1 The Emerging Consensus for Cutting the Corporate Income Tax Rate By Jordan M. Barry* INTRODUCTION Contemporary tax policy circles are characterized by healthy debates on a range of policy measures. However, a consensus has emerged among tax policy experts on one point: the United States should lower its statutory corporate income tax ( CIT ) rate. 1 Doing so would produce a number of benefits, both internationally and domestically. This short Article summarizes some of the chief benefits that are driving the consensus for a reduced CIT rate. It also describes the surprising degree of political agreement that has quietly emerged on this point. I. INTERNATIONAL TAX BENEFITS Much of the consensus surrounding the value of cutting the U.S. CIT rate derives from concerns about U.S. competitiveness. * Professor, University of San Diego School of Law. 1 See, e.g., Karen C. Burke, Is the Corporate Tax System Broken?, 28 VA. TAX REV. 341, (2008); Karen C. Burke, Passthrough Entities: The Missing Element in Business Tax Reform, 40 PEPP. L. REV. 1329, 1329 (2013); Peter R. Merrill, Competitive Tax Rates for U.S. Companies: How Low to Go?, 122 TAX NOTES 1009 (2009), available at taxprof.typepad.com/files/tn1009.pdf; David M. Schizer, Fiscal Policy in an Era of Austerity, 35 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL Y 453 (2012); Joseph J. Thorndike, The Durability of a Dysfunctional Tax: Public Opinion and the Failure of Corporate Tax Reform, 21 KAN. J.L. & PUB. POL Y 347, 350 (2012); John Diamond & George Zodrow, The Case for Corporate Income Tax Reform, AM. ACTION F. (May 29, 2013), research/the-case-for-corporate-income-tax-reform; Dan Maffei & Ryan McConaghy, The Case for Corporate Tax Reform, THIRD WAY 1 (Aug. 2011), way.org/publications/434/third_way_policy_memo_-_the_case_for_corporate_tax_refor m.pdf; Tax: Fundamentals in Advance of Reform: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on Fin., 110th Cong (2008) (statement of Michael J. Graetz, Professor of Law, Yale Law School), available at a38 f-6fbf4c8dab2e; PETE DOMENICI & ALICE RIVLIN, BIPARTISAN POLICY CTR., RESTORING AMERICA S FUTURE: REVIVING THE ECONOMY, CUTTING SPENDING AND DEBT, AND CREATING A SIMPLE, PRO-GROWTH TAX SYSTEM 17 (2010), available at partisanpolicy.org/projects/domenici-rivlin-debt-reduction-task-force; see also Dylan Matthews, Everyone Wants to Lower Corporate Tax Rates. Here s How You Do It., WASH. POST (Sept. 26, 2012), everyone-wants-to-lower-corporate-tax-rates-heres-how-you-do-it/ ( Everyone wants to cut the corporate income tax rate. That s one of the few areas of real common ground in American tax policy.... All three major bipartisan tax reform plans Bowles-Simpson, Domenici-Rivlin and Wyden-Coats include a corporate rate cut. ). 19
2 20 Chapman Law Review [Vol. 18:1 Reducing the statutory CIT rate would make the United States a more attractive business environment by lowering the tax cost of doing business in the United States. At the margin, this would help encourage more businesses to open and operate in the United States. The argument laid out above can be made for any country that imposes a CIT. However, there is a sense among many that the United States is in particular need of a CIT rate cut. The basic argument is as follows: Over the last twenty-five years, business has become increasingly mobile. This has fueled an increase in tax competition among jurisdictions, which have cut their statutory CIT rates to attract businesses. 2 The United States has not participated in this rate cutting and has kept its statutory CIT rate relatively steady at a little below 40%. 3 In 1990, a 40% CIT rate was slightly below the OECD average. 4 However, by 2010, the average CIT rate of non-u.s. OECD countries had fallen to approximately 25%. 5 Thus, the United States, by maintaining the same CIT rate, has found itself changed from a low-cit-rate country to the nation with the highest statutory CIT rate in the OECD. 6 Tax policy experts know that the story described above is accurate, but incomplete. 7 Focusing on the effective tax rates that U.S. companies actually pay paints a more complicated picture. U.S. CIT revenues, as a percentage of GDP, have been below the OECD average almost every year since For example, in 2 See, e.g., Bert Brys, Stephen Matthews & Jeffrey Owens, Tax Reform Trends in OECD Countries (OECD Ctr. for Tax Policy and Admin., Working Paper No. 1, 2011), available at Merrill, supra note 1, at See Merrill, supra note 1, at This number includes both the federal corporate tax rate and state- and local-level corporate income taxes. Id. 4 At that time, the average CIT rate of non-u.s. OECD countries was a little over 41%. See, e.g., OECD Corporate Income Tax Rates, , TAX FOUND. (Dec. 18, 2013), (reporting statistics corresponding to a 41.2% average CIT rate across non-u.s. OECD member countries in 1990). The GDP-weighted average tax rate of non-u.s. OECD member countries was even higher. Id. 5 See id. (reporting statistics corresponding to a 25.2% average CIT rate across non-u.s. OECD member countries in 2010). 6 See, e.g., Kyle Pomerleau & Andrew Lundeen, The U.S. Has the Highest Corporate Income Tax Rate in the OECD, TAX FOUND. (Jan. 27, 2014), foundation.org/blog/us-has-highest-corporate-income-tax-rate-oecd (identifying the U.S. CIT rate, including both federal and state-level CITs, as 39.1%, and the next-highest CIT rate as Japan s 37.0%). 7 See, e.g., Edward D. Kleinbard, Stateless Income, 11 FLA. TAX REV. 699, 759 (2011) ( [T]he gap between U.S. and world corporate [statutory] tax rate[s]... is sometimes overstated. ). 8 Revenue Statistics - Comparative Tables, OECD STATEXTRACTS, cd.org/index.aspx?datasetcode=rev (last visited July 11, 2014). In 1994 and 1995, the U.S. percentage was 0.1% above the OECD average, and in 1996 the U.S. percentage and
3 2014] The Emerging Consensus , U.S. CIT revenues constituted less than 2% of U.S. GDP, one of the smallest proportions in the OECD. 9 From this perspective, the United States could be seen as a low-cit nation. Nonetheless, the general sense that the United States is a high-tax environment for corporations seems to have set in, and the impression seems to be a powerful one. This may be because the statutory CIT rate is simply much more visible than most other information about the corporate tax system. To the extent that this perception drives investment behavior, this is a problem for U.S. competitiveness. If so, this suggests that there may be real benefits to reducing the corporate income tax rate even if doing so did not have a large impact on effective tax rates. II. DOMESTIC TAX BENEFITS In addition to increasing U.S. competitiveness, lowering the statutory CIT rate would have a number of domestic benefits. Our corporate tax laws affect all manner of business decisions, including which legal entity to use, which types of business to pursue, and how to fund the business. Many of these effects are negative, and a lower CIT rate would help ameliorate them. U.S. taxpayers can choose to operate their businesses through a number of legal entities, including many pass-through business entities that are not subject to entity-level tax. The menu of pass-through options includes S corporations, disregarded entities, and partnerships, as well as more specialized structures such as regulated investment companies ( RICs ) and real estate investment trusts ( REITs ). The abundance of pass-through options is one of the reasons why the United States has the highest statutory CIT rate in the OECD, yet its CIT collects a smaller percentage of GDP than other countries do. Consider a 2007 OECD study that looked at the number of incorporated and unincorporated businesses with varying characteristics in OECD member nations. It found that, among U.S. businesses with annual income of $500,000 or more, there were more than twice as many unincorporated businesses as incorporated businesses. 10 In every other country, this ratio the OECD average were equal. On average, from 1982 through 2012 (the most recent year for which data was available), the United States figure was 79% of the OECD average; looking at medians gives a similar picture. Id. 9 See id. (indicating that, in 2009, U.S. taxes on corporate profits raised revenue equal to 1.7% of U.S. GDP, tied with Austria for the third lowest among OECD countries; the OECD average was 2.8%). 10 See ALFONS J. WEICHENRIEDER, OECD, SURVEY ON THE TAXATION OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES: DRAFT REPORT ON RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE 7 8 tbl.1 (2007), available at (reporting a
4 22 Chapman Law Review [Vol. 18:1 was reversed there were at least two incorporated businesses for every unincorporated business at this income level. 11 The U.S. pass-through sector has seen pronounced growth since the 1980s. This growth seems tied to the tax reform bills of the era, which reduced statutory tax rates for individuals 12 and raised the tax burden on corporate income, making it more tax efficient to operate a business via a pass-through entity than through the corporate form. 13 The subsequent changes in business entity choices, presumably due at least in part to these changes in tax incentives, have been dramatic. For example, in 1980, C corporations filed slightly more federal tax returns than pass-through entities did, but the figures were comparable. 14 By 2008, pass-through entities filed more than four times as many returns as C corporations did. 15 In 1985, C corporations filed more than three times as many returns as S corporations; 16 by 2008, that ratio had almost reversed itself. 17 Looking at income earned, instead of at returns filed, tells a similar story: in 1980, C corporations earned over four times as much income as pass-through entities; 18 by 2008, pass-through entities earned significantly more income than C corporations. 19 total of 81,000 such unincorporated entities and 29,000 incorporated entities). 11 See id. The country with the next closest ratio is the United Kingdom, which had 2.1 incorporated businesses for every unincorporated business in this income range. Id. 12 The Tax Reform Act of 1986 reduced the marginal tax rate on the highest earners from 50% to 28%. See Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. No , 104(b)(8), 100 Stat. 2085, In particular, the Tax Reform Act of 1986 repealed the General Utilities doctrine, which enabled corporations to distribute appreciated property to shareholders without triggering entity-level tax. This essentially enabled many corporations to avoid the corporate income tax. When this doctrine was repealed, more corporate income was subject to two levels of tax, once at the corporate level and once at the shareholder level, significantly raising the effective tax rate on corporate income. Id. 14 That year, there were 2,163,458 C corporation returns filed, and a combined total of 1,926,734 returns filed by S Corporations, RICs, REITs, and partnerships. These figures do not include the 8,931,712 returns filed by non-farm sole proprietorships. See SOI Tax Stats Integrated Business Data, INTERNAL REVENUE SERV. tbl.1, gov/uac/soi-tax-stats-integrated-business-data (last visited Sept. 24, 2014). 15 Id. (reporting the filing of 1,782,478 returns by C corporations and a combined total of 7,210,749 returns by S Corporations, RICs, REITs, and partnerships, not including the 22,614,483 returns filed by non-farm sole proprietorships). 16 Id. (reporting that C corporations and S corporations filed 2,549,091 and 724,749 returns, respectively; a ratio of 3.52:1). 17 Id. (reporting that C corporations and S corporations filed 1,782,478 and 4,049,944 returns, respectively; a ratio of 1:2.27). 18 Id. (reporting C corporation net income of $288,701,762,000 and combined S corporation, RIC, REIT, and partnership net income of $67,857,464,000; a ratio of 4.25:1). 19 Id. (reporting C corporation net income of $1,078,770,113,000 and combined S corporation, RIC, REIT, and partnership net income of $1,728,971,856,000; a ratio of 1:1.603).
5 2014] The Emerging Consensus 23 If our tax laws are pushing U.S. businesses out of the corporate form and into pass-through entities, that is not a good thing. Essentially, this would mean that, when individuals are choosing how to structure their businesses, tax law is putting a thumb on the scale in favor of passthroughs and against C corporations. That means that some businesses that would be better managed as C corporations will not be conducted that way. By pushing these businesses out of the CIT base, we both reduce government revenue and reduce economic activity overall due to the less efficient management structure. Similarly, there are several other features of pass-through entities that may also have negative economic impacts. For example, S corporations have significant limits on their capital structures, both in terms of the kinds of ownership interests that they can issue 20 and the shareholders that they are allowed to have. 21 Partnerships generally have more complicated returns than corporations, increasing compliance costs. Incurring these costs to reduce one s tax bill may make perfect sense from an individual businessperson s perspective, but little sense from an overall policy perspective. Lowering the corporate tax rate would help to reduce the tax system s influence on entity choice decisions, reducing all of these costs. In addition, U.S. tax laws provide many deductions and credits that reduce the size of the CIT base. 22 From a policy perspective, this combination of a smaller base with a higher tax rate leaves much to be desired. These deductions and credits also tend to be fairly complicated, and are often industry-specific. 23 This makes it more difficult to understand the tax system, rendering the tax law more opaque. Such opacity makes it harder for constituents to understand and evaluate what their representatives have done, reducing political accountability and the force of popular opinion on policymaking. An increase in the use of business tax expenditures also means that politically favored companies and industries are able to get tax breaks that others are not. 24 This disparate treatment 20 See I.R.C. 1361(b)(1)(D) (2012). 21 See I.R.C. 1361(b)(1)(A) (C). 22 This is a second reason why U.S. CIT revenues are much lower than the statutory rate. 23 See, e.g., I.R.C. 179C (allowing the expensing of certain capital purchases for refineries); I.R.C. 179E (allowing the expensing of certain capital purchases for mine safety equipment); I.R.C. 181 (allowing the expensing of certain costs for qualified film and television productions). 24 See, e.g., Victor Fleischer, Regulatory Arbitrage, 89 TEX. L. REV. 227 (2010) (discussing same); see also Jordan Barry, Response, On Regulatory Arbitrage, 89 TEX. L. REV. SEE ALSO 69 (2011).
6 24 Chapman Law Review [Vol. 18:1 is unfair, as it treats similarly situated taxpayers differently. 25 Moreover, the tax system is once again putting its thumb on the scale in favor of certain businesses relative to others, producing a different outcome than market competition would otherwise produce. More colloquially, the tax system is picking winners and losers. This is likely to produce inefficient outcomes. The combined effects of these deductions and credits have been quite significant. For example, in 2009, publicly traded biotechnology firms had an average effective CIT rate of 4.5%. 26 In contrast, publicly traded trucking firms had an average effective CIT rate of 30.9%. 27 Reducing the statutory CIT rate reduces the value of tax breaks. This both decreases the unfairness in treatment between favored and disfavored industries and the extent to which the tax system encourages certain types of economic activity over others. Higher CIT rates also encourage capital structures with a higher percentage of debt relative to equity. 28 Because interest payments are deductible, money paid out to creditors is only subject to tax once, at the creditor level. In contrast, dividends paid to stockholders are subject to tax twice: First, the corporation pays tax when it earns the income. Second, the shareholder pays tax when she receives the dividend. The increased use of debt financing makes companies more brittle; in a downturn, a company funded with equity can reduce its dividend or suspend paying a dividend altogether. On the other hand, a company that cannot make interest payments on its debt faces the prospect of bankruptcy. This can potentially exacerbate business cycles, making recessions and depressions more severe and longer lasting Another way to describe this phenomenon is that it constitutes a violation of the principle of horizontal equity. 26 See Binyamin Appelbaum, Corporate Tax Code Proves Hard to Change, N.Y. TIMES (Jan. 27, 2011), see also Mike Bostock et al., Across U.S. Companies, Tax Rates Vary Greatly, N.Y. TIMES (May 25, 2013), html (reporting effective CIT rates among S&P 500 companies by sector; the range was significant; utilities paid an average effective CIT rate of 12%, while retailers paid 34%). 27 Bostock et al., supra note See, e.g., Ruud A. de Mooij, The Tax Elasticity of Corporate Debt: A Synthesis of Size and Variations (Int l Monetary Fund, Working Paper No. 11/95, 2011), available at https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp1195.pdf (collecting and reviewing studies of the effect of the CIT on the use of debt financing). Tax rates can also affect corporate capital structures in more subtle ways. See, e.g., Jordan M. Barry & John William Hatfield, Pills and Partisans: Understanding Takeover Defenses, 160 U. PA. L. REV. 633, (2012) (discussing how tax considerations can influence the structure of corporate mergers and acquisitions). 29 See, e.g., Hilary J. Allen, Let s Talk About Tax: Fixing Bank Incentives to Sabotage Stability, 18 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 821, (2013) (discussing the effect of the
7 2014] The Emerging Consensus 25 III. POLITICAL AGREEMENT The consensus for cutting the CIT rate also extends to the political arena. For example, during the 2012 presidential election, both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney advocated for a CIT rate cut. 30 More surprisingly, both advocated for nearly the same cut: Mitt Romney proposed a 25% federal CIT rate. 31 Barack Obama proposed a 28% federal CIT rate, along with a deduction for manufacturers that would ultimately give them a 25% federal CIT rate. 32 Considering the degree of polarization in contemporary politics and the 35% federal CIT rate currently in effect, 33 the size of the gap between these two policy positions seems quite small. In addition, cutting the CIT rate could help reduce disagreement surrounding one of the tax policy questions on which Democrats and Republicans are most strongly divided: How should the United States tax income earned by U.S. corporations and their subsidiaries in non-u.s. jurisdictions? Currently, U.S. corporations with foreign subsidiaries generally do not owe U.S. tax on income that those subsidiaries earn overseas until they repatriate those earnings. 34 This system has several negative effects: Most other companies corporations are not subject to domestic tax on income that they earn in other countries. Because U.S. corporations investing abroad can face an additional level of tax, this can place them at a competitive disadvantage. Further, because income earned in foreign jurisdictions is not subject to U.S. tax until repatriated, it encourages U.S. businesses to move profits to lower-tax countries. Finally, because profits earned abroad are not subject CIT deduction for debt on banks, and suggesting that the effect is much larger than the too big to fail subsidy enjoyed by the largest institutions). 30 See THE WHITE HOUSE & THE DEP T OF THE TREASURY, THE PRESIDENT S FRAMEWORK FOR BUSINESS TAX REFORM 1 (2012) [hereinafter OBAMA PLAN], available at k-for-business-tax-reform pdf; BELIEVE IN AMERICA: MITT ROMNEY S PLAN FOR JOBS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH 6 (2011) [hereinafter ROMNEY PLAN], available at conomicgrowth-full.pdf. 31 See ROMNEY PLAN, supra note 30, at 6, This proposal did not end with the Romney campaign, and remains favored in Republican circles. In February 2014, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp put forward a tax reform proposal that also includes a 25% CIT rate. See HOUSE COMM. ON WAYS & MEANS, 113TH CONG., THE TAX REFORM ACT OF 2014: FIXING OUR BROKEN TAX CODE SO THAT IT WORKS FOR AMERICAN FAMILIES AND JOB CREATORS 19 (2014), available at means.house.gov/uploadedfiles/tax_reform_executive_summary.pdf. 32 See OBAMA PLAN, supra note 30, at 1, 9, This is a slight oversimplification. See I.R.C. 11(b) (2012). 34 This is an oversimplification. Special rules apply to certain types of income, sometimes referred to as Subpart F income. See I.R.C
8 26 Chapman Law Review [Vol. 18:1 to U.S. tax until they are returned to the United States, companies have an incentive to keep those profits overseas instead of bringing them back to the United States. Democrats and Republicans have weighed these varying concerns differently. Democrats have tended to focus on reducing the incentive for U.S. businesses to move profits overseas. For example, President Barack Obama has proposed a minimum tax on foreign income at the time it is earned. 35 This would help reduce the relative benefits of earning income offshore instead of in the United States, but would make U.S. businesses competing abroad less competitive. 36 Republicans, in contrast, have focused more on the issue of U.S. competitiveness. Mitt Romney advocated switching to a territorial tax system, which would mean no U.S. tax on income earned abroad. 37 This would improve the competitive position of U.S. businesses operating abroad; however, it would also increase U.S. businesses incentives to move profits overseas. 38 Regardless, cutting the CIT rate helps with all three of these concerns: It reduces the competitive disadvantage to U.S. corporations from being subject to the U.S. CIT. It narrows the tax differential between earning profits in the United States and earning them in low-tax jurisdictions, reducing the incentive to shift profits out of the country. It reduces the tax cost of repatriating foreign earnings, which will encourage more repatriation at the margin. Thus, cutting the U.S. CIT rate is both a point of agreement across both parties, as well as a policy measure that will help reduce the magnitude of existing political disagreements. CONCLUSION This Article recaps some of the chief factors that have fueled the emerging consensus in favor of a cut in the statutory CIT rate. That said, it bears emphasis that tax policy experts generally envision such a cut as part of a larger tax reform package and there is considerable disagreement on what the rest of that package should look like. 35 See OBAMA PLAN, supra note 30, at Currently, the advantage of foreign profits is that U.S. tax on such profits is deferred until they are repatriated. See id. at 13. Under such a change, more tax would be due at the time the income is earned, reducing the amount of tax deferred. Id. at 14. Such a change would also help reduce taxpayers incentives to leave foreign profits in foreign subsidiaries. Id. 37 See ROMNEY PLAN, supra note 30, at Currently, the advantage of foreign profits is that U.S. tax on such profits is deferred until they are repatriated. See id. at 46. Under this change, such profits would be exempt from U.S. taxation a significantly larger advantage.
9 2014] The Emerging Consensus 27 Many call for a CIT rate cut to be paired with base-broadening provisions that eliminate or pare down existing deductions and credits. 39 Commentators disagree on which deductions and credits to target, and to what extent. Some, concerned about budget deficits, believe that a CIT rate cut can only be enacted if accompanied by spending cuts, new revenue raised from individuals, or a combination of both. Other commentators worry that a CIT rate cut could reduce the progressivity of our tax system, exacerbating economic inequality, 40 and must be enacted along with other tax provisions designed to counteract this effect. On a more nuts-and-bolts level, a reduced corporate tax rate, coupled with capital gains treatment for dividends, could render income earned through the corporate form subject to less tax than income earned by individuals. 41 This could open up an opportunity for tax avoidance and reduce the effectiveness of the individual income tax. All of these are significant concerns for policymakers, and assembling a package that addresses them all will not be easy. Nor does it seem probable that such a package will emerge in the near future. But, given the broad support among commentators and policymakers for cutting the statutory CIT rate, such a cut does seem very likely to happen eventually. 39 See, e.g., OBAMA PLAN, supra note 30, at The short version of this argument is as follows: The burden of the CIT is primarily borne by a combination of shareholders and executives. Both tend to be wealthier than the average American. Accordingly, reducing the corporate tax will reduce the tax burden on those with more income, rendering the tax system less progressive. 41 For example, a 20% CIT rate, coupled with a 20% capital gains rate on dividends would mean that shareholders keep 80% of 80% (=64%) of distributed corporate profits in other words, the net tax rate on such income is 36%. This is less than the current top individual rate. Moreover, if profits grow as money is reinvested, deferring the payment of dividends and reinvesting at the corporate level subject to a lower tax rate can significantly magnify this advantage.
Swiss-American Chamber of Commerce Corporate Tax Reform - Impacts on Swiss and Other European Companies Marc J. Gerson Rocco V. Femia May 25-26, 2011 U.S. Tax Reform Recognized Need for Fundamental U.S.
ENTITY CHOICE AND EFFECTIVE TAX RATES Prepared by Quantria Strategies, LLC for the National Federation of Independent Business and the S Corporation Association ENTITY CHOICE AND EFFECTIVE TAX RATES CONTENTS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Press Center Link: http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/pages/hp1060.aspx Statement For the Record of the Senate Committee on Finance Hearing on International
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 firstname.lastname@example.org www.cbpp.org Revised February 24, 2012 SIX TESTS FOR CORPORATE TAX REFORM Reform Should Help Shrink
REFERENCES TAX REFORM AND SMALL BUSINESS Eric J. Toder * Institute Fellow, Urban Institute and Co-Director, Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center House Committee on Small Business April 15, 2015 Chairman Chabot,
THE PRESIDENT S FRAMEWORK FOR BUSINESS TAX REFORM A Joint Report by The White House and the Department of the Treasury February 2012 The President s Framework for Business Tax Reform Contents Introduction...
COMBINED REPORTING WITH THE CORPORATE INCOME TAX Issues for State Legislatures William F. Fox and LeAnn Luna * November, 2010 Report commissioned by the NCSL Task Force on State & Local Taxation of Communications
THE PRESIDENT S FRAMEWORK FOR BUSINESS TAX REFORM A Joint Report by The White House and the Department of the Treasury February 2012 The President s Framework for Business Tax Reform Contents Introduction...
FISCAL FACT Sept. 2015 No. 479 Details and Analysis of Governor Jeb Bush s Tax Plan By Kyle Pomerleau Economist Key Findings Governor Jeb Bush s tax plan would reform both the individual income tax and
National Small Business Network WRITTEN STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD US SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS JOINT HEARING ON TAX REFORM AND THE TAX TREATMENT
ACHIEVABLE CORPORATE TAX REFORM 2013 PETERSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS DECEMBER 12, 2012 Gary Clyde Hufbauer, Reginald Jones Senior Fellow Martín Vieiro, Research Analyst Realistic Goals for
TAX REFORM: SELECTED FEDERAL TAX ISSUES RELATING TO SMALL BUSINESS AND CHOICE OF ENTITY Scheduled for a Public Hearing Before the SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE on June 5, 2008 Prepared by the Staff of the
New Audit Regime Allows IRS to Assess and Collect Tax at the Partnership Level SUMMARY The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (the Budget Act) replaces the current partnership audit procedures with a very different
The Honorable Ron Wyden Chairman Committee on Finance United States Senate 219 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Orrin Hatch Ranking Member Committee on Finance United
Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112 th Congress James M. Bickley Specialist in Public Finance January 14, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and
H.R. XXX Small Business Tax Relief Act of 2010 July 30, 2010 I. SMALL BUSINESS TAX RELIEF Provide small business tax relief by repealing certain information reporting requirements to corporations and to
Statement of Andrew D. Pike * Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law American University, Washington College of Law before the Senate Finance Committee October 24, 2003 Mr. Chairman and
Delivering U.S. International Tax Advice to U.S. Clients Doing Business Abroad OGLE INTERNATIONAL TAX ADVISORS www.ogleintltax.com OUR INTERNATIONAL TAX PRACTICE INCLUDES BOTH CPAS AND ATTORNEYS WITH BIG
Taxation of Foreign Income by the U.S. and Other Governments James R. Hines Jr. University of Michigan and UC-Berkeley February 2009 1 American Taxation of Foreign Income. The U.S. practice of taxing foreign
Taxes Agenda Reduce Georgia s overall tax burden Minimize Georgia s reliance on the income tax Encourage, where possible, low tax rates and a wide tax base by limiting exemptions Eliminate the discriminatory
MEXICAN TAX BILL FOR 2016 On September 8, 2015, the President sent to Congress the Tax Bill where some proposals are made to change current Mexican tax legislation. The main proposals are the following:
Choice of Business Entity: How Owners Can Limit Taxes and Liability Peter J. Guy, Esq. Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP email@example.com 212 370 1300 Presenter Tax attorney Peter J. Guy specializes in federal
Avoiding U.S. Investment Tax Traps Structuring Real Estate and Other Fund Investments Presented by: Joseph Gulant and Daniel Blickman Major Categories of Tax to Consider in Planning International Transactions
CTJ Citizens for Tax Justice May 21, 2009 Contact: Bob McIntyre (202) 299-1066 x22 Progressive Revenue Options to Fund Health Care Reform Politicians and pundits have lately written or spoken of the difficult
HANDOUTS Property Taxation Review Committee Legislative Services Agency September 1, 2004 Criteria For Good Proposals for Property Tax Reform Dr. Thomas Pogue, University of Iowa DISCLAIMER The Iowa General
FISCAL FACT Jan. 2016 No. 493 Details and Analysis of Dr. Ben Carson s Tax Plan By Kyle Pomerleau Director of Federal Projects Key Findings Dr. Ben Carson s tax plan would replace the federal income tax
Domenici-Rivlin Debt Reduction Task Force Restoring America s Future Released November 17, 2010 1 Debt Held By The Public 300% 250% 200% Percent of GDP 150% 100% 50% 0% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
BARACK OBAMA S COMPREHENSIVE TAX PLAN Barack Obama s tax plan delivers broad-based tax relief to middle class families and cuts taxes for small businesses and companies that create jobs in America, while
November 2012 How to Switch to Being a Benefit Corporation By William H. Clark, Jr. Note: This outline describes the major issues that should be considered by an existing business evaluating becoming a
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF CORPORATE TAX RATE REDUCTIONS Leadership makes the difference January 211 The Economic Impact of Corporate Tax Rate Reductions January 211 Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters Author:
FISCAL FACT Mar. 2015 No. 455 A Dynamic Analysis of President Obama s Tax Initiatives By Stephen J. Entin Senior Fellow Executive Summary President Obama proposed a long list of changes to the tax system
Legal Update December 21, 2015 Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015: Effects on Taxation of Investment in On December 18, 2015, Congress passed and President Obama signed into law the Protecting
Grantmakers of Kentucky Washington Update August 27, 2012 About Independent Sector Membership organization @IndSector Focused on federal level sector-wide issues www.facebook.com/ IndependentSector Priorities
CHAPTER 7 TAXATION OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS Equity investment in the corporate sector is discouraged by the relatively high effective rate of taxation imposed on the return from such investment. The only
TAX NEWSLETTER Special Release: August 2008 REAL OPPORTUNITY: CANADIANS & U.S. REAL ESTATE The weak U.S. economy, the recent subprime mortgage crisis and the strength of the Canadian dollar relative to
Statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce ON: TO: Hearing on Tax Reform and the U.S. Manufacturing Sector House Committee on Ways and Means DATE: July 19, 2012 The Chamber s mission is to advance human
22 Big Picture Tax making the UK competitive 23 Tax making the UK competitive The IoD s Richard Baron, Head of Taxation, and Corin Taylor, Senior Policy Adviser, set out a 10-year programme of tax reform
KPMG Report: Preliminary Analysis of Partnership Tax Changes in Budget Act TAX November 2, 2015 kpmg.com 1 President Obama on November 2, 2015, signed into law H.R. 1314, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015
THE BUFFETT RULE: A BASIC PRINCIPLE OF TAX FAIRNESS The National Economic Council April 2012 The Buffett Rule: A Basic Principle of Tax Fairness The Buffett Rule is the basic principle that no household
One of the most important decisions facing a new business owner is the selection of the most appropriate legal entity for their new business. There are several options including C Corporations, S Corporations,
Considerations in Forming a New Company C. Wells Hall, III Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP Charlotte, North Carolina Business Law Section Annual Meeting North Carolina Bar Association Pinehurst, North Carolina
FISCAL FACT Jan. 2016 No. 496 Details and Analysis of Hillary Clinton s Tax Proposals By Kyle Pomerleau and Michael Schuyler Economist Senior Fellow Key Findings: Hillary Clinton would enact a number of
Are U.S. Effective Corporate Tax Rates Low? Prepared for: Technology CEO Council February 1, 2010 National Economic Consulting This document has been prepared pursuant to an engagement between PricewaterhouseCoopers
141 T.C. No. 5 UNITED STATES TAX COURT BMC SOFTWARE INC. Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 15675-11. Filed September 18, 2013. R determined that royalty payments from
Berkeley Journal of International Law Volume 13 Issue 2 Article 3 1996 The Indirect Foreign Tax Credit: A Policy Analysis of Section 902 Ronald A. Worley Recommended Citation Ronald A. Worley, The Indirect
Cross Species Conversions and Mergers 591 Cross Species Conversions and Mergers JOHN B. TRUSKOWSKI * The adoption by many states of both conversion statutes 1 statutes allowing one form of business organization,
Hitotsubashi Symposium Fundamental Tax Reforms in Japan In Search of Equity-Efficiency Balance Shigeki Morinobu Professor, Chuo Law School President of Japan Tax Institute 1. Introduction Upon entering
REITs and infrastructure projects The next investment frontier? 2 Coming out of the economic downturn, private investors are seeking new avenues to generate tax-efficient returns on their invested funds.
Tax reform: Overview Common elements Eliminate tax preferences Lower rates E.g., National Commission Fiscal Responsibility and Reform Individual rates: 8/14/23%; corporate rate: 26% Tax capital gains and
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tax Reform Advancing America in the Global Economy OCTOBER 2015 JUST THE FACTS Tax Reform Will Boost U.S. Growth, Jobs, Wages and Competitiveness In Tax Reform: Advancing America in the
slaughter and may Article october 2010 Graham Airs On 27 July 2010 the UK Treasury released a discussion document on foreign branch taxation. This explores the possibility for changing the UK tax rules
S CORP vs. C CORP vs. LLC: WHICH IS RIGHT FOR YOUR BUSINESS? One of the significant decisions you face when starting a company is deciding through which type of legal entity you will operate the business.
Municipal Bond Tax Legislation Michael Decker Michael Decker 202-962-7430 or firstname.lastname@example.org The tax-exemption is under threat. 1 The political agenda is dominated by deficit and debt reduction and tax
HOUSTON BOSTON curbstonegroup.com MLP 101: INTRODUCTION TO MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS What are MLPs? MLPs are an investment in real energy infrastructure assets of national importance MLPs are publicly
Actions Are Needed to Eliminate Inequities in the Employment Tax Liabilities of Sole Proprietorships and Single-Shareholder S Corporations May 2005 Reference Number: 2005-30-080 This report has cleared
Debt and equity finance and interest allocation rules Background paper for Session 4 of the Victoria University of Wellington Tax Working Group October 2009 Prepared by the Policy Advice Division of the
For Release on Delivery September 13, 2011 at 2 p.m. The Role of Tax Reform in Comprehensive Deficit Reduction and Fiscal Policy Martin Feldstein Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am very pleased to have this
www.pwc.com U.S. Legislative Outlook Tom Patten 2 Agenda Understanding the U.S. legislative process. Recent legislative developments. Proposals. 2 Understanding the U.S. Legislative Process The Long Road
Order Code 96-769 Updated January 24, 2007 Summary Capital Gains Taxes: An Overview Jane G. Gravelle Senior Specialist in Economic Policy Government and Finance Division Tax legislation in 1997 reduced
Dedicated To Partnering With Our Clients November 2001 Volume 2 OUR COMMITMENT TO OUR CLIENTS Partnering We are an essential part of our clients success, working every day to enhance our clients business
Tax Night: Planning for Higher Income, Estate, and Medicare Taxes after the 2012 Elections, Attorney Tax Section of the Los Angeles County Bar Association 1, Business and Tax Attorney Law Office of 818-936-3490
Obama vs. Romney on es Elections 2012 Where Do the Candidates Stand? Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council The Candidates and Policy October 2012 es affect entrepreneurship, small businesses and the
Tax Reform in Brazil and the U.S. Devon M. Bodoh Principal in Charge Latin America Markets, Tax KPMG LLP Carlos Eduardo Toro Director KPMG Brazil Agenda Overview of Global Tax Reform Overview Organization
Family Matters: Pennsylvania s 100% Marginal Income Tax Rate Gary L. Welton Ph.D. According to the National Taxpayers Union, the U.S. Tax Code includes 3,951,104 words. It is more than twice the length
Insights on... WEALTH PLANNING TAX UPDATE: 2016 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION TAX REFORM POLICY UPDATE Details of the post-convention tax reform for A Fair Tax Code Suzanne L. Shier, Wealth Planning Practice
The Hidden Cost of Federal Tax Policy JASON J. FICHTNER & JACOB M. FELDMAN Arlington, Virginia ABOUT THE MERCATUS CENTER AT GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY The Mercatus Center at George Mason University is the
The Impact of Proposed Federal Tax Reform on Farm Businesses James M. Williamson and Ron Durst United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service Washington, DC Poster prepared for presentation
December 19, 2013 No. 409 Fiscal Fact New York Governor Cuomo s Second Tax Commission Publishes Recommendations By Elizabeth Malm Introduction In mid-december 2013, the second tax commission convened by
TAXATION OF REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANIES January 2012 J. Walker Johnson and Alexis MacIvor I. In General A. Economic functions 1. Pooling of investments 2. Investment diversity 3. Investment advice and
A Guide to Incorporating Your Business Forming a C or S Corporation Advantages of Incorporating Operating and Maintaining a Corporation Comparing C Corps., S Corps. and LLCs Table of Contents INTRODUCTION....................................................
FIRPTA requires that a buyer withhold 10% of the gross sales price, subject to certain exceptions, and send it to the Internal Revenue Service if the seller is a foreign person. U.S. Taxes Foreign investors
Mind Your Business Miles & Stockbridge P.C. Christopher Davis Maryland Institute College of Art January 17, 2014 Firm Overview Miles & Stockbridge P.C. is a full-service law firm that represents businesses
CTJ Citizens for Tax Justice March 23, 2011 Contact: Bob McIntyre (202) 299-1066 x22 Steve Wamhoff (202) 299-1066 x33 Congress Should End Deferral Rather than Adopt a Territorial Tax System Understanding
THE TAX BURDEN ON CROSS-BORDER INVESTMENT: COMPANY STRATEGIES AND COUNTRY RESPONSES HARRY GRUBERT CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO. 964 CATEGORY 1: PUBLIC FINANCE JUNE 2003 PRESENTED AT CESIFO CONFERENCE ON MEASURING
A Note on Business Tax Competitiveness in British Columbia Volume 21, Issue 2, May 2014 It s slightly more than one year since BC scrapped the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) and returned to the former Provincial
VOL. 27, NO. 2 SUMMER 2014 Executive Compensation BENEFITS LAW JOURNAL Executive Compensation Camp Tax Reform Proposal Targets Executive Compensation Joseph S. Adams, Anne S. Becker, and Andrew C. Liazos
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Forming a Florida Limited Liability Company (LLC) Versus a Florida Corporation by Karen J. Orlin This Note outlines advantages and disadvantages of forming a new business
U.S. REITs Investing Globally Ameek Ashok Ponda, Sullivan & Worcester LLP U.S. REITs Investing Globally What is a REIT? Why is a REIT Exempt from Tax? Public Company Tax Structures REIT Subsidiaries ORIAD
tax notes Volume 150, Number 10 March 7, 2016 UBIT Reform Could Help Close the Pension Gap By Ted Dougherty and Jay Laurila Reprinted from Tax Notes, March 7, 2016, p. 1175 (C) Tax Analysts 2015. All rights
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.