1 Physician Quality System What Neurosurgeons Need to Know for 2015 Prepared by the: American Association of Neurological Surgeons Congress of Neurological Surgeons For More Information Contact: Rachel Groman, MPH Vice President, Clinical Affairs and Quality Improvement Hart Health Strategies Phone: ext
2 Physician Quality System What Neurosurgeons Need to Know for 2015 Since 2007, the Physician Quality System (PQRS) has been a voluntary federal program, offering Medicare incentive payments to physicians who reported quality measure data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). However, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires that CMS phase out incentive payments. Physicians and other eligible professionals (EPs) will now be subject to increasing penalties for failure to satisfy PQRS reporting requirements. As such, 2014 was the LAST year to qualify for a PQRS incentive payment. Beginning in 2015, the program transitions to penalties only. Neurosurgeons who do not satisfy the program s requirements in 2015 will be paid two percent less than the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) amount for services rendered from Jan.1, 2017 to Dec. 31, CMS also will use the 2015 reporting year to determine a separate Value-Based Payment Modifier (VM), which will affect payments to all physicians, regardless of group practice size, in The VM is tied to satisfactory PQRS participation, and CMS uses PQRS quality measures to calculate additional, and increasingly larger, performance-based payment adjustments under the VM. Click here for more information about the VM. As a result of these and other penalty-driven programs including the separate Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Programs (known as meaningful use) nearly 10 percent of neurosurgeons Medicare payments will be at risk over the coming years. 1 Physician Quality System Increasing Significance of PQRS Participation Bonus for Traditional PQRS +0.5% payment in 2015 Bonus for PQRS MOC* +0.5% in 2015 ~No Incentives~ Penalty for Failure to Satisfy PQRS -2.0% in % in 2017 Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Additional Penalty for Failure to Satisfy PQRS -2% in 2016 Up to -4.0% in 2017 Total Potential Penalties -4.0% in 2016 Up to -6.0% in 2017 * The PQRS MOC supplemental bonus ends after In addition to payment penalties, CMS plans to make 2015 physician quality performance data available to the public as early as To date, CMS has only publicly reported on a physician s participation status in federal quality reporting programs, such as the PQRS, but not on individual-level physician performance rates for specific measures. 1 With the passage of H.R. 2, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, Medicare s quality programs will transition to a new system called the Merit-based Incentive Payment System. Beginning in 2019, MIPS will replace the PQRS, EHR and VM programs and their existing penalty-only structure. Under MIPS, physicians will be eligible for bonuses as well as being subject to penalties, although only the outlier physicians will be subject to the steepest penalties, which will be no more than 9 percent in the later years of implementation of this new program. More details about MIPS will be provided in a separate publication.
3 Given the increasing significance of successful PQRS participation, it is critical that neurosurgeons understand recent changes that will affect their participation options in PQRS Options for 2015 Eligible professionals (EPs) can choose from multiple reporting options to satisfy PQRS reporting requirements, including: as an individual physician or as a group practice under the Group Practice Option (GPRO); individual measures or measures groups, which are sets of clinically relevant measures that must be reported together (note: for 2015, there are no measures groups entirely relevant to neurosurgeons); measures data via claims, a qualified registry, an electronic health record (EHR), or a qualified clinical data registry (QCDR). How to Get Started 1. Determine your eligibility Click here for more information on which professionals are considered eligible for purposes of the PQRS. Note that PQRS participation is not limited to physicians. Other non-physicians in your practice, such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants, may also be subject to payment penalties for non-compliance. For purposes of group practice reporting, CMS defines group practice as those with two or more EPs, identified by individual National Provider Identifiers (NPIs), who reassign their billing rights to a single Tax Identification Number (TIN). An EP must decide whether to participate in the PQRS as an individual or as a group practice, but cannot receive credit for both. In fact, once a group practice elects to participate in the GPRO, individuals tied to that group are no longer eligible to participate in the PQRS as individuals. Therefore, if you are a part of a larger group, it is important to determine whether your group plans to participate as a group. Also note, if a group practice self-nominates to participate in the GPRO and satisfies PQRS requirements as a group, all individual EPs who have reassigned their billing rights to that group s TIN will be considered satisfactory PQRS reporters. This is true even if the group qualified based on measures that are irrelevant to some individuals in the group. Therefore, a neurosurgeon in a larger multi-specialty group practice could potentially avoid a PQRS penalty without taking any action if others in the group (e.g., primary care physicians) report on a sufficient number of measures. This would allow other physicians essentially to carry the weight of the group in regards to satisfying reporting requirements. 2. Review each method s specific reporting criteria to determine which reporting option is best for you. After determining whether you will participate in the PQRS as an individual or group practice, you will need to select the most relevant and least burdensome reporting mechanism to feed your quality data to CMS. Slightly different options are available depending on whether you participate individually or as a group practice. Click here for more detailed information about individual reporting and here for group practice reporting. Additional resources are listed below:
4 Click here for more detailed instructions on how to report quality measures data via claims. Click here for additional information about reporting via a qualified PQRS registry. Neurosurgery is not sponsoring a qualified registry for However, there are multiple third party vendors that can, for a fee, collect data on any PQRS measure via an online portal on behalf of an EP and submit it to CMS. A list of qualified vendors for 2015 will be available on the CMS website by spring Click here for additional information about reporting via a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR). The QCDR reporting mechanism is relatively new and allows physicians to satisfy PQRS requirements by reporting on measures not included in the traditional PQRS measure set via a specialty society-sponsored clinical data registry. Neurosurgery, through the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N 2 QOD), has applied to become a QCDR for This should offer many neurosurgeons a platform that both minimizes the reporting burden and provides a more relevant set of measures. For 2015, this tool will focus only on spine care. In the future, the N 2 QOD hopes to have additional practice modules to allow more neurosurgeons to statisfy Medicare s quality reporting requirements. Additional information about the availability of this tool and the final set of CMS-approved neurosurgical-focused measures will be posted sometime in April. Click here for additional information about the EHR reporting option, including a guide titled, 2015 PQRS EHR Made Simple. Note that EPs and group practices using this reporting option may be able to satisfy both PQRS and the electronic clinical quality measure (ecqm) component of the Medicare EHR Incentive Program. Click here for additional information about the GPRO, including instructions for larger group practices wishing to report measures via the GPRO Web Interface. 3. Select your measures For 2015, CMS removed many measures relevant to neurosurgeons, including the Perioperative Care measures group and the Back Pain measures group. At the same time, CMS raised the bar on the number of measures that must be reported to avoid a penalty. Most reporting options now require that the individual or group practice report on nine measures, including one cross-cutting measure, for 50 percent of all applicable Medicare Part B patients over the reporting year. PQRS measures are categorized into National Quality Strategy (NQS) domains, and the nine measures selected must cover at least three of these domains. 2 Given these changes, neurosurgeons have a fairly limited number of traditional PQRS measures to choose from for The table below lists individual 2015 PQRS measures that may be relevant to a neurosurgical practice. However, neurosurgeons are encouraged to review the entire list of 2015 PQRS individual measures and 2015 PQRS measures groups to determine if other measures apply. Once you have identified potentially relevant measures, you will want to review their detailed specifications. The specifications list reporting mechanisms available for that measure; the domain under which the measure falls; and, most importantly, the measure s numerator, denominator and any applicable exclusions. The numerator details the clinical quality action that is the focus of the measure. The denominator defined by a set of ICD-9, CPT, HCPCS codes, and other demographic and/or place of service data identifies the patients eligible for each measure. It is critical to review the denominator of each potentially relevant measure to determine whether and/or to what extent it applies to your patient population. 2 Domains include: Patient and Family Engagement, Patient Safety, Care Coordination, Population and Public Health, Efficient Use of Healthcare Resources, Clinical Processes/Effectiveness.
5 2015 PQRS Potentially Relevant to Neurosurgeons 3 PQRS # Measure Title Measure Description National Quality Strategy Domain Mechanisms 21 Perioperative Care: Selection of Prophylactic Antibiotic First OR Second Generation Cephalosporin Percentage of surgical patients aged 18 years and older undergoing procedures with the indications for a first OR second generation cephalosporin prophylactic antibiotic, who had an order for a first OR second generation cephalosporin for antimicrobial prophylaxis. Patient Safety Perioperative Care: Discontinuation of Prophylactic Parenteral Antibiotics (Non- Cardiac Procedures) Perioperative Care: VTE Prophylaxis (When Indicated in ALL Patients) Percentage of non-cardiac surgical patients aged 18 years and older undergoing procedures with the indications for prophylactic parenteral antibiotics AND who received a prophylactic parenteral antibiotic, who have an order for discontinuation of prophylactic parenteral antibiotics within 24 hours of surgical end time. Percentage of surgical patients aged 18 years and older undergoing procedures for which VTE prophylaxis is indicated in all patients, who had an order for Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH), Low-Dose Unfractionated Heparin (LDUH), adjusted-dose warfarin, fondaparinux or mechanical prophylaxis to be given within 24 hours prior to incision time or within 24 hours after surgery end time. Patient Safety Patient Safety 32 Stroke and Stroke Rehabilitation: Discharged on Antithrombotic Therapy Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) who were prescribed antithrombotic therapy at discharge. Effective Clinical Care 46 Medication Reconciliation *cross-cutting measure Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older discharged from any inpatient facility (e.g., hospital, skilled nursing facility, or rehabilitation facility) and seen within 30 days following discharge in the office by the physician, prescribing practitioner, registered nurse, or clinical pharmacist providing ongoing care who had a reconciliation of the discharge medications with the current medication list in the outpatient medical record documented. Communication and Care Coordination 3 The AANS and CNS recognize the current paucity of quality measures with sufficient granularity to capture the subtleties of neurosurgical care. We continue to work to develop more appropriate and meaningful measures for inclusion in the PQRS and other federal reporting programs, including through the QCDR mechanism mentioned above.
6 PQRS # Measure Title Measure Description National Quality Strategy Domain Mechanisms 47 Advance Care Plan *cross-cutting measure Percentage of patients aged 65 years and older who have an advance care plan or surrogate decision maker documented in the medical record or documentation in the medical record that an advance care plan was discussed but the patient did not wish or was not able to name a surrogate decision maker or provide an advance care plan. Communication and Care Coordination 130 Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record *cross-cutting measure Percentage of visits for patients aged 18 years and older for which the eligible professional attests to documenting a list of current medications using all immediate resources available on the date of the encounter. This list must include ALL known prescriptions, over-thecounters, herbals, and vitamin/mineral/dietary (nutritional) supplements AND must contain the medications name, dosage, frequency and route of administration. Patient Safety, EHR, GPRO Web Interface 131 Pain Assessment and Follow-Up *cross-cutting measure Percentage of visits for patients aged 18 years and older with documentation of a pain assessment using a standardized tool(s) on each visit AND documentation of a followup plan when pain is present. Community/ Population Health 154 Falls: Risk Assessment Percentage of patients aged 65 years and older with a history of falls who had a risk assessment for falls completed within 12 months. Note: If the risk assessment indicates patient has documentation of two or more falls in the past year or any fall with injury in the past year, #155 should also be reported. Patient Safety 155 Falls: Plan of Care Percentage of patients aged 65 years and older with a history of falls who had a plan of care for falls documented within 12 months. Communication and Care Coordination 226 Tobacco Use: Screening and Cessation Intervention *cross-cutting measure Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who were screened for tobacco use one or more times within 24 months AND who received cessation counseling intervention if identified as a tobacco user. Community/ Population Health
7 Click here for a list of cross-cutting measures available for Start or Register physicians do not have to register with CMS to participate in the 2015 PQRS. If using the claims-based reporting option, simply start reporting the Quality-Data Codes (QDCs) listed in the specifications of the measures you have selected on applicable Medicare Part B claims. If using a third party entity to submit your measure data to CMS, such as a qualified registry, please check with the entity to determine whether it has its own set of registration and reporting deadlines. Registration is required for those wishing to participate in the PQRS via the GPRO in Authorized representatives of group practices will be able to register via the web between April 1, 2015 and June 30, 2015 (note: this deadline is earlier than last year). Additional information will be posted here. Once a group registers for the GPRO, it cannot withdraw its registration, and individual members of the group cannot participate in the PQRS as individuals. Applicability Validation (MAV) Process EPs who report fewer than nine measures and/or report across fewer than three domains will trigger the Applicability Validation (MAV) process. CMS uses the MAV to analyze whether an EP should be subject to the PQRS penalty for failure to report on additional measures. The process relies on two steps: 1. Evaluating whether any of the measures reported by the EP are found in a CMS-defined cluster of measures related to a particular clinical topic or service (if so, then CMS assumes other closelyrelated measures in that same cluster may also apply to the EP s patient population); and 2. A minimum threshold test that evaluates whether any potentially relevant, but non-reported measures, apply to more than 15 Medicare patients (if so, CMS concludes the EP should be subject to a PQRS penalty for not satisfactorily reporting on as many measures as he/she could have). CMS recognizes that certain EPs simply will not have nine measures that apply to their patient population. If CMS does not identify any other relevant measures through the MAV process, it may conclude that the EP sufficiently satisfied PQRS reporting requirements and should not be subject to a penalty. The MAV is only triggered in cases where less than nine measures or fewer than three domains are reported. CMS will not use the MAV to evaluate the appropriateness of the nine measures selected by an EP. Additional information about the MAV process is available here. PQRS Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Incentive Program CMS has retired this program. Per law, EPs may no longer earn an additional PQRS bonus payments for enhanced participation in a Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Program. Additional Resources The 2015 PQRS Implementation Guide provides a comprehensive overview of the PQRS program. It includes information on how to select measures, how to read and understand measure specifications, and how to submit quality measure data codes on claims forms. You are also encouraged to visit the CMS website for regular updates.
8 2015 PQRS Options to Avoid a Penalty if Participating as an Period Measure Type Mechanism Claims Satisfactory Criteria Report at least 9 measures covering at least 3 National Quality Strategy (NQS) domains, 4 including 1 cross-cutting measure, AND report each measure for at least 50% of the Medicare Part B FFS patients seen during the reporting period to which the measure applies. If less than 9 measures apply, report 1-8 measures covering 1-3 NQS domains, but subject to Applicability Validation (MAV) process. + with a 0 performance rate will not be counted. Qualified Registry Report at least 9 measures covering at least 3 NQS domains, OR, if less than 9 measures covering at least 3 NQS domains apply, report 1-8 measures covering 1-3 NQS domains, AND report each measure for at least 50% of the Medicare Part B FFS patients seen during the reporting period to which the measure applies. If less than 9 measures apply, report 1-8 measures covering 1-3 NQS domains, but subject to the MAV process. 5 with a 0 performance rate will not be counted. Direct EHR product or EHR data submission vendor Report 9 measures covering at least 3 of the NQS domains. If an EP s EHR product/vendor does not contain patient data for at least 9 measures covering at least 3 domains, then the EP would be required to report all of the measures for which there is Medicare patient data. EPs are required to report on at least 1 measure for which there is Medicare patient data. Groups Qualified Registry Report at least 1 measures group, AND report each measures group for at least 20 patients, the majority (11 patients) of which much be Medicare Part B FFS patients. groups containing a measure with a 0 percent performance rate will not be counted. PQRS and/or non-pqrs measures reported by a QCDR Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) Report at least 9 measures available for reporting under a QCDR covering at least 3 of the NQS domains, AND report each measure for at least 50% of all applicable patients (both Medicare and non-medicare). Of these measures, at least 2 must be outcome measures, OR, if 2 outcomes measures are not available, at least 1 outcome measures and at least 1 resource use, patient experience of care, efficiency/appropriate use, or patient safety measure PQRS Options to Avoid a Penalty if Participating as a Group Practice Period Group Practice Size Mechanism Measure Type Satisfactory Criteria eligible professionals (EPs) GPRO Web Interface GPRO measures in GPRO Web Interface Report on all measures included in the Web Interface; AND populate data fields for the first 248 consecutively ranked and assigned beneficiaries in the order in which they appear in the group s sample for each module or preventive care measure. If the pool of eligible assigned beneficiaries is less than 248, then the group practice must report on 100% of assigned beneficiaries. A group practice must report on at least 1 measure for which there is Medicare patient data. 4PQRS measures are categorized under the following National Quality Strategy (NQS) domains: Patient and Family Engagement; Patient Safety; Care Coordination; Population and Public Health; Efficient Use of Healthcare Resources; and Clinical Processes/ Effectiveness. 5 Under the Applicability Validation (MAV) process, CMS verifies whether an EP could have reported on additional clinically relevant measures. It is only triggered when an EP reports on less than 9 measures and/or less than 3 NQS domains. For more information on this process, click here.
9 Period Group Practice Size Mechanism Measure Type Satisfactory Criteria EPs and 100+ EPs GPRO Web Interface + CMS Certified CAHPS Survey Vendor GPRO measures in the GPRO Web Interface + CAHPS for PQRS The group practice must report on all measures included in the GPRO Web Interface; AND populate data fields for the first 248 consecutively ranked and assigned beneficiaries in the order in which they appear in the group s sample for each module or preventive care measure. If the pool of eligible assigned beneficiaries is less than 248, then the group practice must report on 100% of assigned beneficiaries. A group practice will be required to report on at least 1 measure for which there is Medicare patient data. In addition, the group practice must have all CAHPS for PQRS survey measures reported on its behalf via a CMScertified survey vendor. Note: the CAHPS component is optional for groups with EPs, but mandatory for groups with 100+ EPs reporting via the Web Interface EPs Qualified Registry Report at least 9 measures covering at least 3 NQS domains, including 1 cross-cutting measure, AND report each measure for at least 50% of the Medicare Part B FFS patients seen during the reporting period to which the measure applies. If less than 9 measures apply, report 1-8 measures covering 1-3 NQS domains, but subject to MAV. with a 0 performance rate will not be counted EPs and 100+ EPs Qualified Registry + CMS Certified Survey Vendor + CAHPS for PQRS The group practice must have all CAHPS for PQRS survey measures reported on its behalf via a CMS-certified survey vendor, and report at least 6 additional measures, outside of CAHPS for PQRS, covering at least 2 of the NQS domains using the qualified registry. If less than 6 measures apply to the group practice, the group practice must report up to 5 measures. Of the additional measures that must be reported in conjunction with reporting the CAHPS for PQRS survey measures, the group practice must report on at least 1 measure in the cross-cutting measure set. Note: the CAHPS component is optional for groups with 2-99 EPs, but mandatory for groups with 100+ EPs reporting via the Web Interface 2-99 EPs Direct EHR Product or EHR Data Submission Vendor Product Report 9 measures covering at least 3 of the NQS domains. If the group s EHR product/vendor does not contain patient data for at least 9 measures covering at least 3 domains, then the group would be required to report all of the measures for which there is Medicare patient data. A group must report on at least 1 measure for which there is Medicare patient data.
10 Period Group Practice Size Mechanism Measure Type Satisfactory Criteria 2-99 EPs And 100+ EPs Direct EHR Product or EHR Data Submission Vendor Product + CMS Certified Survey Vendor + CAHPS for PQRS The group practice must have all CAHPS for PQRS survey measures reported on its behalf via a CMS-certified survey vendor, and report at least 6 additional measures, outside of CAHPS for PQRS, covering at least 2 of the NQS domains using the direct EHR product or EHR data submission vendor product. If less than 6 measures apply to the group practice, the group practice must report up to 5 measures. Of the additional 6 measures that must be reported in conjunction with reporting the CAHPS for PQRS survey measures, a group practice would be required to report on at least 1 measure for which there is Medicare patient data. Note: the CAHPS component is optional for groups with 2-99 EPs, but mandatory for groups with 100+ EPs reporting via the Web Interface
What is PQRS? Navigating CMS Quality Initiatives: How to Successfully Report and Avoid Payment Adjustments Performance Measurement Committee Practical Theater A federally mandated Medicare Part B quality
Major Changes in CY2015 MPFS Quality Provisions Physician Compare In addition to previously finalized Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) quality measure data to be publicly reported beginning in
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and the Value-Based Payment Modifier Implementation guide for registry-based reporting for the Hepatitis C (HCV) Measures Group 2015 1 Overview of PQRS 1,2 What
2015 PQRS Requirements: What Eligible Professionals Need to Know to Avoid the PQRS Penalty in 2017 Presented by: Camille Bonta, MHS Summit Health Care Consulting Physician Quality Reporting System What
Reporting Once for 2014 Medicare Quality Reporting Programs Use this tool* to learn how to report quality measures one time in 2014 in order to: Become incentive eligible for 2014 Physician Quality Reporting
(NQF) Title Description Numerator 122v2 1 0059 Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control N/A 21 0268 Perioperative Care: Selection of Prophylactic Antibiotic First OR Second Generation Cephalosporin Percentage
2014 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): Implementation Guide 12/13/2013 CPT only copyright 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 41 Table of Contents Page Introduction
QUALITY 01 BEGINNER PQRS Training Module: QUALITY MEASUREMENT 101 Last Updated: August 2014 TRAINING MODULE OBJECTIVES Quality Measurement 101 is a training module for providers who are interested in learning
January 2014 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): What s New for 2014 Purpose This fact sheet includes important information about changes to the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) for 2014.
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Presenter: Alexandra Mugge 4 PQRS Overview CY2018 payment adjustments, based on PY2016 reporting: -2.0% MPFS Changes to PQRS Definition of eligible professional
Physician Quality System What You Need to Know for 2014 Since 2007, the Physician Quality System (PQRS) has been a voluntary federal program, offering Medicare incentive payments to physicians who report
CMS PQRS and VBPM Incentive/Penalty Programs Devin Detwiler Manager Quality Improvement Telligen Free Resource to you Join our Network Engage providers and stakeholders in improvement initiatives through
Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) What are CQMs? What are CQMs? Clinical quality measures, or CQMs, are tools that help eligible providers (EPs) measure and track the quality of health care services provided
CMS s framework for Value Modifier Relationship between quality of care, cost composites and the Value Modifier Clinical Care Patient Experience Population/ Community Health Patient Safety Care Coordination
Table of Contents How to Report Once for 2015 Medicare Quality Reporting Programs: Individual Eligible Professionals 3 How to Report Once for 2015 Medicare Quality Reporting Programs: Group Practices 5
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) And VBM (Value Based Modifier) A Primer on Present and Future Requirements Brett Bernstein, MD, AGAF Chief Quality Officer, Beth Israel Ambulatory Endoscopy Services
Summary of Medicare s Request for Information on the Provisions in MACRA which Allow for Implementation of Alternative Payment Models and a Merit-Based Incentive Payment System On September 28, 2015, the
2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule Summary On October 31, 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the final Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) for 2015. The
Calendar Year 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule Non-facility Cap after receiving many negative comments on this issue from physician groups along with the House GOP Doctors Caucus letter,
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) QCDR Reporting Overview Program Year 2014 Disclaimers This presentation was current at the time it was published or uploaded
Quality Reporting and Registry Update: Challenges and Strategies for Success Heather Smith, PT, MPH September 13, 2014 1 SETTING THE STAGE FOR TOMORROW 2014 American Physical Therapy Association. All rights
The Medicare Quality Reporting Programs: What Eligible Professionals Need to Know in 2016 Modules Module 1: Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) Preview Module 2: 2016 Incentive Payments
CMS QCDR (Qualified Clinical Data Registry) and Other Ways PPRNet Can Help with Value-Based Payment Cara Litvin MD, MS Assistant Professor MUSC Department of Medicine Agenda Provide an update of the current
Managing Clinical Quality Measures for Meaningful Use and PQRS Using the EHR Method These tips will make it easier to qualify. By Seth Flam, DO Charlieaja Dreamstime.com There have been significant changes
2016 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for Claims and Registry Reporting of Individual Measures Utilized by Individual Eligible Professionals for Claims
The Impact of Changing Federal Policies on Physician Reimbursement Peter Margolis, MD, AGAF Chair elect, AGA Regulatory Work Group AGA Institute Practice Management & Economics Committee University Gastroenterology
2015 Data Validation Strategy This data validation strategy details how the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), a medical specialty society representing more than 33,000 emergency physicians,
Outpatient CMS Quality Measurement Programs Implications for I/T/U CAPT Michael Toedt, MD, FAAFP Acting Chief Medical Information Officer Office of Information Technology, Indian Health Service NIHB 2015
Navigating CMS Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals Why It Matters and What You Need to Know Dr. Paul Mulhausen, CMO Objectives Better understand CMS Incentive Programs and payment adjustments
Pay for Performance Solutions A wholly owned subsidiary of Company Overview Balanced Improvement for Health Systems and Physician Practices Products and Services to Integrate People, Processes, and Technology
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Room 352-G 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 FACT SHEET FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 31, 2014 Contact: CMS
Mr. Andrew M. Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-5517-P Submitted electronically to: http://www.regulations.gov
CAHPS for ACOs and PQRS Overview of the Development and Implementation of CAHPS for ACOs and PQRS Sandra Adams, RN, BSN Lauren Fuentes, MPH July 10-11, 2014 Agenda Overview of the Medicare Shared Savings
CMS Proposals for the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier (VM) under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule 2014 July 25, 2013 Medicare Learning Network This
MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) ADVANCING CARE INFORMATION PERFORMANCE CATEGORY SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS Brief Synopsis MACRA sunsets the Electronic
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/01/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-12841, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Medicare Value-Based Payment and Quality Reporting for Physician Services: Navigating Recent Changes Leveraging Incentive Payment Opportunities,
The Physician Quality Reporting System Maintenance of Certification Program Incentive Requirements for 2013 Background In accordance with section 1848(m) (7) of the Act ( Additional Incentive Payment ),
MEDICARE EHR: PREPARING FOR 2015 Community Counts Practice Effectiveness Web Series ION June 26, 2014 Risë Marie Cleland Oplinc, Inc. Important to Remember The information provided in this presentation
MIPS AND MACRA: MAKING SENSE OF THE NEW REGULATIONS AND PAYMENT SYSTEMS 1 No Disclosures 2 1 To Better Understand the Future.. We must remember the past regarding physician payment. 3 THE SGR SGR=Sustainable
What is PQRS? The Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) is a program through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) designed to improve the quality of care to Medicare beneficiaries by
Aligning Meaningful Use CQM and PQRS Reporting for 2015 August 19, 2015 Introductions Marni Anderson Project Specialist, MetaStar email@example.com 608-441-8253 Laura Sawyer Clinical Application Coordinator,
EHR Incentive Programs A program administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Eligible Professional s Guide to STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS...
Welcome The AAMC, UHC and FPSC Web Conference on 2014 PQRS Proposed Changes will begin shortly. Please do not place your phones on hold. If you need to leave the event, hang up and dial back into the conference.
Physician Compare Virtual Office Hour Questions and Answers The Physician Compare Virtual Office Hour session was held on January 22, 2015 via WebEx. The purpose of the session was to allow the Centers
Medicaid EHR Incentive Frequently Asked Questions All external hyperlinks are provided for your information and for the benefit of the general public. The Rhode Island Department of Human Services does
Allscripts CQS Planning for 2014 Webinar: FAQs Listed below are questions asked by attendees based on the CQS Planning for 2014 Webinars, held on May 8, May 28, and May 30, 2014. Answers are provided below.
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Agenda A look at the CMS Website Finding your EMR version Certification Number Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare
Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Repeal and Replace: Comparison of 2014 and 2015 Legislation Proposal 113 th Congress - - H.R.4015/S.2000 114 th Congress - - H.R.1470 SGR Repeal and Annual Updates General
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 NPRM Overview Robert Anthony Office of E-Health Standards and Services Marsha Smith Office of Clinical Standards and Quality March 21, 2012 Proposed Rule
A Guidebook to the 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System Last Updated: February 2, 2012 Getting Started With PQRS The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act made participation in Medicare s Physician
An Overview of 2015 CMS Physician Quality Reporting Programs Carol Saavedra, BA Health Informatics Specialist Health Services Advisory Group (HSAG) September 8, 2015 Presentation Outline HSAG Ohio s Quality
Meaningful Use - Stage 2 Regulations Overview Brought to you by Presented by: Travis Broome, MPH, MBA September 18, 2012 Objectives Specific regulatory changes and requirements based on the CMS Stage 2
MEDICAL ASSISTANCE STAGE 2 SUMMARY OVERVIEW On September 4, 2012, CMS published a final rule that specifies the Stage 2 Meaningful Use criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals (EHs)
Medical Records Law: Regulatory Issues Meaningful Use? EHR v. EMR Conrad Meyer JD MHA FACHE Health Care Section Chair Chaffe McCall, LLP firstname.lastname@example.org (504) 585-7067 6/20/2011 McCall 1 Introduction
e Clinical Quality Reporting for Hospitals and Providers Ashley Rhude RHIA, CHTS IM An Important Reminder For audio, you must use your phone: Step 1: Call (866) 906 0123. Step 2: Enter code 2071585#. Step
Measure #130 (NQF 0419): Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety 2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY DESCRIPTION:
Meaningful Use Stage 2: Understanding the Requirements and Changes June 26, 2013 12:30 1:30 p.m., EDT Marnivia Spencer, CCME EHR Consultant 2013 The Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence All Rights Reserved
WHITE PAPER Meaningful Use Stage 2 Requirements Primer Shefali Mookencherry, MPH, MSMIS, RHIA Principal Consultant Hayes Management Consulting Hayes WHITE PAPER: Meaningful Use Stage 2 Requirements Source:
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Dentists as Eligible Professionals Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator Kim.email@example.com Considerations Must begin participation by Program Year 2016 Not required
Meaningful Use: Registration, Attestation, Workflow Tips and Tricks Allison L. Weathers, MD Medical Director, Information Services Rush University Medical Center Gregory J. Esper, MD, MBA Vice Chair, Neurology
Meaningful Use Stage 2: What s Next? Stage 2 Proposed Rule Lisa Hays, Program Manager Sue Shumate, Implementation Specialist MO-12-02-REC April 2012 Slides adapted from Robert Anthony, CMS Steve Posnack
Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide Stage 1 2013 Edition Ophthalmologists can register for the Medicare electronic health record (EHR) incentive program on the CMS website: https://ehrincentives.cms.gov
CY 2016 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule July 23, 2015 2015, AAMC-UHC-FPSC Page 1 Audio: Housekeeping You will hear the audio through your computer speakers. Please make sure your computer
Page 27 VIII. Dentist Crosswalk Overview The final rule on meaningful use requires that an Eligible Professional (EP) report on both clinical quality measures and functional objectives and measures. While
Whitepaper Meaningful Use Stage 1: EHR Incentive Program Information -------------------------------------------------------------- Daw Systems, Inc. UPDATED: November 2012 This document is designed to
Meaningful Use Updates HIT Summit September 19, 2015 Meaningful Use Updates Nadine Owen, BS,CHTS-IS, CHTS-IM Health IT Analyst Hawaii Health Information Exchange No other relevant financial disclosures.
EHR Incentive Programs A program administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) An Introduction to the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program for Eligible Professionals cms.gov/ehrincentiveprograms
The EHR Incentive Program Summary of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Final Rule on Meaningful Use On July 13th, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its final
FAQs for AMDA Members on the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs, Including Medicare Payment Adjustments Long Term Post-Acute Care Providers I am a physician or nurse practitioner
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Stage 2 Final Rule on September 4, 2012. The Stage 2 Final Rule
Wyoming Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 User Manual for Program Year 2015 April 2015 Version 1 Table of Contents 1 Background... 1 2 Introduction... 2 3 Eligibility... 3 3.1 Out-of-State
Summary of the Key Provisions in the Medicare Final Rule on the 2015 Physician Fee Schedule Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Formula and 2015 Medicare Conversion Factor Congressional intervention to avert
Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only) Background Enacted on February 17, 2009, the American Recovery
ACR Issues Analysis of Proposed MACRA MIPS Rule The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule (CMS-5517-P) on April 27, 2016, to establish many of the provisions of Medicare
4Medapproved Learning Lunch Webinar Series 7.24.13 How to Keep up with Stage 2 MU (Meaningful Use) Questions and Answers Q: Does transfer of care happen within a health system - say for example primary
Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012 Overview CMS recently published a final rule that specifies the Stage 2 criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical
Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits SHERI SMITH, FACMPE STATE VOLUNTEER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Copyright 2014 State Volunteer Mutual Insurance Company Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program Medicare/Medicaid
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS EPs must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 17 core objectives EPs must meet 3 of the 6 menu measures.
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3 Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015 Stage 2 Requirements 2015 EPs beyond 1st year of MU must report on a full year of data EPs in 1 st year
On Oct. 20, 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized new rules under the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) to help doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers better
Demystifying Patient Satisfaction Surveys What you need to know about the H-CAHPS, CG-CAHPS, and PQRS and the benefits of performing patient satisfaction surveys. NCMGMA Lunch and Learn Webinar, June 11,