HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Save this PDF as:

WORD PNG TXT JPG

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "HCP Team Meeting. November 18, 2015. icfi.com"

Edward Nicholson
2 years ago
Views:

Transcription

1 HCP Team Meeting November 18, 2015 icfi.com 1

2 Welcome and Introductions Where are we in the HCP process Hydrology modeling update Native fish survey Fish translocation Finalize covered activities Next phase restoration design and mitigation bank development Cost sharing for restoration/mitigation bank/mitigation credits Next Steps Agenda icfi.com 2

3 1st Stage Upper SAR HCP Planning Process Where are we now? 1 st Stage: 2 nd Stage Planning the HCP, Key Issues, and Preparing the Data We are here 2 nd Stage: Preparing the HCP and Environmental Documents 3 rd Stage 3 rd Stage: Application package and permits icfi.com 3

4 Parallel and Coordinated Regulatory Processes Credit: Mike Thomas, USFWS

5 ANTICIPATED UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER HCP TEAM APPROXIMATE TIMELINE HCP Preparation SAS Translocation Plan Restoration Site Final Design Mitigation "Bank" Development & Restoration Site Permitting RCRCD Expansion & SAS Propagation Aquatics Resources (404/401/1602) Permitting for Covered Activities Restoration Construction SAS Translocation Habitat Conservation Plan Complete 404/401/1602 Permits Issued for Covered Activities Mitigation "Bank" Approved and Credits Available for Covered Activities Apr Sep 2015 Jul Dec 2016 Oct 2017 Aug Today Dec 2017 icfi.com 5

6 Hydrology Modeling Update Hydrologic analysis was performed on gage and model data (Geoscience, Wildermuth) for HCP reaches Comparison of With and Without Covered Activity hydrographs, exceedance analysis, total acre-ft diversions Results showed need to revise model Geocience data Adjust points of diversion Change diversion rates into recharge basins Combine Enhanced Recharge model with Active Recharge Extend model downstream to account for Rubber Dam ~ 3 months - New results will be reevaluated along with gage and Wildermuth data for effects analysis icfi.com 6

7 Potential Effects Approach Overview and Examples Hydrology Verification Best available information Modeling Tool with Comparable Results Monthly Exceedance Flows 5%,25%,50%,75%,95% Without Covered Activities With Covered Activities Estimate Wetted Perimeter ( Surface Area) Lidar HEC-RAS Habitat Quantity (Next Steps) Estimate Effects of Covered Activities icfi.com 7

8 Hydrologic Modeling Sources of Information Reach Source Baseline Condition SAR Tributaries Upstream of the Rubber Dam Geoscience Active Recharge Model Proposed Condition Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Santa Ana River Downstream of Cuttle Weir Santa Ana River Downstream of Warm Creek/Lytle Creek to Prado Geoscience/Leidos New Conservation Model Wildermuth Wasteload Allocation Model 195 cfs Cuttle Weir Diversion 500 cfs Cuttle Weir Diversion Available Models and assumptions weren t compatible and consistent enough Scenario for integration 7 Scenario into HCP 7 Effects Analysis Tributaries Not Specifically Included in Existing Models USGS Data as appropriate Potentially Wildermuth icfi.com 8

9 Hydrology Model Source Data icfi.com 9

10 Native Fish Survey Update Photo: RCRCD icfi.com 10

11 icfi.com 11

12 Santa Ana Sucker Translocation Project icfi.com 12

13 Finalize Covered Activities icfi.com 13

14 Finalize Covered Activities Step 1: Review Covered Activities Information Evaluate and confirm the Covered Activity information you have provided to date. GIS data text describing qualitatively and quantitatively the construction, operations, and maintenance of each covered activity points of diversion or discharge current and proposed future diversion flow rates current and proposed future basin capacities Step 2: Online Meeting with ICF Review Covered Activities information with ICF in online meeting Provide all corrections to text, GIS, and potential hydrologic effects the corrected covered activity document to ICF prior to this online meeting. Step 3: In Person Meeting with Valley District Meet with Valley District in Early December to confirm final Covered Activity information Final covered activity information must be confirmed by each participating water agency during the first week of December. icfi.com 14

15 Finalize Covered Activities icfi.com 15

16 Preliminary Restoration Design Report Describes site characteristics and opportunities and constraints Presents analysis performed to develop preliminary restoration designs and cost estimates for Prop 84 grant icfi.com 16

17 Restoration for HCP and Aquatic Resources Mitigation

18 Evans Lake Drain

19 Evans Lake Drain Create 280 ft of channel to connect with mainstem Install Fish Ladder through the levee Enhance ~3,400 ft of habitat upstream of the levee Woody debris, gravel augmentation, remove non-native vegetation

20 Evans Lake Drain 2 culvert barrels, 80 long with 1% grade 9 to concrete apron from barrels wide concrete apron 7 drop from apron to Riverbed ~ 4% slope needed (feasible for SAS) \

21 Anza Drain / Old Farm Road

22 Anza Drain / Old Farm Road Construct 3,750 ft of new channel Re-contour to direct existing flow into channel Substrate augmentation Removal 516 Palms, 600+ other non-native trees Construct 5,900 ft of new channel at Old Farm Road

23 Anza Drain Downstream

24 Anza Drain - Downstream Enhance existing 3,100 ft of channel Narrow channel and fill deep pools Stabilize eroding banks and revegetate Replace Non-native vegetation with native Reconfigure channel to contain water

25 Hidden Valley Wetlands

26 Hidden Valley Wetlands Construct 3,320 ft of new channel 6.6 acres Native Riparian Habitat Grade floodplain to meet Riverbed Substrate augmentation Riparian habitat management Reestablish water source to wetlands

27 TOTAL HABITAT RESTORATION Location Channel Restoration Feet Old Farm Road New Creation 5,900 Anza Drain New Creation 3,750 Anza Drain Existing Enhancement 3,100 Evans Lake Drain New Creation 280 Evans Lake Drain Existing Enhancement 3,400 Hidden Valley New Creation 3,320 Hole Creek - DS Jurupa Existing Enhancement 2,180 Hole Creek - US Jurupa Existing Enhancement 2,485 Total 24,415 Feet 4.62 Stream Miles 5 Newly Functional Tributaries 79 Acres Native Riparian Habitat

28 Cost Sharing for Restoration, Mitigation Bank, and Mitigation credits icfi.com 30

29 HCP Preparation & Advanced Mitigation $1,944,726 Impact-based split between 10 Partners (Relative Proportion) TOTAL COST SHARE INCLUDES: HCP Preparation USFWS Employee 10% Contingency

30 Est. COST: VALUE to HCP: Conceptual Design Tributaries $384,182 Advanced Mitigation, Conservation Measures HCP Team Mitigation Bank - Full Design Tributaries - Letters of Permission - Bank Development - CEQA & Permits for Construction of Tribs Construction of Tributaries - Anza (Stream focus) - Old Farm Road - Lower Hole Creek - Hidden Valley Wetlands Construction of Tributaries - Evans Lake Drain - Anza Full Revegetation - Upper Hole Creek Water Source for Tributaries - Riverside Recycled Water - Well water Advanced Mitigation, Conservation Measures, Improve Baseline SAS $9,044,656 Advanced Mitigation, Conservation Measures, Improve Baseline SAS $7,115,115 Advanced Mitigation, Conservation Measures, Improve Baseline SAS? Advanced Mitigation, Conservation Measures, Improve Baseline SAS FUNDS ADVANCED BY: SARCUP: (Eastern, Western, IEUA, OCWD, SBVMWD) Valley District $5,022,00 SARCUP $4, 022,00 Prop 84 Local Partner Match & Prop 1 Grant (?) Local Partner Match & Prop 1 grant (?) ULTIMATELY FUNDED BY: Incorporated into Cost/Unit Mitigation Credit. Sold to HCP partners based on project impacts analyzed in HCP SAR HCP Partners based on HCP Planning Total Cost Share Percentage $5 million advance from SARCUP will be incorporated into the Cost/Unit for mitigation. Local Partner Match would be incorporated into Cost/Unit Mitigation Cost of Local Partner match and ongoing cost of supplying water would be incorporated into Cost/Unit Mitigation

31 Est. COST: VALUE TO HCP: FUNDS ADVANCED BY: USGS Native Fish Survey Year 1 $109,000 Understanding Baseline Condition of SAS, Development of Habitat Suitability Model, Testing Monitoring Methods for long term implementation USGS Native Fish Survey Year 2 $148,444 Understanding Baseline Condition of SAS, Testing Habitat Suitability Model Supplemental Water Supply During RIX shutdowns (3 wells) SAR Woolley-star, Drainage A property (adjacent to Riverside rubber dam project) SAS Translocation - Plan Preparation & 3 Sites Fieldwork - Increase capacity to breed RCRCD - Actual Translocation, Monitoring, Management $450,000 Improving Baseline condition of SAS population Could potentially be used to improve substrate conditions following storm season (Conservation Measure in HCP)? Waters of State, US, RAFSS habitat, Woolley-star credits $140,138 $300,000? Conservation Measure in HCP, Establish additional populations in upper watershed, make more fish & habitat, create redundancy in the population Valley District/HCP USFWS Section 6 Planning Grant Valley District/HCP (pending) Valley/HCP Valley/HCP ULTIMATELY FUNDED BY: HCP Planning Contingency Fund ($41,000 contingency and $68,000 covered by extra funds available with addition of Rialto (added to contingency fund) The costs associated with using wells as a Conservation Measure would be incorporated into a Cost per Unit that could be distributed based on partners project based mitigation needs Costs to acquire, restore, manage and monitor would be incorporated into Cost per Unit to be available as credits in HCP Mitigation Bank. All costs of this activity would be incorporated into a Cost per Unit that would be distributed to Partners based on impacts.

33 Next Steps icfi.com 35

34 Next Steps Finalize covered activities Complete New Hydrology Modeling Initiate Effects Analysis Develop Conservation Strategy Biological Goals and Objectives Mitigation strategy based on results of effects analysis

San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant Proposal Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits

Attachment 9 San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits Attachment 9 consists of the following items: Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits.