In ation Tax and In ation Subsidies: Working Capital in a Cashinadvance model


 Barry Hill
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 In ation Tax and In ation Subsidies: Working Capital in a Cashinadvance model George T. McCandless March 3, 006 Abstract This paper studies the nature of monetary policy with nancial intermediaries that provide loans for working capital in a cashinadvance model with indivisible labor. Monetary policy occurs through money injections either directly to families or to the nancial intermediary. Stationary state injection to the families produce an in ation tax while injection directly to the nancial intermediary provide an in ation subsidy that improves output, consumption, and welfare. The dynamic properties, as responses to a monetary inpulse, of both models are compared. Introduction Cash in advance models of money traditionally result in equilibrium where money injections work as a tax, reducing welfare and creating misallocation of resources. The model of Cooley and Hansen [3] is the classic example. However, these models do not generally include any form of a nancial system. In this paper we add a simple nancial system that lends to rms to nance working capital. We assume that the wage bill has to be paid before the rm receives payment for its production so the rms must borrow from a nancial intermediary to cover these expenses. Households acquire physical capital as well as deposits in the nancial system and rent out the physical capital to the rms. We assume that rents on physical capital are paid after the rms are paid for their output. Monetary policy works through lump sum transfers of money into the economy. We consider two ways that money can enter the economy. One way, as in Cooley and Hansen, money can be transfered directly to the households who can use it to make in period consumption purchases or can lend it to the nancial intermediary. The alternative way of injecting money that we consider is through lump sum transfers directly into the nancial system. As we will see, the form of monetary injection is very important in determining the e ect monetary policy has on the economy. Of course, one could also consider the case of lump sum money transfers going directly to the rms. The equilibrium
2 for this economy turns out to be identical to that with transfers directly to the families. Models of real business cycles have been incorporating working capital as a way of generating a positive hump shaped response to a monetary impulse. Christiano [], Dotsey and Ireland [4], and Christiano and Eichenbaum [] are examples of real business cycle models where variants of working capital are included in real business cycle models. The model studied here is more stripped down than theirs, there are fewer other elements added, and we get a clearer picture of the implications of how money enters the economy. The point of this paper is the importance that modeling the monetary system and how monetary policy is carried out. Many papers on monetary policy invoke helicopter money drops directly to the citizens as their way of injecting money into the economy. Central banks work through the nancial system as they implement their monetary policy and without a well modeled nancial system, we may well be missing extremely important characteristics of monetary policy. A model of working capital We construct a model with nancial intermediaries, mutual funds or a banking system, that borrows money from the households and lends money to the rms to nance the wage bill. Our basic assumption is that the rms must nance the entire wage bill by borrowing money from the nancial intermediaries. Compared to a simple cash in advance model, households have an additional asset in which to save, the lending to the nancial intermediary. The behavior of the nancial intermediaries needs to be de ned. This is important because the rms may be constrained in their production decisions by their access to nancing for working capital. In addition, one needs to determine exactly how new money issues or money withdrawals will occur. In the CooleyHansen model, new money enters the economy through direct lump sum transfers to the households. This method is also possible in a model with working capital. However, it is not the only method available. The monetary authority might choose to inject money into the economy through lump sum transfers to the nancial intermediaries. As we will see, this choice is far from innocuous. We describe separately the behavior of the households, the rms, and the nancial intermediaries. In the presentation of the model, we present both versions at the same time, showing how the budget constraints are di erent in the model where transfers go directly to households compared to when they go to the nancial intermediary. Then we compare the stationary states for the two methods of injecting money into the economy. Finally, we compare the impulse reponse functions of the two models responding to monetary shocks.. Households
3 We begin with households. Every household i from a unit mass of households maximizes the same utility function, X E 0 t=0 t ln c i t + Bh i t ; where B = A ln( h 0 )=h 0, h 0 is the number of indivisible hours of work that a household provides to the market if it is one of the families chosen to work, and c i t is the consumption of family i in period t. The common discount factor is 0 < <. The fraction of families that work is h t t=h 0 and the unemployment rate is h t t=h 0. Families face a cashinadvance constraint. The cashinadvance constraint for the family depends on the method used for introducing money into or removing money from the economy. Constraint holds when the transfer goes directly to the families and constraint applies when the transfer goes directly to the nancial intermediary. The cash in advance constraints are c i t = m i t + (g t )M t N i t ; () when the transfer of money goes directly to the families and c i t = m i t N i t ; () when it does not, when it goes to the nancial intermediary. In these constraints, m i t is the money that family i carried over from period t, (g t )M t is the lump sum transfer or tax of money, and Nt i is the amount of money that family i lends to the nancial intermediary at the beginning of period t. The families also face an inperiod real ow constraint (after the cashinadvance constraint has been removed from both sides of the equation) of m i t + k i t+ = w t h i t + r t k i t + ( )k i t + r n t N i t ; where ks i is family i s holdings of capital, which is a credit good and money is not required to purchase it, w t and r t and real wages and rentals, respectively, rt n is the gross interest rate paid on lending to the nancial intermediary. First order conditions for the family s optimization problem are = E t (r t+ + ( )) ; w t w t+ B = w t E t + c i ; t+ r n t = c i t E t + c i : t+ Notice that the household s rst order conditions are the same for both methods of introducing money into the economy. The di erences in the two methods show up in the budget constraints. 3
4 . Firms Firms are perfectly competitive and produce the same good. They rent capital from the households and hire labor. Labor must be paid its wages before the good is sold, so rms borrow working capital from the nancial intermediaries to pay wages. All rms are alike so we just consider a generic rm. Given that rms are perfectly competitive, they make no pro ts and the real budget constraint for each rm is Y t = r f t w t H t + r t K t ; where r f t is the gross interest rate that each rm pays the nancial intermediaries for borrowing working capital to nance their wage bill of w t H t. The production function is CobbDouglas, Y t = t Kt H where t is a technology shock with t ; ln t = ln t + " t ; 0 < <, and " t N(0; ). Under conditions of perfect competition, equilibrium conditions for the factor markets are and r f t w t = ( ) t K t H t ; r t = t K t H t :.3 Financial intermediaries The nancial intermediaries are perfectly competitive and take deposits (loans) from the households and lend them to the rms. The lending to the rms is paid back at the end of the period. The conditions for the nancial intermediary depends on the way the monetary authority introduces money into the economy. When money is introduced by direct lump sum transfers to the families, lending to the rms is N t = Z 0 N i t di = w t H t ; and since the nancial intermediaries make no pro ts, their budget constraint is simply r n t N t = r f t N t : (3) When money is injected into or withdrawn from the economy by transfers to the nancial intermediary, then lending to the rms is N t + (g t )M t = w t H t ; (4) and the budget constraint for nancial intermediaries is r n t N t = r f t [N t + (g t )M t ] : (5) 4
5 Notice in this second method of introducing new money to the economy, injection of money will cause the lending rate to the rms to be di erent from borrowing rate from the households. The monetary policy rule of the monetary authority follows the process M t = gg t M t ; where g is the stationary state growth rate of money and the stochastic monetary shock g t follows the process, with 0 < <, and " g t N(0; g )..4 Aggregation conditions ln g t = ln g t + " g t ; Since all rms, nancial intermediaries, and households are the same, and we have a unit mass of each, the results for the representative agent will be the aggregate for the economy. This means that, in equilibrium, m i t = M t ; N i t = N t ; c i t = C t ; and h i t = H t : 3 Stationary states We de ne a stationary state with constant gross money supply growth rate of g as an equilibrium where all real variables are constant and the nominal variables are equal to the constants M t = M=P ; and N t = N=P ; + = g: From the rst and third foc s of the households we get the stationary state conditions, r = ( ); and r n t = g : 5
6 Households arbitrage between the real return on the two assets in which they can invest, capital and lending to the nancial intermediary so the stationary state real return from capital, + r = =; is equal to the stationary state real return on lending to the nancial intermediary, rt n =+ = =. Notice that the stationary state values of these two interest rates are independent of the method of injecting money into the economy. 3. Transfers directly to families We designate values for the stationary state with transfers directly to the families by the subscript "D". Using equation 3, we have r fd = r n = g ; so we can use the factor market conditions for the rm to get w D = g ( ) r : The second foc for the households gives C D = wd Bg = ( ) ; Bg r where w D was substituted into the second expression. condition in a stationary state is The cashinadvance C D = M=P D N=P D ; and putting this into the ow budget constraint for the households gives K D = r h C D r n w D H Di ; and from the production side of the economy, we have H D = r r n w D K D : These two equations can be solved for K D and H D, where K D = C D [(r ) + r( )=] ; Using the budget constraint for the nancial intermediaries, one gets N=P D = w D H D : 6
7 The stationary state values for the rest of the variables follow immediately. For a quarterly standard cashinadvance economy with indivisible labor (from Cooley and Hansen), the values used for the parameters are = :99, = :05, = :36, h 0 = :583 and A = :7. The table below shows the stationary state values for the variables of the model when money is injected into the economy through direct transfers to the households. Annual inf lation 4% 0 0% 00% 400% g :99 :04 :9 :4 r :0350 :0350 :0350 :0350 :0350 r n :0000 :00 :0343 :00 :44 r f :0000 :00 :0343 :00 :44 M t = M=P :7093 :6675 :573 :09 0:766 N t = N=P 0:7907 0:767 0:745 0:4553 0:737 C 0:987 0:9004 0:8587 0:6358 0:459 Y :354 :08 :547 0:855 0:6090 w :3706 :3469 :99 :97 :6645 H 0:3335 0:369 0:38 0:308 0:644 K :6707 :485 :843 8:7695 6:464 utility 0:9455 0:9485 0:9568 :0485 :64 In ation functions as a tax on the economy. Higher stationary state in ation rates imply lower consumption, production, employment, and utility. These results are very similar to those of Cooley and Hansen [3]. 3. Transfers to nancial intermediaries When the transfers of new money are made directly to the nancial intermediaries, there are two important changes in the structure of the model. The rst is in the equation of the household cashinadvance constraint. Since there are not transfers of money directly to the households, equation is the one that holds. In a stationary state, this equation is C F = M=P F g N=P F ; (6) where the stationary state values for the economy with transfers to the nancial intermediaries are designated by a superscript of "F". Given that the transfers go to the nancial intermediary directly, the zero pro t condition for the nancial intermediaries is given by equation 5. In a stationary state, this condition is r n N=P F = r N=P ff F + ( g )M=P F : (7) The second foc for households can be rearranged to give w F = 7 CF gb ;
8 which we will use to remove wages from the model. Substituting this into equation 4, and evaluating in a stationary state gives the equation C F gb H F = N=P F + ( g )M=P F : (8) From the factor market equations, we get, after substituting out wages, r ff = ( ) r C F gb : (9) Finally we use the household ow budget constraint to get " M=P F = g N=P F C F # gb + (r ) H F : (0) r The ve equations 6 to 0 are a system in the variables M=P F, N=P F, C F, H F, and r ff. Using the same parameter values as above, the solutions to the system were calculated using MATLAB and the rest of the values for the stationary state followed directly. The the values calculated are shown in the following table. Annual inf lation 4% 0 0% 00% 400% g :99 :04 :9 :4 r :0350 :0350 :0350 :0350 :0350 r n :0000 :00 :0343 :00 :44 r f :0 :00 0:984 0:859 0:680 M t = M=P :6557 :6675 :6960 :8896 :395 N t = N=P :7736 :7675 0:753 0:666 0:576 C :8988 : :9040 0:953 0:9458 Y :087 :08 :58 :444 :70 w :393 :3469 :430 :870 3:476 H :363 :3688 0:38 0:3360 0:3434 K :3967 :48 :4690 :767 3:0454 utility 0:9488 0:9485 0:9479 0:9445 0:948 In this model, stationary states with higher rates of money growth have higher output, consumption, real wages, hours worked, capital, and utility. Calculating the unemployment rate as H=h 0, as a function of the stationary state rate of money growth (which equals the stationary state in ation rate) for the two models, one gets the Phillips curves shown in Figure. In the model with working capital and money injections via the nancial intermediaries, money injections operate as a subsidy to hiring labor, reducing the real cost of labor. The reductions in the real cost of capital increases demand 8
9 gross growth rate of money = inflation rate curve.5 paper phillips.4.3 model with transfers to FIs.. model with transfers to families :pdf fraction of families unemployed Figure : Phillips curves for the two models and more labor ends up being hired. With more labor hired, the marginal product of capital increases and stationary state capital is higher. For the model with working capital where the transfers of money are made directly to the families, in ation has the same e ect as in the basic CooleyHansen model, in ation works as a tax in the economy and reduces output and employment so the Phillips curve implies higher unemployment with higher in ation. Recall that in all cases in this graph of Phillips curves, we are comparing stationary states. 4 Transfers directly to the rms A version of this model with lump sum money transfers going directly to the rms ends up being identical to that with transfers to the families. The rst order conditions for the families are the same as in the other models, the cashinadvance constraint is and the ow budget constraint is c i t = m i t N i t ; m i t + k i t+ = w t h i t + r t k i t + ( )k i t + d i t + r n t N i t ; where d i t is the lump sum dividend payment that the family recieves as its share of the pro ts of the rms. The rms maximize pro ts, D t, where D t = t Kt Ht r f t w t H t (g t ) M t r t K t ; 9
10 and (g t )M t = are the real value of the lump sum transfers of money to the rms. The rst order condtiions for pro t maximization are t = t K t H t r t = t = ( ) t K t H t r f t w t = 0: These rst order conditions are the same as in the other models. Here, however, the rms make pro ts of r f t (g t )M t = rather than the zero pro ts in the other models and this amount gets transfered to the families as dividends, and in equilibrium, Z 0 d i tdi = D t = r f t (g t ) M t : The nancial intermediaries lend to the rms the di erence between the wage bill and the money they receive from the new money issue, Since they make no pro ts, N t = w t H t (g t )M t : r n t N t = r f t N t : All the rst order conditions in this model are the same as in the model where the money injections go directly to the families. Using the equation for dividends and for total loans, given above, and substituting them into the families cashinadvance and ow budget constraints give and the ow budget constraint is C t = g t M t w t H t ; M t + K t+ = w t H t + r t K t + ( )K t + r f t (g t ) M t = w t H t + r t K t + ( )K t + w t H t : + r n t The equations for this model, at the aggregate level, are the same as for the model with injections going directly to the families. Therefore, the stationary state equilibria (and the dynamic properties given below) are also the same. 5 Dynamic properties of the models The short run reactions of the models to a money growth shock can be observed by rst loglinearizing the models, solving the linear versions for matrix policy functions, and then comparing the impulse response functions that result from the same money shock. Loglinearization and the solution for the policy matrices of the models is done following techniques described in McCandless [5]. N t 0
11 The following is for the loglinear version of the working capital model where money injections go directly to the family. These equations describe the approximate ( rst order) behavior of the model around a stationary state. The stationary state values of the variables (those indicated by a bar in the equations) are determined as above and depend on the stationary state growth rate of money. 0 = ew t + e E t e Pt+ E t e Ct+ ; () 0 = ew t E t ew t+ + re t er t+ ; () 0 = er t n ew t + C e t ; (3) h 0 = C ept + C e i t M=P M f t M=P eg t + N=P N e t ; (4) 0 = M=P M f h i t + r n N=P M=P ept + KK e t+ wh( ew t + H e t ) (5) rker t (r + )KK e t r n N=P N e t r n N=P er t n ; 0 = ew t + er f t e t K e t + H e t ; (6) 0 = er t t e ( ) K e t ( ) H e t ; (7) 0 = e Y t e t e K t ( ) e H t ; (8) 0 = er f t er n t ; (9) 0 = N=P e N t N=P e wh ew t wh e H t (0) 0 = f M t eg t f Mt : () Equations,, and 3 are the loglinear version of the family s rst order condtions. Equation 4 is the loglinear version of the cash in advance constrant with money injections going directly to the family. Equation 5 is the family ow budget constraint. Equations 6, 7, and 8 come from the production section, the rst two are the factor market conditions and the third is the aggregate production function. Equation 9 comes from the zero pro t condition of the nancial intermediary. Equation 0 is the working capital condition, that borrowing equals the wage bill. Equation is the money growth rule. In addition to this set of equations, we have the rules for the evolution of the technological and monetary shocks, e t = e t + " t ; and eg t = eg t + " g t : h De ning x t = ekt+ ; M f t ; P e i 0 h t as the state variables, yt = er t ; ew t ; Y e t ; C e t ; H e t ; N e i 0 t ; er t n ; er f t h i 0 as the jump variables, and z t = et ; eg t as the stochastic variables, the system can be written as 0 = Ax t + Bx t + Cy t + Dz t ; 0 = E t [F x t+ + Gx t + Hx t + Jy t+ + Ky t + Lz t+ + Mz t ] ; z t+ = Nz t + " t+ :
12 This system can be solved (using MATLAB) for a set of policy matrices of the form x t = P x t + Qz t ; and y t = Rx t + Sz t ; where (g = or the in ation rate equals 0 for the example shown here), 3 P = ; 4 0: : :490 0:0306 Q = ; :0337 :64 3 0: : : R = 0: : ; 6 0: : : :8309 0:5768 0:470 0:047 :8309 0:5768 S = 0:4077 0:3538 :98 0:903 : 6 0:7347 0: :065 0: :065 0:339 The loglinear version of the model with money injection going to the nancial intermediary is the same as the one given above except for equations 4, 9, and 0. These equation become, respectively, h 0 = C ept + C e i t M=P g fm t + N=P e N t ; 0 = r N=P f + M=P er f t + r f r n N=P N g e t r f r n N=P + r f M=P e g +r f M=P eg t + r f M=P fm t r n N=P er t n ; g
13 and 0 = N=P e N t + M=P +M=P eg t wh ew t wh e H t : Mt f N=P + M=P g e g The policy matrices that come from solving this linear system are and x t+ = P x t + Qz t ; y t = Rx t + Sz t ; where (again for the case where g = 0), 0: P = ; 0: : :00 Q = ; :0337 0: : : : R = 0: : ; 6 0: : : :8309 :4 0:470 0:79 :8309 :4 S = 0:4077 :7 :98 :939 : 6 0:7347 0: :065 : :065 0:877 The two models are identical in their response to technology shocks. In addition, the deterministic part of the policy functions (matrices P and R) are identical. The di erence is the way the two economies respond to monetary shocks. This can be seen by comparing the second columns of matrices Q and S. The responses to a monetary shock of capital, real rentals, real wages, output, hours worked, and the interest rate paid by rms are of opposite signs in the two models. Figure shows the responses to a :0 monetary shock of for the two models over thirty periods. 3
14 money injections in FI two models imrs 0 ss Response to money impulse gbar=.00 hours money 0.0 output capital rn loans prices r rf 0.0 consumption :pdf money injections in household Figure : Models with 0 annual in ation 4
15 money injections in FI two models imrs 0.0 Response to money impulse gbar= hours money output capital rn 0 loans prices r rf 0.0 consumption 3:pdf money injections in household Figure 3: Models with 00% annual in ation If a variable responds exactly the same way to a monetary shock in the the two models, the line in the graph for that variable would fall on the 45 line. This is the case for the response of the money stock to the monetary shock. Lines with positive slopes indicate that the variable is responding in the same direction, but possible with di erent timing and magnitures to a monetary shock. Lines with negative slopes indicate that the variable responds in the opposite direction to a monetary shock. For example, in Figure, capital, hours, output, and r f have negative slopes, indicating that the response is in the opposite direction. In the model where the injections are made directly to the families, a monetary injection reduces these variables while in the model where injections are made through the nancial intermediary, a monetary injection increases these variables. Note that wages responds the same and of about the same magniture as does the capital stock so it can not be observed separtely in the graph. The policy matrices for the two economies where the stationary state annual in ation rate is 00% was also calculated. Figure 3 presents the same information as Figure but for the economy with 00% in ation. The reactions are very similar. The main changes are that the maginitures of the response of some of the real variables is reduced and there is a slight change in the timing of the response of some of the nominal variables. 5
16 FI model with inflation = 00% two FI models imrs 0 and Response to money shock for two FI models money loans output rf rn prices hours consumption 4:pdf FI model with inflation = 0% Figure 4: Comparing e ects of rates of in ation Another way to compare the responses of the model as a functions of the stationary state in ation rate is to view graphs similar to those given above but where one is comparing the same model at the two di erent in ation rates. Figure 4 gives this information for the model where the money injections go to the nancial intermediary. The horizontal axis gives the responses for the economy with a zero annual in ation rate and the vertical axis for the same economy but with a 00% annual in ation rate. The lines for all variables fall near the 45 degree line, so that responses are all similar. However, one can observe that output and hours respone more in the lower in ation model, since they are below the 45 degree line. The timing on loans and prices are slightly di erent at the two in ation rates. The results for the real varialbes are consistent with the observation that the interest rate that the rms pay, r f, responds slightly less when in ation is higher. Since in stationary states, higher money injections to the nancial intermediary imply a higher subsidy (and a decreasing marginal subsidy) to production, the impact of a positive monetary shock is likely to be smaller with higher initial in ation. 6
17 5. Conclusions The way monetary policy injects new money (and removes old money) into the economy is crucial for determining its impact on real variables. The traditional stationary state result of an in ation tax in a cashinadvance model continues to hold when nancial intermediaries that lend for nancing working capital are added as long as the mechanism for injecting money is the same. When stationary state monetary policy via money injections works directly on the nancial iintermediaries, then money injections work as a subsidy and with higher rates of in ation come higher output, consumption, and utility. With monetary policy working through the nancial intermediaries, a stationary state Phillips curve exists. The short run responses of the economy to monetary shocks is of a similar nature to those of the stationary states to di erent long run in ation rates. When money injections go directly to the families, positive money shocks tend to have a negative e ect on the real side of the economy. For economies where money injections go to the nancial intermediaries, positive monetary shocks result in positive real responses from capital, output, and hours worked but with a negative immediate response for consumption. The humped shaped response of real variables to monetary shocks exists, but is of relatively short duration. Christiano and Eichenbaum [] and Dotsey and Ireland [4] have looked at ways of changing the timing of the rms decisions so as to reduce the di culty that Christiano and Eichenbaum describe as the result that "disproportionately large share of monetary injections is absorbed by rms to nance variable inputs." However, since the models are corner solutions in that in one all money injections go to families and in the other all go to the nancial intermediary, these results should not be surprising. What we lack is evidence on how monetary injections enter the economy, what fraction can be considered going directly to families (and not directly into the nancial system) and what part works as a subsidy to the nancial system. References [] Christiano, Lawarence (99), "Modeling the Liquidity E ect of a Money Shock." Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review, Winter. [] Christiano, Lawarence, and Martin Eichenbaum (995), "Liquidity E ects, Monetary Policy, and the Business Cycle." Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 7, November, [3] Cooley, Thomas and Gary Hansen (989), "The In ation Tax in a Real Business Cycle Model." American Economic Review 79, September, [4] Dotsey, Michael, and Peter Ireland (995), "Liquidity E ects and Transactions Technologies." Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 7, November,
18 [5] McCandless, George (006), The ABCs of RBC, Working Paper, Banco Central de la República Argentina. 8
Real Business Cycle Theory. Marco Di Pietro Advanced () Monetary Economics and Policy 1 / 35
Real Business Cycle Theory Marco Di Pietro Advanced () Monetary Economics and Policy 1 / 35 Introduction to DSGE models Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) models have become the main tool for
More informationThe Real Business Cycle Model
The Real Business Cycle Model Ester Faia Goethe University Frankfurt Nov 2015 Ester Faia (Goethe University Frankfurt) RBC Nov 2015 1 / 27 Introduction The RBC model explains the comovements in the uctuations
More informationFinancial Intermediation and Credit Policy in Business Cycle Analysis. Mark Gertler and Nobuhiro Kiyotaki NYU and Princeton
Financial Intermediation and Credit Policy in Business Cycle Analysis Mark Gertler and Nobuhiro Kiyotaki NYU and Princeton Motivation Present a canonical framework to think about the current  nancial
More informationSolutions Problem Set 2 Macro II (14.452)
Solutions Problem Set 2 Macro II (4.452) Francisco A. Gallego 4/22 We encourage you to work together, as long as you write your own solutions. Intertemporal Labor Supply Consider the following problem.
More information10. FixedIncome Securities. Basic Concepts
0. FixedIncome Securities Fixedincome securities (FIS) are bonds that have no default risk and their payments are fully determined in advance. Sometimes corporate bonds that do not necessarily have certain
More information13. If Y = AK 0.5 L 0.5 and A, K, and L are all 100, the marginal product of capital is: A) 50. B) 100. C) 200. D) 1,000.
Name: Date: 1. In the long run, the level of national income in an economy is determined by its: A) factors of production and production function. B) real and nominal interest rate. C) government budget
More informationReal Business Cycles. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 370. February 2006. Ellen R. McGrattan
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 370 February 2006 Real Business Cycles Ellen R. McGrattan Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and University of Minnesota Abstract:
More informationLesson 1. Net Present Value. Prof. Beatriz de Blas
Lesson 1. Net Present Value Prof. Beatriz de Blas April 2006 1. Net Present Value 1 1. Introduction When deciding to invest or not, a rm or an individual has to decide what to do with the money today.
More informationFor a closed economy, the national income identity is written as Y = F (K; L)
A CLOSED ECONOMY IN THE LONG (MEDIUM) RUN For a closed economy, the national income identity is written as Y = C(Y T ) + I(r) + G the left hand side of the equation is the total supply of goods and services
More informationDiscussion of Faia "Optimal Monetary Policy with Credit Augmented Liquidity Cycles"
Discussion of Faia "Optimal Monetary Policy with Credit Augmented Liquidity Cycles" Ander Perez (U Pompeu Fabra) November 2008 Ander Perez (U Pompeu Fabra) () Discussion: Faia November 2008 1 / 11 (Related)
More informationOur development of economic theory has two main parts, consumers and producers. We will start with the consumers.
Lecture 1: Budget Constraints c 2008 Je rey A. Miron Outline 1. Introduction 2. Two Goods are Often Enough 3. Properties of the Budget Set 4. How the Budget Line Changes 5. The Numeraire 6. Taxes, Subsidies,
More informationECON 5110 Class Notes Overview of New Keynesian Economics
ECON 5110 Class Notes Overview of New Keynesian Economics 1 Introduction The primary distinction between Keynesian and classical macroeconomics is the flexibility of prices and wages. In classical models
More informationLecture 9: Keynesian Models
Lecture 9: Keynesian Models Professor Eric Sims University of Notre Dame Fall 2009 Sims (Notre Dame) Keynesian Fall 2009 1 / 23 Keynesian Models The de ning features of RBC models are: Markets clear Money
More informationChapter 3 A Classical Economic Model
Chapter 3 A Classical Economic Model what determines the economy s total output/income how the prices of the factors of production are determined how total income is distributed what determines the demand
More informationOutline of model. Factors of production 1/23/2013. The production function: Y = F(K,L) ECON 3010 Intermediate Macroeconomics
ECON 3010 Intermediate Macroeconomics Chapter 3 National Income: Where It Comes From and Where It Goes Outline of model A closed economy, marketclearing model Supply side factors of production determination
More information1 Present and Future Value
Lecture 8: Asset Markets c 2009 Je rey A. Miron Outline:. Present and Future Value 2. Bonds 3. Taxes 4. Applications Present and Future Value In the discussion of the twoperiod model with borrowing and
More informationCapital Trading, StockTrading, andthe In ationtaxon Equity
Capital Trading, StockTrading, andthe In ationtaxon Equity Ralph Chami y IMF Institute Thomas F. Cosimano z University of Notre Dame and Connel Fullenkamp x Duke University May 1998; Revision October 2000
More informationOligopoly and Trade. Notes for Oxford M.Phil. International Trade. J. Peter Neary. University of Oxford. November 26, 2009
Oligopoly and Trade Notes for Oxford M.Phil. International Trade J. Peter Neary University of Oxford November 26, 2009 J.P. Neary (University of Oxford) Oligopoly and Trade November 26, 2009 1 / 11 Oligopoly
More information4. Only one asset that can be used for production, and is available in xed supply in the aggregate (call it land).
Chapter 3 Credit and Business Cycles Here I present a model of the interaction between credit and business cycles. In representative agent models, remember, no lending takes place! The literature on the
More informationRelative prices and Balassa Samuleson e ect
Relative prices and Balassa Samuleson e ect Prof. Ester Faia, Ph.D. Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt a.m. March 2009 rof. Ester Faia, Ph.D. (Johann Wolfgang Goethe Relative Universität prices
More informationLecture Notes: Basic Concepts in Option Pricing  The Black and Scholes Model
Brunel University Msc., EC5504, Financial Engineering Prof Menelaos Karanasos Lecture Notes: Basic Concepts in Option Pricing  The Black and Scholes Model Recall that the price of an option is equal to
More informationFinancial Intermediation and Credit Policy in Business Cycle Analysis
Financial Intermediation and Credit Policy in Business Cycle Analysis Mark Gertler and Nobuhiro Kiyotaki N.Y.U. and Princeton October 29 This version: September 21 Abstract We develop a canonical framework
More informationThe RBC methodology also comes down to two principles:
Chapter 5 Real business cycles 5.1 Real business cycles The most well known paper in the Real Business Cycles (RBC) literature is Kydland and Prescott (1982). That paper introduces both a specific theory
More informationReal Business Cycle Theory
Real Business Cycle Theory Barbara Annicchiarico Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata" April 202 General Features I Theory of uctuations (persistence, output does not show a strong tendency to return
More informationEndogenous Growth Models
Endogenous Growth Models Lorenza Rossi Goethe University 20112012 Endogenous Growth Theory Neoclassical Exogenous Growth Models technological progress is the engine of growth technological improvements
More information(a) Using an MPC of.5, the impact of $100 spent the government will be as follows: 1 100 100 2 50 150 3 25 175 4 12.5 187.5 5 6.25 193.
S5 Solutions 24 points Chapter 2: Fiscal policy. If the marginal propensity to save is.5, how large is the multiplier? If the marginal propensity to save doubles to., what happens to the multiplier? With
More informationVI. Real Business Cycles Models
VI. Real Business Cycles Models Introduction Business cycle research studies the causes and consequences of the recurrent expansions and contractions in aggregate economic activity that occur in most industrialized
More informationThe Real Business Cycle Model for Lesotho
The Real Business Cycle Model for Lesotho Tanka Tlelima University of Cape Town, South Africa October 27, 29 Abstract This paper modi es Hansen s model of indivisible labour, to include labour exports,
More informationECON 3560/5040 Week 2. 1. What Determines the Total Production of Goods and Services
ECON 3560/5040 Week 2 NATIONAL INCOME 1. What Determines the Total Production of Goods and Services  Factors of production: the inputs used to produce goods and services (1) Capital (K) (2) Labor (L)
More informationInterest Rates and Real Business Cycles in Emerging Markets
CENTRAL BANK OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY WORKING PAPER NO: 0/08 Interest Rates and Real Business Cycles in Emerging Markets May 200 S. Tolga TİRYAKİ Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey 200 Address: Central
More informationUse the following to answer question 9: Exhibit: Keynesian Cross
1. Leading economic indicators are: A) the most popular economic statistics. B) data that are used to construct the consumer price index and the unemployment rate. C) variables that tend to fluctuate in
More informationWhat three main functions do they have? Reducing transaction costs, reducing financial risk, providing liquidity
Unit 4 Test Review KEY Savings, Investment and the Financial System 1. What is a financial intermediary? Explain how each of the following fulfills that role: Financial Intermediary: Transforms funds into
More informationECON20310 LECTURE SYNOPSIS REAL BUSINESS CYCLE
ECON20310 LECTURE SYNOPSIS REAL BUSINESS CYCLE YUAN TIAN This synopsis is designed merely for keep a record of the materials covered in lectures. Please refer to your own lecture notes for all proofs.
More informationEstimating baseline real business cycle models of the Australian economy
Estimating baseline real business cycle models of the Australian economy Don Harding and Siwage Negara y University of Melbourne February 26, 2008 1 Introduction This paper is concerned with the issues
More informationReal Business Cycle Theory
Real Business Cycle Theory Guido Ascari University of Pavia () Real Business Cycle Theory 1 / 50 Outline Introduction: Lucas methodological proposal The application to the analysis of business cycle uctuations:
More informationPrinciples of Macroeconomics Prof. Yamin Ahmad ECON 202 Fall 2004
Principles of Macroeconomics Prof. Yamin Ahmad ECON 202 Fall 2004 Sample Final Exam Name Id # Part B Instructions: Please answer in the space provided and circle your answer on the question paper as well.
More information12.1 Introduction. 12.2 The MP Curve: Monetary Policy and the Interest Rates 1/24/2013. Monetary Policy and the Phillips Curve
Chapter 12 Monetary Policy and the Phillips Curve By Charles I. Jones Media Slides Created By Dave Brown Penn State University The shortrun model summary: Through the MP curve the nominal interest rate
More informationMoney. 1 What is money? Spring 2013. 3 functions of money: Store of value Unit of account Medium of exchange
Money Spring 2013 1 What is money? 3 functions of money: Store of value Unit of account Medium of exchange Whether something is money is not always so clear: Physical bills and coins Balances on checking
More informationInflation. Chapter 8. 8.1 Money Supply and Demand
Chapter 8 Inflation This chapter examines the causes and consequences of inflation. Sections 8.1 and 8.2 relate inflation to money supply and demand. Although the presentation differs somewhat from that
More informationShortterm Financial Planning and Management.
Shortterm Financial Planning and Management. This topic discusses the fundamentals of shortterm nancial management; the analysis of decisions involving cash ows which occur within a year or less. These
More informationThe Basics of Interest Theory
Contents Preface 3 The Basics of Interest Theory 9 1 The Meaning of Interest................................... 10 2 Accumulation and Amount Functions............................ 14 3 Effective Interest
More informationIntroduction. Agents have preferences over the two goods which are determined by a utility function. Speci cally, type 1 agents utility is given by
Introduction General equilibrium analysis looks at how multiple markets come into equilibrium simultaneously. With many markets, equilibrium analysis must take explicit account of the fact that changes
More informationComments on \Do We Really Know that Oil Caused the Great Stag ation? A Monetary Alternative", by Robert Barsky and Lutz Kilian
Comments on \Do We Really Know that Oil Caused the Great Stag ation? A Monetary Alternative", by Robert Barsky and Lutz Kilian Olivier Blanchard July 2001 Revisionist history is always fun. But it is not
More informationUNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS
UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Exam: ECON4310 Intertemporal macroeconomics Date of exam: Thursday, November 27, 2008 Grades are given: December 19, 2008 Time for exam: 09:00 a.m. 12:00 noon
More informationCash in advance model
Chapter 4 Cash in advance model 4.1 Motivation In this lecture we will look at ways of introducing money into a neoclassical model and how these methods can be developed in an effort to try and explain
More informationCredit Decomposition and Business Cycles in Emerging Market Economies
Credit Decomposition and Business Cycles in Emerging Market Economies Berrak Bahadir y University of Georgia Inci Gumus z Sabanci University July 24, 214 Abstract This paper analyzes di erent types of
More informationTopic 5: Stochastic Growth and Real Business Cycles
Topic 5: Stochastic Growth and Real Business Cycles Yulei Luo SEF of HKU October 1, 2015 Luo, Y. (SEF of HKU) Macro Theory October 1, 2015 1 / 45 Lag Operators The lag operator (L) is de ned as Similar
More informationECON 20310 Elements of Economic Analysis IV. Problem Set 1
ECON 20310 Elements of Economic Analysis IV Problem Set 1 Due Thursday, October 11, 2012, in class 1 A Robinson Crusoe Economy Robinson Crusoe lives on an island by himself. He generates utility from leisure
More informationFederal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports Monetary Policy Implementation Frameworks: A Comparative Analysis Antoine Martin Cyril Monnet Staff Report no. 313 January 2008 Revised October 2009 This
More informationMONEY, INTEREST, REAL GDP, AND THE PRICE LEVEL*
Chapter 11 MONEY, INTEREST, REAL GDP, AND THE PRICE LEVEL* The Demand for Topic: Influences on Holding 1) The quantity of money that people choose to hold depends on which of the following? I. The price
More informationFinal. 1. (2 pts) What is the expected effect on the real demand for money of an increase in the nominal interest rate? How to explain this effect?
Name: Number: Nova School of Business and Economics Macroeconomics, 11031st Semester 20132014 Prof. André C. Silva TAs: João Vaz, Paulo Fagandini, and Pedro Freitas Final Maximum points: 20. Time: 2h.
More informationMacroeconomic Effects of Financial Shocks Online Appendix
Macroeconomic Effects of Financial Shocks Online Appendix By Urban Jermann and Vincenzo Quadrini Data sources Financial data is from the Flow of Funds Accounts of the Federal Reserve Board. We report the
More informationEmployee Stock Options, Financing Constraints, and Real Investment
Employee Stock Options, Financing Constraints, and Real Investment Ilona Babenko Michael Lemmon Yuri Tserlukevich Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and University of Utah March 2009 Our goals
More informationLongTerm Debt Pricing and Monetary Policy Transmission under Imperfect Knowledge
LongTerm Debt Pricing and Monetary Policy Transmission under Imperfect Knowledge Stefano Eusepi, Marc Giannoni and Bruce Preston The views expressed are those of the authors and are not necessarily re
More informationDiscrete Dynamic Optimization: Six Examples
Discrete Dynamic Optimization: Six Examples Dr. Taikuang Ho Associate Professor. Department of Quantitative Finance, National Tsing Hua University, No. 101, Section 2, KuangFu Road, Hsinchu, Taiwan 30013,
More informationFederal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports. Deficits, Public Debt Dynamics, and Tax and Spending Multipliers
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports Deficits, Public Debt Dynamics, and Tax and Spending Multipliers Matthew Denes Gauti B. Eggertsson Sophia Gilbukh Staff Report No. 551 February 2012 Revised
More informationReal Business Cycle Models
Real Business Cycle Models Lecture 2 Nicola Viegi April 2015 Basic RBC Model Claim: Stochastic General Equlibrium Model Is Enough to Explain The Business cycle Behaviour of the Economy Money is of little
More informationPractice Problems Mods 25, 28, 29
Practice Problems Mods 25, 28, 29 Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. Scenario 251 First National Bank First National Bank has $80 million in
More informationThis paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls
~~EC2065 ZA d0 This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls UNIVERSITY OF LONDON EC2065 ZA BSc degrees and Diplomas for Graduates in Economics, Management, Finance and the Social Sciences,
More informationChapter 5: The Cointegrated VAR model
Chapter 5: The Cointegrated VAR model Katarina Juselius July 1, 2012 Katarina Juselius () Chapter 5: The Cointegrated VAR model July 1, 2012 1 / 41 An intuitive interpretation of the Pi matrix Consider
More informationOn the Cyclicality of Credit
On the Cyclicality of Credit Ufuk Devrim Demirel y University of Colorado at Boulder Abstract This study documents the cyclical properties of business credit in the U.S. and in the Euro area and constructs
More informationMoney and Public Finance
Money and Public Finance By Mr. Letlet August 1 In this anxious market environment, people lose their rationality with some even spreading false information to create trading opportunities. The tales about
More informationMEASURING GDP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH CHAPTER
MEASURING GDP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH CHAPTER Objectives After studying this chapter, you will able to Define GDP and use the circular flow model to explain why GDP equals aggregate expenditure and aggregate
More informationthe transmission channels of monetary policy the fragility of the nancial system the existence of nancial cycles
1 The macroeconomic consequences of nancial imperfections the transmission channels of monetary policy the fragility of the nancial system the existence of nancial cycles the real eects of nancial intermediation
More informationA TwoPeriod Model of the Current Account Obstfeld and Rogo, Chapter 1
A TwoPeriod Model of the Current Account Obstfeld and Rogo, Chapter 1 1 Small Open Endowment Economy 1.1 Consumption Optimization problem maximize U i 1 = u c i 1 + u c i 2 < 1 subject to the budget constraint
More information2.5 Monetary policy: Interest rates
2.5 Monetary policy: Interest rates Learning Outcomes Describe the role of central banks as regulators of commercial banks and bankers to governments. Explain that central banks are usually made responsible
More informationUniversidad de Montevideo Macroeconomia II. The RamseyCassKoopmans Model
Universidad de Montevideo Macroeconomia II Danilo R. Trupkin Class Notes (very preliminar) The RamseyCassKoopmans Model 1 Introduction One shortcoming of the Solow model is that the saving rate is exogenous
More informationThe Stock Market, Monetary Policy, and Economic Development
The Stock Market, Monetary Policy, and Economic Development Edgar A. Ghossoub University of Texas at San Antonio Robert R. Reed University of Alabama July, 20 Abstract In this paper, we examine the impact
More informationMASTER FINANCIAL AND MONETARY ECONOMICS MASTER FINAL WORK DISSERTATION ON THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT DIOGO MARTINHO DA SILVA
MASTER FINANCIAL AND MONETARY ECONOMICS MASTER FINAL WORK DISSERTATION ON THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT DIOGO MARTINHO DA SILVA JANUARY2013 1 MASTER MONETARY AND FINANCIAL ECONOMICS MASTER
More informationSection 4: Adding Government and Money
Section 4: Adding and Money Ec 123 April 2009 Outline This Section Fiscal Policy Money Next Keynesian Economics Recessions Problem Set 1 due Tuesday in class Fiscal Policy Fiscal Policy is the use of the
More informationPRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS. Time value of money equal dollar amounts have different values at different points in time.
PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS Time value of money equal dollar amounts have different values at different points in time. Present value analysis tool to convert CFs at different points in time to comparable values
More informationNoah Williams Economics 312. University of Wisconsin Spring 2013. Midterm Examination Solutions
Noah Williams Economics 31 Department of Economics Macroeconomics University of Wisconsin Spring 013 Midterm Examination Solutions Instructions: This is a 75 minute examination worth 100 total points.
More information1 Economic Application of Derivatives
1 Economic Application of Derivatives derivapplic.te and.pdf April 5, 2007 In earlier notes, we have already considered marginal cost as the derivative of the cost function. That is mc() = c 0 () How
More informationCashinAdvance Model
CashinAdvance Model Prof. Lutz Hendricks Econ720 September 21, 2015 1 / 33 Cashinadvance Models We study a second model of money. Models where money is a bubble (such as the OLG model we studied) have
More informationResearch Division Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series
Research Division Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series The Tax Treatment of Homeowners and Landlords and the Progressivity of Income Taxation Matthew Chambers Carlos Garriga and Don E.
More information8. Simultaneous Equilibrium in the Commodity and Money Markets
Lecture 81 8. Simultaneous Equilibrium in the Commodity and Money Markets We now combine the IS (commoditymarket equilibrium) and LM (moneymarket equilibrium) schedules to establish a general equilibrium
More informationReal Wage and Nominal Price Stickiness in Keynesian Models
Real Wage and Nominal Price Stickiness in Keynesian Models 1. Real wage stickiness and involuntary unemployment 2. Price stickiness 3. Keynesian ISLMFE and demand shocks 4. Keynesian SRAS, LRAS, FE and
More informationDiscussion of Bacchetta, Benhima and Poilly : Corporate Cash and Employment
Summary Discussion of Bacchetta, Benhima and Poilly : Corporate Cash and Employment Vivien Lewis (KU Leuven) "New Developments in Business Cycle Analysis : The Role of Labor Markets and International Linkages"
More informationNormalization and Mixed Degrees of Integration in Cointegrated Time Series Systems
Normalization and Mixed Degrees of Integration in Cointegrated Time Series Systems Robert J. Rossana Department of Economics, 04 F/AB, Wayne State University, Detroit MI 480 EMail: r.j.rossana@wayne.edu
More informationGROWTH, INCOME TAXES AND CONSUMPTION ASPIRATIONS
GROWTH, INCOME TAXES AND CONSUMPTION ASPIRATIONS Gustavo A. Marrero Alfonso Novales y July 13, 2011 ABSTRACT: In a Barrotype economy with exogenous consumption aspirations, raising income taxes favors
More informationBADM 527, Fall 2013. Midterm Exam 2. Multiple Choice: 3 points each. Answer the questions on the separate bubble sheet. NAME
BADM 527, Fall 2013 Name: Midterm Exam 2 November 7, 2013 Multiple Choice: 3 points each. Answer the questions on the separate bubble sheet. NAME 1. According to classical theory, national income (Real
More informationGENERAL EQUILIBRIUM WITH BANKS AND THE FACTORINTENSITY CONDITION
GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM WITH BANKS AND THE FACTORINTENSITY CONDITION Emanuel R. Leão Pedro R. Leão Junho 2008 WP nº 2008/63 DOCUMENTO DE TRABALHO WORKING PAPER General Equilibrium with Banks and the FactorIntensity
More informationThis paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls
This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls UNIVERSITY OF LONDON EC2065 ZA BSc degrees and Diplomas for Graduates in Economics, Management, Finance and the Social Sciences, the Diplomas
More information= C + I + G + NX ECON 302. Lecture 4: Aggregate Expenditures/Keynesian Model: Equilibrium in the Goods Market/Loanable Funds Market
Intermediate Macroeconomics Lecture 4: Introduction to the Goods Market Review of the Aggregate Expenditures model and the Keynesian Cross ECON 302 Professor Yamin Ahmad Components of Aggregate Demand
More informationMoney and Capital in an OLG Model
Money and Capital in an OLG Model D. Andolfatto June 2011 Environment Time is discrete and the horizon is infinite ( =1 2 ) At the beginning of time, there is an initial old population that lives (participates)
More informationKeynesian Macroeconomic Theory
2 Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory 2.1. The Keynesian Consumption Function 2.2. The Complete Keynesian Model 2.3. The KeynesianCross Model 2.4. The ISLM Model 2.5. The Keynesian ADAS Model 2.6. Conclusion
More informationLabor Market Cycles, Unemployment Insurance Eligibility, and Moral Hazard
Labor Market Cycles, Unemployment Insurance Eligibility, and Moral Hazard Min Zhang y Miquel Faig z May 4, 2011 Abstract If entitlement to UI bene ts must be earned with employment, generous UI is an additional
More informationE cient Credit Policies in a Housing Debt Crisis
Housing Credit E cient Credit Policies in a Housing Debt Crisis Janice Eberly and Arvind Krishnamurthy Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, and Stanford GSB May 2015 Housing Credit Introduction
More informationName: Date: 2. The ISLM model takes as exogenous. A) the price level and national income B) the price level C) national income D) the interest rate
Name: Date: 1. John Maynard Keynes wrote that responsibility for low income and high unemployment in economic downturns should be placed on: A) low levels of capital. B) an untrained labor force. C) inadequate
More informationCorporate Income Taxation
Corporate Income Taxation We have stressed that tax incidence must be traced to people, since corporations cannot bear the burden of a tax. Why then tax corporations at all? There are several possible
More informationChapter 3: Commodity Forwards and Futures
Chapter 3: Commodity Forwards and Futures In the previous chapter we study financial forward and futures contracts and we concluded that are all alike. Each commodity forward, however, has some unique
More informationISE 2014 Chapter 3 Section 3.11 Deferred Annuities
ISE 2014 Chapter 3 Section 3.11 Deferred Annuities If we are looking for a present (future) equivalent sum at time other than one period prior to the first cash flow in the series (coincident with the
More informationMathematics. Rosella Castellano. Rome, University of Tor Vergata
and Loans Mathematics Rome, University of Tor Vergata and Loans Future Value for Simple Interest Present Value for Simple Interest You deposit E. 1,000, called the principal or present value, into a savings
More informationOptimal Investment. Government policy is typically targeted heavily on investment; most tax codes favor it.
Douglas Hibbs L, L3: AAU Macro Theory 009/4 Optimal Investment Why Care About Investment? Investment drives capital formation, and the stock of capital is a key determinant of output and consequently
More informationC(t) (1 + y) 4. t=1. For the 4 year bond considered above, assume that the price today is 900$. The yield to maturity will then be the y that solves
Economics 7344, Spring 2013 Bent E. Sørensen INTEREST RATE THEORY We will cover fixed income securities. The major categories of longterm fixed income securities are federal government bonds, corporate
More informationCDMA07/04 Investment Frictions and the Relative Price of Investment Goods in an Open Economy Model * OCTOBER 2008
CENTRE FOR DYNAMIC MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS WORKING PAPER SERIES CDMA07/04 Investment Frictions and the Relative Price of Investment Goods in an Open Economy Model * Parantap Basu University of Durham OCTOBER
More informationA Model of the Current Account
A Model of the Current Account Costas Arkolakis teaching assistant: Yijia Lu Economics 407, Yale January 2011 Model Assumptions 2 periods. A small open economy Consumers: Representative consumer Period
More information2. With an MPS of.4, the MPC will be: A) 1.0 minus.4. B).4 minus 1.0. C) the reciprocal of the MPS. D).4. Answer: A
1. If Carol's disposable income increases from $1,200 to $1,700 and her level of saving increases from minus $100 to a plus $100, her marginal propensity to: A) save is threefifths. B) consume is onehalf.
More informationFINANCIAL FRICTIONS AND BUSINESS CYCLES IN A MONETARY MARCOMODEL Imen Benmohamed
Université Paris 1 PANTHEONSORBONNE UFR 02 Sciences Economiques FINANCIAL FRICTIONS AND BUSINESS CYCLES IN A MONETARY MARCOMODEL Imen Benmohamed Paris, September 2009 1 Introduction
More informationEcon 202 Section H01 Midterm 2
, Spring 2010 March 16, 2010 PLEDGE: I have neither given nor received unauthorized help on this exam. SIGNED: PRINT NAME: Econ 202 Section H01 Midterm 2 Multiple Choice. 2.5 points each. 1. What would
More information