1 CENTML DISTRICT OF ~f9l:t~!!a 1 ~ D~UN 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT ) INFRINGEMENT 14 ) TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED ) )

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "1 CENTML DISTRICT OF ~f9l:t~!!a 1 ~ D~UN 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT ) INFRINGEMENT 14 ) TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED ) )"

Transcription

1 1 Matt Olavi, Esq. (Bar No. 595) Brian J. Dunne, Esq. (Bar No. 59) OLA VI DUNNE LLP 00 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 0 5 Los Angeles, California 9001 Telephone: (1) Facsimile: (1) 5-9 Attorneys for Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC FILED CLERK, U.S. DISTIIICTCOUi '. ; [ ; ;o_~~-- 1 CENTML DISTRICT OF ~f9l:t~!!a 1 ~ D~UN ' 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ECLIPSE IP LLC, a Florida Limited ) cac VJ - 1 J'l-f>(!_ {_ f(! 1C_) 1 Liability Company, ) 1 Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT ) INFRINGEMENT 1 ) V. ) TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED ) FLYWHEEL SOFTWARE, INC., a ) Delaware Corporation, ) 1 ) Defendant. 1 ) ) ) 0 ) 1 5

2 --._/ 1 Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC ("Eclipse"), by and through counsel, complains against Flywheel Software, Inc. ("Flywheel") as follows: NATURE OF LAWSUIT 5 1. This is a suit for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title 5 of the United States Code 1 et seq. This Court has exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Complaint under U.S.C and 1(a). 1 PARTIES AND PATENTS. Eclipse is a company organized under the laws of Florida and having 1 a principal place of business at 1 NW 1th St, Delray Beach, Florida. 1. Eclipse owns all right, title, and interest in and has standing to sue for infringement of United States Patent No.,0,1 ("the '. ~ patent"), entitled 1 "Response systems and methods for notification systems" (Exhibit A); United 1 0 States Patent No.,,95 ("the '95 patent"), entitled "Response systems and methods for notification systems for modifying future notifications" (Exhibit B); 1 United States Patent No.,9,99 ("the '99 patent"), entitled "Notification systems and methods enabling a response to cause connection between a notified PCD and a delivery or pickup representative" (Exhibit C); United States Patent No. 5, 9,901 ("the '90 1 patent"), entitled "Mobile thing determination systems and methods based upon user-device location" (Exhibit D); and United States Patent No.,5,91 ("the '91 patent"), entitled "Mobile thing determination systems 1

3 1 and methods based upon user-device location" (Exhibit E) (collectively, "the Eclipse Patents").. On information and belief, Flywheel is a corporation existing under 5 the laws of Delaware. 5. On information and belief, Flywheel does regular business in this Judicial District and conduct leading to Flywheel's acts of infringement has 9 occurred in this Judicial District. 1. JURISDICTION AND VENUE This Court has personal jurisdiction over Flywheel because it has 1 engaged in continuous and systematic business in California; upon information and 1 belief, derives substantial revenues from commercial activities in California; and upon information and belief, is operating and/or supporting products or services 1 that fall within one or more claims of Eclipse's patents in this District. 1. Venue is proper in this District under U.S.C. 191(b) and (c) 0 and U.S.C. 0(a) at least because the claim arises in this Judicial District, 1 Flywheel may be found and transacts business in this Judicial District, and injuries suffered by Plaintiff took place in this Judicial District. Flywheel is subject to the general and specific personal jurisdiction of this Court at least because of its 5 contacts with the State of California. Ill Ill

4 1 FACTUAL BACKGROUND. On information and belief, Flywheel designs, makes, advertises, and/or distributes a mobile application ("the Flywheel Application") that connects 5 users of the Flywheel Application with drivers of cars for hire ("Flywheel Drivers"). 9. On information and belief, users of the Flywheel Application can use 9 their smartphone or tablet computer ("tablet") to request that a vehicle pick them 1 up from a given location.. On information and belief, when a user opens the Flywheel 1 Application, Flywheel tracks the location of the user's smartphone or tablet and 1 attempts to pinpoint the user on a map. Flywheel also tracks the location of Flywheel Drivers. A non-limiting, exemplary image appears below: Atllin Art Museum *tmi\r1 ) ~~~ : =~ 5 ///

5 1. On information and belief, when the user of the Flywheel Application selects a pickup location, Flywheel sends a pickup request to the closest available Flywheel Driver. If that Flywheel Driver declines or is non-responsive, Flywheel 5 sends the pickup request to other Flywheel Drivers. When Flywheel receives a 9 1 response indicating that a Flywheel Driver will accept the fare, Flywheel notifies the user in at least one way. A non-limiting, exemplary image appears below: On information and belief, through the Flywheel Application, Flywheel displays the location of the Flywheel Driver, the pickup location, and the 5 Ill time until the Flywheel Driver's arrival at the pickup location, allowing the user of the Flywheel Application to track the Flywheel Driver's progress. I I I

6 1 1. On information and belief, through the Flywheel Application, Flywheel allows the user to communicate with the driver or cancel the trip. Non- limiting, exemplary images appear below: On information and belief, Flywheel also notifies the user of the 1 Flywheel Application in at least one way when the Flywheel Driver is arriving at the indicated pickup location. A non-limiting, exemplary image appears below: Ill 5

7 1 FLYWHEEL'S ACTS OF PATENT INFRINGEMENT. Eclipse reiterates and reincorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 1 above as if fully set forth herein. 5. Flywheel owns, uses, deploys, and/or operates at least one service and/or system for booking a taxi electronically. 1. The at least one service and/or system allows users of a smartphone or 9 tablet to request a taxi to pick them up To implement the at least one service and/or system, Flywheel created and/or developed at least one smartphone application- the Flywheel Application- 1 which plays a material role in the at least one car booking service and/or system. 1. The Flywheel Application is available on several different platforms, including but not limited to on smartphones and tablets running versions of Apple 1 Inc.'s ios platform and Google, Inc.'s Android platform Among other things, the Flywheel Application allow users to schedule or arrange a pickup on their smartphone or tablet, and track the status of the 1 vehicle on a map. 1. Among other things, Flywheel tracks the location of the user's smartphone or tablet, tracks the location of a smartphone being used by each 5 Flywheel Driver, distributes requests for pickups received from users of the Flywheel Application, receives responses from at least one Flywheel Driver, and notifies the user when their vehicle is arriving at the pickup location.

8 1 CLAIMS FOR RELIEF COUNT1 (Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No.,0,1 Under 5 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) 5. Eclipse reiterates and reincorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 1 above as if fully set forth herein.. On June 0, 00, the United States Patent and Trademark Office 9 duly and legally issued United States Patent No.,0,1, entitled "Response 1 systems and methods for notification systems." Eclipse is the owner of the entire right, title and interest in and to the '1 patent. A true and correct copy of the '1 1 patent is attached as Exhibit A to this Complaint. 1. The '1 patent is valid and enforceable. 5. Eclipse is informed and believes, and thereupol! ~lieges, that: 1 ( 1) Flywheel has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the '1 1 0 patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents and additionally and/or in the alternative, () Flywheel has actively induced and continues to actively induce 1 and/or has contributed to and continues to contribute to the infringement of one or more claims of the '1 patent in this District and elsewhere in the United States.. On information and belief, Flywheel has directly infringed and 5 continues to directly infringe one or more claims of the '1 patent, in violation of 5 U.S.C. 1(a), by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling a method for communication in connection with a computer-based

9 1 notification system to, for example: notify a Flywheel Driver of a requested pickup; receive a response indicating whether or not the Flywheel Driver will perform the pickup; if the Flywheel Driver will perform the pickup, refrain from 5 sending additional notifications to the Flywheel Driver until detection of one or more events indicating that the user's trip is complete; and if the Flywheel Driver will not pickup the user, notify another Flywheel Driver in order to request 9 assistance in picking up the user.. Additionally and/or in the alternative, on information and belief, 1 Flywheel has actively induced and continues to actively induce and/or has 1 contributed to and continues to contribute to the infringement of one or more 1 claims of the '1 patent, in violation of5 U.S.C. 1(b) and/or (c), by, among other things, actively, knowingly, and intentionally encouraging, aiding, and/or 1 abetting others to make, use, offer for sale, and/or sell portions of a computer- 1 based notification system that infringes one or more claims of the '1 patent, with 0 the specific intent to encourage infringement and with the knowledge that the 1 making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling of such a system would constitute infringement.. On information and belief, Flywheel has had knowledge of the '1 5 patent at least as early as the filing of this Complaint. Additionally, at least as early as the filing of this Complaint, Flywheel knew or should have known that its continued offering, use, deployment, and/or operation of the at least one service

10 1 and/or system for booking a taxi electronically and its continued support of others, ; if those parties perform any limitations of one or more of the claims of the '1 patent, would induce direct infringement of the '1 patent On information and belief, Flywheel's aforesaid infringing activity 1 has been done with knowledge and willful disregard of Eclipse's patent rights, making this an exceptional case within the meaning of 5 U.S.C Flywheel's aforesaid infringing activity has directly and proximately caused damage to Plaintiff Eclipse, including loss of profits from sales and/or licensing revenues it would have made but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, 1 the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and cause irreparable injury to Eclipse for which there is no adequate remedy at law. COUNT (Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No.,,95 Under 5 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) 1. Eclipse reiterates and reincorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 0 above as if fully set forth herein. 1. On January, 009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued United States Patent No.,,95, entitled "Response systems and methods for notification systems for modifying future notifications." 5 Eclipse is the owner of the entire right, title and interest in and to the '95 patent. A true and correct copy of the '95 patent is attached as Exhibit B to this Complaint.

11 ~ 1. The '95 patent is valid and enforceable.. Eclipse is informed and believes, and thereupon alleges, that: ( 1) Flywheel has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the '95 5 patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents and additionally and/or in, the alternative, () Flywheel has actively induced and continues to actively induce and/or has contributed to and continues to contribute to the infringement of one or 9 more claims of the '95 patent in this District and elsewhere in the United States On information and belief, Flywheel has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe one or more claims of the '95 patent, in violation of 1 5 U.S.C. 1(a), by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, 1 and/or selling a method for a computer-based notification system to, for example: schedule a time for a taxi to arrive at a pickup location; schedule a notification 1 communication when the taxi arrives; determine a change in the schedule of the 1 0 taxi; notify the user of the change in schedule; and allow the user to cancel the later-scheduled notification. 1. Additionally and/or in the alternative, on information and belief, Flywheel has actively induced and continues to actively induce and/or has contributed to and continues to contribute to the infringement of one or more 5 claims of the '95 patent, in violation of5 U.S.C. 1(b) and/or (c), by, among other things, actively, knowingly, and intentionally encouraging, aiding, and/or abetting others to make, use, offer for sale, and/or sell portions of a computer-

12 ~. 1 based notification system that infringes one or more claims of the '95 patent, with the specific intent to encourage infringement and with the knowledge that the making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling of such a system would constitute 5 infringement.. On information and belief, Flywheel has had knowledge of the '95 patent at least as early as the filing of this Complaint. Additionally, at least as 9 early as the filing of this Complaint, Flywheel knew or should have known that its 1 continued offering, use, deployment, and/or operation of the at least one service and/or system for booking a taxi electronically and its continued support of others, 1 if those parties perform any limitations of one or more of the claims of the '95 1 patent, would induce direct infringement of the '95 patent.. On information and belief, Flywheel's aforesaid infringing activity 1 has been done with knowledge and willful disregard of Eclipse's patent rights, 1 mak-ing this an exceptional case within the meaning of5 U.S.C Flywheel's aforesaid infringing activity has directly and proximately 1 caused damage to Plaintiff Eclipse, including loss of profits from sales and/or licensing revenues it would have made but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and cause irreparable injury to 5 Eclipse for which there is no adequate remedy at law. Ill I I I 1

13 1 COUNT (Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No.,9,99 Under 5 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) 0. Eclipse reiterates and reincorporates the allegations set forth in 5 paragraphs 1 through 9 above as if fully set forth herein. 1. On January 0, 009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued United States Patent No.,9,99, entitled "Notification 9 systems and methods enabling a response to cause connection between a notified 1 PCD and a delivery or pickup representative." Eclipse is the owner of the entire right, title and interest in and to the '99 patent. A true and correct copy of the '99 1 patent is attached as Exhibit C to this Complaint. 1. The '99 patent is valid and enforceable.. Eclipse is informed and believes, and thereupon alleges, that: (1) 1 Flywheel has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the ' patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents and additionally and/or in the alternative, () Flywheel has actively induced and continues to actively induce 1 and/or has contributed to and continues to contribute to the infringement of one or more claims of the '99 patent in this District and elsewhere in the United States.. On information and belief, Flywheel has directly infringed and 5 continues to directly infringe one or more claims of the '99 patent, in violation of 5 U.S.C. 1(a), by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling a method for an automated notification system to, for example: 1

14 1 monitor the location of a FlywheeVuser; notify the user when the taxi is approaching the pickup location; and enable the user to communicate with the Flywheel Driver Additionally and/or in the alternative, on information and belief, Flywheel has actively induced and continues to actively induce and/or has contributed to and continues to contribute to the infringement of one or more 9 claims of the '99 patent, in violation of5 U.S.C. 1(b) and/or (c), by, among other things, actively, knowingly, and intentionally encouraging, aiding, and/or 1 abetting others to make, use, offer for sale, and/or sell portions of an automated 1 notification system that infringes one or more claims of the '99 patent, with the 1 specific intent to encourage infringement and with the knowledge that the making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling of such a system would constitu~e 1 infringement. 1. On information and belief, Flywheel has had knowledge of the '99 0 patent at least as early as the filing of this Complaint. Additionally, at least as 1 early as the filing of this Complaint, Flywheel knew or should have known that its continued offering, use, deployment, and/or operation of the at least one service and/or system for booking a taxi electronically and its continued support of others, 5 if those parties perform any limitations of one or more of the claims of the '99 patent, would induce direct infringement of the '99 patent. Ill

15 1. On information and belief, Flywheel's aforesaid infringing activity has been done with knowledge and willful disregard of Eclipse's patent rights, making this an exceptional case within the meaning of 5 U.S.C Flywheel's aforesaid infringing activity has directly and proximately caused damage to Plaintiff Eclipse, including loss of profits from sales and/or licensing revenues it would have made but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, 9 the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and cause irreparable injury to Eclipse for which there is no adequate remedy at law. COUNT (Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No.,9,901 Under 5 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) 9. Eclipse reiterates and reincorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through above as if fully ~e~ _forth herein On January 0, 009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office 1 0 duly and legally issued United States Patent No.,9,901, entitled "Mobile thing determination systems and methods based upon user-device location." Eclipse is 1 the owner of the entire right, title and interest in and to the '901 patent. A true and correct copy of the '90 1 patent is attached as Exhibit D to this Complaint. 51. The '90 1 patent is valid and enforceable Eclipse is informed and believes, and thereupon alleges, that: ( 1) Flywheel has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the '901 patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents and additionally and/or in 1

16 1 the alternative, () Flywheel has actively induced and continues to actively induce and/or has contributed to and continues to contribute to the infringement of one or more claims of the '901 patent in this District and elsewhere in the United States On information and belief, Flywheel has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe one or more claims of the '90 1 patent, in violation of 5 U.S.C. 1(a), by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, 9 and/or selling a method for a notification system to, for example: monitor the 1 user's location; receive a request for a pickup; notify a Flywheel Driver of the requested pickup; receive a response from the Flywheel Driver; and communicate 1 the response to the user Additionally and/or in the alternative, on information and belief, Flywheel h~s _actively induced and continues to actively induce and/or has 1 contributed to and continues to contribute to the infringement of one or more 1 0 claims of the '901 patent, in violation of5 U.S.C. 1(b) and/or (c), by, among other things, actively, knowingly, and intentionally encouraging, aiding, and/or 1 abetting others to make, use, offer for sale, and/or sell portions of a notification system that infringes one or more claims of the '90 1 patent, with the specific intent. to encourage infringement and with the knowledge that the making, using, offering 5 to sell, and/or selling of such a system would constitute infringement. 55. On information and belief, Flywheel has had knowledge of the '901 patent at least as early as the filing of this Complaint. Additionally, at least as

17 -/ 1 early as the filing of this Complaint, Flywheel knew or should have known that its continued offering, use, deployment, and/or operation of the at least one service and/or system for booking a taxi electronically and its continued support of others, 5 if those parties perform any limitations of one or more of the claims of the '90 1 patent, would induce direct infringement of the '90 1 patent. 5. On information and belief, Flywheel's aforesaid infringing activity 9 has been done with knowledge and willful disregard of Eclipse's patent rights, 1 making this an exceptional case within the meaning of5 U.S.C Flywheel's aforesaid infringing activity has directly and proximately 1 caused damage to Plaintiff Eclipse, including loss of profits from sales and/or 1 licensing revenues it would have made but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and cause irreparable injury to 1 Eclipse for which there is no adequate remedy at law. 1 0 COUNTS (Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No.,5,91 Under 5 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) 1 5. Eclipse reiterates and reincorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 5 above as if fully set forth herein. 59. On May, 009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office 5 duly and legally issued United States Patent No.,5,91, entitled "Mobile thing determination systems and methods based upon user-device location." Eclipse is 1

18 1 the owner of the entire right, title and interest in and to the '91 patent. A true and correct copy of the '91 patent is attached as Exhibit E to this Complaint. 0. The '91 patent is valid and enforceable Eclipse is informed and believes, and thereupon alleges, that: ( 1) Flywheel has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the '91 patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents and additionally and/or in 9 the alternative, () Flywheel has actively induced and continues to actively induce and/or has contributed to and continues to contribute to the infringement of one or 1 more claims of the '91 patent in this District and elsewhere in the United States. 1. On information and belief, Flywheel has directly infringed and 1 continues to directly infringe one or more claims of the '91 patent, in violation of 5 U.S.C. l(a), by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, 1 and/or selling a method for implementation in connection with a computer-based 1 notification system to, for example: determine the user's location; identify a pickup 0 location; and notify the user when the taxi is approaching the pickup location. 1. Additionally and/or in the alternative, on information and belief, Flywheel has actively induced and continues to actively induce and/or has contributed to and continues to contribute to the infringement of one or more abetting others to make, use, offer for sale, and/or sell portions of a computer- 1

19 1 based notification system that infringes one or more claims of the '91 patent, with the specific intent to encourage infringement and with the knowledge that the making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling of such a system would constitute 5 infringement.. On information and belief, Flywheel has had knowledge of the '91 patent at least as early as the filing of this Complaint. Additionally, at least as 9 early as the filing of this Complaint, Flywheel knew or should have known that its continued offering, use, deployment, and/or operation of the at least one service 1 and/or system for booking a taxi electronically and its continued support of others, 1 if those parties perform any limitations of one or more of the claims of the '91 1 patent, would induce direct infringement of the '91 patent. 5. On information and belief, Flywheel's aforesaid infringing activity 1 caused damage to Plaintiff Eclipse; including loss of profits from sales and/or licensing revenues it would have made but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and cause irreparable injury to 5 Eclipse for which there is no adequate remedy at law. Ill Ill 1

20 1 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Eclipse asks this Court to enter judgment against Flywheel and against each of Flywheel's respective subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, ' 5 servants, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with it, granting the following relief: 1. A judgment that Flywheel has infringed each and every one of the 9 Eclipse Patents;. A permanent injunction against Flywheel, its respective officers, 1 agents, servants, employees, attorneys, parent and subsidiary corporations, assigns 1 and successors in interest, and those persons in active concert or participation with 1 them, enjoining them from direct and indirect infringement of each and every one of the Eclipse Patents; 1. An award of damages adequate to compensate Eclipse for the 1 infringement that has occurred, together with prejudgment interest from the date 0 infringement of the Eclipse Patents began; 1. A reasonable royalty for Flywheel's use of Eclipse's patented technology, as alleged herein; 5. An award to Eclipse of all remedies available under 5 U.S.C. 5 and 5, including enhanced damages up to and including trebling of Eclipse's damages for Flywheel's willful infringement, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs; and

21 1. Such other and further relief as this Court or a jury may deem proper and just. 5 DATED: August 0, OLA VI DUNNE LLP ~/~; By:_~----~ JURY DEMAND Matt Olavi Brian J. Dunne Attorneys for Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC Eclipse demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable pursuant to Federal 1 Rule of Civil Procedure. 1 0 DATED: August 0, OLA VI DUNNE LLP Matt Olavi Brian J. Dunne Attorneys for Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC

22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES JUDGES This case has been assigned to District Judge Magistrate Judge is Jacqueline Chooljian A_u_d_re...~..y_B_._C_ol_li_n_s and the assigned The case number on all documents ft.led with the Court should read as follows: CV1-1-ABC(JCx) Pursuant to General Order 05-0 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Magistrate Judge has been designated to hear discovery related motions. All discovery related motions should be noticed on the calendar of the Magistrate Judge. Clerk, U. S. District Court August 0, 01 Date By C. Sawyer Deputy Clerk NOTICE TO COUNSEL A copy of this notice must be served with the summons and complaint on all defendants (if a removal action is filed, a copy of this notice must be served on all plaintiffs). Subsequent documents must be filed at the following location: ~ Western Division 1 N. Spring Street, G- Los Angeles, CA 9001 D Southern Division West Fourth St., Ste 5 Santa Ana, CA 901 D Eastern Division 0 Twelfth Street, Room 1 Riverside, CA 9501 Failure to fde at the proper location will result in your documents being returned to you. CV-1 (0/1) NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES JUDGES

23 Name & Address: Matt Olavi (SBN 595) Brian J. Dunne (SBN 59) OLA VI DUNNE LLP 00 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA, 9001 ECLIPSE IP LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company FLYWHEEL SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PLAINTIFF(S) DEFENDANT(S). CASE NUMBER CV1- SUMMONS TO: DEFENDANT{S): A lawsuit has been filed against you. Within 1 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it), you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached l!f complaint D amended complaint D counterclaim D cross-claim or a motion under Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiffs attorney, Matt Olavi, whose address is Olavi Dunne LLP, 00 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 0, Los Angeles, CA, Ifyou fail to do so, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court. Dated: f-!s Clerk, U.S. [Use 0 days if the defendant is the United States or a United States agency, or is an officer or employee of the United States. Allowed 0 days by Rule 1(a)()]. CV-OIA (/ SUMMONS

24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL COVER SHEET I. (a) PLAINTIFFS ( Check box if you are representing yourself D ) ECLIPSE IP LLC, a Florida limited liability Company DEFENDANTS ( Check box if you are repr~nting yourself D ) FlYWHEEL SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation (b) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address and Telephone Number. If you are representing yourself, provide same.) Matt Olavi (SBN 595), Brian J. Dunne (SBN 59) Olavi Dunne LLP 00 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 0, los Angeles, CA, 9001 Telephone: ; Facsimile: II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in one box only.) 0 1. U.S. Government Plaintiff D. U.S. Government Defendant 1&1. Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party) 0. Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item Ill) (b) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address and Telephone Number. If you are representing yourself, provide same.) Ill. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES-For Diversity Cases Only (Place an X in one box for plaintiff and one for defendant) PTF DEF PTF DEF Citizen of This State O 1 D 1 Incorporated or Principal Place D D of Business in this State Citizen of Another State O D Incorporated and Principal Place D 5 D 5 of Business in Another State Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country Foreign Nation D D IV. ORIGIN (Place an X in one box only.) lvi 1. Original D. Removed from D. Remanded from ~ Proceeding State Court Appellate Court D. Reinstated or Reopened D 5. Transferred from Another District (Specify).Multi D District litigation V. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: JURY DEMAND: (g) Yes 0 No (Check "Yes" only if demanded in complaint.) CLASS ACTION under F.R.Cv.P. : 0 Yes l&j No (g] MONEY DEMANDED IN COMPLAINT:$ TB_D VI. CAUSE OF ACTION (Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing and write a brief statement of cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity.) U.S.C. 11 and 1(a) VII. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in one box only). OTHER STATUTES CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY CONT IMMIGRATION PRISONER PETITIONS PROPERTY RIGHTS 0 5 False Claims Act D 0 Insurance D 0Torts to Land D Naturalization Habeas Corpus: D 0 Copyrights D 5 Tort Product Application 0 Alien Detainee 0 00 State D Marine ~ liability 5 Other 0Patent Reapportionment 0 5 Motions to Vacate D Immigration Actions 0 10 Miller Act 90 Afl Other Real Sentence 0 0 Trademark D 1 0 Antitrust D 0 50 General D Negotiable Property TORTS SOCIAL SECURITY D 0 Banks and Banking Instrument TORTS.I"KUI"~KI'I' 0 55 Death Penalty D 1 HIA (195ff) D 50 Commerce/ICC 0 Recovery of PERSONAL INJURY D 0 Other Fraud Other: Rates/Etc. 0 Overpayment & 0 Airplane 0 Black lung (9} 0 50 Mandamus/Other D 0 Deportation Enforcement of D Airplane D 1 Truth in lending D 550 Civil Rights D DIWC/DIWW (05 (g)) Judgment 0 Racketeer lnflu- Product liability D 0 0 Other Personal 555 Prison Condition 0 SSID Title XVI enced & Corrupt Org. D 1 Medicare Act 0 Assault, libel & Property Damage D D Slander 50 Civil Detainee D 5 RSI (05 (g)) : 0 0 Consumer Credit Recovery of D. 5 Property Damage 0 Fed. Employers' 0 Conditions of D 0 Defaulted Student D Product liability liability Confinement FEDERAL TAX SUITS 90 Cable/Sat TV Loan (Excl. Vet.) BANKRUPTCY FORFEITURE/PENALTY 0 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or 50 Securities/Com- 0 0Marine Appeal D D Defendant} D Recovery of modities/exchange 5 Marine Product 5 Drug Related usc D Overpayment of 0 liability 0 Seizure of Property 1 0 D Actions usc 0 Stockholders' 0 50 Motor Vehicle D 91 Agricultural Acts D Suits 55 Motor Vehicle CIVIL RIGHTS 0 900ther 0 Product liability D 0 Other Civil Rights 0 9 Environmental D 00ther 0 Other Personal LABOR Matters Contract 0 Injury 0 1 Voting 0 Fair labor Standards D 95 Freedom of Info. D 5 Contract Personal Injury- 0 Employment Act Act Product liability D Med Malpratice 0 0 labor/mgmt. 1 IRS-Third Party USC 90 OtherStatutory Vet. Benefits D Withdrawal USC1 09 D 9 Arbitration 5 Personal Injury- O Housing/ Relations I 0 Franchise 0 Product liability Accomodations REAL PROPERTY 0 0 Railway Labor Act 99 Admin. Procedures Health Care/ 5 American with D Act/Review of Appeal of land Pharmaceutical 0 Disabilities- D 51 Family and Medical Agency Decision 0 Condemnation D Personal Injury Employment leave Act 0 0 Foreclosure Product liability D American with D 90 Other Labor Constitutionality of Asbestos Disabilities-Other litigation State Statutes D 0 Rent lease & 0 Personallnjury D Education D 91 Employee Ret. Inc. Ejectment Product uahilltv Security Act FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Case Number: AFTER complett_n_g_p_a_g_e... ~---=F V:-:::o:-I-.--~---r-1--:-c_o_M_{i.~---~=. ~=-IN;LRMATION REQUESTED on PAGE. CV-1 (0/1) CIVIL COVER SHEET Page 1 of

25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL COVER SHEET Vlll(a). IDENTICAL CASES: Has this action been previously filed in this court and dismissed, remanded or closed? f&1 NO D YES If yes, list case number(s): Vlll(b). RELATED CASES: Have any cases been previously filed in this court that are related to the present case? f&l NO DYES If yes, list case number(s): Civil cases are deemed related if a previously filed case and the present case: (Check all boxes that apply) D A. Arise from the same or closely related transactions, happenings, or events; or 0 B. Call for determination of the same or substantially related or similar questions of Jaw and fact; or 0 C. For other reasons would entail substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges; or D D. Involve the same patent, trademark or copyright. and one of the factors identified above in a, b or c also is present. IX. VENUE: (When completing the following information, use an additional sheet if necessary.) (a) List the County in this District; California County outside of this District; State if other than California; or Foreign Country, in which EACH named plaintiff resides. D Check here if the government, its agencies or employees is a named plaintiff. If this box is checked, go to item (b). County in this District:* California County outside of this District; State, if other than California; or Foreign Country Eclipse IP LLC - Palm Beach County, Aorida (b) List the County in this District; California County outside of this District; State if other than California; or Foreign Country, in which EACH named defendant resides. D Check here if the government, its agencies or employees is a named defendant. If this box is checked, go to item (c). County in this District:* Flywheel Software, Inc. -los Angeles California County outside of this District; State, if other than California; or Foreign Country (c) List the County in this District; California County outside of this District; State if other than California; or Foreign Country, in which EACH claim arose. NOTE: In land condemnation cases, use the location of the tract of land involved. County in this District:* California County outside of this District; State, if other than California; or Foreign Country Los Angeles *Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, R1vers1de, Ventura, Santa Barbara, or San Lu1s Ob1spo Counties Note: In land condemnation cases, use the location of the tract of land in1 DATE: August 0, 01 Notice to Counsel/Parties: The CV-1 (JS-) Civil Cover Sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September, is required pursuant to Local Rule -1 is not filed but is used by the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of statistics, venue and initiating the civil docket sheet. (For more detailed instructions, see separate instructions sheet). Key to Statistical codes relating to Social Security Cases: Nature of Suit Code Abbreviation Substantive Statement of Cause of Action All claims for health insurance benefits (Medicare) under Title 1, Part A, of the Social Security Act, as amended. Also, 1 HIA include claims by hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, etc., for certification as providers of services under the program. ( U.S.C. 5FF(b)) BL DIWC DIWW All claims for "Black Lung" benefits under Title, Part B, of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 9. (0 U.S.C. 9) All claims filed by insured workers for disability insurance benefits under Title of the Social Security Act, as amended; plus all claims filed for child's insurance benefits based on disability. ( U.S. C. 05 (g)) All claims filed for widows or widowers insurance benefits based on disability under Title of the Social Security Act, as amended. ( U.S.C. 05 (g)) 5 SSID RSI All claims for supplemental security income payments based upon disability filed under Title of the Social Security Act, as amended. All claims for retirement (old age) and survivors benefits under Title of the Social Security Act, as amended. ( u.s.c. 05 (g)) CV-1 (0/1) CIVIL COVER SHEET Page of

Case 2:14-cv-07648-PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:7

Case 2:14-cv-07648-PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:7 Case 2:14-cv-7648-PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 1/2/14 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:7 Case 2:14-cv-7648-PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 1/2/14 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:8 Case 2:14-cv-7648-PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 1/2/14 Page 3

More information

Case4:14-cv-04322-PJH Document1 Filed09/25/14 Page1 of 34

Case4:14-cv-04322-PJH Document1 Filed09/25/14 Page1 of 34 Case4:14-cv-04322-PJH Document1 Filed09/25/14 Page1 of 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP CLEMENT L. GLYNN, Bar No. 57117 JONATHAN A. ELDREDGE, Bar No. 238559 One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue,

More information

Case 3:13-cv-04861-K Document 5 Filed 12/13/13 Page 1 of 32 PageID 52

Case 3:13-cv-04861-K Document 5 Filed 12/13/13 Page 1 of 32 PageID 52 Case 3:13-cv-04861-K Document 5 Filed 12/13/13 Page 1 of 32 PageID 52 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

More information

Case 3:15-cv-01785-PK Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 32

Case 3:15-cv-01785-PK Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 32 Case 3:15-cv-01785-PK Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 32 Case 3:15-cv-01785-PK Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 2 of 32 appear only Case 3:15-cv-01785-PK Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 3 of 32 See Case

More information

Case 3:13-cv-00077-ST Document 1 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv-00077-ST Document 1 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION Case 3:13-cv-00077-ST Document 1 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 Trial Attorney for Plaintiff Eric Olsen, Oregon Bar No. 783261 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 9415

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:14-cv-04003-ODE Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department

More information

Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Civil Cover Sheet 3 Designation Form 4 Case Management Track Form

Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Civil Cover Sheet 3 Designation Form 4 Case Management Track Form PEROXYCHEM LLC v. INNOVATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Docket No. 2:14-cv-06446 (E.D. Pa. Nov 07, Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Civil Cover Sheet 3 Designation Form 4 Case Management Track Form

More information

Plaza, 333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 300, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401, alleges

Plaza, 333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 300, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401, alleges CASE 0:12-cv-01258-RHK-JJK Document 1 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Leah Anderson, Plaintiff, Case No: Officers John Doe(s) and Jane Doe(s), individually

More information

Case 3:15-cv-01042-AC Document 1 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:15-cv-01042-AC Document 1 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 7 Case 3:15-cv-01042-AC Document 1 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 7 Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049 email: carl@crowell-law.com Drew P. Taylor, OSB 135974 email: drew@crowell-law.com CROWELL LAW P.O. Box 923 Salem,

More information

Case 3:15-cv-00778 Document 1 Filed 05/06/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:15-cv-00778 Document 1 Filed 05/06/15 Page 1 of 9 Case 3:15-cv-00778 Document 1 Filed 05/06/15 Page 1 of 9 Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049 email: carl@crowell-law.com Drew P. Taylor, OSB No. 135974 email: drew@crowell-law.com CROWELL LAW P.O. Box 923

More information

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICf OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICf OF CALIFORNIA 1 GRADSTEIN & MARZANO, P.C. lffinry GRADSTEIN (State Bar No. 89747) 2 hgradstein@gradstein.com 3 MARYANN R. lvlarzano (State Bar No. 96867) mmarzano@gradstein.com 4 ROBERT ALLEN (State Bar No. 166589)

More information

Case 0:15-cv-60694-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/03/2015 Page 1 of 7

Case 0:15-cv-60694-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/03/2015 Page 1 of 7 Case 0:15-cv-60694-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/03/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION PLASTIC THE MOVIE LIMITED, ) ) Plaintiff,

More information

Case 1:11-cv-00866-RHS-WDS Document 1-1 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:11-cv-00866-RHS-WDS Document 1-1 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 2 Case 1:11-cv-00866-RHS-WDS Document 1-1 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 2 JS 44 (Rev. 12/07 CIVIL COVER SHEET The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the

More information

Case: 1:12-cv-00238 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/12/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv-00238 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/12/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 Case: 1:12-cv-00238 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/12/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 TIAWANDA MOORE, Plaintiff, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CITY OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. JAMES HARRA WAY ) Case No.: (To be supplied by the Clerk) PLAINTIFF, I.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. JAMES HARRA WAY ) Case No.: (To be supplied by the Clerk) PLAINTIFF, I. illu 1. 1 1 1 1 1 0 Name: JAMES HARRAWAY Address: th STREET (.:fti... r:i LANCASTER CA, Phone: 1-- hhmedica1repair@yahoo.com Plaintiff In Pro Per UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

More information

Case 2:13-cv-06004-JAK-AGR Document 1 Filed 08/15/13 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:5

Case 2:13-cv-06004-JAK-AGR Document 1 Filed 08/15/13 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:5 Case 2:13-cv-64-JAK-AGR Document 1 Filed 8/15/13 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:5 FB lri 11-- 1 KING, HOLMES, PATERNO & BERLINER, LLP HOWARD E. KING, ESQ., STATE BARNO. 7712 2 STEPHEN D. ROTHSCIDLD, EsQ., STATE

More information

Case 5:12-cv-06854 Document 1 Filed 10/19/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 5:12-cv-06854 Document 1 Filed 10/19/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Case 5:12-cv-06854 Document 1 Filed 10/19/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON JEFFREY C. SKEENS, as Administrator of

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. vs. MICHAEL BIELLO Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff

More information

Case 1:13-cv-23953-KMM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2013 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:13-cv-23953-KMM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2013 Page 1 of 2 Case 1:13-cv-23953-KMM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2013 Page 1 of 2 JS 44 (Rev. 12/12) CIVIL COVER SHEET The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor

More information

Case 2:10-cv-02135-KJD -RJJ Document 1 Filed 12/08/10 Page 1 of 18

Case 2:10-cv-02135-KJD -RJJ Document 1 Filed 12/08/10 Page 1 of 18 Case 2:10-cv-02135-KJD -RJJ Document 1 Filed 12/08/10 Page 1 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6730 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 9960 West Cheyenne

More information

Case 5:08-cv-00564-FL Document 1 Filed 11/14/2008 Page 1 of 6

Case 5:08-cv-00564-FL Document 1 Filed 11/14/2008 Page 1 of 6 Case 5:8-cv-564-FL Document 1 Filed 11/14/28 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. ~ ~CV"_U UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

More information

2 &5 SE? 29 Pil 2:38 /// (~ase 3:O(~-cv~02150-J M-J MA Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 8

2 &5 SE? 29 Pil 2:38 /// (~ase 3:O(~-cv~02150-J M-J MA Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 8 (~ase :O(~-cv~0-J M-J MA Document Filed 0//00 Page of ANNA Y. PARK (CA SBN ) OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION E. Te_mple Street, Fourth Floor Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: () - Facsimile:() - E-Mail: lado.legal@eeoe.gov

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE DERMAFOCUS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, v. Plaintiff, ULTHERA, INC., a Delaware corporation. Civil Action No: DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MOBILE TRANSFORMATION LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff

More information

Case 4:10-cv-00249-DCB Document 1 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:10-cv-00249-DCB Document 1 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 10 Case :0-cv-00-DCB Document Filed 0//0 Page of 0 0 RICHARD M. MARTINEZ, SBA No. 0 South Convent Avenue Tucson, Arizona 0 () - phone () -00 fax richard@richardmartinezlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff IN THE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD., MITSUBISHI HEAVY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation v. Plaintiff, SALESFORCE.COM, INC., a Delaware Corporation Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Case 1:14-cv-01078-UNA Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:14-cv-01078-UNA Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:14-cv-01078-UNA Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, SUNEDISON,

More information

Case 1:14-cv-01323-ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.

Case 1:14-cv-01323-ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM. Case 1:14-cv-01323-ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS Nemet Motors, LLC d/b/a Nemet

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION ZIPIT WIRELESS INC., Plaintiff, v. BLACKBERRY LIMITED F/K/A RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and BLACKBERRY CORPORATION f/k/a

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JPM NETWORKS, LLC, ) d/b/a KWIKBOOST ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 3:14-cv-1507 JCM FIRST VENTURE, LLC )

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Case 2:12-cv-00604-MHS-CMC Document 1 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 CAPITAL SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Case 6:10-cv-00557 Document 1 Filed 10/21/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION TRANSDATA, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 6:10-cv-557

More information

Case 9:15-cv-80366-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 9:15-cv-80366-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. Case 9:15-cv-80366-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ARRIVAL STAR, SA, and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Case No.: v.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Luke L. Dauchot (SBN Nimalka R. Wickramasekera (SBN Benjamin A. Herbert (SBN South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 001 Telephone: (1 0-00 Facsimile: (1 0-00 Attorneys for Plaintiff, v.

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00929-AWT Document 1 Filed 06/26/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:14-cv-00929-AWT Document 1 Filed 06/26/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Case 3:14-cv-00929-AWT Document 1 Filed 06/26/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ZIPLINK, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., JURY

More information

Case 1:14-cv-02568-SCJ-AJB CIVIL Document COVER SHEET 1-3 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:14-cv-02568-SCJ-AJB CIVIL Document COVER SHEET 1-3 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 2 JS44 (Rev. 1/13 NDGA Case 1:14-cv-02568-SCJ-AJB CIVIL Document COVER SHEET 1-3 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 2 The JS44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement

More information

casu.13-02 82 4 rr: \

casu.13-02 82 4 rr: \ Case 2:13-cv-02824-JFW-MRW Document 1 Filed 04/22/13 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:27 FILED 1 BERLINER LLP HOWARD E. KiNG, ESQ., STATE BAR No. 77012 2 STEPHEND.RoTHSCHILD,EsQ.,STATEBARNo.132514 ROTHSCHILD@KHPBLAW.COM

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION Plaintiff, Case No. v. HAMILTON COMPANY AND HAMILTON

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AEROSCOUT, LTD. and AEROSCOUT, INC., v. CENTRAK INC., Plaintiffs, Defendant. C.A. No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs AeroScout,

More information

Case 1:14-cv-00840 Document 1 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv-00840 Document 1 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Case 1:14-cv-00840 Document 1 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION JOHN DOE, v. Plaintiff CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, EDUARDO CARMONA,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BLACK & HAMILL LLP Bradford J. Black (SBN 1) bblack@bchllp.com Andrew G. Hamill (SBN 1) ahamill@bchllp.com Embarcadero Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California 1 Telephone: --0 Facsimile: -- DESMARAIS

More information

Case: 3:14-cv-00062-bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 3:14-cv-00062-bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Case: 3:14-cv-00062-bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION, v. APPLE INC., Plaintiff, Case

More information

Case3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0-JCS Document Filed0/0/ Page of KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP Karl S. Kronenberger (Bar No. ) Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Bar No. ) Ansel J. Halliburton (Bar No. 0) 0 Post Street, Suite 0 San Francisco,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION RPOST HOLDINGS, INC., RPOST COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, and RMAIL LIMITED, CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiffs, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS

More information

case 3:12-cv-00380-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/16/12 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

case 3:12-cv-00380-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/16/12 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION case 3:12-cv-00380-JTM-CAN document 1 filed 07/16/12 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ROBERT D. DELEE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. CITY OF PL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON BROADBAND GRAPHICS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON BROADBAND GRAPHICS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, 0 Devon Zastrow Newman (State Bar # ) Johnathan E. Mansfield (State Bar # ) SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT SW TH Avenue, Suite 00 Phone: (0) - Fax: (0) -00 Email: dnewman@schwabe.com Email: jmansfield@schwabe.com

More information

Case 2:07-cv-00447-LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:07-cv-00447-LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5 Case 2:07-cv-00447-LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION IP INNOVATION L.L.C. AND TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION FUTUREVISION.COM, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., TIME WARNER CABLE, LLC, CEQUEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC DBA

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ALLURE ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Case No. NEST LABS, INC., a Delaware corporation, GREEN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 LAKESHORE LAW CENTER Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. (State Bar No. 0 0 Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite 0-0 Yorba Linda, CA --0 --0 (fax jeff@lakeshorelaw.org Attorney and Plaintiff

More information

Case 6:15-cv-00145-JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv-00145-JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 Case 6:15-cv-00145-JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SMARTFLASH LLC, and SMARTFLASH TECHNOLOGIES

More information

Case 2:15-cv-02778-CBM-JPR Document 1 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:1. (Full Name) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:15-cv-02778-CBM-JPR Document 1 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:1. (Full Name) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case :-cv--cbm-jpr Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: Ron Newt (Full Name) d nondronnewt@yahoo. CO(Uiail Address) R.. Joost St. (Address Line I) San Francisco Ca. (Address Line) - - (Phone Number) Ron

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. JURY DEMANDED COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. JURY DEMANDED COMPLAINT THE PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PRINTERON INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:13-CV-3025 v. JURY DEMANDED BREEZYPRINT CORPORATION and U.S. HOSPITALITY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Case No. 1 1 1 1 1 1 WORDLOGIC CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation and 01 BRITISH COLUMBIA LTD., a Canadian corporation, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiffs, TOUCHTYPE

More information

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: WESTERN DIVISION. How to Answer the Complaint

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: WESTERN DIVISION. How to Answer the Complaint Revised: April 1 Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: WESTERN DIVISION How to Answer the Complaint What is an Answer? An answer is your written response to the allegations made in the

More information

Case 2:14-cv-00244 Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv-00244 Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE DR. A. CEMAL EKIN, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 6:15-cv-00059 Document 1 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv-00059 Document 1 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 Case 6:15-cv-00059 Document 1 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Plaintiff, v. Case

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. ( Plaintiff or Endeavor ), by and through its

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. ( Plaintiff or Endeavor ), by and through its UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ENDEAVOR MESHTECH, INC., Plaintiff, v. ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Civil Action No. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

More information

Case 1:14-cv-01362-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:14-cv-01362-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:14-cv-01362-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ENDEAVOR MESHTECH, INC., Plaintiff, v. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., Civil

More information

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP Cono A. Carrano (pro hac vice to be filed) Email: ccarrano@akingump.com David C. Vondle (Bar

More information

Case 1:14-cv-00266-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:14-cv-00266-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:14-cv-00266-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE RICHARD L. PONZIANI, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: FORD MOTOR

More information

Case 2:13-cv-04245-JS-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

Case 2:13-cv-04245-JS-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. Case 2:13-cv-04245-JS-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANA MARLEN MEMBRENO JIMENEZ, Plaintiff, - versus - WILLIAM DEGEL and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ACQIS LLC, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP., Case No. 6:11-CV-546 Jury Trial Demanded

More information

Case 1:09-cv-02961-REB-MJW Document 1 Filed 12/18/09 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:09-cv-02961-REB-MJW Document 1 Filed 12/18/09 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:09-cv-02961-REB-MJW Document 1 Filed 12/18/09 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No.: 09-cv- - EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

More information

Case 6:15-cv-00660 Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv-00660 Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 Case 6:15-cv-00660 Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and INTELLECTUAL VENTURES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY !aaassseee 222:::111333- - -cccvvv- - -000444999333666- - -SSSRRR!- - -!LLLWWW DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt 111 FFFiiillleeeddd 000888///111555///111333 PPPaaagggeee 111 ooofff 333999 PPPaaagggeeeIIIDDD:::

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CA No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CA No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 92 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE APPLE INC., vs. Plaintiff, High Tech Computer Corp., a/k/a HTC Corp., HTC (B.V.I.

More information

Case 2:15-cv-01266-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv-01266-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 Case 2:15-cv-01266-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION AUTOMATION MIDDLEWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.,

More information

Case 1:10-cv-10494-WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:10-cv-10494-WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:10-cv-10494-WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V. AND PHILIPS SOLID-STATE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. (SBN: ) josh@westcoastlitigation.com Robert L. Hyde, Esq. (SBN: ) bob@westcoastlitigation.com Hyde & Swigart Camino Del Rio South,

More information

JUDGE RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

JUDGE RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT 1 Filed 09/26/14 Page 1 of 11 Marc A Fenster Email mafenster@raklaw.corn Jeffrey Liao Email: iliao@raklaw.com Andrew D. Weiss Email: aweiss@raldaw.com RUSS AUGUST & KABAT 12424 Wilshire Boulevard Twelfth

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE imtx STRATEGIC, LLC, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC., Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff imtx Strategic, LLC ( Plaintiff or imtx

More information

Case 1:12-cv-00939-RPM Document 1 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:12-cv-00939-RPM Document 1 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:12-cv-00939-RPM Document 1 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SPYDERLYNK, LLC.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE VERINT SYSTEMS INC. and VERINT AMERICAS INC. Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. CALLCOPY INC. Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER Case 1:14-cv-05919-JEI-KMW Document 19 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 84 Frank L. Corrado, Esquire Attorney ID No. 022221983 BARRY, CORRADO & GRASSI, PC 2700 Pacific Avenue Wildwood, NJ 08260 (609)

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action No: v. VICTORIA S SECRET DIRECT BRAND MANAGEMENT, LLC, JURY TRIAL

More information

Case: 3:15-cv-50148 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1

Case: 3:15-cv-50148 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 Case: 3:15-cv-50148 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION LDGP, LLC, d/b/a HARTSOUGH ) DERMATOLOGY, an

More information

Case 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Case 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PRIVATE BUSINESS JETS, L.L.C. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. PRVT, Inc. Defendant. COMPLAINT

More information

Case 2:09-cv-00289-TJW Document 1 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:09-cv-00289-TJW Document 1 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 1 of 8 Case 2:09-cv-00289-TJW Document 1 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SimpleAir, Inc., a Texas corporation, Plaintiff, CASE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-cv-59 TIME WARNER CABLE INC., TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC, TIME WARNER

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:14-cv-01516-WSD Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAPITAL SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. v. Plaintiff, NCR

More information

l V6,\\J. cacvo13-06212. -00~~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

l V6,\\J. cacvo13-06212. -00~~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:13-cv-06212-ODW-VBK Document 1 Filed 08/23/13 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:5 1 STUART F. DELERY 2 Acting Assistant Attorney General MAAME EWUSI-MENSAH FRIMPONG 3 Deputy Assistant Attorney General 4 MICHAEL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION Peter E. Heuser, OSB # 811281 Email pheuser@schwabe.com Devon Zastrow Newman, OSB #014627 Email dnewman@schwabe.com Telephone: 503.222.9981 Facsimile: 503.796.2900 Sean G. Gallagher, pro hac vice pending

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Andrew W. Stavros (8615) Austin B. Egan (13203) STAVROS LAW P.C. 11693 South 700 East, Suite 200 Draper, Utah 84020 Tel: (801) 758.7604 Fax: (801) 893.3573 Email: andy@stavroslaw.com austin@stavroslaw.com

More information

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8 Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# laborlawyer@pacbell.net THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#

More information

Case 2:14-cv-01131-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv-01131-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:14-cv-01131-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC v.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA PHILIP M. BALLIF Nevada Bar # 2650 DURHAM, JONES & PINEGAR. P.C. 10785 W. Twain Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone: (702 870-6060 Facsimile: (702 870-6090 Email: pballif@djplaw.com JOHN

More information

Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document261 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 15. Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Apple Inc.

Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document261 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 15. Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Apple Inc. Case:-cv-000-LHK Document Filed0// Page of JOSH A. KREVITT (CA SBN ) jkrevitt@gibsondunn.com H. MARK LYON (CA SBN ) mlyon@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 0- Telephone:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney GARY PLESSMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Fraud Section California State Bar No. 1 Room 1, Federal Building 00 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles,

More information

1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER]

More information

CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA QUALITY BICYCLE PRODUCTS, INC. v. Plaintiff, BIKEBARON, LLC SINCLAIR IMPORTS, LLC and

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA and ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., v. Plaintiffs, CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS LTD., Defendant.

More information

V"'!,... 8 91 Z~Plfh1~1 COMPLAINT FOR-PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF ORIGINAL ~~ 12. \D\}e1o. DEC -5 201a

V'!,... 8 91 Z~Plfh1~1 COMPLAINT FOR-PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF ORIGINAL ~~ 12. \D\}e1o. DEC -5 201a Case 2:13-cv-08912-DSF-FFM Document 1 Filed 12/05/13 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1 ORIGINAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~~ 9 \D\}e1o 11 ~~ 12 13 ~ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID SHONKA Acting General Counsel

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A, v. Plaintiffs, RACKSPACE HOSTING, INC. and RACKSPACE US, INC., Defendants.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SMILEBOND SYSTEMS LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company, v. Plaintiff, GC AMERICA INC. an Illinois Corporation,

More information

Case4:15-cv-04219-DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case4:15-cv-04219-DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11 Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (bhughes@cooley.com)

More information

Case 6:12-cv-00799 Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 6:12-cv-00799 Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 Case 6:12-cv-00799 Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC. Plaintiff, C.A. No.: v.

More information

Preparing a Federal Case

Preparing a Federal Case Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Preparing a Federal Case If you are reading this, you are probably proceeding on your own in court without the help of an attorney. This is often called

More information