1 June, 2015 Monthly Journal of Tax Controversy Agostino & Associates Summer Barbecue July 2 Hackensack, NJ RSVP: goo.gl/ewddvp Contents Appeals Judicial Approach and Culture The Return of the Independent Appeals Office 1 Fresh Start Section 6321 and the Subordination of the Federal Tax Lien 7 A&A Firm News 14 Upcoming Free Events International Tax Enforcement Update July 2 RSVP: goo.gl/v5heqm Hackensack, NJ Litigation Before the U.S. Tax Court July 16 RSVP: goo.gl/akfsk5 New York, NY IRS Collections Part I July 21 RSVP: goo.gl/vuu1xr Hackensack, NJ IRS Collections Part II August 4 RSVP: goo.gl/bsovxb Hackensack, NJ APPEALS JUDICIAL APPROACH AND CULTURE THE RETURN OF THE INDE- PENDENT APPEALS OFFICE By Frank Agostino, Esq. Jairo Cano, Esq. * The due process of law clause to the Bill of Rights provides that No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Toward that end, in IRS Policy Statement 4-7 acknowledges: An exaction by the United States Government, which is not based upon law, statutory or otherwise, is a taking of property without due process of law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 1 Due process of law includes a person s right to be adequately notified of proceedings, the opportunity to be heard at these proceedings, and that the person or panel making the final decision over the proceedings is impartial in regards to the matter before them. 2 It is against this background, that in 1927 the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) established the Office of Appeals (Appeals). Appeals mission is to resolve tax controversies without litigation on a basis that is fair and impartial to both the IRS and the taxpayer. Regarding the need for independence, the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 prohibits ex (Continued on page 2)
2 (Continued from page 1) parte communications that compromise Appeals independence from the IRS. 3 And further recognizing the importance of the independence of Appeals, the IRS enacted the 2014 Taxpayer Bill of Rights which guarantees The Right to Appeal an IRS Decision in an Independent Forum. 4 Moreover, in 2012 the IRS introduced a project known as Appeals Judicial Approach and Culture ( AJAC or AJAC Project ). The stated purpose of AJAC is to ensure that the IRS Appeals Office fulfils its role as an independent forum where taxpayers and the IRS can resolve tax disputes. Since its announcement, the IRS has issued interim guidance to implement the AJAC Project. Below, we explain how the AJAC Project has impacted the tax controversy profession. AJAC & Appeals in Cases Developed by the Examination Division Traditionally, the Office of Appeals resolved appeals of changes to taxpayers returns proposed by the IRS Examination Division. Tax disputes are considered by the Appeals Office after the taxpayer: (1) protests the findings of the Revenue Agent Report or (2) requests a redetermination of the tax by filing a petition with the U.S. Tax Court. Tax Court cases are sent to the Appeals Office for consideration when the Appeals did not consider or complete its consideration of the case before the Tax Court petition was filed. Aspirationally, the role of the Appeals Officers under AJAC is like that of a judge or an arbitrator except that, under AJAC, Appeals Officers are not fact finders. Consequently, the guidance implementing AJAC took the position that the Appeals Officer should not, and would not, consider any documents or information supporting the tax return position that was not provided to, and considered by, the Examination Division. After the Examination Division forwards a case to the Appeals Office, AJAC contemplates that Appeals Officers will review the administrative file and attempt to resolve the case with the taxpayer based upon an independent review of the facts, consideration of the merits, and assessment of the hazards of litigation. Stated simply, the role of the Appeals Office is to evaluate the merits of the parties' positions, fairly and impartially. For example, if the parties disagree on the deductibility of a business expense, the taxpayer may propose to settle for payment of 75% of the proposed assessment based on his belief that there is a 1-in-4 chance that the taxpayer may lose if the case proceeds to trial. If the Appeals Officer agrees with the taxpayer s evaluation of the hazards of litigation, the case may settle for the offered amount. To discourage gamesmanship by taxpayers and their representatives, and to discourage the Examination Division from sending undeveloped files to the Appeals Office, the AJAC Appeals Office will return cases to the Examination Division if any of the following conditions is present: (Continued on page 3) 2
3 (Continued from page 2) 1. The taxpayer filed an incomplete protest; 2. The case was a reopened case pursuant to Rev. Proc ; 3. Some action is required before Appeals Office can adequately consider the case; 4. Exam did not secure a consent to extent the statute of limitations; 5. The case involves a penalty abatement request that is not meritorious; 6. There is a failure to comply with significant requirements of the IRM; 7. Technical advice was pending when the case was transferred to Appeals; 8. The discovery of possible fraud, malfeasance or misrepresentation of material facts; 9. The taxpayer submits information to the Appeals Office that was not considered by the Examination Division; or 10. The taxpayer raises a new issue that was not considered by the Examination Division. The remand criteria emphasizes the AJAC Project s goal to ensure that all fact finding is completed before a case is considered by the Appeals Office. When newly discovered information supports a taxpayer s meritorious position, the Appeals Officer must return the case to Examination Division for verification of the data. In other words, AJAC is designed to force Appeals Officers to work cases like judges and arbitrators. The Appeals Office will neither evaluate information that was not given to the Examination Division, nor will they raise new issues that were not developed by the Examination Division. To ensure that the Appeals Office has the time needed to consider a case, AJAC limits an Appeals Officer s ability to accept a case if the statute of limitation is close to expiration. Appeals will not accept a case if there is less than 365 days (270 days for estate tax cases) remaining on the statute of limitations. A taxpayer s failure to consent to a statute extension will result in the mailing of a notice of deficiency. As explained above, however, the Appeals Office will consider a case referred for consideration after the Tax Court petition has been filed. During the implementation of AJAC, some taxpayer representatives and Revenue Agents complained that returning cases to examination for further development was inefficient, bureaucratic, and caused delay. However, in practice, Appeals rigid adherence to AJAC has caused taxpayer (Continued on page 4) 3
4 (Continued from page 3) representatives and Revenue Agents to engage in earlier and more frequent conversations about the information needed to resolve a proposed adjustment as well as the development needed for early referrals to Appeals, and the fast-track alternate dispute resolution options available in the Appeals Office. AJAC & Appeals in Collection Cases Taxpayers can appeal most decisions made in connection with the enforced collection of a tax liability to the Office of Appeals. Collection Division based appeals include, but are not limited to, the appeals of: 1. Notice of Federal Tax Lien Filing; 2. Notice of Levy; 3. Notice of Seizure; 4. Notice of Wage Garnishment; 5. Installment Agreement Rejection; 6. Installment Agreement Termination; 7. Offer in Compromise Rejection; 8. Proposed Trust Fund Recovery Penalty Assessment; and 9. The Calculation of the Tax Due. AJAC has significantly impacted the Appeals Office hearings in Collection Appeal Program ( CAP ) and Collection Due Process cases under Sections 6320 and 6330 of the Code ( CDP ). Specifically, as a result of AJAC; 1. Appeals will not take investigative actions with respect to financial information provided by taxpayers; 2. Financial information needing investigation or verification will be sent to the Collection Division; 3. Appeals will only consider assets that were documented by Collection or introduced by the taxpayer; (Continued on page 5) 4
5 (Continued from page 4) 4. Appeals will accept as verified those financial statements reviewed by Collection within the previous 12 months; 5. Appeals will not make recommendations to file Notices of Federal Tax Lien; 6. All Offers in Compromise (OIC) submitted in Collection Due Process (CDP) or Equivalent Hearings will be reviewed by Collection for a preliminary recommendation or acceptance; and 7. In non-cdp OIC cases, Appeals will only determine the acceptability of the OIC and will not offer other collection alternatives. For CAP cases and non-cdp cases, AJAC means that the Appeals Office will only review the case for the appropriateness of the action, proposed or taken, based on laws, regulations, policy, and procedures (national and local), considering all of the relevant facts and circumstances. Because of this limitation on the scope of review, the Appeals Office review is limited to sustaining Collection or otherwise directing Collection to take the appropriate corrective action, e.g., to release a levy. Stated another way, if a taxpayer files a CAP hearing request with the Appeals Office requesting a levy release, the Appeals Office can neither consider nor propose an installment agreement to resolve the underlying collection issue during the CAP hearing. Instead, the taxpayer must make an independent request for an installment agreement with the Collection Division. The Appeals Office will only consider the installment agreement alternative if and when the Collection Division separately denies the installment agreement request. Unfortunately, in CAP cases, AJAC ignores and rejects the taxpayers request for one-stop shopping a single point of contact they can work with to resolve all issues in their collection issues in a case as well as the taxpayers request that the Appeals Office act as the traffic cop to make sure that all collection alternatives be considered in an independent forum, consistent with a taxpayer s right to appeal an IRS decision in an independent forum, before any non-consensual collection action can be taken. A CDP hearing before the Appeals Office is the taxpayer s opportunity for a meaningful hearing before the IRS issues a levy or immediately after it files a notice of federal tax lien ( NFTL ) with respect to a tax liability. At the CDP hearing, the Appeals Office will consider all non-frivolous issues raised by the taxpayer with respect to the unpaid tax, the lien, or the proposed levy, including the appropriateness of the collection action, collection alternatives, spousal defenses, and under certain circumstances, the underlying tax liability. Unlike CAP proceedings, taxpayers have the right to judicial review of Appeal s Office determination if they timely request the CDP hearing and timely petition the United States Tax Court. As a result of AJAC, Appeals Officers are prohib- (Continued on page 6) 5
6 (Continued from page 5) ited from doing even the most basic fact finding in CDP cases. Instead, Appeals Officer must refer a CDP case back to the Collection Division if the collection file does not contain sufficient information to evaluate the appropriateness of a taxpayer s proposed collection alternative or the taxpayer provides a new information that must be verified to support a proposed collection alternative. Indeed, AJAC requires the Appeals Office to return a case to the Collection Division even when a simple public record search would verify the information reported in a Case Information Statement. Conclusion As explained above, the Mission of the Office of Appeals is to resolve tax controversies without litigation on a basis that is fair and impartial to both the IRS and the taxpayer. Taxpayers and tax controversy professionals understand that the administrative settlement of tax disputes is preferable to the litigation of those disputes and that the availability of an independent cost effective forum for the resolution of tax disputes is an integral component of a voluntary compliance system. To the extent that AJAC is administered in a way that is consistent with Appeals Mission, its objectives advance taxpayer due process protections and are laudable. However, thus far, AJAC appears to have had negative effects, including an increase in the number of cases returned to the compliance function, as well as an increase in the cost to resolve a case. Tax controversy professionals must understand both the changes AJAC has caused and, most importantly, insist that the Appeals Office interpret AJAC in a manner that allows tax controversies to be resolved by Appeals more efficiently, and less expensively, than in Court. * Frank Agostino is a principal and Jairo G. Cano is a Tax Associate at Agostino & Associates, P.C. 1. IRS Policy Statement 4-7, reprinted in IRM (Dec. 23, 1960). 2. Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 257 (1970). 3. Pub. L. No , 1001(a)(4), 112 Stat. 685 (1998). 4. Many of the themes regarding taxpayer rights and the IRS Office of Appeals build upon concepts raised by National Taxpayer Advocate Nina E. Olson in her 2014 Annual Report to Congress, available at 6
7 FRESH START: SECTION 6321 AND THE SUBORDINATION OF THE FEDERAL TAX LIEN By Frank Agostino, Esq. Brian D. Burton, Esq. * Pay what you owe, and you ll know what s your own. -Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard, An Almanac for Planners Internal Revenue Code ( IRC ) section 6321 provides the federal government with an automatic or secret lien 1 on almost everything a tax debtor owns, retroactive to the date of assessment. In order to establish the priority of that security interest in a debtor s real property, the IRS will file a Notice of Federal Tax Lien ( NFTL ). 2 For a financially distressed homeowner, a NFTL may dash any hopes of restructuring or refinancing a mortgage, or securing or consolidating a home loan, in order to reduce the monthly payments and lower the risk of foreclosure. In order to help taxpayers refinance mortgages on property encumbered by a federal tax lien, as well as use that property as collateral to secure a loan, the IRS (sometimes, the Service ) has adopted procedures by which it will subordinate the priority of its lien in favor of a lending institution providing mortgage or loan assistance to the taxpayer. 3 While subordination does not remove the lien, it allows other creditors to move ahead of the IRS, which the Service recognizes may make it easier to get a loan of mortgage. This article explores the request, review, and approval process for federal tax lien subordination under section I. Certificate of Subordination The IRS will grant a Certificate of Subordination in favor of a subsequent creditor under IRC 6325(d)(2) in cases where a taxpayer can show that subordination will ultimately aid in the collection of tax. 4 Although this determination is speculative and subjective, the discretion of the service employee reviewing the application is guided by the concern that subordination may cause the government to receive less revenue. 5 To that end, Service employees are instructed that they must exercise good judgment in weighing the risks and deciding whether to subordinate the federal tax lien and that this judgment is similar to the decision that an ordinarily prudent business person would make in deciding whether to subordinate his/her rights in a debtor s property in order to secure additional long run benefits. 6 Moreover, the Tax Court had held that lien subordination is a permissive form of relief, so that the IRS is not generally required to subordinate a lien even if the conditions are fully met. See, e.g., Green v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo citing 26 CFR (d)(1) (providing that an appropriate official may, in her or his discretion, issue a certificate of subordination of a lien under certain circumstances). (Continued on page 8) 7
8 (Continued from page 7) II. Applying for a Certificate of Subordination Taxpayers may apply for a Certificate of Subordination by submitting Form 14134, Application for Certificate of Subordination of Federal Tax Lien Among the information required is the identity of the lender/finance company that the United States is requested to subordinate its interest to, and the type of transaction (e.g., a loan consolidation of refinance). This information is provided by the applicant in Section Five of Form Section Six requests the amount of the existing or outstanding financing and the amount of the new financing being sought. Section Eight seeks information about the property, including a description and a copy of the title or deed. Section Nine requests appraisal and valuation information, including an appraisal completed by an independent third party (or the County). IRM, pt ( ) provides that [u]nless there is evidence the process might not involve an arm's length transaction, the appraisals submitted will normally be accepted and a separate investigation to determine the value of the property is not needed. Moreover, IRM, pt ( ) allows the Advisory Group Manager reviewing an application to waive the appraisal requirement if other acceptable evidence of the value of the property is submitted. Section Twelve requires a current title report so that the Service can review the seniority of other encumbrances against the property. Section 13 requests a copy of the proposed closing statement (HUD-1) or an itemized list of all proposed costs, commissions, and expenses to refinance the property. Section 14 allows the taxpayer to include additional documents in support of the subordination application, such as affidavits, payoff letters, and court documents. Section 15 requires that any person requesting a certificate of subordination must attest to the belief that the application is true, correct, and complete, under penalties of perjury. The most important section on the Form is Section Seven, which concerns that taxpayer s basis for the subordination request. For purposes of this article, section 6325(d)(2) permits the subordination of a federal tax lien when it is determined that the interest of the United States in any part of the property covered by the NFTL will ultimately be increased by the subordination and ultimate collection of the outstanding liability will thereby be facilitated. 10 Section Seven requires an applicant to complete and attach a signed and dated statement describing how: (1) the subordination will ultimately result in an increase in the amount realizable by the U.S. in the property (or any other property owned by the taxpayer); or (2) the ultimate collection of the tax liability will be facilitated by the subordination. The instructions for Form provide an example where a taxpayer finances to a lower interest rate which would allow for a larger monthly payment. 11 However, IRM, pt ( ) also notes other examples, including where a taxpayer refinances a mortgage that is senior in priority to the NFTL in order to allow the taxpayer to (Continued on page 9) 8
9 (Continued from page 8) retain the equity in his property that will ultimately enhance his ability to make payments on the tax liability. Moreover, IRM, pt ( ) includes the general observation that [a]voiding foreclosure helps maintain the value of the property the lien attaches to and reduced mortgage payments assist taxpayers to ultimately pay their tax liabilities. Therefore, taxpayers should not feel limited when explaining how tax collection will be facilitated by the subordination. A completed Form with accompanying documentation is submitted to the Field Revenue Officer assigned the taxpayer's case, if applicable, or directly to the Advisory Group Manager for the state where the property is located. 12 Taxpayers are encouraged to submit their applications at least 45 days before the transaction date that the Certificate of Subordination is required for, in order to allow sufficient time for review, determination, notification and the furnishing of any applicable documents by the transaction date. 13 II. Criteria for Reviewing Section 6325(d)(2) Subordination Requests As noted earlier, the Service is not required to subordinate a federal tax lien, but may do so when it is in the best interest of the government. 14 Of course, the determination of whether subordination is in the best interests of the government is subjective and speculative. That is why service employees are instructed that they must exercise good judgment in weighing the risks and deciding whether to subordinate the federal tax lien and that this judgment is similar to the decision that an ordinarily prudent business person would make in deciding whether to subordinate his/her rights in a debtor s property in order to secure additional long run benefits. 15 Upon receipt of an application for subordination, Advisory (or the Field Revenue Officer) will evaluate the priority of all liens and judgments to determine the interests of the Government in the property. 16 Then, a full compliance check is conducted regarding the taxpayer s account, including the taxpayer s proposal for resolving any outstanding liabilities. Regarding an applicant s compliance history, IRM, pt ( ) provides that [t]here is no prohibition on processing subordination requests if taxpayers are not in compliance with filing and paying requirements; however, non-compliance issues would be a factor in considering the best interest of the government. Field Revenue Officers who receive subordination requests regarding cases they are assigned are encouraged to bring Advisory into the investigation early, as the approval of subordinations is delegated to Advisory and Insolvency Group Managers. 17 The reviewing service employee then examines each application for completeness. If it is determined that the application is incomplete or improper, the applicant should be contacted no later than 21 calendar days from receipt of the package. 18 Regarding completeness, IRM, pt ( ) Provides that applications should not be rejected for incompleteness (Continued on page 10) 9
10 (Continued from page 9) unless the missing information will not allow for a thorough investigation. To the contrary, every effort should be made to accept the application for processing, provided the information submitted would enable a proper investigation to be conducted. 19 Regarding application review, IRM, pt ( ) provides that Advisory will use all available resources to determine whether to issue a certificate of discharge or subordination which may include verifying the information submitted in the application by contacting the: (1) service employee assigned the delinquent account; (2) taxpayer or applicant; (3) taxpayer or applicant's representative; (4) real estate firms, title companies; (5) holders of encumbrances; or (6) any other person or entity that might have relevant information. Some applications may require a field investigation be conducted by a Revenue Officer. The revenue officer will: (1) investigate and verify each item contained in the application, or which should have been contained in the application; and (2) complete Form 3033, Investigation of Discharge or Subordination, on each investigation completed. The Revenue Officer will carefully examine the application to make certain that the property is adequately and properly described, and submit a report, together with the copy of the application and all exhibits, to the Advisory Group Manager, for review and approval. 20 The service s short deadlines for review reflect the urgency involved with these subordination requests. IRM, pt ( ) provides that, in the case of an application relating to a foreclosure proceeding in which a sale is pending, the application will be flagged to indicate that revenue officer's report must be returned to Advisory within 7 calendar days, so that a complete investigation, including initial review and any necessary contact, shall result in Advisory s recommendation for acceptance/denial within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt in the group of the application. In all other cases, unless more expeditious action is necessary, a recommendation should be made within 30 calendar days. Once a completed Form 3033 is received, Advisory has ten (10) calendar days to make the recommendation to accept or deny the application for a certificate. 21 If an application requires additional information, the taxpayer is ordinarily afforded 30-days to comply. 22 If the additional information is not received by the established deadline, the application and case may be closed for insufficient information. 23 However, if the taxpayer provides the requested additional information subsequent to the closing of the application, the IRM instructs the Service employee to open a new control for the case and resume processing the application. 24 (Continued on page 11) 10
11 (Continued from page 10) III. Issuance and Denial of Subordination Commitment Letters Once the taxpayer s completed application has been fully reviewed, Advisory will determine if the discharge or subordination proposed by the applicant is appropriate. If the application is acceptable, the taxpayer will receive Letter 4053, Conditional Commitment to Subordinate Federal Tax Lien. 25 This tentative agreement is conditioned on the provision of additional information by the taxpayer, which may include, for example, a copy of the new mortgage being secured. 26 If the applicant requests an extension of the submission deadline, the basis for the request will be considered and the deadline extended, if appropriate, for a period generally not to exceed an additional 30-days. 27 If the required documentation is submitted by the applicant prior to the deadline, the Advisory or Insolvency Manager will approve that an executed Form 669(D), Certificate of Subordination of Property from Federal Tax Lien, be issued to the taxpayer. 28 IRM, pt ( ) provides that the taxpayer should be advised of his or her responsibility to file the document with the appropriate recording office. Advisory and Insolvency Managers have the authority to issue a denial letter, Letter 4027, Letter Advising of Action on Application for Subordination of Federal Tax Lien, when a proposed request is not acceptable or discrepancies in the amount of the government's interest cannot be resolved. Regarding denial, IRM, pt ( ) provides that after a complete application has been received and agreement cannot be reached on the amount of the government's interest and/or other terms of the discharge or subordination, the application must be denied. However, in working towards case resolution, Service employees are instructed to use problem solving and negotiation techniques and consider the taxpayer's, POA's, or third party's perspective. 29 IV. Appealing the Denial of a Subordination Request - Form 9423 A taxpayer whose lien subordination request is denied will receive a copy of Publication 1660, Collection Appeal Rights, with his or her determination letter. 30 The first step in appealing the denial of the lien subordination request is to request a conference with the employee's manager. If the taxpayer does not resolve his or her disagreement with the Collection manager, the taxpayer must submit Form 9423 in order to request consideration by Appeals. Moreover, taxpayers are required to let the Collection office know within two business days after the conference of the intent to submit Form 9423, and the Form 9423 must be postmarked within three (3) business days of the conference or collection action may resume. 31 The taxpayer will indicate that the collection action being appealed is the denial of a request to issue a lien subordination certificate, explain his or her disagreement with the determination that subordination is not in the government s best interests, and offer a solution to the tax problem. 32 If a taxpayer requests a conference and is not (Continued on page 12) 11
12 (Continued from page 11) contacted by a manager 33 or his/her designee within two (2) business days of making the request, the taxpayer may either contact Collection again or submit Form 9423, noting the date of the conference request in Block 15 and indicating that he or she was not contacted by a manager. Form 9423 is to be submitted to the Collection office involved in the lien action. 34 In a case of noncontact, the Form 9423 must be postmarked within four business days of the conference request in order to prevent collection action from resuming. 35 In any case, IRM, pt ( ) provides that taxpayers will still be entitled to a CAP appeal if their Form 9423 (or other written request) is received up to ten business days after the required or requested managerial conference. In those situations where the denial is creating an economic harm, taxpayers are encouraged to contact the Taxpayer Advocate Service. 36 However, taxpayers must act quickly, as the decision of Appeals is binding and cannot be appealed to the Tax Court for de novo review. V. Conclusion While admirable and significant, the Service s willingness to subordinate a federal tax lien pursuant to section 6325(d)(2) is not entirely altruistic, as it requires that the taxpayer demonstrate that subordination is in the best interests of the government because it will either increase the amount realizable by the United States in the property or otherwise facilitate the ultimate collection of tax liability. However, the Service has adopted the position that it does not want to be a barrier to people refinancing and saving their homes. Therefore, a taxpayer seeking to refinance a mortgage on a property encumbered by a federal tax lien is well advised to fully consider and convey the ways by which subordination will enable the applicant to improve his or her financial situation, thereby increasing the likelihood that the government will collect the tax due. * Frank Agostino is a principal and Brian D. Burton is a Tax Associate at Agostino & Associates, P.C. 1. Tax Lien Act of 1966 Pub. L (a), Nov. 2, In fact, the Act s only carve-out protects Native Americans interests in certain federally restricted lands. See also IRM, pt (Mar. 27, 2012). 2. Section 6323(a) establishes the general rule that [i]f a purchaser, holder of a security interest, mechanic's lienor, or judgment lien creditor with a claim to the taxpayer's property perfects its claim prior to the filing of a NFTL, then that claim is entitled to priority over the tax lien. 3. Understanding a Federal Tax Lien, available at Employed/Understanding-a-Federal-Tax-Lien. 4. See also, IRM, pt (Dec. 12, 2014). 5. Id. 6. Id. 7. Available at 8. See Pub.784, How to Apply for a Certificate of Subordination of Federal Tax Lien, available at pub/irs-pdf/p784.pdf. 9. See IRS video Selling or Refinancing When There Is an IRS Lien, available at IRSLiens. (Continued on page 13) 12
13 (Continued from page 12) 10. IRM, pt (Oct. 14, 2013). 11. Pub.784, How to Apply for a Certificate of Subordination of Federal Tax Lien, available at irs-pdf/p784.pdf. 12. IRM, pt (Oct 14, 2013). See Pub for a list of Collection Advisory Group addresses, available at 13. Pub.784, How to Apply for a Certificate of Subordination of Federal Tax Lien, available at irs-pdf/p784.pdf. 14. IRM, pt (Oct 14, 2013). 15. Id. 16. IRM, pt (Oct. 14, 2013). 17. IRM, pt (May 09, 2013), Delegation Order 5-4 (Rev. 3). 18. IRM, pt (Oct. 14, 2013). 19. Id. 20. IRM, pt (Oct. 14, 2013). 21. IRM, pt (Oct. 14, 2013). 22. IRM, pt (Oct. 14, 2013). 23. Id. 24. Id. 25. IRM, pt (Oct. 14, 2013). 26. IRM, pt (Oct. 14, 2013). 27. Id. 28. IRM, pt (Oct. 14, 2013). 29. IRM, pt (Oct. 14, 2013). 30. IRS Pub. 1660, available at 31. Available at 32. Id. 33. IRS Pub 1660, available at 34. Id. 35. Id. 36. TAS is available to help taxpayers whose problems with the IRS are causing financial difficulties, by phone toll-free at (807) See 13
14 AGOSTINO & ASSOCIATES IS HIRING! Agostino & Associates is looking for a recent graduate with a demonstrated interest in tax and tax controversy. The candidate would work on offshore voluntary disclosures, assist with the preparation of documents for tax controversies before the IRS examination and collection divisions as well as the IRS office of appeals. The candidate would also assist with A&A events, including the A&A USTCP seminar series. A knowledge of QuickBooks, tax preparation software, Excel and Microsoft Publisher is preferred. The applicant is expected to pass the EA exam within one year of hiring. Applicants should send their resume and a writing sample to Caren Zahn at TAXPAYERS ASSISTANCE CORP. Agostino & Associates (A&A) is proud to announce that Desa Lazar, Esq. And Mary Sunderland, EA, USTP, have joined the Taxpayers Assistance Corporation, the public service division of A&A. Ms. Lazar and Ms. Sunderland will be coordinating the pro bono representation of indigent taxpayers as well as our outreach to the New Jersey based Low Income Taxpayer Clinics. The TAC can be contacted at (201) Ms. Lazar can be contacted at Ms. Sunderland can be contacted at AGOSTINO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONTACT INFORMATION Frank Agostino, Esq. Ext. 107 Lawrence Brody. Esq. Ext. 132 Brian Burton. Esq. Ext. 105 Jairo Cano, Esq. Ext. 144 Jeffrey Dirmann, Esq. Ext. 119 Christopher Grau, EA Ext. 143 Eugene Kirman, Esq. Ext. 142 Jeremy Klausner, Esq. Ext. 130 Dolores Knuckles, Esq. Ext. 109 Tara Krieger, Esq. Ext. 118 Lawrence Sannicandro, Esq. Ext. 128 Erica Son, Esq. Ext. 131 Matthew Turtoro, Esq. Ext. 112 Caren Zahn, EA Ext
15 WHEN: Thursday, July 2, :30 AM 12:00 PM 8:30 AM Registration 9:00 AM Program will begin Frank Agostino, Esq. Agostino & Associates, P.C. Catherine Engell, Esq. DLA Piper Barbara Kaplan, Esq. GreenbergTraurig INTERNATIONAL TAX ENFORCEMENT UPDATE FREE NY & NJ CLE *, CPE, AND EA CE Credits (3) WHERE: THIS YEAR S PANELISTS INCLUDE: Bergen Community College Paramus Campus, Technology Education Building 400 County Rd 62, Paramus, NJ Charles Rettig, Esq. Hochman, Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez, P.C. Richard Sapinski, Esq. Sills Cummis & Gross P.C. Bryan Skarlatos, Esq. Kostelanetz & Fink, LLP RSVP for International Tax Enforcement Update at goo.gl/v5heqm or Please join us for lunch after the seminar at the AGOSTINO & ASSOCIATES SUMMER BBQ RSVP for the A&A BBQ at goo.gl/ewddvp or There is no charge to attend the seminar. Attendees are encouraged to volunteer to represent a pro bono taxpayer in connection with a New Jersey LITC, NYCLA's U.S. Tax Court Calendar Call Pro Bono Program or an ABA affiliated Tax Court Calendar Call Program. * This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 3.0 hours of total CLE credit. Of these, 0 qualify as hours of credit for ethics/professionalism, and 0 qualify as hours of credit toward certification in civil trial law, criminal trial law, workers compensation law and/or matrimonial law. This course or program has been approved in accordance with the requirements of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board for a maximum of 3.0 credit hours. Based upon our interpretation of the regulations by the New York and New Jersey State Boards of Accountancy, this event will qualify for CPE credit. Our New Jersey CPE Sponsorship number is 20CE Our New York CPE Sponsorship number is Our Office of Professional Responsibility Sponsor Number is QVGWD
16 WHERE: LITIGATION BEFORE THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT PART I THREE (3) FREE NY & NJ CLE *, CPE, and EA CE CREDITS Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 4 Times Square 37 th Floor New York, NY WHEN: Thursday, July 16, :00 AM to 11:00 AM PANELISTS: Frank Agostino, Esq., Agostino & Associates, P.C. Roland Barral, Esq., Skadden Stuart Finkelstein, Esq., Skadden Sandy Freund, Esq., Rutgers School of Law, Newark Armando Gomez, Esq., Skadden Brian Krause, Esq., Skadden Lyle Press, Esq., IRS, Associate Area Counsel Daniel Rosen, Esq. Baker & McKenzie PART I TOPICS: Understanding Notices of Deficiency & Notices of Determination Pleadings in the Tax Court Formal and Informal Discovery Motion Practice Negotiating a Stipulation of Facts goo.gl/akfsk5 * This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 3 hours of total CLE credit. Of these, 0 qualify as hours of credit for ethics/professionalism, and 0 qualify as hours of credit toward certification in civil trial law, criminal trial law, workers compensation law and/or matrimonial law. This course or program has been approved in accordance with the requirements of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board for a maximum of 3 credit hours. Based upon our interpretation of the regulations by the New York and New Jersey State Boards of Accountancy, this event will qualify for CPE credit. Our New Jersey CPE Sponsorship number is 20CE Our New York CPE Sponsorship number is Our Office of Professional Responsibility Sponsor Number is QVGWD.
The Nuts and Bolts of Handling a Pro Bono Tax Controversy Case Presented by The ABA Section of Taxation Panelists Caroline Ciraolo - Rosenberg, Martin, Greenberg, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland Catherine Engell
IRS Administrative Appeals Process Procedures Charles P. Rettig Avoiding litigation is often the best choice for a client. The Administrative Appeals process can make it happen. Charles P. Rettig, a partner
TAXPAYER RIGHTS ACT OF 2015: SECTION-BY-SECTION SUMMARY TAXPAYER RIGHTS Section 101. Statement of Taxpayer Rights. Section 101 requires the Secretary of the Treasury to publish a Taxpayer Bill of Rights
AGOSTINO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. IRS Collections Presented by : Frank Agostino DISCLAIMER: The following materials and accompanying Access MCLE, LLC audio program are for instructional purposes only. Nothing
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 301 REG-152166-05 Taxpayer Assistance Orders RIN 1545-BF33 AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Withdrawal of notice
1. The Right to Be Informed Taxpayers have the right to know what they need to do to comply with the tax laws. They are entitled to clear explanations of the laws and IRS procedures in all tax forms, instructions,
Part III Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous 26 CFR 601.203: Offers in Compromise (Also Part I, 7122; 301.7122-1) Rev. Proc 2003-71 SECTION 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this revenue procedure is
Practice By Charles P. Rettig A Fresh Start for Struggling Taxpayers Charles P. Rettig is a Principal with Hochman, Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez, P.C. in Beverly Hills, California. Mr. Rettig is Chair
T.C. Memo. 2014-96 UNITED STATES TAX COURT DANIEL RICHARD KURKA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 9365-12L. Filed May 21, 2014. Daniel Richard Kurka, pro se. Melanie
Consensus of Judges on Multnomah County Court Foreclosure Panel The judges who serve on the Multnomah County Court s Foreclosure Panel have been presented with the following recurring issues, which over
Part III Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Claims Submitted to the IRS Whistleblower Office under Section 7623 Notice 2008-4 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This Notice provides guidance to the public on
The IRS Collection Process Publication 594 Page 1 The IRS Collection Process Publication 594 This publication provides a general description of the IRS collection process. The collection process is a series
RULE 2084-1. SCOPE CHAPTER 13 RULES Local Rules 2084-1 through 2084-26 govern chapter 13 practice in cases filed after October 16, 2005. RULE 2084-2. FILING REQUIREMENTS (a) Application to Pay Fee in Installments.
Executive Summary Section 7623(b), providing for whistleblower awards, was enacted as part of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 (the Act). For information provided to the Internal Revenue Service
Federal Tax Issues in Bankruptcy A View From Your Friends at the IRS and DOJ Richard Charles Grosenick Office of Chief Counsel IRS Special Assistant United States Attorney 211 W. Wisconsin Ave. Suite 807
THE IRS APPEALS PROCESS: A PRIMER IN RESOLVING FEDERAL TAX DISPUTES WITHOUT LITIGATION B and Lee Meyercord 1 When faced with a Revenue Agent s Report ( RAR ), a taxpayer may file a protest within 30 days
T.C. Memo. 2015-216 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20785-13L. Filed November 4, 2015. William B. McCarthy,
Dealing with the IRS Collection Division Presented by Eric L. Green, Esq. Green & Sklarz LLC www.gs lawfirm.com Eric L. Green Eric is a partner with Green & Sklarz, LLC in Connecticut. The focus is civil
THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NOTICE OF RULEMAKING Pursuant to the power vested in me as Commissioner of Finance by sections 389(b) and 1043 and 1504 of the New York New York City Charter,
Wis. Stat. 128.21 Wisconsin s Affordable Alternative to Bankruptcy Mont L. Martin Chapter 128 Trustee 933 N. Mayfair Rd., Ste. 107 Milwaukee, WI 53226 P: 414-258-5787 F: 414-258-6510 www.wi128trustee.com
CDP Balancing Test: Advocating for your client before the IRS Office of Appeals in (edited transcript) Thank you, everybody, for coming to our presentation today. We are from the Taxpayer Advocate Service.
SAN FRANCISCO AMENDS BUSINESS TAX ORDINANCE BOARD OF REVIEW ELIMINATED, STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR REFUNDS INCREASED AND MUCH MORE Tax On February 19, 2004, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom approved recent
Florida Foreclosure/Real Estate Law E-Book A Simple Guide to Florida Foreclosure/Real Estate Law by: Florida Law Advisers, P.A. 1 Call: 800-990-7763 Web: www.floridalegaladvice.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...
Part IV- Items of General Interest The Announcement provides an overview of the IRS s use of private collection agencies (PCAs) in 2006 ANNOUNCEMENT 2006-63 Section 881 of the American Jobs Creation Act,
UNDERSTANDING THE COLLECTION PROCESS FOR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS 1. PRE-LITIGATION BY: MULCAHY LAW FIRM, P.C. Almost every community association has problems in collecting unpaid assessments. Most associations
Interim and Year-End Report General Information OMB Number -6 Name of clinic University of Washington School oflaw Federal Tax Clinic Reporting Period D Interim Report - January through June!RI Year-End
1. NOTIFICATION OF USE OF DSI DISPUTE SOLUTIONS, INC. ARBITRATION RULES Any company intending to incorporate these rules or to refer to the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) services of Dispute Solutions,
Contents About This Book How To Use This Book Foreword Acknowledgments About the Author vii ix xi xiii xv Chapter 1 Initial Client Engagement 5 Topical Index 1 1.01 Nature of Federal Tax Law 5 1.02 Role
T.C. Memo. 2015-26 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RICHARD E. SNYDER AND MARION B. SNYDER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent RICHARD E. SNYDER AND MARION SNYDER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER
Small Business Seminar Offer in Compromise Felicia Branch August 15, 2015 Collection Power of the IRS What can they do? For how long? What alternatives does the taxpayer have? Can the taxpayer appeal a
Notice to Delinquent Taxpayers Department of the Treasury Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau TTB P 5610.1 (1/04) Previous Editions are Obsolete NOTICE TO DELINQUENT TAXPAYERS INTRODUCTION When you
T.C. Memo. 2007-35 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ARTHUR W. & RITA C. MILLER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 24308-05L. Filed February 8, 2007. Arthur W. and Rita C. Miller,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
WRITTEN TESTIMONY OF BRYAN C. SKARLATOS, ESQ. The Internal Revenue Service (the Service ) is a Super Creditor because Congress has given it powers to collect money and property that far exceed those of
INSTRUCTIONS HAFA Short Sale Agreement Defines the terms and conditions of a short sale, including the following: listing agreement, maximum real estate commissions and marketing terms; servicer and borrower
REG-100841-97. Agreements for Payment of Tax Liabilities in Installments AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of proposed rulemaking.
I. Collection Begins with Assessment Understanding IRS Collection Procedures Unit One- Assessment Learning Objectives After completing this Unit you should have an understanding of: A. Overview What an
T.C. Memo. 2009-266 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JOEL I. BEELER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20892-07L. Filed November 24, 2009. Richard S. Kestenbaum and Bernard S.
CDP CHECKLIST FOR TAX COURT Petitioner(s): Docket No.: I. JURISDICTION A. Notice of Determination Was a notice of determination issued in case? Yes (Continue.) No (File motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction,
IRS Service Team Don't go it alone* The IRS collection process Introduction Taxpayers periodically request assistance with IRS collection matters. IRS collection contacts can appear intimidating, and taxpayers
CA An Overview» California Taxpayers Bill of Rights Inside 01 02 Taxpayers Bill of Rights legislation enacted 1988 Taxpayers Bill of Rights legislation enacted 1997 03 California Taxpayers Bill of Rights
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
Article 3. Family Law Arbitration Act. 50-41. Purpose; short title. (a) It is the policy of this State to allow, by agreement of all parties, the arbitration of all issues arising from a marital separation
Income Tax Valuation Insights Income Tax Discharge Considerations in an Individual Debtor s Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Robert F. Reilly, CPA, and Ashley L. Reilly Many professional practitioners and small business
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Revenue Officers Took Appropriate Levy Actions but Face Challenges and Delays Bringing Taxpayers Into Compliance November 21, 2011 Reference Number: 2012-30-007
OVERVIEW OF PRESENT LAW RELATING TO THE INNOCENT SPOUSE, OFFERS-IN-COMPROMISE, INSTALLMENT AGREEMENT, AND TAXPAYER ADVOCATE PROVISIONS OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE Scheduled for a Public Hearing Before
State of Maryland: Frequently Asked Questions Presented and Submitted by Jeffrey Van Grack January 1, 2011 State FAQs GENERAL 1. What general state statutes apply to Common Interest Communities in your
RULE Office of the Governor Real Estate Appraisers Board Appraisal Management Companies (LAC 46:LXVII.Chapters 301-309) Under the authority of the newly enacted Appraisal Management Company Licensing and
Statement of Colleen M. Kelley National President National Treasury Employees Union On H.R. 4735 Presented to House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Postal
MOW 2016-1.4 (5/22/07) IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI IN RE: ) ) ) Case No. ) ) Debtors. ) RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS AND
T.C. Memo. 2014-234 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RONALD L. KIRKPATRICK, SR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 6525-13L. Filed November 17, 2014. Donald W. Pemberton, for
FEDERAL TAX LIENS FOR REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS: THE INSIDE SCOOP ON WHAT THEY ARE AND HOW YOU (AND YOUR CLIENTS) CAN DEAL WITH THEM ERIC L. GREEN, ESQ. Copyright 2011 About the Author The focus of Attorney
When clients need protection from creditors, tax debts can be resolved as well. by Donald L. Ariail, CPA/CFP Michael M. Smith, Esq., CPA Neil Deininger, Esq., CPA and Reba M. Wingfield, Esq. Discharging
SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES SECTION 1 - POLICY It is the policy of the Sixth Judicial District ( district ) to encourage out-of-court
Procedures for Opt Out and Removal of Taxpayers from IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Program Guidance for Opt Out and Removal of Taxpayers from the Civil Settlement Structure of the 2009 Offshore Voluntary
TITLE 316 NEBRASKA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, CHAPTER 36 NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RULES FOR THE COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT TAXES Table of Contents REG-36-001 SCOPE, DUTIES, AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES... 3 (Neb.
Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act Consequences of the expiration of the act Cancellation of Debt (COD) Income When a loan is forgiven without being paid back, COD Income is created. That amount is included
JURISDICTION: DECISION CITE: 2009-03-24-02 / NON-PRECEDENTIAL ID: P-08-055-H DATE: MARCH 24, 2009 DISPOSITION: DENIED TAX TYPE: IRS LEVY APPEAL: ON APPEAL / OK S.CT. 107,003 AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND
Internal Revenue Service Estate & Gift General Program & Return Information For External Audiences WHERE DO YOU FILE? File all estate & gift tax returns at the Cincinnati Campus: (Forms 706, 709, 706NA,
CACalifornia Taxpayers Bill of Rights Inside 01 Taxpayers Bill of Rights legislation enacted 1988 02 Taxpayers Bill of Rights legislation enacted 1997 Information for Taxpayers» 03 California Taxpayers
Tax Compliance, Economic Hardship and the IRS Levy: The Recent Tax Court Decision in Vinatieri v. Commissioner Changes the Impact of Tax Compliance on Hardship Cases Eric L. Green, Esq. The IRS Restructuring
Appendix to CGI s A proven path to improving government debt collection issue paper SAMPLE COLLECTION STATUTES This appendix contains the following sample collection statutes: Kentucky Financial Institution
T.C. Memo. 2014-106 UNITED STATES TAX COURT WHISTLEBLOWER 10949-13W, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 10949-13W. Filed June 4, 2014. Sealed, for petitioner. Sealed,
I. What causes someone to file for bankruptcy? Bad investments, too great an assumption of risk, circumstances beyond their control. II. The options A. Individuals Chapter 7, Chapter 11, i Chapter 13 B.
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION Division of Finance and Procurement ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE COLLECTIONS 1 CCR 101-6 [Editor s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.]
Fiscal Year 2013 Report to the Congress on the Use of Section 7623 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary... 1 II. Program History... 2 A. Prior Law and Policy... 2 B. 2006 Amendments... 3 III. Program
T.C. Memo. 2015-178 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GARY WAYNE RODRIGUES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 27277-11L. Filed September 10, 2015. Gary Wayne Rodrigues, pro se.
Moving Your Practice in the Right Direction TM Liens, Levies and IRS Collections Process: What You Need to Know A Practice Essentials Presentation 2010 OnePath Practice Management Advisors, LLC. All Rights
Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) Training for Servicers Agenda HAFA Eligibility Criteria HAFA Policy HAFA Documentation Protections Against Unnecessary Foreclosure Resources What Is HAFA?
NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY COLLECTING A MONEY JUDGMENT Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Collecting a Money Judgment page 1 If money is owed you because you have been awarded a judgment
IRS PROCEDURAL ISSUES I. Introduction A. In general, IRS procedural issues involving organizations that are, are seeking to become, or claim to be exempt from Federal income tax are the same as those for
CitiMortgage Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternative (HAFA) Matrix All servicers that have signed agreements with the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) to participate in the Home Affordable Modification
Formation of a Tax Exempt Entity Cash in Hard Times Vol.28 No.2 March April 2010 A Closer Look Disqualified Employment President s Farewell Message Sec. 105 Medical Reimbursement Plans Disclosing Reportable
THE COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION The Legal Plan was established to provide personal legal services for eligible Company employees, their spouses and dependent children.
Special Report: IRS Tax Lien TAX PLANNING AND IRS DEFENSE C a l l T o d a y! 540-438- 5344 What an IRS Tax Lien is and How it Works What is Inside? Why the IRS Files a Notice of Federal Tax Lien IRS Tax
Sure and Secure IRS Resolution Services Enrolled Agent - Representation What is an Enrolled Agent? An Enrolled Agent (EA) is a federally-authorized tax practitioner who has technical expertise in the field
Chapter 213. Enforcement of Texas Unemployment Compensation Act... 2 Subchapter A. General Enforcement Provisions... 2 Sec. 213.001. Representation in Court... 2 Sec. 213.002. Prosecution of Criminal Actions...
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES 1. Description. The Superior Court of California, County of Orange (Court), offers a voluntary civil mediation program for
IRS Collection: Update and Overlooked Strategies ABA Tax Section May Meeting, 2008 Washington, DC Eric L. Green Gregory Wilson Convicer & Percy, LLP 425 Market Street 41 Hebron Avenue 26 th Floor Glastonbury,
Case 1:04-cv-00446-MHW Document 19 Filed 02/03/06 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO LETHA RUPERT, Case No. CV 04-446-S-MHW Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
Article 14. Dissolution. Part 1. Voluntary Dissolution. 55-14-01. Dissolution by incorporators or directors. (a) The board of directors or, if the corporation has no directors, a majority of the incorporators
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.