1 1 PART I: A STANDARD ANALYSIS OF FACTOR MOBILITY CHAPTER 1: BENEFICIAL vs. DISTORTIONARY MOBILITY OF FACTORS OF PRODUCTION Introduction Classical economic setups suggest that factors of production move, if not constrained, from locations where their marginal product is low to other locations where their marginal product is high. In these setups, perfect competition with complete information prevails and there are no distortions (created by taxation, externalities, etc.), so that the private returns to the factor owners coincide with the social returns. Accordingly, factor mobility induced by private factor return differentials is beneficial both for the owners of the factors that actually move from one location to another and to the source and destination economies. Factor mobility may wear two guises. First, there is the mobility of the factor of production itself, without the owner changing his national residence. Second, one can look at the mobility of the owner with his factor of production. The first kind of mobility is typical for capital. The phenomenon of guest workers can also be viewed as a factor mobility of the first kind. Guest workers are typically not eligible for all the amenities (especially in the area of social insurance) of the host country. In our new age of information technology, many professionals can provide their services via the internet, and other electronic means, without physically moving to the location where their services are received - the so-called
2 2 weightless trade. 1 termed migration. The second type of mobility typically characterizes labor and is usually It raises a host of issues and considerations associated with the welfare state which are not relevant for factor mobility of the first kind: unemployment insurance, pensions, health insurance and care, education, etc. The possibility of separation between the mobility of the factor of production and the mobility of his owner underscores also the distinction between the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of a country and its Gross National Product (GNP). The first term includes all the value added (or income) which is produced in the country in question. The second term subtracts from the GDP of a country the value added produced in this country by factors of production owned by foreigners and adds to it the value added produced abroad by factors of production owned by residents of this country. Factor mobility of the first kind affects primarily the GDP of the host and the source countries, while factor mobility of the second type affects both their GDP and GNP. When analyzing the welfare consequences of factor mobility, it is the GNP which is relevant as it can serve as a macro-economic proxy for welfare. For instance, it may be argued that the heavy subsidization of FDI in Ireland in the last two decades resulted in impressive GDP growth rates but with much less pronounced effect on the well-being of Irish residents, as proxied by the GNP growth rates. 2 In this part we focus our attention on factor mobility without factor owner mobility. (Successive parts of the book deal with factor mobility of the second kind.) One-Good Case Suppose first that there is only one final good. Therefore, in this case there is no scope for trade in goods, (i.e. of one good for another) as in standard trade models. But a person
3 3 residing in one country who provides the services of the factor of production that she owns in the other country, can still retract the remuneration accruing to that factor in the other country to her own country. The welfare impact of factor mobility can be neatly presented with the aid of the familiar scissors diagram (Figure 1.1) in which the marginal product of a mobile factor (say, capital), for two countries (home and foreign) that comprise the world economy, are depicted originating at opposite ends. Following MacDougall (1960), suppose that originally the world allocation of capital is at A, with the home country having a higher marginal product of capital than the foreign country. If capital flows from the foreign country to the home country up until the point at which the marginal product of capital is the same in the two countries, bringing the world allocation of capital to point E, then the world output is at a maximum. In a laissez-faire, competitive environment with complete information and no barriers to factor mobility, an amount of AE units of capital will indeed flow from the foreign country to the home country. This is because in the aforementioned classical setup the market return to capital is equal to its marginal product, so that it will pay the owners of capital in the foreign country to invest the amount of AE units of it in the home country. Furthermore, not only world output (namely, the sum of the home and foreign GNP) rises, but the GNP of each country also rises as well: The GNP of the home country rises from O H MKA to O H MRQA 3 and the GNP of the foreign country rises from O F NSA to O F NRQA,4 so that world output rises by KSR.
4 4 Trade in Goods In this section we extend the preceding analysis to the standard trade models in which some of the goods are traded for other goods. Specifically, there are traded and nontraded goods. This setup guarantees that in the absence of factor mobility, primary inputs will be differently priced internationally (not only in the absence of trade in goods which is obvious), but also when trade in goods takes place (for the same reasons that are advanced in the standard trade models; see, for example, Jones (1967) and the next chapter). Following Helpman and Razin (1983), we present in this section an analysis of welfare gains from factor movements for a small competitive economy with a constant returns-toscale technology. For simplicity, we aggregate all traded goods into a single commodity Y and choose p Y =1as its price. The aggregation is based on the assumption that relative prices of traded goods do not change as a result of factor movements (the small country assumption in commodity markets), so that we can abstract from welfare changes that result from adjustments in the terms of trade of goods. We also assume that there is a single nontraded good X whose price in terms of Y is p. Assuming the existence of a representative consumer, or a social welfare function which is maximized with costless income redistribution, our country s welfare level can be represented by an indirect utility function v(p, GNP ), where GNP stands for gross national product (or income) measured in units of Y. Assuming that all foreign source income stems from international mobility of capital, GNP equals GDP minus rental payments on domestically employed foreign capital. Hence:
5 5 GNP = GDP (p, L, K + ) ρ, (1.1) where GDP ( ) stands for the gross domestic product function, L and K stand for domestically owned labor and capital (assumed to be inelastically supplied), stands for foreign capital employed in the home country when > 0, and domestic capital employed abroad when < 0. Finally, ρ represents the rental rate on. Note that GDP depends both on the exogenously given stocks of primary factors (L and K + ) and the relative price p of nontraded goods which guides the intersectoral allocation of K and L. In fact, the function GDP ( ) is a restricted revenue function in the sense that the total inputs of labor (L) and capital (K + ) to the two industries are exogenously given. Employing the envelope theorem, one can derive the partial derivatives of the restricted profit function GDP ( ) : GDP (p, L, K + ) p = X (1.2a) GDP (p, L, K + ) L = w (1.2b)
6 6 GDP (p, L, K + ) (K + ) = r (1.2c) where w and r are the domestic wage rate and the domestic rental price of capital. When foreign capital is employed in the home country, then ρ = r; the assumption is that foreign-owned capital commands the same rental rate as domestic-owned capital. On the other hand, when domestic capital is employed abroad its rental rate in the foreign country is ρ, which may or may not be a function of the size of investment abroad. Choosing a transformation of the utility function such that in equilibrium the marginal utility of income (i.e., v/ GNP ) equals one, differentiation of u = v( ), using (1.1) and the properties of the indirect utility and GDP functions, yields: du = v p dp + v (GDP ) dp + (GDP ) d ρd dρ. (1.3) (GNP ) p (K + ) Employing Roy s identity, we find that v p = v (GNP ) D X, (1.4) where D X is the consumption of good X. Substituting (1.4), (1.2a) and (1.2c) into equation (1.3) yields:
7 7 du = (r ρ)d +(X D x )dp dρ. (1.5). (Recall that v/ (GNP )=1.) Since X is not traded, in equilibrium X = D X, and equation 1.5 reduces to: du =(r ρ)d dρ. (1.6) Suppose that r is smaller than the rental rate that domestic capital can obtain abroad. Then owners of domestic capital will shift part of it into foreign operations, thereby increasing domestic welfare due to the first term on the right-hand-side of (1.6) (since r < ρ and d < 0). If the foreign rental rate is unaffected by the home country s investment abroad, the second term on the right-hand-side of (1.6) equals zero (because dρ =0). In this case domestic welfare unambiguously rises (du > 0). If, on the other hand, the foreign rental rate on domestic capital invested broad declines with the size of the investment and we start with a positive investment level ( < 0), the second term generates a negative welfare effect, but this negative welfare effect is negligible for small investment levels. In the case under discussion, du evaluated at =0is positive, so that it pays to invest abroad, at least a little. (The negative welfare effect (which does not exist at =0)stems from possible market power in foreign investment.)
8 8 Now suppose that r exceeds the rental rate that foreign capital receives abroad. Then foreigners will invest in the home country, earning the domestic rental rate of r. Thus, r ρ in this case, and (1.6) reduces to du = dr. However, due to diminishing marginal product of capital, the rental rate on capital declines with capital inflows so that for positive investment levels ( > 0) welfare increases. This analysis illustrates again the two points made in the one-good case. First, capital mobility can raise welfare. Second, in a competitive, distortion-free environment (absent terms-of-trade effects) private considerations about the location of capital guided by the differential between r and ρ coincide with social considerations in the sense that social welfare increases as a result of private decisions to shift capital from the low return to the high return location. Factor Mobility in the Presence of Distortions It should be emphasized that the social benefit generated by laissez-faire capital mobility which was demonstrated in the preceding two sections holds in a classical setup, where perfect competition with complete information and no other distortions (such as taxes) prevail. As a matter of fact, with imperfectly competitive markets and/or tax distortions, factor mobility may be harmful. Such deviations from the classical setups are more likely to occur in the factor markets rather than in the goods markets. Labor markets are particularly notorious for their imperfections, due to unionism, state regulation (e.g. minimum wage laws), incomplete information about job availability and workers characteristics, and relatively heavy payroll taxes. Similarly, capital markets are also plagued by imperfect information
9 9 phenomena manifested by severe moral hazards, adverse selection, debt and bank runs, herd behaviour, etc. On the other hand, goods are typically homogenous and information about them is transparent; trade enhances competition in their markets and indirect taxes tend to be uniform (e.g. VAT), thereby avoiding inter-commodity distortions. 5 It is quite straightforward to show that laissez-faire factor mobility can be harmful in distortive environments. We shall consider two deviations from the classical setup: taxes and noncompetitive markets. Taxes It is most convenient to employ the one-good case depicted in Figure 1.2 (which is drawn on Figure 1.1) in order to analyze the effects of taxes. Recall that in the aforementioned case, social welfare increases when a well specified quantity of capital (i.e. AE) moves from the foreign to the domestic economy. However, in a distorted environment, social welfare can fall either when too much capital flows in, or when the flow of capital is reversed. For instance, suppose that the home and the foreign countries levy source-based taxes at rates τ and τ, respectively, on the income from capital that accrues in their jurisdictions. 6 For instance, suppose that the foreign country levies a source-based tax at the rate of τ which is equal to VG/VF, while the home country levies no tax (i.e. τ =0). In this case the schedule of after-tax return to capital in the foreign country falls from NP to N 0 P 0 and a quantity of AF units of capital flows from the foreign country to the home country. World output changes from O H MKSNO F to O H MGV NO F, amounting to a decline of RV G, minus KSR in world output. (Of course, a similar allocation can be achieved with both countries levying a tax, but with the foreign country levying a higher
10 10 rate (that is, τ > τ > 0).) Similarly, if the home country levies a much higher tax rate than the foreign country, then the direction of capital flows may be reversed, causing a decline in world output. Increasing Returns Another possibility of welfare-reducing factor mobility can occur when there are increasing returns, forcing prices to deviate from marginal costs. To illustrate this, we revert to the two-good model described earlier in this chapter, while introducing to the model increasing returns-to-scale. We continue to assume that the traded good (Y ) is produced with a constant-returns-to-scale technology. However, the nontraded good (X) is now a composite good of symmetric differential products, produced by N firms, each possessing increasing returns-to-scale technology. All of the N firms which produce X possess identical technologies. Thus, they charge the same price, and due to free entry that entails zero profits, they engage in average cost pricing. The free entry assumption pins down analytically the number of firms (N) in the industry, as always. Good Y is produced with constant returns-to-scale technology in which the unit (average) cost, denoted by c Y (w, r) is constant, unrelated to the scale of production. Therefore, at equilibrium in the market for Y : 1=c Y (w, r) (1.7) (recalling that Y is the numeraire whose price is set to unity). of production of X decreases with the scale of production. However, the average cost Denoting by x the scale of production of each firm in the X industry, we conclude that at equilibrium in the market
11 11 for X : p = c X (w, r; x) (1.8) where c X (w, r; x) is the average cost of producing x units of X. Similarly, the unit capital and labor requirements in industry Y (a KY and a LY, respectively) are independent of the scale of production; whereas the unit capital and labor requirements in industry X (a KX and a LX, respectively) are assumed to be declining in the scale of production, x, due to increasing returns-to-scale. Thus, equilibrium in the factor markets requires that: a LY (w, r)y + a LX (w, r; x)x = L, (1.9) a KY (w, r)y + a KX (w, r; x)x = K +, (1.10) where X = Nx. Given x, the restricted revenue function which depends, as above, also on p, L and K +, is essentially equal to GDP (p, L, K + ; x). The partial derivatives of this function can be found as before, by the envelope theorem:
12 12 GDP (p, L, K + ; x)/ p = X = Nx, (1.11a) GDP (p, L, K + ; x)/ L = w, (1.11b) GDP (p, L, K + ; x)/ (K + ) =r. (1.11c) As was already mentioned, the difference between this GDP function and that used earlier in this chapter is the dependence of the present one on x, the individual firm s output level (or, alternatively, its scale of production). One can observe from the set of equilibrium equations (1.7)-(1.10) that our nonconstant returns-to-scale economy is formally similar to a constant returns-to-scale economy with a technical progress coefficient. An increase in x reduces average costs c X ( ), because the elasticity of c X ( ) with respect to x is negative: b 0 (w, r, x) c X x x c X = 1+ϕ(w, r; x) < 0, (1.12) where ϕ(w, r; x) is the elasticity of total cost (namely, xc X ) with the respect to the firm s
13 13 output (namely, x). Due to the increasing returns-to-scale, ϕ must be smaller than one, so that b 0 < 0. The absolute value of b 0, denoted by b, is b(w, r; x) = ϕ(w, r; x)+1> 0. (1.13) We can now adopt the familiar analysis of technical progress in the standard model of two factors, two goods and constant returns-to-scale technologies developed by Jones (1965). He showed that b = θ LX b L + θ KX b K, (1.14) where b L is the absolute value of the elasticity of a LX ( ) with respect to x, b K is the absolute value of the elasticity of a KX ( ) with respect to x, and θ jx is the share of factor j in costs of production; j = L, K. As Jones (1965) shows, a one percentage point increase in x has thesameeffect on output levels as a b percent increase in the price p, plus a λ LX b L percent increase in the labor force, plus a λ KX b K percent increase in the capital stock, where λ LX is the share of labor employed in the production of X and λ KX is the share of the capital stock employed in the production of X. This can be explained as follows. Suppose x is increased by a one percentage point and the number of firms N is reduced by a one percentage point, so that aggregate output in sector X (namely, Nx) does not change. As a result of the
14 14 increase in x, each firm will increase its employment of labor by ε Lx percent, where ε Lx is its elasticity of labor demand with respect to output, so that the sector s demand for labor will increase by ε Lx percent. On the other hand, due to the decline in the number of firms in the industry, the industry s labor demand will fall by 1 percent, so that b L 1 ε Lx is the proportion of the industry s labor force that is being released as a result of these changes. Since the industry employs the proportion λ LX of the total labor force, λ LX b L is the industry s saving of labor as a proportion of the total labor force. Similarly, λ KX b K is the proportion of total capital saved by industry X as a result of a one percent increase in x, holding aggregate output of good X constant (with the adjustment being made by means of a decline in the number of firms in the industry). In addition to these factor supply effects, a one percentage point increase in x reduces unit production costs by b percent. Using the above-described elasticity relationship between the effects on output levels of a one percentage point increase in x, and b percent increase in the price of p, plus λ jx b j (j = L, K), percent increases in the supply of factors of production, we can calculate the change in GDP as a result of a one percentage point increase in x as follows: GDP x x = µ p X p + Y µ pb + p X p L + Y µ Lλ LX b L + p X L K + Y Kλ KX b K K = w L λ LX b L + r K λ KX b X, due to the envelope theorem (recall that GDP = px + Y ). 7 Hence, using the definition of λ jx (j = L, K), we obtain:
15 15 GDP x x = wa LXXb L + ra KX Xb K = px(θ LX b L + θ KX b K )=pxb and GDP (p, L, K + ; x) =pn(1 ϕ), (1.15) x where use has been made of the relationships X = Nx and b =(1 ϕ). Now define r astheincreaseingdp that results from an increase in, holding p constant. In the competitive case with constant returns-to-scale technologies analyzed earlier in this chapter, this was shown to equal r - the market rental rate on capital. In the case considered, however, r is given by: r = dx GDP ( )+ GDP ( ) (K + ) x d. Using (1.15) this can be written as: r = r + pn(1 ϕ) dx d. (1.16) Since ϕ < 1 (due to economies of scale at the firm level), equation (1.16) tells us that an inflow of one unit of capital will increase GDP by more than the market rental rate on
16 16 capital if it brings about an expansion of every firm s output level in sector X. An inflow of the same amount of capital will increase GDP by less than the market rental rate on capital, or even reduce GDP, if it brings about a contraction of every firm s output level in sector X. In more general terms, this means that the private sector may undervalue or overvalue the marginal productivity of capital (and that of labor) as far as GDP valuation is concerned, depending on the marginal effect of capital inflows on the size of operation of firms in the sector with economies of scale: r R r as dx R 0. (1.17) d That is, the private sector undervalues (respectively, overvalues) the effect of capital inflows on GDP when such inflows increase (respectively, decrease) the scale of production. Therefore, such a biased evaluation by the market of the effect of capital inflows on GNP andwelfarecanoccuraswell. 8 For a complete welfare analysis of the effect of a capital inflow by the amount, one has to fill the above model with a formal specification of consumer preferences and the market organization of the increasing returns (nontraded) industry (e.g., imperfect competition with differentiated production). Such specification enables an explicit solution for the scale of production (x and, consequently, N) and the relative price p of the nontraded good, as described, for intance, in Helpman and Razin (1983).
17 17 Conclusion We show that in a classical setup with perfect competition everywhere, no distortion and full information, the private return to a factor of production coincides with the social return. In such a setup, factor mobility induced by international differentials in factor returns is beneficial both for the factor owner and the source and destination countries, provided that distortion-free redistribution is made within each country. We also show that once we deviate from the classical setup - for instance, through distortive taxes, market imperfections, etc. - private and social returns to factor of production may diverge and factor mobility may reduce welfare. Furthermore, when countries experience some market power, factor mobility may change the terms-of-trade. In this case, even when perfect competition and distortion-free environments prevail in each country, factor mobility can be detrimental to welfare. In the familiar Dornbusch-Fischer-Samuelson (1977) Ricardian model, a country receiving migrants may find its terms-of-trade deteriorating to such an extent so as to immeserise all the native-born. Naturally, these adverse terms-of-trade effects never occur to a small country.
Lecture 2 Dynamic Equilibrium Models : Finite Periods 1. Introduction In macroeconomics, we study the behavior of economy-wide aggregates e.g. GDP, savings, investment, employment and so on - and their
Practice Problems on the Capital Market 1- Define marginal product of capital (i.e., MPK). How can the MPK be shown graphically? The marginal product of capital (MPK) is the output produced per unit of
Factor Markets Problem 1 (APT 93, P2) Two goods, coffee and cream, are complements. Due to a natural disaster in Brazil that drastically reduces the supply of coffee in the world market the price of coffee
Chapter 5 MEASURING GDP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH* Key Concepts Gross Domestic Product Gross domestic product, GDP, is the market value of all the final goods and services produced within in a country in a given
Chapter 3 A Classical Economic Model what determines the economy s total output/income how the prices of the factors of production are determined how total income is distributed what determines the demand
We analyze the multiplier effect of fiscal policy changes in government expenditure and taxation. The key result is that an increase in the government budget deficit causes a proportional increase in consumption.
Economics Education and Research Consortium Working Paper Series Economic Development and Gains from Trade Georgi Trofimov Working Paper No 98/06 This project (No 96-161) was supported by the Economics
ECON 3010 Intermediate Macroeconomics Chapter 3 National Income: Where It Comes From and Where It Goes Outline of model A closed economy, market-clearing model Supply side factors of production determination
19. Transfer Prices A. The Transfer Price Problem A.1 What is a Transfer Price? 19.1 When there is a international transaction between say two divisions of a multinational enterprise that has establishments
Chapter 4 Specific Factors and Income Distribution Introduction So far we learned that countries are overall better off under free trade. If trade is so good for the economy, why is there such opposition?
Intermediate Macroeconomics: The Real Business Cycle Model Eric Sims University of Notre Dame Fall 2012 1 Introduction Having developed an operational model of the economy, we want to ask ourselves the
Answers to Text Questions and Problems Chapter 22 Answers to Review Questions 3. In general, producers of durable goods are affected most by recessions while producers of nondurables (like food) and services
Practice Problems on Current Account 1- List de categories of credit items and debit items that appear in a country s current account. What is the current account balance? What is the relationship between
Who gains and who loses from an import tariff? An export tax? (Assume world prices are fixed). Governments usually impose import tariffs, taxes levied on imports, to promote industries considered to be
Macroeconomics Lecture 1: The Solow Growth Model Richard G. Pierse 1 Introduction One of the most important long-run issues in macroeconomics is understanding growth. Why do economies grow and what determines
Lectures, 2 ECONOMIES OF SCALE I. Alternatives to Comparative Advantage Economies of Scale The fact that the largest share of world trade consists of the exchange of similar (manufactured) goods between
Universidad de Montevideo Macroeconomia II Danilo R. Trupkin Class Notes (very preliminar) The Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans Model 1 Introduction One shortcoming of the Solow model is that the saving rate is exogenous
Name: Solutions Cosumnes River College Principles of Macroeconomics Problem Set 11 Will Not Be Collected Fall 2015 Prof. Dowell Instructions: This problem set will not be collected. You should still work
The Elasticity of Taxable Income: A Non-Technical Summary John Creedy The University of Melbourne Abstract This paper provides a non-technical summary of the concept of the elasticity of taxable income,
CHAPTER 15 EXCHANGE-RATE ADJUSTMENTS AND THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS 1. According to the absorption approach, the economic circumstances that best warrant a currency devaluation is
2 Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory 2.1. The Keynesian Consumption Function 2.2. The Complete Keynesian Model 2.3. The Keynesian-Cross Model 2.4. The IS-LM Model 2.5. The Keynesian AD-AS Model 2.6. Conclusion
Competency: Basic Economic Concepts and Principles 1. Define money (characteristics, role, and forms) and trace how money and resources flow through the American economic system. 2. Utilize decision-making
Name: Date: 1. In the long run, the level of national income in an economy is determined by its: A) factors of production and production function. B) real and nominal interest rate. C) government budget
The National Accounts and the Public Sector by Casey B. Mulligan Fall 2010 Factors of production help interpret the national accounts. The factors are broadly classified as labor or (real) capital. The
Chapter 4 Consumption, Saving, and Investment Multiple Choice Questions 1. Desired national saving equals (a) Y C d G. (b) C d + I d + G. (c) I d + G. (d) Y I d G. 2. With no inflation and a nominal interest
Protection and Real Wages Wolfgang Stolper and Paul Samuelson (1941) Presented by Group Hicks Dena, Marjorie, Sabina, Shehryar No nation was ever ruined by trade Benjamin Franklin Under a system of perfectly
Lecture 11-1 6.1 The open economy, the multiplier, and the IS curve Assume that the economy is either closed (no foreign trade) or open. Assume that the exchange rates are either fixed or flexible. Assume
ECO364 - International Trade Chapter 2 - Ricardo Christian Dippel University of Toronto Summer 2009 Christian Dippel (University of Toronto) ECO364 - International Trade Summer 2009 1 / 73 : The Ricardian
Page 1 of 11 Gains from Trade and the Ricardian Model 1. Use community indifference curves as your indicator of national welfare in order to evaluate the following claim: An improvement in the terms of
Chapter 3 EXPENDITURE MULTIPLIERS: THE KEYNESIAN MODEL* Key Concepts Fixed Prices and Expenditure Plans In the very short run, firms do not change their prices and they sell the amount that is demanded.
Government Budget and Fiscal Policy 11 CHAPTER The National Budget The national budget is the annual statement of the government s expenditures and tax revenues. Fiscal policy is the use of the federal
SIMULATING THE TURKISH TAX SYSTEM ADEM İLERİ Middle East Technical University Department of Economics firstname.lastname@example.org PINAR DERİN-GÜRE Middle East Technical University Department of Economics email@example.com
Exercises Lecture 8: Trade policies Exercise 1, from KOM 1. Home s demand and supply curves for wheat are: D = 100 0 S = 0 + 0 Derive and graph Home s import demand schedule. What would the price of wheat
MEASURING GDP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH CHAPTER Objectives After studying this chapter, you will able to Define GDP and use the circular flow model to explain why GDP equals aggregate expenditure and aggregate
Econ 100B: Macroeconomic Analysis Fall 2008 Problem Set #3 ANSWERS (Due September 15-16, 2008) A. On one side of a single sheet of paper: 1. Clearly and accurately draw and label a diagram of the Production
02/10/2015 C h a p t e r 12 FISCAL BALANCE AND PUBLIC DEBT Public Finance, 10 th Edition David N. Hyman Adapted by Chairat Aemkulwat for Public Economics 2952331 Chairat Aemkulwat, Public Economics 2952331
Competency: Comparative Economic Systems 1. Use basic economic concepts (e.g., supply and demand; production, distribution, and consumption; labor, wages, and capital; inflation and deflation; market economy
General Equilibrium Theory 1 Overview 1. General Equilibrium Analysis I Partial Equilibrium Bias 2. Efficiency and Perfect Competition 3. General Equilibrium Analysis II The Efficiency if Competition The
The Circular Flow of Income and Expenditure Imports HOUSEHOLDS Savings Taxation Govt Exp OTHER ECONOMIES GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Factor Incomes Taxation Govt Exp Consumer Exp Exports FIRMS Capital
Chapter 2: Key Macroeconomics Variables ECON2 (Spring 20) 2 & 4.3.20 (Tutorial ) National income accounting Gross domestic product (GDP): The market value of all final goods and services produced within
Trade and Resources: The Heckscher-Ohlin Model Professor Ralph Ossa 33501 International Commercial Policy Introduction Remember that countries trade either because they are different from one another or
Notes on indifference curve analysis of the choice between leisure and labor, and the deadweight loss of taxation Jon Bakija This example shows how to use a budget constraint and indifference curve diagram
ECO 745: Theory of International Economics Jack Rossbach August 26, 2015 - Week 1 Course Details Time & Location: 1:15-2:35 PM Wed & Fri in BA 214 Office Hours: 3:00-4:00 PM Wed in BA 109B (or by appointment)
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 308 Revised April 2008 Time Inconsistency and Free-Riding in a Monetary Union V. V. Chari University of Minnesota and Federal Reserve
International Economics, 8e (Krugman) Chapter 8 The Instruments of Trade Policy 8.1 Basic Tariff Analysis 1) Specific tariffs are A) import taxes stated in specific legal statutes. B) import taxes calculated
Taxation of Shareholder Income and the Cost of Capital in a Small Open Economy Peter Birch Sørensen CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO. 5091 CATEGORY 1: PUBLIC FINANCE NOVEMBER 2014 An electronic version of the paper
Second Hour Exam Public Finance - 180.365 Fall, 2007 Answers HourExam2-Fall07, November 20, 2007 1 Multiple Choice (4 pts each) Correct answer indicated by 1. The portion of income received by the middle
Agenda Productivity, Output, and Employment, Part 1 3-1 3-2 A production function shows how businesses transform factors of production into output of goods and services through the applications of technology.
An example of externalities - the multiplicative case Yossi Spiegel Consider an exchange economy with two agents, A and B, who consume two goods, x and y. This economy however, differs from the usual exchange
Lecture 1: current account - measurement and theory What is international finance (as opposed to international trade)? International trade: microeconomic approach (many goods and factors). How cross country
READING 11: TAXES AND PRIVATE WEALTH MANAGEMENT IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT Introduction Taxes have a significant impact on net performance and affect an adviser s understanding of risk for the taxable investor.
Economics 165 Winter 2002 Problem Set #2 Problem 1: Consider the monopolistic competition model. Say we are looking at sailboat producers. Each producer has fixed costs of 10 million and marginal costs
These are some practice questions for CHAPTER 23. Each question should have a single answer. But be careful. There may be errors in the answer key! 67. Public saving is equal to a. net tax revenues minus
General Equilibrium Theory: Examples 3 examples of GE: pure exchange (Edgeworth box) 1 producer - 1 consumer several producers and an example illustrating the limits of the partial equilibrium approach
Money and Public Finance By Mr. Letlet August 1 In this anxious market environment, people lose their rationality with some even spreading false information to create trading opportunities. The tales about
Comments on \Do We Really Know that Oil Caused the Great Stag ation? A Monetary Alternative", by Robert Barsky and Lutz Kilian Olivier Blanchard July 2001 Revisionist history is always fun. But it is not
Rafal Borkowski, Hipoteczna 18/22 m. 8, 91-337 Lodz, POLAND, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Krzysztof M. Ostaszewski, Actuarial Program Director, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4520, U.S.A., e-mail:
ECONOMIES OF SCALE AND IMPERFECT COMPETITION Bharati Department of Economics, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, USA Keywords: Economies of scale, economic geography, external economies,
TRADE AND INVESTMENT IN THE NATIONAL ACCOUNTS This text accompanies the material covered in class. 1 Definition of some core variables Imports (flow): Q t Exports (flow): X t Net exports (or Trade balance)
Gains from Trade: The Role of Composition Wyatt Brooks University of Notre Dame Pau Pujolas McMaster University February, 2015 Abstract In this paper we use production and trade data to measure gains from
Problem Set 3 Econ 122a: Fall 2013 Prof. Nordhaus and Staff Due: In class, Wednesday, September 25 Problem Set 3 Solutions Sebastian is responsible for this answer sheet. If you have any questions about
Managerial Economics 1 is the application of Economic theory to managerial practice. 1. Economic Management 2. Managerial Economics 3. Economic Practice 4. Managerial Theory 2 Managerial Economics relates
UNIT I NATIONAL INCOME AND MACROECONOMICS 1 National Income National Income is defined as the sum total of all the goods and services produced in a country, in a particular period of time. Normally this
Why is Insurance Good? An Example Jon Bakija, Williams College (Revised October 2013) Introduction The United States government is, to a rough approximation, an insurance company with an army. 1 That is
ECONOMIC QUESTIONS FOR THE MASTER'S EXAM Introduction 1. What is economics? Discuss the purpose and method of work of economists. Consider observation, induction, deduction and scientific criticism. 2.
Name: Date: 1 A measure of how fast prices are rising is called the: A growth rate of real GDP B inflation rate C unemployment rate D market-clearing rate 2 Compared with a recession, real GDP during a
Chapter 13 Real Business Cycle Theory Real Business Cycle (RBC) Theory is the other dominant strand of thought in modern macroeconomics. For the most part, RBC theory has held much less sway amongst policy-makers
Agenda The IS LM Model, Part 2 Asset Market Equilibrium The LM Curve 13-1 13-2 The demand for money is the quantity of money people want to hold in their portfolios. The demand for money depends on expected
Envelope Theorem Kevin Wainwright Mar 22, 2004 1 Maximum Value Functions A maximum (or minimum) value function is an objective function where the choice variables have been assigned their optimal values.
KOÇ UNIVERSITY ECON 321 - INTERNATIONAL TRADE Mid-term Exam (100 points; 90 minutes) Answer all 5 questions. In providing answers to the questions in this section algebra or graphs might be helpful. State
CHAPTER 7: AGGREGATE DEMAND AND AGGREGATE SUPPLY Learning goals of this chapter: What forces bring persistent and rapid expansion of real GDP? What causes inflation? Why do we have business cycles? How
Fiscal Stimulus Improves Solvency in a Depressed Economy Dennis Leech Economics Department and Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy University of Warwick email@example.com Published
Economic Development Research Group April 1997 MEASURING ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS GLEN WEISBROD, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH GROUP BURTON WEISBROD, ECONOMICS DEPT., NORTHWESTERN UNIV.
C000452 Crowding out refers to all the things which can go wrong when debtfinanced fiscal policy is used to affect output. While the initial focus was on the slope of the LM curve, now refers to a multiplicity