Network Design Team (51) Preliminary Scoring Rubric/Rating Sheet

Transcription

1 Network Design Team (51) Preliminary Scoring Rubric/Rating Sheet Team Number RANKING SHEET COMPLETE ONE PER CONTESTANT PRELIMINARY PRESENTATION SCORE Judge 1 (500 points) Judge 2 (500 points) Total Judges Divided by # of judges AVERAGE OF JUDGES SCORES PRELIMINARY SPECIFICATION SCORE PRELIMINARY MODIFICATION SCORE PRELIMINARY TOTAL (500 maximum) (40 maximum) (40 maximum) (580 maximum) RANK

2 Judge Number Items to Evaluate TECHNICAL POINTS Team Number Below Average Average Good Excellent Earned Written Proposal Customer profile Objectives Abstract of implementation Explanation of products and/or services provided Clarity of message Message is attention-grabbing, compelling and concise. Message was developed according to topic. Short/long range goals defined Financial Analysis Supporting Documentation Grammar, Spelling, Punctuation, and Usage Content without errors/no copyright violations Creativity Solution is innovative Fresh ideas, unique 5 (3+ errors) 10 (2 errors) (1 error) (0 errors) (180 possible) TOTAL (20 possible) TOTAL Specific Technical Recommendations Solution adequately addresses the need to add an additional 75 employees across town in another building in Boston Secure and fast Network is online ready for users Solution adequately addresses growth at the Austin office Solution adequately addresses the need for increased speed (band width) and upgrades for the Boston facility Solution adequately addresses Seattle need for a backup Internet solution Solution adequately addresses the need for Seattle s employees to work at home with high speed access to all server at the Seattle site Solution adequately defines the needs and a possible solutions for a hot-standby for the Boston data center Solution addresses the standardization of a single smartphone platform with needed services including Text message Browse the web Wi-fi access Solution adequately addresses a security strategy to segment the network into proper security zones PRESENTATION POINTS (160 possible) TOTAL Oral Presentation

3 Ability to outline short and long-term objectives and defend the solution as the most appropriate for the given scenario Ability to use technical terms, along with appropriate explanations that achieve effective communications with the client Voice quality and diction Self-confidence, assertiveness, and eye contact Presentation quality/style; flow All team members participated in presentation Response to judges questions (140 possible) TOTAL TOTAL POINTS (500 points maximum)

4 Specification Scoring Rubric/Rating Criteria SPECIFICATION POINTS: All points or none are awarded by the proctor per individual, not per judge. Documentation, release form and CD/DVD submitted at presentation 10 Presentation (including video) lasted no more than ten (10) minutes. 10 Earned All registered team members participated in the presentation 20 TOTAL SPECIFICATION POINTS (40 points maximum) TEAM NUMBER Items to Evaluate TECHNICAL MODIFICATION POINTS Written Proposal Below Average Average Good Excellent Earned Solution adequately addresses security needs for the Android Smartphone platform Solution adequately addresses security needs for the iphone Smartphone platform TOTAL MODIFICATION POINTS (40 possible) TOTAL

5 JUDGES COMMENTS Judge Number Team Number COMMENTS: (to be viewed by contestant) (Judges: please provide positive feedback and areas of improvement in a constructive manner regarding your analysis of his/her competition.) REASON FOR DISQUALIFICATION: (if applicable)