1 Exposures from the Events at the NPPs in Fukushima following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Yoshiharu YONEKURA The 58th session of UNSCEAR, 23 rd May, 2011
2 1. Impact on Public & Environment 1A. Evacuation & Sheltering during the accident 2B. Radiation exposure to residents and workers 3C. Directives on foods and drinks
3 1A. Evacuation & Sheltering (1/4) 21:23 on March11, evacuation of residents within 3km radius from Unit 1 of 1F NPP 5:44 on March 12, evacuation within 10km radius from 1F NPP 17:39 on March 12, evacuation within 10 km radius from 2F NPP 18:25 on March 12, evacuation within 20 km radius from 1F NPP On March 15, in house stay was directed for the residents from 20 to 30 km radius from 1F NPP On March 15th, the Local Emergency Response Headquarter issued the direction to administer the stable Iodine during evacuation On March 25th, Chief Cabinet Secretary, Edano promoted voluntary evacuations for the residents within the area from 20 km to 30 km from 1F NPP
4 1A. Evacuation & Sheltering (2/4) On April 21 st, the Prime Minister issued the following instruction to the Governor of Fukushima prefecture. < 1F NPP > to establish a restricted area within 20km radius from 1F NPP to prohibit the access to the area < 2F NPP > to change the evacuation area from 10km radius to 8km radius from 2F NPP. Source: METI
5 1A. Evacuation & Sheltering during the accident (3/4) <1F NPPs> On April 22 nd to lift the area of in house stay between 20km and 30km radius from 1F NPP to establish Deliberate Evacuation Area as well as Evacuation Prepared Area in case of Emergency for the residents and others to make a preparation to enable deliberate leaving Deliberate Evacuation Area Evacuation-Prepared Area Source: METI
6 1A. Evacuation & Sheltering (4/4) A) Deliberate Evacuation Area As there is a threat that the accumulated dose reaches 20mSv in a year since the occurrence of the accident, it is requested for the residents and others to evacuate. The reference level of the radiation protection in the situation of emergency exposure of ICRP and IAEA (20 to 100mSv) was considered. B) Evacuation Prepared Area in Case of Emergency Since the situation caused by the accident of 1F NPPs has not been settled down, the possibility of requiring actions such as evacuation or in house stay in cases of emergency cannot be denied hereafter. Therefore in the Evacuation Prepared Area in case of Emergency, it is required for the residents to stay inside the house or to prepare for emergency evacuation by themselves.
7 1B. Radiation exposure to residents and workers (1/2) (Residents) 1) Local Emergency Response Headquarters started radiation screening, from March 12 th to 15 th, for 162 residents, and 41 of those were above the initial screening level of 6,000 cpm. 2) Local Government started the screening, from March 13 th, for the public at 11 places such as health offices. 3) Among 188,758 people who received screening, 102 persons were above the 100,000 cpm, but when measured these people again without contaminated clothes, etc, the counts decreased to below 100,000 cpm, and there was no case with health problems. 4) Thyroid accumulation of I 131 was measured in more than 1,000 children (age below 15), showing no cases of thyroid dose above 50 msv.
8 1B. Radiation exposure to residents and workers (2/2) Regulation on the dose limit for emergency workers was changed from 100 msv to 250 msv on March 14 th (Exposure of Workers) Total of 30 people had exposure dose above 100mSv. On March24, dosage above 170 msv was confirmed on 3 workers. Contamination of radioactive liquid on the skin of both legs was confirmed on two of them. Examination showed that none of them had any major systemic risk. Exposure dose on the legs was initially estimated to be maximum of 2 3 Sv to skin, but revealed much lower later. While the level of leg and internal exposure did not require treatment, they were hospitalized for follow up and discharged without heath problem on March 28.
9 1C. Directives on foods and drinks Provisional regulation values of radioactive materials in food. Radioactive iodine ( 131 I) Radioactive cesium (Sum of 134 Cs and 137 Cs) Uranium Alpha emitting nuclides of plutonium and transuranic elements ( 238 Pu, 239 Pu, 240 Pu, 242 Pu, 241 Am, 242 Cm, 243 Cm, 244 Cm) Provisional regulation values of radioactive materials in food in accordance with the Food Sanitation Act (Bq/kg) Drinking water, Milk, dairy products* 300 Vegetables, Fish 2,000 Drinking water, Milk, dairy products 200 Vegetables, Grains, Meat, eggs, fish, etc. 500 Infant foods, Drinking water, Milk, dairy products 20 Vegetables, Grains, Meat, eggs, fish, etc. 100 Infant foods, Drinking water, Milk, dairy products 1 Vegetables, Grains, Meat, eggs, fish, etc. 10 *)Provide guidance so that materials exceeding 100 Bq/kg are not used in milk supplied for use in powdered baby formula or for direct drinking.
10 2. Radiation Monitoring 2A.Guideline for Radiation Monitoring in Japan 2B. Overview of radiation monitoring around the Fukushima-I NPP 2C. On-site monitoring 2D. Off-site monitoring 2E. Aerial monitoring 2F. Sea monitoring 2G. Build-up of monitoring system for the future
11 2A. Guideline for Radiation Monitoring in Japan (1/3) Rational 1) In case of nuclear accident, the regulatory body, the provincial government and the nuclear operator must take measures on necessary disaster prevention according to the Act on Special Measures Concerning Nuclear Emergency Preparedness. 2) As part of this disaster measures, the emergency environmental radiation monitoring act is to be taken, in order to obtain the information on radioactive materials and radiation doses in the environment. 3) The Guideline for Emergency Environmental Radiation Monitoring have been established by Nuclear Safety Commission. In this guidance, the organization of monitoring team, radiation measuring instruments and materials and equipment for nuclear disaster prevention, and guidance for monitoring are prescribed.
12 2A. Guideline for Radiation Monitoring in Japan (2/3) 4) With regard to the practical procedures, authorized standard operation procedures have been already prepared and a series of emergency environmental radiation monitoring is to be operated in accordance with these procedures. 5) The operation of environmental, personal and contamination monitoring must be entirely made by nuclear operators and regulatory authorities, using well calibrated radiation measuring instruments, in accordance with the approved programs on radiation protection activities by regulatory body. 6) Calibrations of the measuring instruments is appropriately performed by accredited calibration bodies using radiation and radioactive standards which are traceable to the national standards.
13 2A. Guideline for Radiation Monitoring in Japan (3/3) Monitoring after Earthquake and Tsunami Emergency environmental monitoring around Fukushima I NPP, personal monitoring for staffs and contamination monitoring programs for workers and members in public, have been operated, using the equipment which has not been damaged. However, many radiation measuring instruments have been severely damaged, particularly at the NPP site. On the other hand, many instruments were delivered to Fukushima area and used for screening and monitoring by cooperating teams from the universities, hospitals, and other organization. Therefore, radiation measuring instruments which are not properly calibrated might have been used in emergency situation.
14 2B. Overview of radiation monitoring around 1F NPP Parameters; - Ambient dose rate - Radioactive concentration of fallout - Radioactive concentration of drinking water Sea area Monitoring ( km off shore ) Aerial Monitoring ( 80 km ) Off-site Monitoring ( 20 km ) 1F 2F Food & Drinks 10km On-site Monitoring Daily results of environmental monitoring by MEXT is updated at
15 2C. On site Monitoring (1/5) 1. Trend of on site radiation level 11,930 µsv/h was recorded near front gate on March 15th. Ambient Dose rate (µsv/h) 1F Monitoring Trend Near NearFront FrontGate Gate North of Admin. Bldg. South of Admin. Bldg. Near MP-4 Date / Time
16 2C. On site Monitoring (2/5) 2. Radioactive concentration in the air TEPCO conducted nuclide analyses of radioactive materials contained in the air which were collected at the site of 1F NPP. Source:
17 2C. On site Monitoring (3/5) 3. Radioactive concentration in soil samples Detected amount of Pu 238 is the same levei as that of the fallout in Japan by previous nuclear tests. Although Pu 238, 239, and Pu 240 are detected from the samples taken on and after March 21, those values have not been greatly changed. Sampling spot ( ): Distance from the stack of Unit 1, 2 1Playground (west-northwest approx. 500m) 2Forest of wild birds (west approx. 500m) 3Adjacent to industrial waste disposal facility (south-southwest approx.500m) Date of sampling/ Analyses organization Pu-238 Pu-239, Pu-240 April 25/ JCAC (1.1±0.12) 10-1 (4.6±0.74) 10-2 N.D. N.D. (Unit: Bq/kg Dry soil) N.D. N.D. Soil in Japan * N.D.~ N.D.~ *: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Environmental Radiation Database,
18 2C. On site Monitoring (4/5) 4. Radioactive concentration in subsurface water near the turbine building of 1F In order to verify any leakages to underground and sea, and safety, TEPCO have been implementing the sampling survey of subsurface water and seawater. 1F NPP : Results of Nuclide Analysis of Sub-drain (Data summarized on May 12) Place of sampling Sub drain of Unit1 Sub drain of Unit2 Sub drain of Unit3 Sub drain of Unit4 Sub drain of Unit5 Sub drain of Unit6 Deep well Time of sampling Detected Nuclides 14:03, 14:08, 14:16, 14:25, 13:35, 13:23, 10:10, May 11 th May 11 th May 11 th May 11 th May 11 th May 11 th May 11 th Radioactivity Density of Sample (Bq/cm3) I E E E 01 ND ND 2.2E 02 ND Cs E E E E 02 ND 4.6E 02 ND Cs E E E E E E 02 ND
19 2C. On site Monitoring (5/5) 5. Out flow of fluid containing radioactive materials to the ocean from areas near intake canal of 1F Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 At 9:30 am on April 2nd, 2011, TEPCO detected water containing radiation dose over 1,000 msv/h in the pit* where power supply cables are stored near the intake channel of Unit 2. Furthermore, there was a crack of about 20 cm length on the concrete lateral of the pit, from where the water in the pit was out flowing out. At 5:38 am on April 6th, TEPCO have observed stopping of spilling of water to the ocean from the crack on the concrete lateral of the pit. * In addition to above place of collection, Data are summarized for other Units.
20 Place of Collection Time of sampling Detected nuclide Shallow Draft Quay 2C. On site Monitoring (5/5) North intake canal (U 1 4) (outside the silt fence) Unit 1 (outside the silt fence) Unit 1 (inside the silt fence) Unit 2 (outside the silt fence) 6:55 7:09 6:20 6:15 7:18 May 12 th May 12 th May 12 th May 12 th May 12 th Bq/cm 3 (Q) < Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (1F) > Q/L Bq/cm3 (Q) Q/L Bq/cm3 (Q) Q/L Bq/cm3 (Q) (Data summarized on May 13) Q/L Bq/cm3 (Q) Q/L Limit by Regulation (Bq/cm 3 ) (L) I E E E E E E 02 Cs E E E E E E 02 Cs E E E E E E 02
21 1. Radiation monitoring 2. Cumulative doses measured 3. Radioactive concentration of Land samples (Weed, Soil, pond water) 4. Radioactive concentration of Dust samples 5. Air borne monitoring by MEXT and US DOE 6. Sea area monitoring 2D. Off site Monitoring
22 1. Radiation monitoring 2D. Off site Monitoring Source: MEXT
23 1. Radiation monitoring 2D. Off site Monitoring Overall radiation level has tended down since March 17 th. The highest value recorded at Monitoring Point #32 has peaked out at 170 μsv/h and has been declining since then. 30km from 1F In NW direction 30km from 1F In NW direction Mar. 17 th Apr. 1 st May. 1 st Ambient dose rate monitoring at monitoring post outside of 20km zone of 1F Source: MEXT
24 2D. Off site Monitoring 2. Cumulative doses measured Radiation level cumulatively measured since March 23 th topped 28,680μSv at #32, 30km North West from 1F. Source: MEXT
25 2E. Air borne monitoring by MEXT and U.S. DOE (1/2) < 1.0 No Data 1F NPP Assessment of ambient dose rate on 1 m from the ground surface and Cesium deposition inside the 80 km zone of 1F was carried out. 20km 30km 60km 80km The map was prepared based on results obtained from April 6 th to 29 th by a small airplane and two helicopters, in total of 42 flights. Decay of radioactive substances was considered and actual readings were converted into values as of the last survey date of April 29 th. Source: MEXT
26 2E. Air borne monitoring by MEXT and U.S. DOE (2/2) 20km 30km 3E+6 3E+7 1E+6 3E+6 6E+5 1E+6 3E+5 6E+5 < 3E+5 No Data 1F NPP 60km The deposition of Cs-134 in the ground was calculated based on the results of air-borne monitoring and of measurements which DOE took on the ground using a gammaray analysis. Based on the results of DOE measurements of Cs-134 on the ground using a gamma-ray analysis, and analysis values of Cs-137, the deposition of Cs- 137 in the ground was calculated from the results of accumulated Cs km Results of total deposition of Cs 134 and Cs 137 Source: MEXT
27 2F. Sea Area Monitoring 1. Sampling Point of Sea Area Monitoring Source: MEXT MEXT have conducted seawater sampling surveys at 12 points, from surface water (1m from the sea surface) and sub surface (10 m above the sea bottom) around 30km off shore Fukushima Pref. TEPCO have conducted seawater sampling surveys at 4 points, off the shore and 6 points, 15 km off the shore of 1F. Since April 17, TEPCO have also conducted sampling surveys at 4 points, 3 km off the shore and two points, 8 km off the shore of 1F.
28 2F. Sea Area Monitoring 2. Radioactive Concentration of Seawater at South Discharge Channel of 1F (Bq/cm 3 ) Radioactive concentration in seawater (Bq/cm 3 ) I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Month / Date Source:
29 2G. Build up of monitoring system for future Main Analytical Body of Monitoring by MEXT National Institute of Radiological Sciences Japan Atomic Energy Agency Japan Agency for Marine-earth Science and Tecnology Nuclear Safety Technology Center Japan Chemical Analysis Center Universities etc. U.S. Department of Energy (Aerial monitoring) Strengthen monitoring by MEXT in response to the Enforced Plan on Environmental Monitoring - Off-site Monitoring - Aerial Monitoring - Sea Area Monitoring - Construct distribution map for ambient dose rate, deposition of I-131, Cs-137, and accumulated dose etc. Soil sampling and analysis will be done by Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, JAEA, and other relating organizations.
30 3. Information Sharing with International Community
31 3. Information sharing with international community 1. Daily Notification by NISA (1) ENAC Website (IAEA) (2) IEC (IAEA) (3) Foreign Media Briefing (4) Briefings for Diplomatic Representatives in Tokyo (5) English information on the Web Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency: Office of Prime Minister: e.html
32 3. Information sharing with international community 2. IAEA (1) Technical Briefing on March 21 st Following the special meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors, NISA officials briefed the member state representatives on the overview of the earthquake itself as well as the status of and ongoing measures to address the Fukushima NPP accident. (2) Side event on the Fukushima Daiichi Accident and Initial Safety Measures Worldwide on April 4 th NISA and MEXT officials explained the member state representatives the Status of Fukushima Daiichi NPPs and monitoring, action taken and Future plan as well as the implementation on emergency safety measures.
33 3. Information sharing with international community 3. ICRP ICRP Main Commission Meeting on April OECD MDEP Steering Technical Committee on April27 29 OECD/NEA Steering Committee on April CNRA Highlevel Senior Task Group on May 4 6 OECD/NEA 69 th CRPPH meeting on May WHO 63 rd World Health Assembly on May Technical briefing on May 17
34 Summary After the great earthquake and tsunami in eastern Japan, the NPP (Fukushima Daiichi) was severely damaged and a significant amount of radioactive material was released to the environment. In order to limit and reduce the exposures, counter measures including evacuation from surrounding area, sheltering, restrictions on consumption of water and certain food products were taken by the government. With regard to the workers, operational staff and emergency response personnel were exposed to certain levels of radiation in managing the emergency situation. Since there has been much concern about the levels of exposure and effects both on general public and workers, we are prepared to collect and offer further information, hoping to share the experience and knowledge of the accident with the international community.
V. Response to the nuclear emergency 1. Emergency response after the accident occurred (1) Establishment of organizations and instruction for evacuation etc. 1) Initial response etc. pursuant to the Act
May 6, 2011 Results of Airborne Monitoring by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the U.S. Department of Energy The results of the Airborne Monitoring by the Ministry
NE/NEFW/2013 ORIGINAL: English 23.01.2014 Final Report The Follow-up IAEA International Mission on Remediation of Large Contaminated Areas Off-Site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Tokyo and Fukushima
Attachment VI-1 SPEEDI trial estimation of total discharge of radioactive nuclides Although accurately estimating the amount of radioactive materials discharged by the accident that occurred at Fukushima
Appendix 1-2 Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, TEPCO Progress Status July 19 th, 2011 Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters Government-TEPCO Integrated
Damage of Fukushima Nuclear Accident and a new compensation scheme Kenichi Oshima College of International Relations, Ritsumeikan University SPRU, University of Sussex email@example.com 1 Contents
August 22, 201 Nuclear Accident Response Office, Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, METI Fact sheet: overview of contaminated ground water leakage at TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi NPS On June 19, 201,
September 21, 2011 Preparation of Distribution Map of Radiation Doses, etc. (Map of Iodine 131 Concentration in Soil) by MEXT Concerning the distribution maps of radiation doses, etc. (soil concentration
Nuclear Safety Regulation Reform in Japan 18th January 2012 Shuichi KANEKO Cabinet Secretariat Government of JAPAN 1 Contents Background of the Reform Process of the Reform Basic System for Nuclear Safety
Fukushima Accident: Radioactive Releases and Potential Dose Consequences Peter F. Caracappa, Ph.D., CHP Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ANS Annual Meeting Special Session: The Accident at Fukushima Daiichi
Overview of the Multi-nuclide Removal Equipment (ALPS) at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station March 29, 2013 Tokyo Electric Power Company Purpose of Installing the Multi-nuclide Removal Equipment Installation
Policy elements for post-accident management in the event of a nuclear accident: The French approach Jean-Christophe Niel Director general Autorité de sûreté nucléaire (ASN) Introduction (The CODIRPA activities)
Decontamination Project in Fukushima Prefecture Conducted by Japanese Government Masaru Moriya Chief of Fukushima Decontamination Team Acting Superintended of Fukushima Office for Environmental Restoration,
< Reference > November 26, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 1-3 Evaluation method of the present amount of radioactive material released from the Reactor Building
Extract August 16, 2011 Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency Seismic Damage Information (the 231st Release) (As of 14:00 August 16, 2011) The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) confirmed the current
III. Emergency Responses Required and Taken by Governments and Other Bodies 1. Emergency responses mandated in the Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Act, the Basic Plan for Emergency Preparedness, etc. (1)
Provisional Translation Basic Policy for the Contaminated Water Issue at the TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station September 3, 2013 Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters 1. Basic Policy The
Final Report on the Accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company --- Recommendations --- Investigation Committee on the Accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo
TOKAI-MURA ACCIDENT, JAPAN THIRD PARTY LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION ASPECTS* Summary of events The accident On 30 September 1999, at 10.35, Japan s first criticality accident occurred in a conversion test
Evaluation of the report of the Tokyo Electric Power Company regarding the leakage from the double strainer differential manometer for the water transfer pipes of the desalination system at Fukushima Daiichi
Atoms for Peace Board of Governors General Conference GOV/2011/59-GC(55)/14 Date: 5 September 2011 For official use only Item 3(b) of the Board's provisional agenda (GOV/2011/46) Item 14(b) of the Conference's
DOI: 10.15669/pnst.4.76 Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology Volume 4 (2014) pp. 76-80 ARTICLE The aerial radiation monitoring in Japan after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident Yukihisa
The integrity evaluation of the reactor building at unit4 in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station May 2012 Government and TEPCO s Mid-to Long Term Countermeasure Meeting Management Council Outline
Legislation in Ukraine about the Radiological Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident Oleg NASVIT Institute of Hydrobiology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 12 pr. Geroev Stalingrada, Kyiv 254210,
ICRP symposium 2013 Experience and current issues with recovery management from the Fukushima accident Michiaki KAI ICRP C4 member Oita University of Nursing and Health Sciences April 29, 2011 Aerial Survey
Elements of the Russian Emergency Preparedness Program Randolph L. Sullivan, NRC National Radiological EP Conference St. Louis, Missouri March 2006 2 3 4 5 6 Volgodonsk NPP 1000 MWe VVER, a PWR Large Staff
Supplementary Document 1 Research and Development Road Map for Decommissioning Units 1 4 at TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant July 30, 2012 Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters Government-TEPCO
Science, Values and Stakeholder Dialogue: NEA Experience in Fukushima Dr Ted Lazo Radiation Protection and Radioactive Waste Management Division International Experts Meeting on Radiation Protection after
Seminar Das Japan-Cockpit für Schweizer KMU. Sicher auf dem Erfolgspfad navigieren Recovering situation and imports from Japan Zurich, May 11, 2011 Michiaki Watanabe, Director General, JETRO Switzerland
National Emergency Plan for Nuclear Accidents December 2005 Contents Foreword 1 What type of occurrence does the plan provide for? 2 How would people in Ireland be affected? 2 How will the alarm be raised?
Radioprotection 2013 Vol. 48, n o 5, pages S117 à S123 DOI: 10.1051/radiopro/20139918 Case studies in national experiences Assessment of environmental radiation monitoring data in Hungary following the
Contents 1 Effort for New Regulatory Requirements ( 1 ) Overview of a Gist of New Regulatory Requirements in Nuclear Regulation Authority ( 2 ) Major Requirements of a Gist of New Regulatory Requirements
1 J7-TM-44883 Technical Meeting on the Implications of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident on the Safety of Fuel Cycle Facilities IAEA Headquarters Vienna, Austria 1 5 July 2013 INFORMATION SHEET 1. Background
Software platforms for Collecting, Managing and Providing Monitoring Data for Food and Agricultural Products Japan Atomic Energy Agency Center for Computational Science and E-systems Hiroshi Takemiya Observed
NE/NEFW/2011 ORIGINAL: English Summary Report of the Preliminary Findings of the IAEA Mission on remediation of large contaminated areas off-site the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP 7 15 October 2011, Japan 14.
IAEA MINISTE ERIAL CONFE RENCEE ON NUCLEAR SAFETY Vienna,, 20 24 June 2011 CHAIRPERSONS SUMM MARIES 1 The attached texts are the Chairpersons summaries of the main proposals that emerged from the Working
CB(1)1882/10-11(01) Information Note Introduction Panel on Economic Development Radiation monitoring after the Japanese Fukushima nuclear power plant incident The Hong Kong Observatory (HKO) started monitoring
Impact on marine environment of radioactive releases resulting from the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear accident 4th April 2011 Measurements taken over several days in the sea water in the vicinity of the power
Tohoku University and the Great East Japan Earthquake Our Role, Responsibility and Mission Susumu SATOMI President, Tohoku University 1 The Great East Japan Earthquake: Outline Multi hazards Mega Earthquake,
Start of introducing ICP MS method for analyzing water samples for Strontium November 27, 2014 Tokyo Electric Power Company 1. Current Strontium analysis and introduction of various methods Strontium analysis
Progress on Off-site Cleanup and Interim Storage in Japan June 2016 Ministry of the Environment, Japan Outline 1. Policy Framework 2. Progress in Special Decontamination Area (directly conducted by the
RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION OF WOOD IN LITHUANIA L. Pilkytė, R. Ladygienė, A. Orentienė, A. Skripkienė Radiation Protection Centre Lithuania CONTENT OF PRESENTATION Sources of radioactive contamination Methods
National Report Date: 20 August 2004 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY IN NORWAY. The third Norwegian Report in Accordance with Article 5 of the Convention. National
March 13 th of March, 2014 Yoshiharu TACHIBANA Visiting Researcher Graduate School of Public Policy The University of Tokyo firstname.lastname@example.org Death 15,884(March 11 th,2011) Still missing 2,633(2014)
Decommissioning situation of Nuclear Power Plant in Japan April, 2015 The Japan Atomic Power Co. The Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. General Description 1 Operational years of commercial NPP in Japan 40
Training Meeting on Post-Fukushima Research and Development Strategies and Priorities IAEA Headquarters Vienna, Austria 15 18 December 2015 Ref. No.: 622-I3-TR-48057 Information Sheet A. Background Against
RADIATION MONITORING NETWORK OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC Petr Kuča, Leoš Novák, Petr Rulík, Josef Tecl National Radiation Protection Institute, Prague, Czech Republic Introduction The Radiation Monitoring Network
United States Office of Radiation and October 1998 Environmental Protection Indoor Air Agency Radiation and Indoor Environments National Laboratory Radiation and Indoor Environments National Laboratory
Five Myths About the Fukushima Disaster By Robert Singleton and Karen Hadden Sustainable Energy & Economic Development (SEED) Coalition Not long after the 9.0 earthquake and subsequent tsunami struck Japan
EMERGENCY RESPONSE FOR THE AREA SURROUNDING THE CATTENOM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Information for the population in Rhineland-Palatinate Issued by: Supervision and Service Directorate (ADD) Willy- Brandt- Platz
JAPAN-U.S. DECOMISSIONING AND REMEDIATION FUKUSHIMA RECOVERY FORUM February 19, 2014 Senior Fellow, Nuclear Energy Systems & Services Division Power Systems Company Toshiba global formation Information
Guidelines for applying to the Validation of technologies for contaminated water management project in the FY2013 Supplementary Budget Date: March 24, 2014 Management Office for the Project of decommissioning
Nuclear Emergency Response Program NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS In California, there are two operating nuclear power plant sites: Diablo Canyon in San Luis Obispo County has two active units and San Onofre Nuclear
Assessment of the impact on Australia from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident Julia Carpenter and Rick Tinker Technical Report Series No. 162 Assessment of the impact on Australia from
Provisional Translation Document 1, The 7th Meeting, Working Group on Voluntary Efforts and Continuous Improvement of Nuclear Safety, Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy Working Group on
Provisional Translation Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management National Report of Japan for the Second Review Meeting October 2005 Government
APPENDIX 10 Normally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) Contents A10.1 Introduction... A10/3 A10.2 Occurrence & Concentration of NORM in Oil and Gas Operations... A10/4 A10.2.1 Probability of NORM formation
Provisional Translation Specific Information on the Restriction of Electricity Use under the Electricity Business Act May 25, 2011 Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry 1. Subjects to the restriction
NUCLEAR POWER INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN VIETNAM AND HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT FOR NUCLEAR POWER 1 Dr. HOANG Anh Tuan Director General, Vietnam Atomic Energy Agency ATOMEXPO 2015 Moscow, 2 June 2015
Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 Accident line Date 3/11 14:46 0:00 Reactor SCRAM (large earthquake acceleration) Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety The Accident
L 296/12 Official Journal of the European Union 7.11.2013 DIRECTIVES COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2013/51/EURATOM of 22 October 2013 laying down requirements for the protection of the health of the general public
The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Technical Volume 5/5 Post-accident Recovery THE FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI ACCIDENT TECHNICAL VOLUME 5 POST-ACCIDENT RECOVERY i The following States are Members of the International
For Safe Travel in Japan List the below links for the latest information. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA (English) http://www.iaea.org/ http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate01.html
Japanese Requirements for Wind Turbine TÜV Rheinland Japan Presented by; Yoshihiro Sugita TUV Rheinland Japan Industrial Services Date: 01. August Sep. 2014 Contents 1.Introduction of TÜV Rheinland 2.Strategic
Engineered Media for Removal of Fission Products from Aqueous Streams 14580 Abigail Holmquist, UOP - A Honeywell Company ABSTRACT Nuclear fission products from fuel have the potential to be released into
Sino-Italian Cooperation Project Role and tasks of Arpa Piemonte in controlling and monitoring of ionizing and non ionizing radiation G.. d Amored Environmental Protection Agency of Piedmont Region (ARPA
RC-17 Radiation Protection in Waste Management and Disposal Implementing the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management Alejandro V. Nader
Questionnaire for NORM service providers This questionnaire is intended for institutes and companies providing services relevant for NORM industries in Belgium. Its objective is to give to Belgian NORM
Report A comparison of U.S. and Japanese regulatory requirements in effect at the time of the Fukushima accident November 2013 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the Staff Requirements Memo (SRM) to SECY-12-0110
MELODI Workshop, 8-10 October 2013, Brussels Response of to the Fukushima Nuclear Accident in the Context of the Protection of Belgian Citizens Johan Camps Crisis Management and Decision support unit Belgian
Environmental Remediation Examples and Remediation Strategic Planning Yasuo Onishi (email@example.com) October 16, 2011 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and Washington State University, Civil
Evaluación de riesgo sobre la salud en respuesta al accidente de Fukushima-Daiichi Dra Maria del Rosario Pérez Departamento de Salud Pública y Medio Ambiente WHO Response to Fukushima accident Headquarters
Nuclear Regulatory Organization Changes in Korea January 18, 2012 Yong Ho RYU, Ph.D. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety http://www.kins.re.kr 1 Background Concerns about regulatory independence in Korea
1 Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies Base line data collection will be collected for the Post-Monsoon season 2016 (September to November 2016) in study area and 10 kms radius from project site.
centre for radiation protection To excel in radiation science so as to: enforce and promote the radiation safety of workers, the public and the environment; ensure that irradiating apparatus and nuclear
SAMPLE FRACTION MITIGATION CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR DIRECTIONAL DRILLING 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction and Purpose 3 2.0 Description of Work 3 3.0 Site Supervisor/Foremen Responsibilities 4 4.0 Equipment