VHR Thematic Maps from Aerospace for Regional and Provincial Urban Planning

Transcription

1 VHR Thematic Maps from Aerospace for Regional and Provincial Urban Planning Massimo Zotti pkm

2 Soil loss index Which soil type has been lost in the urban sprawl? Land use 2006 Class description % Industrial or commercial units 0, Construction sites 0,41 Industrial or commercial units Green urban areas 0, Sportland and leisure facilities Construction sites 0, Arable land Green urban areas 49, Permanent crops Sport and leisure facilities 2, Heterogeneus agricultural area 0,19 30 Arable land 3.1 forests 7,92 Permanent crops Scrubs and/or herbaceus vegetation associations 23,79 10 other Heterogeneous agricultural areas 13,65 Forests 0 Scrub and/or herbaceous % vegetation associations Other

3 About Planetek Italia Massimo Zotti pkm

4 Company profile Name: Planetek Italia S.r.l. Industry sector: Geomatics specialized in Earth Observation and design & development of Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDI) Target Customers: Central and local public administrations, research agencies, private industries Property: SME, four founding associates Group: Planetek Italia S.r.l. controls Geo-K S.r.l. (Italy) and Planetek Hellas E.p.e. (Greece), minority associate of Geophysical Applications Processing S.r.l. (Italy) Economy: triennium value of the production circa 15 M Uman resources: 43 employees with medium age of 32 years (85% graduates), mostly involved in R&D activities Reference Customers: ASI, ESA, UE, MATT, ISPRA, ENEA, Regione Sardegna, Calabria, Puglia, Lombardia, Emilia Romagna, Lazio, numerous provinces, townships and other hundreds of administrations, Infoterra, Telespazio, E-geos, Thales Alenia Space Principal collaborations: AIT, AMFM, AIPAS, Consorzio SUD Space, Distretto Aereospazio Puglia, UniBA, PoliBA VALUE CHAIN Raw Data Elaborated Data Integrated Solutions SW Develop ment SW Reselling Professional Services Training Consulting Support

5 Planetek Italia Group Rome GEO-K Bari Planetek Italia GAP Athens Planetek Hellas

6 Experience in GMES GMES Urban Service GSE Land GMES Forest Users: Prov. di Treviso, Prov. di Foggia e Comune di Bari Users: Regione Veneto, Patti territoriali Users: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente (E) Land Use Maps

7

8 Soil Sealing Maps 2012 Land monitoring services: high resolution land cover characteristics of 5 main land cover types

9 Soil Loss Analysis Massimo Zotti pkm Munich, June 8th 2011

10 Use of multispectral data WorldView-2 Spectral Bands (Pan) (coastal) (blu) (green) (yellow) (red) (Red-Edge) (NIR1) (NIR2) Spatial Resolution 0.46 m 1.84 m 1.84 m 1.84 m 1.84 m 1.84 m 1.84 m 1.84 m 1.84 m

11 WorldView-2 First Images 4 band 2m Image November 23, 2009 Aitutaki Lagoon Coastal Areas Analysis

12 WorldView-2 First Images 4 band 2m Image November 23, 2009 Aitutaki Lagoon

13 WorldView-2 First Images RE, NIR1, NIR2 2m Image November 23, 2009 Aitutaki Lagoon Rifrazione delle onde e vegetazione acquatica sommersa barriere lineari

14 WorldView-2 First Images R, RE, NIR1 2m Image November 23, 2009 Aitutaki Lagoon Vegetazione aquatica sommersa

15 WorldView-2 First Images Y, R, RE 2m Image November 23, 2009 Aitutaki Lagoon Vegetazione aquatica sommersa

16 WorldView-2 First Images G, Y, R 2m Image November 23, 2009 Aitutaki Lagoon

17 WorldView-2 First Images B, G, Y 2m Image November 23, 2009 Aitutaki Lagoon

18 WorldView-2 First Images C, B, G 2m Image November 23, 2009 Aitutaki Lagoon

19 Data / Information / Knowledge Data Satellite orthoimages Vector maps DTM Information Transport network Buidlings Land use Soil sealing Knowledge Indicators

20 Multi-level Geospatial Data Informative level Description File format Level 0 Level 1 (Land Use) Level 2 (Transport Infrastructures) Level 3 (Buildings) Level 4 (SoilSealing) Auxiliary levels Orthoimage. Is the basis for all the updating activities Land use map with a legend of 43 classes compliant with the European CORINE Land Cover nomenclature system Roadway and Railway Layer Buildings Layer classified on the basis of their use SoilSealing Layer. Binary raster map of the selaed areas Available ancillary data (i.e. CTR, hystorical LCM, DTM, etc.) TIFF, ECW Metadata ISO SHP, GDB Metadata ISO Statistics Report TIFF, ECW Metadata ISO SHP/GDB Metadata ISO Statistics Report

21 Multi-level Geospatial Data Buildings and transport network Satellite Ortophoto Transport network and soil sealing areas Land Use Map

22 Workflow VHR satellite images Atomated extraction of land cover basic classes Reference land use map integration Screening of territorial changes Topology control Phtointerpretation Geometric accuracy validation Soil sealing generation Hystorical LCM, DTM, etc GeoDataBase construction Thematic accuracy validation Reference cartography Geometry construction Quality control Available ancillary data Urban density definition Building extraction Land Use Map Trasportation network extraction Land cover extraction

23 SEA Indicators Indicator Soil loss Land use Landscape fragmentation Landscape diversity others Description Measures the soil loss incidence due to urban sprawl and transport infrastructure construction Measures the surface size of the principal land use types (artificial, agricultural, forest, etc.) Measures the medium size of natural areas that are not interrupted by transport infrastructures Measures the diversity of the landscape that is very important from the perceptive point of view specific indicators can be derived by the intersection with other ancillary information

24 Soil loss index (Apricena) Soil Sealing map 2006 Soil Sealing map 2010 Urban areas percentage with respect to the Municipality area = 4.6 % Urban areas percentage with respect to the Municipality area = 4.7 %

25 Soil loss index (Apricena) Urban sprawl with respect to the Municipality area: 0.16% = 29 ha Urban sprawl with respect to the built-up areas 2006: 3.7 %

26 Soil loss index Which soil type has been lost in the urban sprawl? Land use 2006 Class description % Industrial or commercial units 0, Construction sites 0,41 Industrial or commercial units Green urban areas 0, Sportland and leisure facilities Construction sites 0, Arable land Green urban areas 49, Permanent crops Sport and leisure facilities 2, Heterogeneus agricultural area 0,19 30 Arable land 3.1 forests 7,92 Permanent crops Scrubs and/or herbaceus vegetation associations 23,79 10 other Heterogeneous agricultural areas 13,65 Forests 0 Scrub and/or herbaceous % vegetation associations Other

27 Soil loss index What the soil lost in 2006 become in 2010? Land use 2006 Class description % Continuos urban fabric 0,25 Continuous urban fabric Discontinuos urban fabric 0,96 Discontinuous urban fabric Industrial or commercial units 21, Road and rail network and associated land Industrial or commercial 5,77 units Mineral extraction sites Road and rail netw 21,03 orks and Dump sites associated land Mineral extraction 3,64 sites Construction sites 31,95 Dump sites Areas waiting for a final destination 0,99 Construction sites Green urban areas 0,64 areas w aiting for a final Sport and leisure facilities 0,75 5 destination other Green urban areas 13,65 0 Sport and leisure facilities % Other

28 Conclusions Temporal Optimization for the plan arrangement Landscape understanding improved by the production of objective indicators SEA monitoring Stakeholder involvement guarantees trasparecy of the planning process Operative and diffuse use of EO products for the modern urban planning process

29 Thank you for your attention! Massimo Zotti Planetek Italia s.r.l.