1 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs Brooklyn College Faculty Council Approved May 9, 2006 Prepared by Philip F. Gallagher Consultants: Maurice Callahan, Office of the Provost Bonnie Gustav, Chair, Undergraduate Curriculum Committee Keith Harrow, Chair, Graduate Curriculum Committee Yedidyah Langsam, Former Chair, Undergraduate Curriculum Committee Malgorzata Ciszkowska, Chair, Master Planning, Educational Policy and Budget This manual supersedes requirements and procedures previously issued for submitting new program proposals to the Faculty Council Committee for Master Planning, Educational Policy, and Budget. [ BC New Program Manual ver ]
2 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs In 2001 the City University of New York s Office of Academic Affairs (OAA) issued a Revised Faculty Handbook for the Preparation of New Academic Programs. In order to receive approval from the Board of Trustees and, ultimately, the New York State Education Department (SED), every proposal for a new degree or certificate program must adhere to the procedures and format described in the Handbook and meet the criteria for approval enunciated therein. 1 The process for preparing new academic programs has two components: a Brooklyn College Faculty Council-centered curriculum approval process and a University-SED approval process. The two operate concurrently and interactively. The process is thorough and complex. With regard to those parts of the process that pertain to the University and the State, the Handbook is clear; the Brooklyn College steps in the process are not covered by the Handbook except to say that new programs must have College governance approval. This manual describes the Brooklyn College portion of the process. It also aims to present in a schematic manner the entire new program development and approval process, and to ensure 2 that Brooklyn College practices are in harmony with University procedures. This manual covers the planning, development, and approval process of all new programs, graduate and undergraduate (including 3 what are termed majors). If you wish assistance with this process, contact the Provost s Office. INTRODUCTION Every new program must undergo qualitative reviews and meet with the approval of appropriate governing bodies at three levels: Brooklyn College, the CUNY Board of Trustees, and the New York State Education Department. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION: Proposals for new programs are evaluated according to the following standards. Justification for a new program proposal should emphasize the criteria listed below, as applicable. 1 There is one exception: see Guidelines for a Streamlined Approval Process for the Certificate Program that Is a Subset of a Registered Program. 2 Much of what appears below in the boxed lists has been borrowed from the CUNY Handbook, sometimes in paraphrase, often word for word. Consult the CUNY Handbook for a full description of University-mandated procedures. 3 Minor programs ( minors ) are not subject to new program procedures but follow instructions provided in Brooklyn College s Manual for Preparing Undergraduate Curriculum Proposals for Submission to the Faculty Council Committee on Curriculum and Degree Requirements (Undergraduate). The protocols for instituting new programs presented there (as well as in the Manual for Preparing Graduate Curriculum Proposals...) are superseded by the procedures described in this manual.
3 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs (3) 1. Academic Quality 2. Justification of Need 3. Regional, state and national societal needs 4. Career Opportunities for graduates 5. Student Interest 6. Relationship to other programs at CUNY (e.g., possible duplication) 7. Centrality to other campus programs and to the College and University missions 8. Resources available to implement the program 9. Conformity with the standards of accrediting agencies for the professions 10. Conformity with the regulations of the State Education Department SNAPSHOT OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS: there are four main steps, each of which has sub-sections: A) The Letter of Intent (below, pp. 3-5) B) Circulation of the Letter of Intent throughout the University (below, p. 6) C) Preparation of a full, comprehensive program proposal and related curriculum documents (below, pp. 6-11) D) The Process of Final Approval by the College, University, and the State Education Department (SED) (below, pp ) A) THE LETTER OF INTENT. (CUNY Handbook, pp. 4-5.) Purpose: A Letter of Intent is not a program or a curriculum document; it is a declaration of the College s intent to develop such a program. While its formal purpose is to inform the University community of the College s plans and to provide an opportunity for other CUNY colleges to comment on the academic and financial feasibility of the proposed program, a Letter of Intent is actually a preliminary version of a full proposal; think of it as such. The Process: Starting Point. A program begins as a Letter of Intent in either a department or, in the case of an interdisciplinary program, in an interdisciplinary curriculum committee, graduate or undergraduate, appointed by the respective dean. After department approval (or the approval of an interdisciplinary committee and all departments concerned), the Letter of Intent goes to the Office of the Provost. Review by Provost and Master Planning. If the Provost judges the proposed program to be academically and financially feasible, the Letter of Intent is next reviewed by the Faculty Council Committee on Master Planning, Educational Policy, and Budget. Master Planning s review is detailed. The committee may ask for more information; it may request an interview with the Provost and/or the program s proposer(s); it may require revisions judged necessary by concerns related to academic standards, the availability of resources, and other criteria; it may accept the Letter as written.
4 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs (4) When Master Planning approves in principle the Letter of Intent to develop the proposed program, it prepares a resolution for Faculty Council: this resolution briefly describes the proposed program, informs Faculty Council that it has approved in principle the intent to develop the program, gives a brief justification for its decision, and indicates that it is concurrently forwarding the Letter of Intent to the President for transmittal to the University to begin the 30-day comment period as soon as possible. If for any reason Faculty Council does not approve Master Planning s resolution, the Letter of Intent is withdrawn. In summary, here is the typical route for a Letter of Intent for a new program: G 1. Letter of Intent is drafted by faculty and approved by departmental or interdisciplinary curriculum committee. G 2. Letter of Intent is reviewed and approved in principle by sponsoring academic department(s). (Interdisciplinary programs to which a number of departments contribute require approval in principle by all contributing departments.) After approval, the Letter of Intent is forwarded to the Provost. G 3. Provost reviews proposal; if it meets criteria for new programs, the proposal is sent to the Faculty Council Committee on Master Planning, Educational Policy, and Budget. G 4. Master Planning reviews Letter of Intent closely. If it approves, it concurrently submits a resolution to Faculty Council for approval in principle and sends the Letter of Intent to the President. G 5. President submits the Letter of Intent to the University s Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs for circulation throughout CUNY. Colleges are given thirty days to review and comment. G 6. Faculty Council receives resolution for approval in principle from Master Planning and votes. Unless rejected, Letter of Intent circulates throughout the University. Preparing the Letter of Intent. Purpose and process have been outlined above. Below are the major components on which the program s Letter of Intent must focus. Length: pages long. The Letter of Intent must be informative, clear, and concise. It must include all of the items noted below, beginning with the title page. Title Page /Basic Information: provide the following information: (CUNY Handbook, p. 4) G 1. College name G 3. official name of program G 5. anticipated date for implementation G 2. name of department(s) sponsoring program G 4. name of degree or certificate to be awarded G 6. date of approval by Master Planning Narrative: Cover all of the topics described below. Together they form the heart of a Letter of Intent. Reviewers are pleased to find the anticipated subject matter treated and numbered in the following order:
5 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs (5) G 1. Purpose and Goals. Be explicit so that readers outside your discipline will understand:! a detailed statement of educational goals and career objectives for students! a brief review of the rationale! national or local educational trends! faculty interest and commitment! program s relation to existing departmental or college offerings! other compelling factors that have led to the development of the program G 2. Need.! Relevant needs of a) students, b) college, c) community, d) economy. (CUNY Handbook, p. 4).! The program s relationship to the College s mission G 3. Students. Citing tangible evidence of student interest is mandatory:! sources of potential students! feeder schools Provide in a TABLE:! numerical estimate of enrollments (full-time, part-time) for each of the first five years of the program! estimated attrition rate and how determined! Identify similar programs at other CUNY campuses: any duplication? If so, why should program be approved? Note any special admission requirements. G 4. Curriculum.! Rationale for the curriculum, including complete curricular design.! List course titles and credit requirements; indicate new courses. Course descriptions are not needed now.! Note relevant accrediting or licensure requirements.! Describe articulation prospects: All baccalaureate program proposals require developing articulation agreements with one or more CUNY community colleges. G 5. Faculty.! Potential for existing full-time faculty to teach in the program! How many needed for implementation? How many adjuncts?! What impact will the program have on existing programs in terms of staffing and workload? N,B.: CUNY and SED look unfavorably on programs staffed predominantly by adjunct faculty. G 6. Cost Assessment. New programs are expected to generate revenue: explain how.! Compare estimated costs with estimated revenue.! Provide a TABLE: estimated cumulative costs and revenues for first 5 years of the new program! Write narrative describing this table; indicate source of funding to pay costs, including reallocation of funds. How will college ensure funds are available for at least first 5 years of program s existence?
6 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs (6) B) CIRCULATION OF THE LETTER OF INTENT THROUGHOUT THE UNIVERSITY. (CUNY Handbook, pp. 5-6: procedure ) University Review of the Letter of Intent. Once the Letter of Intent has been endorsed in principle by Master Planning, it proceeds concurrently to Faculty Council and, via the College President, to the University s Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs. The Letter of Intent is reviewed in that office and then circulated throughout the University for comment over a 30-day period. In addition to the circulation process required of all Letters of Intent, those involving graduate proposals are 4 screened by the Graduate Advisory Council, chaired by the President of the CUNY Graduate Center. The program s sponsors and the College s Dean of Research and Graduate Studies will be asked to appear before the committee. They must be ready to answer any questions asked about the proposed program. The committee may require changes before approval. This could take an additional month or more a good reason to initiate the process of preparing the Letter of Intent as soon as possible. In summary, here are various steps of the University circulation process for the Letter of Intent: G 1. After the Letter of Intent has been endorsed in principle by Brooklyn College governance, the President submits 25 copies and a cover letter to the Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs. G 2. The Letter of Intent is circulated to presidents of other CUNY colleges with a request for written comments within 30 days. CUNY presidents send their comments to the Executive Vice Chancellor with copy to BC President. G 3. Office of Academic Affairs staff review comments from colleges. An outside review may be solicited. If there are questions, the Provost and appropriate faculty may be contacted by OAA. G 4. Graduate program proposals include review by the CUNY Graduate Advisory Council. Program sponsors should be prepared to appear before this committee to answer questions. G 5. When review is complete, Executive Vice Chancellor sends response to President: College is either authorized to proceed with development of a full proposal or requested to provide more information. It may be told to address specific CUNY-wide comments/criticisms within the body of the proposal. A full proposal must be received within two years from the date of authorization to proceed. C) PREPARATION OF A FULL, COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM PROPOSAL AND RELATED CURRICULUM DOCUMENTS Relation of the Letter of Intent to a Full Proposal. While the Letter of Intent is circulating among units of the University, the program s sponsors should assume that the Letter of Intent will be approved by OAA (even if revisions are required) and begin to develop the full proposal. The full proposal must go well beyond the level of detail contained in the Letter of Intent. It must flesh out all details for a new program: new courses will be proposed, existing courses will be revised (as needed) or withdrawn, program 4 This is a committee referred to in the CUNY Handbook as a council.
7 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs (7) requirements will be put into appropriate legislative language, and so forth. The full proposal (excluding appendices and SED attachments) should not, however, exceed 25 pages. Faculty Council Curriculum Committee review and Faculty Council approval. The actual content of every degree or certificate/advanced certificate program must be drafted as curricular legislation, reviewed by the appropriate Faculty Council curriculum committee (graduate or undergraduate), and then submitted to Faculty Council for approval. Every proposal for a program must be approved by the University, but it is the approval of curriculum documents by the College (and ultimately by the Trustees and the State, via the program proposal) that brings institutional reality to a new program. Curriculum documents are generated by the program s sponsor(s) and approved by the pertinent department(s). They are then submitted to either the Undergraduate Committee on Curriculum and Degree Requirements or the Committee on Graduate Curriculum and Degree Requirements. Curriculum protocols. Submission of curriculum documents must follow Faculty Council protocols (outlined in the respective curriculum manuals referred to above): Sections A-I, A-II, A-III, A-IV. By the time the University has authorized the College to proceed with a full proposal, Faculty Council will have endorsed in principle the intent to develop the program; after this endorsement, Faculty Council curriculum committees will accept new program curriculum documents for review. Departments may create new courses (Section A-II) or revise old courses (Section A-III) at any time, but new or revised courses that will be part of the proposed program should be identified as such and ideally submitted to the appropriate curriculum committee when degree requirements (Section A-I) for the new program are submitted. Certain other matters (e.g., reactivation or withdrawal of courses) fall under Section A-IV: Other Changes. All of the above will eventually appear in a discrete document submitted to Faculty Council by the appropriate Faculty 5 Council curriculum committee. Advice about timing when to start working on the full proposal:! Do not wait for University approval of the Letter of Intent to begin work on the full proposal: delays in the review process are common. Write the proposal as soon as possible; revise later, if necessary.! Begin formal preparation of the necessary curriculum documents noted above (A-I, A-II, A-III, A- IV) as soon as Faculty Council has endorsed in principle Master Planning s resolution on the Letter of Intent. (To be sure this has happened, check with your department chairperson or with the Office of Faculty Council 1415 Boylan). At the same time, flesh out the full program proposal. By the time the full proposal is on its way to the University s Office of Academic Affairs, the curriculum approval process in Faculty Council should be moving toward completion.! Keep in mind that the program development process has two components one centered here at the College, the other focused on the University: they run concurrently and interactively they depend on one another. Faculty Council curricular legislation creates specific degree requirements as well as precise course titles and numbers; this information must be available for entry into SED attachments. Lacking this, 5 Templates for protocols Section A-I, A-II, A-III, and A-IV are on College s website.
8 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs (8) the University s Office of Academic Affairs cannot advance the proposal to the Board Committee on Academic Policy, Program, and Research (CAPPR) or the Board of Trustees. Length: the full proposal (excluding appendices and SED attachments) should not exceed 25 pages. Audience: the chief academic officers and staff at the College, the CUNY Office of Academic Affairs, and the Board CAPPR, as well as, ultimately, the staff of the New York State Education Department. Advice on preparing the content of the full proposal: The details of a full proposal are similar to those of the Letter of Intent. If the latter has been carefully prepared, the full proposal should not be too much extra work, although preparation of the University- and SED-required forms is time-consuming and must be executed meticulously. Between the Letter of Intent and the University s go-ahead on a full proposal, gather the additional information required. Create new courses, revise existing ones, and structure degree requirements and have them approved by the department(s). The checklist/table below details what s needed for the full proposal, step by step, but be sure to refer to the full text of the CUNY Handbook for helpful tips (pp. 6-9). Again, remember that reviewers appreciate finding all the anticipated subject matter treated and numbered in the order given below. Note on programs that involve collaboration with the School of Education: For program proposals that entail collaboration with the School of Education (SOE) there are additional SED forms and requirements. Although there is a long and involved online manual for new Teacher Education programs, the best advice for satisfying these requirements is to work closely with the SOE and the Office of the Provost. In summary, here is what the Full Proposal requires: G Title page / basic information: Use SED Attachment A to guide you through this step. The full proposal also requires a Table of Contents and a 250 word abstract. Early on consult the 14 SED attachments (CUNY Handbook, p. 11) major aids to developing good content. Electronic versions (into some of which you may enter data) are provided in various formats (pdf, rtf, wpd) on the College s web page. A list of the SED attachments is posted below at the very end of this document. G 1. Purpose and Goals. Once again, provide a clear statement of the purpose of the program. Build on the already completed and approved Letter of Intent. See CUNY Handbook (p. 7) for ideas / details. G 2. Need and Justification. In this section be as specific and concrete as possible:! How will this program serve the needs of a) students, b) the College, c) the community?! How will it contribute to specific State and societal needs?! Discuss employment opportunities, specific job titles with salary ranges. Document assertions.! Emphasize local demand for persons with the knowledge, skills, and credentials that program will provide. Be specific! For more ideas, see the CUNY Handbook, p. 7.! Letters of support from potential employers, if credible, can help.! Refer to articles in appropriate media that document your contentions (include in an appendix).! Address any overlap and duplication concerns that may exist at CUNY or other local colleges. Such concerns within CUNY should have been resolved before the final proposal is presented.
9 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs (9) G 3. Students.! Describe present and projected student demand; include evidence from market surveys and questionnaires, if at all possible.! Provide a TABLE projecting enrollments, full- and part-time, for the first 5 years of program.! Indicate estimated rate of attrition.! Discuss assumptions regarding enrollment and attrition in the narrative.! Address the impact of standards on admission.! Detail arrangements for counseling students to promote timely completion of the program. See CUNY Handbook for more details: p. 7. G 4. Curriculum.! Present an overview of the curriculum; give an intellectual rationale for design. See ATTACHMENT SED B.I. as a guide. Curriculum must be intellectually coherent and clearly capable of implementation.! Provide a semester-by-semester sequence for a typical program: use ATTACHMENT SED B.II.! In Appendix A provide complete course descriptions for all courses required in the program and complete course syllabi for all new courses. Note any requirements for thesis or comprehensive examination.! Address articulation needs (ATTACHMENT C). Describe articulation agreements with CUNY colleges. Include copies of signed articulation agreements in appendix (at least one such agreement for every new baccalaureate degree program is required; articulation agreements are not required for graduate programs). CUNY Handbook, pp G 5. Cost Assessment. A comprehensive assessment is needed: cover costs incurred with Faculty; Facilities and Equipment; Library and Instructional Materials. Utilize ATTACHMENTS D and E which serve as a guide to all information required for these items. See CUNY Handbook, p. 8. G a. Faculty.! Briefly summarize the qualifications of available full-time faculty who will teach in the program. Use ATTACHMENT D and see the Handbook (p. 5) for guidance in filling out the table.! Provide in Appendix B brief resumes (no more than 2 pages each) of principal full-time faculty who will teach in the program. G b. Facilities and Equipment.! Describe special space needs (for computers, laboratories, etc.). Need to add, lease, or renovate space? Estimate the costs of providing and maintaining such space and the source of funding.! Any special equipment needed? Estimate the costs and sources of funding. G c. Library and Instructional Materials.! Consult with appropriate Library faculty and describe library resources presently available for the program and any additional library needs that the program will create.! Estimate the total annual costs for upgrading library support and for other instructional materials (e.g., software, audio-visual). G d. Budget Table. Provide a TABLE of cumulative estimated costs and revenues accompanied by an explanatory narrative. ATTACHMENT E (all three parts) will take you through what is needed.
10 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs (10) G 6. Evaluation. In this section you must describe the internal and external evaluation. G a. Internal Evaluation and Outcomes Assessment.! How will program quality be monitored in the first 5 years? Include a discussion of desired outcomes for students and program.! Indicate measures that will be used in assessment, including any prospective departmental (collegiate) external evaluation.! State the criteria to be examined. See CUNY Handbook, p. 9, for more details. G b. External Evaluation. This section is required of all graduate programs and is distinct from periodic departmental external evaluations noted above.! The SED mandates that all new Master s programs be evaluated by one expert in the subject area who is from a college or university outside the New York metropolitan area. (See CUNY Handbook, p. 9, for prospective doctoral programs.) OAA, however, requires two outside evaluations for both new master s and new doctoral programs.! Evaluators names, positions, and affiliations should be identified in this section. Put the full reports of evaluators along with the curriculum vitae of each evaluator in an appendix. N.B. The requirement for External Evaluation of new Master s programs means that the completed full proposal must be sent to outside evaluators before the full proposal with these evaluations can be sent to the University s OAA. Be sure to plan at least two-three weeks for this evaluation into your schedule. APPENDICES. Following your narrative add any required appendices. Requirements will vary depending on the nature of your proposal. Appendices A and B are necessary for all proposals. Label the appendices consecutively; there should be no gaps in labeling. For example, if there are no survey instruments (as in Appendix C below), the next appendix, whatever its title, should be labeled Appendix C. For more information on appendices, see the CUNY Handbook, pp G Appendix A. Course descriptions and syllabi. The Brooklyn College Bulletin descriptions of all courses required in the program must be appended here. In addition, complete course syllabi must be included for all new courses. G Appendix B. A curriculum vitae (brief resume no more than 2 pages preferred) should be included for each principal full-time faculty member who will teach courses required in the program. Appendices C, D, E, F, and G are applicable only to some programs. Include if needed. G Appendix C. Survey instruments and results. If the college conducted a survey to determine the need for the program, the actual survey form should be appended here, as well as a summary of the findings. G Appendix D. Letters of external support. The letters must be current and the signatories should not be directly connected to the College.
11 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs (11) G Appendix E. Articulation Agreement(s), if needed. Complete and signed articulation agreement(s) in conformance with the Guidelines for Articulation Agreements (see ATTACHMENT C). G Appendix F. Affiliation Agreements. If the proposed program involves cooperative arrangements with hospitals or agencies that provide opportunities for clinical training, the appropriate agreements should be included in Appendix F. G Appendix G. The complete reports of the outside evaluators should be included here. Each evaluator s curriculum vitae must also be included. D) THE PROCESS OF FINAL APPROVAL BY THE COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY, AND THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT. See the CUNY Handbook, pp Write the full proposal for the College, University, and the State, incorporating pertinent information from all related curriculum documents (developed under protocols Section A-I, A-II, A-III, or A-IV) that have been approved by Faculty Council. Much of this material will be embedded in the SED attachments to the full proposal. The completed package--the full proposal with all appendices and attachments mandated by the University and the State Education Department is submitted by the President (after clearance from the Provost) to the University for review and approval by the Office of Academic Affairs; the Board of Trustees Committee on Academic Policy, Program, and Research (CAPPR); the Board of Trustees; and the State Education Department. Note. When a program entails a new degree to be offered by the College, or a new subject area (under the subdivisions of the HEGIS taxonomy), the SED may circulate a précis of the proposed program to colleges in the metropolitan area for comment as part of a revision of the College s master plan. Here is a summary of the specific steps of the final approval process: G 1. Faculty Council approval of Program and Curriculum. After receiving approval in principle of the Letter of Intent from Faculty Council and permission to develop the proposal from the University, submit to the appropriate Faculty Council curriculum committee all documents required to implement the program: Section A-I for program description and degree requirements; Section A-II for new courses; Section A-III for changes in existing courses; Section A-IV for other changes. University and SED procedures mandate that required and elective courses (including prerequisites) be listed by course number and title in the proposal; curriculum documents authorizing the curriculum must therefore be approved by Faculty Council by the time the College sends the full proposal to OAA. Note to Faculty Council curriculum committees: It is preferable that the pertinent Faculty Council curriculum committee (graduate or undergraduate) submit the various program components for a new program to Faculty Council for approval via a discrete curriculum document for that program and not commingle its items with heterogeneous proposals for Academic Affairs.
12 Brooklyn College Manual for Preparing New Academic Programs (12) G 2. From BC to OAA. After Faculty Council approval of the program s requirements and curriculum, the President submits 4 copies of the proposal with all required appendices and SED attachments with a cover letter to the Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs. (Note: curriculum requirements are transmitted to the Board via the program proposal, not the Chancellor s Report.) G 3. Review by OAA. The proposal is reviewed by staff at OAA within 30 business days. Any issues or concerns that require clarification are quickly communicated to the College. G 4. From OAA to CAPPR. If no revisions are required, or after revisions have been completed, the final proposal is forwarded by OAA staff to the Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs with a recommendation that it be presented to the Board s Committee on Academic Policy, Program, and Research (CAPPR). If cleared, the proposal is placed on the CAPPR agenda, the College is notified, th and the Provost and primary proposer or Department Chair travel to 80 St. for the CAPPR review. G 5. Review by CAPPR. The Executive Vice Chancellor presents the proposal to CAPPR. Though the College is not expected to make a formal presentation, be prepared to answer any questions that arise. G 6. From CAPPR to CUNY Board. If CAPPR approves the proposal, a resolution stating that approval is placed on the calendar for the next Board of Trustees meeting. After the Board has approved the program, the Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs sends the Board resolution, the full proposal, and a request to register the program to the State Education Department. G 7. From CUNY Board to State Education Department. The State Education Department (SED) review may take several months or more. The SED may request further information. G 8. Final approval and registration. N.B.: Only after the College has received notification of registration from the State Education Department, i.e., formal addition to the Inventory of Registered Programs with an assigned HEGIS code and a discrete SED program code, may it advertise the program and enroll students in it. List of SED Attachments:! Attachment A: Basic Facts / Title Page! Attachment B I: Program Content and Requirements (two parts)! Attachment B II: Program Scheduling (two parts)! Attachment C: CUNY CUNY Articulation Agreement Guidelines (directions)! Attachment C: Forms pp. 1-4! Attachment D: Faculty [Table 7 (a-d)]! Attachment D: Faculty (continued) [Table 7 (e-g)]! Attachment D: Faculty Table 8! Attachment D: Faculty Table 9! Attachment E (1): Projected Expenditures! Attachment E (2): Projected Revenue! Attachment E (3): Projected Capital Expenditures [BC New Program Manual ver ]
Board of Governors, State University System of Florida Request to Offer a New Degree Program (Please do not revise this proposal format without prior approval from Board staff) University Submitting Proposal
Staff Analysis Checklist Request to Offer a New Degree Program Board of Governors, State University System of Florida University Submitting Proposal Initial Review Date Proposed Implementation Term Last
Guidelines for Preparing New Graduate Program Proposals The New Programs and Program Review Committee of the Graduate Council recommends that the originators of proposals for new graduate programs follow
Doc. T92-012, as amended Passed by the BoT 4/8/92 Revised 8/6/97 UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS PROCEDURES FOR UNIVERSITY APPROVAL OF NEW ACADEMIC DEGREE PROGRAMS, PROGRAM CHANGES, AND PROGRAM TERMINATION
PROCEDURES FOR NEW ACADEMIC PROGRAM PROPOSALS AND PROGRAM CHANGES PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION Approved June 1992 (Amended July 1997) INTRODUCTION The
Board of Governors for Higher Education Sec. 10a-34 page 1 (12-96) TABLE OF CONTENTS Licensure and Accreditation of Institutions and Programs of Higher Learning ARTICLE ONE Policies and Procedures Introduction....
Note: These regulations are in effect while being revised to comply with Public Act 13-118. All references to the Board of Governors for Higher Education, Department of Higher Education and Commissioner
RYERSON UNIVERSITY POLICY OF SENATE PERIODIC PROGRAM REVIEW OF GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS Policy Number 126 Previous Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3,
Proposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes This document presents the format, criteria, and submission procedures for CSU bachelor
Office of the Provost Approved 8/23/2006 Pratt Institute Academic Initiative Proposal Guidelines Office of the Provost Approved 8/23/2006 Introduction This document describes the procedures for submission
Cleveland State University Approval Process for NEW Graduate Degree Programs (based on Revised OBOR Guidelines of November 2012 and Faculty Senate Policy of October 2006) 1 Step 1 A Program Development
PROPOSAL TO IMPLEMENT A NEW ACADEMIC PROGRAM (Major, Minor, Master s, Dual Degree, or Certificate) New academic programs must be approved by the AAC/Grad Council, Faculty Plenary, VPAA, Board of Trustees,
Procedures for Implementing New Graduate Programs 1 MASTER'S DEGREE PROGRAMS 2 Introduction There are three possible ways to propose new master's degree programs: the standard process (involves two steps),
Alabama Commission on Higher Education PROPOSAL FOR A NEW BACCALAUREATE DEGREE PROGRAM A. General Information 1. Institution: 2. Date of Proposal Submission: 3. Institutional Contact Person: Telephone:
Graduate Policies and Procedures for New Programs Table of Contents Page I. Overview...2 II. Five-Year Master Plan...2 III. New degree proposals: white papers...2 IV. Consultation among units...4 Prior
University of Dayton ecommons Senate Documents Academic Senate 3-14-2014 DOC 2014-04 Actions pertaining to degree programs and academic departments University of Dayton. Academic Policies Committee Follow
Procedures for Submitting Proposals for Implementation of New Degree Major Programs (Bachelor s and Master s Levels) Revised March 1985, February 2007, June 2009, June 2014 This document presents the format,
GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPING JOINT DOCTORAL PROGRAMS WITH INDEPENDENT INSTITUTIONS These procedures are based on documents developed by the CSU and California Postsecondary Education Commission (CPEC)
ESTABLISHMENT OF A GRADUATE PROGRAM LEADING TO A NEW OR EXISTING DEGREE I. Purpose and Scope These procedures describe the required steps to establish a graduate degree program leading to a new or existing
Utah System of Higher Education R401, Approval of New Programs, Program Changes, Discontinued Programs, and Program Reports Approved April 1, 2010 Printed April 6, 2010 Page 1 of 21 R401, Table of Contents
GUIDELINES FOR THE APPROVAL OF NEW, MODIFIED, OR DELETED GRADUATE PROGRAMS (DEGREES, MAJORS AND OPTIONS) THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Approved by the Graduate Council, 3/8/00; rev 12/11*, rev. 8/12**
PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY DEGREE PROGRAMS Interdisciplinary degree program refers to a program that is comprised of two or more interrelated disciplines or fields. The
OFFICE OF PROVOST S THE AND OFFICE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT TUFTS UNIVERSITY APRIL 27, 2011 GUIDELINES FOR PROPOSING NEW DEGREE AND CERTIFICATE PROGRAMS These guidelines outline the steps necessary to develop
2011 Outcomes Assessment Accreditation Handbook Associate Degree Programs Baccalaureate Degree Programs Master Degree Programs Accreditation Policies can be found in a separate document on the ATMAE website
Approval Process Overview PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NEW GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS Proposal for a new degree program is initiated by the submission of a Program Development Plan (PDP). Following
Proposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes This document presents the format, criteria, and submission procedures for CSU bachelor
GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE PROVOST UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15260 JULY, 2002 Guidelines for Conducting Evaluations of Academic Programs
PROVOST S OFFICE TUFTS UNIVERSITY GUIDELINES FOR PROPOSING NEW DEGREE PROGRAMS AT TUFTS UNIVERSITY These guidelines outline the steps necessary to develop a written proposal and to obtain the approvals
DOCTORAL PROGRAMS It is the policy of the university to allow development of new doctoral programs (either independent or programs developed in conjunction with other institutions). Joint doctoral programs
HANDBOOK FOR THE CREATION OF CSU/UC JOINT DOCTORAL PROGRAMS This Handbook sets forth the information needed to plan and implement a joint CSU/UC doctoral degree. The administrative elements that need to
CANDIDACY FOR ACCREDITATION The Meaning of Candidacy The Candidate for Accreditation program offers certain postsecondary institutions the opportunity to establish a formal, publicly recognized relationship
CAMPUS GUIDE TO THE NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM APPROVAL PROCESS As of February 2015 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS New Graduate Program Approval Process Steps (Overview).... 2 1. Introduction.... 3 2. Initial Discussion
University of Richmond http://facultyhandbook.richmond.edu/ch_iii/index.html#discontinuance E. Procedures for the Discontinuance of an Academic Department or Program of Instruction Involving Possible Dismissal
IU Southeast Program Development Guidelines: New Degree Online Follow the steps below to develop a proposal and supporting documentation for a New Online Degree. School Level Academic Affairs Contingent
Institutional Quality Assurance Process University of Ottawa June 27, 2011 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Authorities...1 1.2 Contact person...1 1.3 Definitions...1 1.4 Evaluation of programs...2
Appendix B Format for the Graduate Degree Program Proposal The proposal must adhere to the following specifications. Failure to do so will result in the return of the proposal to campus and an associated
To receive the master s degree at San Diego State University, the candidate must complete the following general requirements as well as the more specific requirements listed in the appropriate sections
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education NEW PROGRAM REQUEST FORM FOR TRADITIONAL AND ONLINE PROGRAMS (Created for Consideration of Programs Outside Institutional Function) Revised June 2015 Institution
A. Introduction Policies and Procedures for Undergraduate Certificate Programs Undergraduate certificate programs may be created within the structure of undergraduate academic units. Students may be awarded
Organization and Bylaws College of Education and Human Development I. Mission The College of Education and Human Development (EHD) has a special mission within the University of fostering healthy human
Institutional Quality Assurance Process University of Ottawa June 28, 2011 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Authorities... 1 1.2 Contact person... 1 1.3 Definitions... 1 1.4 Evaluation of programs...
Accelerated Graduate Degree Programs Proposal Template Overview. This template was created to: 1) provide a general overview of the basic elements of accelerated graduate degree programs at the University
Accreditation Standards and Rules and Regulations for Mississippi Nursing Degree Programs Revised July 1, 1992 Revised July 1, 1993 Amended April 1995 Amended June 1998 Amended July 1999 Revised November
FORMAL PROPOSAL FOR A NEW DEGREE PROGRAM and DISTANCE LEARNING DELIVERY (Program is New and Institution Currently Offers Distance Learning Programs) Form 3A Institution: Georgia Southwestern State University
Guidelines For Graduate Studies In Biology The Master of Science in Biology Department of Biology Virginia Commonwealth University 1000 W. Cary St. Richmond, VA 23284-2012 Telephone: (804) 828-1562 Fax:
10/23/03 DEPARTMENT PLAN The Department of Counseling, Educational, and Developmental Psychology College of Education and Human Development Eastern Washington University Cheney ω Spokane Washington Formally
Oklahoma Board of Nursing 2915 North Classen Boulevard, Suite 524 Oklahoma City, OK 73106 (405) 962-1800 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEY VISITS OF NURSING EDUCATION PROGRAMS Preparing for the Survey Visit Each nursing
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON The Graduate School New Graduate Degree Program Proposal Guidelines A new graduate degree proposal must include the items below and be submitted with a cover sheet and appendices
Graduate Certificate Programs General Guidelines and Formal Review Processes An academic program organizes courses and related activities for the achievement of specific learning outcomes. Academic programs
UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL OFFICE OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 4 Program-Related Actions New and Spin-off Degree Program
Office of the Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs MSC05 3400 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 505.277.2611 NEW GRADUATE DEGREE PRELIMINARY REVIEW AND PROPOSAL
TITLE 135 PROCEDURAL RULE WEST VIRGINIA COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION SERIES 11 DEGREE DESIGNATION, GENERAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NEW PROGRAM APPROVAL, AND DISCONTINUANCE OF EXISTING
Thesis-Dissertation Regs, March 2009 1/7 Regulations for the Preparation of the MA THESIS And PhD DISSERTATION FACULTY/SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES REGULATIONS Thesis and dissertation proposal regulations
GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY Texas Southern University The Purposes of Graduate Program Review Graduate program review at Texas Southern University exists to ensure that programs are functioning at the
Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Geography Bylaws Passed: 1 December 2006 Revised: February, 2007; February, 2008; April, 2008; August, 2008; October 8th, 2009; The Department of Environmental
August 21, 2012 Creating Graduate Dual-Degree and Joint-Degree Programs at Rice University Guidelines Proposal - March 9, 2012 extensively revised John Olson and Arnaud Chevallier, April -July 2012, in
244 CMR 6.00: APPROVAL OF NURSING EDUCATION PROGRAMS AND THE GENERAL CONDUCT THEREOF Section 6.01: Definitions 6.02: Public Notice of Nursing Education Program Approval Status 6.03: Nursing Education Programs
QUALITY ASSURANCE HANDBOOK Policies, procedures and resources to guide undergraduate and graduate program development and improvement at UOIT UOIT Academic Council June 15, 2010, revised June 9, 2011 QUALITY
FORMAL PROPOSAL FOR A NEW DEGREE PROGRAM and DISTANCE LEARNING DELIVERY (Program is New and Institution Currently Offers Distance Learning Programs) Institution: Approval by President or Vice President
Periodic Program Review Graduate Programs MANUAL PART I: The Self-Study Report 1 Table of Contents GRADUATE KEY CONTACTS AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION 3 INTRODUCTION 5 HOW TO USE THIS MANUAL? 5 THE SELF STUDY:
Associate in Arts for Transfer (AA-T) and Associate in Science for Transfer (AS-T) General Instructions February 2011 Approval of Associate in Arts for Transfer (AA-T) and Associate in Science for Transfer
Board of Commissioners SELF-STUDY HANDBOOK CHAPTER TWO Guidelines for Conducting an Institutional Self-Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Purpose of the Self-Study 1 Institutional Evaluation 1 Institutional
Appointments, Promotion, and Tenure Criteria and Procedures College of Nursing The Ohio State University Approved by the College of Nursing Faculty, June 2, 2005 Approved by the Office of Academic Affairs,
Texas Woman s University Guidelines for Implementing Distance Education Degrees 1 The offering of entire programs via distance technologies involves rigorous approvals both on and off campus. Individuals
Strategic Planning Procedure Manual Adopted by the Strategic Planning Committee January 2003; revised December 2007, revised November 2011; revised September 2012; revised October 2014; revised June 2015
8.011 Authorization of New Academic Degree Programs and Other Curricular Offerings. (1) New Academic Degree Program Authorization - To ensure that new academic programs implemented by a state university
FINANCIAL PLANNING GUIDELINES FOR PROFESSIONAL DEGREE SUPPLEMENTAL TUITION SELF SUPPORTING PROGRAM FEES PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS INTRODUCTION This document describes the financial planning required for charging
PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY AND DEPARTMENTS The Graduate School of NMSU 575 646-5745 Revised on March 19, 2013 Guidelines are provided on developing proposals for the following: Guidelines on
International Board of Education General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists Handbook for the Approval of New Degree Programs and Institutional Upgrading in Seventh-day Adventist Colleges and Universities
Offshore and Cross-Border Programs FULL POLICY CONTENTS Scope Policy Statement Reason for Policy Procedures Definitions ADDITIONAL DETAILS Additional Contacts Web Address Forms Related Information Effective:
Guidelines for Massachusetts Early Educator Preparation Programs Participating in the Early Childhood Educator Scholarships Program Background The Departments of Higher Education and Early Education and
Curriculum Development & Procedures Contents Curriculum Program, Course Development, and Revision Procedures... 3 Program of Study: Required Actions... 7 Program Termination... 8 Transfer Agreement Process...
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities APPLIED DOCTORATE NEW PROGRAM APPLICATION All new programs must be reviewed and formally approved by the Office of the Chancellor. Proposals for new applied doctorate
INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY Approval: Responsibility: Contact Office: University Senate; Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance (Quality Council) Provost and Vice President Academic
COMMISSION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Friday, October 14, 2011 DISCUSSION ITEM D: New Program Proposal Guidelines Staff Recommendation Background For discussion only. Drafts of the New Program Proposal Guidelines
GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS OVERVIEW OF PROGRAM REVIEW At Illinois State University, primary responsibility
SELF-STUDY REPORT DIVIDERS Outlined below are the supporting documents that are required to be submitted with the Self- Study Report. These additional details are designed to provide the Program Director
Institutional Quality Assurance Process (Covering also the academic, non vocational degree programs of Dominican University College) February 17, 2012 Senate Approved May 30, 2012 Quality Council Ratification