1 P. Bloom, T.P. German / Cognition 77 (2000) B25±B31 B25 COGNITION Cognition 77 (2000) B25±B31 Brief article Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind Paul Bloom a, *, Tim P. German b a Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT , USA b University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 35Q, UK Received 5 April 2000; accepted 14 June 2000 Abstract The false belief task has often been used as a test of theory of mind. We present two reasons to abandon this practice. First, passing the false belief task requires abilities other than theory of mind. Second, theory of mind need not entail the ability to reason about false beliefs. We conclude with an alternative conception of the role of the false belief task. q 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Cognitive development; False belief task; Theory of mind 1. Introduction The false belief task is one of the classic methods in the study of development. There have been hundreds of articles and chapters concerning this task, comparing the performance of different populations, exploring how success correlates with other abilities, and modifying and extending the task in various ways. This journal has published 19 such articles, including the one in which the task was rst described (Wimmer & Perner, 1983) and the one reporting that autistic individuals show a special impairment on this task, more so than normal and retarded children of the same mental age (Baron-Cohen, Leslie & Frith, 1985). There is little doubt that the false belief task has motivated some of the most exciting research in cognitive development, research that bears in important ways on issues such as nativism and modularity, constructivist theories of conceptual change, and the relationship between self-knowledge and knowledge of others (e.g. see collections of papers in * Corresponding author. Fax: address: (P. Bloom) /00/$ - see front matter q 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S (00)
2 B26 P. Bloom, T.P. German / Cognition 77 (2000) B25±B31 Baron-Cohen, Tager-Flusberg & Cohen, 2000; Carruthers & Smith, 1996; Mitchell & Riggs, 2000). The `standard version' of the false belief task presents the child with a character, Sally, who leaves a desirable object such as a chocolate in her basket, before departing the scene. In her absence, another character, Anne, removes the object and places it in a box. Children are asked to predict, on Sally's return to the room, where Sally will look for the object (or, sometimes, where she thinks the object is). Four-year-olds tend to succeed at this task ± correctly attributing a false belief to Sally, saying that she will look for the object in the basket ± while younger children tend to fail (see Wellman, Cross & Watson, in press, for review). 1 This has led many scholars to conclude that children undergo a radical shift in their understanding of the mind. For instance, Gopnik (1993, p. 1) claims that ªat about age 4, there is an important developmental shift to a representational model of the mindº and Wimmer and Weichbold (1994, p. 45) state that ª¼not until the age of about 4 years do children become able to attribute belief states to themselves and other peopleº (see also Flavell, 1988, p. 247). Under this view, failure at false belief task re ects some serious de cit in children's understanding of the mental lives of themselves and others ± a de cit in `theory of mind'. 2 Our goal here is to review the evidence to the contrary; we argue that there are two independent reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. 2. Reason 1: There is more to passing the false belief task than theory of mind The logic behind the false belief task was outlined by several commentators on the paper by Premack and Woodruff (1978) entitled `Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?' Suppose you want to know whether a chimpanzee can reason about the mental states of others. As Dennett (1978) and others pointed out, it is not enough to demonstrate that individual A can predict the actions of individual B. In many cases, A can do so without an understanding of B's mental states, but by simply observing the actual state of the world. (Suppose A knows the chocolate is in the basket and observes B searching for food. A might expect B to look in the basket, not because A 1 There are other tasks that assess an individual's ability to attribute a false belief to him or herself. These typically take the form of showing children a familiar container (e.g. a `smarties' tube), soliciting their beliefs about its contents, and then revealing that the container has a different content (e.g. a pencil). They are then asked to state what they thought was in the container (e.g. Perner, Leekham & Wimmer, 1987, among many others), and younger children typically fail to acknowledge their own false belief. In this paper our arguments focus primarily on the Sally±Anne task, but these apply with equal force to this somewhat different task. 2 Note that there is a more subtle proposal articulated by Perner (1991, 1995), which states that 2- and 3- year-olds ªunderstand mental states as relations of semantically evaluable objects (propositions)º but that they fail to appreciate ªthat these intentional objects (propositions) are semantically evaluableº (Perner, 1995, p. 243). The idea here is that children need to learn that beliefs are mental representations that (critically) can misrepresent how the world is; this understanding is presumed to develop as part of children's acquisition of the more general concept of representation. Perner's theory differs in important regards from the more standard interpretation of the false belief ndings; it is considered at greater length elsewhere (German & Leslie, 2000; Leslie, in press), and will not be discussed here.
3 P. Bloom, T.P. German / Cognition 77 (2000) B25±B31 B27 is attributing a belief to B, but because the chocolate actually is in the basket.) A more robust test involves predicting the behavior of another animal based on an inferred mental state that differs from reality ± a false belief. This would show that the individual understands that it is the mental state, rather than the state of the world, that causes the action. Based on this reasoning, Wimmer and Perner (1983) developed a false belief task for use with preschool and school-age children. This task was modi ed by Baron- Cohen et al. (1985), in order to be simple enough to be administered to children with autism. The Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) version has become the `standard' version of the false belief task, and this is the Sally±Anne task discussed above. As many have pointed out, even if children understand that beliefs can be false, this is still a dif cult task. To solve it, the child has to follow the actions of two characters in a narrative, has to appreciate that Sally could not have observed the switching of the chocolate, has to remember both where the chocolate used to be and where it is at the time of the test, and has to appreciate the precise meaning of the question (for instance, that it means where will Sally look, not where she should look). Though control questions ensure that 3-year-old children can cope with some of these basic task demands (e.g. see Perner, Leekham & Wimmer, 1987), the task is too hard for 1- and 2-year-olds, as they lack suf cient attentional and linguistic resources to cope. Why do 3-year-olds fail? Several investigators have modi ed the false belief task so as to make it simpler ± for instance, by making the questions simpler, more speci c, and more pragmatically natural (Freeman, Lewis & Doherty, 1991; Lewis & Osborne, 1990; Moses, 1993; Siegal & Beattie, 1991; Surian & Leslie, 1999), making the change of location less salient (Carlson, Moses & Hix, 1998; Wellman & Bartsch, 1988; Zaitchik, 1991), giving the children a memory aid for false belief content (Freeman & LacoheÂe, 1995; German & Leslie, 2000; Mitchell & LacoheÂe, 1991) and so on. Such modi ed false belief tasks are often passed by 3- year-olds, a nding that has been used to support the argument that younger children have sophisticated conceptual competence when it comes to understanding that beliefs can be false, but that this competence is ltered through inef cient processing capacities (German & Leslie, 2000). Advocates of the developmental change view are not convinced. Gopnik (1993, p. 13), for instance, sees such ndings as showing that ªAt best¼ there may be evidence of some fragile and fragmentary false-belief understanding in some 3- year-olds under some conditions.º And, as noted above, such modi cations might lower the age of children who pass the task by about 6 months to a year, but not much lower. Because of this, the results above do not in themselves challenge the substance of the developmental change view supported by Gopnik and others, because an option for developmental change theorists is to argue that they merely show that developmental change occurs somewhat earlier than expected. The more serious problem is that false belief tasks are inherently dif cult. This is because any false belief task requires, at minimum, that the child reasons about a belief that is false. As Leslie, among others, has pointed out, beliefs are supposed to be true. This is what they are for (Leslie, 1994). Hence, even for a child who clearly understands that beliefs can be false, getting the right answer places non-trivial processing demands.
4 B28 P. Bloom, T.P. German / Cognition 77 (2000) B25±B31 To put it another way, to succeed at the false belief task, the child has to override useful and simple heuristics, such as `people will act in accord with their desires' (Fodor, 1992; Gergely, NaÂdasdy, Csibra & BiroÂ, 1995; Roth & Leslie, 1998; Russell, Mauthner, Sharpe & Tidswell, 1991; Saltmarsh, Mitchell & Robinson, 1995; Zaitchik, 1990; but see Wimmer & Weichbold, 1994 for an opposing view). Furthermore, there is evidence that standard false belief tasks are dif cult for children even independent of the requirement to reason about false belief. In the `false photograph' task, a picture is taken of a scene, the scene is changed, and the child is asked what the picture depicts. Here there are multiple representations and there is the realist pull of the way the world really is ± but there are no false beliefs. If children pass the false photograph task and fail the false belief task, it would be reasonable to infer that their problem with the false belief task really does have to do with beliefs. But in fact, 3-year-olds fail both the false photograph task and the false belief task (Zaitchik, 1990; see also Leslie, 2000; Slaughter, 1998). It gets worse, as there is evidence that standard false belief tasks are dif cult for children, independent of the requirement to reason about any sort of representation. For instance, Riggs, Peterson, Robinson and Mitchell (1998) constructed a task in which children are required to set aside an actual state of affairs (the fact that an object has been placed in one location) and generate an answer based on an alternative counterfactual state of affairs (where it would have been placed had some other event not happened). Younger children are poor at this task, even though there is no representational content. In a similar vein, Roth and Leslie (1998) developed the `screens task'. Children are presented with a box and a basket, and a marble is placed in the box. These objects are then concealed by a screen. Then a replica box and basket are placed in front of the screen. A marble is placed in the replica box, and then moved to the replica basket. Children are simply asked to report where the marble is behind the screen. This task requires children to set aside a currently available, salient situation (in which the marble is in the basket) and generate an answer based on a similar, less salient situation (in which the marble is in the box). Once again, 3-year-olds fail this task. It is revealing that when older autistic children are tested on these photograph and screens tasks, they pass ± even though they fail on the standard false belief task (Charman & Baron-Cohen, 1995; Leslie & Thaiss, 1992; Roth & Leslie, 1998). This suggests that autistic children really do have speci c problems with false beliefs. But given their failure at all of these tasks, this inference cannot be made about normal 3-year-olds. 3. Reason 2: There is more to theory of mind than passing the false belief task If younger children do not show signs that they have an appreciation of false belief, how do you know that they are reasoning about mental states at all? Fortunately, there are other methods that can be used to determine whether or not children are attributing mental states. For instance, in an elegant study by O'Neill (1996), 2- year-olds observed as an attractive toy was put on a high shelf. As this happened, the child's parent was either present or absent. When later asking for help in retrieving
5 P. Bloom, T.P. German / Cognition 77 (2000) B25±B31 B29 the toy, the children were more likely to name the toy and gesture to the location when their parent had not been present to witness the placement of the toy than if their parent had been present. This suggests that they modify their behavior according to the knowledge states of other people (i.e. whether or not their parent possesses a given belief), and that they have a tacit appreciation of the circumstances under which beliefs are formed. Furthermore, there are plenty of signs that even before their second birthday, children have some appreciation of the workings of other minds. They are capable of initiating pretend play and of understanding the pretence of others (Leslie, 1994). They can attribute goals to other agents (Csibra, Gergely, BiroÂ, KooÂs & Brockbank, 1999; Gergely et al., 1995; Woodward, 1998). They can imitate the intended, as well as completed actions of other agents (Carpenter, Akhtar & Tomasello, 1998; Meltzoff, 1995). They can use eye gaze as a cue to what someone is attending to when they use a new word (Baldwin, 1991) and orient to follow the gaze of an inanimate object if it displays evidence of being an intentional agent (Johnson, Slaughter & Carey, 1998). In fact, young children's learning of the meanings of words can be seen in a large part as the direct consequence of their ability to infer the referential intentions of other people (Bloom, 2000). It might be that developmental psychologists are so obsessed with the false beliefs task just because it is the one measure of theory of mind that children are not very good at. Consider nally the fact that older autistic children fail the false belief task. Wimmer and Weichbold (1994) suggest that this ªspeak[s] for the validity of the false belief task, since social and communicative impairments are among the de ning characteristics of autismº. But it also illustrates a weakness in the task. Normal 3-year-olds and older children with autism both fail the false belief task, but, in all interesting regards, normal 3-year-olds are nothing like older children with autism (e.g. see HappeÂ, 1996). Normal 3-year-olds are far superior with regard to communicative and linguistic skills, the ability to pretend and understand the pretence of others, and the ability to engage in, understand and manipulate the actions of others. This is a severe problem for any theory that lumps the two groups together as individuals who lack theory of mind. A more promising analysis is that some individuals with autism fail the false belief task because they lack the capacity to acquire a theory of mind. In contrast, 3- year-olds might fail the false belief task because of general task demands, because they don't have a grasp of false belief, or both. But they surely have a `theory of mind', in the general sense of having a sophisticated ability to reason about the mental states; this is precisely why they differ from autistic individuals in the social, communicative, and imaginative domains. 4. The proper role of the false belief task The false belief task should not be abolished. For one thing, while failure in the false belief task isn't necessarily informative about a child or animal's conceptual abilities, success is. If a 2-year-old or a chimpanzee could be shown to succeed at a
6 B30 P. Bloom, T.P. German / Cognition 77 (2000) B25±B31 false belief task, it would be big news. Furthermore, the false belief task can be used to explore the relative dif culty of reasoning about different representations, including beliefs, photographs, and drawings. It can be used to diagnose and study older children and adults with cognitive and linguistic impairments. And studies of the factors that improve or diminish performance on the task (such as manipulations of salience, or use of memory aids) can be interesting in their own right, as they bear on theories of how children cope with multiple representations, how they understand questions, and so on. The point of this paper is that the false belief task should be considered in its proper context. It is an ingenious, but very dif cult task that taps one aspect of people's understanding of the minds of others. Nothing more, nothing less. References Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development, 62, 875±890. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a `theory of mind'? Cognition, 21, 37±46. Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J. (2000). Understanding other minds: perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Hix, H. R. (1998). The role of inhibitory processes in young children's dif culties with deception and false belief. Child Development, 69, 672±691. Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behaviour and Development, 21, 315±330. Carruthers, P., & Smith, P. (1996). Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Charman, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Understanding photos, models, and beliefs: a test of the modularity thesis of theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 10, 287±298. Csibra, G., Gergely, G., BiroÂ, S., KooÂs, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of `pure reason' in infancy. Cognition, 72, 237±267. Dennett, D. (1978). Beliefs about beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 568±570. Flavell, J. H. (1988). The development of children's knowledge about the mind: from cognitive connections to mental representations. In J. Astington, P. Harris, & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fodor, J. (1992). A theory of the child's theory of mind. Cognition, 44, 283±296. Freeman, N., & LacoheÂe, H. (1995). Making explicit 3-year-old's implicit competence with their own false beliefs. Cognition, 56, 31±60. Freeman, N. H., Lewis, C., & Doherty, M. J. (1991). Preschoolers' grasp of a desire for knowledge in false-belief prediction: practical intelligence and verbal report. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 7±31. Gergely, G., NaÂdasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & BiroÂ, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165±193. German, T. P., & Leslie, A. M. (2000). Attending to and learning about mental states. In P. Mitchell, & K. Riggs (Eds.), Children's reasoning and the mind. Hove: Psychology Press. Gopnik, A. (1993). How we know our own minds: the illusion of rst person knowledge of intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 1±14. HappeÂ, F. (1996). Autism: an introduction to psychological theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Johnson, S., Slaughter, V., & Carey, S. (1998). Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1, 233±238.
7 P. Bloom, T.P. German / Cognition 77 (2000) B25±B31 B31 Leslie, A. M. (1994). Pretending and believing: issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition, 50, 193±200. Leslie, A. M. (2000). How to acquire a `representational theory of mind'. In D. Sperber, & S. Davies (Eds.), Metarepresentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press (in press). Leslie, A. M., & Thaiss, L. (1992). Domain speci city in conceptual development: neuropsychological evidence from autism. Cognition, 43, 225±251. Lewis, C., & Osborne, A. (1990). Three-year-olds' problems with false belief: conceptual de cit or linguistic artifact?. Child Development, 61, 1514±1519. Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: re-enactment of intended acts by 18- month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838±850. Mitchell, P., & LacoheÂe, H. (1991). Children's early understanding of false belief. Cognition, 39, 107± 127. Mitchell, P., & Riggs, K. (2000). Children's reasoning and the mind. Hove: Psychology Press. Moses, L. J. (1993). Young children's understanding of belief constraints on intention. Cognitive Development, 8, 1±25. O'Neill, D. K. (1996). Two-year-old children's sensitivity to parent's knowledge state when making requests. Child Development, 67, 659±677. Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Perner, J. (1995). The many faces of belief: re ections on Fodor's and the child's theory of mind. Cognition, 57, 241±269. Perner, J., Leekham, S., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds' dif culty with false belief: the case for conceptual de cit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125±137. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 512±526. Riggs, K. J., Peterson, D. M., Robinson, E. J., & Mitchell, P. (1998). Are errors in false belief tasks symptomatic of a broader dif culty with counterfactuality? Cognitive Development, 13, 73±91. Roth, D., & Leslie, A. M. (1998). Solving belief problems: towards a task analysis. Cognition, 66, 1±31. Russell, J., Mauthner, N., Sharpe, S., & Tidswell, T. (1991). The `windows task' as a measure of strategic deception in preschoolers and autistic subjects. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 331± 349. Saltmarsh, R., Mitchell, P., & Robinson, E. (1995). Realism and children's early grasp of mental representation: belief-based judgements in the state change task. Cognition, 57, 297±325. Siegal, M., & Beattie, K. (1991). Where to look rst for children's knowledge of false beliefs. Cognition, 38, 1±12. Slaughter, V. (1998). Children's understanding of pictorial and mental representations. Child Development, 69, 321±332. Surian, L., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Competence and performance in false belief understanding: a comparison of autistic and three-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 141± 155. Wellman, H., & Bartsch, K. (1988). Young children's reasoning about beliefs. Cognition, 30, 239±277. Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (in press). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: the truth about false-belief. Child Development. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and the containing function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103±128. Wimmer, H., & Weichbold, V. (1994). Children's theory of mind: Fodor's heuristics examined. Cognition, 53, 45±57. Woodward, A. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69, 1±34. Zaitchik, D. (1990). When representations con ict with reality: the preschooler's problem with false beliefs and ªfalseº photographs. Cognition, 35, 41±69. Zaitchik, D. (1991). Is only seeing really believing? Sources of true belief in the false belief task. Cognitive Development, 6, 91±103.
The Role of Simple and Complex Working Memory Strategies in the Development of First-order False Belief Reasoning: A Computational Model of Transfer of Skills Burcu Arslan (email@example.com), Stefan
SOCIAL COGNITION The Development of Theory of Mind in Early Childhood* 1 Janet Wilde Astington, PhD, 2 Margaret J. Edward, MA 1 Institute of Child Study, University of Toronto, Canada 2 School District
Cognition 89 (2003) 25 41 www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit Limits on theory of mind use in adults Boaz Keysar a, *, Shuhong Lin a, Dale J. Barr b a The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA b The University
Research in Developmental Disabilities 31 (2010) 617 624 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Research in Developmental Disabilities Theory of mind in children with severe speech and physical impairments
Theory of Mind in Children with Cerebral Palsy and Severe Speech Impairment Kerstin W. Falkman, Annika Dahlgren Sandberg and Erland Hjelmquist Department of Psychology, Göteborg University, Sweden Falkman,
How to pass the false-belief task before your 4 th birthday Paula Rubio-Fernández Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature, University
Metarepresentation in Philosophy and Psychology Sam Scott (firstname.lastname@example.org) Department of Cognitive Science Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Abstract This paper brings together two definitions
Mindblind Eyes: An Absence of Spontaneous Theory of Mind in Asperger Syndrome Atsushi Senju, 1 * Victoria Southgate, 1 Sarah White, 2 Uta Frith 2,3 1 Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck,
This paper appeared in Prisme, 2001, 34, 174-183. Theory of mind in normal development and autism Simon Baron-Cohen Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Downing
1 Ezrine, G.A. (2007). Promoting Social Skills in Young Children [white paper, electronic version]. Retrieved from Georgia State University Center for School Safety, School Climate and Classroom Management
COGNITIVE UNDERPINNINGS OF PRESCHOOLERS ABILITY TO LEARN FROM OTHERS By JENNIFER M. TAMARGO A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2004. 55:87 124 doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142044 Copyright c 2004 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved First published online as a Review in Advance on October 27, 2003
Developmental Science 17:6 (2014), pp 977 983 DOI: 10.1111/desc.12171 SHORT REPORT Follow the liar: the effects of adult lies on children s honesty Chelsea Hays 1 and Leslie J. Carver 1,2 1. Department
British Journal of Developmental Psychology (2000), 18, 609 624 2000 The British Psychological Society Printed in Great Britain 609 An investigation of pretend play, mental state terms and false belief
9.85 Cognition in Infancy and Early Childhood Lecture 2: Theoretical perspectives in developmental psychology: Piaget 1 Today CI-M instructors: Partner lectures Piagetian theory and stages Challenges to
329 Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, July 2008, Vol. 34, No.2, 329-336. Children s Theory of Mind: Educational, School and Instructional Implications Bhaswati Patnaik National Institute
Psychological Review 2009 American Psychological Association 2009, Vol. 116, No. 4, 953 970 0033-295X/09/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0016923 Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States?
Is Mindreading a Universal or Culture-Specific Construct? Arkadiusz Gut (KUPISA@Kul.Lublin.Pl) Departments of Philosophy/ Cognitive Science/ Sinology, 14 Racławickie Avenue 20-950 Lublin, Poland Michał
Center for Early At the University of Chicago Childhood Research May 2012 http://babylab.uchicago.edu 2012 Newsletter What we are all about! Inside this issue: Page 4, New Study for 5- month-olds! Page
112 Chapter 8: Cognitive development Jean Piaget, 1896 1980. An example of the dominance in play of assimilation over accommodation pretending that an old packing case, a box, and a tube are a tank. The
393 British Journal of Developmental Psychology (2002), 20, 393 420 2002 The British Psychological Society www.bps.org.uk A new false belief test for 36-month-olds Malinda Carpenter*, Josep Call and Michael
Developmental Science 11:4 (2008), pp 487 494 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00694.x PAPER Blackwell Publishing Ltd Do as I do: 7-month-old infants selectively reproduce others goals J. Kiley Hamlin, Elizabeth
Review for Exam 2 1) When Roy first received a new toy, he played with it all the time. The longer he had it, the less he played with it. This change in Roy's behavior is an example of A) priming. B) habituation.
White paper for the CS Education Research Summit Josh Tenenberg I have two goals for this paper. The first is to go meta, to question the very research questions that we are to generate, by unpacking their
Infant Behavior & Development 32 (2009) 286 290 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Infant Behavior and Development A method for eliciting scale errors in preschool classrooms Karl S. Rosengren a,,
Verb Learning in Non-social Contexts Sudha Arunachalam and Leah Sheline Boston University 1. Introduction Acquiring word meanings is generally described as a social process involving live interaction with
Developmental Psychology Copyright 2004 by the American Psychological Association 2004, Vol. 40, No. 6, 1093 1104 0012-1649/04/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.523 Are Eyes Windows to a Deceiver s Soul?
Infancy, 16(3), 248 265, 2011 Copyright Ó International Society on Infant Studies (ISIS) ISSN: 1525-0008 print / 1532-7078 online DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00044.x Social Engagement Leads 2-Year-Olds
The ASHA Leader December 3, 2002 Feature Theory of Mind: Language and Cognition in Deaf Children by Brenda Schick, Jill de Villiers, Peter de Villiers & Bob Hoffmeister see also References Children Talk
Physical and Cognitive Cognitive Intro Psychology Georgia Tech Instructor: Dr. Bruce Walker Changes in behavior and structure from womb to tomb We focus on childhood because more is known about that stage
Psychology - pathways & 1000 Level modules School of Psychology Head of School Degree Programmes Single Honours Degree: Joint Honours Degrees: Dr V. J. Brown Psychology Neuroscience (see Biomedical Sciences)
Child Development, May/June 2002, Volume 73, Number 3, Pages 752 767 Theory of Mind and Self-Control: More than a Common Problem of Inhibition Josef Perner, Birgit Lang, and Daniela Kloo This study tested
SPECIAL SECTION: M-COMMERCE Copyright 2002 Electronic Markets Volume 12 (1): 47 57. www.electronicmarkets.org Keywords: consumer behaviour, m-commerce, travel portal A b s t r a c t This paper presents
School of Psychology Important Degree Information: B.Sc./M.A. Honours The general requirements are 480 credits over a period of normally 4 years (and not more than 5 years) or part-time equivalent; the
733 British Journal of Developmental Psychology (2006), 24, 733 751 q 2006 The British Psychological Society The British Psychological Society www.bpsjournals.co.uk Mental playmates: Siblings, executive
Descartes Fourth Meditation On human error Descartes begins the fourth Meditation with a review of what he has learned so far. He began his search for certainty by questioning the veracity of his own senses.
Learning and cognitive effects of acquired brain injury caused by meningitis or septicaemia Meningitis and septicaemia can be a cause of acquired brain injury (ABI). This is an injury to the brain that
Department of Education Learners first, connected and inspired Frequently Asked Questions about Early Entry to Kindergarten (Cross Sectoral Information for Parents) Frequently Asked Questions about Early
FRAMING EFFECTS A framing effect is usually said to occur when equivalent descriptions of a decision problem lead to systematically different decisions. Framing has been a major topic of research in the
Beyond Bloom s Taxonomy: Rethinking Knowledge for the Knowledge Age Developing Higher-Level Approaches to Knowledge Carl Bereiter and Marlene Scardamalia Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the
Convention: An interdisciplinary study Luca Tummolini Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies Via San Martino della Battaglia 44 00185 Roma Italy email@example.com In our lives we are
Cognitive History Timeline Review of Cognitive Psychology : History 1 Philosophical Considerations Schools of Thought Mind = the entity that can process information and display intelligence Brain = the
Developmentally Appropriate Technology in Early Childhood: Video Conferencing a limit case? Spring 2001, AERA Symposium Paper John Siraj-Blatchford Homerton College, Cambridge, UK Iram Siraj-Blatchford
Curriculum Vitae JEFF LOUCKS Department of Psychology University of Regina 3737 Wascana Parkway Regina, SK, S4S 0A2 Email: Jeff.Loucks@uregina.ca Phone: (306) 585-4033 Web Page: uregina.ca/~loucks5j Education
Consciousness and Cognition 12 (2003) 732 751 Consciousness and Cognition www.elsevier.com/locate/concog Do I get what you get? Learning about the effects of self-performed and observed actions in infancy
PSYC2013 Cognitive, Developmental and Social Psychology Unit of Study Code: Coordinator: PSYC2013 Dr Karen Croot Office: Room 509 Griffith Taylor Building Phone: 9351 2647 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
LEARNING THEORIES Ausubel's Learning Theory David Paul Ausubel was an American psychologist whose most significant contribution to the fields of educational psychology, cognitive science, and science education.
Blending the World of Special Education With General Education Services 2 Figure 2.1 Provide opportunities for children to work together. Best Practices According to NAEYC and DEC Two professional organizations,
Autism, Asperger's & Theory of Mind A Literature Review Abstract: This literature review examines the history and pertinent research on Autism, a brain development disorder characterized by social impairment,
Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal UK Edition Goodwin Watson Edwin Glaser Practice Test Published by Pearson Assessment, 80 Strand, London, WC2R 0RL. Copyright 2002, 1993, 1990, 1980, 1964 by The
Cognition 109 (2008) 224 234 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cognition journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe Juliane Kaminski
International Education Journal Vol 2, No 4, 2001 Educational Research Conference 2001 Special Issue http://www.flinders.edu.au/education/iej 329 Current research in the area of Autism and Savant Syndrome
Worlds Without Words Ivan Bretan email@example.com Jussi Karlgren firstname.lastname@example.org Swedish Institute of Computer Science Box 1263, S 164 28 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden. Keywords: Natural Language Interaction, Virtual
Science in the National Curriculum: Four Messages from Psychology Christine Howe University of Cambridge What can Psychology offer? Cognitive and developmental psychologists study knowledge acquisition
Descartes Handout #2 Meditation II and III I. Meditation II: The Cogito and Certainty A. I think, therefore I am cogito ergo sum In Meditation II Descartes proposes a truth that cannot be undermined by
For questions about the implementation of these materials/kits, please contact Shirley Cutshall, Director of Special Programs & Services at 360-299-4098 or email@example.com. To reserve materials, please
Ms Dympna Browne, Consultant Clinical Psychologist Dr Irene Loughran, Educational Psycahologist The investigation of sexual abuse of any child is fraught with difficulty given the dynamics of abuse. ABE
1 Although there are multiple ways in which young children can use language, categorize objects, use tools, and play games, they seem to quickly realize that there is one preferred, or conventional, way
APPIC APPLICATION Summary of Practicum Experiences 1. Intervention Experience How much experience do you have with different types of psychological interventions? NOTE: Remember that hours accrued while
STUDIES OF THEORY OF MIND: Are Intuitive Physics and Intuitive Psychology Independent? Simon Baron-Cohen, Ph.D., Sally Wheelwright, M.A., Amanda Spong, M.A., Victoria Scahill, M.A., and John Lawson, M.A.
Name: Date: 1. In Piaget's stage of concrete operational intelligence, the child acquires an understanding of the principle of: A) conservation. B) abstract logic. C) attachment D) object permanence. 2.
CSC384 Intro to Artificial Intelligence What is Artificial Intelligence? What is Intelligence? Are these Intelligent? CSC384, University of Toronto 3 What is Intelligence? Webster says: The capacity to
Lecture 8 The Subjective Theory of Betting on Theories Patrick Maher Philosophy 517 Spring 2007 Introduction The subjective theory of probability holds that the laws of probability are laws that rational
H. Tager-Flusberg, K. Sullivan / Cognition 76 (2000) 59±89 59 COGNITION Cognition 76 (2000) 59±89 www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit A componential view of theory of mind: evidence from Williams syndrome Helen
Developmental Science 6:3 (2003), pp 297 311 PAPER Blackwell Publishing Ltd Infants developing understanding of the link between understanding of gaze looker and object Amanda L. Woodward Department of
Words as Windows to Thought: The Case of Object Representation The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Published
Providence College Department of Psychology Independent Study Guide for Students 2014-2015 2 Introduction The Department of Psychology at Providence College offers a 4-credit Independent Study (IS) course
Sobel D.M., Capps L.M., & Gopnik A. (2005). Ambiguous figure perception and theory of mind understanding in children with autistic spectrum disorders British Journal Of Developmental Psychology, 23(2):
The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference, Bergen 2013 Developing Fictionally Immoral Attitudes: Spaces of Moral and Narrative Possibilities in Computer Games Daniel Alexander Milne Introduction I once
Developmental Psychology Copyright 2005 by the American Psychological Association 2005, Vol. 41, No. 2, 328 337 0012-1649/05/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2068 Unwilling Versus Unable: Infants Understanding
1 Oralism and How it Affects the Development of the Deaf Child 2 Many Deaf individuals face a plethora of discrimination in a world in which they do not belong, a world which relies heavily on sound in
1 Forthcoming in Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. London: Nature Publishing Group. FOLK PSYCHOLOGY Shaun Nichols Keywords: Eliminativism, Folk Psychology, Introspection, Simulation, Theory Theory Contents:
HOW TO CHANGE NEGATIVE THINKING For there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2, 239 251. Although you may not be fully aware of it, our minds
Course aims and objectives This course examines how the mind fits into the physical world. This is one of the central issues in contemporary philosophy of mind and cognitive science, and we will address
Teaching Students with Epilepsy: Children with epilepsy often experience learning issues as a result of their seizures. These may include ongoing problems with motor skills or cognitive functions, as well
Text of article appearing in: Issues in Science and Technology, XIX(2), 48-52. Winter 2002-03. James Pellegrino Knowing What Students Know Recent advances in the cognitive and measurement sciences should
JUVENILE ADJUDICATIVE COMPETENCE INTERVIEW (JACI)* General Guidance 1. Obtain information about youth s abilities in 12 areas relevant for competence to stand trial. 2. Explore youth s answers and explanations
Harvard College Program in General Education Faculty of Arts and Sciences Harvard University A Guide to Writing in Ethical Reasoning 15 A Guide to Writing in Ethical Reasoning 15 Professor Jay M. Harris
Piaget's Stages Piaget's Stages of Cognitive Development Kay C. Wood, Harlan Smith, Daurice Grossniklaus Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology, University of Georgia Contents
1 Terra Haptica is a journal published by Les Doigts Qui Rêvent (Dreaming Fingers) Here the front and back cover pages. Size A4. Drawing in blind and visually impaired children* Annie VINTER a, Viviane
PRACE NAUKOWE Akademii im. Jana D³ugosza w Czêstochowie Seria: KULTURA FIZYCZNA z. VII, 2007 Svietlana N. Feklistova Differentiated approach to teaching play activity to children of infant and preschool
Theories of Behavior Change Defining Theories of Behavior Change Behavior change is often a goal for staff working directly with constituents, organizations, governments, or communities. Individuals charged
Howard Gardner s Theory of Multiple s Many of us are familiar with three general categories in which people learn: visual learners, auditory learners, and kinesthetic learners. Beyond these three general
RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES IN COGNITIVE REHABILITATION: PROGRAM DESIGN AND CLINICAL BENEFITS In the treatment of traumatic brain injury, cognitive rehabilitation is an intervention that seeks to improve cognitive
IAI : Knowledge Representation John A. Bullinaria, 2005 1. What is Knowledge? 2. What is a Knowledge Representation? 3. Requirements of a Knowledge Representation 4. Practical Aspects of Good Representations
My Brilliant Brain Intelligence Susan Polgar, Chess Champion Chapter 10 Psy 12000.003 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vlggm5wyzo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95eyyyg1g5s 1 2 What is Intelligence? Intelligence
What Grown-Ups Understand About Child Development: A National Benchmark Survey Researched by DYG, Inc. Introduction For most parents, raising a child is one of life s most miraculous and rewarding experiences.