americanlawyer.com march 2011 marriage brokers Behind the scenes of the odd couple s groundbreaking litigation. By Ross Todd and david Boies

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "americanlawyer.com march 2011 marriage brokers Behind the scenes of the odd couple s groundbreaking litigation. By Ross Todd and david Boies"

Transcription

1 americanlawyer.com march 2011 marriage brokers Behind the scenes of the odd couple s groundbreaking litigation. By Ross Todd TEd Olson (left) and david Boies in Los Angeles

2 Forget Bush v. Gore. Perry v. Schwarzenegger, for better or for worse, will likely shape the professional legacy of two of the country s best-known lawyers. Marriage Brokers By Ross Todd No lawsuit in recent history has been the source of more partisan rancor than Bush v. Gore. It divided everyone, it seems, except the two attorneys who argued opposing sides of the 2000 case before the U.S. Supreme Court: Theodore Olson and David Boies. When I was watching David on television explaining the positions he was advancing on behalf of Vice President Gore, no matter how much I disagreed with him, I found myself nodding my head, says Olson with a grin. I thought that was really dangerous. Adds Boies of Olson: In the Bush v. Gore arguments you could sit back and really admire what [Ted] was doing and his command of the cases, his command of the facts, his ability to weave them together, and to actually tell a story.... But you couldn t actually enjoy it. So when the two lawyers announced in May 2009 that they d teamed up to fight for same-sex marriage, it wasn t a pairing of bitter ideological enemies. Rather it was the culmination of a professional and personal relationship that bloomed over the past decade: Shortly after Bush v. Gore, Boies and his wife, Mary, accepted Olson s invitation to his swearing-in ceremony as solicitor general. The two lawyers also shared a long embrace on stage in fall 2001 as Olson presented Boies with an award from the Lab School of Washington, Photograph By Scott Council Ted Olson (right) talked to colleagues, family, and friends before agreeing to take on prop 8. When he asked David Boies to be cocounsel, Boies didn t pause before saying yes.

3

4 Lawyers sometimes get caught up in what they want to accomplish and what their goals are, says Gibson, Dunn s Olson. We can t forget that we re representing human beings. D.C., for overcoming dyslexia. Their appearance together was a tremendously emotional thing, says Olson, whose wife Barbara died in the September 11 attacks. It was like the crowd thought, If they re coming together, so can we. The men and their wives Olson has since remarried have taken a pair of bike trips in Europe with a group that has included Tom Brokaw, American Lawyer founder Steven Brill, and Bloomberg L.P. s Norman Pearlstine. On the professional front, Boies says, Ted and I have wanted to do something together for some time. The something that s brought together the two 70-year-olds and their firms Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Boies, Schiller & Flexner is Perry v. Schwarzenegger, a federal challenge to California s Proposition 8. The 2008 ballot initiative amended the state s constitution to say that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized. Olson and Boies have asked the federal courts to strike down Prop 8, arguing that it violates the equal protection and due process guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment. The case one of a few samesex marriage cases currently in the courts that could potentially reach the Supreme Court is the most closely watched that either lawyer has handled since their election showdown. And, one way or the other, it will shape their professional legacies. I m convinced that 45 years from now that people will look back on the discrimination against gays and lesbians with the same kind of puzzlement that people who are 20 years old look back at what happened in the mid-1960s, Boies says. The Prop 8 challenge has involved several unexpected twists. When Boies and Olson filed suit in San Francisco federal district court on May 22, 2009, they thought a ruling on their motion for preliminary injunction would create grounds for a quick appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Neither expected the case to go to trial. But Judge Vaughn Walker opted to hold a 12-day bench trial in January The judge handed them a victory in August 2010 with a 136-page opinion stating that the plaintiffs demonstrated by overwhelming evidence that Proposition 8 violates their due process and equal protection rights. On December 6, 2010, Olson and Boies finally got their date with the Ninth Circuit, splitting oral arguments before a three-judge panel at a two-and-a-half-hour hearing. The Ninth Circuit put the case on another detour from its trajectory toward the Supreme Court by asking the California state supreme court to clarify whether state law gives proponents of Proposition 8 standing to appeal Judge Walker s ruling. (The California governor, attorney general, and other government defendants named in the lawsuit had declined to defend Proposition 8 in court.) Whether proponents of the ballot initiative have standing to appeal Judge Walker s ruling is an issue that could determine the outcome of the case before the Ninth Circuit panel even considers the merits. If the state court finds that the proponents don t have standing, that would likely mean the end of Proposition 8. But it could also mean the case stalls out before reaching the Supreme Court. The story of how Ted Olson joined the fight for same-sex marriage has taken on an air of folklore. The week after Prop 8 passed in the 2008 election, Los Angeles political strategist Chad Griffin met over lunch at the Polo Lounge in the Beverly Hills Hotel with a group that included actor and director Rob Reiner and Reiner s wife. Griffin, who came out in his late twenties, had spent election night watching California election returns on a laptop while President Barack Obama s victory speech played on television. Prop 8 s passage made it impossible to join in any sort of celebration, says Griffin, who was a staff assistant in the Clinton White House press office at age 19. The message [Proposition 8] sent to young gay and lesbian teenagers closeted and otherwise was devastating, Griffin says. The lunch group was discussing what to do in response to the initiative when Kate Moulene, an acquaintance of the Reiners, stopped by and overheard the conversation. She later told the Reiners they should reach out to her former brother-in-law Ted Olson because he shared their views. Griffin says he quickly recognized that if in fact this was something that [Olson] agreed with us on, he could be a very significant figure in terms of accomplishing equality. After an initial phone conversation with Olson, Griffin offered to meet with him at Gibson, Dunn s Washington, D.C., office in late November. In D.C., Griffin noted tokens of Olson s career around his office a photograph of President Ronald Reagan; a mug full of white quills representing Olson s Supreme Court arguments, including dozens earned as President George W. Bush s solicitor general. They were reminders, Griffin says, that this is a guy that I never thought in my entire life that I would ever agree with on anything. But over about 45 minutes, their conversation ventured from the suicide rates of gay and lesbian teenagers to what a federal constitutional challenge to Proposition 8 would look like. It was an emotionally moving and very persuasive session, Olson says. Olson, who grew up in California and went to the University of the Pacific as an undergrad and the University of California, Berkeley, for law school, says when he heard that Proposition 8 had been put on the state s ballot, it crystallized his thoughts and feelings on the issue of same-sex marriage. Although Olson is an icon within the conservative legal movement, he leans libertarian and says he believes that religious convictions should not be the basis for civil laws. Olson says he thought it was wrong that fellow citizens who are like us in every single way except for their sexual orientation [were] selected out to be

5 erin siegal denied a relationship... because of the way they were born, Olson says. It seemed to be cruel and unnecessary and very harmful. After his meeting with Griffin, Olson discussed the idea of taking the Prop 8 assignment with his wife, his children, Gibson, Dunn chair Kenneth Doran, and Los Angeles partner Theodore Boutrous, Jr., whom he would eventually tap as his field general in California. From the beginning, Olson knew he would need cocounsel. He says he didn t want the case to look like one mossbacked conservative person stepping out of character. Olson initially considered teaming up with prominent gay and lesbian lawyers. Early on he reached out to Jenner & Block partner Paul Smith, who successfully argued Lawrence v. Texas, the 2003 Supreme Court case that struck down Texas s sodomy law. Smith declined to play a role in the case. When Olson called Boies in early spring 2009 about working on the case as cocounsel, Boies s deliberations were less exhaustive than his counterpart s. Boies didn t even pause to take a breath before he said enthusiastically, Yes. Count me in. I ll do it, Olson says. Boies says he still talked the case over with partners, but he was confident that they d be on board because of the firm s history of taking on large pro bono matters. Boies says he started paying close attention to the issue of same-sex marriage after then San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom directed city officials to issue marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples in Seeing those couples from around the country stand in line overnight, Boies says, I thought to myself, Why would you want to prevent people from having something that is so important to them and costs us nothing? Still, Boies initially had some of the same concerns about bringing the suit that some gay and lesbian advocates had they believed that a loss in federal court could cause setbacks in the larger fight for equal rights. It took 17 years, after all, for the Lawrence case to overturn a prior sodomy ruling at the Supreme Court. That was fast for the Supreme Court, said nine gay and lesbian groups, including GLAD and Lambda Legal, in a statement titled Make Change, Not Lawsuits rereleased the same day Olson and Boies announced their lawsuit. And during that time, many [lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender] Americans lost jobs, lost custody of their children, and suffered other harms because [the earlier] decision was taken as a license to discriminate against us. Boies says, Because [those concerns] came from people who had really devoted an enormous amount of effort over a long period of time to this cause that was something that we had to think about seriously. Boies, though, agreed with Olson that federal litigation challenging Proposition 8 was inevitable, and that any team bringing such a challenge should be well funded and experienced in the federal courts. We had clients that wanted to get married, and we believed they had a constitutional right to get married, Boies says. To say that they needed to wait until there was the right time I don t think was something for any lawyer to do. Between the fall of 2008 and the spring of 2009, when Olson reached out to Boies, political strategist Griffin raised money to found The American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER), the nonprofit foundation formed to fund the litigation. Gibson, Dunn donated its first $100,000 of work on the matter, and since then the firm has negotiated flat fees periodically with AFER for the phases of the case that have followed. It s more of a good-faith dialogue than a lockdown agreement, says Gibson, Dunn s Doran. The arrangement has worked out to be an 80 percent discount off typical Gibson, Dunn rates. At first, Boies, Schiller agreed to take the case for a discounted fee, but later gave back an initial payment after deciding to do the work pro bono. For his part, Griffin says the assignment he envisioned was beyond the scope of a typical pro bono case a multiyear, resource-intensive campaign to win marriage equality nationwide. In spring 2009 a Gibson, Dunn team including Boutrous; partners Christopher Dusseault, Ethan Dettmer, and Matthew McGill; and associates Amir Tayrani, Theane From left: Gibson s Enrique Monagas And Sarah Piepmeier Helped With Closing Arguments; Amir Tayrani and Theane Kapur drafted filings.

6 Evangelis Kapur, and Enrique Monagas began quietly doing legal research about marriage laws in California and other states, and Supreme Court cases involving marriage, gay and lesbian rights, civil rights, due process, and equal protection issues. We didn t want someone else to file [another challenge in federal court] ahead of us and be the other case we had to compete with or be joined with, so that we would not have control of the litigation, Olson says. That meant we had to be quiet. Secrecy was of such importance that the client code and matter description in Gibson, Dunn s internal system kept junior associates and paralegals who were assigned discrete tasks from knowing they were working on a federal challenge to Prop 8. (For instance, Monagas asked a junior associate to research where and how to serve the attorney general and governor of California with a lawsuit without describing the pending filing.) Meanwhile, a separate challenge to Prop 8 brought by couples and municipalities made its way through the state court system. At oral arguments in March, a majority of the judges on the state supreme court seemed unlikely to strike down Proposition 8 on the basis of the plaintiffs argument that it was a revision of the state s constitution rather than an amendment a distinction that would have required approval of two-thirds of both houses of California s legislature prior to the November election. With the state supreme court set to rule within 90 days of arguments, Gibson, Dunn lawyers began preparing filings. Los Angeles associate Kapur handled the first draft of the complaint, and D.C. associate Tayrani drafted the first version of the preliminary injunction motion. In late spring the team had a task remaining before finalizing the papers and filing the case in federal district court: Going with the plaintiffs to apply for marriage licenses. On Wednesday, May 20, 2009, Gibson, Dunn s Dusseault and Kapur went to the Los Angeles County Clerk s office with plaintiffs Paul Katami and Jeffrey Zarrillo, a gay couple who had been together for nearly a decade. An employee at the clerk s office told the pair they could not be issued a license. T h e n e x t d a y G i b s o n s M o n a g a s accompanied Kristin Perry and Sandra Stier, lesbian partners who had been together for nine years and were raising four boys together, to the Alameda County Clerk-Recorder s office to obtain a marriage license. (Perry is the Perry in Perry v. Schwarzenegger.) The initial worker they approached did not want to refuse them, so a supervisor read them a statement saying they could not be issued a permit because of Proposition 8. They were welcome to come back once the law changed, the supervisor said. Monagas, who married his husband in October 2008 in the brief window when gay marriage was recognized by California before the election, says he remembers thinking that day, This is the first step toward marriage equality. It happened today. Right now. The Perry group filed suit Friday, May 22, 2009, after the state supreme court announced that its decision would be handed down the following Tuesday. As expected, the state court upheld Prop 8. The Perry team announced their federal challenge to the law on May 27, at a news conference at the Millennium Biltmore Hotel in Los Angeles. The vast majority of lawyers at Gibson, Dunn and Boies, Schiller were surprised by the announcement. Even though Olson says the reaction to the filing was overwhelmingly positive, there were a small number of colleagues who disagreed with his constitutional argument. In August, Judge Walker set a trial date for early 2010, and added new members to the Perry team as he allowed the city and county of San Francisco to intervene. The race to trial was on. The Perry team had four months to identify witnesses, file expert reports, and take depositions. Gibson, Dunn s Dusseault, Boies, Schiller partner Jeremy Goldman, and San Francisco chief deputy city attorney Therese Stewart coordinated the effort through weekly conference calls. Stewart s office, which had worked on three prior same-sex marriage cases in California courts, had previously gathered expert declarations on relevant subjects. We had put together a trial record of sorts and gotten all dressed up with no place to go, Stewart says. Four of the city s experts were retained by the Perry team. In the run-up to trial, Boies traveled to Montreal in November 2009 to take depositions of two of the opposition s experts, Katherine Young and Paul Nathanson, both faculty members at McGill University. I don t take a lot of depositions, Boies says. In the Microsoft case I only did one deposition, which was of Bill Gates. But since the pair were experienced advocates who had participated in Canada s marriage debate, Boies says he thought it was important to try and build as good a record for crossexamination as we could. Boies, Schiller counsel Rosanne Baxter tracked down the academics writings and prior public statements and pulled out cogent quotes and concepts for Boies. Dyslexia keeps him from reading quickly, so he put together points that he wanted to make with the witnesses and asked Baxter for help digging up more material to support those thoughts. The opposition ultimately did not call the McGill faculty members at trial: The plaintiffs entered pieces of their depositions as evidence. B o i e s s f o c u s o n t h e o p p o s i t i o n continued at trial in January 2010 as he cross-examined both their experts and handled the only adverse witness. His confrontation with expert witness David Blankenhorn, founder and president of the Institute for American Values, proved contentious as it stretched out over two days. Blankenhorn had testified that gay marriage could contribute to an increase in divorce rates and the number of children being born out of wedlock. Boies s crossexamination elicited the admission from Blankenhorn that the children of gay couples would benefit from their parents ability to marry. Blankenhorn also agreed with a statement he had previously written in his 2007 book The Future of Marriage stating that we would be more American o n t h e d a y w e p e r m i t t e d s a m e - s e x marriage than we were on the day before. Theodore Uno, a Boies, Schiller associate who had joined David Boies at his first inperson meeting with AFER s Griffin in New York in 2009, says that being in the courtroom for the Blankenhorn crossexamination provided a unique blend of the personal and the professional. Before Prop 8 passed, Uno had planned to get married to his partner, Derek Peake, with whom he s raising five children. Where Boies s strength involves asking questions, the very nature of Olson s practice as an appellate lawyer entails being interrupted with them by judges. Olson writes out his arguments, or at least extended pieces of what he d like to say, with a no. 2 Ticonderoga pencil. His assistant Helen Voss, who has worked with him for more than 20 years, types up drafts for him to review. This process can repeat upward of 50 times for

7 each argument. I want it to be as perfect as I can make it, because you may only have that one time to express that one point of view, he says. You want people to hear it, understand it, agree with it. Because of a pending appellate matter in the case, closing arguments in the district court trial weren t heard until June 2010, nearly five months after the last day of witness testimony. That delay gave Olson time to try out a new technique: He interspersed his Plan B What happens if the California case stalls out? It was an election that pitted Ted Olson versus David Boies more than a decade ago, so it s only appropriate that the case that s brought them together again has come to resemble a campaign. The trial setup in Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher s San Francisco offices in January 2010 included a communications war room to handle press inquiries alongside conference rooms for the attorneys from Gibson, Dunn; Boies, Schiller & Flexner; and the city and county of San Francisco. We want this case not just to be a case of winning something in court, but we want to in the process win over the court of public opinion, Olson says. Part of that approach comes from AFER s board president, Chad Griffin, who cut his political teeth in the Clinton White House. Although AFER is not the plaintiff in the Perry case, they have funded the litigation and the communications campaign surrounding it. And they intend to see the litigation to legitimize gay marriage all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. If the Perry case does not make it there which is a possibility AFER plans to fight its fight on other fronts. Griffin says the foundation has experts on the laws and political prospects for marriage equality in all 50 states. As do Gibson, Dunn and Boies, Schiller, he says. AFER has one goal: It s to achieve marriage equality for everyone in this country. We won t close our doors until that s accomplished, he says. We will not waste time on moving to next options. The team is poised to find plaintiffs and file suit in other venues soon after the conclusion of the Perry litigation, if necessary. Boies says they are prepared to act very promptly and act in more than one state if it s decided that s the appropriate thing to do. R.T. closing argument with video of testimony recorded at the trial. Gibson, Dunn s Monagas and Sarah Piepmeier scoured the trial transcripts for excerpts including emotional moments of the plaintiffs testimony on the trial s first day. Boies had examined Katami and Zarrillo, and Olson handled Perry and Stier. I don t think that I could do anything in a closing argument more persuasive than playing the video that was taken of their testimony, Olson says. That told an immense and powerful story. Charles Cooper from Washington, D.C. s Cooper & Kirk handled the opening and closing arguments at trial as well as the appeal for Prop 8 proponents. Solo practitioner Andrew Pugno and the Alliance Defense Fund were cocounsel. The crux of their argument, as summed up in their appellate brief, is that responsible procreation and child rearing is the animating purpose of marriage. They argue that Judge Walker s decision effectively stripped the voters of California of the right to decide how to define marriage in the state. Judge Walker ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on August 4, Twelve days later, the Ninth Circuit ordered the judgment stayed pending appeal. Olson and Boies first talked about how to split appellate arguments at the Ninth Circuit in September. After discussing several options in the intervening months, they went with their initial plan that Boies would argue the issue of whether their opposition had standing to appeal, and Olson would argue the merits of the case. Preparations for the appellate argument included an afternoon moot court session a few days before in a conference room in Gibson, Dunn s San Francisco offices. Eight colleagues gathered around tables littered with color-coded case books and halfempty soda cans. Boies sat at a table to Olson s right with his eyeglasses perched on the tip of his nose, having just run through his argument in front of the group. Olson began as he would three days later before the Ninth Circuit panel, arguing that California carved discrimination on the basis of sex and sexual orientation into its fundamental governing charter. At the end of his prepared remarks, he countered the opposition s contention that allowing same-sex marriage would somehow cause children to become prematurely occupied with issues of sexuality. That reasoning, Olson argued, would warrant banning comic books, television, magazines, video games, the Internet, and, of course, contact with other children. The line elicited a round of laughter from the lawyers around the table. The following Monday morning before the judges, Olson received a similar response from the packed Ninth Circuit courtroom with a tweaked punch line, changing contact with other children into the more Ninth Circuit friendly conversations with other children. Talking about the change in language a month after the argument in January 2011 in his Washington, D.C., office, Olson didn t know whether to attribute the change to his process of revision or an offthe-cuff improvisation. While he s happy to discuss such minutiae, he s more interested in discussing the larger issues raised in the case and the four plaintiffs he s representing. When this reporter asked Olson what comes next if Perry does not make it to the Supreme Court, Olson firmly focused on his clients in the present case. Lawyers sometimes get caught up in what they want to accomplish and what their goals are, Olson says. We represent four people whose lives are in our hands, in a sense. We want them to have their goal. We want them to be married and to be treated as equals in California.... We can t forget that we re representing human beings. Reprinted with permission from the March 2011 edition of THE AMERICAN LAWYER 2011 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. For information, contact or #

YOUNG LAWYERS. The mood in San Francisco was euphoric in early. Behind the Scenes with. Working on the Same-Sex Marriage Cases.

YOUNG LAWYERS. The mood in San Francisco was euphoric in early. Behind the Scenes with. Working on the Same-Sex Marriage Cases. Behind the Scenes with YOUNG LAWYERS Working on the Same-Sex Marriage Cases Erik Cummins The mood in San Francisco was euphoric in early 2004 when then-mayor Gavin Newsom decreed that same-sex couples

More information

Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 111 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 864

Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 111 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 864 Case 2:13-cv-00395-AWA-LRL Document 111 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 864 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC, TONY C. LONDON, CAROL

More information

What Is Small Claims Court? What Types Of Cases Can Be Filed In Small Claims Court? Should I Sue? Do I Have the Defendant s Address?

What Is Small Claims Court? What Types Of Cases Can Be Filed In Small Claims Court? Should I Sue? Do I Have the Defendant s Address? SMALL CLAIMS COURT What Is Small Claims Court? Nebraska law requires that every county court in the state have a division known as Small Claims Court (Nebraska Revised Statute 25-2801). Small Claims Court

More information

The Case Against 8 Discussion Guide

The Case Against 8 Discussion Guide Director: Ben Cotner & Ryan White Year: 2014 Time: 109 min You might know these directors from: Good Ol Freda (2013) Pelada (2010) FILM SUMMARY After a short-lived legalization of same-sex marriage in

More information

This case challenged the constitutionality of California s Proposition 8.

This case challenged the constitutionality of California s Proposition 8. BRIEFING JUNE 2013 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ISSUES RULINGS ON DOMA AND PROPOSITION 8 CASES On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued decisions in two cases affecting the legal definition

More information

MARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES IN CALIFORNIA

MARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES IN CALIFORNIA MARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES IN CALIFORNIA Frequently Asked Questions Last Updated: July 9, 2015 NOTE: This document is intended to provide information for same-sex couples who are considering getting

More information

INTRODUCTION DO YOU NEED A LAWYER?

INTRODUCTION DO YOU NEED A LAWYER? INTRODUCTION The purpose of this handbook is to provide answers to some very basic questions that inmates or inmates families might have regarding the processes of the criminal justice system. In no way

More information

OPENING INSTRUCTIONS

OPENING INSTRUCTIONS OPENING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Jury: Respective Roles of Jurors and Judge You ve been chosen as jurors for this case, and you ve taken an oath to decide the facts fairly. As we begin the trial, I

More information

ROLES TO ASSIGN. 1. Judge. 2. Courtroom Deputy. 3. Prosecutor 1 opening statement. 4. Prosecutor 2 direct of Dana Capro

ROLES TO ASSIGN. 1. Judge. 2. Courtroom Deputy. 3. Prosecutor 1 opening statement. 4. Prosecutor 2 direct of Dana Capro ROLES TO ASSIGN 1. Judge 2. Courtroom Deputy 3. Prosecutor 1 opening statement 4. Prosecutor 2 direct of Dana Capro 5. Prosecutor 3 direct of Jamie Medina 6. Prosecutor 4 cross of Pat Morton 7. Prosecutor

More information

Wisconsin Survey Spring 2012

Wisconsin Survey Spring 2012 The St. Norbert College Wisconsin Public Radio Wisconsin Survey Spring 2012 Survey Information: Random Selection, Landline and Cell Telephone Survey Number of Adult Wisconsin Residents: 406 LIKELY VOTERS

More information

Judicial Election Questionnaire - Judge version

Judicial Election Questionnaire - Judge version Judicial Election Questionnaire - Judge version 1) Your full name: Youlee Yim You 2) Office Address and Phone Number: 1021 SW Fourth Ave., Portland, Oregon 97204 503-988-3404 3) Web site (if applicable):

More information

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS For Use with All DOM REL Forms

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS For Use with All DOM REL Forms Please read these instructions before you file your papers. These instructions may contain some legal words that are not familiar to you. A list of common legal words and their definitions is attached.

More information

A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process

A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney General s Office A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney

More information

Law Offices of. 2249 Derby Road (at Sunrise Highway) Baldwin, New York 11510 Telephone (516) 223-5500 Fax (516) 223-5505 www.nelsonlaw.

Law Offices of. 2249 Derby Road (at Sunrise Highway) Baldwin, New York 11510 Telephone (516) 223-5500 Fax (516) 223-5505 www.nelsonlaw. ROBERT N. NELSON KIMBERLY I. NELSON ADMITTED IN NY, NJ SHANA L. CURTI MATTHEW R. DROST Law Offices of ROBERT N. NELSON 2249 Derby Road (at Sunrise Highway) Baldwin, New York 11510 Telephone (516) 223-5500

More information

- 2 - Your appeal will follow these steps:

- 2 - Your appeal will follow these steps: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT YOUR APPEAL AND YOUR LAWYER A Guide Prepared by the Office of the Appellate Defender 1. WHO IS MY LAWYER? Your lawyer s name is on the notice that came with this guide. The

More information

How Do People Settle Disputes? How a Civil Trial Works in California

How Do People Settle Disputes? How a Civil Trial Works in California Article brought to you by the Administrative Office of the California Courts and California Council for the Social Studies in partnership for Civic Education How Do People Settle Disputes? How a Civil

More information

EARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW PROJECT WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT

EARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW PROJECT WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT EARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW PROJECT Publication Date: May 2010 WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT In the operation of your child care business you may encounter problems which force you to go

More information

Representing Yourself. Your Family Law Trial

Representing Yourself. Your Family Law Trial Representing Yourself at Your Family Law Trial - A Guide - June 2013 REPRESENTING YOURSELF AT YOUR FAMILY LAW TRIAL IN THE ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE This is intended to help you represent yourself in a

More information

Medical Malpractice VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Medical Malpractice VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS Medical Malpractice VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS INTRODUCTION: Tell the jurors that this is a very big and a very important case. Do a SHORT summary of the case and the damages we are seeking. This summary should

More information

Release #2301 Release Date and Time: 6:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Release #2301 Release Date and Time: 6:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 10, 2009 THE FIELD POLL THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 1947 AS THE CALIFORNIA POLL BY MERVIN FIELD Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco,

More information

Supreme Court Strikes Down DOMA, Clears Way for Same-Sex Marriage in California

Supreme Court Strikes Down DOMA, Clears Way for Same-Sex Marriage in California Brought to you by Alamo Insurance Group Supreme Court Strikes Down DOMA, Clears Way for Same-Sex On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court announced decisions in two significant cases regarding laws affecting

More information

How My Lawsuit Got Dismissed

How My Lawsuit Got Dismissed How My Lawsuit Got Dismissed Before a classified employee may file a civil action with superior court he must exhaust certain administrative remedies. When the Civil Service Commission denied me a hearing

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. Mock Trial Script. The Case of a Stolen Car

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. Mock Trial Script. The Case of a Stolen Car SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Mock Trial Script The Case of a Stolen Car This mock trial is appropriate for middle and high school students. The script includes a role for a narrator,

More information

If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement

If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement United States District Court for the Northern District of California If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement A federal court authorized this notice. This

More information

Boulder Municipal Court Boulder County Justice Center P.O. Box 8015 1777 6 th Street Boulder, CO 80306-8015 www.bouldercolorado.

Boulder Municipal Court Boulder County Justice Center P.O. Box 8015 1777 6 th Street Boulder, CO 80306-8015 www.bouldercolorado. Boulder Municipal Court Boulder County Justice Center P.O. Box 8015 1777 6 th Street Boulder, CO 80306-8015 www.bouldercolorado.gov/court JURY READINESS CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS You have set your case for

More information

Arizona criminal appeal and PCR process - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Arizona criminal appeal and PCR process - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: Tracey Westerhausen Re: Arizona criminal appeal and PCR process Date: April 17, 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This memo

More information

THE MINNESOTA LAWYER

THE MINNESOTA LAWYER THE MINNESOTA LAWYER September 6, 2004 MN Court of Appeals Allows Testimony on Battered-Woman Syndrome By Michelle Lore A District Court judge properly allowed an expert on battered-woman syndrome to testify

More information

JUROR S MANUAL (Prepared by the State Bar of Michigan)

JUROR S MANUAL (Prepared by the State Bar of Michigan) JUROR S MANUAL (Prepared by the State Bar of Michigan) Your Role as a Juror You ve heard the term jury of one s peers. In our country the job of determining the facts and reaching a just decision rests,

More information

New York Law Journal. Wednesday, July 31, 2002

New York Law Journal. Wednesday, July 31, 2002 New York Law Journal Wednesday, July 31, 2002 HEADLINE: BYLINE: Trial Advocacy, Cross-Examination: The Basics Ben B. Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan BODY: Cross-examination involves relatively straightforward

More information

Separation, Divorce and Marriage Equality

Separation, Divorce and Marriage Equality Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders 30 Winter Street, Suite 800 Boston, MA 02108 Phone: 617.426.1350 or 800.455.GLAD Fax: 617.426.3594 Website: www.glad.org Separation, Divorce and Marriage Equality Note:

More information

KEY CONCEPTS BACKGROUND

KEY CONCEPTS BACKGROUND REDISTRICTING TEXAS: A PRIMER Michael J. Gaudini Master of Public Affairs Candidate LBJ School of Public Affairs KEY CONCEPTS Redistricting. Political districts are redrawn after the decennial census in

More information

Original FAQ Prepared July 30, 2013

Original FAQ Prepared July 30, 2013 2013-2014 COURT COSTS AND FEES - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Original FAQ Prepared July 30, 2013 Note: All of the answers to the following frequently asked questions (FAQ) reflect the interpretation of

More information

In January 2009, Judge Smith became board certified as a Family Law Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy.

In January 2009, Judge Smith became board certified as a Family Law Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy. JUDGE PHILIP SMITH 4th Circuit Court Room 607 I. BRIEF BIOGRAPHY Judge Philip E. Smith graduated from the University of Tennessee College of Law in May of 1988. In October of 1988, Judge Smith went to

More information

Child Abuse, Child Neglect. What Parents Should Know If They Are Investigated

Child Abuse, Child Neglect. What Parents Should Know If They Are Investigated Child Abuse, Child Neglect What Parents Should Know If They Are Investigated Written by South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center with editing and assistance from the Children s Law Center and the

More information

To Wed or Not to Wed By barbara findlay, Q.C.

To Wed or Not to Wed By barbara findlay, Q.C. To Wed or Not to Wed By barbara findlay, Q.C. Do you know what it means to be married (legally speaking, that is)? What are the differences in rights and responsibilities between two people living together

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14 1449 BASHIR SHEIKH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. GRANT REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District

More information

MAXIMIZING STRIKES FOR CAUSE IN CRIMINAL CASES BY ROBERT R. SWAFFORD

MAXIMIZING STRIKES FOR CAUSE IN CRIMINAL CASES BY ROBERT R. SWAFFORD Maximizing Strikes for Cause MAXIMIZING STRIKES FOR CAUSE IN CRIMINAL CASES BY ROBERT R. SWAFFORD I. INTRODUCTION This paper will introduce an approach to jury selection that is radically different from

More information

Preparing a Federal Case

Preparing a Federal Case Last Updated: October 2010 Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Preparing a Federal Case If you are reading this, you are probably proceeding on your own in court without the help of an

More information

Governor Edmund G. Pat Brown, NAACP attorney Nathaniel S. Colley and California Democratic Senator Clair Engle, Ca. 1962.

Governor Edmund G. Pat Brown, NAACP attorney Nathaniel S. Colley and California Democratic Senator Clair Engle, Ca. 1962. Governor Edmund G. Pat Brown, NAACP attorney Nathaniel S. Colley and California Democratic Senator Clair Engle, Ca. 1962. Nathaniel S. Colley Nathaniel S. Colley was born on November 21, 1918 in Carlowsville,

More information

About your appeal... About your appeal... Answers to your questions about the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

About your appeal... About your appeal... Answers to your questions about the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims About your appeal... About your appeal... Answers to your questions about the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Veterans Consortium Pro Bono Program You fought for us, now we ll fight for you.

More information

EARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW UNIT WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT

EARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW UNIT WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT EARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW UNIT Publication Date: November 2013 WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT In the operation of your child care business you may encounter problems which force you to

More information

What You Need to Know About Divorce

What You Need to Know About Divorce What You Need to Know About Divorce There are four main steps in a divorce: 1. 2. 3. 4. Your lawyer writes the divorce papers and files them with the court. The sheriff s department gives (serves) your

More information

If You Shopped at Target from November 27 through December 18, 2013 or Received Notice That Your Personal Information Was Compromised,

If You Shopped at Target from November 27 through December 18, 2013 or Received Notice That Your Personal Information Was Compromised, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA If You Shopped at Target from November 27 through December 18, 2013 or Received Notice That Your Personal Information Was Compromised, You Could

More information

BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 08-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT. Parties and Appearance

BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 08-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT. Parties and Appearance BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 08-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS 11 Austin Office COMMISSION FOR LAWYER * DISCIPLINE, * Petitioner * * 201400539 v. * * CHARLES J. SEBESTA, JR., * Respondent

More information

239th DISTRICT COURT GENERAL GUIDELINES

239th DISTRICT COURT GENERAL GUIDELINES 239th DISTRICT COURT GENERAL GUIDELINES Court: 239th District Court, Brazoria County Judge s Name: Patrick E. Pat Sebesta Court Address: 111 E. Locust Street Room 214-A Angleton, Texas 77515 Staff: Clerk:

More information

Role Preparation. Preparing for a Mock Trial

Role Preparation. Preparing for a Mock Trial Civil Law Mock Trial: Role Preparation This package contains: PAGE Preparing for a Mock Trial 1-5 Time Chart 6 Etiquette 7-8 Role Preparation for: Plaintiff and Defendant Lawyers 9-12 Judge 13 Jury 13

More information

What to Expect In Your Lawsuit

What to Expect In Your Lawsuit What to Expect In Your Lawsuit A lawsuit is a marathon not a sprint. Stewart R. Albertson. There is a saying that the wheels of justice move slowly. That is as true today as when it was initially stated.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES HILL, JR., No. 381, 2011 Plaintiff Below, Appellant, Court Below: Superior Court v. of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County RICHARD P.

More information

Release #2349 Release Date: Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Release #2349 Release Date: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 THE FIELD POLL THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 1947 AS THE CALIFORNIA POLL BY MERVIN FIELD Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco,

More information

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FROM COUPLES WHO ARE CONSIDERING GETTING MARRIED IN SAN FRANCISCO

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FROM COUPLES WHO ARE CONSIDERING GETTING MARRIED IN SAN FRANCISCO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FROM COUPLES WHO ARE CONSIDERING GETTING MARRIED IN SAN FRANCISCO On February 12, 2004, the county clerk in San Francisco began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples,

More information

County Court Restraining Orders

County Court Restraining Orders Answers to Your Questions About County Court Restraining Orders Excellence in Customer Service Colorado Judicial Branch http://www.courts.state.co.us June 2002 CIVIL LAW In a civil case, the person seeking

More information

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive

More information

Statement of Introduction on the Nomination of John B. Owens to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Senator Dianne Feinstein

Statement of Introduction on the Nomination of John B. Owens to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Senator Dianne Feinstein Statement of Introduction on the Nomination of John B. Owens to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Senator Dianne Feinstein Senate Judiciary Committee October 30, 2013 I will now introduce

More information

Farzad Family Law Scholarship 2014

Farzad Family Law Scholarship 2014 Farzad Family Law Scholarship 2014 Should the right to marry for same-sex couples become a federal constitutional right by amendment to the United States Constitution or remain a State issue? The United

More information

Your Voice in Criminal Court

Your Voice in Criminal Court Your Voice in Criminal Court a guide to court orientation for adult witnesses INFORMATION + RESOURCES FOR VICTIM SERVICE WORKERS introduction Victim Service Workers have an important role to play in the

More information

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE PETITION TO CORRECT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE PETITION TO CORRECT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE PETITION TO CORRECT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE About the Petition Who can file a petition to amend a birth certificate? You can only apply to amend a birth certificate if you are

More information

Should government get out of the marriage business?

Should government get out of the marriage business? Should government get out of the marriage business? Gay rights» Civil unions for all could be a compromise that helps churches and the state. By Rosemary Winters The Salt Lake Tribune Salt Lake Tribune

More information

MEDIATION STRATEGIES: WHAT PLAINTIFFS REALLY WANT By Jim Bleeke, SweetinBleeke Attorneys

MEDIATION STRATEGIES: WHAT PLAINTIFFS REALLY WANT By Jim Bleeke, SweetinBleeke Attorneys MEDIATION STRATEGIES: WHAT PLAINTIFFS REALLY WANT By Jim Bleeke, SweetinBleeke Attorneys As defense attorneys, we often focus most of our efforts on assembling the most crucial facts and the strongest

More information

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION INTO DIVORCE LAW: THE BASICS OF OHIO DIVORCE LAW By BETH SILVERMAN, J.D.

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION INTO DIVORCE LAW: THE BASICS OF OHIO DIVORCE LAW By BETH SILVERMAN, J.D. A BRIEF INTRODUCTION INTO DIVORCE LAW: THE BASICS OF OHIO DIVORCE LAW By BETH SILVERMAN, J.D. How can a marriage be terminated in Ohio? There are two primary ways to terminate a marriage: Dissolution or

More information

PRESS RELEASE Dale Vince v Kathleen Wyatt

PRESS RELEASE Dale Vince v Kathleen Wyatt 8 May 2013 PRESS RELEASE Dale Vince v Kathleen Wyatt FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The Court of Appeal has today delivered a ground breaking judgment in favour of Dale Vince, founder of green energy business Ecotricity,

More information

Choosing a Lawyer .JUREWITZ. By Ross A. Jurewitz Injury Accident Attorney, Jurewitz Law Group

Choosing a Lawyer .JUREWITZ. By Ross A. Jurewitz Injury Accident Attorney, Jurewitz Law Group Choosing a Lawyer How to Choose a Great Lawyer for Your Injury Accident Case By Ross A. Jurewitz Injury Accident Attorney, Jurewitz Law Group.JUREWITZ LAW GROUP Jurewitz Law Group 600 B Street Suite 1550

More information

THE BASICS Custody and Visitation in New York State

THE BASICS Custody and Visitation in New York State THE BASICS Custody and Visitation in New York State This booklet answers common questions about custody and visitation when the parents cannot agree about who is responsible for taking care of the children.

More information

The Court Has Spoken: Case Law Update

The Court Has Spoken: Case Law Update The Court Has Spoken: Case Law Update Texas Case Law Mara Flanagan Friesen Deputy Director for Child Support Texas Office of the Attorney General The Office of the Attorney General of Texas v. Scholer,

More information

Chapter 4 Legal Ethics

Chapter 4 Legal Ethics Chapter 4 Legal Ethics Yes. You read that right legal ethics. Har de har. Go ahead. Get it out of your system. How about this one? Why do scientists prefer using lawyers over lab rats? There are some things

More information

SMALL CLAIMS COURT INFORMATION

SMALL CLAIMS COURT INFORMATION Clark County District Court SMALL CLAIMS COURT INFORMATION INTRODUCTION The Small Claims Department of District Court allows a person or business with a legal dispute to sue without hiring an attorney.

More information

Going to Court as a Witness

Going to Court as a Witness Going to Court as a Witness - July 2010 Going to Court as a Witness 1 Introduction Going to court can be stressful for many victims and witnesses. If you need to give evidence in a criminal trial, we hope

More information

CITY OF EDMONDS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE ATTORNEYS. The City of Edmonds ( City ), Washington, is requesting proposals from well

CITY OF EDMONDS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE ATTORNEYS. The City of Edmonds ( City ), Washington, is requesting proposals from well CITY OF EDMONDS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE ATTORNEYS The City of Edmonds ( City ), Washington, is requesting proposals from well qualified attorneys interested in providing legal representation

More information

U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Relating to Same-Sex Marriage

U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Relating to Same-Sex Marriage WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMORANDUM U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Relating to Same-Sex Marriage Hollingsworth v. Perry challenged California s Proposition 8, the state s constitutional

More information

Profiles of Chemical Engineers

Profiles of Chemical Engineers Profiles of Chemical Engineers James Monroe Associate Attorney Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner Washington, DC Education: B.S. - Chemical Engineering, Washington University J.D. - George

More information

Labor & Employment Law Update

Labor & Employment Law Update , California 90071, California 92260-4305 Wrongful Termination/Retaliation for First Quarter 2007 WRONGFUL TERMINATION Catherine Coble, Esq. Public employer has immunity against direct liability for wrongful

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL The Superior Court has authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

SAN DIEGO DEFENSE LAWYERS 2014 MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION OFFICIAL RULES. 1. The Competition is sponsored by the San Diego Defense Lawyers ( SDDL ).

SAN DIEGO DEFENSE LAWYERS 2014 MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION OFFICIAL RULES. 1. The Competition is sponsored by the San Diego Defense Lawyers ( SDDL ). SAN DIEGO DEFENSE LAWYERS 2014 MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION OFFICIAL RULES GENERAL INFORMATION 1. The Competition is sponsored by the San Diego Defense Lawyers ( SDDL ). A violation of any of the rules governing

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RONALD C. BETTEN and ESTHER LAFA, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Case No. CV13-02885-CBM-(FFMx)

More information

Ruling Guides Parents on Legal Conundrum of Moving a Child. By Mitchell A. Jacobs and David L. Marcus *

Ruling Guides Parents on Legal Conundrum of Moving a Child. By Mitchell A. Jacobs and David L. Marcus * Ruling Guides Parents on Legal Conundrum of Moving a Child. By Mitchell A. Jacobs and David L. Marcus * In its most recent child custody move-away case, the California Supreme Court in In re Marriage of

More information

Attending Court as a Witness

Attending Court as a Witness Attending Court as a Witness 2006 Attending Court as a Witness This booklet is also available in the following languages: - Arabic - French - Irish - Latvian - Lithuanian - Mandarin - Polish - Russian

More information

PETER J. ECKERSTROM 400 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-1374 eckerstrom@appeals2.az.gov Office phone: (520) 628-6950

PETER J. ECKERSTROM 400 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-1374 eckerstrom@appeals2.az.gov Office phone: (520) 628-6950 PETER J. ECKERSTROM 400 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-1374 eckerstrom@appeals2.az.gov Office phone: (520) 628-6950 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND & EXPERIENCE Judge, Arizona Court of Appeals Appointed

More information

SMALL CLAIMS COURT IN ARKANSAS

SMALL CLAIMS COURT IN ARKANSAS SMALL CLAIMS COURT IN ARKANSAS Note: The information contained in this publication is designed as a useful guide to remind you of your rights as a citizen of this state. You should not rely totally on

More information

Opening Statements Handout 1

Opening Statements Handout 1 Opening Statements Handout 1 Once the jury has been chosen, the attorneys for both sides deliver an opening statement about the case to the jury. Opening statements outline the facts that the attorneys

More information

KEROSKY PURVES & BOGUE ATTORNEYS AT LAW

KEROSKY PURVES & BOGUE ATTORNEYS AT LAW SANTA ROSA OFFICE 131 A STONY CIRCLE SUITE 500 SANTA ROSA, CA. 95401 TELEPHONE: (707) 433-2060 ckerosky@youradvocate.net www.youradvocate.net KEROSKY PURVES & BOGUE ATTORNEYS AT LAW AN ASSOCIATION OF ATTORNEYS

More information

The Legal System in the United States

The Legal System in the United States The Legal System in the United States At the conclusion of this chapter, students will be able to: 1. Understand how the legal system works; 2. Explain why laws are necessary; 3. Discuss how cases proceed

More information

Challenging Your College s Speech Code

Challenging Your College s Speech Code Challenging Your College s Speech Code The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education is pleased to offer this pamphlet for public university students interested in pursuing legal challenges against

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION JURY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION JURY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION MARY CUMMINS Plaintiff, vs. AMANDA LOLLAR, DENISE TOMLINSON, DOROTHY HYATT, MICHELLE MCCAULLEY, KATE RUGRODEN,

More information

Preparing a Federal Case

Preparing a Federal Case Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Preparing a Federal Case If you are reading this, you are probably proceeding on your own in court without the help of an attorney. This is often called

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ. 4143 (SJF) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT All persons who received

More information

IN RE MARRIAGE CASES (California): 2008

IN RE MARRIAGE CASES (California): 2008 IN RE MARRIAGE CASES (California): 2008 These cases present the issue of the legality of gay marriage bans, in the context of previous State domestic partnership (CA) or civil union (CT) Statutes, under

More information

(Copyright (c) 2005 Los Angeles Times)

(Copyright (c) 2005 Los Angeles Times) Death Row Often Means a Long Life; California condemns many murderers, but few are ever executed; [HOME EDITION] by Rone Tempest Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, Calif.: Mar 6, 2005. pg. B.1 (Copyright

More information

DIVORCE AND SEPARATION

DIVORCE AND SEPARATION DIVORCE AND SEPARATION What are the reasons for a divorce? In Virginia, you can get a divorce for six reasons. Two reasons don't need a waiting period: Adultery, sodomy or buggery. These are very difficult

More information

Winning the Mediation: A Trial Lawyer's Guide

Winning the Mediation: A Trial Lawyer's Guide Winning the Mediation: A Trial Lawyer's Guide Article Contributed by: Allen B. Grodsky, Grodsky & Olecki LLP Lawyers often market themselves as great trial lawyers, even going so far as to promote their

More information

A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal

A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal Presented by the Office of the Richmond County District Attorney Acting District Attorney Daniel L. Master, Jr. 130 Stuyvesant

More information

Thank you for your consideration.

Thank you for your consideration. I would first like to extend to you my appreciation for considering Reed & Reed for your mediation requirements. In attempting to resolve your dispute through mediation you have taken a major step in the

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Case 307-cr-00289-M Document 368 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DON HILL, et al., Defendants. NO. 307CR289-R ELECTRONICALLY

More information

The NH Court System excerpts taken from http://www.courts.state.nh.us/press/030608guide.pdf

The NH Court System excerpts taken from http://www.courts.state.nh.us/press/030608guide.pdf The NH Court System excerpts taken from http://www.courts.state.nh.us/press/030608guide.pdf NH court system: The modern trial and appellate court system in New Hampshire took shape in 1901, when the legislature

More information

DONALD LAWRENCE ZACHARY

DONALD LAWRENCE ZACHARY Personal Data Sheet DONALD LAWRENCE ZACHARY 371 Brockmont Dr. Glendale, CA 91202-1302 Telephone: (818) 637-2495 Telecopier: (818) 549-0524 Email: dzachary@dlzlaw.com www.dlzlaw.com. October 2002 - Present

More information

Question 5. After the trial, Attorney sent a $500 gift certificate to Doctor, with a note thanking her for recommending that Peter call him.

Question 5. After the trial, Attorney sent a $500 gift certificate to Doctor, with a note thanking her for recommending that Peter call him. Question 5 Attorney mailed a professional announcement to several local physicians, listing his name and address and his area of law practice as personal injury. Doctor received Attorney s announcement

More information

The Electoral Process STEP BY STEP. the worksheet activity to the class. the answers with the class. (The PowerPoint works well for this.

The Electoral Process STEP BY STEP. the worksheet activity to the class. the answers with the class. (The PowerPoint works well for this. Teacher s Guide Time Needed: One class period Materials Needed: Student worksheets Projector Copy Instructions: Reading (2 pages; class set) Activity (3 pages; class set) The Electoral Process Learning

More information

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE NEW MEXICO FAMILY VIOLENCE PROTECTION ACT

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE NEW MEXICO FAMILY VIOLENCE PROTECTION ACT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE NEW MEXICO FAMILY VIOLENCE PROTECTION ACT This information guide is general in nature and is not designed to give legal advice. The court does not guarantee the legal sufficiency

More information

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-4037

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-4037 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-4037 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. REGGIE ANDRE BECKTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States

More information

LGBT Adoptions in the US & South Africa Samantha Moore

LGBT Adoptions in the US & South Africa Samantha Moore LGBT Adoptions in the US & South Africa Samantha Introduction Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender, most commonly referred to as LGBT, have become a subject of controversy over the past decade. LGBT

More information

LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE FOR MAY 2016 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE. Timothy L. Davis. Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP www.bwslaw.

LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE FOR MAY 2016 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE. Timothy L. Davis. Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP www.bwslaw. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE FOR MAY 2016 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE Timothy L. Davis Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP www.bwslaw.com OVERVIEW FOR 2016 UPDATE Labor Law Court Decisions Employment

More information

What the Jury Hears in Products Liability Litigation. The View From Both Sides and the Middle

What the Jury Hears in Products Liability Litigation. The View From Both Sides and the Middle What the Jury Hears in Products Liability Litigation The View From Both Sides and the Middle Theresa Zagnoli, Communications Expert and Jury Consultant Susan T. Dwyer, Defense Lawyer Jeffrey A. Lichtman,

More information