ASBESTOS SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT REPORT

Transcription

1 ASBESTOS SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT REPORT BUILDING NUMBER: 4194 BUILDING NAME: FT. PIERCE CITGO SERVICE STATION BUILDING ADDRESS (SR/MP): CITY/COUNTY: AGENCY: DISTRICT: DATE OF SURVEY: FT. PIERCE/ST. LUCIE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FLORIDA S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE OCTOBER 12, 2006 AND OCTOBER 19, 2006 CONTRACT #: C Southwest 19 th Street Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Corporate Phone: 954/ Fax: 866/ CONSULTANT NAME: CONSULTANT ADDRESS: TRACI-ANNE BOYLE, CIH CONSULTANT TELEPHONE: CONSULTANT FACSIMILE: AIRQUEST ENVIRONMENTAL, INC SOUTHWEST 19 TH STREET FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA Air Nationwide Toll Free Phone: 877/ Fax: 866/ uest Environmental, Inc. TRACI-ANNE BOYLE, CIH FLORIDA LICENSED ASBESTOS CONSULTANT AX-60 ASBESTOS CONSULTING BUSINESS ZA-304

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AirQuest Environmental, Inc. was contracted to conduct an asbestos survey within Florida Turnpike Building 4194, Florida Department of Transportation Ft. Pierce Citgo Service Station, located on State Road 91 at mile marker 144. The purpose of this survey was to identify asbestos-containing materials within accessible areas of the interior, exterior and roof of the building. Destructive sampling procedures were not used to access the interior of wall cavities or fire doors. The roofs above the two (2) diesel fuel pump islands were not included within the scope of this survey. Any suspect materials not identified in this survey (including roofing materials above the two (2) diesel fuel pump islands, fire door insulation and caulking, insulation, mastic or other materials within wall cavities and walk-in coolers) should be treated as asbestos-containing materials and not disturbed until identified as non-asbestos containing material through sampling and laboratory analysis. All suspect materials that were identified were sampled and analyzed (other than the non-scope materials identified above). The results of the asbestos survey identified the following asbestos containing materials at the site: Homogeneous Area Number 8 Sample No.: , , Material: Silver Built-Up Bituminous Roof Location: Central and South Roof Decks Results: 12% Chrysotile Asbestos Condition: Fair Estimated Quantity: 1,400 Square Feet The silver built-up bituminous roof is in fair condition and is considered to be Category I Nonfriable Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). If non-friable ACM is left undisturbed, it presents a low threat to release harmful asbestos fibers. Non-friable materials should not be removed, cut, or abraded in any way as these activities may result in a significant fiber release episode. If the material will be impacted by renovation, it must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor. If the material will be impacted by demolition, it does not require removal prior to demolition and the building may be demolished with the material in-place. However, the demolition crew must abide by OSHA regulations pertaining to asbestos exposure and the material must be disposed of in an appropriate landfill capable of accepting asbestos containing materials. The owner may consider removal prior to demolition in order to reduce the waste stream requiring asbestos handling and additional disposal costs. Response Options and Cost Estimates are included in Section 2.2. ii

3 Homogeneous Area Number 9 Sample No.: , , Material: Black Tar Roofing Location: South Roof Deck Results: 7% Chrysotile Asbestos Condition: Good Estimated Quantity: 450 Square Feet The black tar roof is in good condition and is considered to be Category I Nonfriable Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). If non-friable ACM is left undisturbed, it presents a low threat to release harmful asbestos fibers. Non-friable materials should not be removed, cut, or abraded in any way as these activities may result in a significant fiber release episode. If the material will be impacted by renovation, it must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor. If the material will be impacted by demolition, it does not require removal prior to demolition and the building may be demolished with the material in-place. However, the demolition crew must abide by OSHA regulations pertaining to asbestos exposure and the material must be disposed of in an appropriate landfill capable of accepting asbestos containing materials. The owner may consider removal prior to demolition in order to reduce the waste stream requiring asbestos handling and additional disposal costs. Response Options and Cost Estimates are included in Section 2.2. iii

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II 1 SECTION FACILITY DESCRIPTION SURVEY METHODS AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS ASBESTOS INSPECTION FORM SECTION ASBESTOS SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT FORM INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR SAMPLE LOCATIONS ROOF SAMPLE LOCATIONS EXTENT OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL 2-7 APPENDICES Appendix I Section 3.0, Photographs Appendix II Section 4.0, Laboratory Report & Chain of Custody Appendix III Section 5.0, Asbestos Form 3, Training Certificates and Credentials iv

5 1 SECTION 1 A survey for asbestos-containing materials (ACM) was conducted within Building 4194, Florida Department of Transportation Ft. Pierce Citgo Service Station located on State Road 91 at mile marker 144 ( the site ). The survey was performed on October 12, 2006 and October 19, 2006 by a certified Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) asbestos inspector. The purpose of this survey was to identify asbestos-containing materials within accessible areas of the interior, exterior and roof of the site. The roofs above the two diesel fuel islands were not included within the scope of this survey. 1.1 FACILITY DESCRIPTION The site is a single story building of approximately 2,705 square feet. The building was constructed in 1957 of concrete block. The exterior walls, roof deck and floor were constructed of concrete. 1.2 SURVEY METHODS AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS The sampling protocol used in this asbestos survey are those detailed in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part for the sampling of friable surfacing materials, thermal systems insulation and miscellaneous materials (i.e. ceiling tiles). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations require that sample locations be randomly selected. Suspect Asbestos Containing Building Materials (ACBM) were identified and samples of each different type of material were obtained. The bulk sampling procedure utilized for the collection of samples suspected of being ACBM required the establishment of homogeneous sampling areas. A homogeneous sampling area is defined as an area of friable or non-friable material of similar type that appeared to be applied or constructed during the same general period of time. This is the most acceptable and costeffective method for the sampling of suspect ACBM. Samples of suspect materials were collected from predetermined homogeneous sampling areas and the location of each sample was recorded. Samples were labeled and transported to the laboratory for analysis, using polarized light microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining. The samples were analyzed in accordance with Title 61 Code of Federal Regulations. Polarized light microscopy (PLM) is a method of analysis that utilizes the unique optical crystallographic properties of the various crystalline forms in the samples. These properties, such as refractive indices, birefringence, sign of elongation and extinction angle, are unique to crystalline asbestos forms and therefore can be used to identify the type of asbestos mineral as chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, tremolite, or actinolite. Each type of asbestos displays unique characteristics when subjected to these tests. Percentages of the identified types of asbestos are determined by visual estimation. Any material containing over one percent (1%) by weight is considered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to be an asbestos containing material and if disturbed must be handled according to specific local, state and federal regulations. 1-1

6 The point count method of quantification was used on select samples as deemed necessary to verify PLM results reported at less than 5% asbestos. 1.3 RESULTS Eleven (11) homogeneous areas (HA) of suspect material were identified and a total of thirtythree (33) samples were collected. Sample descriptions and laboratory results can be found in Section 2. Photographs of the sampled materials can be found in Appendix I, Section 3. A copy of the laboratory report and chain of custody record are included in Appendix II, Section 4. The materials sampled and found to contain more than one percent (1%) asbestos are listed below. The point counting method for quantification is recommended by the EPA for samples identified as having less than ten percent asbestos by visual estimation. Analysis using the point counting method was performed if deemed necessary to determine the presence of asbestos. The quantities of material described herein are approximate and are not to be relied upon by asbestos abatement contractors for bidding purposes. Homogeneous Area Number 8 Sample No.: , , Material: Silver Built-Up Bituminous Roof Location: Central and South Roof Decks Results: 12% Chrysotile Asbestos Condition: Fair Estimated Quantity: 1,400 Square Feet Homogeneous Area Number 9 Sample No.: , , Material: Black Tar Roofing Location: South Roof Deck Results: 7% Chrysotile Asbestos Condition: Good Estimated Quantity: 450 Square Feet 1-2

7 1.4 CONCLUSIONS The result of the asbestos survey identified the following asbestos containing materials at the site: Homogeneous Area Number 8 Sample No.: , , Material: Silver Built-Up Bituminous Roof Location: Central and South Roof Decks Results: 12% Chrysotile Asbestos Condition: Fair Estimated Quantity: 1,400 Square Feet The silver built-up bituminous roof is in fair condition and is considered to be Category I Nonfriable Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). If non-friable ACM is left undisturbed, it presents a low threat to release harmful asbestos fibers. Non-friable materials should not be removed, cut, or abraded in any way as these activities may result in a significant fiber release episode. If the material will be impacted by renovation, it must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor. If the material will be impacted by demolition, it does not require removal prior to demolition and the building may be demolished with the material in-place. However, the demolition crew must abide by OSHA regulations pertaining to asbestos exposure and the material must be disposed of in an appropriate landfill capable of accepting asbestos containing materials. The owner may consider removal prior to demolition in order to reduce the waste stream requiring asbestos handling and additional disposal costs. 1-3

8 Homogeneous Area Number 9 Sample No.: , , Material: Black Tar Roofing Location: South Roof Deck Results: 7% Chrysotile Asbestos Condition: Good Estimated Quantity: 450 Square Feet The black tar roof is in good condition and is considered to be Category I Nonfriable Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). If non-friable ACM is left undisturbed, it presents a low threat to release harmful asbestos fibers. Non-friable materials should not be removed, cut, or abraded in any way as these activities may result in a significant fiber release episode. If the material will be impacted by renovation, it must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor. If the material will be impacted by demolition, it does not require removal prior to demolition and the building may be demolished with the material in-place. However, the demolition crew must abide by OSHA regulations pertaining to asbestos exposure and the material must be disposed of in an appropriate landfill capable of accepting asbestos containing materials. The owner may consider removal prior to demolition in order to reduce the waste stream requiring asbestos handling and additional disposal costs. Destructive sampling procedures were not used to access the interior of wall cavities, coolers or fire doors. Access was not available to the roofs above the diesel fuel pumps, so the roofing materials above those canopies were not included in the scope of this survey. Any suspect materials not identified in this survey (including the roofs above the diesel fuel pumps, fire door insulation and caulking, insulation, mastic or other materials within wall cavities and coolers) should be treated as asbestos-containing materials and not disturbed until identified as nonasbestos containing material through sampling and laboratory analysis. Prior to any planned renovations or demolition activities, the owner must abide by the notification requirements (10 business work-day notification) set forth in 40 CFR 61 U.S. EPA NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants). The owner/operator of the facility is responsible to submit the notification. 1-4

9 1.5 ASBESTOS INSPECTION FORM 1 Building Identification County: St. Lucie Facility: Florida s Turnpike Enterprise Agency: Florida Department of Transportation Building Name: Ft. Pierce Citgo Service Station Building Number: 4194 Address and/or Geographic Location: Building Contact Person: Mike Caputo Telephone Number: Agency Contact: John M. McAllister-DAC Telephone Number: Survey Identification Survey Date: October 12 & 19, 2006 Report Date: November 15, 2006 Contract Number: C8334 Consultant's Name: Traci-Anne Boyle, CIH License Number: AX-60 Name of Firm: AirQuest Environmental, Inc. Address: 3030 Southwest 19th Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida Telephone Number: Building Information Year of Construction: 1957 Renovation Dates: Unknown Type of Occupancy: Gas Station Typical Number of Occupants: 5 to 10 Building Documents/Drawings Available/Consulted: Types: Plans (Y/N): N/A Specifications (Y/N): N Other (Y/N): N Asbestos Documents (Y/N): N Location: Number of Stories/Floors: 1 Area Each Floor: 2,705 Penthouse Area: N/A Attic Area: N/A Basement Area: N/A Crawl Space Area: N/A Number of Elevators: N/A Number of Stops: N/A Structural Data Vertical Supports: Steel Horizontal: Steel Roof: Tar & Gravel and Built-Up Floors: Concrete Ceiling: Concrete & Wallboard Exterior Walls: Concrete Partition Walls: Concrete HVAC System (Y/N): Y Type: Air Handlers Air Handlers Roof Top (Y/N): Y Number: 2 Type: Units Boilers (Y/N): N/A Type: N/A Chillers (Y/N): N/A Type: N/A 1-5

10 2 Section Asbestos Survey and Assessment Form 2 Consultant: Inspection & Assessment Date: 12-Oct-06 Agency: Contract Number: C8334 Building Contact Person: AirQuest Environmental, Inc. Florida Department of Transportation Mike Caputo Room Sample Material Homogen Functional Salient Quantity Friable Asbestos Condition Damage Hazard Response Air Monitor Response Air Monitor Replacement Reason Not Sampled Number Number Type Area Space Area SF or LF Y or N Type & % G,F,P Potential Assessment Priority Results Costs ($) Costs ($) Costs ($) or Comments Employee Locker Room WB/JC Ceiling 1 Locker Room NA 650 SF N ND G Low N/A Men's Bathroom WB/JC Ceiling 1 Bathroom NA 650 SF N ND G Low N/A Entrance to Women's Bathroom WB/JC Ceiling 1 Bathroom NA 650 SF N ND G Low N/A Office in Service Station White 2x4 ACT 2 Office NA 120 SF Y ND G Low N/A Office in Service Station White 2x4 ACT 2 Office NA 120 SF Y ND G Low N/A Office in Service Station White 2x4 ACT 2 Office NA 120 SF Y ND G Low N/A Office Yellow 1"x1" Splined Ceiling Tile 3 Office NA 120 SF Y ND P Medium N/A Office Yellow 1"x1" Splined Ceiling Tile 3 Office NA 120 SF Y ND P Medium N/A Office Yellow 1"x1" Splined Ceiling Tile 3 Office NA 120 SF Y ND P Medium N/A Air Handler Room White Duct Mastic 4 Mech. Room NA 3 SF N ND G Low N/A Air Handler Room White Duct Mastic 4 Mech. Room NA 3 SF N ND G Low N/A Air Handler Room White Duct Mastic 4 Mech. Room NA 3 SF N ND G Low N/A West Exterior Wall of N. Bldg Window Caulking 5 Exterior NA 245 LF N ND G Low N/A North Exterior Wall of N. Bldg Window Caulking 5 Exterior NA 245 LF N ND G Low N/A East Exterior Wall of N. Bldg Window Caulking 5 Exterior NA 245 LF N ND G Low N/A West Exterior Wall of S. Bldg Window Caulking 6 Exterior NA 400 LF N ND G Low N/A South Exterior Wall of N. Bldg Window Caulking 6 Exterior NA 400 LF N ND G Low N/A East Exterior Wall of N. Bldg Window Caulking 6 Exterior NA 400 LF N ND G Low N/A West Exterior Wall Stucco 7 Exterior NA 900 SF N ND G Low N/A North Exterior Wall Stucco 7 Exterior NA 900 SF N ND G Low N/A East Exterior Wall Stucco 7 Exterior NA 900 SF N ND G Low N/A South Roof Deck Silver Built-Up Bituminous Roof 8 Roof NA 1,400 SF N 12% Chry. F Low 4 Central Roof Deck Silver Built-Up Bituminous Roof 8 Roof NA 1,400 SF N 12% Chry. F Low 4 Central Roof Deck Silver Built-Up Bituminous Roof 8 Roof NA 1,400 SF N 12% Chry. F Low 4 South Roof Deck Black Tar Roof 9 Roof NA 450 SF N 7% Chry. G Low 8 South Roof Deck Black Tar Roof 9 Roof NA 450 SF N 7% Chry. G Low 8 Page 2-1

11 2.1 Asbestos Survey and Assessment Form 2 Consultant: Inspection & Assessment Date: 12-Oct-06 Agency: Contract Number: C8334 Building Contact Person: AirQuest Environmental, Inc. Florida Department of Transportation Mike Caputo Room Sample Material Homogen Functional Salient Quantity Friable Asbestos Condition Damage Hazard Response Air Monitor Response Air Monitor Replacement Reason Not Sampled Number Number Type Area Space Area SF or LF Y or N Type & % G,F,P Potential Assessment Priority Results Costs ($) Costs ($) Costs ($) or Comments South Roof Deck Black Tar Roof 9 Roof NA 450 SF N 7% Chry. G Low 8 Large Upper White Built-Up Canopy Bituminous Roof 10 Roof NA 8,000 SF N ND G Low N/A Large Upper White Built-Up Canopy Bituminous Roof 10 Roof NA 8,000 SF N ND G Low N/A Large Upper White Built-Up Canopy Bituminous Roof 10 Roof NA 8,000 SF N ND G Low N/A North Section of Silver Built-Up North Roof Deck Bituminous Roof 11 Roof NA 900 SF N ND F Low N/A Silver Built-Up Vent-North Roof Bituminous Roof 11 Roof NA 900 SF N ND F Low N/A Silver Built-Up South Parapet Wall Bituminous Roof 11 Roof NA 900 SF N ND F Low N/A Page 2-2

12 2 Section Asbestos Survey and Assessment Form 2 Acronyms Definitions - The following definitions apply to the characteristics of the material and are not indicative of the asbestos content (if any). ACBM Asbestos Containing Building Material Friable - A material that can be crushed under hand pressure (e.g. insulation). ACM Asbestos Containing Material Non-friable - A material that cannot be crushed under hand pressure (e.g. floor tile). ACT Acoustical Ceiling Tile Condition - Good (G) - The building material is not damaged. LF Linear Feet Condition - Fair (F) - The building material is damaged. NA Not Applicable Condition - Poor (P) - The building material is significantly damaged. ND Not Detected Damage Potential (Low) - The material has a low potential for damage from contact, erosion, vibration, etc. SF Square Feet Damage Potential (Moderate) - The material has a moderate potential for damage from contact, erosion, vibration, etc. VFC Vinyl Floor Coving & Mastic Damage Potential (High) - The material has a high potential for damage from contact, erosion, vibration, etc. VFT Vinyl Floor Tile & Mastic WB/JC Wallboard and Joint Compound Hazard Classification 1 Fair or poor condition thermal system insulation ACM 2 Fair condition friable surfacing ACM 3 Poor condition friable surfacing ACM 4 Fair or Poor condition miscellaneous ACM 5 ACBM with potential for damage 6 ACBM with potential for signicant damage 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspected ACBM 8 All other non-friable ACBM Page 2-3

13 2.2 Response Options & Cost Worksheet Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Plan O&M Plan Report 6 Month Reassessment (DOT personnel) 3 Year Reassessment 3 Year Reassessment Report/O&M Update 1st Year Cost 2nd Year Cost 3rd Year Cost $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ Abatement of Materials HA Material/Service Quantity SF/LF Removal Cost/SF or LF Removal Cost Days Air Monitoring Abatement Cost Silver Built Up 8 Bituminous Roofing 1400 SF $ 3.50 $ 4, $ $ 5, Black Tar Roofing 450 SF $ 4.00 $ 1, $ $ 2, Abatement Mobilization Abatement Report Total Abatement Cost Estimate Notes: Asbestos Awareness Training is not included in the O&M Cost Estimate. Costs do not include travel time or reimbursable travel expenses, per diem, hotel, etc. which would be billed as incurred. Provided costs are budgetary numbers only. The scope should be priced at the time services will be rendered. $ $ $ , Page 2-4

14 2.3 INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR SAMPLE LOCATIONS Men s Room Ladies Room N Air Handler Room Locker Room , 11, 12 Air Handler Room Office & & Cashier & 07 Retail Air uest Environmental, Inc. 2-5 Figure 1 Asbestos Sample Locations, FDOT Building # 4194

15 2.4 ROOF SAMPLE LOCATIONS N Air uest Environmental, Inc. Figure 2 Asbestos Sample Locations, FDOT Building #

16 2.5 EXTENT OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL Built-Up Bituminous Roofing Built-Up Bituminous Roofing Black Tar Roofing Air uest Environmental, Inc. Figure 3 Extent of Asbestos Containing Material, FDOT Building #

17 APPENDIX I SECTION 3 PHOTOGRAPHS

18 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg

19 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ , 08, 09.jpg

20 10/12/ , 11, 12.jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg

21 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg

22 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/19/ jpg 10/19/ jpg

23 10/19/ jpg 10/19/ jpg 10/19/ jpg 10/19/ jpg

24 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/12/ jpg 10/19/ jpg

25 10/19/ jpg 10/19/ jpg

26 APPENDIX II SECTION 4 LABORATORY REPORT AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37 APPENDIX III SECTION 5 TRAINING CERTIFICATES AND CREDENTIALS

38 Building #: 4194 Building Name: Fort Pierce Citgo Service Station Date of Survey: October 12 and 19, 2006 Asbestos Survey Report - Form 3 Personnel Summary Name Address Task Performed License/ Certification # Traci-Anne Boyle, CIH 3030 Southwest 19th Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida Licensed Consultant AX-60 Jim Whalen 3030 Southwest 19th Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida Inspector Jay Moss 38 NE 20th Avenue, Ste 7, Pompano Beach, FL Inspector Schneider Laboratories, Inc West Cary Street, Richmond, Virginia Analysis

39

40

41

42