey Supreme Court District XA Ethics Committee. She is an associate managing editor of the New Jersey Family Lawyer, a publication of the New Jersey State Bar Association, of which Ms. Lazor is also a member. She also sits as an early settlement panelist in Morris, Essex and Hudson Counties, which is an in-court mediation program for family law matters. Ms. Lazor formerly was a co-director of Women's Leadership Subcommittee for the New Jersey Women Lawyers Association ( ). Ms. Lazor graduated from Lafayette College with a BA in history with honors and obtained her JD from Rutgers School of Law Newark.
12 Aspatore Books, a Thomson Reuters business, exclusively publishes C-Level executives and partners from the world's most respected companies and law firms. Each publication provides professionals of all levels with proven business and legal intelligence from industry insiders direct and unfiltered insight from those who know it best. Aspatore Books is committed to publishing an innovative line of business and legal titles that lay forth principles and offer insights that can have a direct financial impact on the reader's business objectives. Each chapter in the Inside the Minds series offers thought leadership and expert analysis on an industry, profession, or topic, providing a futureoriented perspective and proven strategies for success. Each author has been selected based on their experience and C-Level standing within the business and legal communities. Inside the Minds was conceived to give a first-hand look into the leading minds of top business executives and lawyers worldwide, presenting an unprecedented collection of views on various industries and professions.
13
Supreme Court Strikes Down DOMA, Clears Way for Same-Sex Marriage in California
Brought to you by Alamo Insurance Group Supreme Court Strikes Down DOMA, Clears Way for Same-Sex On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court announced decisions in two significant cases regarding laws affecting
More informationU.S. Supreme Court Decisions Relating to Same-Sex Marriage
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMORANDUM U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Relating to Same-Sex Marriage Hollingsworth v. Perry challenged California s Proposition 8, the state s constitutional
More informationMarriage Equality Relationships in the States
Marriage Equality Relationships in the States January 7, 2015 The legal recognition of same-sex relationships has been a divisive issue across the United States, particularly during the past two decades.
More informationMARRIAGE RIGHTS I N I L L I N O I S
MARRIAGE RIGHTS I N I L L I N O I S FOREWORD At Equality Illinois, we work to promote a fair and unified Illinois where everyone is treated equally with dignity and respect and where all people live freely
More informationThe Overturn of DOMA and its Impact on Financial Planning
The Overturn of DOMA and its Impact on Financial Planning In 1996, President Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as being the union between one man and one woman.
More informationExpert Analysis Same-Sex Marriages and Benefit Plans After Windsor
Westlaw Journal Employment Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 28, issue 2 / august 28, 2013 Expert Analysis Same-Sex Marriages and Benefit Plans After Windsor
More informationPLANNING FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE POST-DOMA RULING
PLANNING FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE POST-DOMA RULING Understand and start planning for IRS and other agency changes. KEY TAKEAWAYS Supreme Court decision struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act
More informationPlanning Update for Married Same-Sex Couples
Client Alert August 2013 Planning Update for Married Same-Sex Couples On June 26, 2013, in Windsor v. U.S., the United States Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was
More informationEstate Planning for California Same-Sex Couples. Trisha A. Vicario & Chelsea J. Hopkins
Estate Planning for California Same-Sex Couples Trisha A. Vicario & Chelsea J. Hopkins Legal Recognition for Same-Sex Couples Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) In 1996, the United States Congress enacted
More informationPOLITICAL AND CIVIL STATUS OF WOMEN
2 POLITICAL AND CIVIL STATUS OF WOMEN as of January 1, 1953 Political Status Nationality Citizenship in the United States is acquired in the same way by men and women; that is, by birth within the domain,
More informationDomestic Partner Benefits
Domestic Partner Benefits A majority of the nation s largest corporations provide health insurance coverage for domestic partners of their employees 1. Regardless of the size of the business, the trend
More information7 FAM 200 APPENDIX D IDENTIFYING NEXT OF KIN OR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
7 FAM 200 APPENDIX D IDENTIFYING NEXT OF KIN OR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE (CT:CON-484; 09-13-2013) (Office of Origin: CA/OCS/L) 7 FAM 210 APPENDIX D INTRODUCTION (CT:CON-484; 09-13-2013) a. The term next of
More informationGestational Surrogacy in Maryland Alive and Well after Roberto d.b
In the September 2007 issue of Family Law News we published an article that analyzed the Court of Appeals ruling on gestational surrogacy in Roberto d.b. That article is printed for you again, this time
More informationThis case challenged the constitutionality of California s Proposition 8.
BRIEFING JUNE 2013 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ISSUES RULINGS ON DOMA AND PROPOSITION 8 CASES On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued decisions in two cases affecting the legal definition
More information1. Whether, for Federal tax purposes, the terms spouse, husband and wife,
Rev. Rul. 2013-17 ISSUES 1. Whether, for Federal tax purposes, the terms spouse, husband and wife, husband, and wife include an individual married to a person of the same sex, if the individuals are lawfully
More informationErica@ambler-keenan.com www.ambler-keenan.com
Civil Unions and Estate Planning after DOMA Ruling Erica Johnson, Esq. Ambler & Keenan, LLC 950 S. Cherry St. Suite 1650 Denver, CO 80246 303-321-1267 Erica@ambler-keenan.com www.ambler-keenan.com B.S.
More informationThe Colorado Lawyer, July 2013, Vol. 42, No. 7 [Page 91]
The Colorado Lawyer, July 2013, Vol. 42, No. 7 [Page 91] 2013 The Colorado Lawyer and Colorado Bar Association. All Rights Reserved. Articles Family Law Colorado Civil Union Act by Angela Forss Schmit,
More informationSurrogacy and Employment Law: When it s not your pregnancy is it your leave of absence? The UK position
ABA Section of Family Law 2012 Fall CLE Conference Philadelphia, October 2012 Surrogacy and Employment Law: When it s not your pregnancy is it your leave of absence? The UK position Colin Rogerson Solicitor
More informationLegal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships
Name of Country and Jurisdiction: California, United States. What forms of legally recognized relationships are available? 2. What are the requirements to be able to enter into the above relationships?
More informationCIVIL UNIONS & ESTATE PLANNING AFTER THE DOMA RULING
CIVIL UNIONS & ESTATE PLANNING AFTER THE DOMA RULING ERICA L. JOHNSON 950 South Cherry Street, Suite 1650 Denver, Colorado 80246 303-407-1542 www.ambler-keenan.com ESTATE PLANNING PROBATE TRUST ADMINISTRATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Lake James H. Perriguey, OSB No. 983213 lake@law-works.com LAW WORKS LLC 1906 SW Madison Street Portland, OR 97205-1718 Telephone: (503) 227-1928 Facsimile: (503) 334-2340 Lea Ann Easton, OSB No. 881413
More informationMARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES IN CALIFORNIA
MARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES IN CALIFORNIA Frequently Asked Questions Last Updated: July 9, 2015 NOTE: This document is intended to provide information for same-sex couples who are considering getting
More informationSAME-SEX ADOPTION LAWS BY STATE
SAME-SEX ADOPTION LAWS BY STATE The issue of adoption by same-sex couples has moved to the forefront in recent years. Liberty Counsel was instrumental in upholding the constitutionality of Florida s ban
More informationAlert. Client PROSKAUER ROSE LLP. Impact of New Jersey s Civil Union Act on the Workplace
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Client Alert Impact of New Jersey s Civil Union Act on the Workplace New Jersey s Governor Corzine recently signed the Civil Union Act ( CUA ) authorizing civil unions between individuals
More informationCAFFA Connection. Second Parent Adoption. By Susan Frances, Esq.
The CAFFA Connection Second Parent Adoption By Susan Frances, Esq. 2012, Vol. 39, No. 2 Second parent adoptions, also known as co-parent adoptions, are adoptions in which the parents are a lesbian or gay
More informationProvided By Touchstone Consulting Group Benefits for Same-sex Couples and Domestic Partners
Provided By Touchstone Consulting Group Benefits for Same-sex Couples and A significant number of U.S. companies provide benefits, such as health insurance coverage, for their employees domestic partners
More informationI. FIGURING OUT YOUR CLIENT S STATUS
REPRESENTING SAME-SEX FAMILIES IN CALIFORNIA AFTER WINDSOR AND PERRY 2014 Deborah H. Wald As published in the Journal of the California Association of Certified Family Law Specialists (ACFLS), Winter 2014,
More informationEstate Planning and Charitable Giving for Same-Sex Couples After United States v. Windsor
Magazine September/October 2014 Vol. 28 No 5 Estate Planning and Charitable Giving for Same-Sex Couples After United States v. Windsor By Ray Prather Ray Prather is a partner in the Chicago, Illinois,
More informationFarzad Family Law Scholarship 2014
Farzad Family Law Scholarship 2014 Should the right to marry for same-sex couples become a federal constitutional right by amendment to the United States Constitution or remain a State issue? The United
More informationParentage, Adoption, and Child Custody
14 Parentage, Adoption, and Child Custody Sheri E. Cohen Hon. Margaret S. Johnson Thomas M. Pinkerton, Jr. Excerpts of the Parentage section only. II. PARENTAGE A. Understanding Parentage Issues in Domestic
More informationTHE IMPACT OF THE NEW ILLINOIS CIVIL UNION LAW
THE IMPACT OF THE NEW ILLINOIS CIVIL UNION LAW Kenny Eathington Husch Blackwell LLP 401 Main St., Suite 1400 Peoria, Illinois 61602 Kenny Eathington is a member of the Real Estate Practice Group in the
More informationLegal Information for Same Sex Couples
Community Legal Information Association of Prince Edward Island, Inc. Legal Information for Same Sex Couples People in same sex relationships often have questions about their rights and the rights of their
More informationTransgender Family Law in the U.S.: A fact sheet for transgender spouses, partners, parents, and youth
Transgender Family Law in the U.S.: A fact sheet for transgender spouses, partners, parents, and youth MARRIAGE, CIVIL UNIONS, AND REGISTERED DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS For transgender people, determining whether
More informationWalking Employees Through the Regulatory Maze Surrounding Same-Sex Domestic Partner Benefits By Todd A. Solomon and Brett R.
Walking Employees Through the Regulatory Maze Surrounding Same-Sex Domestic Partner Benefits By Todd A. Solomon and Brett R. Johnson Todd A. Solomon is a partner in the Employee Benefits Practice Group
More informationA BRIEF SUMMARY OF FAMILY LAW AS IT AFFECTS LGBT (LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDERED) PERSONS IN FLORIDA
A BRIEF SUMMARY OF FAMILY LAW AS IT AFFECTS LGBT (LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDERED) PERSONS IN FLORIDA By Michael E. Morris, Attorney at Law Updated January 2013 First, this is a summary of some
More informationStrategies for Trusts and Estates in New York Leading Lawyers on Analyzing Recent Developments and Navigating the Estate Planning Process in New York
I N S I D E T H E M I N D S Strategies for Trusts and Estates in New York Leading Lawyers on Analyzing Recent Developments and Navigating the Estate Planning Process in New York 2014 EDITION 2014 Thomson
More informationDOMA- Introduction to the Federal Tax Issues of Legally Married Same Sex Couples after the Windsor Supreme Court Case Decision
DOMA- Introduction to the Federal Tax Issues of Legally Married Same Sex Couples after the Windsor Supreme Court Case Decision Speakers Paul La Monaca, MST, CPA, Director of Education, National Society
More informationLGBT PARENTING ISSUES
LGBT PARENTING ISSUES Presented by: Joan M. Burda Attorney at Law 2035 Elmwood Avenue Lakewood, OH 44107-5816 216.832.8825 jmburda@mac.com www.lgbtlaw.com I. INTRODUCTION In a 2011 review of the 2010 Census
More informationA Legal Overview of the Nordic Countries! Senior Advisor Salla Silvola! Ministry of Justice, Finland!!
A Legal Overview of the Nordic Countries! Senior Advisor Salla Silvola! Ministry of Justice, Finland!! 1 Structure of presentation! 1. Overview of current domestic legislation in the Nordic countries on
More informationParent or not? Civil unions and parentage in Illinois. By Carl W. Gilmore Woodstock Legal Consultants Woodstock, Illinois.
Parent or not? Civil unions and parentage in Illinois By Carl W. Gilmore Woodstock Legal Consultants Woodstock, Illinois. The Religious Freedom and Civil Union Act is the second time in six years Illinois
More informationProtecting Parent-Child Relationships: Determining Parental Rights of Same-Sex Parents Consistently Despite Varying Recognition of their Relationship
Protecting Parent-Child Relationships: Determining Parental Rights of Same-Sex Parents Consistently Despite Varying Recognition of their Relationship LINDA S. ANDERSON * I. INTRODUCTION Imagine a child
More informationWho May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption?
State Statutes Series Current Through February 2006 Who May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption? In order for an adoption to take place, a person available to be adopted must be placed in
More informationNEW JERSEY FAMILY COLLABORATIVE LAW ACT. An Act concerning family collaborative law and supplementing Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes.
NEW JERSEY FAMILY COLLABORATIVE LAW ACT An Act concerning family collaborative law and supplementing Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes. Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of
More informationParenthood. for same-sex couples. A guide designed to provide an overview of new parenting laws for lesbian, gay and bisexual people.
Parenthood for same-sex couples A guide designed to provide an overview of new parenting laws for lesbian, gay and bisexual people. Contents one two three four 1. Introduction 01 2. New rights for lesbian
More informationMaterials Provided by Shelley Bishop and Matt Voorhees. Same Sex Marriage & Related Issues in Missouri
Materials Provided by Shelley Bishop and Matt Voorhees Same Sex Marriage & Related Issues in Missouri Program Description: A survey of the status of the law, same sex dissolution and custody issues, the
More informationSame-Sex Spouses, Partners and Adult Adoptions:
Same-Sex Spouses, Partners and Adult Adoptions: Trust Administration Issues Presented by Beneficiary Relationships ABA Fall 2010 Joint CLE Meeting Section of Taxation and Trust and Estate Law Division
More informationCHAPTER 50. C.2A:23D-1 Short title. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the New Jersey Family Collaborative Law Act.
CHAPTER 50 AN ACT concerning family collaborative law and supplementing Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: C.2A:23D-1 Short
More informationDomestic Partner Benefits: Facts and Background (for a more recent version see February 2009 Facts from EBRI)
March 2004 Domestic Partner Benefits: Facts and Background (for a more recent version see February 2009 Facts from EBRI) g What is a domestic partnership and what proof of the relationship is required?
More informationShari A. Levitan. Boston T 617.854.1405 F 617.523.6850 shari.levitan@hklaw.com
Shari A. Levitan Partner Boston T 617.854.1405 F 617.523.6850 shari.levitan@hklaw.com Related Practices: Wealth Planning and Preservation Private Companies Private Wealth Services Trusts, Estates and Fiduciary
More informationnewsletter Estate Planning Opportunities in a World Without DOMA
newsletter July 2013 in this issue A report for clients and friends of the firm. Estate Planning Opportunities in a World Without DOMA... 1 Edited by Henry J. Leibowitz Contributor: George D. Karibjanian
More informationThe Court Has Spoken: Case Law Update
The Court Has Spoken: Case Law Update Texas Case Law Mara Flanagan Friesen Deputy Director for Child Support Texas Office of the Attorney General The Office of the Attorney General of Texas v. Scholer,
More informationMany states have passed laws to improve education outcomes for children in foster care. Innovative approaches include:
The federal Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 (Fostering Connections) promotes education stability for all children in foster care. A May 2014 joint letter from the
More information1 copyright 2012 workers compensation research institute
Fees For Worker's Source Of Payments To Worker's Worker's Fee Worker's Fee Formula Alabama Statutory formula: 15% N/A Alaska As stated, 25% of first $1,000 and 10% of 10% of recovery or actual fees, Paid
More informationCase 6:15-bk-16988-SY Doc 27 Filed 10/21/15 Entered 10/21/15 13:59:46 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
Case :-bk--sy Doc Filed 0// Entered 0// :: Desc Main Document Page of FOR PUBLICATION FILED & ENTERED OCT 0 CLERK U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT Central District of California BY jeanmari DEPUTY CLERK 0 UNITED
More informationThis is a publication of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. FAQ Same-sex marriage 2010
This is a publication of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs FAQ Same-sex marriage 2010 1 1. Same-sex marriage 2. Alternative types of partnership 3. Conversion 4. Recognition abroad 5. Non-Dutch
More informationCase 2:13-cv-00217-RJS Document 16 Filed 08/12/13 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:13-cv-00217-RJS Document 16 Filed 08/12/13 Page 1 of 14 PHILIP S. LOTT (5750) STANFORD E. PURSER (13440) Assistant Utah Attorneys General JOHN E. SWALLOW (5802) Utah Attorney General 160 East 300
More informationSummary of Laws Regarding International Adoptions Finalized Abroad 50 States and 6 U.S. Territories
Summary of Laws Regarding International Adoptions Finalized Abroad 50 States and 6 U.S. Territories (7/01) Effect of Foreign Adoption Decree Twenty-five States and one territory (Commonwealth of the Northern
More informationAttorneys and Counselors at Law
GIBBS LAW FIRM, P.A. 5666 SEMINOLE BOULEVARD, SUITE TWO TELEPHONE: (727) 399-8300 SEMINOLE, FLORIDA 33772 FACSIMILE: (727) 398-3907 January 4, 2011 VIA EMAIL wvff@wvfamily.org Mr. Kevin McCoy West Virginia
More informationImportant Plan Document Amendments Please Review with Your Legal Advisor and Retain with your Plan Records
Subject: Important Plan Document Amendments Please Review with Your Legal Advisor and Retain with your Plan Records Dear Retirement Plan Sponsor: Enclosed please find two amendments provided by Thompson
More informationPrather Ebner LLP. Legal Guidance for Life
Legal Guidance for Life Ray Prather ray@pratherebner.com / Dan Ebner dan@pratherebner.com / Landon Perkinson landon@pratherebner.com The Monadnock Building, 53 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1025, Chicago,
More informationNonprofit Mergers. Question by: Deb Ulmanis. Date: 6 August 2010. Does your state statutes permit nonprofits to merge?
Topic: Nonprofit Mergers Question by: Deb Ulmanis Jurisdiction: New Hampshire Date: 6 August 2010 Jurisdiction Question(s) Does your state statutes permit nonprofits to merge? Can nonprofits only merge
More informationMommy (and Daddy) Dearest Determining Parental Rights and Enforceability of Surrogacy Agreements
HON. WILLIAM J. GIACOMO is a Justice of the Supreme Court, 9th Judicial District, and an Adjunct Professor at Pace University. He received his B.S. from Boston College and his J.D. from Pace University
More informationTax Credit to Offset Cost of Health Insurance
640 Superior Court - Medford, OR 97504 Ph. 541-773-6633 May 18, 2010 Tax Credit to Offset Cost of Health Insurance Calculating the Small Employer Health Insurance Tax Credit for 2010 Type of Clients: Small
More informationTo Wed or Not to Wed By barbara findlay, Q.C.
To Wed or Not to Wed By barbara findlay, Q.C. Do you know what it means to be married (legally speaking, that is)? What are the differences in rights and responsibilities between two people living together
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FROM COUPLES WHO ARE CONSIDERING GETTING MARRIED IN SAN FRANCISCO
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FROM COUPLES WHO ARE CONSIDERING GETTING MARRIED IN SAN FRANCISCO On February 12, 2004, the county clerk in San Francisco began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples,
More informationAdapting Estate Planning Strategies to Meet Client Needs and a Changing Legal
Adapting Estate Planning Strategies to Meet Client Needs and a Changing Legal and Political Landscape Daniel S. Rubin Partner Moses & Singer LLP Introduction The past year has been a year of significant
More informationASSOCIATES, LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W
Lynch Legal ASSOCIATES, LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W www.lynchlegal.com Lynch Legal ASSOCIATES, LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W www.lynchlegal.com Contents About the Firm 1 Practice Areas 2-5 Attorney
More informationMuch Has Changed in Surrogate Pregnancies
Much Has Changed in Surrogate Pregnancies Robin Layton/Associated Press Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick, with son, James, and daughters Marion, left, and Tabitha, born through surrogacy. By
More informationGENERAL SCHEME OF A CHILDREN AND FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS BILL 2014 ARRANGEMENT OF HEADS PART 1. Preliminary and General PART 2
GENERAL SCHEME OF A CHILDREN AND FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS BILL 2014 ARRANGEMENT OF HEADS PART 1 Preliminary and General Head 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Repeals. 4. Expenses. PART
More informationThresholds for Coverage under State Employment Laws
Thresholds for Coverage under State Employment Laws January 2014 Coverage under various federal and state labor laws is generally determined by the number of individuals a company employs. As such, not
More informationWealth management for LGBT couples
Wealth management for LGBT couples Creating a financial strategy for you and your partner Whether you and your partner are legally married or not, implementing a sound strategy, with the proper documentation
More informationDivorce for Same-Sex Couples Who Live in Non-Recognition States: A Guide For Attorneys
Divorce for Same-Sex Couples Who Live in Non-Recognition States: A Guide For Attorneys BACKGROUND A growing number of states recognize marriages between same-sex spouses, or comprehensive registered domestic
More informationWilliam & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 1994 A Rejoinder Larry I. Palmer William & Mary Law School Repository Citation
More informationLife insurance and property issues on marriage breakdown
Life insurance and property issues on marriage breakdown Estate plans that include life insurance can be significantly impacted as a result of marriage breakdown. Life insurance that has been put in place
More informationSupplementary Submission to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. Same-Sex: Same Entitlements
Supplementary Submission to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Same-Sex: Same Entitlements Australian Lawyers for Human Rights Inc (ALHR) is a national network of Australian lawyers active
More informationIMPORTANT TAX DISCLAIMERS
The Supreme Court victory in United States v. Windsor striking down the discriminatory federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) affirms that all loving and committed couples who are married deserve equal
More informationIn Brief. Contraception Counts: Ranking State Efforts
In Brief 2006 Series, No. 1 Contraception Counts: ing Efforts Unintended pregnancy is a major public health and social problem in the United s. Of the six million pregnancies that occur among American
More information2014 Group Benefits Employer Markets Legislative Notice
2014 Group Benefits Employer Markets Legislative Notice Employee Version Note: The purpose of this Notice is to provide an overview of new laws primarily passed in 2014 that may impact your insurance policy.
More informationSeparation, Divorce and Marriage Equality
Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders 30 Winter Street, Suite 800 Boston, MA 02108 Phone: 617.426.1350 or 800.455.GLAD Fax: 617.426.3594 Website: www.glad.org Separation, Divorce and Marriage Equality Note:
More informationGay Marriage. but it is hard to make a decision whether gay marriage should be legal. There are
Gay Marriage In many countries around the world have talked about gay marriage a long time, but it is hard to make a decision whether gay marriage should be legal. There are some reasons why some people
More informationSame-sex Couples Consistency in Reports of Marital Status. Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division
Same-sex Couples Consistency in Reports of Marital Status Author: Affiliation: Daphne Lofquist U.S. Census Bureau Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division Phone: 301-763-2416 Fax: 301-457-3500
More informationWHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ADOPTION A NEW JERSEY STATE BAR FOUNDATION PUBLICATION
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ADOPTION A NEW JERSEY STATE BAR FOUNDATION PUBLICATION Toby Solomon, a family law practitioner specializing in family law, provided the legal information contained in this brochure.
More informationWhat is Marriage? Traditional Union. Legal Partnership. woven couple protect/provide for mother and children health of individuals (sexual)
John C. Hoelle, Esq. Disclaimer: This presentation does not represent legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. The views here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Carrigan Law, LLC.
More informationBOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW. Family Law, JD 814 A1. Professor McClain Date: April 28, 2011
BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Family Law, JD 814 A1 Exam #: Professor McClain Date: April 28, 2011 Format: Open-Book Time: 3 hours INSTRUCTIONS: 1. This is an open-book exam. You may use the casebook,
More informationLiability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02)
Liability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02) This memorandum addresses the California and federal law protections that exist to shield volunteer directors of nonprofit corporations
More informationA PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION. HEALTH INSURANCE FOR ADOPTED CHILDREN by Mark McDermott, J.D. with Elisa Rosman, Ph.D.
Adoption Advocate NICOLE FICERE CALLAHAN, EDITOR CHUCK JOHNSON, EDITOR NO. 19 DECEMBER 2009 A PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION HEALTH INSURANCE FOR ADOPTED CHILDREN by Mark McDermott, J.D.
More informationImpacts of Sequestration on the States
Impacts of Sequestration on the States Alabama Alabama will lose about $230,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Alabama could lose up to $102,000 in funds
More informationTax time and preserving
Tax time and preserving your federal rights Contact GLAD s Legal InfoLine for the most accurate, up-to-date information: www.glad.org/rights 800-455-GLAD Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders This document
More informationManagement Alert. California Supreme Court Approves Same-Sex Marriage & Bush Signs Genetic Information Act
California Supreme Court Approves Same-Sex Marriage & Bush Signs Genetic Information Act A recent California Supreme Court decision to recognize same-sex marriages and recent federal legislation banning
More informationDOMA: What s Your Action Plan? July 25, 2013
DOMA: What s Your Action Plan? July 25, 2013 Presented By: Mark S. Thomas, Partner, Williams Mullen D. Earl Baggett, Partner, Williams Mullen Brydon M. DeWitt, Partner, Williams Mullen Today s Presenters
More informationIssues INSIGHTS AND. Why Trusts Still Matter: The Brave New World of Estate Planning
Issues AND INSIGHTS September 2013 Why Trusts Still Matter: The Brave New World of Estate Planning IN THIS ARTICLE Planning for same-sex couples after the passage of DOMA Understanding inheritance rights
More informationCALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM BILL ANALYSIS. Assembly Bill 205 Assembly Member Goldberg (As amended 3/25/03)
CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM BILL ANALYSIS Assembly Bill 205 Assembly Member Goldberg (As amended 3/25/03) Position Proponents: Opponents: Support California Alliance for Pride and Equality
More informationNEW JERSEY LAW REVISION COMMISSION. Final Report. Relating to. Civil Unions March 19, 2015
NEW JERSEY LAW REVISION COMMISSION Final Report Relating to Civil Unions March 19, 2015 The work of the New Jersey Law Revision Commission is only a recommendation until enacted. Please consult the New
More informationIncome, Estate & Gift Tax Impact of the Supreme Court s Decision in the Windsor Case
Income, Estate & Gift Tax Impact of the Supreme Court s Decision in the Windsor Case 37 th Annual Federal and State Tax Institutes December 2, 3 & 4, 2013 Presented by Jordon N. Rosen, CPA, AEP Director,
More informationInternational family law
Editor: Judge Alexandra Harland SURROGACY IN CALIFORNIA A PRIMER FOR AUSTRALIAN PRACTITIONERS As opportunities for creating families have expanded with the advancement of assisted reproductive technology
More informationOGALLA Oregon Gay and Lesbian Legal Association
THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF REGISTERED DOMESTIC PARTNERS IN OREGON Introduction If you are in a committed same-sex relationship in Oregon, it may be important for you to register with the state as domestic partners.
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Washington, DC 20580 Washington, DC 20530. September 20, 1996
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Washington, DC 20580 Washington, DC 20530 September 20, 1996 The Honorable Thomas A. Edmonds Executive Director Virginia State Bar
More informationNOTICE TO THE BAR. /s/ Philip S. Carchman
NOTICE TO THE BAR DIVORCE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ALTERNATIVES TO CONVENTIONAL LITIGATION DESCRIPTIVE MATERIAL REQUIRED BY RULE 5:4-2(h); CERTIFICATION FORMS As part of the July 27 rule amendments that went
More informationCLINICAL PRIVILEGE WHITE PAPER Psychology
Psychology CLINICAL PRIVILEGE WHITE PAPER Psychology Background Psychology is a broad field that includes the scientific study of mental processes and behavior. It is similar to the medical field of psychiatry.
More informationIntestate Inheritance Rights for Adopted Persons
STATE STATUTES Current Through April 2012 Intestate Inheritance Rights for Adopted Persons Leaving a will is the best way to ensure that heirs or descendants may inherit from your estate. Issues of property
More information