1 WATER QUALITY MODELING TO SUPPORT THE ROUGE RIVER RESTORATION Edward H. Kluitenberg, P.E., Applied Science, Inc. Gary W. Mercer, P.E., Camp, Dresser and McKee Vyto Kaunelis, Wayne County Department of Environment Abstract The Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Program (Rouge Project) has taken on the challenge of implementing river restoration efforts in a highly urbanized watershed. The 467 square mile Rouge River Watershed is located in southeastern Michigan, and encompasses 48 communities, including the City of Detroit. A significant number of storm water and combined sewer overflow (CSO) controls are being implemented within a watershed planning framework to address multiple Rouge River pollution reduction objectives. A suite of hydrologic, sewer system and riverine water quality models have been used to address technical questions that have been asked in Rouge River Watershed planning. This paper presents application of four of the models used by the Rouge Project: TRTSTORM, Watershed Management Model (WMM), Storm Water Management Model (SWMM), and a Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP). The TRTSTORM model was developed and used to predict annual overflow statistics for various CSO control facilities. A simple pollutant loadings model, the WMM is being used by subwatershed groups to evaluate and communicate the relative impacts of various storm water controls. SWMM is aiding the development of subwatershed management plans by predicting relative changes in wet weather river response for alternative controls. Finally, the WASP event model has replicated the highly transient dissolved oxygen drops caused by CSO discharges, and is being used to predict dissolved oxygen (DO) benefits for various levels of CSO control. The Rouge Project models have been and continue to be an important decision-making aid for the project. In addition, the modeling approach used by the Rouge Project as well as several specific modeling tools are transferrable to other urban watershed management projects. Introduction The Rouge Project is using a suite of modeling tools to support river restoration efforts in the highly urbanized Rouge River Watershed. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) sponsored Rouge Project, which began in 1992, is demonstrating effective solutions to wet weather water quality problems in urban areas. Under the leadership of the Wayne County Department of Environment, CSO controls and stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are being implemented within a watershed approach which stresses an inclusive process of all stakeholders.
2 This paper presents an overview of how water quality models are being used to answer technical questions which arise in the Rouge Watershed planning process. Application of four specific models is discussed including each model s role and sample results which illustrate how the model could be applied in other watersheds. Several lessons learned in the Rouge Project modeling effort are also presented. The Rouge Watershed The Rouge Watershed encompasses 467 square miles in Michigan s greater Detroit metropolitan area and is home to 1.5 million residents. The Rouge River has been identified as one of the most polluted rivers in the Great Lakes basin. The Lower, Middle, Upper and Main Rouge River branches total 127 miles in length, and comprise one of the states most publicly accessible rivers. Multiple pollution sources have led to the gradual degradation of water quality and habitat in portions of the Rouge River and resulted in use impairments. The primary pollutants include CSOs, nonpoint stormwater runoff, illicit connections, failing septic tanks, stream bank erosion and increased flow variability. The combined effect of these pollutants has led to depressed DO levels, whole body contact prohibitions, damaged aquatic habitat, fish consumption advisories and poor aesthetics. One-third of the CSOs in the watershed are being controlled by 11 demonstration CSO basins, several of which became operational in Performance of the demonstration facilities will be used to determine the most appropriate level of control for the remaining CSOs. The watershed has been divided into 11 subwatersheds where advisory groups are forming to address all other pollution sources in a holistic fashion. Numerous stormwater BMPs, recreation and habitat projects have already begun and more are planned. Modeling Approach The modeling effort consists of a three-tiered modeling approach. Tier 1 consists of several small area models used to simulate flows, pollutant loads and concentrations from specific pilot projects or localized areas of study such as wetlands, swales, wet detention ponds and individual CSO basins. Tier 2 consists of a simple pollutant loading model and a detailed sewer system model which both simulate pollutant generation by subarea for the entire watershed. The Tier 3 models are the river models which simulate instream flows and concentrations in the four main river branches based on the inputs from the Tier 2 detailed sewer system models. Following are four examples of how these models are being applied. CSO Facility Performance While the 11 demonstration CSO facilities were in the design stages, the TRTSTORM model was developed to provide some early predictions as to how these basins would perform (Kluitenberg, et. al, 1994). The model was used to address the following questions:
3 How will the proposed CSO facilities, which were designed to several different sizing criteria, perform relative to presumptive criteria in the USEPA CSO Policy (USEPA, 1994)? What annual pollutant load reductions are to be expected from the proposed facilities? The TRTSTORM model is a simple hydrologic mass balance model which tracks CSO facility filling, treatment, overflow, dewatering and decanting based on long-term hourly precipitation records. It is a modified version of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Storage, Treatment, Overflow, Runoff Model (HEC, 1976). The model generates annual performance statistics for flows to the treatment plant (via interceptor), treated overflows and untreated overflows. The model was used to show that all CSO facilities designed to the demonstration sizing criteria should meet the 85 percent capture and four overflow per year presumptive criteria in the USEPA CSO policy. The model results were also used with assumed treatment efficiencies to determine expected annual load reductions for a number of pollutants at each facility. Figure 1 shows a summary of the predicted annual reduction in biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) entering the receiving water for: one site limited facility; five basins sized to provide 20 minutes detention of the 1 year, 1 hour storm (demonstration sizing criterion); and 2 basins sized to capture the 1 year, 1 hour storm (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) sizing criterion). The results make it clear that for either of the two sizing criterion evaluated, annual load reduction is strongly governed by capture and is fairly insensitive to basin treatment efficiencies. Pollutant Loading Analysis The Watershed Management Model (WMM) is being used to generate annual pollutant loading estimates. In each subwatershed, WMM is being used to address the following questions and to communicate technical findings to stakeholders in an easy-to-understand fashion. What are the relative contributions of different pollutant sources in the subwatershed? What pollutant load reductions can be achieved with various stormwater BMPs and CSO controls? How will expected land use changes impact pollutant loads to the river? The Rouge Project recently completed development of WMM for Windows (RPO, 1997) which is being provided to each community for their own use in subwatershed planning efforts. WMM calculates pollutants loads for each source of flow (baseflow, storm water runoff, CSOs and point sources) in each watershed subarea using annual flow volumes and event mean concentrations (EMCs) assigned to that specific source. The model
4 generates annual pollutant loads by subarea. Various combinations of stormwater BMPs and CSO controls can be selected in specific geographic areas to determine the overall resulting pollutant reductions for a particular management plan. WMM was used early in the project as a prioritization tool to develop pie charts showing the major pollutant sources in each subwatershed. It was recently used as an analysis and communication tool in three detailed subwatershed management studies. Figure 2 is a sample of WMM results for BOD in the Middle 3 subwatershed, where it was used to show the cumulative effect of two phases of CSO control and two different storm water management plans. Watershed Hydrology/River Hydraulics The Rouge Project has developed a continuous, growing-season model of the entire watershed and the major river branches using the USEPA Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) (Huber et. al., 1992). The model is used as the hydraulic driver for the riverine water quality model. It has also been used to assess river hydraulic impacts for issues which arise in the subwatershed planning efforts. Questions it has addressed include: How will expected land use changes impact instream hydraulics (flow rates, volumes, depths and velocities)? How will proposed CSO control facilities impact instream hydraulics? What combination of storm water BMPs and CSO controls will reduce instream peak flow rates to within desired target regimes for suitable fish habitat? The SWMM RUNOFF block is used to model the hydrology of all storm sewered areas and areas with natural drainage. An existing SWMM RUNOFF/TRANSPORT model, the Greater Detroit Regional Sewer System Model (CDM, June, 1994), is used to model all CSOs entering the river. Inflow hydrographs from both these models comprise all inputs to the one-dimensional river model, which is simulated with the SWMM TRANSPORT block. A continuous simulation with the full model was calibrated to 6 months of 15-minute data collected with a network of rain and stream flow gages. As part of the Upper 2 Subwatershed Management Study, the model was used to evaluate several scenarios including the cumulative impact of future land use projections, complete CSO control, placement of regional extended dry detention ponds throughout the subwatershed. A fourth scenario involved placement of such ponds at only a few select locations in the subwatershed instead of everywhere. The average increase in peak flow rates for a range of typical storms are shown in Figure 3 for one sample location. The results clearly show that the existing high flow rates and velocities and the resultant bank erosion problems will worsen, however, regional detention could be used to accommodate future land use changes and reduce peak stream flows and velocities below existing conditions.
5 Instream Water Quality Building on the SWMM quantity model, a riverine water quality model of the Lower, Middle, Upper and Main Rouge River branches was developed using the Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) EUTRO model (Ambrose et. al., 1993). While the model was originally developed and calibrated as a continuous model of eight pollutants, it has evolved to its current, primary role as an event model to simulate the CBOD-DO interaction which results from CSOs, including the sudden transitory DO drops which have been observed in the Rouge River. The model is currently being used to addresses the following questions: Will various CSO control alternatives eliminate the transitory DO drops caused by high CBOD in CSO discharges? What wet weather DO impairment will remain after all CSO controls are in place? How much will dry weather DO improve after controls eliminate most of the sediment oxygen demand (SOD) contributed by CSOs? The water quality model developed is shown schematically in Figure 4. Stormwater inputs are simulated with the SWMM RUNOFF build-up/washoff algorithms. CSO inputs are assigned concentrations based on the time from when overflow begins, based on typical pollutograph shapes from monitoring data. The Rouge Project also developed a new model code linking the SWMM TRANSPORT river hydraulic output to the WASP model. Portions of the model have been calibrated to several heavilymonitored wet weather events. The model was utilized to evaluate two alternative CSO basin sizes in Oakland County on the main branch of the Rouge. For one of the calibrated wet weather events, the instream DO improvement was determined by modeling the impact of complete CSO control with three CSO basins sized to the demonstration sizing criterion. The simulation was also repeated assuming the basins were enlarged to the MDEQ standard sizing criterion. The simulated instream DO shown in Figure 5 illustrates that the demonstration size basins improve the DO sag enough that it no longer falls below the 5 mg/l standard for this event. It also shows the marginal improvement which would have been achieved if the MDEQ basin sizing criterion were used, which would approximately double the size of each of the facilities. The model of the entire main branch of the Rouge was also used to simulate dry weather DO, which is primarily driven by SOD and reaeration. For the first phase of CSO control and also for complete control, model SOD was reduced to approach that of in-situ SOD measurements made in river reaches which were not CSO impacted. The results in Figure 6 show that CSO controls will provide a significant benefit to dry weather DO, but that some DO impairment will remain in selected river reaches which are somewhat impounded.
6 Performance monitoring for the demonstration CSO control facilities includes instream monitoring which began in The monitoring is intended to show whether effluent from the demonstration facilities will cause any remaining water quality impairment. The water quality event models will be used in the future as part of the analysis of the monitoring results. Model Findings Many findings have arisen out of the Rouge Project, several of which the models helped bring to light. Several model findings are given below. The impairments caused by wet weather pollution are certainly not limited to wet weather periods. In the Rouge this is especially true for the CSO contributions to SOD and the resultant dry weather DO impairment. In a predominantly urban watershed, increased stream flow due to urbanization must be considered as a pollutant, as it damages aquatic habitat and causes bank erosion, log jams, sedimentation and increased instream solids concentrations. While not severe in nature, some dry and wet weather DO impairment is expected to remain in the Rouge Watershed after all CSO are controlled, simply due to nonpoint storm water runoff. Storm water and CSO must be addressed together in a holistic approach or limited resources may all be directed to the CSO control program. It is expected that the Rouge Watershed CSO basins sized to demonstration sizing criteria will be adequate to eliminate any resultant water quality impairments. Rouge Watershed standard practices for on-site detention of stormwater do little to mitigate development-induced flow increases for small storms, which has led to increased velocities and streambank erosion. Lessons Learned Over the course of the Rouge Project modeling effort there have been a number of lessons learned from the modeling work which has been conducted. Several of the key lessons are: If possible, model selection and development should not be performed until the specific questions to be addressed by the model are well formulated. A simple loadings model such as WMM can be a good technical resource, but it may be even more important as a tool for communicating technical findings. Urban rivers dominated by stormwater runoff present a unique modeling challenge as the difficulty of monitoring nonpoint sources means there are not well defined inputs for the model.
7 Models should not be used to try to answer every question. Many questions can still be answered based on analysis of monitoring data. Conclusions The Rouge project is successfully using a suite of water quality modeling tools to address technical questions raised in watershed management planning. The Rouge Project models, modeling approach and findings are a resource that is transferable to other urban watersheds. References Ambrose, R.B., T.A. Wool and J.L. Martin, The Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program WASP5, Part A: Model Documentation, Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA, September Camp Dresser & McKee Inc (CDM), DWSD Greater Detroit Regional System Report, Prepared for Detroit Water & Sewerage Department, City of Detroit, Michigan, June 30, Huber, W. C. and R. E. Dickinson, Storm Water Management Model, Version 4: User s Manual, EPA/600/3-88/001a, USEPA, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA, October 1992 (Second Printing). Hydrologic Engineering Center, Storage, Treatment, Overflow, Runoff Model "STORM," U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Kluitenberg, E.H., and Cantrell, C., Percent Treated Analysis of Demonstration Combined Sewer Overflow Control Facilities, Technical Memorandum RPO-MOD- TM17, Prepared for Wayne County Rouge Program Office, Wayne County, MI, October Wayne County Rouge Program Office, User s Manual: Watershed Management Model Version 1.0, Technical Memorandum RPO-NPS-TM27, Wayne County, MI, December, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Combined Sewer Overflow Control Policy, Office of Water, EPA 830-B , April 1994.
8 Annual Reduction in BOD (%) Treatment Capture Figure 1 Annual Percent Reduction in BOD for Various Basin Sizing Criteria Site Limited Demonstration Size MDEQ Standard
9 Figure 2 Middle 3 Subwatershed WMM Model Results Average Annual BOD Load 900 BOD5 (1,000 lbs/yr) Stormwater CSO Baseflow Baseline Phase I CSO Phase II CSO SW Plan 1 SW Plan 2
10 Figure 3 Model River Flow Rate Compared to Existing Conditions Upper 2 Subwatershed - Bell Beech Daly Change from Existing River Flow Rate (%) Future Land Use Phase II CSO Dry Detention Select Dry Detention -30 Modeling Scenario
11 Figure 4 Rouge Tier 3 Model Schematic RUNOFF Stormwater Runoff Model Flows RUNOFF/TRANSPORT Combined Sewer System Overflow Model Flows Pollutants TRANSPORT River Hydraulic Model Pollutants Hydraulics WASP River Water Quality Model
12 DO (mg/l) Figure 5 Modeled DO for CSO Control Alternatives Main Rouge at 8 Mile Rd Baseline MDEQ Size Basins Demo Size Basins Jun 14-Jun 15-Jun 16-Jun 17-Jun
13 DO (mg/l) Figure 6 Dry Weather Model Instream DO for June 13, 1994 Main Rouge from Adams to Greenfield Baseline Phase I CSO Control Full CSO Control Main Rouge River Miles Downstream of Adams Road
Community Case Study Rouge River Watershed, MI Region 5 Number of CSO Outfalls 168 Combined Sewer Service Area 93 square miles Wastewater Treatment Capacity 1,700 mgd (primary) 930 mgd (secondary) Receiving
City of East Lansing CSO Control Facility Evaluation Demonstrative Approach to Meet WQS Jeff Johnston, East Lansing WWTP Superintendent & Tom Maxwell, P.E., Hubbell, Roth & Clark, Inc. East Lansing CSO
North Branch Chicago River Watershed-Based Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In Lake County, the Lake County Stormwater Management Commission (SMC) is responsible for managing Lake County s water resources. The North
Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project Wayne County, Michigan TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Data Screening, Validation, Reduction, and Reporting RPO-WM03A-TM05.02 February 1996 Rouge River National
ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND The Rose Creek Watershed (RCW) consists of three planning
40 slide sample of Presentation Please contact email@example.com if you would like the complete presentation Key Principles to Current Stormwater Management Distributed Control Measures Integrated
Viewed broadly, the concept of ecosystem services describes the many resources and services provided by nature. Typically, traditional planning and development practices do not adequately represent the
Peter J. Strazdas Associate Vice President, Facilities Management Western Michigan University firstname.lastname@example.org Mark S. Kieser Principal, Senior Scientist Kieser & Associates, LLC email@example.com
Sustainability Brief: and Watershed Integrity New Jersey depends on water resources for the health of our people, the strength of our economy, and the vitality of our ecosystems. The quality of our water
Maine Department of Environmental Protection Program Guidance On Combined Sewer Overflow Facility Plans OVERVIEW The objective of a Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Facility Plan is to abate CSO discharges
4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets 4.1 Environmental Impacts Significant additional development in the Alder Creek watershed is not anticipated at this time; however, there are
Managing our Water Resources During Tough Financial Times Now What? John P. McCulloch Oakland County Water Resources Commissioner Let me begin by thanking you for the opportunity to share some thoughts
Integrated Water Management in Maryland Anwer Hasan, Senior Vice President Discussion Topics State initiatives for water management o Stormwater management o Agriculture runoff o Enhanced Nutrient Removal
Fort Wayne Water Pollution Control Plant The Water Pollution Control Plant located on Dwenger Avenue -- provides wastewater treatment for the City of Fort Wayne and surrounding areas. Following the treatment
CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL Book 2 (SW) SW9 June 2015 SW9.01 Purpose This Chapter provides information for the design of open channels for the conveyance of stormwater in the City of Fort Wayne.
Harmony Creek subwatershed Harmony Creek subwatershed BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT April 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
Permit No. MI0022802 FACT SHEET PERMITTEE/FACILITY NAME: City of Detroit / Detroit Wastewater Treatment Plant COUNTY: Wayne DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES: The Detroit (DWSD) owns
United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, D.C. EPA 832-F-99-041 September 1999 Combined Sewer Overflow Management Fact Sheet Sewer Separation DESCRIPTION Sewer systems that
City of Jacksonville Master Stormwater Management Plan (MSMP) Update December 2008 Update CDM Agenda 1. Data Collection 1. GIS/LiDAR 2. Survey 2. Water Quantity 1. SWMM Modeling 2. FEMA 3. Water Quality
Development and Utilization of a Customized Model for Evaluating Performance of the Calumet, Mainstream and Des Plaines Tunnel and Reservoir Systems Ann Gray, P.E. Associate Civil Engineer Areas Served
User s Manual for the BMPTRAINS Model Prepared By: Marty Wanielista, Mike Hardin, Przemyslaw Kuzlo, and Ikiensinma Gogo-Abite STORMWATER TREATMENT ANALYSIS: STEP 1: Specify pre- and post-development watershed
Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) Performance Analysis Revised Document: March 2010 (Original Document: December 2008) Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 5 Post
Toronto s Wet Weather Flow Master Plan 1. The Master Plan 2. The Don And Waterfront Study 3. What the Individual Can Do Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan 2000 Storm Presentation to Don Mouth Naturalization...
City of Atlanta Department of Watershed Management Post-Development Stormwater Management Ordinance Summary of Revisions Cory Rayburn, CPESC Environmental Program Manager firstname.lastname@example.org Stormwater
GIS Tools for Proactive Urban Watershed Management Scott D. Bryant, PE *, Kenneth A. Carper, PE ** and John Nicholson, PhD *** *Manager & Chief Engineer, City of Greensboro Stormwater Management Division,
Regulatory Alternatives to Address Stormwater Management and Flooding in the Marlboro Street Study Area Alternative 1: Amend Existing Local Regulations This proposed alternative provides an incremental
United States Environmental Protection Agency CASE STUDY City of Grand Rapids Stormwater Asset Management Program Overview With increasing pressure to meet water quality targets, address population growth,
Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC 3 Lakes, Reservoirs, and Ponds Forty-six states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia (collectively referred to as states in the rest of this
UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs 10 Year Plan Update UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update Page A 1 UMRWD LIST OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS Since its inception in 1967, the
New State Storm Water Rules: WHAT MUNICIPALITIES NEED TO KNOW Total Suspended Solids: The Hows & Whys of Controlling Runoff Pollution Stormwater management by Wisconsin municipalities is under scrutiny.
7.0 Stream Restoration 7.1 Issue Statements One of the primary concerns of residents in the Bassett Creek watershed is the maintenance of the natural beauty of the creek in residential and recreational
9.0 Local Post-Construction Stormwater Management Programs 9.1 Overview Prior to the 1980s, stormwater management was synonymous with flood control. Postconstruction stormwater management systems consisted
1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria 1.7.1 Introduction These guidelines set out standards for evaluating and processing proposed modifications of the 100- year floodplain with the following objectives:
Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013 Rationale Underground infrastructure may be at risk from valley, streambank
City of Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed Department of Watershed Management Implementing Green Infrastructure in Atlanta SESWA Southeast Regional Stormwater Seminar April 9, 2014 Jo Ann J. Macrina, P.E. Commissioner
STORMWATER AND URBAN DESIGN Atlanta BeltLine Fall 2012 DESIGN + RESEARCH Urban Design Strategies for Four Sites on the Atlanta BeltLine Maddox Park, Boone Blvd and Proctor Creek Ansley Mall and the Clear
1008 STORM DRAINAGE (3/24/05) 1008.01 PURPOSE To minimize the amount of stormwater runoff resulting from development utilizing nonstructural controls where possible, maintain and improve water quality,
Kansas City s Overflow Control Program Kansas City Water Services Water Wastewater Stormwater 2 Water Services Department 1000 Positions 835 Employees 3 Utilities FY 13/14 Budget = $307 million Water Wastewater
I-70 East Final EIS 5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology 5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology This section discusses floodplain and drainage/hydrology resources and explains why they are important
Strategy Name: Reduce Existing Potential for Flood Damages LRSW-S3C1. Develop and implement a program to: Minimize flood damages through the use of structural measures. Minimize flood damages through the
The Clean Water Project What Is The Stormwater Impact? Presentation To: Seminar On Water Issues Bob Weimar, PE, BCEE Chief of Program Management The Metropolitan District Sewage Overflows Have Become More
Muddy River Restoration Project Project Description Since the fall of 1996, the Muddy River has flooded three times, causing damage to residents, businesses institutions and the public transit system in
City of Ann Arbor Sanitary Sewer Wet Weather Evaluation Project Best Practices Sub- Group of the Citizens Advisory Committee Examples of Wet Weather Improvements from Other Communities December 5, 2013
DID YOU KNOW... THE IMPAT OF ON-SITE SEWAGE SYSTEMS AND ILLIIT DISHARGES ON THE ROUGE RIVER by Barry Johnson, P.E., M.S., amp Dresser & McKee and Dean Tuomari, Wayne ounty Department of Environment The
IEPA Log No.: C-0679-14 CoE appl. #: CEMVR-OD-P-2014-1343 Public Notice Beginning Date: June 10, 2015 Public Notice Ending Date: July 10, 2015 Section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments
Use of Green Roofs to Meet New Development Runoff Requirements Greg Davis Nov. 8, 2007 Why green roof? Absorption of precipitation Increased insulation Reduced urban heat island effect Pollutant removal
Estimating Potential Reduction Flood Benefits of Restored Wetlands Kenneth W. Potter University of Wisconsin Introduction Throughout the summer of 1993 a recurring question was the impact of wetland drainage
Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist Walworth County Land Conservation Department The following checklist is designed to assist the applicant in complying with the Walworth
High-Rate Retention Treatment Facility for CSO Control in Windsor Riverfront East Jian Li, Ph.D., P.Eng., PE Senior Environmental Engineer Stantec Consulting Ltd. Water & Wastewater Treatment BMP Forum
Chapter 3 3.01 General Provisions 3.01.1 Introduction 3.01.2 Application and Interpretation of Chapter 3.01.3 Unbuildable Lots 3.01.4 Other Permits 3.01.5 Prohibited Activities 3.02 Service Provider Letter
Department of Planning Report for Riverstone and Alex Avenue Precincts Post Exhibition Flooding and Water Cycle Management (incl. Climate Change impact on Flooding) May 2010 Contents 1. Background 1 1.1
Part B Integrated Monitoring Design for Comprehensive Assessment and Identification of Impaired Waters Contents Chapter 10. Selecting Metrics or Indicators of WQS Attainment... 10-2 Chapter 11. Monitoring
WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION IN ANYANG STREAM Yu, M.J., Cho, Y.M. 2, Lee, S.K. 3 Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul, Jennong-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea. 2 Department
United States Office of Water EPA 916-F-01-032 Environmental Protection (4606) July 2001 Agency Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows
21 st Century Approaches to CSO & Water Quality Restoration Paul L. Freedman, P.E., BCEE Wet Weather Partnership & NACWA April 26-27, 2007 Burning Cuyahoga Traditional CWA Approach to Water Quality Protection,
TEXAS: SAN ANTONIO San Antonio Protects Edwards Aquifer Background San Antonio, the seventh largest city in the United States, covers approximately 515 square miles of Bexar County in south central Texas.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS LOWER GREAT MIAMI RIVER NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT INTRODUCTION On behalf of a partnership of Water Resource Recovery Facilities (WRRFs) WRRFs and other stakeholders with permitted
9. DATA MANAGEMENT Data management is a crucial aspect of successful implementation of the ARB IRWMP and its component projects. This section discusses the adequacy of available data and monitoring efforts,
DRAFT White Paper Green Solutions for the City of Omaha City of Omaha Department of Public Works August 2007 DRAFT Green Solutions for the City of Omaha Background The purposes of this White Paper is to
APPENDIX IV Version: February 2, 2015 Sample DEQ Plan Submitter s Checklist for Stormwater Management Plans Please fill in all blanks and please reference the plan sheets/pages where the information may
FIVE-YEAR ASSESSMENT REPORT For the Long Branch Basin Management Action Plan prepared by the Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Watershed Restoration Program Florida Department of Environmental
Environment Developing a Municipal Source Water Protection Plan: A Guide for Water Utilities and Municipalities Step Identify Potential Contaminants and Assess Risk Prepared by: Nova Scotia Environment
US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center Methods for Determination of Safe Yield and Compensation Water from Storage Reservoirs October 1966 Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited.
Planning, Building, and Environmental Services NAPA VALLEY GROWTH NAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM Plunging Forward May 15, 2015 1 YOU CAN T CROSS THE SEA MERELY BY STANDING AND STARING AT THE WATER. Rabindranath
National Disaster Management Institute CONTENTS one Cause of Urban Flood Disaster two Urban Flood Damage Case three Disaster Prevention Measures for Future Urban Flood four NDMI s Measures & Strategy for
Water Resource Management Planning About this Document This guidance was designed to explain the types of water management planning reports towns and communities can use when approaching their particular
Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting Economics in the Decision Process Return on Investment Willingness to Pay Municipal Growth
A SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE BY CITY UTILITIES COMMITTEE 12-O-1761 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 74, ARTICLE X OF THE CITY OF ATLANTA CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROMOTING GREEN
Flood Risk Management Value of Flood Risk Management Every year floods sweep through communities across the United States taking lives, destroying property, shutting down businesses, harming the environment
Flood Risk Management Value of Flood Risk Management Value to Individuals and Communities Every year floods sweep through communities across the United States taking lives, destroying property, shutting
Lower Huron River Watershed Management Plan Prepared by the Lower Huron Watershed Advisory Group and the Alliance of Downriver Watersheds: City of Belleville Berlin Township Brownstown Township City of
Shooks Run Drainage Study Basic Terminology PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: City of Colorado Springs CH2M DATE: April 9, 2015 Introduction This document is intended to provide an introduction to Colorado Springs
Stormwater management around the world Lessons from Novatech 2010 Dennis Corbett and Marion Urrutiaguer Novatech 2010, the 7th international conference on sustainable techniques and strategies in urban
Wastewater Master Plan DWSD Project No. CS-1314 Review of Footing Drain Disconnection Projects Technical Memorandum Original Date: August 8 2002 Revision Date: September 2003 Author: CDM Table of Contents
Description Retention/irrigation refers to the capture of stormwater runoff in a holding pond and subsequent use of the captured volume for irrigation of landscape of natural pervious areas. This technology
Watershed Treatment Model for Urban Watersheds Neely L. Law Watershed Analyst Center for Watershed Protection Outline Background Primary Loads Secondary Loads Current Management Practices Future Development
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Wastewater Treatment Story: Three Decades and Counting BACWA Watershed Management Case Studies October 6, 2014 Tanya T. Spano Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Chair,
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD CENTRAL VALLEY REGION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM NO. R5-2002-0042 NPDES NO. CA0084816 FOR The Discharger shall not implement any changes to this Program
Green Spaces to Improve Waterways and Communities Thomas M. Evans, ASLA LEED AP Green Infrastructure Design Services Director Cleveland, Ohio Northern Michigan Green Infrastructure Conference June 4, 2015
overflow can lead into a permeable conveyance system to increase further the benefit and reduce the need for pipe systems. Pollutant removal rates have been shown to be high, with some pollutants being
Introduction A visual examination of Doolittle Creek in a highly developed suburban county in Georgia yielded telltale signs of a creek whose original streambed had been altered. Examination of official
New Jersey Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual February 2004 C H A P T E R 5 Computing Stormwater Runoff Rates and Volumes This chapter discusses the fundamentals of computing stormwater runoff
OVERFLOW ABATEMENT PROGRAM Executive Summary Consent Decree The sewer system in Nashville dates back to the late 1800s and originally consisted of a combined sewer system, later transitioning to separate
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.