EVOLVING LAW AFFECTING SAME-SEX COUPLES AND THE RIGHT TO MARRY

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "EVOLVING LAW AFFECTING SAME-SEX COUPLES AND THE RIGHT TO MARRY"

Transcription

1 EVOLVING LAW AFFECTING SAME-SEX COUPLES AND THE RIGHT TO MARRY Sponsor: Young Lawyers Division and Family Law Section CLE Credit: 1.0 Thursday, June 18, :40 a.m. - 10:40 a.m. Thoroughbred 5-7 Lexington Convention Center Lexington, Kentucky

2 A NOTE CONCERNING THE PROGRAM MATERIALS The materials included in this Kentucky Bar Association Continuing Legal Education handbook are intended to provide current and accurate information about the subject matter covered. No representation or warranty is made concerning the application of the legal or other principles discussed by the instructors to any specific fact situation, nor is any prediction made concerning how any particular judge or jury will interpret or apply such principles. The proper interpretation or application of the principles discussed is a matter for the considered judgment of the individual legal practitioner. The faculty and staff of this Kentucky Bar Association CLE program disclaim liability therefore. Attorneys using these materials, or information otherwise conveyed during the program, in dealing with a specific legal matter have a duty to research original and current sources of authority. Printed by: Evolution Creative Solutions 7107 Shona Drive Cincinnati, Ohio Kentucky Bar Association

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Presenters... i Same-sex Marriage in Kentucky, Sooner or Later?... 1 A Basic Timeline for Same-sex Marriage... 5 Case Summaries... 11

4

5 THE PRESENTERS Dawn R. Elliott Fauver Law Office 1752 Frankfort Avenue Louisville, Kentucky (502) DAWN R. ELLIOTT is an attorney with Fauver Law Office in Louisville and practices in the area of criminal law. She received her B.S. from Hamilton University and her J.D. from the Louis D. Brandeis School of Law at the University of Louisville. Prior to joining the practice of law, Ms. Elliott worked as a paralegal with the Office of the Commonwealth Attorney. She is a member of the Louisville, Kentucky, and American Bar Associations. Shannon R. Fauver Fauver Law Office 1752 Frankfort Avenue Louisville, Kentucky (502) shannon@fauverlaw.com SHANNON R. FAUVER maintains a general practice in Louisville. She is a graduate of Morehead State University and received her J.D. from the Louis D. Brandeis School of Law at the University of Louisville. Prior to going to law school, Ms. Fauver served overseas with the Peace Corps. She is a member of the Louisville, Kentucky, and American Bar Associations, Women Lawyers Association, Louis D. Brandeis American Inns of Court, Kentucky Justice Association, and National Association of Social Security Representatives. i

6 Abby R. Rubenfeld Rubenfeld Law Office, PC 2409 Hillsboro Road, Suite 200 Nashville, Tennessee (615) ABBY R. RUBENFELD maintains a general law practice in Nashville, with an emphasis on family law, sexual orientation and AIDS-related issues. She is also a professor at Vanderbilt Law School teaching Sexual Orientation and the Law. Ms. Rubenfeld received her J.D. from Boston University School of Law and her A.B., with honors, from Princeton University. While at Princeton, she was the first woman elected as class president in more than 225 years of Princeton history. Ms. Rubenfeld currently serves on the board of directors of the ACLU of Tennessee. She has served on the board of directors of the Human Rights Campaign and as Legal Director of Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. Ms. Rubenfeld is a past recipient of the Bill of Rights Award from the ACLU of Tennessee and the Dan Bradley Award from the National Lesbian and Gay Law Association. ii

7 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN KENTUCKY, SOONER OR LATER? Sharon R. Fauver and Dawn R. Elliott The question isn't whether or not same-sex marriage will be legal in Kentucky; the question is when it will be legal in Kentucky. At this point, Kentucky has the opportunity to be a trailblazer with regard to the legalization of same-sex marriage. To date, fifty-five percent of the citizens of Kentucky are covered by Fairness Ordinances, which means they can't be discriminated against for housing or work, amongst other things, based on their sexual orientation, but Kentucky will not allow same-sex marriages for those same citizens. Since the U.S. v. Windsor, 133 S.Ct (2013) ruling, things have changed dramatically in regards to same-sex marriage in the United States. Edie Windsor filed her original case when she was given a $363,000 federal estate tax bill after her partner of forty-four years died. Ms. Windsor and her wife were legally wed in Canada in 2007, as they could not marry in this country at that time due to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). After the case worked its way up to the United States Supreme Court, it was ruled on in June As a basic background, the United States Supreme Court ruled on June 26, 2013, that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional. That section defined a marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The Supreme Court did not rule that same-sex marriage was allowed, as they did not specifically tackle that issue. So, from the date DOMA was signed in 1996 until June 26, 2013, same-sex marriage was specifically not allowed by the Federal government. Between the ruling on DOMA on June 26, 2013, and now, April 12, 2015, thirty-seven states recognize same-sex marriage. (Washington D.C. legalized same-sex marriage on March 3, 2010.) There have been different ways the states have legalized same-sex marriage; some states legalized same-sex marriage by popular vote. After the ruling on Windsor, the Federal government has stated that they will recognize same-sex marriages for Federal purposes, ranging from veterans' benefits to taxes. Over the last two years since the Windsor ruling, there continues to be litigation across the country to try and determine exactly what the implications are for the citizens of each state. For example, in Kentucky a same-sex couple who was married in another state may receive veterans' benefits for their spouse, but cannot file state taxes as a married couple. There are numerous issues and inequities that result from the treatment of same-sex and opposite-sex married couples, some of which can be found in Bourke v. Beshear, 996 F.Supp.2d 542 (W.D. Ky. 2013). That case asks that Kentucky recognize same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions, just as Kentucky recognizes opposite-sex marriages from other jurisdictions. While the Bourke case has received national coverage, it is not the first same-sex marriage case in Kentucky. There may have been others, but the first one that I am aware of is a bankruptcy case filed last year. In that case, a married same-sex couple filed as such in the Bankruptcy Court in Louisville. The ruling in the case was stayed until after the Supreme Court ruling in the Windsor case, as the Supreme Court had granted cert on that case right before the bankruptcy case was filed. In October of this year, the 1

8 bankruptcy court allowed that bankruptcy case to go forward as a joint filing. The joint filing would not be allowed if the Federal government did not state that they would recognize same-sex marriages for Federal purposes. In a 2013 murder trial, the topic of spousal privilege came up, but the judge ruled that the couple was not legally married in a state that allowed it, but instead had a civil union. So, the decision didn't end up directly addressing spousal privilege in same-sex marriage cases in Kentucky. A state court case was filed in Frankfort by a male couple who were previously married in another state. They asked for clarification as to whether or not the county clerks in Kentucky recognize their marriage and when they were informed that they did not, they asked for and were denied a marriage license. Upon that denial of a marriage license, they filed suit. That case is currently pending in Franklin Circuit Court. In Jefferson County Circuit Court a divorce proceeding has been filed for a same-sex couple. That case was ruled on in December As far as we know, it is the only same-sex divorce that has been finalized in Kentucky to date. One of the flukes about the same-sex marriage ban is that the state doesn't recognize same-sex marriages, but it may preclude a same-sex divorce. As of today, the only jurisdiction that allows samesex divorce for non-residents is Washington D.C., but the marriage must have been performed there. In January 2013, two men were arrested for criminal trespassing as they were peacefully resisting instructions to leave when they could not obtain a marriage license. In their trial, they were found guilty, but only fined one cent apiece, which was conditionally discharged. These gentlemen would become two of the Plaintiffs in Love v. Beshear, 89 F.Supp.2d 536 (W.D. Ky. 2014). Along with the Bourke case, a similar case was filed in Frankfort's Federal District Court, Franklin v. Beshear, Case No. 3:13-CV This case was later merged with the Bourke case so that the cases did not run the risk of receiving two inconsistent rulings in the two federal jurisdictions of Kentucky. On February 12, 2014, Judge Heyburn ruled on Bourke. He ruled that the Commonwealth of Kentucky had to recognize valid same-sex marriages performed outside of Kentucky. There was a brief stay issued in that ruling. On February 14, 2014, while the stay was in effect the Love case was filed along with a motion to intervene in the Bourke case. The Love case asked that the state's ban on issuing same-sex marriage licenses be invalidated. The Commonwealth of Kentucky appealed the Bourke case and then once Heyburn ruled on behalf of the Plaintiffs, in the Love case, the State also appealed that ruling. Stays were issued in both cases pending a resolution by the Sixth Circuit. On August 6, 2014, the Bourke and Love cases were heard by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, along with cases from Ohio, Tennessee and Michigan. In November 2014, all four of those cases were ruled on creating a split in the Circuits as every other Circuit had ruled in favor of same-sex marriage up until that time. 2

9 Cert was requested and these cases are presently set to be heard on April 28, 2015, by the United States Supreme Court with a ruling expected in June

10 4

11 A BASIC TIMELINE FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE I. 1920s 1924 The Society for Human Rights in Chicago becomes the country's earliest known gay rights organization. II. 1950s A The Mattachine Society, the first national gay rights organization, is formed by Harry Hay, considered by many to be the founder of the gay rights movement. B The first lesbian-rights organization in the United States, the Daughters of Bilitis, was established in San Francisco in III. 1960s A Illinois becomes the first state in the United States to decriminalize homosexual acts between consenting adults in private. B the Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), case was decided, in which the court said that the government can't regulate whom you marry (in that case in relation to race) as marriage is a fundamental right. C The Stonewall riots transform the gay rights movement from one limited to a small number of activists into a widespread protest for equal rights and acceptance. Patrons of a gay bar in New York's Greenwich Village, the Stonewall Inn, fight back during a police raid on June 27, sparking three days of riots. IV. 1970s V. 1980s A Boulder, Colorado issued six same-sex marriage licenses, before they were halted. One of those married couples, Richard Adams and Tony Sullivan, were the first couple to ask the U.S. Government to recognize their same-sex marriage as Tony is an Australian citizen. Their petition was denied, and Tony is still fighting to stay in the United States legally as a now surviving spouse of a U.S. citizen. B About 75,000 people participated in the National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Washington, D.C., in October. A At the 1980 Democratic National Convention held at New York City's Madison Square Garden, Democrats took a stance supporting gay 5

12 rights, adding the following to their plank: "All groups must be protected from discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, language, age, sex or sexual orientation." B Wisconsin becomes the first state to outlaw discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. C The city of Berkeley, California, becomes the first city to offer its employees domestic-partnership benefits. VI. 1990s A The "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy is instituted for the U.S. military, permitting gays to serve in the military but banning homosexual activity. B In Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996), the Supreme Court strikes down Colorado's Amendment 2, which denied gays and lesbians protections against discrimination, calling them "special rights." According to Justice Anthony Kennedy, "We find nothing special in the protections Amendment 2 withholds. These protections... constitute ordinary civil life in a free society." VII. 2000s A Vermont becomes the first state in the country to legally recognize civil unions between gay or lesbian couples. The law states that these "couples would be entitled to the same benefits, privileges, and responsibilities as spouses." B The Court ruled in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), that the private consensual acts in one's bedroom could not be criminalized (in relation to a sodomy law). C Kentucky passed an amendment that limited marriage to a man and a woman. On May 17, same-sex marriages become legal in Massachusetts. D Civil unions become legal in Connecticut in October. E Civil unions become legal in New Jersey in December. F In November, the House of Representatives approves a bill ensuring equal rights in the workplace for gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals. G In February, a New York State appeals court unanimously votes that valid same-sex marriages performed in other states must be 6

13 H recognized by employers in New York, granting same-sex couples the same rights as other couples. 2. In February, the state of Oregon passes a law that allows samesex couples to register as domestic partners allowing them some spousal rights of married couples. 3. On May 15, the California Supreme Court rules that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. By November 3rd, more than 18,000 same-sex couples have married. On November 4, California voters approved a ban on same-sex marriage called Proposition 8. The Attorney General of California, Jerry Brown, asked the state's Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of Proposition 8. The ban throws into question the validity of the more than 18,000 marriages already performed, but Attorney General Brown reiterated in a news release that he believed the same-sex marriages performed in California before November 4 should remain valid, and the California Supreme Court, which upheld the ban in May 2009, agreed, allowing those couples married under the old law to remain that way. 4. On October 10, the Supreme Court of Connecticut rules that same-sex couples have the right to marry. This makes Connecticut the second state, after Massachusetts, to legalize civil marriage for same-sex couples. The court rules that the state cannot deny gay and lesbian couples the freedom to marry under Connecticut's constitution, and that the state's civil union law does not provide same-sex couples with the same rights as heterosexual couples. 5. November 4, voters in California, Arizona, and Florida approved the passage of measures that ban same-sex marriage. Arkansas passed a measure intended to bar gay men and lesbians from adopting children. 6. On November 12, same-sex marriages begin to be officially performed in Connecticut. 1. On April 3, the Iowa Supreme Court unanimously rejects the state law banning same-sex marriage. Twenty-one days later, county recorders are required to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. 2. On April 7, the Vermont Legislature votes to override Governor Jim Douglas's veto of a bill allowing gays and lesbians to marry, legalizing same-sex marriage. It is the first state to legalize gay marriage through the legislature; the courts of the other states in which the marriage is legal Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Iowa gave approval. 7

14 3. On May 6, the governor of Maine legalized same-sex marriage in that state in Maine; however, citizens voted to overturn that law when they went to the polls in November, and Maine became the thirty-first state to ban the practice. 4. On June 3, New Hampshire Governor John Lynch signs legislation allowing same-sex marriage. The law stipulates that religious organizations and their employees will not be required to participate in the ceremonies. New Hampshire is the sixth state in the nation to allow same-sex marriage. VIII On June 17, President Obama signs a referendum allowing the same-sex partners of federal employees to receive benefits. They will not be allowed full health coverage, however. This is Obama's first major initiative in his campaign promise to improve gay rights. IX X A. March 3, Congress approves a law signed in December 2009 that legalizes same-sex marriage in the District of Columbia. B. August 4, Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker rules that Proposition 8, the 2008 referendum that banned same-sex marriage in California, violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. "Proposition 8 singles out gays and lesbians and legitimates their unequal treatment," Vaughn writes. "Proposition 8 perpetuates the stereotype that gays and lesbians are incapable of forming long-term loving relationships and that gays and lesbians are not good parents." (Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 704 F.Supp.2d 921 (N.D. Cal. 2010)). C. December 18, the U.S. Senate votes sixty-five to thirty-one in favor of repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," the Clinton-era military policy that forbids openly gay men and women from serving in the military. Eight Republicans side with the Democrats to strike down the ban. The ban will not be lifted officially until President Obama, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, agree that the military is ready to enact the change and that it won't affect military readiness. On Dec. 18, President Obama officially repeals the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" military policy. June 24, New York passes a law to allow same-sex marriage. New York is now the largest state that allows gay and lesbian couples to marry. A. February 7, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California rules two to one (Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012)) that Proposition 8, the 2008 referendum that banned same-sex marriage in the state, is unconstitutional because it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In the ruling, the court says, the law "operates 8

15 XI XII with no apparent purpose but to impose on gays and lesbians, through the public law, a majority's private disapproval of them and their relationships." B. February 13, Washington becomes the seventh state to legalize gay marriage. C. March 1, Maryland passes legislation to legalize gay marriage, becoming the eighth state to do so. D. May 9, President Barack Obama endorses same-sex marriage. A. June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that part of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional in that it restricts marriage to one man and one woman. (United States v. Windsor, 133 S.Ct (2013)). Shortly thereafter, lawsuits started being filed across the country to allow and/or recognize same same-sex marriage. B. July 26, 2013, the first case, Bourke v. Beshear, 996 F.Supp.2d 542 (W.D. Ky. 2013), was filed in Kentucky asking to recognize four marriages for same-sex couples which had been performed in other states or countries. A. On February 12, 2014, Judge Heyburn ruled that Kentucky has to recognize marriages that were performed in other jurisdictions for samesex couples. (Bourke vs. Beshear, 996 F.Supp.2d 542 (W.D. Ky. 2013)). B. On February 14, 2014, Love v. Beshear, 989 F.Supp.2d 536 (W.D. Ky. 2014), was filed in order to allow same-sex couples in Kentucky to be married. Judge Heyburn also ruled to allow same-sex marriages to be performed in Kentucky. Both the Bourke and Love cases were appealed to the Sixth Circuit, which hears cases from Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan and Tennessee. The cases were heard on August 6, C. October 6, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear appeals of rulings in Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin that allowed same-sex marriage. The move paves the way for same-sex marriages in the five states. In fact, Virginia announced that unions would begin that day. 9

16 XIII D. On November 6, 2014, the Sixth Circuit overturned Judge Heyburn's rulings and those of the other three states in the Sixth Circuit, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee. (DeBoer v. Snyder, 772 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 2014)). A. January 16, the Supreme Court decided to hear the four cases from the Sixth Circuit, before the end of April, which means there should be a decision in June B. As of April 7, 2015, thirty-seven states and D.C. allow same-sex marriages. C. On April 28, 2015, the Supreme Court will hear the cases from the Sixth Circuit, with a ruling expected in June

17 CASE SUMMARIES Laurel B. Hostetter I. BOURKE V. BESHEAR, 996 F.SUPP.2D 542 (W.D. KY. 2014) A. The Complaint On July 26, 2013, Dawn Elliott and Shannon Fauver, serving as counsel for the plaintiffs (Gregory Bourke and Michael Deleon), filed a complaint with the United States District Court in the Western District of Kentucky, challenging the constitutionality of Kentucky's laws excluding same-sex couples from marriage and voiding within the Commonwealth of Kentucky marriages of same-sex couples entered in other states or countries. Plaintiffs Gregory Bourke and Michael Deleon married in Ontario, Canada in The couple has two children, both of whom were adopted by Michael. They could not legally be adopted by both parents as their marriage was not recognized by the Commonwealth. The complaint states, "by preventing same-sex couples from marrying and refusing to recognize their marriages from other states, the Commonwealth's law deprives them of numerous legal protections that are available to opposite-sex couples in Kentucky by virtue of their marriages." These protections include those surrounding inheritance tax, financial support, and eligibility for numerous federal protections afforded other married couples, including in the areas of immigration and citizenship, taxes, and social security. Specifically, Plaintiffs were seeking: a) a declaration that the Commonwealth's prohibition of marriage for same-sex couples and its refusal to recognize marriages of samesex couples validly entered into outside of the Commonwealth violate the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and, b) a permanent injunction i) preventing Defendants from denying the Plaintiff couple and all other same-sex couples otherwise eligible to marry, the right to marry in the Commonwealth of Kentucky; and ii) directing Defendants to recognize the marriages of the Plaintiff couple and other same-sex couples validly entered into outside of Kentucky. B. Order from Judge John G. Heyburn, United States District Court, Western District of Louisville On February 11, 2014, Judge Heyburn ordered that to the extent that KRS ,.020,.040, and.045 and Section 233A of the Kentucky 11

18 Constitution denied validly married same-sex couples equal recognition and benefits under Kentucky and federal law, they violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. C. Motion to Intervene On February 14, 2014, Timothy Love and Lawrence Ysunza, along with Maurice Blanchard and Dominique James, moved the court (United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky) to intervene as coplaintiffs in the Bourke v. Beshear action "on the basis that their claim shares with the main action a common question of law or fact." On February 26, 2014, Judge Heyburn ruled that the couples were allowed to join the Bourke suit. II. DEBOER V. SNYDER, 772 F.3D 388 (6TH CIR. 2014) Bourke v. Beshear, along with Tanco v. Haslam, 7 F.Supp.3d 759 (M.D. Tenn. 2014), and Obergefell v. Hodges, 962 F.Supp.2d 968 (S.D. Ohio 2013), were merged into DeBoer v. Snyder (originally DeBoer v. Snyder, 973 F.Supp.2d 757 (E.D. Mich. 2014)), for review by the Sixth Circuit, United States Court of Appeals. On November 6, 2014, the Sixth Circuit ruled 2-1 that Michigan's ban on samesex marriage did not violate the Constitution. The court claimed it was bound by Baker v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972), in which Minnesota refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple. The United States Supreme Court denied review "for want of a substantial federal question." The court further held: In just eleven years, nineteen States and a conspicuous District, accounting for nearly forty-five percent of the population, have exercised their sovereign powers to expand a definition of marriage that until recently was universally followed going back to the earliest days of human history. That is a difficult timeline to criticize as unworthy of further debate and voting. When the courts do not let the people resolve new social issues like this one, they perpetuate the idea that the heroes in these change events are judges and lawyers. Better in this instance, we think, to allow change through the customary political processes, in which the people, gay and straight alike, become the heroes of their own stories by meeting each other not as adversaries in a court system but as fellow citizens seeking to resolve a new social issue in a fair-minded way. DeBoer v. Snyder, 772 F.3d 388, 421 (6th Cir. 2014) In Judge Martha Daughtrey's dissent, she rejects the majority's "reverence for 'proceeding with caution.'" She further states that: Because the correct result is so obvious, one is tempted to speculate that the majority has purposefully taken the contrary 12

19 position to create the circuit split regarding the legality of samesex marriage that could prompt a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court and an end to the uncertainty of status and the interstate chaos that the current discrepancy in state laws threatens. DeBoer v. Snyder, 772 F.3d 388, 430 (6th Cir. 2014) (Daughtrey, J., dissenting). III. BOURKE V. BESHEAR, CERT. GRANTED, 135 S.CT (JAN. 16, 2015) In their brief for a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court, filed on November 18, 2014, attorneys for the petitioners, now condensed to Gregory Bourke, et al., and Timothy Love, et al. ask for an appeal of the ruling in DeBoer v. Snyder, 772 F.3d 388 (6th. Cir. 2014). Petitioners believe there are two questions presented by this case: 1. Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage of two people of the same sex?; and 2. Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage of two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state? Petitioners "ask merely to be treated like everyone else that is, free to enter into society's most revered form of mutual association and support, and worthy of the stature and crucial protections that marriage affords." Petitioners further argue that the same-sex marriage ban: impinges upon the liberty of same-sex couples to participate in one of the most vital relationships in life, codifies inequality for petitioners and their children, discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation, and discriminates on the basis of sex. The same-sex marriage ban, according to petitioners, is also not supported by any legitimate state interest. For all the foregoing reasons, the petitioners ask that the judgment of the court of appeals be reversed. Oral arguments were held April 28,

20 14

Supreme Court Strikes Down DOMA, Clears Way for Same-Sex Marriage in California

Supreme Court Strikes Down DOMA, Clears Way for Same-Sex Marriage in California Brought to you by Alamo Insurance Group Supreme Court Strikes Down DOMA, Clears Way for Same-Sex On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court announced decisions in two significant cases regarding laws affecting

More information

Marriage Equality Relationships in the States

Marriage Equality Relationships in the States Marriage Equality Relationships in the States January 7, 2015 The legal recognition of same-sex relationships has been a divisive issue across the United States, particularly during the past two decades.

More information

U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Relating to Same-Sex Marriage

U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Relating to Same-Sex Marriage WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMORANDUM U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Relating to Same-Sex Marriage Hollingsworth v. Perry challenged California s Proposition 8, the state s constitutional

More information

MARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES IN CALIFORNIA

MARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES IN CALIFORNIA MARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES IN CALIFORNIA Frequently Asked Questions Last Updated: July 9, 2015 NOTE: This document is intended to provide information for same-sex couples who are considering getting

More information

Materials Provided by Shelley Bishop and Matt Voorhees. Same Sex Marriage & Related Issues in Missouri

Materials Provided by Shelley Bishop and Matt Voorhees. Same Sex Marriage & Related Issues in Missouri Materials Provided by Shelley Bishop and Matt Voorhees Same Sex Marriage & Related Issues in Missouri Program Description: A survey of the status of the law, same sex dissolution and custody issues, the

More information

Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships

Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships Name of Country and Jurisdiction: California, United States. What forms of legally recognized relationships are available? 2. What are the requirements to be able to enter into the above relationships?

More information

Case 2:13-cv-00217-RJS Document 16 Filed 08/12/13 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:13-cv-00217-RJS Document 16 Filed 08/12/13 Page 1 of 14 Case 2:13-cv-00217-RJS Document 16 Filed 08/12/13 Page 1 of 14 PHILIP S. LOTT (5750) STANFORD E. PURSER (13440) Assistant Utah Attorneys General JOHN E. SWALLOW (5802) Utah Attorney General 160 East 300

More information

SAME-SEX ADOPTION LAWS BY STATE

SAME-SEX ADOPTION LAWS BY STATE SAME-SEX ADOPTION LAWS BY STATE The issue of adoption by same-sex couples has moved to the forefront in recent years. Liberty Counsel was instrumental in upholding the constitutionality of Florida s ban

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION Lake James H. Perriguey, OSB No. 983213 lake@law-works.com LAW WORKS LLC 1906 SW Madison Street Portland, OR 97205-1718 Telephone: (503) 227-1928 Facsimile: (503) 334-2340 Lea Ann Easton, OSB No. 881413

More information

This case challenged the constitutionality of California s Proposition 8.

This case challenged the constitutionality of California s Proposition 8. BRIEFING JUNE 2013 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ISSUES RULINGS ON DOMA AND PROPOSITION 8 CASES On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued decisions in two cases affecting the legal definition

More information

Farzad Family Law Scholarship 2014

Farzad Family Law Scholarship 2014 Farzad Family Law Scholarship 2014 Should the right to marry for same-sex couples become a federal constitutional right by amendment to the United States Constitution or remain a State issue? The United

More information

MARRIAGE RIGHTS I N I L L I N O I S

MARRIAGE RIGHTS I N I L L I N O I S MARRIAGE RIGHTS I N I L L I N O I S FOREWORD At Equality Illinois, we work to promote a fair and unified Illinois where everyone is treated equally with dignity and respect and where all people live freely

More information

Tax Research: Understanding Sources of Tax Law (Why my IRC beats your Rev Proc!)

Tax Research: Understanding Sources of Tax Law (Why my IRC beats your Rev Proc!) Tax Research: Understanding Sources of Tax Law (Why my IRC beats your Rev Proc!) Understanding the Federal Courts There are three levels of Federal courts that hear tax cases. At the bottom of the hierarchy,

More information

Domestic Partner Benefits: Facts and Background (for a more recent version see February 2009 Facts from EBRI)

Domestic Partner Benefits: Facts and Background (for a more recent version see February 2009 Facts from EBRI) March 2004 Domestic Partner Benefits: Facts and Background (for a more recent version see February 2009 Facts from EBRI) g What is a domestic partnership and what proof of the relationship is required?

More information

An Ohio court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued.

An Ohio court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued. NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR To all persons who purchased a single premium credit life and/or credit disability insurance policy from Protective Life

More information

Divorce for Same-Sex Couples Who Live in Non-Recognition States: A Guide For Attorneys

Divorce for Same-Sex Couples Who Live in Non-Recognition States: A Guide For Attorneys Divorce for Same-Sex Couples Who Live in Non-Recognition States: A Guide For Attorneys BACKGROUND A growing number of states recognize marriages between same-sex spouses, or comprehensive registered domestic

More information

Do laws and constitutions that prohibit same-sex marriage violate the 14 th Amendment?

Do laws and constitutions that prohibit same-sex marriage violate the 14 th Amendment? The 14 th Amendment and Same-Sex Marriage Do laws and constitutions that prohibit same-sex marriage violate the 14 th Amendment? Marriage is more than just a union between two people who love each other

More information

7/20/2015. Same-Sex Marriage on the Cusp: Remaining Issues and a Look into the Future. Same-Sex Marriage

7/20/2015. Same-Sex Marriage on the Cusp: Remaining Issues and a Look into the Future. Same-Sex Marriage Same-Sex Marriage on the Cusp: Remaining Issues and a Look into the Future ABA Annual Meeting 2015 Prof. William P. LaPiana, New York Law School Prof. Lee-ford Tritt, University of Florida College of Law

More information

Gay Marriage. but it is hard to make a decision whether gay marriage should be legal. There are

Gay Marriage. but it is hard to make a decision whether gay marriage should be legal. There are Gay Marriage In many countries around the world have talked about gay marriage a long time, but it is hard to make a decision whether gay marriage should be legal. There are some reasons why some people

More information

IN RE MARRIAGE CASES (California): 2008

IN RE MARRIAGE CASES (California): 2008 IN RE MARRIAGE CASES (California): 2008 These cases present the issue of the legality of gay marriage bans, in the context of previous State domestic partnership (CA) or civil union (CT) Statutes, under

More information

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Statements of the U.S. Department of Justice Regarding Section 3 Of DOMA

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Statements of the U.S. Department of Justice Regarding Section 3 Of DOMA Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders 30 Winter Street, Suite 800 Boston, MA 02108 Phone: 617.426.1350/800.455.GLAD Fax: 617.426.3594 Website: www.glad.org Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Statements

More information

Same-Sex Spouses, Partners and Adult Adoptions:

Same-Sex Spouses, Partners and Adult Adoptions: Same-Sex Spouses, Partners and Adult Adoptions: Trust Administration Issues Presented by Beneficiary Relationships ABA Fall 2010 Joint CLE Meeting Section of Taxation and Trust and Estate Law Division

More information

The Overturn of DOMA and its Impact on Financial Planning

The Overturn of DOMA and its Impact on Financial Planning The Overturn of DOMA and its Impact on Financial Planning In 1996, President Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as being the union between one man and one woman.

More information

Estate Planning for California Same-Sex Couples. Trisha A. Vicario & Chelsea J. Hopkins

Estate Planning for California Same-Sex Couples. Trisha A. Vicario & Chelsea J. Hopkins Estate Planning for California Same-Sex Couples Trisha A. Vicario & Chelsea J. Hopkins Legal Recognition for Same-Sex Couples Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) In 1996, the United States Congress enacted

More information

Provided By Touchstone Consulting Group Benefits for Same-sex Couples and Domestic Partners

Provided By Touchstone Consulting Group Benefits for Same-sex Couples and Domestic Partners Provided By Touchstone Consulting Group Benefits for Same-sex Couples and A significant number of U.S. companies provide benefits, such as health insurance coverage, for their employees domestic partners

More information

Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships

Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships Name of Country and Jurisdiction: rkansas, United States. What forms of legally recognized relationships are available? 2. What are the requirements to be able to enter into the above relationships? 3.

More information

Same Sex Marriage, Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships

Same Sex Marriage, Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships GO Issues & Research» Human Services» Same Sex Marriage Go 16430 Same Sex Marriage, Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships Last Update: April, 2010 Quick facts on key states: Issues marriage licenses to

More information

Expert Analysis Same-Sex Marriages and Benefit Plans After Windsor

Expert Analysis Same-Sex Marriages and Benefit Plans After Windsor Westlaw Journal Employment Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 28, issue 2 / august 28, 2013 Expert Analysis Same-Sex Marriages and Benefit Plans After Windsor

More information

Multijurisdictional Practice of Law for In-House Counsel

Multijurisdictional Practice of Law for In-House Counsel Multijurisdictional Practice of Law for In-House Counsel Presentation for Association of Corporate Counsel - Charlotte March 2010 Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A. Robert E. Harrington and Peter C. Buck

More information

Who May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption?

Who May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption? State Statutes Series Current Through February 2006 Who May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption? In order for an adoption to take place, a person available to be adopted must be placed in

More information

I. FIGURING OUT YOUR CLIENT S STATUS

I. FIGURING OUT YOUR CLIENT S STATUS REPRESENTING SAME-SEX FAMILIES IN CALIFORNIA AFTER WINDSOR AND PERRY 2014 Deborah H. Wald As published in the Journal of the California Association of Certified Family Law Specialists (ACFLS), Winter 2014,

More information

Case 6:15-bk-16988-SY Doc 27 Filed 10/21/15 Entered 10/21/15 13:59:46 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Case 6:15-bk-16988-SY Doc 27 Filed 10/21/15 Entered 10/21/15 13:59:46 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Case :-bk--sy Doc Filed 0// Entered 0// :: Desc Main Document Page of FOR PUBLICATION FILED & ENTERED OCT 0 CLERK U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT Central District of California BY jeanmari DEPUTY CLERK 0 UNITED

More information

POLITICAL AND CIVIL STATUS OF WOMEN

POLITICAL AND CIVIL STATUS OF WOMEN 2 POLITICAL AND CIVIL STATUS OF WOMEN as of January 1, 1953 Political Status Nationality Citizenship in the United States is acquired in the same way by men and women; that is, by birth within the domain,

More information

The Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction

The Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction The Circuit Court The circuit court is the trial court of general jurisdiction in Virginia, and the court has authority to try a full range of both civil and criminal cases. Civil cases involve disputes

More information

Same-Sex Marriages: Legal Issues

Same-Sex Marriages: Legal Issues Alison M. Smith Legislative Attorney June 9, 2009 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL31994 Summary In 2003, state

More information

LGBT Adoptions in the US & South Africa Samantha Moore

LGBT Adoptions in the US & South Africa Samantha Moore LGBT Adoptions in the US & South Africa Samantha Introduction Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender, most commonly referred to as LGBT, have become a subject of controversy over the past decade. LGBT

More information

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FROM COUPLES WHO ARE CONSIDERING GETTING MARRIED IN SAN FRANCISCO

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FROM COUPLES WHO ARE CONSIDERING GETTING MARRIED IN SAN FRANCISCO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FROM COUPLES WHO ARE CONSIDERING GETTING MARRIED IN SAN FRANCISCO On February 12, 2004, the county clerk in San Francisco began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples,

More information

Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Date: July 29, 2013. [Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C)] [July 29, 2013]

Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Date: July 29, 2013. [Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C)] [July 29, 2013] Topic: Question by: : Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Kevin Rayburn, Esq., MBA Tennessee Date: July 29, 2013 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado

More information

7 FAM 200 APPENDIX D IDENTIFYING NEXT OF KIN OR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE

7 FAM 200 APPENDIX D IDENTIFYING NEXT OF KIN OR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE 7 FAM 200 APPENDIX D IDENTIFYING NEXT OF KIN OR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE (CT:CON-484; 09-13-2013) (Office of Origin: CA/OCS/L) 7 FAM 210 APPENDIX D INTRODUCTION (CT:CON-484; 09-13-2013) a. The term next of

More information

Erica@ambler-keenan.com www.ambler-keenan.com

Erica@ambler-keenan.com www.ambler-keenan.com Civil Unions and Estate Planning after DOMA Ruling Erica Johnson, Esq. Ambler & Keenan, LLC 950 S. Cherry St. Suite 1650 Denver, CO 80246 303-321-1267 Erica@ambler-keenan.com www.ambler-keenan.com B.S.

More information

Release #2301 Release Date and Time: 6:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Release #2301 Release Date and Time: 6:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 10, 2009 THE FIELD POLL THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 1947 AS THE CALIFORNIA POLL BY MERVIN FIELD Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco,

More information

Non-Profit Entity Conversion. Question by: Julia Dale. Date: February 6, 2012. [Non-Profit Entity Conversion] [2012 February 07]

Non-Profit Entity Conversion. Question by: Julia Dale. Date: February 6, 2012. [Non-Profit Entity Conversion] [2012 February 07] Topic: n-profit Entity Conversion Question by: Julia Dale : Michigan Date: February 6, 2012 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California See below under additional comments Colorado

More information

Executive Summary. Public Support for Marriage for Same-sex Couples by State by Andrew R. Flores and Scott Barclay April 2013

Executive Summary. Public Support for Marriage for Same-sex Couples by State by Andrew R. Flores and Scott Barclay April 2013 Public Support for Marriage for Same-sex Couples by State by Andrew R. Flores and Scott Barclay April 2013 Executive Summary Around the issue of same-sex marriage, there has been a slate of popular and

More information

Legal notice about a class action settlement involving payment of medical expenses under Liberty auto policies.

Legal notice about a class action settlement involving payment of medical expenses under Liberty auto policies. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN THE COUNTY OF ST. CLAIR Legal notice about a class action settlement involving payment of medical expenses under Liberty auto policies. A court authorized this

More information

Getting A Marriage License In Texas

Getting A Marriage License In Texas KNOW YOUR RIGHTS MARRIAGE EQUALITY The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that the constitutional right to marry extends to same-sex couples. As a result, gay, lesbian, and transgender Texans

More information

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS MARRIAGE EQUALITY

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS MARRIAGE EQUALITY KNOW YOUR RIGHTS MARRIAGE EQUALITY The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that the constitutional right to marry extends to same-sex couples. As a result, gay, lesbian, and transgender Texans

More information

CIVIL UNIONS & ESTATE PLANNING AFTER THE DOMA RULING

CIVIL UNIONS & ESTATE PLANNING AFTER THE DOMA RULING CIVIL UNIONS & ESTATE PLANNING AFTER THE DOMA RULING ERICA L. JOHNSON 950 South Cherry Street, Suite 1650 Denver, Colorado 80246 303-407-1542 www.ambler-keenan.com ESTATE PLANNING PROBATE TRUST ADMINISTRATION

More information

A BRIEF SUMMARY OF FAMILY LAW AS IT AFFECTS LGBT (LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDERED) PERSONS IN FLORIDA

A BRIEF SUMMARY OF FAMILY LAW AS IT AFFECTS LGBT (LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDERED) PERSONS IN FLORIDA A BRIEF SUMMARY OF FAMILY LAW AS IT AFFECTS LGBT (LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDERED) PERSONS IN FLORIDA By Michael E. Morris, Attorney at Law Updated January 2013 First, this is a summary of some

More information

INTRODUCTION. Mitchell Katine* 1

INTRODUCTION. Mitchell Katine* 1 INTRODUCTION Mitchell Katine* 1 Gay and lesbian people in the United States currently enjoy the most respected position, legally and socially, since coming out as an identifiable group. However far we

More information

Principles in Collision: Labor Union rights v. Employee civil Rights

Principles in Collision: Labor Union rights v. Employee civil Rights Principles in Collision: Labor Union rights v. Employee civil Rights Barry Winograd Arbitrator and mediator in Oakland, California Member of the National Academy of Arbitrators Adjunct faculty of the law

More information

FACT SHEET. Language Assistance to Persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP).

FACT SHEET. Language Assistance to Persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). FACT SHEET Office of Civil Rights Washington, D.C. 20201 (202) 619-0403 Language Assistance to Persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). To ensure that persons with limited English skills can effectively

More information

ORDER: DENYING MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL/RECONSIDERATION

ORDER: DENYING MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL/RECONSIDERATION DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO 1777 Sixth Street Boulder, CO 80302 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, in his official capacity as Colorado Attorney General, and

More information

D.C. Code Ann. Prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of tobacco use except where

D.C. Code Ann. Prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of tobacco use except where National Conference of State Legislatures Discrimination Laws Regarding Off-Duty Conduct Updated October 18, 2010 The issue of employees' rights to engage in certain off-duty activities and in the competing

More information

The Court Has Spoken: Case Law Update

The Court Has Spoken: Case Law Update The Court Has Spoken: Case Law Update Texas Case Law Mara Flanagan Friesen Deputy Director for Child Support Texas Office of the Attorney General The Office of the Attorney General of Texas v. Scholer,

More information

American Institute of Accountants INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE SOCIETY SERVICE DEPARTMENT

American Institute of Accountants INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE SOCIETY SERVICE DEPARTMENT American Institute of Accountants INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE SOCIETY SERVICE DEPARTMENT THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 270 MADISON AVENUE,

More information

Tax time and preserving

Tax time and preserving Tax time and preserving your federal rights Contact GLAD s Legal InfoLine for the most accurate, up-to-date information: www.glad.org/rights 800-455-GLAD Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders This document

More information

State Income Taxation of Trusts - Fifty-One Different Stories and a Few Surprise Endings

State Income Taxation of Trusts - Fifty-One Different Stories and a Few Surprise Endings Chicago Estate Planning Council January 22, 2012 State Income Taxation of Trusts - Fifty-One Different Stories and a Few Surprise Endings Christine L. Albright Holland & Knight LLP This document is not

More information

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress Order Code RL32928 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Breastfeeding and Jury Duty: State Laws, Court Rules, and Related Issues May 17, 2005 Douglas Reid Weimer Legislative Attorney American

More information

Management Alert. California Supreme Court Approves Same-Sex Marriage & Bush Signs Genetic Information Act

Management Alert. California Supreme Court Approves Same-Sex Marriage & Bush Signs Genetic Information Act California Supreme Court Approves Same-Sex Marriage & Bush Signs Genetic Information Act A recent California Supreme Court decision to recognize same-sex marriages and recent federal legislation banning

More information

Intercountry Adoptions Finalized Abroad

Intercountry Adoptions Finalized Abroad State Statutes Series Current Through July 2005 Adoptions Finalized Abroad adoptions may be finalized abroad or domestically. Most State statutes give full effect and recognition to intercountry adoptions

More information

A GUIDE TO VOTING LEAVE LAWS BY STATE

A GUIDE TO VOTING LEAVE LAWS BY STATE State Alabama Public and private s Time necessary to vote, not exceeding one hour, unless employee has two hours before work or after work available to vote. Alaska All s Not specified, but must allow

More information

UTAH: A CASE STUDY ON THE ROAD TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE. Jennifer Watson

UTAH: A CASE STUDY ON THE ROAD TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE. Jennifer Watson UTAH: A CASE STUDY ON THE ROAD TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Jennifer Watson Kitchen v. Herbert, 961 F. Supp. 2d 1181, 1191 (D. Utah, 2013), aff d, 755 F.3d 1193 (10th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 265 (2014)

More information

The Colorado Lawyer, July 2013, Vol. 42, No. 7 [Page 91]

The Colorado Lawyer, July 2013, Vol. 42, No. 7 [Page 91] The Colorado Lawyer, July 2013, Vol. 42, No. 7 [Page 91] 2013 The Colorado Lawyer and Colorado Bar Association. All Rights Reserved. Articles Family Law Colorado Civil Union Act by Angela Forss Schmit,

More information

Supplementary Submission to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. Same-Sex: Same Entitlements

Supplementary Submission to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. Same-Sex: Same Entitlements Supplementary Submission to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Same-Sex: Same Entitlements Australian Lawyers for Human Rights Inc (ALHR) is a national network of Australian lawyers active

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., v. Plaintiffs, HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil

More information

Summary of Laws Regarding International Adoptions Finalized Abroad 50 States and 6 U.S. Territories

Summary of Laws Regarding International Adoptions Finalized Abroad 50 States and 6 U.S. Territories Summary of Laws Regarding International Adoptions Finalized Abroad 50 States and 6 U.S. Territories (7/01) Effect of Foreign Adoption Decree Twenty-five States and one territory (Commonwealth of the Northern

More information

PLANNING FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE POST-DOMA RULING

PLANNING FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE POST-DOMA RULING PLANNING FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE POST-DOMA RULING Understand and start planning for IRS and other agency changes. KEY TAKEAWAYS Supreme Court decision struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act

More information

Domestic Partner Benefits

Domestic Partner Benefits Domestic Partner Benefits A majority of the nation s largest corporations provide health insurance coverage for domestic partners of their employees 1. Regardless of the size of the business, the trend

More information

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Updated January 20, 2010

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Updated January 20, 2010 State Limits on to Candidates Updated January 20, 2010 Individual Candidate Alabama 10-2A-70.1 and 17-22A- 1 et seq. $500/candidate/election a,j Alaska 15.13.065 to.080 $500/candidate/year Aggregate amounts

More information

same sex marriage passed, and includes 50 of the over 200 rights afforded to married couples in that state.

same sex marriage passed, and includes 50 of the over 200 rights afforded to married couples in that state. Same Sex Marriage and Civil Unions Prepared by Kimberly D. Richman, Ph.D. University of San Francisco Distributed by the Sociologists for Women in Society August 2005 Same Sex Marriage and Civil Unions:

More information

COLORADO, IOWA, VIRGINIA VOTERS BACK POPE ON CLIMATE, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY SWING STATE POLL FINDS; VOTERS SAY LEAVE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ALONE

COLORADO, IOWA, VIRGINIA VOTERS BACK POPE ON CLIMATE, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY SWING STATE POLL FINDS; VOTERS SAY LEAVE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ALONE Peter A. Brown, Assistant Director, (203) 535-6203 Tim Malloy, Assistant Director (203) 645-8043 Rubenstein Associates, Inc., Public Relations Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR RELEASE: JULY 23, 2015 COLORADO,

More information

Nonprofit Mergers. Question by: Deb Ulmanis. Date: 6 August 2010. Does your state statutes permit nonprofits to merge?

Nonprofit Mergers. Question by: Deb Ulmanis. Date: 6 August 2010. Does your state statutes permit nonprofits to merge? Topic: Nonprofit Mergers Question by: Deb Ulmanis Jurisdiction: New Hampshire Date: 6 August 2010 Jurisdiction Question(s) Does your state statutes permit nonprofits to merge? Can nonprofits only merge

More information

Walking Employees Through the Regulatory Maze Surrounding Same-Sex Domestic Partner Benefits By Todd A. Solomon and Brett R.

Walking Employees Through the Regulatory Maze Surrounding Same-Sex Domestic Partner Benefits By Todd A. Solomon and Brett R. Walking Employees Through the Regulatory Maze Surrounding Same-Sex Domestic Partner Benefits By Todd A. Solomon and Brett R. Johnson Todd A. Solomon is a partner in the Employee Benefits Practice Group

More information

1. Whether, for Federal tax purposes, the terms spouse, husband and wife,

1. Whether, for Federal tax purposes, the terms spouse, husband and wife, Rev. Rul. 2013-17 ISSUES 1. Whether, for Federal tax purposes, the terms spouse, husband and wife, husband, and wife include an individual married to a person of the same sex, if the individuals are lawfully

More information

DOMA / Same-Sex Spouse Benefits Briefing Card

DOMA / Same-Sex Spouse Benefits Briefing Card Prepared by: LCDR Nate Christensen Updated: 2013-08-13 Reviewed by: Reviewed: DOMA / Same-Sex Spouse Benefits Briefing Card Background The Supreme Court found June 26, 2013, in U.S. v. Windsor that Section

More information

Release #2349 Release Date: Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Release #2349 Release Date: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 THE FIELD POLL THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 1947 AS THE CALIFORNIA POLL BY MERVIN FIELD Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco,

More information

Collateral Damage. How the Defense of Marriage Act Harms the Troops and Undermines the U.S. Military. Katie Miller and David McKean February 2013

Collateral Damage. How the Defense of Marriage Act Harms the Troops and Undermines the U.S. Military. Katie Miller and David McKean February 2013 AP PHOTO/GREGORY BULL Collateral Damage How the Defense of Marriage Act Harms the Troops and Undermines the U.S. Military Katie Miller and David McKean February 2013 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Introduction

More information

Attorneys and Counselors at Law

Attorneys and Counselors at Law GIBBS LAW FIRM, P.A. 5666 SEMINOLE BOULEVARD, SUITE TWO TELEPHONE: (727) 399-8300 SEMINOLE, FLORIDA 33772 FACSIMILE: (727) 398-3907 January 4, 2011 VIA EMAIL wvff@wvfamily.org Mr. Kevin McCoy West Virginia

More information

A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process

A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney General s Office A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney

More information

Impacts of Sequestration on the States

Impacts of Sequestration on the States Impacts of Sequestration on the States Alabama Alabama will lose about $230,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Alabama could lose up to $102,000 in funds

More information

Nonprofit Organizations

Nonprofit Organizations Nonprofit Organizations 2005 Prevent Child Abuse New York, Albany, New York Co-presenter of workshop entitled Abduction and Reprogramming of American Teens: The Need to Regulate Businesses that Abuse,

More information

THE IMPACT OF THE NEW ILLINOIS CIVIL UNION LAW

THE IMPACT OF THE NEW ILLINOIS CIVIL UNION LAW THE IMPACT OF THE NEW ILLINOIS CIVIL UNION LAW Kenny Eathington Husch Blackwell LLP 401 Main St., Suite 1400 Peoria, Illinois 61602 Kenny Eathington is a member of the Real Estate Practice Group in the

More information

Promoting Civil Unions to Undermine Marriage

Promoting Civil Unions to Undermine Marriage Promoting Civil Unions to Undermine Marriage "A statement from the Catholic Conference of Illinois, representing the six dioceses of the Province of Chicago" Promoting Civil Unions Civil to Unions Undermine

More information

CHILD PLACING AGENCY RELIG. CONFLICT H.B. 4188 (H-2), 4189, & 4190: ANALYSIS AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE

CHILD PLACING AGENCY RELIG. CONFLICT H.B. 4188 (H-2), 4189, & 4190: ANALYSIS AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE CHILD PLACING AGENCY RELIG. CONFLICT H.B. 4188 (H-2), 4189, & 4190: ANALYSIS AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE House Bill 4188 (Substitute H-2 as reported without amendment) House Bills 4189 and 4190 (as reported

More information

Prather Ebner LLP. Legal Guidance for Life

Prather Ebner LLP. Legal Guidance for Life Legal Guidance for Life Ray Prather ray@pratherebner.com / Dan Ebner dan@pratherebner.com / Landon Perkinson landon@pratherebner.com The Monadnock Building, 53 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1025, Chicago,

More information

Two of a kind: What employers need to know about Obergefell and same-sex marriage. Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Two of a kind: What employers need to know about Obergefell and same-sex marriage. Tuesday, September 22, 2015 Two of a kind: What employers need to know about Obergefell and same-sex marriage Tuesday, September 22, 2015 Speakers Shafeeqa Giarratani, Partner Partner Shafeeqa Giarratani, an Austin native, practices

More information

West Case Reporters and Digests Research Guide

West Case Reporters and Digests Research Guide West Case Reporters and Digests Research Guide H. Douglas Barclay Law Library Check the library s Location Guide and Summit/Voyager the Online catalog for the current location of sources mentioned in this

More information

Case 2:13-cv-00217-RJS Document 94 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:13-cv-00217-RJS Document 94 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 6 Case 2:13-cv-00217-RJS Document 94 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 6 PHILIP S. LOTT (5750) STANFORD E. PURSER (13440) Assistant Utah Attorneys General BRIAN L. TARBET (3191) Acting Utah Attorney General 160 East

More information

September 2014. The bill itself can be viewed at: https://malegislature.gov/laws/sessionlaws/acts/2014/chapter260

September 2014. The bill itself can be viewed at: https://malegislature.gov/laws/sessionlaws/acts/2014/chapter260 September 2014 Additional information will be forthcoming related to any required change in Matrix s process, practice, written or verbal employee communications as a result of these new laws. Massachusetts

More information

HEALTH CARE RIGHTS AND TRANSGENDER PEOPLE March 2012

HEALTH CARE RIGHTS AND TRANSGENDER PEOPLE March 2012 HEALTH CARE RIGHTS AND TRANSGENDER PEOPLE March 2012 For the first time, the Affordable Care Act of 2010 banned sex discrimination in many health care facilities and programs. While we still desperately

More information

APPENDIX 4. A. State Courts. Alaska Superior Court. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Alabama Circuit Court. Arizona Superior Court

APPENDIX 4. A. State Courts. Alaska Superior Court. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Alabama Circuit Court. Arizona Superior Court APPENDIX 4 COURT ABBREVIATIONS This appendix contains abbreviations for federal courts. Abbreviations for state courts can be developed by consulting Appendix 1 and Rule 2 concerning abbreviations and

More information

SURVEY OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND CIVIL UNIONS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS, DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT AND OTHER RECIPROCITY ISSUES

SURVEY OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND CIVIL UNIONS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS, DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT AND OTHER RECIPROCITY ISSUES SURVEY OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND CIVIL UNIONS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS, DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT AND OTHER RECIPROCITY ISSUES Marie Avery Moses Lass Moses Ramp, LLC 1441 18 th Street, Suite 300 Denver, CO

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 13 September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. WILLIAM M. LOGAN Bell, C.J. Raker Wilner Cathell Harrell Battaglia Greene JJ.

More information

EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION

EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION NOTICES: THE EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY COVERAGE PART/ENDORSEMENT PROVIDES THAT THE LIMIT OF LIABILITY AVAILABLE TO PAY JUDGMENTS OR

More information

CLINICAL PRIVILEGE WHITE PAPER Psychology

CLINICAL PRIVILEGE WHITE PAPER Psychology Psychology CLINICAL PRIVILEGE WHITE PAPER Psychology Background Psychology is a broad field that includes the scientific study of mental processes and behavior. It is similar to the medical field of psychiatry.

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PALAU HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PALAU HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PALAU HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS I. Purpose of This Handbook The purpose of this handbook is to acquaint trial jurors with the general nature and importance of their

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Case 1:12-cv-00589-UA-JEP Document 34 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA MARCIE FISHER BORNE, for herself And as guardian ad litem

More information

Legal Information for Same Sex Couples

Legal Information for Same Sex Couples Community Legal Information Association of Prince Edward Island, Inc. Legal Information for Same Sex Couples People in same sex relationships often have questions about their rights and the rights of their

More information

Curriculum Vitae BARBARA R. SNYDER. 2004-2007 Executive Vice President and Provost The Ohio State University Office of Academic Affairs

Curriculum Vitae BARBARA R. SNYDER. 2004-2007 Executive Vice President and Provost The Ohio State University Office of Academic Affairs Curriculum Vitae BARBARA R. SNYDER ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT 2007-present President Case Western Reserve University 2004-2007 Executive Vice President and Provost The Ohio State University Office of Academic

More information