CCFC Master Exhs. P969. Cal. Coalition for Families and Children v. San Diego County Bar Ass'n 13 cv 1944 CAB BLM

Transcription

1 CCFC Master Exhs. P969

2 CCFC Master Exhs. P970

3 CCFC Master Exhs. P971

4 CCFC Master Exhs. P972

5 CCFC Master Exhs. P973

6 CCFC Master Exhs. P974

7 CCFC Master Exhs. P975

8 CCFC Master Exhs. P976

9 there is a strong possibility that the custody evaluator will not be paid for work that they perform prior to the form being signed and submitted to the Court. As to Family Law 327, that also needs to be signed and contained in the case file. It seems apparent that there is going to be a tremendous amount of scrutiny being placed upon these forms and if you have any old cases still pending where these forms have not been used, please make sure that they are filed appropriately as you risk claims from your client that the matter was not properly handled, if they later disagree with the recommendations from the evaluator. If you have any particular questions regarding this, feel free to contact me. Bob Lesh CFLS Chair.._ ABOUT THIS MESSAGE FROM THE FAMILY LAW SECTION You are a receiving this as a member of the San Diego County Bar Association s Family Law Section. This was generated through a listserve, and does not represent the views of the San Diego County Bar Association, or the San Diego County Bar Association s Family Law Section. To adjust your list delivery settings and subscription options for all SDCBA list servers and communities, Click Here. NOTE: By replying to this message, you will be replying to the individual sender. Click Reply to All to send your message to all members of the Family Law Section To send your own message, send to sdcbafamilylaw@lists.membercentral.com To permanently unsubscribe from the Family Law Section listserve, Click Here. _.. Log in to Reply CCFC Master Exhs. P977

10 BS says: December 16, 2010 at 6:07 am I just checked out Mr. Bob Lesh s website, and it says he is a Certified Specialis Family Law. Down the page is reads: Bob is currently President-Elect of the Executive Committee of the San Diego County Certified Family Specialists, and is in his second three-year term as a Board Member of the Executive Committee. Bob ha different aspects of Family Law at seminars presented by the Certified Family Law Specialists and the Sa County Bar Association. Bob is currently a member of the San Diego County Bar Association and its Fami as well as a member of the State Bar of California and its Family Law Section, and is currently the Chair Court Services Subcommittee for the San Diego County Certified Family Law Specialists, and is also serv Minor s Counsel Subcommittee. So basically this Certified Specialist in Family Law who knows the CA State Rules of Court told all of the F lawyers on the SDCBA list-serve to go ahead and break the law by making sure these forms get filled out post-haste even though the law mandates that they are to be filled out within 10-days of appointment or Evaluator s opportunity to serve as expert witness is invalid; he/she cannot serve as expert witness. Sinc Attorneys advocates for the Evaluators? Afraid of losing your corruptly earned money Bob? Way to go Bo break the law you swore to follow! What a model lawyer you are Bob! Isn t one of the lectures you attended Bob titled Litigants Behaving Badly and hosted by non-other than Doyne, your golden boy Evaluator who also breaks the law with CRC 5.225? How about Lawyers Behaving Badly Bob? Or, Evaluators Behaving Badly? Log in to Reply Eileen Lasher says: December 16, 2010 at 6:15 pm My family law case has been held hostage for 16 years without resolving any housekeeping issues. On Jun 15, 2010 my ex husband s attorney Dave Schulman, Esq and my former attorney Anthony Dunne, Esq we Judge Allard indicating they had no idea why they were in Court. I had given my attorney Anthony Dunn he indicated he had no idea why he was there. According to the rules of the Court attorneys are required out prior to going into the Court room otherwise they are subject to sanctions. My ex husband s attorney Schulman, Esq said very nonchalantly that the file went missing for quite a long time and things are miss proceedings. Gone was my $5,000. San Diego Family Law Court is being run by a group of attorneys who conflict cases for fees and delay resolution. It is a financial institution that should not be in business. Log in to Reply CCFC Master Exhs. P978

11 Ben says: December 16, 2010 at 6:37 pm It appears Mr. Lesh and the entire Executive Family Law Committee are making criminal decisions. Th are violating the very mandated laws that they should be following. Log in to Reply Eileen Lasher says: December 16, 2010 at 6:26 pm My daughter and I made an appointment with Michael Rody after I attended a meeting spearheaded by M Aguirre. During the meeting approximately 50 litigants told their horror stories about their San Diego Fa Cases. It was clear my situation was not unique. Approximately 50 litigants who had the same attorneys I experienced the same racketeering. I called Michael Rody s office and made an appointment. I thought I this organized crime ring to his attention for the first time. My daughter explained that her Court Appoin Counsel Marcia Orenstein who had billed the San Diego tax payers for her services never checked on h Rody explained to me and Natalie that his job was to keep the lights on and he has no role in the court ca closure of the meeting my daughter and I were immediately placed under arrenst by 5 deputies and take Hoffman s Courtroom where he wanted to conduct a debtor s exam. No service was provided. Thankfully the Commission on Judicial Performance and they thanked me for bringing this to their attention. Judge discplined but based on the current rules they could not reveal any other details. In other words the pers the San Diego Family Court Service are working together to scam high conflict litigants out of their mo accounting, rules being followed or any process. Log in to Reply Ben says: December 16, 2010 at 6:35 pm Micheal G. Roddy said it is his job to keep the lights on? His job is outlined in Title 10 of the CA State R of Court and it in no way, shape, manner or form says that is his job. If fact, under Title 10 Rules of Court it is Micheal G. Roddy s job to administer Rules of Court, this woul rules and amendments to them. Yes, and by Bob Lesh telling all of the Family Law Attorneys what he has told them is supporting the de process that litigants are entitled to. What Bob Lesh is telling the Family Law Attorneys is the Evaluators responsibility to have those forms filed appropriately. It should have been the Attorneys to have appropriately counseled their clients ove and to vet the Evaluator. Now Bob Lesh apparently trying to cover-up a mass violation of law due to th unprofessionalism, incompetence, and corrupt San Diego Superior Court and San Diego Family Law C Can you spell Federal RICO? CCFC Master Exhs. P979

12 Log in to Reply LitigantParent says: December 16, 2010 at 7:51 pm I want to thank the hard work of the members of CCFC. Digging through files, searching for documentat in its various paper and electronic forms, driving to court houses to personally interview court administr gathering countless examples of litigant experiences to put the pieces together demonstrates muckrakin CCFC should be added to this list of well known muckrakers. Log in to Reply Emad Tadros MD and the Chronically Cheated Public At Large says: December 16, 2010 at 10:52 pm On I stated in public, to Judge Bloom that FL326 is mandated to be filed Under The Penalty of Perjury. On this form, a verified signature by the evaluator is mandated according to Rule k-1-b, w BOLD that this form must be filled out and signed Under The Penalty of Perjury 10 days BEFORE-BEFO custody work starts, by any evaluator. The ethical, legal and professional instructions from the SDCBA to all San Diego attorneys, who are supp about the child Best Interest, is to never touch any old cases as it is illegal on its face and according to th mandate outlined by k-1-b. As a matter of fact filing these forms after the fact is only committing perjury in day-light. Any layman would wonder: was this prompting to flagrantly violate CRC, serve the public or serve thy At Was this about Child s Best Interest or was it about taking the candy out of the kids mouth and keep the a sucking on it, instead? PLEASE READ AND EXAMINE WHAT WAS ALREADY FILED PUBLIC AND NOW OUTLINED IN THE PEN FILED AMIUCS. Forwarded Message From: jvandoorn at cox.net To: tadrosmd at pol.net Sent: Wednesday, February 17, :34:31 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: from Robert Lesh to Family Law Community Emad, CCFC Master Exhs. P980

13 Below is a forwarded I received from an anonymous source who is a member of the San Diego Fam community. I was told that this was sent as a mass ing to all members of the San Diego Coun Association who practice in family law. I had originally received this in early October of 2009 and a had forwarded it to you and various other members of the Doyned community at that time. If required, I can and will testify under oath as to the conditions that I received this communication unde integrity of the individual who forwarded this document to me and his/her professional affiliation (a pra member of the family law section of the San Diego Bar Association) in order that you can legally establish of this document with the courts. Regards! John van Doorn Robert Lesh [mailto:wrl@leshlaw.com] Sent: Thursday, October 01, :19 PM To: SDCBA Family Law Section Subject: [sdcbafamilylaw] Important Custody Evaluation Forms/Orders SDCBA Community Message Sent by: W. Lesh. To reply privately to W. Lesh, Click Here Note: By replying to this message, your response will be ed directly to the individual sender. Click Reply to All in your client to send your response to all SDCBA Family Law Section members instantly. This is a PRIVATE list for members of the SDCBA s Family Law Section. Do not forward messages or post confidential case or client data on this list server. For a list of SDCBA list serve guidelines, click here. To permanently unsubscribe from this listserve, Click Here I have been advised that a press conference occurred today (October 1) which involved the issue of custody evaluations and the submission to the Court of the attached Family Law Forms 326 and 327. As you may be aware from a prior I sent to all of you, these forms are mandatory and have been now for some time. Whenever you are involved in a custody evaluation matter, you need to make sure that your custody evaluators sign form FL-326 and that that gets filed with the Court, as there is a strong possibility that the custody evaluator will not be paid for work that they perform prior to the form being signed and submitted to the Court. As to Family Law 327, that also needs to be signed and contained in the CCFC Master Exhs. P981

14 case file. It seems apparent that there is going to be a tremendous amount of scrutiny being placed upon these forms and if you have any old cases still pending where these forms have not been used, please make sure that they are filed appropriately as you risk claims from your client that the matter was not properly handled, if they later disagree with the recommendations from the evaluator. If you have any particular questions regarding this, feel free to contact me. Bob Lesh CFLS Chair.._ ABOUT THIS MESSAGE FROM THE FAMILY LAW SECTION You are a receiving this as a member of the San Diego County Bar Association s Family Law Section. This was generated through a listserve, and does not represent the views of the San Diego County Bar Association, or the San Diego County Bar Association s Family Law Section. To adjust your list delivery settings and subscription options for all SDCBA list servers and communities, Click Here. NOTE: By replying to this message, you will be replying to the individual sender. Click Reply to All to send your message to all members of the Family Law Section To send your own message, send to sdcbafamilylaw@lists.membercentral.com To permanently unsubscribe from the Family Law Section listserve, Click Here. _.. Log in to Reply California Coalition for Families and Children says: December 18, 2010 at 10:32 pm September 15,2010 San Diego Dear Senator Boxer: CCFC Master Exhs. P982

15 The pleadings that are screamed aloud by the violated San Diego Families are real, and are of extreme co San Diego County Judiciary now fits the criteria of a Fascist establishment that operates in conjunction w group of the private industry, who constantly and illegally fund judges election campaigns, all to collude families and grandparents of their assets while using the suffering children as PAWNS. Pay for play, oth financially capable parent cannot be able to see his/her children. The San Diego Court professionals hav unprofessional thugs violating California Rules/CRC of Court for the last 9 years. The CRC were made M reason! As a result parents and their children have been constantly broken down financially, professiona human being stripped off their basic rights. The California Administrative Office of the Courts/AOC (which employs the California Judicial Council th California Rules of the Court/CRC), has been cleverly represented by Mr. Eric Pulido. He is, in my opinio hand-picked to be as diplomatic as he can, absorb, waste time and frustrate the complainants from the violated families! By doing so, families feel hopeless, go no further and throw in the towel. All in my opin hands of the top of our state, the AOC that is located in San Francisco. The Public is not allowed any form communication with these public officials. Their is held confidential. The one thing allowed is 86 with only a recording and very limited time to leave a message for a maximum of seconds or so. Repeated Phone calls and pleadings to the AOC have not been returned to many of our citizens for a rea AOC does (with much prompting) The documentation is left up to the interpretation and bias of the AOC complaint taker, Erik Pulido. Nobody knows how and what AOC exactly writes when they take such a pho They have taken some of our addresses or contact information and said that they would send us a of our complaints. So far, AOC has done nothing. This is exactly what happened in my case, total silence from the AOC. I met with the Senate Judiciary Co State Capital in Sacramento, they expressed that the AOC is the Fox in the Hen-House. Is it true? AOC very cleverly established a masked Performa Complaint Process. They refuse to give their o you to locate their physical address off the internet, but they will not give it to you over the phone and G why the AOC behaves this way? The AOC only allow a general fax (never a personal one) and this never confirms whether or not they re anything and how many pages they received to start with? Therefore, the AOC has created a complaint p whereby there is no formal way of documenting anything. The AOC makes sure not to have it formal for reason! The thievery, lies and deception all in the name of Justice is atop our nose. We are a group of committed functioning San Diego parents numbering in the 100s, and on their behalf, CCFC is NOT going to keep q those local and state corrupt officials who are all conspiring wide eyed, ripping off family assets, all in t justice. We are ready to fly to the White House. Whom should we ask to arrange a meeting with our President? C out? Referenced Google sites are: CCFC Master Exhs. P983

16 Angeimedia Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family COurt Under Fire Channel 10 blog Custody Evaluator credentials questioned in a lawsuit Stephen Doyne City Search Reviews Emad Tadros, M.D. Diplomate American Board of Psychiatry and Neurrology Cofounder California Coalition for Families and Children Forwarded Message From: Emad Tadros To: benjamin palmer Sent: Wednesday, September 15, :29:12 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Fwd: Saskia.Kim@Sen.ca.gov Forwarded Message From: Emad Tadros To: Saskia Kim Cc: Equalparenting, cole, Eileen Lasher, Maureen Miller, Harold Rose, John Van Doorn Sent: Wednesday, September 15, :22:19 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Fwd: Saskia.Kim@Sen.ca.gov Dear Senator Saskia: On the behalf of San Diego Parents, we are obligated to respect your office and your person as long as yo serves and does not mislead the public! Any silence on what appears to be Organized-Crime, will be carr and WE will go to the White House and IT IS A MATTER OF TIME. Please allow me to express to you that I do not appreciate your silence which clearly conveys unprofessio corresponding with my serious concerns, in regards to our County Parents who have constantly been rip assets by our court Personnel, for many years, conducting illegal activities and flat out violating Californi Court. I do not believe that there should be an iota of any government official who should dream that he be Above the Law. Please take a note that we are documenting any and all communications with your office. And that have received nothing from your office. Emad Tadros, M.D. CCFC Master Exhs. P984

17 . Forwarded Message From: Emad Tadros To: Saskia Kim Cc: cole staurt, Sent: Thursday, August 26, :45:07 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Fwd: Dear Senator Saskia: Did you receive my May earlier and its same attachments? If you did, we at California Coal Families and Children/CCFC would appreciate your office s professional reply.. We have a lot of the ripp who lost their shirts because of our San Diego county s court derelict and unprofessional behavior! You re Our San Diego County Courts, BAR and judges continue to use Doyne who is the solid CA Rules of the Co CRC/Violator and total fraud as their number one referral source and lecturer to our judges and lawyers be quite frustrating and is clearly building more anger in our county and our families. Are you going to here? Thank You.. Emad Tadros MD Forwarded Message From: Emad Tadros To: Saskia Kim Cc: cole Sent: Friday, May 21, :13:29 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Fwd: Saskia.Kim@Sen.ca.gov Dear Senator Kim Saskia: My name is Emad Tadros, MD, Diplomate American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. Your was s from my previous attorney, Mr. Michael Aguirre who used to be the San Diego City Attorney for many ye accidentally found your and discovered that I totally forgot to send my requests to you. Mr. Aguirre was handling my case as a plaintiff before the San Diego Superior Court accusing Court offic Mr. Aguirre and I both mutually gave up on his further involvement as long as my case stays in San Diego Courts. Mr gruirre concluded that a BROAD San Diego formal investigation of our county courts would re fraudulent and illegal utilization of state funding by our County Courts. We have discovered that San Diego county Superior Court had undertaken unusual and unprofessional s nine years would mount to serious State and Federal Felony Tax Evasion. Please investigate and I attache Revenue Service Letters for your convenience. Emad Tadros, MD San Diego CCFC Master Exhs. P985

18 office cell: Attorney Cole Stuart cole ; Forwarded Message From: michael aguirre To: tadrosmd@pol.net Sent: Tuesday, December 22, :13:21 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Saskia.Kim@Sen.ca.gov Michael J. Aguirre Aguirre, Morris & Severson 444 West C Street, Suite 210 San Diego, CA (619) maguirre@amslawyers.com Log in to Reply CCFC says: December 18, 2010 at 10:46 pm Forwarded Message From: Emad Tadros To: eric Cc:. Sent: Wednesday, September 22, :18:41 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Formal communication to request a Formal Investigation against San Diego Judiciary filed Dear Mr. Pulido: We sincerely appreciate your professional approach handling our San Diego matter. While we will try ou restraints on our frustrations to your office, we ask your administration to realize the fact that the partie CCFC Master Exhs. P986

19 immediate harm, and who have been and continue to be at a total loss are the helpless and silenced Ch For clarification purposes, the court professionals who for decades put legal duct tape on the children m make sure never to allow them to vent their frustration and the truth about who those court professiona been those same court professionals mostly Minor s Council and the Illegal 730 Evaluators, sheltered by fostering such behavior! Some of our honorable county judges are also Family Law Lawyers part-time! Th conflict of interest. One of whom has been a total fraud ripping off parents and putting liens on their ho is done by some of the Family law Honorable, whom 33 (out of total 36) are in the habit of not reporting Campaign Funds, when in-fact it is the law to report to the public by filing Form 700 and report it in all r hearings. Our San Diego CEO Mr. Michael Roddy is well respected and honored to the point he received medals of and special recognitions. Mr. Roddy was advanced to be one of the most respected executive members o Judicial Committee/CJC and this has been the case already for many years. This CJC is the one that is su sincerely listen to the public, act on behalf of the public, and execute CRC as requested, voted and mand Public. These CJC Executive members owe us back Honesty, Integrity and Professionalism. As a result Mr. Mich being one of the CJC Executive members, was the guard on the Hen House, the state of California in ge Diego specific. Mr. Roddy is getting annual salary ~ $185, and to my understanding with incentives, he gets paid million more or less annually. As for donation to him or his office and who donates to him, this remains t Mr. Roddy has been travelling to San Francisco on a regular basis (average twice a year or so since ~~ 20 noticed, approved and seconded the CRC to: 1- Establish FL 325, 326 (both are serious forms and they both are signed under the penalty of perjury fro a reason to protect the Public) and 327 as strongly recommended in each CA county. To our Knowledge e county has been compliant in using those forms as strongly recommended by our CJC Executive membe Diego County Superior Court where Mr. Roddy is actually the Court CEO! Why? 2- Every year thereafter these forms are more and more appreciated and detailed for a reason. Yet Mr. R travel regularly, but somehow as soon as Roddy lands in San Diego, he suffers from Selective Amnesia being strongly recommended under the penalty of perjury in his own San Diego County where he sits as Executive Officer. 3- Starting January 2005 these forms, besides being under the penalty of perjury and being more detaile had become MANDATORY and again in every CA County. Yet, Mr. Roddy somehow continues to suffer fr Selective Amnesia Process especially when they become Mandatory. Was there a reason or financial incentive for the churning caused by the illegal 730 evaluations who wer ripping off and committing frauds on the naive trusting parents and their helpless children? These Evalu Diego County alone have been charging upwards of $350 per 45-minutes, or an average of $15,000 per CCFC Master Exhs. P987

20 This is grossly excessive. Each and every Evaluator is a multimillionaire, drives a $100,000 Mercedes funded by the stolen and ille college funds, at the court order. To our knowledge many of them take months vacations around the wo cleverly fraudulent that you do not really know where they invest their illegally stolen property at? Those mostly led by the fraudulent Evaluator (who also illegally take on other roles by chameleon the sam case, with different professional colors, at the court order, such as Mediator, Supervisor, Therapist, Reun Therapist, Case Manager, Special Master) are not held accountable for any of their fraudulent billings tha a day to day basis. This is a custom to keep ripping off families with fraudulent work hours, fraudulent ph fraudulent contacts. Judges would not move an inch or ever allow the public any chance to formally expo fraud! It is a custom not to make any court orders of any inquiry or allow any details ordering such fraud REFUND constantly and illegally fund the Judges Election Campaign. Why is that? Most of our county judges have been sitting there for years and they un-contested with, in the first place that it is unspoken language to never dare to challenge a judge on his/her re-elction. The statistics are v challenge any judge and strongly speak against any judge losing re-election! Therefore, why do our San judges (FL 327 repeated Violators and passive violators of both FL325 and FL326) still allow parties at diff attorney/evaluators homes held for their re-election Campaign Funds? Is this called Money Laundry or committed by our San Diego County Judiciary? In late 2009 I advised Jaqueline Hernandez MFT who was one the captives in the Riverside Family Court from San Diego). She gave due diligence over Roy Bradbury, Phd credentials claimed expertise, being tau own CLE courses and his verified status as a 730 Custody Evaluator. Ever since, Dr. Bradbury has been un Credentials Microscope. When he was due to formally file his credentials and expose them to the court a the CJC, he shot himself committing suicide in a parking lot in Riverside County on It was disco Bradbury never filled out the mandated CJC forms, same as Doyne, since Also records confirm tha actually never fulfilled the legally required CLE hours, to start with. Clearly such unchecked Bogus Crede by Doyne were ripping off and controlling thousands of families. This is totally expected when CRC were is FRAUD! Fraud by Mr. Michael Roddy, fraud by the Evaluators! THIS ALSO SPEAKS VOLUMES AS TO THE SERIOUS IMPORTANCE OF CRC AND AS TO WHY CRC WER ESTABLISHED IN THE FIRST PLACE? We are not just parents who have been violated. We are speaking on the behalf of many intentionally ke suffering children. For that, we have been spending much time and finances uncovering every deceptive fraudulent Court-Professional who dares to mess up with the Children. Seeking immunity and shelter be judges robes and granting it to those violators, have been the bread and butter practice, fostering Fraud Justice in our San Diego County. As long as I refused to keep quiet and or settle earlier with the Fraud Doyne, I am now ordered to pay th Doyne $80,000 in Attorney fees by the Honorable Bloom who makes sure to hold on to the case persona let it take a breath out of our corrupt San Diego county, FOR A REASON. The order to pay the clear as th Fraudulent Doyne $80,000 is nothing more than Spread the Fear and Terror in the hearts and minds o CCFC Master Exhs. P988

21 County parents who dare to speak up and uncover the San Diego Superior and Family Court Chronic Jud So far, we have been stopping at nothing. We sincerely thank you and your office for taking us seriously. sincerely hoping that you would help us to stop at your office and go no further. Respectfully, Emad Tadros, MD Diplomate American Board of Psyhciatry and Neurology California Coalition for Families and Children/CCFC Attached Hereto is my Petition for Writ of Mandate, to Recuse Judge Bloom in Tadros V. Doyne. Due to limitations, Petition by the 92 members of the public to Recuse judge Bloom off Tadros V. D the public and filing with the State Supreme Court to recuse judge bloom will be follow on another emai Thank you again for your patience and professionalism with us. Original Message From: Eric Pulido To: Emad Tadros Cc: Equalparenting, cole, Eileen Lasher, Maureen Miller Sent: Tuesday, September 21, :46:54 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: RE: Emad Tadros Reply Brief from CCFC Dr. Tadros, At this time, today, I am in receipt of four messages with attachments from you with timestamps of 3:27p and 3:40p. I am still reviewing all the documentation that both you and Mr. Siegfried provided on Friday. As you kno of those submissions is also very high. I am reviewing the information on a first-in-first out basis. At the suggestion of Mr. Siegfried, I am carefully reviewing the documents. In addition to a full workload group s complaints and the high volume of documents submitted so far by members of your group, it wil time to get through the information submitted so far. This office is not staffed to handle this volume so I request your patience and consideration. You and your colleagues will receive acknowledgement letters soon. You and others in your group have individual and collective frustration. Considering this, I implore you and others not to misinterpret the la letter as my office ignoring your complaints. Due to the sensitive nature of any complaint process not m information is provided. The information submitted thus far will be reviewed and if needed further contact will be made. You are to submit more information; I do want you and your colleagues to be aware it is taking time to get throu information. CCFC Master Exhs. P989

22 Eric Pulido Supervising Internal Auditor Internal Audit Services Judicial Council of California Administrative Office of the Courts 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA , Fax , Serving the courts for the benefit of all Californians Original Message. From: Emad Tadros Sent: Tuesday, September 21, :40 PM To: Pulido, Eric Cc: Equalparenting; cole; Eileen Lasher; Maureen Miller Subject: Fwd: Emad Tadros Reply Brief from CCFC Dear Mr. Pulido: I appreciate you looking into this serious Public matter. Please take a note of this PUBLIC document (Rep change Venu filed for 6-11 hearing that never took place) as a part of my formal complaint against what a clearly corrupt and unprofessional San Diego Superior Court. This document among many serious conce the flat outright violation of CRC since 2001 and that only 3 out of 26 judges reported election campaign Diego County. Please let me know that if you do not consider this as a formal document without my signature. I will be the last page and send it to you. We at California Coalition for Families and Children/CCFC appreciate your candor and professionalism this serious matter. Please maintain this for your records. Signed Emad Tadros, MD Cofounder California Coalition for Families and Children CC: Some Members of CCFC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted in t CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted in this message is intended to be confid the use of only the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended re are hereby notified that you are in possession of privileged information, also, you are hereby notified tha retention, dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have rec CCFC Master Exhs. P990

23 mail in error, immediately notify us via return at the address above, & discard, remove, delete, & trace of it. his message is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are in possession o information, also, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copy of this e is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, immediately notify us via return at above, & discard, remove, delete, & destroy any trace of it. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted in t CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted in this message is intended to be confid the use of only the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended re are hereby notified that you are in possession of privileged information, also, you are hereby notified tha retention, dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have rec mail in error, immediately notify us via return at the address above, & discard, remove, delete, & trace of it. his message is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are in possession o information, also, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copy of this e is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, immediately notify us via return at above, & discard, remove, delete, & destroy any trace of it. Log in to Reply Ben says: December 27, 2010 at 2:40 am Hey Bob Lesh, Michael Roddy, Lorna Alksne, Stephen Doyne, and all the other cast of unprofessionals wi no heart and soul, I got a special message for you that you should pay attention to. Listen carefully, espec minute 18:30: Log in to Reply Litigants Behaving Badly says: January 5, 2011 at 4:21 pm Below is the ongoing reasearch findings being conducted while collecting stories from hundreds of man San Diego Parents who are victimized by the so-called Family Court Dismantlers : As long as: CCFC Master Exhs. P991

24 A. 50/50 custody BY DEFAULT does NOT exist along with child support, B. child support is being based upon parents income and not necessarily the child s actual n money churning machine ripping off families, run by the Court Family Dismantlers, will only have an inc pushing parents into the ring, fiercely fighting each other longer and harder. HOW? What happens when it is NOT 50/50 physical Custody: 1- One scenario, where a lower percentage parent (usually the one who is the cash cow) let us say 30% o ALWAYS be anxiously prompted by his/her attorney to only keep paying the Family Dismantlers for Hir COURT ORDERED SERVICES to see his/her kids, hoping for higher percentage over time. Once 5% higher Physical custody, i.e. as little as 35% is achieved, the bribing parent (to the dismantlers), start paying less child support to the other parent! Any such increase (from 5-50%) is highly dependent u paid (bribed by that parent) and money still visible to the Family Court Dismantlers to grab. The Dismant be fabricated and filed with the court, accordingly. Imagine such a rich parent paying $50,000. Would that parent get a 50% increase in Physical Custody? Does anyone know if there is a $$$ Service Menu (fees/bribes) to adjust the physical custody? Would that take us to square one as to why there is never 50/50 custody by default, except for poor pare this becomes an almost automatic procedure? 2- The parent who has a higher custody of 70% is warned by his/her attorney (who have been keeping q 2001, aiding and abetting CA Court Rule Violations and allowing the dismantlers to commit perjury in da subtly keep that parent in fear that he/she will have to pay them more fees to keep the support coming any less$$$. That parent also senses the subtle threat coming from the dismantlers for likely less custody keep paying both the attorney and the dismantlers to keep custody at 70% (because there is no such 50/ This way, the kids college funds only continue to churn to the Dismantlers and Attorneys on both sides. 3- As a result of such a firm hollywood-stance orchestrated by the Dismnatlers and attorneys in action and successfully tearing apart both parents, the next move is to start accusations, further breaking down Surely and gradually, both parents while losing their shirts to the Dismantlers and Attorneys, will only fin fighting each other for years, to be able to see their kids! What a Racket? Who else gets indirect financial support for this behavior? Why do the judges not legally report election campaign funds? The end result is Mom and Dad are both fighting real good utilizing both attorneys, with the Attorneys g CCFC Master Exhs. P992

25 intelligent impression that they are on your side and you are a winner pay this to get this much percen pay that to get that, etc. When in fact the Dismantlers including Attorneys, Evaluators, Therapists, and M ONLY cashing out the kids college funds with nothing left for the kids. Wake up parents Do you now understand why on , San Diego s outspoken parents were called Litigants Behaving arrogant seminar hosted by the SDCBA where they falsely propped up and gave standing ovation to the credentialed Stephen Doyne, et al.? Parents, please listen to other parents in the know, and do not believe one iota of what you are being to attorneys who keep promoting and supporting the Dismantlers. One of the Thousands of Litigants Behaving Badly. Log in to Reply Eileen Lasher says: January 17, 2011 at 7:14 pm District Attorney County of San Diego has a section called Family Protection Division one would think t this Division would have an interest in San Diego Family Law Court being victimized by a group of attorn racketeering business. This racketeering crime ring was funded by tax dollars and continues to be funde dollars. The tax payers are providing the initial down payment for their illegal activities. In today s curren climate more than ever a criminal investigation should be conducted immediately and the perpetrators o with tax payer money should be arrested and with their profits should be made to pay not only the litigan tax payers. It is also clear these crimes are being committed under the color of authority making these more serious as well as placing these crimes under the jurisdiction of the US Attorney s Office. Log in to Reply Emad Tadros MD and The Public At Large says: January 19, 2011 at 8:46 pm The one Million Dollar lawsuit threat is alive if we do not shut down this thepubliccourt.com site. Please USmail the Amicus signature page only or attach it to my . This Amicus has no conection or liablitie that we filed agiasnt the ACFE or ACFEI on Let the the Frauds and their Racket read your professional opinion with no swearing please. We are to be all times and regardless. Even though no one desires to respect such a racket, however we are only to L Example. It is who we are being real professionals and we do not want to be a fake symbol of who they Every single public support is needed. Thank you. CCFC Master Exhs. P993

26 Log in to Reply soydaytah says: January 20, 2011 at 8:27 pm I love Here I always find a lot of helpful information for myself. Thanks for your work. Best regards Log in to Reply Emad Tadros and the Habitually Cheated and Frustrated San Diego families and Children says January 22, 2011 at 9:50 pm This is my Clarification to the Nationwide phone inquiries in regards to the Authentic-Psychology-Spec Board. Please note that we only mention the facts and not opinions. The Facts Are: The American Academy of Forensic Psychology/AAFP is the one and only legitimate, well respected For Psychology Board. It is the Forensic sub-specialty branch of the APA, the American Board of Professional ABPP. There are a total of 11 sub-specialty ABPP Boards. Each one of them is a well respected psychology board recognized by the APA/American Psychological Association as opposed to the counterfeit APA/Am Psychotherapy Association that is owned by Robert O Block. Why did O Block recreate the same APA-sounding name? Mr. O Block created a counterfeit APA, (using the same APA acronym) as the real APA as if to convey his e organization as the real APA, and justifying it by calling it the American Psychotherapy Association? It is layman s language to state the APA or AMA or FDA etc. and one rarely states the full three words. Would that fit the definition of Fraud according to the FTC? Watch out for sound-alikes! The naïve public is victimized and deceived by such counterfeit APA wall plaques that appear from a dista real thing (read with the APA in big letters), but the actual words underneath and their meaning need a m lens to tell the difference. It is obviously clever that Mr. O Block created a name that sounds exactly the same as the real APA. O Blo of-hand is cleverly crafted counterfeiting of the APA s name. If you happen to inquire from his phony ce purchasers as to whether or not their certificate was authorized by the APA, the answer would be Yes, t CCFC Master Exhs. P994

27 and defrauding the naïve public. Please review the Real Diplomate Directory dated above, where it says 0 Dilpomate under the Academy of Forensic Psychology/AAFP for Stephen Doyne. DIPLOMATE DIRECTORY SAYS: 0 DIPLOMATE WHEN SEARCHING FOR STEPHEN DOYNE. TadrosMD@pol.net Log in to Reply Emad Tadros and the Habitually Cheated and Frustrated San Diego families and Children says January 23, 2011 at 1:29 am The Voir Dire of Forensic Experts: Issues of qualification and training [Subtitle: "Sheepskins for sale: Shortcut to Slaughter?] Presented at American Psychological Association Boston, MA. 8/22/99 Stephen L. Golding, Ph.D. Professor Department of Psychology Adjunct Professor College of Law and Department of Psychiatry Log in to Reply Judicialcouncilwatcher says: January 30, 2011 at 10:53 pm judicialcouncilwatcher says: January 30, 2011 at 7:18 pm (UTC 0) CCFC Master Exhs. P995

28 Here is our bio s on your two Internal Audits people at the AOC: John The Cleaner Judnick, the senior manager of the AOC internal audits division serves as the ironica confidential fraud waste and abuse coordinator for California s judicial branch of government. His title ironically named confidential fraud, waste and abuse coordinator accurately represents what his role is coordinating fraud, waste and abuse. He operates an 800 number where dumb-ass judicial branch emplo genuinely believe they are doing the right thing reporting fraud, waste and abuse can call and file a repo Judnick s role is not to do anything about any fraud, waste, abuse or public corruption. His role is to ferre whistleblower, ferret out the facts, ferret out the evidence and then make it all disappear. Mr. John Judn figure in the taxpayer funded racketeering enterprise that is the AOC. Eric The Cleaner s Boy Pulido is the supervising analyst in the internal audits divison and the number tw charge. His job is to work with John The Cleaner Judnick supervising lower level auditors but also to wo ensure the judicial branch or trial courts remain faultless. By the way, judicialcouncilwatcher is placing the finishing touches on marincourtwatcher and sandiegoco For the proper definiton of what a cleaner is, use urbandictionary.com 3. Cleaner Usually called upon to clean up a mess another mobster has made. For instance: a gangster robs a store o comes back to base with a bullet in his stomach. A cleaner is quickly called-up and will be sent in to clear evidence, even if this means killing the store-keeper. Elite cleaners are rarely found in the mobs/mafias/gangs etc., but instead are part of a government age Considering the drastic consequenced often involved with these agencies actions, elite cleaners are req never hear of them, and you rarely hear of what they have cleaned up. All that s left is the event: somethi but the cleaner will make sure there are no trails left behind. Such cleaning jobs can be on a global scale clearing a trail of money used to get the job done. Log in to Reply Elena says: February 14, 2011 at 3:49 pm The Riverside Superior Court has the same problems, and they are not using the FL 327form. I ve pasted letter to the judicial council. The court attorney is refusing to release the fl 325 forms to a the party who know what the education, training and licensing of an evaluator was, and the court is refusing to issue su requesting that information. Judicial Council of California Administrative Office of the Courts 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco CA CCFC Master Exhs. P996

29 - angiemedia Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts Posted By Chris on November 20, Comments Recommend Send 3 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. In late October 2009, one or more people distributed a large quantity of flyers inside the San Diego family law courts. Reportedly they were stuffed in books, free magazines, and other literature in the courthouses. The flyers protest the use of expensive professionals in child custody cases, in particular section 730 psychological evaluators. Criticisms are also directed at minor s counsel attorneys, exchange and visitation monitors, and consulting psychologists. You can see a scanned PDF of the flyer [1]. The text of the protest flyer has also been posted on Courthouse Forum [2], one of the sites hosting discussions about the scandal. Some other web sites with related public discussions are: Custody Evaluator s Credentials Questioned In Lawsuit (10 News main site) [3] Custody Evaluator s Credentials Questioned In Lawsuit (10 News blog site) [4] Parents Say They Are Drained Of Money By Court Professionals [5] Some of the discussions mention the courts sealing the Tadros v. Doyne case after it started to be discussed publicly. Perhaps the courts want to protect privacy or maybe simply cover up allegations of their misconduct. Whatever the case may be, you can read the text from this quote in case the link or discussion thread becomes unavailable: PARENTS BEWARE! PRIVATE CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS ALSO CALLED 730 EVALUATIONS AND THE CHILDREN GO TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER Judges regularly order parents into Private Child Custody Evaluations and appoint a specific evaluator. Yet no one in the Court, including the Judge, verifies the education, credentials, training, or competence of the appointees. The Court deems itself not responsible for private sector practitioners, yet they make orders that force you to sign a contract and pay for what could only be called a disservice to your children. The evaluator then coerces you to sign a service agreement, medical releases, and other documents, when no legally binding contract existed prior to your signature being received. If the Court is allowed to make this kind of order, why is your signature required? But you will do this. You will do this because your lawyer (who probably told you it was a good idea and suggested an evaluator), the Judge, and the evaluator themselves will deem you uncooperative and imply that you will lose all custody of your children if you don t. Parents, WE, AS CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY, have no right under the U.S. or California Constitutions to raise or even have contact with our own children. Those in the business of the Justice Factory know this and will exploit your fear of losing your child to serve themselves and feed the mill. Regardless of these facts, the Judge will enter any report an appointee CCFC Master Exhs. P997

30 generates into your Court file under California Evidence Code 730, without verifying that the evaluator followed the legal procedures and/or complied with the orders they issued in your case. Once released to the court, you have no independent access the report you paid for. If you are ordered into a 730 Evaluation, your only chance at 50/50 custody is if: a) You are paying the right Family Law Attorney ($250+/hr.), and; b) You agree to pay for ½ the evaluation, in advance of the report..which has no set limit as to how long it can take or how much the evaluator charges hourly. Evaluations can cost as much as $30,000 and you may be required to participate in more than one!!! As w ell, you may be farmed out to their partner marketed colleagues for therapy, mediation, parenting coordination, supervised visitation, coaching and a few other services these same people provide. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A COURT APPROVED PRIVATE EVALUATOR DESPITE WHAT YOU MAY HAVE BEEN TOLD * Please download PKT-036 at the link provided below HOW THIS COULD HAVE HAPPENED? In 1992, the Federal Government enacted The Child Support Recovery Act. The States were at risk of having welfare funding cut. In response, California dismissed Argos Minimum Child Support Standards Act of 1984, in favor of The California Child Support Guideline (Family Code ). Child support was thereafter based on time-share rather than meeting the minimum needs of the child. Non-custodial parents, previously disinterested in custody but ordered to pay child support or face criminal charges, flooded the Court seeking custody. Resources exhausted, the Court, in its infinite business sense, created measures allowing the out-sourcing of services at the parents expense. The Court enticed private practitioners by calling them expert witnesses, such that their work product was immune to lawsuit, under Evidence Code 730. With HMO s and PPO s limiting payments to doctors for mental heath services that were not medically necessary, psychologists who formerly refused to be involved in the Court system, suddenly saw a cash cow. The public was now required to pay their full hourly rates for an indeterminate length of time, in hopes of continued, meaningful contact with their children. To this day the Court takes no responsibility to ensure that the credentials, training and education of the 730 Evaluators they appoint meet the legal standards. Lorna Alksne, Supervising Judge of the Fam ily Court, recently told Channel 10 News that it is the responsibility of the parents to verify credentials of an appointed evaluator.** In other words, they scapegoat their incompetence, corruption, and deliberate ignorance on you, at the cost of your home, your retirement, your children s savings and college funds and m ost im portant, your child s psychological, em otional, physical and spiritual wellbeing NAMES 730 s : Stephen Doyne, John C. Parker IV, William Dess, David Green, Lori Love, Russell Gold, Steven Sparta, Robert Simon, Yanon Volcani, Breffni Barrett, Neil Ribner, Linda Altes; Marketed Partners: Hannah s House, Family Connections, Monika Konia, Penny Angel-Levy, William Eddy, Terrence Chucas, Dave Schulman, Margot Lewis.and more too numerous to list here. LINKS CCFC Master Exhs. P998

31 * [6] (search PKT-036 created 7/09) ** [7] [4] [8] [9] (check Amazon for deals) [10] (note link) [11] (what???) - created and/or dispersed 9/09 by citizens exercising their 1st Amendment Rights Authorship Unclear, Possibly Related to Tadros v. Doyne Case Although it s not clear who the authors of this protest flyer are, my best guess is that they re motivated by the San Diego family law court scandal involving Stephen Doyne, a section 730 child custody / psychology evaluator, and the pervasive violations of court rules in San Diego County regarding psychological evaluators. Check my recent articles, including Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [12], for more information on that dispute. Widespread Criticisms Typical of Child Custody Disputes Because of way California courts treat divorces and child custody disputes as adversarial matters, the government encourages conflict that hurts children and families. The judges are clearly incapable of understanding the complex matters that go on in these fighting families in the limited amount of time they have to spend, especially because there is seldom any clear-cut evidence and there is extensive perjury in many cases. Even when there is evidence it is sometimes not clear what is real and what is not. Fabricated documents, spinning the meanings of s, phone messages, and photographs, and outright lying about events that never even occurred are common. Sometimes the dispute simply comes down to one or both parties having such animosity towards each other that they will do anything to hurt the other. Such parents often view children as pawns in their war. So there is a very high chance that the lying party will pull one over on the judge and if that party is awarded anything approaching 100% custody, the results will be dire for the children. Severing the connections between a parent and his or her children, especially by hostile means such as parental alienation, tends to cause a lifetime of psychological problems for both the children and the parent. The result of the adversarial process imposed by the courts is that one or both parents are generally very upset at many of the divorce professionals, often rightly so. It s my perception that these professionals should have understood the damage this adversarial system causes and how it often fails to reach accurate conclusions while financially devastating the parents and emotional damaging everybody involved. While there are some cases in which parental alienation campaigns or severe substance abuse problems almost demand a psychological evaluation, even those cases may not be truly clear-cut even with dozens of hours of interviews and testing. There are some psychological evaluators who do get it, but even they are often put into a position that they cannot truly help much. Even after they have issued their reports, often one party wants to continue to fight and argue and refuse to accept that the children need and should spend time with both of their parents. The psychological evaluation often simply serves to waste a huge amount of money while perpetuating a damaging conflict. Everybody suffers except for the people making their living on applying the destructively nutty psychological evaluation process in cases where it really isn t appropriate. Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the CCFC Master Exhs. P999

32 Rape of American Justice [13] Booklist Mini-review [14] A take-no-prisoners condemnation of psychiatric experts being waved into the witness box, this account trashes psychiatry in general as a quack profession. Hagen (a psychology professor) assails most of the diagnostic tools of the field in her text, which roams among court cases whose outcome hinged on the testimony of mental-health experts. Her fundamental contention is that psychiatry is a junk science whose theories when extended to matters of legal culpability go against common sense. Indeed, Hagen assumes the posture of that legendary [13] legalism, the reasonable person, and her prose is peppered with exclamations and rhetorical questions like Who could believe that? which might annoy as many readers as it might convince about whatever points are in question. Among them are such topically current items as battered-wife syndrome, recovered memory claims, post-traumatic stress syndrome, and urban psychosis claims. The average person could easily encounter in divorce and child custody litigation the situations Hagen vigorously complains of, so her energetic attack could gain considerable attention. Gilbert Taylor Further Reading Unjust Delays in San Diego Family Law Courts [15] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [16] Amicus Curiae brief filed for Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne [17] California Access to Justice in Family Court Law Panel [18] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [12] California Legislature Orders Investigation of Family Law Courts [19] Unconstitutional Child Custody Decisions [20] Holding Family Law Judges Accountable [21] 22 Comments To "Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts" #1 Comment By Monika s Not So Bad On December 13, 8:03 pm There are a lot of people listed on that flyer. I don t know most of them. But I d like to speak up for one I do know, Monika Konia. She s been up-front and focused on enabling kids to see their parents. She makes her living doing that. I am unhappy that I have to use services of her and people like her. But it s not because she does a bad job. On the contrary, she has been very professional. If I hadn t hired her, I might be spending many times the amount I spent on supervised exchanges fighting more false accusations from my vicious ex. CCFC Master Exhs. P1000

33 It sounds to me like whoever is behind this flyer is lumping together some really bad people (Doyne) with some OK people (Konia) simply because they are providing services to comply with court orders and making their living doing so. Maybe they should be attacking the judges and courts for doing such a bad job of resolving family conflicts rather than shotgunning everybody involved in providing the services. The courts encourage conflict to intensify and never get resolved. That s why there are so many people making their livings from the misery of divorces. #2 Pingback By CCFC Family Court Reform Presentation in Del Mar, California angiemedia On January 4, 2:47 am [...] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [...] #3 Pingback By Judge Lorna Alksne in Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter angiemedia On January 12, 6:55 pm [...] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [...] #4 Pingback By Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall angiemedia On January 25, 5:46 pm [...] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [...] #5 Comment By missing the point monikas not so bad On March 26, 4:30 pm You are missing the point altogether Monika s not so bad, the very fact that you have been ordered to a Stalinist supervised visitation monitor business is absolutely and completely wrong for most parents. The court routinely abuses situations like yours. Your Constitutional rights and civil rights are being violated by the very fact that you have to see your child in supervised visitation. #6 Pingback By Eric Moelter Speaks Against Cindy Dumas Distortion Campaign angiemedia On April 1, 2:46 pm [...] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [...] #7 Pingback By A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children angiemedia On July 29, 5:28 pm [...] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [...] #8 Pingback By San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining Orders angiemedia On October 10, 3:12 am [...] On Stephen Doyne Corruption/Fraud CaseEileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court MisconductFlyer Protest in San Diego Family Law CourtsSan Diego Courts Cover Up CCFC Master Exhs. P1001

34 Missing Forms and Psych EvalsStephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts [...] #9 Pingback By San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is Corrupt angiemedia On November 11, 11:30 pm [...] Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court MisconductFlyer Protest in San Diego Family Law CourtsSan Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych EvalsStephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts [...] #10 Comment By mike marvin On July 14, 2:23 pm monika has false reported, lied,everything she can possibily do to make money and prolong the abuse of children. Any positive reports of her come from her or someone she knows. Absoluetly the worst of the bunch. She needs to be jailed! #11 Comment By mike marvin On July 14, 2:29 pm monika is a lieing,false reporting criminal that needs to be jailed, she will abuse your kids to profit. dont use her! #12 Comment By Allison On July 16, 1:45 am Hi, I #13 Comment By Carol On September 29, 12:40 am Monica Konia is unreliable and unprofessional. On the phone most of the time while supervising. She is obviously only involved for the money. She gossips about attorneys, judges and the other parent. Her reports could be written by a third grader. Will follow the directions given to her by David Schulman or Stephen Doyne. Very low rapport with children. Uses poor language. #14 Comment By Chris On October 4, 7:15 am Carol, Many of the complaints I have heard about custody exchangers have come from the abusive parent who does not like that their maliciousness is being reported. Other times the abused parent is complaining because they feel unfairly treated which in fact they are. Frequently abused parents are made to pay for supervised visitations going on for years and have to choose between being nearly destitute or not seeing their kids. Men are frequently the targets as the family courts are undeniably sexist, but it happens to women, too. The San Diego family law courts are among the worst in the nation in terms of corruption, bias, violations of laws, and willingness to reward perjury and harm children. CCFC Master Exhs. P1002

35 From the top on down, the message is that hurting families is profitable so that should be the business of the courts. Few in the courts are willing to oppose these corrupt marching orders. Those who do may see themselves reassigned or mistreated by the judicial criminals who run the San Diego courts. No politician can honestly claim to stand for family values unless he or she is demanding drastic reform of the family law system in this nation. Chris #15 Comment By One of thousands On October 5, 3:57 pm I politely suggest the comments here are missing an important point. Divorce is a profit industry. They make money by placing hurdles between you and your kids. Why? Probably because your spouse wants to shake you down too. I m a lawyer and am >ashamed< that so many of my professional colleagues accept-noencourage this behavior. It is a disgrace. Solution? Kill them? Illegal, though it sounds reasonable. Reform them? Hard to defeat blind greed. Report them to the CJP? Or just vote them out for those who promise to promote independence? Hmm. There is an election coming up in April 2012 #16 Comment By One of thousands On October 5, 4:14 pm The last thing these maniacs want to see is justice. Our founders gave people the power to speak, and decide whether they wanted to be controlled. Personally I d throw out family court and require immediate mediation, but too many of my lawyer douchebag colleagues make so much money off of hysterical, greedy scumbag clients. An But the real disgrace to our society is that our courts are their partners in crime. The solution is pretty simple-throw their sorry asses out immediately. Make them suffer the abuse they have created. Put in honest, diligent, fair citizens who don t get a hard-on dealing out pain. Please Vote in April, My best to all. #17 Comment By Filth-Buster On October 16, 4:57 am konia is a sidekick to doyne. Two of the worst COURT WHORES in San Diego county. It was by the grace of God that I didn t beat the living shit out of her or her pansy-ass asslicking sidekick spouse. In fact, I bet his twat was bigger than hers. A truly Filthy sub-human duo. And doyne is their daddy-in-crime. Make that a Filthy sub-human trio. No worries though- it all washes out in the end #18 Comment By Konia the two headed monster On August 22, 9:30 pm CCFC Master Exhs. P1003

36 Konia forwarded every I wrote to her to my ex which was used in court against me. Konia volunteered to write a declaration to the court, when she left off an incident I reminded her to include it. She then falsely accused me of telling her what to write and stated I had done something illegal. She finally figured out her error but not before writing my ex-spouse that I had asked to do be involved in illegal activities. My advice is to avoid her at ALL costs. I will never ask her anything again and my answers will never be longer than two words. #19 Comment By WhoreExposer On August 25, 10:34 pm If you are using the konia duo pussies, then you deserve what you get. Those two are kunts #20 Comment By rob donaldson On August 27, 7:44 pm Monika is late 80% of the time. Rarely returns phone calls and is SO unprofessional that she brings her own kids. #21 Comment By rob donladson On October 10, 8:13 pm Konia is another reason why I believe all women are bitches. Mr. Glitch, her husband goes around with a stop watch! Wonder how that works since she is habitually late. The new Kid does look promising though. I would like to gargle his balls #22 Comment By Admin On November 4, 10:31 pm [22] There is a reported dispute about the comment made regarding Monika Konia on August 22, We have received an that seems to be claiming the comment was written to impersonate another party. The party sending the requested that the comment be removed. We do not have enough information to determine the accurate identity of the party leaving the comment, and it appears other recent similar comments may be related. Therefore pending further information we are posting this notice that the August 22 comment is disputed and also note that the comments on August 25, August 27, and October 10 may be involved in the same dispute. Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] scanned PDF of the flyer: [2] posted on Courthouse Forum: id= &post= #post [3] Custody Evaluator s Credentials Questioned In Lawsuit (10 News main site): [4] Cal. Custody Coalition for Evaluator s Families and Children Credentials v. San Diego Questioned County Bar Ass'n In Lawsuit (10 News blog site): CCFC Master Exhs. P1004

37 [5] Parents Say They Are Drained Of Money By Court Professionals: [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] v=bsh-zndx8vc [12] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire: p=5068 [13] Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice: 20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN= [14] Booklist Mini-review: [15] Unjust Delays in San Diego Family Law Courts: [16] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct: p=5277 [17] Amicus Curiae brief filed for Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne: p=5235 [18] California Access to Justice in Family Court Law Panel: [19] California Legislature Orders Investigation of Family Law Courts: [20] Unconstitutional Child Custody Decisions: [21] Holding Family Law Judges Accountable: [22] : #comment Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1005

38 - angiemedia San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct Posted By Rodney on July 19, Comments Recommend Send 12 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. Despite more than two decades of repeated investigations by the San Diego County Grand Jury of misconduct by the County of San Diego Child Welfare Services (aka San Diego CPS) agency, the abusive agency and its illegal and harmful actions continue unabated. Safeguards to fix errors and abuses have been perverted into meaningless mechanisms to cover up wrong-doing and insulate the County of San Diego and individual social workers from criminal prosecution and civil litigation. The agency is unrelenting in its refusals to correct its own problems, and continues to run roughshod over the law, civil rights, and best interests of children. The County of San Diego and its derelict Board of Supervisors also avoid taking necessary actions to correct the problems. Two reports have been released in 2008 and 2009 that indicate how San Diego CPS frequently: Removes children from homes without revealing the reasons Fails to document reasons for CPS actions in writing Fails to provide written communications and instructions to parents Claims to courts and others to have communicated in writing to parents, but no such evidence of this alleged written communication could be found by the Grand Jury. This implies that CPS social workers lied and/or perjured. This is consistent with past findings in previous Grand Jury investigations that CPS social workers routinely lie and perjure to the detriment of children and parents. Fails to objectively and competently investigate complaints regarding CPS and its social workers after children are removed from homes. Uses the removal of children from homes on inadequately investigated allegations as an excuse to stop further investigation. CPS Refuses to Communicate Effectively with Parents CPS social workers avoid using written communications with parents. It appears part of the purpose for this is to leave parents uncertain of what is happening and stymied in their responses because they lack critical information that should have been provided to them. (from San Diego County Grand Jury 2008 Report: NOTIFICATION AND TRAINING IN CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES [1], page 2) The complainants were a small group of individuals from all areas of the County and from different ethnic and economic groups. Their common ground was that they all had been accused of child neglect or abuse resulting in children having been temporarily removed from their custody. A common complaint was, at the time the children were removed, that they did not receive verbal or written notification specifying the reasons for removal. There was also an indication that the parents or custodians experienced ongoing difficulties in communicating with the social workers assigned to their cases and more difficulty in receiving written notices updating the status of those cases. Fact: Four of the six complainants were not told why their children were being removed nor were they notified in writing. Finding: Of the cases we examined, the Grand Jury found no record of written notification at the time of removal. CPS Refuses to Record Interviews and Use Written Communications It is unlikely that the following behavioral patterns apply to all CPS workers. In a system of hundreds of employees it seems likely there must be a few good apples. Yet they appear to be rare. If a citizen of San Diego believes the stereotype of CPS social workers as duplicitous abusive liars who will harm children and parents and do so without reasonable care for facts and without available means of recourse, it is CCFC Master Exhs. P1006

39 with good reason. CPS social workers do not record interviews and refuse to allow recordings of interviews when people request to make such recordings. Based upon these Grand Jury reports, statements from parents who have been abused by CPS, and documents in CPS case files, it appears that this conduct occurs for the following reasons: Social workers do not want to be held accountable for getting facts straight, so they are intent on covering up original physical evidence except for that evidence that they can control and manipulate as they see fit. Social workers want to be able to bias reports and findings in any way they see fit, the facts be damned. They do this via biased choice of words, false implications and statements that would leave an objective reader of a report believing things that are not true, intentional or seriously negligent false statements, and distortions and fabrications of statements of others. They omit mention of their own lying and manipulations and abusive conduct. Once they have documented a case with inaccurate, biased, and defamatory misinformation in their self-serving and biased manner, then there is no original source material upon which abused families can rely upon to correct the systematic misinformation promulgated by CPS. This then functions as an excuse for why they will not reopen a biased and seriously flawed investigation. Social workers do not want recordings of their verbal statements because they frequently lie, make inflammatory remarks, exhibit blatant disregard for the law and safety of children, show evident sexism and bias particularly against fathers and men, and commit psychological abuses and use unwarranted threats against parents to manipulate and control them. Social workers want to be able to manipulate 3rd parties contacted during the course of investigations to produce false evidence to be used against parents whom they have already decided with prejudice to target for deprivation of civil rights, suspension or termination of custody, or other unjustifiable actions. Social workers and the County of San Diego want to avoid prosecution and civil litigation for violation of the US Constitution and Federal Civil Rights legislation. If proper documentation of their actions and words and those of others were kept, it would significantly assist families abused by CPS in criminal prosecutions and law suits against individual social workers and the County of San Diego. CPS Has No Effective Oversight There is no effective oversight of San Diego CPS and its social workers. Instead, there is refusal to perform objective and competent investigations of their abuses and errors. The agency s supposed complaint investigation system, the CPS Ombudsman office, simply functions as a rubber stamp and biased selfdefense mechanism covering up abuses and errors by CPS and abusive social workers. As the Grand Jury stated: (from San Diego County Grand Jury 2009 Report: ENHANCING OMBUDSMAN S RESPONSIBILITIES WITHIN CHILD WELFARE SERVICES [2], page 2) When errors are made in CWS operations they are often highly visible and can have a devastating impact on the children and families involved. In addition, they have a negative impact on the overall credibility of the department. Where independent review exists it gives people confidence that no cover-ups are occurring. When there is no investigation, objectivity can be called into question. Objective investigations give the public confidence no cover-up exists. Based on recent newspaper articles and citizen complaints, there is a public perception that CWS s internal investigations are biased in favor of the agency. Interviews with CWS managers revealed that internal investigations are limited to a review of the case file and no additional field investigation occurs. When specifically asked if they sought out the truth, managers indicated that once a child was no longer in the home, active investigation of the initial circumstances of a case ceases. San Diego CPS: 20+ Years of Abusive and Illegal Conduct The 2008 and 2009 reports are rehashes in many ways. Citizens continue to file the same types of complaints against this agency year after year because the County of San Diego refuses to fix the problems. (from San Diego County Grand Jury 2009 Report: ENHANCING OMBUDSMAN S RESPONSIBILITIES CCFC Master Exhs. P1007

40 WITHIN CHILD WELFARE SERVICES [2], pages 1-2) In response to concerns regarding CWS processes in the removal of children that developed while reviewing previous Grand Jury investigations, the 2008/2009 Grand Jury undertook a study of the history of Grand Jury investigations as they related to CWS for the past 20 years. It has been noted that Grand Jury reports during this period discussed similar complaints and made recommendations to CWS about its initial contacts with families. Parents complain that these meetings are fraught with difficulties. They think that initial reports are not always accurate. To many parents, both the initial determination and the process leading to it are a source of confusion and misunderstanding. The initial determination is important because it serves as the foundation for Court proceedings, including placement of the child. In general, parents are not aware of any means to challenge the initial determination until a Court hearing. The Grand Jury undertook this investigation after Jurors noted that CWS is the current recipient of complaints of a similar nature to those covered in previous Grand Jury reports. The current Grand Jury investigation indicates that decisions made by CWS personnel are not subjected to significant oversight although they are subject to limited internal review of the case file. Additionally, employees of CWS testified that they have the ability to consciously manipulate the Risk Assessment tool(1) for the purpose of supporting any decision [they]. make. 1. Risk Assessment is a form that is used by CWS workers to assess the level of risk and may support the removal of the child. Complicit Involvement of Rady Children s Hospital and Chadwick Center The staff of Rady Children s Hospital and Chadwick Center have been involved in many abuses against families and children. The staff of these organizations appear to lack objectivity and allow themselves to be entangled in CPS misconduct for their own financial gain. Instead of helping children, they aim to help CPS. These are two very different goals. The first is to help children recover from any trauma that may have occurred, the second is often to traumatize children and brainwash them to assist CPS is generating evidence falsely to be used against CPS s chosen targets, even if their targets did nothing illegal. CPS and law enforcement feed incomplete and biased information to therapists who are supposed to be helping children. Often truly abusive parents have engaged in brainwashing tactics on their children, also, hoping to help build false accusations against the other parent. These behaviors all result in the focus of the therapy being on building a CPS or criminal case often against a parent who did not do anything illegal, not discovering what really happened or did not happen and helping the children deal with it. Accused parents are not provided the opportunity to talk with these therapists or to find out what is being discussed, even though it may be substantially inaccurate. Beyond the ability of accusing parents to brainwash their children directly, accusing parents or other accusers often have their words and statements fed to the therapists via CPS and law enforcement. The result is that these therapists lack objectivity and full information about a case. They are taught to regard the accused parent as a criminal and to speak about him or her in front of the children as such. They will consequently cause more damage to the children involved. They push children to make false statements and develop unfounded fears, causing what may turn into a lifetime of trauma for these children. The trauma may not be from anything done by the accused parent or caregiver, but rather from the psychological assault on the children committed by the therapists at the behest of CPS and law enforcement. (from San Diego County Grand Jury Report of : Dale Akiki Case and Prosecutorial Misconduct [3] ) The Grand Jury was able to determine that therapy frequently is not used to its fullest treatment benefit, but is an adjunct to develop evidence for the prosecution of child molestation cases. The many issues involving conflict of interest, hidden agendas and misguided treatment by therapists are addressed in this report as well as the dispelling of the myth that satanic ritual abuse is prevalent in child molestation cases in San Diego County. The Grand Jury s investigation of the prosecution procedures started with the role of the investigators who respond to the first report of molestation, and the relation to the social worker who participated in the first response. The Jury then went on to review the operation at Children s Hospital with regard to the initial evidentiary interview and physical examination. The Grand Jury spent a considerable amount of time investigating the role of therapists in dealing with children, and a review of the beliefs in ritual abuse and satanic ritual abuse. Many mental health workers were interviewed and testified before the Grand Jury. These CCFC Master Exhs. P1008

41 included Marriage, Family and Child Counselors (MFCC), Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSW), clinical psychologists and psychiatrists. Therapists are utilized by the court and the District Attorney s office to provide healing and treatment for young children who are victims of sexual molestation. In some cases these therapists have been used to encourage disclosures by children of events or perceived events relating to sexual molestation cases. The Grand Jury finds that The San Diego Model needs improvement when compared with the Orange County CAST model. The question of whether the prosecuting deputy district attorney had produced enough evidence to initiate proceedings against Dale Akiki is one that concerned this Grand Jury. This was especially true since there was almost no physical evidence, and in most instances disclosure by the children came only after intense therapy. The Grand Jury has learned that the original prosecutor in the case had concerns about the believability, credibility and reliability of the children s testimony. She lacked confidence in proceeding with the case because she believed that the children s testimony was neither accurate nor consistent. Rady, Chadwick, CPS, Police, and DA Dishonestly Tow Government Line Many of the mental health professionals working with allegedly abused children in San Diego County are employees of Rady Children s Hospital and its affiliate Chadwick Center. These so-called professionals are not objective parties. They have a vested interest in serving the goals of CPS and the government before the goals of helping children. Children do not pay for their services, the government does. They know who their customers are, and if their customers want them to harm children then they will gladly do it for a fee. CPS social workers are often in frequent contact with these therapists. As the Grand Jury found, when a therapist does not agree with the assessment of a CPS social worker, the therapist stands to lose business from this disagreement. Consequently, these therapists align with CPS because it is in their financial interests to do so. This is yet another problematic practice that results in wrongful accusations, abusive child custody changes, wrongful prosecutions, and indeed in some case in the covering up of actual child abuse by the actual abusive parent because the CPS social worker in charge of the case refuses to act in an objective and responsible fashion. When therapists and doctors from Chadwick and Rady are not sure what is going on in a family, they will allow police and CPS to influence them with intentional misinformation. As mandatory child abuse reporters, if these therapists and doctors are informed of something that could be abuse or neglect and fail to report it, they could be disciplined or prosecuted. Often they are not sure what is happening because they have incomplete information, so it is understandable that they may fail to file a report. But when they realize they may have failed to follow the mandatory child abuse reporting laws and there are signs of real abuse and neglect that had been pointed out to them, they will turn on the party that may push for disciplinary action against them. It is a game of kill the messenger intended to cover-up to protect themselves and their government handlers. When enough of these dishonest doctors and therapists stick together with their distortions, fabrications, and attacks on a parent who has legitimate concerns backed by real evidence of child abuse or neglect, they can turn that parent into an accused target for the government to persecute. They are happy to do it to protect themselves and line their pockets with government money. They will write letters and reports which intentionally omit evidence which shows legitimate concerns of the target parent, and instead portray the target parent as crazy and abusive. San Diego parents would be well-advised to never trust anybody at Rady Children s Hospital or Chadwick Center or any other doctor or therapist who is involved in child abuse or neglect reporting. Even if a parent thinks they have good evidence of abuse or neglect and have shared it with these so-called professionals, it can and will be ignored and evidence fabricated or spun to portray them as the problem if the government handlers such as CPS social workers wish the doctors or therapists to do this. Rady, Chadwick, CPS, police, the District Attorney, and others get together on Wednesdays at Rady Children s Hospital for seminars on child abuse topics. Too often these are used as gab-fests for these corrupt and dishonest parties to influence each other inappropriately and to set the government position on particular families and cases to which all the parties must adhere at risk of discipline or loss of income. As a parent who risks contact with these corrupt groups, you run the very real risk of being turned into a falsely accused child abuser. Every contact you have with these people can be spun to portray you inaccurately, and they will do it willingly so that even outside objective parties doubt what you say and believe the lies and distortions of Rady, Chadwick, CPS, and police staff. It may sound alarmist, but it is a real phenomenon that occurs because there are plentiful incentives for dishonesty and spin-jobs and inadequate mechanisms for punishing or removing those who engage in them. CCFC Master Exhs. P1009

42 Therapists Become Child Abusers Therapists who are used by CPS and law enforcement agencies as described above may function as government-paid child abusers and brainwashers. In such cases, they force psychological trauma on target children until the children break and do what is demanded of them, even if they know they are lying. This includes repeating false allegations against the chosen targets of CPS and the police. (from San Diego County Grand Jury Report of : Dale Akiki Case and Prosecutorial Misconduct [3] ) CONTAMINATION Contamination is the act of introducing outside influences into a person s subjective experience so that either his memory of an event or his description of the event is altered. Kenneth V. Lanning is the Supervisory Special Agent assigned to the Behavioral Science Unit of the FBI at their academy in Quantico, Virginia. In his list of possible sources of contamination he includes overzealous intervenors. He points out how interested parties such as parents, other family members, doctors, therapists, social workers, law enforcement and prosecutors can create intervenor contagion. Lanning describes how contamination occurs: Victims have been subtly as well as overtly rewarded and bribed by usually well meaning intervenors for furnishing details. In addition, some of what appears to have happened may have originated as a result of intervenors making assumptions about or misinterpreting what the victims are saying. The intervenors then repeat, and possibly embellish, these assumptions and misinterpretations and eventually the victims are forced to agree or come to accept this official version of what happened. In the Akiki case it appears that contamination occurred at many levels. First, the parents had several meetings where the accusations against Dale Akiki were discussed. Although the parents were cautioned not to talk about these events with the children, the fact is that at least some of the parents did. One father even supplied an audiotape of his session with his child. The therapists were also a source of contamination. Therapy is not only a possible source of contamination, it is by its very nature a form of contamination. Therapy is an active effort to provide the client a new framework to understand the events in their lives. Therapeutic change on the part of the client is based on suggestibility. In order for a person to benefit from therapy, some degree of suggestibility must exist within the client. Unless people were suggestible, therapy would not work. Contamination in therapy can occur through overt and covert methods. Therapists can also contaminate each other, and this is then passed on to the client. When one therapist deals with more than one client connected with a particular case, it is possible that information extracted from one client interview can consciously or subconsciously be transferred to a second client. In addition, when several therapists dealing with different clients in the same case get together, the possibility of the transfer of misinformation or misinterpretations exists. The possibility becomes even greater when all the therapists have a common bias, such as accepting ritual abuse allegations as established fact. The best example of contamination in the Akiki case was the fact that the therapists were not only trying to treat the children but they were also attempting to be criminal investigators. The prosecutor asked the therapists to provide more disclosures of abuse. One therapist reported that she encouraged parents to use the empty chair technique with their child at home so that the child could accuse Dale Akiki, and act out her anger toward him in effigy. The parents were urging the children to provide more and more allegations that could be used for trial. The pressures on the children were enormous. SUGGESTIBILITY According to Elizabeth Loftus, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology at the University of Washington and author of several books and articles on memory, There is enormous variability in the age of earliest memory from two years to eight years and occasionally later. Young people go through a period of development when their vocabulary has not been fully formed and where they do not really understand how the world works, so they make up explanations for what they observe, which may not be very logical. Psychological studies do not show a simple relation between age and suggestibility. A person s perception, memory and verbal report of an event can be influenced by numerous factors unrelated to the truth of the incident. Pre-event and post-event information, interviewer bias, repeated yes-no questioning and the wording of a question can influence the recall and reporting of an event. Research shows that young children are generally more CCFC Master Exhs. P1010

43 suggestible than older children, and that children can be made to distort information based on what they believe the interviewer wants to hear, and this can occur consciously or unconsciously. The dilemma faced by the prosecution is how to extract believable testimony from very young children. To aid them in this effort the prosecution often turns to therapists. WHAT IS A THERAPIST? The term therapist represents a function, not a title. Persons of several backgrounds and training are considered capable of treating a child victim as a therapist. These include social workers holding the credentials of Marriage, Family, Child Counselor (MFCC) and Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW), either of whom need to have a Master of Social Work degree. A therapist may also be a psychologist with a Ph.D., or Psy.D. or a psychiatrist (MD). San Diego County therapist, Michael Yapko, in his book, states there are essential key points that therapists need to remember. Some of his findings include the statements that, Therapists often hold erroneous views on the workings of memory, repression and hypnosis; most therapists surveyed admitted they do nothing to differentiate truth from fiction in their clients narratives; Therapists and researchers have no reliable means to distinguish authentic from false memories and clients need for acceptance is a powerful factor that leads them to conform with therapists perceptions. The author stressed that, Therapy typically involves more art than science, and how it is practiced is largely a product of a therapist s subjective beliefs. Families of child victims may privately hire a therapist of their own choosing; however if the therapist is to be paid through the Child/Victim Witness Fund they must select from a list of therapists who are approved by the Juvenile Court. In order to receive court approval, the applicant must complete an extensive and thorough application showing his/her educational training, existence of a State license, specialties and experience. They must also affirm that they have viewed a three-hour videotape and the accompanying syllabus of a training seminar for therapists. The Jury found that an inexperienced intern could be covered by this Court approval under the blanket of a licensed therapist simply by filling out a short two-page application. There is no screening of the amount of supervision the intern receives. In fact, there is no evidence that the applications of the licensed therapists receive more than a cursory screening or that there is any periodic peer review of the therapist s performance. The only peer review protocol that the Grand Jury found was developed to assist the presiding judge of the Juvenile Court to communicate with the mental health community on issues relating to the writing of reports, the format and guidelines adopted for that purpose, and to educate them concerning the interaction between the work of the court and that of the therapists. There was no provision for judging the work of the therapist as a therapist unless a complaint was received, and then the matter was referred to the presiding judge for action that he/she might feel was appropriate. Therapists Fail to Adequately Document Their Work Government-paid therapists and those paid by accusing parties, often malicious parents in a divorce, often fail to adequately document any of their work. They do not audio record or video record sessions, and they may take few if any notes. The result of this sloppiness is that the evidence which exists comes down to hearsay perceptions of the therapist who can spin and distort statements to be whatever is necessary to endear themselves to CPS. A good therapist from CPS s perspective is one who documents whatever CPS wants them to say and hides whatever disagrees with CPS. Even therapists who do not believe there is any abuse happening are forced to report abuse by mandatory child abuse reporting laws. This is what happened in the Dale Akiki case, one of the most egregious wrongful prosecution cases involving child abuse allegations in the history of the United States. (from San Diego County Grand Jury Report of : Dale Akiki Case and Prosecutorial Misconduct [3] ) MISGUIDED THERAPY In the Akiki case, when suspicion of molestation first surfaced, the pastor of the church called in a therapist who was a consultant to the church to interview the children. After interviewing them, he turned in a report of suspected molestation, as required by law, to the authorities and referred the children to another therapist who saw each child one time. He later told the prosecuting deputy district attorney that he did not feel that Dale Akiki had been involved in any molest. Many of the children underwent a videotaped evidentiary interview at the CCP at Children s Hospital. After that the children were placed in treatment with the various therapists mentioned above. CCFC Master Exhs. P1011

44 The Child Victim-Witness Protocol, supposedly followed by the District Attorney s office, calls for therapists to assume that they may be called as witnesses in a trial and that they, therefore, should maintain concise, clear and factual records. In the Akiki case, there was little or no documentation of any of these sessions which went on for an extended period some of them twice weekly for years. There were no videotapes or audiotapes, and notes were either illegible or non-existent. In addition to trying to provide healing therapy, some therapists were also engaging in investigative techniques, trying to extract disclosures of molestation from the children. Therapists can get children to say just about anything. When children initially say that nothing happened to them, a misguided therapist labels them as being in denial. Then therapy is sometimes continued for months or sometimes years until the children disclosed answers the therapists want to hear. In the case of Alicia W., which was studied by a previous Grand Jury, the child was kept from her parents and treated by a therapist who told her that she would not be allowed to return to her parents until she admitted that her father had raped her. The child originally disclosed that a stranger had entered her bedroom window, but no one believed her until conclusive physical evidence proved that her statements were true. Records show that most of the therapists involved in the Akiki case attended the seminar where the training video for therapists was filmed. The Jury found that the training video was excellent, but concluded that there was a blatant disregard of its contents when it came to working with the children. Tactics such as the brainwashing and threats used on Alicia Wade are emotional and verbal abuse against a child. They are paid for with San Diego County taxpayer dollars. As a result, all taxpaying citizens of San Diego are forced to contribute to the child abuse epidemic in the county because they help fund child abuse by the government. Therapists who engage in these forms of child abuse refuse to document them in any way. The result is that they help protect themselves from prosecution and lawsuits to hold them responsible for the child abuse they have committed under government direction. Usually this cover-up succeeds very well. The exceptions are few and far between, but include cases such as the Wade family lawsuit that resulted in CPS-hired therapist Kathleen Goodfriend losing her license and being held liable for a judgement of $1 million for her abusive treatment of Alicia Wade. CPS agencies across the state are on record as opposing liability for misconduct of social workers and the people they hire to abuse children under the guise of therapy as is shown by the record for California Assembly Bill 1355 in 1995: (from California AB 1355 [4] ) DIGEST: This bill specifies that immunity from prosecution does not include specified acts on the part of a juvenile social worker, child protection worker or other public employees. Senate Floor Amendments of 9/8/95 recast provisions that are not covered by immunity. ANALYSIS: Existing law confers an absolute immunity on various persons who are required by law to file reports under the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act. Other persons who file reports under the Act, but who are not required to do so, are liable only if the report is false, and the person knew the report was false, or recklessly disregarded the truth of falsity of the report. [Penal Code Section ] Existing law also immunizes various persons who, in good faith, file reports under the Child Welfare Services Act. It also immunizes the same persons for participation in any judicial proceeding resulting from such a report. [Welfare and Institutions Code Section ] This bill provides that, notwithstanding any other provision of the law, the civil immunity of juvenile court social workers, child protection workers, and other public employees authorized to initiate or conduct investigations or proceedings shall not extend to any of the following: 1. Perjury. 2. Fabrication of evidence. 3. Failure to disclose known exculpatory evidence. 4. Obtaining testimony by duress. As used in this section, omaliceo means conduct that is intended by the person described in subdivision (a) to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct that is carried on by the person described in subdivision (a) with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. Note: This bill has been amended in the Senate Judiciary Committee. As it was voted on in the Cal. Coalition Assembly, for Families the immunization and Children v. San was Diego the County same as Bar the Ass'n civil immunity provided to peace CCFC officers. Master Exhs. P1012

45 Background In Superior Court v. Goodfriend (1993) 169 Cal.App.4th 169, the Fourth District held that the Act (specifically Penal Code Section 11172) is a reporting statute and its protection runs to reporting: it does not apply to activities that continue more than two years after the initial report of abuse by parties who are not acting as reporters. [p. 174.] The Goodfriend case arose from the Wade family s experience with the dependency system and has become infamous as an example of how much emotional and financial harm the current system can cause to a child and her family. The following account is taken from the Fourth District s opinion: On the morning of May 9, 1989, eight-year-old Alicia Wade complained of pain when she went to the bathroom. Her parents brought her to the Navy medical unit by 8:30 a.m. The family was then escorted to Children s Hospital where staff determined that Alicia had been raped and sodomized, and filed a report under the Act. Alicia stated that a man had come through her bedroom window and hurt her. Late that afternoon, a hospital worker and detective accused Alicia s father of the molest. In an attempt to prove the father s innocence, the parents agreed to have their home searched and talk with the police, and the father submitted to a rape test, a DNA test and three polygraph tests. By May 11, the Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a dependency action and the following day had Alicia placed in temporary foster care. Meanwhile, DSS investigative employee Diane Anderson interviewed the parents and referred them to a private family counselor, Kathleen Goodfriend. At her first session with the family on May 11, Goodfriend accused the father of the assault. In July 1989, the family s attorney advised them to plead nolo contendere to a charge of neglect and assured them all other charges would be dropped. The attorney added that, assuming the parents passed a psychological evaluation and found a 24-hour caretaker, Alicia would be home within a week. The parents reluctantly accepted the plea bargain in order to get their daughter home and put the experience behind them. Notwithstanding that the psychological exam was favorable and the family had provided the names of three 24-hour caretakers, counselor Goodfriend refused to cooperate and DSS later backed out of the agreement. For over a year after her attack, Alicia stood firm in her insistence that her father was not the assailant. Further, the same month that Alicia was attacked, a man entered the bedroom window of a four-year-old girl living across the street from the Wades, abducting the girl and attempting to rape her. The man, Carder, a registered sex offender, was arrested in June, 1989 and by August was charged with four criminal cases involving minors, but not with the Wade case. Goodfriend, the District Attorney and DSS were all aware of the Carder cases. Goodfriend and the foster-parents put continuing pressure on Alicia to confess that her father was the one who assaulted her. Directing Alicia to say her father was guilty, Goodfriend repeatedly told the child: (1) she knew Alicia s father had molested her; (2) Alicia would feel a lot better if she admitted it; (3) the story Alicia had been telling was not believable; (4) Alicia s mother had been assaulted by Alicia s grandfather; and (5) if she wanted to go home, Alicia would have to say her father was the perpetrator. At Goodfriend s direction, every night when she was put to bed, the foster-mother told Alicia over and over again that Alicia s father had raped her. During all this time, Alicia was completely cut off from her family. Her mother did not see her for a full year and her father did not see her for two years. Finally, Alicia yielded in June 1990, finally stating that her father was guilty. She testified against her father in July. In September, Alicia, her mother and brother entered conjoint therapy with Goodfriend. By November, the mother was so overwhelmed that she attempted suicide and was placed in a locked ward until January, Alicia s father was arrested in December, New counsel for father had Alicia s nightgown, worn the night she was raped, tested and the DNA test proved that her father could not have committed the rape and, instead, Carder was among the nine percent of the population whose DNA would have matched that found on Alicia s nightgown. The Wade family sued and the trial court sustained the demurrers of the defendants based upon the various immunities provided in law. In their petition for writ of mandate, the family argued that, the courts have moved beyond the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act, Penal Code sections et seq., to come full circle so those who abuse children in the name of preventing abuse are immunized by the very law meant to protect children. [p. 173.] In finding liability on the part of Goodfriend and the foster-parents, the Fourth District noted that they came onto the scene after the initial reporting of abuse and voluntarily assumed CCFC Master Exhs. P1013

46 roles of those who, having received the report and determined the identity of the perpetrator, search for corroboration and/or attempt to pressure a witness to get a conviction. [p.176.] The demurrers to all causes of action against the social worker and DSS were sustained because of the statutory immunity. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No SUPPORT: (Verified 9/8/95) Child and Family Protection Association Coalition of Parent Support Fathers Rights and Equality Exchange Committee on Moral Concerns Grandparents as Parents OPPOSITION: (Verified 9/8/95) County Welfare Directors National Association of Social Workers California State Association of Counties California Independent Public Employees Legislative Council, Inc. Service Employees International Union, Calif. State Council County of Sacramento ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The author s office believes that the absolute immunity of social workers, when coupled with their power and influence in a dependency case, has created a lack of checks that is needed to maintain an appropriate balance between these two types of harm. The author states it is his intent in this bill to provide that needed balance. Supporters argue that judges simply rubber stamp the report and recommendations of the social workers in these cases. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: The concern raised by opponents, and noted by the courts prior to Goodfriend, is that any limitation on their immunity would make social workers too fearful of lawsuits to appropriately intervene to protect an endangered child. Opponents state that the decision to remove a child from his or her home, in the first instance, is made with little that is immediately verifiable in the way of information and the possibility of harm to the child may be such that a social worker would generally err on the side of caution and remove the child. How is psychologically torturing a child for more than a year into making false accusations against a parent in the best interests of the child? The answer is that it is not, it is in the best interests of the social workers and government. They don t care about hurting children if they can profit from it. Although AB 1355 was signed into law in 1995 by Governor Pete Wilson, it has not had the effect of holding social workers liable for misconduct. This is because now social workers and the government keep cases out of juvenile and criminal court when they know they have lied and manipulated witnesses and evidence. By doing so, they can keep children from families for years and escape prosecution and civil litigation for their misconduct. Prosectorial Misconduct by District Attorney When an alleged child abuse case is passed along from CPS to the police for continued investigation, it seems that might eliminate some of the lack of objectivity and gender bias from the situation. But the reality is that it does not. The San Diego Police Department and related law enforcement agencies are in close contact with CPS, Rady Children s Hospital, Chadwick Center, and the Child Abuse Unit in the District Attorney s office. All of these groups frequently interact with each other and do so in a fashion that spreads bias and lack of objectivity. This can and does lead to severe prosecutorial misconduct going so far as prosecuting people for child abuse crimes that it is unlikely they committed and which in fact may never have occurred at all. Often such wrongful prosecutions are done by intentionally hiding evidence from the accused with intent to win a case at the expense of justice. (from San Diego County Grand Jury Report of : Dale Akiki Case and Prosecutorial Misconduct [3] ) The Grand Jury notes that Brady v. Maryland indicates that it is the duty of the prosecution to disclose evidence favorable to the defense exists in constitutional due process, both in state and Federal jurisdictions. In California, such disclosure must be made voluntarily. It is held in People v. Wright, We have imposed a stricter duty on prosecutors in this state, by requiring them to disclose material evidence favorable to the accused without request. The Grand Jury notes that the U. S. Supreme Court has stated, The United States Attorney is CCFC Master Exhs. P1014

47 the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one. The philosophy expressed applies equally to all public prosecutors. The extent and consistency of disclosure by deputy district attorneys to the defense of material evidence, or information which might lead to material evidence, favorable to the accused has been considered by the Grand Jury. In the Akiki case, the prosecuting deputy district attorney failed to disclose in a timely manner the fact and result of a surveillance of the accused conducted prior to charging. Such disclosure ultimately was made under imposition of court order. Further, the fact of the investigation of alleged child sexual abuse by a known prior offender, involving a victim related to and occurring near the time of the alleged incidents in the Akiki case, was not disclosed to the defense. Moreover, the investigation of that reported occurrence was not pursued. These circumstances were learned by the defense through an anonymous tip. Moreover, in an unrelated matter, the Grand Jury has taken notice of reversal by the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District of a conviction because of failure of the District Attorney s office to reveal information bearing on the credibility and professional competence of a principal prosecution witness. And, in the civil aftermath of an ill-fated sexual abuse prosecution, notice is taken of allegations of failure to disclose and lack of truthfulness on the part of a deputy district attorney as reported in the opinion of the Court of Appeal. Yet, the Grand Jury has found that prosecutors both in this and other jurisdictions, as well as jurists, were of the opinion that those items of potential evidence which were withheld or ignored by the District Attorney s office should have been disclosed promptly and voluntarily to the defense. As to the yet unproved allegations of suppression and lack of truthfulness, the Grand Jury can only express its grave concern. Although the Grand Jury has observed some excellent lawyers in the District Attorney s office, certain members of that office have become obsessed with the idea of winning cases. The fact that It is their duty to see to it that those accused of crime are afforded a fair trial has been forgotten or overlooked. Because the District Attorney s office is charged not only with pursuing and prosecuting criminals, but also with doing justice, the fine balance that must be struck is easily outweighed by overzealous prosecution. An atmosphere of conviction, and conviction only, can be expected to produce inadequate investigation, incomplete disclosure to the defense and sharp practices. The District Attorney must provide leadership to change any such attitudes in his office at the earliest possible time. San Diego County Board of Supervisors is Negligent and Knowingly Enables Abusive Tactics Including Civil Rights Abuses and Government-Sponsored Child Abuse The failures and shortcomings in the CPS agency in the county have been brought to the attention of the Board of Supervisors repeatedly. Yet they do nothing effective to fix the problems, leaving CPS and its abusive staff free to continue to abuse the county s children and parents. There is no realistic doubt that the current San Diego County Board of Supervisors is substantially at fault for the abuses in the current system. Grand Jury reports have exposed the problems to them over and over again with substantial evidence of the misconduct of CPS and its sister child-abusing agencies. But little to no action is taken to correct the serious deficiencies. The current Board of Supervisors consists of Greg Cox, Dianne Jacob, Pam Slater-Price, Ron Roberts, and Bill Horn. All five of the supervisors have been in office since 1995 or earlier, a period of time during which Grand Jury investigations have consistently shown that serious problems exist with CPS and that the agency blows off the recommendations to fix them on a routine basis. The county supervisors have no incentive to clean up problems in the system because to do so, those problems must be discussed further. This is political risk-taking intolerable to them. They know they were in charge during this whole period of time and should have done something about the problems. Doing it now is effectively an admission that they were negligent in the past. Instead, they do all they can to bury these problems behind the scenes so that they are not politically damaged by their harmful and negligent conduct. (from No Term Limits for San Diego County Supervisors [5] ) Three of San Diego County s five member Board of Supervisors were sworn in again today. CCFC Master Exhs. P1015

48 There are no term limits for County Supervisors, and all of them have been on the board for more than 12 years. KPBS reporter Alison St John has more. The Board of Supervisors uses county executives and county counsel such as Walter Ekard and John Sansone to cover up for themselves. These people year after year write responses to Grand Jury investigations that whitewash the wrongdoings, hide the responsibility of the Board of Supervisors, make excuses for the agencies not fixing problems, and enable the abuses and misconduct to continue. They also participate in cover-ups and enablement of wrongdoing by individual supervisors, too. The San Diego County Board of Supervisors must be recalled or voted out of office if there is to be any meaningful reform of the abusive County of San Diego Child Welfare Services agency and its related government perpetrators of civil rights, family, and child abuse. Secondly, the executive staff of the County of San Diego must have its head chopped off. The figurative guillotine should surgically excise Walter Ekard, John Sansone, and people in positions like them out of the top two or three levels of county government. They should be replaced with government officials who understand that they are responsible for ensuring County of San Diego agencies comply with laws, do not abuse the civil rights of families, and do not engage in child abuse and other illegal actions. The replacements for these corrupt executives should not come from within the County of San Diego as the county government is corrupt to its core and the culture of corruption and dishonesty is spread by the executives down the line to social workers as a matter of policy and de facto behaviors. The Board of Supervisors and county executive staff replacements should come from groups that have exercised significant resistance to the wrongdoings of the County. Groups that have argued against civil rights violations, wasteful government spending, and police and law enforcement abuses are prime sources for candidates for these elected and hired positions. There must also be much more transparency of government implemented in San Diego County. Law enforcement and CPS routinely use the law to hide their misconduct from the public. They cite privacy concerns as reasons to fail to release evidence that damns their conduct as corrupt and lawless. Even citizens who have been egregiously wronged have trouble getting to any of this evidence. Further, if they dare oppose the government, they risk retaliation. CPS and the police retaliate against troublemaking parents by taking away their children with no good cause and then turning what should be routine investigations that take a few weeks into many months or years of refusal to comply with the law, refusal to comply with judicial directions, and working relentlessly to build a cast of co-conspirators who will help defend each other from their misconduct and pin the blame for it all on the target parent. San Diego s children and their parents are not safe from government abuse at the hands of CPS and its allies until the agencies and people who engage in these unlawful and abusive activities are removed from their positions and punished or prosecuted for their misconduct. Further Reading Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [6] San Diego County Grand Jury 2008 Report: Notification and Training in Child Protective Services [1] County of San Diego Responses to Grand Jury Reports [7] San Diego County Grand Jury 2009 Report: Enhancing Ombudsman s Responsibilities Within Child Welfare Services [2] San Diego County Grand Jury Report of : Dale Akiki Case and Prosecutorial Misconduct [3] San Diego County Grand Jury Report of : Families in Crisis [8] A Report by the San Diego County Grand Jury of June 29, 1992: Child Sexual Abuse, Assault, and Molest Issues [9] San Diego County Grand Jury Letter Regarding CPS Abuses [10] Torture of the Wade Family by San Diego CPS [11] Child Welfare Urged To Tell Parents Why Kids Taken [12] No Term Limits for San Diego County Supervisors [5] Imposing Term Limits on County Supervisors [13] Bill Horn, arrogant pol; John Sansone, slippery pol enabler [14] Enter the daughter: Bill Horn scrambles to explain his relationship with his chief of staff [15] CCFC Master Exhs. P1016

49 San Diego News More on Horn/Wonsley financial irregularities story [16] 30 Comments To "San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct" #1 Pingback By Child Safety and Civil Rights vs. Government Killing Citizens angiemedia On July 29, 3:56 am [...] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct [...] #2 Comment By Colleen Morris On August 7, 12:09 am Thanks, Rodney! I ve been thirty years in this system and I never understood (really!) what they were doing to me. CPS is the only agency I have dealt with that says you are guilty until proven innocent. And you are never innocent until you pay! #3 Pingback By Defending Against False Child Sexual Abuse Allegations (Part 1) angiemedia On August 13, 4:35 am [...] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct [...] #4 Comment By Ronald Moortgat On September 16, 2:50 pm Why isn t the governor or Federal agencies doing something about these and other abuses in our state? This is by no-means only happening in California. It seems to be country wide. How could this wellintentioned idea, have degraded into this gestapo-style modus? I find it hard to believe that our U.S. Congress is oblivious to these atrocities. #5 Comment By Kimberly Trembly On September 17, 8:36 am Thank you for providing such a thorough and informative site. I live in San Diego and am going through the nightmare of trying to get my children, (Jack,3 and Kendra,1 yr.), back from CPS. Thanks again for your info.!! Kimberly #6 Pingback By Father Imprisoned 20 Years on Fake Child Sex Abuse Charges angiemedia On September 21, 2:43 am [...] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct [...] #7 Comment By Mark A. Massey, Esq. On September 24, 11:39 am I am a former prosecutor of juvenile dependency cases for the Los Angeles County Office of the County Counsel. I served in that role for two years, as long as I could stand it, before quitting and changing sides in order to represent parent, legal guardians, de facto parents, relatives of dependent children and others including some minors (though the courts are very resistant to outside counsel representing the children since they have their own in-house court-created firms, CLC 1,2 and 3.). I left prosecuting because of L.A. County s Department of Children and Family Service s (DCFS) policies of self-protection, and win-at-allcosts approach to cases which they filed in the court on behalf of the kids for whose protection and best CCFC Master Exhs. P1017

50 interests they supposedly were looking out. Lying and manipulation of facts are minimally as rampant in DCFS s reports as in San Diego s CPS s reports. They County Counsel s here are generally noble, but they stand by the social workers in court even when they have serious reason to know that the social workers have manufactured, manipulated or omitted essential facts and evidence. They and the DCFS view it to be the defense attorney s job to defeat them if they can, and when the defense attorney fails to do so, it is the defense attorneys fault, or the case was righteous. Thus, the Deputy County Counsels and DCFS social workers can sleep at night, despite their insideous disregard of families and children whose interests they are there to preserve and protect. I and my law firm, Komanapalli Massey LLP, love to take on these sociopathic DCFS social workers and the attorneys who represent them. I find the use of the foster family agencies who harbor the children detained by the DCFS, or the independently licensed foster parents also employed by the DCFS, so long as they play along with the DCFS s game plans, useful sources of truth, generally unintentionally yielded up, because they are usually not as trained in the art of deception as are the DCFS s social workers. Parents attorneys and others with interests in kids caught up in the wretched dependency system without just cause ought to bear that tip in mind as they go about building a defense against the presumption of guilt imposed upon them at the outset of cases involving their child wards. It help to remind the foster parents, in order to obtain their assistance, that they can sue the DCFS for lots of money as soon as the DCFS retaliates against them in response for their betrayal their audacious exposure of arrow-sharp truth aimed at piercing and deflating the ballooning deceptions manufactured by the commanding DCFS. Invariably, the DCFS does delist the foster parent who exposes the truth about kids statements and the manipulations thereof by the DCFS and those enlisted by the DCFS to help build their case against the parent or other caretaker whose rights and interests in the subject children, in maintaining their families unimpeded by a second-guessing, paternalistic government, the DCFS has wrongly infringed. For the assistance of my law firm, Komanapalli Massey LLP, with your juvenile dependency case, me at [17]. I will happily assist in your battle for the return of your child(ren). Best of luck to all suffering at the government s meddling and deceitful hands. [18] #8 Pingback By Gun Collection + Malicious Mom + Government = Life in Ruins angiemedia On October 7, 3:51 pm [...] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct [...] #9 Pingback By California Men s Centers, San Diego» Blog Archive» Domestic Violence Month in the DV capitol of the world ain t what it used to be On October 7, 6:40 pm [...] San Diego Grand Jury recently released a third or fourth comprehensive and scathing report of child protective services. The first report issued in the 1990 s. Since then child protective services has thumbed [...] #10 Comment By Mike Winters On October 12, 7:19 am This sort of thing goes on in the state of Tennessee all the time. Why our government won t do anything about these legalized criminals is beyond me. Oh that s right, CPS is a government agency and it is all about money. #11 Comment By wayne On October 12, 9:10 am Don t forget the attachment of social dollars coming from this Democratic Society where money is paid within 72 hours and well checks are deemed appropriate to support the staff of psychiatrists that attach to Social Security Benefits and Medicare. Want to clean up waste in the government then look to HHS for the answer. #12 Pingback By Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire angiemedia On November 18, 6:35 am [...] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct [...] CCFC Master Exhs. P1018

51 #13 Pingback By John Van Doorn Runs for San Diego County Supervisor in 2010 angiemedia On February 24, 1:39 am [...] The wrongs heaped upon San Diego children and parents will never stop with the current board members in place. As one of our authors wrote last year: (from San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct) [...] #14 Comment By Renee On March 18, 10:31 am CPS was made to help truly abused children but today it is nothing but tearing families apart. Instead of getting these families help they ruin thousands of life s just to put money in these evil crooked social workers pockets. And in which many of these social workers are liars and have no real compassion for these families! #15 Comment By shelley salus On March 21, 10:23 am My son Bo was in the system for 12 years. Thankfully he trusted us to come back home. He lived with an old couple. The foster father died. The house had an extreme fire. He jumped on a broken trampoline and dived from a house. He purposefully threw a baseball through a neighbor s window, with no consequences. One of the boys stole a car. He brags how sneaky his life was in the system. All the dangerous things that he did. He doesn t know how to drive, cook, clean. He doesn t know how to fill out an application, look for work. He has no knowledge of girls or responsibility. He is damaged permanently by the CPS system. They put him on drugs he didn t know, expected him to take the drugs, as we were told he was sad. He was deprived of his Indian heritage. He is NOT a man. His grooming habits are sad. His memory is shot. His social graces are lost. He doesn t care about people. And he has lost so much that even material things mean nothing except video game cards. He has no dreams or ambitions. He is afraid of rejection and is a potential bum in the making. Another homeless person. I had a son that knew sign language, was polite and sweet as a ladybug. He was honest and aimed to please. Now he is lost. And his brother is out next year, and he is the same way. To this day CPS scares me, not just for myself, but for the USA. I have others in the system still. I expect the same. Oh yeah, we were accused of having too little food. We completed their criteria 3 times and still the paper work was lost. I hope our story is not repeated, but alas; now my son is going through the same thing. And they had their child taken because the mother slept after having the baby, rather than nurse him. Thank you for your time. [19] #16 Pingback By CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010 angiemedia On April 12, 8:50 pm [...] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct Child Custody, Children, Civil Rights, Courts, Divorce, Family, Government Abuse, Legal, Parental Alienation Barbara Asher, California Coalition for Families and Children, CCFC, Charles Asher, Christine Goldsmith, Cole Stuart, Edlene McKenzie, Emad Tadros, Hannah's House, Janis Stocks, Jeannie Lowe, Larry Corrigan, Laury Baldwin, Lori Love, Meredith Levin, Robert Simon, San Diego County, San Diego County Bar Association, San Diego Superior Court, Stephen Doyne, Susan Griffin, Terry Chucas, Up To Parents, William Hargreaves, William McAdam Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback [...] #17 Pingback By CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010 angiemedia On April 12, 8:50 pm [...] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct Child Custody, Children, Civil Rights, Courts, Divorce, Family, Government Abuse, Legal, Parental Alienation Barbara Asher, California Coalition for Families and Children, CCFC, Charles Asher, Christine Goldsmith, Cole Stuart, Edlene McKenzie, Emad Tadros, Hannah's House, Janis Stocks, Jeannie Lowe, Larry Corrigan, Laury Baldwin, Lori Love, Meredith Levin, Robert Simon, San Diego County, San Diego County Bar Association, San Diego Superior Court, CCFC Master Exhs. P1019

52 Stephen Doyne, Susan Griffin, Terry Chucas, Up To Parents, William Hargreaves, William McAdam Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback [...] #18 Pingback By CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader angiemedia On April 16, 4:33 am [...] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct Children, Civil Rights, Courts, Crime, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Family, Government Abuse, Legal, Parental Alienation, Partner Violence, Police, Politics Bill Eddy, California, California Coalition for Families and Children, CCFC, Colbern Stuart III, Cole Stuart, Jeffrey Fritz, Judge Lorna Alksne, Lisa Schall, Lyndolyn Stuart, Lynn Stuart, malicious mom, Robert Basie, San Diego, San Diego County Bar Association, San Diego Police Department, SDPD, Stephen Doyne, United States, William Eddy Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback [...] #19 Pingback By San Diego Lawyer Jeffrey Fritz Increases Conflict and Costs angiemedia On April 20, 10:05 pm [...] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct Child Custody, Children, Courts, Divorce, Family, Legal, Parental Alienation, Psychology Bill Eddy, borderline personality disorder, California, Child Custody, Cole Stuart, dirty legal tactics, Divorce, Domestic Violence, false accusations in divorce, family law court, high conflict personalities, Jeffrey Fritz, Legal, Lynn Stuart, narcissistic personality disorder, perjury, personality disorder, police abuse, San Diego, San Diego Superior Court, United States, William Eddy Comments (3) Trackbacks (1) Leave a comment Trackback [...] #20 Pingback By Tonya Craft s Ex, Parental Alienator Joal Henke, Shows Kids Will Lie About Sexual Abuse To Hurt Target Parent angiemedia On July 22, 9:13 am [...] a community crusade to destroy an innocent man s life, this time with claims about how Dale Akiki, a disabled and disfigured man who volunteered at Faith Chapel Church, sexually molested, made them drink the blood, and then mysteriously disposed of the carcasses so nobody could find [...] #21 Pingback By Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct angiemedia On July 31, 6:29 am [...] for 15 years until her youngest child turned 18. The interviewer, Fred Sottile, used my article San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct as the outline for his interview. I had no idea this was going to be the case when I started [...] #22 Pingback By Why Damon Moelter Is Being Abused angiemedia On August 10, 6:53 am [...] a community crusade to destroy an innocent man s life, this time with claims about how Dale Akiki, a disabled and disfigured man who volunteered at Faith Chapel Church, sexually molested the children in his care and somehow murdered an elephant and giraffe in front of [...] #23 Comment By Scared Grandma On August 29, 2:25 am I have to say, in our situation, CPS got it right. Those of you who cry that CPS tears families apart, keep in mind the sociopathic/narcissistic nature of a child abuser. They are often charming and everyone s best friend and most people can t believe what goes on behind closed doors. Then when they do lose their children, they cry foul hiding behind the facade. My son in law nearly killed my 3 week old grandson. He could not wait for the CPS case to close so he can now sue CPS. He is evil defined, and not many people know it because of the face he shows. But I was there when the older child would stop on a dime if his father even looked at him. He was 16 months old at the time. I was there when there were two bite mark bruises on the child and when I took a picture of the second time, my son in law erased it telling me that I had no right to take a picture of his son without his permission. I was there when my daughter and I came back from a 4 day trip and both of his little ears were completely black (bruised) because he fell. I later found out he liked to flick him in the ears to get him to mind. He was 14 months old at the time. I was there when on three separate occasions, his little face Cal. Coalition was covered for Families with and broken Children blood v. San vessels Diego County from Bar crying Ass'n hard, and my son in law said CCFC he didn t Master Exhs. cry, I P1020 don t

53 know what you re talking about. I was there when my son in law was looking at him with fury because his sippy cup was leaking on the couch. I took the garbage out and when I came in the baby was screaming and his face was beat red. I asked why, and my son in law said because he s crying, and when I said his face never gets that red when he cries, he said oh I just washed his face, the water might have been a little too hot. On his first birthday, we were out to breakfast and his father took him out to the car to change his diaper. When he came in he had a red mark on his forehead and another between his eyes. He later got a slight black eye. I asked what happened, my son in law told me that he had been thrashing around and must have banged against something. Later he admitted he had plucked (I call it thumping)him in the head because he wouldn t hold still when he was changing his diaper. Of course no one was around when he admitted that to me. One time he got ready to pluck him in the head because he had crawled into the kitchen and he knew he wasn t supposed to (under 1 year old at the time) and I told my son in law if he did it, I would call 911. And I talked to friend in a different state about what to do, and was told that nothing would be done if I didn t actually see anything happen. My biggest regret in life not calling anyway. When my daughter and her family moved to San Diego due to a job transfer for her, my son in law refused to look for work and was the main caretaker of my grandson. My son in law convinced my daughter that I was jealous of their happy family and that I was trying to break it up, and I wanted my grandson for my own. She refused to believe me when I would tell her something was not right. Fast forward to April of last year. Another baby is born. When he is 3 weeks old, he begins to cry non stop. Literally non stop. Then, he stops. He is catatonic and having seizures. My son in law doesn t want to take him to the doctor. Finally they do. He has a skull fracture, several subdural bleeds, dead brain matter, retinal hemorrhaging, bruises on his face from where my son in law tried to force feed him. (They stayed back in their bedroom the entire time the baby was fussy so I did not see him until right before they took him to the hospital.) A hold is placed on the baby at the hospital. They take the older child too and send him to Polinsky (where he sucked his thumb going in and was scared to when he came out) then my parents came down and gave up several months of their life to take care of these children. I couldn t have them because I lived in the home too and no one was admitting to hurting the baby. My grandson was on life support, and eventually taken off and then he was released. A few days later he was readmitted with hydrocephalus and had to have a VP shunt put in his brain to drain the fluid. Something he will have for life. I remember coming home from work one day, and my son in law was moving furniture around in their bedroom. He doesn t even wash a dish, so why was he doing this? I found it odd, really odd. He also came home the first night the baby was in the hospital and moved a coffee table to sit in front of the love seat instead of in front of the couch where it had been. The wonderful detective came over the next day to interview me. The first thing she asked me was if my son in law had moved any furniture. I said yes. She mentioned that she found it odd he had come home in the middle of the night when his son was in the hospital in PICU in critical condition. She also told me that my son in law had told the doctors and the detectives that the older grandson had head butted the baby a few days ago. She described what he had told her and the way he said it had happened could not have been possible with the position the coffee table had been in. She interviewed me (my oldest grandson was still with me at that point, he was taken later that day). When she left, she said she was authorized to remove him from the home, but she did not feel the need. My son in law then spent the next two weeks frantically on the computer searching for any way my grandson could have the brain injuries. He tried to say he got the fracture during delivery. At this point we were thinking the same thing. Come to find out later, the skull fracture was too large to have been done in the birth canal. The following 1+ year, up to now, my EX son in law has done everything within his power to make our lives miserable. My daughter ended up getting the children back, she worked very hard to do it. CPS said they had never seen anyone work so hard, and even asked her permission to use her work as a teaching tool. We found out that the norm is for women to choose the abuser over the children, and that is why we have so many children in foster care now. (My son in law knew that, because he tried to make CPS think she was in contact with him and was going to reunite with him.) My point in sharing my tragedy with you, is that sometimes it may look like someone is getting screwed over by CPS and it just is not the case. My son in law will no doubt find some slimy lawyer willing to take his case and willing to buy into his lies and rake my daughter over the coals even more than she already has been. We do have facts on our side. For example, he calls about once every 3 months and he will leave a voice mail that says just trying to get in touch with the kids AGAIN and sigh, so you know someone is in the background hearing him and thinking we never answer the phone or let him talk to the kids. He is probably even pretending to call all the time when someone is standing there, but he really isn t. We have phone records to back that up! He even LIED TO A JUDGE, when it was brought up in court that he was not attending any of the medical appointments, he said to the judge I don t know what they are talking about, I go to all the appointments, and he knows the doctors, physical therapists, etc. can testify that he has not been to any! But he will get some slimy lawyer to buy into it. I just hope that any attorney who takes his case, takes a look at the medical records, and keeps in mind that we have tangible data to disprove all the assertations he is making! To further prove what a slime he is, he proceeded to shack up with another woman, get her pregnant and had another baby before his brain damaged son even turned 1!! And, his girlfriend refuses to believe any of this (because he is a sociopath) and in fact, went to her parents to have the baby, stayed with them until CPS came out, then left and moved in with him the next day. CPS in that state still believes she is keeping the baby away from him. What kind of man brings another child into the world in this situation. He STILL did not have a job when the new baby was born!!!!! CCFC Master Exhs. P1021

54 So, before you start believing people s pity stories, you may just want to look into the background of the situation and talk to several people involved, not just take the word of one person who is very likely a sociopath!! #24 Comment By Mary Hart On September 26, 4:44 pm The San Diego County CPS is very much corrupt. I am currently dealing with them and sadly so are my Grandchildren. I am currently not able to have any type of communication with them, unless I pay the CPS Social Worker money. What kind of bullshit is that?? #25 Comment By Chris On September 26, 8:31 pm What Mary is describing regarding San Diego CPS social workers demanding bribes from families is blatant corruption, is criminal activity, and should be prosecuted. However, given the collusion we have seen between some of the local police departments and CPS, the cops may be aware of how CPS social workers are demanding bribes from families and are allowing it. I doubt you can trust the local prosecutor s office, either. Even if you were to bring them evidence of this crime, for instance audio and video recordings of the social worker requesting a bribe, they may decide to prosecute you instead of the social worker. Their logic would be that the recordings are illegal and you are a criminal, they want to put somebody in jail, and they don t want to embarrass their bosses in the San Diego County Board of Supervisors. After countless Grand Jury investigations of San Diego CPS, the county supervisors fully know how CPS hurts families. But they are happy for it to continue because it helps them balance their budget via Title IV funding they receive for abusing children and terrorizing parents. That s why you should vote against all county supervisor incumbents. Both Ron Roberts and Bill Horn are up for re-election in November Voters should vote them both out. While there s no way to know for sure if Stephen Whitburn and Steve Gronke will be any better, simply shaking up the current board with outsiders is likely to create some resistance to the corruption-and-abuse-is-good thinking of the board. The same county supervisors have controlled the region for more than a decade without any serious challenges. County employees were fed up and sponsored a term limits proposition in the June 2010 elections which passed. You can see a hint of the sort of corrupt behaviors pervasive to San Diego County s government from how its chief administrative officer used his job and county resources to fight the proposition. (from [20] ) San Diego County s Chief Administrative Officer Walt Ekard sent an to about 1,250 recipients attacking the term limits measure. He wrote, Term limits is a fools errand that only helps perpetuate inexperience, mediocrity and special interest control. Let s do things the old-fashioned way and just trust the voters to decide whom they want to represent them. [7] Public employees are not allowed to use public resources to support or oppose ballot measures and, as a result, Ekard has been criticized for sending the missive. He, however, told a local newspaper he believes he did nothing wrong. Walter Ekard is part of the reason for CPS abuse of families and children and the corrupt nature of the county s government. When the current board is replaced by new members, they would do well to get rid of him. Your best bet may be to work with investigative news media, perhaps 60 Minutes or another group not influenced by dirty local politics, and also with the FBI or State Attorney General s office. #26 Comment By Hurt Father On November 13, 1:03 pm [21] I am the father in the case that this so called scared Grandma mentioned. This is one of the most elaborate instances of deception I ve seen yet. Before you buy into this psycho s pity stories, realize that even with the tangible evidence in front of her, she would rather protect her daughter at the expense of her grandchildren s safety than to face truth. While all of these accusations are lies, there are only certain points that need to be addressed, as people believe what they want in the end. My son was nearly KILLED when his mother went into a fit of rage as a result of his frequent crying in the first weeks of life. She slammed him with enough force to crack his skull. CCFC Master Exhs. P1022

55 According to a licensed clinical social worker on this case, this scared grandma s daughter, the Mother in this case, displayed all the symptoms throughout out marriage of post-partum psychosis. Not depression, PSYCHOSIS. Both Scared Grandma and the Mother failed polygraph tests at San Diego Police Dept, a corrupt organization who in conjunction with CPS, covered up that fact and LIED to the dependency court REPEATEDLY. I have proof because scared grandma left her cell phone behind when she moved out of our home, allowing me to discover all the text messages where the Mother revealed her failure, and stated that she was even being interrogated! Yet the court report clearly says they PASSED?! This is one coverup that allowed me to get Federal authorities involved. One one occasion, the Mother revealed that she nearly drove off a cliff in one of several suicidal episodes WITH my child in the back seat. One of several suicidal episodes. Yet a gullible social worker bought her phony tears and her supposed ignorance to any possible cause for my son s LIFE THREATENING injuries. Another example. To protray me as a psycho, the Mother lied to CPS and said that I MADE HER WALK right after a gall bladder surgery from Sharp to Rady s Hospital, a COMPLETE lie that she immediately recanted. But did CPS put that into the report, NO! They put her lies in there for the judge to see, in addition to their own. Yet CPS bought her lies no matter what the evidence against her, and proceeded to twist every detail of this case against me. They even went so far as to ask me to engage in a type of therapy, ruled by their OWN appointed therapist to be HARMFUL to me, as a condition of reunification. When this therapists findings became favorable, a 20 something social worker actually questioned the therapist, who has been practicing TWICE as long as she d been alive, whether she thought I was MANIPULATING her?! Ridiculous! Yet, all the Mother s therapist had to say was nothing about her looks like a perpetrator! If anyone can tell me what a perpetrator looks like, please share. I would ve never married this psycho let alone had kids with her. The list goes on and on. Look closely at what scared Grandma writes in this article above. You can clearly see the sheer amount of paranoia, even where she claims that I have people listening in so I can set them up. These are telltale signs of a guilty conscience. Scared Grandma would rather believe that her daughter could never commit such a crime against my sons, rather than protect them and she knows it. With regards to the statement about me being slime and shacking up, I don t shack up with anyone. I find it laughable that scared grandma, the same person who locked her daughter out of the house as a kid so she could have sex with one of her many boyfriends, could even think to make any negative comment about what I do over here. She displayed unnaturally possessive behavior towards my first son from the outset, so much in fact that she ended her 5+ year relationship because my son became more attached to her boyfriend than she wanted! Oh I have letters in writing about all this, and as an award winning journalist who depends on honesty for a living, I seriously doubt his words. Based on what I have seen and what I m told about her therapy sessions, you re capable of doing ANYTHING to push the male figure out of your life, or your daughters. Bottom line, I love my children and would never hurt them. The FACT is, the children in my care suffered no injuries, until their Mother became the primary caretaker. This site is for people who have been victimized by a corrupt organization, not for the delusional to post their lies in an effort to try to vindicate CPS. You should save your breath for court scared grandma, because we are coming in hard against CPS and the people responsible for my children still being in danger. This will not end until I get justice for my children! #27 Comment By Hurt Father On November 14, 12:49 am [21] Oh, and one more thing. I need to correct one more lie that has been told here by scared Grandma. CPS in the neighboring state where I reside took an interest in the aforementioned case scared Grandma mentions due to the daughter I have in my care. Upon investigating, this agency referred to the other case as, and I quote, a crock and stated that San Diego CPS had no case at all in their eyes! Several workers were shocked at the treatment we received from the other agency (Even workers involved with the original case disapproved of the primary worker s conduct). They left us alone fully aware that my child was in my care and that of her mother, and that she is healthy and well cared for. I was fortunate, and I don t take it for granted. But let me say this: Beware of the people around you, and who you let into your kids lives. There are sad, pathetic individuals out there who would do anything to ruin your life and steal your children, and this is by no means limited to CPS caseworkers. There are aunts, uncles, cousins, and even grandmothers who are capable of falsely reporting to CPS just because they want your kids. Guard your children, because in this day and age you just never know. #28 Pingback By San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS «Fight Corrupted Family Courts and CPS On July 15, 7:52 pm CCFC Master Exhs. P1023

56 [...] 19th, 2009 Goto commentsleave a comment Thank you for this article goes to- Rev. G. Allen Smart [...] #29 Pingback By CJP Investigation of Judge Lisa Schall Heats Up, Citizen Input Sought angiemedia On November 9, 1:52 am [...] and Families In Contempt for LawEileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct >San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS MisconductSan Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych EvalsStephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts [...] #30 Pingback By Judge Diane E. Gibbons Confirms Herself An Enemy of Free Speech and Supporter of Abuse By Silencing The Psycho Ex Wife Website angiemedia On February 25, 6:14 am [...] otherwise. Access to evidence is restricted, evidence is tampered, perjurers are everywhere and the perjurers include government employees as evidenced by grand jury investigations of CPS. The sociopath knows how to manipulate all of these people for maximum harm. Frankly, I am [...] Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] San Diego County Grand Jury 2008 Report: NOTIFICATION AND TRAINING IN CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES: [2] San Diego County Grand Jury 2009 Report: ENHANCING OMBUDSMAN S RESPONSIBILITIES WITHIN CHILD WELFARE SERVICES: [3] San Diego County Grand Jury Report of : Dale Akiki Case and Prosecutorial Misconduct: [4] California AB 1355: [5] No Term Limits for San Diego County Supervisors: [6] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct: [7] County of San Diego Responses to Grand Jury Reports: [8] San Diego County Grand Jury Report of : Families in Crisis: [9] A Report by the San Diego County Grand Jury of June 29, 1992: Child Sexual Abuse, Assault, and Molest Issues: [10] San Diego County Grand Jury Letter Regarding CPS Abuses: [11] Torture of the Wade Family by San Diego CPS: [12] Child Welfare Urged To Tell Parents Why Kids Taken: [13] Imposing Term Limits on County Supervisors: [14] Bill Horn, arrogant pol; John Sansone, slippery pol enabler: [15] Enter the daughter: Bill Horn scrambles to explain his relationship with his chief of staff: [16] San Diego News More on Horn/Wonsley financial irregularities story : [17] : mailto:mark-massey@sbcglobal.net [18] : [19] : mailto:stimelingsss@yahoo.com [20] : [21] : #comment Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1024

57 California Coalition for Families and Children, et al. vs. San Diego County Bar Association, et al, United States District Court, Southern District of California Exhibits to Complaint Exhibit 7 CCFC Master Exhs. P1025

58 Thousands of Children Pawns in Culture of Greed and Corruption in California Family Courts San Diego, CA Revelations that the San Diego Family Court system s highest paid psychologists, administrators and referring attorneys may be engaged in multiple levels of corruption, fraud and kick-backs has led the California Coalition for Families and Children (CCFC) to demand a full-scale investigation. What started as a lawsuit filed by one of the state s leading Psychiatrists Dr. Emad Tadros, Vice Chief of Behavioral Health at Scripps Mercy Medical Center has rapidly expanded to include law violations by judicial staff, tax evasion, and hefty referral bonuses between lawyers who profit from and in many cases encourage the conflict and misery of divorcing families. Top custody evaluator lied on resume and received credentials from fake diploma mill It was only after Dr. Tadros himself went through a family court hearing in 2006 that he began noticing a pattern questionable reasoning behind the custody recommendations of San Diego s top family court evaluator Dr. Stephen Doyne. Upon investigating Doyne s background, Tadros learned he had lied on his resume when seeking court-appointed work and repeatedly misrepresented his professional certifications during client disputes. Doyne billed these clients over $300 an hour to interview thousands of children in private and make life-altering custody recommendations that often increased hostility and pitted parents against each other. According to Tadros, more conflict would lead to more cash for the lawyers and evaluators. Tadros lawsuit cites two inconsistencies in Doyne s resume: Two area colleges USD and UCSD deny that Doyne taught psychology courses there (as his resume claims) Doyne s additional Diplomate credentials were obtained from a notorious fake degree mill that according to an investigative piece in The American Bar Association Journal, also awarded a highlevel diploma to a house cat. Referrals and Paybacks net Doyne millions According to Coalition spokesperson Cole Stuart, Doyne prefers high conflict cases where the parents have lots of money but can t agree on anything. Doyne cashes in by taking advantage of a feuding couple, entrapping them in an endless string of additional sessions to resolve the conflict the winner take all environment he engenders. Doyne often receives referrals from divorce attorneys for these cases, and according to a recent legal brief filed by the Coalition, paybacks for these referrals may include generous finder s fees. The Coalition estimates Doyne earns over $1,000,000 per year preying off of conflicted families far higher than the average family court psychologist salary of $60,000 $120,000. A cottage industry thriving on people s misery Kathleen Russell, a cofounder and staff consultant at the Center for Judicial Excellence, a Marin County community-based judicial watchdog organization, says the entire California family court system has evolved into a culture of cronyism from which a cottage industry of private evaluators and mediators has grown and thrived. CCFC Master Exhs. P1026

59 In Sacramento County, the average rate for a court-ordered evaluation and report is $15,000. In Marin County, evaluators may charge as much as $60,000. Families are being ruined emotionally and financially by this system, says Barbara Kauffman, a family law attorney in Marin County. Evaluators use future custody of children to extort cash payments and illegally avoid taxes Private custody evaluators including Doyne are pulling out all stops to avoid paying taxes on the money they charge families in disputes. The Coalition for Families and Children are requesting to review Doyne s tax records to prove that his noncompliance with Court reporting rules allows him to commit felony tax evasion. According to Title 5 of the California Rules of Court, every custody evaluator must file credentialing paperwork within 10 days of being hired to each case. The Coalition says that Doyne has not filed any such paperwork for at least 6 years. Coalition members in past disputes claim they were charged up front cash payments by Doyne and others for any hope of a favorable custody decision. No accountability The Superior Court of San Diego County recently admitted that it does not see itself as responsible for verifying the qualifications of each child custody evaluator it appoints. Instead, it claims that responsibility for oversight belongs to the Public at Large. However, with limited regulatory oversight and virtually no avenues for members of the public to challenge important evaluator decisions such as child custody, The California Coalition for Families and Children says that an unscrupulous agent can commit negligent even criminal behavior without fear of accountability. In the case of Doyne, the Coalition contends that his network of referrals and relationships with judges has provided the legal and political cover for him to remain in the shadows. Says Coalition spokesperson Stuart: With layers of people making huge amounts of money off the current system including judges and administrators the court has little incentive to make changes. Stuart said that the Coalition is in process of obtaining the campaign finance records of every elected San Diego Family Court Judge to determine if Doyne and other evaluators are illegal contributors. Thousands of Cases Could be Affected Coalition Calls for Reform According to the Tadros suit, Doyne was committing fraud each time he provided his credentials to clients, patients, colleagues, and courts. Such fraud could lead thousands of disenfranchised parents to seek legal damages against Doyne, their attorneys, and the court, and request that their disputes be reopened and Doyne s reports tossed out. Says Stuart: The Coalition is asking the Legislature to immediately audit the San Diego family court system to begin reforming the way that family courts do business including how evaluators are supervised, credentialed, and hired. Parents need to regain confidence that custody decisions are being made by certified, competent professionals whose primary motivation is the well-being of the child not getting rich. CCFC Master Exhs. P1027

60 - angiemedia Killer Bonnie Hoult Made False Abuse Allegations Against Ex Posted By Rob on December 18, Comments Recommend Send 5 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. News station KTLA has reported new details in the San Clemente, California, murder/suicide on December 14, 2009, involving two little girls, their mother, and their killer, grandmother Bonnie Hoult. Investigators believe that Hoult used her.357 handgun to shoot and kill first her 2 year old granddaughter Julia, then her daughter Elizabeth Liza Hoult Fontaine, next her 4 year old granddaughter Catherine, and finally herself after Orange County Sheriff s Department showed up at the home where they were staying. OCSD believes that Elizabeth was holding Julia on her lap as Bonnie put the gun in her mouth and pulled the trigger, meaning that Elizabeth was a willing participant in the murder of both her children and herself. KTLA interviewed Hoult s step-son, Howard Hoult, who lives in Culver Bonnie Hoult City, California. He told reporter Chris Wolfe that Bonnie Hoult tried to use false child sexual abuse charges against her ex-husband decades ago. He doesn t believe the sexual molestation accusations against Jason Fontaine. Howard related how Bonnie Hoult was a negative force who exerted toxic influence on his half-sister Elizabeth Fontaine and likely encouraged her to use false sexual abuse allegations against Jason Fontaine. Bonnie Hoult s History of Mental Instability Statements of people familiar with Bonnie Hoult indicate she exhibited behavioral problems typical of somebody with a personality disorder. Personality disorders involve extreme deviations in behavior patterns apart from cultural norms. Many of the descriptions of personality traits of Bonnie Hoult and Elizabeth Hoult Fontaine center around them being very controlling, unwilling to compromise, and prone to extreme reactions. Such personality traits are often associated with the dramatic, emotional, or erratic personality disorders [1] including narcissistic, borderline, antisocial, and histronic personality disorders. (from Investigator: Grandmother likely killed 4 in Talega [2] ) Howard Hoult, 51, Elizabeth Fontaine s half-brother, said Bonnie Hoult has behaved erratically over the years. One time, he said, she blasted a hole in the ceiling of a home with a shotgun, according to a story relayed to him by his father. I would describe her as not being well-balanced, Howard Hoult said. Elizabeth Fontaine was about 5 when her parents divorced and mostly was raised by her mother in Sylmar, according to Howard Hoult. Elizabeth s father, Charles P. Hoult also Howard s father now is 76. He is a retired scientist living in Los Angeles. Charles Hoult found out about the killings on his birthday as he recovered from a recent surgery, according to his son. Imagine hearing that as a birthday present, Howard Hoult said. Charles Hoult did not return phone calls. [We removed the text in this location from this quote of an article published by the OC Register [2] after receiving threats from a person that shall remain unidentified. We cannot verify the accuracy of what the OC Register reported, we merely quoted and credited OC Register under fair use doctrine, but have removed the disputed text in case their information was not accurate. You can see the original text on their website [2].] According to Howard Hoult, Elizabeth grew up in a fractured household, rarely seeing her father, who worked long hours. Comments from former coworkers of Elizabeth Fontaine at Rockwell Automation and her work as a CCFC Master Exhs. P1028

61 lawyer indicate she was well-regarded. However, a former acquaintance of the Hoult family indicates behaviors that suggest a narcissistic enmeshment [3] between mother and daughter. (from Comments in Howrey Associate Killed in Apparent Murder-Suicide [4] ) I grew up a few houses away from Liza and Bonnie Hoult in Simi Valley. Liza graduated in from Simi High School in I remember Bonnie being way too protective of Liza when growing up. When we would play together, Liza would always want her own way and if she didn t get it.. would call her mom into the room to either send my sister and I home or would bully us in doing what Liza wanted. I am always shocked when I hear stories of this nature. You are supposed to love your children more than you hate your ex. I cannot say I not surprised to learn that Bonnie would do this. I felt she was a little crazy. They are used to getting what they want. It was either their way or the highway. Elizabeth Fontaine may have developed a personality disorder from being a victim of parental alienation. Many personality disordered people can excel in the workplace while their family relationships are dysfunctional and even disastrous. It s also not uncommon for alienated children to learn abusive behaviors and emotional manipulation tactics from their harmful parent and then to apply them to their own children as part of the cycle of child abuse, much as she was attempting to do against father Jason Fontaine. Custody Decision Triggered Murders The murder/suicide occurred shortly after a family law court ordered the two children into the custody of a paternal aunt, Stephanie McLaren, amidst continuing but unsubstantiated accusations of child sexual abuse against the father, Jason Fontaine, and behaviors from mother Elizabeth Fontaine that are clearly consistent with possible parental alienation and indicate an elevated risk of parental abduction. Jason was investigated and no physical evidence was produced. He was never charged with a crime. Elizabeth couldn t accept that. Jason s attorney, John York, believes that Elizabeth truly believed her accusations even though he believes that they are entirely false. Allegations of Sexual Abuse In Divorce Often False The phenomenon of sexual abuse allegations in divorce (often abbreviated as SAID) is a disturbing reality in child custody battles today. Frequently a parent who is unwilling to accept shared child custody will resort to making sexual abuse allegations against the other parent, just as Elizabeth Fontaine did to Jason Fontaine. Often these parents making such false allegations are mentally ill, typically suffering from a personality disorder or other mental impairment that makes them unwilling to compromise and possibly even unable to acknowledge and accept reality. (from Talega: Molestation charges troubled judge [5] ) As the hearing progressed in Orange on Monday morning, Elizabeth Fontaine presented the new documents that suggested her daughters were molested by Jason Fontaine. Fontaine and his lawyer could not be reached for comment. How the accusations are connected to the deaths is still unclear, like so much about molestation allegations heard in custody battles in Orange County Family Court. In general, estimates for how many of such accusations are true range from 40 percent to 80 percent, said John McLaughlin, a former Irvine police officer whose firm does family risk assessments. Of the 400 cases he s been involved in, around 40 percent are false accusations, McLaughlin said. As the Fontaine case unfolded over the past year, Schulte didn t see any danger in allowing Jason Fontaine unmonitored overnight visits with his daughters while granting primary custody to Elizabeth Fontaine, court records show. Schulte allowed Elizabeth Fontaine to move to Houston, even though her changing testimony worried him, court records show. It seems to me almost like, um, tactics, when one takes the position (about) the extreme danger that the children would be in, and when that approach to the issue CCFC Master Exhs. P1029

62 seemed to be failing, then the testimony is now, We re getting along wonderfully. We re going to be able to share the children from 1,800 miles apart, Schulte says in court records. Several times, Schulte said he was worried that Elizabeth Fontaine would try to reopen the case in Texas. After his last order in August, she had made another abuse report to Child Protective Services and now, court records show, Schulte worried that if he let her go, that she ll make a report to Child Protective Services in Houston and this thing starts all over again. That is exactly what happened. Move To Texas Requested by Elizabeth Fontaine There are claims that Elizabeth Fontaine lead Commissioner Schulte into thinking that it was her employer, Howrey Associates at which she was a specialist in intellectual property law, that requested her job location transfer from Orange County to Texas. The reality is that it was her request as part of her plot to get the kids away from their father and re-open her false sexual abuse allegations in a new jurisdiction. She was court shopping because the Orange County, California, courts and government did not do what she wanted. (from Houston lawyer dead in apparent murder-suicide in California had obtained Texas court order in custody fight [6] ) Stephen Cagle, managing partner of Howrey s Houston office, declines comment. In a Dec. 15 written statement on its Web site, the firm wrote that it is devastated to learn of Fontaine s death. Fontaine, who joined the firm s Irvine office in 2005 and recently transferred at her request to Houston, was a talented lawyer who was advancing quickly in her career at Howrey. We will feel her loss deeply as a friend and as a colleague. California Family Law Courts A Disaster The Orange County, California, family law courts are at least partially at fault for this tragedy. Given the acrimonious situation and the difficulty of effectively sharing custody of children at a distance, Schulte should never have allowed the move to Texas in the first place. Then Schulte failed to order safe custody transfer orders that were necessary given the highly volatile situation that was ripe for a parental abduction. While the murder/suicide scenario may have seemed hard to anticipate, a parental abduction scenario was not. The murder/suicide could have been prevented by requiring the children to be present in court before the order was made and then transferring child custody using law enforcement officers to keep the peace. This type of transfer is appropriate at the time of custody decisions in cases like this one in which involve an obsessed parent who is flinging about extreme allegations and has already demonstrated a tendency to run away with the children and subvert court authority as Elizabeth Fontaine had done. Elizabeth Fontaine Elizabeth Fontaine moved the children to Texas, claiming she was going to be able to share custody with Jason. She then proceeded to manipulate the Texas courts into issuing a restraining order against Jason to keep him from seeing the children. Based upon the events unfolding the way they have, it appears reasonable to believe that Elizabeth and/or her mother Bonnie were executing a parental alienation campaign focused on the 4-year-old Catherine to program her to respond to sexual abuse investigation questions from Elizabeth s paid experts in such a fashion that they would accurately conclude she had been traumatized but inaccurately conclude that it was due to sexual abuse. The real trauma likely came from what Catherine s mother and grandmother were doing to her. Family Court Commissioner Thomas Schulte was clearly not careful enough given the circumstances. But he is far from the only family law court official making such a poor decisions. Family law judges and commissioners in the State of California are poorly educated on how to deal with disastrous cases like the Fontaine case. They are also poorly equipped to resolve them or to keep the children safe, involved with both of their parents, and protected from parental alienation for which they were clearly at high risk in this case. Now two innocent children are dead in part because of the systematic failure of the California courts to deal effectively with extreme contested child custody cases. Misconduct investigations of family law courts are underway in several California counties. The high profile family law corruption case of child custody evaluator Stephen Doyne in San Diego County is regularly making the news. And now the Fontaine family law murder case is being splashed across CCFC Master Exhs. P1030

63 the world in headlines. Legislators in California should be prepared for a political blood bath during the next elections if they do not start to force the courts to make serious reforms. Looking at the comments in coverage of this murder/suicide story and the Stephen Doyne story in the Orange County and San Diego County media, it is clear that parents are fed up with the abuses and incompetence of California family law courts. That sentiment is shared by parents across the state. Parents are willing to do almost anything for their children. Consider the high number of difficult child custody and divorce cases and complete lack of confidence in the family law courts. That plus the widespread budget and operational problems in California mean that the public voting out of office many members of the legislature and courts is a growing possibility. More On This Story Custom Search Search No abuse evidence against girls father found [7] Report: Grandmother Likely Fired Gun in OC Murder-Suicide [8] Investigator: Grandmother likely killed 4 in Talega [2] Talega: Molestation charges troubled judge [5] Sheriff: Deputy arrived just before murder-suicide [9] Deputy arrived at San Clemente home just before mass killing, heard shots [10] Houston lawyer dead in apparent murder-suicide in California had obtained Texas court order in custody fight [6] Other Divorce, Child Custody, and Murder Stories Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [11] Death by Divorce? Fire, Custody Dispute Yield Death Sentence [12] Abusive Women Acceptable By Double Standards [13] False Child Porn Persecution: The Child Custody Scenario [14] Gun Collection + Malicious Mom + Government = Life in Ruins [15] Defending Against False Child Sexual Abuse Allegations (Part 1) [16] How to Win Custody by Framing Your Ex for Child Sexual Abuse [17] Breaking Mental Illness, Violence, Divorce, and Murder Cycles [18] The Gregory Mantell Show: Parental Alienation Syndrome [19] Murderous Mentally Ill Mothers and Government Negligence [20] Custody Dispute Leads to Child Involvement in Murder Attempt on Father [21] False Feminists and Abusive and Murderous Women [22] 7 Comments To "Killer Bonnie Hoult Made False Abuse Allegations Against CCFC Master Exhs. P1031

64 Ex" #1 Comment By Jason Fontaine On January 4, 1:36 am Rob, This is Jason Fontaine. I am the father of Catherine and Julia and the ex of Elizabeth Fontaine. You have obviously done your research. You have the most accurate account of the events that took place. I would like to talk with you. Please contact me when you have the chance. Jason Fontaine #2 Pingback By Jason Fontaine Speaks Up About Child Custody Murders angiemedia On January 4, 6:10 pm [...] you re aware of the December 2009 child custody murders described in our article Killer Bonnie Hoult Made False Abuse Allegations Against Ex, you might have been wondering just what father Jason Fontaine has to say about the tragic events. [...] #3 Pingback By Deadly Divorces: Bonnie Hoult, Bruce Pardo, and Many More angiemedia On January 7, 7:49 pm [...] Killer Bonnie Hoult Made False Abuse Allegations Against Ex [...] #4 Pingback By Judge Lorna Alksne in Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter angiemedia On January 12, 7:51 pm [...] Killer Bonnie Hoult Made False Abuse Allegations Against Ex [...] #5 Comment By Rob On February 24, 10:25 pm As an interesting side note to this weird tragedy, Jake Hoult the dog lost his family when Bonnie Hoult shot her granddaughters and daughter to death. [23] After research and help from fellow CL s, we found out that Jake s tags were Ca. tags. When I googled Hoult, this came up: [24] Turns out, poor Jake lost his family that day. He belonged to those sweet little girls that lost their lives that day. Thus, the Califonia tags and last name Hoult. I found that his current owner had posted signs this morning and I called him. He was telling me that he was so happy that I had helped Jake out, because he had already had a tradgedy in his life. jake deserved to find his home. What a life he s had. I would like to thank all of my fellow CL s for all of the phone calls and s to help me help Jake. I love it when everyone bands together to help out one dog. JUST ONE. We can make a difference. #6 Pingback By Bonnie mormor, mamma & mördare «Ann-Mari s Blogg On May 2, 9:27 am [...] har haft ett finger med i anklagelserna mot Jason och att hon uppmuntrat Elisabeth att anmäla Jason för sexuella övergrepp. Många som kände både Bonnie och Elisabeth har beskrivit kvinnorna som väldigt kontrollerande [...] CCFC Master Exhs. P1032

65 #7 Comment By Megan On September 21, 2:36 pm I knew Bonnie from 1988 to the time she moved to OC. I saw a few times after that move and just before her move to TX. In fact, after I broke up with my fiance, a long time attorney practing in LA county, she dated him until she moved to Orange County. Neither he nor I support the allegationns about Bonnie s mental health. In her defense and in all the time I spent with her, I never saw a personality disorder that you and others alleged. What I do know is this: I was before Thomas Schulte in a divorce trial. Commissioner Schulte was so corupt, biased, prejudiced and close friends with the other attorney, that he broke boundaries, he never looked/considered at any of my motions, pleadings, or financial documents I filed. He just rubber stamped everything that the other side submitted (admitted in Thomas Schulte s recusal transcript and the statements made in court Worse, he tried my case in his chamber outside of the rules of ocurt and witnesses even when I was in pro per and was not in chambers. After Thomas Schulte received my motion to replace him he did recuse himself based on bias and prejudice against me he went into a long, abuse discussion of my conduct that was awful, that he found he could not be fair and just rubber stamped the previous 3 years of motions. The record does not bear out Thomas Schyulte s allegations that I abused the system (I wonder if the same could be said in the custody case that ended so tragicly. In fact, it was the other side s attorney who kept the dissolution in the courts 8 years for our 6 month marriage without children or community property. The other side ran up attorney fees of over $80,000 for the case and Thomas Schultie ordered I pay the fees without even looking at the fees or the other attorney serving the papers on me. Essentially, Thomas Schulte OC commissioner in family law court just rubber stamped the order that I pay $80,000 without looking at anything and then blamed me for the case being in court so long. When the presiding judge received the case, I was found blameless and my x-husband s attorney completely at fault. What I am saying is this: Thomas Schulte was not a fair judge. He practiced croneism (sorry if I misspelled the word), and he was extremely abusive and prejudicial to those who he did not like. If he did this to me for a 6 month marriage, what did he do in the child custody case we are discussing. I believe, if one went through the case and got access to the private court memos written by ciommissioner Schulte, you would find the same attitude and behavior against the mother. It is true that both sides had attornies, but I had an attorney also. Nevertheless, commissioner Schulte managed to get around my attorney and continue to abuse me in court and on the record. It is my belief that Thomas Schulte, commissioner (who is about to retire in September 2011) used his chambers to try cases off the record and out of site. That his past actions were so prejudicial that after my motion to remove him from my case, he agreed that he was prejudicial and despite being paid as a judge, ignored the law and practiced his own prejudical type of law in the Orange County Family Law Court. Please do not misunderstand me, I am not excusing the tradedy that happened, but I can testify that when one has done all one can do legally and still was beaten up by a family law judge who is hired to be fair and is not, that it take a huge toll one one psychologically and makes one feel helpless. Thomas Schulte, Commissioner used the power of his office to abuse many who came before him and he did not follow the law. In my opinion, it was the actions of Thomas Schulte and I seriously doubt he was fair in the custody case, e.g., Schulte was worried that the case would be tried in Texas court after he made a ruling. If it was, that was not his concern what another juridiction did in a case before them. Schulte took the same stand on issues that were not under the jurisdiction of OC family law court in my case. Had Thomas Schulte just practiced the law as it was written, not make up his own legal rules, not worry about what another state would do if it was petitioned, it may be that four people two of whom are children would be alive. I state this as true, have documets to back up my own case and believe Thomas Schulte took money to be a judge and failed to be a judge. Instead, he practiced bias and prejudice which, in my case cause me tens of thousands of dollars in direct fees and other loses (He, stated on the record after he recused himself, he could live with that. CCFC Master Exhs. P1033

66 Bonnie and her daughter is dead. It is easy to blame someone after death. However, I knew Bonnie, never saw a psychological disorder with her (I am a professional and trained to assess psychological and medical problems), and firmly believe that had Thomas Schulte, commissioner of the Orange County Court been fair in the case and not made Bonnie or her daughter to feel helpless and hopeless, I believe those four people would be alive today. DURING THE 9 YEARS I WAS IN FAMILY LAW COURT ON MY 6 MONTH MARRIAGE, I NOTED THAT ORANGE COUNTY FAMILY COURT WAS A BASTION FOR THE OLD BOYS CLUB. If you did not practice law the way the attorneys/judges wanted you to practice, you were subjected to abuse and threats (in the chambers of the judges). What I have to live with is this: I took no aciton to remove Thomas Schulte from the bench afer the abuse I experienced at his hand and there were 7 years of abuse. Had I taken the steps to initiate an investigation, it may be that Bonnie, her daughter, and granddaughters would be alive today. I take responsibility for that but after being so abused by commissioner Schulte, I just wanted to heal. However, the story last December brought everythng back to memory. I do with I had started proceedings to have him removed as a commissioner possibly a fair judge would have tried the case and Bonnie and her daughter would have not felt so helpless and the tragedy would not have happened. It is almost a years since the tragedy. Bonnie and her family are dead but Thomas Schulte still practices and shortly will receive a very nice retirment from the State of Calif for his being a fair, competent judge in OC family law court. This is not right; he got away with it and I seriously doubt he loses sleep because he forced two women in to such a situation that they felt they had no other alternatives. The real guilty party is Commissioner Thomas Schulte. Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] dramatic, emotional, or erratic personality disorders: [2] Investigator: Grandmother likely killed 4 in Talega: -.html [3] narcissistic enmeshment: [4] Howrey Associate Killed in Apparent Murder-Suicide: [5] Talega: Molestation charges troubled judge: elizabeth-schulte.html [6] Houston lawyer dead in apparent murder-suicide in California had obtained Texas court order in custody fight: [7] No abuse evidence against girls father found: fontaine-child.html [8] Report: Grandmother Likely Fired Gun in OC Murder-Suicide: [9] Sheriff: Deputy arrived just before murder-suicide: [10] Deputy arrived at San Clemente home just before mass killing, heard shots: [11] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire: [12] Death by Divorce? Fire, Custody Dispute Yield Death Sentence: [13] Abusive Women Acceptable By Double Standards: [14] False Child Porn Persecution: The Child Custody Scenario: [15] Gun Collection + Malicious Mom + Government = Life in Ruins: [16] Defending Against False Child Sexual Abuse Allegations (Part 1): p=4128 [17] How to Win Custody by Framing Your Ex for Child Sexual Abuse: [18] Breaking Mental Illness, Violence, Divorce, and Murder Cycles: [19] The Gregory Mantell Show: Parental Alienation Syndrome: [20] Murderous Mentally Ill Mothers and Government Negligence: [21] Custody Dispute Leads to Child Involvement in Murder Attempt on Father: CCFC Master Exhs. P1034

67 [22] False Feminists and Abusive and Murderous Women: [23] : [24] : Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1035

68 Grieving mom battles to save others' children Lucy Nash honors memory of her slain son by giving to schools, speaking out on law By Joe Hughes STAFF WRITER May 16, 2004 Slowly, sometimes painstakingly so, Lucy Nash is reclaiming her life. It has been nearly nine months since her 14-year-old son, Evan, was shot and killed by his father on a busy Ocean Beach street. The tears still flow, and the bouts of depression are never far away. Nine months, and Nash still finds her mind wandering, wondering what she could have done to save her son. Unable for months to talk about what happened, watch television or read accounts about how Evan was killed while on a training run with his Point Loma High School cross country team, Lucy Nash is fighting back. She's doing it for the sake of Evan's memory. She recently bought a defibrillator in her son's name for M ar Vista High School in Imperial Beach, the Sweetwater Union High School District campus where she has taught art and English for the past 11 years. NELVIN CEPEDA / Union-Tribune "All my hopes and dreams are gone," says Lucy Nash, whose 14-year-old son, Evan, was shot and killed by his father in September On June 2, she plans to bestow the first Evan Nash Scholarship on a cross country runner at Point Loma High School, paying for the award with money she had intended for Evan's education and money from a crime victims fund. In an even more public step, she is working with local legislators and actively campaigning for state laws that would require a person named in a restraining order to turn in guns they own. Perhaps most important, Lucy Nash is finally able to discuss the loss of her son. "Evan was my only child," she said recently. "I am now 57 and alone. All my hopes and dreams are gone." She talked on the porch of her Loma Portal home, within sight of Evan's treehouse in the giant Chinese elm that rises in front of the one-story house. A basketball hoop that has seen better days still hangs from a pole in the driveway. Inside the house, a Pokemon card collection sits on a table near Evan's room. The front yard has been newly landscaped. "M y neighbors did it on their own. That was very nice," she said. Nash proudly showed pictures of Evan as a Sea Cadet a Scout-like Navy program and junior lifeguard. "He loved the ocean and wanted to go to the U.S. Naval Academy. I took him there once," said Nash, whose father was in the Navy and a POW during World War II. Nash said she focuses now on her teaching career and taking care of her elderly parents. A foreign exchange student recently lived with her. He stayed in Evan's room. "It was nice to have some company," she said. CCFC Master Exhs. P1036

69 S tarted with a song Lucy Nash and Bill Hoffine never married. Evan was conceived during a brief relationship. The affair, Nash said, started with a song. One night in 1988, Nash had gone to Jose Murphy's, a Pacific Beach nightspot, to listen to her brother play in a band. As the group sang "When a Man Loves a Woman," a stranger Hoffine walked up to Nash and blurted: "I bet you don't know who first did this song." "Oh, yes, I do," Nash shot back. "Percy Sledge." A few drinks, some conversation, and a walk on the beach followed. Not long after, Nash was pregnant. Neither Nash nor Hoffine, who had a fledgling computer business, wanted a relationship, marriage or children. Nash, then 42, thought of an abortion. She changed her mind when she saw the fetus moving on a sonogram. Hoffine, who was hoping that Nash would have an abortion, changed his mind about parenthood when he learned that he would have a son, Nash said. "He decided he wanted to be a parent, having lost his dad very young in life." He thought having a son would be a way of making up for that loss, Nash said. "If I had had a girl," Nash said, "none of this would have happened." Even before Evan was born, conflict brewed between Nash and Hoffine, each determined to be the child's guardian. Five court files, piled as high as several phone books, document Hoffine vs. Nash. All his life, Evan was the prize in what would become a deadly fight. Numerous mediators, counselors and psychologists tried to reconcile the custody arrangement over the years. Some quit the caseafter Hoffine threatened to sue or took them to court. Friends of Hoffine's have said Evan's father was simply devoted to his son, refusing to be pushed aside in his quest to help raise him. A brother, reached at his Los Angeles home, declined to comment for this story. Nash said that when she learned Hoffine had told Evan he was suicidal, she resolved to ask a judge to order Hoffine to stay away from her and his son. Nash knew that Hoffine had several guns in his home. She worried that Hoffine would take Evan's life before taking his own. After one particularly urgent call from Evan's therapist,nash left school early one day last September to get a temporary restraining order. But the judge was reluctant because there had been no previous reported acts of physical violence. "Had it only been my word, it would have been denied," Nash said. She noted the psychologist's concerns, completed the forms and detailed Hoffine's firearms. Nash remembers commenting to the officer on duty that it must be troubling to have to serve a restraining order on someone who is possibly volatile, knowing he has weapons. The order directed Hoffine to turn in his weapons a.45-caliber handgun, a.357 Magnum, a.380-caliber pistol and a shotgun and stay 100 yards away from her. Nash said she was and still is incredulous that the guns were not taken from Hoffine when he was served. "Why ask about the presence of weapons if not intending to confiscate them?" she asked. "If I had known Hoffine was still armed after being served, I would have moved Evan to safety." On the afternoon of Sept. 4, Evan Nash and his cross country team were jogging on Voltaire Street near Sunset Cliffs Boulevard when Hoffine stepped out from behind a parked van with a large-caliber pistol and opened fire. As his son lay dying, Hoffine fled to a nearby town house. Police say he killed himself several hours later. "Evan died because the system failed to protect him from years of emotional abuse inflicted by a mentally ill father," Lucy Nash said. Speaking out This spring, at the Hyatt Islandia Hotel on M ission Bay, Nash was a guest during a conference of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. One of the speakers was La Jolla-based forensic psychologist Dr. Stephen Doyne, who was one of Evan's counselors. He discussed the difficulty courts have discriminating between high-conflict and high-risk custody battles. CCFC Master Exhs. P1037

70 It was the Evan Nash story. Lucy Nash sat at a front table, clutching tissues, tears streaming down her face. It was one of her first appearances in her new public role and she was unsteady. "I'm not really wild about being a poster girl for all this," she said to a tablemate. "But... " Doyne had worked with Evan in a counseling role that prompted Hoffine to threaten and harass him. Doyne stopped the counseling when Hoffine filed a complaint against him with the state licensing board, a complaint that was later dismissed. It was Doyne who was pivotal in persuading Nash to publicly champion changes in the family court system. "How do we get to the point where a father murdered his innocent 14-year-old son?" Doyne said that day. San Diego City Attorney Casey Gwinn, who has gained national recognition for his efforts to combat domestic violence, has taken a keen interest in the Evan Nash case. He has applied for a grant from the National Institute of Justice to study access to firearms and the impact of restraining orders. He says the law may have to be changed. "There is no mechanism or system in place to actually confiscate weapons," Gwinn said. "I am hoping that Evan Nash did not die in vain. Perhaps his mom's advocacy on this issue will help the state Legislature to address it." Lucy Nash is determined to change the law. "If I have to go to Sacramento and sleep on the steps of the Capitol, that's what I will do." Joe Hughes: (619) ; joe.hughes@uniontrib.com Find this article at: w w.utsandiego.com/uniontrib/ /new s_1m16mom.html Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article. Copyright 2011 The San Diego Union-Tribune LLC. CCFC Master Exhs. P1038

71 California Coalition for Families and Children, et al. vs. San Diego County Bar Association, et al, United States District Court, Southern District of California Exhibits to Complaint Exhibit 8 CCFC Master Exhs. P1039

72 - angiemedia Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? Posted By Chris on January 22, Comments Recommend Send 30 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. People often complain about incompetent, biased, and even vicious judges. That s especially the case for litigants cursed with enduring the injustices of family law courts in the Western world. Often the judges are causing more destruction by following bad laws as judges can t make law on their own, aside from the judicial activists who may try only to be often overturned by a higher court. Many times the judges may be more concerned with saving their political futures than with following the laws or dispensing fair rulings. Hence we get illegal and immoral guilty until proven innocent rulings that kick a person out of his or Judge Lisa Schall her home, ban contact with the kids, and label the person as a pseudo-criminal all without a shred of evidence based upon false allegations or distortions for which the false accuser will never be punished even if his or her lies are proven. For many suffering from the wrongs of the family law courts, this is business as usual. Sometimes, however, a judge really is notably bad in ways beyond the typical judicial incompetence, selfish disregard for the rights of others, and maliciousness when displeased. Based upon public records and accounts of people who have been in her courtroom, Judge Lisa Schall [1] of San Diego County, California, is one such judge. After plea-bargaining down from drunk driving charges from her September 2007 arrest, Schall was re-elected with no opposition in June But Schall is not just a drunk driver, she s a judge who abuses people s civil rights, insults and attacks litigants in her courtroom, and helps reinforce the reputation of the San Diego family law courts as a corrupt, biased, and unjust organized crime ring (a phrase often used by San Diego citizens who have been abused by these courts) that violates the law and the rights of citizens. San Diego County Superior Court Judge Lisa Schall is a disgrace even to the disgraceful San Diego courts. Schall has been employed as a judge in the county since She was formerly known as Lisa Guy-Schall and later changed her name due to legal separation and divorce. The separation was in 2006 from husband Steven Guy in SDSC Case DN [2]. The divorce was in 2007 in SDSC Case DN [3]. Whatever name she s using today, her bad reputation has been earned by her and her alone. Unfortunately, her mistakes and misconduct are harming the public because of her employment as a judge. Lisa Schall: Reckless Drunk Driver Schall was stopped by the Escondido Police Department on September 12, 2007, for driving the wrong way on Centre City Parkway, a street classified as a four-lane divided highway. After failing a field sobriety test, she was arrested for drunk driving as a violation of the California Vehicle Code 23152(a) [4]. Her blood alcohol test was 0.09 percent, above the legal limit of Schall plea-bargained to a lesser reckless driving charge of driving the wrong way in March (from San Diego Judge Publicly Censured Over Wet Reckless Plea [5] ) The Commission on Judicial Performance has publicly admonished San Diego Superior Court Judge Lisa Schall over her conviction stemming from a 2007 arrest for drunk driving. CCFC Master Exhs. P1040

73 Seven of the commission s 10 members voted 6-1 to admonish Schall who is referred to in the admonishment as Lisa Guy-Schall, but who dropped the hyphenation of her name in June in a letter dated Sept. 5. Schall, who could not be reached for comment, currently presides over civil trials in the court s Vista Courthouse, and was arrested on the evening of Sept. 12, 2007 when an officer of the Escondido Police Department conducted a traffic stop after observing her vehicle traveling in the wrong direction on the Centre City Parkway, a divided four-lane highway. The jurist was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of Vehicle Code Sec.23152(a), and driving with a blood alcohol level in excess of 0.08 percent in violation of Sec (b), after she allegedly failed a field sobriety test, and a blood test performed within the hour indicated a blood alcohol level of approximately 0.09 percent. She pled guilty to the lesser offense of alcohol-related reckless driving in March. The commission wrote that Schall s unlawful conduct evidence[d] a serious disregard of the principles of personal and official conduct embodied in the California Code of Judicial Ethics, and violated canons one and two of the code, which require that members of the judiciary maintain high standards of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary will be preserved, respect and comply with the law, and act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. I can t help but wonder if the prosecutor would have offered a plea bargain to somebody seemingly so clearly guilty of DUI and endangering public safety if she wasn t a judge. Abuse of Contempt of Court Power Many judges seldom do a thing about perjury and contempt of court. Schall is usually no different, but when she has chosen to act, she s done so abusively and illegally. In 1995, Schall abusively misused a contempt of court ruling to imprison an upset litigant for five days in violation of court rules. She illegally ordered the bailiff, an apparently uninformed and/or spineless employee of the San Diego Sheriff s Department [6], to violate the litigant s legal rights and throw her in jail. As many bailiffs errantly believe they are akin to a personal security detail for judge-dictators, the bailiff did Schall s illegal bidding. The California Commission on Judicial Performance publicly admonished Schall for this misconduct. (from Judicial Performance Commission Issues Public Admonishment of Judge Lisa Guy-Schall [7] ) On December 18, 1995, Joanna Slivka appeared before Judge Guy-Schall for a hearing on a petition for a restraining order against Ms. Slivka. During the hearing, Ms. Slivka began yelling and acting aggressively, and Judge Guy-Schall ordered her out of the courtroom. While Ms. Slivka was outside the courtroom, Judge Guy-Schall had her bailiff ask Ms. Slivka if she would be willing to reappear in court and keep herself under control; the bailiff reported to the judge that Ms. Slivka had responded that if the judge would not allow her to tell her story, she would probably go off again. In Ms. Slivka s absence, without citing her for contempt or having her returned to the courtroom, Judge Guy-Schall found her in contempt and sentenced her to five days in jail. The order issued by Judge Guy-Schall stated that Ms. Slivka was in direct contempt and was to serve five actual days in jail. With respect to the facts underlying the finding of contempt, the order stated, full order and findings are set forth in the reporter s transcript that is order [sic] this date. Ms. Slivka was taken into custody outside the courtroom and remained in custody for five days. Judge Guy-Schall s actions constituted an abuse of the contempt power. By failing to return Ms. Slivka to court to inform her that she was in contempt, failing to give her a chance to respond to the contempt order, and finding her in CCFC Master Exhs. P1041

74 contempt in her absence, Judge Guy-Schall failed to follow the required procedures for holding an individual in contempt of court. (See, Ryan v. Commission on Judicial Performance (1988) 45 Cal.3d 518, 533, in which the commission and the California Supreme Court found that a judge committed willful misconduct by holding a litigant in contempt in her absence and incarcerating her, for a remark uttered as she left the courtroom.) The contempt order entered by Judge Guy-Schall failed to state on its face facts sufficient to constitute a contempt, as also required by law. (See, In re Baroldi (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 101, 110; Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications (1975) 14 Cal.3d 678, 694.) Judge Guy-Schall, who had been a judge for ten years at the time of the incident, was obligated to know or research proper contempt procedures. (See, Cannon, supra, 14 Cal.3d at p. 694; Ryan, supra, 45 Cal.3d at p. 533.) The contempt power, which permits a single official to deprive a citizen of his fundamental liberty interest without all of the procedural safeguards normally accompanying such a deprivation, must be used with great prudence and caution. It is essential that judges know and follow proper procedures in exercising this power. (See, Furey v. Commission on Judicial Performance (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1297, 1314; Ryan v. Commission on Judicial Performance, supra, 45 Cal.3d at p. 533; Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, supra, 14 Cal.3d at p. 694.) Judge Guy-Schall has informed the commission that this is the only instance in which she has found an individual in contempt. However, she has acknowledged no problems in her handling of this matter. Is it really conducive to resolving issues to toss a litigant upset over the way he or she is being treated in the courtroom into jail for five days? It is not surprising that a litigant who believes he or she is being prevented from discussing what happened would be upset about it. The public has a very inaccurate perception that people have a right to present their version of events and facts in a family law court. That s not at all what happens in many of these courts. Often the lawyers and judges appear to litigants to do everything they can to silence the truth, often while letting dishonest parties commit perjury unabated and aggressive lawyers lie and harass with twisted questions. Further, many family law court litigants are self-represented because they don t have the money to pay for legal representation at $250 or more per hour. It s not reasonable to treat these people the same as trained and experienced lawyers who are not deeply emotionally involved in their cases. The state has wrongly decided to handle divorces and child custody matters in senselessly counterproductive and damaging adversarial fashion. Compounding this already amply demonstrated error, its judges are unwilling to even let many people, especially selfrepresented parties, talk, question witnesses, or present evidence. All of these complaints have been leveled against Schall and many other family law judges in San Diego, California, and the United States. Private Admonishment in 1995 for Misconduct in Juvenile Dependency Case Prior to her current involvement in San Diego family law cases, Schall was previously a judge in civil cases. Prior to that, she was a judge in juvenile court. In 1995, she was privately admonished over his misconduct in a juvenile dependency case. Details are not available as the Commission on Judicial Performance has not yet published adequate information on her actions. Improper Involvement in Political Activities Judges are supposed to stay out of politics to avoid the creation of a perception of bias. Even at the start of her judicial career when you might think she d be keen on playing by the rules, Schall didn t stay uninvolved. Attorney Michael Aguirre filed a complaint against Schall for her involvement in the re-election campaign of Governor George Deukmejian in what appears to be a possible violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct. This is the same person who appointed her to San Diego Municipal Court in 1985 and then to San Diego Superior CCFC Master Exhs. P1042

75 Court in (from Lawyer Seeks Probe of Forum Speech by Judge [8] ) A San Diego lawyer has requested that a state panel investigate whether Municipal Court Judge Lisa Guy-Schall violated judicial ethics guidelines when she appeared on behalf of Gov. George Deukmejian at a candidates forum last week. In a complaint filed with the California Commission on Judicial Performance, Michael Aguirre charged that Guy-Schall s appearance at the forum violated a judicial conduct rule stating that judges should not take active roles in political campaigns. The commission is likely to decide whether to investigate the incident at its meeting Oct. 23 and 24, a spokesman said Tuesday. Poor Reputation In family law cases, Schall has been widely criticized for rude, arrogant, malicious, and unjust behaviors in her courtroom. These include refusing to allow a party to be represented telephonically in an ex-parte hearing, disconnecting the call, and then conducting the remainder of the hearing without the party who was effectively banned from participation. Schall is also reputed to have a poor track record in appeals courts. Some believe she has an unusually high number of her decisions being overturned on appeal. How Did Schall Get Re-elected? Despite clearly evident problems with her behaviors, Schall has continued to be re-elected term after term since she was first appointed in 1985 as a judge by then-governor Deukmejian. Why is that? It s for at least three reasons. 1. Nobody bothers to run against her. In the June 2008 election immediately after her drunk driving fiasco, she wasn t even on the ballot and won automatic re-election simply because nobody else ran for the office. When you look at the judicial races for that June 2008 election [9], you see that out of 51 judges up for election, only 3 races were contested. The other 48 judges won by default. 2. Incumbents have an excessive advantage, especially in elections in which the public has little idea of the basis for selecting the best candidate. Judicial elections are a prime example of this sort of election. 3. There is no timely oversight of judicial misconduct. Schall s abusive behavior in December 1995 wasn t publicly reprimanded until October 1999, nearly four years later. That s conveniently long after she stood for re-election in 1996 and well before she stood for re-election again in Schall s drunk driving conviction in March 2008 wasn t publicly reprimanded until half a year later, conveniently after the election in June Perhaps the Commission on Judicial Performance should adopt a namechange to the Commission on Judicial Cover-up. What kind of confidence can the public have in courts that employ abusive drunk drivers who abuse people s civil rights? It s no wonder the public sentiment in California is that its courts are corrupt, slow, unjust, and even abusively illegal. Court Integrity Requires Means to Vote Out Bad Judges The public should have had a chance to vote Schall out of office even if there was nobody else running for the office. She s disreputable and abusive. She doesn t belong in on the bench, even if nobody else wants the job. There s a strong need for judicial candidates outside of the corrupt insider club to run for office. However, it s clear with only 6% of the offices in 2008 being contested with more than one candidate, there is very little competition for judicial offices. This is unfortunately resulting in some very poor judges remaining in office. CCFC Master Exhs. P1043

76 The legislature should enact a none of the above choice for all elections of public officials in California. If the public votes 50% or more for none of the above choice, then all of the candidates running should be disqualified and not allowed to run for that office again until the next regularly scheduled election. The situation should be handled in a manner similar to what would happen if the elected candidate elected died before taking office. If necessary, the governor could appoint an interim judge. A special election could then be called to select a suitable replacement. As judges serve six year terms, Schall won t stand for re-election until The only ways to get her off the bench in a timely fashion is via the exceptionally slow judicial disciplinary process or to mount a recall effort. It s our understanding that one or more formal complaints to the Commission on Judicial Performance against Schall are underway by citizens she has abused in San Diego family law courts. There s also discussion of using the recall process to clean up the California judiciary given the problems in the state courts. Perhaps Schall will find herself looking for a new job sooner than she thinks. Further Reading Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall [10] Unjust Delays in San Diego Family Law Courts [11] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [12] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [13] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals [14] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [15] San Diego judge Lisa Schall publicly admonished for drunk driving [16] San Diego Judge Publicly Censured Over Wet Reckless Plea [5] Judicial Performance Commission Issues Public Admonishment of Judge Lisa Guy-Schall [7] Court provides rare support for EIR s water analysis; damages award thrown out; Fallbrook PUD faces new trial. [17] Lawyer Seeks Probe of Forum Speech by Judge [8] California Judges Disciplined 2008 [18] San Diego Judges: Injustice [19] Judge Lisa C. Schall [20] DUI Law California Vehicle Code: VC Alcohol and/or Drugs [21] 50 Comments To "Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?" #1 Pingback By Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall angiemedia On January 25, 5:55 pm [...] we received some interesting feedback on our article regarding San Diego s abusive reckless drunk driver Judge Lisa Schall from a reader who has experienced what it s like to appear in front of her. This reader has a [...] CCFC Master Exhs. P1044

77 #2 Pingback By CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010 angiemedia On April 13, 4:15 pm [...] You might think that a judge violating the code of ethics would be held accountable. Think again. Judge Lisa Schall was implicated in similar types of unethical behavior. (from Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?) [...] #3 Pingback By CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader angiemedia On April 16, 4:31 am [...] Schall is the ill-reputed San Diego family court judge with a reckless drunk driving conviction and a long record of Commission on Judicial Performance [...] #4 Pingback By Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff angiemedia On April 20, 3:35 pm [...] Schall was reprimanded by the Commission on Judicial Performance for ordering a bailiff (a sheriff s department deputy) to take a litigant into custody and jail her because she became upset in the courtroom during her family law case. (from Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?) [...] #5 Pingback By Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA angiemedia On April 30, 3:40 am [...] Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? [...] #6 Pingback By California AB 2475 To Strip Immunity from Custody Evaluators angiemedia On May 5, 1:41 am [...] As it stands today, there is no real accountability for judges nor for most court employees. The vast majority of judges run for election without challengers. The public has no report card for judges. The result is the public continues to re-elect drunk drivers with repeated judicial disciplinary actions like Judge Lisa Schall of San Diego. [...] #7 Pingback By Cole Stuart s Review of Baskerville s Taken Into Custody angiemedia On June 18, 8:34 pm [...] attorney, he had never seen anything like what occurred in the San Diego family law court of convicted drunk driver Judge Lisa Schall. In 2009, he and other victims of San Diego family court abuse banded together to form the [...] #8 Pingback By A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children angiemedia On July 6, 5:56 am [...] and Quoting) July 6th, 2010 Goto comments Leave a comment Highlights of a speech by San Diego s Honorable Lisa Schmuck on June [...] CCFC Master Exhs. P1045

78 #9 Pingback By Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse angiemedia On October 24, 1:50 am [...] in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group LeaderPersonality Disordered Abusers in Family Law CourtsWhy Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert JusticeStephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts [...] #10 Comment By One of Thousands On October 27, 8:51 am Bad judges? Sure dozens of them in San Diego. Why? Because who the hell want s to be the man? They represent the oppression, fraud, and abuse of incompetent government despised for centuries. They take it up the ass for pennies, waste their lives sifting through other people s trash, and endure heaps of abuse. No sane person would do it, and frankly there are but a few of them who still have a grasp on reality. It s a shit job, but they have a solution: Change jerseys. Stop being the man. Root for the citizen. Take off the jack boot of oppression and put a foot up the man s ass for a change. Do what s right for your community not the assholes who have dough your neighbors, your family, your friends. You ll soon be free. Money won t cure your guilt. They don t pay you that much of it to begin with so who the fuck cares?. Power ugh. Flipping coins for a living that sounds like fun. If that s your game there s an Indian casino down the street with a help wanted sign waiting for you. What will free you is doing the right thing. You can begin now. You already have the power. You lack the courage here it is. We re behind you. Just do it. #11 Comment By Lisa Schall Destroys Yet Another Family On October 28, 12:11 pm Lisa Schall runs a corrupt courtroom; she makes up her own orders, does not remember facts in the case, changes rulings arbitrarily depending on her mood, and recklessly admonishes litigants in her courtroom. If you are unable to afford representation you will surely loose. While in her courtroom she inappropriately went off into an hour of rambling sentences how she didn t like her father because he was an alcoholic and how awful he was. She should have to tell litigants about her driving arrest before she hears their case. Vivacious litigants now use alcohol abuse in her courtroom knowing they will get a favorable ruling from her. I have filed a complaint with the judicial complaint commission in San Francisco against her. If you have been abused by Lisa Schall send your complaint to: COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite San Francisco, California More people need to stand up to this incompetent judge; she needs to be removed from the bench before she destroys more families. It is too late for me, because of her rulings, I will now have to wait until my children are 18 to see them. I have no arrests, educated, respected in the community. I am a good parent who has lost the right to see my children because of Lisa Schall s abuse of the system. CCFC Master Exhs. P1046

79 #12 Pingback By San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining Orders angiemedia On October 28, 11:29 pm [...] Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert JusticeReader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa SchallWhy Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?CCFC Family Court Reform Presentation in Del Mar, CaliforniaCCFC Press Release On Stephen Doyne [...] #13 Pingback By San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed TV Show angiemedia On November 6, 6:42 pm [...] is common practice for CJP. They have done it time and again with other abusive judges like Lisa Schall and Peter McBrien. (from Sacramento Judge Peter James McBrien Dismembers Park Trees and Families In [...] #14 Pingback By San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is Corrupt angiemedia On November 11, 11:29 pm [...] For instance, both felony-plea-bargained-to-misdemeanor convicted criminal Judge Peter McBrien and convicted drunk driver Judge Lisa Schall remain on the bench despite repeated CJP investigations against each of them. What killed [...] #15 Comment By ex-nanny with an MBA On November 19, 2:48 am WOW-this is the first I have read about Lisa. I used to nanny for she and her drunk husband and their two stuck up and unnattractive teenage girls. I used to find it so amusing that for some odd reason, their whole family thought they were so much better than everyone else. She was an unpleasant individual who would fly off the handle and who always had a red face from drinking too much. I am not suprised that she is disliked by so many. All I have to say is, what goes around comes around and she will get hers in the end. She should know this, being the good Christian woman she is at least that is what her family claimed to be #16 Pingback By Amicus Brief in Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne Appeal in San Diego angiemedia On November 23, 5:19 am [...] Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert JusticeReader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa SchallWhy Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court MisconductFlyer Protest in San Diego Family Law [...] #17 Pingback By San Diego Superior Court Seeks New Grand Jury For 2011 / 2012 angiemedia On December 14, 1:16 am [...] Superior Court is filled with abuse, corruption, illegal conduct, and disreputable judges such as drunk driver Lisa Schall, cover-up scam artist Lorna Alksne, abusive Christine Goldsmith with her nepotistic control over [...] #18 Comment By brian long On January 2, 2:28 am CCFC Master Exhs. P1047

80 this is how some very evil people are controling our judges elected officials and others in the government they catch them in a dui or their relatives and then use this against them to get control in other case that may apear to be almost normal but it gives them control and i am not sure who them is yet but am going through the same thing but on a much larger scale it wasnt a dui but child porn and when i found the evidence to prove who did what they tried and are still trying to cover it up there were no charges filed in my case but they destroyed the evidence or so they would think now back to the judge they are manipulating her descisions by using this dui against her. probably telling her they can destroy her career and as long as we the people allow this the corruption will continue #19 Comment By TheJKH1999 On January 20, 5:06 pm Here she is getting another case of hers remanded!! She refused to follow the UCCJEA and got called on it Marr. of Fernandez-Abin and Sanchez 1/11/11 CA4/1 #20 Comment By TheJKH1999 On January 20, 5:07 pm Sorry, here s the link [22] #21 Comment By Sturm Law On January 26, 4:30 pm We need higher caliber people in our courtrooms. Lisa Schall is too much of a shady character with a questionable past. She shouldn t be running a courtroom. #22 Comment By Sharon Kramer On March 17, 12:22 am Hi, I would like to make contact with the person who filed a complaint against Lisa Schall on October 28, I filed a complaint against her on October 25th. How can I make contact with this person? Thank you #23 Comment By Chris On March 17, 3:55 am Sharon, We have sent you and other parties who have filed complaints against Schall an to help you communicate. We would encourage all of you to us copies of your complaints in PDF form to [23]. If you do this, we will publish these complaints to help force CJP to act against Schall and to help qualified decent judicial candidates run against her. Without intense public pressure on CJP, they will continue to whitewash judicial corruption and abuse across the state. Chris CCFC Master Exhs. P1048

81 #24 Comment By Jake On March 20, 2:47 am Hi, I too want to file a complaint and get in contact with a group that is against Judge Schall. She recently ruled in favor of my psycho ex wife after a horrendous custody battle which I should have won by a land slide. How do I do this? #25 Comment By Aide On April 3, 12:53 am [24] SHE IS A FAIR JUDGE ALL CRITICISM AGAINST HER ARE DONE FOR WOMEN ABUSERS #26 Comment By Aide On April 3, 12:58 am SHE IS A FAIR JUDGE ALL THE CRITICISM AGAINST HER ARE FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ABUSERS. #27 Comment By Non-divorce Critic of Schall On April 4, 8:18 pm [25] You have no idea what you are talking about. There are many litigants Lisa Schall has abused who were not DV abusers. Some were not even in family law courts! The woman is a drunk and disorderly wacko. It is a crime that she is still a judge. #28 Comment By Mrs. Kramer On April 14, 11:39 pm To Aide, You are incorrect in your evaluation that all those who speak out of the oddities and inequities of Judge Schall s rather bizarre interpretation of the legal system, are the man woman haters. I am a woman. Married for 30 years and mother of two daughters. I can assure you there is nothing that is sexist motivation in her inabilities as a judicuary. #29 Comment By Mrs. Kramer On April 22, 4:02 pm Dear Angie Media, Could you let those who have posted to your web site who have had problems with lack of ethics and ability within the San Diego courts with the Commission on Judicial Performance turning a blind eye to complaints of these serious violations, know of an important hearing coming up in Sacramento on April 27th? It is hitting the fan and heads are beginning to roll at the highest levels of CA judicial branch. CCFC Master Exhs. P1049

82 The Administration of the Courts which is overseen by the Judicial Council, is being challenged by the judges themselves for being corrupt and out of control. I was able to get the Commission on Judicial Performance included in the scenario of influential justices practicing politics, not law. While those speaking in support of AB 1208, that takes control from these conflicted few, will be primarily judiciaries themselves, the CA legislators need to hear from the public how much damage these people have done to the lives of many and to democracy itself. Please let those who would like to speak on April 27th (or mail letters) to Sacramento know of this opportunity to make a real difference in the integrity of Ca s judicial system. The information is found within the below link: [26] Thanks! #30 Comment By Auntie Mom On May 8, 3:14 pm The Dishonorable Judge Lisa Guy- Schall I went before Lisa Guy-Schall on a guardianship case early 1998 (I had, and still have legal custody of my nephew) there are few words to describe her behavior. After contacting Star Jones (the View), Oprah Winfrey, the head of Health and Human Services and Pam Slater to name a few, an attorney was appointed to represent my nephew. It was not long before Lisa was replaced in probate. The damage that she has done to my family alone is both reprehensible and irreparable, and that is a vast understatement! I am shocked that this mentally and emotionally unstable woman is still on the bench! Please send me your stories, there is strength in numbers and together we can get rid of her! It sickens me that she is still working with children!!! How quickly they have forgotten the child that was being traded for sex after she placed him with a sex offender!! My sister is dead now largely because of Lisa and her special interests. Please! Send me your stories! Thank you, Auntie Mom. [27] #31 Comment By Auntie Mom On May 8, 6:02 pm [28] You are as guilty as her if you honestly believe that! I wonder if that young boy she placed in a gaurdianship with a sex offender out in the middle of nowhere would agree with you! #32 Comment By Auntie Mom On May 8, 6:26 pm Today is Mothers Day; I hope that she is enjoying her day with her children. May God bless all of the mothers whose relationships with their children were destroyed by this Twisted Bitch. That includes Me, My Mother, My Dead Sister and her children. In honor of my sister and the others whose lives she has destroyed I will continue to fight to get her off the bench. By the way; I was told by an officer of the court that this is her 3rd DUI! Where is MADD! I was quite vocal about The Dishonorable Judge Lisa Guy- Schall back then, most people agree with me and contact me when she screws up which is often. #33 Comment By Auntie Mom On May 8, 6:43 pm CCFC Master Exhs. P1050

83 [29] Be on the watch for false prophets, who come to you in sheep s clothing, but inside they are cruel wolves. Bible in Basic English: She definitely played the Christian Card in our case. I only needed to point out the separation of church and state to the supervising judge (and others) to be heard. #34 Comment By One of Thousands On May 26, 1:08 pm [24] Here is a link to the Schall opinion > [30] In short, Schall failed to follow several relevant laws concerning jurisdiction of California Family Courts. Her error created an enormous mess and waste of judicial and party resources. The Court of Appeals is normally very deferential to trial court judges, but in this case the Fourth District (San Diego) Court of Appeals really hammered her, pointing out many errors and unprofessional conduct and analysis, reversing her on several grounds, and sending the case back to her with strict instructions to do it right. I reiterate to the readers Judge Schall continues her pattern of playing fast and loose with the law in her courtroom. She s been admonished three times now and is facing numerous additional complaints with the CJP. If you ve been injured by Schall or have witnessed unprofessional conduct in your case or the cases of others, please report her to the CJP at the address provided by the reader above. She s a disaster undermining public confidence in the courts and government in general. Blessings and good luck to all. #35 Comment By Peaceful Warrior On June 9, 7:29 pm I am not an abuser in any way, Ms. Aide. In fact, I am a Peaceful Warrior, in favor of nonviolent means to solve any disagreement. My manipulative and brilliant ex-wife, was able to manipulate the entire court system into believing her lies, with the aid of one; Sue Ann Edwards, LMFT, false testimony. I tried to have a peaceful divorce, by absorbing all of our collective marital debt. This made no difference to my ex, and the ensuing custody battle drained every drop of my financial resources. In the end, I lost my business, my home, and my child. I have not seen my child in the past two years, except for a handful of special occasions, with the court ordered supervisor present ( a beneficiary of these rulings). I have not had the money to see her, and it is a ridiculous and demeaning notion to have a supervisor present anyway, to me and to anyone who knows me. I tried to make this all change, so I got a generous newbie attorney to help me. My attorney was not only shut down by Judge Schall, she was terrified by her presence, and she was not allowed to present our evidence, to prove my innocence. You get the notion that I have to prove my innocence, they have not had to prove my guilt, but I am judged guilty without evidence or proof of any kind. I am in full support of anyone who has had to endure the painful and unnecessary wrath of Judge Schall, and false testimony of, so called, court operatives. I pledge my full support, removing Judge Schall from the bench, and I will go one step further and would like to get a federal Judge to rule that our children s and our constitutional rights CCFC Master Exhs. P1051

84 have been violated, by Judge Schall and her cohorts. She needs to be permanently disbarred from ever practicing law again, and we need our constitutional and parental rights restored. Also, anyone with the same issues, should become members of a class action suit against Judge Schall, Sue Ann Edwards, LMFT (or any other psyc-cohorts), and the malicious FCS and benefiting parties from these rulings. We can only win with numbers, and attorneys will not touch this without the promise of a lucrative end result. We need to provide this for them to be interested. One person cannot do this alone. I want my child s custody restored and so does my child; we have been denied due process of the law. Our financial conditions also need to be restored. This can be done. Please join me. I am ready to move forward on this but I cannot do it alone. We all need to get together and do this in a smart way, or it will be squashed like our hopes and the hopes of our children. No matter how much they have suffered in their hands, we owe it to them to get this to all change back to what is right. Our children are counting on us. I am a Peaceful Warrior please join me in this quest. Send me an with a brief description of your experience, and I will respond. When we get a solid base of litigants, we can select the proper help. Anyone who wants to invalidate and negate our efforts need find another forum for your misguided attempts to legitimize state sponsored child abuse. We who are in this together, know the truth. We rest only upon truth. [31] #36 Comment By Peaceful Warrior On June 9, 8:09 pm I am not an abuser in any way, Ms. Aide. In fact, I am a Peaceful Warrior, in favor of nonviolent means to solve any disagreement. My manipulative and brilliant ex-wife, was able to manipulate the entire court system into believing her lies, with the aid of one; Sue Ann Edwards, LMFT, false testimony. I tried to have a peaceful divorce, by absorbing all of our collective marital debt. This made no difference to my ex, and the ensuing custody battle drained every drop of my financial resources. In the end, I lost my business, my home, and my child. I have not seen my child in the past two years, except for a handful of special occasions, with the court ordered supervisor present ( a beneficiary of these rulings). I have not had the money to see her, and it is a ridiculous and demeaning notion to have a supervisor present anyway, to me and to anyone who knows me. I tried to make this all change, so I got a generous newbie attorney to help me. My attorney was not only shut down by Judge Schall, she was terrified by her presence, and she was not allowed to present our evidence, to prove my innocence. You get the notion that I have to prove my innocence, they have not had to prove my guilt, but I am judged guilty without evidence or proof of any kind. I am in full support of anyone who has had to endure the painful and unnecessary wrath of Judge Schall, and false testimony of, so called, court operatives. I pledge my full support, removing Judge Schall from the bench, and I will go one step further and would like to get a federal Judge to rule that our children s and our constitutional rights have been violated, by Judge Schall and her cohorts. She needs to be permanently disbarred from ever practicing law again, and we need our constitutional and parental rights restored. Also, anyone with the same issues, should become members of a class action suit against Judge Schall, Sue Ann Edwards, LMFT (or any other psyc-cohorts), and the malicious FCS and benefiting parties from these rulings. We can only win with numbers, and attorneys will not touch this without the promise of a lucrative end result. We need to provide this for them to be interested. One person cannot do this alone. CCFC Master Exhs. P1052

85 I want my child s custody restored and so does my child; we have been denied due process of the law. Our financial conditions also need to be restored. This can be done. Please join me. I am ready to move forward on this but I cannot do it alone. We all need to get together and do this in a smart way, or it will be squashed like our hopes and the hopes of our children. No matter how much they have suffered in their hands, we owe it to them to get this to all change back to what is right. Our children are counting on us. I am a Peaceful Warrior please join me in this quest. Send me an with a brief description of your experience, and I will respond. When we get a solid base of litigants, we can select the proper help. Anyone who wants to invalidate and negate our efforts need find another forum for your misguided attempts to legitimize state sponsored child abuse. We who are in this together, know the truth. We rest only upon truth. [32] #37 Comment By Peaceful Warrior On June 9, 8:11 pm My address was set up wrong sorry. [32] #38 Comment By Peaceful Warrior On June 9, 9:24 pm They both work though [31] is also valid. Sorry about any confusion. #39 Comment By Chris Noble On July 18, 6:12 pm Well people, I ve finally had it with this tyrant. I FEEL YOUR PAIN. My son feels your pain. We can t heal if we can t laugh about this atrocious miscarriage of our judicial system; so I ve decided to tell my story regarding Lisa Schall and it s done with a twist of dry humor. So if you would be so kind as to stop by my blog for some juicy behind the scenes with Lisa Schall stories please be my guest at fortheloveofgun.blogspot.com #40 Comment By Chris Noble On July 18, 6:14 pm [33] :Well people, I ve finally had it with this tyrant. I FEEL YOUR PAIN. My son feels your pain. We can t heal if we can t laugh about this atrocious miscarriage of our judicial system; so I ve decided to tell my story regarding Lisa Schall and it s done with a twist of dry humor. So if you would be so kind as to stop by my blog for some juicy behind the scenes with Lisa Schall stories please be my guest at [34] #41 Comment By Chris Noble On July 18, 6:29 pm hey brian hit me up on my blog fortheloveofgun/blogspot.com. I HEAR YOU but would prefer to share a name in a less public environment frightening as that may be (given our freedoms Cal. Coalition and for Families all.) and [35] Children v. San Diego County Bar Ass'n CCFC Master Exhs. P1053

86 #42 Comment By Peaceful Warrior On August 17, 11:53 pm Hey Chris I just went to your blogspot and read all your stuff. Here is the deal. None of the truth matters to this court, and publicity in this form can be used against you later. I do not know what is going on in this court, but it is a nefarious entity. I thought that I might do the same as you and create a website with all of the facts. But, I have since determined that this requires a federal judge to step in and get involved. Judges who think that they can ignore facts, fail to read pleadings, and dish out punishments to parents with no evidence of any wrong doing, and are not in the best interest of the child, are in violation of our 5th amendment rights to due process of law. We are in effect being punished for uncommitted crimes, and are children are being punished for them as well. This is totally unconstitutional. Violating the law and making your own rules as a Judge violates constitutional authority. We need to band together and formulate a constitutional challenge and disbarment action subsequent with civil litigation for compensation and emotional damages caused to our children and ourselves. See who you can get together with us to do this, we need more than just me, or just me and you we need numbers to make this work and get the proper legal help to get this done. I cannot bear another summer without my daughter. This is a slam dunk if we have enough numbers. It is the only way to win. Please join me in this fight Peaceful Warrior #43 Comment By One of thousands On October 9, 4:49 pm Vote them out. Please. April #44 Comment By Auntie Mom On November 3, 5:36 pm I say Paste her face and info all over facebook Embarrass her right out of the court room!! #45 Comment By Auntie Mom On November 3, 7:35 pm I have lost all faith in the American court system. Not long after Judge Lisa my neighbors and I took a neighbor to court for videotaping our kids and posting it on his web page with the heading Unsuspecting teen porn. At the Sheriffs request we took him to court for a TRO. Judge David Ryan: Ya, Speaking of Bad Judges, Judge Felon Hugger! After sarcastically insulting the group of mother and their children representing themselves, he reluctantly granted us a TRO. When Randy returned to taping we called the sheriff, they came out and now, because of the TRO could access his house. As the senior officer exited the house we asked what he had found, he replied Move, this is one sick F**K! Every room in that house (2 story, 3 bed, 2 bath!) is filled with computers and surveillance equipment and his garage is a dark room. We all thought that a RO was a sure thing, nope; Judge David Ryan found that he had the right Go figure.to add insult to injury; Judge David Ryan ordered the mothers to collectively pay Randy s legal fees of more than $10.000! Well, those families and others all moved out of the neighborhood. While David Ryan may have found Randy s behavior acceptable someone didn t, because CCFC Master Exhs. P1054

87 about a year later Randy just disappeared, his house sat empty, car in the driveway but no sign of him. About a year later some guys moved into his house. They asked what had happened with him, when I asked why they told me that they had rented the house over the internet with the agreement that they would pack up his belongings and his car and bring them to him in New Mexico. Stating that Dude was run out of town, someone took him to the state border and told him to never come back, there was food on the table and blood on the floor. Encinitas Sheriff and Our H.O.A. were both well aware of his long history of doing these kinds of things unfortunately the law and judges like David Ryan tied their hands. I have no idea who dealt with Randy and the damage was already done to us and our children, but I learned something from that We all did. #46 Comment By One of thousands On November 6, 1:40 am San Diego-don t let these incompetent, dishonest scum take our beautiful city. These are discrepulous people. And I ve worked in DC for Prosecutors. The peaceful way is to vote them out. Are there other ways? #47 Comment By One of Thousands On November 8, 6:36 pm All: I have just spoken with the investigator for the Commission on Judicial Performance handling judge Schall s case, Mr. Brad Batson. He was unable to provide specific comments regarding the investigation of Judge Schall, but mentioned it was complex i.e. serious a la De Anne Salcido s resignation serious. He also encouraged others with complaints re: Judge Schall to submit them in writing. As there appear to be many just on this site, the CJP is requesting your cooperation as well as the cooperation of others of whom you may be aware. Submit >specific< complaints in as concise a format as possible to: Mr. Brett Battson Commission on Judicial Performance 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite San Francisco, CA TELEPHONE: (415) FAX: (415) Good luck and blessings to all. #48 Pingback By CJP Investigation of Judge Lisa Schall Heats Up, Citizen Input Sought angiemedia On November 9, 1:52 am [...] Share Use of Our Content (Reposting and Quoting) November 9th, 2011 Leave a comment Go to commentsdrunk driver Judge Lisa Schall of San Diego is being investigated by the California Commission on Judicial Performance. She s been [...] #49 Comment By NT On November 29, 9:38 am Wish I had seen this site earlier. Too late now CCFC Master Exhs. P1055

88 Short url [36] #50 Comment By Shelly and John Van Paver On January 29, 7:27 am My wife loves Lisa, shelly my wife made a death threat tape and we got the kids away and got out of paying child support, then the grandma gets sick, then the mother ends up in jail, then the daughter who was in our care ends up in hospital. My wife was good at lying, verbally abusing my daughters, she was the step mom. I tried to kill my 1st wife, my daughters and my ex-mother in law. And we almost killed the mother and get away with it. Judgement day will come Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] Judge Lisa Schall: [2] SDSC Case DN144055: casenum=dn144005&casesite=nc&applcode=d [3] SDSC Case DN147397: casenum=dn147397&casesite=nc&applcode=d [4] California Vehicle Code 23152(a): [5] San Diego Judge Publicly Censured Over Wet Reckless Plea: [6] San Diego Sheriff s Department: [7] Judicial Performance Commission Issues Public Admonishment of Judge Lisa Guy-Schall: [8] Lawyer Seeks Probe of Forum Speech by Judge: 24/local/me-8732_1_political-forum [9] judicial races for that June 2008 election: [10] Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall: [11] Unjust Delays in San Diego Family Law Courts: [12] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct: p=5277 [13] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts: [14] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals: p=5195 [15] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire: p=5068 [16] San Diego judge Lisa Schall publicly admonished for drunk driving: [17] Court provides rare support for EIR s water analysis; damages award thrown out; Fallbrook PUD faces new trial.: [18] California Judges Disciplined 2008: [19] San Diego Judges: Injustice: [20] Judge Lisa C. Schall: [21] DUI Law California Vehicle Code: VC Alcohol and/or Drugs: [22] : case= &q=uccjea&hl=en&as_sdt=2,48&as_ylo=2011 [23] : mailto:info.angiemedia@gmail.com CCFC Master Exhs. P1056

89 [24] : #comment [25] : #comment [26] : [27] : mailto:dishonorablejudgelisa@hotmail.com [28] : #comment [29] : #comment [30] : [31] : mailto:peacefulwarrior.againstlisa@gmail.com [32] : mailto:peacfulwarrior.againstlisa@gmail.com [33] : #comment [34] : [35] : #comment [36] : Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1057

90 - angiemedia Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Posted By Chris on January 25, Comments Recommend Send Be the first of your friends to recommend this. Today we received some interesting feedback on our article regarding San Diego s abusive reckless drunk driver Judge Lisa Schall [1] from a reader who has experienced what it s like to appear in front of her. This reader has a lot of experience in courts in multiple states and believes that Schall may be the worst judge the reader has encountered. The reader believes we ve given Schall and other bad judges too many outs and means to scapegoat others (such as the legislature) for their bad decisions and haven t pointed out enough effective ways for the public to fight these bad judges. In my view these comments are pretty much on the Judge Lisa Schall mark and open up further points for discussion, so I d like to share them with our other readers. Also, at the end of this posting are two poll questions on which I d appreciate your feedback. The comments were interspersed with some of the article s text as shown below. Article Text: People often complain about incompetent, biased, and even vicious judges. That s especially the case for litigants cursed with enduring the injustices of family law courts in the Western world. I d urge you to take a more accurate perspective: complain implies moaning and groaning or sour grapes by the person alerting the public to judicial abuse. More accurately, Evidence of the incompetence, bias, and vicious judges on the San Diego Superior Court bench, and San Diego s blind acceptance of such rampant abuse continues to mount. Article Text: Often the judges are causing more destruction by following bad laws as judges can t make law on their own, aside from the judicial activists who may try only to be often overturned by a higher court. Unfortunately, your statement that judges are merely following bad laws gives judges an excuse to duck their responsibility to interpret and apply laws equitably by blaming a law or the legislature that enacted it. Blaming a law is preposterous as judges in family court have tremendous discretion to interpret laws in light of individual circumstances. Witness the vague best interests of the child standard in most cases where both parents have strengths and weaknesses as parents (we all inevitably do), determining the best interests of the child is nothing more than a guessing game supplemented by the judge s own biases. A noted researcher who has studied application of the best interests standard concluded that the best interests standard is impossible to apply without inserting a judge s or psychologist s inherent personal bias. (O Donohue & Bradley, 1999). For example, is it in a child s best interest to remain with a warm, but overprotective mother, or an intelligent, but not as nurturing father? Is it in the child s best interest to be raised in the father s Catholic home, or the mother s Protestant religion? Do the burdens of moving away where the mother can start a new career outweigh the benefits of staying in the child s traditional home town with a financially secure father? O Donohue & Bradley point out that even if we were able to read a crystal ball and determine how these questions would affect the child in the longer term, CCFC Master Exhs. P1058

91 and even if these decisions did result in the child maturing into significantly different ways over time, who is to say that one outcome is better or worse for the child? In essence, we ve established a standard that is objectively unworkable except for judges and consultants pretending to make the right decision in the best interests of the child by inserting their own values and perspective. Granted, where one parent has serious abuse problems, it s an easier call. However, those cases are likely a tiny fraction of the cases judges must rule on. I submit that a far, far more effective method of permitting the child to achieve his best interests is to recognize that in 99% of cases parents not judges should decide what is best for their children. Parents have far more invested in their offspring, have long-term contact with them, and have tremendous affection. While it s true that parents don t always agree, the judge s role should be focused on encouraging agreement and compromise not making ham-fisted decisions that are biased in favor of their own values which are likely far less consistent with the child s sociological and psychological makeup than the parents decisions. Today s courts simply fail to recognize that parents given the proper education and incentives and not threatened with a complete loss of custody (or equally as often tempted with the victory of winning complete custody) will almost always do what they believe is in their children s best interests. Blaming the law simply gives the judges a scapegoat: The law is bad, not me. This excuse is exactly why the public tolerates clumsy judicial intervention, and why judges continue to make very harmful decisions. I suggest not allowing the judges to pass the buck to politicians by giving them firm guidelines to achieve 50/50 custody in most cases, and limiting judicial discretion to vary from such guidelines. I also suggest that characterizing a judge who interprets a law fairly as a judicial activist is an insult. Again, you re given bad judges an excuse to do the right thing would make me an activist, therefore I have to do the wrong thing by inserting my own values and speculation. If you think I m wrong, haven t paid attention, or don t know what I m doing, blame the legislature. Vague guidelines are often passed into law to give the judge the discretion to do the right thing trusting in the judiciary. Thus, judicial intergrity in interpreting the law is a critical element in the effective function of legislation. Giving bad judges an excuse to do bad things completely undermines this function and permits bad results. Being a judge is an enormous responsibility to act in an unbiased way. Unfortunately this responsibility in San Diego family courts today is held by many arrogant, incompetent, and even corrupt people. Article Text: Many times the judges may be more concerned with saving their political futures than with following the laws or dispensing fair rulings. Hence we get illegal and immoral guilty until proven innocent rulings that kick a person out of his or her home, ban contact with the kids, and label the person as a pseudocriminal all without a shred of evidence based upon false allegations or distortions for which the false accuser will never be punished even if his or her lies are proven. For many suffering from the wrongs of the family law courts, this is business as usual. It s a good point, but judges are in fact elected. It s not per se wrong for a judge to be concerned about a judge s political future as a judge. It s wrong for a judge to act irresponsibly, incompetently, or fraudulently in any way, or act in a way that promotes his or her political or financial future off the bench. For example, it s well known that the San Diego family law community is a closed society. Family court judges often retire from the bench only to enter the practice or move on to judicial mediation and/or arbitration. They know that the attorneys appearing before them today will be their colleagues, clients, or even employers for decades to come. Yet another reason Judges so heavily favor represented parties in family court they re practically business partners. As such, judges inherently are acting out of their own self-interests or the interests of attorneys in their courtrooms rather than the litigants who will soon be history. CCFC Master Exhs. P1059

92 Article Text: Sometimes, however, a judge really is notably bad in ways beyond the typical judicial incompetence, selfish disregard for the rights of others, and maliciousness when displeased. Based upon public records and accounts of people who have been in her courtroom, Judge Lisa Schall of San Diego County, California, is one such judge. While Judge Schall is certainly one such judge, the statement about her is true for far more judges than Judge Schall. Article Text: The public should have had a chance to vote Schall out of office even if there was nobody else running for the office. She s disreputable and abusive. She doesn t belong in on the bench, even if nobody else wants the job. It s interesting that Judges and psychologists often respond to criticism with the following: If I didn t do it, somebody even worse would. It s the equivalent of a physician who is asked to perform outdated, harmful medicine stating, yes, I know it s no longer appropriate to amputate a leg for a small infection, but I have no choice because if I didn t cause the harm, somebody else would. The equivalent of Patty Hearst pleading innocent to bank robbery because Charlie Manson made her do it. I say if you know you re causing harm by incompetence, inability to provide necessary attention, or otherwise, then stop doing it altogether. Period. Perhaps with enough judges acting ethically by ceasing to perform duties they can t perform competently, the need for true reform would become evident. Until that happens, the good enough for government work standards and practices will continue to harm children and families. Focus On Other Issues Doesn t Excuse Bad Judges In light of these comments, it s clear that well-informed people who have experienced how horrible the family law courts are may have a variety of opinions as to how to fix the problems. I can see how my focus on issues other than the misconduct of bias of individual bad judges may come across as giving them an out by suggesting how they can scapegoat the legislature and appeals courts for their harmful actions. However, it s my belief that a full fix for the broken courts requires far more than replacing individual judges. Changes to election laws are needed to ensure that the public has a right to veto judicial candidates who run unopposed but who are not acceptable. There also need to be protections written into the law that are not just left to the often wrong discretion of individual judges. For instance, shared parenting with 50/50 custody should be presumptive policy unless clear and convincing evidence shows otherwise. Seeking Your Input For the readers who are following this story, I ve got two questions. Please vote just once on each question. You re encouraged to pass around the link to the polls and articles. Further Reading Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? [1] Unjust Delays in San Diego Family Law Courts [4] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [5] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [6] CCFC Master Exhs. P1060

93 San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals [7] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [8] Holding Family Law Judges Accountable [9] Rate The Courts: Judge Lisa Schall [10] 10 Comments To "Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall" #1 Pingback By Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? angiemedia On January 25, 6:13 pm [...] Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall [...] #2 Pingback By A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children angiemedia On July 15, 5:36 am [...] Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall [...] #3 Pingback By San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining Orders angiemedia On October 10, 3:12 am [...] San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert JusticeReader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa SchallWhy Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?CCFC Family Court Reform Presentation in Del [...] #4 Pingback By San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed TV Show angiemedia On November 6, 7:18 pm [...] Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego SheriffSan Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert JusticeReader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa SchallWhy Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law [...] #5 Pingback By Amicus Brief in Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne Appeal in San Diego angiemedia On November 23, 5:20 am [...] Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego SheriffSan Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert JusticeReader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa SchallWhy Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law [...] #6 Pingback By New Evidence Stephen Doyne Violated Child Custody Evaluation Laws angiemedia On March 18, 3:22 am [...] Eager For New Weapons For Judicial AbuseCCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa SchallWhy Is San Diego Judge Lisa CCFC Master Exhs. P1061

94 Schall Still On The Bench?Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law [...] #7 Comment By Lorriane Bieda On April 24, 4:22 am Judge Lisa Schall is the most shocking, unprofessional I have ever seen in the courtroom. She is sarcastic, disrespectful, and unorganized. I watched in horror as she confused facts, would not even pay attention to the lawyers while she read her s & yet rules on the lives of individuals within her control. Schall is exceptionally rude to women, overlooking obvious legal issues and even flirting with some of the men. It is a sad situation to see San Diego Family Court continue to suffer through Schall s lack of justice so much for the blindfolded lady justice who weighs facts, without prejudice and rules fairly. Get her out!!! #8 Comment By Chris Noble On June 26, 2:43 pm I have been forced to appear before Judge Judy Lisa Schall more times in the last year than I spent with my own son. The way she runs he courtroom is nothing less than jaw-dropping. Forget about your first amendment rights you -can leave those at the door of her court room. YOU WILL speak only when spoken too. You will be spoken too; only when it suits her agenda. I was supposed to be able to cross examine or otherwise question the other party and single witness regarding what I believe to be a frivilous move-away where clearly the intent was to frustrate. The mother couldn t even be honest about their current living situation; let alone the events that have led to it. I was never given the opportunity to ask ANY questions of the mother. Anything I said was re-interpreted by the judge and basically reworded and spoon-fed to the opposing party. A 8-year old could see how she carefully avoided certain topics that were tantamount to the entire move-away and instead chose to focus on my apparent lack of ability when it came to filing the appropriate forms. I explained in no uncertain terms from what I understand of current move-away caselaw You could throw out my entire declaration and it wouldn t change the fact that 1. The move WAS frivolous, premeditated and done intentionally to frustrate. 2. The move was not in the childs best interest as he had deteriorated from a GATE Seminar honors student; to barely passing 5th grade. He went from All A s to one A. 3. His relationship with his father, friends, and community were not considered 4. Due process and my right to challenge the other party regarding motives for their moveaway were not just lacking They didn t exist. There is no way you can fix a system where people like Judge Schall are allowed to come into your living room and tell your family how to conduct itself. The problem is the system. You wanna come into my? You wanna see how we live and then critique it ANYONE? YOU had better DAMN well ring the door bell, announce yourself, use your manners at my dinner table ohh and one more thing before desert and before you judge others.. WE DON T ALLOW ROBES AT THE DINNER TABLE in my home, or in my family Spit noble #9 Comment By Chris Schneider On April 24, 1:32 am I ll say one thing about Judge Schall. I just came out from jury selection with her presiding, and the experience was the right mix of instilling respect for the law and the court, but with the right modicum of relaxing humor to set everyone at ease to comfortably voice thier true thoughts. She s got my vote. Best jury experience I ve had and I have new respect for the CCFC Master Exhs. P1062

95 court because of Schall. #10 Comment By David Sutton On September 9, 12:33 pm I won t go into too much detail but, dealing with this judge I have lost all faith in our justice system. This judge ignored evidence, told me I did not deserve to speak and gave me less than 5 minutes to speak. She also mixed up facts and it was clear that she was not prepared. She is not working in family court right now, but that is not going to give the year back that I lost with my children because of her disgusting behavior. Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] our article regarding San Diego s abusive reckless drunk driver Judge Lisa Schall: [2] Take Our Poll: [3] Take Our Poll: [4] Unjust Delays in San Diego Family Law Courts: [5] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct: p=5277 [6] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts: [7] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals: p=5195 [8] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire: p=5068 [9] Holding Family Law Judges Accountable: [10] Rate The Courts: Judge Lisa Schall: Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1063

96 - angiemedia A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Posted By Paco on July 6, Comments Recommend Send 60 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. Please be sure to read the editor s note at the end. Highlights of a speech by San Diego s Honorable Lisa Drunk [1] on June 31st I am honored to appear before you tonight at this meeting of the San Diego County Bar Association [2]. Thank you for inviting me to speak on my views on the best interests of children as judges see them. This is a very important matter as it is essential to our careers as jurists, attorneys, and court service providers. As an experienced family law judge, I am tasked with upholding the law in my courtroom and serving the best interests of children. This is a difficult job, one to which I must give a great deal of consideration and attention to creating the best possible outcome to the people who really matter, judges and our friends. When litigants enter my courtroom, they must understand that I am God and the law is what I say it is. If they question this, I will take their children, property, and other privileges away from them. They have no rights, only privileges which I allow them to have. They have no right to trial by jury, no right to due process of law, and no right to anything except to bask in the glow of my presence so long as they do not annoy me. If one dares annoy me, I will quickly arrange for arrest and imprisonment. This is why I have armed deputies in my courtroom, to silence anybody who dares to annoy me, just as I did to that unruly mother Joanna Slivka [3] who dared speak when I told her to be quiet. I decide who can talk and what they can say. The five days she spent in jail for thinking otherwise is only a down payment on what I ll do to her if she ever sets foot in my court again. My dear friends and colleagues Judge Christine Goldsmith and Judge Lorna Alksne have recently done likewise to that nasty man who wrongly believes that the US Constitution is the law of the land and dared challenge them [4]. In our courts, WE JUDGES ARE THE LAW and people like him should remember that. We family law judges have all discussed the necessity of arrests and incarceration at length and know full well our roles in handling such annoying people. We are thankful to have the support of law enforcement, including our friends Sheriff Gore [5] and Chief Lansdowne, in such matters. clearing throat, sipping water Children are property of the state Wild cheers from audience, Judge Lisa Drunk pauses for a moment for quiet Let me say that again, to be clear. Children are property of the state, and this is good for the community. The law clearly establishes that I can do whatever I fancy with children. There is no right to a jury in my court, and as we judges ensure that litigants are intimidated and bankrupt there is no right to appeal. This helps save taxpayers a great deal of money each year, by the way. This duty to make decisions about children is well-understood by the entire family and juvenile judiciary across the United States. It is exemplified by the outstanding records of my CCFC Master Exhs. P1064

97 esteemed colleagues Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan [6]. They know that children are in our courts to enrich judges and our friends and have for many years skillfully extracted millions of dollars of profit from the kids appearing in their courtrooms on such ghastly serious charges as treasonous rebellion against school authorities. Kudos to them for their fine efforts! Hearty applause from the audience plus a few loud cheers As we judges rightfully demand, lawyers who appear in our courtrooms give campaign contributions to us and are careful to always support our re-elections. My friend, retired Judge Randa Trapp [7], was ever so right when she asked the lawyers appearing in her courtroom to give a show of hands in support of her re-election [8]. They all supported her fully, and today she strongly supports incumbent judges. We judges here in San Diego are confident that our friends in the San Diego County Bar Association trust us to make the best use of children to ensure maximum profitability of the family law community. If for some odd reason a short-sighted attorney dares oppose us, he will lose in court and may, if particularly annoying, be quickly arrested and cast into jail as our friends in law enforcement will see to that. If an attorney supports us, he will be rewarded with ongoing profitable work as we judges endeavor to take as much time as possible to settle any matter before us and to maximize potential for continued conflict. Children appreciate this, I hear their gratitude when I speak with them to explain how we judges help them. They long to help serve justice and know when their parents fight, our whole community benefits. The practices that I as a judge apply daily benefit the community. There are many, but I will highlight the three most important. First and foremost, children are the property over which I can ensure parents will war with each other. War between parents is good for the court and community as it ensures the income and job security for court administrative staff, law enforcement judicial security staff, as well as judges and all of my attorney, mediator, and mental health professional friends in the community. As a judge, it is my first obligation to uphold government power. By stripping children from parents and rewarding them for attacking each other, I can decide how to best advance this goal consistently. The children are grateful as they know I am powerful and want to help them meet their highest potential to enrich the community. They wish to serve me in any way they can and tell me this every time I meet with them. Secondly, we judges must reward skilled story-telling. It is the foundation upon which conflict is built. Conflict is good for the courts and our friends and is therefore good for the children. We must encourage it by all means. Any parent who blesses us with another accusation of domestic violence or child abuse is particularly worthy of reward as these are the issues we can use to make ourselves known as protectors of women and children, gain ever more votes, and ensure our continued ability to serve our community. Thirdly, we must avoid clarity in our court orders. Clarity endangers conflict. This is simply unacceptable and unprofitable. Further, clarity in court orders requires more careful thought. I am simply too busy considering how to reward stories and claims without evidence in thousands of cases before me so I can ensure continuing conflict to have time to waste on expressing clear court orders. Also importantly, my attorney friends like to write and argue over their versions of orders to increase their billable hours and profits. As a judge who derives my income and campaign contributions from their work, I want to keep them busy so they keep my campaign support flowing in. Cheers of thank you Lisa! from audience My SDCBA friends each year send cards with campaign contribution checks to thank me for thoughtfully applying these practices. I want to you all to know that I very much appreciate this and remember carefully who contributes to our community. I would like to deeply thank all my supporters for their campaign support checks and referrals to my friends. I particularly thank Sheriff Bill Gore [5], City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, and our esteemed friend Stephen Doyne [9] who have all done so much for our community. CCFC Master Exhs. P1065

98 Thank you also to the entire San Diego County Bar Association for yet another solid recommendation for my re-election. Thank you all for your continued support! Wild applause, slowly dies down Next to speak will be my esteemed supervisor, Judge Lorna Alksne [10], who has taught me so much about being a good judge and who is a fine example for all of us. Audience applauds quickly, spotlight shifts to black-robed woman walking up to podium Editor s Note: We realize that some of our readers have been so traumatized by judges like the fictional Lisa Drunk (based upon the real convicted drunk driver Judge Lisa Schall [1] ) that they can see only how real this speech seems and might have missed the clues that it is a dark satire. Many of them may have lost their senses of humor along with their children, finances, and health and see only the reality of what the family law courts did to destroy not only their lives, but the lives of their children, too. While this speech is indeed fictional, it includes links to many articles and other sources that illuminate that it is very close to the actual mentality of many officials of the corrupt and abusive judiciary and government of San Diego County, California. Joanna Slivka, named in the speech, is but one of many victims of the abusive San Diego courts. In her case, she was arrested and jailed for five days on the orders of Judge Lisa Schall because she was so emotionally upset about being told she could not tell her side of the story. The Commission on Judicial Performance publicly admonished Schall for abusing her contempt-of-court powers against Slivka. Yet Slivka s family has suffered far more court-assisted abuse than just this. Possibly the worst of it is that her daughter was reportedly sexually assaulted at a group divorce therapy session at a church that she was ordered by the court to attend. Like some other families, they have been abused by family law courts in multiple California counties as the corruption in family law courts is widespread across California and the entire United States. San Diego judges are working with each other and their family and friends in law enforcement to attack the growing number of parents who are calling for reform of the courts. Family law courts in San Diego are a form of organized crime that violates US and state laws as well as the human rights of children and parents. Local law enforcement will never, ever protect the children and parents of San Diego from the ongoing violation of law and human rights by these judges. That s because they are in the pocket of the judiciary, exchanging favors with each other to quash political dissent in the region. Most parents are unable to mount an appeal when their children and they are harmed by the frequent abuses in these courts. Even if they are able to obtain the funds to appeal, the judges have often stacked the deck by wrongly manipulating the admission of evidence and testimony to create a flawed court record that supports their prejudiced opinions. Some even go so far as to order clerks and court reporters to alter court records and transcripts. Further, records are often lost or misplaced as necessary to support a judge s opinions. The court records in San Diego cannot be trusted, just as the judges cannot be trusted. In such a climate of corruption, appeals are likely to often be ineffective because the court records are relied upon for appeal. The San Diego courts and law enforcement will not do their jobs competently or fairly because of the family connections and revolving door between the courts, district attorney, and senior law enforcement positions in the county. DA Bonnie Dumanis is buddies with City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, a former judge, who is married to family law Judge Christine Goldsmith. Sheriff Bill Gore, Judge Lorna Alksne, the County Board of Supervisors, and many others are connected in this web of corruption and abuse. Many of the judges and law enforcement officials involved deserve prosecution and imprisonment. Instead, the nepotism and corruption in the county provide them with aid in politically persecuting their growing numbers of enemies composed in part of many parents who are fed up with the abuses and injustices being inflicted upon their children and their families. CCFC Master Exhs. P1066

99 Further Reading Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed [11] Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA [2] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse [10] Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff [5] San Diego Lawyer Jeffrey Fritz Increases Conflict and Costs [12] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader [4] CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010 [13] San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice [14] Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall [15] Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? [1] CCFC Family Court Reform Presentation in Del Mar, California [16] CCFC Press Release On Stephen Doyne Corruption/Fraud Case [17] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [18] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [19] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals [20] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [9] Crimes Against Children: Zero Tolerance and Kids for Cash [21] Corrupt Pennsylvania Courts Jail Kids for Cash [6] Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice [22] Booklist Mini-review [23] A take-no-prisoners condemnation of psychiatric experts being waved into the witness box, this account trashes psychiatry in general as a quack profession. Hagen (a psychology professor) assails most of the diagnostic tools of the field in her text, which roams among court cases whose outcome hinged on the testimony of mental-health experts. Her fundamental contention is that psychiatry is a junk science whose theories when extended to matters of legal culpability go against common sense. Indeed, Hagen assumes the posture of that legendary [22] legalism, the reasonable person, and her prose is peppered with exclamations and rhetorical questions like Who could believe that? which might annoy as many readers as it might convince about whatever points are in question. Among Cal. Coalition them for are Families such and topically Children v. San current Diego County items Bar as Ass'n battered-wife syndrome, recovered CCFC Master Exhs. P1067

100 memory claims, post-traumatic stress syndrome, and urban psychosis claims. The average person could easily encounter in divorce and child custody litigation the situations Hagen vigorously complains of, so her energetic attack could gain considerable attention. Gilbert Taylor 20 Comments To "A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children " #1 Comment By Ben Dover On July 6, 6:42 pm WTF is this nutjob judge thinking? What a miserable piece of shit she is. #2 Comment By AXJ On July 10, 3:56 am This AXJ and more than a million members will put a stop to this #3 Comment By Imnot Happee On July 11, 2:12 pm Sounds like Florida Family Law, only in Florida this is NOT fiction!!!! #4 Comment By Truckin On July 14, 9:43 pm Never, I repeat NEVER, has there been a time for everyone to get out of this private law system to NOT be subject to these laws. Click my name and start reading. The ONLY way we will all stop this, and more, is to expatriate from being a U.S. citizen (which we were never meant to be little did you know) and repatriate back into our true countries, such as Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Maine, Oregon, Texas, Florida, and all the rest. Get knowledge now about how to get out. #5 Comment By Truckin On July 14, 10:32 pm You realize, reading the editor s note, this is a fictionalized account, but have little doubt this is pretty close to the mentality. Again, it s past time to get out of this private law system. Go to [24]. #6 Comment By Janette M. Isaacs On July 18, 12:42 pm Great article. While it is fictionalized, it translates into a non fictional documentary of what is actually happening in our California family courts. I am sure that your fictional perspective hits home to most of our L.A. Superior Family Court judges. They have the pleasure of thinking it, and you had the pleasure of writing it. Great stuff. #7 Comment By San Diego Cynic On July 19, 10:14 pm CCFC Master Exhs. P1068

101 Yes, judges believe their word is God s word. Have you ever been in Commissioner Jeanne Lowe s courtroom? She holds her hand up, palm out and says, My courtroom, MY LAW! #8 Comment By one of thousands On July 20, 4:40 pm San Diego realize your government is run by arrogant dopes who have little or no respect for the law. Thanks George W. (Gore was equally a dope just another puppet for money). Bush set a great example: Stupidity plus guns equals right. Welcome to America. People it s about money and power, which in the US are virtually synonymous. >You< can and do have enormous power if you vote intelligently. But today in the US you're being herded like sheep into the pockets of corporations (money). It's hard to see if you haven't been on the inside I have. Trust me you're becoming slaves to very mediocre people with selfish motives to screw you over. They're using your trust to promote their interests at your expense. What to do? Demand more choices elect Nader or another third party candidate (personally I have no dog in the fight so pick the one you like best). Otherwise you're going to get shafted like this forever. Idiot A vs. idiot B is leading to your enslavement. Good luck waking up. #9 Pingback By Holding Family Law Judges Accountable angiemedia On July 23, 10:51 pm [...] A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children [...] #10 Pingback By Will Mass Media Build Awareness and Opposition to State-Sponsored Child Abuse? angiemedia On August 29, 3:14 am [...] Ex, Parental Alienator Joal Henke, Shows Kids Will Lie About Sexual Abuse To Hurt Target ParentA Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Moms Discredit Themselves by Denying Parental AlienationEileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law [...] #11 Pingback By San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining Orders angiemedia On October 28, 11:33 pm [...] San Diego family dismantlers.further ReadingJudge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home PicketedA Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBAJudge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons [...] #12 Pingback By San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed TV Show angiemedia On November 6, 7:17 pm [...] Victimizing Families Using Restraining OrdersJudge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home PicketedA Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBACCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego [...] #13 Pingback By San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is Corrupt angiemedia On November 11, 11:18 pm CCFC Master Exhs. P1069

102 [...] Park Trees and Families In Contempt for LawJudge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home PicketedA Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBACCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego [...] #14 Pingback By San Diego Superior Court Seeks New Grand Jury For 2011 / 2012 angiemedia On December 14, 1:21 am [...] Baca, and Others Filed with US AttorneyJudge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home PicketedA Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBACCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego [...] #15 Comment By Joanna Velky On February 1, 3:56 pm Lisa Guy Schull was a not a normal Judge. I never said a word and was accused of a death threat tape concerning my kids. I still have that tape, it was my ex-husband wife. Lisa you need professional help. You are a disgrace to the good judges in San Diego County. They need to keep female judges off the bench. I spent from in court due to a sick obsessed ex-husband. #16 Pingback By New Evidence Stephen Doyne Violated Child Custody Evaluation Laws angiemedia On July 13, 7:25 pm [...] Victimizing Families Using Restraining OrdersJudge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home PicketedA Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBACCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego [...] #17 Pingback By Treatment of Depression and Anxiety from High Conflict Divorce and Child Custody Battles Using Antidepressants and Benzodiazipines Is Risky angiemedia On May 19, 10:10 pm [...] A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children [...] #18 Comment By Will Cooper On July 9, 7:58 am Has anybody had problems with Commissioner Lowe. That women is as daft as a brush. She didn t even know what state my 2 year old daughter lived in. She sits there fiddling her finger nails going round in circles. How that women got a job is beyond me. She is a complete Dunce. Has anyone encountered this incompetent daft women? #19 Comment By Joe Warner On July 16, 4:10 am And this story repeats itself in every county across the USA. There is not one of them that is moral, not one that is not worthy of damnation. #20 Comment By Azul On July 27, 4:08 am CCFC Master Exhs. P1070

103 [25] First of all, she is not a judge. As a commissioner, she is obviously not good with numbers and seems almost proud of the fact that comprehensive information overwhelms her. Instead she relies on such a cozy relationship with some counsel that she just accepts what is said with no supporting data, even when their repeated lies are accepted as fact forcing opposing counsel to spend thousands to expose them. Such lazy capricious behavior on the part of someone entrusted to resolve important family disputes is quite troubling. I only hope that one day she may be on the receiving end of the same arrogance and disregard for facts. Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] San Diego s Honorable Lisa Drunk: [2] San Diego County Bar Association: [3] Joanna Slivka: #Joanna Slivka [4] Judge Christine Goldsmith and Judge Lorna Alksne have recently done likewise to that nasty man who wrongly believes that the US Constitution is the law of the land and dared challenge them: [5] Sheriff Gore: [6] Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan: [7] Judge Randa Trapp: [8] give a show of hands in support of her re-election: [9] Stephen Doyne: [10] Judge Lorna Alksne: [11] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed: [12] San Diego Lawyer Jeffrey Fritz Increases Conflict and Costs: [13] CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010: [14] San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice: [15] Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall: [16] CCFC Family Court Reform Presentation in Del Mar, California: [17] CCFC Press Release On Stephen Doyne Corruption/Fraud Case: [18] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct: CCFC Master Exhs. P1071

104 misconduct/ [19] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts: [20] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals: [21] Crimes Against Children: Zero Tolerance and Kids for Cash : [22] Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice: 20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN= [23] Booklist Mini-review: [24] : [25] : #comment Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1072

105 - angiemedia Judge Diane E. Gibbons Confirms Herself An Enemy of Free Speech and Supporter of Abuse By Silencing The Psycho Ex Wife Website Posted By Chris on February 25, Comments Recommend Send 16 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. In June 2011, Judge Diane E. Gibbons of Bucks County, Pennsylvania, illegally ordered an excellent web site called The Psycho Ex Wife [1] to be taken down in violation of the US Constitution s First Amendment. The site is reportedly owned by a Pennsylvania woman named Misty Weaver-Ostinato whose partner for the last several years has been a man named Anthony Morelli. On the site, they identified themselves as DW and Mister M never using their real names or identifying information, nor the real name or identifying information of Morelli s ex who allegedly inspired the site with her behaviors. First Amendment rights expert Eugene Volokh writes that he believes this order is blatantly unconstitutional, especially because of its expansiveness: from Father Shall Take Down That Web Site and Shall Never on Any Public Media Make Any Reference to Mother At All, [2] If the father says anything about the mother in public, he could be sent to jail for contempt of court. The order isn t limited to banning libelous statements (though I think even such a much narrower ban would itself pose constitutional problems, especially under Pennsylvania law), nor is it even limited to statements about minor children (though even that sort of order strikes me as constitutionally impermissible). Rather, the court order categorically orders the removal of a Web site, and prohibits all public statements factually accurate or not by one person about another person. Allison Morelli apparently claims that PEW (the abbreviation for Psycho Ex Wife, one of the main characters discussed on the site) is her, even though nobody is ever identified or named on the site. According to reports in other publications, PEW served as the source for around a quarter of the articles describing bizarre and abusive behaviors on the banned website. Allison, for reasons that don t make any sense to me at all, wants us all to believe that PEW is her and therefore the whole site is an attack on her. She claims the site is about her without naming or identifying her or anybody else. She simultaneously implies or maintains that she didn t behave as the PEW character behaved but somehow she knows they were writing the site about her to attack her. This makes no sense to me, nor does it to much of anybody else except apparently Allison Morelli, her supporters, and Judge Gibbons. The PEW character may not be meant to be literally interpreted. The words and actions appear to be what you could see as a synthesis of behaviors and conduct of more than one troubled ex-spouse. Certainly describing a person as looking like Jabba the Hut (a description used for PEW) is obviously figurative speech that no rational person is going to believe is a literal statement. Yet Allison Morelli claims the site is about her and is an attack on her, all the while trying to imply or claim she didn t write the s or do the actions described. But somehow she knows it is all about her. However much literary license may have been taken with PEW s words and actions and no matter what victimhood badge Allison is trying to win with her weird assertions, it is clear that PEW as used on the site often does not even refer to Allison Morelli even if you believe it sometimes does. PEW is used to refer not just to the PEW character but also as a generic abbreviation throughout the site s content. It means different things in different places. This abbreviation is often used to refer to any generic psycho ex wife or at times even more broadly any psycho ex regardless of gender or marital status. Even the readers of the site used such terms to describe their own conflicts. PEW is frequently used to generically refer to a psycho ex wife or to some other unnamed specific ex-wife that could Cal. Coalition not be for Families Allison and Morelli, Children unless v. San Diego of course County she Bar Ass'n wants to claim she has been CCFC married Master to Exhs. dozens P1073

106 or hundreds of the readers and they are all writing about her, too. The site and its readers also use PEH to refer to psycho ex husband which can t be about her. Or can it? If she were to claim she was a man named Alfred in some past life and therefore any references to PEH are about her, too, from her actions to date it looks like Judge Gibbons would be convinced by that argument. The generic psycho ex content and discussion included all the kinds of things you d expect to see discussed about malicious Borderlines, Narcissists, Antisocials, and other personality disorders that are typically seen in sociopaths. These include drug abuse, alcohol abuse, verbal abuse, emotional abuse, physical abuse, manipulation, projection, gaslighting, pathological lying, distortion campaigns, and more. They even discussed at times how these people get to be their malicious selves, often from a history of abuse as children. All of that is very generic and helpful information that doesn t specifically pertain to Allison Morelli. Some of it may not have been written to have anything to do with her. Yet Judge Gibbons, in her infinite stupidity, sought to silence all of that content, too, because she apparently is unable or unwilling to differentiate between content that is widely and generally applicable and not specific to any one person and content (be it information or misinformation) that has to do with the Morelli dispute in particular. Unfortunately for the operators of the site and its readers, Judge Gibbons does not seem able to ask basic questions about how an anonymous site naming and identifying nobody but quoting bizarre and abusive s and describing similar behaviors could be about a person unless that person is also in effect admitting she is behind those words and actions. Gibbons must also have failed her Constitutional Law classes on the First Amendment, nor does she understand that even if there was some defamatory or harassing statement on the site that this does not justify banning all the content. She evidently can t comprehend or doesn t care that roughly 2/3 or more of the material on the site wasn t even about the PEW character and therefore could not have been about the Morelli dispute, even if Allison wants people to believe she is the PEW character. Did Gibbons even review the site? By the appearance of the alleged transcripts I ve seen so far, it looks like she just took Allison s word for it when she moved to ban the site. Take Down the Site Or Go To Prison The judge stated among other things that if the site was not taken down, she would imprison Anthony and take away his kids. Here s a direct quote from the alleged June 6, 2011 transcript [3] : THE COURT: Father shall take down that website and shall never on any public media make any reference to the mother at all, nor any reference to the the relationship between mother and children, nor shall he make any reference to his children other than happy birthday or other significant school events. The father s girlfriend shall not be referred to as mother and father shall not in any way interfere with mother s relationship with her children. Mother will not consume any alcohol at all and will continue in alcohol treatment. This matter is continued for a period of four months. By her words in the alleged transcript, Judge Gibbons indicates that Allison Morelli is an alcoholic. Later you see: NAME REDACTED: You know, in the course of having custody evaluation, it was discovered that I had developed a drinking problem as a result of gastric bypass surgery that I had in March of 09. And that after that point, you know, I suffered from addiction transference and, you know, it I am certainly not going to minimize that today, that of course it impacted the children. But the children saw me intoxicated four times in the course of two years. And I am in treatment. I attend AA meetings. To date I have not seen anybody disputing the legitimacy of this transcript. There s also a second alleged transcript of a June 14, 2011 hearing [4] available. I d like to have some reasonably easy way to quickly authenticate such documents with court records, but apparently the Pennsylvania courts don t publish such court records online. CCFC Master Exhs. P1074

107 The website had a lot to say about the PEW character over the years. PEW was alleged to be an emotional child abuser, harasser, abusive litigator, perjurer, frequent violator of court orders, and was suspected by Anthony and Misty of suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder. If Allison Morelli didn t do such things, then why on earth would she be arguing that the site is about her? And if she did so such things, why on earth would she want the public to hear about it by publicly claiming the site is about her? If Anthony and Misty believe that PEW behaved so abusively, regardless of who PEW is, those familiar with such destructive situations should be able to understand why they would have been motivated to write anonymously about such conflicts. Later in the transcript, Gibbons talks about incarcerating the father if he does not follow her orders, apparently including the ones regarding the illegal restrictions on his free speech rights and the illegal orders made regarding his partner s website: THE COURT: You better follow it because if you don t follow it, I will hold you in contempt if you recommend to him not to follow it. And if he doesn t follow it, I will incarcerate him. Do you understand? Anthony Morelli claims that Gibbons made these orders without allowing for a proper hearing. He also claims she doesn t know the case, either, having less than a month experience dealing with this high conflict case before issuing her illegal orders. Quoted from Judge Diane E. Gibbons Opinion [5] : Judge Diane E. Gibbons has drawn a myriad of conclusions over a number of issues without having heard a single word of meaningful testimony, without allowing witnesses, without allowing evidence, without allowing arguments, without allowing objects, etc. Until Judge Diane E. Gibbons sat at the hearing of June 6th, 2011 she had not previously presided over a single child custody hearing in the case dating back to the beginning. One might presume that had she permitted an actual, legal hearing and all that entails, she might have been able to file an informed opinion about many of the issues about which she clearly knows very little. After reading about Judge Gibbons abusive conduct recently, I m feeling a bit like an ostrich with its head in the sand. Many of us who have written for this site have been distracted with our own personal family law crises instigated by sociopaths, so we haven t kept up to date on happenings elsewhere in the online family law community as much as we d like. We re late to defend these two people who are being abused by the Pennsylvania courts. But, as the saying goes, it s better late than never. Anthony and Misty are still trying to defend their civil rights against abuse by Judge Gibbons via an appeal case in Pennsylvania. They could use your help if you have a few dollars to spare. [6] So far they have raised over $8000 out of the expected $15,000 needed for the appeal. Many of their readers have donated and/or written testimonials [7] about how The Psycho Ex- Wife [1] helped them. One that I liked in particular is the following reminding US citizens they should not be so quick to give up their free speech rights when the government is violating them: Mr M and DW About a year ago a friend pointed me to your blog. It is the single most helpful thing I have ever encountered in my life. At that point I had been subjected to 15 years of trauma in a marriage with a personality disordered wife and for the preceding 12 months had hardly any contact with my two daughters following false accusations of abuse. Despite complete exoneration in the criminal courts the family court system refused to acknowledge my innocence and consequently denied me access to my children and property. I was caught in a living hell that no one around me could begin to comprehend. CCFC Master Exhs. P1075

108 PEW.com has helped me to save my family. I read and learned that I was not alone, that others had and were experiencing the same issues around the world. The combined advice and experiences that the blog brings together gave me hope and way forward. I now have good access to my children, my ex wife is under medical observation and the court system acknowledges the abuses she perpetrated against our children and is working to assist us. Without PEW.com I would not have found a path out of this darkness and two young girls would have remained in the sole care of an abusive mother, shielded by the family courts. It is vital that the blog remains freely available. I live in a country where we have no constitutional right to free speech. Do not allow the rights you have in the USA to be chipped away, it is too precious and I am grateful that in this modern age people across the world can also benefit from the wisdom of your founding fathers. Monty They and the many people they helped could also use some moral support, too, to counter the many ignorant critics who don t understand what it is like to be abused by the sociopath and the government for years. And that s what I aim to do in the rest of the article. Courts Aid Sociopathic Abusers Regardless of who is telling the truth in the Morelli case, it is clear that much of the generic content on the The Psycho Ex Wife [1] website applies to a vast number of cases involving people who behave as sociopaths in their efforts to harm the other parent using the children. Whether any of it applies to Allison Morelli or not, I don t know, but whatever the case may be it is truly bizarre given what the site says about the anonymous PEW character that she claims the site was written about her. I am going to write about the controversy over The Psycho Ex Wife [1] based upon what I ve seen of the site myself, before it was illegally silenced, and what I was able to read in archives I located maintained by others. Also, my opinions consider the plentiful horrific experiences of those I ve met over the years who have been faced with the malevolent destruction caused by a sociopathic ex. Many of the writers in mainstream media have failed to grasp this context completely. It is as if they object to Adolf Hitler as being described as a bloodthirsty, manipulative, genocidal maniac as nasty, denigrating, and defamatory writing that should not be allowed because they haven t met anybody like him and don t believe he could have existed. Well, let me tell you, just like Hitler did exist, sociopaths do also exist. Even if you think you don t know any, you probably know one or more. Sometimes even a neighbor could be one. (See the excellent book The Sociopath Next Door [8] for more information.) Just like a blond-haired blueeyed German might not appreciate how evil Hitler was, you simply don t realize how evil sociopaths are because you are lucky enough to not be one of their targets. People who have been targeted by a sociopathic ex are put through the ringer for years, even decades, as the world around them often blames them for the abuse and helps the sociopath inflict more abuse. The typical sociopath in a family law dispute pathologically perjures and lies to the detriment of the children and target parent and that parents immediate and extended family. He or she gains allies via the lies and often uses those allies to aid in the abuse. Make no mistake, these are dangerous people who do far more damage than mere insults could ever do. Below, I describe some of their common tactics. False Law Enforcement Reports Typically a sociopathic ex files numerous false and malicious reports with CPS and police agencies ranging from physical to sexual child abuse and even poisoning the children. The sociopath often induces doctors, psychologists, therapists, and schools to file false reports by lying to them. Even in what should be easy cases, such as when false poisoning allegations end up with toxicology screens finding nothing, that doesn t stop the sociopaths from lying again and getting the Cal. Coalition same government-aided for Families and Children harassment. v. San Diego County Typically Bar Ass'n the falsely accused parent CCFC is banned Master Exhs. fromp1076

109 contact with the children or forced into expensive and intrinsically abusive supervised visitation situations that can last for months or longer while the investigation proceeds at a glacial pace. Law Violations Including Perjury Sociopaths violate restraining orders, steal property, hide financial records, defame and slander and libel in their communities, churches, and workplaces. If you simply sample ten typical people harassed like this, I d estimate that the sociopaths attacking them may have manipulated hundreds of upstanding people such as church ministers, police officers, psychologists, doctors, childcare providers, teachers, and more to participate in years of unrelenting harassment, emotional child abuse, and abusive aggression. It s common for the sociopath to suborn perjury out of these upstanding people. You can find court cases littered with provable lies by good church people and responsible teachers who are so mind-numbingly stupid that they cannot figure out they are being played like puppets. And then there are the really sick and evil allies, the disreputable or even disbarred attorneys and the sociopath s truly disturbed friends who are willing to lie even when they know full well what they are saying is not true because they were there. You see, sociopaths often gang up on their victims. And courts are stupid enough to think the truth is a popularity contest and refuse to do anything to punish people who can be proven to have perjured or suborned perjury. As a result, the sociopath always has the advantage in family law court. Impact on Kids and Target Parents The impact is usually devastating. It is unusual for there to be less then several tens of thousands of dollars and several years of wasteful and abusive litigation. Extreme cases run up tabs of millions of dollars of legal bills spanning decades, most of it born by the families often by emptying the children s college savings, selling the parents home(s), and borrowing from relatives. Often there is a substantial cost to taxpayers, too, as hundreds or thousands of hours of time from law enforcement agencies is used to investigate false allegations. But the financial damages related to litigation are simply the most easily quantified loss. The kids are often emotional wrecks from being lied to and manipulated, even if they do not succumb to full-bore parental alienation. Countering the damage inflicted by a sociopathic parent is difficult in the extreme. The more time they have with the kids, the more they damage them. Anything less than about 40% to 50% time with the healthier parent is a recipe for lifelong damage to these children. But it s common for the sociopath to have primary or even sole custody of the kids so they can damage the kids all they like. Then there s job loss caused by the harassment. At any moment you may have cops at your office or home searching you and maybe arresting you over yet another false allegation. At any moment, your kids may be detained by CPS and interrogated again over some false abuse allegation. How can you expect to focus on work when your family and you are being abused? Especially after you have probably been kicked out of your home on false allegations and may be living on a friend s couch because you are too poor to afford anything better. Then there are forced relocations. It s dangerous to live in proximity to one of these sociopaths, much safer to live hundreds of miles away. Some have relocated across the country to get away from their abusers as the courts refuse to protect them. But that increases the odds of never seeing your kids again, at least until they are adults, so many people are unwilling to do that even though they know even living in the same state as a sociopath is very risky. There s the loss of friends and sometimes even family members who buy into the sociopath s convincing defamation or because of forced relocations. Sociopaths excel at turning people into their accomplices and destroying the support systems of their victims. Threats of criminal prosecution over false allegations can sap your energy and keep you so wound up that you can t even sleep, often leading to chronic depression, anxiety, and other health problems that are worsened by the endless drain on money as the courts rape and pillage the family for all its worth. And usually the sociopath doesn t pay for much of this as she or he is often able get the government to fund her or his campaign of terror at taxpayer expense. Then there s actual criminal prosecution instigated by judges who are tyrants and enemies of the law. For example, the ex won t let you see or talk with your kids in violation of court orders, and after months of this you make the mistake of calling her a bitch or him a bastard in for refusing to allow contact. And then the court attacks the person who wrote the insulting CCFC Master Exhs. P1077

110 , not the person who is violating the court orders and harming the children involved. In some particularly hellish family court systems, in response to such an you might find yourself slapped with a restraining order and prosecuted for violating it even though it was never served on you and such s are a tame nonviolent response to the blatantly illegal and/or abusive conduct of an ex. Such courts fail to acknowledge cause-and-effect and treat the aggrieved party as a criminal and the abusive party as a victim. Cole Stuart is a father and activist attorney apparently targeted by the abusive family law courts of San Diego, California, for founding the California Coalition for Families and Children and protesting against family court abuse. [9] He reports that his ex wouldn t let him have contact with their child going on a year. He got fed up and called his ex Lynn Stuart (a TV news reporter in San Diego) names in protesting what he says she was doing to interfere with contact with their child, allegedly against court orders. Then the courts used it as an excuse to persecute him and harass CCFC group members who were peacefully protesting against the abusive courts. Many suffer from devastating mental and physical ailments caused by the years of stress and require expensive chronic medical and mental health care. Plus there s the matter of lost wages as they can t work. The economic cost of the abuse committed by sociopaths and aided by courts is possibly in the tens or hundreds of billions every year in the US alone. [10] Almost all targets of abuse by a sociopathic ex at one time or another suffer from being banned from talking with their kids on the telephone, or worse not seeing their kids at all for months or years due to false allegations, violations of court orders, and more. And for those who still saw their kids after spending years and fortunes defending against the sociopaths, even then some of the kids slip away into the abyss of parental alienation as they buy into the emotional manipulations and lies of the sociopathic parents who teach them to mindlessly hate. They learn to obey their abuser and stay away from their healthier parent or else their abuser will make them suffer even more than usual. Government Aids and Abets Abuse The government is often the chief ally of the sociopathic abuser. They are quick to remove kids from good parents based upon false allegations. They are slow to investigate, endlessly delaying in court and claiming they need more time and hiding that they haven t a shred of evidence of the allegations. They sometimes even hide evidence and findings that clear the falsely accused parent. The police, DA, and courts virtually never act to prosecute or punish the false accuser or hold him or her accountable in any way. They seldom do anything to punish malicious violations of court orders. It s almost unheard of for them to issue a protective order to put a stop to the endless filings of false CPS and police reports used to manipulate law enforcement to do much of the harassment on the behalf of the sociopath. All of this creates the distinct appearance that helping sociopaths functions as a jobs programs for the government and its professional friends (lawyers, psychologists, etc.) Let a sociopath run lose unrestrained and you keep the wheels of abuse turning. Everybody in this corrupt system gets a cut of the victimized families assets plus the Federal funds that are paid out for providing services to help children despite the malicious and harassing allegations being false. If the aim was really to help children, the sociopaths should at a minimum be spending the time they don t have with the kids in a psychiatric prison. Clearly, the aim of this system is NOT to help children, it is to help themselves to whatever financial assets the family has including their home(s), savings, and income. A sociopath committing such abuses over many months or longer deserves to be publicly exposed when the courts fail to stop the abuse. When courts prevent this and even block the discussion of sociopathic behaviors as the abusive Gibbons is doing, they directly aid in the destruction of the sociopath s victims because they make it far easier for the sociopath to build a community of accomplices to the abuse in the children s schools, clubs, churches or other religious organizations, and neighborhoods. The Ignorant Trash The Psycho Ex-Wife Many of us writing for family law sites (including this one) as well as many of our readers have previously read the The Psycho Ex-Wife [1] in the past and found that it was insightful as to the CCFC Master Exhs. P1078

111 behaviors of the sociopath in a divorce and child custody battle. The material posted also showed how ignorant and incapable the courts are at upholding the law, preventing child abuse and harassment, and protecting the victims of sociopathic abuse. Reviewing the discussion on other sites, it s clear that many of the commenters, bloggers, and mainstream media personalities (Matt Lauer of the Today Show is major offender here) simply are entirely ignorant when it comes to the challenges posed by a person who behaves as a sociopath. These naive people s opinions are largely based upon a total misconception that it takes two to fight and that the government will usually do something to protect people from being viciously abused and harassed for years. Neither are true statements and anybody who has suffered from the abuse inflicted by a sociopath in a divorce or child custody battle knows this. Family law courts routinely violate the law. False allegations are given the weight of proven facts until proven otherwise. Access to evidence is restricted, evidence is tampered, perjurers are everywhere and the perjurers include government employees as evidenced by grand jury investigations of CPS [11]. The sociopath knows how to manipulate all of these people for maximum harm. Frankly, I am surprised there are not more murders in these conflicts as it is clear the abuse is intolerable and the courts seldom do anything but encourage it. Plausible Behaviors For Sociopaths The content of the The Psycho Ex-Wife [1] was very plausible in terms of the behaviors it discussed about Borderline Personality Disorder, the contributions of a biased and corrupt family law courts in harming people wrongly, and the impact on the kids, new partners, and extended family. Some of the writing was demeaningly flowery (such as comparison of the psycho ex-wife with Jabba the Hut ), probably for entertainment value. The site s writers mentioned that the writing style was meant to attract readers in similar situations. But it was anonymous, and certainly many other people have been even more demeaningly extreme without a court ruling they cannot do so. To be clear, I don t know Anthony, Misty, or Allison and have never talked with any of them. I have no idea really of what the truth about their situation is and I m not claiming to know who out of them is right or wrong. In all likelihood, the courts probably have little understanding of this conflict, either, yet the latest judge is willing to act and assign blame apparently without considering the full picture including how court actions including unwarranted and illegal censorship are now harming people who had no knowledge of or participation in the Morelli case. Anybody who has dealt with a sociopath and the courts knows that even after months or years of litigation the courts usually don t have a full understanding and frequently have absolutely no clue of the truth. It s either that or the judges and court employees simply don t care about the truth as they pursue their personal political agendas or work to enrich their lawyer friends by dragging out simple matters into years-long battles. Steps Were Taken To Hide Identities From what I and others have written elsewhere above how it is right to expose sociopaths who won t stop, you might think that PEW was exposed by name. But that s not the case here. From past reading of the site and reviewing a site archive [12], it is clear that the writers were avoiding naming names and even hiding their location. Most of their articles don t even mention the PEW character. Prior to reading about the court orders to shut down the site, nobody I ve discussed the site with had any clue where they might have been located, nor any idea of the actual names of the people involved. This makes it clear the intent was not to harass PEW. So how did PEW find out about the site? Allison Morelli claims to be PEW and she claims the kids told her about the website. Anthony claims that is not true and that PEW showed them the site. Which is true? I certainly don t know. But I would point out that computer account hacking, malware, and spyware are common tools for Cal. sociopaths Coalition for Families or people and Children who v. behave San Diego like County them. Bar Ass'n That means there are a lot of CCFC ways, Master including Exhs. P1079

112 illegal ways, that such a site could be discovered. For all we know, somebody could have planted spyware on a USB memory stick that traveled with the kids and when they went to use their father s computer then it was infected and this was used to track his computer usage and report it to others. Or somebody could have found the site then anonymously ed the kids something that told them about the site, knowing it would get out and could be misportrayed as it has been as being a site dedicated to attacking a single person when it was not. Maybe nobody but the parties involved know what really happened. Given the propensity of sociopaths to lie in court, probably the court will never know what actually happened despite how it may delude itself otherwise. Not Defamatory If there was something truly inaccurate and damaging to the reputation of somebody that was posted on The Psycho Ex-Wife [1], perhaps there would be a legal basis to order that untrue material to be removed. But even then, wholesale ordering the entire site to be shut down would be wrong as much of the material on the site had nothing directly to do with the operators or the psycho ex wife. To my knowledge, there has been no legal finding that anything written on the site was defamatory or untrue. Some of the material consisted of sanitized (names and identifying information removed) repostings of s apparently between Anthony and Allison, if you believe Allison s claim that she is PEW. There have been no reports of defamation law suits filed. Whatever the full story is behind the s quoted and attributed to PEW, the text did make her appear to be a very troubled person. But certainly many of the details of scenarios such as blocking child custody exchanges were nothing unique. Almost all of us dealing with sociopaths have seen such tactics. Some of the dates for child custody exchanges might have been somewhat unique, but even that s hard to say given that there are millions of children of divorce being exchanged and undoubtedly thousands with similar schedules. So to me, for Allison to be be so sure that PEW is her then it seems likely that those s and/or behaviors described are substantially similar to hers. Otherwise, how would she know it was about her as there were no names or locations mentioned? What a lot of people wonder, myself included, is why she would want to promulgate the idea the site is about her in the first place? If she didn t write such s or do the things described, then how was the site about her? And if she did, then isn t this a serious indictment of her own behaviors and words? Not Harassment The authors point out that the PEW site wasn t started to harass the real person behind the PEW character. [13] This site wasn t started to put PEW down. If we wanted to do that, we would have responded to each and every one of her disgusting s, text messages, and phone calls. We would have sent this site, with her readily identified, to everyone at her work, her family, her friends, everyone. We didn t do that and we certainly didn t tell her about this site. It s not about her. It s not about our alleged hatred of her. This site is about going through a divorce with a psycho ex-wife and what we must do in order to keep her out of our lives. It s to let others know they are not alone, and our hope to teach them how to handle their own situation better. In that regard, we want to keep this site focused on telling our story and what we ve learned (and continue to learn) without interacting with PEW. We have no need to interact with her. Examples of PEW s Alleged Abuse Against the Kids That article about PEW s discovery of the PEW website also pointed out the behaviors PEW engaged in towards the kids, including showing the kids the website and playing the victim to them. Personally I think that the claims the kids are somehow disturbed by the website is one of the weaker cases of abuse and that Gibbons is nuts if she is mostly focused on that issue. Many of the other things on the following list sound like child endangerment and emotional CCFC Master Exhs. P1080

113 abuse. Especially concerning to me are the allegations of having an out-of-control alcoholic relative living with them. PEW Let me spell a few things out for you. You are an abuser. You are abusive to everyone in your life. LM never abused you. A woman who has been abused for 10- years doesn t contact her abuser 21-times in a single day. She doesn t ask him to come back to her once she finally got free and is happier than ever. She doesn t come to a website that he writes and try to engage him. Only someone who has no fear of someone does this. Someone who was truly abused wants nothing to do with their abuser. Calling CPS with false abuse allegations and making your own children go through interrogations is ABUSE Alienating your kids and telling them I will drag your ass to court and make you choose me is ABUSE Lying to them about their stepmother and how she calls you up all the time and calls you names is ABUSE Telling the kids not to tell anyone when PP gets drunk and falls down the steps, scaring the hell out of them as they thought she was dead is ABUSE Having PP move-in when she is so clearly out of control is dangerous to the children, and exposing them to that kind of situation is ABUSE Lying to them about their father and how he abandoned them and abused you is ABUSE Alienating your kids by withholding phone calls and visits from their father is ABUSE Telling the children about this website is ABUSE The shit you allow your father to do to them and teach them is ABUSE It s common for the actual abuser to play victim and torment the target parent by unwanted contact, stalking, cyberstalking, telling the children lies, etc. From the above list, such things are included in what Anthony and Misty think PEW is doing. (And again I wonder: if one isn t doing any of these things, then how is the quoted text about her?) If the site is truly harming the kids, then why is the focus on the site and not on the person who allegedly showed the site to them and allegedly doesn t do anything to block it? Quoted from Shutting Down ThePsychoExWife.Com [14] : This brings us to the children. How can the children be protected from this website? The fact is, the children never have to know about this website. However, they do. And do you know why the children know about this website? The children are aware of the existence of this website because PEW, in her infinite thoughtlessness (particularly when it comes to protecting the children from the madness she creates) told them about it. That s right, folks. PEW made the unilateral decision to tell the children about a site that details the horror of the situation that is horrible enough because they live it. I would say something like, that s a decision she ll have to live with for the rest of her life but that would imply that she gives a shit or understands what a terrible choice that was, all in the name of her selfishness and attempts to leverage control over whether or not this site continues to exist, and who the children will choose when she forces them to go to court. As I ve said many times before, PEW will not hesitate to throw the children under the bus if it means she can go on the offensive about some nonsensical bullshit. She believes the site harms them, and she tells them about it so that they are harmed and she has something to bitch about. Sick. PEW won t take the simplest steps to protect the children from anything, which was exemplified when S1 discovered internet porn [15]. Despite my recommendations which included the easiest fixes such as password protect the computer so that they cannot login when she is not available block certain sites via the browser tools so that the sites seemingly don t exist actually supervising the kids on the PC and invest in child safety protective software of which there are many good ones available she s done NONE of them. Worse she actually goes out of her way to tell them about it. Even today, she still has taken no steps to ensure that the children are protected from objectionable websites of which thepsychoexwife.com must certainly be one. Worse, her failure to take the minimum steps necessary combined with the fact that she tells them (with her spin, no doubt) about certain content is all CCFC Master Exhs. P1081

114 about PEW. The fact that she can t stop herself from stalking the site (and probably when the boys are in proximity) means that the only person exposing the children to such horror is PEW. She s not that stupid. She does this with a purpose. Somewhere in that twisted brain of hers, she believes that the children will be convinced that my documentation of our experiences is more of a terrible crime than the fact that she actually puts us through everything that has been documented. That s logical only from a PEW standpoint. Writing about her behaviors is unconscionable. Her actual behaviors well nevermind all that. Only in the mind of a PEW. They claim that PEW won t even bother to take steps to keep the kids from accessing porno sites once they found them. If that s true, should that be the fault of the porno sites and they should be shut down because of it? (Not that I approve of porn, I m just pointing out that s the same twisted reasoning Gibbons is using.) Or is it more the fault of PEW? Furthermore, if the focus is on the kids not reading it, then why not implement a technological solution such as blacklisting the IP addresses for PEW s home and the children s school(s) and using parental web surfing control software on the children s computers? Of course it s possible to get around this by some means, but the kids probably don t know that or wouldn t be sufficiently motivated to do so. What Judge Gibbons has done is like saying that since some parents don t like Huck Finn since it contains some racial stereotypes, all copies of it should be burned so nobody can read it. Such actions are overly broad, unreasonable, unconstitutional, destructive, and harmful to people who are not even involved in the case. Violation of Due Process Law The judge allowed no testimony or defense to explain anything about the website. This violated the father s right to due process. When a court makes orders with no opportunity to explain or dispute and/or blocks access to relevant evidence, it is flagrantly violating many important principles of law. Judge Gibbons apparently does not care about the law or due process. As such, she has no place on the bench. Personally, I hope this case leads to her removal from the bench via whatever processes are available in Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, Pennsylvania is a corrupt state in which judicial abuse against children [16] and judicial misconduct and felony crime is rampant [17] and usually ignored by the professionals such as other judges, court employees, and police for years. Stories like those plus Ben Vonderheide s crusade against child abuse for profit in Pennsylvania [18] has made it clear that the government in that state views children as pawns to be used and abused for its own profit. So there s probably not much chance of tyrant Gibbons being drawn and quartered by the government for her abuses. The best hope rests with the public holding her accountable for her abhorrent conduct. Court Made Illegal Orders Against Non-Party To Case Misty Weaver-Ostinato was not a party to the case. Yet Judge Gibbons made orders affecting her website / business without any due process for her. This is clearly a violation of the US Constitution s 14th Amendment and probably many other laws, too. Practicing Without A License Complaints Several commenters have ranted about how the custody coaching services [19] allegedly offered by Misty and/or Anthony is somehow practicing law or practicing psychology without a license. There are many people who provide such services all across the US without having such licenses and they make it clear they are not lawyers and are not psychologists. Some of these people are actually well-known in their communities and get a lot of referrals from the courts. Many of them have been through hell and back based upon their own experiences and have something valuable to offer to clients. They shouldn t need licenses to share their experience and advice so long as they make it clear they are not lawyers and are not psychologists. And in fact as part of their disclaimer [20], whomever is running the site writes: CCFC Master Exhs. P1082

115 MrCustodyCoach.com is not an attorney, psychologist, counselor, nor therapist. The information provided or given, by MrCustodyCoach.com or any other members of MrCustodyCoach.com, via telephone, Internet, , instant messenger, FAX, in-person or by any other means is provided solely for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice, counseling, nor therapy. IF YOU ARE SEEKING LEGAL ADVICE, PLEASE CONSULT WITH A LICENSED ATTORNEY IN YOUR JURISDICTION. What we ve collectively noticed is many of the people who rant about practicing without a license issues are often the sociopaths in the mix. They don t like what somebody has said about them or a sociopath who behaves like them, no matter how true. So they will find any way they can to attack and harm that person. Frankly licenses don t get in the way of their attacks, either. They file malicious licensing board complaints with little or no basis in fact to get revenge even on those who are licensed simply because they recited facts and opinions that the sociopath did not like. This happens often enough that it would dilute the ability of any licensing board to deal with the legitimate complaints. Worse, however, is that many licensing boards are incapable of doing their jobs and routinely relicense people who have engaged in behaviors such as sex with their clients while they threaten to revoke the licenses of practitioners whose billing service messed up a bill sent to an insurance company. With such inept and overloaded licensing boards, it is all too easy for the therapist being harassed by a sociopath to suffer significant damages. Misogynist Complaints Even more commenters have whined about how Anthony is a misogynist. Reportedly he doesn t even own the website, his female partner Misty does. How plausible is it that she would be antifemale herself? And clearly many of the readers and supporters of the site are self-identified as women and write as if they are women, too. Maybe they should have called the site The Psycho Ex and made it clear from the start that the sociopath can be a woman or a man. But not doing so does not mean they are misogynists. On the contrary, they posted several articles with titles including Psycho Ex-Husband such as Wise Old Sayings Redefined for a Psycho Ex-Wife or Psycho Ex-Husband [21]. They clearly understand that not all the psycho ex s are female. One Partially Redeeming Point of Gibbons The sorts of things Gibbons had to say in the transcripts that I reviewed which sounded reasonable were to encourage parents to stop the conflict. That might be applicable to as much as 80% to 90% of divorces. But in a case with years of allegations of false law enforcement reports, parental alienation, breaking-and-entering, alcohol and/or drug abuse, emotional abuse of the kids, child endangerment involving alcohol abuse, etc. as this one features, it is totally naive for her to say this. It frankly makes her appear to be totally out of touch with reality, sort of the judicial equivalent to an imbecile walking up into the midst of a warring group of religious fanatics and wondering Why can t we all just get along? As I said, I don t know the parties involved. But I do know plenty of others who have been afflicted by sociopathic abuse. Typically the victims tried to be nice and reasonable only to see themselves abused by some combination of being run out of their homes on false allegations, defamed throughout their communities, attacked on the Internet via defamation on websites and threats by , banned from seeing their kids or being put in supervised visitation based upon lies, and forced to spend most of their incomes if not their life savings just trying to defend against it all. A person put in that situation by a court that won t life a finger to stop the abuse has every right to discuss the abuses publicly. The court has failed to do its job. There has to be some other alternative than to just silently suffer for years. What Anthony and Misty did was far better than many other alternatives. Their creation helped a lot of other people being abused by sociopathic ex-spouses and abusive courts. Contrary to the propaganda espoused by Allison and the inaccurate statements by Gibbons, the site wasn t about attacking Allison. Anthony s and Misty s dislike for her alleged behaviors might have been the inspiration for the site, but bad situations are often the inspiration for people to find something constructive they can do based upon what they have learned through a miserable experience. CCFC Master Exhs. P1083

116 Allison is so clearly far from an innocent victim in this case, any way you look at it. If PEW is not Allison, then Allison is severely misrepresenting the whole situation by claiming she is. And if the PEW character is even a somewhat accurate representation of Allison s behavior, then she s no innocent victim, either. She and the courts behave as if the site is about her so they can pummel Anthony while doing nothing about the harmful behaviors described. It s nonsensical in the extreme. I contend that quite often courts don t want there to be any other alternatives but conflict. Courts clearly profit from abuse and conflict and want them to continue. After all, if the abuse stops, the conflict would stop, and therefore the court would slow down. When a judge limits a falsely accused parent s rights and encourage such abuse to continue by failing to punish false accusers, then the judge can create the false impression that he or she cares about children while fanning the flames of the conflict for the job security and profit of those in the family law industry. Public Defense Against Defamation Many targets of sociopaths are people who are being defamed extensively with lies claiming they are adulterers, child sex offenders, wife beaters, drunks, drug abusers, pornographers, and more. Somebody who is being defamed should have a right to defend themselves with facts and reasoned opinions. That should apply whether the defamation is on the Internet or in the great defamation gossip mills that Borderlines and other sociopaths create in their churches, schools, and communities. And when somebody is being harassed with an endless stream of false reports to law enforcement agencies, they should also have a right to defend themselves. Expecting them to file a lawsuit in the very same abusive courts that do nothing when many of these people are being defamed, harassed, and litigated into bankruptcy is completely ridiculous. If they can t talk honestly and openly about their plight publicly to try to put a stop to the harassment, what else are they supposed to do? Buy a gun and kill the harasser, knowing that they can make a good case for mental cruelty and abuse causing them temporary insanity? Oh, wait, that smells like what a sociopath would do. What many family law courts are doing today is to help the defamer / harasser and to punish anybody who tries to defend themselves against defamation and false reports to law enforcement agencies. We see that time and again. Mom (or Dad) falsely says Dad (or Mom) is a drunk, physically violent, and molests the kids to gain sympathy and supporters and instant wins in court. She (or he) then passes those lies around verbally everywhere she (or he) can. She (or he) files many false police reports so she (or he) can pass them out like candy to prove the lies are true to the unsuspecting fools [22] who swallow up the sociopath s lies and buy into the false victim story. Pretty soon the target has trouble finding a job and can t talk with anybody involved with his (or her) kids without being treated like a criminal. It s clear that the defamation and malicious manipulation of the government is causing this, and doing nothing is not going to help. It just lets the abuser make the problem worse. And it will get worse. These people even go after your family members such as your new spouse, parents, siblings, etc. After years of this damage spreading, the victim of the defamation puts up a website refuting it. Knowing that it has spread everywhere, there is no way to put a stop to it by talking to individuals because it has spread to even people he or she has never met. The court doesn t help because even after being fully aware of false allegations and hearing about how the defamation is causing problems, the judge won t do a thing about it. So when the sociopath discovers the website, the sociopath goes running to the court and claims she (or he) is being harassed. Who does the court punish? The victim. Who does the court help? The defamer. And that happens fairly consistently without many exceptions. Systematically bad-mouthing and defaming a person verbally throughout the community is OK by the standard these judges use, but posting a defense or explanation of what is really happening on a website is not acceptable even when it is true. It boggles me as to how somebody can claim the site is about her, even though nobody was ever named or identified in any way on the site, and then the same somebody also tries to imply or claim she didn t do the things described or write those s, either. So tell me, how can it be about her if she is neither named nor did she write the s nor did she do the actions described on the site? CCFC Master Exhs. P1084

117 Personally I doubt that this Morelli case is the exception to this general pattern. That s based in part upon how Anthony (Mister M) and Misty (DW) showed great restraint trying to keep the site as anonymous as they did and it was clearly about more than just setting the record straight. And it is also based upon how it makes no sense that somebody can claim victimhood by saying the identity-free site is about her and then claim innocence by saying it doesn t describe her accurately. Sociopaths Hate Being Exposed Sociopaths hate to be exposed publicly. [23] They know that most people they manipulate will not bother to talk with the falsely accused and harassed person and will just side with the emotionally convincing lies they spew absent other information to the contrary. As Dr. Tara Palmatier explains about the PEW case [24] : One of the things abusive bullies, high-conflict people (HCP) whatever you want to refer to them as fear most is exposure. They will fight tooth and nail against having their misbehavior exposed. These types equally fear the loss of control. PEW probably represents both fears for Ms Morelli; exposure and loss of control. By this reasoning, when Allison Morelli learned about the site, she of course wanted to shut it down. The method she picked was to claim to the court that she was a victim of harassment by claiming the site is about her. Judging by the site s reports of PEW s actions, PEW had been allegedly defaming the authors for years using their names in false reports to police, CPS, and others. Yet by all accounts I ve seen and from my own personal review, he wrote anonymously and didn t name her. So how can she be a victim of harassment when she is not named? If you reason she can be because the site describes her actions and writings, then how can one not see that those actions and writings are unreasonable and even abusive on their face? It looks for all the world like the roles of victim and abuser are being twisted around via manipulation and distortion. Such behavior patterns are the typical projection and distortion that you see coming from sociopaths and people with personality disorders. Palmatier goes on to point out that it is PEW s own fault if her kids are upset about the PEW website: The only reason PEW is no longer anonymous and that people following this story know that Allison Morelli is PEW is because Ms Morelli, in what appears to be her blind desire to control her ex and portray herself as the victim, told anyone and everyone who would listen, that she is PEW including her own children, in whose best interests she claims to be acting. Ms Morelli brought her complaint regarding PEW to Judge Gibbons because she alleges the children are hurt by the existence of the website blithely ignoring the fact that the only reason their children know about PEW is because she, their mother, told them about it. If the existence of PEW hurts the children and the only reason the children know about PEW is because Ms Morelli told them, then it is Ms Morelli who is hurting the children. Why would she tell their children about PEW if she was so concerned for their welfare? Why Naming Names Can Be Good In a normal divorce, I agree that it is reasonable to not write about the ex on the Internet other than anonymously. Despite this case being far worse than a normal divorce, anonymous writing is what Anthony and Misty did. However, I believe it s fair game to name the judges and other legal professionals involved in abuses and failure to protect the actual victims. By reports of her actions to date, Gibbons has engaged in abuse of discretion and outright violations of basic civil rights laws. She should be held accountable. There is no way to hold a judge accountable without names. So she should be named and what she did should be CCFC Master Exhs. P1085

118 publicized so the citizens of Bucks County can eliminate her from the judiciary as they should. But if Anthony (Mister M) and Misty (DW) had named Gibbons and other asleep-at-the-wheel family law judges who they believe screwed up their lives via failure to follow the law and put in place protection mechanisms that would help reduce the conflict and stop the abuse, it s my observation that the courts probably would have targeted them for even more abuse. This is what we ve seen happen in many other cases. Publicly cite abuse by a judge and the judge will violate the law to inflict even more harm. File a proper legal complaint against the judge, then the judge will refuse to recuse and proceed to persecute any way she or he can, even when that persecution involves judicial abuse of the children. Today s family court is not about the best interests of children. It is not about the law. It is about pure unadulterated greed, maliciousness, and outright evil. The judges are for the most part like little miniature devils, sitting up there claiming to be Gods in their courtrooms and violating people s rights, helping abusers, and all the while claiming this is somehow in the children s best interests to be subjected to endless violations of custody exchange rules, being emotionally manipulated to not want to spent time with their better parent who isn t trying to alienate or manipulate them, being interrogated over yet another false child abuse allegation, etc. In the end, even the best courts have usually entirely failed to do their jobs in most high conflict divorces. When they do get it right, it is so late that it can never undo the years of emotional torture inflicted upon the children and better parent. And the courts virtually never do anything to even try to repair the hundreds of thousands of dollars of damage done to the victims of the sociopath. Family courts in the US are a total failure. Gibbons and judges like her are directly responsible for these failures. They lack the knowledge and integrity to do their jobs competently. And this problem is so widespread that frankly I believe that it is time for the family law industry to be shut down. Family law courts do not provide a valuable service, on the contrary they are directly responsible for a huge amount of damage and waste of taxpayer money not just in court but throughout government as law enforcement, CPS, social services, etc. are all mobilized to deal with the failure of the family court to put a stop to the perjury, false allegations, and harassment and how it more often than not rewards the abuser and persecutes the children and target parent. Family law courts should not be able to deviate from 50/50 custody barring felony level criminal conviction of something directly related to the physical safety of the children or repeated convictions for filing false reports with law enforcement as a means of harassment. And the courts and DA have to start prosecuting perjurers and false reporters and publicly disclosing their crimes to put a stop to the abuse. Their failure to do so is a major reason why the problems today are so bad. Short of such changes, I don t think the situation is going to improve. Sociopaths know how to game the system. The courts and their friends benefit from their games and so are willing accomplices. And usually it is children and the party who is heavily abused by the sociopath who are most abused by the court. Among the few allies most families have against the hell on earth created by sociopaths and family law courts is websites such as The Psycho Ex Wife [1] that help them understand they are not alone, the sociopath may be bizarre and evil but there are methods that can help such as low-contact/zero-contact, and offer help for figuring out what to do when the next attack of lies and manipulations comes as it most surely will. Gibbons has done more than just violate the law and people s civil rights. She has acted to harm many thousands of people who benefited from The Psycho Ex Wife [1] who had no idea who Allison Morelli is until after she started her weird claims the site is about her to portray herself as a victim. They knew very well that the site s PEW character behaved much like the sociopath in their lives and so they welcomed the opportunity to read and discuss such problems with others having similar experiences. Now these people have one less place to turn for help dealing with their miserable situations, thanks to Allison Morelli and Judge Gibbons. What You Can Do If you re disturbed by the abusive conduct of Gibbons and the implications it has for free speech rights and the rights of litigants abused by a sociopath and the courts, please take action. You could write, call, or fax to complain. Here s the contact information: CCFC Master Exhs. P1086

119 Dishonorable Diane E. Gibbons 20 East Court Street 1st Floor Doylestown, PA Phone: Fax: You can donate to the appeal case [6]. If you live in Bucks County, you could be sure to vote against Gibbons in the next election or participate in a recall drive to remove her from the bench. And you can pass along this article or others like it to raise awareness of the abusive conduct of family law courts and Judge Gibbons in particular. More On The Psycho Ex Wife and Judge Diane Gibbons Judge Diane E. Gibbons Orders ThePsychoExWife.com Shut Down: What Would You Do? [24] Dad Ordered To Remove Psycho Ex-Wife Blog. But What About His Tattletale Ex-Wife? [25] Divorced dad s blog becomes free-speech test [26] Anthony Morelli Appeals Against Censorship [27] Judge Orders Ex Husband To Shut Down The Psycho Ex Wife Blog [28] Judge Orders Father to Take Down Website Critical of Judge, Mother [29] Bucks County Judge Diane Gibbons Sued for $1 Billion For Racial & Gender Discrimination of Hispanic/American Man in Child Custody Case [30] More On Sociopathic Abuse in Family Law Disputes Sociopaths In Our Midst Hate the Truth and Its Advocates [31] Telling Your Nasty Ex About BPD or NPD May Hurt You [32] How Sociopathic Parents Use Police Reports for Defamation [22] Escaping Sociopathic Abuse Almost Impossible When Children Are Involved [33] More on Parental Alienation Review of Dr. Warshak s Parental Alienation DVD Welcome Back Pluto [34] Dr. Amy Baker On Parental Alienation, PAS, and Helping Your Kids Resist Both [35] Borderline Personality Disorder and Parental Alienation Involve Similar Abusive Behaviors [32] 67 Comments To "Judge Diane E. Gibbons Confirms Herself An Enemy of Free Speech and Supporter of Abuse By Silencing The Psycho Ex Wife Website" #1 Pingback By The Psycho Ex-Wife angiemedia On February 25, 7:48 am [...] with a Borderline, this site will give you some hope that you are not alone.the Psycho Ex- Wife blogjudge Diane E. Gibbons Confirms Herself An Enemy of Free Speech and Supporter of CCFC Master Exhs. P1087

120 Abuse By Silencing BPD, Divorceborderline personality disorder, Divorce Comments (2) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment [...] #2 Comment By TXTOAST On February 25, 11:20 am I have been convicted of an assault felony. I have 2 md s terminating patient relationship with ex for Rx abuse. I can prove perjury but no one wants to hear. My adopted daughter (hers) was arrested for threatening her with a gun she perjured in assault trial and has been subjected to drug treatment multiple times. Wife (refused divorce because judge does not know HIPPA and my insurance is better than hers) files police reports continuously. Last complaint made me pull down the story of Jessibell from the bible on Facebook. Still trying to get appeal or writt but trauma caused plea that court did not follow, crim. lawyer ineffective and forced to wear gps for 10 years. No violation ever except return to home to get wallet and car after release. Loosing my mind as well as job, house (false civil against citimortgage for fraud ) pension (legal fees and orders pending to give it o her) proven false allegation of sex assault of step daughter (sells x drugs) live in hotel no job felon and going crazy fast. If I kill myself on steps of home with all evidence would anyone believe me? #3 Comment By Rob On February 25, 9:52 pm TXTOAST, Please don t klll yourself. I don t think the cops would even bother to look at the evidence. They don t care to investigate deaths they can easily write off as suicides or accidental deaths. I don t follow how your medical insurance could be better for your wife given you don t have a job. How can a Bible story have some impact that makes you pull it down from Facebook? There can t be any intellectual property or morality reason, so I m puzzled. Maybe you should leave the US and start over somewhere else. The US has abused you and many other men and from what you re writing mentioning just a nasty wife and nasty step daughter it sounds you have nothing left here. Rob #4 Comment By SD parent 22 On February 26, 1:12 am Who was it that gave that forbidden apple to Adam Wait, I think I remember her name Give me a moment #5 Comment By Anon On February 26, 5:37 pm I couldn t believe tony and misty were so horrible with their posts. And that their kids could read this online. When I expressed my concerns they responded with that it was anonymous and if their kids found out about it they d shut it down. They recognized that it would be harmful. Tony dared me (a midwestern mom w/ an excellent friendship & coparenting relationship with my child s father) to find out who they were, and I did. He deleted my message and refused to follow through when I pointed out how easy it was for me to find out their identities. Well? Seems the $ and fame means more to them than his kids emotional stability and dragging them and his ex publicly through national and international media circus. He and his wife/fiancée/whatever (misty ostinato-weaver) have intentionally pitched this to as many media outlets as possible. They probably reached out to You! Can you imagine being his kids at school right now? I Cal. deplore Coalition you for Families almost and as Children much v. as San tony Diego & County misty Bar for Ass'n what they re doing to their CCFC kids Master and the Exhs. P1088

121 mother of his children, whom they love. Do you know how much it would hurt you and screw you up as a kid to see your Father blasting you calling you fat online, telling all about your private life, and insulting your mommy and then asking the media to blast it all over the online media? and then they do? Shame on You, shame on Tony Morelli, and shame on Misty Ostinato-Weaver. I cannot believe what you did and continue to do. Tony, you do not love your children at all, you cannot with what you re doing to them, and I hope they re taken away for good! And btw tony and misty, you look like a mid-life crisis pimp and a frowny horse-face couple of devils. #6 Comment By Chris On February 26, 10:32 pm Anon, It s great that you have a good friendship with your ex. But that also means you cannot understand the situation from the perspective of somebody who has been abused and attacked for years and is badly damaged by it while the court reuses to put a stop to the abuse. Many parents are being subjected to years of defamation, character assassination, false police reports, false child abuse allegations, being constantly dragged back into court over lies, being blocked from even seeing their kids in violation of court orders, and then being forced to pay for all of this abuse and left with so little that if they didn t have loved ones helping them financially they would be homeless. The courts allow all of this sort of abuse without even lifting a finger to stop it. Perjury is not just not prosecuted but it is actually REWARDED by the courts. Malicious and totally unreasonable court order violations are often ignored, too. That is until somebody criticizes the courts on the Internet or points out the abusive behavior of the maliicious ex on the Internet. Then the courts get all holier-than-thou that this is bad for the kids and you can t do that. All the previous things were even WORSE for the kids, and the courts did nothing to stop those abuses. As for the kids, they and everybody close to them (school friends, family, etc.) already knew much about their problems. It was already public before any of this was on the Internet. And if their mother and aunt are having drunken black-outs and nobody was doing anything about it, do you think that would be good for them? They were going to have to learn to deal with this mess whether anybody discussed it on the Internet or not. And the fact is, most people had no idea who any of them were until Allison Morelli made a big stink about it. I d agree that some of the language used (the Jabba the Hut comparison and some of the non-behavior focused personal attacks and swearing) was overly incendiary. But when you discuss some of the problems (alcohol abuse, child endangerment, court order violations, harassing s, etc.) honestly even without such language, you are going to make the parent causing these problems sound nasty. The answer isn t to not talk about it. The answer is for the problem parent to stop the behaviors. Further, if you are offended by such language, then why are you using the same offensive personal attacks? I quote you: mid-life crisis pimp and a frowny horse-face couple of devils You come off looking like a hypocrite. So what did you do to figure out who they were? And would the same approach even work today? I checked their DNS registration, for instance, and it is private and does not show their names or a business name associated with the site. Their IP address for the site shows up in Chicago, far from where they are physically located. Maybe it was somewhere else earlier, but I have no realistic way of knowing that. Your IP address is in that same vicinity, too. That seems suspicious to me. Maybe you know somebody who works for Steadfast Networks (apparently the web hosting provider) or work there yourself (as an employee, consultant, etc.) and violated their confidentiality by illicit means? If so I d be surprised you would admit it because that could get you fired and in trouble with the law yourself. If not, then what is it that you did to figure out who they were? Neither I nor anybody I discussed the site with recalled seeing a court case number, location, names of CCFC Master Exhs. P1089

122 judges or family members, or anything else that would be easy to trace. That seems to leave mostly their web hosting account that would expose them and like I said, if that company was a thousand miles away that is hardly much of a clue UNLESS you have inside access to that company s records. Even if you had a legitimate means to trace them, do you think much of anybody else would be willing or able to go through the same effort to track them down like you did? Chris #7 Comment By Anon2 On February 26, 10:48 pm Maybe she didn t work for the web host but hacked into the web site? Bet you can find a lot about who runs a site that way, for example their addresses that might reveal their names. #8 Comment By Not a Hacker On February 27, 8:04 am Hacker means somebody who can write code fast. MSM has ruined the term. Cracker is more appropriate. Did you consider that the woman who claims she found the identities of the people running Psycho Ex Wife could work for GoDaddy or know somebody who does? That s where their domain name is registered. GoDaddy actually supported SOPA. Can t trust them. #9 Comment By Not a Hacker On February 27, 8:11 am [36] What does a midwestern mom w/ an excellent friendship & coparenting relationship with my child s father) mean? You have sole custody, you let your ex see the kiddo once per year, and he pays for everything? Like many fathers, Tony was put through a lot of misery to even see the kids somewhat equitably. Thank Allison for that, the oh so wonderful mom she is. Like many mothers, Allison is a child-owner who cares oh so much for her kids because she gets child support for them. They are her key to free money, that is why she loves them. And that is why she doesn t want them to see their father. No time with daddy, more money for her. #10 Comment By Not a Hacker On February 27, 8:19 am What does a midwestern mom w/ an excellent friendship & coparenting relationship with my child s father) really mean? You have sole custody, he gets to see the kid once per year, and he is homeless after you took his pension, savings, and current income? Anthony Morelli had to fight even to see his kids. Allison didn t want him to see them. She s such a good mom you say? Hah! Allison Morelli loves her children for the money. She doesn t want them to see their father so she can try to get the court to take all of Anthony Morelli s income and savings. I ve been reading that Allison s father hit the younger son, her sister is a drunk who falls down CCFC Master Exhs. P1090

123 stairs, and her birth family is basket cases because of abuse in the family. Probably explains why Allison is the way she is. If she has her way, she will turn those two boys into abusers just like her. The kiddos need to go read Understanding the Borderline Mother to understand the dynamics of their family before it is too late for them to have a chance at a healthy future. Too bad they are probably too young to do it on their own. #11 Comment By Allison On February 28, 1:40 pm Chris, I read your article and you sound like a raving lunatic. You don t know anything about me or our case. If you want to read the judge s opinion on custody and get a better idea of what is going on you can me. You have NO idea. Do you call everyone who doesn t agree with you a Sociopath? I know a few people who do that. It s called projection. Take care. Allison #12 Comment By Rob On February 28, 9:16 pm Allison, Are you in fact Allison Morelli or just some imposter? Chris didn t call Allison Morelli a sociopath. He was writing about the freedom of speech issues and how The Psycho Ex Wife content covers the behaviors of sociopaths in family law disputes in a much more general sense than it being a bash Allison Morelli site. Most of the content on the site was not about Allison Morelli. I used to read that site sometimes and also looked at the archives of it to refresh my memory. So far as I saw, the site never named her anywhere, nor did it provide identifying information that would help the general public figure out who the PEW might be. Furthermore, the abbreviation PEW is often used when it clearly has nothing to do with that Allison Morelli, even by people who are clearly writing about other people. Your implication that Chris calls people a sociopath for not agreeing with him suggests a few things: 1) You have a reading comprehension problem. 2) You have an inability to differentiate discussion of freedom of speech and the problems that many people are faced with by sociopaths in family law courts from your own behaviors. Does that mean you recognize you behave as a sociopath or does it mean something else? 3) You are distorting what another person wrote to claim victim status. One of the behaviors a sociopath engages in frequently is distortions to claim victim status. So what does this say about you? Nobody writing here has called Allison Morelli a sociopath because we don t know her and don t have our own independent access to detailed history of the situation. Chris pointed that out not only by using language such as reportedly and allegedly to refer to claims other people are making about Allison Morelli, he also made it clear that PEW isn t necessarily about Allison Morelli and he doesn t know the people involved: Allison apparently served as the source for around a quarter of the articles describing bizarre and abusive behaviors on the banned website as it is believed that PEW (the abbreviation for Psycho Ex Wife, one of the main characters discussed on the site) was based at least partially upon Allison Morelli. However, some statements suggest PEW may be a synthesis of her behaviors and conduct and those of other troubled ex-spouses. However much literary license may have been taken with PEW s words and actions, it is clear that PEW as used on the site often does not even refer to Allison Morelli. PEW is used as an abbreviation throughout the site s content and the discussion of its readers. It means different things in different places. Often it is used to generally refer to a psycho ex wife and many readers refer to PEW, too, Cal. Coalition meaning for Families their and own Children psycho v. San ex Diego wives. County Indeed Bar Ass'n the site and its readers also CCFC use Master PEH Exhs. P1091

124 to refer to psycho ex husband. The generic psycho ex content and discussion included all the kinds of things you d expect to see discussed about malicious Borderlines, Narcissists, Antisocials, and other personality disorders that are typically seen in sociopaths. Drug abuse, alcohol abuse, verbal abuse, emotional abuse, physical abuse, manipulation, projection, gaslighting, pathological lying, distortion campaigns, and more. They even discussed at times how these people get to be their malicious selves, often from a history of abuse as children. All of that is very generic and helpful information that doesn t specifically pertain to Allison Morelli. Yet Judge Gibbons, in her infinite stupidity, sought to silence all of that content, too. To be clear, I don t know Anthony, Misty, or Allison and have never talked with any of them. I have no idea really of what the truth about their situation is. But in all likelihood, neither do the courts. Finally, as to your statement about projection, it appears that you yourself are projecting projection. So if you are indeed Allison Morelli, comments like those you made are simply tending to confirm the allegations that The Psycho Ex Wife website made about her. Rob #13 Comment By Chris On February 29, 4:39 am Allison, It looks to me that you are claiming to be Allison Morelli, so I will reply as such. Insult me all you like, doesn t change a thing. If you have actual relevant information that has some bearing on the case, you are always welcome to it to [37]. You are not the main focus of the story. Please read more carefully. My article was about free speech and why this kind of speech is important, namely to build awareness of sociopathic abuse and help people who are suffering from it. Most people don t understand what it is like to be attacked by a sociopath and don t understand why somebody would be motivated to put up a site like The Psycho Ex Wife. Many of the mainstream writers dumb-down and oversimplify is to Anthony Morelli is just nasty. But that is obviously not the case given the steps he took to keep the site anonymous and how much of the content is not even about you. Tthat is why I spent a lot of words on discussing sociopathic behaviors and how much damage they cause. Many of the readers of The Psycho Ex Wife do know that from personal experience, but thanks to Judge Gibbons, one more source of information and support for them was eliminated by her idiotically sweeping illegal order. There s no real difference between what Gibbons did and ordering a library to be shuttered permanently on the grounds that one of the books inside contains denigrating or obnoxious text. Her thinking exemplifies the I don t like the racial stereotypes in Mark Twain books and how they might hurt some kids feelings, so I ll shut down the whole library or burn the books abusive mentality pervasive among family law judges. I didn t call you a sociopath, and I don t call people sociopaths merely because they disagree with me. They earn that label through a pattern of malicious and abusive behaviors towards others. There are certainly people who are neither malicious nor abusive but who don t agree with me and I would not call them sociopaths. I also didn t claim what The Psycho Ex Wife wrote about you was accurate, nor did I say it was inaccurate. If you read what I wrote with any objectivity you would see that I was reporting what they said and that the s purported to be from you do look disturbing, but that clearly they had some changes (at least names were removed) but I don t know what else might have been changed. I have no knowledge of you myself other than how your name is popping up everywhere in relation to that site and what some court documents said about you (e.g., alcoholism). Lots of CCFC Master Exhs. P1092

125 people are alcoholics and I hope the best for them, but it is not good for kids to be exposed to substance abuse by their parents and relatives, especially if they are living with them on a daily basis. It is a bad role model and in your situation even worse as they are probably going to be highly susceptible to substance abuse problems via genetics and the alienation style warfare between their parents. Note I m not claiming who is the alienator, either, as without being able to listen like a fly on the wall it is very hard to know that with certainty. As Rob wrote, reading between the lines of your comment says a lot, at least if you are really Allison Morelli. Many of the accounts of what happened peg you as the one who told the kids about the site. If you were the one who showed the kids the website and told them it was about you, what were you thinking? This looks like a move that is more about playing up false victim status to get an abusive judge to take your side than it is a move with any real concern about the kids. Now that the cat s out of the bag, there is nothing you can do to put it back in, either. The kids will have to figure out who is telling the truth on their own as the courts almost never understand and with both parents calling the other a liar they can t count on their parents, either. The best that can come of this mess to me appears to be to more clearly establish First Amendment rights, remove Gibbons from the bench because she is clearly incompetent, and to publicize the kind of information that The Psycho Ex Wife was trying to share about sociopaths and their abuse patterns in family law disputes. Your kids will need that kind of information, too, given the apparent situation they are in predisposes them to get involved in the same kind of destructive high conflict relationships themselves in the future. Chris #14 Comment By Allison On March 6, 11:24 pm Chris and Rob, I did contact Angiemedia about this article and Rob s subsequent article. They are meant to be inflammatory and you know it. I do not go back in forth with people about my case. You clearly do not have all the facts and it s not my job to give them to you and I m not here to defend myself to you, a bitter divorcee. There are LOTS of men like you guys out there. I will tell you this, I now have primary custody of my children (since December) and when the appeal is done, maybe you ll have the information you need to write an educated article, as of right now you couldn t possibly write an intelligent piece about me because your basing it on the information you ve gotten from the website, which was written by anther bitter divorcee and his new girlfriend. Do you believe everything people tell you? You shouldn t. Judge Gibbons is a great Judge, her primary focus the whole time was on my kids and that is EXACTLY as it should be. You should try focusing on your kids and stop spewing your HATE all over the web. Allison #15 Comment By Allison On March 7, 12:37 am Oh, I see, you re one of those sites who only allow the comments that you WANT people to read. Still waiting to hear from the Admin. at Angiemedia. #16 Comment By Chris On March 7, 3:51 am Allison, You ve lost all credibility. If you are trying to show the The Psycho Ex Wife wasn t accurate about its description of the PEW character reputed to be based upon you, it s having the exact opposite effect. You are also doing a bang-up job of confirming other people s negative impressions of you. You ed us with your threats and demands. Then what looks to be about a couple hours later, before you ve even allowed reasonable time to even notice your , you started publicly posting misleading distortions about how we haven t replied to you and misleading claims that we only allow the comments that you WANT people to read. CCFC Master Exhs. P1093

126 Consider this your reply. We do review comments and sometimes that means there s a delay of as much as a few days before they are visible to the public. Until now, all of your comments you posted here have been published verbatim, including your insults, attacks, and distortions. All were published with little delay. But then you started spamming us and engaging in distortion attacks writing that we ve written things that we did not. And you combined that with threats. You re no longer welcome here. If you had bothered to read the site in interests of accuracy before making your wild claims, you would see contrary to your misleading implications that we certainly do allow comments by people who do not agree with an author. Even our authors don t always agree. We ve been far more in favor of freedom of speech than many web sites are, even speech with which we don t agree and which has attacked us misleadingly and inaccurately such as you are doing. The two main points of this article were that Judge Gibbons violated important freedom of speech rights and that there are legitimate reasons for running a site like The Psycho Ex Wife that have nothing to do with you or attacking you, regardless of what kind of person you are. I didn t call you a sociopath. I mentioned when we quoted from The Psycho Ex Wife and when writing about that mentioned its statements are about the PEW character and are allegations. Look it up in a dictionary if you don t know what the word means. Because this case is being widely discussed in public, apparently due to your actions and clearly with your personal participation, many will read about how you are behaving in your own words. Your public beahviors are now lending credibility to what you claim was inaccurately said about you on The Psycho Ex Wife. And the media (including websites such as this one) can write about the allegations made by The Psycho Ex Wife without it being defamatory. For if it turns out some or even all of those allegations are not accurate, they were still allegations and were reported as such. And if that came to pass, then the onus would be on the writers at The Psycho Ex Wife to explain their actions. Judge Gibbons messed up. If she was actually competent and truly concerned about the kids, she might have had a leg to stand on to require that defamatory content, if there was any, be removed from the The Psycho Ex Wife. But wholesale shutdown of the site (including much content that has nothing to do with you) under penalty of jail or loss of the kids is wrong. It looks to be an illegal abuse of discretion that violates the US Constitution. It is a tremendous disservice to many people who benefited from that site who had no part in your conflict and knew nothing about you. Chris #17 Pingback By I Want The Litigation To End May Be A Warning You Are Being Manipulated By A Sociopath angiemedia On March 7, 6:16 am [...] a comment Go to commentsthere has been much mainstream media coverage of the controversy over the illegal banning of the The Psyco Ex Wife website. Many of the mainstream media writers pump up sympathy-evoking statements, particularly those [...] #18 Comment By Borderline Target On March 8, 7:37 pm So where have they defamed you Allison? I read the article, the only thing it said about you which could be defamation (if it were not true) is that you are an alcoholic. But they also refer to a court transcript that shows the judge treating you like an alcoholic and you admitting that you are. Everything else is clearly stated as being the position of the people writing the Psycho Ex website. They even say they are not sure what might be true and what might be made up. Hell, if anything that is giving you the benefit of the doubt. And they can report about what the Psycho Ex wrote even if you say it is not true. It is no different than a newspaper printing a story about alleged crimes by a person then it later turns CCFC Master Exhs. P1094

127 out the person didn t commit those crimes. The person might not like it, but that s not defamation when the story makes it clear they are allegations made by others like the cops or the alleged victim. So what do they allege you did or said that you didn t do or say? And why do you think it is defamation? You sound like you are confusing feelings with facts and have substance abuse problems. Maybe that is why your ex thinks you are a Borderline. #19 Comment By Borderline Target On March 8, 9:02 pm Hey Allison, is it true that you are such a bimbo that you put your kids on TV with you to discuss the Psycho Ex Wife? I read that on another website. #20 Comment By Borderline Target On March 8, 9:15 pm Hey Allison, is your name Allison Morelli or Allison Lowry? Please keep writing, your psycho comments are entertaining! Is it true you were drunk on Mother s Day and threw your children out of the house because they made a card for Misty? If Allison wanted to end the conflict, she would get help for herself and stop jerking the kids around. You don t throw your pre-teen children out of their house on Mother s Day because they wrote a card to their step-mother. Any father worth his salt would do everything he possibly could to protect his children from a mother like that. If it is not true, that is far more defamatory than anything written about you here. If it is true, just like the comments you are making here it says a lot about your true nature. Insecure, vengeful, and then vicious even when there is no just cause for such behaviors. So what is your real reason for threatening the authors here? That you recognize your own behaviors as a sociopath and don t want other people to read this article because they will, too? #21 Comment By Chris On March 8, 9:48 pm Borderline Target, Where did you find that quote? I read something about a Mother s Day incident in the court transcript, but did not know what it was. Chris #22 Comment By Borderline Target On March 9, 12:21 am Umm, on your home page it looks like you approved some of my comments but I can t see them on this page? #23 Comment By Borderline Target On March 9, 12:22 am CCFC Master Exhs. P1095

128 Oh, wait, they showed up when I left another comment. Weird. #24 Comment By Borderline Target On March 9, 12:25 am I think you guys should write an article using Allison s comments as examples of why lowcontact/no-contact communication with somebody like her is a good idea. #25 Comment By Borderline Target On March 9, 12:26 am I got that quote about the Mother s Day incident from somebody s comments on another article about Allison Morelli on another site. Will try to find it again. #26 Comment By Borderline Target On March 9, 12:37 am I found the quote. It is on the page [38] from a comment by Karen Baker on November 13, 2011 at 7:29pm. #27 Comment By Chris On March 9, 1:04 am Allison, I am not a follower of your ex-husband. The last time I read the site prior to reading about it being illegally censored was probably in 2009 or It took me over half a year to even notice it had been shut down, and that was only because I was checking some links to other sites. It looks like you are very busy searching the web for your name (Google searches for Allison Morelli ) and visiting web sites about you the past few days. Don t you have something better to do like spend time with your kids? If you contend there is something I wrote that is not true, quote it and explain. So far you have not done so. It appears that you are defaming me by claiming I have defamed you when there is no basis for such a claim that I can see. I have reviewed the article repeatedly and rephrased a few things which could be more clear but which were not defamatory. I do not see anything I wrote which is about you which isn t backed up by another source not including solely what was written about you on The Psycho Ex Wife. I relied upon the alleged transcripts and other media reports including ones in which you participated. Now I can use your own words and behaviors here, too. As I wrote from the start, I think that probably some of what was written on The Psycho Ex Wife included some literary license and might not be exactly accurate and that it is not clear that the PEW character was intended to be a literal representation of you but could be some representation of behaviors or examples based upon multiple people, none of whom were identified. We have bent over backwards letting you have a forum to wrongfully and inaccurately attack me. Then you started spamming the site. That reminds me of things I read about what the PEW character did to The Psycho Ex Wife when it was discovered. You behaving similarly builds credibility for Anthony Morelli s version of events. If you contend that what Anthony Morelli wrote about you was untrue, then why didn t you sue him for libel? That you have not done so and yet attack other people who have sided with him having First Amendment rights to write anonymously about his experiences says to me that what he wrote about the PEW character was probably largely true and/or that you can t prove it was about you. But like I said, I don t know for sure. Your Cal. Coalition aggressively for Families hostile and Children and v. threatening San Diego County attitude Bar Ass'n further confirms that impression CCFC Master that Exhs. youp1096

129 want to shut up everybody else who has anything to say with which you disagree, even if those things are not defamatory and are not about you. If you are truly the victim you paint yourself to be, you are doing a horrible job of demonstrating that. Chris #28 Comment By Curious On March 10, 9:01 pm I was curious about the mother s day incident. Didn t find it. I did find The Psycho Ex-Wife is also a Facebook page. [39] Like you wrote, the term isn t about Allison Morelli. Lots of people are using it. #29 Comment By step On March 13, 9:15 pm [40] As a female and a child of divorce, you make me sick, Allison. A tenth of what is written here could be the only truth and you would be in the 1% of crappiest moms I have ever heard of. #30 Comment By step On March 13, 9:58 pm And the author doesn t have to call you a sociopath your writing shows that. #31 Pingback By How and Why Psycho Parents Manipulate Kids to Resist Custody Exchanges angiemedia On March 14, 12:56 am [...] of the family law courts manipulated by a truly malevolent ex. It was popularized in part by the illegally banned website The Psycho Ex Wife. Malicious moms are deservingly labeled as psychos quite often, hence the widespread recognition of [...] #32 Comment By Father of Mine On March 14, 1:45 pm I have read the Psycho Ex Wife site almost since its creation. I can vouch that I had no idea at all who any of these people were or where they were until I saw the segment on the today show. there were no clues at all. It was completely anonymous. The issue here is free speech. Diane Gibbins actions are treasonable against the constitution. Mr. Morelli was threated to take the site completely down (rather than just remove certain articles deemed slanderous) without the benefit of a hearing. Meanwhile, it appears Allison has free rein to badmouth Mr. Morelli and anyone else in any public forum. Nice. Incidentally, since the site is completely anonymous, and everything on there is a lie, how did Allison Morelli recognize she was talking about her? #33 Comment By Laura On March 14, 5:42 pm Please publish Allison s threatening s, we all need a good laugh. Thanks! #34 Comment By Jimpy On March 14, 6:28 pm CCFC Master Exhs. P1097

130 Hi Allison! I m not a bitter divorcee, and I understand if you find these questions are inflammatory, but here goes: 1. If your civil rights have been violated by that blog, why haven t you sued him for libel (as Chris asked as well)? I know this isn t the first time you have been asked this, but to date you haven t responded. 2. You claimed that the website was harassing, intimidating, and harmful to the children, yet none of the parties were ever mentioned by name. How, specifically, was this harassing, intimidating, and harmful to the children? 3. Why is it okay for a woman to appear on talk shows, radio shows, write books, and give interviews about their ex-husbands, but it is not okay for a man to contribute to an anonymous weblog? 4. There are many who claim that Judge Gibbons ruling is in direct violation of the 1st and 14th amendments. You obviously agree with the Judge, so can you explain why the ruling isn t a violation of these basic civil rights? 5. When Judge Gibbons ruling is overturned, what will you do next? Thank you for your time, and I await your response. #35 Comment By Clara On March 14, 7:27 pm Misty is Karen Baker. Sorry to disappoint anyone, but the judge has consistently found in Mother s favor. Father continues his petulance because he doesn t want to pay child support. This is very typical in cases such as these. The mother is a nut, the father is a glorious exampe of parenthood. He just doesn t want to pay childsupport. The shrinks interviewed them both, and whatever you may think of a mother for being irritated as constant misrepresentation, all that matters is what the shrink thought. She has fulltime custody and the girlfriend can have no contact with the boys at alll. Not that it would appear she really would want to, given that her own s were put into evidence to resulted in that decision. When it is all said and done, your children know the truth and come to their own conclusions. #36 Comment By Clara On March 14, 7:37 pm You know, Chris, sometimes things have to happen before a person can sue for additional things. Sometimes getting the domestic issue is more urgent than suing someone for something that was already dismissed in court. No one has to care about what you or anyone else thinks, even if it might hurt. It seems that Anthony continues to lose, and then he tries to shift judges and attempts to do the stuff he then claims on his website only high conflict people do. He s not an innocent person and certainly not a victim. You would think a person selling custody advice could point to his own successful resolution, but that isn t the case here. You know, Chris, sometimes things have to happen before a person can sue for additional things. Sometimes getting the domestic issue is more urgent than suing someone for something that was already dismissed in court. No one has to care about what you or anyone else thinks, even if it might hurt. It seems that Anthony continues to lose, and then he tries to shift judges and attempts to do the stuff he then claims on his website only high conflict people do. He s not an innocent person and certainly not a victim. You would think a person selling custody advice could point to his own successful resolution, but that isn t the case here. #37 Comment By SD parent 22 On March 15, 12:29 am CCFC Master Exhs. P1098

131 Ever heard of this mental thing called hysteria? How about this one: Can t we all just, get along? Some people say laughter heals. Perhaps we all need healing. Here s the best I can do at the moment: [41] Blessings to all. #38 Comment By Bob On March 15, 8:31 I ll answer for Allison. 1. She did not sue them for libel or slander because she had already lost her home due to the $75k she spent in legal fees defending her custody. You have to have money to retain a civil attorney, unless it s a personal injury case. 2. The website was harming the children because they saw their father and Misty blogging on it all the time. They knew about it because of that. They told their mother about it and several articles about it. This FACT was verified during the last custody evaluation. 3. Who are you talking about? I don t think it s ok in either case. 4. Judge Gibbons ruling in June was NOT a final ruling. Mr. Morelli volunteered to take the site down when in front of Judge Gibbons. Not to mention the fact that she clarified keep it, but I will take it into consideration in custody and she did. 5. If Judge Gibbons decision is overturned, and if Mr. Morelli chooses to continue to post defamatory information about Allison, she will take the same actions that she is taking against this website for posting defamatory information about her. I don t think the two anonomous authors on this website realize that they are responsible for the information they ve posted about Allison Morelli and what they consider to be thier facts for backing their information up, are not actual facts, so the information in the articles is libelous, slanderous and harmful. #39 Comment By Glad2BFree On March 15, 10:39 am [42] :Misty is Karen Baker. Sorry to disappoint anyone, but the judge has consistently found in Mother s favor. Father continues his petulance because he doesn t want to pay child support. (Disclosure: I was a semi-regular contributor to The Psycho Ex Wife website before it was shut down.) I hear this argument all the time: The father is just mad because he doesn t want to pay support. But Clara, if you want to make that argument then you have to accept the opposite: That Allison might only be doing what she s doing in order to *get* child support. If you want to pin peoples motivations on money, you can t be choosy. As Chris has been saying, this piece is about how Family Court judges flagrantly disregard citizens constitutionally protected rights, with no practical option for relief (since appeals often cost more than most people bring home in a year). What Lord Gibbons did was completely inappropriate, if not illegal. She refused to hear any defending evidence or testimony, she entered excerpts from PEW.com into evidence *without* allowing anyone to see exactly what she was entering, and her ruling was in direct violation of multiple parts of the Constitution. She s running a kangaroo court and deserves to be removed. Also, we apparently have Allison herself demonstrating how she is still under the impression that this is all about her. Trademark narcissism. I also notice she is quick to criticize and mock others, but will never answer the substantial questions such as why did you admit publicly that you are the sick person known as PEW? or how did you know the site was describing you, if it s so untruthful? or if you claim you re trying to protect your kids, why did you tell them about the site? She doesn t answer because she can t without destroying her carefully constructed poor victim CCFC Master Exhs. P1099

132 facade. Unfortunately for her, there are too many of us men and women alike who have been tortured by people just like her, and we can see right through her bull. #40 Comment By Curious On March 15, 7:12 Allison and now you claim there is something written here that is defamatory. Neither of you will say what you consider to be defamatory except for making obviously misleading statements of your own. Why? Is is because you know that you are making it all up and you hope to confuse others into taking your side? #41 Comment By Curious On March 15, 7:38 What Allison leaves out says a lot about her true methods. She and her friends continue to claim defamation. But they also avoid stating what they consider to be defamatory. If I was not an alcoholic and a document purported to be a court transcript were circulated and people were relying upon that and making statements based upon it, I would be attacking the legitimacy of the document first. So far there has been no peep from Allison and friends about that. So do they agree that court transcript link is legitimate? Sometimes reporters and writers are fooled by false documents held out to be true. If it was really false I bet they would correct anything inaccurate they wrote based upon a false document and maybe even apologize for being fooled. I see corrections like that in newspapers, magazines, and websites. So is there nothing defamatory and that s why they will not quote the supposed defamation? That s what I think is happening. #42 Comment By Curious On March 15, 7:45 pm Here s a quote from that transcript link [3] : NAME REDACTED: You know, in the course of having custody evaluation, it was discovered that I had developed a drinking problem as a result of gastric bypass surgery that I had in March of 09. And that after that point, you know, I suffered from addiction transference and, you know, it I am certainly not going to minimize that today, that of course it impacted the children. But the children saw me intoxicated four times in the course of two years. And I am in treatment. I attend AA meetings. This reads like it is Allison saying it. So Allison, do you deny saying that in court? If so, what did you say? #43 Comment By Borderline Target On March 15, 10:16 pm Doesn t this sound just like a Borderline, trying to blame surgery for becoming an alcoholic? #44 Comment By Jimpy On March 16, 3:04 pm Hi Bob & Allison! Thank you for your prompt reply. Then, I have some follow up questions: CCFC Master Exhs. P1100

133 1. She did not sue them for libel or slander because she had already lost her home due to the $75k she spent in legal fees defending her custody. You have to have money to retain a civil attorney, unless it s a personal injury case. False. An attorney can take a case like this on a contingency, but I m guessing you already knew that. Is Allisons case strong enough to pursue, or not? 2. The website was harming the children because they saw their father and Misty blogging on it all the time. They knew about it because of that. They told their mother about it and several articles about it. This FACT was verified during the last custody evaluation. they saw their father and Misty blogging on it. And how, was this harming the children, specifically? 3. Who are you talking about? I don t think it s ok in either case. Daytime TV is rife with talk shows that feature ex-wives regaling an audience with stories of their evil, abusive ex-husbands. A quick search on Amazon.com shows nearly twenty thousand books on the subject. Question: Do you live in the Western hemisphere? Are you aware that the first amendment guarantees an individuals right to free speech and freedom of the press? And again, why is it okay for a woman to express herself in this fashion, but not okay for a man? 4. Judge Gibbons ruling in June was NOT a final ruling. Mr. Morelli volunteered to take the site down when in front of Judge Gibbons. Not to mention the fact that she clarified keep it, but I will take it into consideration in custody and she did. You haven t answered my question, so I will ask again: can you explain why the Judge s ruling is not in direct violation of the 1st and 14th amendments? 5. If Judge Gibbons decision is overturned, and if Mr. Morelli chooses to continue to post defamatory information about Allison, she will take the same actions that she is taking against this website for posting defamatory information about her. Allison was never identified on Mr. Morelli s weblog. Question: Does anonomous speech afford the same protections from the first amendment or not? I don t think the two anonomous authors on this website realize that they are responsible for the information they ve posted about Allison Morelli and what they consider to be thier facts for backing their information up, are not actual facts, so the information in the articles is libelous, slanderous and harmful. If this is truly the case, I would encourage Allison to file a lawsuit. If it is not, this kind of posturing is nothing more than an empty threat. #45 Comment By Bob On March 17, 10:03 am The whole article is defamatory to Allison Morelli and to Judge Gibbons. Allison is currently unemployed and looking for a job and you re writing articles referring to her as an abusive alcoholic and a sociopath. Very irresponsible and you re opening yourself up to alot of liability with this article and your subsequent articles. You must know that the Morelli s had psych evals and Allison was not the one to be found to have sociopathic traits? Anthony is and always was the high conflict party in this divorce case. You all will never be convinced that you re barking up the wrong tree when it comes to the Morelli s because Allison is a woman and Misogynists don t support women. The FBI, state attorney general, etc..etc have already been notified about your harrassment. It will be dealt with, trust me. #46 Comment By Psycho Lobster On March 19, 7:54 am Chop, chop So how is it that Allison contends that her kids recognized the site was about her? Let s stipulate she is right they saw him or Misty working on it. Doesn t Misty run a few websites? CCFC Master Exhs. P1101

134 So how would they know it was about Allison? Did they read it? And then recognize her behaviors? Did they have that moment of realization: Oh, they are writing about mom and all the horrible things she has done to Dad and us. If you believe her version of events, it must have been something like that because it sure didn t name a single person. Judge Gibbons posits that it is not OK to talk about abuse publicly but it is OK to abuse other people so that they could recognize the description of the abuse when they read it because they experienced it personally. WTF kind of reasoning is that? Judge Gibbons must be aiming to drum up the child abuser vote. #47 Comment By Psycho Lobster On March 19, 8:00 Judge Gibbons is a public official. Anybody has a right to criticize her decisions as a judge. It s not defamation, esp not with Volokh and attorneys doing the same. Sounds to me like you are trying to intimidate the press with lies to the government. What s your connection with Gibbons and Allison? Friends? Lovers? Stablemates? #48 Comment By Psycho Lobster On March 19, 8:02 am If Allison Morelli didn t do such things, then why on earth would she be arguing that the site is about her? And if she did so such things, why on earth would she want the public to hear about it by publicly claiming the site is about her? New judge, new lies. She figured the new judge would be too dumb to realize it. Guess she was right. #49 Comment By Psycho Lobster On March 19, 8:03 Come on Bobby, upload the psych evals! We want to read them. #50 Comment By Psycho Lobster On March 19, 8:23 am So Bobby, are you saying the linked transcript is false? Looks to me like they heavily relied upon it for their opening monologue. Most of the article isn t about Allison. Allison says boo hoo hoo, it is all about me because she wants to shut up another website by lying it is all about her. It worked so well for her last time, why not try again? How can you call these people misogynists when they write she (or he) all over the place when talking about sociopaths? Because you believe that no woman could ever do a single wrong thing and anybody who says otherwise is a misogynist? #51 Comment By TB On March 19, 9:13 am CCFC Master Exhs. P1102

135 @Bob, You wrote: You must know that the Morelli s had psych evals and Allison was not the one to be found to have sociopathic traits? Anthony is and always was the high conflict party in this divorce case. So you are saying that Anthony is a sociopath? Why do you say he is high conflict? Because he wanted to see the kids fairly and wouldn t accept the usual Mom gets all abuse from the family court? Almost any parent who is being treated unfairly and illegally is going to fight it. That doesn t make the parent high conflict. #52 Comment By Dasher On March 19, 1:13 pm [43] You know what, I have watched my husband deal with a woman like you for years. Same play book, same lies. Attack his wife, then attack him, lie lie lie, destroy his kids. The mistake that Chris is doing on this site is to try to talk to you like a reasonable human being, which you are not. Punishing you ex for your perception that he has abandoned you because he has moved on is your sole motivation. You my dear are a Psycho ex wife and I hope you and all those like you pay for your sins. #53 Comment By WTF On March 19, 8:31 pm How can Allison have it both ways that a site that named nobody is about her and then act like she didn t write the s and do the evil things described? And why do Allison and her groupies assume that the whole article is about her when it is not? Are these both signs of BPD? It is mass stupidity. They are too stupid to comprehend a long text can have sections and also their stupidity reinforces the same in the other members of their group. Bob and Clara showed up when Allison disappeared. Maybe they are actually both Allison and it is just Allison being stupid? #54 Comment By WTF On March 19, 9:24 pm If Allison didn t write the s and do what Psycho Ex Wife says PEW did, she could simply tell the kids no, the site is not about me. End of story. Gibbons is a simpleton if she thinks that all parents are unable to partition something they write not for children s viewing having a different style and tone than what they say around the kids or show the kids. With what PEW is alleged to have said about dragging the kids into court, don t you think she probably is the kind of person who would be showing them court papers and other inappropriate writings naming their father herself? That s worse than some nameless website that can easily and truthfully be said to be about somebody else if she really didn t write and do what the site mentions. #55 Comment By Chris On March 19, 11:38 pm CCFC Master Exhs. P1103

136 Dasher, Good observation regarding my mistake. I tried to give Allison the benefit of the doubt, that maybe she has not been represented accurately, so I did not dwell on her and focused on how Gibbons is a problem, sociopaths are problem, and the kind of behaviors said to be executed by the PEW character are a problem but that I don t know how accurately that represents her. I most definitely did not call her a sociopath, nor an abusive alcoholic as her distorting and intimidating buddy Bob says. Most of my article is about Judge Gibbons and why her decision is both illegal and irresponsible, including that people need help dealing with psycho ex type people who behave as sociopaths do. Allison then tried to claim victimhood again, even when I directly avoiding quoting some portions of the alleged transcripts that made her look even worse. Another commenter quoted that part, where she tries to say she became an alcoholic because of surgery and that her kids have only seen her intoxicated four times in two years. Well, so be it, if she wants it to be all about her then I can add more about her from the transcript and so I added that quote in, too. I think it is telling on its own with little commentary. I know a lot of people who have had surgery but nobody who has ever claimed to have become an alcoholic from it. Only Allison, because Allison is special. Allison s writings and behaviors here match up with many of the problems attributed to the PEW character on The Psycho Ex Wife site. The it is all about me thinking, projecting, distorting, avoiding discussing what she has done wrong while blaming everybody else, threatening and intimidating to get her way, falsely accusing people, etc. are all included. She and her friends are making an excellent case that she can behave much like the PEW character. Maybe that s part of her weird strategy of claiming her victimhood badge? Somebody else mentioned that we should write an article on low contact / no contact communication with a psycho ex. The comments on this article are turning out to be an excellent example of why that can be good advice. Once you try communicating with a psycho ex, you are all too easily sucked into the twisted word warfare they use to manipulate, intimidate, threaten, and harm other people to get their way. And if you show even the slightest bit of irritation or anger with them, they are so adept at twisting it around to be all your fault and falsely playing the victim yet again. Chris #56 Comment By Chris On March 20, 12:09 am Bob, You are the one using phrases such as abusive alcoholic associated with Allison, not me. The court calls her an alcoholic in multiple of the alleged transcripts, but they don t use that phrase either. The PEW character s behaviors are those of a sociopath. I made it clear from the outset that I don t know how much of what was written about the PEW character accurately represents Allison, or if it is even her. She seems convinced it is, and again the only way I can see she can be convinced it is would be that she recognizes her writing and/or behaviors in those of the PEW character and that they closely match. Why she would want to take the credit for PEW s horrible behaviors by saying PEW is her and the whole site is about her is an excellent question that many are asking. Then Allison shows up here and starts behaving just like the PEW character. Apparently she wants to prove that the PEW character s behaviors includes many things she can do naturally, too. Is that part of her plan to lay claim to being a victim? If you have a copy of the psychological evaluations, it and we can publish it so everybody sees it. It is my observation that very often psychological evaluations are way off the mark. The true behavior of a person can t be seen in a few sessions with a psychologist or some multiple choice tests. You see it over the course of many years, particularly under stressful circumstances. Moreover, cause and effect matter greatly. The Psycho Ex Wife writings claim that the PEW CCFC Master Exhs. P1104

137 character started the battles and mistreatment. Does that mean Allison started the war between Anthony and her? I don t know, but if it is the case, it is no wonder he and anybody else living with such ongoing torment described would become bitter after years of such behaviors. When somebody is abused for years, they tend to start behaving as an abuse victim even if they never behaved like that previously. Maybe that is what is happening, maybe not. Nobody writing for this site is a misogynist. We have highlighted many cases of abuse against mothers and children. [44] We have argued that [45]. We have stuck up for female authors whose writings have been trashed and distorted by false feminists who are not aiming for equal rights as real feminists, the kind who rightly worked for women s right to vote, would do. We have highlighted excellent writings of female authors such as Dr. Amy Baker, Wendy McElroy (who runs the ifeminists site), and others. Our authors have met many w omen w ho are being screw ed over by the family courts. Men are victimized more often because of bias, but that doesn t make it any less wrong when the woman is the victim. Our goals include combating both the gender bias and the illegal and abusive conduct of many judges and government agencies in their war on families. Just because some of the worst offenders are female judges doesn t mean there are no male offenders. Look at [46] and the [47]. The FBI investigated those two scum and they are in Federal prison for their crimes against thousands of children. Many think those two should be executed for their crimes. But they were not the only participants. Little or nothing was done to school administrators who were also participating in systematic governmental abuse against children. Ciavarella and Conohan are far from from the only bad judges in Pennsylvania. [17] Looks like Pennsylvania has abysmal courts staffed by criminals. When you falsely claim we are misogynists, you are spewing lies and propaganda with the clear goal of damaging our reputation with malicious misinformation. If you want to see a defamer, go look in the mirror. Chris #57 Comment By Tom On April 13, 5:48 pm [43] Allison, Why to prove you re not a psycho by posting like a psycho. Way to follow me on twitter just because I followed Misty and when I post a tweet to Misty, Guess who s Stalk- er following me on twitter! You send me a nasty tweet and then block me. With every single post you are confirming what you are trying to disprove. This is down right comedic. It s going to be hard for you o take the stance that you didn t write the s posted on thepsychoexwife.com when your posts follow the pattern and writing styles to a tee. #58 Comment By The Shadow On May 9, 7:23 on twitter Between her random on-again, off-again twitter accounts that she uses to stalk and abuse others and her antics on Facebook as Allison Lowry Morelli in the same vein, in my quiet opinion, this is no longer about where there is smoke, but about how many firefighters it s going to take to put out the raging inferno. Truly a shame for the children. You done good, Judge Gibbons! #59 Comment By Karen Baker On June 17, 4:18 pm I am the Karen Baker that wrote the following. CCFC Master Exhs. P1105

138 If Allison wanted to end the conflict, she would get help for herself and stop jerking the kids around. You don t throw your pre-teen children out of their house on Mother s Day because they wrote a card to their step-mother. Any father worth his salt would do everything he possibly could to protect his children from a mother like that. I was a member of The Psycho Ex Wife Blog and Forums at one time. The Mother s Day incident was posted on the PEW blog before it was ordered taken down. I have no personal information regarding the Mother s Day Incident other than what was posted publicly. There have been accusations here (and in comments on many other articles) that I am Misty Ostinato-Weaver. I am not. I am myself. In fact, I have never met Misty Ostinato-Weaver or Anthony Morelli. I have never spoken to them, and until the Today Show coverage I had know idea who they were or where they lived- in spite of being a member of the PEW forums since their inception. It should be said that while the PEW site was still public, Allison outted herself by posting comments on posts that she strongly disagreed with. She would then post comments in support of herself using the Aliases- Allison/Bob/Clara/Anon. If I remember correctly, all posts made under those names were tracked to the same IP address or known IP addresses of her immediate family members. I am not surprised that she is doing the same here. I thought clearing up the confusion would be beneficial to the authors of this article. #60 Comment By Rob On June 19, 7:41 pm [48] Karen, Thanks for clearing this up. It s a staple of sociopathic behavior to discredit any criticism by falsely accusing the person of being a liar, distorting the person s words to be something they were not, and playing the innocent victim when in fact the sociopath is the one who started the conflict and keeps it going. I think we see all of these behavior patterns in the writings of Allison Morelli aka Allison Lowry and the other aliases she may be using. Rob #61 Comment By Karen Baker On June 19, 11:59 pm Here is an exchange between Allison and I on an article posted on the Phillyburbs.com where she mentions and admits to the statements I made on the Examiner post being accurate. The Phillyburbs comments have since been removed (I think she was banned) but I kept a copy of our exchange. As you can see, she continues to use her staple behavior in this exchange as well. I did forget to mention that she also used the alias Liz on the Psycho Ex Wife as well. You can find some of her comments on archived posts. Simply look through the media links on the SavethePsychoExWife.com. One of the articles has a link that will take you to the archives. If you chose not to post this publicly, I do understand. My intent is not to continue the conflict, but to further demonstrate the nature of the beast. The Phillyburbs exchange follows: Allison Lowry Morelli commented on [49]. no testimony about her incoherent rantings on the internet, no testimony about her mental health..and the sick get sicker. I guess all the Welcome to Oz folks are happy! Jury finds Burklund guilty of first-degree murder in husband s death [49] It will be life in prison without parole for Dorleen Burklund, the Upper Bucks wife who fatally pumped eight bullets into her husband during an altercation at their Springfield home... CCFC Master Exhs. P1106

139 Like May 18 at 6:38pm Karen Baker- Allison, I don t understand the comment about her incoherent rantings on the internet, or testimony about her mental health. Obviously, if she were incompetent to assist in her own defense, a psychiatric evaluation would have been ordered. Mental illness does not excuse a person from taking responsibility for their actions. May 21 at 6:55pm Like. Allison Lowry Morelli- Thank you, Karen/Misty for your input. I didn t realize you were so knowledgable about criminal law, as well as mental health. If she was able to get a criminal defense attorney, instead of a public defender, this whole trial would have went down a totally different way. Everyone knows that.why do you think her son was trying to use his money to get her a defense attorney? Her internet rantings indicate her state of mind at the time of the murder, from what I read, she could not put a thought together in any cohesive way. That s a sickness. I m sorry if I don t think she should rot in prison for the rest of her life for being sick. May 21 at 7:29pm Like. Karen Baker- I m sorry, Misty? I am not Misty. How could you know how knowledgable about criminal law and mental health I am if you don t know me? I asked a simple question as a person who is interested in this case. A public defender has an obligation to give a person the best defense they are able. It would be poor practice for even the prosecution to continue a trial without establishing the mental status of a person on trial. They would be creating a situation that would be immediately appealed. If Ms. Burkland were not competent to stand trial they would postpone it until she was, or place her in a mental health facility. She killed her husband. She should go to prison. Even Charles Mason, obviously mentally ill, has to serve out his sentence. May 21 at 7:40pm Like. Allison Lowry Morelli- um yes.i was told you were Misty by several pretty reliable sources almost a year ago. I would tend to believe it since the nature of your comments on my case contained some pretty intimate and specific information. Regarding Dorleen Burklund, unless you were present at the trial and behind the scenes, you have no way of knowing what was done by the Public Defender, nor do I. I do know what wasn t brought up during the trial and what the jury didn t hear. Obviously, her husband believed she was mentally ill because he was part of a support group for loved ones of Borderlines. According to the info available to the public, the Jury didn t know that. I think comparing Dorleen Burlund to Charles Manson is a huge stretch. Who ever said he was mentally ill? was that written somewhere? He was an obvious danger to society.i m not so sure this woman is.and you couldn t be either because there isn t enough information available to make that assessment. May 21 at 7:55pm Like. Karen Baker- Well, Allison. Your reliable sources were wrong. I do not know Misty. Never have. Prey tell me what does the husband s involvement in a support group for loved one s with Borderline s have anything to do with her shooting him 5 times, reloading the gun, and then shooting him 3 more times? You wrote- Regarding Dorleen Burklund, unless you were present at the trial and behind the scenes, you have no way of knowing what was done by the Public Defender, nor do I. I do know what wasn t brought up during the trial and what the jury didn t hear. So which is it Allison? You stated that you didn t know what was done by the public defender because you weren t at the trial. So tell me, how do you know what wasn t brought up during the trial and what the jury didn t hear? Were you present or not? Okay, so Charles Manson is not mentally ill, and neither is Ms. Burklund. They both are a danger to society. They have killed other people. They both belong in jail. If Ms. Burklund is mentally ill like her husband claimed she was, it still doesn t excuse her actions. It only supports that a support group for loved ones with borderline may have been a good choice for him. May 21 at 8:09pm Like. Allison Lowry Morelli- If you don t know Misty and never have, how did you find yourself AGAIN commenting in the same forum as me almost a w hole year after your original posts about me and my case? With regard to this case, the trial was covered by the newspaper, I only know what they published and I m pretty sure they didn t leave out a huge fact like her mental health history if it was brought up. Are you telling me that you don t know the difference between the representation of a Public Defender and a Criminal Defense Attorney? I don t know why you re CCFC Master Exhs. P1107

140 dogging me or what you re getting at but you have my phone #, just call me directly and drop the charade. May 21 at 8:17pm Like. Allison Lowry Morelli- BTW, Charles Manson was interviewed a few years ago.and remains unruly and unremorseful. May 21 at 8:19pm Like. Allison Lowry Morelli- and still not mentally ill May 21 at 8:19pm Like. Karen Baker- No, I don t have your number. This is not a charade. I am not Misty. Never have been. Never will be. Yes, I have commented on other forums that you have commented on. We seem to be drawn to the same kinds of stories. Great minds think alike! If all you know is what was covered in the newspapers then, perhaps, the newspapers did not report on a psychological evaluation being requested by the defense or the prosecution? It makes little difference if Ms. Burkland is mentally ill or not. She was found sane enough to withstand trial and assist in her own defense OR the trial wouldn t have taken place. She killed her husband, she belongs in jail. No excuses. You are the one implying that Ms. Burkland is mentally ill. no testimony about her incoherent rantings on the internet, no testimony about her mental health..and the sick get sicker. I didn t realize you were so knowledgable about criminal law, as well as mental health. If it s true that all you know about the case is what has been posted in the newspaper, and there has been no public announcement that she was mentally ill, then how can you imply that she is mentally ill. What are your credentials Allison? Agreed, there is a difference between a Public defender and a Criminal Defense Attorney. One the taxpayers pay for, and one the defendant (or in this case- family members) pay for. Both have the same legal training. Perhaps Ms. Burkland should have saved her money before she decided to shoot him. You feel I m dogging you? Why? I m simply trying to have a reasonable discussion with you. That s all. I d love to hear why you believe what you do. So far you ve done nothing to back up your claims with anything but feelings and opinions. May 21 at 8:39pm Like. Allison Lowry Morelli- I read what Dorleen Burklund posted on the internet. Her husband met with members of the support group the week before the murder. He must have believed she was mentally ill right? why did he pick a BPD group I wonder, if she was just evil, why not just join a group for people going through a difficult divorce? I read some posts by friends and neighbors of hers who said things like it s such a shame, she needed help for a long time. Her son is supporting her and she shot his FATHER. The public defender didn t call any of those people to testify. Nothing was reported about any of that during the trial, so deductive reasoning tells me it wasn t brought up. You can bet your ass a criminal defense attorney would have called her mental health into question. you didn t just happen upon this story why don t you go back and read your comments on the examiner.com and then tell me again we re just drawn to the same type of stories? I m done here. You ll never comprehend why I feel the way I do about this case and I m not capable of being as nasty and judgemental as you, so I ll never see it your way. Have a nice night. May 21 at 9:22pm Like. Karen Baker- Allison, how have I been nasty and judgmental? Have I called you names? A liar? I ve simply disagreed with you and asked you to back up what you are saying with facts. That s all. You call my knowledge about criminal defense and mental health in to question, yet you are willing to make a diagnosis based on some things that Dorleen Burklund posted on the internet. What difference does it make what support group Mr. Burklund met with? He probably picked one related to BPD because he believed his wife exhibited symptoms of the disorder. Yes, many people do believe that people that suffer from BPD are just evil as you say. They can be very trying individuals to reason with. He probably didn t join a support group for people going through a difficult divorce because divorcing a person with BPD is far different than divorcing a difficult person. A difficult person will eventually be able to come to a somewhat satisfactory agreement with their former spouse and be able to move on. Not so when you are divorcing a person with BPD. They will litigate for years and years simply to feed their need for conflict. They just don t know how to drop things, will continue to attack, make false accusations, spread lies and rumors, project their own feelings on to others, alienate their own children against the CCFC Master Exhs. P1108

141 other parent, and be offended when their self-entitled needs and wants are not met by the other party. It is likely that the neighbors did say things like, it s such a shame, she needed help for a long time. BPD is quite recognizable if a person is familiar with the symptoms. If Ms. Burklund did indeed have BPD, it is unlikely that she was able to recognize the disorder in herself. That is one of the symptoms. Denial that their thinking may be in any way skewed is another. BPD s are notorious for pitting one family member against the other, and accepting no hint of loyalty to the enemy. They also attack unjustifiably when they are questioned. Ms. Burkland s son could very well be a victim of his mother s successful alienation attempts. Often a child of an individual will believe the lies and fabrications about the alienated parent, or they will simply agree with them because it makes their own life easier. Individuals suffering from BPD also tend to walk away from a reasonable conversation when they know they are losing it, and project their own feelings on to others. I imagine that it was best to leave Ms. Burklund s mental health out of the trial. It is hard to feel sympathetic to a person who makes excuses for their behavior, especially when they are nasty and judgmental. Ms. Burklund judged her husband unworthy of living, and disposed of him like a nasty little problem. Her mental health (healthy or not) would not give her reason, or excuse for murder. Plain and simple. I do not recall ever posting anything on the examiner.com. It s possible, but I find it unlikely because it requires a person to log in to post, and that is not something I typically do. If you could find the post and point it out to me, I would be happy to own up to it if it is mine. (Note- I have owned up to the Examiner post, with my explination above.) I believe I can comprehend why you feel the way you do. I am an intelligent person. At this point, basically the only reason you are giving me for your feelings is because you say so. Your opinions are solely based on emotions and feelings and have little factual information to back it up. May 21 at 10:22pm Like 1. Allison Lowry Morelli- The bottom line is this: She was convicted and is going to spend the rest of her life in prison. If you re comfortable with that, super that s good for you. I m not comfortable with it for all the reasons I ve stated over the past week and I m not going to post a long diatribe with you because there isn t a thing I can do about this woman s situation. I can t help her, I can t change what happened. I already stated why I posted what I posted on the other article. Another thing, I have little respect for people who post under fake identities. May 22 at 7:19am Like #62 Comment By Clara On July 19, 2:00 am [48] No, I am not Allison, and my IP address was never connected to her. I am grateful that she has continued to win in court, Karen. #63 Comment By Karen Baker On July 19, 10:25 pm [50] Okay, Clara- So you aren t Allison, but you are a supporter of her, and have been for quite sometime. How is it that you were so sure that I was Misty? I d would really sincerely like to know. I posted nothing that wasn t public knowledge. Allison as much as admitted that my post on the examiner was accurate. The accuracy of my Examiner post is also backed up by the transcripts listed on the Savethepsychoexwife.com site as well. Copy and past this link. You will find it there in black and white. [3] CCFC Master Exhs. P1109

142 It seems that, in my experience, you only come out when Allison is also posting as Bob or Liz. (Anon typically appears as well.) You must have some close connection to her, as you have posted on the PEW blog defending her since the initial outing. It s rather bizarre that you appear and disappear just as quickly as she does. I could very well be wrong, but this appears to me to be a parting shot to try and recover from the damning train wreck that occured above. Allison s FB page disappears after there were attempts to disguise it under an new name- Allison Doe. Now at about the exact same time, Clara comes back out of the wood work to get one last shot in about how Allison is winning- two days after oral arguments for the appeal took place. The coincidences are simply amazing. I suppose in the end none of my suspicions really matter. You say you are not Allison, I will have to assume that you are telling you the truth. I have no real evidence otherwise. Clara could you do me a favor? Let Allison know that it really isn t winning if the children are hurting. Period. There is NO win in this situation. I am sure that there will be arguement that the children are happy as clams and have never been more content in their lives than they are right now. I m not buying it. Any child denied access to the other parent based on the wishes of the other is being hurt. No doubt. They might not show it now, but it will come out later. Hopefully you will also be around to support her when the kids figure out the truth. #64 Comment By Ann On September 5, 1:44 am I found the Psyho Ex-Wife when I remarried a man who also had an ex-wife. His ex-wife was just like Ms. Morelli. For years we have combated her false allegations, threats and lies. I have had to send proof to her family that my husband did in fact pay child support because it was a long standing lie that she spread. Then I had to the parenting plan to prove she was lying about us refusing to allow her to see or talk to the kids when in fact the choice has always been hers. I can tell you once that was done she changed her ways. She stopped saying those lies, and even attempted to be involved in the kids lives. I imagine that is hard to keep up the lies in your head. Maybe it was a release actually for her. I don t know only time will tell. #65 Comment By Lauren On November 7, 5:00 am [40] If this is really Allison Morelli, can you please contact me by . I am a Mother that is currently being bashed and bullied on Savethepsychoexwife.com FORUMS! I had someone from the w ebsite send me a message today telling me to shut my mouth or her law yer w ould chew me up and spit me out!! AND I have NO clue who the woman is! They know my kids names, they know where I live and I am concerned with my privacy and safety. #66 Comment By Not Paige On November 7, 7:53 pm [51] Umm if you want to speak to Allison, it might be helpful if you leave your contact information. Another bulb shines so bright #67 Comment By Tiffany Traylor On November 16, 11:54 pm [52] Bravo. I thought I was the only one to remember the Bob and Liz comments on PEW. That alw ays seemed so funny to me. Sometimes I make up people to love me, also. I made up five of them the other day but they all called me crazy and ran away so I sued them and made up two CCFC Master Exhs. P1110

143 more. Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] The Psycho Ex Wife: [2] Father Shall Take Down That Web Site and Shall Never on Any Public Media Make Any Reference to Mother At All, : [3] alleged June 6, 2011 transcript: [4] second alleged transcript of a June 14, 2011 hearing: Hearing-Transcript-Redacted.pdf [5] Judge Diane E. Gibbons Opinion: [6] They could use your help if you have a few dollars to spare.: [7] written testimonials: [8] The Sociopath Next Door: ie=utf8&tag=angiemedia- 20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN= [9] Cole Stuart is a father and activist attorney apparently targeted by the abusive family law courts of San Diego, California, for founding the California Coalition for Families and Children and protesting against family court abuse.: [10] The economic cost of the abuse committed by sociopaths and aided by courts is possibly in the tens or hundreds of billions every year in the US alone.: [11] perjurers include government employees as evidenced by grand jury investigations of CPS: [12] a site archive: [13] The authors point out that the PEW site wasn t started to harass the real person behind the PEW character.: [14] Shutting Down ThePsychoExWife.Com: [15] discovered internet porn: [16] judicial abuse against children: [17] judicial misconduct and felony crime is rampant: [18] Ben Vonderheide s crusade against child abuse for profit in Pennsylvania: [19] custody coaching services: [20] disclaimer: [21] Wise Old Sayings Redefined for a Psycho Ex-Wife or Psycho Ex-Husband: [22] Cal. files Coalition many for Families false police and Children reports v. San so Diego she County (or he) Bar Ass'n can pass them out like candy CCFC to prove Master Exhs. the P1111 lies

144 are true to the unsuspecting fools: [23] Sociopaths hate to be exposed publicly.: [24] Dr. Tara Palmatier explains about the PEW case: [25] Dad Ordered To Remove Psycho Ex-Wife Blog. But What About His Tattletale Ex-Wife?: [26] Divorced dad s blog becomes free-speech test: [27] Anthony Morelli Appeals Against Censorship: [28] Judge Orders Ex Husband To Shut Down The Psycho Ex Wife Blog: [29] Judge Orders Father to Take Down Website Critical of Judge, Mother: [30] Bucks County Judge Diane Gibbons Sued for $1 Billion For Racial & Gender Discrimination of Hispanic/American Man in Child Custody Case: [31] Sociopaths In Our Midst Hate the Truth and Its Advocates: [32] Telling Your Nasty Ex About BPD or NPD May Hurt You: [33] Escaping Sociopathic Abuse Almost Impossible When Children Are Involved: [34] Review of Dr. Warshak s Parental Alienation DVD Welcome Back Pluto : [35] Dr. Amy Baker On Parental Alienation, PAS, and Helping Your Kids Resist Both: [36] : #comment [37] : mailto:info@angiemedia.com [38] : [39] : [40] : #comment [41] : [42] : #comment [43] : #comment [44] : [45] : [46] : [47] : [48] : #comment [49] : [50] : #comment [51] : #comment [52] : #comment Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1112

145 - angiemedia Judge Lorna Alksne in Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter Posted By Chris on January 12, Comments Recommend Send Be the first of your friends to recommend this. Update on March 31, 2010: Eric Moelter has started to speak up a bit about what has happened in the false sexual abuse and child custody abduction case of Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter [1]. He believes Cindy Dumas suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder and has been waging a distortion campaign [2] against him for years. Please see our update in Eric Moelter Speaks Against Cindy Dumas Distortion Campaign [3]. Cindy Dumas 2004 On January 15, 2010, there will be yet another hearing in the long-running and highly destructive San Diego family law case of Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter that started in In this case, Dumas has alleged for years that Moelter sexually abused their children. The children corroborated some of these claims, but were viewed as potentially repeating misinformation and opinions programmed into them by their mother. Despite investigations that don t agree with Dumas, she would not change her opinion or reach some resolution that would allow the children safe contact with both of their parents. This article lays out many of the reported facts and statements and observable events and artifacts such as flyers and websites. Later I ll be writing about my interpretation of the case and some of the problems with the manner in which the courts and law enforcement are handling this case and others like it. Background on the Dumas v. Moelter Case Although complete court records from the State of Hawaii are not readily available online, it appears the Moelter and Dumas family resided in Hawaii in the 1990 s and were divorced in the early 2000 s. Despite the resolution of the divorce in Hawaii, the child custody battle ended up in the San Diego County court system. Mother Cindy Jean Dumas filed a court action against her exhusband Eric Moelter in San Diego Superior Court case D [4] on March 27, 2003, shortly after she filed for a DV TRO against him on March 5, 2003 [5]. Starting about the same time, she made claims that he physically and sexually abused their youngest son Damon. At the time, he was 6 and his two older brothers were 9 and 10. (Note: Normally we would avoid mentioning identifiable information on a minor child, but Damon s name has been circulated extensively throughout the media by his father due to the child abduction and by his mother due to her public campaign to vilify Eric Moelter and alienate the children from him.) Dumas has organized a significant number of San Diego residents and national organizations to protest what she sees as injustice against her and her sons because the police, CPS, and courts refuse to find that there was ever any abuse and because she has persisted in making accusations despite a continuing lack of evidence, the courts have found that she has disrupted the relationships between the sons and their father. Essentially, the experts and courts have come to the conclusion that Cindy Dumas is a parental alienator. Dumas wouldn t accept any of this. She abducted their children around November 5, An arrest warrant for her was issued on January 11, 2005 [6]. She hid from the law for three years in New York, Florida, and Colorado. She eventually reappeared with the children after negotiating that she would not be charged and prosecuted for child abduction and would cooperate with the family law court. CCFC Master Exhs. P1113

146 Dumas Went to War, Still Fighting Since returning to San Diego, Dumas has become increasingly vocal in her opposition to the courts and intent on gathering allies to her side. She and her allies have been staging protests at the San Diego Superior Court Family Law Division on Sixth Avenue during Part of their protests is picketing. Another part is passing out flyers. Much of their ire is directed at San Diego Superior Court Judge Lorna Alksne, the Presiding Judge for Family Law who is the judicial officer handling the case after the original judge, Judge Michael Smyth [7], moved to the criminal courts. Below is a video of one of these protests in the summer of KUSI Video Story on Dumas Protests at San Diego Court Below is the text of one flyer they were passing out in December You can also examine a scanned PDF of the flyer [8]. To: Judge Lorna Alksne McKellar PETITION Cc: California Commission on Judicial Performance, Chief Justice George, Governor Schwarzengegger, Attorney General Jerry Brown, D.A. Bonnie Dumanis, Speaker Karen Bass, Assemblyman Nathan Fletcher, Assemblywoman Fiona Ma, Senator Dennis Hollingsworth, Senator Ellen Corbett, Supervisor Diane Jacobs, Mayor Jerry Sanders Don t ignore Damon s courageous reports of abuse any longer!! Thousands of people from all over California and the U.S. are supporting his right to be protected after reading about his story at SavingDamon.com and StopFamilyViolence.org. Damon in 13 years old and has been bravely reporting years of physical, sexual and emotional abuse by his father, despite his father s threats to kill him and his mother if he told anyone about the abuse. Damon has said that he will run away or kill himself if he is forced to live with his father. You must not take a chance with his life. Family Code 3118 states you must do a full investigation of the abuse before forcing him to go back with his father. Family Code states you cannot take custody away from parents who are trying to protect their children from abuse. These laws were enacted because so many judges have not protected children and have punished protective parents with loss of custody when they tried to protect their children. Please protect Demon and allow him to return to his protective, loving mother. CCFC Master Exhs. P1114

147 Your most important job is to protect children and families! GO TO SAVINGDAMON.COM [9] TO SIGN THIS PETITION COURT ORDERED ABUSE Approximately 58,000 children a year are placed in this custody of convicted abusers! Millions of children report abuse but are forced with live with their abusers. Children rarely report abuse falsely, but family court judges, minors counsels and psychologists disregard their cries for help and re-victimize them. The vast majority of parents (usually mothers) who try to protect their children in family court are placed on supervised visits and lose custody to the abuser. Unscientific forms of mother blame such as alienation, unfriendly parent, coaching, danger to the children, etc. are used to take custody away. Expensive attorneys and psychologists are appointed to reunify children with abusers using threats, fear, maternal deprivation, lies, deprogramming, coercion, and isolation prisoner-of-war tactics. Children and their mothers are tormented by being deprived of each other in order to silence them about the abuse. Instead of protecting children, family courts bankrupt parents and deprived them of their Constitutional right to parent and protect their children. WORST OF ALL: the children are hurt and damaged by continuing abuse and loss of their mother; and the perpetrators are allowed around YOUR CHILDREN. Demand FAMILY COURT protect children!! SavingDamon.com Research: LeadershipCouncil.org; ProtectiveParents.com, SavingDamon.com, StopFamilyViolence.org, mothers-of-lost-children.com Facebook: Protective Mothers Alliance To report negligent/corrupt officials: Distinctioninfamilycourts.com Books: From Madness to Munity, Why Mothers are Running from Family Courts and What Can Be Done About It, by Neustein and Lesher Court Licensed Abuse, by S. Carolyn Taylor A Mother s Nightmare, by John Meyers Mothers on Trial, by Phyllis Chesler Dumas Web Campaign Dumas has spread her campaign into cyberspace. She has the Saving Damon [10] website running to publicize the case. She also has a Facebook page [11], a MySpace page [12], and others. Some appear to be published by her, others by organizations affiliated with her. Dumas has convinced some of her friends to publicize the case and her criticisms of the San Diego courts and Lorna Alksne. For instance, one of her apparent friends identifying herself as Elizabeth Donaldson claims to have published the following blog post in 2009: (from It s my heart they re burning [13] ) For all their words about looking out for the best interests of the child, reunifying family members, etc., California Family Court is not really Family Court. It s a slave auction. Consider: most children are placed in the custody of the parent who has/pays/donates the most money. Any attempts to uncover the ugly truth are CCFC Master Exhs. P1115

148 rapidly smothered. The children in question are traumatized for years (if not the rest of their life), and little/no real effort is made to help them heal from it. They are bartered and used in threats like they are no more than cheap trinkets. And, in the case of my friend s children, siblings are placed in separate homes with no foreseeable reunification until they are out of the system, i.e. when they reach the age of majority. Yes, you read that right. Today, Judge Lorna Alksne of San Diego Family Court placed my friend s two oldest boys (17 and 15) in the custody of their father, Eric Moelter, the man who repeatedly sexually abused the youngest boy (13 years of age), who is still in the custody of Moelter s friend s family. Having full physical and legal custody of the two oldest, Eric Moelter could easily hold visits with the youngest over their heads, should the boys choose to resist. But one of, if not the, truly heartbreaking things about this is that recently, the youngest boy told the custody evaluator Dr. Breffni Barrett that he was afraid to be alone, and hated being without his brothers. And so, they have decided to continue waging war on a child, for daring to tell the truth. It s been a while since I ve felt so powerless, and hated every moment of it. If you remember nothing else from this post, remember this: Judge Lorna Alksne, Dr. Breffni Barrett, and Eric Moelter are part of the evil that fuels California s injustice system. Remember those names. Tell everyone. These vampires operate best in secrecy; exposing them to the world will weaken them like sunlight does others of their kind. UPDATE: March 30, 2011: To the best of my knowledge of this case, there are a number of very strong reasons to doubt many of the claims of Cindy Dumas. For one, her pattern of behavior viciously attacking Moelter for years despite major holes in her stories looks an awful lot like the actions of a person suffering from a personality disorder. Despite this, or some may say because of the intensity associated with such behaviors, she is clearly able to motivate many people to help her viciously attack Eric Moelter. While many of Donaldson s comments above about the San Diego family court system have significant cause, her allegations that Eric Moelter repeatedly sexually abused Damon is likely grounds for a defamation lawsuit against her. She is now complaining about the attributed quotation of her writing above despite it falling under the fair use doctrine. Perhaps she realizes that she has defamed Eric Moelter and does not have the honesty to admit it? Moelter Appears Quiet Publicly There are signs that Eric Moelter may have tried to both find the kids after Dumas abducted them and to counteract their mother s public attacks on him by using the Internet. The remnants of a mostly defunct website at [14] still show content tags for related keywords in the HTML source code, but the page appears as almost blank with virtually every link to a file or image broken. Aside from this, there s nothing obvious on the web that appears to be coming from Moelter. It seems he s not interested in slugging it out in public, or has realized that all it accomplishes is to further aggravate Cindy Dumas into further hostilities. Lorna Alksne Delayed Hearings Yet Again Judge Lorna Alksne [15] has been delaying hearings in this case as she s done in many others she is handling (see Unjust Delays in San Diego Family Law Courts [16] ). It appears Alksne lacks the commitment, resources, and/or judicial expertise to ensure reasonably speedy justice, especially in cases like this one. While for many types of court cases it may not particularly matter if resolution is achieved in CCFC Master Exhs. P1116

149 one year or two, in child custody cases the time delay is a serious problem. Years of childhood can race by while corrupt and inept courts fail to do their jobs. Children can miss out on having one or both parents, grandparents, and other relatives in their lives because of abusively slow courts. The Dumas case is near the end of its seventh year in court. While Cindy Dumas is partially at fault for that herself because she ran away with the children for three years, the courts do bear substantial blame for delays like these. They are happening not just in this case but also in cases in which litigants haven t run away with the children and there is no excuse for the years of delay in resolving child custody questions. It appears the latest hearing now rescheduled for Friday, January 15, 2010 will finally move forward according to the San Diego Superior Courts [17] calendar on their website on January 11, 2010: Dept. F5: Judge LORNA ALKSNE 1555 Sixth Avenue, San Diego 09:00AM D OSC DUMAS, CINDY. vs MOELTER, ERIC DUMAS, CINDY. (P) PRO PER MOELTER, ERIC (D) HENRICH, WILLIAM M. MINORS, COUNSEL (D) PLAVNICK, GARY S. MINORS, COUNSEL (D) SMITH, TIMOTHY N. MINORS, COUNSEL (D) SCHULMAN, DAVID S. Further Reading Custom Search Search Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed [18] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse [19] Eric Moelter Speaks Against Cindy Dumas Distortion Campaign [3] Jason Fontaine Speaks Up About Child Custody Murders [20] Killer Bonnie Hoult Made False Abuse Allegations Against Ex [21] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [22] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [23] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals [24] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [25] RateTheCourts.com: Judge Lorna Alksne [26] Child Trafficking: San Diego Family Law Courts [27] Family Law Courts Injustice: San Diego [28] 7 Comments To "Judge Lorna Alksne in Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter" CCFC Master Exhs. P1117

150 #1 Comment By Carol On January 26, 8:15 pm I hope you don t consider Ms. Dumas flyer and website content facts. Many of your statements are misguided at best and outright incorrect at worse (see below). How can you comment on a case and make judgments about a Court system for w hich you only have the assertions of a mentally ill woman? San Diego County, California, mother Cindy Jean Dumas filed for divorce against her exhusband Eric Moelter in San Diego Superior Court case D on March 27, 2003, shortly after she filed for a DV TRO against him on March 5, : Mr. Moelter sued for divorce in mid 2001 in the state of Hawaii well before there were any allegations of abuse by Ms. Dumas. The divorce was finalized in mid 2002 well before she filed the DV TRO. Check out these articles on this very website that speak about parental alienation that sometimes occurs during high-conflict divorces including false allegations of child abuse against fathers by mothers: [29] and [30] Dumas has alleged for years that Moelter sexually abused their children. The children corroborated some of these claims : Ms. Dumas has only ever officially alleged that Mr. Moelter sexually abused the youngest. This is Ms. Dumas method of expanding her claims to evoke outrage in her audience. Furthermore, the boys, including the youngest, only corroborated the official allegation after spending 3-1/2 years sequestered with their mother with almost no contact with the outside world. Statements from the boys before they were abducted documented in minors counsel report of 2005 reveal a loving and trusted relationship with their father. Damon s name has been circulated extensively throughout the media by his father due to the child abduction : The only media involved was the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children a common forum for parents to try to find their missing children, many of whom have been kidnapped by the other parent; and a website the father kept to let the boys know they were missed by family and friends and that he loved them and hoped they would be home soon. Mr. Moelter took down the site at the request of the judge who also wanted Ms. Dumas to take down savingdamon in order to protect the children from unwanted publicity. Ms. Dumas has continued to ignore that request. Mr. Moelter NEVER went to the media. He has been very sensitive to the privacy of his sons and the potential damage of having their awkward and difficult situation exposed to their friends and classmates. It has been Ms. Dumas who has used the media in her ongoing attempts to bring public scrutiny to this case that wildly misrepresent the truth. This is just one example of how Ms. Dumas does not have her sons best interest in mind. Essentially, the experts and courts have come to the conclusion that Cindy Dumas is a parental alienator. : This is correct. This was the conclusion the first time around in 2005 and this round. Read minors counsel report of You ll see the progression of alienation of the boys against their father over a period of just a few months. Can you imagine what happened after 3-1/2 years of total isolation of the boys with Ms. Dumas? During that period the boys had virtually no contact with the outside world isolated from their family, friends, school, a normal life, and were subjected to the constant insistence by Ms. Dumas that the molest happened and that their father is a monster who wants to kill them. Judge Lorna Alksne has been delaying hearings in this case.. : This proves that you are only getting your information from Ms. Dumas. There have been over 30 hearings on this case since Feb The boys have each been represented by their own attorney. There have been four psychologists who have evaluated the boys and provided ongoing therapy. Vast resources have been brought to bear on this case by Judge Alksne to ensure that it has been fully vetted and that the boys were represented and heard. Ms. Dumas doesn t like the findings of Judge Alksne s Court or Judge Smyth s which were tellingly identical. time delay is a serious problem On the contrary, the time has been necessary and good for the boys. Per the above the judge was very thorough and careful about fully vetting the case. The boys have had time to recover from the years of psychological abuse from their mother and have had time to come to know and love their father again that he is not the monster that Ms. Dumas had created CCFC Master Exhs. P1118

151 him to be in their minds. They now have normal lives again going to school, spending time with family and friends, playing sports, etc. Sometimes children do need to be separated from their abusive parent; and sometimes that parent is their mother. #2 Comment By Chris On January 30, 12:56 am Carol, Thank you for pointing out what you believe are some areas in need of factual correction. I don t take everything propounded by Cindy Dumas as factual. I m planning to write more about this story as I have time. From an outsider s point of view, it is very clear this is a story about which it is quite difficult to know what the truth is but which feature severe claims that seem consistent with the pattern of manipulation by parental alienators and mentally ill people with personality disorders. However, the general public generally tends to believe the allegations because they are easily snowed by people who make false allegations and lack an understanding of child abuse, personality disorders, and illegal tactics frequently used in child custody battles. I aimed to first paint a picture, then planned to go back and show how that picture may not be what it seems from a couple of different angles. Unfortunately, time to write about it isn t unlimited so I haven t gotten to posting more on the story yet. Alksne has sealed records in court cases in the past. It would surprise me if much of anything in this case which would be useful to understanding it would be accessible to the public via the court record given the claims made by Cindy Dumas and the government agencies and experts which have been involved. At a minimum, psychological evaluations, CPS and police records, and other files involved in these types of cases tend to be held in confidential portions of the court files and the entire file may be sealed. If the entire case is sealed, then there is very little opportunity for anybody to independently verify anything from documents submitted to the courts. What you point out about the divorce being filed in Hawaii isn t reflected in any way in the California court records that are accessible online. Those records make it appear that Cindy Dumas filed a court case in California after making allegations of child sexual abuse. I did make a mistake in reporting the case she filed was a divorce as that would have been shown differently in the court records. I have corrected that in the text of the article. The court records in Hawaii available online are incomplete. I did find a case 2SP regarding what appears to be a special guardianship matter involving Eric Moelter and Cindy Dumas in Thus there is clearly basis to believe that they were in Hawaii at one point. Nothing shows up in terms of a divorce case via their court system s public database, however I don t discount what you are stating. It is more a reflection of the inadequate job the government does in making records available. I stand by the statements regarding Lorna Alksne delaying court cases. That she s delayed hearings in this case appears to be factually accurate based upon the court s own calendar. However, in this case these delays may not have seriously impacted the matter, especially compared to the years of delays she and other San Diego judges have allowed, encouraged, or caused in other cases. They have delayed hearings and trials in other cases for multiple years, sometimes leaving children deprived of one or both parents for nearly their entire lives. These delays have caused very serious adverse impacts on the people involved. The courts have an obligation to ensure that they provide a reasonably speedy resolution to litigation and to ensure that children have significant time with both of their parents without a compelling case that shows the children are at immediate risk with one or both parents. But the courts have failed to do that far too often. The San Diego courts contribute to parental alienation and child abuse. These judges should wake up and realize that they are accomplices in parental alienation, child abuse, and criminal actions in many cases and they and their incompetent and corrupt system are contributing to severe damage to many people who have done nothing to warrant such abusive and even illegal mistreatment. CCFC Master Exhs. P1119

152 I hope when the sons are older, they may consider working with people like Dr. Amy Baker and others who are working to further the public s understanding of parental alienation, false child abuse allegations, and how the courts fail to address these problems competently. Even if they eventually get it right, the number of years it takes for them to do so usually results in severe damage to the children and the parents, damage that should never have occurred were it not for incompetent judges operating in a perjury-safe environment which encourages lies, manipulations, distortions, and devastating damage to everybody in the family while the lawyers and courts enrich themselves at expense of the parties, children, and public. Thanks again for your input. Chris #3 Pingback By US Warns Japan Over Shielding Parental Child Abductors angiemedia On February 3, 3:05 am [...] Judge Lorna Alksne in Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter [...] #4 Comment By Carol On March 1, 3:35 pm Don t you realize that by publicizing her petition and website you give credence to her campaign? Do you think people will scroll to the comments to read the truth of the matter? No, they will be outraged by her claims and assume that the father is guilty, link to her website and sign the peition. You are just aiding and abetting her vilification campaign. I also disagree that Alknse purposefully delays cases. In my observations she has to work with all parties to find a time when everyone is availble and allow sufficient time for courtordered psychological reviews to be completed, reports to be written, etc. Ms. Dumas has been responsible for many of the delays in insisting on additional evaluations (none of which have been in her favor), filing motion after motion, etc. To Alkne s credit she has involved a large number of resources to ensure that this case has been properly vetted (3 attorneys to represent the minors, 3 psychologists to do evaluations, 1 therapist to support the boys, etc.). #5 Pingback By Eric Moelter Speaks Against Cindy Dumas Distortion Campaign angiemedia On April 13, 3:03 pm [...] up a bit about what has happened in the false sexual abuse and child custody abduction case of Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter now that all three boys are living with him once again. He believes their mother Cindy Dumas [...] #6 Pingback By CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010 angiemedia On April 13, 5:18 pm [...] law system. A judge can appoint a minor s counsel attorney (or even one per child as in the Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter case which has employed three minor s counsel attorneys, one for each child, for years) and a [...] #7 Pingback By Why Damon Moelter Is Being Abused angiemedia On August 10, 6:44 am CCFC Master Exhs. P1120

153 [...] Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert JusticeParental Alienation Can Happen to Adults and In MarriagesJudge Lorna Alksne in Cindy Dumas v. Eric MoelterDeadly Divorces: Bonnie Hoult, Bruce Pardo, and Many MoreGender Polarization Impedes Family Law [...] Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter: [2] distortion campaign: [3] Eric Moelter Speaks Against Cindy Dumas Distortion Campaign: p=6584 [4] D477012: casenum=d477012&casesite=sd&applcode=d [5] DV TRO against him on March 5, 2003: casenum=dv014964&casesite=sd&applcode=d [6] arrest warrant for her was issued on January 11, 2005: casenum=cd188068&casesite=sd&applcode=r [7] Judge Michael Smyth: [8] scanned PDF of the flyer: [9] SAVINGDAMON.COM: [10] Saving Damon : [11] Facebook page: [12] MySpace page: [13] It s my heart they re burning : [14] [15] Judge Lorna Alksne: [16] Unjust Delays in San Diego Family Law Courts: [17] San Diego Superior Courts: [18] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed: [19] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse: [20] Jason Fontaine Speaks Up About Child Custody Murders: p=5601 [21] Killer Bonnie Hoult Made False Abuse Allegations Against Ex: p=5554 [22] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct: p=5277 [23] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts: [24] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals: p=5195 [25] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire: p=5068 [26] RateTheCourts.com: Judge Lorna Alksne: id=965631&which=judge [27] Child Trafficking: San Diego Family Law Courts: [28] Family Law Courts Injustice: San Diego: CCFC Master Exhs. P1121

154 [29] : [30] : Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1122

155 - angiemedia Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse Posted By Chris on April 22, Comments Recommend Send One person recommends this. Be the first of your friends. Protecting citizens from crime is a good goal. Technology has contributed many new tools to the effort such as burglar alarms, car security systems, and cell phones. But some technological tools have vast potential for abuse. GPS monitoring devices being used for family law and civil restraining orders are one such application fraught with serious abuse potential. GPS Monitoring Raises Risks of Convincing But False Accusations The potential for false accusations and harassment is aggravated dangerously if GPS tracking devices are used in family law and civil restraining order cases in which there has not been any conviction in a criminal court. That s exactly the common case for many people falsely accused of domestic violence who have temporary retraining orders (TROs) slapped on them with no evidence, no chance to contest the false allegations, and no due process. This is business as usual for abusive judges like Lorna Alksne and Lisa Schall of the San Diego Superior Court as well as other similarly abusive judges across the United States. They issue such orders routinely without even a shred of evidence and no chance for a defense until much later. TROs A Weapon For Corrupt Judges To Abuse Critics Schall and Alksne apparently go even further by using TROs as a tool to persecute their political opponents by creating opportunities for false arrest and false prosecution. The recent alleged actions by Schall and Alksne to harass and intimidate Cole Stuart and family law protesters who are members of the California Coalition for Families and Children are a prime example of this form of judicial treachery that if true may warrant the removal from office and prosecution of Schall and Alksne for judicial abuses and civil rights violations. Alksne Wants More Tools to Abuse Litigants and Critics Alarmingly, Alksne is now investigating the usage of GPS tracking monitors for people slapped with restraining orders. CCFC Master Exhs. P1123

156 Judge Lorna Alksne Looks for New Tools to Abuse Parents for Profit Based upon this video, it appears that Bonnie Russell, a person who should very well know just how abusive the family law courts are given her Family Law Courts [1] website, is actually advocating for these GPS tracking devices. This is disturbing and raises some questions about Russell s true intentions and full knowledge of the family court crisis. While I have spent some time reading her site and think she s far more honest and rationale than many of the extremists out there who proclaim that parental alienation isn t real, all men are bad, and women are always victims, it may be that she hasn t fully considered the problem of false allegations as to how they affect domestic violence restraining orders and family court conflicts. Anybody who has seriously examined the problems in family law courts knows that one of the prime categories of trouble-making litigants is the personality disordered abusive parent who makes false allegations of domestic violence and child abuse with devastating effects. The damage done to the targets of such abuse is astronomical even when the accusations are later shown conclusively false when the courts months or years later get around to allowing the falsely accused parent to defend himself or herself against the lies. Some parents simply can t mount a defense because they can t afford an attorney and don t know how to defend themselves on their own and end up persecuted by a falsely obtained permanent restraining order that can last for many years. TROs are a frequently used weapon of abusers in family law cases. There was no violence, but lying that there was is so easy to do that an abuser intent on harming a victim parent can and will resort to such false accusations. Adding GPS monitoring to the mix creates the potential for even more damaging false accusations as I ll explain in detail below. Also consider the reports of death threats and heightened security around Alksne due to the growing number of people in San Diego who are fed up with the abuses she and other family law judges are committing. Perhaps Alksne would like to be using these tools (at taxpayer expense, of course) for her own family and have TROs and GPS tracking devices slapped on all of her political opponents, critics, and litigants she abuses because they could help her harm these people and their families for her own profit and that of her friends even more than she already has. TROs Are Often A Dirty Weapon Of Liars There is substantial danger to innocent people from these devices, even if you don t have a CCFC Master Exhs. P1124

157 civil rights abuser like Alksne as your judge. Many of the people slapped with TROs are falsely accused as a stunt to help gain sole custody in a divorce or child custody dispute. Some estimates are that the vast majority of TROs are issued for precisely such abusive purposes. Attorneys widely recognize that likely more than half of TROs are not warranted but are simply dirty legal tactics by people who are willing to perjure themselves to harm their ex-spouse, particularly when it seldom triggers any penalties even when their lies are discovered. That s because if the lies work, they substantially bolster their chances of sole custody of the children and large child support and spousal support payments. Misused GPS Monitoring Can Result in More False Accusations GPS tracking monitors can be used by the false accusers to create a wrongful record of restraining order violations to assist in the persecution of their targets. All it takes is the false accuser knowing something about their target of abuse s typical patterns of movement in the community. As many false accusers are former spouses or were in a long-term relationships, they know precisely where their targets shop, pick up mail, work, get the kids from school, and other typical activities. With the new toys that Alksne is seen salivating over in the above video, they can easily frame their targets for violating a restraining order when their targets did not even know they were in proximity to the false accuser. That s because these devices alert the user when the supposed threat (or target, in the view of a false accuser) is within range and update their displays to indicate the changing distance. It doesn t take much effort to close the distance to set up the target for false claim of a restraining order violation. A false accuser can simply lie in wait of the target near a school, grocery store, shopping center, or other frequently visited location after they have entered, or better yet inside before they enter. Once the GPS tracking monitor the false accuser is carrying alerts her to the presence of her target, she can determine which direction to head to get closer and position herself nearby within the keep away distance (often 100 yards or more). It can be staged to make it look like the target is the one closing the distance to make it even more convincing. Then she can call the police to have the target arrested for violating a restraining order even though the target had no knowledge or intent to do so and was completely unaware the false accuser was in the area. Giving false accusers a weapon, which is what the GPS tracking with notification really is, will cause more false arrests and persecution of innocent people. If you doubt this, consider the story of Ken Newell [2] who has been repeatedly arrested for incidents that his ex-wife causes as well as entirely false allegations. Give a person like her a tool like the GPS tracking with victim notification and you will find they will stalk their abuser in order to frame him or her for restraining order violations. Newell s ex-wife should be prosecuted for filing false police reports and causing false arrests. Instead, the police and prosecutors do nothing about her crimes. The evidence of such violations will be in the tracking system. The typical techno-illiterate judge (as Lorna Alksne is) will eat up this lie joyfully and further persecute the target on behalf of the false accuser. It will be much easier for dirty and abusive judges to wrongfully put permanent restraining orders on targets, strip them of time with their children, and toss them in classes and services from which their corrupt family-abusing friends profit such as batterer s intervention classes, anger management classes, psychological evaluations, and more. It also makes it much easier to issue abusive child custody determinations that can be used to financially victimize the target on top of all the other wrongs. The local child support office will provide the muscle to make the victim pay the abuser. This is great news for judges in these days of unstable government finances because the governments paying their salaries often derive a substantial portion of their revenues from US federal government payments for enforcing such abuses. It may seem ironic that a judge violating a person s rights gains job security from doing it, but this is commonplace. Perjury And Harassment Common When TROs Are Involved If you are not familiar with how family law courts work, you may not understand that it is common practice for malicious parties to perjure, suborn perjury, produce altered evidence, and to distort the meaning of factual evidence all in an effort to get what they want. Many of the factual-seeming types of evidence which naive observers may believe are objective and reliable are in fact neither. If you ve been following the reasoning about how these GPS monitors can be misused, that is one example. Below are a couple more examples featuring other supposedly objective and reliable evidence such as audio recordings and CCFC Master Exhs. P1125

158 photographs. These are realistic examples based upon actual behaviors seen in high-conflict family law cases typical of those involving TROs being used as abusive weapons use by a malicious parent to persecute a good parent to gain child custody and financial advantages. Malicious mom brings in a recording showing her ex-husband is yelling, screaming, and cursing at her. Obviously he is a violent dangerous person. Or is he? It may be very easy to stage such a recording. For instance, mom can ruin the father s property, leave a nasty insulting note, make threats, and then record dad exploding in a verbal rage after he comes home to mom screaming at him for no apparent reason, finds dishes smashed in the kitchen and his childhood trophies (or other property he values) smashed to bits, hears mom repeatedly threatening to leave him and take the kids away so they will never see him again because he s dangerous, and sees the kids are visibly upset and even crying at the destructive behavior of their mother. So he yells at her for being an unreasonable bitch along with a few other insults. She s recording it and will select just the part where he and the kids sound upset and portray him as a violent man who scares his children. Just listen to the kids crying in the background! she emotes to make her lies sound more convincing. If asked why the earlier part of the recording is missing, she ll say there s nothing missing, she just didn t start the recording until he started screaming in a rage after he was drinking. That he didn t have a drink that day doesn t matter as he is assumed guilty and can t prove otherwise. It is all part of the distortions she does to make him sound dangerous and out of control, yet reality is that his response to her aggressive abuse may have even been relatively even-keeled compared to how most people might have responded in the same situation. Destructive dad brings in photographs showing his ex-wife stalking him. She s hiding in bushes and taking pictures of his home. He says she is obsessive about him and is so jealous of his new girlfriend that she has more than once threatened to kill her. She s clearly violating the restraining order on her and should be arrested. In reality, the photos are more or less real, but nothing else is. She isn t obsessed about him or threatened by his new girlfriend and has not threatened to kill her. As for the photos showing stalking, she s standing in public view at a park next to their former home together (before he got a kick-out order on her) taking pictures of the kids and he s hiding in the bushes to manipulate the photo to make it look like she is the one hiding. He s altered the date/time stamps in the photos to make it look like this happened after he got a restraining order on her when it actually occurred two weeks earlier as he was plotting to get rid of her. You can easily interchange the malicious mom and destructive dad scenarios above as abusers come from both genders. Over the years, our writers have personally seen and been told about countless dishonest scenarios like these which were highly effective at causing severe damage to the targets and which almost never result in punishment or sanctions against the abusers. The facts are that family courts rewards liars like these malicious moms and destructive dads time and again. Giving them new tools to harass their victims like GPS monitors will simply mean they adapt to come up with new and inventive ways to distort reality for their own benefit. These people may be mentally ill with a personality disorder, but they are not obviously crazy to many people who know them. Many of them are very intelligent and capable of convincingly lying. They are therefore dangerous precisely because most people do not understand how manipulative they can be and believe their lies and false evidence with little if any hesitation. Lawyers Enable Perjury And Distortions Given how many dirty family law attorneys are willing to help clients frame and persecute exspouses to win cases and rack up big fees, there is a high potential for abuse from these people, too. The client could be dense to the point of being incapable of doing it on his or her own, but the attorney could easily supply the names of a few experts or investigators who could help them commit such a crime convincingly and likely get away with it. Even if this is discovered, the attorney could feign ignorance or blame the client as so many family law attorneys already do when they are caught being manipulative and dishonest. Risk of Judicial Tyranny Greatly Elevated For a judge like Lorna Alksne who appears intent on violating the rights of parents to maximize profits for the courts and her friends, GPS tracking is a terrific new tool. But for a CCFC Master Exhs. P1126

159 judge like Lorna Alksne who is willing to stoop to deceit and civil rights abuses to persecute a critic as she has allegedly done, the danger to innocent citizens is even more severe because many people who have not been through the hellish disaster of the family law courts naively believe that such dirty judges are honest. Even those who many judges are dishonest and abusive may have reasons for helping them perpetuate such abuses against the citizens they target. For instance, law enforcement appreciates it when judges pretends a dishonest cop is telling the truth even when it should be evident there is reason for doubt. Helping a judge abuse a few opponents in return could be seen as scratching each other s backs for such dishonest law enforcement officials. Dirty district attorneys helping their friends who are judges with arrest warrants for their adversaries backed up with false GPS monitoring evidence is another possibility for further abuse. It doesn t take much imagination to see how a truly reprehensible judge could misuse these devices to frame and imprison a serious critic or opponent and readily get away with the crime. For instance, a judge could falsely claim that she received a threat from some litigant in her court or a court of one of the judges she supervises. She and/or that judge could get a TRO on the target litigant requiring 100 yards (or more) keep away distance from them and their family members. These judges have ready access to plentiful information about where the target lives, works, picks up kids from school, and more in the court files, even if they are sealed from public view. It would take little for them to frame the target for a violation, the same way a falsely accusing spouse might do. But in this case, the repercussions for the target could be far worse because the false accuser is a high-and-mighty government official who will demand more justice than even a very effective false accuser spouse could get. Potential for Abuse Too High For law-abiding citizens who are tired of being abused by family law judges and the government, GPS tracking devices with potential for abuse as these ones have are yet another item to add to the growing list of reasons why the United States is a dysfunctional and abusive nation that violates the civil rights of its residents on a daily basis. I m a fan of technology in general, but the potential for abuse of this particular technology is so high as to make its use completely unacceptable for anybody who has not been convicted of a felony violent crime in a criminal court. That family law judges are examining this technology for use in their cases is deeply disturbing and frightening. If such devices are put into use, it will be a very short time before parental alienators and false accusers figure out how to manipulate them to cause even more destruction of children s and good parents lives. The dirty judges and their conspirators will be laughing all the way to the bank as they help them commit even more of these abuses than they already do. When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. Thomas Jefferson Further Reading Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff [3] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader [4] Personality Disordered Abusers in Family Law Courts [5] Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? [6] San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice [7] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [8] Father Imprisoned 20 Years on Fake Child Sex Abuse Charges [9] Many Domestic Violence Temporary Restraining Orders (DV TRO) in the US are Falsely Obtained [10] CCFC Master Exhs. P1127

160 Holding Family Law Judges Accountable [11] Dirty Tactics of Dirty Lawyers [12] BPD Distortion Campaigns [13] 11 Comments To "Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse" #1 Comment By San Diego County Parents On April 25, 6:40 pm Recall Dishonorable Lorna Alksne now! [14] Please sign the petition! #2 Pingback By A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children angiemedia On July 7, 1:03 am [...] to speak will be my esteemed supervisor, Judge Lorna Alksne, who has taught me so much about being a good judge and who is a fine example for all of [...] #3 Pingback By Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed angiemedia On July 8, 7:16 am [...] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse [...] #4 Pingback By San Diego Judge Edward Allard On The Way Out for Misconduct? angiemedia On July 22, 6:07 pm [...] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse [...] #5 Pingback By San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining Orders angiemedia On October 28, 11:35 pm [...] of Best Interests of the Children Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBAJudge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial AbuseSan Diego Lawyer Jeffrey Fritz Increases Conflict and CostsCCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego [...] #6 Comment By Bonnie Russell On December 4, 7:13 pm Those involved with the fear factor should realize two things. 1. Men are secretly having themselves GPS d to combat false allegations; 2. Women are secretly having themselves GPS to combat false allegations surrounding CCFC Master Exhs. P1128

161 drinking; and 3. GPS elminates PERJURY. Duh. #7 Comment By Chris On December 4, 9:37 pm Bonnie, GPS doesn t eliminate perjury if the false victim (i.e., the false accuser) is provided the location of the actual victim and can use it to frame him or her for a restraining order violation. The system you re advocating needs to be implemented to ensure that it cannot be abused by a false accuser. As it has been described so far, it seems to be vulnerable to abuse and may cause even more damage to real victims of false accusers than they are already experiencing. GPS is also not totally reliable. I ve seen consumer grade GPS devices fail to provide accurate location information due to signal impairments or other technical problems. They can easily be tens of meters off in the location they record. This itself can cause false conclusions to be reached. For example, in your GPS to stop false drinking allegations example, it could look like somebody was inside a bar when in fact he or she never went closer than the fast food restaurant 100 feet away. Chris #8 Comment By One of Thousands On December 6, 12:01 pm There s a critical disconnect between Bonnie s comments which are well-taken and Chris s. The question is who makes the choice? If a parent wants to put a GPS device on themselves to combat false accusations they can do that today. Good for them if it helps. I did it and it helped my case. The very different question the article addresses is should courts have the ability to order normal, ordinary, non-criminal citizens to be tracked involuntarily by GPS? In my experience courts particularly divorce courts screw this kind of power up all the time and I m a lawyer. They re worse than congress have a problem, throw a bunch of money and legislation at it and hope it helps. Giving GPS tracking power to idiot family court judges is like giving guns to children. It s a reckless threat to liberty and just another tool for abuse of power. I d respectfully suggest to Bonnie that she market her devices to parents rather than courts. Blessings to all. #9 Comment By MOTHERS FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY On November 1, 3:00 am IF you want the truth, LESS THAN 3% of all the CONTESTED cases in FAMILY LAW COURTS IN THE USA bring allegations of SEX ABUSE! Judges and courts USE THIS AS A WAY TO NOT HAVE TO MAKE TOUGH CHOICES and to AVOID ending a case to prolong the pocketbook. If you go to you will find a pole / study done with the results inside. The fact is what most Americans don t know is how corrupt the system is and what needs to be done. We NEED change in FAMILY LAW COURTS in this country, and it begins with the fact that: 1. Every FAMILY COURT ROOM should be made available on VIDEO TAPE WITH AUDIO for every litigant directly following the hearing for say a $20.00 Fee. I call the bill, ALLAN S LAW Forcing Judicial Accountability Through Video Tape. This also must only be released under sworn affidavit that it will only be used in the court system for places review such as the AOC, or the GRAND JURY, Perhaps even the JUDICIAL COUNCIL, or other court officials for CCFC Master Exhs. P1129

162 REPRIMAND of bias, degrading remarks, defamation, and Prejudice. These Judges are getting away with extortion, ruthless bias, and a number of other things that have NO PLACE in family court! VIDEO TAPE would supply each litigant with a FAIR TRIAL and still not put the reporters out of business because they still would have to transcribe the VIDEO COMMENTS AND POSSIBLE BIAS ACTIONS IN THE COURT. You may sign a bill relating to ( Allan s law Forcing Judicial Accountability through Video Tape) at [15] 2. We want Children to have a VOICE IN COURT AND ALWAYS BE TRUSTED UNDER AGE 10 TO TELL THE TRUTH! Our kids do know LYING IS BAD, and at such a small age to be called a liar, its what is killing these kids! 3. If one litigant has a LAWYER, the other should be appointed one! Thus = EQUALITY! And ALL CONTESTED CASES should be reviewed by a PANEL of REGULAR CITIZENS either annually or semi annually for review of reasonable and fair practice and with the panel being elected electronically online with an up to the min. posting of ballots totals so their will be no electoral voting. And On these Panels should be a minimum of 1Womans rights advocates and 1 fathers rights advocates to keep it fair and ensure both sides of all the proper points to child safety are upheld. You can find a listing of the demands for changes in [16], where Bill Windsor directs the equality factor in family court systems to the congress and house of the USA. thank you #10 Comment By Rob On November 3, 10:40 pm [17] We posted a link to your petition on our Facebook page. A few months ago, I wrote about how [18]. Regarding your comment on kids being labeled as liars in family law cases, the fact is that this happens. Kids often lie to support their abusers because they feel trapped and safer supporting the abuser in the hopes it will reduce the abuse because they can see clearly that they are going to be stuck living much of the time with the abuser and that the nonabuser (the parent against who they most often lie) is likely not to treat them badly in retaliation. Such kids lie against both against fathers and mothers. The target depends upon the dynamics in the family. Teaching a kid to lie to hurt the other parent is by definition emotional child abuse. That doesn t stop bad parents from doing it. The notion that a really severe accusation cannot possibly be a lie because nobody would like about something like sexual abuse, attempted murder, etc. is just not true. Look at what governments and CEOs and others do on an everyday basis. We as a society are fed a constant stream of lies, from the little ones to the big whoppers used to justify killing millions of innocent people and to dupe many people into helping execute such crimes. #11 Comment By Green Peace 415 On May 10, 7:45 am ROB: Your in outer space, check it out, your reality is lacking some true facts. You are comparing children under age 10 even 5 years of age to governments and CEO s., outer space is minimal. Babies are not going to lie for one parent against the other, they know right and wrong, they love both of them, it is false, and besides in less than 3% of all disputed custody cases do sexual allegations rise, this means they maybe should believe what these kids tell. And another thing, it is proven through the US DEPT. Child INFORMATION GATEWAY that many times kids finally disclose abuse following parental separation or divorce due to the new found security they feel by having a 2nd home to run to. It is fact! And if you review interviews from now adult child victims such as the fox interviews and series the news is reporting called Lost in the system from LA, then you will see grown people still at even the CCFC Master Exhs. P1130

163 age of adult hood, still telling about all the abuse suffered as children. Their is not a bit of coaching going on their. get real dude! And I followed that Allan s law link and its gone! But still it was a great idea i must say! Video tape is needed to even the grounds of justice in court, i think they should be also like criminal court to provide a reporter in family law, its unjustified they don t! And don t inform the litigants first prior to hearings they don t have one. this blog is ridiculously bias against women from what i see. Go remove all your narcissistic comments, your a freak! Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] Family Law Courts: [2] Ken Newell: [3] Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff: [4] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader: [5] Personality Disordered Abusers in Family Law Courts: [6] Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?: [7] San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice: [8] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire: [9] Father Imprisoned 20 Years on Fake Child Sex Abuse Charges: [10] Many Domestic Violence Temporary Restraining Orders (DV TRO) in the US are Falsely Obtained: [11] Holding Family Law Judges Accountable: [12] Dirty Tactics of Dirty Lawyers: [13] BPD Distortion Campaigns: [14] : [15] : [16] : [17] : #comment [18] : Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1131

164 - angiemedia Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed Posted By Chris on July 8, Comments Recommend Send 6 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. Recently, we heard from a reliable source that embattled San Diego Judge Lorna Alksne spoke at yet another family law seminar in June She speaks at many of these events to rally her friends and associates in the family law profession to keep the courts humming with the profitable business of financially victimizing and violating the rights of children and families. There was talk both of her being furious over her home being picketed by an increasingly angry public and a job change she is planning. She anticipates being out of the San Diego family law system by the end of Alksne Planning to Bow Out Under Fire Apparently the bad reputation Alksne has earned and the increasing public animosity towards her has finally had some effect on her career plans. She reportedly mentioned that she plans to stay in control over the San Diego family law courts for another year before she moves to another position. There have allegedly been death threats made against her. There is public chatter about law enforcement investigations of the threats on web sites of those upset at Alksne s abusive and biased conduct. Picketing of her courthouse on Sixth Avenue has become routine as more and more parents understand that she aids and abets the ongoing abuse, corruption, and misconduct of family law courts and professionals in the county. Hundreds of parents and concerned community members have signed a petition calling for the recall of Judge Lorna Alksne [1]. Alksne Wastes Taxpayer Funds Alksne s misconduct is not only resulting in the abuse of children and parents, it is also costing San Diego taxpayers plenty. The government has assigned more full-time security personnel to her and has assigned Sheriff s Department staff and as well as agents from other agencies (the FBI has been mentioned) to root out the people responsible for the alleged threats. When Alksne goes out in public, such as to family law seminars, she has a large posse of gun-toting uniformed and plainclothes security officers around her. But even in her own courtroom, in a well-guarded courthouse with security scanners and plentiful armed deputies, she still gets added security as her armed bailiff isn t enough. This is a reflection of how abusive she has been to children and parents alike, worse than even most of the other corrupt judges in the county. Why does a lowly county judge warrant security measures more comprehensive than those for many state officials? Because she is viewed as an abusive tyrant whom parents and their families blame for harming their children. Alksne Supports Judicial Tyranny The public should be asking what this judge who has created such a continuous public uproar is doing on the bench. Alksne has managed to prove to the public that she will whitewash, spin, hide, and obfuscate at every opportunity rather than to admit San Diego families are being harmed unjustly by the family law tyrants in our midst. She considers spincontrol more important than reform and justice. Power first, money second, children well, what San Diego judge would bother to care about them with Alksne setting the example she has? CCFC Master Exhs. P1132

165 As Alksne and her ilk s reign of terror has intensified for years, it s become more evident to the public that judicial tyrants are a far greater danger to the public than even irresponsible politicians. While politicians may mud-sling and vilify each other, they generally don t target average citizens for attack in their own homes and don t directly abuse their children. Family law judges in San Diego and across the United States have amassed far too much power and have zero interest in justice. They avail themselves of opportunities to use their judicial power to silence and crush their own opponents as well as anybody who annoys a friend or associate and later appears in their courtrooms. This is not just a problem in San Diego. We hear of similar abuses elsewhere in California, Illinois, Missouri, Texas, and many other locales. Lies are facts in San Diego s kangaroo courts. The judges know this well as many of them lie and deceive others about ex-parte communications, connections with parties appearing in cases, relationships with attorneys, evidence admitted or suppressed, and more. Even when egregious outcomes are publicly disclosed, their leaders, including Lorna Alksne, have the unbridled arrogance to claim the courts are doing a wonderful job. (from Joyce Murphy s Letter Regarding Judge DeAnn Salcido [2] ) Although most judges might have the grace to blush over revelations of in-yourface incompetence, keep in mind, San Diego, as demonstrated by Supervising Family Court Judge Lorna Alksne, is different than most. In a rare display of a complete lack of credibility of family courts regarding the long over-due arrest of pedophile Bud Parson, (Family court judge DeAnn Salcido first apologized to Parson for having to undergo a CPS investigation, then granted him full custody of his and Joyce Murphy s daughter for six years in spite of Murphy s repeated attempts to protect their daughter), Judge Alksne s cheerleading, Family court judges are doing an excellent job. was beyond the pale. Ultimately, media exposure prompted Parson to plead guilty to six counts of child molesting split between two separate victim. He got off very lightly, sentenced to just six years in prison. The outcomes are often decided once the judge knows who the litigants are, prior to impartial hearing of evidence and testimony. If it looks like another mom making wild allegations, treat her like she s crazy and strip her of all contact with her children rather than putting in safeguards to ensure both risks of abuse and false allegations are minimized. If the litigant is a dad being driven crazy by court order violations, false allegations, and interference with custody, treat him like a violent criminal and proclaim I m a tough on crime judge simply because he lost his temper and used a swear word in an pointing out how his ex is refusing to even let the kids talk with him on the phone despite court orders. If a litigant is a cop or other government employee, like the former husbands of many litigants in these courts, treat them like kings and the other parents like criminals. Judges want to keep law enforcement on their side, after all they need armed officers willing to hunt down, intimidate, arrest, and perhaps even kill the growing numbers of angry parents who have had enough with this system and want their children back. Far too many judges today are responsible for what amounts to terrorism against the citizens, children and parents alike. The public can see that as more and more parents are banned from their children s lives without any just cause, simply at the whim of a corrupt and abusive judge who decides she knows what is best and damn the plentiful evidence to the contrary. We are not talking about parents who are extremists and pariahs like the Randy Weavers and Branch Davidians of the world. While the US Federal Government has wrongly murdered many of those people, the general populace didn t feel so threatened by that because they could see clear us vs. them distinctions even if they didn t approve of government agents shooting children in the back and torching homes. CCFC Master Exhs. P1133

166 But with San Diego family law tyranny, many of these victimized parents are normal people who find themselves in the middle of a nasty marital dispute and suddenly discover that there is no justice in family law courts. That s particularly true for those who have managed to tick off anybody in the political establishment. With so many people on the government payrolls in the county, it is not hard to inadvertently end up on some government troll s bad side. Even if you have not annoyed anybody in the government, you had better hope that your future ex-spouse is not connected with the power-elite nor capable of providing them any substantive favors. That s because it is often evident that a well-connected person, be it some real estate mogul or a news reporter, is going to get preferential treatment in San Diego courts. Could Picketing Judges Homes Force Change? The picketing of Alksne s home may be one of the elements encouraging her to leave her comfy family court abuser position, raising the possibility that picketing the homes of other abusive and corrupt San Diego judges might have similar effects. Considering the number of San Diego judges involved in crimes against children and families, aggrieved parents and their families could probably keep themselves busy for years picketing the abusive judges currently populating the bench in the county. Even gender-oriented court reform groups in the county are starting to set aside their differences to protest the growing court corruption. While malicious moms and dastardly dads may be nominal enemies, corrupt judges are even more of a threat so many of them have come to believe that battle must be delayed for now. It s a bit like the US and the Soviet Union (as played by the gender-oriented parent groups) joining forces to fight Nazi Germany (as played by the San Diego courts). Obviously I d like to share with you some of the details of the picketing of Alksne s home. If a recipe could be found to force a corrupt judge from office, it should be widely published and practiced. The judicial tyranny we have today in San Diego and in many American cities is a dire threat to the future of this nation and the freedom of its citizens. If picking a judge can turn around such a threat, the citizens should be aware of just how to do it. Not being among the protesters and with my usual sources pleading ignorance of the picket, I turned to the Internet, figuring that Google and other search engines might make quick work of locating details. Given the many sites featuring criticisms of Lorna Alksne and other corrupt family law judges, I expected something to turn up. What did I find? Nothing. That a judge has so angered so many people that they picketed her home and she s furious about it and apparently considering a job change seems like it should be making the mainstream news, but it isn t. Media Aligned with Courts to Hide Public s Anger Why isn t the growing crisis of confidence in the abusive family law courts being reported in the local mainstream media? One major reason is that there is an alignment of interests between the mainstream media and the power elite. Follow the power and money and potential threats to each and you ll begin to understand what is happening. Pretend for a moment that you are one of Alksne s ilk, a corrupt San Diego judge. Would you willingly cooperate with the abuse a child by depriving him of a good parent to prevent a potentially damaging story being spread by a TV or radio news reporter who is a nasty abusive parent of that child? Almost any San Diego judge today would pick child abuse as the better option. Kids don t get on the TV or radio to expose corruption and they don t have money to donate to political campaigns, so what corrupt judge would care about children? That s why you see vicious parents who appear to be child abusing parental alienators like TV reporter Lynn Stuart getting away with apparent child abuse and violations of court orders with impunity. Between being a reporter and her ex, Cole Stuart, ticking off Lorna Alksne and other family law judges by organizing aggrieved San Diego parents to push for CCFC Master Exhs. P1134

167 Reporter Lynn Stuart (photo by ZenzenOK) court reform, tyrants like Judge Lisa Schall and Judge Christine Goldsmith have decreed that parental alienation child abuse is acceptable conduct for their young son. Lynn Stuart has reportedly consistently refused to allow her son to see, speak with, or have any contact with his father despite court orders to the contrary. Even after Lynn Stuart s stunt of falsely accusing her ex of alcohol abuse was exposed as such by Judge Joel Wohlfeil after he inflicted four months of alcohol testing on the father only to find not a single bit of evidence to support her apparently malicious false allegations, she reportedly stepped up the abuse by intensifying the interference with contact. Self-serving judges like Lisa Schall and Christine Goldsmith won t dare hold Lynn Stuart in contempt of court because they would rather see a child suffer than to have a bad headline about themselves on the television. In the calculus of power, the interests of a little boy mean nothing to a power-hungry abusive judge, especially when you can quash the story by sealing a case file and have a corrupt boss like Lorna Alksne conspiring with you and your colleagues. The San Diego public cannot trust the mainstream local media to do an accurate or responsible job reporting on court corruption and abuse. While not all local media figures are child abusing parental alienators like Lynn Stuart appears to be, many of them are connected via friends and family to the judges and other power elite figures in the county. They have a vested interest in keeping the corruption and abuse covered up, and if and when the time presents itself, they will be rewarded for doing so. Corruption and Abuse Details Hidden Until Parents Step Forward The public may ask where the details on corruption are. It is frankly hard to get details for all but the most egregious cases of abuse for two main reasons. One is that the judges seal cases and block public access to information. The other is that the judges are effectively engaging in extortion and blackmail against parents. Consider this, if you as a parent are down to seeing your child for only a few hours per week and have been told if you dare mention anything about the case in public that you may be punished (meaning you will not see your child again, perhaps for months or years), do you think you would risk it? Many of the parents who are risking disclosure are so concerned about their children s wellbeing that they are convinced their kids could be physically injured or seriously abused if they do not speak up. But far more parents do not speak up as they may not have such concerns of immediate abuse by the other parent against their children, so they stay quiet, enabling the courts to abuse their families further. The courts continue the extortion and blackmail while they suck their finances into the vast family law system employing thousands of lawyers, psychologists, visitation and exchange monitors, and other court-appointed professionals. These parents know that nobody in the government will help them and that their children are pawns in a big game involving money and power that has nothing to do with the self-serving judicial drivel about the best interests of the children. As the mainstream media mostly stays silent on the abuse, it helps ensure that few parents will step forward and expose the corrupt courts for what they are. Parents see there is nobody there to help them and so they stay quiet out of fear of losing the last bit of contact with their children. As such, tyrants such as Lorna Alksne stay in power, freely abusing and terrorizing thousands of families for the profit and job security of themselves and their friends and associates. Further Reading Custom Search CCFC Master Exhs. P1135

168 Search Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA [3] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse [4] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader [5] CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010 [6] Holding Family Law Judges Accountable [7] Judge s accusations on colleagues denied in appeals court [8] San Diego Superior Court Judges: Can Judges clean up the legal profession? [9] Petition to Recall Judge Lorna Alksne McKellar [1] 26 Comments To "Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed" #1 Comment By Madre in Malaise On July 9, 11:37 pm Am I right that you say this Alksne judge is going to STILL be a judge? That is victory? She cares not for upholding even the right of children to be with parents. Will she stick her middle finger up at the law in other cases? Will she toss homeless people to many years of prison for being dirty and smelly while sleeping on park benches in your fair city? Off with her own head, I say, before she harms another innocent. #2 Comment By One of Thousands On July 10, 11:23 am Judging is a skill like juggling, painting, singing, or any other high-talent profession. Some people are born with natural skills the Jackson family is a great example of gifted DNA they were extraordinarily gifted and largely succeeded despite their public missteps. Others work very hard and succeed witness Warren Buffet, the goofball genius in Oklahoma City. Most people wouldn t want to be him (he s baboon-ass-ugly), no matter how much money he has, but he s very successful. But like most musicians, artists, or others, judging is a skill that few people who practice the profession have. Tons of bad artists out there but then again they can t throw you in jail so who cares? So why are these bad lawyers still judges? Simple: If you were a really bad artist, but you could force people to buy your art by threatening to send them to jail, you d probably make good money from terrified people who you could shoot if they didn t buy your crappy paintings. That s it folks. They have control of goons with guns and badges, why do they need to think? It s called tyranny in case you were interested enough to get this far. And if you did, know this your freedom, life, and property are at risk. CCFC Master Exhs. P1136

169 Sad fact that today in San Diego most judges lack talent necessary to be a judge ain t a Picasso or even a Wyland among em. They are selected from the District Attorneys office. They are long-term government employees who ve never started a business, worked at a law firm, or done anything of note other than throw people in jail. DA prosecutors, despite their power, are generally not top lawyers. Check their resumes you won t find any Ivy League diplomas. In fact, most are from the bottom half of third tier schools. San Diego your city is being run by the bottom half of a very mediocre class of lawyer. And you wonder why these people can t balance your checkbook? But even worse is your unwillingness to do anything about it. It s your city that s being run by these uneducated, incompetent, immoral goons, but you regularly whistle past the graveyard and pretend everything s fine and dandy. I wonder how much Prozac it takes to get to that level of denial? Good luck San Diego great place, beautiful city, but I ve been there, know how it works, and I can tell you your government is about as incompetent and corrupt as they come. Don t let anyone fool you that pain in your ass isn t incompetent government, it s premeditated rape. Throw these scumbags out on their ass, put in the best of the best in San Diego, and watch how your beautiful city will bloom. Blessings to all. #3 Pingback By A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children angiemedia On July 15, 5:35 am [...] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed [...] #4 Comment By Lynn Stuart supporter On July 17, 4:06 am Lynn Stuart is a great mom. Why do you blame her for wanting her son all to herself? That s a mother s right. Fathers are nothing but sperm donors. I agree with Lynn Stuart on this 110%. Croix Stuart will never see his father Cole again, exactly what his mom and her friends in the courts want. He doesn t need his father, his mom is all he needs. Cole, if your reading this, all you have left of Croix are the pictures of him on YouTube. If you ever try to contact him again, Lynn can have one of her police friends blow your brains out and make it look like your fault. If your not a corpse after that, any San Diego judge will side with her and the police. Have a nice day! Happy drinking! #5 Comment By Chris On July 17, 8:33 pm Your comment helps prove the points we ve been making. Malicious moms (or malicious dads) will hurt their children to get back at their hated exspouses. Badmouthing the other parent and blocking custody and visitation are common means, but so are false accusations in divorce cases. It s all a part of parental alienation child abuse. It is likely to badly harm these children well into their adult years as we ve discussed in many articles in the past. But many in the San Diego courts are happy that parents abuse their children like this. The judges in this group reward and encourage this type of child abuse. That s because they want it to continue as it keeps them in control over families, boosting job security and incomes for all in the divorce industry. CCFC Master Exhs. P1137

170 Many of the people in the divorce industry are nothing but parasitic child abuse enablers. They make their livings off of inflicting harm on children and their parents in order to maximize the funds they can suck out of the families for hearings, trials, transcripts, psychological evaluations, supervised visitation, and many other court ordered services that do little to help the families but do enrich the people abusing them. Follow the money. San Diego County Bar Association divorce lawyers and affiliated mental health professionals and court ordered service providers make big bucks off of judges who abuse children and families by driving conflict and dragging out cases for years without putting into place reasonable tools to stop the conflict and keep the kids involved with both parents. Money, not competence or helping families efficiently end a marriage with minimal damage to all parties, is what matters to SDCBA and most of the San Diego divorce industry. Judges who abuse children therefore will tend to get both excellent ratings from SDCBA and campaign donations from their affiliates. Incumbents get endorsements and campaign funding from SDCBA, other judges, lawyers, law enforcement, and others with financial and other interests in seeing the child abuse and judicial misconduct continue. This is exactly why voters in almost every case should be voting against current incumbents in the San Diego courts, government, and law enforcement. But if an incumbent has dared to rise up to oppose government misconduct, protect people s rights, and heal families, that incumbent deserves fair consideration. Most of them, however, have done neither. The judges among them are just greedy child abusers in black robes. This entire set of circumstances also reveals why judges should not be allowed to deviate from 50/50 custody without an agreement between parents or a trial run according to criminal evidentiary standards with presumption of innocence and a fairly selected and impartial jury. If a jury of 6 women and 6 men is not convinced that a parent is so unfit that he or she shouldn t have 50/50 time with the children, then the court s focus should be on putting into place rules and support systems to ensure the children will get to see both parents more or less equally. The courts should be ensuring that all parties will have support of therapeutic mental health professionals. By this I mean therapists who are focused on helping the family to heal, not the terrorist parasites like Stephen Doyne and his associates who thrive by creating conflict via incompetent psychological evaluations that simply are used to drive more conflict and enable the divorce industry to suck a family s wealth dry by terrorizing both parents into thinking their contact with their children is in dire jeopardy. There also need to be efficient means to resolve the usual minor conflicts without having to return to court. That s where a parental coordinator would come in, to help coordinate the schedules for the children, to ensure that both parents have fair access to their school and medical records and can participate in decisions, and to mediate and arbitrate over the typical bickering that occurs between parents at odds with each other. Yet the courts and legislature appear to be opposed to this because it removes power from judges and lawyers, people who are good friends of many legislators. Again, follow the money too often, the point of courts and lawyers is to serve themselves, not the community. Lynn Stuart has been making false accusations against Cole Stuart for years and she has been rewarded for it by Judges Lisa Schall and Christine Goldsmith. We ve been informed that she accused her ex of being an alcoholic in the court of Judge Joel Wohlfeil. The court ordered four months of sobriety testing. Cole Stuart passed the tests. That judge called Lynn Stuart on her lies and verbally lashed her and her attorney Marilyn Bierer for their misrepresentations. Reportedly he was so appalled that he threatened to have Bierer arrested. Unfortunately, Judge Wohlfeil didn t hold Lynn Stuart accountable in some meaningful way for her dishonesty with intent to harm her ex-husband and child that might have dissuaded her from trying it again. All he did was order joint custody and visitation about 40% to the father. Lynn Stuart refused to cooperate with this. Instead, she has so interfered with contact that their son reportedly has not seen his father since March As you can imagine, a typical caring father put in this situation would be upset and he would continue to try to have contact with the children. That s what Cole Stuart did. As Lynn Stuart s reported interference and violation of court orders continued, he used some CCFC Master Exhs. P1138

171 language (reportedly the word bitch ) in his s that Lynn saw as an opportunity to cause more trouble. She started making apparently false accusations of harassment, stalking, and other DV crimes. This is the kind of behavior you expect out of a child abusing parent who cannot separate her own emotional needs from those of the children. It is just a portion of the many reasons we think Lynn Stuart probably is in reality a parental alienator and a very malicious mom. If there was an ethical and competent judge involved, none of this would be happening. Such a judge would have put a stop to Lynn Stuart s court order violations, particularly those involving custody and visitation interference, long before tempers flared so far to create the current situation. But instead of an ethical and competent officials, there are Christine Goldsmith, Jan Goldsmith, Lorna Alksne (who reportedly pointed out Cole Stuart to have him arrested at a family law seminar his group was protesting), and others who have grabbed on to the false accusations and exaggerations to use them as weapons for political persecution against Cole Stuart. He dared to protest against the harm being done to San Diego families by the family law courts and they are going to make him pay for it, the law be damned. Just look at the timing of the issuance of orders, failure to serve those orders until after the politically motivated arrest at a peaceful protest, and how the arrest warrant was issued on the day before the protest of which the family law courts were clearly aware. There should be no question that this is not justice, it is illegal harassment by the government to serve the personal political agendas of the people involved. Whether Jan Goldsmith or Christine Goldsmith were honest and reasonable people even prior to the political persecution stunts they are pulling in 2010 is an open question. There are reports about Christine filing for a DVTRO against Jan over an alleged argument with [10]. Perhaps Jan has learned that when Christine tells him to do something, even persecute somebody illegally, he better do it or there will be consequences for him? He arranged for the arrest warrant for Cole Stuart on April 14, before Christine s DVTRO orders could have been violated as they were not served until April 16 after the arrest. It s nepotism at its finest featuring your taxpayer dollars at work to harass a person to suit the needs of the criminals in the courts and government. Subsequent events have shown that very likely the entire San Diego judiciary is unable to be impartial and ethical with regards to Cole Stuart. Whether it is because they are buddies with the Goldsmiths and Alksne, they are greedy bastards who value profits and power over justice, or some other reason, it is clear that he will not get fair treatment in San Diego s courts with the current group of judges on the bench. Perhaps a jury might understand that this is all about political persecution. Even so, much harm will have already been done as it is highly disruptive and expensive for a person to have to defend against a criminal charge, even if it is a political stunt. Employing Lynn Stuart on the San Diego Channel 6 XETV News shows that station value looks and image over ethics and honesty. They care not if their pretty blonde reporter lies all over town so long as they get ratings. Anybody who has been on the receiving end of parental alienation abuse and false accusations in divorce should let XETV management know they don t appreciate their station putting a child abusing liar on the air as a reporter, a role that nominally requires honesty that Lynn Stuart doesn t have. You can send to them at [11]. Or maybe it would be more worthwhile to encourage other San Diego media, particularly Channel 10 TV which has had some of the best coverage of the San Diego family law court mess, to cover how their competition s reporter is involved in what appear to be malicious false allegations and child abuse. In a more ideal world, San Diego media would often cover stories to protect the public from government abuse. But even if they have zero altruistic intent, in this situation they might smell enough of a ratings-grabbing scandal with potential to embarrass XETV to report on what is happening with the case of reporter Lynn Stuart, her abused ex Cole Stuart, and the corruption and nepotism in San Diego courts and the city attorney s office. #6 Pingback By San Diego Judge Edward Allard On The Way Out for Misconduct? angiemedia On July 19, 5:13 pm CCFC Master Exhs. P1139

172 [...] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed [...] #7 Pingback By Judge Lorna Alksne in Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter angiemedia On July 20, 5:30 pm [...] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed [...] #8 Comment By Lynn Stuart is a censor On July 20, 5:43 pm [12] What s the matter, Lynn? Can t even let your ex have the [13] for him and his family to view? Did you ask YouTube to censor it because it mentioned how you re hurting your son by keeping him from seeing his father since March 2009? Let s count the ways Lynn is such a fine example for a news reporter: 1) She s a liar. 2) She hurts her own son. 3) She s a heavy drinker. When XETV fires you for being so dishonest and disreputable, you can take up a career modeling for books on bad moms! #9 Comment By Sad Dad On July 21, 11:34 pm [12] Why do judges side with such rotten mothers? Many of my friends, like me, can see our kids just a couple times per month. We d be thrilled to have more time, but our vindictive exs won t allow it. Judges nearly always side with moms no matter how badly they treat the kids. #10 Comment By one of thousands On July 25, 4:59 pm There s a reason our country s founders required trial by jury and family court is a fine example of that reason. People in power (i.e., the regular men and women no better than you or me down the street who can tell thugs with guns who s ass to kick) have for ages abused that power to help themselves or their friends unfairly, and to hurt you. When we give government power to keep the peace and arm them to do so, we place enormous power in their hands. But with that power comes responsibility, yet that responsibility is often abused by bad people. Juries are ordinary people working people. Smart people. And not so smart people. But people who don t have the power to send thugs with guns and shields into your home to screw up your life. They are the opponents of government power because they are the potential victims of it. They prevent the abuse of the power we give to cops and judges. In a different world we d just let everyone have guns. The bullies would still try to terrorize the peaceful, but the peaceful could shoot back. Probably lots of bloodshed. That was the CCFC Master Exhs. P1140

173 wild west where every shop owner/bartender was heavily armed. But in family court there are no juries. Hence no ability to check the power of judges. Hence the strong thirst of bullies to abuse their power goes unchecked. Hence tyranny and abuse. The solution? Vote them out. Vote in non-das who ve done something significant with their lives other than throw people in jail. Vote for your neighbor. Your girlfriend. Somebody, anybody, who s had to deal the the abuse of power we give them. Term limits for politicians work for a reason they assure the politicos have to get out of their power position and live in the world they create. Not so likely to encourage abuse if you potentially face the barrel of a gun. There are no term limits on judges that is if you don t vote them out, complain them out, hound them out, or. A woman asked Ben Franklin coming out of the Constitutional Convention: Mr. Franklin, do we have a republic or a monarchy? Franklin replied: A republic. If you can keep it. It is your republic America vote them out and take it back. #11 Pingback By American Judicial Terrorism May Lead to Widespread Violence angiemedia On August 6, 4:45 am [...] opponents with dishonest and criminal abuses of power in response to even small peaceful protests. Picket a judge s house and maybe the aggrieved public can get a message through to the abuser to move on, but [...] #12 Pingback By Why Damon Moelter Is Being Abused angiemedia On August 10, 6:43 am [...] would be able to be impartial seems obviously true. As previously discussed in our story Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed, Alksne has been subjected to alleged death threats, very public adverse opinions about her family, [...] #13 Comment By Chris On September 23, 8:40 pm [14] The censored video tribute to Croix Stuart is once again available at [15]. Hopefully Croix will someday find this and realize that his father loves and misses him and the only reasons they can t see each other are his malicious mom and her friends like the Goldsmiths and Alksne in the San Diego courts and government like to abuse children and their parents for their own varied interests. #14 Pingback By San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining Orders angiemedia On October 5, 12:27 am [...] need it in spades to get anything but misery out of the San Diego family dismantlers.further ReadingJudge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home PicketedA Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit [...] CCFC Master Exhs. P1141

174 #15 Comment By Ricardo R. Rivero On October 25, 7:56 pm From Ricardo R. Rivero They Illegally invoked the Jurisdiction of another man s case against me!!!!! NO JURISDICTION Echeverria Norberto J.CASE NUM DISCLAIMER: We have sent this story to every congressman senate house member any and all representatives of the state and their affiliated entities. Help me howard wouldn t help We have been kicked off of Obama s site Oprah you name it The Govenor the Florida and Sarasota Bar and all 142 lawyers seen and still counting and all the other hundreds of attorneys who sat in we have now taken this to the Federal Court System where we have petitioned for a trial by jury soon this injustice will be written correctly and we will become a landmark case. To change the system if not we will march this right on up to the Supreme Court. To: angiemedia The UN has closed a major gap in disability rights protection. 6 June The recent entry into force of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities closes a major gap in human rights protection for hundreds of millions of people around the world. I am Ricardo Rivero I suffer from a crippling learning disability referred to as Dyslexia. The story definitively begins with the birth of my son Ricardo Adrian Rivero on April 16, 1990 one of the happiest days of my life and sadly the beginning to an all out war of the roses. When he was born I soon found out that my relationship with Sheila Leal had been infected with the disease of infidelity that plagues our American Culture. Of course you know how quickly our emotions and insecurities arose during this torrential war and ended up in a separation. We parted paths and soon she found herself in another relationship that ended in the death of her new spouse by a heroin drug overdose. What a perfect role model for our child. During this time I found myself on the wrong side of the law and was incarcerated in a Federal Prison. Shortly before her new husbands untimely demise we entered into the Court system in Montana which it was decided by the court that the central depository would deduct child support from my paychecks. Failure to pay child support is a violation of probation as recorded by the Federal probation system. In December 2001 Sheila and I decided to reconcile our differences and attempt to live together for the common goal in this trivial pursuit of happiness to re establish our family. I continued to pay child support even though we lived together as documented by my Federal Probation Officer who informed me that it was a violation of probation not to pay child support. I discussed the issue with my probation officer who suggested that Sheila would need to cancel the child support since we had continued to live together to avoid any penalties. In October 2, 2002 we were sent a notice stating that child support obligations were cancelled. One year later we again separated and I moved back to Homestead. I received a letter from the Department of Revenue (D.O.R.) in Sarasota stating that I owed $15,000 in child support arrearages. The initial application that this entire action began with was redefined in a statement she made in open court I have not seen him or heard from him in four years the exact amount of time recorded by my Wonderful United States Probation Officers Unfortunately I could not get the courts to even glance at the evidence that I presented in my behalf that would ultimately sway the case in my favor. The Family court system that we now have in place favors the woman and makes it a crime to be a Father who merely wants to be involved in the life of our child. Even though the tender years Doctrine has been abolished in the late 80 s which briefly states that a child would be better suited to live with the mother than the father. Countless letters and documents were produced to the D.O.R. and the Judges presiding over the case and the expert testimony of my federal probation officer was quickly denied not once but twice, as my due process rights and my constitutional rights were thrown out of court. Time after time David G. Taylor a private Attorney who represented Sheila Leal and his client committed perjury with the intent to commit fraud against the court to gain equitable relief and to gain an unfair advantage. I represented myself as a pro se litigant as I was unable to swallow the expense of an Attorney at that time. I attempted to seek the CCFC Master Exhs. P1142

175 assistance of the Florida bar that approved me with a pro bono Attorney. My request was denied by David Taylor and the Judge Dianne Moreland who stated that with a 6th grade education disabled or not I could have adequately defended myself. This again is a denial of my rights which I am covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act. Ultimately David G. Taylor seeking to destroy my credibility in court set a hearing date and did not adequately advise me through proper notification of the time and date or the presiding judge and the details of the hearing. Complaints coincidentally have been filed with the Florida Bar against David G. Taylor. I did not attend the hearing for lack of knowledge that it was to be held which the judge attached a writ of bodily attachment of $2,800. The officers seeking to place me into custody were sent to my address by Sheila and I was arrested on a bench warrant. After nine days I paid the purge and was released. Three weeks later I was arrested again during a routine traffic stop in which the officers informed me that the arrest warrant still stood and was not removed. I was held for five more days in a Dade County Correctional Facility. The guard awoke me from my sleep by kicking my bed and stated that we have nothing to do with this you now have what we call and consider a double jeopardy and I should pack my bags and leave Dade Counties illustrious criminal vacation facility. Sarasota received the money and had not removed the warrant that had already been appeased in my first arrest. I was not asked to bond out simply released due to an error. I was fired from my job and forced to move out of my home as I was living check to check with no job and out on the streets because someone forgot to process the paperwork that sat on some pencil pushers desk. I have now begun to file a 50 million dollar law suit for double jeopardy against Sarasota County. The image of blind justice with the woman holding the scales haunts my daily walk for it is the woman who holds the scales. How ironic that a person who see s that image and reads the quote All who Labor here seek justice does not look at it as a woman who holds the scales. Four income tax checks, my passport, and my license has been seized on the basis that I have not paid my child support that I can prove I do not owe homeless and forced to live with a family member on the sofa with my son. Yes my son who has run away from home to live with me since he was 16 and we now celebrate his 18 birthday just this past April 16. The celebration is now that he is sur juris citing a landmark case of Crone Baugh v. Van Dyke. 415 So 2d 738 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982, Rev. denied, 426 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1983) the cause of action to enforce the father s child support obligations, [if any] and to collect those arrearages belonged to the children, and that their mother as such, did not have standing to enforce the children s rights and to collect from the father the money due the children, neither did HRS have the right or standing to collect those sums on behalf of the former wife. He alone has the right to enforce or withdraw the course of action of enforcement of child support and arrears. He is fed up with his mother s actions and parental alienation of his father. He is a witness first hand to the plots against his father and the atrocities of the situation countless perjury attempts and vindictive maliciousness to utilize the system to gain an unfair advantage. He should have been protected from all pending court matters and disparaging remarks (as stated by chapter 61) made by his own mother that has damaged him psychologically. Parents fail to realize that when you attack the other parent you stab at the child as well for that child understands that he is a part of the other parent who is being attacked. In a land where African Americans sought and obtained equal rights, Women burned their braziers and protested for equality, Gays and Lesbians actively seek the opportunity to establish their relationships and be bonded in Matrimony. Why can I as the Paternal Father of our child have my equal rights to seek justice in a fair and impartial court system in Sarasota County? Respectfully Submitted, Ricardo R. Rivero We have filed them in Federal Court in Miami..FL. Sarasota Fl. case number. 2004DR9684NC Ricardo R.Rivero..case # civ.gold Father Ricardo A.Rivero case # civ.graham Son Ricardo Rivero Oct. 25, 2010 CCFC Master Exhs. P1143

176 yahoo.com. Phone Number.. (786) Written by Louis Antonio Lliteras II a next friend Regards Ricardo Rivero richiebox11@ yahoo.com #16 Comment By One of Thousands On November 1, 9:53 am Folks it s not going to change until we vote them out, hound them out, or just kick their sorry asses. It s your country but it s being run by fascist-wanna-be tyrants who are amazingly arrogant for having done so little with their lives. Solution: Take control out of the incompetent hands of the bozos in robes and put it in the hands of caring people who don t get a hard on running other people around. Now. Please. #17 Pingback By San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed TV Show angiemedia On November 6, 7:17 pm [...] Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining OrdersJudge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home PicketedA Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Cole Stuart Considers $10M False [...] #18 Pingback By San Diego Superior Court Seeks New Grand Jury For 2011 / 2012 angiemedia On December 14, 1:20 am [...] Against Judge David Yaffe, Sheriff Leroy Lee Baca, and Others Filed with US AttorneyJudge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home PicketedA Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Cole Stuart Considers $10M False [...] #19 Pingback By Amicus Brief in Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne Appeal in San Diego angiemedia On July 13, 7:30 pm [...] Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining OrdersJudge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home PicketedA Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children Cole Stuart Considers $10M False [...] #20 Comment By Denise Rogers On September 14, 10:40 pm I had a great judge in North San Diego County in My ex husband s corrupt Lawyer Steven J. Moore requested a different judge and I was forced to go to Commissioner Lorna Alksne. She refused to read the family court mediator s recommendation that stated very clearly custody should be 98% to me and 2% to dad. She never even read it. She ordered 50/50 custody and my daughter has suffered substantially for 8 years at the hands of her father and his new wife. The new wife constantly makes my ex tell my daughter that he loves his wife more than her. The wife does things like dump dish-soap down my daughter s throat, and slaps her all the time. My ex has never been a good father, and never will be. I CCFC Master Exhs. P1144

177 believe his lawyer and my ex paid the Commissioner off to favor them. GET HER OUT! #21 Comment By Nicole On September 18, 4:26 pm I am in SD family court and my lawyer tells me if I take my case to trial he doesn t think they will win because of the bio judge. I feel manipulated to take the settlement and give SD CPS a true finding. I can not live with myself going along with their allegations of severe neglect because I am a medical cannabis card holder and the possibility of the kids eating a med brownie. I need support during this trial [16] #22 Comment By Nicole On September 18, 4:29 pm typo I meant biased judge that looks at the false statement reported by CPS and look at me as a guilty mother and then I have to prove my innocence. It should be the other way around because I am innocent and CPS can not prove my guilt my children DID NOT test POSITIVE for cannabis. #23 Pingback By Profile of Hannah s House San Diego Visitation and Exchange Center angiemedia On December 14, 7:03 am [...] family law courts are among the most broken in the nation. Reports are that under the tenure of Supervising Judge Lorna Alksne they have become far worse, particularly for fathers. Local mental health professionals have [...] #24 Comment By lori On May 26, 5:11 pm Lorna alksne is a criminal. She practices under the table for profit..my case lasted 3yrs. She was blantantly negligent, she hates women, she cares nothing for the best interest of the children.my case is so corrupt..i am the poster girl for this issue with intent, negligence and completed disregard for law.had I known about this earlier I would like to know the leading person in this project of removing her from the seat.my case could go as far as the Supreme court I would like to tell the story..evil to the core this woman is.. #25 Comment By Cole Stuart On May 24, 3:04 pm I ve posted a detailed review of San Diego Famil Court Evaluator Stephen Done and opened a discussion forum at [17]. Parents are welcome to join the discussion and exchange tips/advice/experiences about Doyne or any of the other problematic San Diego Custody Evaluators. Please: Parents Only and focus on positive suggestions/advice rather than trashing Doyne even more. There s plenty that exists already online. Best! Cole Stuart #26 Comment By Cole Stuart On July 13, 4:43 pm [18] CCFC Master Exhs. P1145

178 Oops! The link in the previous comment is broken. My bad. Hopefully the one below works. [19] Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] petition calling for the recall of Judge Lorna Alksne: [2] Joyce Murphy s Letter Regarding Judge DeAnn Salcido: [3] Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA: [4] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse: [5] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader: [6] CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010: [7] Holding Family Law Judges Accountable: [8] Judge s accusations on colleagues denied in appeals court: [9] San Diego Superior Court Judges: Can Judges clean up the legal profession?: [10] : [11] : mailto:newstips@sandiego6.com [12] : #comment [13] : [14] : #comment [15] : [16] : mailto:nic21nak@yahoo.com [17] : [18] : #comment [19] : Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1146

179 - angiemedia San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed TV Show Posted By Chris on October 23, Comments Recommend Send 16 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. We received a tip on this story from source personally familiar with the common abusive and criminal behaviors of San Diego judges. Before reading the documents and only knowing they concerned San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido, I anticipated it was going to have something to do with Salcido s deceitful political antics a few months back regarding her accusations and law suit against other San Diego judges as a ploy to boost her popularly in the June 2010 election. While that is in part the case, the documents contain some surprises. The 21 page long formal complaint against Salcido [1] reveals an arrogant and superficial judge who shows contempt for the law, her judicial office, litigants, attorneys, court employees, and common decency. Salcido s 75 page long response [2] further shows her apparent contempt for judicial canons and the law. Yet Salcido has the audacity to berate, insult, and threaten a litigant who she thinks shows disdain for her. Judging from her reported actions in numerous incidents, Salcido is entirely worthy of immense disdain by virtually anybody appearing in her courtroom. Election Rigging? Particularly alarming is that the complaint was kept secret by the Commission on Judicial Performance until after the June 2010 balloting which re-elected her. If the public had known the quantity and severity of complaints regarding Salcido, it is likely that some voters would have voted differently. (from Judge Salcido probe kept secret during election [3] ) Under strict confidentiality rules, the commission could not say anything about the investigation until a formal complaint was filed, which happened on Sept. 20. Salcido, now assigned to a downtown San Diego courtroom, is supposed to file a response to the allegations today. The 21-page complaint details conduct dating to January 2009, more than a year before the election. Lawyers mentioned by name in the complaint declined to comment, citing confidentiality rules or that the matter is pending before the commission. Only one lawyer was willing to acknowledge speaking to commission investigators before the June primary. Salcido s opponent in June, Harold Coleman Jr., said he wonders if the commission had told voters about the judge s conduct if it would have made a difference in the election. Coleman was one of four candidates backed by a conservative religious group that challenged incumbent Superior Court judges in June. Most are re-elected without an opponent. None of the challengers won, though Coleman captured more votes than any of the others. He had 41 percent to Salcido s 60 percent. I don t know if this would have been enough to close that gap, Coleman said. But I think it (the investigation) is a very material factor the public ought to have known. While the San Diego Union Tribune explains this away as compliance with confidentiality rules, it turns out that keeping complaints and disciplinary actions secret until shortly after elections is common practice for CJP. They have done it time and again with other abusive judges like Lisa Schall [4] and Peter McBrien [5]. (from Sacramento Judge Peter James McBrien Dismembers Park Trees and Families In Contempt for Law [5] ) CJP is a spineless organization that covers up judicial misconduct as its mission. It nominally takes complaints and is to investigate them while making the investigations open to public review. But the reality is that it suppresses information about the complaints and helps judges to prevent any serious impact to their careers. For example, in 2000, around the time of the McBrien tree cutting episode, it buried 948 out 951 complaints so the public could not see them. In the complaints it does investigate, it generally takes multiple years to investigate and often issues public admonishments and censures after elections. This helps keep the voters in the dark about what a judge has done wrong, thus helping the judge to be re-elected. Although CJP has the authority to remove a judge from the bench, it seldom does so. What it generally does, if anything, is to issue a private or public admonishment and time it to minimize its impact. Drunk driving, sexual harassment, vandalism, false imprisonment, and other crimes are all routinely whitewashed by CJP. CCFC Master Exhs. P1147

180 The lesson here is that if you have a complaint against a judge, you should endeavor to make it public. CJP cannot be trusted to do its legally specified job, what it will do is to try to minimize the impact on the abusive judge in nearly every case. Salcido also engaged in pre-election posturing using her conflict with other judges and the publicity of the Amber DuBois and Chelsea King murders by convict John Gardner to gain favorable publicity for herself. While she has openly attacked other judges trying to portray herself as more law-abiding than they are, the details of her many alleged misconducts paint a rather different picture. Salcido Wants To Be A TV Star Like judges in far too many American courts, the black-robed thugs sitting on the benches in San Diego courts certainly don t want accurate records maintained because it might expose many of their crimes and abuses for the public to easily see. But some judges do want a record kept for their own personal gain. DeAnn Salcido is one of those judges. She apparently thinks video recording her abusive antics for the entertainment industry, where she hopes to get a future job being a wise-cracking rude TV judge, is acceptable conduct in a San Diego courtroom. Video and audio recording in a court room should be routine for the benefit of creating an accurate record, particularly for litigants who can t afford to pay thousands of dollars for transcripts that are error prone and are often inaccurate because of mistakes and even intentional alterations done by off-the-record actions for the benefit of people paying money to the criminally dishonest judges, court reporters, or other court staff who disregard the law as they lie and abuse the rights of citizens for their own benefits. Don t think that such abuses are typical of just entry level inexperienced judges. In corrupt counties like San Diego, altering or destroying records and covering up such tampering is common practice all the way up the bench to supervising judges like Judge Lorna Alksne, one of Salcido s supervisors during her time in family law court assignments since Salcido became a judge in When the supervisors and Commission on Judicial Performance make it clear to their subordinates that bias, corruption, and criminality are tolerable conduct for a judge, can you expect the courts to be fair, just, and law-abiding? Certainly not. Particularly appalling is how some of these ridiculous behaviors appear to be something Salcido does for the benefit of a video camera in the courtroom. The formal complaint proceedings prepared by the Commission on Judicial Performance make this clear: The purpose of the filming was to promote yourself for a role in a potential television entertainment program featuring a judge. Salcido apparently fancies herself a budding entertainment celebrity ala TV s Judge Judy [6]. In violation of law and legal process and for her own personal gain, she had her bailiff s husband and later a professional video crew videotaping her acting on the bench with court in session on multiple dates in order to pass along demo videos to entertainment industry contacts in hopes of securing herself a job. She improperly used her court room to demean, ridicule, and berate litigants for the purpose of videotaping her acting talent to show she could be an entertaining judge. Furthermore, allegations are that she rearranged her court schedule to benefit the video recordings. The CJP complaints include mention of evidence of this. In an message dated March 5, 2009, sent by you to the entertainment lawyer, you suggested that filming in your courtroom be scheduled for April 24. You told him that you have been setting my more interesting defendants and those with substance abuse issues for Friday April 24th. On March 9, 2009, following his suggestion that filming occur on May 1, you sent an message in which you told him that I will line up my most interesting cases for the afternoon of [Friday] May 1st. Your statements give the appearance that you were scheduling cases based on their possible appeal in a videotape to be used to promote yourself for a television program. It also creates an appearance of impropriety to represent that you would manipulate your calendar for non-judicial purposes. Your conduct in count one violated canons 1 (a judge shall uphold the integrity of the judiciary), 2 (a judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety), 2A (a judge shall respect and comply with the law and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary), 2B(2) (improper use of the prestige ofjudicial office) and 3 A (a judge s duties shall take precedence over all other activities). Salcido s Antics Aren t Just for TV After reading the many initial pages of detailed complaints and responses about Salcido s misconduct pertaining to videotaped court sessions, I couldn t help but wonder if her arrogant and abusive conduct was worse than usual in an attempt to be entertaining. But the complaints go far beyond the videotaping incidents. It seems reasonably clear that Salcido s very personality is one of an arrogant abuser whether she has a camera recording her or not. Below I ll highlight some of the more outrageous examples of what is apparently common conduct in her courtroom. Salcido Destroys Court Evidence Salcido apparently thinks that she can destroy material submitted to the court by a litigant s attorney as she sees fit. On June 30, 2009, around 3:11 p.m., attorney Alan Spears appeared regarding his pregnant client Justine Means, who was in Maine. Attorney Spears, who was seeking a continuance, said that his client felt unable to travel because of the pregnancy, and gave you a physician s letter that noted her due date. You stated that pregnant people traveled all the time, and noted that the physician s letter did not say that the defendant was at high risk or subject to bed rest. After the prosecutor said that she did not object to a continuance, you said that you would grant it. As you explained that you were CCFC Master Exhs. P1148

181 granting the continuance for discovery reasons, not because Means was pregnant, you ripped up the physician s letter, and either threw the pieces in the trash yourself or handed the pieces to your clerk to put into the trash. Maybe she got the idea that destroying filings is acceptable conduct from her friend Judge Lorna Alksne who has been involved in the cover-up of court misconduct regarding misfiling and/or destroying mandatory family law court forms [7] going back many years, including all the years during which she has been Supervising Judge, and then trying to cover its tracks at Alksne s orders. Salcido Denigrates and Discusses Violent Threats Against Public Defender Salcido participated in insulting and denigrating Deputy Public Defender Richard Longman and discussing having her bailiff use a Taser against him. Similarly, on July 28, 2009, near the end of the court day, during a discussion in open court not connected to a particular case, you repeatedly referred to DPD Longman as Mr. Federal Case and complained that you never get out of court early when he is in your department. And, on May 1, 2009, while waiting for DPD Longman, the bailiff jokingly asked if you wanted her to Taser him; after responding in a joking manner that you did not want her to Taser him, you asked either the bailiff or someone else present in the courtroom, Do you want to Taser him? As it is the bailiff who brought up the mockery and discussion of violence, the bailiff should be subjected to disciplinary action for this misconduct. But if these reports are accurate, Salcido played right along with it and she is not simply an innocent bystander. If you read the full text of the complaints, it is clear she routinely ridicules Longman in her courtroom and encourages others to do so, also. Salcido Engages in Possible Defamation and Display of Bias The judge apparently doesn t know how to shut her trap about matters not before the court and/or to recuse when she has personal involvement that is too close. In this portion of the complaint, it appears she is engaging in possible defamation against football player Shawne Merriman by accusing him of illegal drug usage and reveals personal knowledge that should cause her to recuse from any case involving Merriman. On July 28,2009, at about 10:06 a.m., during a case discussion with a privately retained attorney, you remarked regarding football player Shawne Merriman [8], Although I do have it on a reliable source he likes to play with Ecstasy pills. You further remarked, A friend of mine personally observed it, it was at his house. Salcido Attempts to Dissuade Litigant from Speaking With Attorney The judge apparently thinks it is OK to push litigants from discarding their legal rights. If they are uncertain, then she thinks it is OK to make fun of them. Around 4:10 p.m., defendant Jemeelah Coleman appeared before you unrepresented; she apparently had failed to comply with a condition of probation. You advised her that you would allow her to serve 24 hours in custody, instead of the customary 48 hours, for the violation of probation. You advised her that she had a right to be counseled by an attorney before admitting the violation and being sentenced, and informed her that she would have to come back on Monday if she wanted to speak with an attorney. At one point you told her, But I might not be so gracious on Monday. After further discussion, the defendant said that she wanted to do the 24 hours. When the defendant paused after you said that this meant she would waive her right to speak with an attorney, you asked, You want to ask the lifeline? You need a lifeline? The audience laughed at your remarks. Salcido Violates Contempt of Court Rules This troublesome conduct is much like the actions of drunk driver Judge Lisa Schall [4] that got her into hot water with CJP. CJP found that what Schall did by throwing an upset litigant into custody without a hearing was a violation of due process and abuse of contempt of court powers. Salcido has done much the same. On January 7,2010, around 10:03 a.m., defendant Chadira Gipson appeared before you in case number C for a change of plea. As set forth below, you took Gipson into custody for direct contempt without affording her due process or complying with the legal requirements for direct contempt, and without sentencing her; you also directed comments to the courtroom audience that failed to uphold a high standard of conduct: Court: Oh, Chadira Gipson. Counsel: Good morning, Your Honor, Michael Kern appearing on behalf of Ms. Gipson. She s present in court for the court out of custody for change of plea to a 415(2) as a misdemeanor. Your conduct constituted an abuse of authority and demonstrated embroilment. It violated canons 1 (a judge shall uphold the integrity of the judiciary), 2 (a judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety), 2A (a judge shall promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary), 3B(2) (a judge shall be faithful to the law), 3B(4) (a judge shall be patient, dignified, and courteous) and 3B(7) (a judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding the right to be heard). Salcido Demeans Court Staff As Incompetent CCFC Master Exhs. P1149

182 Salcido repeatedly denigrates other judges in her courtroom. This is probably what is driving CJP s actions more than anything else. CJP normally hides judicial misconduct, but in Salcido s case it appears she may actually get something more closely approximating justice simply because she has attacked other judges and they and their allies likely have made their displeasure known to CJP. While the I am God in my courtroom and I don t care what other judges say attitudes shown here are typical for San Diego judges like Lisa Schall, Lorna Alksne, and many others, the level of direct insults of court staff is unusual. Salcido probably has earned herself a bad reputation with other judges. This in and of itself might not be so bad as many San Diego judges are truly reprehensible people. However, combined with her other misconduct, it is clear this does not reflect Salcido attempting to stick up for justice but instead are simply glaring displays of the severe defects in her personality. On June 9, 2009, around 10:27 a.m., you raised concerns regarding an August 7, 2008 order entered by Judge Peter Gallagher in a criminal case involving defendant Sean Strange. After checking the court file, you commented, Ah, Judge Gallagher, aka assistant public defender. You later commented, Is that ridiculous that Judge Gallagher did that. I mean it s a sex offender case. Yeah, whatever, you know. A DV statute says it s mandatory but, you know, we re the judge, we can do what we want. Quote. Justice be damned. On July 6, 2009, around 2:38 p.m., while reviewing a request for modification of the terms of a protective order in the Houmi case, you remarked, I can t do this because it s not consistent with the statute, I mean I can send it up to Judge Deddeh since he s the one who doesn t want to follow the statute. In approximately early 2010, you made remarks in court disparaging the general clerical staff as follows. On a number of occasions, you referred to the business office staff as cucumbers. For example, on one occasion around March or April 2010, when it was suggested that a case be postponed to the afternoon, you said words to the effect that no, because the cucumbers might lose the file. On another occasion around March or April 2010, after referring to the clerical staff as cucumbers, you then added that they aren t even potatoes because potatoes have eyes. On more than one occasion around March or April 2010, you have made the potatoes comment to the courtroom audience and have added that they aren t corn because corn has ears. On January 7,2010, around 10:32 a.m., after a defendant appearing on a warrant referred to information he had received from a clerk, you stated, Sir, most of those clerks, I wouldn t trust a guinea pig to. Let alone my freedom. On May 20, 2010, around 2:30 p.m., during a discussion about a paperwork mix-up in a certain case, you sarcastically said, however, I was going to say another word, the brilliant people in the back office decided not to file your paperwork in the court s file. You later commented Yi, yi, yi, yi, yi. This is what I have to work with, all right, every day. On February 22,2010, court operations supervisor Beverly Harris had assigned a backup clerk to your department who had to leave at 3:30 p.m. While waiting for a replacement clerk, you made disparaging comments about Harris in open court, some of which referred to an she had previously sent to your clerk. Your remarks included, the supervisor decided to send us a clerk that had to leave at 3:30, That was what they taught them at Management 101 seminars that they attend, and How to get the most of your employees. Let them know they could get fired. When Harris arrived in your courtroom you asked her, did you know we finish at 5:00? These quotes and the related matters are possibly part of the reason why she has tried to resort to deceptive practices to get the uninformed public to side with her against other judges in She almost certainly knew that these complaints were being made against her as the investigation started before the election in June It appears she may have thought her May 2010 stunts could help deflect the coming disciplinary actions against her or to provide a deceptive escape hatch by which she could blame unfair disciplinary actions upon rival judges whom she has attacked as being soft on crime. Salcido Just One Bad Judge Of Many Salcido doesn t belong in a courtroom as a judge or an attorney. She should be tossed off the bench and disbarred for making a mockery of the law and courts. But Salcido is just one part of a much larger problem. Many of the other judges in the county and state belong kicked off the bench, too. Alas, if the public relies upon CJP to do its job, corruption and injustice will continue to be the norm in San Diego and California. People who are being wronged by these judges need to be taking their cases to the public and media rather than letting CJP engage in cover-up and whitewashing in secrecy. Sheriff s Department Role In Judicial Abuse and Corruption San Diego Sheriff s Department should take some disciplinary action against the bailiff involved, but to be fair give her retraining and a second chance given that she probably was improperly trained to serve the black-robed thugs without considering the law. More importantly, the Sheriff s Department should institute training of its entire staff, especially its court services staff, on their requirements to disobey illegal orders made by a judge and to report such judges for disciplinary action and prosecution. To date, the Sheriff s Department has been providing poorly trained bailiffs to San Diego judges who then proceed to violate the law at the command of these judges. But with Sheriff Bill Ruby Ridge Gore [9] in charge of the department and the San Diego County Board of Supervisors stacked with its own corrupt and abusive officials, don t expect there to be any meaningful reform without first purging the county of the tyrants in control via recalls, elections, or other means. While in some counties those other means might include criminal prosecution, in San Diego that s not likely with DA Bonnie Dumanis clearly siding with the crooks and abusers that are her friends throughout the region s courts, governments, and law enforcement agencies. Salcido is not alone in making improper use of Sheriff s staff. Judge Lorna Alksne is another of the judges making improper use of Sheriff s resources. Alksne has her own personally controlled security staff because she has CCFC Master Exhs. P1150

183 reportedly been repeatedly subjected to death threats and protests. When this was recently explained to a sitting Federal judge who has previously served varied judicial assignments including family law, the judge s reaction was that something must be very wrong with such a judge because competent and fair judges do not engender this level of animosity. But as Alksne is neither competent nor fair, the surprise should not be the death threats and protests but that nobody from the Sheriff s department has yet gotten hurt due to the abusive black-robed tyrant Lorna Alksne. Public Action Needed to Force Judicial Reform With a Supervising Judge like Alksne showing the way for tyrants-and-wackos-in-training like Salcido and drunk driver Judge Lisa Schall [4], San Diego family law courts have a well-deserved reputation as kangaroo courts that violate the law and people s rights and wrongly hurt children and parents as a matter of practice. This is not going to change until the abusive judges are run out of office, either via elections, recalls, or other less usual means. Even though CJP has the ability to remove these judges from office, they will not do it unless forced into it by their allies or the public. Salcido has a decent shot of being removed from office only because of how she has angered other judges. But most abusive judges do not make that same mistake and constrain their abuses to defenseless citizens and other people that the judiciary would like to target for its own improper motives. CJP is fine with such judges violating the law and abusing people s rights so long as they don t embarrass or anger other government officials. So in a sense, there is a double standard at work here by which other abusive judges will not get reprimanded and punished but Salcido will. This doesn t make Salcido any less of a bad judge, it simply shows that CJP is a biased organization that does not promote the law or public interests as it should. Salcido is trying to fight back with a propaganda campaign of her own. Yet even the photos of Salcido available show her concern for image and influence over justice and the law. The photo at the top of this article is the glamor shot she uses to make herself look better than she really does, perhaps to influence TV shows to be interested in filming in her courtroom and the public to have a favorable view of her. The photo on the right is a more accurate representation of her appearance. She has reportedly posted a Facebook page [10] to help organize people to support her violations of the law and justice by duping them into thinking she is actually opposed to the corruption and abuse in San Diego family law courts. Salcido talks out of both sides of her mouth just like so many other judicial sociopaths in San Diego. Best interests of the children and protecting women from violence are propaganda phrases used while she and her cohorts in judicial crime emotionally, legally, and financially rape, pillage, and DeAnn Salcido ruin so many families. Sociopathic judges make it appear they are concerned for the public good and upholding the law when in fact their real concerns are selfish, spiteful, and entirely at odds with the public good. Spinning Hitler as family friendly by photographing him giving an apple to a child doesn t make him any less of a mass murderer, just as Salcido s propaganda campaign doesn t make her any less of an abysmally abusive judge. The case of Richard Fine, the attorney who has made great noise and fury over the illegal payments being made by county governments to the judges discussed in this article and many more [11], shows what the California judiciary will do to its opponents if the public does not support reform. Fine has pointed out for years that the illegal county payments to state judges created the appearance and effect of illegal bias in courts in nearly every California county. In retaliation, the California judiciary agreed to throw him into jail on trumped-up allegations of contempt of court without proper due process and to have its allies in the Los Angeles Sheriff s Department hold him in solitary confinement incommunicado until activists and affiliated free media journalists pushed to shut down the communications blockade. Even with that pressure, it took 18 months of increasing public uproar and the resignations of Judge David Yaffe and California Chief Justice Ronald George for the judiciary to relent from its illegal actions and let Fine out of prison. When somebody with political and legal connections like Fine has from his service in the Clinton Administration s Department of Justice can t get justice in a speedy and fair fashion in California, you can bet that almost nobody can. But it does show that public pressure may have an effect. This is why it appears that the public is going to have to put a lot of pressure on CJP and the legislature to start cracking down on judicial abuse and corruption. When judges like Salcido, Schall, and Alksne start falling like flies, then perhaps the people can again have some confidence that judicial tyranny has been defeated and the rule of law will again prevail. Further Reading San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is Corrupt [12] San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining Orders [13] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed [14] A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children [15] Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA [16] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader [17] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse [18] CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010 [19] CCFC Master Exhs. P1151

184 Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff [9] San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice [20] Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall [21] Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? [4] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [22] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [23] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals [7] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [24] Judge s TV dreams make for unpleasant reality [25] Judge Salcido denies most serious charges [26] Judge Salcido probe kept secret during election [3] Misconduct charges against judge detailed [27] Judge Salcido sues Superior Court and Judge Deddeh [28] Richard Fine, Lawyer Who Accused Superior Court Judges Of Being Biased In Cases Involving L.A. County, Freed After 18 Months Of Jail For Civil Contempt [29] Judge DeAnn Salcido: Odd, Grasping, But Ready For Hollywood! [30] 10 Comments To "San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed TV Show" #1 Comment By CourtWatch_OneOfManyMillions On October 23, 3:42 pm San Diego is known for much corruption in its courts, especially Family Courts. Judge Salcido is a disgrace to humanity. Why it takes an act of Congress, nonetheless, an act of the CJP is beyond this tax paying citizen. There should be a special Grand Jury vote of the citizenry regarding whether she should be indicted for crimes. After seeing the facts, a Grand Jury would easily indict her. But instead, the CJP who supposedly polices their own, gives every benefit of the doubt for their Judges. No adherence to even the slightest possibility of impropriety, rendering the canons as unimportant to any judicial misconduct of any kind. It is true, when the people fear the judiciary, there is tyranny. It doesn t get any more tyrannical than this in San Diego or elsewhere. Also, the Bailiff for this criminal judge should be taken to task by the Sheriff s dept. But it won t happen. The Sheriff s dept. is deeply involved in all aspects of this Judge s crimes, and backs her up completely, unequivocally. LISTEN UP FOLKS THIS IS NO DIFFERENT THAN HILTER S HENCHMAN S CRIMES IN WWII. IT TOOK THE NUREMBERG TRIALS TO BRING THESE MURDERERS TO JUSTICE, AND YES, MANY OF THEM HUNG BY THE NECK, OR WERE IMPRISONED FOR LIFE. THAT WAS JUSTICE. WHAT HAS BEEN, AND STILL IS HAPPENING IN SAN DIEGO IS OUTRIGHT CRIMINAL. THERE WILL BE JUSTICE FOR THE WAYWARD CRIMINALS, IN TIME. IF THE PUNISHMENT WERE A PUBLIC HANGING, THAT WOULD BE ENOUGH OF A DETERRENT FOR MOST POTENTIAL CRIMINALS SUCH AS SALCIDO AND SCHALL. #2 Comment By One of Thousands On October 23, 4:10 pm Salcido s antics, sadly, are but the tip of a large iceberg of incompetent arrogance. There is no corporate environment in the nation much less the county of San Diego in which this type of behavior would be tolerated for ten seconds. Yet in San Diego, Salcido s colleagues simply turned their lazy see no evil eyes away. Shame, shame, shame on you San Diego judiciary for participating in and facilitating the degradation of your communities and public confidence in courts. It s no surprise given that most of you have done little important with your lives other than throw people in a government cage and have little if any accountability, training, or relevant experience. If this happened in a corporate environment you d all be collecting food stamps for your next meal. CCFC Master Exhs. P1152

185 San Diego: Your courts are incompetent at best, but more likely corrupt. Have no ZERO confidence in them. Until heads roll, don t set foot into a courtroom thinking you ll receive fair justice. Solution: Stop paying taxes. Stop obeying orders or laws that don t suit you. Most of your judges certainly don t why should you? Power is the great evil with which we are contending. We have divided power between three branches of government and erected checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. However, where is the check on the power of the judiciary? If we fail to check the power of the judiciary, I predict that we will eventually live under judicial tyranny. Patrick Henry The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated. Thomas Jefferson They were right, and here we are. To kill a poisonous snake, you don t grab it by the tail or battle the fangs you cut off it s head in one swift stroke. Anybody have a hatchet handy? #3 Comment By Burn Them! On October 23, 7:53 pm What do the judges in your article have in common? They wear costumes of black robes, behave as criminals, hurt innocent people, control others with threats, and all are women. Last point makes me wonder there must be some bad male judges, too? Well, no matter, burn them all at the stake for being witches, warlocks, and devilworshippers all! You need to write more about Lorna Alksne s crimes. Her conspiracy with Michael Roddy to violate the California court rules for custody and psychological evaluations went on for years before it was discovered. There s more to report than her actions to hide it by correcting court files years later after the law was already violated. She was the SUPERVISING JUDGE for a whole court system that violated the law to rob families as its way of doing business. She should be the first cast onto the funeral pyre, be sure to pour on some gasoline before tossing the match else her dirty rotten corpse may not burn! #4 Comment By CourtWatch On October 23, 9:11 pm No need to burn them or anyone else. But yes, get them de-robed, and off the bench, and give them some jail time for their crimes, poor judgement decisions. Again, no need to burn em, just put them into the jails and prisons where there are hardened criminals. They ll be taken care of nicely there with the rapists, murderers etc. And who said they are just the female judges? That s not at all true. Some of the male judges are equally incompetent. We are getting numerous reports in, of a couple of judges in Vista, San Diego County, that are largely incompetent as well. If I recall, their names begin with the letter P? I ll have to check my reports that came in these last six months or so, but that s w hat I recall at the moment. It s not a male vs. female judge thing. The males can put on their panties in the morning, just as the females do. Panty Waist Male judges are on the benches in all courts of this land, down to the lowly family court system as well. #5 Comment By Chris On October 24, 1:18 am In my opinion, it s probably at least partly coincidence that there are so many disgustingly bad high-profile female judges in San Diego. But there may be other explanations, too. For instance, perhaps they associate with each other and encourage each other s misconduct. You can certainly find lists of complaints against male judges, too. Take a look at Bonnie Russell s website [31] for a long list of complaints against various San Diego judges, most of whom are men but several of which are also women including Alksne, Salcido, and Trapp. Use the drop-down menu to flip to the Judging Judges page. While I think Russell s proposed solution for domestic violence prevention using GPS tracking with victim notification is likely to cause a lot more crime given the widespread false use of DV allegations as I described previously in [18], it s possible she doesn t understand this. Perhaps she had actual experiences with real DV that were ignored? However, there are a substantial number of people who are being victimized by false allegations, often starting with false DV allegations and moving on to even more serious false allegations. Giving false accusers a weapon, which is what the GPS tracking with notification really is, will cause more false arrests and persecution of innocent people. If you doubt this, consider the story of [32] who has been repeatedly arrested for incidents that his ex-wife causes. Give a person like her a tool like the GPS tracking with victim notification and you will find they will stalk their abuser in order to frame him or her for restraining order violations. Newell s ex-wife should be prosecuted for filing false police reports and causing false arrests. Instead, the police and prosecutors do nothing about her crimes. CCFC Master Exhs. P1153

186 Stopping DV is a great goal and I support Russell in that. But stopping false allegations is also a great goal. Both need a lot of attention and anything done to solve one problem has a high potential to worsen the other. She doesn t seem to account for this and in my opinion plays the gender card too much, so keep this in mind when you re reading her site. She is on the mark with many of her comments, however. I particularly like this one recommending a Federal investigation of the corrupt San Diego courts: Familylawcourts.com recommends a federal panel. One outside San Diego, and the too cozy confines well documented in this area and arena. When you understand the money and referrals flowing between judges, lawyers, custody evaluators, therapists, and other service providers, it is clear there is corruption and abuse and the San Diego courts benefit from it. Russell also clearly points out that parental alienation is a real phenomenon, boosting her credibility immensely in my book. I can understand as a mother that she may identify more with other abused moms than with abused dads, but so many of the feminist websites and organizations out there advocate that all men are evil and parental alienation is not real. They blow their credibility completely so far as I am concerned when they make such blanket denials of established research and the personal experiences of millions of children and parents. #6 Comment By one of thousands On October 24, 3:06 am San Diego: Say what you will about individual judges Salcido s a narcissistic whacko, Alksne s an abusive idiot, Schall s a hothead alcoholic sure. As they currently act, none of them would survive ten seconds in the top law firms in town. The bigger picture isn t about any individual judge. It s about our government and those in power. And we ve screwed up our responsibility to keep it clean. It s like the old barn out back that we didn t pay attention to, and now it s inhabited by a gang of hobos. But this time the hobos have robes and guns and can push us off of our own property. Kill them? Tar and feathers? Throw them in a cage? Sure that would do the trick for now, and it s probably a good idea for most of them. But it s a big city if you don t watch it another gang of stinky bums would move in right behind them. And who s going to sit out back on hobo-watch? You? Me? We got shit to do things like paying taxes so the judges er hobos can have something to eat while they sit idly in our barn with guns telling us what to do. Makes sense right? The trick SD is to demand the best from your judges and, for that matter, all politicians. Today the offices are filled with former DAs generally very weak lawyers. I m a former prosecutor and practicing lawyer believe me there are light years of difference between the competence of your average (or even best) DA/CA and the best attorneys in town. We need the best to lead our extremely powerful public institutions. Putting these bozos in the drivers seat is the equivalent of putting a pine-mirror ornament owning taxi cab driver in charge of driving the USS Nimitz nuclear aircraft carrier. It s recklessly irresponsible, but because of our past choices in ignoring the backyard barn full of bozos, we re stuck with a mile long ship of death run by hobos that smell like each other s urine. San Diego the solution is to vote them out. Judges are mostly ex-das. For the most part they re weak and/or loser attorneys. They graduate from second or third schools and usually in the bottom of their class. They re in the job because they have little ability or incentive to think independently, and usually just follow the flock. In other words, they re like schools of brainless fish jittering and jumping in unison anytime any one of them blinks. It s sad, disgusting, and extremely harmful to a great city like SD, but here we are. Welcome to Paradise. It s odd that in a country that prides itself as free so few of those intelligent enough to exercise their freedoms do. Then again, since George W (the first one, not the recent airhead), T.J., Pat Henry, etc. handed over our great nation to our care and keeping, exercise has not been one of our strong suits. Our expanding waistlines and shrinking hat sizes will prove that. Get off your lazy asses SD judges and protect our citizens or the ship is headed to the disgrace of bankruptcy and decay that it currently deserves. #7 Comment By Janette M. Isaacs On November 7, 12:20 pm All of the comments in this article pertaining to the California Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) are accurate and well worth the read. My numerous complaints to the CJP regarding the legal and unjust custodial timeshare kidnappings of my two younger children attributable to fraud, impersonation, malicious prosecution, obstruction of justice and neglect to adjudicate in accordance with the law have been ignored since My most recent complaint (August, 2010) alleging that my Judge Thomas Trent Lewis intentionally embezzled or misappropriated $53, of my money to further harm me and obstruct justice (which I proved) is still pending an answer. The CJP has proven itself to be a worthless body of bureaucratic accomplices to crimes committed by our Judges. They stand by and do nothing while they enjoy their taxpayer funded paychecks. Until we can replace the members of the CJP with alternates who are committed to doing their jobs and addressing the corruption in our judiciary; promoting media awareness as to their incompetency and failure to act is about the best that we can do. CCFC Master Exhs. P1154

187 #8 Pingback By San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is Corrupt angiemedia On November 11, 11:29 pm [...] November 11th, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments DeAnn SalcidoAs we reported in our story San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed T a few weeks ago, San Diego family law judge DeAnn Salcido has been under investigation by the [...] #9 Pingback By CJP Investigation of Judge Lisa Schall Heats Up, Citizen Input Sought angiemedia On November 9, 6:22 am [...] an .further ReadingSan Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is CorruptSan Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed T Sacramento Judge Peter James McBrien Dismembers Park Trees and Families In Contempt for LawEileen [...] #10 Pingback By Eileen Lasher and Dr. Emad Tadros Interviewed Regarding Kids for Cash San Diego Family Law Court Crimes angiemedia On April 21, 8:26 pm [...] Custody Evaluation LawsSan Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is CorruptSan Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed T Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court MisconductSan Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further [...] Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] 21 page long formal complaint against Salcido: 10.pdf [2] Salcido s 75 page long response: [3] Judge Salcido probe kept secret during election: [4] Lisa Schall: [5] Peter McBrien: [6] TV s Judge Judy: [7] Judge Lorna Alksne who has been involved in the cover-up of court misconduct regarding misfiling and/or destroying mandatory family law court forms: [8] football player Shawne Merriman: [9] Sheriff Bill Ruby Ridge Gore: [10] Facebook page: [11] Richard Fine, the attorney who has made great noise and fury over the illegal payments being made by county governments to the judges discussed in this article and many more: [12] San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is Corrupt: [13] San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining Orders: [14] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed: [15] A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children : [16] Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA: [17] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader: [18] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse: [19] CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010: [20] San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice: CCFC Master Exhs. P1155

188 [21] Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall: [22] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct: [23] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts: [24] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire: [25] Judge s TV dreams make for unpleasant reality: [26] Judge Salcido denies most serious charges: [27] Misconduct charges against judge detailed: [28] Judge Salcido sues Superior Court and Judge Deddeh: [29] Richard Fine, Lawyer Who Accused Superior Court Judges Of Being Biased In Cases Involving L.A. County, Freed After 18 Months Of Jail For Civil Contempt: [30] Judge DeAnn Salcido: Odd, Grasping, But Ready For Hollywood!: [31] : [32] : Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1156

189 - angiemedia San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is Corrupt Posted By Chris on November 11, Comments Recommend Send 14 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. As we reported in our story San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed TV Show [1] a few weeks ago, San Diego family law judge DeAnn Salcido has been under investigation by the California Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) for numerous corrupt and abusive practices including using her courtroom to jump-start a career move into television. It appears she s realized she is the judicial equivalent of thoroughly burnt toast because as part of her misconduct, she angered other corrupt and abusive San Diego judges who have friends in the CJP by her attempts to pose as a reformer to draw fire away from her own actions. DeAnn Salcido She aimed to position herself as a reformer against Judges Peter Deddeh and Peter Gallagher by taking advantage of the child molestation crimes against Amber DuBois and Chelsea King by John Gardner. Salcido Resigns On November 10, 2010, Salcido announced she is resigning from her position. The resignation is part of a deal with CJP to avoid a public hearing on her misconduct in By resigning and accepting censure by the CJP, she avoids increasing the public embarrassment she already faces for her appalling conduct. CJP Does Not Pursue Public Interests California citizens, particularly those in San Diego, should accept that Salcido s resignation is largely not the result of CJP s actions itself. CJP hid the investigation of Salcido until after the election in June 2010, enabling Salcido to win re-election. This is a standard practice for CJP. The organization does not operate in the public interest, as is clearly evidenced by how CJP has failed to send judicial criminals packing in the past. For instance, both felony-pleabargained-to-misdemeanor convicted criminal Judge Peter McBrien [2] and convicted drunk driver Judge Lisa Schall [3] remain on the bench despite repeated CJP investigations against each of them. What killed Salcido s career as a judge is not her abuses, crimes, and misconduct. Such actions are routine for California judges. Her fatal offense was going up against other judicial officers by daring to file a lawsuit against them for their actions [4] in a publicity stunt designed to deflect attention from her own behaviors. CJP Cover-ups and Whitewashing Routine CJP functions by hiding complaints except for a few ones that are particularly egregious and usually already quite public, as was the case for McBrien s felony-level crimes in destruction of trees in a state park for his own financial benefit and Schall s reckless drunk driving the wrong way on a high speed divided road. In most such cases, CJP engages in whitewashing judicial criminals and hiding their crimes from the public until after elections. Because CJP is composed largely of legal professionals and their family members and political allies, California s entire judicial disciplinary system lacks any legitimacy whatsoever. Salcido herself has hinted at this, and while we believe she deserves far worse than what she is getting, we agree with her that she is being treated more harshly than many other judicial violators for political reasons. This should make it very clear to citizens who care about justice in CCFC Master Exhs. P1157

190 California that in reality there is no justice for judges or the citizens they abuse. (from Sacramento Judge Peter James McBrien Dismembers Park Trees and Families In Contempt for Law [2] ) In McBrien s case, he s been punished twice now. The latest is a public censure for misconduct in a 2006 divorce trial. McBrien was up for re-election in November Even though this was a very clear-cut case of violations, CJP didn t issue the public censure against him until January 2010, just over a year after the election. Undoubtedly this helped McBrien get re-elected. Imagine what the results might have been if the public censure had been issued six months to a year before the election. Similar timing can be observed in many other notices issued by CJP. CJP should be paying attention to election timing. The public needs information to determine whether to re-elect a judge. By failing to timely handle judicial misconduct cases, CJP is impeding the public s ability to make competent election decisions on judges. CJP is clearly not operating in the public interests by its actions. Its composition makes this virtually certain to be the case. Traditionally, the majority of CJP members are current or former judges, attorneys, or relatives of a judge. These people have every interest in ensuring that judges can violate the law and people s rights with impunity because they directly or indirectly benefit from it. In recent years, the number of public members who might not be so aligned has increased to provide the illusion of impartiality. But if you investigate the background of these members, it is clear that many of them are connected with the judicial legal community they are asked to police. Californians Have No Confidence in Courts The existing situation is part of why Californians should have absolutely no confidence in their courts, particularly those that lack juries (as do family and juvenile courts) to help reduce the impact of judicial bias, abuse, and corruption. It is common to see judicial criminals in charge of other judges to participate in violations of law and rules and then whitewash the misconduct of their staffs, claiming they are doing a good job while it is entirely clear that they are systematically violating the law. You can see this in the habitual dishonesty of Judge Lorna Alksne, one of Salcido s former supervisors who has overseen widespread violations of rules for child custody evaluations and the use of minor s counsel in San Diego courtrooms. She s not alone far too many California judges are essentially abusive and sometimes profiteering criminals with immunity from prosecution. CJP Should Be Replaced CJP should be sacked and replaced with a citizens commission composed entirely of people outside the legal/political community and tied to a state office devoted to prosecuting government criminals, being able to request investigative assistance from that office and recommend criminal prosecution of the worst of the judges. Such a revised CJP should also include rotating short-term advisors from the legal community who get no vote whatsoever but do get to provide their input on complaints and investigations to the citizen members via written public opinions that all citizens can read. Transparency should be the goal as we have amply seen what the failure to be transparent and public has done in the state s courts. California s secretive family law and juvenile courts routinely seal records and hearings and then proceed to abuse citizens and their children to reward friends of the court, even going so far as to threaten and persecute people they are illegally harming with even more harm if they discuss the crimes publicly. Families and citizens are routinely abused by these criminals dispensing their version of justice that is often far from just and often outright illegal and abusive in an of itself. Short of such a major overhaul, CJP will continue to be an organization of criminally-minded abusers policing their friends. Further Reading San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed TV Show [1] CCFC Master Exhs. P1158

191 San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining Orders [5] Sacramento Judge Peter James McBrien Dismembers Park Trees and Families In Contempt for Law [2] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed [6] A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children [7] Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA [8] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader [9] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse [10] Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? [3] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [11] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [12] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals [13] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [14] Judge Salcido to resign after public censure [15] Curtains Fall on San Diego Judge s Bid for Television Career [16] Judge s Attempts at Humor Leave Judicial Commission Stone-Faced [17] Judge Salcido sues Superior Court and Judge Deddeh [4] 7 Comments To "San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is Corrupt" #1 Comment By one of thousands On November 12, 6:08 am Angiemedia: In 100 years, people will quote >you<. My best always. #2 Comment By Janette M. Isaacs On November 16, 1:27 pm Dear Chris: Your articles are always so truthful and accurate. I simply wanted to validate your position that the CJP is corrupt. I agree that it should be sacked and replaced with a citizen s commission comprised of people outside of the legal and political community. I have been filing formal complaints substantiated by evidence and witnesses to support all of my allegations which include: custodial timeshare kidnappings; obstruction of justice; malicious prosecution; fraud; extortion; impersonation; and now embezzlement since CCFC Master Exhs. P1159

192 February, The CJP is good for one thing and one thing only. That is, burying their heads in the sand. Here is a copy of my most recent complaint to them. Enjoy the last paragraph! Take care and thank you again for exposing the corrupt California Commission on Judicial Performance. JANETTE M. SABA aka JANETTE M. ISAACS Larwin Avenue Chatsworth, CA Home / Fax: E Mail [18] / [19] November 5, 2010 Ms. Sonya Smith Attorney at Law State of California Commission on Judicial Performance 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite San Francisco, CA Re: In re Isaacs LASC Family Law Case BD Follow up on my complaint regarding Judge Thomas Trent Lewis guilty of embezzling $53, of my money in the guise of a Child Support Security Deposit Account, intimidating me with incarceration, manipulating CSSD and Title IV transactions, writing bogus court orders and declaring me to be a vexatious litigant simultaneously with said grand theft, bogus orders and intimidation. Dear Ms. Smith: In the spirit of transparency and accountability, I am updating you with new information and documentation which shall serve to supplement my existing complaint with the CJP. Accordingly, enclosed please find the following documents: Letter dated October 5, 2010 from Court Counsel, Frederick Bennett Last hour of the Clerk transcript of proceedings of September 28, 2010 Request for Production of Records OSC filed 10/22/2010 for hearing on 12/13/10 As you read Mr. Bennett s letter, please note that he begins paragraph 3 by stating You make the contention that Judge Thomas Trent Lewis embezzled or misappropriated funds that had initially been designated for a child support security Deposit Account by issuing an order reallocating those funds. Ms. Smith, the Judge never made a subsequent order to reallocate those funds nor have I ever made that contention. Mr. Bennett s letter is complete misstatement of the facts and my contentions as well. Judge Lewis hijacked my entire Judgment proceeds of >$53,000 and said that he was using them to open a Child Support Security Deposit Account. He never oversaw that the account was opened and then he threatened me with incarceration if I complained about the bogus court order and theft of my money. Mr. Bennett continues by stating there is no evidence that those funds were embezzled. Notice that Mr. Bennett left off the words or misappropriated. As you read the Clerk Transcript of Proceedings for September 28, 2010, I accused the court and Mr. Kolodny of embezzling my money. Judge Lewis evaded my question twice Where s my money. Judge Lewis had no answer. The Petitioner, James J. Isaacs was in contempt of the Judgment, which ordered that my $53, be paid to me forthwith. Had he done that, I would have paid the child support simultaneously ordered with the Judgment, maintained my expenses and enrolled in paralegal school for purposes of employment and maintenance of the support order. On 5/23/2008, I was forced to file an extension (30 days) of my appeal because Judge Lewis had sequestered my records and deprived me of the opportunity to review them for purposes of completing my records designation log. Then, Judge Lewis cut me off at the knees by interfering with my ability to collect on the Judgment (which I was in process of accomplishing) so that I could not even afford to purchase the transcript of proceedings let CCFC Master Exhs. P1160

193 alone buy my life sustaining medication. Judge Lewis s action of signing this bogus court order on 6/25/2008 also caused me to lose my Appeal. Please refer to my Appellate Court docket where you may see that my Appeal was filed on 5/14/2008. I am also enclosing excerpts of the Appellate decision which pertains to my argument that I was rendered indigent by the court and unable to afford my reporter s transcript. Judge Lewis actions of cutting off every last dime to my name were in the spirit of collusion and complicity of contempt on two counts: (1) the Judgment and (2) his own order reallocating those funds into a bogus account. Even if the account had been opened, Judge Lewis discretion was limited to one year s worth of child support payments, which would have been $14, vs. the $53, he illegally hijacked. I would also like to remind you that my younger children were legally kidnapped due to fraud upon the court which dates back to January I should never have lost custody of them to begin with. The support order is based on fraud as is, my entire case. Please refer to my historical complaints regarding the fraud Dr. King and the unethical paid off Gary Chase M.D. Judge Lewis continues to obstruct justice in my case and has now prolonged my custody evidentiary hearing for the 3rd year in a row. He enables and permits Mr. Kolodny s malicious prosecution of me by hearing these bogus contempt of court proceedings. As past performance predicts future performance, I fully anticipate that this biased dishonest judge s next move will be to incarcerate me again next year as he rules on preponderance of evidence standards relating to this most recent bogus contempt of court action filed by his buddy, Mr. Kolodny. Ms. Smith, I am disappointed that you and our California Commission on Judicial Performance has neglected to act on any of my complaints. Your failure to act gives the appearance that you are complicit with this corruption. Are you all complicit with this corruption? If not, why is Judge Thomas Trent Lewis still presiding over my case, or any one else s case for that matter? I look forward to your reply. Sincerely, Janette M. Saba aka Janette M. Isaacs #3 Pingback By San Diego Superior Court Seeks New Grand Jury For 2011 / 2012 angiemedia On December 14, 1:17 am [...] abusive Christine Goldsmith with her nepotistic control over the San Diego City Attorney, and TV-star-wannabe DeAnn Salcido (who recently resigned over her misconduct) that the Grand Jury would literally have to investigate most judges for misconduct and eventually [...] #4 Comment By Lisa On January 3, 2:00 pm Judge MCBRIEN, has now lost judicial immunity in Federal Court, ULF CARLSSON v PETER MCBRIEN findings and recommendations, on PACER. #5 Comment By One of thousands On October 31, 12:30 pm These judges have gone to great lengths to prove their character. How dare we deny them that opportunity to show that they are complete lying talentless scumbags. Look-if you were a cruel idiot who could make a living only by destroying the lives of your fellow neighbors-wouldn t you??? Don t be stupid-of CCFC Master Exhs. P1161

194 course you would. I don t care if America is headed for the dumper-as long as me and the judges are on top of the sinking pile of feces, I m ok with that People get ready, there s a train a comin You don t need no baggage, you just get on board All you need is faith to hear the diesels hummin Don t need no ticket, you just thank the Lord People get ready- YOU are the train. Get on board and REFUSE to be oppressed! #6 Pingback By CJP Investigation of Judge Lisa Schall Heats Up, Citizen Input Sought angiemedia On November 9, 1:55 am [...] to assist in their investigation and hopefully forcing her removal from office much as happened to Judge DeAnn Salcido who resigned when she was on the verge of being removed from office for abuse an. All:I have just spoken with the investigator for the Commission on Judicial Performance handling [...] #7 Pingback By Commissioner Alan Friedenthal s Public Admonishment By California Commission on Judicial Performance angiemedia On August 9, 11:18 pm [...] Alan H. FriedenthalCJP Investigation of Judge Lisa Schall Heats Up, Citizen Input SoughtSan Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is CorruptSan Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed [...] Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed TV Show: [2] felony-plea-bargained-to-misdemeanor convicted criminal Judge Peter McBrien: [3] convicted drunk driver Judge Lisa Schall: [4] file a lawsuit against them for their actions: [5] San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using Restraining Orders: [6] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed: [7] A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children : [8] Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA: [9] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader: CCFC Master Exhs. P1162

195 arrest-of-group-leader/ [10] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse: [11] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct: [12] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts: [13] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals: [14] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire: [15] Judge Salcido to resign after public censure: [16] Curtains Fall on San Diego Judge s Bid for Television Career: [17] Judge s Attempts at Humor Leave Judicial Commission Stone-Faced: [18] : mailto:londonbritches@aol.com [19] : mailto:litigantsforjustice@gmail.com Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1163

196 - angiemedia San Diego Judge Edward Allard On The Way Out for Misconduct? Posted By Chris on July 19, Comments Recommend Send 5 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. We ve recently heard that San Diego family court Judge Edward Allard III, department F9 at the Sixth Avenue courthouse, has been racking up a growing pile of complaints. While this is no different than many of the abusive and corrupt family law judges in San Diego, there are reports that he s about to be moved out of department F9 over his unwillingness to be a reasonable judge. Rumors are that he will shortly be removed from the family law bench and possibly moved to some form of purgatory for judges. Video criminal arraignments were mentioned as one possibility. We re a bit skeptical of the rationale for Judge Lorna Alksne removing him from family law courts. If she were to apply the same reasoning to other judges in her oversight, she and many others would be joining Allard in purgatory. Perhaps it is simply a way for Alksne to play sleight of hand and blame others for the abusive, corrupt, and destructive practices of many of the judges under her supervision. We don t have details on particular cases of misconduct, but note that Allard s RateTheCourts.com [1] ratings look poor. Out of 29 surveys completed, he s earned an F (0.29) rating. A representative comment is this one: (from RateTheCourts.Com: Comments for Edward Allard III, San Diego [2] ) This judge is incapable of being impartial. Change judges if you have the chance before it s too late. He does not have the ability to get any thing done in a timely manner. He could care less if your case drags on forever. He clearly has anger issues and blows up easily in court. My entire family witnessed this first hand. I would give more specific examples, but I m actually afraid of him and how he might abuse his power to retaliate against me. Among the more favorable comments on him was this: (from RateTheCourts.Com: Comments for Edward Allard III, San Diego [2] ) I love judge Allard he made me feel good in court and winked at me and reassured me that I will win my case. He blasted my husband and made him so little and then stepped on him like a bug. My husband is such a loser and a wimp I don t know why I married him and to see him cry in front of the judge was pathetic. It made me sick. I just can t stand weak men and he deserved the restraining order because he wouldn t listen to me and make more money. I feel great I got all the money when my husband was in jail and he can t go back to the house ever thanks to judge Allard so I will be selling all my husbands stuff in a garage sale and will get more money. Judge Allard thanks for your love and support for all women. I am glad your staff called me to make sure I was all right. I would really want to go out with a real man like you. Denise XOXOXOXOXO As for a replacement, speculation is that newly appointed Judge Margo Lewis may be taking over department F9. (from Gov. Schwarzenegger Appoints Margo Lewis to San Diego County Superior Court [3] ) Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger today announced the appointment of Margo L. Lewis to a judgeship in the San Diego County Superior Court. Lewis, 43, of San Diego, has served as a partner for Moore, Lewis, Schulman & CCFC Master Exhs. P1164

197 Moore since Previously, she was an attorney and partner for Lewis & Schulman from 1997 to Lewis served the San Diego Community College District as an adjunct faculty member for the Legal Assistant Program in Family Law in She was a sole practitioner from 1995 to 1997 and a partner at Galam, Lewis & Pope from 1994 to 1995 and Galam, Hurt, Lewis & Pope from 1993 to Lewis earned a Juris Doctorate degree from California Western School of Law and a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Iowa. She fills the vacancy created by the disability retirement of Judge John L. Davidson. Lewis is a Republican. The compensation for this position is $178,789. As usual, we d welcome your insights on Judge Allard, Judge Lewis, or any of the other San Diego family law judges or divorce industry players. If you re afraid to comment on your experience with an abusive judge or government official due to the likelihood of retaliation, we do accept anonymous comments. You can make them truly anonymous to the point that we and our service providers will not have your IP address on record by using anonymizing web proxies or anonymizing networks such as Tor. Our article Tamworth, NH Shows Why You Should Stay Anonymous [4] provides some examples of why it s often best to stay anonymous when criticizing abusive government officials. In that case, a critic of the town government found himself with a $4 million property tax assessment as punishment for expressing his views. When criticizing a family law judge, your children and their future are at risk because many of these judges will persecute a parent and harm children when it suits their own personal agendas. The article Exercising Your Free Speech Rights Despite Government Harassment [5] explains how you can use technological tools to preserve your anonymity while sharing your thoughts with the world. If you re careful to follow the guidelines and use the tools mentioned properly, you can view and comment on websites or even publish your own blog without revealing your identity, even if the local tyrants in your area decide to subpoena the records of web hosting and Internet service providers in an attempt to identify and suppress your criticism. Further Reading Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed [6] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse [7] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader [8] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [9] Amicus Curiae brief filed for Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne [10] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals [11] Unjust Delays in San Diego Family Law Courts [12] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [13] Margo Lewis appointed to Superior Court judgeship [14] 6 Comments To "San Diego Judge Edward Allard On The Way Out for Misconduct?" #1 Comment By Celeste Cortes On July 25, 2:10 am CCFC Master Exhs. P1165

198 In a neighborhood CHULA VISTA, CA 91913, a self admitted Pedophile lives. What do I mean by self admitted? Well, first he admitted it to his wife, then to a family therapist, then to a San Diego County CPS social worker, then he made a sworn Deposition for J.A.M.S, then he admitted it San Diego Family Court. NOW, that s what I meant by self admitted. Apart from that, his Step-son has made sworn affidavits with graphic details about this guy abusing him as a child. There is even an unsolved murder of this guy s 12 year old niece that was found in a abandoned house, knowm to be used by the homeless as a drug house and brothel. Why is this guy running loose? Bonnie Dumanis is why? At least that is what Judge Allard III said. When I called Bonnie Dumanis she said it was the police s fault. So I called the North Park police (where this sexual abuse he admitted to happen) and they said it s Judge Allard III s Fault. No matter whose fault it is, the result is the same. What is the result well, This Self admitted Pedophile has full custody of his victim and is he left to run free in the neighborhood. #2 Comment By abused mom On July 29, 7:29 pm What makes anybody think Margo Lewis will be a good judge? Or even better than Allard? Margo Lewis was a horrible attorney. She is a greedy manipulative bitch. As a judge expect nothing else. Parents, when you see her assign children s lawyers jobs to her friends and business partners like David Schulman, know this: it is about the money, not the children. #3 Comment By Chris On July 29, 10:01 pm It turns out that the family law legal rumor mill must be wrong about some of this story. At a minimum, the timing is off. According to San Diego Superior Court staff listings, Margo Lewis has been assigned to the main courthouse department 8. Perhaps the potential for nepotism was a consideration given her partnership in a firm that does minor s counsel representation. Whatever the reason may be, as a criminal judge she isn t going to be assigning family law attorneys to represent children. #4 Comment By Disgusted On August 28, 9:21 pm Margo Lewis is a fraud. She doesn t do anything to help kids in need. Sbe doesn t file mandatory children s attorney reports. She doesn t present bills for her services, not even when a judge ordered her to. Then she got a judge to more than quadruple her fees and help her extort the family she was abusing to fill her bank accounts. San Diego judges and San Diego attorneys are in cahoots. They are organized criminals, pillaging and abusing families. The FBI should be investigating them for corruption, fraud, extortion, child abuse, and more. #5 Comment By Karen On May 20, 4:03 pm Celeste: You are a nut! You have involved yourself with every crackpot in town who doesn t like the way their divorce turned out. But being a crackpot yourself its no wonder. You are CCFC Master Exhs. P1166

199 calling someone a pediphile when you have NO FACTS whatever. You re listening to the rantings of another crackpot like yourself. #6 Comment By Jim B. On October 13, 11:21 am I was in grade school and junior high (Woodrow Wilson J.H.) with judge Lewis. She was smart, popular, rich and attractive then too. Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] Allard s RateTheCourts.com: [2] RateTheCourts.Com: Comments for Edward Allard III, San Diego: [3] Gov. Schwarzenegger Appoints Margo Lewis to San Diego County Superior Court: [4] Tamworth, NH Shows Why You Should Stay Anonymous: [5] Exercising Your Free Speech Rights Despite Government Harassment: [6] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed: [7] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse: [8] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader: [9] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire: [10] Amicus Curiae brief filed for Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne: [11] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals: [12] Unjust Delays in San Diego Family Law Courts: [13] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct: [14] Margo Lewis appointed to Superior Court judgeship: Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1167

200 California Coalition for Families and Children, et al. vs. San Diego County Bar Association, et al, United States District Court, Southern District of California Exhibits to Complaint Exhibit 9 CCFC Master Exhs. P1168

201 - angiemedia Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff Posted By Chris on April 20, Comments Recommend Send 62 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. We re not ready to endorse a candidate for San Diego Sheriff yet, but we do believe that we have ample reason to advise voters to vote for somebody other than Bill Gore. Gore is a member of the good old boys network of San Diego political corruption. His personal friend, former Sheriff Bill Kolendar, jammed through Gore s role as interim sheriff with full support of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors when Kolendar retired in Bill Gore From speaking with those familiar with Gore and the duties of the sheriff who benefit from a vantage point inside of the Sheriff s Department, it is our understanding that there is little respect for Gore from many of the officers of the department. Gore reportedly hasn t ever held a role in local law enforcement previous to becoming interim sheriff via backdoor political machinations. What experience Gore has in law enforcement comes from serving as an FBI agent for 32 years. Yet in this capacity, Gore did not have to manage large numbers of personnel, manage a budget, or perform many of the other tasks that the sheriff must handle. But management inexperience may be a minor concern compared to the others arising out of Bill Gore s history with the FBI and his ties to the corrupt political machine ruining San Diego County. Bill Gore And Ruby Ridge Government Murders More concerning, Gore s record as an FBI employee is fraught with problems. He was the agent in charge for the Ruby Ridge FBI assault on Randy Weaver s family that resulted in multiple fatalities, including the death by shooting of a mother holding a baby and a child shot in the back as he fled law enforcement gunfire. The government settled out of court with a $3.1 million award to Randy Weaver for the wrongful deaths of his wife and son. (from Shredding the Bill of Rights by Gore Vidal [1] ) Others had done the same, including the Weaver family, who had moved to remote Ruby Ridge in Idaho. Randy Weaver was a cranky white separatist with Christian Identity beliefs. He wanted to live with his family apart from the rest of America. This was a challenge to the F.B.I. When Weaver did not show up in court to settle a minor firearms charge, they staked him out August 21, When the Weaver dog barked, they shot him; when the Weavers 14-year-old son fired in their direction, they shot him in the back and killed him. When Mrs. Weaver, holding a baby, came to the door F.B.I. sniper Lon Horiuchi shot her head off. Gore is believed to be the government agent who issued the kill on sight orders to federal law enforcement agents that lead to the unnecessary and wrongful deaths. Gore plead the 5th Amendment during an investigation of the FBI and US Marshall Service misconduct that resulted in the deaths at Ruby Ridge. Some speculate that Gore was merely trying to protect his law enforcement buddies who killed the Weavers rather than trying to protect himself. Even if that is so, it illustrates that Gore s loyalties are not with the citizens and Constitution which he is supposed to protect. They lie first and foremost with the CCFC Master Exhs. P1169

202 dangerous goons in law enforcement who abuse both. Obviously this makes him a poor choice for Sheriff in and of itself. Bill Gore And 9/11 Terrorists in San Diego Gore was also involved in the failure of the FBI to apprehend 9/11 terrorists training in San Diego to use airplanes as manned flying bombs. An FBI informant working with the FBI San Diego office, of which Gore was in charge, was in contact with two of the terrorists. Yet the FBI missed the opportunity to catch them before they killed thousands. Gore claims there was no evidence of Al Qaeda activity in San Diego and that s why his branch didn t find any such evidence. (from Ex-FBI Official Assails 9/11 Report [2] ) The congressional report on the Sept. 11 attacks is rife with inaccuracies and greatly exaggerates the possibility the terrorist acts could have been prevented, according to the former head of the FBI s San Diego office. In an interview, former Special Agent in Charge Bill Gore asserted there was no evidence the FBI missed opportunities to catch two of the hijackers who for months lived in San Diego. He also said there was no evidence that anyone, including Saudi officials, knowingly assisted the terrorists. I believe the joint intelligence committee jumped to conclusions not supported by the facts of the FBI investigation, Gore said. I was convinced by the time I left the FBI [in] January that there was no Al Qaeda support network in San Diego prior to or after 9/11, and that no group of people wittingly helped the hijackers in furtherance of the 9/11 attacks. In its 900-page report, the joint panel of the House and Senate intelligence committees criticized the pre-sept. 11 counterterrorism analysis done by the FBI and CIA. The report suggests there were several missed opportunities to foil the attacks, and that alleged intelligence failures were especially obvious in San Diego, where two hijackers were known to a longtime FBI informant. Bill Gore Deploys Military Crowd Control Weapons At Political Rallies Even if you buy into Gore s version of the San Diego 9/11 connection and dismiss the Ruby Ridge fatalities as being somebody else s fault, look at Gore s track record as interim sheriff. Gore has made it clear he values control and power, including the ability to inflict harm upon citizens at political events, more than he values his nominal role in protecting citizens. (from San Diego Sheriff deployed military crowd control device at Congressional town halls [3] ) Rep. Susan Davis-D Calif. and Rep. Darrell Issa-R Calif. held town halls that exceeded capacity (10,000+ total attendees) and prompted the Sheriff s Department to have Long-Range Acoustic Devices(LRADs) standing ready. Both town halls took place without incident; however the use of the military device concerned San Diegans. The LRAD crowd control is primarily used in Iraq to control insurgents and can cause serious and lasting harm to humans. According to the manufacturer, American Technology Corporation, the LRAD provides military personnel the capability to transition through the rules of engagement to determine a target s intent and also provides greater assurance that innocent lives on both sides of the device are not lost due to miscommunication. CCFC Master Exhs. P1170

203 Why did SDSO Deploy Military Sonic Weapon at Healthcare Town Hall Meetings? Sheriff s Court Services Role in Abusing Litigants Even if you re not a criminal, if you find yourself in San Diego family law courtroom you have reason to be afraid of Sheriff s Department employees acting as the muscle for abusive judges such as Lisa Schall, Christine Goldsmith, and Lorna Alksne. The department provides bailiffs and court security. Yet judges like these are willing to misuse law enforcement to persecute people who anger them. Schall Reprimanded for Abuse of Power Schall is the family law judge who has been responsible for alleged misconduct in the divorce case of Cole Stuart and Lynn Stuart. While Cole Stuart professes to be shocked by her conduct in the courtroom, it isn t anything new for her. Schall was reprimanded by the Commission on Judicial Performance for ordering a bailiff (a sheriff s department deputy) to take a litigant into custody and jail her because she became upset in the courtroom during her family law case. (from Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? [4] ) Many judges seldom do a thing about perjury and contempt of court. Schall is usually no different, but when she has chosen to act, she s done so abusively and illegally. In 1995, Schall abusively misused a contempt of court ruling to imprison an upset litigant for five days in violation of court rules. She illegally ordered the bailiff, an apparently uninformed and/or spineless employee of the San Diego Sheriff s Department, to violate the litigant s legal rights and throw her in jail. As many bailiffs errantly believe they are akin to a personal security detail for judge-dictators, the bailiff did Schall s illegal bidding. The California Commission on Judicial Performance publicly admonished Schall for this misconduct. Bullying Citizens Upset With Family Law Courts Judge Lorna Alksne, supervisor of family law judges in San Diego, is suspected of having acted in concert with Schall and/or Goldsmith, City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, the San Diego County Bar Association, and possibly others to set up Attorney Cole Stuart for arrest during a California Coalition for Families and Children (CCFC) protest against her corrupt courts. CCFC Master Exhs. P1171

204 On April 8, either Schall or Goldsmith signed a TRO against Cole Stuart. He was trying via to arrange times to talk with his son on the phone. As with so many hostile and alienating parents, ex-wife Lynn Stuart opposes this and is willing to use dirty legal stunts to attack her ex-husband. This sort of abuse with the assistance of the court is routine for judges in San Diego, especially when they have self-interest to serve as has been the case for Alksne, Schall, and Goldsmith. Schall is biased against Cole Stuart in part because he filed a Commission on Judicial Performance complaint against her for her misconduct in his divorce case. Slapping a TRO on him and working to have him arrested would be payback for her. Alksne and Goldsmith have a bias against Cole Stuart because he and CCFC members are building up support to reign in the corruption and abuse of the San Diego family law courts. On or about April 14, San Diego judges and court employees became aware of Stuart s plans to protest the April 15 family law seminar sponsored by the San Diego County Bar Association and which Alksne would be attending. Based upon our logs, we believe they may have learned about the protest via an article on our website. The courts issued an arrest warrant for Stuart on April 14, yet he wasn t even served the TRO until April 16. The arrest warrant request was filled out as a felony offense, something they will likely claim was a clerical error as that isn t even applicable to the charge of annoying phone calls which is at most a misdemeanor. Cole Staurt was inside the family law seminar on April 15 and had paid for his admission. He was not causing any trouble, nor were any of the other protesters. Lorna Alksne became aware of his presence, possibly after having been informed by ill-reputed custody evaluator Stephen Doyne who makes frequent appearances in Alksne s family law courts. She disappeared backstage after speaking. Shortly later, six uniformed sheriff s deputies were reportedly glaring at Cole Stuart. It appears that Alksne coordinated having him forced out of the seminar by SDCBA security so that San Diego Police Department (SDPD) could arrest him for a misdemeanor that demands no such aggressive action. Despite attempts to influence them to act more aggressively, SDPD was planning to wait until he left the seminar to contact him and had communicated this to other security and law enforcement personnel at the scene. Our initial information was that Schall signed the TRO, but later Cole Stuart reported to us that he found Christine Goldsmith s name on the CLETS TRO printout he was served by the Sheriff s Department the day after San Diego Police Department arrested him. Further, we ve been informed that it was Goldsmith s husband, San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, who signed the arrest warrant request. It appears that Cole Stuart is a target of the San Diego political insider network that includes such ill-reputed parties as the Goldsmiths, Bonnie Dumanis, Bill Gore, and many San Diego judges and politicians. Apparently this form of legal service was staged to make it appear more legitimate that he was arrested for a violation of a TRO of which he was never told until after being arrested. It was reportedly further defective in that they failed to notify him of the hearing date on April 28, Reportedly Judge Christine Goldsmith proceeded to issue a permanent restraining order on him even though he was improperly served notice and didn t even know of the hearing until we contacted him to ask for his comments. According to the San Diego Sheriff s Department, Cole Stuart now has a 5 year restraining order on him. Yet he never had an opportunity to defend himself as required by law. It strongly appears the courts manipulated law enforcement in both San Diego Police Department and San Diego Sheriff s Department to violate his due process rights and the law for their own political agendas. That they can do this even to an experienced civil attorney goes to show they are perfectly capable and willing to violate the rights of anybody targeted by the corrupt San Diego courts and their allies. So why was Cole Stuart handcuffed and removed from the SDCBA seminar when SDPD wanted to wait? It s likely because Alksne and her cohorts wanted to shut him up, embarrass him publicly, and intimidate the protesters. Witnesses state there were discussions about arresting other protesters, but San Diego Police Department refused to do it because they were not causing trouble. While sheriff deputies didn t do the dirty deed of slapping on the handcuffs because SDPD had jurisdiction, there is no question in the minds of witnesses that if this had been outside of the City of San Diego that Alksne s goons supplied by the Sheriff s Department would have followed her orders even if they were an CCFC Master Exhs. P1172

205 illegal use of her authority with intent to abuse citizens she and her fellow abusive judges dislike. Given Gore s bent on trampling citizen s rights and even lives, there is no likelihood he would ensure SDSO deputies are trained to refuse to execute illegal orders by a judge and to report the judge for abuse of power. Gore s Connections To Bonnie Dumanis Are Disturbing While certainly not all San Diego judges are abusive, biased, corrupt, and incompetent, the ones who aren t becomes targets for the diseased San Diego political machine. Some of them are under attack from law enforcement elements such as Bonnie Dumanis and her prosecutors that hide exculpatory evidence in violation of the law [5] because they have dared to cite and oppose the illegal actions of the District Attorney s office. Gore worked for Dumanis after he retired from the FBI and is likely to side with wellconnected abusers like Dumanis over the citizens he is supposed to protect. Having a sheriff like Gore who clearly has no regard for citizen s rights makes it all the more likely that courts using law enforcement as a tool to persecute their opponents and anybody else they dislike will be a recurring outcome of the corrupt San Diego courts. Citizens should not have to fear law enforcement violating their rights, yet Gore has done this himself with deadly effect and is aligned with others who do it for political purposes. Citizens Speak Out Against Gore As shown by our further reading links below, there are many aware of Bill Gore s record that are opposing his continuing role as sheriff. Craigslist Rants N Raves shows that even common citizens have started to point out that Bill Gore is a poor choice for sheriff. While some of the writers there engage in childish bickering and worse, it s clear that at least some who are aware of the impending vote are very much against electing Bill Gore as shown by this example posting: (from Bill Gore for Sheriff- hell no!! [6] ) For critics of Bill Gore, this news comes as no surprise. Gore has a history of heavy handed actions toward American citizens. In 1992 he was the FBI s agent in charge of the highly criticized Ruby Ridge incident; issuing shoot on sight orders to his snipers and other FBI SWAT Team operators. This resulted in the unjustified homicide of the families mother, who was holding her baby in her arms at the time the FBI snipers bullet struck her in the head and killed her. The family s son was shot in the back while running away and family dog were also killed. Gore later plead the fifth at the Senate subcommittee hearing, which heavily criticized the FBI for this incident. The FBI later fired and disciplined numerous members of Gore s FBI assault team, but as the senior agent in charge of the assault, Gore came out apparently unscathed. We hope voters will be wise and select a better candidate than Gore for the important position of San Diego County Sheriff. Either Jay La Suer or Jim Duffy would make a better choice for sheriff than Bill Gore. It s time to stop the dominance of the crooked San Diego political machine over the citizens. When election day comes, if you remember nothing else, remember that a vote for Gore is a vote for continued abuse and violation of the rights of the citizens for the benefit of a local government that is dominated by a corrupt political insiders club. Further Reading Custom Search Search Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA [7] CCFC Master Exhs. P1173

206 CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader [8] Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? [4] John Van Doorn Runs for San Diego County Supervisor in 2010 [9] San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice [5] Wikipedia: Ruby Ridge [10] Law Enforcement Operations at Ruby Ridge From August 22, 1992 Until August 31, 1992 [11] Ex-FBI Official Assails 9/11 Report [2] Stafford: If FBI Agent Bill Gore had been at all competent in this job 9/11 would not have happened [12] San Diego Sheriff deployed military crowd control device at Congressional town halls [3] Gun rights advocates demand to be heard at San Diego Sheriff Debate [13] San Diego Sheriff Raids Political Fundraiser for US Congressional Candidate Francine Busby [14] Busby Blames Local Resident s Political Agenda, Sheriff s Department Officer In Raid On Fundraiser [15] 11 Comments To "Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff" #1 Comment By Built Stronger On April 21, 7:02 am Appointed Sheriff Gore; Why did you deploy an LRAD weapon to Congressional Healthcare Town Hall Meetings? [16] #2 Pingback By Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse angiemedia On April 22, 3:21 am [...] Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff [...] #3 Pingback By A Judge s View of Best Interests of the Children angiemedia On July 6, 7:05 am [...] such annoying people. We are thankful to have the support of law enforcement, including our friends Sheriff Gore and Chief Lansdowne, in such [...] #4 Pingback By DA Bonnie Dumanis, DDA Laura Gunn Not Immune from $20 Million Federal Lawsuit angiemedia On July 19, 5:15 am [...] trades endorsements and campaign support with these people, from family court judges CCFC Master Exhs. P1174

207 to her friend Sheriff Bill Gore. Stopping the abuse in local government is an unlikely prospect without first getting rid of power [...] #5 Comment By John V. Doorn On August 31, 8:38 am Gore, has to help the health care lobbyists stay out of harms way? Why else would you have interest in listening to a health meeting with a known weapon? Gore, can get away with this because of the Patriot Act I think he was searching for the Taliban rebels who are tring to keep Americans alive through health care reform? Or maybe he was using his second amendment of our constitution to bear arms? Or maybe he was practicing and your home is the next objective? Patriot Act means we are in Marshall Law! #6 Comment By Joe Bago On September 1, 10:37 am Shake your head and see if it rattles. A great deal of the information about Gore came out from candidate Bruce Ruff s Campaign (website) months before Duffy or LaSuer touted Gore s shortcomings. The public was sternly warned at virtually every debate by Ruff about Gore s incompetence and the scope of the good ol boy network Gore had been associated. From Kolender to the Commissioners to Ruby Ridge, everyone was warned about the fix. Ruff predicted the betrayal of Kolender quitting early and installing Gore over a year ahead and the end result is what the sheeple got. No one listens. I agree Duffy and LaSuer would have been better, but they had background problems as well. Ruff got disgusted with the whole charade and backed away. Ruff has all the experience and qualifications in all phases of the job acquired over 30 years. People need to educate themselves. #7 Pingback By San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Demeans Litigants and Justice to Create Demo Videos for Her Proposed TV Show angiemedia On October 23, 10:25 am [...] to San Diego judges who then proceed to violate the law at the command of these judges. But with Sheriff Bill Ruby Ridge Gore in charge of the department and the San Diego County Board of Supervisors stacked with its own [...] #8 Comment By One of Thousands On October 28, 12:20 am Bill Gore is a murderer. In any sane society such a monster would be strung from a high tree for his treachery at Ruby Ridge running an F.B.I. operation indisputably responsible for murdering an unarmed woman and child running for their lives >after committing no crime. No doubt, they held politically unpopular beliefs disgusting political beliefs. Was Randy Weaver a model citizen? No. He was a white supremicist and clearly not the kind of guy most educated people would want to hang out with. Did he have a right to be on his own property and say whatever dim-witted stuff he wanted? I couldn t imagine any of our founding fathers, no matter how much they disagreed and how much we disagree with the content of his speach, would say no. In fact, they d probably say that s why we risked and in many cases gave our lives freedom from the yoke of government oppression telling you what to say, think, and do. Gore deserves the same fate he has inflicted on dozens wrongfully-accused, punished, and even murdered citizens. Yet in the Sanders/Dumanis/Goldsmith/Lansdowne/Gore reign of terror gripping San Diego, which utilizes clear terror tactics to inflict it s horror, so many go whistling past the graveyard we selectively ignore the truly despicable state of affairs these demons impose. Solution? Vote them the hell out. Ignore police in fact give them a piece of your mind. Tell CCFC Master Exhs. P1175

208 them they re inflicting horror on their own neighbors and depriving our country of the blessings of liberty described in the Constitution. To Protect and Serve they have to be kidding us. To Harass and Oppress For Financial and Political Gain We Couldn t Otherwise Obtain If We Weren t Jackboot Tyrants should be the motto. If we all stand up and shout back together, they ll have little choice but to back down. Until we do, the tyranny creeps will keep creeping. Let them cut us out one by one and the tyranny will keep creeping. Creeping toward You, San Diego. First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me. ~Pastor Martin Niemoller, regarding the stunning complacency of the German people in the face of advancing Nazi tyranny Speak up San Diego. The words to use are No f ing way #9 Comment By Mavado On November 17, 3:57 pm Sheriff gore is corrupt, Rebecca Zahau s blood is on his hands, what is he hiding? I want to see a full investigation, not only about the Rebecca Zahau case, but a full review of his entire career. #10 Comment By Lu Liu On December 16, 5:45 pm Gore called Dr. Phil s evidence sensational and short on facts. After watching Dr. Phil s Show, I found that it was based on the fact regarding Rebecca Zahau s case. What the hexx was Gore talking about??? Don t fool citizens anymore. Your power is just temperary You are the one that short on facts but manapilatinging power to expand your part of rotten society. Politcal clown. I have seen these kinds of political scandals everywhere which involves with these wolves covered with sheep skin. Only time will show and will tell how is going to affect them and their family if these wolves have the same situation it s pathetic that most these politician made the shame out of the US. #11 Pingback By A Vote for Bonnie Dumanis Is A Vote For Corruption And Abuse angiemedia On May 22, 10:00 pm [...] Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff [...] Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] Shredding the Bill of Rights by Gore Vidal: CCFC Master Exhs. P1176

209 [2] Ex-FBI Official Assails 9/11 Report: [3] San Diego Sheriff deployed military crowd control device at Congressional town halls: Examiner~y2009m9d11-San-Diego-Sheriff-deployed-military-crowd-control-device-at- Congressional-town-halls [4] Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?: [5] Bonnie Dumanis and her prosecutors that hide exculpatory evidence in violation of the law: [6] Bill Gore for Sheriff- hell no!!: [7] Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA: [8] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader: [9] John Van Doorn Runs for San Diego County Supervisor in 2010: [10] Wikipedia: Ruby Ridge: [11] Law Enforcement Operations at Ruby Ridge From August 22, 1992 Until August 31, 1992: [12] Stafford: If FBI Agent Bill Gore had been at all competent in this job 9/11 would not have happened : [13] Gun rights advocates demand to be heard at San Diego Sheriff Debate: Examiner~y2009m9d13-Gun-rights-advocates-demand-to-be-heard-at-San-Diego-Sheriff- Debate [14] San Diego Sheriff Raids Political Fundraiser for US Congressional Candidate Francine Busby: [15] Busby Blames Local Resident s Political Agenda, Sheriff s Department Officer In Raid On Fundraiser: [16] : Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1177

210 - angiemedia John Van Doorn Runs for San Diego County Supervisor in 2010 Posted By Chris on February 24, Comments Recommend Send 2 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends. John Van Doorn has announced he is running for San Diego County Supervisor in We believe he deserves strong consideration for your vote in the June 2010 primaries. The corruption and abuse within the County of San Diego government threatens the wellbeing of the citizens and particularly children and parents of the county. Bill Horn, the incumbent candidate, has participated in hiding and continuing these abuses. Despite two decades of San Diego Grand Jury reports detailing how San Diego CPS has wrongly removed children from families, fabricated evidence, perjured, and acted in a malicious fashion against many parents and children, Bill Horn has not lifted a finger to correct these problems despite being a member of the County Board of Supervisors during this long era of egregious CPS misconduct. ELECT JOHN VAN DOORN TO THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN 2010 DISTRICT 5 I m running again in 2010 as I continue to feel passionately about the issues I raised in Thanks to the people of District 3 for their vote of confidence in that message. I knew that as a newcomer to the political scene, in running against a very well liked incumbent, I was likely to face resounding defeat. However, in receiving 30% of the vote in the June primary, this was to me, an affirmation that the message and issues I put forward in the campaign were very much on the hearts and minds of San Diegans. That said, in the past year, I ve heard from many of you about the concerns felt by many of the residents of District 5, that being, our vulnerability to wildfire, our ever dwindling supply of water, and our current supervisor s questionable relationships with developers. It s time to bring an outsider into this office, one that does not have ties to big business or special interests, one who wants to make himself available to you and your concerns. As such, I am running for the office of County Supervisor of San Diego County, District 5, and I hope we have the chance to meet in the months ahead, discuss some of your concerns about where this county is headed and come June and possibly November, see to it that we the voters bring about for ourselves the leadership we deserve and can trust! My 2010 website will be up and running before the end of February. Until then, you can click here to view my 2008 website as it looked back at the election in 2008, nothing has changed since then (other than our address and FPPC number). If you would like to contact me, you can me at jvandoorn@cox.net. Again, I look forward to the privilege of being considered as your next County Supervisor! 2008 Campaign In 2008, John Van Doorn ran for the County Board of Supervisors as a virtually unknown candidate against four-term supervisor Pam Slater-Price. Despite his newcomer status, he attained 30% of the vote. I believe his strong showing in part came from sharing his views about how the County of San Diego is harming children and families and how he wants to stop this destruction. His CCFC Master Exhs. P1178

211 personal experience with the corrupt and broken San Diego government and courts has educated him in the way the county hurts children and parents for a profit. He has seen in person the abusive conduct of County of San Diego Child Welfare Services (commonly referred to as San Diego CPS). He has been subjected to harm against his family by the broken San Diego County Superior Courts that fail to understand that children need both parents. It s evident to him that the County of San Diego government has decided that declaring fit parents as child abusers or bad parents and tossing their children into foster care or sole custody are viewed as money-making opportunities. The county gets Federal Title IV payments for each child it takes from a family, each parent it labels as an abuser, and each child support case it opens up. You and your children are but dollar signs to the County of San Diego. They care about their budget and jobs, not about your family. John Van Doorn says that he knows this well and wants to put an end to it. Using Children To Pump Up Revenues The County of San Diego has financial motivation to label you as a child abuser or a bad parent. That you have not abused or neglected your children or that you may have made a mistake that has CPS upset at you but did not seriously endanger any children doesn t matter to them. The shocking truth is that San Diego CPS management predetermines the outcome of some risk evaluations to meet their financial goals. You can be declared a child abuser to have your children taken from you and put into foster care so that the County of San Diego can get paid by the federal government for doing it. They are likely to fight to keep your kids in foster care, even if there is no reasonable justification, as they earn federal Title IV-D revenues for each child in foster care. John Van Doorn related in a conversation in January 2010 that this disgusting practice of predetermined risk evaluations was revealed to him by a CPS case worker as an explanation for why he couldn t change a CPS report with false information and conclusions. He said his supervisor told him what the outcome would be before he even did the interviews. He explained that he could not change his report even though he knew the bruise on the child involved was from slipping in a bathtub and hitting the tub spout and that this has been verified by the interviews. Van Doorn was alarmed and brought attention to this problem in a public meeting of the County Board of Supervisors. He explained how these practices hurt innocent parents and children who are in no danger. Instead of moving to correct the problem by ensuring CPS management stops this abusive profiteering, the CPS case worker who disclosed the abusive practices of CPS management was promptly fired. Hiding Title IV Funding Dependencies Upon Abusing Families CPS and the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors want to hide their very dirty secret that a large part of funding for county operations comes from abusing children and parents to get payments from the federal government. It doesn t just involve foster care and child support, it even involves adoptions. For many years, by delaying or blocking adoptions, the county maintained its revenue stream for each child living under its protection in foster care. That foster care is statistically more dangerous than leaving children with their biological parents is well known but commonly ignored because putting children in foster care is more profitable and helps keep county social worker jobs secure. When this problem became apparent to some in the federal government, rather than cracking down on the CPS family abusers, they passed a law allowing payments to county governments for each child they adopted out to make up for the revenue loss. Now adoptions are more often supported by San Diego County. It s not because they realized that adoptions are generally better than leaving children in foster care until age 18 and then kicking them out on the streets. They are now more supportive because adoptions have become yet another revenue center for the county. Maximizing revenue involves declaring parents child abusers, taking their kids and putting them into foster care, and then moving to terminate parental rights and adopt out the children. This is the way County of San Diego Child Welfare Services (CPS) helps funds its own operations and that of other county agencies. John Van Doorn wants to end this practice by substantial cuts in funding and employee count CCFC Master Exhs. P1179

212 for the family-abusers in county government. Children who are in danger should still get help to ensure their safety, but children who are merely poor or needy or whose families are going through temporary difficulties shouldn t be removed from their homes simply because the government can make a profit on them. Broken Family Law and Juvenile Law Courts This corruption spreads into the San Diego family law and juvenile courts. The judges know that they are expected to help fund county and court operations. They can do it by issuing unfair and punitive child custody and child support orders as part of the Title IV federal funding paid to the County of San Diego is for collecting and enforce child support. Taking away children, dragging out trials for years, and abusing families are tactics they can use to help do their part to fund county operations. Encouraging the use of psychological evaluators in cases in which they are not needed is another tactic that the local courts use to pass along dollars to their friends. Van Doorn has experience with this abuse, too. Despite a fair and impartial psychological evaluation by one psychologist that pointed out the good points and flaws in both parents, the courts allowed Van Doorn s ex-wife to force a second psychological evaluation conducted by ill-reputed Dr. Stephen Doyne. Doyne was allegedly upset at Van Doorn for not being able to pay him because his assets were frozen by the court due to the divorce. Van Doorn pointed out that his ex-wife could pay, so it appears her payments got her the evaluation she wanted. The San Diego Superior Court rubber-stamped this corruption and the county benefits from it doing so as the county is paid by the federal government to place children primarily or solely with one parent to force the other parent to pay child support. (from Custody Evaluator s Credentials Questioned In Lawsuit [1] ) John Van Doorn, a Doyne client, said You have a certain expectation that the courts have vetted out the person they are appointing. San Diego family law courts have allowed Stephen Doyne to act as a court-appointed psychological evaluator even though he appears to have published questionable and allegedly fraudulent credentials and failed to file state-mandated disclosure and reporting forms required of all psychological evaluators. Doyne has earned the ire of many San Diego parents for allegedly biased evaluations and unethical business practices. Some of the other section 730 psychological evaluators in the county have been critical of Doyne, expressing the opinion that Doyne is making a bad name for all psychologists involved in resolving child custody and divorce disputes in the county. Too often the result of this type of corruption is that children are prevented from spending more or less equal time with each of their parents. The abuse of using a divorce or child custody case as a means to impede or terminate parent/child relationships is traditionally committed against fathers. But it sometimes happens to mothers, too. Whichever parent is the target, the children will suffer harm in virtually every case. Even when good evaluators spell out workable plans to keep both parents involved in the lives of their children, San Diego courts may misuse such evaluations in winner takes all decisions that ultimately harm the children and are extremely unfair to one of the parents. Children need both parents. The government should get its fingers out of perverting children s lives for its own financial gain. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with children who have adequate food, shelter, clothing, education, and medical care (which is the case with the vast majority of children) from spending equal time in each parent s home and seeing that their parents have made different choices and have different lifestyles as a result. This would be far more beneficial to the children than yanking them away from one parent, damaging or destroying that child-parent relationship, and doing so to maximize the amount of child support to be paid and thereby maximizing the amount of Title IV funding that the County of San Diego will be paid to enforce these abuses. New County Board of Supervisors Members Needed The wrongs heaped upon San Diego children and parents will never stop with the current board members in place. As one of our authors wrote last year: (from San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct [2] ) CCFC Master Exhs. P1180

213 The failures and shortcomings in the CPS agency in the county have been brought to the attention of the Board of Supervisors repeatedly. Yet they do nothing effective to fix the problems, leaving CPS and its abusive staff free to continue to abuse the county s children and parents. There is no realistic doubt that the current San Diego County Board of Supervisors is substantially at fault for the abuses in the current system. Grand Jury reports have exposed the problems to them over and over again with substantial evidence of the misconduct of CPS and its sister child-abusing agencies. But little to no action is taken to correct the serious deficiencies. The current Board of Supervisors consists of Greg Cox, Dianne Jacob, Pam Slater-Price, Ron Roberts, and Bill Horn. All five of the supervisors have been in office since 1995 or earlier, a period of time during which Grand Jury investigations have consistently shown that serious problems exist with CPS and that the agency blows off the recommendations to fix them on a routine basis. The county supervisors have no incentive to clean up problems in the system because to do so, those problems must be discussed further. This is political risk-taking intolerable to them. They know they were in charge during this whole period of time and should have done something about the problems. Doing it now is effectively an admission that they were negligent in the past. Instead, they do all they can to bury these problems behind the scenes so that they are not politically damaged by their harmful and negligent conduct. The county badly need new leadership to put an end to these problems and clean up the abuses and corruption. John Van Doorn is a candidate who has stated that he intends to do exactly that. While he alone may not be enough to clean up the county, there s no doubt in my mind that the alternative of re-electing Bill Horn will certainly lead to four more years of the same bad government. Further Reading Custom Search Search San Diego County Board of Supervisors Candidate Questionnaire Responses in 2008 [3] Men s Legal Center Endorsement for John Van Doorn in 2008 [4] John Van Doorn Contact Information [5] John Van Doorn 2008 Campaign Site [6] San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice [7] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [8] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [9] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct [2] Torture of the Wade Family by San Diego CPS [10] Conservatives Organize Rare Push Against Incumbent Judges [11] Child Welfare Urged To Tell Parents Why Kids Taken [12] CCFC Master Exhs. P1181

214 No Term Limits for San Diego County Supervisors [13] Imposing Term Limits on County Supervisors [14] Enter the daughter: Bill Horn scrambles to explain his relationship with his chief of staff [15] San Diego News More on Horn/Wonsley financial irregularities story [16] Lifting the Veil: A Critical Look at the Foster Care System [17] Nationwide Blueprint for Title IV Reform [18] TITLE IV GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD WELFARE SERVICES [19] 7 Comments To "John Van Doorn Runs for San Diego County Supervisor in 2010" #1 Comment By Joan Parro On March 1, 3:56 pm I sent you an from both the San Diego County Federated Republican Women and the Oceanside Republican Women Federated inviting you to two separate meetings. I used the [20] and it won t go thru. What is another I can use? Please help me. Joan Parro, Program Chair #2 Comment By Chasity On March 29, 7:52 pm Hey I m a mother, and going through a custody battle. Ever since, the grandmother of my son (his dad s mother) is constantly making malicious reports on me. All have been unfounded, with the exception of one in VA. Her and her son and daughters lied and said that I gave her youngest daughter alcohol when I didn t but they believed her. Don t know why, when I have witnesses saying that I wouldn t do that. CPS also made up lies from witnesses on my side, saying that they told them something different, and one was one of my best friends and others that CPS told me they had contacted and really didn t. Also now the grandmother is still making false allegations against me for abuse and neglect, and all of those have been unfounded. DSS tells me that there is nothing they can do to stop her even though DSS now knows that she is making the reports to harass me and try to gain custody of my son. The GAL and DSS is aware of this. Also the judge won t let anyone else try this case which I feel is biased. I have a clinical social worker that tells me something can and should be done. This judge has gone so far as to giving shared custody between myself, dad, and grandmother without considering that the child has other grandparents that never get to see him because they live in another state. When I don t have my son the dad s family has him, so when my family is in town for holidays my son is always with them. Why can t anyone help me or give me some straight answers to why the system is allowing this woman to continue to abuse the sytem to try and gain custody based on lies. When does a judge say ok, this is where I draw the line!! Or is it just the simple fact that the whole system is corrupt?!! #3 Pingback By Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff angiemedia On April 20, 3:35 pm [...] John Van Doorn Runs for San Diego County Supervisor in 2010 [...] CCFC Master Exhs. P1182

215 #4 Comment By Tariq Mousa On April 29, 12:23 am Tonya from District Attorney s Office North County Division stated to me that her office is 10 feet from the 5th District Board of Supervisors. She agreed to go on a recorded voice memo that states she has worked next door to Bill Horn s Office for 2 years and has not seen Bill Horn in his office or his staff members at his 5th district office at 325 N. Melrose Suite 5200 the whole 2 years she worked there. #5 Comment By Tariq Mousa On May 11, 6:30 am Hello every body I have personaly spoke to John Van Doorn and myself victim of CPS my name is Tariq Mousa I my self agree with the statement that there is some very corrupt people runnig CPS. When I was A child CPS would come to my house alot, to be exact 7 times there where violent act done to me by my Step father Bob Lawrence these reports are documented by schools and baby sitters and reported to CPS. The digree of violent behavior Reported was every thing from bitting me to beating me with belts at age 5 that left welts of black and blue on legs and butt. Back in the day when the police would come to a domestic seen for example if the husband was beating there wife and or child the police would not arrest the husband, what would accur is the police would tell the wife to leave and get a hotel since they could not ask the husband to leave since he was on the lease. I did this on a regular basis I swear, it was insanity!!!!! The funny thing is Im entitled to my childhood records up to 38 years of age but CPS and the county sent me a certified letter stating my child abuse records where sealed with out my permission and all information thus far has been destroyed. But all juvinille criminal history remains these buricrats that run our county run it with very poor moreality and they really don t care about people it really sucks.oh by the w ay my mothers name is Betty Law rence and my? To her is w hy did she let that guy do that to me over & over& over again? And to the county my question is Why? To Your suprise the reason I contacted John Van Doorn was not becuase of CPS but becuase of our corrupt medical system & our currupt fith district supervisor Bill Horn oh by the way folks I have an audio of the DAs office stating Bill Horn hasn t been in his office in 2 years here in N County which is 7 feet away from Bill Horns front office. When I spoke to John Van Doorn he explained to me that 5 years ago CPS took his children from him, John thought I was another father in the same boat I knew this becuase he explained to me he understood what I was going through why he thought this I don t know. He then explained to me how CPS workers lied on witness stands and they told John they where above the law why he told me all this I don t know? I explained to this man I have incriminating evidence against the medical establishment he explained I should give up becuase trying I was not going to go any where with my efforts in a very polite way he explained I would either go insane from disapointment or would end up dieing..as my conversation went on with this man as he ridiculed me for being emotional while he telling me he knows how corporations are billing the goverment for medical services over charging and leaving patients sick. He told me I would better serve the good of the people WE is if I healed and wasn t emotional then people would believe me. I then I asked John if other sick patients call you and there emotional because the medical system are you going to tell them when there better and and non emotional then you be of help he then hung up on me! I called him bac and he said he can t help and if I wanted to express my self I would need an advocate. So I have been having friend call and ask him?s. My first friend spoke to him for 30 min he told my friend Nate if he got elected he would help me. This is not the case case I had another person call and John started saying dud because he was being asked sensitive?s and said to him the children are more important well hey buddy Im one of the victims of the CPS system too! Can you be a little more sensitive please! The? my friend asked was how is Tariq supposed to get better if the Dr.s lie to him My? If we want to make this land great we need basic principles love, kindness, forginess, hope, peace, honestly & most of all God like it says on our money In God We Trust. Oh so I meet with Fabio Marci at Starbucks yesterday this man has a soft heart for you who do not understand he is very kind and very eager to help the community he works full time and he has these traights, quick to listen, slow to speak that is what we want in community leaders he s genuine you can tell he s never been about a quick dollar he s miticulase and punctual and out to do the best he can with no bios opinions and no hidden agendas like getting back at CPS..We need a leader like Fabio who tells me when he goes to fundraisers people give him $50 & $100s as donations not lots at a time but what people can afford. John Van Doorn explained to me with his 2 months of CCFC Master Exhs. P1183

216 fundraising efforts he s only taken in $150 in total donations I told him how can you a run a campaign on a $150 he told me he s spent $150,000 out of his own pocket I asked how he got it he explained to me he was successful in his last position. My question is if you only got $150 in fundraising money in 2 months why would you throw your own money away like that. If this is any indication on yr business sense you should you have no rite in a county buget especially when u have $150,000 in expenditures and a $150 in profit We want people in office like Fabio who don t lie about the donations they recieve and are willing to help more than them selves. Real leaders lead by example they should be humble John Doorn you of all people know what it s like to be a victim of buricratic madness you of all people should have compassion twards the children and it s victims old and young. John you decided if you can t beat em join em. Thank You For Reading Tariq Mousa The Good Word Truth! #6 Comment By Tariq Mousa On May 29, 10:22 am People are watching angiemedia.com because of the Attack on Tariq Mousa by Angie Media what they call the Vindictive Campaign THE PEOPLE with BDP is Angie Media for sleeping with the pharmaceutical companies. Im with my Attorneys and I saved everthing to disk and gave it to some one responsible! THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE! Jesus LOVES #7 Comment By admin On June 18, 10:10 pm Tariq, your animosity towards us is misguided. Where have we attacked you in any way? Not writing about your issues is not the same as attacking you. As for your allegation that we re sleeping with the pharmaceutical companies, that is nonsense. We ve written repeatedly about the corrupt collusion between big pharma and the FDA contributing to the deaths of many people and denial of safer cost-effective treatments to many more. How is that in any way aligned with pharmaceutical companies? It is our understanding that you talked with John Van Doorn and he cautioned you that you could hurt your own cause by behaving in this fashion, but that you didn t seem to understand the message. Article printed from angiemedia: URL to article: URLs in this post: [1] Custody Evaluator s Credentials Questioned In Lawsuit: [2] San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct: p=3715 [3] San Diego County Board of Supervisors Candidate Questionnaire Responses in 2008: [4] Men s Legal Center Endorsement for John Van Doorn in 2008: [5] John Van Doorn Contact Information: [6] John Van Doorn 2008 Campaign Site: [7] San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice: CCFC Master Exhs. P1184

217 p=5982 [8] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct: p=5277 [9] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire: p=5068 [10] Torture of the Wade Family by San Diego CPS: [11] Conservatives Organize Rare Push Against Incumbent Judges: [12] Child Welfare Urged To Tell Parents Why Kids Taken: [13] No Term Limits for San Diego County Supervisors: [14] Imposing Term Limits on County Supervisors: [15] Enter the daughter: Bill Horn scrambles to explain his relationship with his chief of staff: [16] San Diego News More on Horn/Wonsley financial irregularities story : [17] Lifting the Veil: A Critical Look at the Foster Care System: [18] Nationwide Blueprint for Title IV Reform: [19] TITLE IV GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD WELFARE SERVICES: [20] : mailto:jvandoorn@cox.net Copyright 2010 angiemedia. All rights reserved. CCFC Master Exhs. P1185

218 Judicial elections raise questions of how judges should fund their campaigns attorneys in suits and ties, munching on grilled vegetables with Gorgonzola dressing and redsdcitybeat.com Dave Maass April 27 th, 2010 view original Illustration by Adam Vieyra. The Palm Court room of the U.S. Grant Hotel is swarming with jurists judges and private CCFC Master Exhs. P1186