Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location (District) Project applied. for 1 VISION Medak IRCA 2 Ravicherla Integrated Development and

Transcription

1 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCREENING COMMITTEE HELD ON 20 TH MARCH 2013 AND AGAIN ON TH APRIL 2013 TO CONSIDER NEW PROJECT PROPOSALS UNDER THE SCHEME OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR PREVENTION OF ALCOHOLISM AND SUBSTANCE (DRUGS) ABUSE AND FOR SOCIAL DEFENCE SERVICES. A meeting of the Screening Committee constituted by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment was held on 20th March, 2013 under the Chairmanship of Shri T.R. Meena, Joint Secretary (Social Defence) to scrutinize and make recommendation on the new proposals of NGOs received through State Governments/Union Territories under the Scheme of Financial Assistance for Prevention of Alcoholism and Substance (Drugs) Abuse and for Social Defence Services. The Committee could not consider all the new proposals due to shortage of time; therefore, it decided to meet again on 16-17th April 2013 to consider these cases. Shri T.R. Meena, Joint Secretary (SD) and the Chairman of the Committee had to leave for election duty as an observer for the assembly election in the State of Karnataka on 16 th April 2013, therefore, he authorized the other members of the committee to scrutinize the proposals. Due to his ill health Shri M.M. Sabharwal from HelpAge India, authorized Ms. Anupama Datta to participate in the meeting on his behalf. Fr. Joe Pereira from Kripa Foundation, Shri Sandeep Gupta, Deputy Secretary (IFD) in the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, and Ms. Anupama Datta (On behalf of Shri M.M. Sabharwal) members of the Committee, were present in the meeting. Shri Lalsanglur, Director (SD), Shri Surendra Rawat, Deputy Secretary (Age) and Shri Aujender Singh, Under Secretary were asked by the Committee to assist in the scrutiny during the meeting. 2. At the outset, the Committee members were briefed about the existing guideline of the Ministry (i.e. Order No.1-31/2006-Cdn dated ), norms and guidelines of the Scheme, budget allocation for under the Scheme, notional allocation fixed for the States/UTs within the budgetary outlay and number of new proposals received. 3. Shri T.R. Meena, Joint Secretary (Social Defence) and Chairman of the committee draw the attention of the members to clause (ii) of the Scheme of Assistance for Prevention of Alcoholism and Substance (Drugs) Abuse and for Social Defence Services which entails that the organizations/institutions to be eligible should ordinarily have existed for three years. After deliberations in details, the Committee agrees that its inference in the context of the scheme is that the organization should have working experience of three years in the deaddiction sector. 4. The Committee then decided to give priority to those proposals which have been received from un-served/under-served States, followed by un-served/under-served districts, in that order, subject to fulfillment of other requirements of the scheme and availability of funds. The Committee also decided to give priority to the innovative projects, projects for most vulnerable groups like children, women etc. and proposals from States where high incidence of drug abuse is reported. 5. The Committee, during examination of the proposals, observed that a large number of new proposals recommended by the State Government were incomplete in many respects and therefore, did not find it possible to recommend these proposals. The Committee decided that all such incomplete proposals should be returned to the respective State/UT Governments with the request to advise the concerned Organization to rectify such shortcomings and rerecommend afresh for consideration of the Screening Committee in the future meeting. Page 1 of 24

2 6. State wise position of the new proposals placed before the Committee and its recommendations are given as under: (i) Andhra Pradesh: All the 7 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Andhra Pradesh were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, found only following two proposals suitable for recommendation:- Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location (District) Project applied for 1 VISION Medak 2 Ravicherla Integrated Development and Krishna Education Society (RIDES) Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee is at Annexure. (ii) Assam: All the 24 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Assam were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not found any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (iii) Bihar:- One new proposal duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Bihar was placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing the proposal in detail did not find it suitable for recommendation. Details of the proposal along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (iv) Chhattisgarh: All the 2 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Chhattisgarh were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (v) Delhi: 4 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of NCT of Delhi were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals, found only one proposal suitable for recommendation whose detail is given as under: Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location (District) Project applied for 1 Bhartiya Parivardhan Sansthan, D I Basti Vikas Kendra,Nand Nagri, Delhi. Nand Nagri, Delhi Up gradation of 15 bedded to 30 bedded Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee is at Annexure. (vi) Gujarat:- 14 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Gujarat were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals, found only one proposal suitable for recommendation whose detail is given as under: Page 2 of 24

3 Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location (District) Project applied for 1 Nashabandi Mandal Nadiyad Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (vii) Haryana: One new proposal duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Haryana was placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing the proposal in detail did not found it suitable for recommendation. Details of the proposal along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (viii) Himachal Pradesh: 2 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (ix) Jammu & Kashmir: 3 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (x) Jharkhand:- One new proposal duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Jharkhand was placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing the proposal in detail did not find it suitable for recommendation. Details of the proposal along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (xi) Karnataka: All the 8 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Karnataka were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, recommended the following 6 proposals: Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location (District) 1 Rajiv Gandhi Education Chamarajanagar & Welfare Trust, Mysore 2 Eshwar Education & Bangalore Welfare Society 3 Sri Sai International Bangalore Rural Charitable Trust 4 ROSHINI Rehabilitation Hangal, Haveri Centre for Addicts, Distt. Dakshina Kannada 5 Sri Akshaya Niketana Mandya Trust, Mandya 6 Shri Shakthi Association, Guttur Colony, Davanagere District, Karnataka Davanagere Karnataka Project applied for RRTC Page 3 of 24

4 Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. The Committee reiterated its earlier recommendation that the organization Shri Shakthi Association may work as RRTC for Karnataka State. (xii) Kerala: All the 9 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Kerala were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, recommended the following one proposal: Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location Project applied (District) for 1 Gandhi Bhavan, International Trust Pathanamthitta Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (xiii) Madhya Pradesh: All the 6 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Madhya Pradesh were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, recommended the following one proposal: Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location (District) 1 Kamalnayan Shiksaha prasar Jabalpur Samiti, Azad Madhya Pradesh Project applied for Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (xiv) Maharashtra: All the 37 new proposals for duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Maharashtra were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, recommended the following 5 proposals: Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location Project applied for (District) 1 Sagar Gramin Vikas Sanstha Wardha 2 Shri Vitthal Rukmini Sevabhavi Beed Sanstha 3 Prajwal Bahuddeshiya Education Nagpur Sanstha 4 Janhit Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, Amravati 5 Lokseva Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Akola Yavatmal Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. Page 4 of 24

5 (xv) Manipur:- All the 13 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Manipur were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not found any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (xvi) Mizoram: All the 6 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Mizoram were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, recommended the following 3 proposals: Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location (District) Project applied for 1. Gilead Healing Centre Lawngtlai Lawngtlai Bazar Veng, Mizoram 2. Kharislabon Society, Zote, Champhai District Champhai Vengthaing, Champhai District 3. Darlawn Block MHIP, Darlawn, Town Shillong Veng, Darlawn Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee is at Annexure. (xvii) Nagaland: One new proposal duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Nagaland was placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing the proposal in detail did not found it suitable for recommendation. Details of the proposal along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (xviii) Odisha: All the 14 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and are received through Govt. of Odisha were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, recommended the following 3 proposals: Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location Project applied for (District) 1 Jana Kalyan Seva Sanstha Nuapada 2 The Chetana Dhenkanal 3 Association for Voluntary Action Dampur, Distt. RRTC (AVA), at Dampur, P.O. Berboi, Distt. Puri, Orissa Puri, Odisha Details of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. The Committee also reiterated its earlier recommendation that the organization Association for Voluntary Action (AVA) may work as RRTC for the State of Orissa. Page 5 of 24

6 (xix) Punjab:- : 2 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Punjab were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (xx) Puducherry: One new proposal duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Pudducherry was placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing the proposal in detail did not find it suitable for recommendation. Details of the proposal along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (xxi) Rajasthan:- All the 14 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Rajasthan were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, recommended the following one proposal: Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location (District) Project applied for 1 Tapovan Nasha Mukti Avam Punarwas Sansthan Sri Ganganagar, Raj. Sri Ganganagar Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (xxii) Sikkim: The 2 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Sikkim were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, recommended both the proposals whose details are given as under: Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location (District) Project applied for 1 Serenity Home Betzatha Lower Burtuk, Gangtok. Society, Lower Burtuk, Gangtok. 2 Sikkim Rehabilitation and Detoxification Society, Nimtok, 32 Mile, East Sikkim East Sikkim (xxiii) Tamil Nadu: Four new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Tamil Nadu were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, recommended the following one proposal: Page 6 of 24

7 Sl. No Name of NGO Project Location (District) 1 Mass Action Network India Trust Project applied for Thiruvallore Up gradation of 15 bedded to 30 bedded Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (xiv) Uttar Pradesh:- 7 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Uttar Pradesh were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. (xv) West Bengal: All the 3 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of West Bengal were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure. 8. The recommendations of the Committee in para 7 above are subject to other conditions and completion of necessary formalities as per the norms/ guidelines of the Scheme. (M. M. Sabharwal) Member (Fr. Joe Pereira) Member (Sandeep Gupta) Member (T.R. Meena) Chairman Page 7 of 24

8 Annexure List of New Proposals under the Scheme of financial assistance for Prevention of Alcoholism and Substance (Drugs) Abuse and for Social Defence Services considered by the Screening Committee in its meeting held on 20 th March 2013 and again on April 2013 Sl. No. Name of the Organization (i) ANDHRA PRADESH 1. Society for Rural Development and Rehabilitation Project Location (District) Date of State Govt. Recommen dation Remarks R.R. District Date of Establishment is Therefore, experience of three years is not with the organization. No work done reflected in Annual Report 2. PATH, Kamareddy Nizamabad Date of Establishment is Therefore, experience of three years is not with the organization. No expenditure on deaddiction in last 3 years 3. Gracy Organisation for Development Services 4. SANKALP Mahaboobnaga r 5. Health & Care Social Welfare Society Nizamabad No Expenditure on Awareness on Deaddiction reflected in audited accounts Date of commencement is in the year No work done except projection. Nellore New Project. No experience of 3 years. Descriptive and identical annual reports which do not reflect the actual work done by the organization. Discrepancy in the date of commencement of the project in Annual report and the Inspection report. 6. Ravicherla Integrated Recommended Development and Education Society Krishna (RIDES) 7. VISION Medak Recommended Page 8 of 24

9 (ii) ASSAM 1. Indira Ghandhi Charitable Trust Dist. Kokrajhar 2 Sadu Asom Gramya Puthibhoral Santha Distt. Karbi Angiong 3 Jyoti Development Society, Distt. Nagaon 4 O joyoti Managament Society, Distt. Nagaon 5 Gram Vikas Parished, Distt. Nagaon 6 GYPSY CARE, Distt. Nagaon 7 North East Disabled Development Society Kamrup 8 GREENS, Udalguri, BTAD, Mission Road 9 Gram Vikas Kendra Bongalmora, P.O. Islamgaon 10 Jaluguti Agragami Mahila Sammittee Jalugut Morigaon 11 Nalbari Zila Samaj Seva Sangha, Nalbari Town, Ward No-8, PO & Distt. Nalbari 12 WODWICHEE, P.O. Lakshirbond Distt. Hailakandi, 13 Al-Amin Library Foundation, R.D.M, Road P.O.. Distt. Kokrajhar Annual Report not available. No mention of de-addiction in Audit Report. Karbi Angiong No mention of deaddiction in Annual Report & Audit Report. Nagaon No mention of deaddiction in Annual Report & Audit Report. Nagaon No mention of deaddiction in MOA & Audit Report. Annual Report for not available. Nagaon Proposal is for RRTC Not sufficient Experience in de-addiction Nagaon No mention of deaddiction in Annual Report & Audit Report Kamrup IR is not in prescribed format. No mention of deaddiction in Annual Report & Audit Report Udalguri IR is not in prescribed format. No mention of deaddiction in MOA, Annual Report & Audit Report. Annual Report & Audit Report for not available. Lakhimpur Proposal is for organizing Camps. No work done in de-addiction Morigaon IR is not in prescribed format. No mention of deaddiction in Annual Report & Audit Report Nalbari IR unsigned and not in prescribed format. No mention of de-addiction in MOA. Annual Report not available. Cachar No work in de-addiction. Discrepancy in inspection & annual report. Jorahat No mention of deaddiction in MOA Page 9 of 24

10 Nagaon, Assam 14 North East Voluntary Association of Rural Development, Assam 15 Society of Total Society Education & Economical Development (SOFTSEED), P.O.Sonitpur, Distt. Sonitpur 16 New Life Foundation Sonaborighat, Cachar, Assam 17 Barak Valley Welfare Dev. Society, Ramkrishna Mission Road Cilchar, Cachar 18 Disha Foundation Netaki Road, Subhash Nagar Silchar, Distt. Cachar 19 North East Development Society, Cachar Assam 20 Deepa s Food Prolduct Samiti P.O. Khoirabari, Distt. Darrang, Assam 21 North Eastern Centre for Education Distt. Kamrup Assam 22 Dr. Ambedkar Mission Dhopatari, PO Changachari, Kamrup 23 Tribal Welfare Development Society Kharguli, Kampur (M) 24 North East Voluntary Kamrup Rural No work done in deaddiction and no mention in annual report Sonitpur No evidence of work done in drug addicts rehabilitation. Discrepancy in Annual report and Audit reports. Cachar IR is not in prescribed format. Annual Report not available. No mention of de-addiction in Audit Report Cachar IR is not in prescribed format. No mention of deaddiction in MOA, Annual Report & Audit Report Cachar IR is not in prescribed format. Annual Report for not available. No mention of de-addiction in Audit Report Cachar IR is not in prescribed format. No mention of deaddiction in MOA & Annual Report Darrang IR is not in prescribed format. Kamrup Proposal is for RRTC. No clinical experience at all Kamrup No mention of deaddiction in MOA & Audit Report Kamrup Name of Inspection Officer is not mention in IR. MOA not available. No mention of deaddiction in Annual Report & Audit Report Barpeta No work done in deaddiction and no mention Page 10 of 24

11 Association of Rural Development, Assam (iii) BIHAR 1. Safal Nav Nirman Sansthan (iv) CHHATTISGARH 1. Kalayani Social Welfare and Research Organiation, Bhilai Distt. Durg 2 Sreejan Sewa Samiti, Pakhanjur, Kanker (Chhattisgarh). (v) DELHI 1. Turning Point Foundation, A-528, Near Dayal Market, Narela Road, Alipur, Delhi-36 2 Society for Promotion of Youth & Masses (SPYM) 1119/9, Opp.-B-4, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi 3 Urbo-Rural Integrated Development Association WZ- 33A, Dayal Sar Road, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi 4 Bhartiya Parivardhan Sansthan, D I Basti Vikas Kendra,Nand Nagri, Delhi. (VI) Gujarat 1. Jivandeep Health Education and Charitable Trust 2. Maldhaari Seva Sangh 3. Shree Katurba Seva Ashram Page 11 of 24 in annual report Muzaffarpur Discrepancy in Annual Report and organization has not experience of 3 years in the field of de-addiction Durg IR is not in prescribed format. Kanker Annual Report for & not available. Alipur, Delhi- 36 Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi. WZ-33A, Dayal Sar Road, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi Nand Nagri, Delhi No mention of deaddiction in Audit Report Inspection has been done of the existing centre, whereas the proposed centre is elsewhere No mention of deaddiction in MOA and Annual Reports Recommended for Up gradation from 15 bedded to 30 bedded Junagarh No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. Ahmedabad No application, No Annual Report for last 3 years. No specific mention about deaddiction in MOA Navsari No application, No Annual Report for last 3 years. No

12 4. Shree Harssidha Education and Charitable Trust 5. Naya Gujarat Seva Mandal 6. Shree Gram Nirman Trust 7. Bharat Gram Vikas Mandal 8. Shiv Shakti Mahilaa Sahakari Udhyog 9. Sardar Patel Khadi Gramudhyog Sammiti 10. Shree Rambhaben Mohanbhai Doberiya Education and Charitable Trust 11. Jay Khodiyar Khadi Gram Vikas Seva Mandal 12. Bhansali Charitable Trust specific mention about deaddiction in MOA. Incomplete documents Panchmahal No experience in the field of prevention of drug abuse. This is the first attempt Ahmedabad No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No Annual Report for last 3 years. Bhavnagar No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. Rajkot No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. Ahmedabad No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. Rajkot No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction Rajkot No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. No Annual Report for last 3 years. Rajkot No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. No Annual Report for last 3 years Banaskantha No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. 13. Nashabandi Mandal Nadiyad Recommended 14. Nashabandi Mandal Bharuch Documentation not complete (vii) HARYANA 1. Society for All Around Human Development ward No. 9 Vivekanand Nagar, Bahadurgarh, Jhajjar. Haryana Bahadurgarh De-addiction not an objective in MOA No report on work done on Drug abuse prevention Page 12 of 24

13 (viii) HIMACHAL PRADESH 1 Naya Severa Trust Delhi Integrated Rehabilitation Centre for Addicts Jhiri 2 Naya Severa Trust Sidhpur Sarkari Delhi Integrated Rehabilitation Centre for Addicts at Sidhpur Sarkari (ix) 1. All J&K Youth Welfare Organisation near Gousia Hospital, Khanyar, JAMMU & KASHMIR 2. J&K United Pakeeza Welfare Forum 3. J&K United Pakeeza Welfare Forum (x) JHARKHAND 1 Jharkhand Swastha Seva Sansthan (xi) KARNATAKA 1 Rajiv Gandhi Education & Welfare Trust, Mysore 2 Eshwar Education & Welfare Society 3 Ujwala Vividhodesha Sangha 4 Sri Sai International Charitable Trust 5 Surakshitha Women and Children Multi Welfare Cultural Social Charitable Trust Jhiri No supporting proof for rent. Peripheral work not clinical. Khanyar, Srinagar Dharmsal, Mendhar, Distt. Poonch Poonch, Rajouri Rural Area Page 13 of 24 No rent Documents. Documentation of beneficiaries not proper Inspection report not in prescribed format. No mention about the name and designation of the inspecting officer. No activity on de-addiction reflected Identical and descriptive annual reports Proposal is for deaddiction camps and as per the Scheme De-addiction camps can be organized by existing s only Ranchi Inspection Report not in prescribed format. Annual Report & Audit Account not available for 3 years Chamarajanagar Recommended Bangalore Recommended Gulbarga No clinical experience Bangalore Rural Recommended Hassan It is a prospective project. Descriptive and identical annual reports.

14 6 ROSHINI Rehabilitation Centre for Addicts, Dakshina Kannada 7 Sri Akshaya Niketana Trust, Mandya 8 Shri Shakthi Association, Guttur Colony, Davanagere District, Karnataka (xii) KERALA 1. Mochanam, Shornur road, Thrissur Hangal, Haveri Distt. Page 14 of Recommended Mandya Recommended Davanagere Karnataka 2. St. Johns, Pirappancode, uram 3. The Dale View Thiruvananthap uram Proposal is for RRTC. Recommended Thrissur Proposal is for deaddiction camps and as per the Scheme De-addiction camps can be organized by existing s only Thiruvananthap No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA Proposal is for expansion of to 50-bedded. Present bed capacity of the centre is sufficient as per bed utilization 4. Family Planning Association of India Thiruvananthap uram No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. 5. Vivekananda Medical Mission Palakkad No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. 6. The Liberation Idukky Incomplete inspection Social and report Charitable Society, 7. Centre for Advanced Projects and Ernakulam Proposal is for RRTC. No experience in de-addiction Solutions (CAPS) 8. St. Gregorious Pathanamthitta De-addiction not an Medical Mission objecting in MOA 9. Gandhi Bhavan, Pathanamthitta Recommended (xiii) MADHYA PRADESH 1. Matrabhumi Mahila avam Bal Vikas samiti viyabra Distt. Rajgarh Rajgarh Existing activities are on tobacco and there is no focus on de-addiction 2. Red Swastik Society Bhopal Branch JDA Bhawan Jabalpur Distt. 3. Society for Maximining Agricultural & Rural Technology B-31 Aakriti Garden Jabalpur Discrepancy in reported activities and expenditure statement. Descriptive & identical reports Khandwa No mention of deaddiction in AR and Audit reports. Therefore, no evidence of work done on recovery of addicts

15 Nehru Nagar Bhopal Branch 18 Ravindra Nagar Khandwa 4. Indian Red Cross Society Distt. Branch, Red Cross Bhavan, Jabalpur 5. Dalit Sangh H.No. 13 Lata Marg Mitra Kunj Sohagpur Distt. Hosangabad (Counseling Centre) 6. Kamalnayan Shiksaha prasar Samiti, Azad Madhyapradesh (xiv) MAHARASHTRA 1. Saraswati Dhyan Prasarak Sanstha 2. Shri Jagdamba Vidya Prasarak Mandal 3. Jeevan Rekha Pratisthan, Latur 4. Indian Red Cross Society 5. Sagar Gramin Vikas Sanstha 6. Astha Bahuudeshiya Sanstha, Bhosari 7. Gayatri Education Trust, 8. Universal versatile Society, 9. Buddhabhushan Manvata Vihar Samiti 10. Ahilya Bahudhesiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Latur 11. Late Sona Algonda Patil Trust, Sangli 12. Youth Action for Social Awareness & Jabalpur Organization has not experience in de-addiction Hosangabad I/R indicates the year as , whereas the recommendations of the State Govt are for Jabalpur Recommended Parbhani No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. Parbhani This is a time barred case. Last grant was released in the year Beed No proof of work done. Rent not proportionate Nagpur It is a prospective project. No experience in the field Wardha Recommended Pune No registration certificate Annual Report one year no mention Jalgaon No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. Washim No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No expenditure/activity about de-addiction. Akola Annual report for not available. Other reports also do not indicate any activity on drug deaddiction. Osmanabad No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No expenditure/activity about de-addiction. Sangli No work done reflected in the Annual Reports. Incomplete documentation Thane No expenditure/activity about de-addiction. Page 15 of 24

16 Development Activities 13. Chandan Yuvak Shikshan Vyam Vikas Krida Mandal 14. Ashirwad Shaikshanik & Samajik Sanstha 15. Shri Gurudatta Bahudeshiya Shikshan Sanstha 16. Indian Red Cross Society 17. Sagar Gramin Vikas Sanstha 18. Samta Gramvikas Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, Yavatmal 19. Savitribai Phule Bahujanvikas Health & Sports Magasvargiya A.E. Sanstha 20. Lokmanya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Latur 21. Jogaimata Krushi Gramin Vikas Sevabhavi Sanstha, Dhule 22. Mahila Bahuddeshiya Krida Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Akola 23. Universal versatile Society, Washim 24. Maitree Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, Aurangabad Non-existent Centre as reported by RRTC (West Zone-I) Latur No rent agreement All years annual report same No work done Nanded No work reflected in audit reports. Not authentic inspection report Jalgaon Unsigned Inspection Report. No expenditure/activity about de-addiction. Wardha Also figured at Sl.No.5 Recommended Gadchiroli No mention of deaddiction activities in annual report esp. in Washim No expenditure/activity about de-addiction. Osmanabad Documentation lacking. Annual reports inadequate Too many other projects on different fields. Nandurbar No documentation of rent Annual Report of projection. No work done Washim Identical Annual Reports. Not authentic reports Rent agreement not specific Washim No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. Nagpur No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. 25. Jeeven Dhara Thane No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. 26. Anandvan Pune MOA in Marathi. No Bahhudeshiya Sanstha expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. 27. Indian Social Nagpur Annual Reports not Page 16 of 24

17 Welfare Association 28. Jagruthi Bahuuddeshiya Sethkari Mitramandal 29. Shri Datta Gramin Va Shahari Vidya Prasark Mandal 30. Muktachitanya Samajik Shaikshanik, Arogya, Krida Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, 31. Navayuvak Krida Vyayam Yuvak Kalyan Shaikshnik Va Sanskrutik Mandal 32. Late Bhikajirao Alies Dada Jagtap Prathisthan 33. Sneha Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, 34. Shri Vitthal Rukmini Sevabhavi Sanstha 35. Prajwal Bahuddeshiya Education Sanstha 36. Janhit Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, 37. Lokseva Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Yavatmal (xv) MANIPUR 1 Rural Education Development Association (REDCA) Ukhrul 2 The Youth Development Organization, Tera Bazar, Imphal West available. MOA in marathi Washim No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction. Akola Incomplete address No mention in MOA. No work done as per Annual Report. Akola Less expenditure/activity on de-addiction. Akola No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. Less expenditure/ activity on de-addiction. Pune No objective proof with documentation available for work done Nagpur No objective proof with documentation of work done Recommended Beed Nagpur Amravati Akola Page 17 of Recommended Recommended Recommended Ukhral No work done till date. It is a prospective project In the AR also the funds have been requested without showing any work being done. Imphal West The Annual Reports and Audit reports do not substantiate the work done. It is a prospective project.

18 3 Rural Downtrodden People Upliftment Society Tamengiong 4 Sangai Foundation Uripok Haobam Dewan leikai Imphal East District 5 The Cultural Training Institute Brahmapur Nahabm Imphal East 6 Rural Woman & Children Development Association Taobungkhok 7 Ching-Tam Yaipha Thourang Lup (CTYTL), Imphal East 8 United Voluntary Youth Council, 4 th Floor, Deva Office Complex, Paona Bazar, Imphal- 9 The Youth Development Organisation, Tera Bazar, Imphal West 10 Environment and Economics Management Association (EEMA) 11 Existence Development Society, Nagamapal Soram Leirakm Imphal 12 Council for Anti Poverty Action & Rural Volunteers, New Checkon, dimdailong, Imphal East Manipur 13 Rural Health Organization Naoremthong, Laishram Leirak Imphal, Manipur Tamengiong No documentations Annual reposts descriptive. Imphal East IR is not in prescribed format. No mention of deaddiction in Annual Report & Audit Report Imphal East Name of Inspection Officer is not mention in IR. No mention of deaddiction in Annual Report & Audit Report Imphal West No mention of deaddiction in MOA, Annual Report & Audit Report Imphal East No mention of deaddiction in MOA, Annual Report & Audit Report Imphal West The Annual Reports and Audit reports do not substantiate the work done. It is a prospective project Imphal West The Annual Reports and Audit reports do not substantiate the work done. It is a prospective project Imphal West No mention of deaddiction in MOA, Annual Report & Audit Report Imphal West Minimal or no expenditure on de-addiction. Multiplicity of many other projects and there is no focus on De-addiction Imphal East As per the inspection report the year of establishment is Annual reports of 3 years not available. Imphal West ; The Annual Reports and Audit reports do not substantiate the work done. It is a prospective project Page 18 of 24

19 (xvi) MIZORAM 1. Thenzawl Service Society Thenzawl Field veng Serchhip District, Mizoram 2. MHIP Joint Vairengte, Kawngthar, Vairengte, Mizoram 3. Gilead Healing Centre Lawngtlai Bazar Veng, Mizoram 4. Kharislabon Society, Zote, Champhai Vengthaing, Champhai District 5. Darlawn Block MHIP, Shillong Veng, Darlawn 6. Mara Chano py Council Veng, Saiha (xvii) NAGALAND 1. Shansham Organization Post Box 09, Mon, Nagaland (xviii) ORISSA 1. Voluntary Association for Nature's Development & Human Upliftment, Distt. Bhadrak 2. The Chetana, Distt. Dhenkanal 3. Laxmi Narayan Seva Pratisthan 4. Orissa Social Rural Technology Institute 5. Society for Upliftment of Poor through Peoples Organisation Research & Training (SUPPORT) Serchhip District, Mizoram Page 19 of No mention of deaddiction in MOA Annual Report shows that they do not have minimal experience in drug deaddiction programme. Audit Account do not indicate any expenditure on de-addiction. Vairengte Annual Report & Audit Account for last 3 years are not available Lawngtlai Recommended Champhai District Darlawn, Town Uncovered Distt. Area at Saiha Recommended Recommended Incomplete documentation of the work done on deaddiction. Mon Inspection Report is not in prescribed format Bhadrak No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. Dhenkanal No mention in MOA. No work done in de-addiction. Jajpur No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. Sonepur No activity is going at the project location. Deogarh No specific mention about de-addiction in MOA. No expenditure/ activity about de-addiction.

20 6. Juba Jyoti Jubak Sangh Subarnapur (Sonepur) Inspection Report not in proper format, no exact location of project & no activity at project location. 7. Jana Kalyan Seva Nuapada Recommended Sanstha 8. DARIA Jagatsinghpur Organization has not got 3 years experience in deaddiction field. 9. Association for Voluntary Action (AVA) Jharsuguda Organization is already running 2 s and proposal of RRTC also recommended. Therefore, the proposal of not recommended 10. Institute for Self Keonjhar No work done in the field Employment and of drug de-addiction Rural Development centre. 11. The Chetana Dhenkanal Recommended 12. Association for Malkangiri Organization is already Voluntary Action running 2 s and (AVA) proposal of RRTC also recommended. Therefore, the proposal of not recommended. 13. AAKASH Nabarangpur No activity in the Annual 14. Association for Voluntary Action (AVA), At Dampur, P.O. Berboi, Distt. Puri, Orissa (xix) PUNJAB 1. Akal Charitable Drug-De-addication, Cheema Distt. Sangrur, Punjab 2. Red Cross Society, Ferozpur Dampur, Distt. Puri, Orissa Report for Recommended Sangrur Not capable of handling drug de-addiction programme only by medication. Medical model based treatment is dangerous in the situation of Punjab where the trend is of addiction to medication drugs. Further, the organization has expertise in educational sector. Ferozpur It is a projective prospect. No experience on deaddiction Page 20 of 24

21 (xx) PUDUCHERRY 1 Mother Trust (Mind Body Medicine Organization for Treatment, Training, Holistic Education and Research) (xxi) RAJASTHAN 1 Sanjivani Manav Vikas Sansthan 2 Tejaswani Mahila Evam Jan Kalyan Samit Kota Raj 3 Shree Narayan Seva & Vikas Sansthan Bundi Raj. 4 Bikaner Medical Relief Societym Bikaner Raj. 5 Pragya Yuva Chakshu Sikshan Sansthan Bikaner Raj 6 Nehru Nav Yuvak Mandal, Kashmir, Barmer Raj. 7 H.S.P. Shikshan & Prashikshan Sansthan Village Banji, Post Bhont, Panchayat Samiti Sewar Bharatpur Raj. 8 People Reform Association for Better and Advance Livelihoods Society, Bharatpur 9 Sambal Samiti Jaipur Raj Puducherry Date of starting of project does not fit with the employment list, date of employment & details of beneficiaries. No experience of drug deaddiction work. Baswara 19/10/2012 Does not indicate any activity on rehabilitation. No mention of deaddiction in Audit Report. Kota 19/10/2012 No mention of deaddiction in Annual Report & Audit Report. Bundi 19/10/2012 Audit Report for not available. No mention of de-addiction in Audit Report Bikaner 19/10/2012 Annual reports and Audit Report for not available. No mention of de-addiction in MOA, Annual Report & Audit Report. Bikaner 19/10/2012 No mention of deaddiction in MOA discrepancy in the staff employed. Barmer 19/10/2012 In experience in the field of de-addiction Bharatpur 19/10/2012 Inspection Report just say new case and does not indicate any activity of the organization and it seems to be a prospective project. Bharatpur 19/10/2012 List of beneficiary deceptive including the readdress. Inspection Report does not indicate any activity. Chitorgarh 19/10/2012 Discrepancy in work done and expenditure shown in audited accounts. Page 21 of 24

22 10 Gyan Jyoti Vidha Mandir Samiti Dausa Raj. 11 Tapovan Nasha Mukti Avam Punarwas Sansthan Sri Ganganagar, Raj. 12 Soceity for Universal Welfare, 407, geetanjali Tower Ajmer Road, Jaipur Raj. 13 Nari Chetna Samiti, Jaipur Raj. 14 Shubham Inter National School Samiti, Jiapur Raj. 15 Tagore South Avam Vikas Sansthan Kota Raj. 16 Yukta Jan Kalyan Samiti, Jhalawad 17 Deepshisha Gramin Vikas Sansthan Vill. Pujari Ki dhani. Post Gothara Distt Jhunjhuna Raj 18 Madhu Samarti Mahila Bal Kalyan Uthan Samiti Ranbadi, Kota Raj 19 Ravinder Vidhya Mandir Samiti Ward Ratwali, Kota Raj 20 Maharshi Ved Seva Samiti Bhilwara Raj 21 Mahila Avam Bal Utthan Samiti E-695, Amrapali Circle, Vaishali Nagar Jaipur 22 Sikar Swasthaya Samiti Purohitji Dhani, Sikar Raj Dausa 19/10/2012 No mention of deaddiction in Audit Report Sri Ganganagar 19/10/2012 Recommended Jaipur 19/10/2012 No work done in the field of the de-addiction. Jaipur 19/10/2012 Annual reports for last 3 years not available. Jaipur 19/10/2012 Annual reports are photocopies. No mention of de-addiction in Audit Report Kota 19/10/2012 No substantial done of all in drug de-addiction. Jhalawad 19/10/2012 Annual reports not available. No mention of de-addiction in Audit Report A/R for not available Jhunjhuna 19/10/2012 Exact location of project not given. Focus of the organization is not on deaddiction. Kota 19/10/2012 No mention of deaddiction in Audit Report Kota 19/10/2012 IR is not in prescribed format. No mention of deaddiction in Audit Report Bhilwara 19/10/2012 IR not available. No mention of de-addiction in Audit Report Jaipur 19/10/2012 No mention of deaddiction in Annual Report & Audit Report Sikar 19/10/2012 Annual report not available. No mention of de-addiction in MOA Page 22 of 24

23 23 Maru Kshetriya Vikas avam Samajik Sansthan Cali No, 3, Dhohi Talai, Bikaner 24 Sarojani Naidu Mahila Vikas avam Kalian Sansthan Jaipur Raj. (xxii) SIKKIM 1. Serenity Home Betzatha Society, Lower Burtuk, Gangtok. 2. Sikkim Rehabilitation and Detoxification Society, Nimtok, 32 Mile, East Sikkim (xxiii) TAMILNADU 1. Annai Karunalaya Social Welfare Association 2. Society for Rural Development Promotion Services (SRDPS) 3. Foundation for Infrastructure Reconstruction and Employment (FfIRE) (xiv) UTTAR PRADESH 1 NIRVAN, D-2059 Indra Nagar, Lucknow-16 2 Jeevan Surbhi Sewa Samiti Sector-19, C- 33 Rohini, New Delhi 3 Jeevan Surbhi Sewa Samiti Sector-19, C- 33 Rohini, New Delhi 4 Umakant Service Foundation, Village Kodopur, Post Chaubeypur Distt Varanasi, U.P. Bikaner 19/10/2012 IR is not in prescribed format Jaipur 19/10/2012 No proof of work done on drug de-addiction by the organization. No focus on the de-addiction. Lower Burtuk, Gangtok. Page 23 of Recommended East Sikkim Recommended Villupuram Vellore Coimbatore Takrohi, Lucknow Gajroala Distt. J.P. Nagar Gajroala Distt. J.P. Nagar U.P As per the inspection report the year of establishment is January, therefore, the experience of 3 years is not there Inspection report indicates that it is a new project. Therefore, no experience Descriptive and identical annual reports Proposal is for RRTC. No programme on training and no documentation of work done No mention of deaddiction in MOA No mention of deaddiction in MOA Varanasi ARs are not consistent with the other documents. Over emphasis on medicines

24 5 Vaishnavi Foundation, Vill. Jamua, Koraon, P.O. Pavari, Allahabad, UP 6 Akhil Bhartiya Mahila Udyog Kalyan & Shiksha Samiti, G.B. Nagar Noida UP 7 Bhagirath Sewa Sanstha, Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad, UP (xv) WEST BENGAL 1 Haripur Amra Sabai Samiti, Vill & P.O. Bijoygunj Bazar, P.S. Mandirbazar, Dist. South 24-Pgs. 15 bedded at Raidighi P.O. Raidighi, Block Mathurapur-II Dist South 24-Pgs. 2 Dum Dum Park Unnayani Samannay, 172, Lake Town, Block- A, Kolkata Nepura Rural Development Society, Newpura, P.O. Mataldanga, Dist. Paschim Medinipur. Mirzapur Proposal is for upgradation from 15 beds to 30 beds. Work done as reflected in the Annual reports does not justify for up-gradation Noida Proposal is for upgradation from 15 beds to 30 beds. Work done as reflected in the Annual reports does not justify for up-gradation Ghaziabad Proposal is for upgradation from 15 beds to 30 beds. Work done as reflected in the Annual reports does not justify for up-gradation South 24 - Pgs No mention of deaddiction in MOA, Annual Report & Audit Report Darjeeling IR is not in prescribed format. No mention of deaddiction in MOA, Paschim Medinipur IR is not in prescribed format. No mention of deaddiction in MOA, **** Page 24 of 24