Adjusted Forward Rates as Predictors of Future Spot Rates. Abstract


 Blaise White
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Stephen A. Buser G. Andrew Karolyi Anthony B. Sanders * Adjusted Forward Rates as Predictors of Future Spot Rates Abstract Prior studies indicate that the predictive power of implied forward rates for future spot rates is weak over long sample periods and typically varies dramatically across different subperiods. Fama (1976, 1984) conjectures that the low forecast power is due to a failure to control for the term premium embedded in forward rates. We show that Fama s conjecture is consistent with the data using any of four different models of the term premium. We measure the term premium using a variety of ex ante instruments, including the junk bond premium, bidask spreads in Treasury bills, the Standard & Poor s 500 stock index s dividend yield and the conditional volatility of interest rate changes using an Autoregressive Conditionally Heteroscedastic (ARCH) process. Forward rates adjusted for the term premium are reliable predictors of future spot rates over the entire period. Version: April, 1996 (fourth). Comments welcome. * Authors are, respectively, Professor, Associate Professor and Professor of Finance at the Fisher College of Business at the Ohio State University, 1775 College Road, Columbus, OH Seminar participants at Indiana University, University of Illinois and Southern Methodist University provided helpful comments. The authors are particularly grateful for clarifying discussions with Eugene Fama, Wayne Ferson, Robert Hodrick and Avi Kamara. Karolyi and Sanders acknowledge the Dice Center of Financial Economics for support. All remaining errors are our own.
2 Adjusted Forward Rates as Predictors of Future Spot Rates 1. Introduction According to the pure expectations hypothesis, forward rates provide unbiased predictions about future spot rates. Early tests reject this pure form of the expectations hypothesis (see, for example, Macauley (1938), Hickman (1942), and Culbertson (1975)). However, even if the pure expectations hypothesis is rejected, there are varying degrees of support for weaker forms of the expectations hypothesis. For example, Fama (1984) finds that the onemonth forward rate has the power to predict the spot rate one month ahead, but finds little evidence that two to fivemonth forward rates can predict future spot rates (see also Shiller (1979) and Campbell and Shiller (1991)). The evidence is further mixed by the dramatic variations in forecast power across different subperiods. For example, Mankiw and Miron (1986) find strong forecast power from 1890 through 1914, weaker forecast power from 1914 to 1933 and no power at all from 1933 through Hardouvelis (1988) finds that forward rates have predictive power up to six weeks ahead prior to October 1979, but that it diminishes substantially during the October 1979 through August 1982 period. Finally, Mishkin (1988) finds that the forecast power of forward rates is generally higher after August Fama (1976, 1984) conjectures that the weakness of the forecast power stems from model misspecification or measurement error. That is, since the forward spread (implied forward rate net of spot interest rate) incorporates both a forecast of future spot rate changes and a premium for risk, failure to control for this risk premium in 1
3 the predictive regression models of future spot rate changes on the forward spread could lead to specification bias. Specifically, in the regression forecasts of future spot rate changes on the forward spread, omitting the term premium biases the slope coefficient estimates toward zero, reduces their overall precision, and decreases the power of the forecasts. 1 Our paper investigates whether Fama s conjecture about the weakness of the forecast power can reconcile why the forecast power is invisible in some subperiods ( ) and reappears in other subperiods ( ). Specifically, we examine empirically a series of ex ante economic variables that proxy for a term premium in bond yields and allow them to interact with the forward spread in the regression forecasts. If the regression model is misspecified because the term premium is omitted, then by extracting the component of the forward spread due to the term premium, we can show how to adjust forward rates to be better predictors for future spot rate changes. The proxy variables we study include the bidask spread in the yields of one to sixmonth Treasury bills, the junk bond premium, measured as the returns spread between Moody s Baa corporate bonds and longterm government bonds, the Standard & Poor s 500 stock index dividend yield, the level of the spot rate itself, and a measure of the conditional volatility of spot rate changes, measured using 1 There are, of course, other potential explanations for the biases in tests of the expectations hypothesis of the term structure of interest rates. For example, Bekaert, Hodrick and Marshall (1995, 1996) demonstrate that large biases and dispersion in the regression test statistics are likely to arise in small samples. Kamara (1988, 1996) hypothesizes that biases in Treasury spread forecasts are due to a default premium from short sellers, which is not evident in futuresimplied Treasury bill spreads because of the existence of the clearing association that eliminates the cost of default on futures contracts. Finally, Hein, Hafer and MacDonald (1995) also demonstrate that the bias in Treasury spread forecasts may be due to timevarying term premia which can be extracted from survey data and Treasury bill futures prices. 2
4 an Autoregressive Conditionally Heteroskedastic (ARCH) model. Our results show that each of the term premium proxies interact significantly with the forward spread. These variables have the predicted effect on the coefficient estimates and the power of the tests for maturities up to sixmonths and for all subperiods from For example, for the fourmonth Treasury bills, the slope coefficients on the forward spread are adjusted upwards from 0.38 to 1.07 and associated R 2 measures increase from less than 5% on average to almost 21%. Finally, we show how to extract the component of the forward spread that is due to the term premium and how to adjust the forward spread to forecast future spot rate changes. Section 2 provides variable definitions and outlines hypotheses to be tested. Data and preliminary results are described in Section 3. We discuss the implications of our preliminary findings for supplementary tests that measure the term premium in Section 4. Section 5 provides the main results and robustness checks are discussed in Section 6. Conclusions follow. 2. Definitions and Hypotheses 2a. Definitions Following Fama (1984), we use V τ, t to denote the price at the end of month t of a unit discount bond (bill) that matures and pays $1 for certain at the end of month t+τ. The continuously compounded onemonth rate can be written as, V 1, t = exp(r t+1 ). (1) 3
5 Similarly, the price of longer maturity bills can be expressed as V τ, t = exp(r t+1  F 2, t F τ, t ), (2) where F τ, t, the forward rate for month t + τ observed at t, is F τ, t = ln (V (τ1), t / V τ, t ). (3) We can also define the onemonth holding period return from t to t+1 on a bill with τ months to maturity as, H τ,t+1 = ln(v τ,t+1 / V τ,t ), (4) and the term premium on that τmonth bill as its holding period return in excess of that for the onemonth spot rate as, (5) P τ,t+1 = H τ,t+1  r t+1. Fama (1976) shows that equation (3) for the forward rate can be decomposed into components that relate to market expectations about τperiod ahead spot rates, E t (r t+τ ), the expected premium in the onemonth return on the τperiod bill and expected changes in the series of future expected premiums, (6) F τ,t = E t (P τ,t+1 ) + [ E t (P (τ1),t+2 )E t (P (τ1),t+1 ) ] [ E t (P 2,t+τ1 )E t (P 2,t+τ2 ) ] + E t (r t+τ ). 4
6 Since all expectations are found on the righthandside of the equation, this expression is an identity; however, it is the variation in the expected premiums that obscure the predictive power of F τ,t for future spot rates, E t (r t+τ ). Assuming these adjacentperiod changes in expected premiums are negligible, and rearranging the expression in terms of future spot rates, we can simplify to: E t (r t+τ ) = F τ,t + E t (P τ,t+1 ), (7) which is the forecast relation we test in this study. 2b. Hypotheses We study the forecast power of forward rates for future spot rates using regression analysis. However, early tests of the corresponding version of (7) reveal substantial autocorrelation in the yields. To correct for this autocorrelation, Fama (1984) regresses the change in the spot rate, r t+τ  r t+1, on the current forwardspot differential or (slope of the term structure), F τ, t  r t+1, r t+τ  r t+1 = α + β ( F τ, t  r t+1 ) + ε t+τ1. (8) For example, consider the forward rate implied by a twomonth Treasury bill observed at month t, F 2, t. The spot rate observed at month t for the upcoming month is r t+1. The future spot rate that is relevant for the test is r t+2. Therefore, the change in the spot rate, r t+2  r t+1, is regressed against the slope of the term structure, F 2, t  r t+1. 5
7 In the pure form of the expectations hypothesis the forward rate should be exactly equal to the expected future spot rate which suggests the null hypothesis α equals zero and β equals one. Fama's response to concerns about term premia is to generalize the investigation of equation (8) to determine whether the slope of the term structure has power to predict future spot rates. If the coefficient β is equal to zero, there is no predictive power in the slope. If β is equal to one (and α is zero), there is evidence for the pure expectations hypothesis. If β lies between zero and one, then there is indirect evidence in favor of the expectations hypothesis, but forecasts embedded in forward rates are systematically biased upward because of the existence of a term premium. The empirical problem, however, surrounds the term premiums in longer maturity yields which can cause forward rates to exceed subsequent spot rates and exhibit less variation. Our goal is to offer marketspecific variables and macroeconomic variables that can proxy for the term premium. Moreover, we show how to extract these components to adjust the forward rate forecasts and reduce the resulting systematic bias. 3. Data and Preliminary Results 3a. Data. The U.S. Treasury bill and oneyear bond data were obtained from the Center for Research on Security Prices (CRSP) at the University of Chicago. On the last trading day of each month, a Treasury bill is chosen that has the maturity closest to six 6
8 months. After one month the same bill is chosen as the five month bill. Since bills with exact maturities are rarely available, the exact number of days to maturity is used to compute the spot or forward rate. The daily value is then multiplied by 30.4 to generate a uniform monthly series. 3b. Preliminary Results for Treasury Bills. Table 1 shows the means and standard deviations for the actual spot rate changes and forward spreads, measured as the forward rate minus the future spot rate for various maturities and subperiods from February 1959 through December The results indicate that forward rates are consistently higher than observed future spot rates. This indicates that there is likely a liquidity premium embedded in forward rates. However, it is interesting to note that while the means and standard deviations of the differences between the forward rates and the spot rates increase with maturity for most of the subperiods, the means and standard deviations for the February 1988 through December 1993 subperiod are constant across maturities. We also show that the autocorrelations in forward and spot rates is large and indicative of close to an integrated time series process. In firstdifferenced form, the autocorrelation problem is less severe. Table 2 shows the estimated βs, associated robust tstatistics and R 2 s for regression equation (5). The standard errors are adjusted for possible heteroskedasticity and serial correlation generated by overlapping data using Newey and West s (1987) procedures. 2 The results are virtually the same as the second half of 2 We chose to use 6 lags in the construction of the NeweyWest (1987) residual covariance matrix estimator. 7
9 Fama's (1984) Table 3 and Mishkin's (1988) Table 1. The primary differences between our results and Fama's (1984) is that the CRSP data has been updated and corrected for data errors. The startling finding is for the February 1988 to December 1993 subperiod. The β coefficient is not statistically significant from one for the four to sixmonth forward rate spreads. Furthermore, the R 2 measures for the regression tests are much higher than in any previous subperiod. For example, the R 2 are less than 1% for the fourmonth forward rate spreads during Fama s 1959 to 1982 subperiod, but increases to 54.8% during the 1988 to 1993 period. Although the β coefficient for 2 and 3 month forward rate spreads are not significantly different from the previous subperiod (October 1982 to June 1986), it is clear that the post1982 period has greater forecast power than the pre1982 period. The results in Table 2 are consistent with a constant (and low) premium in the forwards rates during the latter part of the 1980s and 1990s while the results for the 1982 to June 1988 period are consistent with a timevarying premium. The source of this premium could be lower inflation expectations, which declined in the latter part of the 1980s. We also have other indicators of the low premium. For example, in Table 1, the standard deviation of Treasury yield changes fell from about 0.80% per month for twomonth bills to only 0.62% during Similar declines in volatility were observed in other maturities, as well. Consider also the default spread between yields on bonds with Moody s ratings of Aaa and Baa, which averaged only 94 basis points from 1988 to 1993 whereas over the early 1980s this spread reached as high as 130 8
10 basis points. Similarly, bidask spreads on endofmonth quotes on Treasury bills ranging from two to sixmonths in maturity were as low as 5 to 7.5 basis points during the 1988 to 1993 period, although they averaged between 7 to 10.5 points from 1982 to We show how the term premium could be modeled as a function of such indicators in the next section. 4. Implications of Preliminary Findings 4a. Modeling the Term Premium The time pattern in our preliminary findings suggests potential problems with Fama's specification of test equation (8). The term premium for τperiod bills, E t (P τ,t+1 ), has been omitted from the regression model. Combining (7) and (8) produces generalized forms of Fama's test equation: r t+τ  r t+1 = α + β ( F τ, t  r t+1 ) + γ E t (P τ,t+1 ) + ε t+τ1. (9) Fama (1976) and Startz (1982) report evidence of significant temporal variation in term premia. Failure to control for this variation can produce inefficient and potentially biased forecast results. In effect, by omitting the term premium variable in equation (9), Fama's procedure forces the average effect of the term premia into the intercept (α) and adds the variable effect to the residual, likely due to a possible systematic link via the forward rate which would show up as a bias in the coefficient of interest, β. 9
11 We attempt to shore up the bias in the slope coefficient and the forecast power of the forward spread by introducing a linear forecast model of the term premium conditional on public information variables, Z t. For example, we specify: P τ,t+1 = δ 0 + Σ k δ k z k,t + η t+τ1, (10) where z k,t are the components of the information set available at the time the forward rate forecasts are made, δ k are parameters, and η t+τ+1 is the forecast error. A direct approach would integrate the term premium model of (10) into the forecast model of (9). However, since both are linked by the identity in equations (6) and (7), we are not restricted to any one particular specification for the term premium. Because our focus is on the bias in forward rate forecasts for future spot rates, we employ a specification in which the term premium model in (9) is defined as a series of interactive variables between the forward spread and the information variables that proxy for the term premium. For example, for an information variable z k,t, we estimate: r t+τ  r t+1 = α + β ( F τ, t  r t+1 ) + γ z k,t (F τ, t  r t+1 ) + ε t+τ1. (11) to evaluate the extent to which the bias in β is adjusted by the introduction of the product of z k,t and (F τ,t  r t+1 ). In this way, we are able to determine how the bias changes with different marketspecific or macroeconomic proxy variables. We perform this extended regression for each of a series of information variables and a combination of all of these variables. The next section describes the information variables and associated proxies for the term premium model. 3 3 The authors are grateful to Wayne Ferson for providing the framework to understand these issues better. 10
12 4b. Proxies for Term Premium As a check for potential specification bias, we consider several crude proxies for possible term premia effects. Each variable is measured as at the beginning of the month in the forecast regressions so that it is a genuine ex ante measure. The first proxy is the bond quality spread which we measure as the difference between the returns on Moody s Baa corporate bonds and longterm government bonds. The idea behind the use of such a proxy is that the term premia of interest may vary systematically with measures of risk premia and/or liquidity premia as reflected in the quality spread. This risk premium proxy has been used in previous empirical asset pricing studies, including Chen, Roll and Ross (1986) and Fama and French (1989). We obtain this series, denoted PREM t,, monthly from Ibbotson Associates (1995) for the period A second proxy is the bidask spread for bills of the corresponding maturities. According to the existing market microstructure literature, the quoted bidask spread has three components (Copeland and Galai, 1983; Glosten and Harris, 1988; Hasbrouck, 1988; and Stoll, 1989): the component due to order processing costs for market makers, a second reflecting their inventory holding costs, and finally the adverse selection component, which represents compensation for market makers risk in dealing with informed traders. We interpret this bidask spread proxy primarily in terms of its third component in that it measures mostly interest rate uncertainty. The 11
13 spreads, denoted SPR τ,t, are obtained separately for each maturity to sixmonths from the Treasury bill files of CRSP. The third proxy we employ is the dividend yield of the Standard & Poor s stock index. It is computed as the ratio of sum of the monthly dividends of the index during the month and dividing by the value of the portfolio at the end of the month. Fama and French (1988, 1989) have demonstrated the predictive power of the dividend yield for stock and bond returns. The intuition is that stock prices are low in relation to dividends when discount rates and expected returns are high, so the dividend yield varies positively with the market risk premium. This dividend yield series is obtained from the monthly stock master of CRSP and measured as the difference between the S&P returns with and without dividends, D t /P t. The fourth risk premium proxy is measured as the level of the spot rate, r t+1. Numerous models of the term structure of interest rates model the conditional volatility of spot interest rate changes as a function of the level of the spot rate (Cox, Ingersoll and Ross, 1985). Empirical studies have shown that the conditional volatility of bonds and stocks are predictable from the level of the spot rate, including Longstaff and Schwartz (1992), and Glosten, Jagannathan and Runkle (1993). The data is obtained directly from the CRSP bond files for the onemonth yield. Our final risk premium proxy is estimated using the family of Autoregressive Conditionally Heteroscedastic (ARCH) models (Engle, 1982). ARCH models can be used to capture the timevarying conditional second order moments and risk premia in the term structure of interest rates. Our model extends the earlier work of Engle, Lilien 12
14 and Robins (1987), Engle, Ng and Rothschild (1990) and Longstaff and Schwartz (1992). Specifically, we posit: r t+τ  r t+1 = α + β ( F τ, t  r t+1 ) + γ h t+τ1 (F τ, t  r t+1 ) + ε t+τ1, (12a) ε t+τ1 ~ N(0,h t+τ1 ), h t+τ1 = a + Σj bj h t+τj + Σ k c k ε 2 t+τk + d r 3/2 t+1, (12b) where the residuals are assumed to be conditionally zeromean and independently Gaussian distributed with variance, h t+τ1. The ARCH process projects the conditional variance of interest rate changes linearly on past squared residuals and past estimates of the conditional variance. We also add a term that allows the conditional variance to be dependent on the level of the interest rate, consistent with the findings of Chan, Karolyi, Longstaff and Sanders (1992). The model is estimated using the quasimaximum likelihood techniques of Bollerslev and Wooldridge (1992) and impose the lag structure to be GARCH (1,1) although a number of extended lag specifications were attempted. Table 3 provides summary statistics on each of these information variables from January 1963 to December The bidask spreads vary by maturity, increasing from on average 2.43 basis points for twomonth bills to 3.29 basis points for sixmonth bills. The default spread, PREM t, averages about 108 basis points with a relatively low standard deviation of 47 points. Finally, the conditional volatility estimates from the GARCH model of equation (12) reveal increasing average volatility with longer maturity bills and also higher variation in the conditional volatilities. The common feature of these information variables is that they are highly autocorrelated 13
15 with first to thirdorder autocorrelation coefficients ranging from 0.66 to An innovations series of the variables constructed as their first differences dampens down the autocorrelations considerably. We examine the sensitivity of our tests to using innovations series of the information variables in Section Extended Results Table 4 presents the results of the regressions of the extended model in equation (11) for the various term premium proxy variables, including the bidask spread (SPR τ, t ), the junk bond premium (PREM t ) and the S&P dividend yield (D t /P t ). For each variable, the regressions are run for each of three periods: the overall period from January 1963 to December 1993, the first subperiod that corresponds most closely to that of Fama (1984), or January 1963 to July 1982, and the second subperiod, August 1982 to December The first panel of the table highlights the findings in Table 2 of the simple forward spread regression on the future spot rate changes for each Treasury bill from two to sixmonths in maturity. The results again indicate that the forecast power is weaker and bias in the slope coefficients more evident in the first subperiod, in contrast with the period from The β coefficients increase from 0.1 to 0.2 across maturities up to 0.6 and 0.8 post 1982; the R 2 estimates jump from less than 1% in the period before 1982 up to 3540%, after a. BidAsk Spreads 14
16 The introduction of an interactive variable between the forward spread and the bidask spread in Treasury bill prices measurably increases the slope coefficient on the forward spread across all maturities and in all three subperiods studied. For example, the β estimate for the fourmonth Treasury bill regression in the first subperiod increases from 0.17 up to 0.93 and the R 2 increases over tenfold to about 6%. The reason for this is the usually statistically significant, negative γ coefficient on the interactive term (not reported). If we interpret the bidask spread, and especially its adverse selection component, to proxy interest rate uncertainty, then this negative coefficient implies that the forward spread forecast needs to be adjusted downward in those months in when there is greater uncertainty. This adjustment is necessary because the term premium comprises a larger component of the forward rate measure in those months. The γ coefficient is mostly significant across the different maturities, although the estimates have no patterns. This could arise because each maturity uses a different bidask spread variable. Finally, it is important to note that γ coefficients are smaller, negative values in the post1982 period, as would be expected in a relatively more stable interest rate environment. As a result, smaller adjustments would appear to be necessary; the β coefficient estimates are adjusted upward very little and the R 2 measures are largely the same with or without the interactive terms. 5b. Junk Bond Premium Table 4 also presents the extended estimates for equation (11) using the returns spread on the Baa corporate bonds and the longterm government bonds from Ibbotson and Associates, denoted PREM t. We expect the junk bond premium to be positively 15
17 related to the term premium. The results are very similar to those obtained with the bidask spreads across all maturities. For the first subperiod, the γ coefficients (not reported) are all negative although not reliably different from zero. The β coefficient estimates are higher and statistically not different than one, but our inference draws from much larger standard errors. As expected, the magnitude of the increase of the β estimates is much larger in the pre1982 period than in the later subperiod. Finally, the R 2 measures are only slightly higher than the basic forward spread regressions. 5c. Dividend Yield Table 4 indicates that the interactive variable with the forward spread and the S&P 500 dividend yield plays the same role in the spot rate forecast regressions. The γ coefficient is negative for all maturities, although not significantly different from zero (again, not reported). This interactive term allows the slope coefficient on the forward spread variable (around 0.15) to increase to values close to as low as 0.70 for the threemonth bills and as high as 0.92 for the fourmonth bills. The adjustments are generally more dramatic for the longer maturity, five and sixmonth bills, and even in the post1982 period. 5d. Level of the Spot Rate A subset of the extended regression results of Table 4 use the level of the spot rate of interest as the information variable. In a number of empirical studies, such as Glosten, Jagannathan and Runkle (1993), estimates of the conditional timevarying risk premium and volatility in S&P 500 stock returns have been shown to be dependent on the level of the spot rate of interest. The results in Table 4 show that 16
18 similar patterns obtain as for the other information variables. The γ coefficients are reliably negative (not reported) and, as a result, the β coefficients in the forecast regressions are systematically adjusted upward toward one. For the fourmonth bills, for example, the β adjusts from 0.36 to 1.51, which is insignificantly different from one. The adjusted R 2 increases from 4.8% to 17.0%. The weakest results occur for the twomonth bills, although the correction is in the right direction. 5e. Conditional Volatility Forecasts using ARCH Models Table 4 summarizes the results for the conditional volatility proxy, but for this model, we also report in Table 5 the detailed ARCH model estimates by Treasury bill maturity that were employed for the conditional volatility forecasts. We present the basic forward spread regression forecasts in the first panel (identical to those of Table 4), the ARCH model estimates for equation (12) in the second panel, and, finally, the standardized residuals for each model in the third panel. The ARCH model estimates demonstrate the type of persistence in the conditional volatilities processes in a number of financial time series: the b coefficient estimate on the lagged conditional volatility measure has a value close to 0.80 and the c coefficient on the lagged squared residual is close to The sum of the coefficients is close to 0.95 which indicates how close to integrated the series is. The dependence of the conditional volatility on the level of the interest rate, measured by the d coefficient, is also important, as demonstrated by Chan et al. (1992). The adjusted β slope coefficients in pre1982 and post1982 subperiods are higher than without the interactive variable. The degree of adjustment is smallest in magnitude, however, compared to the other term premium 17
19 proxies in Table 4. The γ coefficients are all largely negative across maturities, but again largely insignificantly different from zero. Finally, the R 2 measures (presented in Table 4) indicate greater forecast power with the adjustment terms but not as great as with the other risk premium proxies. 5f. Term Premium Model with All Information Variables Table 6 provides estimates of the extended model with all four of the term premium proxies included in the regression forecast. Several interesting patterns arise in how the various interactive variables influence each other and the forward spread variable in both subperiods and across all maturities. For example, for the fourmonth forecast model in the pre1982 subperiod, the β coefficient in the basic model is 0.17 with an R 2 of 0.5%. The extended model adjusts the β coefficient to although not reliably different from one  and the R 2 value jumps to 21.3%. The γ coefficient for the bidask spread variable, SPR τ, t, is negative and typically significant; those γ coefficients for the other risk premium proxies are negative but with larger standard errors. The main difference in the extended model combining all information variables is that the β slope coefficients are now reliably adjusted upward  particularly in the pre1982 period  as are the R 2 measures across all maturities. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the extent of the forward bias correction that our models yield. Figure 1 shows the adjusted forward spread for fourmonth Treasury bills (solid line), which is the fitted series from the regression model in Table 6. We contrast this adjusted forward spread forecast with that of the unadjusted forecast using 18
20 the raw forward spread (dotted line). The forward spread tends to be positive over the entire sample whereas the adjusted forward spread can become negative at times, such as for example during the deflationary periods of and Figure 2 presents the adjustment factor as the difference between the two series in Figure 1. We can see that the level of adjustment required during the period is substantial compared to the periods of relatively low interest rate uncertainty during the and periods. 6. Robustness Checks 6a. Spurious Association Table 3 revealed that a common feature of the information variables used in our analysis is their high level of persistence. Serial correlation coefficients up to three lags ranged from 0.6 to 0.9. One possibility is that the bias correction in the forward spread regressions is an artifact of these seriallycorrelated time series. To gauge the sensitivity of our conclusions to this issue, we replicated our experiments in Table 6 using a crude measure of the innovations in these information variables. Table 3 showed that the differenced series yielded much lower autocorrelations. The results (available from the authors) were similar though somewhat weaker. The β coefficients were adjusted upward, as before, but not as dramatically, and statistically we would reject that they were equal to one. The R 2 measures were also less dramatically affected. 6b. Peso Problems 19
21 Bekaert, Hodrick and Marshall (1995, 1996) document extreme bias and dispersion in the small sample distributions in regressionbased tests of the expectations hypothesis, as in this study. They argue that these biases derive from the extreme persistence in short term interest rates. To illustrate this phenomenon, they estimate a regimeswitching model dependent on the level of the spot rate; the forward spread forecasts of future spot rate changes are allowed to be different in lowinterestrate and highinterestrate states. This model is similar in spirit to our extended regression tests in Table 4 in which the term premium proxy variable is the level of the spot rate. Their tests show that the expectations hypothesis is more strongly rejected when these small sample biases are corrected; that is, the β coefficient should approach perhaps as high as 1.25 or 1.50 in our regressions. Our results in Table 4 are somewhat consistent with this premise in that we show that the β estimates with the level of the spot rate variable can even adjust above one for each of the four, five and sixmonth Treasury bill regressions. However, future research should explore the implications of small sample biases for our regressions. 7. Summary and Implications Prior studies indicate that the predictive power of implied forward rates for future spot rates is weak over long sample periods and typically varies dramatically across different subperiods. Fama (1976, 1984) conjectures that the low forecast power in general is due to model misspecification or measurement error that is introduced by a failure to control for the term premium embedded in forward rates. We show that 20
22 Fama s conjecture is consistent with the data using any of four different models of the term premium. Forward rates adjusted for the term premium are reliable predictors of future spot rates over the entire period. We measure the term premium using a variety of ex ante instruments, including the junk bond premium, bidask spreads in Treasury bills, the Standard & Poor s 500 stock index s dividend yield and conditional volatility of interest rate changes using an Autoregressive Conditionally Heteroscedastic (ARCH) process. Using these proxies, we show how to quantify the magnitude of the bias in the forward rate forecasts introduced by the term premium and how to adjust for it. 21
23 References Bekaert, Geert, Robert Hodrick and David Marshall, 1995, Peso Problem Explanations for Term Structure Anomalies, Northwestern University working paper. Bekaert, Geert, Robert Hodrick and David Marshall, 1996, On Biases in Tests of the Expectations Hypothesis of the Term Structure of Interest Rates, Northwestern University working paper. Bollerslev, Tim and Jeffrey Wooldridge, 1992, Quasimaximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Models with Timevarying Covariances, Econometric Reviews 11, Campbell, John, and Robert Shiller, 1991, Yield Spreads and Interest Rate Movements: A Bird s Eye View, Review of Financial Studies 58, Chan, K.C., G. Andrew Karolyi, Francis A. Longstaff and Anthony B. Sanders, 1992, An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Models of the Shortterm Interest Rate, Journal of Finance 47, Chen, Naifu, Richard Roll and Stephen A. Ross, 1986, Economic Forces and the Stock Market, Journal of Business 59, Copeland, Thomas and Dan Galai, 1983, Information Effects on the Bidask Spread, Journal of Finance 38, Cox, John C., Jonathan E. Ingersoll, Jr. and Stephen A. Ross, 1981, A Reexamination of Traditional Hypotheses about the Term Structure of Interest Rates, Journal of Finance 36, Cox, John C., Jonathan E. Ingersoll, Jr. and Stephen A. Ross, 1985, A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates, Econometrica 53, Culbertson, J. W., 1957, The Term Structure of Interest Rates, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Engle, Robert, 1982, Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of UK Inflation, Econometrica 50, Engle, Robert, David Lilien and Russell Robins, 1987, Estimating Timevarying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The ARCHM Model, Econometrica 55,
24 Engle, Robert, Victor Ng and Michael Rothschild, 1990, Asset Pricing with a Factor ARCH Covariance Structure: Empirical Estimates for Treasury Bills. Journal of Econometrics 45, Fama, Eugene F., 1976, Forward Rates as Predictors of Future Spot Rates, Journal of Financial Economics 3, Fama, Eugene F., 1984, The Information in the Term Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 13, Fama, Eugene F., 1990, TermStructure Forecasts of Interest Rates, Inflation, and Real Returns, Journal of Monetary Economics, 25, Fama, Eugene F. and Robert R. Bliss, 1987, The Information in LongMaturity Forward Rates, American Economic Review 77, Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French, 1988, Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns, Journal of Financial Economics 22, Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French, 1989, Business Conditions and Expected Returns on Stocks and Bonds, Journal of Financial Economics 25, Glosten, Lawrence and Lawrence Harris, 1988, Estimating the Components of the Bidask Spread, Journal of Financial Economics, 21, Glosten, Lawrence, Ravi Jagannathan, and David Runkle, Seasonal Patterns in the Volatility of Stock Index Excess Returns, Journal of Finance 48, Hafer, R., Scott Hein and Scott MacDonald, 1995, Predicting the Ex Post Term Premium in Treasury Bill Rates, Texas Tech University working paper. Hardouvelis, Gikas A., 1988, The Predictive Power of the Term Structure during Recent Monetary Regimes, Journal of Finance 43, Hasbrouck, Joel, 1988, Trades, Quotes, Inventories and Information, Journal of Financial Economics 22, Hickman, W. Braddock, 1942, The Term Structure of Interest Rates: An Exploratory Analysis, National Bureau of Economic Research, mimeo. Ibbotson & Associates, 1995, Stocks, Bonds, Bills and Inflation: 1995 Yearbook and Market Results for , Chicago, IL. Kamara, Avi, 1988, Market Trading Structure and Asset Pricing: Evidence from the Treasury Bill Markets, Review of Financial Studies 1,
25 Kamara, Avi, 1996, The Relation between Defaultfree Interest Rates and Expected Economic Growth is Stronger than You Think, University of Washington working paper. Longstaff, Francis and Eduardo Schwartz, 1992, Interest Rate Volatility and the Term Structure: A Twofactor General Equilibrium Model, Journal of Finance 47, Macauley, Frederick R., 1938, The Movements of Interest Rates, Bond Yields, Bond Yields and Stock Prices in the United States Since 1859, National Bureau of Economic Research (New York: Columbia University Press). Mankiw, N. Gregory and Jeffrey A. Miron, 1986, The Changing Behavior of the Term Structure of Interest Rates, Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, Mishkin, Frederic S., 1988, The Information in the Term Structure: Some Further Results, Journal Applied Econometrics 3, Newey, Whitney and Kenneth West, 1987, A Simple Positive, Semidefinite, Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix, Econometrica 55, Shiller, Robert, 1979, The Volatility of Longterm Interest Rates and Expectations Models of the Term Structure, Journal of Political Economy 87, Startz, Richard, 1982, Do Forecast Errors or Term Premia Really Make the Difference Between Long and Short Rates?, Journal of Financial Economics 10, Stoll, Hans, 1989, Inferring the Components of the Bidask Spread, Journal of Finance 44,
26 Table 1. Summary statistics for the change in future spot rate and forward spread for Treasury bills in selected subperiods from February 1959 through December F τ, t is the 1month forward rate observed at t for τ months ahead and r t+1 is the onemonth spot rate at t. All statistics are computed for the full sample from February 1959 to December 1993 and various subperiods. Data is from the Government Bond Files of the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP). ρ k denotes the kth order autocorrelation coefficient. Statistic r t+2 r t+1 r t+3 r t+1 r t+4 r t+1 r t+5 r t+1 r t+6 r t+1 F 2,t r t+1 F 3,t r t+1 F 4,t r t+1 F 5,t r t+1 F 6,t  r t : :12 Mean Standard Deviation tstatistic (Mean=0) Skewness Kurtosis ρ ρ ρ : : 7 Mean Standard Deviation tstatistic (Mean=0) Skewness Kurtosis ρ ρ ρ : : 12 Mean Standard Deviation tstatistic (Mean=0) Skewness Kurtosis ρ ρ ρ
27 Table 2. Regression model estimates of the change in the future spot rate on the forward spread. F τ, t is the onemonth forward rate observed at t for τ months ahead and r t+1 is the onemonth spot rate at t. Estimates are computed for the full sample from February 1959 to December 1993 and various subperiods. Data is from the Government Bond Files of the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP). Standard errors are computed using NeweyWest correction for heteroscedasticity and serial correlation and associated tstatistics are reported in parentheses. r t+τ  r t+1 = α + β ( F τ, t  r t+1 ) + ε t+τ1 ( 5) r t+2  r t+1 r t+3  r t+1 r t+4  r t+1 r t+5  r t+1 r t+6  r t+1 Models β t (β=0) Adj.R 2 β t (β=0) Adj.R 2 β t (β=0) Adj.R 2 β t (β=0) Adj.R 2 β t (β=0) Adj.R 2 Overall Period: 1959: : Fama Subperiod: 1959: : Subperiods: 1959: : : : : : : : : : : : : :
28 Table 3. Summary statistics on Informational Variables for Term Premium Proxy from January 1963 through December BA k denotes the bidask spread (in percent per month) on the kmonth Treasury bill from the Government Bond Files of the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP). PREM is the yield spread between Moody s Baa and Aaa corporate bonds, D t /P t is the Standard and Poor s 500 stock index dividend yield, r t+1 is the level of the onemonth spot rate at t. h t+τ1 denotes the conditional volatility from ARCH model estimates of the τperiod difference in the spot rates (see Table 5). ρ k denotes the kth order autocorrelation coefficient. Statistic BA 2,t BA 3,t BA 4,t BA 5,t BA 6,t PREM t D t /P t r t+1 h t+1 h t+2 h t+3 h t+4 h t+5 Mean Standard Deviation tstatistic (Mean=0) Skewness Kurtosis Autocorrelations: ρ 1 ρ 2 ρ 3 Differences: ρ ρ ρ
29 Table 4. Regression estimates of the change in the future spot rate on the forward spread and a risk premium in τperiod bonds. The risk premium is measured by an interactive term with an instrumental variable with the forward spread, F τ, t  r t+1. The instrumental variables include: the bid/ask spread of τperiod bonds, SPR τ, the junk bond premium measured by the returns spread between Moody s Baa corporate bonds and government bonds, PREM t, the Standard and Poor 500 dividend yield, D t /P t, the level of the short rate, r t+1, and the conditional variance of interest rate changes estimated from ARCH models of Table 5. Estimates are computed for January 1963 to December 1993 and two subperiods from January 1963 to July 1982 and August 1982 to December Standard errors are computed using NeweyWest correction for heteroscedasticity and serial correlation with six lagged autocovariances. The tstatistic is computed under the null hypothesis that β=1. The basic model is based on equation (5) in Table 2: r t+τ  r t+1 = α + β ( F τ, t  r t+1 ) + ε t+τ1 ( 5) The adjusted model augments (5) by including interactive term with the instrumental variable, X t : r t+τ  r t+1 = α + β ( F τ, t  r t+1 ) + γ [ X t ( F τ, t  r t+1 ) ] + ε t+τ1 (10) r t+2  r t+1 r t+3  r t+1 r t+4  r t+1 r t+5  r t+1 r t+6  r t+1 Models β t (β=1) Adj.R 2 β t (β=1) Adj.R 2 β t (β=1) Adj.R 2 β t (β=1) Adj.R 2 β t (β=1) Adj.R 2 Overall Period Unadjusted SPR t PREM t : D t /P t h t r t : :7 Unadjusted SPR t PREM t : D t /P t h t r t : :12 Unadjusted SPR t PREM t : D t /P t
30 h t r t Table 5. ARCH model estimates of the change in the future spot rate on the forward spread and a risk premium in τperiod bonds. The risk premium is measured by interactive term of conditional volatility of interest rate changes, h t+τ1, with the forward spread, F τ, t  r t+1. Estimates are computed from January 1963 to December 1993 and two subperiods from January 1963 to July 1982 and August 1982 to December The model is estimated using quasimaximum likelihood methods based on Bollerslev and Wooldridge (1992). Robust t statistics are reported in parentheses. R 2 are computed from secondpass regressions of the spot rate changes on the forward spread and the interactive variable. The The ARCH model augments equation (5) of Table 2 by including interactive term with conditional volatility, h t+τ1, using GARCH(1,1) specification including level of the shortrate, r t+1 : r t+τ  r t+1 = α + β ( F τ, t  r t+1 ) + γ [ h t+τ1 ( F τ, t  r t+1 ) ] + ε t+τ1 + θ ε t+τ2 (11) ε t+τ1 ~ N(0, h t+τ1 ) h t+τ1 = a + b h t+τ2 + c ε 2 3/2 t+τ2 + d r t+1 (12) Overall Period 1963:11993:12 Subperiod I 1963:11982:7 Subperiod II 1982:81993:12 Coefficients r t+2 r t+1 r t+3 r t+1 r t+4 r t+1 r t+5 r t+1 r t+6 r t+1 r t+2 r t+1 r t+3 r t+1 r t+4 r t+1 r t+5 r t+1 r t+6 r t+1 r t+2 r t+1 r t+3 r t+1 r t+4 r t+1 r t+5 r t+1 r t+6 r t+1 β t (β=1) (4.76) (3.00) (2.41) (2.26) (2.06) (3.06) (1.48) (1.26) (1.05) (0.61) (3.00) (4.33) (4.75) (3.82) (3.81) γ (0.27) (1.13) (0.90) (0.53) (0.12) (0.27) (0.73) (0.62) (0.43) (0.17) (1.14) (0.65) (0.56) (1.26) (1.72) θ (1.03) (13.51) (1.14) (3.84) (1.78) (0.86) (14.64) (1.00) (7.90) (1.30) (0.79) (1.97) (0.63) (2.51) (1.25) a (0000s) (0.04) (0.04) (0.05) (0.05) (0.06) (0.02) (0.03) (0.03) (0.04) (0.05) (0.06) (0.12) (0.06) (0.04) (0.06) b (14.42) (16.39) (6.91) (12.22) (25.50) (7.96) (7.32) (4.54) (11.95) (20.36) (15.94) (1.37) (14.24) (8.68) (24.52) c (1.90) (2.41) (1.79) (2.09) (2.81) (1.90) (2.28) (1.50) (1.88) (2.30) (0.76) (1.01) (2.26) (1.30) (2.23) d (0000s) (2.67) (3.24) (2.01) (2.18) (2.83) (1.35) (1.52) (1.09) (1.92) (2.00) (3.49) (3.43) (12.73) (1.52) (2.87) Std. Residuals: Mean Std. Dev Skewness
CONDITIONAL TIMEVARYING INTEREST RATE RISK PREMIUM: EVIDENCE FROM THE TREASURY BILL FUTURES MARKET. Alan C. Hess. And.
CONDITIONAL TIMEVARYING INTEREST RATE RISK PREMIUM: EVIDENCE FROM THE TREASURY BILL FUTURES MARKET Alan C. Hess And Avraham Kamara UW Business School University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195300 June
More informationStock market booms and real economic activity: Is this time different?
International Review of Economics and Finance 9 (2000) 387 415 Stock market booms and real economic activity: Is this time different? Mathias Binswanger* Institute for Economics and the Environment, University
More informationThe Central Tendency: A Second Factor in Bond Yields
The Central Tendency: A Second Factor in Bond Yields by Pierluigi Balduzzi New York University Sanjiv Ranjan Das Harvard University Silverio Foresi New York University May 1994. This revision, July 1996.
More informationSTOCK MARKET VOLATILITY AND REGIME SHIFTS IN RETURNS
STOCK MARKET VOLATILITY AND REGIME SHIFTS IN RETURNS ChiaShang James Chu Department of Economics, MC 0253 University of Southern California Los Angles, CA 90089 Gary J. Santoni and Tung Liu Department
More informationThe term structure of equity option implied volatility
The term structure of equity option implied volatility Christopher S. Jones Tong Wang Marshall School of Business Marshall School of Business University of Southern California University of Southern California
More informationIs the Forward Exchange Rate a Useful Indicator of the Future Exchange Rate?
Is the Forward Exchange Rate a Useful Indicator of the Future Exchange Rate? Emily Polito, Trinity College In the past two decades, there have been many empirical studies both in support of and opposing
More informationVOLATILITY FORECASTING FOR MUTUAL FUND PORTFOLIOS. Samuel Kyle Jones 1 Stephen F. Austin State University, USA Email: sjones@sfasu.
VOLATILITY FORECASTING FOR MUTUAL FUND PORTFOLIOS 1 Stephen F. Austin State University, USA Email: sjones@sfasu.edu ABSTRACT The return volatility of portfolios of mutual funds having similar investment
More informationDoes the Spot Curve Contain Information on Future Monetary Policy in Colombia? Por : Juan Manuel Julio Román. No. 463
Does the Spot Curve Contain Information on Future Monetary Policy in Colombia? Por : Juan Manuel Julio Román No. 463 2007 tá  Colombia  Bogotá  Colombia  Bogotá  Colombia  Bogotá  Colombia  Bogotá
More informationThe Abnormal Performance of Bond Returns
The University of Reading THE BUSINESS SCHOOL FOR FINANCIAL MARKETS The Abnormal Performance of Bond Returns Joëlle Miffre ISMA Centre, The University of Reading, Reading, Berks., RG6 6BA, UK Copyright
More informationMarket Efficiency and Stock Market Predictability
Mphil Subject 301 Market Efficiency and Stock Market Predictability M. Hashem Pesaran March 2003 1 1 Stock Return Regressions R t+1 r t = a+b 1 x 1t +b 2 x 2t +...+b k x kt +ε t+1, (1) R t+1 is the oneperiod
More informationNo More Weekend Effect
No More Weekend Effect Russell P. Robins 1 and Geoffrey Peter Smith 2 1 AB Freeman School of Business, Tulane University 2 WP Carey School of Business, Arizona State University Abstract Before 1975, the
More informationPreholiday Returns and Volatility in Thai stock market
Preholiday Returns and Volatility in Thai stock market Nopphon Tangjitprom Martin de Tours School of Management and Economics, Assumption University Bangkok, Thailand Tel: (66) 858156177 Email: tnopphon@gmail.com
More informationDo LongTerm Interest Rates Overreact to ShortTerm Interest Rates?
N. GREGORY MANKIW Massachusetts Institute of Technology LAWRENCE H. SUMMERS Harvard University Do LongTerm Interest Rates Overreact to ShortTerm Interest Rates? THE TERM STRUCTURE of interest rates has
More informationThe Day of the Week Effect on Stock Market Volatility
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE Volume 25 Number 2 Summer 2001 181 The Day of the Week Effect on Stock Market Volatility Hakan Berument and Halil Kiymaz * Abstract This study tests the presence of the
More informationC(t) (1 + y) 4. t=1. For the 4 year bond considered above, assume that the price today is 900$. The yield to maturity will then be the y that solves
Economics 7344, Spring 2013 Bent E. Sørensen INTEREST RATE THEORY We will cover fixed income securities. The major categories of longterm fixed income securities are federal government bonds, corporate
More informationCommentary" Stock Market Margin Requirements and Volatility
Journal of Financial Services Research, 3:139151 (1989) 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers Commentary" Stock Market Margin Requirements and Volatility GIKAS A. HARDOUVELIS Department of Finance Rutgers University
More informationVOLATILITY TRANSMISSION ACROSS THE TERM STRUCTURE OF SWAP MARKETS: INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE
VOLATILITY TRANSMISSION ACROSS THE TERM STRUCTURE OF SWAP MARKETS: INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE Pilar Abad Alfonso Novales L March ABSTRACT We characterize the behavior of volatility across the term structure
More informationIn recent years, Federal Reserve (Fed) policymakers have come to rely
LongTerm Interest Rates and Inflation: A Fisherian Approach Peter N. Ireland In recent years, Federal Reserve (Fed) policymakers have come to rely on longterm bond yields to measure the public s longterm
More informationDo the asset pricing factors predict future economy growth? An Australian study. Bin Liu Amalia Di Iorio
Do the asset pricing factors predict future economy growth? An Australian study. Bin Liu Amalia Di Iorio Abstract In this paper we examine whether past returns of the market portfolio (MKT), the size portfolio
More informationPriceEarnings Ratios, Dividend Yields and Real Estate Stock Prices
PriceEarnings Ratios, Dividend Yields and Real Estate Stock Prices Executive Summary. Both dividend yields and past returns have predictive power for P/E ratios; hence they can be used as tools in forming
More informationFinancial Assets Behaving Badly The Case of High Yield Bonds. Chris Kantos Newport Seminar June 2013
Financial Assets Behaving Badly The Case of High Yield Bonds Chris Kantos Newport Seminar June 2013 Main Concepts for Today The most common metric of financial asset risk is the volatility or standard
More informationThe day of the week effect on stock market volatility and volume: International evidence
Review of Financial Economics 12 (2003) 363 380 The day of the week effect on stock market volatility and volume: International evidence Halil Kiymaz a, *, Hakan Berument b a Department of Finance, School
More informationFinancial predictors of real activity and the financial accelerator B
Economics Letters 82 (2004) 167 172 www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase Financial predictors of real activity and the financial accelerator B Ashoka Mody a,1, Mark P. Taylor b,c, * a Research Department,
More informationModelling Intraday Volatility in European Bond Market
Modelling Intraday Volatility in European Bond Market Hanyu Zhang ICMA Centre, Henley Business School Young Finance Scholars Conference 8th May,2014 Outline 1 Introduction and Literature Review 2 Data
More informationJournal Of Financial And Strategic Decisions Volume 9 Number 2 Summer 1996
Journal Of Financial And Strategic Decisions Volume 9 Number 2 Summer 1996 THE USE OF FINANCIAL RATIOS AS MEASURES OF RISK IN THE DETERMINATION OF THE BIDASK SPREAD Huldah A. Ryan * Abstract The effect
More informationMonetary Policy and Longterm Interest Rates
Monetary Policy and Longterm Interest Rates Shu Wu The University of Kansas First Draft: July 2004 This version: March 2005 Abstract This paper documents some new empirical results about the monetary
More informationExchange rates and longterm bonds
Exchange rates and longterm bonds Annika Alexius and Peter Sellin April 2002 Abstract Tentative evidence suggests that the empirical failure of uncovered interest parity (UIP) is confined to shortterm
More informationThe predictability of excess returns on UK bonds: a nonlinear approach
The predictability of excess returns on UK bonds: a nonlinear approach Ilias Lekkos* Monetary Instruments and Markets Division Bank of England and Costas Milas Department of Economics and Finance Brunel
More informationA. GREGORIOU, A. KONTONIKAS and N. TSITSIANIS DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, BRUNEL UNIVERSITY, UXBRIDGE, MIDDLESEX, UB8 3PH, UK
 Does The Day Of The Week Effect Exist Once Transaction Costs Have Been Accounted For? Evidence From The UK 
More informationThe Best of Both Worlds:
The Best of Both Worlds: A Hybrid Approach to Calculating Value at Risk Jacob Boudoukh 1, Matthew Richardson and Robert F. Whitelaw Stern School of Business, NYU The hybrid approach combines the two most
More informationThe information content of lagged equity and bond yields
Economics Letters 68 (2000) 179 184 www.elsevier.com/ locate/ econbase The information content of lagged equity and bond yields Richard D.F. Harris *, Rene SanchezValle School of Business and Economics,
More informationOnline appendix to paper Downside Market Risk of Carry Trades
Online appendix to paper Downside Market Risk of Carry Trades A1. SUBSAMPLE OF DEVELOPED COUNTRIES I study a subsample of developed countries separately for two reasons. First, some of the emerging countries
More informationVolatility in the Overnight MoneyMarket Rate in Bangladesh: Recent Experiences PN 0707
Volatility in the Overnight MoneyMarket Rate in Bangladesh: Recent Experiences PN 0707 Md. Shahiduzzaman* Mahmud Salahuddin Naser * Abstract This paper tries to investigate the pattern of volatility in
More informationPricing Corn Calendar Spread Options. Juheon Seok and B. Wade Brorsen
Pricing Corn Calendar Spread Options by Juheon Seok and B. Wade Brorsen Suggested citation format: Seok, J., and B. W. Brorsen. 215. Pricing Corn Calendar Spread Options. Proceedings of the NCCC134 Conference
More informationInvestors and Central Bank s Uncertainty Embedded in Index Options OnLine Appendix
Investors and Central Bank s Uncertainty Embedded in Index Options OnLine Appendix Alexander David Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary Pietro Veronesi University of Chicago Booth School
More informationGARCH 101: An Introduction to the Use of ARCH/GARCH models in Applied Econometrics. Robert Engle
GARCH 101: An Introduction to the Use of ARCH/GARCH models in Applied Econometrics Robert Engle Robert Engle is the Michael Armellino Professor of Finance, Stern School of Business, New York University,
More informationTrading for News: an Examination of Intraday Trading Behaviour of Australian TreasuryBond Futures Markets
Trading for News: an Examination of Intraday Trading Behaviour of Australian TreasuryBond Futures Markets Liping Zou 1 and Ying Zhang Massey University at Albany, Private Bag 102904, Auckland, New Zealand
More information4. Simple regression. QBUS6840 Predictive Analytics. https://www.otexts.org/fpp/4
4. Simple regression QBUS6840 Predictive Analytics https://www.otexts.org/fpp/4 Outline The simple linear model Least squares estimation Forecasting with regression Nonlinear functional forms Regression
More informationEFFECTS OF DAYLIGHTSAVING TIME CHANGES ON STOCK MARKET VOLATILITY: A COMMENT 1, 2
Psychological Reports, 2010, 107, 3, 111. Psychological Reports 2010 EFFECTS OF DAYLIGHTSAVING TIME CHANGES ON STOCK MARKET VOLATILITY: A COMMENT 1, 2 MARK J. KAMSTRA Schulich School of Business York
More informationThe Dynamics of Corporate Credit Spreads
The Dynamics of Corporate Credit Spreads Fred Joutz a, Sattar A. Mansi b and William F. Maxwell b Corresponding author: William Maxwell Texas Tech University College of Business Administration Box 4211
More informationChap 3 CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models
Chap 3 CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models 1 Asset Pricing Model a logical extension of portfolio selection theory is to consider the equilibrium asset pricing consequences of investors individually
More informationAssessing and managing credit risk of. Explaining Credit Spread Changes: New Evidence from OptionAdjusted Bond Indexes
Explaining Credit Spread Changes: New Evidence from OptionAdjusted Bond Indexes JINGZHI HUANG AND WEIPENG KONG JINGZHI HUANG is an assistant professor of finance at the Smeal College of Business at
More informationWhat Drives International Equity Correlations? Volatility or Market Direction? *
Working Paper 941 Departamento de Economía Economic Series (22) Universidad Carlos III de Madrid June 29 Calle Madrid, 126 2893 Getafe (Spain) Fax (34) 916249875 What Drives International Equity Correlations?
More informationGRADO EN ECONOMÍA. Is the Forward Rate a True Unbiased Predictor of the Future Spot Exchange Rate?
FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS Y EMPRESARIALES GRADO EN ECONOMÍA Is the Forward Rate a True Unbiased Predictor of the Future Spot Exchange Rate? Autor: Elena Renedo Sánchez Tutor: Juan Ángel Jiménez Martín
More informationWhat Really Happened to U.S. Bond Yields
What Really Happened to U.S. Bond Yields Peter Best, Alistair Byrne, and Antti Ilmanen Analysts have been able to say surprisingly little about the sources of the very volatile yields of longterm U.S.
More informationLiquidity of Corporate Bonds
Liquidity of Corporate Bonds Jack Bao, Jun Pan and Jiang Wang MIT October 21, 2008 The QGroup Autumn Meeting Liquidity and Corporate Bonds In comparison, low levels of trading in corporate bond market
More informationImplied Volatility Skews in the Foreign Exchange Market. Empirical Evidence from JPY and GBP: 19972002
Implied Volatility Skews in the Foreign Exchange Market Empirical Evidence from JPY and GBP: 19972002 The Leonard N. Stern School of Business Glucksman Institute for Research in Securities Markets Faculty
More informationInternet Appendix to Stock Market Liquidity and the Business Cycle
Internet Appendix to Stock Market Liquidity and the Business Cycle Randi Næs, Johannes A. Skjeltorp and Bernt Arne Ødegaard This Internet appendix contains additional material to the paper Stock Market
More informationOnline Appendix for Demand for Crash Insurance, Intermediary Constraints, and Risk Premia in Financial Markets
Online Appendix for Demand for Crash Insurance, Intermediary Constraints, and Risk Premia in Financial Markets Hui Chen Scott Joslin Sophie Ni August 3, 2015 1 An Extension of the Dynamic Model Our model
More informationInterpreting Market Responses to Economic Data
Interpreting Market Responses to Economic Data Patrick D Arcy and Emily Poole* This article discusses how bond, equity and foreign exchange markets have responded to the surprise component of Australian
More informationThe VAR models discussed so fare are appropriate for modeling I(0) data, like asset returns or growth rates of macroeconomic time series.
Cointegration The VAR models discussed so fare are appropriate for modeling I(0) data, like asset returns or growth rates of macroeconomic time series. Economic theory, however, often implies equilibrium
More informationDoes the Stock Market React to Unexpected Inflation Differently Across the Business Cycle?
Does the Stock Market React to Unexpected Inflation Differently Across the Business Cycle? Chao Wei 1 April 24, 2009 Abstract I find that nominal equity returns respond to unexpected inflation more negatively
More informationTrading Turnover and Expected Stock Returns: The Trading Frequency Hypothesis and Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange
Trading Turnover and Expected Stock Returns: The Trading Frequency Hypothesis and Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange Shingyang Hu National Taiwan University and University of Chicago 1101 East 58
More informationCalculate the holding period return for this investment. It is approximately
1. An investor purchases 100 shares of XYZ at the beginning of the year for $35. The stock pays a cash dividend of $3 per share. The price of the stock at the time of the dividend is $30. The dividend
More informationTrading Probability and Turnover as measures of Liquidity Risk: Evidence from the U.K. Stock Market. Ian McManus. Peter Smith.
Trading Probability and Turnover as measures of Liquidity Risk: Evidence from the U.K. Stock Market. Ian McManus (Corresponding author). School of Management, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton,
More informationThe comovement of US and German bond markets
The comovement of US and German bond markets Tom Engsted and Carsten Tanggaard The Aarhus School of Business, Fuglesangs alle 4, DK8210 Aarhus V. Emails: tom@asb.dk (Engsted); cat@asb.dk (Tanggaard).
More informationStock Returns and Equity Premium Evidence Using Dividend Price Ratios and Dividend Yields in Malaysia
Stock Returns and Equity Premium Evidence Using Dividend Price Ratios and Dividend Yields in Malaysia By David E. Allen 1 and Imbarine Bujang 1 1 School of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Edith Cowan
More informationInternet Appendix to Picking Winners? Investment Consultants Recommendations of Fund Managers
Internet Appendix to Picking Winners? Investment Consultants Recommendations of Fund Managers TIM JENKINSON, HOWARD JONES, and JOSE VICENTE MARTINEZ * This Internet Appendix includes the following additional
More informationPriceEarnings Ratios: Growth and Discount Rates
PriceEarnings Ratios: Growth and Discount Rates Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER Xiaoyan Zhang Purdue University This Version: 20 May 2011 We thank Geert Bekaert, Sigbjørn Berg, and Tørres Trovik
More informationFORECASTING DEPOSIT GROWTH: Forecasting BIF and SAIF Assessable and Insured Deposits
Technical Paper Series Congressional Budget Office Washington, DC FORECASTING DEPOSIT GROWTH: Forecasting BIF and SAIF Assessable and Insured Deposits Albert D. Metz Microeconomic and Financial Studies
More informationEarnings Announcement and Abnormal Return of S&P 500 Companies. Luke Qiu Washington University in St. Louis Economics Department Honors Thesis
Earnings Announcement and Abnormal Return of S&P 500 Companies Luke Qiu Washington University in St. Louis Economics Department Honors Thesis March 18, 2014 Abstract In this paper, I investigate the extent
More informationDOES HOUSEHOLD DEBT HELP FORECAST CONSUMER SPENDING? Robert G. Murphy Department of Economics Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
DOES HOUSEHOLD DEBT HELP FORECAST CONSUMER SPENDING? By Robert G. Murphy Department of Economics Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 Email: murphyro@bc.edu Revised: December 2000 Keywords : Household
More informationFRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER
FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER 21323 August 19, 213 The Price of Stock and Bond Risk in Recoveries BY SIMON KWAN Investor aversion to risk varies over the course of the economic cycle. In the current recovery,
More informationCHAPTER 15: THE TERM STRUCTURE OF INTEREST RATES
CHAPTER 15: THE TERM STRUCTURE OF INTEREST RATES 1. Expectations hypothesis. The yields on longterm bonds are geometric averages of present and expected future short rates. An upward sloping curve is
More informationIt is generally believed that monetary policy
Monetary Policy Actions and LongTerm Interest Rates By V. Vance Roley and Gordon H. Sellon, Jr. It is generally believed that monetary policy actions are transmitted to the economy through their effect
More informationThe Stability of Moving Average Technical Trading Rules on the. Dow Jones Index
The Stability of Moving Average Technical Trading Rules on the Dow Jones Index Blake LeBaron Brandeis University NBER August 1999 Revised: November 1999 Abstract This paper analyzes the behavior of moving
More informationThe Term Structure of the RiskReturn Tradeoff
The Term Structure of the RiskReturn Tradeoff John Y. Campbell and Luis M. Viceira 1 Recent research in empirical finance has documented that expected excess returns on bonds and stocks, real interest
More informationValue versus Growth in the UK Stock Market, 1955 to 2000
Value versus Growth in the UK Stock Market, 1955 to 2000 Elroy Dimson London Business School Stefan Nagel London Business School Garrett Quigley Dimensional Fund Advisors May 2001 Work in progress Preliminary
More informationBooth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2015, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2015, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Midterm Problem A: (30 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. Each question has
More informationCurriculum Vitae ROBERT F. STAMBAUGH. Ph.D., University of Chicago, 1981, finance and econometrics.
Curriculum Vitae ROBERT F. STAMBAUGH Finance Department The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 191046367 (215) 8985734 (voice) (215) 8986200 (fax) stambaugh@wharton.upenn.edu
More informationOptimization of technical trading strategies and the profitability in security markets
Economics Letters 59 (1998) 249 254 Optimization of technical trading strategies and the profitability in security markets Ramazan Gençay 1, * University of Windsor, Department of Economics, 401 Sunset,
More informationAutocorrelation in Daily Stock Returns
Autocorrelation in Daily Stock Returns ANÓNIO CERQUEIRA ABSRAC his paper examines the roles of spread and gradual incorporation of common information in the explanation of the autocorrelation in daily
More informationAutomation, Stock Market Volatility and RiskReturn Relationship: Evidence from CATS
136 Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 3/2005 Automation, Stock Market Volatility and RiskReturn Relationship: Evidence from CATS Ata Assaf Abstract We employ GARCH (p,q) and GARCH (p,q)m
More informationAustralian Implied Volatility Index
Key words: stock market volatility; S&P/ASX 200 Index; ValueatRisk; options pricing models Australian Implied Volatility Index Volatility implied from option prices is widely regarded as the market s
More informationVariance swaps and CBOE S&P 500 variance futures
Variance swaps and CBOE S&P 500 variance futures by Lewis Biscamp and Tim Weithers, Chicago Trading Company, LLC Over the past several years, equityindex volatility products have emerged as an asset class
More informationCHAPTER 15: THE TERM STRUCTURE OF INTEREST RATES
CHAPTER : THE TERM STRUCTURE OF INTEREST RATES CHAPTER : THE TERM STRUCTURE OF INTEREST RATES PROBLEM SETS.. In general, the forward rate can be viewed as the sum of the market s expectation of the future
More informationFactorGARCH Modeling of the Treasury Term Structure
actorgarc Modeling of the Treasury Term Structure Christopher. aum asma ekdache Department of Economics Department of Economics oston College Wayne State University Chestnut ill MA 02167 Detroit MI 48202
More informationDecimalization and market liquidity
Decimalization and market liquidity Craig H. Furfine On January 29, 21, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) implemented decimalization. Beginning on that Monday, stocks began to be priced in dollars and
More informationBOND RETURN PREDICTABILITY: AN INVESTIGATION FOR THE EUROPEAN MARKET. Florinda C. C. Campos Silva * fsilva@eeg.uminho.pt
BOND RETURN PREDICTABILITY: AN INVESTIGATION FOR THE EUROPEAN MARKET Florinda C. C. Campos Silva * fsilva@eeg.uminho.pt Maria Ceu Cortez * mccortez@eeg.uminho.pt Manuel J. Rocha Armada * rarmada@eeg.uminho.pt
More informationPredicting the US Real GDP Growth Using Yield Spread of Corporate Bonds
International Department Working Paper Series 00E3 Predicting the US Real GDP Growth Using Yield Spread of Corporate Bonds Yoshihito SAITO yoshihito.saitou@boj.or.jp Yoko TAKEDA youko.takeda@boj.or.jp
More informationEVALUATION OF THE PAIRS TRADING STRATEGY IN THE CANADIAN MARKET
EVALUATION OF THE PAIRS TRADING STRATEGY IN THE CANADIAN MARKET By Doris SiyYap PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Approval
More informationLIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES INVESTING IN HIGHYIELD BONDS
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES INVESTING IN HIGHYIELD BONDS by Faye S. Albert and Paulette Johnson September, 1999 Society of Actuaries 475 N. Martingale Road Suite 800 Schaumburg, Illinois 601732226 Phone:
More information2. Discuss the implications of the interest rate parity for the exchange rate determination.
CHAPTER 6 INTERNATIONAL PARITY RELATIONSHIPS AND FORECASTING FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES SUGGESTED ANSWERS AND SOLUTIONS TO ENDOFCHAPTER QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS QUESTIONS 1. Give a full definition of arbitrage.
More informationA Panel Data Analysis of Corporate Attributes and Stock Prices for Indian Manufacturing Sector
Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, ISSN 15486583 November 2013, Vol. 9, No. 11, 15191525 D DAVID PUBLISHING A Panel Data Analysis of Corporate Attributes and Stock Prices for Indian Manufacturing
More informationTHE ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FORECAST BIAS
Forthcoming in Advances in Futures and Options Research THE ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FORECAST BIAS OF S&P 100 INDEX OPTION IMPLIED VOLATILITY Jeff Fleming * Jones Graduation School of Management Rice
More informationThe relationship between exchange rates, interest rates. In this lecture we will learn how exchange rates accommodate equilibrium in
The relationship between exchange rates, interest rates In this lecture we will learn how exchange rates accommodate equilibrium in financial markets. For this purpose we examine the relationship between
More informationRobustness of the LjungBox Test and its Rank Equivalent
Robustness of the Test and its Rank Equivalent Patrick Burns patrick@burnsstat.com http://www.burnsstat.com This Draft: 6 October 2002 Abstract: The test is known to be robust. This paper reports on
More informationA comparison between different volatility models. Daniel Amsköld
A comparison between different volatility models Daniel Amsköld 211 6 14 I II Abstract The main purpose of this master thesis is to evaluate and compare different volatility models. The evaluation is based
More informationDiscussion of Momentum and Autocorrelation in Stock Returns
Discussion of Momentum and Autocorrelation in Stock Returns Joseph Chen University of Southern California Harrison Hong Stanford University Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) document individual stock momentum:
More informationDOWNSIDE RISK IMPLICATIONS FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ROBERT ENGLE PRAGUE MARCH 2005
DOWNSIDE RISK IMPLICATIONS FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ROBERT ENGLE PRAGUE MARCH 2005 RISK AND RETURN THE TRADEOFF BETWEEN RISK AND RETURN IS THE CENTRAL PARADIGM OF FINANCE. HOW MUCH RISK AM I TAKING? HOW
More informationDeterminants of shortterm debt financing
ABSTRACT Determinants of shortterm debt financing Richard H. Fosberg William Paterson University In this study, it is shown that both theories put forward to explain the amount of shortterm debt financing
More informationDepartment of Economics and Related Studies Financial Market Microstructure. Topic 1 : Overview and Fixed Cost Models of Spreads
Session 20082009 Department of Economics and Related Studies Financial Market Microstructure Topic 1 : Overview and Fixed Cost Models of Spreads 1 Introduction 1.1 Some background Most of what is taught
More informationVolatility spillovers among the Gulf Arab emerging markets
University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong in Dubai  Papers University of Wollongong in Dubai 2010 Volatility spillovers among the Gulf Arab emerging markets Ramzi Nekhili University
More informationPITFALLS IN TIME SERIES ANALYSIS. Cliff Hurvich Stern School, NYU
PITFALLS IN TIME SERIES ANALYSIS Cliff Hurvich Stern School, NYU The t Test If x 1,..., x n are independent and identically distributed with mean 0, and n is not too small, then t = x 0 s n has a standard
More informationReal Estate Closedend Funds and Exchange Traded Funds: A Style Analysis and Return Attribution. Marta Charrón, Ph.D.
Real Estate Closedend Funds and Exchange Traded Funds: A Style Analysis and Return Attribution Marta Charrón, Ph.D. Real Estate Closedend Funds and Exchange Traded Funds: A Style Analysis and Return
More informationOn the Predictive Power of the Implied Correlation Index
On the Predictive Power of the Implied Correlation Index Hongtao Zhou Job Market Paper Abstract This paper explores the forecasting power of the ICJ index, i.e. the S&P 500 Implied Correlation Index, for
More informationReal Estate Returns in Public and Private Markets
Real Estate Returns in Public and Private Markets The NCREIF Property Index understates the return volatility of commercial properties. JOSEPH GYOURKO PRIOR TO THE 1990S, commercial real estate was undoubtedly
More informationInternet Appendix to. Why does the Option to Stock Volume Ratio Predict Stock Returns? Li Ge, TseChun Lin, and Neil D. Pearson.
Internet Appendix to Why does the Option to Stock Volume Ratio Predict Stock Returns? Li Ge, TseChun Lin, and Neil D. Pearson August 9, 2015 This Internet Appendix provides additional empirical results
More informationWORKING PAPER CENTRAL BANK OF ICELAND. A Variance Decomposition of IndexLinked Bond Returns. No. 57. By Francis Breedon
WORKING PAPER CENTRAL BANK OF ICELAND No. 57 A Variance Decomposition of IndexLinked Bond Returns By Francis Breedon January 2012 Central Bank of Iceland Working Papers are published by the Economics
More informationCHAPTER 15: THE TERM STRUCTURE OF INTEREST RATES
Chapter  The Term Structure of Interest Rates CHAPTER : THE TERM STRUCTURE OF INTEREST RATES PROBLEM SETS.. In general, the forward rate can be viewed as the sum of the market s expectation of the future
More information