1 NHS Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group Complaints Policy V1 Approved by: Haringey CCG Quality Committee (29/01/13) Ratification by: Haringey CCG Governing Body (is on agenda for March 2013 meeting) Review date: July 2013 Equality Impact Assessment carried out January Version control Version Date Information /12/12 Initial draft of policy by Caroline Rowe for circulation to Quality Committee and NCL/CSU complaints managers for comment /12/12 Shared with Quality Committee as a paper for the meeting on 18/12/12. CR to give verbal update at meeting /12/13 Amendments by Jenny Singleton, Quality Lead, Transition NCL /01/13 Further detail added to section 10 reporting on complaints and outcomes 1 29/1/13 Policy approved by the Quality Committee
2 1. Introduction 1.1 Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) will be statutorily established on 1 April 2013 as a result of the Health and Social Care Act Until this point, the CCG has been operating in shadow form alongside Haringey Primary Care Trust which will cease to exist on 31 March This document sets out ways in which Haringey CCG will encourage feedback and respond to comments, concerns and complaints in respect of the services it provides or commissions. 2. Policy framework 2.1 Haringey CCG is committed to providing patients, families, carers and members of the public with the opportunity to raise concerns or to complain regarding any services it provides or commissions and using the information received to improve services. 2.2 This policy is consistent with: Local Authority Social Services and National Health Services Complaints (England) Regulations 2009 The Principles of Good Complaint Handling (Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman) 2008 Listening, Improving, Responding a Guide to Better Patient Care (Department of Health 2009) NHS Constitution (Department of Health 2009) 2.3 Haringey CCG is committed to having effective procedures in place to handle concerns and complaints bought to the attention of staff. All complaints will be treated seriously. Concerns will be listened to and assistance and advice will be provided on the process which the organisation will follow. All complaints will be properly investigated in an unbiased, open and transparent manner. Complainants will receive a timely response with the outcome of the investigation, together with any actions taken in light of the complaint. 2.4 Haringey CCG will ensure that the complaints process is as widely publicised as possible so that people are aware how to make a formal complaint, should they wish to do so. 3. Aims of the policy 3.1 This policy aims to provide:
3 ease of access for complainants by empowering all staff to receive and, where appropriate, respond to complaints; a rapid, open, fair, conciliatory approach to complaints which meets the needs of the complainant whilst being fair to staff; a one-stop shop approach to complaints that relate to more than one organisation, with unified handling of complaints across health and social care boundaries where possible; a means of identifying and managing complainants who are persistent/habitual or vexatious; a high profile for good complaints handling and responding within agreed timescales; a means of providing information to senior managers and the CCG s Quality Committee so that learning can take place, policies can be changed, services can be improved and complainants can be reassured that their complaint has made a difference. 3.2 A draft flow chart setting out how complaints will be handled by Haringey CCG can be found in Appendix Scope of the policy 4.1 This policy covers all complaints received by Haringey CCG relating to a policy, service or care it provides or commissions or that are received by another health or social care organisation which relate to a policy, service or funding provided by Haringey CCG. 4.2 Complaints may be received verbally over the telephone or during a face-to-face meeting, in writing, by fax or . Haringey CCG does not require complaints to be made in writing. 4.3 This policy does not include complaints: by health organisations or local authorities against other health organisations or local authorities are not included in this policy; from staff about employment, contractual or pension issues; where disciplinary action is being considered or taken against a member of staff, provided due regard is given to good practice around restrictions in providing confidential or personal information to the complainant. Although the complaints handling arrangements operate alongside the disciplinary arrangements, the two processes will remain separate. that have already been investigated under the current or previous complaints regulations; where legal action is being taken or the police are involved, provided that it can be established that progressing the complaint will not prejudice subsequent legal or judicial action;
4 which are being or have been investigated by a Local Commissioner under the Local Government Act 1974, or the Health Service Commissioner under the 1993 Act; arising from the alleged failure to comply with a data subject request under the Data Protection Act 1998; arising from an alleged failure by an English local authority or NHS body to comply with a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act However, all feedback on issues mentioned above may provide opportunities for organisational learning and service improvement and will be captured through the reporting process, where relevant. 5. Who this policy applies to 5.1 This policy applies to all members of staff working for Haringey CCG. It also applies to all staff working for the North and East London Commissioning Support Unit on behalf of Haringey CCG, as set out in the service level agreement. 5.2 A complaint can be made by any person who has received or is receiving NHS treatment or services, or any person who has been affected by an action or decision of the CCG. 5.3 A complaint can also be made by a representative acting on another person s behalf, if that person: Has requested the representative to act on their behalf Is a child Is unable to make the complaint themselves because of physical incapacity or lack of capacity within the meaning of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 Has died 5.4 If a complaint is made by a representative, consent will be required so that a full investigation can be made. In the case of an individual being unable to provide consent (for example, due to physical or mental capacity or in the case of a minor), their legal guardian, parent or other verified appropriate representative will be accepted to act on their behalf. 5.5 If a parent or guardian complains on behalf of their son or daughter and that person is sixteen years old or older, then their consent will be sought. Complaints made on behalf of children under the age of sixteen will be considered on an individual basis and according to the nature and subject of the complaint before consent is requested.
5 5.6 In the case of a representative acting on behalf of a deceased patient, the relationship of the representative to the deceased must be clarified and confirmed as either the next of kin or Executor. 5.7 If a Member of Parliament makes a complaint on behalf of a constituent, it will be considered that the MP has obtained consent prior to contacting Haringey CCG (In line with requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998 processing of Sensitive Personal Data Elective Representatives Order 2002). 6. Definitions used in this policy 6.1 The NHS Complaints Regulations (2009) make it clear that a complaint can be made relating to any matter reasonably connected with the exercise of the functions of an NHS body or the exercise of social services functions by a Local Authority. This deliberately allows for complaints about a very wide range of issues relating either to the provision of services or the commissioning or policy decisions of an NHS organisation. 6.2 The NHS Executive has suggested that one definition of a complaint is An expression of dissatisfaction that requires a response. This is a wide definition and it is not intended that every minor concern should warrant a full-scale complaints investigation. The spirit of the complaints procedure is that front line staff are empowered to resolve minor comments and problems immediately and informally or to offer the assistance of the complaints team at NEL CSU. Haringey CCG will therefore seek to distinguish between requests for assistance in resolving a perceived problem and an actual complaint. 6.3 Whenever there is a specific statement of intent on the part of the caller/correspondent that they wish their concerns to be dealt with as a complaint, they will be treated as such. 6.4 Any caller/correspondent who is dissatisfied with an immediate response to a matter which has been dealt with informally and not as a complaint will be advised of their right to pursue the matter further through the complaints procedure. 6.5 Complainants (and/or anyone acting on their behalf) may be deemed to be habitual, persistent or vexatious where contact within the last 12 months shows that they meet at least two of the following criteria: a) Persist in pursuing a complaint where the NHS complaints procedure has been fully and properly implemented and exhausted. b) Seek to prolong contact by changing the substance of a complaint or continually raising new issues and questions whilst the complaint is being addressed. (Care must be taken not to discard new issues which are significantly different from the original complaint. These might need to be addressed as separate complaints).
6 c) Are unwilling to accept documented evidence of treatment given as being factual e.g. drug records, GP records, nursing notes. d) Deny receipt of an adequate response despite evidence of correspondence specifically answering their questions. e) Do not accept that facts can sometimes be difficult to verify when a long period of time has elapsed. f) Do not clearly identify the precise issues which they wish to be investigated, despite reasonable efforts of staff and, where appropriate, independent advocacy, to help them specify their concerns, and/or where the concerns identified are not within the remit of Haringey CCG. g) Focus on a trivial matter to an extent which is out of proportion to its significance and continue to focus on this point. However, what is considered 'trivial' is a subjective judgement and great care will be used when applying this criterion, particularly towards people who may have mental health issues. h) Have, in the course of addressing a registered complaint, had an excessive number of contacts with Haringey CCG or the NEL CSU complaints team placing unreasonable demands on staff. A contact may be in person, by telephone, letter, or fax. Care will be taken in determining excessive contacts as this is a subjective judgement. i) Display unreasonable demands or expectations and fail to accept that these may be unreasonable (e.g. insist on responses to complaints or enquiries being provided more urgently than is reasonable or normal recognised practice). j) Have threatened or used actual physical violence towards staff or their families or associates at any time - this will in itself cause personal contact with the complainant and/or their representatives to be discontinued and the complaint will, thereafter, only be pursued through written communication. k) Have harassed or been personally abusive or verbally aggressive on more than one occasion towards staff dealing with their complaint or their families or associates. (Staff will recognise that some complainants may be mentally ill and some will act out of character at times of stress, anxiety or distress and will make reasonable allowances for this.) Staff will document all incidents of harassment in line with the Zero Tolerance Procedures, completing an incident form. 6.6 The term complainant includes anyone acting on behalf of a complainant or who contacts Haringey CCG about a complaint. 7. Roles and responsibilities 7.1 The Chief Officer (CO) has overall responsibility for complaints handling issues, as stated in Section 4 of the Local Authority Social Services and NHS Complaints (England) Regulations The CO, or their deputy, will decide whether a complainant meets the definition of a vexatious, persistent or habitual complainant (section 6.5).
7 7.2 Operational management of the complaints procedure will be undertaken centrally by the North and East London Commissioning Support Unit (CSU), as specified in the service level agreement. The Director of Quality and Integrated Governance will be the complaints lead within the CCG. 7.3 The CO, or their nominated deputy in their absence, will review and agree response letters. The CO relies on directors, senior managers and the NEL CSU complaints team to ensure investigation reports and responses are accurate, timely, fair and comprehensive. 7.4 The NEL CSU complaints team will maintain an up-to-date database of all concerns and complaints and provide annual complaints data for Haringey CCG, as set out in the service level agreement. 7.5 The NEL CSU complaints team is responsible for maintaining a record of all action plans and changes in practice resulting from complaints and obtaining progress reports on actions at regular intervals, as set out in the service level agreement. 7.6 The NEL CSU complaints team is responsible for providing information to the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman and NHS regulatory bodies and ensuring actions arising from investigations are monitored, delivered and reported to the Quality Committee, as set out in the service level agreement. 7.7 The NEL CSU complaints team is responsible for providing the Quality Committee with regular reports about the number and type of concerns and complaints made about Haringey CCG or any other matters reasonably connected with the exercise of their functions, as set out in the service level agreement. 7.8 The NEL CSU complaints team is responsible for ensuring the service is widely advertised to patients and the public, staff and independent contractors and is accessible, particularly to people with communication difficulties such as learning difficulties or people who cannot read, write or speak English. All staff will be encouraged to offer and advertise the availability of interpreters and the NHS Independent Complaints Advocacy Service (ICAS), where appropriate. 7.9 The NEL CSU complaints team is responsible for co-ordinating any complaints relating to Haringey CCG and other NHS Trusts, independent contractors or services and, where appropriate, providing a single integrated complaint response. In such cases the NEL CSU complaints team will liaise with other complaints manager/s and agree who will take the lead in co-ordinating investigations and sending out the final response. A joint agreement for the handling of complaints across organisations in North London is provided as Appendix 2 and will be reviewed during 2013 in the light of NHS organisational changes taking place on 1 April This provides an outline for how Haringey CCG will cooperate and collaborate with health and social care organisations for the handling of complaints which cover multiple organisations.
8 7.10 The NEL CSU complaints team is responsible for deciding when a complaint received by Haringey CCG requires a response from another organisation providing or commissioning NHS care or services or a GP, dental, pharmaceutical or optical practice within Haringey. In such cases the NEL CSU complaints team will advise the complainant where their complaint should go and send their complaint to the right organisation with their agreement Haringey CCG managers are responsible for any immediate response to a complaint relating to their area of responsibility which they receive directly. Should a complaint be resolved in one working day, they will ensure a record of the issue and actions taken is provided to the NEL CSU complaints team. If the complaint cannot be resolved in one working day, they will inform a member of the NEL CSU complaints team and, where relevant, help identify an investigating officer who is independent of the events leading to the complaint Haringey CCG managers will ensure that any member of staff who is the subject of a complaint relating to their area of responsibility, and any subsequent investigation, is informed and offered appropriate, timely support including, where appropriate, referral to Occupational Health Services Where a formal investigation is required, managers will liaise with the NEL CSU complaints team and, with their agreement, ensure that the investigation is completed within the agreed timescale and sent to the NEL CSU complaints team for record keeping. Managers are responsible for writing draft complaint responses and ensuring these are in plain English and address all the concerns raised. They are also responsible for attending meetings with the complainant, when requested, and for any action plans drawn up as a result of the complaint Haringey CCG managers are responsible for implementation of any action plan arising from a complaint relating to their area of responsibility and for providing a progress report on the action plan when requested Haringey CCG managers are responsible for delivering and reporting on any recommendations arising from an Ombudsman s report relating to their area of responsibility and reporting progress to the NEL CSU complaints team Haringey CCG staff who are appointed to the role of an investigating officer are required to investigate the subject of the complaint and provide a fair, accurate, comprehensive report of their investigation in plain English within the agreed timescale All staff working for Haringey CCG who come into contact with patients and the public are responsible for knowing how to contact the NEL CSU complaints team and for responding to expressions of dissatisfaction about a policy, service or commissioning decision by Haringey CCG. 8. Haringey CCG complaints procedure
9 8.1 It is recognised that a number of people using the word complaint do not wish to make a formal complaint, but they do require a swift and effective resolution of their issues. 8.2 It is the responsibility of all staff who receive a complaint to attempt to resolve it at the point of contact and this is how many complaints are handled. In most cases, it is still essential that consent is obtained from the patient for the purposes of sharing clinical information with a third party. 8.3 Where the complainant accepts the response as being satisfactory and appropriate, and where that response is communicated within the next working day, there will be no requirement for further action. If the complainant is not satisfied with the response, they may make a formal complaint. 8.4 It is important that all complaints resolved informally within one working day are reported to and logged by the NEL CSU complaints team so that learning can take place. 8.5 Complaints regulations state that an NHS or social care complaint must be made within 12 months from the date on which a matter occurred, or the matter came to the notice of the complainant. However, there is discretion to extend this time limit where it would be unreasonable in the circumstances of a particular case for the complaint to have been made earlier and where it is still possible to properly investigate the facts of the case. An example of this may be where a complainant has been too unwell or upset to raise their complaint sooner. Front-line staff receiving a complaint which appears out of time, should contact the NEL CSU complaints team for advice, who will make the decision as to whether out of time complaints should be accepted and investigated. 8.6 All staff will advise complainants of the support available to them in making their complaint. Staff should advise complainants, at the earliest appropriate opportunity, of the support offered by the Independent Complaints Advocacy Service (ICAS) in all the processes of the NHS Complaints Procedure. 8.7 Any unresolved concern or formal complaint will be passed to the NEL CSU complaints team and logged onto Datix. All complaints will be formally acknowledged within three working days of its receipt by the CSU complaints team. 8.8 All complaints received by Haringey CCG or the NEL CSU complaints team will first be risk rated using the risk matrix set out below: 8.9 Haringey CCG Complaints Risk Matrix Complaint minor
10 Relates either to an unsatisfactory service or experience not directly related to clinical care or to a single resolvable issue relating to care with minimal impact and minimal risk to the provision of care or the service. Examples include complaints about manner and attitude. delayed or cancelled appointments cleanliness Acknowledgement within 3 working days. Final response within 10* working days. Complaint moderate Relates to a service or experience which appears to be below reasonable expectation in several ways, but not causing lasting problems. There may be some potential for litigation. Includes clinical care issues. Examples include complaints about alleged prescribing errors event resulting in moderate harm failure to meet care needs complaint affecting a vulnerable adult Acknowledgement within 3 working days. Final response within 25* working days. Complaint major Raises significant issues regarding standards, quality of care and safeguarding of or clear evidence of denial of rights. Evidence of quality assurance or risk management issues. High probability of litigation and adverse local publicity. Examples include complaints about continuing care assessment or issues listed under Moderate, but where there are multiple issues, where serious harm is caused or where joint investigations with other NHS or Social Care Trusts are required. Acknowledgement within 3 working days. Final response within 40* working days. Complaint catastrophic Serious issues which may cause long-term damage, including grossly substandard care or professional misconduct. High risk of litigation or adverse national publicity. Examples include complaints about: Events resulting in serious harm or death. Criminal offence (e.g. assault) Abuse or neglect.
11 Acknowledgement within 3 working days. Final response within 40* working days. *These are suggested response timescales for consideration during negotiation with complainants All complaints that are rated moderate or above, using the risk matrix shown, require a formal investigation due to their potential gravity or complexity and include those that: allege staff misconduct or clinical negligence; could lead to legal proceedings; raise concerns about adult or child safeguarding; are historic in nature relating to multiple events over a long period of time; are multi-agency complaints requiring investigation by other organisations e.g. Social Services, Hospital Trust could significantly adversely affect the reputation of Haringey CCG Occasionally complaints give rise for concern about the immediate welfare or safety of the complainant or another person connected to the complainant. Contacts of this nature will be immediately prioritised for same day action and the complainant will be contacted and advised to contact their GP and/or NHS Direct for advice. Alternatively the Director of Quality will be asked for advice as to immediate next steps Sometimes complainants state they are going to commit or feel like committing suicide. Suicidal callers will be encouraged to seek help from their GP or (if they already have one) their mental health team. They can also be advised to go to A&E as they can access mental health help there. NHS Direct can advise over the phone. Details of The Samaritans can also be given. It may sometimes be apparent that the threat is not being made seriously; even if this is the case, the matter should be fully recorded on Datix If staff are concerned about a caller, they will speak to a senior manager in the CCG or CSU Quality teams who will consider informing relevant professionals either so that the matter is recorded for the future or in order to obtain immediate help for the patient. In particular, it may be appropriate to inform the caller s GP practice. If possible, the patient s agreement to this course of action should be obtained. However there may be cases where the patient is not willing to authorise any contact but staff assess that the situation is so serious that they do need to contact a third party. Before contacting anyone outside the Quality teams it must be remembered that breaking the patient s confidentiality in this way is only justified when there is perceived to be a danger to the patient or someone else. In these cases, staff MUST consult the Caldicott Guardian for the CCG who is the Medical Director or, in their absence, the Director of Quality and Integrated Governance. Any action taken without the patient s express permission must be considered very carefully and be in proportion to the assessed risk to the caller. All such cases should be recorded with full details of all contacts and action taken.
12 8.14 A written copy of any oral complaint and the complaints case management plan will be sent to the complainant with an acknowledgement and an invitation to sign and return it The complainant will be informed that if it is not signed within 10 working days it will be assumed that the statement is an accurate representation of their complaint and the plan has been accepted as agreed For clinical complaints concerning primary care commissioned services, the NEL CSU complaints team will liaise with the relevant team in the NHS Commissioning Board and, with the agreement of the complainant, redirect the complaint to the most appropriate team 8.17 Once the appropriate CSU senior manager has approved a complaint response, it will be sent to the CO for approval. Final letters for CO consideration will be accompanied by the original complaint letter(s) and relevant documents such as the investigation report. If a complaint is not released for CO signature by the CSU senior manager or their nominated deputy after 3 working days, the NEL CSU complaints team will escalate the case to their manager or Director. If the case is still held up, after another 5 working days, the CSU complaints team will escalate the case to the CSU Director of Quality If it is not possible to respond to the complainant within the agreed timescale, the complainant will be contacted at the agreed review date to agree a new response time, which normally should not exceed twenty working days from the date of that conversation/confirmation letter Responses will be written in plain English, free of jargon, and wherever possible, include an apology. All responses will contain a clear statement as to which aspects of the complaint have been upheld, or not, with an explanation as to what took place. Details will be given of what actions have been, or will be, taken to prevent a recurrence of the incident. Information about the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman and the NHS Independent Complaints Advocacy Service will also be given. All responses will include the contact details of a named person who will discuss the complaint and the response letter with the complainant, if required A meeting can be offered as part of the resolution process. The NEL CSU complaints team can also arrange dispute resolution to aid this process, including the possible use of a Lay Conciliator/Mediator. Interpreting will be offered for any meeting where this would aid communication and complainants will be informed that they are welcome to bring a friend and/or advocate to any meeting if they wish The NEL CSU complaints team will refer any relevant claims issues to relevant staff in the CSU to forewarn the claims process where there is an explicitly stated intention to take legal action.
13 8.22 Where a complainant indicates they will be contacting the media as a result of their complaint/issue or where the NEL CSU complaints team feels there is a potential significant reputational risk relating to the complaint, the communications team will be informed of the complaint/issue within 2 working days Complaints received about other NHS services in the NHS in London will be directed to the relevant Trust or provider service complaints manager/s for investigation and response Complainants that meet the definition of habitual, persistent or vexatious, as deemed by the Chief Officer, will be sent a formal letter or setting out the ways in which the complainant can use the complaints service, behaviour that is and is not acceptable and how to communicate with the complaints team. The letter will also set out the time period that the complainant will be considered habitual, persistent or vexatious and when the procedure will be reviewed and the complainant will be reassessed. If the NEL CSU complaints team are at all concerned that the complainant will not be able to understand the first or second letters/ s a follow up phone call will be made by the NEL CSU Patient Experience and Effectiveness Manager or deputy and a meeting will be offered to provide a verbal explanation Complaints will be handled in strict confidence at all times. Care will be taken that information is only disclosed to those who have a demonstrable need to have access to it. Information will not be disclosed to patients or complainants unless the person who has provided the information has given written consent to disclosure. 9. Learning from complaints 9.1 Every opportunity will be taken by Haringey CCG to learn from complaints and to use the insight and experience of complainants to resolve the complaint or issue and ensure it does not recur. 9.2 Where actions have been identified following the investigation of a complaint these will be shared with the service manager for the service concerned. An action plan should be put in place together with a timeframe for implementation. 10. Reporting of complaints and their outcome 10.1 Reports will be produced by the NEL CSU complaints team for consideration by the CCG s Quality Committee; frequency of reports will be set out in the service level agreement. Reports will identify the number of complaints received, performance indicators with regard to responses, issues raised and lessons learnt together with highlighting any emerging trends.
14 10.2 An annual report on complaints will also be produced by the CSU and received by the Quality Committee prior to being presented to the Governing Body The outcomes of complaints will be communicated as follows: Complainants will receive an individual response to their complaint, as per the timeframes set out in section 8.9 of the complaints policy Healthwatch sit on the CCG s Communications and Engagement Subcommittee of the Governing Body. They will collect feedback on local services and patient experience and feed it into the subcommittee. The Subcommittee will feed this information into the Quality Committee and report back to Healthwatch about actions that have been taken. Healthwatch will be responsible for feedback outcomes to the local population through their networks and local committees. Healthwatch also have observer with speaker rights on the CCG s Governing Body. The CCG will publish the annual complaints report (from the CSU to the Quality Committee) on the website which will show the types of complaints received each year and the actions taken to improve services and make changes. The CCG will use its communications channels such as the website, newsletters, and patient meetings to update patients and the voluntary sector on the outcomes of complaints. 11. Monitoring and assurance 11.1 Haringey CCG will monitor the effectiveness of the complaints process and how information is being used to improve services. The complaints system will: Disseminate learning from complaints Use the complaint procedure as a measure of performance Use information to inform decisions, where appropriate
NHS Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group Complaints Policy V0.7 Ratification by: Barnet CCG Governing Body March 2013 Review date: August 2013 Version control Version Date Information 0.1 23.01.2013 0.4
NHS England Complaints Policy 1 2 NHS England Complaints Policy NHS England Policy and Corporate Procedures Version number: 1.1 First published: September 2014 Prepared by: Kerry Thompson, Senior Customer
NHS Waltham Forest Clinical Commissioning Group Complaints Policy Author: David Pearce, Head of Governanace Version V 3.0 Amendments to previous version - Policy updated to reflect latest reporting processes.
Complaints Policy Page 1 Complaints Policy Policy ref no: CCG 006/14 Author (inc job Kat Tucker Complaints & FOI Manager title) Date Approved 25 November 2014 Approved by CCG Governing Body Date of next
- NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICA CLINICAL NON CLINICAL - CLINICAL CLINICAL Complaints Policy Incorporating Compliments, Comments,
Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols Document Details Title Complaints and Compliments Policy Trust Ref No 1353-29025 Local Ref (optional) N/A Main points the document This policy and procedure
Berkshire West Clinical Commissioning Groups Corporate Policy 1 (CP1) CCG Policy for the Handling of Complaints Version: 1 Ratified by: Date ratified: April 2013 Name of originator/author: Name of responsible
COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY Compliance with all CCG policies, procedures, protocols, guidelines, guidance and standards is a condition of employment. Breach of policy may result in disciplinary action.
POLICY & PROCEDURE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLIMENTS, PALS ENQUIRIES AND COMPLAINTS INCLUDING UNREASONABLE OR PERSISTENT COMPLAINANTS APPROVED BY: South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Quality
Customer Services (Enquiries/Concerns/Complaints) Framework 2012/13 Version: One Responsible Committee: The Audit & Governance Group Date approved: Name of author: JANET SMART Name of responsible director/
Policy Document Control Page Title Title: Complaints and Compliments Policy Version: 10 Reference Number: CO3 Supersedes Supersedes: Version 9 Description of Amendment(s): Amendment of review date to reflect
Policy and Procedure for Handling and Learning from Feedback, Comments, Concerns and Complaints Author: Shona Welton, Head of Patient Affairs Responsible Lead Executive Director: Endorsing Body: Governance
COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY A GENERAL 1. INTRODUCTION This policy sets out the process for handling complaints, generated by patients, carers and the general public, by the Clinical Commissioning Group
Complaints Policy and Procedure REFERENCE NUMBER DraftAug2012V1MH APPROVING COMMITTEE(S) AND DATE THIS DOCUMENT REPLACES REVIEW DUE DATE March 2014 RATIFICATION DATE/DRAFT No NHS West Lancashire Clinical
NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group Customer care and complaints policy Supporting people in Dorset to lead healthier lives PREFACE This policy sets out the mandatory framework for managing all comments,
REFERENCE NUMBER: IN-007 GUIDANCE FOR RESPONDING TO COMPLAINTS AREA: NAME OF RESPONSIBLE COMMITTEE / INDIVIDUAL NAME OF ORIGINATOR / AUTHOR Trust Wide Director of Nursing and Quality Patient Experience
Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure September 2014 The current version of all policies can be accessed at the NHS Sheffield CCG Intranet site http://www.intranet.sheffieldccg.nhs.uk/ VERSION
GENERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE Version 1.0 Page 1 of 65 November 2013 POLICY DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL CERTIFICATE TITLE Title: General Policies and Procedures: Complaints
Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust THE ADVICE CENTRE AND COMPLAINTS POLICY 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The aim of the Advice Centre is to support the Trust s Service Experience Strategy by providing
RMP. South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust Policies and Procedures Policy on the Handling of Complaints Approved by Trust Board December 2006 (revised version approved by RMEC May 2010) Policy Type Policy
COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY A GENERAL 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This policy sets out the process that the Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG) will use for handling complaints, generated by patients, carers
Corporate CCG CO02 Complaints Policy and Procedure Version Number Date Issued Review Date V3: 16/01/2016 01/12/2016 Prepared By: Senior Clinical Quality Officer, NECS Complaints Team. Consultation Process:
High Oak Surgery Complaints Policy Document Description Document Type CQC Standard 7 Service Application Version 2 Ratification Date Target Group All staff Last Reviewed October 2012 Next Review Date October
COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE TWC7 Version: 3.0 Ratified by: Complaints Group Date ratified: July 2011 Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/ individual: Date issued: July 2011 Review
Policy Type Information Governance Corporate Standing Operating Procedure Human Resources X Policy Name CO02: COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE Status Committee approved by Final Governing Body Date Approved
NHS Newark and Sherwood Clinical Commissioning Group Quality & Patient Safety Directorate Complaints and Concerns Policy and Procedure Review Date September 2016 1 Complaints and Concerns Handling Policy
COMPLIMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY Document information Document type: Document reference: Document title: Policy Compliments, Concerns and Complaints Policy Document operational date: 1 st February
Under the provisions of the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 2005 pharmacy contractors are required to have in place arrangements, for the handling and consideration of complaints
Customer Care Policy and Procedure for Managing Complaints, Concerns, Comments and Compliments Responsible Director: Author and Contact Details: HR & Governance Director Customer Care Team Manager Tel:
APPROVED BY: PAGE: Page 1 of 8 1.0 Purpose To define a complaints procedure which is as transparent, fair and impartial as possible to all users and providers of the services undertaken by the State Hospital.
NHS SOUTH DEVON AND TORBAY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP COMPLAINTS POLICY Version: 1.4 dated 26 March 2014 DATE VERSION CONTROL 01/08/2013 1.0 First draft Phil Stimpson Based upon initial policy produced
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST POLICY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLAINTS APPROVED BY: POLICY & GUIDELINES COMMITTEE TRUST REF: A10/2002 MOST RECENT REVIEW: NOVEMBER 2008 ORIGINATOR: SENIOR SAFETY
COMPLIMENTS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES Lead Responsible: Responsible Person: Review Date: Document type: Date Issued: Ratified by: Reference: Version Helen Hirst - Director
The NHS complaints procedure (England only): guidance for primary care August 2015 Introduction This document provides LMCs (local medical committees), practices and GPs with guidance on the requirements
The NHS complaints procedure (England only) August 2009 Introduction This document has been produce to provide LMCs, practices and GPs with guidance on the requirements of the NHS complaints system, including
Item 9 POLICY FOR THE REPORTING AND MANAGEMENT OF PATIENT COMPLAINTS Authorship: Chief Operating Officer Approved date: 20 September 2012 Approved Governing Body Review Date: April 2013 Equality Impact
HANDLING COMPLAINTS POLICY & PROCEDURE This policy can be made available in other formats and languages upon request to the PALS office on 01708 435454 Content includes: Principles of Complaints Management
COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE AUGUST 2004 Revised July 1996 Revised March 1997 Revised November 1997 Revised May 1998 Revised November 1998 Revised July 1999 Revised May 2002 Revised March 2004 Revised June 2004
Complaints, Compliments and Concerns Policy Author Sara Whittaker Role Associate Director of Quality Date / version 25/07/2013 Version 3 Considered by WAM Joint Quality Committee Committee Recommendation
IMPROVING HEALTH IN WALES Complaints in the NHS A Guide to handling complaints in Wales April 2003 NHS WALES Complaints in the NHS A guide to handling complaints in Wales Contents Executive Summary Part
TITLE: POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR MANAGING COMPLAINTS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLIMENTS VALID FROM: January 2014 EXPIRES: January 2016 This procedural document supersedes the previous procedural document
Comments, Concerns, Complaints and Compliments Policy Policy ID CG05 Version: 1.2 Date ratified by Governing Body 29/11/13 Author Suzi Shettle, Head of Communications and Engagement Last review date: November
Policy for handling formal complaints (CG009) Approval and Authorisation Approval Group Job Title, Chair of Committee Date Executive Committee Chief Executive Officer, Chair of Executive Committee Change
POLICY CONTROL DOCUMENT - 2 NUMBER OF PAGES (EXCLUDING APPENDICES) 8 SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: 22 nd December 2011 Sections removed from policy and placed as Appendix which include the following: Responsibilities
COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES Clinical Governance & Risk Management Department Policy elibrary Reference: Date of Issue: May 2010 Prepared by: Patient Focus Manager Date of Review: April 2012 Lead Reviewer:
FACS Community Complaints Guidelines for Ageing and Disability Direct Services Summary: This is designed to guide FACS staff when handling community complaints and is an extension of the FACS Community
Guide to making a complaint about an NHS service February 2014 Healthwatch Coventry www.healthwatchcoventry.org.uk Contents 1. About this guide page 3 2. The NHS complaints procedure page 3 3. About the
Northumberland Clinical Commissioning Group Complaints Policy and Procedure Author Steph Edusei-Basra, Authorisation Development Lead Owner Alistair Blair, Chief Clinical Officer (designate) Date: 10 August
COMPLAINTS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS & COMPLIMENTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE Version: Approved by: Date approved: Date ratified by Governing Body: Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/individual:
Redbridge CCG Complaints Handling Policy Contents 1.1 Purpose and Approach... 3 1.2 How to read this document... 3 1.3 The role of the CCGs... 3 2. Responsibilities... 4 2.1 Definition of a complaint...
Complaints Handling Policy Incorporating Complaints, Concerns and Compliments Version 5.0 Purpose: For use by: This document is compliant with /supports compliance with: To advise and inform hospital staff
Devon County Council Children & Young Peoples Services Directorate Complaints & Representations Policy Created April 2008-amended Sept 2009 1 Index 1. Introduction 2. Legislative Background and National
COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES Scope Trustwide Owner Patient Experience Group Contact Head of Complaints Version 3.2 Issue date June 2009 Last reviewed December 2014 Next review due December 2017 Search
COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE ENGLAND BEAUFORT ROAD SURGERY INTRODUCTION This procedure sets out the Practice s approach to the handling of complaints and is intended as an internal guide who should be made readily
St Helens & Knowsley Hospitals NHS Trust COMPLAINTS POLICY INCLUDING THE PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING, EVALUATING AND RESPONDING TO COMPLAINTS Recommending Committee: Approving Committee: Clinical Performance
COMMENTS, COMPLAINTS AND COMPLIMENTS POLICY DOCUMENT STATUS SCOPE Unclassified This policy sets out Genesis Housing Association's approach to managing complaints from customers. This policy does not cover
Policy: C1 Management agement of Complai nts, Concerns, Comments & Com pliments Po licy Version: C1 / 09 Ratified by: TMT Date ratified: 12 th December 2012 Title of Author: Title of responsible Director
COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT NGH/PO/016 Ratified By: Procedural Documents Group Date Ratified: October 2009 Date(s) Reviewed: August 2009 Next Review Date: August 2011 Version No: 3 Responsibility for Review:
Version: 1.1 Ratified by: NHS Bury Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Date ratified: 27 th March 2013 Name of originator /author (s): Responsible Committee / individual: Gareth Webb Quality and
COMPLAINTS, CONCERNS and COMPLIMENTS POLICY 2015-2016 V 2.1 August 2015 Version: 2.1 Ratified by: CCG Governing Body Date ratified: 8 th September 2015 Name of originator/author: Name of lead: Date issued/published:
Signpost to NKCCG28 NHS North Kirklees Clinical Commissioning Group Complaints Policy North Kirklees CCG Complaints Policy Version Date Author Draft / Final Status 0.1 9 th October 2012 Jan Randall Draft
PALS and complaints policy NOTE: This is a CONTROLLED document. The current version of this document is maintained and is always available electronically from SharePoint or the intranet. All other electronic
North Ayrshire Council Management of Unacceptable Contact Policy 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This Policy sets out North Ayrshire Council s approach to managing the relatively few customers whose actions or behaviours
Complaints Policy and Procedures Document Owner Sheilagh Reavey, Director of Nursing and Quality Document Author Sheilagh Reavey, Director of Nursing and Quality Version 1 Directorate Nursing and Quality
Stafford & Surrounds Clinical Commissioning Group Policy for Handling Complaints Agreed at Governing Body Signature: Designation: Chair of the Governing Body Date: 5 th November 2012 Review Date: March
Complaints Policy Author and Contact details: Responsible Director: Carolyn McConnell, Head of Tel: (0151) 529 5530 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Director of Strategy & Planning Approved
ST LAWRENCE ROAD SURGERY Complaints Procedure General Practice Index 1. Introduction 2. Practice Complaints Administrator 3. What Constitutes a Complaint 4. Matters Excluded from the Complaints Process
Complaints Policy Reference No: P_CIG_08 Version: 4 Ratified by: Lincolnshire Community Health Services Trust Board Date ratified: 15 th July 2015 Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/individual:
COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES First issued by/date Wirral PCT November 2006 Issue Version Purpose of Issue/Description of Change 3 Revised update to unify procedure across Local Authority Social Services
Guide to to good handling of complaints for CCGs CCGs May 2013 April 2013 1 NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Commissioning Development Publications Gateway Reference: 00087 Document Purpose
Paper 07 Governing Body 13 November 2013 Overview of complaints and handling processes Paper Author Lead Executive FOI status Michaela Maloney, Interim Head of Communication and Engagement Brendan Ward,
NHS FORTH VALLEY COMPLAINT POLICY and PROCEDURE Author: T Horne, Complaint Manager 1. Background 1.1. NHS Forth Valley is a learning, patient-focused organisation that welcomes feedback from users of its
CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY GENERAL POLICY NO 1 Applies to: All staff employed by Wirral Community Trust Committee for Approval Quality and Governance Committee Date of Approval December 2011 Review
MANAGEMENT OF COMPLAINTS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS AND COMPLIMENTS POLICY Documentation Control Reference GG/CM/002 Date approved Approving Body Trust Board Implementation date Supersedes Patient and Carer Feedback