IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
|
|
- Alyson Bishop
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 No. Vancouver Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: BENJAMIN TEPEI, ADRIAN TEPEI, ANGELICA TELESCU, CAMELIA COLCER, DAN TEPEI by his litigation guardian, Dina Tepei, and the said DINA TEPEI AND: THE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, DANNY BURNETT and SANDRA FERRELL PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM This action has been started by the Plaintiff for the relief set out in Part 2 below. If you intend to respond to this action, you or your lawyer must (a) (b) file a response to civil claim in Form 2 in the above-named registry of this court within the time for response to civil claim described below, and serve a copy of the filed response to civil claim on the plaintiff. If you intend to make a counterclaim, you or your lawyer must (a) (b) file a response to civil claim in Form 2 and a counterclaim in Form 3 in the abovenamed registry of this court within the time for response to civil claim described below, and serve a copy of the filed response to civil claim and counterclaim on the plaintiff and on any new parties named in the counterclaim. JUDGMENT MAY BE PRONOUNCED AGAINST YOU IF YOU FAIL to file the response to civil claim within the time for response to civil claim described below.
2 TIME FOR RESPONSE TO CIVIL CLAIM A response to civil claim must be filed and served on the Plaintiff, (a) (b) (c) (d) if you reside anywhere in Canada, within 21 days after the date on which a copy of the filed notice of civil claim was served on you, if you reside in the United States of America, within 35 days after the date on which a copy of the filed notice of civil claim was served on you, if you reside elsewhere, within 49 days after the date on which a copy of the filed notice of civil claim was served on you, or if the time for response to civil claim has been set by order of the court, within that time. CLAIM OF THE PLAINTIFFS PART 1: STATEMENT OF FACTS THE PARTIES 1. The Plaintiff Benjamin Tepei is a stone mason, presently residing at 1825 Laurier Avenue, Port Coquitlam, British Columbia. 2. The Plaintiff Adrian Tepei is a part-time roofer s assistant, presently residing on Austin Road, Coquitlam, British Columbia. 3. The Plaintiff Angelica Telescu, is a homemaker, presently residing at rd Avenue, in Fort St. John, British Columbia. 4. The Plaintiff Camelia Colcer is a care aide, presently residing on St. Anne Street, Port Coquitlam, British Columbia. 5. The Plaintiff Dina Tepei is a homemaker, presently residing at 1825 Laurier Avenue, Port Coquitlam, British Columbia. Dina Tepei is the mother of the other four Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Dan Tepei and has been appointed committee over Dan Tepei s person and estate. 6. The Defendant Insurance Corporation of British Columbia ( ICBC ) is a Crown corporation registered pursuant to the laws of the province of British Columbia, with
3 its principal place of business at 151 West Esplanade, North Vancouver, British Columbia. 7. The Defendants Danny Burnett ( Burnett ) and Sandra Ferrell ( Ferrell ) are Senior Claims Representatives and employees of the Defendant ICBC, and have addresses unknown to the Plaintiffs. THE INCIDENT 8. On October 27, 1996, the Plaintiffs were involved in a motor vehicle accident on Interstate 5 in the vicinity of Onalaska, Lewis County, Washington, United States. 9. The vehicle in which the Plaintiffs were traveling as passengers at the time of the 1996 accident was a 1990 Toyota Previa van owned by the Plaintiffs father and husband, Petru Tepei. 10. On April 26, 2004, following a seven-week trial before a jury in Lewis County, Washington, the Plaintiffs were awarded US $9,103, in damages against Petru Tepei for injuries and losses sustained in the 1996 accident (hereinafter, the Washington Judgment ). 11. At the time of the 1996 accident, Petru Tepei possessed a valid British Columbia owner s certificate for the 1990 Toyota Previa, as well as third party automobile liability insurance coverage from the Defendant ICBC in the amount of CDN $200,000 per incident. 12. As a member of Petru Tepei s household at the time of the 1996 accident, the Plaintiffs qualified as insured s entitled to receive underinsured motorist protection ( UMP ) benefits through the owner s certificate held by their father and husband, pursuant to 148.1(1) of the Revised Regulations under the Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Act ( the Regulations ). 13. The damages awarded the Plaintiffs exceeded the limits of available insurance and/or assets available to satisfy the Plaintiffs judgment in the Washington state action. As a result, the Plaintiffs asserted a right to collect UMP benefits pursuant to of the Regulations.
4 FACTS RELEVANT TO FIRST CLAIM ICBC S DUTY TO TIMELY EVALUATE THE PLAINTIFFS FIRST PARTY CLAIMS 14. The Plaintiffs incurred more than $350,000 in litigation expenses pursuing their Washington Judgment, the financing for which they incurred continuing interest of 12% per annum. The Plaintiffs conveyed these figures to the Defendant ICBC on or before December 3, Following preliminary negotiations on January 11, 2005, the Defendant ICBC offered to settle the Plaintiffs first party UMP claims as follows: Adrian Tepei $102,500 Angelica Telescu $185,000 Ben Tepei $237,500 Camelia Colcer $ 18,750 Dan Tepei $112,500 Dina Tepei $ 25,000 Total: $681,250 The Defendant ICBC further offered $100,000 to the Plaintiffs collectively, as costs. 16. On February 17, 2005, the Plaintiffs offered to settle their claims collectively for the sum of $2,500,000 inclusive of costs. 17. It having become evident that a dispute existed between the parties as to the amount of compensation to which the Plaintiffs were entitled under the applicable UMP coverage, pursuant to 148.2(1) of the Regulations, the Plaintiffs were compelled to submit this dispute to arbitration under the Commercial Arbitration Act. 18. In the UMP case, the Defendant ICBC argued that the arbitrator could ignore the 2004 findings of the Washington court and force the Plaintiffs to reprove both causation and damages, at significant additional expense and delay for the Plaintiffs.
5 19. More than five years after its initial offers, beginning in or about March 2010, the Defendant ICBC offered to settle the Plaintiffs claims as follows: Adrian Tepei September, 2011 $590,000 Angelica Telescu March 8, 2010 $468,800 Ben Tepei August 11, 2010 $445,000, plus costs Camelia Colcer March 8, 2010 $40,000, plus costs Dan Tepei January 14, 2011 $500,000 plus costs Dina Tepei March 8, 2010 $ 50,000 TOTAL: $2,093,000, plus costs 20. After a hearing on the merits by Order dated May 13, 2010, Arbitrator J.J. Camp awarded certain Plaintiffs the following amounts of UMP compensation: Angelica Telescu $707, Camelia Colcer $46,200 Dina Tepei $84, The Defendant ICBC owed the Plaintiffs a duty of good faith and fair dealing which required them to fairly, reasonably, fully and properly investigate the Plaintiffs claims and to offer them a reasonable amount to settle their claims, keeping the Plaintiffs interests equal to the Defendant ICBC s interest, which they failed to do. FACTS RELEVANT TO SECOND CLAIM ICBC S DUTY TO DISCLOSE CONFLICT OF INTEREST 21. On December 1, 2004, the Defendant ICBC proposed the names of three lawyers as potential arbitrators for the adjudication of the UMP dispute. 22. At the time of proposing these three candidates, the Defendant and its agents knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, that all three of the lawyers proposed as potential arbitrators were members of law firms which provided legal
6 services to the Defendant and/or its insureds, and which had entered into contracts with the Defendant for the provision of the same. 23. At the time of proposing these three candidates, the Defendant and its agents knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, that as a condition of providing legal services to the Defendant and/or its insureds, all three of the proposed arbitrators and their firms were signatories to a Strategic Alliance Agreement between themselves, their firms and the Defendant which, among other provisions: (a) (b) prohibits signatory lawyers and their firms from counseling or assisting parties in advancing actions against the Defendant alleging claims of punitive, aggravated or exemplary damages, whether by direct or indirect conduct; and grants the Defendant at its discretion the right to terminate the contract for legal services between itself and a signatory lawyer or firm if any member of the signatory firm engages in any activity that was, is, or may be contrary to the Defendant s strategic business or financial direction or initiatives. 24. At no time did the Defendant ICBC disclose to the Plaintiffs that the lawyers proposed as arbitrators for the Plaintiffs dispute were members of law firms which had a prior and ongoing contractual agreement with the Defendant for the provision of legal services. 25. At no time did the Defendant disclose to the Plaintiffs that the lawyers proposed as arbitrators for the Plaintiffs dispute were bound, either individually or as members of signatory law firms, by the provisions of a Strategic Alliance Agreement between themselves and the Defendant, or the terms contained within that agreement. 26. Following negotiations between counsel, the Plaintiffs elected to proceed with their UMP arbitration before Joseph P. Boskovich of the law firm of DuMoulin & Boskovich. The Plaintiffs joined with Defendant in contracting with Mr. Boskovich to provide his services as an arbitrator of this matter, with the costs and expenses associated with those services to be borne between the parties as
7 required by the rules of the British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Centre ( BCICAC ). 27. Upon accepting appointment as arbitrator in the Plaintiffs matter, Mr. Boskovich executed on December 13, 2004 a one page Statement of Independence and Impartiality as required by the BCICAC for all domestic arbitrations conducted under its aegis. In his statement, Mr. Boskovich asserted, among other provisions: (a) that he had no interest, directly or indirectly, in the outcome of the dispute between the Plaintiffs and Defendant; and (b) that he was unaware of any circumstances that could give rise to justifiable doubts as to his independence or impartiality, or which could raise a likelihood of perceived bias in the conduct of the Plaintiff s arbitration. 28. In the face of arbitrator Boskovich s Statement of Independence and Impartiality, the Defendant ICBC stood silent, despite knowing that the assertions contained therein were misleading and/or inaccurate. 29. Subsequent to the commencement of the UMP arbitration process, and following significant expenditures of time and effort on the part of Plaintiffs, the Plaintiffs learned of the existence of the previously undisclosed business relationship between the Defendant and arbitrator Boskovich and his firm. 30. The Defendant owed the Plaintiffs a duty of good faith and fair dealing, grounded in both contract and in tort, to fully disclose all information in its possession bearing on the qualifications, impartiality and independence of an arbitrator proposed to resolve disputes arising under the Regulations, including but not limited to: (a) (b) the existence, nature and extent of the ongoing financial relationship between the Defendant and a proposed and/or selected arbitrator or his firm, if any; and the existence, nature and extent of any contractual obligations running between the Defendant and a proposed and/or selected arbitrator or his firm, whether contained in the Strategic Alliance Agreement or otherwise.
8 31. The Defendant breached this duty of good faith and fair dealing to the Plaintiffs by the conduct alleged herein. 32. Further, and in the alternative, the Defendant s conduct constitutes a negligent misrepresentation regarding the fairness and impartiality of the arbitration process in which the Plaintiffs are statutorily compelled to participate. 33. The Defendant had a duty to refrain from making misrepresentations of fact regarding the fairness and impartiality of arbitrators proposed or chosen by the parties, which included a duty to fully disclose all information in its possession bearing on the qualifications, impartiality and independence of an arbitrator proposed to resolve disputes arising under the Regulations. The Plaintiffs assert the Defendant negligently breached this duty based on the facts alleged herein. 34. The Plaintiffs reasonably relied upon the Defendant s negligent misrepresentations to their detriment, resulting in damage to the Plaintiffs. CAUSATION AND DAMAGES 35. As a result of the Defendant s conduct alleged herein, the Plaintiffs have sustained a range of general and special damages. Without in any way limiting or restricting the scope and extent of damages the Plaintiffs may seek to prove at trial, the Plaintiffs have suffered delay in the payment of monetary benefits, continued interest on financed litigation expenses, the actual costs expended in the furtherance of an arbitration procedure which has been made worthless by the impermissible taint of bias, and nominal or other damages for the inconvenience, frustration and delay occasioned by the Defendant s conduct. AGGRAVTED DAMAGES 36. Defendants, well knowing the Plaintiffs mental, emotional and financial situation, have continued to wrongfully deny the Plaintiffs benefits, in consequence of which the Plaintiffs have sustained additional mental and emotional stress, anxiety, worry, upset, economic hardship and additional pecuniary loss, in having to retain Legal
9 Counsel and incur Legal expense to obtain benefits lawfully due to the Plaintiffs all in consequence of the Defendants' Bad Faith and Wrongful Conduct, which conduct has materially aggravated the Plaintiffs circumstances and condition. PARTICULARS OF BAD FAITH 37. The Defendants have acted in Bad Faith, and acted wantonly toward the Plaintiffs PARTICULARS OF WHICH ARE AS FOLLOWS.: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p) Failing to thoroughly investigate their insureds claims and to fully inquire into all possible bases that might support their insureds claims; Failing to objectively evaluate the insureds claims; Failing to contact the insured's treating physicians, where any clarification may have been required; Construing the Policy in a manner more onerous than written; Failing to fairly, reasonably, fully, and properly investigate the Plaintiffs matter; Failing to treat the Plaintiffs interests with equal regard to its own interests; Failing to act fairly and reasonably; Failing to pay benefits in a timely manner; Failing to properly evaluate material provided; Discounting a claim due supposedly to lack of information, when the Defendant had a duty to assist the Plaintiffs with the claim, and collect medical information; Failing to assist the Plaintiffs with their claims; Failing to pay benefits in a timely manner; Failing to properly evaluate material provided; Denying and delaying the Plaintiffs claims so as to increase Defendant Company's profitability; Failing to provide any reasonable explanation for denying and delaying the Plaintiffs claims; Selectively accepting medical information supporting the Defendant s position,
10 (q) (r) and ignoring evidence supporting the Plaintiffs injuries and disabilities; Failing to properly hire, train or monitor its claims adjudicators, including Defendants Burnett and Ferrell; Such further particulars as Counsel may advise. INTENTIONAL INDUCEMENT OF BREACH OF CONTRACT & INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT 38. The Defendants Burnett and Ferrell intentionally induced the Defendant, ICBC to breach the owner s certificate of UMP insurance and intentionally interfered with the performance of the contract, thus breaching the duty of good faith and fair dealing to the Plaintiffs, which conduct represents an independent actionable wrong irrespective of any statutory or contractual entitlement to benefits. CONFLICT OF INTEREST 39. At all relevant times, the Claims Examiners had the responsibility of administering the Plan of Insurance, and paying benefits from their employer s funds; at all relevant times, the Defendant s ICBC, Claims Examiners productivity, promotions and consequential compensation amounted to an inherent conflict of interest, particulars of which are solely and entirely within the knowledge of the Defendants. PUNITIVE & EXEMPLARY DAMAGES 40. The Defendant ICBC had conducted itself reprehensibly and in a willful and conscious disregard for the Plaintiffs contractual rights, subjecting the Plaintiffs to cruel and unjust hardship, intentionally depriving the Plaintiffs of benefits, acting in BAD FAITH toward the Plaintiffs, which conduct was willful, wanton, and
11 conduct designed to make an economic benefits for the Defendant, ICBC which conduct necessitates reproval. 41. The Plaintiffs will seek Punitive Damages commensurate to the Defendant s, ICBC s, net worth. PART 2: RELIEF SOUGHT the Plaintiffs claim against the Defendants as follows: (a) general damages; (b) special damages; (c) punitive damages; (d) aggravated damages; (e) pre- and post-judgment interest, as applicable; (f) costs of maintaining this action, as applicable; and (g) such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. PART 3: LEGAL BASIS BAD FAITH The Defendants owed the Plaintiffs a duty of good faith and fair dealing, pursuant to the Insurance (Vehicle) Act R.S.B.C c. 318, the Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Act R.S.B.C c. 231, and the Regulations promulgated thereto, which they breached. Plaintiffs address for service: CROSS BORDER LAW CORPORATION West 2 nd Avenue Vancouver, BC V6J 1H6 Fax number for service: address for service: gls@crossborderlaw.com
12 Place of Trial: 800 Smithe Street, Vancouver, BC The address of the registry: Vancouver Law Court 800 Smithe Street Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 2E1 Dated: March, Greg Samuels Barrister and Solicitor Lawyer for Plaintiffs
13 Rule 7-1(1) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules states: (1) Unless all parties of record consent or the court otherwise orders, each party of record to an action must, within 35 days after the end of the pleading period, (a) prepare a list of documents in Form 22 that lists (i) all documents that are or have been in the party s possession or control and that could, if available, be used by any party at trial to prove or disprove a material fact, and (ii) all other documents to which the party intends to refer at trial, and (b) serve the list on all parties of record.
14 APPENDIX (The following information is provided for data collection purposes only and is of no legal effect) PART 1: CONCISE SUMMARY OF NATURE OF CLAIM: PART 2: THIS CLAIM ARISES FROM THE FOLLOWING: A matter not listed here. PART 3: THIS CLAIM INVOLVES: None of the above PART 4: ENACTMENTS RELIED ON 1. Insurance (Vehicle) Act, R.S.B.C c. 318, c Negligence Act, R.S.B.C c. 333; and 3. Court Order Interest Act, R.S.B.C c Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Act R.S.B.C c. 231
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM
Form 1 (Rule 3-1(1)) No. Vancouver Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN AND THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM This action has been started
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY
THE HONORABLE CAROL MURPHY 1 1 1 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY TARVA LEE, ) ) No: --00- Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF ) CONTRACT, BAD FAITH, FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA YING JIANG
19-Sep-14 Court File No. VLC-S-S-147229 Vancouver No. VANCOUVER REGISTRY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: YING JIANG PLAINTIFF AND: PEOPLES TRUST COMPANY, PEOPLES CARD SERVICES LIMITED
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
(PRECEDENT STATEMENT OF CLAIM A ) Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: ******************** Plaintiff and ******** corporation Defendant STATEMENT OF CLAIM TO THE DEFENDANT A LEGAL
More informationNOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM. This action has been started by the plaintiffs for the relief set out in Part 2 below.
IN THE SUPREME COURT 0 F BRITISH COLUMBIA No. Vancouver Registry BETWEEN: CHERYL LYNN ROBINSON and CYNTHIA ELIZABETH KASK PLAINTIFFS AND: NATIONAL MONEY MART COMPANY, JUSTENNA ENTERPRISES INC., DAVID ROBERTSON,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * *
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA vs. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER CV-99-792 Defendants. COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiffs, Bryan K. Bunten and Lisa Bunten, are over the age of nineteen (19) years
More informationA Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 jrl@cwilson.com Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM. This action has been started by the plaintiff for the relief set out in Part 2 below.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA No. ----- Vancouver Registry BETWEEN: THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION Plaintiff AND: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendant Narne and address
More informationTHE STATE OF FLORIDA...
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE STATE OF FLORIDA... 2 A. FREQUENTLY CITED FLORIDA STATUTES... 2 1. General Considerations in Insurance Claim Management... 2 2. Insurance Fraud... 5 3. Automobile Insurance...
More informationIntroduction Page to the Appellant s PDF Factum:
Introduction Page to the Appellant s PDF Factum: Note: When you bind your factum, all pages (except for the cover and index) starting with your chronology, should always be on the left-hand side. The righthand
More informationThe two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive
More informationOFFICE OF THE ETHICS COMMISSIONER PROVINCE OF ALBERTA REPORT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE INVESTIGATION
OFFICE OF THE ETHICS COMMISSIONER PROVINCE OF ALBERTA REPORT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE INVESTIGATION BY THE ETHICS COMMISSIONER INTO ALLEGATIONS INVOLVING BRIAN EVANS, Q.C., FORMER
More informationCORNERSTONE A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM
CORNERSTONE A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM THIS IS A CLAIMS MADE POLICY WITH DEFENSE EXPENSES INCLUDED IN THE LIMIT OF LIABILITY. PLEASE READ AND REVIEW THE POLICY CAREFULLY. In consideration
More informationTitle XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter
Title XLV TORTS Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE View Entire Chapter 768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification;
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you were injured or provided treatment for an injury and filed a claim under your Allstate Med Pay coverage, and were compensated in an amount
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Richard v. British Columbia, 2014 BCSC 1290 William Joseph Richard and W.H.M. Date: 20140714 Docket: S024338 Registry: Vancouver Plaintiffs
More informationHave you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION
Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION If you have suffered a personal injury it is important to consider all potential sources of compensation. A personal
More informationONTARIO COURT (GENERAL DIVISION)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM (GENERAL) Dye & Durham CFS (Litigation v 4.1) (Form 14A under the Rules) Court file no. 1292/97 ONTARIO COURT (GENERAL DIVISION) In the matter of a Claim under the Class Proceedings
More informationAN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act.
3721L.01I AN ACT To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI,
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
More informationReal Estate Errors & Omissions Indemnity Plan
B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A Real Estate Errors & Omissions Indemnity Plan No. RE0398 Issued by Real Estate Errors and Omissions Insurance Corporation (Herein called the Corporation ) Pursuant to the
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More informationPERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS BILL 2002
1 PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS BILL 2002 EXPLANATORY NOTES General Outline Purpose of legislation The main purpose of this Act is to facilitate the ongoing affordability of insurance through appropriate
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 100 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND
More informationMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT
Province of Alberta MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter M-22 Current as of April 1, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s
More informationNorthern Insurance Company of New York v. Resinski
MONTGOMERY COUNTY LAW REPORTER 140-301 2003 MBA 30 Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Resinski [140 M.C.L.R., Part II Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Resinski APPEAL and ERROR Motion for Summary
More information2009 BCCA 78 Pearlman v. American Commerce Insurance Company
Page 1 of 8 COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Pearlman v. American Commerce Insurance Company, 2009 BCCA 78 David Pearlman American Commerce Insurance Company, and Betsy Morrisette
More informationCompulsory Arbitration
Local Rule 1301 Scope. Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. (1) The following civil actions shall first be submitted to and heard by a Board of Arbitrators: (a) (b) (c) (d) Civil actions, proceedings
More informationPREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com
Form: Plaintiff's original petition-wrongful Death [Name], PLAINTIFF vs. [Name], DEFENDANT [ IN THE [Type of Court] COURT [Court number] PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION 1. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Plaintiff
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING MYSPINE, PS, a Washington professional services corporation; BODY RECOVERY CLINIC LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company; and YAROSLAV KUTSY, Plaintiffs,
More informationTime for response to civil claim. A response to civil claim must be filed and served on the plaintiffs,
Time for response to civil claim A response to civil claim must be filed and served on the plaintiffs, (a) if you reside anywhere in Canada, within 21 days after the date on which a copy ofthe filed notice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION 1. Practitioners are reminded of the need to bear in mind the overriding objective set out at Order 1 rule 1(a)
More informationPART 15--ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS UNDER FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT
Note: This document contains FAR Part 15 including Amendment 15-4 published in the Federal Register on September 4, 1997. PART 15--ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS UNDER FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT Subpart A--General
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TRIAL DIVISION CIVIL SECTION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TRIAL DIVISION CIVIL SECTION LOUISE FOSTER Administrator of the : AUGUST TERM 2010 Estate of GEORGE FOSTER : and BARBARA DILL : vs.
More informationGuidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court
Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court Preamble The following are guidelines for attorneys and non-lawyer volunteers appointed as guardians ad litem for children in most family
More information2006 WL 6142740 (Miss.Cir.) (Trial Pleading) Circuit Court of Mississippi. Lee County. No. CV05-045 (A)L. June 12, 2006. Second Amended Complaint
2006 WL 6142740 (Miss.Cir.) (Trial Pleading) Circuit Court of Mississippi. Lee County Charlene DUNN, Plaintiff, v. John A. MURPHY, Future Benefits, Inc. American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company,
More informationMotor Legal Care Terms and Conditions
Motor Legal Care Terms and Conditions The cover provided under this notice is in addition to your Breakdown cover and should be read together with your existing terms and conditions. RAC Motor Legal Care
More informationD R A F T. LC 117 2016 Regular Session 1/19/16 (TSB/ps)
LC 0 Regular Session // (TSB/ps) D R A F T SUMMARY Provides that insurer that has duty to defend insured against claim has fiduciary duty toward insured if insurer does defend against claim. Provides that
More informationCROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY PROTOCOL FOR 360NETWORKS INC. AND ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES
CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY PROTOCOL FOR 360NETWORKS INC. AND ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES 1. Certain defined terms used in this Protocol shall have the meanings assigned to them in Appendix A. 2. The 360 Group
More informationRULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES
RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES (a) Illegal, Prohibited, or Clearly Excessive Fees and Costs. [no change] (b) Factors to Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Fees and Costs. [no change]
More information[J-119-2012] [MO: Saylor, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : : DISSENTING OPINION
[J-119-2012] [MO Saylor, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT HERD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, P.C., v. Appellee STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant No. 35 MAP 2012 Appeal
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) LAW FIRM OF KAISER, DEBIASO. ANDREW AND SWINDELLS SUMfTOMO TOWER NINTH FLOOR 444 WEST OCEAN BOULEVARD LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802-4516 (310) 590-8471 ERIC C. DEMLER
More informationNo-Fault Automobile Insurance
No-Fault Automobile Insurance By Margaret C. Jasper, Esq. Prior to the enactment of state no-fault insurance legislation, recovery for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident were subject
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Action No. L020662 Vancouver Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: The COUNCIL OF THE HAIDA NATION and Guujaaw, suing on his own behalf and on behalf of all members of the HAIDA NATION
More informationMotor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95
New South Wales Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 2 4 Amendment of other
More informationCourt File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. BETWEEN: JEAN-FRANCOIS FARJON and REBECCA SOROKA. -and-
Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: JEAN-FRANCOIS FARJON and REBECCA SOROKA -and- PLAINTIFFS DR. CHRISTIANE FARAZLI, and C. FARAZLI MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION DEFENDANTS STATEMENT
More informationTerms and Conditions for Tax Services
Terms and Conditions for Tax Services In the course of delivering services relating to tax return preparation, tax advisory, and assistance in tax controversy matters, Brady, Martz & Associates, P.C. (we
More information1 (5) The state and its agencies and subdivisions shall be liable for tort claims in the
768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification; risk management programs. (1) In accordance with
More informationPRE-ACTION PROTOCOL. Re: Road Traffic Accidents and Personal Injury Claims. 1.1. The aims of the pre-action protocols are:
1 PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL Re: Road Traffic Accidents and Personal Injury Claims 1. GENERAL 1.1. The aims of the pre-action protocols are: (a) (b) (c) to foster more pre-action contact between the parties,
More informationSPECIMEN. (1) advising, counseling or giving notice to employees, participants or beneficiaries with respect to any Plan;
In consideration of payment of the premium and subject to the Declarations, limitations, conditions, provisions and other terms of this Policy, the Company and the Insureds agree as follows: I. INSURING
More informationPREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit.
Information or instructions: Plaintiff's original petition-auto accident 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. 2. It assumes several plaintiffs were rear-ended by an employee
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DOROTHY YOUNG SHELL CANADA LIMITED. Brought under the Class Proceedings Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA No. L021060 Vancouver Registry Between: And: DOROTHY YOUNG SHELL CANADA LIMITED Brought under the Class Proceedings Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 50 Plaintiff Defendant
More information8:11-mn-02000-JMC Date Filed 04/22/15 Entry Number 150 Page 1 of 8
8:11-mn-02000-JMC Date Filed 04/22/15 Entry Number 150 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENWOOD DIVISION In re: Building Materials Corporation of America
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid a practice assessment to the American Psychological Association Practice Organization, you
More informationConditional Fee Agreement ( CFA ) [For use in personal injury and clinical negligence cases only].
Disclaimer This model agreement is not a precedent for use with all clients and it will need to be adapted/modified depending on the individual clients circumstances and solicitors business models. In
More informationbut does not include
WRONGFUL DEATH ACCOUNTABILITY ACT SEPTEMBER 2011 Contents 1 Definitions 2 Actions for Wrongful Death Scope 3 Action to be Prosecuted on Behalf of Decedent s Estate Time Limits 4 Types of Damages Recoverable
More informationGADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
More information2012 -- S 2686 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
LC01 01 -- S S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO INSURANCE - MOTOR VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ACT Introduced By: Senators
More informationThe A-B-C s of Motor Vehicle Collisions and Personal Injury Claims In Minnesota
The A-B-C s of Motor Vehicle Collisions and Personal Injury Claims In Minnesota Douglas E. Schmidt Accident Attorney 13911 Ridgedale Drive Suite 110 Minnetonka, MN 55305 952.473.4530 Fax: 952.544.1308
More informationVIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
More informationMASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMIZED PRACTICE COVERAGE TITLE INSURANCE AGENT LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT
(hereinafter called "the Company") MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMIZED PRACTICE COVERAGE TITLE INSURANCE AGENT LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT In consideration of the payment of the premium, in reliance upon the statements
More informationPUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE
PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2015 TO JUNE 30, 2016 EFFECTIVE: JULY 1, 2015 PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT
More informationDocument hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentviewer.aspx?fid=2066f4aa-63a1-461f-a364-221d2e99642d
How Much Is My ICBC Claim Worth? Each ICBC claim is unique. The value of any ICBC claim will depend on a number of factors including who is at fault, the type of injuries and the effect of the injuries
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION NANCY PRITCHARD, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION; KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, as PLAN ADMINISTRATOR;
More informationS13G1048. CARTER v. PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Carter
295 Ga. 487 FINAL COPY S13G1048. CARTER v. PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE. HINES, Presiding Justice. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Carter v. Progressive Mountain Ins.,
More informationBuckeye Brainiacs Support Terms of Service
Buckeye Brainiacs Support Terms of Service 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS OF SERVICE The Brainiacs Terms of Service ( Service Terms ) are available to you ( Customer ) at our website www.buckeyecableystem.com
More informationB.C. LAWYERS COMPULSORY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER: LPL 00-01-01
B.C. LAWYERS COMPULSORY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER: LPL 00-01-01 INSURER: THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. (the Company ) Administrative Offices, 6th Floor, 845 Cambie Street
More informationSTANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS
Notice: This Agreement is not valid unless signed and accepted by an officer of The Feldman Law Firm, P.C., who will make the sole decision whether to accept your case. This Agreement may be digitally
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION : : : : : : : O R D E R
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION JOHN I. GORDON, ESQUIRE v. MICHAEL O. PANSINI, ESQUIRE, et al. JUNE TERM, 2011 NO. 02241
More informationHow To Settle A Class Action Lawsuit Against Jimmy Johns
LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STARKS vs. JIMMY JOHN S LLC, et al. CASE NO. BC01 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. PLEASE READ IT
More informationLAND CONSOLIDATION ACT
LAWS OF KENYA LAND CONSOLIDATION ACT CHAPTER 283 Revised Edition 2012 [1977] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org CAP. 283 [Rev.
More informationMONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.
,5SEPV Wl0: 3ii /"'LCD JCOURT MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY Robert Jacobsen, -vs- Allstate Insurance Company, Plaintiff, Defendant. Cause No.: ADV-03-201(d) Final Order Approving
More information13.12.3.1 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Public Regulation Commission Insurance Division. [7/1/97; 13.12.3.1 NMAC - Rn & A, 13 NMAC 12.3.
TITLE 13 CHAPTER 12 PART 3 INSURANCE MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE UNINSURED AND UNKNOWN MOTORISTS COVERAGE 13.12.3.1 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Public Regulation Commission Insurance Division. [7/1/97; 13.12.3.1
More informationCIVIL LITIGATION ASSISTANCE SCHEME CONDITIONS OF ASSISTANCE
APPLICATION CIVIL LITIGATION ASSISTANCE SCHEME CONDITIONS OF ASSISTANCE 1. Applications for funding under the Civil Litigation Assistance Scheme can only be submitted through a private legal practitioner
More informationCLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS
CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS Martin M. Ween, Esq. Partner Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman
More informationNEW MEXICO SELF-INSURERS' FUND WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY PLAN
NEW MEXICO SELF-INSURERS' FUND WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY PLAN In return for the payment of the premium and subject to all terms of this Policy, we agree with you as follows. GENERAL
More informationNumber 31 of 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Preliminary and General
Number 31 of 2004 CIVIL LIABILITY AND COURTS ACT 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Preliminary and General Section 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Orders and regulations. 4. Service
More informationAnatomy of a Medical Malpractice Case
Anatomy of a Medical Malpractice Case You have an important story to tell Let our voice tell your story with power, clarity and effectiveness Our Litigation Team Why choose our team? We provide more than
More informationBEAZLEY ARMOUR SIDE A DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY
BEAZLEY ARMOUR SIDE A DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY In consideration of the payment of the premium, in reliance on all statements made in the application and subject to all of the provisions
More informationA brief guide to professional negligence claims
A brief guide to professional negligence claims Contents Introduction Do I have a claim? Important considerations Pre-action protocol procedure Court proceedings Contact information Introduction Claims
More informationLIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT
LIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT CHAPTER 7:09 Act 36 of 1997 Amended by 2 of 2000 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 18.. L.R.O. 2 Chap. 7:09 Limitation of Certain Actions
More informationOctagon Insurance Legal Expenses Policy
Octagon Insurance Legal Expenses Policy 1 2 This Octagon insurance policy is underwritten by Inter Partner Assistance SA and administered on their behalf by Arc Legal Assistance Limited. The following
More informationMore than you bargained for -
More than you bargained for - The effect of British Columbia s Universal Automobile Insurance on American, and other out-of-province, Insurance Policies 1. INTRODUCTION When motorists venture into the
More information11 NYCRR 60-2.0. Text is current through February 15, 2002, and annotations are current through August 1, 2001.
11 NYCRR 60-2.0 OFFICIAL COMPILATION OF CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK TITLE 11. INSURANCE DEPARTMENT CHAPTER III. POLICY AND CERTIFICATE PROVISIONS [FN1] SUBCHAPTER B. PROPERTY
More informationCase 0:12-cv-60597-JIC Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/13 12:33:23 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:12-cv-60597-JIC Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/13 12:33:23 Page 1 LISA KOWALSKI, a Florida resident, v. Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Michigan
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-156 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RONALD W. RAMEY AND JONI J. RAMEY,
More informationLife Insurance Law Firm Los Angeles
Life Insurance Law Firm Los Angeles James T. Hudson is a California civil trial lawyer, specializing in insurance disputes. Mr. Hudson handles virtually all types of insurance claims: for disability income
More informationCase 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO DAVID ASHE Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 10-2236 ( DRD ) vs. DISTRIBUIDORA NORMA,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of British Columbia TRILLIUM PROJECT MANAGEMENT LTD. VINCENZO BONADDIO, MICHAEL CALDERONI, DOUGLAS DOLPHIN, ANTHONY DACOSTA, and
SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER REGISTRY AUG 01 2012 C"1?5U3 No. Vancouver Registry In the Supreme Court of British Columbia Between TRILLIUM PROJECT MANAGEMENT LTD. Plaintiff and VINCENZO
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS INSURANCE BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN COLORADO. Exhibit 1A Bad Faith Case Outcomes 2.1 INSURED S REMEDIES LIMITED UNDER CONTRACT LAW
TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 INSURANCE BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN COLORADO Exhibit 1A Bad Faith Case Outcomes Chapter 2 TORT VERSUS CONTRACT REMEDIES 2.1 INSURED S REMEDIES LIMITED UNDER CONTRACT LAW 2.2 EXPANDED
More informationWill, trust and estate disputes
Will, trust and estate disputes Contents Types of claim Is the Will valid? Inheritance Act Claims Have you not been left sufficient financial provision following the death of a friend or relative? Promissory
More informationCAUSE NO. DC-12-07825
CAUSE NO. DC-12-07825 Filed 13 September 9 P4:46 Gary Fitzsimmons District Clerk Dallas District CADE MANNETTI, v. Plaintiff, VISIONARY RESTAURANTS LLC, VISIONARY STAFFING LLC, WILLIAM McCROREY, AND THOMAS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION IN RE: * * [Debtor s Name] * (***-**-last four digits of SSN) * Case No. - [Joint Debtor s Name, if any * Chapter 13 (***-**-last
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2014 INDEX NO. 650177/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2014
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2014 INDEX NO. 650177/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 01/17/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationChapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July 2006. Manual of Legal Aid
Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES Last Amended: 1 July 2006 Manual of Legal Aid TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 6B - STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES GENERAL...3 PROVISION OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE...3 GENERAL GUIDELINES
More informationOREGON LAWS 2015 Chap. 5 CHAPTER 5
CHAPTER 5 AN ACT SB 411 Relating to personal injury protection benefits; creating new provisions; and amending ORS 742.500, 742.502, 742.504, 742.506, 742.524 and 742.544. Be It Enacted by the People of
More informationAM ENDED T AY OF.0.4Q11) D. a-004. PURSUMT Tr'
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON Action No. 0403-12898 BETWEEN: TANYA LAB ONTE Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ln RIGHT OF ALBERTA as represented by THE DIRECTOR
More informationConditional Fee Agreement (CFA)
Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) This agreement is a binding legal contract between you and your solicitor/s. Before you sign, please read everything carefully. This agreement must be read in conjunction
More informationTITLE 18 INSURANCE DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1. 900 Consumer Rights. 901 Arbitration of Automobile and Homeowners' Insurance Claims
DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1 900 Consumer Rights 901 Arbitration of Automobile and Homeowners' Insurance Claims 1.0 Purpose and Statutory Authority 1.1 The purpose of this Regulation is to implement
More information