The higher education community and institutions of
|
|
- Erika Williams
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 What s an Accrediting Agency Supposed to Do? Do everything possible to let others know that we are open to discussion and that we do not believe that everything we do is perfect the way it is. by Elizabeth H. Sibolski Elizabeth H. Sibolski is president of the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, one of seven U.S. regional accrediting agencies. She is a past-president of the Society for College and University Planning and co-author of Integrating Higher Education Planning and Assessment: A Practical Guide (SCUP 2006). She holds Ph.D. in public administration and master of public administration degrees from American University. The higher education community and institutions of higher learning generally approve of a voluntary peer review process for quality assurance. In an article entitled There s A Lot That s Right About Regional Accreditation, Judith Eaton (2009, 4) noted that Perhaps most important, regional accreditation is a successful model of a powerful professional peer review process by which academic quality can be judged. Peer review is acknowledged throughout the world as the most appropriate and desirable approach to the evaluation of such complex areas as higher education. In thinking about accreditation, it is important to keep in mind that U.S. higher education is not monolithic and that the various institutional sectors do not necessarily agree on what the process of peer review should entail. For example, there is no agreement across sectors and institutions as to whether and how student learning outcomes should be assessed. The federal government wants to assure that higher education delivered in the United States meets high-quality standards because higher education has become increasingly essential in developing a citizenry prepared to participate in a knowledge-driven economy. A huge amount of federal funding (now reported to be more than 22 April-June 2012 Copyright Society for College and University Planning (SCUP). All rights reserved.
2 What s an Accrediting Agency Supposed to Do? $175 billion) goes into higher education annually (National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity 2011), and it is clear that the government and the general public have a right to know that these funds are well spent. At the same time, the press and the Congress (especially the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions) have investigated and made public a number of situations in which it is clear that, at the very least, students have been misled and, in the worst cases, subject to fraud and abuse. The money involved, the high stakes of higher education, and the bad actor factor have naturally resulted in moves to protect the public interest through increasingly granular regulation and review processes. Add to this mix the fact that the Higher Education Act is renewed and revised every few years, and in the months leading up to reauthorization, there is always a debate about how to improve the law and the regulations that flow from it. Current debate springs from passage of the Higher Education Opportunity Act in 2008 and ongoing related regulatory activity. In addition, the act will once again be up for review and reauthorization shortly, and the cycle will start again. Focus on institutional improvement or focus on compliance? The higher education community supports peer review and institutional improvement as a means of assuring quality, but debates what should be involved. The federal government seeks to protect the public interest and the public purse through accountability, transparency, and compliance with regulation. All of this produces ongoing tensions in and for accreditation. Focus on institutional improvement or on compliance what should an accrediting agency do? The Context for U.S. Higher Education Accreditation A few words about higher education accreditation in the United States may be useful for readers who are not familiar with the subject. Those who are familiar with the structure of accreditation in the United States may wish to skip this section. One important set of current definitions of accreditation is provided by the U.S. Department of Education: accreditation is the status of public recognition that an accrediting agency grants to an educational institution or program that meets the agency s standards and requirements, and an accrediting agency is the entity that conducts accrediting activities through voluntary, non-federal peer review (U.S. Department of Education 2012, p. 4). An agency that meets the department s requirements and demonstrates that its standards are rigorous and effective is determined to be a reliable authority regarding the quality of the education or training provided by the institutions or programs it accredits (National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity 2012, 1). Once an accrediting agency has met federal requirements and has achieved recognition by the Secretary of Education, it can serve as a gatekeeper for access to federal funding. However, each agency must regularly undergo review in order to maintain its recognized status. These regular reviews usually take place at five-year intervals, but additional follow-up may be required as necessary. There are three principal types of accrediting bodies that may be recognized by the Secretary of Education and thus become gatekeepers for access to U.S. Title IV funding. First, national accreditors focus on the institution as a whole. Among the national accreditors are some that are faith-based and others that accredit career-based or single-purpose institutions. Second, regional accrediting agencies also focus on the whole institution, and many can trace their origins back to the late 1800s. The New England Association of Schools and Colleges was founded in 1885, and the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools was formed in The North Central Association of Colleges and Schools and the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools were established in The Northwest Association of Schools and Colleges followed in 1917, and, finally, the Western Association of Schools and Colleges was founded in As is clearly evident from the naming conventions of these agencies, regional geographic boundaries were established at the outset and have been maintained to present times even though geography is much less relevant today. Programmatic or specialized accrediting agencies make up a third group of accreditors that may be recognized by the Secretary of Education. These agencies focus on a specific academic discipline such as business, law, or medicine. Regardless of the type of agency, accreditation addresses the following roles (Eaton 2011): Assuring quality, Providing access to federal and state funds, Planning for Higher Education Search and read online at: 23
3 Elizabeth H. Sibolski Engendering private-sector confidence (e.g., among employers), and Easing transfer of student credit among institutions. There are a number of resources available to readers interested in learning more about higher education accreditation in the United States. One of the best general discussions about the history of U.S. accreditation can be found in Accreditation in the United States: How Did We Get to Where We Are? (Brittingham 2009). A number of publications and other resources, many of which can be found online at are available from the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Among these are The Fundamentals of Accreditation: What Do You Need To Know? (Council for Higher Education Accreditation 2002); The Value of Accreditation: Four Pivotal Roles (Eaton 2003); and An Overview of U.S. Accreditation (Eaton 2011). Additional resources about U.S. higher education accreditation are available from each of the accrediting agencies. For example, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (2009) has published Highlights from the Commission s First 90 Years. This and other documents concerning Middle States accreditation standards and processes are available online at The View from a Regional Accrediting Agency An emphasis on quality. As noted previously, regional accrediting associations were initially founded by educators to serve the common goals and purposes of member institutions. In the case of Middle States, the original objectives of the association were to standardize the qualifications required for admission to college; to determine the desired characteristics for college preparatory schools; to recommend courses of study for both colleges and schools; to foster relationships among schools, colleges, and the government; and to study and recommend best practices of organization and governance. (Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2009, p. 2) It was not until the 1920s that Middle States institutions achieved approved status by verifying compliance with accreditation guidelines through completion of definitions and standards questionnaires and application forms. During these early years, institutions were added to the approved list following inspection visits that usually were made by a single individual. In the 1930s, the designation of approved was dropped and institutions were identified as accredited. The 1940s brought the use of evaluation teams to replace inspection visits by an individual, and emphasis shifted from the maintenance of minimal standards to the improvement of institutions (Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2009, p. 5). In 1957, a cycle of re-visits at approved/accredited institutions was instituted. That practice was found to be so useful that the Association agreed, without dissent, to have the practice continue on a regular basis at 10-year intervals (Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2009, p. 6). As the years passed, accreditation standards and processes were refined. By the 1970s, comprehensive self-studies were expected from institutions, and a new standard report was added in the fifth year of the accreditation cycle. In the years since, an optional alternative to the traditional self-study approach has been added to provide for institutional focus on selected topics, collaborative reviews with other agencies have been introduced, and the commission has devoted increasing attention to the provision of training and orientation programs that assist member institutions and volunteer peer evaluators in understanding their roles and responsibilities (Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2009). The commission has regularly reviewed and revised its accreditation standards and processes over the years. In the 1990s, standards were less specific than they are today. For example, the 1994 Middle States publication on standards for accreditation had this to say about institutional effectiveness and outcomes: Institutions should develop guidelines and procedures for assessing their overall effectiveness as well as student learning outcomes. The process of seeking such evidence and its subsequent use helps to cultivate educational excellence. The plan for the assessment of outcomes should attempt to determine the extent and quality of student learning. (Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1994, pp ) In the decade that followed, institutions increasingly noted that the commission s expectations were not clear 24 April-June 2012 Search and read online at:
4 What s an Accrediting Agency Supposed to Do? enough, and the commission learned that these statements about the assessment of outcomes were not as specific as they needed to be. When the standards were fully reviewed and overhauled, effective in 2004, these problems were addressed. Henceforth there would be two standards dealing with outcomes assessment one focusing on the assessment of student learning and the other focusing on institutional assessment. In addition, an expectation for closing the loop would be clarified in statements explicitly connecting assessment to planning and resource allocation. This short trip through the history of one accrediting agency provides a means of making some important points. First, the development of accreditation activities has been evolutionary rather than revolutionary. Further, because regional accrediting agencies are nongovernmental membership organizations, their college and university members are ultimately responsible for decisions made about the content of the standards for which each institution will be held accountable. Another point that can be drawn concerns the ongoing emphasis placed on improvement. For example, some believe that accreditation requirements have been the driving force behind today s emphasis on assessment. The journey toward assessment has not been smooth to date and will not be smooth in the future, but regional accreditation has provided a venue for discussion and establishment of some common expectations. Federal regulatory controls from the accreditor s perspective. The developmental story for each of the regional accrediting agencies is somewhat different, but the goals of these organizations probably would have remained focused on institutional quality and improvement had there not been increasing attention from the federal government. This situation began to develop in the 1950s, when significant federal student financial aid was provided to GIs and that aid was linked to accredited institutions. While certainly good for the GIs and for the institutions they attended, with hindsight we now know that this represented a foot in the door. Since that time, more and more federal funding has been poured into higher education, and, as gatekeepers for access to that increasingly important funding, accrediting agencies have been a point of access for the introduction of increasingly granular regulation. With each reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, the number of issues covered by federal regulation has grown. For example, following passage of the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 and negotiated rulemaking, the Department of Education issued a number of revised and new regulations. These covered topics such as distance education and the verification of the identity of students undertaking education via this modality; confirmation that institutions have and disclose transfer-of-credit policies; credit hour definitions and regulatory requirements; state authorization, especially as it relates to distance learning undertaken by residents of various states; the elimination of safe harbors for incentive compensation as related to enrollment and financial aid; engagement in substantial misrepresentation; and gainful employment rules related to programs that are focused on providing the education and training necessary to secure employment in a recognized occupation. How have these regulatory developments affected the work of accreditation? Certainly not all of them have had the same impact, but they all require understanding and communication with member institutions and the general higher education community, and some require much more up to and including the development and introduction of new policies and procedures to ensure compliance. In at least one case the credit hour rule the sweep of regulatory activity has entered the academic realm in a new and unsettling way. Then there is the process through which accrediting agencies must apply every five years for continuing recognition as gatekeepers for access to federal Title IV aid. The guidelines provided by the Department of Education to assist accreditors in preparing petitions for recognition have grown to 88 pages of detailed information about what must/should be provided. Following a two-year hiatus, the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI) was reconstituted in late Departmental staff review and analyze the petitions for recognition received from accrediting bodies and provide information to NACIQI that is taken into consideration as that body makes a recommendation to the secretary about agency recognition. Since 2010, the scope of departmental and NACIQI review has been characterized as granular. Omissions or deficiencies small and large lead to findings of noncompliance and extension of a 12-month period during which all issues must be addressed. In the December 2011 NACIQI meetings, virtually all of the accreditors up for review were faced with this situation. Seeking an appropriate balance. Where does this leave an accrediting agency? Initially, our purpose was Planning for Higher Education Search and read online at: 25
5 Elizabeth H. Sibolski focused on quality and institutional improvement, and this has continued to be an essential foundation of accreditation. Indeed, the federal government and the public continue to look to our agencies to be reliable authorities regarding the quality of education and training offered by the institutions that we accredit. The government and public look to our agencies to be reliable authorities regarding quality. At the same time, accrediting agencies have become responsible for increasingly granular and intrusive regulatory and compliance-based activity. The introduction of these regulatory responsibilities has been determined to be necessary for the public good, and, to date, accreditation has been seen as the best method to address compliance issues. It is also important to note that the introduction of increasing regulatory requirements is coming at a less than opportune moment for most institutions of higher education. Budgets have been tight for several years particularly for public institutions and there is little evidence that the situation will change in the near future. Where new regulations mean changes and additions to campus-based record keeping and other processes, added pressures are felt, and it is often easy to blame the accreditor for the increasing cost of accreditation. The result of this situation is some institutional unhappiness with accreditors as well as growing tension between the original quality and improvement purposes of accreditation that were established by member institutions and the compliance-based requirements and needs of the federal government on behalf of the public interest. A View from the Federal Perspective Regulatory controls. The discussion to this point has focused primarily on the perspective of the accrediting agencies and somewhat on that of the institutions that are members of these associations, but what about the federal perspective? Beginning in the 1950s, the federal government has invested increasing amounts in higher education. In just the last few years, the annual federal investment in higher education has nearly doubled from $90 billion (Brittingham 2009) to a current total that is reported to be more than $175 billion (National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity 2011). For that investment, and without reference to any other factors, taxpayers deserve accountability. The public has a right to know something about how its tax dollars are spent. Beyond the sheer amount of money involved, there are other reasons why the government and the public should be concerned with accountability. Periodically, questions are raised by representatives of the media, public watchdog organizations, governmental investigatory agencies, Congressional committees, or others about abusive practices in higher education. Some of these abusive or potentially abusive practices have been quite serious, and some of the institutions involved have been accredited by agencies that are recognized by the Secretary of Education, including regional accreditors. The public has a right to know something about how its tax dollars are spent. Investigations have led to Congressional hearings, extended television and press coverage, and other forms of reporting about abuses and outright fraud. The presence of high-pressure sales tactics, the enrollment of students who will find it difficult or impossible to complete a degree or other credential, and the generation of debt that students and their families are unlikely to ever be able to repay are just a few of the revelations that have surfaced. Perhaps in a kinder, gentler era there was a public trust that higher education represented the path to a better life. However, what the public experiences and learns about through the media concerning higher learning paints a very different picture today one that suggests that more consumer and public protections are needed. Given the actions of some accredited institutions and the growing recognition that students and their families, as well as taxpayers, may be taken advantage of, it should be no surprise that the federal regulations governing higher education and accreditation would be expanded and tightened. One answer to the concern over fraud and abuse has been the creation of new regulations, some of which are to be enforced by accrediting agencies. A few of the newest regulations have already been mentioned. 26 April-June 2012 Search and read online at:
6 What s an Accrediting Agency Supposed to Do? The problem of oversight to prevent fraud and abuse becomes somewhat more complicated when one considers recent revelations. For example, institutions are cautioned to be watchful regarding fraud by students applying for financial aid, a serious concern even if it did not involve systemic thefts by groups moving from one campus to another, intent only on collecting aid dollars. How are issues of regulation and oversight to be addressed? The federal government and accrediting agencies do not stand alone. Of late, there has been increasing interest in what is known as the Triad. In addition to the accreditors and the federal government, states also play a significant role in the oversight of higher education. Although oversight structures and responsibilities vary greatly from state to state, the responsibility for licensure/ charter and for various types of regulation rests here. Seeking an appropriate balance. What is the picture that is painted from the federal perspective? Higher education is important to the future of this nation and therefore is worthy of significant federal investment; however, there are bad actors out there perpetuating fraud and abuse at multiple levels, and the oversight and enforcement Triad does not seem to be working as effectively or efficiently as is needed. This describes an additional set of tensions that exists today that should and will be addressed in some way. Can t (and Shouldn t) Have One Without the Other It appears that we have reached a point where we should not expect there to be only one prevailing view of higher education. Realistically, we cannot expect to return to that kinder and gentler age (that may or may not have ever existed) when higher education was placed on a pedestal and honored for the pure good it was thought to represent. However, higher education still represents an important public priority for individuals and a nation that must operate in a sophisticated information age. The positive aspects of higher education should be encouraged and supported, while fraud and abuse at any level should be found and eliminated. This position recognizes the necessity of reviews focused on both institutional quality and improvement and regulatory compliance. The issue seems to be, how do we best organize to address quality/improvement and regulatory compliance? The following points may suggest a foundation for further discussion and exploration: Let s recognize that we are in a period of disruption and transition that is unlikely to abate any time soon. Changes in the landscape of higher education coupled with the current economic context suggest that we may wish to reexamine elements of accreditation and other oversight and regulatory compliance activities that are necessary now and likely to be needed in the future. Instead of focusing on only one area at a time (e.g., on fixing accreditation), perhaps it would make more sense and be more efficient to look at the overall picture. The Triad is a part of this, but we should also consider the roles and responsibilities of institutions and other constituencies. While it is very easy to get caught up in the minutia of regulation, this may be a good time to focus on what is really important rather than on the granular detail. Above all, let s not get so caught up in process points that we stop thinking about broad policy content. Discussion and exploration is a place to start, and there are some current initiatives that may prove helpful. NACIQI has been asked to provide the Secretary of Education with recommendations for consideration during the next renewal cycle of the Higher Education Act. NACIQI has been working on that project and is expected to release its final report later this spring. Discussion at the NACIQI hearing held at the end of 2011 suggests that the final report may offer a significant list of topics for further study, but that de-linking accreditation from Title IV probably will not be recommended. A second important initiative is the formation of the National Task Force on Institutional Accreditation by the American Council on Education. To date, that group has held a number of meetings, and its report is also expected later this spring. So What Should an Accrediting Agency Do? Some have suggested that accreditors, especially in public pronouncements, appear to be complacent, that we appear to be set in our ways and unwilling to acknowledge changes that need to be made. From inside an accrediting agency, that unflattering characterization does not seem at all accurate. No matter how we accreditors may have achieved our current reputation or how accurate it may be, we do need to do everything possible to let others Planning for Higher Education Search and read online at: 27
7 Elizabeth H. Sibolski know that we are open to discussion and that we do not believe that everything we do is perfect the way it is. Critiques of the current accreditation system and hearings/discussions that are taking place within the NACIQI and the American Council on Education task force represent necessary steps toward figuring out what should happen next with regard to oversight of institutional quality and improvement as well as regulatory compliance. In the interest of developing the best systems possible, current discussions and debates should be extended to include all of the members of the Triad as well as other interested parties. Another way that accreditors can provide guidance is by focusing on what is truly important in reviewing institutional quality and promoting institutional improvement. As nongovernmental membership organizations, we have the means and ability to do this. Working cooperatively in a collegial process, we can define what is important and put in place the systems that are necessary for today and the years ahead. The author wishes to note that the views expressed in this article are hers and do not necessarily represent positions that have been or will be taken by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. References Brittingham, B Accreditation in the United States: How Did We Get to Where We Are? New Directions for Higher Education, no. 145, Council for Higher Education Accreditation The Fundamentals of Accreditation: What Do You Need To Know? Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Eaton, J. S The Value of Accreditation: Four Pivotal Roles. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation There s A Lot That s Right About Regional Accreditation. Inside Accreditation 5 (1): An Overview of U.S. Accreditation. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Middle States Commission on Higher Education Characteristics of Excellence in Higher Education: Standards for Accreditation. Philadelphia: Middle States Commission on Higher Education Highlights from the Commission s First 90 Years. Philadelphia: Middle States Commission on Higher Education. National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity NACIQI Discussion Draft: Higher Education Accreditation Reauthorization Policy Considerations. Retrieved February 13, 2012, from the World Wide Web: www2.ed.gov/about /bdscomm/list/naciqi-dir/hea-recommendations.pdf Purpose and Importance of the NACIQI. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from the World Wide Web: U.S. Department of Education Guidelines for Preparing/ Reviewing Petitions and Compliance Reports in Accordance with 34 CFR Part 602 The Secretary s Recognition of Accrediting Agencies. Unpublished document. 28 April-June 2012 Search and read online at:
ACCREDITATION AND COMMUNITY COLLEGES TRUSTEES
ACCREDITATION AND COMMUNITY COLLEGES TRUSTEES JUDITH S. EATON, PRESIDENT COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION ACCREDITATION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRUSTEES August 4, 2015 WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? WHY IS
More informationISSUE PAPER. Fourth in a series of Issue Papers released at the request of Chairman Charles Miller to inform the work of the Commission
A NATIONAL DIALOGUE: The Secretary of Education s Commission on the Future of Higher Education ISSUE PAPER Fourth in a series of Issue Papers released at the request of Chairman Charles Miller to inform
More informationAn Overview of U.S. Accreditation
AccreditationCHEA Council for Higher Education An Overview of U.S. Accreditation Judith S. Eaton Revised August 2012 An Overview of U.S. Accreditation 1 The Council for Higher Education Accreditation Mission
More informationAugust 26, 2014. Dear Chairman Harkin:
August 26, 2014 Senator Tom Harkin Chairman Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions United States Senate 428 Senate Dirksen Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Chairman Harkin: On behalf
More informationGAO HIGHER EDUCATION. Issues Related to Law School Accreditation. Report to Congressional Requesters. United States Government Accountability Office
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters March 2007 HIGHER EDUCATION Issues Related to Law School Accreditation GAO-07-314 Contents Letter 1 Appendix I Briefing
More informationAccreditation is built on and ref lective of the core values of the academy.
The Future of Accreditation All of this activity establishing an organization, setting standards, self-review, peer review, and accreditation judgment is funded and managed by colleges and universities.
More informationHIGHER EDUCATION. Education Should Strengthen Oversight of Schools and Accreditors
United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Education and the Workforce, House of Representatives December 2014 HIGHER EDUCATION Education Should Strengthen
More informationIssues and Trends in Quality Assurance in the US
Issues and Trends in Quality Assurance in the US ENQA General Assembly October 22, 2015 for C-RAC: Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions Barbara Brittingham CIHE of NEASC bbrittingham@neasc.org Quality
More informationThe Value of Accreditation
Council for Higher Education Accreditation The Value of Accreditation Developed by regional, national and programmatic accrediting organizations and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation June
More informationONTARIO COLLEGES MOVING TO ACCREDITATION
ONTARIO COLLEGES MOVING TO ACCREDITATION July 2015 Ontario College Quality Assurance Service Service de l assurance de la qualité des collèges de l Ontario Ontario s colleges will be moving to an institutional-level
More informationDr. Eduardo M. Ochoa. Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education United States Department of Education
Dr. Eduardo M. Ochoa Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education United States Department of Education Overview of Remarks The higher education and quality assurance systems in the US Governmental
More informationRegional Accreditation in the 21 st Century: Changes and Challenges
+ Regional Accreditation in the 21 st Century: Changes and Challenges + Setting the stage: Major trends and challenges in higher education n Unmet demand for college/college as the path to jobs n Economic
More informationFive-Year Strategic Plan
U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General Five-Year Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2014 2018 Promoting the efficiency, effectiveness, and integrity of the Department s programs and operations
More informationCouncil for Higher Education Accreditation THE. Fundamentals of ACCREDITATION WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW?
Council for Higher Education Accreditation THE Fundamentals of ACCREDITATION WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW? September 2002 The Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) is a private, nonprofit national
More informationQuality Assurance, Accountability, and Accreditation in Collegiate Business Programs
Quality Assurance, Accountability, and Accreditation in Collegiate Business Programs Executive Summary This paper argues that when states require business programs offered in the state to achieve specialized
More informationU.S. Accreditation: Meeting the Challenges of Accountability and Student Achievement
Evaluation in Higher Education 5:1 (June 2011): 1-20 2011 HEEACT & Airiti Inc. U.S. Accreditation: Meeting the Challenges of Accountability and Student Achievement Judith S. Eaton President Council for
More informationAMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT. April 26, 2011
AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT April 26, 2011 The Honorable Tom Harkin Chairman U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee 428 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington,
More informationThe Successful Accreditors' Approach to Network Marketing
April 24, 2015 Middle States Commission on Higher Education MSCHE TO: The Honorable Lamar Alexander, Chairman Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions U.S. Senate The Commission on Institutions
More informationTitle IV Federal Student Aid Program Integrity Final Regulations
January 2011 Final Program Integrity Regulations Title IV Federal Student Aid Program Integrity Final Regulations On October 29, 2010, the U.S. Department of Education published final regulations for improving
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL BACKGROUND
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL July 23, 2013 AUDIT SERVICES Control Number ED-OIG/A09L0001 James W. Runcie Chief Operating Officer Federal Student Aid U.S. Department
More informationConference Call with Deputy Undersecretary Robert Shireman of the U.S. Department of Education. May 29, 2009 12:30 PM ET
Deputy Undersecretary Robert Shireman of the U.S. Department of Education Massie Ritsch: All right. Good afternoon, folks, thanks for your patience. This is Massie Ritsch, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
More informationQuis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will guard the guardians? Assessing Quality
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will guard the guardians? Assessing Quality 2 nd Athens International Conference on University Assessment October 12, 2007 Patricia O Brien, Deputy Director Commission
More informationGAO SPECIAL EDUCATION. Clearer Guidance Would Enhance Implementation of Federal Disciplinary Provisions
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, U.S. Senate May 2003 SPECIAL EDUCATION Clearer Guidance Would Enhance
More informationU.S. Department of Education. Staff Report to the Senior Department Official on Recognition Compliance Issues
U.S. Department of Education Staff Report to the Senior Department Official on Recognition Compliance Issues RECOMMENDATION PAGE 1. Agency: Council on Education for Public Health (1974/2007) (The dates
More informationEligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Accounting Accreditation. Engagement Innovation Impact
Adopted: April 8, 2013 Updated: January 31, 2015 Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Accounting Accreditation Engagement Innovation Impact AACSB International The Association to Advance
More informationDETC ACCREDITING COMMISSION 1601 18th Street, NW, Suite 2 Washington, D.C. 20009-2529 (202) 234-5100; fax (202) 332-1386 www.detc.
DETC ACCREDITING COMMISSION 1601 18th Street, NW, Suite 2 Washington, D.C. 20009-2529 (202) 234-5100; fax (202) 332-1386 www.detc.org July 15, 2013 David A. Longanecker President Western Interstate Commission
More informationCommission on Institutions of Higher Education Standards Revision Discussion Paper: 2015. Background Information
Commission on Institutions of Higher Education Standards Revision Discussion Paper: 2015 Background Information As specified by its policy and in light of the important changes in higher education and
More informationBefore I go further, let me set forth three of the underlying premises that inform our work.
Testimony by Sylvia Manning President, Higher Learning Commission, North Central Association of Colleges and Schools Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions March 10, 2011 Chairman Harkin,
More informationPart I Professional (Self) Regulation of Academic Quality David D. Dill and Maarja Beerkens
Part I Professional (Self) Regulation of Academic Quality David D. Dill and Maarja Beerkens Historically self-regulation has been the dominant mode for assuring academic quality in the US and the UK higher
More informationOnline Programs Face New Demands From Accreditors
November 6, 2011 Online Programs Face New Demands From Accreditors Brian Levin, House Committee on Education and the Workforce Democrats Michale S. McComis, executive director of the Accrediting Commission
More information1100 H St., NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 331-8080
1100 H St., NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 331-8080 April 17, 2015 Submitted By: John C. Cavanaugh, PhD. President & CEO of the Washington Metropolitan Area The paper provides a good synopsis
More informationACCJC NEWS. Western Association of Schools and Colleges. Special Edition. Twelve Common Questions and Answers About Regional Accreditation
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges, Western Association of Schools and Colleges Special Edition Twelve Common Questions and Answers About Regional Accreditation These Questions and
More informationLoss of Program or Institutional Accreditation: A Compliance Guide
Risk Research Bulletin Loss of Program or Institutional Accreditation: A Compliance Guide Student lawsuits over accreditation of colleges or academic programs are on the rise. Consider the following: Graduate
More informationGAO DISTANCE EDUCATION. Growth in Distance Education Programs and Implications for Federal Education Policy. Testimony
GAO United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, U.S. Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. Thursday, September 26,
More informationAmerican Council of Trustees and Alumni Institute for Effective Governance
Accreditation A Call to Action for COLLEGE TRUSTEES American Council of Trustees and Alumni Institute for Effective Governance American Council of Trustees and Alumni Launched in 1995, the American Council
More informationNational Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment. Handbook for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Saudi Arabia PART 1
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Handbook for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Saudi Arabia PART 1 THE SYSTEM FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ACCREDITATION Ver. 2.0 THE SYSTEM
More informationNational Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment. Standards for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Higher Education Programs
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Standards for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Higher Education Programs November 2009 Standards for Quality Assurance and Accreditation
More informationTeaching and Learning Newsletter
Teaching and Learning Newsletter Volume 2010; Number 17 Originally established by the task force on Teaching and Learning, Distributed by the President s Office Sandwich Seminars If you would like to schedule
More informationDivision. Impact. Before the. Pensions
Oregon Insurance Division Statement of Teresa Miller, Administrator Oregon Insurance Division Department of Consumer and Business Services ON Impact Affordable Care Act: on Health Insura ance Rate Review
More informationRe: PCAOB Release No. 2015-005 (Docket Matter No. 41) Concept Release on Audit Quality Indicators ( Concept Release )
October 22, 2015 VIA E-MAIL comments@pcaobus.org Office of the Secretary Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 1666 K Street, NW Washington DC 20006-2803 Re: PCAOB Release No. 2015-005 (Docket Matter
More informationInstitutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Aid Programs Under the Higher Education Act: Background and Reauthorization Issues
Order Code RL33909 Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Aid Programs Under the Higher Education Act: Background and Reauthorization Issues March 9, 2007 Rebecca R. Skinner Specialist
More informationTransnational Association of Christian Colleges and Schools
Transnational Association of Christian Colleges and Schools Steps Toward Accreditation Transnational Association of Christian Colleges and Schools (TRACS) is recognized by the United States Department
More informationHigher Education Accreditation: Market Regulation or Government Regulation? Joshua Hall Department of Economics, Beloit College
Higher Education Accreditation: Market Regulation or Government Regulation? Joshua Hall Department of Economics, Beloit College Introduction In recent public debates regarding higher education there has
More informationUnited States General Accounting Office GAO. High-Risk Series. February 1995. Farm Loan Programs GAO/HR-95-9
GAO United States General Accounting Office High-Risk Series February 1995 Farm Loan Programs GAO/HR-95-9 GAO United States General Accounting Office Washington, D.C. 20548 Comptroller General of the
More informationACCJC ACCREDITATION REDESIGN - WHERE THINGS STAND NOW AND WHERE THEY RE GOING
ACCJC ACCREDITATION REDESIGN - WHERE THINGS STAND NOW AND WHERE THEY RE GOING A Presentation by President Barbara Beno, ACCJC with Robert Pacheco, MiraCosta College for The California Association for Institutional
More informationGoverning Boards: Middle States Commission on Higher Education
Governing Boards: Understanding the Expectations of the Middle States Commission on Higher Education Middle States Commission on Higher Education Governing Boards: Understanding the Expectations of the
More informationAMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT. February 16, 2011
AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT February 16, 2011 Secretary Arne Duncan U.S. Department of Education LBJ Education Building, Room 7W311 400 Maryland Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20202
More informationA Research Agenda for For Profit Colleges and Universities. Pullias Center for Higher Education. University of Southern California
A Research Agenda for For Profit Colleges and Universities Pullias Center for Higher Education University of Southern California Guilbert Hentschke, William G. Tierney, & Mark DeFusco At first glance,
More informationEligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Accounting Accreditation. Innovation Impact Engagement
Exposure Draft Accounting Accreditation Standards (November 15, 2012) FOR AACSB MEMBER REVIEW NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Accounting Accreditation
More informationPUBLIC DISCLOSURE NOTICE MOUNTAIN STATE UNIVERSITY Beckley, West Virginia Effective: December 18, 2012
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE NOTICE MOUNTAIN STATE UNIVERSITY Beckley, West Virginia Effective: December 18, 2012 The following public information is provided by the Higher Learning Commission regarding ( the University
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. May 24, 2010
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Evaluation and Inspection Services Dr. Sylvia Manning President The Higher Learning Commission 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2400 Chicago,
More informationPRESIDENT (The Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools)
EXECUTIVE SEARCH PROFILE PRESIDENT The Middle States Commission on Higher Education (The Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools) THE OPPORTUNITY An important challenge for the next president
More informationThe Value of National Accreditation
The Value of National Accreditation 2015 Table of Contents What is Accreditation... 3 Functions of Accreditation... 4 Types of Accrediting Agencies... 5 What Does it Mean to be a Recognized Accrediting
More informationThank you for the opportunity to testify. My name is Michale McComis and I am the
, Executive Director, Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges Before the On The Department of Education Inspector General s Review of Standards for Program Length in Higher Education Thank
More information15. Policy on Institutions Participating in Title IV Programs
15. Policy on Institutions Participating in Title IV Programs This policy sets forth the Accrediting Commission s procedures for the institutions to seek to establish eligibility to participate in, Federal
More informationJudith Eaton, President of Council for Higher Education Accreditation, 2009
College Accreditation Dr. MaryLou DAllegro D Allegro Senior Director Planning, Research & Assessment Penn State Berks 1 What is Accreditation? The periodic process of peer/professional review that requires
More informationCANDIDACY FOR ACCREDITATION
CANDIDACY FOR ACCREDITATION The Meaning of Candidacy The Candidate for Accreditation program offers certain postsecondary institutions the opportunity to establish a formal, publicly recognized relationship
More informationSUMMARY OF THE CFPB NOTICE
COMMENTS OF THE TAX PROBLEM RESOLUTION SERVICES COALITION TO THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION IN CONSIDERATION OF DOCKET NUMBER CFPB-HQ-2011-2 FOR DEFINING LARGER PARTICIPANTS IN CERTAIN CONSUMER
More informationa GAO-04-492 GAO TAX DEBT COLLECTION IRS Is Addressing Critical Success Factors for Contracting Out but Will Need to Study the Best Use of Resources
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2004 TAX DEBT COLLECTION IRS Is Addressing Critical Success Factors for Contracting Out but Will Need to Study the Best
More informationAccepting Transfer Credit from Non- Regionally Accredited Institutions. Andi Liner Dean/Registrar, Enrollment Services Blinn College
Accepting Transfer Credit from Non- Regionally Accredited Institutions Andi Liner Dean/Registrar, Enrollment Services Blinn College SACSCOC Statement The Commission supports institutional autonomy in determining
More informationDRAFT COPY. Good Practice Guide: The Education, Training, and Development of Accounting Technicians. IFAC Developing Nations Committee
IFAC Developing Nations Committee Agenda Item 8.2 December 2008 DRAFT COPY Good Practice Guide: The Education, Training, and Development of Accounting Technicians IFAC Developing Nations Committee International
More informationProcedures for Assessment and Accreditation of Medical Schools by the Australian Medical Council 2011
Australian Medical Council Limited Procedures for Assessment and Accreditation of Medical Schools by the Australian Medical Council 2011 Medical School Accreditation Committee These procedures were approved
More informationGAO Work on Efforts to Reduce Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud Prepared for the Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board Public Meeting May 1, 2013
United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 GAO Work on Efforts to Reduce Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud Prepared for the Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board Public Meeting May
More informationNASPAA Accreditation. Policy Briefs. Crystal Calarusse
NASPAA Accreditation Policy Briefs Crystal Calarusse What are the Characteristics of NASPAA Accreditation? Crystal Calarusse 1 April 2015 The Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation (COPRA) of the
More informationState A uthor ization
Page 2 of 15 Program Integrity State A uthor ization Question 1: Does section 600.9(a)(1)(i)(A) permit an institution to be authorized by name by a State as a postsecondary educational institution in one
More informationU.S. Department of Education. Staff Report to the Senior Department Official on Recognition Compliance Issues
U.S. Department of Education Staff Report to the Senior Department Official on Recognition Compliance Issues RECOMMENDATION PAGE 1. Agency: Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs
More informationAn Overview of Nonprofit Governance David O. Renz, Ph.D. Midwest Center for Nonprofit Leadership at UMKC
David O. Renz, Ph.D. at UMKC This article is adapted from a chapter prepared for Philanthropy in the U.S.: An Encyclopedia (Dwight Burlingame, ed.) Governance is the process of providing strategic leadership
More informationREPORT TO THE U.S. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION. Higher Education Act Reauthorization. 2015 Accreditation Policy Recommendations
REPORT TO THE U.S. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION Higher Education Act Reauthorization 2015 Accreditation Policy Recommendations U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY
More informationU.S. Higher Education and Accreditation: A Quality Perspective. By Henry Lindborg and Stephen D. Spangehl
U.S. Higher Education and Accreditation: A Quality Perspective By Henry Lindborg and Stephen D. Spangehl Accredited is a word used to describe colleges and universities that most people understand only
More informationFor community and public transportation operators regardless the mode or the
Ahead of the Curve: CTAA s Safety Training Programs For community and public transportation operators regardless the mode or the service area safety has always been the priority. Recent action by the United
More informationA Study on Comparison of Accreditation Organization and System of International Higher Education between the US and the UK
A Study on Comparison of Accreditation Organization and System of International Higher Education between the US and the UK Yi-Fang Chen Wenzao Ursuline College of Languages yifangmeister@gmail.com Horng-Jyh
More informationPosted by David A. Katz, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Sunday December 16, 2012 at 10:20 am
1 of 7 5/8/2014 7:34 PM Posted by David A. Katz, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Sunday December 16, 2012 at 10:20 am Editor s Note: David A. Katz is a partner at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz specializing
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS THROUGH JULY 31, 2015. 1. Review of Marketing Materials
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In connection with its acquisition and operation of various Everest and Wyotech campuses and on-line programs, Zenith Education Group ( ZEG or Zenith ) voluntarily agreed with the U.S.
More informationCOMMENTARY ON THE RESTRICTIONS ON PROPRIETARY TRADING BY INSURED DEPOSITARY INSTITUTIONS. By Paul A. Volcker
COMMENTARY ON THE RESTRICTIONS ON PROPRIETARY TRADING BY INSURED DEPOSITARY INSTITUTIONS By Paul A. Volcker Full discussion by the public, and particularly by directly affected institutions, on the proposed
More information2015 Accreditation Institute Accreditation: Evolution and New Challenges
2015 Accreditation Institute Accreditation: Evolution and New Challenges Constance M. Carroll, Ph.D. Chancellor San Diego Community College District 1 Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Other Countries
More informationSupranational accreditation, trust and institutional autonomy
Supranational accreditation, trust and institutional autonomy Alberto Amaral, Maria João Rosa, Diana Tavares 2008 IMHE General Conference Paris, 8-10 September Introduction Europe - supranational policy
More informationSemiannual Report to Congress. Office of Inspector General
Semiannual Report to Congress Office of Inspector General Federal Election Commission 999 E Street, N.W., Suite 940 Washington, DC 20463 April 1, 2005 September 30, 2005 November 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationProtocol for the Review of Distance and Correspondence Education Programs Effective July 5, 2006
Western Association of Schools and Colleges Accrediting Commission for Senior Colleges and Universities Protocol for the Review of Distance and Correspondence Education Programs Effective July 5, 2006
More informationRe: UC Academic Senate proposals for program review and external validation
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ACADEMIC SENATE BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ Robert M. Anderson Telephone: (510) 987-9303 Fax: (510) 763-0309
More informationNo. 11-03 April 30, 2003
No. 11-03 April 30, 2003 STATEMENT OF PETER S. GAYTAN, PRINCIPAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR VETERANS AFFAIRS AND REHABILITATION COMMISSION BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON BENEFITS COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS UNITED
More informationGeneral HIPAA Implementation FAQ
General HIPAA Implementation FAQ What is HIPAA? Signed into law in August 1996, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ( HIPAA ) was created to provide better access to health insurance,
More information(1) ECMC has obtained substantial private student loan debt relief for current and former Corinthian students.
February 2, 2015 Hon. Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G St. NW Washington, DC 20552 RE: ECMC Group, Inc. s purchase of certain Corinthian Colleges, Inc. assets Dear Director
More informationProcedures: Music Therapy Supplement
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS OF MUSIC Procedures: Music Therapy Supplement Intended for use only by institutions seeking accreditation or reaccreditation which offer baccalaureate and/or graduate degree
More information10 YEARS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE: ACHIEVEMENTS AND IMPERATIVES
10 YEARS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE: ACHIEVEMENTS AND IMPERATIVES Quality Assurance in Online Education Towards a Culture of Assessment Dr. Hilroy A. Thomas, Associate Dean/Associate Professor, St. Thomas University,
More informationRegulating Online Postsecondary Education: State Issues and Options
issue brief Regulating Online Postsecondary Education: State Issues and Options Background States and their colleges and universities face competing pressures when it comes to meeting the economy s demand
More informationAugust 29, 2014. Via email to HEAA2014@help.senate.gov
Closing the gaps in opportunity and achievement, pre-k through college. August 29, 2014 Via email to HEAA2014@help.senate.gov The Honorable Tom Harkin Chairman Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee
More informationInstitute for Financial Literacy
Institute for Financial Literacy Financial Certification: A Study of the Impact on Professionals' Financial Literacy Levels and Competency A Report Published by the Institute for Financial Literacy, Inc.
More informationHow To Write An Accreditation Manual For College Governing Boards
ACCREDITATION MANUAL FOR GOVERNING BOARDS A Publication of the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges May 2012 Edition ACCJC/WASC 10 Commercial
More informationCode of Ethics and Professional Conduct
Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct CHAPTER 1. VISION AND APPLICABILITY 1.1 Vision and Purpose As practitioners of project management, we are committed to doing what is right and honorable. We set
More informationOctober 15, 2012 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
R A N D E L K. J O H N S O N S E N I O R V I C E P R E S I D E N T L A B O R, I M M I G R A T I O N, & E M P L O Y E E B E N E F I T S C H A M B E R O F C O M M E R C E O F T H E U N I T E D S T A T E
More informationUniversity Professional and Continuing Education Association Center for Research and Consulting
University Professional and Continuing Education Association Center for Research and Consulting 2013 Student Authentication and Online Proctoring Report March 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Overview 2 Objective
More informationHow quality assurance reviews can strengthen the strategic value of internal auditing*
How quality assurance reviews can strengthen the strategic value of internal auditing* PwC Advisory Internal Audit Table of Contents Situation Pg. 02 In response to an increased focus on effective governance,
More informationPREPARED REMARKS OF JOHN A. KOSKINEN COMMISSIONER INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE BEFORE THE TAXPAYERS AGAINST FRAUD EDUCATION FUND WASHINGTON, D.
PREPARED REMARKS OF JOHN A. KOSKINEN COMMISSIONER INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE BEFORE THE TAXPAYERS AGAINST FRAUD EDUCATION FUND WASHINGTON, D.C. SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 Good afternoon. I m the one who s tasked
More informationSTANDARDS FOR ACCREDITATION
STANDARDS FOR ACCREDITATION OF POST-GRADUATE CRNA FELLOWSHIPS January 2014 Copyright 2014 by the Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs 222 S. Prospect Avenue, Park Ridge, Illinois,
More informationBoard of Commissioners
Board of Commissioners SELF-STUDY HANDBOOK CHAPTER ONE An Introduction to Accreditation by the Commission on Accrediting TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 The Meaning of Commission Accreditation 1 The Purposes
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS Licensure and Accreditation of Institutions and Programs of Higher Learning ARTICLE ONE Policies and Procedures
Board of Governors for Higher Education Sec. 10a-34 page 1 (12-96) TABLE OF CONTENTS Licensure and Accreditation of Institutions and Programs of Higher Learning ARTICLE ONE Policies and Procedures Introduction....
More informationHigher and Rising (Figure 1)
Higher and Rising (Figure 1) Employer contributions to public school teacher pensions and Social Security are higher than contributions for privatesector professionals, the gap more than doubling between
More informationUS Regional Accreditation: The Claims, Reality, Cost & Reason. James L. Turk Simon Fraser University March 29, 2012
US Regional Accreditation: The Claims, Reality, Cost & Reason James L. Turk Simon Fraser University March 29, 2012 Background Six regional accrediting bodies Middle States, New England, North Central,
More informationData Quality Assurance
CHAPTER 4 Data Quality Assurance The previous chapters define accurate data. They talk about the importance of data and in particular the importance of accurate data. They describe how complex the topic
More informationRole and Value of Accreditation
NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES COMMISSION ON INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION 3 Burlington Woods, Suite 100, Burlington, MA 01803-4514 Voice: (781) 425 7785 Fax: (781) 425 1001 Web: http://cihe.neasc.org
More information