2 Panel Introductions Judge Keith Starrett Moderator Judge Robert Francis Panelist Judge Stephen Manley Panelist Charles Robinson - Panelist
3 Dallas SAFPF 4-C Reentry Court Custody Step 1 Initial Assessment, Client ordered to SAFPF as a condition of probation! Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Client waits in jail for a bed. Regular SAFPF 6-Months Special Needs SAFPF 9-Months Ongoing Assessment & Discharge Planning occurs while the client is in the unit.
4 Dallas SAFPF 4-C Reentry Court Reentry Re-Entry Court Program Track 1 Approved home plan Requires family participation Track 2 Transitional housing Housing director participates
5 California Parolee Reentry Court Total of 5 programs in the state Created by state statue Funding provided by California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation as well as local county rehabilitation funds transferred from the state under Realignment.
6 Program Objectives Introduce and discuss nuts and bolts concepts of a reentry court program. To examine how two programs have implemented the key reentry practices.
8 Target Population Reentry Failure Isn t an Option! Each year more than 700,000 individuals are released from state and federal prisons and millions more cycle through local jails. Many are rearrested within 3 years of their release and ½ are reincarcerated. High rates of recidivism = more crime, more victims, and more pressure on an overburdened system. OJP Annual Report 2011
9 Target Population Meeting System Demands Necessary to have a continuum of responses to service the differences that exist with those reentering. Reentry Courts are a part of the continuum but shouldn t be seen as the one size fits all response. It is important to identify the appropriate candidate for inclusion and exclusion in a reentry court program. Providing a great service (program) for the wrong population can lead to undesirable outcomes!
10 Target Population More intensive services should be reserved for higher risk offenders. Validated assessment instruments should be used to help identify appropriate and inappropriate candidates Need for multiple and ongoing assessments Criminal risk Needs What are they (criminogenic vs. noncriminogenic)? Severity Reassessment
11 Target Population
12 Dallas ReEntry Participant Data Prior Arrest History of Study Participants Average Arrests prior to Reentry Court 9 Range of Arrests 1 to 34 Over 20% have 15 or more Prior Offenses ReEntry Courts deal with High Risk Participants
14 Dallas 4-C Re-Entry Court Target Population
15 Dallas 4-C Re-Entry Court Target Population Is anyone excluded?? 2 participants have prior murder convictions 2 participants on probation for murder 6 participants have homicide related charges 45 % have prior aggravated charges 40% on probation for aggravated charges
16 Dallas 4-C - Assessment There Are two types of assessment instruments used in the Dallas 4-C program. Risk Assessment risk of recidivism Wisconsin Risk & Needs Assessment Level of Service Inventory - Revised Clinical Evaluation - level of services needed Done by a trained professional Determines the treatment track
17 Dallas 4-C - Assessment You Cannot Have Too Many 1 st at the Time of Plea or Before Disposition 2 nd During Incarceration or Treatment 3 rd Upon Admission to Reentry Court It s Hard for Participant to Lie 3 Times Clients can always have an assessment done while participating in reentry. Reassess participants while they are in the program.
18 California Parolee Reentry Court Targets high risk and high need offenders in violation status. May be used prior to violation being filed or after a finding of a violation Targets offenders who are substance abusers and mentally ill.
19 California Parolee Reentry Court Requirements of Parole/Probation Offender released from Custody Parole/Probation utilize validated assessments to place clients in appropriate services and programs Parole/Probation mandated to use intermediate interventions and sanctions before a petition may be filed and to document them Reentry Court is the highest level of intervention available to Parole/Probation and is also available to the hearing Judge if a Petition is filed
20 California Parolee Reentry Court Participants Serious /violent and other felony offenders released from prison on parole who are supervised by Parole and are in violation status. Non serious/violent felony offenders released from prison to community supervision by probation, and are in violation status. Newly sentenced felony offenders given a split term of custody followed by supervision by Probation and are in violation status.
21 California Parolee reentry Court Is anyone excluded?? In General No Homicide only Sex Offenders added in 2013
22 California Parolee Reentry Court Supervision Type
23 California Parolee Reentry Court Participants by Risk Level
24 California Parolee Reentry Court Participants by Level of Need 98% use drugs (average of 21 years of use) 37% are mentally ill 86% are unemployed at the time of entry 83% do not have stable housing at entry.
25 California Parolee Reentry Court Participants by Race/Ethnicity
26 California Reentry Courts -Assessment Initial Assessment: Parolee Violator Decision Making Instrument -Validated Followed by local Needs assessment - Validated Followed by repeated reassessments based on program progress, lack thereof, relapse, decompensation, rearrest Reasessments done immediately, often in the courtroom or in custody in some programs
27 Target Population What questions do you have for the panel?
29 Services Provided Assess and target criminogenic needs for change to reduce the probability of recidivism. Source: Gendreau, P., French, S.A., and A.Taylor (2002). What Works (What Doesn t Work) Revised Invited Submission to the International Community Corrections Association Monograph Series Project
30 Services Provided Criminogenic needs are intermediate targets and should be the focus of correctional programming. Antisocial Attitudes Antisocial Peers Substance Abuse Impulsivity Employment Family Dysfunction
31 Services Provided The most effective interventions are behavioral Focus on current factors that influence behavior Action oriented The most effective behavioral models Involve structured social learning where new skills are modeled and reinforced. Cognitive behavioral approaches that target criminogenic risk factors
32 Services Provided Address other needs that may interfere (present a barrier to) with treating dynamic risk factors. Housing Mental Health Motivation Child Care Transportation Other
33 Dallas 4 -C
34 Dallas 4-C Services Provided Evaluations help determine the level & type of services needed Housing Job training & placement Education Drug treatment Counseling services Criminogenic treatment
35 California Reentry courts NO Tracks No special tracks within reentry court or distinction between offenders needing Some programs special emphasis on Women suffering from sever trauma Some programs greater emphasis on co-occurring disorders of substance abuse and mental illness Cognitive behavioral approaches that target criminogenic risk factors
36 California Reentry Services Provided Housing Substance abuse treatment Mental Health Treatment including medications Therapy (cognitive and trauma) Case Management Long term residential for special needs clients Crisis Residential Benefits and medical Transportation
37 Services Provided What questions do you have for the panel?
39 The Reentry Court Team The purpose of the team? Who is on the team? What role do team members fill? Consistent members of the team vs. others who may share information with the team How often do teams meet? What is the purpose and intent of the meeting?
40 Dallas SAFPF 4-C Reentry Court Team Judge Supervision Field Officer Public Defender Assistant District Attorney Assessor Counselor
41 California Reentry Court Team Judge Parole Agents Probation Officers Public Defender Assistant District Attorney Treatment /Services assessors Case Managers Treatment /Services programs
42 The Team What questions do you have for the panel?
45 Responding to Behavior Parameters for Effectiveness Certainty Celerity Magnitude Perception of Fairness Red Flags Learned Helplessness
46 Dallas 4-C SAFPF Reentry Court Rules Do NOT Run Do NOT Lie Goals No new arrest Employment in a job with career potential Reduction in relapse and recidivism rates
47 California Reentry Courts Rules Stay in Housing Stay in Treatment See Agent/Probation Come to Court Goals No new arrest/alternatives to violations Compliance with medications Clean tests Reduction in Relapse Returns to Prison
48 Responding to Behavior What questions do you have for the panel?
50 Program Evaluation Clearly defined process & fidelity Process & Outcome Evaluations Purpose Considerations Part of early discussions Control/Comparison groups Who can benefit
51 Dallas County Reentry Court Study 70 SAFPF Regular Participants SAFPF + Reentry Court 70 SAFPF Regular Participants SAFPF Only
52 Dallas County Reentry Court Study Revocations over a 3 year period Control Re-Entry Revoked 69% (48) 33% (23) Technical 52% (25) 48% (11) New Offenses 48% (23) 52% (12) 52% Reduction Revocations
53 Dallas County Reentry Court Study New arrest 3 years after reentry court Percent Arrested Control 49% (34) Re-Entry 29% (20) Total New Arrests % Reduction New Arrests
54 Dallas County Reentry Court Study Probation Status 3 Years after Reentry Control Re-Entry Revoked 69% (48) 33% (23) On Probation or Complete 20% (14) 60% (42) Absconded 11% (8) 7% (5)
55 Dallas County Reentry Court Study Status and Post-Prison Release Arrests for Revoked Participants Revoked by Year 3 Control 48 Re-Entry 23 In Prison Released Percent of Released Re-arrested 18 5 Number of Re-arrests 29 7
56 Dallas County Reentry Court Study Conclusions The addition of Reentry Courts to the SAFPF program significantly reduced revocation rates for a high risk population. The addition of Reentry Courts to the SAFPF program led to fewer new arrests and ultimately fewer victims in the community. Higher revocation rates did not result in fewer victims.
57 California Parolee Reentry Court ONGOING INDEPENDENT EVALUATION Coordinated by the AOC for presentation to the Legislature
58 California Reentry Courts Reentry Court Participants Prison returns at the end of one year
59 California Parolee Reentry Court Participants vs. Nonparticipants at one year
60 California Parolee Reentry Court 33% Graduation Rate (over 50% still in treatment) 97% of homeless participants secure housing 26% obtained permanent housing 42% of unemployed participants secured a job 18% obtained a higher level of education
61 California Reentry Courts Special Finding: Mentally ill participants do well in reentry courts Historically data shows that parolees with a documented mental health condition have a 36% higher risk of committing parole violations in the general parole population. In reentry courts, mentally ill parolees were as likely to succeed as those parolees who were not mentally ill.
62 Program Evaluation What questions do you have for the panel?
Evidence-Based Practices Courts Hon. John C. Creuzot Dallas, Texas Teresa May-Williams, Ph.D. Assistant Director Dallas County CSCD Texas Definition of Courts Texas law allows probation even with prior
10/26/2015 Community Supervision Texas Association of Counties October 2015 Presented by District Judge Todd Blomerth, 421 st Judicial District Court of Caldwell County 1 10/26/2015 2 10/26/2015 Your Possible
The Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Program: Evaluation and Recommendations Criminal Justice Policy Council Prepared for the 77 th Texas Legislature, 2001 Tony Fabelo, Ph.D. Executive Director The Substance
Criminal Justice 101 The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness April 2009 Acronyms DOC = Department of Corrections DYC = Division of Youth Corrections DCJ
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE WHAT IS PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT? PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT Revises the definition of a felony
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE Erin Sasse, Chief Office of External Affairs firstname.lastname@example.org (916) 445-4950 WHAT IS
County Intermediate Punishment Plan 2014-2015 1. Assessment of available countywide correctional services and future needs The Allegheny County Jail (ACJ) is a detention and incarceration facility based
AB 109 is DANGEROUS Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011. Governor Brown stated in his signing message on AB 109 - "For too long, the state s prison
MANDATORY SUPERVISION COURT: Blueprint for Success The FIRST YEAR OF REALIGNMENT 1906 Local Prison Sentences: 93% Drug & Property Crimes MSOs treated as high risk probationers Inconsistent approach amongst
Proposition 5 Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute. SUMMARY This measure (1) expands drug treatment diversion programs for criminal offenders, (2) modifies parole supervision
STATE REENTRY COORDINATORS are uniquely positioned to ensure that the policies and practices that go into a recidivism-reduction initiative are being implemented effectively, both in corrections settings
Supervising the Drug Addicted Offender Jac A. Charlier, M.P.A. Director Consulting and Training Learning Objectives Learn your supervision philosophy Review some of the 13 NIDA Principles of Drug Abuse
Session of 00 [As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No. By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight - 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure;
2011 REGULAR SESSION HB 463 PENAL CODE AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES LEGISLATION Full text of the bill: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/11rs/hb463.htm SECTION 1. -description of reasoning behind legislation SECTION
County of Sonoma CCP Data Management and Evaluation Sub-committee CCP Organizing Principles 1. Use of detention beds should be minimized, consistent with public safety, and integrity of the criminal justice
Offender Screening Oklahoma Department of Mental health and Substance Abuse Services Presenters DR. DAVID WRIGHT, EVALUATION PROJECTS MANAGER NISHA WILSON, STATE DIRECTOR OF SPECIALTY COURTS The Problem
SESSION OF 2013 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON HOUSE BILL NO. 2170 As Amended by House Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Brief* HB 2170 would make numerous changes to sentencing, probation, and postrelease
Three Year Recidivism Tracking of Offenders Participating in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs Prepared for the 76 th Texas Legislature, 1999 Criminal Justice Policy Council Tony Fabelo, Ph.D. Executive
SHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency. STATE OF OKLAHOMA 2nd Session of the 45th Legislature (1996) SENATE BILL NO. 1153 By: Hobson AS INTRODUCED
ENROLLED Regular Session, 1997 HOUSE BILL NO. 2412 BY REPRESENTATIVE JACK SMITH AN ACT To enact Chapter 33 of Title 13 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 13:5301 through 5304,
GEORGIA GEORGIA GEORGIA GEORGIA GEORGIA Department of Corrections ON THE MOVE Stopping the Revolving Door for Mentally Ill Offenders in the Criminal Justice System via Diversion and Re-entry Programs Academic
It s all apples and oranges. January 31, 2012 Nathan Brady OLRGC What is recidivism and what is the impact on the state? How does Utah compare nationally? What is Utah doing to address inmate recidivism
Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide Updated January 2012 PREVENTION ASSESSMENT TREATMENT REINTEGRATION MUNICIPAL & COMMON PLEAS COURT GUIDE Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Municipal
Mental Health Court 101 2007 Georgia Drug & DUI Court Conference Peachtree City, GA Honorable Kathlene Gosselin, Hall County Superior Court & H.E.L.P. Program Team While the number of patients in psychiatric
December 18, 2007 Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17 th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Ms. Krystal Paris Initiative Coordinator Dear Attorney General Brown: Pursuant
PLATTSBURGH MENTAL HEALTH COURT PARTICIPANT CONTRACT I, have pled guilty to the crime of and will be sentenced to three years on Probation. [OR have admitted Violation of Probation OR have been charged
IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board Ch 11, p.1 CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of Ch 7] 205 11.1(906) Voluntary termination of parole. Any voluntary termination of parole should
First Veteran Family Treatment Court In Texas Hidalgo County Veteran Family Treatment Court What is the Hidalgo County Veterans Family Treatment Court Program The Hidalgo County Veterans Treatment Court
Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide Updated July 2015 PREVENTION ASSESSMENT TREATMENT REINTEGRATION MUNICIPAL & COMMON PLEAS COURT GUIDE Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Municipal
External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015 1. There seems to be an extended wait from disposition to sentence where defendants are in jail awaiting the completion of the pre-sentence report. How many
Improving the Effectiveness of Correctional Programs Through Research Presented by: Edward J. Latessa, Ph.D. Center for Criminal Justice Research Division of Criminal Justice University of Cincinnati www.uc.edu/criminaljustice
CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE André de Gruy Capital Defender Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force Created - HB 1231 2013 Leg. Judge and Prosecutor concerns about lack of certainty in sentencing/time-served
Orange County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet For more information, contact Dr. Ana Yáñez- Correa at email@example.com, or (512) 587-7010. The Texas Criminal Justice Coalition seeks the implementation
St. Croix County Drug Court Program Participant Handbook Updated: May 2014 To The St. Croix County Drug Court Program. This Handbook is designed to answer your questions and provide overall information
From the office of the Rice County Attorney: Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines Revision June, 2004 1. These guidelines apply to any adult felony defendant case prosecuted by this office, which is not disposed
JOB DESCRIPTION MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION JOB SPECIFICATION PAROLE/PROBATION OFFICER Employees in this job function as professional representatives of the Department of Corrections in the parole,
Pierce County Drug Court Established September 2004 Policies and Procedures Updated September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Drug Court Team II. Mission Statement III. The Drug Court Model IV. Target Population
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Programs Division June 2010 SAFPF (Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Facility) Community treatment alone is not always enough Some individuals must be
A PROPOSAL FOR A REENTRY/DRUG COURT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Nov. 1, 2009 Judge Jeffrey Tauber (ret.) Consultant Reentry Court Solutions jtauber@reentrycourtsolutions CLOSING THE DRUG COURT GAP The reentry
Mental Health Fact Sheet Substance Abuse and Treatment Branch (SATB), Community Supervision Services Re-Entry and Sanctions Center (RSC), Office of Community Justice Programs Adult Probationers / Parolees
Prepared by: Bexar County Court at Law No. 1 Adult Drug Court Program Drug Courts presentation Presiding Judge: Honorable Al Alonso Session Objectives: As a result of this session, you will be able to:
Jail Diversion Diversion programs serve as critical strategies in preventing people with mental illness who commit crimes from entering or unnecessarily remaining in the criminal justice system. Interception
Adult Probation Frequently Asked Questions How do I make an appointment with my probation officer? To make an appointment with your probation officer, you should give him/her a call. If you do not have
An Outcome Analysis of Connecticut s Halfway House Programs Stephen M. Cox, Ph.D. Professor Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice Central Connecticut State University Study Impetus and Purpose
POTTER, RANDALL AND ARMSTRONG COUNTIES DRUG COURT: A VIABLE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCE HON. JOHN B. BOARD Judge, 181 st District Court State Bar of Texas SEX, DRUGS & SURVEILLANCE January 10-11, 2013
County of San Diego Public Safety Realignment & Post-Release Community Supervision Preliminary 2011 Implementation Plan Executive Committee of the Community Corrections Partnership: Mack Jenkins, Chief
Mandatory Supervision: The Benefits of Evidence Based Supervision under Public Safety Realignment State prison and probation are two ends of the response continuum traditionally available to judges who
Regular Session, 0 HOUSE BILL NO. BY REPRESENTATIVE LOPINTO Prefiled pursuant to Article III, Section (A)()(b)(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana. CRIMINAL/PROCEDURE: Authorizes probation and parole officers
CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION REPORT September 8, 2005 The Criminal Justice Advisory Council ( CJAC ) established a Subcommittee to address recommendations regarding alternatives
Fina~~26/ll Denver Sobriety Court Program Memorandum of Agreement Introduction The Denver Sobriety Court (Sobriety Court) was established in 2010 through efforts of the Crime Prevention and Control Commission
COMMUNITY SAFETY VICTIM RESPECT OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY OUR MISSION The mission of the New Hampshire Department of Corrections is to provide a safe, secure, and humane correctional system through effective
LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT Administered by the Lancaster County Department of Community Corrections Judicial Oversight by the Lancaster County District Court www.lancaster.ne.gov keyword: drug court
TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES P.O. Box 13401, Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/bpp/ WHAT IS PAROLE? Discretionary release of offenders from prison by a Board of Pardons
Building A Reformed Criminal Justice System: The Sequential Intercept Model Mark Gale Criminal Justice Chair, NAMI Los Angeles County Council firstname.lastname@example.org Ratan Bhavnani Board Member, NAMI California
Drug Court Handbook Mission Statement Drug Courts in the 7th Judicial District will strive to reduce recidivism of alcohol & drug offenders in the criminal justice system and provide community protection
Statistics on Women in the Justice System January, 2014 All material is available though the web site of the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS): http://www.bjs.gov/ unless otherwise cited. Note that correctional
Tough and Smart: Opportunities for Kansas Policymakers to Reduce Crime and Spending Dr. Tony Fabelo, Senior Research Consultant Marshall Clement, Policy Analyst Overview Tough and Smart Criminal Justice
Case 1:06-cr-00201-AWI Document 91 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 5 Prob 12B UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OF SUPERVISION WITH CONSENT OF THE OFFENDER (Probation Form 49, Waiver
Youth and the Law Presented by The Crime Prevention Unit Objectives Explaining the juvenile justice system and the differences between it and the adult system. Discussing juveniles rights and responsibilities
New Mexico Corrections Department (NMCD) Mike Estrada Program Manager Community Corrections NMCD is comprised mainly of two (2) divisions. They are: Adult Prisons Probation and Parole NMCD works with individuals
OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of the Olmsted County Attorney to pursue all domestic abuse allegations with zealous, yet discretionary prosecution
Clinical Skills for Evidence-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Practices with Offenders Treatment of Co-Occurring Disorders National TASC Conference, Columbus, Ohio; May 8, 2013 Roger H. Peters, Ph.D., University
STATE OF CONNECTICUT Results First Adult Criminal and Juvenile Justice Evidence-Based Program Inventory October 2014 INSTITUTE FOR MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL POLICY Central Connecticut State University Connecticut
October 12, 2011 CJI/CPOC OCTOBER WORK SESSION Organizational Development and Change Management Wendy S. Still David Koch Chief Adult Probation Officer Chief Deputy Probation Officer San Francisco Adult
The High Cost of DWI In New Mexico 2007-2008 The New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Bureau Offense Jail 1 Fines and Fees 2 License Revocation 1 st 90 days 48 hours if offender fails
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION AND PARDON Forms and Penal Code 4852.01, and 4852.06 Instruction Sheet Notice of Filing of Proof of Service Certificate of Rehabilitation
CHAPTER 23 AN ACT concerning treatment for drug and alcohol dependent persons, amending N.J.S.2C:35-14 and N.J.S.2C:44-6, and supplementing Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate
Introduction The New York City criminal justice system is made up of many different agencies and organizations. These include the independent judiciary, the five elected District Attorneys and the Special
Integrated Treatment Court 20 th Judicial District Boulder County, Colorado Presented by Judge Roxanne Bailin Chief Judge Origin of Drug/Treatment Courts In 1989, the first drug court was established in
Criminalization & Mental Illness: Next Steps & NAMI Advocacy Mark Gale Criminal Justice Chair, NAMI Los Angeles County Council Past NAMI California Criminal Justice Workgroup, Chair Past NAMI California
DUI Court is a Problem Solving Court or commonly referred to as a drug court. A "drug court," as defined by the National Association of Drug Court Professionals, is "a special court given the responsibility
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Pima County s Drug Treatment Alternative to Prison (DTAP) Program Final Report Submitted to: Barbara LaWall Pima County Attorney Pima County Attorney s Office Submitted by: Patricia
Milwaukee County Drug Treatment Court Participant Handbook Property of: If found please return to Justice 2000, Inc.: 821. W. State St. Rm. 417 Milwaukee, WI 53233 (414) 278-2140 _ This Handbook was created
SANTA CLARA COUNTY REENTRY SERVICES SEAMLESS SYSTEM OF SERVICES, SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION Ready to Change: Promoting Safety and Health for the Whole Community Vision/Mission Vision Build safer communities
CHECKLIST FOR ALL FIRST OFFENSE DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE CASES IMPORTANT: HIRE A LAWYER OR, IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD ONE, APPLY FOR A PUBLIC DEFENDER IMMEDIATELY. YOU MUST MEET INCOME GUIDELINES TO QUALIFY
September 2012 States Report Reductions in Recidivism In many jurisdictions, state and local government officials have intensified their efforts to reduce recidivism. As policymakers are under tremendous
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division Ivy Anderson-York Region I Director, Parole Division March 25, 2011 1 TDCJ Parole Division TDCJ Parole Division is responsible for pre-release planning
Analyses of Crime, Community Corrections, and Sentencing Policies Governor Jennifer M. Granholm, Senate Majority Leader Michael D. Bishop, and Speaker of the House Andy Dillon requested intensive technical
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT SENTENCING/DISPOSITION SHEET DEFENDANT: LEON CURT WALDROP AGE/DOB: 44/04-29-67 SENTENCING DATE: JULY 1, 2011 CITIZENSHIP: UNITED STATES JUDGE/DIVISION: MARGARET BENNY/RCC