EDB Information Disclosure Requirements Information Templates for Schedules 11a 13

Transcription

1 EDB Information Disclosure Requirements Information Templates for Schedules 11a 13 Disclosure Date 31 March 2015 Start Date (first day) 1 April 2015 Templates for Schedules 11a 13 (Asset Management Plan) Template Version 3.0. Prepared 13 December NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX CoverSheet

2 Table of Contents Schedule Description Asset Management Plan Schedule Templates 11a Report on Forecast Capital Expenditure 11b Report on Forecast Operational Expenditure 12a Report on Asset Condition 12b Report on Forecast Capacity 12c Report on Forecast Demand 12d Report on Forecast Interruptions and Duration 13 Report on Asset Management Maturity 2 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX TOC

3 Disclosure Template Guidelines for Information Entry These templates have been prepared for use by EDBs when making disclosures under subclauses 2.6.1(4), 2.6.1(5) and 2.6.5(5) of the Electricity Distribution Information Disclosure Determination Disclosures made under subclauses 2.6.1(4) and 2.6.1(5) must be made before the start of each disclosure year. Disclosures made under subclauses 2.6.5(5) must be made within 5 months after the start of the disclosure year. The information disclosed under 2.6.5(5) should be identical to that disclosed under 2.6.1(4) and 2.6.1(5). Under clause 2.6.3, EDBs can elect to complete and publicly disclose before the start of the disclosure year, an AMP update. EDBs can elect to complete and publicly disclose an AMP update instead of a full AMP in the following years: 31 March March 2015 If electing to complete an AMP update, EDBs can choose to not complete and disclose Schedule 13: Report on Asset Management Maturity Table. Schedule 13 sheet should be removed if not completed. If disclosing a Full AMP, EDBs must complete and disclose Schedule 13. and Dates To prepare the templates for disclosure, the supplier's company name should be entered in cell C8, the date of the first day of the 10 year planning period should be entered in cell C12, and the date on which the information is disclosed should be entered in cell C10 of the CoverSheet worksheet. The cell C12 entry (planning period start date) is used to calculate disclosure years in the column headings that show above some of the tables. It is also used to calculate the AMP planning period dates in the template title blocks (the title blocks are the light green shaded areas at the top of each template). The cell C8 entry (company name ) is used in the template title blocks. Dates should be entered in day/month/year order (Example "1 April 2013"). Data Entry Cells and Calculated Cells Data entered into this workbook may be entered only into the data entry cells. Data entry cells are the bordered, unshaded areas (white cells) in each template. Under no circumstances should data be entered into the workbook outside a data entry cell. In some cases, where the information for disclosure is able to be ascertained from disclosures elsewhere in the workbook, such information is disclosed in a calculated cell. Under no circumstances should the formulas in a calculated cell be overwritten. Validation Settings on Data Entry Cells To maintain a consistency of format and to guard against errors in data entry, some data entry cells test entries for validity and accept only a limited range of values. For example, entries may be limited to a list of category names or to values between 0% and 100%. Where this occurs, a validation message will appear when data is being entered. Conditional Formatting Settings on Data Entry Cells Schedule 12a columns G to K contains conditional formatting. The cells will change colour if the row totals do not add to 100%. Inserting Additional Rows The templates for schedules 11a, 12b and 12c may require additional rows to be inserted in tables marked 'include additional rows if needed'. Additional rows must not be inserted directly above the first row or below the last row of a table. This is to ensure that entries made in the new row are included in the totals. For schedule 12b the formula for column J (Utilisation of Installed Firm Capacity %) will need to be copied into the inserted row(s). Schedule 11a & 11b Schedule 11a requires Capital and Operational Expenditure to be expressed in both nominal and constant prices. The differences between the nominal and constant prices should reflect EDB expectations of the impact of changes in the costs of its labour, materials and other inputs (ie, inflationary pressures). Schedule 12b(ii) 3 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX Guidelines

4 The purpose of schedule 12b(ii) is to disclose transformer capacity as at the end of the current year. As the information may not be available in time for disclosures made under subclause 2.6.1(4), but available for disclosures made under 2.6.5(5), EDBs can choose not to disclose transformer capacity under schedule 12b(ii). EDBs who do not disclose transformer capacity under schedule 12b(ii) must disclose the information in schedule 9e(iii). Accordingly, the Excel template has been modified to allow the value "N/A" to be entered into these input cells. Schedule 12d Report Forecast Interruptions and Duration sub network disclosures If the supplier has sub networks, schedule 12d must be completed for the network and for each sub network. A copy of the schedule 12d worksheet must be made for each sub network. Schedule 13 Report on Asset Management Maturity The name of the standard applied (eg, 'PAS55') must be entered in cell K4. 4 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX Guidelines

5 SCHEDULE 11a: REPORT ON FORECAST CAPITAL EXPENDITURE sch ref This schedule requires a breakdown of forecast expenditure on assets for the current disclosure year and a 10 year planning period. The forecasts should be consistent with the supporting information set out in the AMP. The forecast is to be expressed in both constant price and nominal dollar terms. Also required is a forecast of the value of commissioned assets (i.e., the value of RAB additions) EDBs must provide explanatory comment on the difference between constant price and nominal dollar forecasts of expenditure on assets in Schedule 14a (Mandatory Explanatory Notes). This information is not part of audited disclosure information. 7 Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 CY+5 CY+6 CY+7 CY+8 CY+9 CY+10 8 for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar a(i): Expenditure on Assets Forecast $000 (in nominal dollars) 10 Consumer connection System growth 9,553 3,697 4,889 8,234 10,550 10,821 3,464 2, ,605 1, Asset replacement and renewal 1,574 1,921 2,188 1,063 1,085 1,161 1,132 1,156 1,320 1,206 1, Asset relocations 2,024 2, Reliability, safety and environment: 15 Quality of supply Legislative and regulatory Other reliability, safety and environment Total reliability, safety and environment 920 1, Expenditure on network assets 15,035 9,873 8,559 10,481 12,837 12,844 5,643 4,953 2,987 5,819 3, Non network assets Expenditure on assets 15,559 9,873 8,559 10,481 12,837 12,844 5,643 4,953 2,987 5,819 3, plus Cost of financing 24 less Value of capital contributions plus Value of vested assets Capital expenditure forecast 15,182 9,506 8,354 10,291 12,617 12,652 5,536 4,871 2,912 5,751 3, Value of commissioned assets 14,490 10,302 8,857 6,931 4,833 12,967 17,673 4,857 2,719 5,315 9, Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 CY+5 CY+6 CY+7 CY+8 CY+9 CY+10 for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar $000 (in constant prices) 33 Consumer connection System growth 9,553 3,697 4,787 7,894 9,904 9,946 3,118 2, ,046 1, Asset replacement and renewal 1,574 1,921 2,142 1,019 1,019 1,067 1,019 1,019 1,139 1,019 1, Asset relocations 2,024 2, Reliability, safety and environment: 38 Quality of supply Legislative and regulatory Other reliability, safety and environment Total reliability, safety and environment 920 1, Expenditure on network assets 15,035 9,873 8,380 10,047 12,051 11,805 5,079 4,365 2,577 4,917 2, Non network assets Expenditure on assets 15,559 10,348 8,765 10,432 12,436 12,190 5,079 4,365 2,577 4,917 2, Subcomponents of expenditure on assets (where known) 47 Energy efficiency and demand side, reduction of energy losses 48 Overhead to underground conversion 2,024 1,440 1,300 1,300 1, , , , Research and development 5 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S11a.Capex Forecast

6 SCHEDULE 11a: REPORT ON FORECAST CAPITAL EXPENDITURE sch ref This schedule requires a breakdown of forecast expenditure on assets for the current disclosure year and a 10 year planning period. The forecasts should be consistent with the supporting information set out in the AMP. The forecast is to be expressed in both constant price and nominal dollar terms. Also required is a forecast of the value of commissioned assets (i.e., the value of RAB additions) EDBs must provide explanatory comment on the difference between constant price and nominal dollar forecasts of expenditure on assets in Schedule 14a (Mandatory Explanatory Notes). This information is not part of audited disclosure information. 57 Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 CY+5 CY+6 CY+7 CY+8 CY+9 CY for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Difference between nominal and constant price forecasts $ Consumer connection System growth Asset replacement and renewal Asset relocations Reliability, safety and environment: 65 Quality of supply Legislative and regulatory 67 Other reliability, safety and environment 6 68 Total reliability, safety and environment Expenditure on network assets , Non network assets (475) (385) (385) (385) (385) 71 Expenditure on assets (475) (206) Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 CY+5 for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar a(ii): Consumer Connection 75 Consumer types defined by EDB* $000 (in constant prices) 76 Consumers 20kVA and less Consumers greater than 20kVA *include additional rows if needed 82 Consumer connection expenditure less Capital contributions funding consumer connection Consumer connection less capital contributions a(iii): System Growth 86 Subtransmission 8, ,800 1, Zone substations ,040 7,200 7, Distribution and LV lines 2,060 1, ,320 1, Distribution and LV cables 56 1, Distribution substations and transformers Distribution switchgear Other network assets System growth expenditure 9,553 3,697 4,787 7,894 9,904 9, less Capital contributions funding system growth System growth less capital contributions 9,432 3,650 4,726 7,794 9,779 9,820 6 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S11a.Capex Forecast

7 SCHEDULE 11a: REPORT ON FORECAST CAPITAL EXPENDITURE sch ref This schedule requires a breakdown of forecast expenditure on assets for the current disclosure year and a 10 year planning period. The forecasts should be consistent with the supporting information set out in the AMP. The forecast is to be expressed in both constant price and nominal dollar terms. Also required is a forecast of the value of commissioned assets (i.e., the value of RAB additions) EDBs must provide explanatory comment on the difference between constant price and nominal dollar forecasts of expenditure on assets in Schedule 14a (Mandatory Explanatory Notes). This information is not part of audited disclosure information. 103 Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 CY for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar a(iv): Asset Replacement and Renewal $000 (in constant prices) 106 Subtransmission Zone substations Distribution and LV lines Distribution and LV cables 26 1, Distribution substations and transformers Distribution switchgear Other network assets Asset replacement and renewal expenditure 1,574 1,921 2,142 1,019 1,019 1, less Capital contributions funding asset replacement and renewal Asset replacement and renewal less capital contributions 1,496 1,826 2, , a(v):Asset Relocations 117 Project or programme* 118 New Switchroom and Switchboard Hope Substation 529 1, Underground Conversions 1,495 1, *include additional rows if needed 124 All other asset relocations projects or programmes 125 Asset relocations expenditure 2,024 2, less Capital contributions funding asset relocations Asset relocations less capital contributions 1,830 2, a(vi):Quality of Supply 130 Project or programme* kV Line Extension Eves Valley to Pea Viner Corner *include additional rows if needed 137 All other quality of supply projects or programmes Quality of supply expenditure less Capital contributions funding quality of supply 140 Quality of supply less capital contributions a(vii): Legislative and Regulatory 143 Project or programme* *include additional rows if needed 150 All other legislative and regulatory projects or programmes Legislative and regulatory expenditure less Capital contributions funding legislative and regulatory 153 Legislative and regulatory less capital contributions NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S11a.Capex Forecast

8 SCHEDULE 11a: REPORT ON FORECAST CAPITAL EXPENDITURE sch ref This schedule requires a breakdown of forecast expenditure on assets for the current disclosure year and a 10 year planning period. The forecasts should be consistent with the supporting information set out in the AMP. The forecast is to be expressed in both constant price and nominal dollar terms. Also required is a forecast of the value of commissioned assets (i.e., the value of RAB additions) EDBs must provide explanatory comment on the difference between constant price and nominal dollar forecasts of expenditure on assets in Schedule 14a (Mandatory Explanatory Notes). This information is not part of audited disclosure information Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 CY+5 for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar a(viii): Other Reliability, Safety and Environment 164 Project or programme* $000 (in constant prices) 165 Protection Relay Upgrades for Arc Flash Detection Transformer Bunding *include additional rows if needed 171 All other reliability, safety and environment projects or programmes Other reliability, safety and environment expenditure less Capital contributions funding other reliability, safety and environment 174 Other reliability, safety and environment less capital contributions a(ix): Non Network Assets 179 Routine expenditure 180 Project or programme* 181 Computer & IT *include additional rows if needed 187 All other routine expenditure projects or programmes Routine expenditure Atypical expenditure 190 Project or programme* *include additional rows if needed 197 All other atypical projects or programmes 198 Atypical expenditure Non network assets expenditure NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S11a.Capex Forecast

9 SCHEDULE 11b: REPORT ON FORECAST OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE Network Tasman L 1 April Marc This schedule requires a breakdown of forecast operational expenditure for the disclosure year and a 10 year planning period. The forecasts should be consistent with the supporting information set out in the AMP. The forecast is to be expressed in both constant price and nominal dollar terms EDBs must provide explanatory comment on the difference between constant price and nominal dollar operational expenditure forecasts in Schedule 14a (Mandatory Explanatory Notes). This information is not part of audited disclosure information. sch ref 7 Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 CY+5 CY+6 CY+7 CY+8 CY+9 8 for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar 24 9 Operational Expenditure Forecast $000 (in nominal dollars) 10 Service interruptions and emergencies Vegetation ,012 1,048 1, Routine and corrective maintenance and inspection 1,289 2,022 2,092 2,165 2,240 2,318 2,399 2,483 2,569 2, Asset replacement and renewal 1,959 1,850 1,914 1,981 2,050 2,122 2,196 2,272 2,351 2, Network Opex 4,857 5,452 5,642 5,839 6,041 6,252 6,470 6,696 6,929 7, System operations and network support 2,225 2,416 2,481 2,548 2,616 2,687 2,759 2,833 2,910 2, Business support 2,524 2,593 2,656 2,722 2,789 2,857 2,928 3,000 3,073 3, Non network opex 4,749 5,009 5,137 5,270 5,405 5,544 5,687 5,833 5,983 6, Operational expenditure 9,606 10,461 10,779 11,109 11,446 11,796 12,157 12,529 12,912 13, Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 CY+5 CY+6 CY+7 CY+8 CY+9 20 for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar $000 (in constant prices) 22 Service interruptions and emergencies Vegetation Routine and corrective maintenance and inspection 1,289 2,022 2,042 2,062 2,083 2,104 2,125 2,146 2,167 2, Asset replacement and renewal 1,959 1,850 1,869 1,887 1,906 1,925 1,944 1,964 1,983 2, Network Opex 4,857 5,452 5,507 5,561 5,617 5,674 5,730 5,788 5,845 5, System operations and network support 2,225 2,416 2,422 2,427 2,433 2,438 2,443 2,449 2,455 2, Business support 2,524 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2,593 2, Non network opex 4,749 5,009 5,015 5,020 5,026 5,031 5,036 5,042 5,048 5, Operational expenditure 9,606 10,461 10,522 10,581 10,643 10,705 10,766 10,830 10,893 10, Subcomponents of operational expenditure (where known) Energy efficiency and demand side, reduction of energy losses 34 Direct billing* 35 Research and Development 36 Insurance * Direct billing expenditure by suppliers that direct bill the majority of their consumers Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 CY+5 CY+6 CY+7 CY+8 CY+9 40 for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Difference between nominal and real forecasts $ Service interruptions and emergencies Vegetation Routine and corrective maintenance and inspection Asset replacement and renewal Network Opex ,084 1, System operations and network support Business support Non network opex , Operational expenditure ,091 1,391 1,699 2,019 2,352 9 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S11b.Opex Forecast

10 Ltd ch 2025 s CY Mar 25 1,029 1,122 2,752 2,518 7,421 3,069 3,226 6,295 13,716 CY Mar ,211 2,023 5,962 2,466 2,593 5,059 11, CY Mar , ,236 2, NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S11b.Opex Forecast

11 SCHEDULE 12a: REPORT ON ASSET CONDITION This schedule requires a breakdown of asset condition by asset class as at the start of the forecast year. The data accuracy assessment relates to the percentage values disclosed in the asset condition columns. Also required is a forecast of the percentage of units to be replaced in the next 5 years. All information should be consistent with the information provided in the AMP and the expenditure on assets forecast in Schedule 11a. All units relating to cable and line assets, that are expressed in km, refer to circuit lengths. sch ref 7 8 Asset condition at start of planning period (percentage of units by grade) % of asset forecast to be replaced in next 5 years Voltage Asset category Asset class Units Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade unknown Data accuracy (1 4) 9 10 All Overhead Line Concrete poles / steel structure No. 3.00% 27.00% 70.00% % 11 All Overhead Line Wood poles No % 50.00% 4 12 All Overhead Line Other pole types No % 50.00% % 13 HV Subtransmission Line Subtransmission OH up to 66kV conductor km 25.00% 75.00% 4 14 HV Subtransmission Line Subtransmission OH 110kV+ conductor km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15 HV Subtransmission Cable Subtransmission UG up to 66kV (XLPE) km % 4 16 HV Subtransmission Cable Subtransmission UG up to 66kV (Oil pressurised) km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 17 HV Subtransmission Cable Subtransmission UG up to 66kV (Gas pressurised) km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18 HV Subtransmission Cable Subtransmission UG up to 66kV (PILC) km % 4 19 HV Subtransmission Cable Subtransmission UG 110kV+ (XLPE) km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20 HV Subtransmission Cable Subtransmission UG 110kV+ (Oil pressurised) km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 21 HV Subtransmission Cable Subtransmission UG 110kV+ (Gas Pressurised) km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 22 HV Subtransmission Cable Subtransmission UG 110kV+ (PILC) km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23 HV Subtransmission Cable Subtransmission submarine cable km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 24 HV Zone substation Buildings Zone substations up to 66kV No. 9.00% 91.00% % 25 HV Zone substation Buildings Zone substations 110kV+ No. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 26 HV Zone substation switchgear 22/33kV CB (Indoor) No % 4 27 HV Zone substation switchgear 22/33kV CB (Outdoor) No % 4 28 HV Zone substation switchgear 33kV Switch (Ground Mounted) No. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 29 HV Zone substation switchgear 33kV Switch (Pole Mounted) No % 4 30 HV Zone substation switchgear 33kV RMU No. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 31 HV Zone substation switchgear 50/66/110kV CB (Indoor) No. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 32 HV Zone substation switchgear 50/66/110kV CB (Outdoor) No % 12.00% 4 33 HV Zone substation switchgear 3.3/6.6/11/22kV CB (ground mounted) No. 8.00% 92.00% % 34 HV Zone substation switchgear 3.3/6.6/11/22kV CB (pole mounted) No % 4 11 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S12a.Asset Condition

12 SCHEDULE 12a: REPORT ON ASSET CONDITION This schedule requires a breakdown of asset condition by asset class as at the start of the forecast year. The data accuracy assessment relates to the percentage values disclosed in the asset condition columns. Also required is a forecast of the percentage of units to be replaced in the next 5 years. All information should be consistent with the information provided in the AMP and the expenditure on assets forecast in Schedule 11a. All units relating to cable and line assets, that are expressed in km, refer to circuit lengths. sch ref 42 Asset condition at start of planning period (percentage of units by grade) 43 % of asset forecast to be Data accuracy Voltage Asset category Asset class Units Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade unknown replaced in next (1 4) 5 years HV Zone Substation Transformer Zone Substation Transformers No % 30.00% 4 46 HV Distribution Line Distribution OH Open Wire Conductor km 2.00% 20.00% 78.00% % 47 HV Distribution Line Distribution OH Aerial Cable Conductor km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 48 HV Distribution Line SWER conductor km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 49 HV Distribution Cable Distribution UG XLPE or PVC km % 2 50 HV Distribution Cable Distribution UG PILC km 3.00% 12.00% 85.00% % 51 HV Distribution Cable Distribution Submarine Cable km 50.00% 50.00% 2 52 HV Distribution switchgear 3.3/6.6/11/22kV CB (pole mounted) reclosers and sectionalisers No. 1.00% 15.00% 84.00% % 53 HV Distribution switchgear 3.3/6.6/11/22kV CB (Indoor) No. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 54 HV Distribution switchgear 3.3/6.6/11/22kV Switches and fuses (pole mounted) No % 35.00% 55.00% % 55 HV Distribution switchgear 3.3/6.6/11/22kV Switch (ground mounted) except RMU No % 90.00% % 56 HV Distribution switchgear 3.3/6.6/11/22kV RMU No % 50.00% 3 57 HV Distribution Transformer Pole Mounted Transformer No. 3.00% 34.00% 63.00% % 58 HV Distribution Transformer Ground Mounted Transformer No % 83.00% 4 59 HV Distribution Transformer Voltage regulators No % 50.00% 3 60 HV Distribution Substations Ground Mounted Substation Housing No % 4 61 LV LV Line LV OH Conductor km 50.00% 50.00% % 62 LV LV Cable LV UG Cable km 90.00% 10.00% 2 63 LV LV Streetlighting LV OH/UG Streetlight circuit km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 64 LV Connections OH/UG consumer service connections No % 40.00% 50.00% % 65 All Protection Protection relays (electromechanical, solid state and numeric) No % 90.00% % 66 All SCADA and communications SCADA and communications equipment operating as a single system Lot % 4 67 All Capacitor Banks Capacitors including controls No % 4 68 All Load Control Centralised plant Lot % 4 69 All Load Control Relays No. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 70 All Civils Cable Tunnels km N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S12a.Asset Condition

13 SCHEDULE 12b: REPORT ON FORECAST CAPACITY This schedule requires a breakdown of current and forecast capacity and utilisation for each zone substation and current distribution transformer capacity. The data provided should be consistent with the information provided in the AMP. Information provided in this table should relate to the operation of the network in its normal steady state configuration. sch ref 7 12b(i): System Growth Zone Substations Utilisation of Utilisation of Installed Firm Security of Supply Installed Firm Installed Firm Installed Firm Installed Firm Capacity 8 Current Peak Load Capacity Classification Transfer Capacity Capacity Capacity +5 years Capacity + 5yrs Constraint +5 years Existing Zone Substations (MVA) (MVA) (type) (MVA) % (MVA) % (cause) 9 Founders 7 15 N % 15 52% No constraint within +5 years 10 Annesbrook N % 23 90% No constraint within +5 years 11 Songer St N % 23 91% No constraint within +5 years 12 Richmond N % 23 83% No constraint within +5 years 13 Hope 8 10 N % 10 98% No constraint within +5 years 14 Mapua 5 10 N 4 49% 10 55% Subtransmission circuit Subtransmission circuit has N security only 15 Brightwater 7 15 N % 15 59% No constraint within +5 years 16 Eves Valley 4 5 N % 5 76% No constraint within +5 years 17 Takaka 6 8 N 71% 8 80% Subtransmission circuit Subtransmission circuit has N security only 18 Swamp Road 2 3 N 1 77% 3 93% Subtransmission circuit Subtransmission circuit has N security only 19 Lower Queen St N 77% 30 77% Subtransmission circuit Industrial customer only wishes for N security for subtransmission 20 Motueka N % 20 80% Transformer New Zone substation to be developed which will offload existing. 21 [Zone Substation_13] [Select one] 22 [Zone Substation_14] [Select one] 23 [Zone Substation_15] [Select one] 24 [Zone Substation_16] [Select one] 25 [Zone Substation_17] [Select one] 26 [Zone Substation_18] [Select one] 27 [Zone Substation_19] [Select one] 28 [Zone Substation_20] [Select one] 29 ¹ Extend forecast capacity table as necessary to disclose all capacity by each zone substation 30 12b(ii): Transformer Capacity 31 (MVA) 32 Distribution transformer capacity (EDB owned) Distribution transformer capacity (Non EDB owned) Total distribution transformer capacity Zone substation transformer capacity 329 Explanation 13 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S12b.Capacity Forecast

14 SCHEDULE 12C: REPORT ON FORECAST NETWORK DEMAND Network Tasman L 1 April Marc This schedule requires a forecast of new connections (by consumer type), peak demand and energy volumes for the disclosure year and a 5 year planning period. The forecasts should be consistent with the supporting information set out as the assumptions used in developing the expenditure forecasts in Schedule 11a and Schedule 11b and the capacity and utilisation forecasts in Schedule 12b. sch ref 7 12c(i): Consumer Connections 8 Number of ICPs connected in year by consumer type Number of connections 9 Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 10 for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Consumer types defined by EDB* 12 Group Group 1 35,240 35,671 36,105 36,540 36, Group 2 2,707 2,721 2,735 2,748 2, Group Group Connections total 38,303 38,750 39,200 39,650 40, *include additional rows if needed 19 Distributed generation 20 Number of connections Installed connection capacity of distributed generation (MVA) c(ii) System Demand 23 Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 24 Maximum coincident system demand (MW) for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar GXP demand plus Distributed generation output at HV and above Maximum coincident system demand less Net transfers to (from) other EDBs at HV and above Demand on system for supply to consumers' connection points Electricity volumes carried (GWh) 31 Electricity supplied from GXPs less Electricity exports to GXPs plus Electricity supplied from distributed generation less Net electricity supplied to (from) other EDBs Electricity entering system for supply to ICPs less Total energy delivered to ICPs Losses Load factor 61% 60% 60% 59% 59% 40 Loss ratio 5.6% 5.5% 5.6% 5.6% 5.5% 14 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S12c.Demand Forecast

15 Ltd ch 2025 in the AMP as well CY+5 31 Mar ,408 2, , CY+5 31 Mar % 5.6% 15 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S12c.Demand Forecast

16 SCHEDULE 12d: REPORT FORECAST INTERRUPTIONS AND DURATION Network / Sub network Name This schedule requires a forecast of SAIFI and SAIDI for disclosure and a 5 year planning period. The forecasts should be consistent with the supporting information set out in the AMP as well as the assumed impact of planned and unplanned SAIFI and SAIDI on the expenditures forecast provided in Schedule 11a and Schedule 11b. sch ref 8 Current Year CY CY+1 CY+2 CY+3 CY+4 CY+5 9 for year ended 31 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar SAIDI 11 Class B (planned interruptions on the network) Class C (unplanned interruptions on the network) SAIFI 14 Class B (planned interruptions on the network) Class C (unplanned interruptions on the network) NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S12d.Reliability Forecast

17 SCHEDULE 13: REPORT ON ASSET MANAGEMENT MATURITY This schedule requires information on the EDB S self assessment of the maturity of its asset practices. Asset Management Standard Applied Question No. Function Question Score Evidence Summary User Guidance Why Who Record/documented Information 3 Asset To what extent has an asset The AM Policy is discussed in the AMP, Widely used AM practice standards require an Top. The team that has policy been maintenance policies are in place with overall responsibility for asset. lead contractor (Delta). policy documented, authorised and communicated? 3 The 2012 AMP has been inspected, and it is confirmed that Section 1.2 clearly refers to the SCI, Vision and Mission and sets out the Business Objectives and the Asset Drivers. The SCI has been inspected, and it is confirmed that the Vision and Mission are clearly set out and that the Business Objectives and the Asset Drivers are aligned to the Vision and Mission. organisation to document, authorise and communicate its asset policy (eg, as required in PAS 55 para 4.2 i). A key pre requisite of any robust policy is that the organisation's top must be seen to endorse and fully support it. Also vital to the effective implementation of the policy, is to tell the appropriate people of its content and their obligations under it. Where an organisation outsources some of its asset related activities, then these people and their organisations must equally be made aware of the policy's content. Also, there may be other stakeholders, such as regulatory authorities and shareholders who should be made aware of it. The organisation's asset policy, its organisational strategic plan, documents indicating how the asset policy was based upon the needs of the organisation and evidence of communication. 10 Asset strategy 11 Asset strategy What has the organisation done to ensure that its asset strategy is consistent with other appropriate organisational policies and strategies, and the needs of stakeholders? In what way does the organisation's asset strategy take account of the lifecycle of the assets, asset types and asset systems over which the organisation has stewardship? 3 The SCI and AMP have been There are feedback mechansisms from In setting an organisation's asset strategy, Top. The organisation's strategic planningthe organisation's asset strategy inspected to confirm that the the Trust, which approves the SCI it is important that it is consistent with any other team. The team that has overall document and other related organisational policies and Asset Drivers and Business policies and strategies that the organisation has and hasresponsibility for asset. strategies. Other than the organisation's strategic plan, which in turn reflects the AM price and reliability targets. The AMP sets out the Objectives are aligned to the SCI taken into account the requirements of relevant these could include those relating to health and safety, identification of stakeholders, which targets, Vision and Mission. The was confirmed by inspecting the 2014 stakeholders. This question examines to what extent environmental, etc. Results of stakeholder Business Case for the new cable AMP. to the Bell's Island Sewage Works was inspected, and the template requires the Strategic Fit of the proposed works to be confirmed, along with the Benefits and Risks. The Board Paper for the proposed new 33kV cable to Founders was inspected, and alignment of project objectives to AM the asset strategy is consistent with other organisational policies and strategies (eg, as required by PAS 55 para b) and has taken account of stakeholder requirements as required by PAS 55 para c). Generally, this will take into account the same polices, strategies and stakeholder requirements as covered in drafting the asset policy but at a greater level of detail. consultation. 3 Asset survey database, demonstrates how individual inspection items are used to prioritise work, and how aggregated data is used to identify patterns and trends. The network is disaggregated by asset type (verified by inspecting the 2014 AMP), and the lifecycle fo each asset type is considered. There is a comprehensive fault process that identifies trends and patterns of component failures. This is fed back into the condition replacement program. Good asset stewardship is the hallmark of an organisation compliant with widely used AM standards. A key component of this is the need to take account of the lifecycle of the assets, asset types and asset systems. (For example, this requirement is recognised in d) of PAS 55). This question explores what an organisation has done to take lifecycle into account in its asset strategy. Top. People in the organisation with expert knowledge of the assets, asset types, asset systems and their associated life cycles. The team that has overall responsibility for asset. Those responsible for developing and adopting methods and processes used in asset The organisation's documented asset strategy and supporting working documents. 26 Asset plan(s) establish and document its asset plan(s) across the life cycle activities of its assets and asset systems? 3 Inspection of the AMP indicates Performance requirements for that asset condition is a individual assets and components are cascaded from the target SAIDI. A significant driver of documented feeder reliability analysis is performed lifecycle activities. A wide range every year and the SAIDI from each of NTL policies have been fault is determined, and the overall inspected to confirm that SAIDI for each feeder is determined. lifecycle activities are This is reported to the Board and used comprehensively documented, to set future SAIDI targets. and that public and worker safety are considered. The asset strategy need to be translated into practical plan(s) so that all parties know how the objectives will be achieved. The development of plan(s) will need to identify the specific tasks and activities required to optimize costs, risks and performance of the assets and/or asset system(s), when they are to be carried out and the resources required. The team with overall responsibility for the asset system. Operations, maintenance and engineering managers. The organisation's asset plan(s). 17 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S13.AMMAT

18 SCHEDULE 13: REPORT ON ASSET MANAGEMENT MATURITY (cont) Asset Management Standard Applied Question No. Function Question Maturity Level 0 Maturity Level 1 Maturity Level 2 Maturity Level 3 Maturity Level 4 3 Asset To what extent has an asset The organisation does not have a The organisation has an asset The organisation has an asset The asset policy is policy been documented asset policy. policy, but it has not been policy, which has been authorised by top, is policy documented, authorised and communicated? authorised by top, or it is authorised by top, but it not influencing the of the assets. widely and effectively communicated to all relevant employees and stakeholders, has had limited circulation. It may be in use to influence development of strategy and planning but its effect is limited. and used to make these persons aware of their asset related obligations. 10 Asset strategy What has the organisation done to ensure that its asset strategy is consistent with other appropriate organisational policies and strategies, and the needs of stakeholders? The organisation has not considered the need to ensure that its asset strategy is appropriately aligned with the organisation's other organisational policies and strategies or with stakeholder requirements. OR The organisation does not have an asset strategy. The need to align the asset Some of the linkages between the longterm asset strategy and strategy with other organisational policies and strategies as well as other organisational policies, strategies stakeholder requirements is understood and stakeholder requirements are and work has started to identify the defined but the work is fairly well linkages or to incorporate them in the advanced but still incomplete. drafting of asset strategy. All linkages are in place and evidence is available to demonstrate that, where appropriate, the organisation's asset strategy is consistent with its other organisational policies and strategies. The organisation has also identified and considered the requirements of relevant stakeholders. 11 Asset strategy In what way does the organisation's asset strategy take account of the lifecycle of the assets, asset types and asset systems over which the organisation has stewardship? The organisation has not considered the need to ensure that its asset strategy is produced with due regard to the lifecycle of the assets, asset types or asset systems that it manages. OR The organisation does not have an asset strategy. The need is understood, and the organisation is drafting its asset strategy to address the lifecycle of its assets, asset types and asset systems. The long term asset The asset strategy takes strategy takes account of the lifecycle of account of the lifecycle of all of its some, but not all, of its assets, asset assets, asset types and asset systems. types and asset systems. 26 Asset plan(s) establish and document its asset plan(s) across the life cycle activities of its assets and asset systems? The organisation does not have an identifiable asset plan(s) covering asset systems and critical assets. The organisation has asset The organisation is in the process of plan(s) but they are not aligned with the putting in place comprehensive, asset strategy and documented asset plan(s) objectives and do not take into that cover all life cycle activities, clearly consideration the full asset life cycle aligned to asset objectives (including asset creation, acquisition, and the asset strategy. enhancement, utilisation, maintenance decommissioning and disposal). Asset plan(s) are established, documented, implemented and maintained for asset systems and critical assets to achieve the asset strategy and asset objectives across all life cycle phases. 18 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S13.AMMAT

19 SCHEDULE 13: REPORT ON ASSET MANAGEMENT MATURITY (cont) Asset Management Standard Applied Question No. Function Question Score Evidence Summary User Guidance Why Who Record/documented Information 27 Asset How has the organisation 3 The SCI, AMP and other lifecylce The lead contractor (Delta) receives a Plans will be ineffective unless they are communicated The team with overall responsibility for Distribution lists for plan(s). Documents derived from communicated its plan(s) to all policy documents are on NTL's prioritised annual work list that to all those, including contracted suppliers and those the asset system. Delivery functions and plan(s) which detail the receivers role in plan delivery. provides no discretion. Every month plan(s) relevant parties to a level of intranet. who undertake enabling function(s). The plan(s) need suppliers. Evidence of communication. Delta reports back to NTL on progress detail appropriate to the against plan, and the evidence is that to be communicated in a way that is relevant to those receiver's role in their delivery? the rate of in service component who need to use them. failures is falling. NTL's maintenance plan is sent to Delta a few months before the year starts, and all CapEx under $50,000 is given to Delta. The work program is very predictable for resourcing purposes. 29 Asset plan(s) How are designated responsibilities for delivery of asset plan actions documented? 3 Section 2.6 of the AMP clearly sets out the various AM responsibilities between the Network Manager, the Operations Manager and the Customer Services Manager. The AMP contains job summaries, individual job descriptions set out targets that reflect AM priorities (verified by inspecting the AMP). The overall structure of Tasman's also reflects the AM priorities. Delta's contract sets out their responsibilities. G.Hall indicated that there is a 5 year contract which is the basis of the relationship. The implementation of asset plan(s) relies The team with overall responsibility for on (1) actions being clearly identified, (2) an owner the asset system. Operations, allocated and (3) that owner having sufficient delegatedmaintenance and engineering managers. If responsibility and authority to carry out the work appropriate, the performance team. required. It also requires alignment of actions across the organisation. This question explores how well the plan(s) set out responsibility for delivery of asset plan actions. The organisation's asset plan(s). Documentation defining roles and responsibilities of individuals and organisational departments. 31 Asset plan(s) What has the organisation done to ensure that appropriate arrangements are made available for the efficient and cost effective implementation of the plan(s)? (Note this is about resources and enabling support) 2.5 The Works contract has been There are rigourous annual and 10 year inspected, and it appears to be budgets, the SCI informs the Trust of the forward revenues, monthly working well 4 years into a 5 reporting against budget (cashflow, year term. P&L, balance sheet), quarterly It is essential that the plan(s) are realistic and can be The team with overall responsibility for implemented, which requires appropriate resources to the asset system. Operations, be available and enabling mechanisms in place. This maintenance and engineering managers. If question explores how well this is achieved. The plan(s) appropriate, the performance team. If reporting to the bank. There are no not only need to consider the resources directly appropriate, the performance team. concerns that the bills can't be paid. required and timescales, but also the enabling activities Where appropriate the procurement team and service There is a treasury policy, including for example, training requirements, supply providers working on the organisation's asset related and a delegated authorities policy. chain capability and procurement timescales. activities. The organisation's asset plan(s). Documented processes and procedures for the delivery of the asset plan. 33 Contingency planning What plan(s) and procedure(s) does the organisation have for identifying and responding to incidents and emergency situations and ensuring continuity of critical asset activities? 3 NTL's Outage Plan has been inspected, and its approval by the (former) Electricity Commission is noted. There is an established procedure and Widely used AM practice standards require that an resourcing for localised faults with an organisation has plan(s) to identify and respond to escalation to feeder faults. There are emergency situations. Emergency plan(s) should also established disaster recovery and business continuity plans. Document outline the actions to be taken to respond to specified v1 Disaster Recovery Plan was emergency situations and ensure continuity of critical examined. Tasman does not perform asset activities including the emergency or civil defence exercises communication to, and involvement of, external per se, however recent large storms agencies. This question assesses if, and how well, these have confirmed that disaster recovery plan(s) triggered, implemented and resolved in the procedures are suitable. Tasman is also part of a mutual aid agreement with event of an incident. The plan(s) should be appropriate neighboring EDB's. to the level of risk as determined by the organisation's risk assessment methodology. It is also a requirement that relevant personnel are competent and trained. The manager with responsibility for developing emergency plan(s). The organisation's risk assessment team. People with designated duties within the plan(s) and procedure(s) for dealing with incidents and emergency situations. The organisation's plan(s) and procedure(s) for dealing with emergencies. The organisation's risk assessments and risk registers. 19 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S13.AMMAT

20 SCHEDULE 13: REPORT ON ASSET MANAGEMENT MATURITY (cont) Asset Management Standard Applied Question No. Function Question Maturity Level 0 Maturity Level 1 Maturity Level 2 Maturity Level 3 Maturity Level 4 27 Asset How has the organisation The organisation does not have plan(s) The plan(s) are communicated to some The plan(s) are communicated to most The plan(s) are communicated to all communicated its plan(s) to all or their distribution is limited to the of those responsible for delivery of the of those responsible for delivery but relevant employees, stakeholders and plan(s) relevant parties to a level of authors. plan(s). there are weaknesses in identifying contracted service providers to a level of detail appropriate to the OR relevant parties resulting in incomplete detail appropriate to their participation receiver's role in their delivery? Communicated to those responsible for or inappropriate communication. The or business interests in the delivery of delivery is either irregular or ad hoc. organisation recognises improvement is the plan(s) and there is confirmation needed as is working towards resolution. that they are being used effectively. 29 Asset plan(s) How are designated responsibilities for delivery of asset plan actions documented? The organisation has not documented responsibilities for delivery of asset plan actions. Asset plan(s) inconsistentlyasset plan(s) consistently document responsibilities for delivery of document responsibilities for the plan actions and activities and/or delivery of actions but responsibilities and authorities for responsibility/authority levels are implementation inadequate and/or inappropriate/ inadequate, and/or there delegation level inadequate to ensure are misalignments within the effective delivery and/or contain organisation. misalignments with organisational accountability. Asset plan(s) consistently document responsibilities for the delivery actions and there is adequate detail to enable delivery of actions. Designated responsibility and authority for achievement of asset plan actions is appropriate. 31 Asset plan(s) What has the organisation done to ensure that appropriate arrangements are made available for the efficient and cost effective implementation of the plan(s)? (Note this is about resources and enabling support) The organisation has not considered the arrangements needed for the effective implementation of plan(s). The organisation recognises the need to The organisation has arrangements in ensure appropriate arrangements are in place for the implementation of asset place for implementation of asset plan(s) but the plan(s) and is in the arrangements are not yet adequately process of determining an appropriate efficient and/or effective. The approach for achieving this. organisation is working to resolve existing weaknesses. The organisation's arrangements fully cover all the requirements for the efficient and cost effective implementation of asset plan(s) and realistically address the resources and timescales required, and any changes needed to functional policies, standards, processes and the asset information system. 33 Contingency planning What plan(s) and procedure(s) does the organisation have for identifying and responding to incidents and emergency situations and ensuring continuity of critical asset activities? The organisation has not considered the The organisation has some ad hoc need to establish plan(s) and procedure(s) to identify and respond to incidents and emergency situations. arrangements to deal with incidents and emergency situations, but these have been developed on a reactive basis in response to specific events that have occurred in the past. Most credible incidents and emergency Appropriate emergency plan(s) and situations are identified. Either procedure(s) are in place to respond to appropriate plan(s) and procedure(s) are credible incidents and manage incomplete for critical activities or they are inadequate. Training/ external alignment may be incomplete. continuity of critical asset activities consistent with policies and asset objectives. Training and external agency alignment is in place. 20 NTL_LIBRARY-# v1-Network_Tasman_AMP_Schedules_2015.XLSX S13.AMMAT